Encyclopedia of Crystallographic Prototypes: The Trigonal Crystal System
Encyclopedia of Crystallographic Prototypes: The Trigonal Crystal System
html
Pearson Symbol Strukturbericht Chemical Symbols Prototype Index Crystal Info Search prototypes... search
Space Group
ENCYCLOPEDIA OF
CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
PROTOTYPES
M. J. Mehl, D. Hicks, C. Toher, O. Levy, R. M. Hanson, G. L. W. Hart, and S. Curtarolo, The AFLOW Library
of Crystallographic Prototypes: Part 1, Comp. Mat. Sci. 136, S1-S828 (2017).
(doi=10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.01.017)
D. Hicks, M. J. Mehl, E. Gossett, C. Toher, O. Levy, R. M. Hanson, G. L. W. Hart, and S. Curtarolo, The
AFLOW Library of Crystallographic Prototypes: Part 2, Comp. Mat. Sci. 161, S1-S1011 (2019).
(doi=10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.10.043)
1 of 6 4/26/21, 7:10 AM
Firefox http://www.aflowlib.org/prototype-encyclopedia/trigonal_lattice.html
2 of 6 4/26/21, 7:10 AM
Firefox http://www.aflowlib.org/prototype-encyclopedia/trigonal_lattice.html
–
a √3
a1 = x ^− ^
ay
2 2
–
a √3
a2 = x ^+ ^
ay
2 2
a3 = c ^
z.
The space groups associated with the (trigonal) hexagonal lattice are
3 of 6 4/26/21, 7:10 AM
Firefox http://www.aflowlib.org/prototype-encyclopedia/trigonal_lattice.html
and the volume of the primitive cell is one-third that of the conventional
cell,
2
V =( – ) a c.
2
√3
or, equivalently, a = b = c ≡ a′ , where we designate the common length as a′ to distinguish it from the length of
the first two vectors in the conventional lattice. The vectors also make equal angles with each other
2c2 − 3a2
α = β = γ = cos ( −1
).
2 (c2 + 3a2 )
The above equations provide another definition of the rhombohedral lattice. We can show this by writing the
4 of 6 4/26/21, 7:10 AM
Firefox http://www.aflowlib.org/prototype-encyclopedia/trigonal_lattice.html
primitive vectors in a form that depends only on the common length and separation angle.
⎛ ^
sin α2 x ⎞
⎜ − ( 1 ) sin α y ^ ⎟
a1 = a ′ ⎜
⎜
⎟
⎟
⎜ ⎟
√ 3 2
− − −− −− −− −− −−
⎝ +√ 3 (4 cos 2 − 1) ^
1 2 α
z⎠
–
′
⎛ (2/√3) sin α2 y ^ ⎞
a2 = a − − −− −− −− −− −−
⎝ +√ 13 (4 cos2 α2 − 1) ^
z⎠
⎛ ^
− sin α2 x ⎞
⎜ − ( 1 ) sin α y ^ ⎟
a3 = a ′ ⎜
⎜
⎟.
⎟
⎜ ⎟
√3 2
− − −− −−− −− −− −
⎝ +√ 3 (4 cos 2 − 1) ^
1 2 α
z⎠
An alternative orientation is given by Setyawan and Curtarolo who only give the primitive vectors in this (a′ , α)
setting. The primitive vectors used for their rhombohedral cell di�er from the equations above only by the
orientation of the vectors relative to the Cartesian axes. Their choice is simpler for computational purposes, but does
not show the relationship between the (a, c) and (a′ , α) variants.
We can define the rhombohedral lattice in two ways: as a trigonal lattice with additional translational vectors, or as a
“simple” lattice with primitive vectors of equal length making equal angles with one another. The International
Tables address this ambiguity by listing atomic positions for the rhombohedral lattice in a “hexagonal setting,” where
all coordinates are referenced to the conventional cell, and in a “rhombohedral setting,” where the coordinates are
referenced to rhombohedral lattice. To further confuse matters, the unit cell's dimensions might be reported in
terms of (a, c) or in terms of (a′ , α). An article might say that there were N atoms in the rhombohedral cell, or 3N
atoms in the conventional cell. One has to pay attention to the context. In the database, we will report the lattice
5 of 6 4/26/21, 7:10 AM
Firefox http://www.aflowlib.org/prototype-encyclopedia/trigonal_lattice.html
parameters of the system by giving a and c , since that is the usual crystallographic practice. However, we will record
atomic positions using the rhombohedral primitive vectors, since computer calculations work best with the smallest
number of atoms needed to describe the system.
¯¯
¯
146. R3 148. R3 155. R32
160. R3m 161. R3c 166. R¯¯
3¯ m
167. R¯¯
3¯ c
M. J. Mehl, D. Hicks, C. Toher, O. Levy, R. M. Hanson, G. L. W. Hart, and S. Curtarolo, The AFLOW Library of Crystallographic Prototypes:
Part 1, Comp. Mat. Sci. 136, S1-S828 (2017). (doi=10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.01.017)
D. Hicks, M. J. Mehl, E. Gossett, C. Toher, O. Levy, R. M. Hanson, G. L. W. Hart, and S. Curtarolo, The AFLOW Library of Crystallographic
Prototypes: Part 2, Comp. Mat. Sci. 161, S1-S1011 (2019). (doi=10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.10.043)
6 of 6 4/26/21, 7:10 AM