0% found this document useful (0 votes)
48 views

Hematology 2 Lab Subject: Instructions

This document provides instructions for group members to evaluate each other based on 5 criteria: interest, participation, timeliness, accuracy, and completeness. Members should rate each other objectively on a scale of 2 points (if the criteria is observed) or 1 point (if not observed) for each category. The ratings will be submitted to the Google classroom by December 24, 2020 and will contribute to the activity grade.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
48 views

Hematology 2 Lab Subject: Instructions

This document provides instructions for group members to evaluate each other based on 5 criteria: interest, participation, timeliness, accuracy, and completeness. Members should rate each other objectively on a scale of 2 points (if the criteria is observed) or 1 point (if not observed) for each category. The ratings will be submitted to the Google classroom by December 24, 2020 and will contribute to the activity grade.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

HEMATOLOGY 2 LAB SUBJECT: Group member evaluation

This rating will form part of your ACTIVITY GRADE. The average will be computed based on the ratings
submitted and will be recorded under activities/researchers.

INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Rate your groupmates OBJECTIVELY based on the following rubrics.
2. Do NOT include your name in the list of members.
3. Submit rating sheet in the LAB Google classroom on or before December 24, 2020.
Indicators for the Evaluation of Member

2 points 2 points 2 points 2 points 2 points

INTEREST in doing assigned PARTICIPATION in ACCURACY of the


TIMELY COMPLETENESS
task (e.g. Does NOT argue group discussion submitted reports
submission of of answers
nor give an alibi when (online and/or (Answers were derived
output submitted
assigned with task) offline) from reliable sources

Give: 2 points iF the indicator is OBSERVED


1 point if the indicator is NOT observed.

PARTICI-PATI TIMELI-NES COMPLETE-


Names of Group Members INTEREST ON S ACCURACY NESS TOTAL

1. AARON GOTOH 2 2 2 2 2 10

2. ALYSA OABEL 2 2 2 2 2 10

3. KAMIL OLARTE 2 2 2 2 2 10

4. SHARA PALAOAG 2 2 2 2 2 10

5. GRACE JOY PILAWEN 2 2 2 2 2 10

6. BENMAR PULUCAN 2 2 2 2 2 10

7. KATE NARDO 2 2 2 2 2 10

8.

9.
*Please Arrange Names Alphabetically

You might also like