BJL 3208 Lobbying and Advocacy Cat
BJL 3208 Lobbying and Advocacy Cat
6 marks
Lobbying is the attempt to influence legislators in setting policy by taking a more active and
wide-ranging approach than simply submitting a proposal or set of proposals. It generally
requires the involvement of the media, politicians, and key people from your organization in
an integrated strategy designed to ensure a positive response to your proposal and increase
the chances of achieving your objectives.
Determining what is possible and achievable- When beginning a campaign on any issue, you
must look at what is possible and achievable. Determine the level of knowledge and
awareness of hemophilia and the support you have among politicians. If this is the first issue
you have ever campaigned on, and the level of public and political knowledge and
awareness is very low, then you have to educate politicians, the media, and the public.
Alternatively, if your organization has a strong and successful lobbying record, and there is a
relatively high degree of understanding of the issues for which you are lobbying among
politicians, you can assume a greater level of knowledge and proceed accordingly. Any
organization starting on a campaign must be aware of its own political strength,
infrastructure, priorities, and key health issues. You should also look at current changes in
the healthcare system, changes which you can use to support your case.
Example: In Ireland, a report on centralization of major services in regional centers was
implemented as a government priority. This was used by the Irish Hemophilia Society to
gain support among politicians for comprehensive regional hemophilia treatment centers.
Defining expected outcomes- The board should agree on both the objectives of the
campaign and the political lobbying efforts necessary to achieve these objectives. In any
campaign, it is important for the board to first define: what the submission will ask for, the
minimum result which is acceptable, the desired outcome, what total success would be. If
board members have different views on an issue, it is important that, once consensus has
been reached, they stand behind the agreed upon objectives. It is damaging to the
campaign if individual board members who do not agree with the campaign speak to
politicians, media, Developing and Sustaining an Effective Lobbying Campaign or the public
in opposition to the agreed objectives. Write down what the board agrees to, so you can
return to it later in the campaign when you wish to review your objectives, or if there is
disagreement regarding the objectives.
Example: On issues such as compensation for HIV or hepatitis C, it is important to write
down agreed objectives at the beginning of the campaign. As the campaign progresses,
realities change, perceptions differ, expectations shift. At a later stage, if there is
disagreement about the objectives, you can refer back to the written notes from the
meeting when the objectives
Consulting with members- Once you have defined your objectives, the next step is to
inform your members of the campaign. This may be in writing initially, but, for maximum
support by members, meetings should be held where you set out: what you are doing, what
you hope to achieve, what members can do to help, how you will keep them informed as
the campaign develops. This gives the members an opportunity to comment, hopefully
constructively, on the campaign, and to agree to the objectives.
Example: A group of faculty conduct a research project collecting information on the
dangers of the use of pesticides. They produce and publish a report that presents the
advantages, disadvantages, and economic costs of current patterns of pesticide use and
significantly reduced levels of pesticides. The report concludes that the costs outweigh the
benefits and recommends that legislation should be adopted to control the use of
pesticides.
Scott, J. C. (2015). The Social Process of Lobbying? Cooperation or Collusion?. New York:
Routledge.
Skoko, B. (2006). Priručnik za razumijevanje odnosa s javnošću. Zagreb: Novelti Millenium.
Tomić, Z. (2009). Odnosi s javnošću: teorija i praksa. Zagreb, Sarajevo: Synopsis.
Tusinski Berg, A. (2009). Finding Connections Between Lobbying. Public Relations and Advocacy.
Public Relations Journal, 3 (3), 2-19.
Verčič, D. & Tkalac Verčić, A. (2012). Public relations and lobbying: New legislation in Slovenia.
Public Relations Review, 37 (1), 12–19.
Vidačak, I. (2007). Lobiranje: interesne skupine i kanali utjecaja u Europskoj uniji. Zagreb:
Planetopija.
Wilcox, D. (2001). Essentials of Public Relations. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational
Publishers Inc.
Zetter, L. (2011). Lobbying: The Art of Political Persuasion. Petersfield, Hampshire: Harriman
House Limited.
Risse, T. (2000). " Let's Argue!": Communicative action in world politics. International
organization,
54(1), 1-40.
Schimmelfennig, F. (2001). The community trap: Liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the
Eastern
enlargement of the European Union. International organization, 55(01), 47-80.
Schlozman, K. L., & Tierney, J. T. (1986). Organized interests and American democracy: Harper &
Row New York.
Schmitter, P. C., & Streeck, W. (1999). The organization of business interests: Studying the
associative action of business in advanced industrial societies: MPIfG discussion paper.
Servaes, J., & Malikhao, P. (2012). Advocacy communication for peacebuilding. Development in
Practice, 22(2), 229-243.
The UK Public Affairs Council, http://www.publicaffairscouncil.org.uk.
The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com.
Public Relations Society of America, http://www.prsa.org.
Webster's Dictionary, http://www.merriam-webster.com.