Scribd
Upload
136 views

Lab & Lec Final Quiz

The document contains a quiz on monitoring and evaluation concepts with true/false and multiple choice questions. Some key points covered are: - Monitoring involves systematically tracking progress using indicators, observing implementation, and ensuring plans and timelines are followed. - Evaluation assesses effectiveness, efficiency, outcomes and impacts to determine the worth of programs and identify lessons. - Both monitoring and evaluation provide feedback to improve targeting, strategies and program design.

Uploaded by

Claire Gargarita
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
136 views

Lab & Lec Final Quiz

The document contains a quiz on monitoring and evaluation concepts with true/false and multiple choice questions. Some key points covered are: - Monitoring involves systematically tracking progress using indicators, observing implementation, and ensuring plans and timelines are followed. - Evaluation assesses effectiveness, efficiency, outcomes and impacts to determine the worth of programs and identify lessons. - Both monitoring and evaluation provide feedback to improve targeting, strategies and program design.

Uploaded by

Claire Gargarita
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

PHN-LEC FINALS QUIZ

1. -
2. Pre-survey evaluation is typically used to reassess development needs
and project feasibility. T
3. Results evaluation shows how inputs or resources invested in the project
are transformed through a series of sequential processes into outputs. F
4. A good indicator is valid, simple, clear & precisely defined, reliable and
sensitive to change. T
5. Supervision is a process of helping and guiding the field implementors to
help them become motivated and competent in their work, thus
achieving efficient and effective work performance. T
6. Summative evaluation is carried out before project implementation to
assess project for the benefit of funding agencies and project managers.
F
7. Coordination is defined as the synchronization and integration of
activities, responsibilities and command and control structures to ensure
that the resources are used most efficiently in pursuit of the specified
objectives. T
8. Formative evaluation can only make a partial assessment of project
impact but can act as an early warning system. T
9. Resource generation involves the training of nutrition workers at all
levels on specific knowledge and skills to manage their own projects. F
10. Human resource development involves tapping the national and
local budget offices, business sector, non-government organizations, and
the international community to raise and mobilize resources for the
effective implementation of the LNAP. F
11. Planning sets the course of action from objectives, strategies, and
schedule before the project implementation. T
12. Monitoring ensures that things are done according to plan. T
13. The Phase 2 of the Nutrition Program Management is monitoring
and evaluation. F
14. It is possible that there are some projects or activities in the Local
Nutrition Action Plan that were not approved by the Sanggunian
Panlalawigan/Bayan. T
15. Nutrition Action Plan cannot be adjusted and updated because it
was already approved by the Local Nutrition Committee (LNC). F
16. After the program or project has been implemented, evaluation
should be done. T
17. The Nutrition Program Management cycle starts with
implementation which involves deciding in advance the actions that
would be done to achieve nutritional objectives. F
18. The planning phase of the cycle involves putting the plan into
action, monitoring the progress of implementation, and adjusting actions
accordingly. F
19. To be able to sustain an M and E system, the M and E plan should
be built-in during Phase 3. F
20. A Local Nutrition Action Plan does not have a monitoring and
evaluation component is incomplete. T
21. Monitoring is done before, during and after the implementation. F
22. Evaluation is done during the implementation. T
23. A good practice is considered a dynamic undertaking that evolves
over time to meet changing needs of the community. T
24. Good practices is designed to be freely accessible, with evidence of
success, sustainable, but not transferrable. F
25. Evaluation is the regular follow-up of the implementation of
planned activities. F
26. Monitoring is the systematic assessment of effectiveness and
efficiency of the project achievements based on the set objectives. F
27. Planning sets the course of action from objectives, strategies, and
schedule before the project implementation. T
28. Monitoring ensures that things are done according to plan. T
29. When monitoring the results, the indicators identified during the
planning phase should be used to measure the success or failure of a
nutrition intervention. T
30. It is not necessarily important that indicators are accepted by
everyone involved in the implementation of the nutrition intervention. F
31. To be able to sustain an M and E system, the M and E plan should
be built-in during Phase 3. F
32. An LNAP that does not have a monitoring and evaluation
component is incomplete. T
33. A good practice is considered a dynamic undertaking that evolves
over time to meet changing needs of the community. T
34. Good practices is designed to be freely accessible, with evidence of
success, sustainable, but not transferrable. F
35. A sound nutrition plan entails a well-defined situation of the
community where the causes and effects of malnutrition problems have
been identified and analyzed. T
36. An approved budget is only the starting point of efficient utilization
of funds. T
37. A periodic (for example monthly) record of cumulative expenditures
by item is a good basis for determining whether expenses are within
budget limits. T
38. Evaluation is the regular follow-up of the implementation of
planned activities. F
39. Monitoring is the systematic assessment of effectiveness and
efficiency of the project achievements based on the set objectives. F
40. The Local Nutrition Committee is responsible for planning
nutrition programs and preparing the Local Nutrition Action Plan
depending on the unique situation of each Local Government Unit. T

PHN-LAB FINALS QUIZ

1. Determine is the word is associated with either monitoring or evaluation:


Keeping track. MONITORING
2. Determine is the word is associated with either monitoring or evaluation:
Recording. MONITORING
3. Determine is the word is associated with either monitoring or evaluation:
Assessing. EVALUATION
4. Determine is the word is associated with either monitoring or evaluation:
Effectivity. EVALUATION
5. Determine is the word is associated with either monitoring or evaluation:
Watching. MONITORING
6. Determine is the word is associated with either monitoring or evaluation:
Judging. EVAL
7. Determine is the word is associated with either monitoring or evaluation:
Follow-ups. M
8. Determine is the word is associated with either monitoring or evaluation:
Feedback. E
9. Determine is the word is associated with either monitoring or evaluation:
Performance. E
10. Determine is the word is associated with either monitoring or
evaluation: Observing. M
11. Determine if the question below is commonly asked in either
monitoring or evaluation: Are the indicators appropriate? M
12. Determine if the question below is commonly asked in either
monitoring or evaluation: Are targeted outputs being met? M
13. Determine if the question below is commonly asked in either
monitoring or evaluation: Are we proceeding according to the plan and
timetable? M
14. Determine if the question below is commonly asked in either
monitoring or evaluation: Are the inputs required and adequate, timely,
and of right quality? M
15. Determine if the question below is commonly asked in either
monitoring or evaluation: Were the needs met? E
16. Determine if the question below is commonly asked in either
monitoring or evaluation: What systems were actually in place? E
17. Determine if the question below is commonly asked in either
monitoring or evaluation: How effective were strategies used to
implement project activities? E
18. Determine if the question below is commonly asked in either
monitoring or evaluation: Have the outcomes/objectives been met? E
19. Determine if the question below is commonly asked in either
monitoring or evaluation: Did you identify the correct problem and has
this problem changed? M
20. Determine if the question below is commonly asked in either
monitoring or evaluation: Have the needs changed? E
21. Help managers to improve implementation. M
22. Provide information to improve targeting. M
23. Determine the worth or value of on-going programs. E
24. Provide information that will permit cost-effectiveness
comparisons. E
25. Verify that inputs are transformed through activities, into outputs
that generate results. M
26. Identify impacts that are attributable to a program. E
27. Increase the effectiveness of program management and
administration. E
28. Identify operational constraints to program effectiveness. M
29. Re-design an on-going program or design a new program. E
30. Assess the quantity, quality, and timeliness of program inputs. M
31. An intervention where the government controls and/or reduce the
price of staple food to make these foods available and accessible to the
target group of nutrition programs. Food subsidy
32. Preservation of leafy greens, yellow vegetables and fruits will
provide susceptible children with supplies of Vitamin A. Food
preservation
33. Process of developing low-bulk, highly nutritious foods with
desired nutritional and sensory attributes for the nutritionally at-risk
groups that include preschool children, pregnant and lactating women.
FOOD FORMULATION
34. Process of adding nutrients to food to maintain or improve the
quality of the diet of a group, a community, or population. Food
fortification
35. Involves the administration of pharmaceutically prepared vitamins
and minerals to target individuals or groups for treatment or prevention
of specific micronutrient deficiency. Micronutrient supplementation
36. Involves payment of services in the form of food. FOOD FOR WORK
37. Aims to provide additional source of income to the family that
could result to increased purchase and consumption of food. Livelihood
assistance
38. Focused on the therapeutic aspect of the diet and on the
preventive and promotive aspects of nutritional care, especially in the
community. DIET COUNSELING
39. A well-selected and implemented targeting method will maximize
the social returns from food and nutrition program by including non-
needy individuals, while minimizing the cost by only including the
neediest. F
40. After an evaluation of the LNAP has been conducted, the results
can be used as basis in scaling up and improving nutrition interventions.
T

You might also like