A Cost-Based Interior Design Decision Support
A Cost-Based Interior Design Decision Support
net/publication/221908345
CITATIONS READS
7 3,295
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Jaejun Kim on 15 March 2016.
Korea
1. Introduction
In the early stages of a large-scale housing project, many interior design alternatives remain
to be confirmed after a rough review of the costs. In general, interior designers consider the
overall concept, colour and style according to floor plans, spaces and elements. However,
because they generally do not consider the construction work required, the construction and
design characteristics are not connected, and the cost and design properties are controlled
separately. This is why the real-time management of cost change is not included in the
decision-making process. It is therefore necessary to consider the cost when making
decisions on interior design items for an apartment unit plan (Lee et al., 2007).
Rapid advances in information technology are changing the nature of most human activities
(Bennett, 2000) and are generating new requirements for clients such as the
owner/developer in large-scale housing projects. The clients’ requirements are stated in
ongoing communications among project participants in the early phase of a project and
become embodied in the design phase, during which design alternatives must be selected to
meet the clients’ requirements while satisfying them in a realistic way. A decision support
system for selecting design alternatives is intended to represent design information,
document design rationale and manage design changes (Geoffrion, 1987). Many studies on
the design phase have focused on the cooperation between various participants such as the
architects, engineers and contractors (A/E/C) (Demirkan, 2005; Kalay et al., 1998; Khedro et
al., 1994; Lee et al., 2001; Mokhtar et al., 2000), but few studies have examined cooperative
systems or decision support systems in which the end-user or client participates in the
selection of interior design specifications. In addition, it is unusual to propose a process or
database function that accepts and manages the extensive interior design information
generated by too many alternatives.
Integrated project systems would help streamline project activities by allowing downstream
disciplines to access design information. With this, they could evaluate the design and
assess the impact of design decisions on downstream project activities early in the design
process (Halfawy & Froese, 2005).
In this chapter, we aimed to devise a system that allows clients to make cost-based decisions
suited to their own interior design specifications and that enables the builder to plan
resource requirements and budget costs. We describe an information model that supports
Source: Convergence and Hybrid Information Technologies, Book edited by: Marius Crisan,
ISBN 978-953-307-068-1, pp. 426, March 2010, INTECH, Croatia, downloaded from SCIYO.COM
150 Convergence and Hybrid Information Technologies
cost-based decision making in the interior design phase. To do this, we derive the space
hierarchy for a large-scale housing project. We also propose a method for building a library
of interior design information based on the space hierarchy and interior object information.
The proposed model is validated using an example study analysis to show how it supports
the decision-making process of various participants in the interior design phase by
providing real-time cost information when the interior is initially planned or later changed.
However, the procedure is a long one, and is subject to many problems in feedback
concerning alternative design proposals. During the design stage, design alternatives for
finishing materials are based on the planned space and rooms in a unit, according to the
demands of the project manager; these alternatives are then incorporated into the unit plan.
This process usually generates a good amount of cost information, although it usually fails
to manage cost information, one of the fundamental criteria of project performance. Design
characteristics and costs are generally not assessed simultaneously as finishing materials are
selected because the process is managed on a basis of dualization. Therefore, no cost
baseline is determined at each project stage. The interior designer usually does not consider
costs generated by the selection of finishing materials, focusing instead on design
characteristics such as the concept, color, and pattern for the space or unit plan.
Therefore, we propose a procedure in which designers use an interior design object library
(IDOL) to select an interior design item based on cost. At that point, the total cost for the
interior can be reviewed. The builder’s constructability review and the suppliers’
availability review of the interior design are not included in this study, but the design
information stored in the interior design information model can be used in the construction
phase.
In this study, the structured floor plan (Choi et al., 2007) was used as the basis of the interior
design information for housing projects. The structured floor plan is roughly divided into
private space and public space. Its major components are surfaces such as floors, walls and
ceilings, and non-surfaces such as furniture, windows, doors and lighting fixtures. These are
the major components of private space for an apartment unit plan and serve as the primary
focus of this study.
the proposed BPH. For work items, the IDOL includes the surfaces and Non-surfaces design
information (colour, material, pattern, texture, image), cost information (quantity, unit, unit
price, cost), and work information (specification, size, cad file, work breakdown structure),
as shown in Fig. 5. Surfaces include floors, walls and ceilings, while non-surfaces include
furniture, windows, doors and lighting fixtures. These are the major components of private
space for an apartment unit plan and serve as the primary focus of this study.
Project
Legend
Building Class
A
Space
B is a subclass of A
Public space B
Private space
(Unit plan)
Utility room Entrance
Object information Sample values
Load BPH
Unit-A
Load BPH
(3) Cost Estimator
Cost
Floor Cost database Object Sample
Cost data information values
Wall Cost Description
? Quantity 20
Ceiling ? Unit M2
? Unit Price 30$/M 2
? Cost 600$
Load BPH
(4) Builder
Work Work data Work Object Sample
database information values
Non-surfaces Work description
? Specification Document-#001
Furniture ? Size W:0.1 H: 0.9
? Cad file name #AD01.DWG
Lighting Fixture ? WBS Finish
Window, Door
Collaborative system
with experts
(Fig. 11)
Client Client
Interior designer’s UserForm (VBA)
design object Client
Unit Unit
selection Client interior design
- Interior design object selection - Interior design Area
object object
- Total account - Total account
DATABASE
Interior design information
(Default value) object selection
DATABASE
Interior design information
Builder (Default value) Builder
Integration with
BPH and IDOL UNIT, WBS UNIT, WBS
- Resource plan Builder
(Fig. 8) - Resource plan
- Budget costs - Budget costs Area
Spreadsheet(EXCEL)
Client selects
e.g., BPH design object e.g., IDOL
Project : 00Housing W orkitem : W ood flooring
Building : Apartment Specification : W F-1
Unit Plan : Unit-A Integrating Object Image :
Room : Bedroom BPH and IDOL Quantity : 14
Surface : Floor Unit : ㎡
Unit Price($) : 30/㎡
Project : 00Housing Cost ($) : 420
W BS : Finish
Building : Apartment
Unit Plan : Unit-A
Room : Bedroom
Surface : Floor
W orkitem :W ood flooring
Specification : W F-1
Object Image :
Quantity : 14
Unit : ㎡
Unit Price($) : 30/ ㎡
Cost ($) : 420
W BS : Finish
cost is indicated. Nevertheless, the client can still choose from a variety of alternatives. The
information generated in this example is then used in resource planning and project cost
management.
Default (1) Information Floor Wall Ceiling Decoration Doors Fixture Total
Interior Wood Wood Lighting
Wallpaper Wallpaper Moulding
work item flooring door fixture
Specification WF-1 WP-1 WP-1 MD-1 0.9*2.0 LF-01
Object Image
Quantity 14 28 14 15 1 1
2 2 2
Unit M M M M EA EA
Unit Price ($) 30 5 5 3 250 150
Cost ($) 420 140 70 45 250 150 1,075
WBS Finish Finish Finish Decoration Doors Electric
DATABASE
(IDOL)
DATABASE
(BPH)
Client Select
DATABASE
(BPH + IDOL)
Object Image
Quantity 14 28 14 15 1 1
Unit M2 M2 M2 M EA EA
Unit Price($) 30 5 5 3 250 150
Cost ($) 420 140 70 45 250 150 1,075
WBS Finish Finish Finish Decoration Doors Electric
Fig. 12. Options for the client-selected values under the fixed cost scenario
without changing the costs relative to the default values set by the interior designer. With
the variable cost option, changing the wood flooring to tile carpet and the wallpaper
material from paper to fabric increased the cost to $1,439 from the default value of $1,075.
Object Image
Quantity 14 28 14 15 1 1
Unit M2 M2 M2 M EA EA
Unit Price($) 50 7 7 3 250 150
Cost ($) 700 196 98 45 250 150 1,439
WBS Finish Finish Finish Decoration Doors Electric
Fig. 13. Options for the client-selected values under the variable cost scenario
D ATA B A S E
(B P H + ID O L )
V a ria n c e ($ )
D e fa u lt ($ ) A lt. 1 ($ ) A lt. 2 ($ ) A lt.2 -D e fa u lt
P ro je ct
2 1 ,0 7 5 ,0 0 0 2 1 ,0 7 5 ,0 0 0 2 1 ,4 3 9 ,0 0 0 3 6 4 ,0 0 0
(e .g ., 1 0E a A p a rtm e n t)
B U IL D IN G
2 ,1 0 7 ,5 0 0 2 ,1 0 7 ,5 0 0 2 ,1 4 3 ,9 0 0 3 6 ,4 0 0
( e .g .,2 5F /1 A p a tm e n t)
F loo r
( e .g ., 4 U n its / 1F ) 8 4 ,3 0 0 8 4 ,3 0 0 8 5 ,7 5 6 1 ,4 5 6
U n it 2 1 ,0 7 5 2 1 ,0 7 5 2 1 ,4 3 9 364
B e d ro o m 1 B e d ro o m 1 : B e d ro o m 1 : B e d ro o m 1 :
Room : 1 ,0 7 5 1 ,0 7 5 1 ,4 3 9 364
O th er R o o m : O th e r R o o m : O th e r R oo m : O th er R o o m :
2 0 .0 0 0 2 0 .0 0 0 2 0 .0 0 0 0
COST($)
3,000 3,000
2,000 2,000
1,000 1,000
0 0
1
om
t
1
on
in
he
ng
g
w
m
om
l
l
l
rk
y
ca
r
om
tr y
ia
ca
oo
in
ur
n
ro
Fr
do
il t-
tc
wo
oo
oo
oo
oo
li
ec
ni
co
co
co
sh
en
tri
ro
nit
Ti
D
ro
Ki
Bu
g
in
hr
dr
dr
dr
ha
Sp
ec
th
l
in
rp
ini
ur
s
Ba
Ba
Ba
ss
W
t
Be
Be
Be
las
nv
Ba
Ba
El
ec
Ca
F
re
Li
M
G
D
SPACE WORK
The design objects and costs generated here are used as data for managing project costs in
the WBS as shown in Fig. 16. By analysing the costs according to the different spaces (Fig.
16(a)) and work (Fig. 16(b)), the builder can make a construction cost plan and resource
consumption plan in accordance with the WBS. From the perspective of project cost
management, the default cost proposed by the interior designer and the costs determined by
client selection can increase the estimate accuracy of the project costs in the early phases of a
project.
6. Conclusion
We proposed an interior design decision support system that enables clients to participate in
the early phases of the interior design for a housing project. This allows them to select
objects (e.g., colours, patterns, material) for the interior design based on the unit measure of
costs with input from various A/E/C experts. This also allows the interior designer and cost
estimator to check the costs accordingly. The proposed system was implemented using the
BPH and IDOL. In an example study, interior design objects and default costs were
proposed while examining the fixed and variable cost options.
This study examined how client decisions made during the early design phases and based
on restrictions in the interior design can affect a project. An analysis of the results confirmed
that our interior design decision support system leads to client satisfaction with the interior
design, while enabling clients to manage project costs by providing a cost baseline. Overall,
this increases the accuracy of early estimates made during the project concept phase.
Cost and time are both very key indicators for assessing project performance. In the earlier
phases of large-scale housing projects, the review of construction costs is important (Kim et
al., 2004).
It is not appropriate to state that high-cost interiors designs are good and low-cost ones are
not. However, making interior designs or design changes without any consideration of the
cost is a source of serious problems for the interior designer and other project participants,
especially the owner/developer. Moreover, despite considerable information on costs for
alternative proposals selected by interior designers, existing procedures have many
problems as seen in a review and feedback of these alternatives.
To address these problems, we investigated various alternative proposals for surfaces (floor,
wall and ceiling) and non-surfaces (furniture, windows and doors) on a unit plan basis for
large-scale housing development projects, and provided an interior information model. The
model was validated through an example study to show how it could be used in the
decision-making process by various participants in a construction project. The proposed
model is useful in providing a total interior cost review and cost baseline for the
developer/owner, a means for cost-based decision making by interior designers, and the
interior material information required by builders.
Future studies will focus on the automation of quantity surveying and graphics to reinforce
the use of Internet-based decision support systems. In future studies, further subdivision of
the design objects characteristics will be necessary, as well as the development of a system
that enables clients to make interior design decisions by changing layers, a subject outside
the scope of the present study. Additional work is also required to enable interior designers
to use the information provided by vendors and suppliers directly, and to provide the
information for the procurement phase without any additional processing.
A Cost-Based Interior Design Decision Support System for Large-Scale Housing Projects 163
7. References
Anwar, N. (2005). Component-based, information oriented structural engineering applications.
Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 29 (1), pp 45–57.
Bennett, J. (2000). Construction the third way: managing cooperation and competition in
construction, Butterworth–Heinemann, Boston, MA.
Björk, B.C. (1989). Basic structure of a proposed building product model. Computer Aided
Design, Vol. 21 (2) pp 71–78.
Choi, J.W., Kwon, D.Y., Hwang, J.E., & Lertlakkhanakul, J. (2007). Real-time management of
spatial information of design. Automation in Construction, Vol. 16 (4), pp 449–459.
Dawood, N., Sriprasert, E., Mallasi, Z., & Hobbs, B. (2003). Development of an integrated
information resource base for 4D/VR construction processes simulation. Automation in
Construction, Vol. 12 (2), pp 123–131.
Demirkan, H. (2005). Generating design activities through sketches in multi-agent system.
Automation in Construction, Vol. 14 (6), pp 699–706.
Geoffrion, A.M. (1987). An introduction to structured modelling. Management Science, Vol. 33,
pp 547–588.
Gielingh, W. (1988). General AEC Reference Model. ISO TC184/SC4/WG1 doc. 3.2.2.1, ISO,
Delft, The Netherlands.
Halfawy, M. & Froese, T. (2005). Building integrated architecture/engineering/construction
systems using smart objects. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 19 (2),
pp 172–181.
Hegazy, T., Zaneldin, E., & Grierson, D. (2001). Improving design coordination for building
projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 127 (4), pp
322–329.
Huyn, P.N., Geneserth, M.R., & Letsinger, R. (1993). Automated concurrent engineering in
design. World Computing, Vol. 26 (1), pp 74–76.
ISO (1994). ISO 10303-1 Part 1: Overview and fundamental principles, International Organization
for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kalay, Y.E., Khemluni, L., & Choi, J.W. (1998). An integrated model to support distributed
collaborative design of buildings. Automation in Construction, Vol. 7 (2–3), pp 177–
188.
Khedro, T., Teicholz, P., & Geneserth, M.R. (1994). A framework for collaborative
distributed facility engineering. Proceedings of the 1st Congress of Computing in Civil
Engineering, ASCE, New York, NY, pp 1489–1496.
Kim, G.H., An, S.H., & Kang, K.I. (2004). Comparison of construction cost estimating models
based on regression analysis, neural networks, and case-based reasoning. Building and
Environment, Vol. 39 (10), pp 1235–1242.
Korean National Statistical Office, <http://www.nso.go.kr/>
Lee, E.J., Woo, S.G., & Sasada, T. (2001). The evaluation system for design alternatives in
collaborative design. Automation in Construction, Vol. 10 (3), pp 295–301.
Lee, H.K., Lee, Y.S., Kim, K.H., & Kim, J.J. (2007). A Cost-based Information Model for an
Interior Design in a Large-scale Housing Project, ICCIT 07, 2007 International
Conference on Convergence Information Technology.
Luiten, G.T.B. & Tolman, F.P. (1997). Automating communication, in civil engineering. Journal
of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 123 (2), pp 113–120.
164 Convergence and Hybrid Information Technologies
Mokhtar, A., Beard, C., & Fazio, P. (2000). Collaborative planning and scheduling of interrelated
design changes. Journal of Architectural Engineering, Vol. 6 (2), pp 66–75.
Project Management Institute (2000). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge
(PMBOK® Guide). Project Management Institute, Singapore.
Reichard, G. & Papamichael, K. (2005). Decision-making through performance simulation and
code compliance from the early schematic phase of building design. Automation in
Construction, Vol. 14 (2), pp 173–180.
Turner, J.A. (1990). AEC Building Systems Model. ISO TC184/SC4/WG1 doc. 3.2.2.4, ISO,
Delft, The Netherlands.