Scribd
Upload
550 views

Practical Research I Performance Task

This document discusses a qualitative research performance task involving interviewing 5 classmates about their experiences with printed modular instruction during the COVID-19 pandemic. The interviews were conducted via messenger or video conference instead of face-to-face. The methodology used was ethnography using observation, interviews, and questionnaires. The sampling method was quota sampling by selecting 5 classmates. The conclusion found that students were concerned about face-to-face classes, health, knowledge, and finances, but modular learning can still provide lessons and help continue education. It is recommended to have face-to-face orientation to help students understand modules better with teacher explanation, but to accept reality during the pandemic and rely on guidance.

Uploaded by

Ericka Rivera Santos
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
550 views

Practical Research I Performance Task

This document discusses a qualitative research performance task involving interviewing 5 classmates about their experiences with printed modular instruction during the COVID-19 pandemic. The interviews were conducted via messenger or video conference instead of face-to-face. The methodology used was ethnography using observation, interviews, and questionnaires. The sampling method was quota sampling by selecting 5 classmates. The conclusion found that students were concerned about face-to-face classes, health, knowledge, and finances, but modular learning can still provide lessons and help continue education. It is recommended to have face-to-face orientation to help students understand modules better with teacher explanation, but to accept reality during the pandemic and rely on guidance.

Uploaded by

Ericka Rivera Santos
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

PRACTICAL RESEARCH I – QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

PERFORMANCE TASK

III.

 Summary
 Grade 11 learners have encountered problems in printed modular instruction. The students should
interview 5 classmates/ grade 11 learners to observe what effect it has on the students. The students
can be interviewed through messenger or video conference but not face to face. After asking questions
or being interviewed the evidence of the interview must be presented like photos of the interview/written
output etc. the methodology, research I used was ethnography because this type of design is done
through observation, interview and questionnaire which is this design is exactly right. sampling method
is quota sampling because the interviewer was told to select 5 classmates/grade 11 learners.
Instrumentation and Data collection should be validity. The student can make their own qualitative
analysis and the findings should have made sense.

 Conclusion
 The grade 11 learners are concerned about face-to-face classes, physical health, about the knowledge
and financial. But they should study with inspiration and don’t be afraid to study independently. Modular
learning can provide important lesson to the students also helps us to continue our learning.
Students/learners can overcome this type of problem that we encountered because of this pandemic.

 Recommendation
 The printed modular instruction will help the learners a lot but still if they’re going to study independently
it is very hard. It’s an added pressure to us specially no teachers are around for the learners. I
recommend face-to-face orientation because it can help the student/learners a lot because in school
there are teachers to teach you and explain what’s in the module very well. Learners are really hoping
that we would go back to face-to-face orientation but because the pandemic I think the best thing to do
is to accept the reality and ask GOD’s guidance, wisdom and understanding.

IV. Write your references using APA style


Akkoyunlu, B. (1998). Techological developments in education. In B. Özer (Eds.), New technologies in
contemporary education (p. 3). Anadolu University Publication. Aydın, C. Ç., & Biroğul, S. (2008). Open-source
learning management systems in e-learning and Moodle. International Journal of Informatics Technologies,
1(2), 31-36. Bates, A. W. (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London, New York:
Routledge Falmer. Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling:
Merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 623-630. Çepni, S. (2007). Introduction to
research and project studies (3rd ed.). Trabzon: Celepler Printing. Duran, N., Önal, A., & Kurtuluş, C. (2006).
E-learning and new learning management systems in professional education. Paper presented at the 2006
Conference on “Akademik Bilişim”. Ankara. Retrieved September 14, 2010, from http//: www.ab.org.tr/
ab06/bildiri/165.pdf Emir, Ş. (2006). Exam models in e-learning and implementation (Unpublished Master
Thesis, Istanbul University). Greenberg, L. (2002). LMS and LCMS: What’s the difference? Retrieved
December 18, 2010, from http//: www.learningcircuits. org/NR/exeres/72E3F68C-4047-4379-8454-
2B88C9D38FC5.htm Jamornmann, U. (2004). Techniques for assessing students’ elearning achievement.
International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 12(2), 26-31. Kışla, T., Sarsar, F., Arıkan,
Y. D., Meşhur, E., Şahin, M., & Kokoç, M. (2010). Encountering problems of the Web-based distance learning
systems. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy Education Sciences, 5(1), 1-18. Levine, A., & Sun, J. C.
(2002) Barriers to distance education. American Council on Education. Retrieved July 22, 2010, from
http://www.acenet.edu/bookstore/pdf/distributed-learning/distributed-learning-06.pdf Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B.
(2000). Globalization and education: complexities and contingencies. Educational Theory, 50, 4. Rosenberg,
M. J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. New York: McGraw-Hill. Scalise,
K., & Gifford, B. (2006). Computer-based assessment in e-learning: A framework for constructing “intermediate
constraint” questions and tasks for technology platforms. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment,
4(6), 1-45. Retrieved October 12, 2010 from http://www.jtla.org Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., &
Zvacek, S. (2003). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (2nd ed.). Upper
Saddle River, N. J.: Merrill Prentice Hall. Website, measurement and evaluation system in e-learning. (n. d.)
Retrieved August 20, 2010, from http://www.enocta.com/ web2/ContentShowOne.asp?
CType=2&ContentID=73&T=5 Wellington, J. (2000). Educational research, contemporary issues and practical
approaches. London: Continuum. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Qualitative research methods in social
sciences (6th ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd
ed.). Beverly Hills, C. A.: Sage Publishing.

You might also like