1 Chapter 1: Spaces of Functions: PDE III (M597J Fall 2004) Lecture Notes
1 Chapter 1: Spaces of Functions: PDE III (M597J Fall 2004) Lecture Notes
Yuxi Zheng
Department of Mathematics
The Pennsylvania State University
University Park, PA 16802
Abstract
We find in many key steps in the theory of partial differential equations that we need fine
properties of functions. One example is the smoothness of the Newtonian potential w for a
continuous function f . Hölder continuity of f transmits to Hölder continuity of the second-
order derivatives of w. Simply being continuous does not imply continuity of D2 w, however.
Another example is the numerical approximation of smooth domains with rectangular grids,
thus corners are produced, and harmonic functions at a corner x0 typically exihibit behavior
of the type w(x) = |x − x0 |α for some real non-integral number α. The Hölder spaces and their
subspaces are handy in catching these properties.
Notations: Rn : Euclidean n-space. A point x = (x1 , x2 , · · · , xn ). Norm |x| = ( ni=1 x2i )1/2 .
P
C k (Ω): The set of all functions having all derivatives of order ≤ k continuous on Ω (k is a
nonnegative integer or infinity);
1
C k (Ω): The set of all functions in C k (Ω) all of whose deriatives of order ≤ k have continuous
extensions to Ω.
Example 1: The function f (x) = |x|2/3 on B1 (0) is Hölder continuous with exponent 2/3
at x = 0.
|f (x) − f (y)|
[f ]α,D := sup (2)
x6=y∈D |x − y|α
is finite.
Local Hölder continuity. Let f be a function defined on any set D ⊂ Rn . Let 0 < α ≤ 1.
We call f locally Hölder continuous with exponent α in D if f is uniformly Hölder continuous
with exponent α on any compact subsets of D. Local and uniform Hölder are equivalent on
compact sets D. A bounded, locally Hölder continuous function is pointwise Hölder continuous
in D.
Hölder continuity may be rgarded as fractional differentiability. The two exponents (k, α)
can be combined to form one k + α. In the reverse splitting, we always choose 0 < α ≤ 1. This
practice is slightly different from Gilbarg [2].
2
We define the seminorms
[u]k,0;Ω = |Dk u|0;Ω = sup|β|=k supΩ |Dβ u|, k = 0, 1, 2, · · ·
(3)
[u]k,α;Ω = [Dk u]α;Ω = sup|β|=k [Dβ u]α;Ω ,
on the spaces C k (Ω) and C k,α (Ω) respectively. They are Banach spaces. We note that it does
not make any difference whether we use Ω or its closure: The supremum taken in the definition
blurs distinction. One needs to use the concept of local spaces (i.e., mention the word “local”)
to make a distinction.
Product rule. Non-dimensional norms are neat to present theorems. For example, the
product rule for Hölder continuous functions is
When interior estimates are sharply presented in terms of distance to the boundary, the natural
non-dimensionalization reveals itself. So the non-dimensionalized norms come of age. Interior
elliptic estimates are often presented in two concentric balls, in which the dimension of the
inner ball is the same as the distance to the boundary of the outer ball.
3
Consider an open proper subset Ω ⊂ Rn . For x, y ∈ Ω, let dx = dist (x, ∂Ω), dx,y =
min(dx , dy ). We define for u ∈ C k (Ω), C k,α (Ω) the following quantities,
[u]∗k,0;Ω = [u]∗k;Ω = sup|β|=k supx∈Ω dkx |Dβ u(x)|, k = 0, 1, 2, · · · ;
β u(x)−D β u(y)|
(7)
|D
[u]∗k,α;Ω = sup|β|=k supx,y∈Ω dk+α
x,y |x−y|α , 0 < α ≤ 1;
The various derivatives are naturally compensated with multiplication by the distance to
the appropriate powers.
We note that the starred norms |u|∗k;Ω and |u|∗k,α;Ω are norms on the subspaces of the local
spaces C k (Ω) and C k,α (Ω) respectively for which they are finite. If Ω is bounded and d = diam
Ω, then obviously these interior norms and the global norms are related by
|u|∗k,α;Ω ≤ max(1, dk+α )|u|k,α;Ω .
If Ω0 ⊂⊂ Ω and σ = dist (Ω0 , ∂Ω), then
min(1, σ k+α )|u|k,α;Ω0 ≤ |u|∗k,α;Ω .
When a solution behaves smoothly on a portion of the boundary, thus the portion is not really
boundaries, the portion can be included with the interior, hence creating a set appropriately
called partially interior. Thus the distance function dx = dist (x, ∂Ω) can be restricted to the
true boundary (aka bad boundary). See Figure 1 for an image.
4
Consider T ⊂ ∂Ω. Let
Using this restricted distance in place of dx , we change the interior norms to “partially interior
norms” (called by [2]), which we call Interior with some boundary norms. The notations are
k
[u]∗k,0;Ω∪T = [u]∗k;Ω∪T = sup|β|=k supx∈Ω dx |Dβ u(x)|, k = 0, 1, 2, · · · ;
We sometimes need more weight of the distance. For σ a real number and k a non-negative
integer we define
(σ) (σ)
[f ]k,0;Ω = [f ]k;Ω = supx∈Ω,|β|=k dk+σ
x |Dβ f (x)|;
(σ) |D β f (x)−D β f (y)|
[f ]k,α;Ω = supx,y∈Ω,|β|=k dk+α+σ
x,y |x−y|α ;
(9)
(σ) Pk (σ)
|f |k;Ω = j=0 [f ]j;Ω ;
(σ) (σ) (σ)
|f |k,α;Ω = |f |k;Ω + [f ]k,α;Ω .
In this notation, when σ = 0, these quantities are identical with those defined earlier, so that
[·](0) = [·]∗ and | · |(0) = | · |∗ .
When σ > 0, I call the norm super-dimensionally weighted. These norms can measure the
growth rates of the function and its derivatives at the (targeted) boundary.
5
When σ < 0, I call the norms sub-dimensionally weighted. These are the true Intermediate
norms introduced bu Gilbarg and Hörmander [1]. These norms can pick up the vanishing rates
of the function and its derivatives at the (targeted) boundary.
References
[1] Gilbarg, D., and L. Hömander, Intermediate Schauder estimates, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal.,
74(1980), 297–318.
[2] Gilbarg, D., and Trudinger, N., Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order,
Springer, New York, 2nd ed, 1983.
[3] Grisvard, P., Elliptic Problems in Nonsmooth Domains, Pitman Advanced Publishing
Program, Boston, 1985.
[4] Guan, Pengfei; Sawyer, E., Regularity estimates for the oblique derivative problem on
non-smooth domains (I), Chin. Ann. of Math. 16B: 3(1995), 299–324.
[5] Hörmander, L., Pseudo-differential operators and non-elliptic boundary problems, Ann.
of Math., 83(1966), 129–209.