“Maybe Later: How Nursing Students Cope Up with Loaded Requirements in Central Mindanao

University”

Review Related Literature and Studies

Nursing students specifically are particularly forced in this season of the pandemic. They
are troubled by the way that the entirety of their prerequisites must be agreed at their own homes
through adaptable learning attributed by the 'new normal'. In any case, this presents its own issues
on these understudies. It is on the grounds that few conditions could happen in the existences of
these nursing students that may hinder their learning. With the pandemic constantly overrunning our
lives, it had a greater effect on them. This may reflect for example, one of their relatives losing their
jobs, or even be infected by the virus. Circumstances like these could risk students learning and
could even obstruct their capacity to adapt. This part uncovers exactly how these versatile medical
caretakers cope up to these difficulties, alongside the explanation and the impacts of their picked
coping strategy.

COPING STRATEGIES
School is periodically depicted as a period of hopeful what's more, calm youthful
adulthood, loaded up with late night existential conversations, and described via cheerful
perspectives that essentially everything is conceivable with adequate versatility and resolve. The
truth for the present college students is regularly a lot more distressing. Since undergrads rise out of
youth, they are met with an extraordinary arrangement of changes and new obligations as they
become free grown-ups, quite a bit of which is upsetting (Pierceall and Keim, 2007).
Notwithstanding new conditions and duties, for some students, it is their first experience with
planning, covering bills, and mindfully utilizing credit (Gutter and Copur, 2011; Tinto, 2012). To
add to this, students must capably explore a complex monetary climate which may incorporate
temperamental individual budgets, quickly expanding educational cost, and dissolving monetary
help from guardians and family (Commendable, Jonkman, and Blinn-Pike, 2010).
Consequently, from the main day on earth until the last, students confronted various
degrees of affliction. Difficulty might be disorder, a faltering evaluation, or the passing of a friend
or family member. How they took care of these difficulties characterized how they accomplished
significance in their lives. By staying engaged, decided, and focused on the positive, commonly
they could get more grounded. Guardians were presently shielding their kids against any little
affliction for dread it very well may be agonizing. They showed them how to make misfortune
functioned for them. These difficulties and the manner in which they dealt with the misfortunes
characterized what their identity was and set them up for challenges later on. Causing students to
understand their possibilities will draw out their eagerness to lead (Laguador, Velasquez and
Florendo, 2013).
Affliction regularly created obscure gifts. When the entryway of affliction shut one
freedom, the entryway of significance regularly opened another. At the point when difficulty came,
don't stay away from it; assault misfortune with all assets. The manner in which students oversaw
affliction characterized who they were for future freedoms, since misfortune could be the seed of
significance (Natividad, 2008). Kopoka (2008) noticed that all people regularly used adapting
abilities in day by day life. When assisting human arrangements with explicit issues, proficient
advisor discovered that an emphasis of consideration on adapting abilities to or without therapeutic
activity frequently helps the person. The scope of fruitful adapting abilities fluctuated broadly with
the issues to survive.
Adapting, first approach to manage difficulty, is a cycle of overseeing toxin circumstances,
consuming endeavors to take care of individual and relational issues, and looking to dominate,
limit, lessen or endure pressure or struggle. Second is self-control which alludes to the capacity to
control human conduct through the effort of will. Self-control is needed to repress impulsivity, and
has been an intermittent subject since the beginning, culture and reasoning, where it is viewed as a
key to volition and freedom of thought. Next is adaptation which alludes to the capacity to conform
to new data and encounters. Learning was basically adjusting to continually evolving climate.
Through adaptation, students had the option to adjust new practices that permit them to adapt to
change. Fourth is self-improvement, the difference in one's demeanor. Personality development is
the fifth method to evaluate, know and teach oneself. Furthermore, finally, using time productively
and inspiration (Vinas, D. K. D., & Aquino-Malabanan, M. G., 2015). Using time productively for
students is of most extreme significance to offset their investigations with other day by day
fundamental assignments. Happy using time productively thinks about your wellbeing and
furthermore adds to your energy to accomplish more (Team Leverage Edu, 2020). And lastly
motivation, it is important for its role in encouraging ourselves to continue studying. This topic
would be further discussed in other part of this section.

FACTORS AFFECTING APPROACHES TO LEARNING

The following considerations, according to Biggs (2003:13), Herington and Weaven (2008:129),
and Heikkila and Lonka (2006:100), influence students' learning approaches:

 Learning concepts among students various influences, such as variations in knowledge,

behavioral preferences, and attitudes, affect how students learn and how quickly they learn.
Learning is a method that is both constructive and re-constructive. The above refers to the
reorganization of current expertise in response to newly acquired information. The quality
of life is improved by successful re-construction enhances the quality of learning outputs
(Meyer & Van Niekerk, 2008:96).
 Level of academic growth of students
The level of academic progress of each student is determined by the student's research
strategy, study methodology, and accomplishment of course goals. The use of taxonomies
of learning outcomes by lecturers would also help students develop their knowledge levels.
 Students' understanding of the mission requirements In order to be considered qualified, the
student must consider what each task or project requires as well as the evaluation
requirements.
  Educating style Lecturers' strategies for improving students' problem-solving and
intellectual abilities.
 The subject's newness and scale Involves the student's constructive participation in
determining the importance of contents or circumstances in the context of problem-solving
skills.
 Workload/content the amount of content in the program has an impact on how students deal
with the material, which in turn has an impact on how they learn.
 Students' feelings of danger and distress The student's path to learning can be determined
by this. Acceptance as a requirement for emotional maturity is critically significant, as is a
sense of personal and academic safety, or confidence (Meyer & Van Niekerk, 2008:92).
 The type of evaluation
The worth of knowledge and schooling is measured in terms of outcomes. The importance
of evaluating any improvement, progress, or restructuring of learners' cognitive abilities,
attitudes, and knowledge is indicated by the evaluation of learning. The outcomes are
reflected in the learners' professional conduct. To a significant degree, the quality of this
behavior is determined by the quality of education and learning (Meyer & Van Niekerk,
2008:149).

Help seeking has the greatest direct impact on academic success, according to a study by
Ofori and Charlton (2002:512). Younger students were also found to be less likely to accept
academic assistance, putting them at risk in terms of their grades and, eventually, their withdrawal
(Ofori & Charlton, 2002:513). Cooperative learning, on the other hand, may help students.
Cooperative learning is described by Riley and Anderson (2006:130) as a pedagogical method that
incorporates learners in their own learning by assisting others and learning from others. In order for
this type of learning to be effective, the trained nurse instructor must have an attention on the
learning groups' structure. Welsh (2007:76) claims that the theory of peer and self-evaluation aligns
with ‘active' student participation, cultivating a more cognitive approach to learning and, as a result,
professional skill development. The trick to enhancing students' learning is to change their attitudes
about the subject matter they are learning (Ramsden, 2003:11).

MOTIVATION AND LEARNING

Motivation is described by Glynn, Aultman, and Owens (2005:150) as an internal condition
that arouses, directs, and sustains human behavior. Motivation to learn is described by Artelt
(2005:233) as a current or recurring urge to gain information. Academic success, according to
Entwistle (2008:1), is determined by a student's commitment and general sense of motivation.
In the field of education, motivation is regarded as a vital psychological term (Leufer,
2007:323). When students are given instructional assignments to complete, such as writing an
assignment, their approach would be determined by the motivation they are taking the course and
what they think the studying needs of them (Entwistle, 2008:1).
 Meyer and Turner (2002:108) recognize "motivation to learn" as a goal that can be captured
by attempts to pursue and engage difficult academic challenges, as demonstrated by students'
expectations and pursuits of learning. Students' perceptions of college life can play a significant role
in determining academic success, scholarly pursuits, science, and professional identity creation
(Zysberg & Zisberg, 2008:389). Student expectations of the organization, both explicit and implicit,
can drive motivation, achievement, and dedication.
Due to the large transition from rigid school structures to more flexible structured
environments in colleges, college students frequently struggle to motivate themselves (Glynn,
Aultman & Owens, 2005:150).
According to Meyer and Turner (2006:377), engaging students in learning requires
consistent, positive, emotional teacher-student relationships and interactions necessary for
motivation to learn. Effort and persistence are motivational in nature and are therefore susceptible
to change in the learning environment (Ofori & Charlton, 2002:513). Emotions emerge through
interactions with the environment and they signal how well expectations are being met in the
current situation (Meyer & Turner, 2006:387). Emotions are triggered by encounters with the
atmosphere which indicate how well needs are being fulfilled in the present situation (Meyer &
Turner, 2006:387).
Formative appraisal with input, according to Koh (2008:225), will affect students'
motivation and achievement by either unlocking the strength and capacity for learning or
demoralizing learning. Behavioral theorists, on the other hand, claim that behavior is conditioned
and not based on natural impulses or drives (Ahl, 25 2006:390). This will happen if students are
subjected to enough stimuli while studying something new. According to Biggs (2003:13),
inspiration is a product of successful training, not a prerequisite. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation
was further distinguished by Glynn, Aultman, and Owens (2005:150).

 Intrinsic motivation Internal

Motivation is an ability to learn from inside. As a result, according to Artelt
(2005:233), intrinsic learning rewards can exist inside the learner. This may be due to a
desire to become self-actualized. According to Herington and Weaver (2008:124),
participating in group activities indicated that intrinsic influences may have motivated
students to participate in activities at various times, implying that personal factors and
social styles may have influenced adopted learning methods.
Internal driving considerations for career preference are altruism and self-
awareness, according to students (Rognstad & Polit, 2002:322). Adult students are also
more intrinsically inspired, self-directed, able to accept help from peers, and active
participants in the learning process (Spitzer, 2000:84).

It is better for lecturers to merely prevent an excess of the curriculum, according to

Diseth (2007:202), than it is to enforce internal motivation among students through external
rewards. Students' minds must be turned toward learning priorities and a mastery mindset,
according to Bain (2004:35). Giving students as much influence over their curriculum as
possible, demonstrating a deep interest in their learning and confidence in their skills,
 providing nonjudgmental input on students' work, providing difficulty resources to develop,
and actively searching for ways to promote development are all examples of this.

 Extrinsic motivation
Extrinsic motivation, on the other side, is bolstered by external stimuli such as the
desire to obtain a credential or a stable work (Artelt, 2005:233). External motivating
influences, according to Rognstad and Polit (2002:322), are the ability to make a living and
progress in a profession by experiencing and following the nursing position. Spitzer
(2000:84) states that extrinsic motivation is more common among younger students who are
more reliant on the teacher to tell them what to do and how to learn it.
Teachers engage with several students at the same time, feeling a range of
emotions, and their emotions are thus critical to their inspiration, cognition, and,
consequently, their teaching effectiveness (Meyer & Turner, 2006:388).

Reference:
Ahl, H. 2006. Motivation in adult education: a problem solver or a euphenism for direction and
control? International Journal of Lifelong Education, Vol.25(4):385-405.
Ansari, W.E. 2002. Student professional nurse satisfaction levels with their courses: Part 11: effects
of academic variables. Professional nurse Education Today, 22:171-180.
Artelt, C. 2005. Cross–cultural approaches to measuring motivation. Educational Assessment,
10(3):231-255.
Bain, K. 2004. What the best college teachers do. London: Harvard University Press.
Biggs, J.B. 2003. Teaching for quality learning at university. 2nd ed. Berkshire: The Society for
Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Diseth, A. & Martinsen, O. 2003. Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors
of academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23(2):195- 207.
Diseth, A. 2007. Students’ evaluation of teaching, approaches to learning, and academic
achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(2):185-204.
Entwistle, N. 2008. Approaches to learning and levels of understanding influences and
responsibilities. Available at: http://www.ed.ac.uk/etl [Accessed 2 May, 2021].
Glynn, S.M., Aultman, L.P. & Owens, A.M. 2005. Motivation to learn in general education
programs. The Journal of General Education, 54(2):150-170.
Gutter, M., & Copur, Z. (2011). Financial behaviors and financial well-being of college students:
Evidence from a national survey. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 32(4), 699–714.
Heikkila, A. & Lonka, K. 2006. Studying in higher education: students’ approaches to learning,
self-regulation, and cognitive strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 31(1):99-117.
Herington, C. & Weaven, S. 2008. Action research and reflection on student approaches to learning
in large first year university classes. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(3):111-134.
Kember, D. & Leung, D.Y.P. 2006. Characterising a teaching and learning environment conducive
to making demands on students while not making their workload excessive. Studies in
Higher Journal, 31(2):185-198.
Koh, L.C. 2008. Refocusing formative feedback to enhance learning in pre-registration professional
nurse education. Professional nurse Education in Practice, 8:223- 230.
Laguador, J.M., Velasquez, M.E. & Forendo, K.C. (2013). Leadership Capability Assessment of
Senior Industrial Engineering Students, International Journal of Basic Applied & Social
Sciences, 1(3): 7-12.
Meyer, D.K. & Turner, J.C. 2002. Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research.
Educational Psychologist, 37(2):107-114.
Meyer, D.K. & Turner, J.C. 2006. Re-conceptualizing emotion and motivation to learn in classroom
contexts. Educational Psychology, 18:377-390.
Meyer, S.M. & Van Niekerk, S.E. 2008. Professional nurse educator in practice. Cape Town: Juta.
Natividad, F. (2008).―the Name game‖ Psychology Today, 41(1)
Newman, D.M.L. 2008. Conceptual models of nursing and Baccalaureate nursing education.
Journal of Nursing Education, 47(5):199-200.
Orfori, R. & Charlton, J.P. 2002. A path model of factors influencing the academic performance of
nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 38(5):507-515.
Pierceall, E., & Keim, M. (2007). Stress and coping strategies among community college students.
Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 31(9) 703–712.
Ramsden, P. 2003. Learning to teach in higher education. 2nd ed. London: Routledge Falmer.
Riley, W. & Anderson, P. 2006. Randomized study on the impact of cooperative learning distance
education in public health. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(2):129-144.
Rognstad, M.K. & Polit, C. 2002. Recruitment to and motivation for nursing education and the
nursing profession. Journal of Nursing Education, 41(7):321-325.
Rossetti, J. & Fox, P.G. 2009. Factors related to successful teaching by outstanding professors: an
interpretive study. Journal of Nursing Education, 48(1):11-16.
Spitzer, T.M. 2000. Predictors of college success: a comparison of traditional and nontraditional age
students. ProQuest Education Journals, 38(1):82-98
Team Leverage Edu, (2020). Importance of time management for students.
https://leverageedu.com/blog/time-management-for-students/#:~:text=Time
%20management%20for%20students%20is%20of%20utmost%20importance,importance
%20for%20all%20students%3A%20It%20Increases%20Your%20Productivity.
Vinas, D. K. D., & Aquino-Malabanan, M. G. (2015). Adversity quotient and coping strategies of
college students in Lyceum of the Philippines University. Asia Pacific Journal of
Education, Arts and Sciences, 2(3), 68–72.
Welsh, M.M. 2007. Engaging with peer assessment in post-registration professional nurse
education. Professional nurse Education in Practice, 7:75-81.
Wingate, U. & Dreiss, C. 2009. Developing students’ academic literacy: an online approach.
Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 3(1):A14-A25.
Worthy, S. L., Jonkman, J., & Blinn-Pike, L. (2010).Sensation-seeking, risk-taking, and
problematic financial behaviors of college students. Journal of Family and Economic
Issues, 31(2), 161–170.