LAS-1 III Q4 Data-Analysis-Method
LAS-1 III Q4 Data-Analysis-Method
I. LEARNING COMPENCY
Gathers and analyzes data with intellectual honesty using suitable techniques.
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
1. Familiarize on the data analysis method;
2. Understand the steps involved in undertaking basic qualitative and
quantitative data analysis; and
3. Develop appreciation towards the conduct of data analysis of research.
even symbols. Deriving absolute meaning from such data is nearly impossible;
hence, it is mostly used for exploratory research. While in quantitative research there
is a clear distinction between the data preparation and data analysis stage, analysis
for qualitative research often begins as soon as the data is available.
Qualitative data analysis can also be conducted through the following three
steps:
Coding can be done manually or using qualitative data analysis software such
as
NVivo, Atlas ti 6.0, Hyper RESEARCH 2.8, Max QDA and others.
When using manual coding you can use folders, filing cabinets, wallets etc. to
gather together materials that are examples of similar themes or analytic ideas.
Manual method of coding in qualitative data analysis is rightly considered as
labor-intensive, time-consuming and outdated.
In computer-based coding, on the other hand, physical files and cabinets are
replaced with computer based directories and files. When choosing software for
qualitative data analysis you need to consider a wide range of factors such as the
type and amount of data you need to analyze, time required to master the software
and cost considerations.
Moreover, it is important to get confirmation from your dissertation supervisor
prior to application of any specific qualitative data analysis software.
The following table contains examples of research titles, elements to be
coded and identification of relevant codes:
Research title Elements to be coded Codes
Born or bred: revising The Leadership practice Born leaders
Great Man theory of Made leaders
leadership in the 21st Leadership effectiveness
century
A study into advantages and Market entry strategies Wholly-owned subsidiaries
disadvantages of various Joint-ventures
entry strategies to Chinese Franchising
market Exporting
INQUIRIES, INVESTIGATIONS, AND IMMERSIONS
Licensing
Impacts of CSR programs Activities, phenomenon Philanthropy
and initiative on brand Supporting charitable
image: a case study of courses
Coca-Cola Company UK. Ethical behavior
Brand awareness
Brand value
An investigation into the Tactics Viral messages
ways of customer Customer retention
relationship management in Popularity of social
mobile marketing networking sites
environment
Step 3: Summarizing the data. At this last stage you need to link research findings
to hypotheses or research aim and objectives. When writing data analysis chapter,
you can use noteworthy quotations from the transcript in order to highlight major
themes within findings and possible contradictions.
It is important to note that the process of qualitative data analysis described
above is general and different types of qualitative studies may require slightly
different methods of data analysis.
Data Preparation
INQUIRIES, INVESTIGATIONS, AND IMMERSIONS
The first stage of analyzing data is data preparation, where the aim is to
convert raw data into something meaningful and readable. It includes four steps:
Descriptive Statistics
INQUIRIES, INVESTIGATIONS, AND IMMERSIONS
or powerful, but rarely is it the case that one and only one viewpoint has a
complete monopoly on reason and evidence.
3. Be willing to publicly acknowledge and question one’s own assumptions
and biases. All of us rely on assumptions when applying our world view to make
sense of the data about the world. And all of us bring various biases to the table.
4. Be willing to publicly acknowledge where your argument is weak. Almost
all arguments have weak spots, but those who are trying to sell an ideology will
have great difficulty with this point and would rather obscure or downplay any
weak points.
5. Be willing to publicly acknowledge when you are wrong. Those selling an
ideology likewise have great difficulty admitting to being wrong, as this undercuts
the rhetoric and image that is being sold. You get small points for admitting to
being wrong on trivial matters and big points for admitting to being wrong on
substantive points. You lose big points for failing to admit being wrong on
something trivial.
6. Demonstrate consistency. A clear sign of intellectual dishonesty is when
someone extensively relies on double standards. Typically, an excessively high
standard is applied to the perceived opponent(s), while a very low standard is
applied to the ideologues’ allies.
7. Address the argument instead of attacking the person making the
argument. Ad hominem arguments are a clear sign of intellectual dishonesty.
However, often times, the dishonesty is more subtle. For example, someone might
make a token effort at debunking an argument and then turn significant attention
to the person making the argument, relying on stereotypes, guilt-by-association,
and innocent-sounding gotcha questions.
8. When addressing an argument, do not misrepresent it. A common tactic of
the intellectually dishonest is to portray their opponent’s argument in straw man
terms. In politics, this is called spin. Typically, such tactics eschew quoting the
person in context, but instead rely heavily on out-of-context quotes, paraphrasing
and impression. When addressing an argument, one should shows signs of
having made a serious effort to first understand the argument and then accurately
represent it in its strongest form.
9. Show a commitment to critical thinking.
10. Be willing to publicly acknowledge when a point or criticism is good. If
someone is unable or unwilling to admit when their opponent raises a good point
or makes a good criticism, it demonstrates an unwillingness to participate in the
give-and-take that characterizes an honest exchange.
While no one is perfect, and even those who strive for intellectual honesty can
have a bad day, simply be on the lookout for how many and how often these criteria
apply to someone. In the arena of public discourse, it is not intelligence or knowledge
that matters most – it is whether you can trust the intelligence or knowledge of
another. After all, intelligence and knowledge can sometimes be the best tools of an
intellectually dishonest approach.
2) 2)
3) 3)
4) 4)
5) 5)
Data Analysis
Rubric
Criteria Percentage
1. Critical Thinking 30%
2. Appropriateness 20%
3. Content 30%
4. Organization 20%
Total 100%
V. APPLICATION
Task 1: Gather and Analyze
Direction:
1. Choose fifteen (15) respondents from your family and neighborhood.
2. Conduct an interview method and gather the following data.
a. Age
b. Gender
c. Preferred TV show (one only) from any TV channels
d. Reasons of their TV show preferences
3. Organize and Tabulate your data either manually in a paper or digitally using
Microsoft Excell, SPPS, or JASP softwares.
4. Do a descriptive quantitative analysis on the following: age, gender, and
preferred TV shows.
5. Do a qualitative analysis on the reason of their TV show preference.
6. Write your answers in a separate sheet of paper or encode it in the Microsoft
Word or Microsoft Excel.
Task 2: Results and Discussion
Direction: Analyze and evaluate the result of the conducted survey of your research.
Prepare the Chapter 3 of your manuscript.
Rubric
Criteria Percentage
1. Procedure 25%
2. Execution 25%
3. Interpretation 50%
Total 100%
VI. ASSESSMENT
A. Identification
Instruction: Provide the correct answer of each item and write it in the space
provided or in a separate paper.
INQUIRIES, INVESTIGATIONS, AND IMMERSIONS
B. Enumeration
Instruction: Enumerate the items asked and write your answers in a
separate sheet of paper.
6-10 What are the methods to analyze qualitative data?
6. _____________________________
7. _____________________________
8. _____________________________
9. _____________________________
10. ____________________________
11-12 What are two most commonly used quantitative data analysis
methods.
11. ____________________________
12. ____________________________
13-18 Enumerate the few commonly used descriptive statistics.
13. ____________________________
14. ____________________________
15. ____________________________
16. ____________________________
17. ____________________________
18. ____________________________
19-20 Give 2 importance of intellectual honesty in research.
19. ____________________________
20. ____________________________
C. Essay
1. Why is it important that a researcher must have in-depth understanding of
INQUIRIES, INVESTIGATIONS, AND IMMERSIONS
2. Write in your own words one (1) paragraph description of either quantitative
or qualitative data analysis. Include its relevance in your research problem and
how it will assist you to qualify the data gathered. (5 points)
Data Analysis
Not enough information and safety concerns are the most frequent
responses.
Practice Task 1. Justify
Answers may vary.
Practice Task 2. The Venn
13. Mean
14. Median
15. Mode
16. Percentage
17. Frequency
18. Range
19. Answer may vary
20. Answer may vary
C. Essay
Answer may vary.
VIII. REFERENCE
BHATIA, MANU (2018). Your Guide to Qualitative and Quantitative Data
Analysis Methods. Humans of Data Atlan. from
https://humansofdata.atlan.com/2018/09/qualitative-quantitative-data-
analysis-methods/
Chua, Von Christopher. (2018) Inquiries, Investigations and Immersion.
MATHBYCHUA from https://mathbychua.weebly.com/inquiries-
investigations-and-immersion.html
Cristobal, De la Cruz Cristobal (2017)Practical Research 1 for Senior High
School 1.C & E Publishing, Inc.
Department of Education-Bureau of Learning Resources (2016). Practical
Research 1: Teacher’s Guide. Pasig City, Philippines: Lexicon Press, Inc.
Dizon, H. (2019) EFFECTS OF TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES TO THE
PERFORMANCE OF THE SHS STUDENTS (Chapter III): Pamplona
High School.
Gray, D. E. (2020). Doing Research in Business World: Sage Publishing
https://study.sagepub.com/grayresearchbusiness2/student-resources/multiple-
choice-quizzes
Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Prentice Hall Legal and
Privacy Terms Copyright © 1995-2010.
fromhttps://wps.prenhall.com/chet_airasian_edresearch_7/5/1490/381467
.cw/index.html
Prieto, N. G., Naval, V. C., Carey, T. G. (2017). Practical Research 2:
Quantitative Research. Metro Manila: LORIMAR PUBLISHING, INC.
INQUIRIES, INVESTIGATIONS, AND IMMERSIONS