Medical Ethics Conference: Tawfique Chowdhury
Medical Ethics Conference: Tawfique Chowdhury
Ethics
conference
December 2008
Presented by
Tawfique Chowdhury
Student: _____________________
If misplaced, please contact
Email: _______________________
Table of Contents
Course objectives 4
Types of difficulty 30
Conditions that must be fulfiled for the harm to be considered for removal 46
Introduction
This course will also focus on the Islamic angle to dealing with
Muslim clients by providing:
Islamic view of the nature of depressive mental illnesses
Specific Islamic faith based strategies to combating depression and
anxiety.
Specific faith based sensitivity practices for optimum client support
and treatment.
Clarification of faith vs cultural barriers to conventional mental
health treatment methods.
Integration of Islamic healing into conventional CBT and Problem
solving strategies.
UNDERSTANDING
AND THE
UNIVERSAL RULES
OF FIQH
AlQarafi rahimahullah, the great scholar of the Maliki madhab said: Important quote from Imam
alQarafi rahimahullah
“These rules are immensely beneficial and by the degree of
comprehension of these rules does the ability and greatness of the
faqeeh show, and the methodology of giving verdicts become clear
to him. As for he who takes to learning the specific issues of Fiqh
without learning the Rules of Fiqh, then his rulings becomes self
contradictory and he becomes hesitant and he is in need of
memorizing specifics of which there is no end. As for he who
understands and learns Fiqh through its rules, then he is free from
memorizing and learning many of the specific issues and rulings due
to its falling under the general rules. He is firm and clear in those in
which others are hesitant and unclear.” [AlFurooq (1/2)]
or general laymen?
ِ ِ ِِ ِ ٍ ِ ِ
يم ُ لََبَنْي،َن َق ْو َمك َحد ْيثُو َع ْهد بِالش ِّْرك
َ ت ال َك ْعبَةَ َعلى َق َواعد إ ْبَراه َّ لَوال أ
Were it not that your people only recently reverted from Shirk, then I
would have rebuilt the Ka'bah on the foundations of Ibrahim.
[AlBukhari (3/439)] and [Muslim (2/968)]
1. All affairs are by their intention (اص ِد َها ِ )األُمور مِب ََق
ُ ُ
2. Difficulty gives rise to ease (ب التَّْي ِسْيَر ِ
ُ )املَ َش َّقةُ جَتْل
3. All harm is to be removed ()الضََّر ُر يَُز ُال
4. Certainty is not removed by doubt (َّك ِّ )اليَ ِقنْي ُ ال يَُز ُال بِالش
5. The rule is by the custom (ٌالع َادةُ حُمَ َّك َمة
َ)
اص ِد َها
ِ األُمور مِب ََق
ُ ُ
person and his dealings whether they are statements of the tongue or
actions of the limbs have different results and rulings according to
the intention of the person from them. So whoever kills a person
without a valid reason, then for this action is a ruling, and if he was
mistaken, then for his action is another ruling. Similarly, if someone
was to tell another person: Take these dirhams, then if he intended to
give it away, then the action would be a gift. If not, then it would be
regarded as a loan that would be obligatory to pay back."
[AlMadhkhal al-Fiqhi (2/965-966)]
التْي ِسْيَر ِ
َ ب ُ املَ َش َّقةُ جَتْل
Subordinate
ًاصة ْ َالضُر ْو َر ِة َع َّامةً َكان
َّ ت أ َْو َخ َ َاجةُ ُتَنِّز ُل َمْن ِزلَة
َ َاحل
Rule No. 34 Necessity takes the place of dire necessity in
general as well as specific.
UNDERSTANDING
AND VARIOUS
ISSUES IN
ISLAMIC MEDICAL
ETHICSRULES OF
FIQH Introduction to the Rules of Fiqh
:Opinion 1
Proof قال رسول اهلل صلى اهلل عليه وسلم يف وصف الذين
وال، هم الذين ال يكتنوون:يدخلون اجلنة بغري حساب
وعلى رهبم يتوكلون، وال يتطريون،يسرتقون
The Prophet sallallahu alaihi wa sallam said
about those who will enter Jannah without
reckoning: “They are those who do not perform
cauterization, nor have the ruqya performed on
them and they put their reliance on Allah.”
[Agreed upon]
اعقلها وتوكل
Tie its rope then put your trust in Allah.
[Tirmidhee (No. 2522) with an authentic isnad]
Opinion 3:
Medical treatment is obligatory. This is the opinion of some of the
companions of Imam AsShafi rahimahullah and some Hanbali
scholars. Some of them put the condition, that seeking medical
treatment is obligatory when it is known that the medical treatment
will help in that matter.
[See Majmoo alFatawa of Ibn Taymiyyah (21/564, 24/269)].
Proof And do not destroy yourselves by your own
hands. [AlBaqarah: 195]
Consent of a patient
Opinion 1:
Chemical transformation by human intervention does not make a
haram product halal and does not make alcohol halal. This is the
opinion of the Shafi, Hanbali and some of the scholars in the Maliki
madhab. [See Majmoo alFatawa (29/331)]
Stronger opinion: The stronger opinion and Allah knows best is the
second opinion inshaAllah and that is because the rulings revolve
around the reason for its application. It is for this reason why grape
juice is pure, which when it becomes alcohol it becomes haram and
when it becomes vinegar, it again becomes pure once again. [See
Fathul-Qadeer (1/200, 201)] Ibn Hazm said: “If a haram product
transforms in its name and characteristics, then the ruling that was
attached to it will also have changed.” [AlMuhalla (7/429)]
Important note: The scholars of the past were not aware that blood
could be donated and that blood and its products could be useful for
a person in need. As a result, the scholars of the past only dealt with
this topic from the position of someone drinking blood to save
himself from dying of hunger – not from the angle of a patient who
needs blood to replace lost volume, Haemoglobin, transfusion etc..
:Opinion 1
:Opinion 2
The stronger opinion: The second one. Medical science shows that
the treatment that can be achieved with blood cannot in the majority
of cases be adequately replaced by any other form of treatment.
:Opinion 1
عن أيب جحيفة أن النيب صلى اهلل عليه وسلم هنى عن
الكلب ومثن الدم وكسب البغي
From Abi Juhayfah that the Prophet sallallahu
alaihi wa sallam forbade from the sale of the dog
and the profit from the sale of blood and from the
earnings from prostitution. [Reported by
AlBukhari]
Genetic testing
Genetic testing for the above is complicated, since the Shariah has
specific requirements and regulations for each of its rulings:
Important matters:
The wife abstaining from countering the lee’an does not establish
the punishment of stoning upon her.
Genetic testing CAN establish the link of lineage in Islam,
however Islamically, it CANNOT remove the link of lineage.
The only way of remove the link of lineage is to perform Lee’an.
Note: The person receiving and giving the money can ofcourse
intend that the fee is for the service of providing the blood and not
for the blood itself. Also, this matter should be under the care of the
government so that blood banks are not forced into coaxing clients
into donating blood and luring them with financial compensations.
Also a lot of care must be taken to prevent frequent doners from
abusing this system to make a living out of donating blood for
money.
As for any blood that is not a lot and does not gush out and flow –
such as the blood in the meat when skinning the animal after it has
been slaughtered etc.. then this blood is considered pure. There is no
known difference amongst the scholars on this matter.
The Hanafi scholars may Allah have mercy on them are of the
opinion that if a person has flowing blood that comes out of him,
then it breaks his wudu – but not a drop or two. Their proofs rests on
the hadeeth: “Wudu should be made from every flowing blood.”
[Reported by Ad-Daraqutni and it is not authentic. See Nasb Ar-
Raayah (1/37)] There are also some reports of the Prophet sallallahu
alaihi wa sallam telling those who had various types of bleeding to
make wudu – such as to Fatimah bint Qayis who had a lot of
bleeding [Reported by AtTirmindhee]. Also the hadeeth: “Whoever
vomits or has a nose bleed, then let him go away and make wudu
again and build upon his prayer as long as he has not spoken.”
[Reported by Ibn Majah. See Na’ilul-Awtar (1/187)]
The Hanbali scholars may Allah have mercy on them are of the
opinion that it breaks the wudu as long as it is a lot basing it on the
hadeeth or Rasulullah sallallahu alaihi wa sallam to Fatimah bint Abi
Hubaish who used to have defective bleeding: “It is from a vein, so
make wudu for every prayer.” [Reported by AtTirmidhee]
The Maliki, Shafi and Dhahiri scholars may Allah have mercy on
them are of the opinion that the flowing of blood from other than the
front and back passages does not break the wudu. [See Bidayatul
Mujtahid (1/34)]
The opinion of the majority of the scholars of Islam from the Hanafi,
Shafi, Maliki and also an opinion in the Hanbali school is that it does
not break the fast. This is based on the hadeeth: “The Prophet had
cupping performed whilst he was in ihram and he had it performed
whilst he was fasting.” Also: “The Prophet sallallahualaihi wa sallam
gave us the concession to have cupping done whilst fasting.” [See
Fathul-Bari with Sahih alBukhari (4/178)]
The second opinion is the stronger opinion and Allah knows best.
The majority of the scholars of Islam are of the opinion that it breaks
the fast since it has entered into his body.
Other scholars such as Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Hazm are of the
opinion that it does not break the fast since this is not in the meaning
of eating and drinking. [See AlMughni (3/119-126)]
The first opinion is the safer and stronger opinion and Allah knows
best.
In the latter half of the 20th Century, given the significant advances in
Medical research, there has been a lot of interest in the medico-legal
front for defining exactly what death is. This was also compounded
by a BBC Panorama show on Brain death in 13/10/1980C.E. that
interviewed a number of people who had been in a coma and were
pronounced brain dead by the doctors. Later on, as the doctors and
family were debating whether to take the ventilator off her, she was
hearing them all throughout – only to come out of the coma many
days later and with apparently little signs of brain death. Also in
1976 the Karen Ann Quinlan that hit the headlines showed the first
move by legislatures in Western countries for redefining moving for
brain death as the acceptable definition of death.
Note: Some Muslim countries and also China have yet to agree to a
classification of brain stem death to be brain death.
A similar ruling has been issued by the World Fiqh Council in its
decree No. 17 (3/5) on 16 October 1986. [PVS]
Some of the scholars of Islam of recent times are of the opinion that
it is not permissible to donate any body part or tissue or organ at all,
whether it be from a living or a dead person. They base their
argument on the proof that a person does not own his or her own
body and it is owned by Allah and thus not under our jurisdiction to
dispose of it in any way that we want. These views were championed
by some popular contemporary scholars such as Sh Ash-Sha’rawi
rahimahullah.
[See Kullu ma Uhimmul-Insaanu fi Hayatihi (9/71)]
This can be argued from the point that although we do not own our
own body, we have still been ordered by Allah to put our body and
life in danger by performing Jihad in His cause. This shows that
although disposing of our body in an unrestricted manner is not
allowed, however if it is done in a manner that is defined by the
Shariah – then there is no prohibition in that. If that is understood,
then to donate an organ thereby saving a life and this being equal to
saving all of mankind shows that here organ donation that is within
the boundaries put by the Shariah – would also be legislated rather
than prohibited. This is in general terms.
To further clarify the matter, tThere are 3 major issues that must be
discussed in this section:
1. The sources of the donated tissue or organ.
2. The type of need or necessity behind requiring the organ or
tissue.
3. The type of tissue or organ that is being transplanted.
The scholars of the past have dealt with this matter. They concluded
that if the animal is pure [ ]طاهرthen there is no harm in using that part
of its body for human benefit. As for impure animals, then the
scholars have differences.
Shafi opinion Under duress, any part of any animal can be used
for human benefit, even swine. AnNawawi
rahimahullah says: “If someone breaks his bones,
then bone that is pure should be used to fix it.
Our scholars said: And it is not right for him to
be forced to use the impure whilst he has the
ability to use the pure. So if he is forced into it,
then if he is in need of it and cannot find a pure
one that can take its place, then he is excused.”
[AlMajmoo (3/138)]
Autografts
:Opinion 1
Important note: The scholars of the past were not aware that blood
could be donated and that blood and its products could be useful for
a person in need. As a result, the scholars of the past only dealt with
this topic from the position of someone drinking blood to save
himself from dying of hunger – not from the angle of a patient who
needs blood to replace lost volume, Haemoglobin, transfusion etc.
:Opinion 1
The stronger opinion: The second one. Medical science shows that
the treatment that can be achieved with blood cannot in the majority
of cases be adequately replaced by any other form of treatment.
Conditions for using donated blood
:Opinion 1
عن أيب جحيفة أن النيب صلى اهلل عليه وسلم هنى عن
الكلب ومثن الدم وكسب البغي
From Abi Juhayfah that the Prophet sallallahu
alaihi wa sallam forbade from the sale of the dog
and the profit from the sale of blood and from the
earnings from prostitution. [Reported by
AlBukhari]
Note: The person receiving and giving the money can of course
intend that the fee is for the service of providing the blood and not
for the blood itself. Also, this matter should be under the care of the
As for any blood that is not a lot and does not gush out and flow –
such as the blood in the meat when skinning the animal after it has
been slaughtered etc.. then this blood is considered pure. There is no
known difference amongst the scholars on this matter.
The Hanafi scholars may Allah have mercy on them are of the
opinion that if a person has flowing blood that comes out of him,
then it breaks his wudu – but not a drop or two. Their proofs rests on
the hadeeth: “Wudu should be made from every flowing blood.”
[Reported by Ad-Daraqutni and it is not authentic. See Nasb Ar-
Raayah (1/37)] There are also some reports of the Prophet sallallahu
alaihi wa sallam telling those who had various types of bleeding to
The Hanbali scholars may Allah have mercy on them are of the
opinion that it breaks the wudu as long as it is a lot, basing it on the
hadeeth or Rasulullah sallallahu alaihi wa sallam to Fatimah bint Abi
Hubaish who used to have defective bleeding: “It is from a vein, so
make wudu for every prayer.” [Reported by AtTirmidhee]
The Maliki, Shafi and Dhahiri scholars may Allah have mercy on
them are of the opinion that the flowing of blood from other than the
front and back passages does not break the wudu. [See Bidayatul
Mujtahid (1/34)]
The opinion of the majority of the scholars of Islam from the Hanafi,
Shafi, Maliki and also an opinion in the Hanbali school is that it does
not break the fast. This is based on the hadeeth: “The Prophet had
cupping performed whilst he was in ihram and he had it performed
whilst he was fasting.” Also: “The Prophet sallallahualaihi wa sallam
gave us the concession to have cupping done whilst fasting.” [See
Fathul-Bari with Sahih alBukhari (4/178)]
The second opinion is the stronger opinion and Allah knows best.
The majority of the scholars of Islam are of the opinion that it breaks
the fast since it has entered into his body.
Other scholars such as Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Hazm are of the
opinion that it does not break the fast since this is not in the meaning
of eating and drinking. [See AlMughni (3/119-126)]
The first opinion is the safer and stronger opinion and Allah knows
best.
Stages of creation
The majority of the scholars of Islam are of the opinion that the soul
is blown into the womb at 120 days based on the narration of Ibn
Masud in AlBukhari that mentions the first 3 stages each with 40
days. As for the narrations in Muslim, it mentions 40 days and some
mention 42 and 45 days. A narration of Jabir in Sahih Muslim
mentions: “When the nutfah lies in the womb 40 days or 45 nights,
then Allah gives the command for its creation.” This is therefore also
a very strong opinion.