Application Form For MCABE
Application Form For MCABE
Land adjacent to
By
December 2020
1
In 2015 Council embarked on a new partnership with
dealing with new schools across
We have dealt with various new schools ranging
from primary, secondary, colleges and special needs schools, with more on
the way to us, which are currently at pre-application stage. I am part of
the plans examination team dealing with the various school projects,
which are then inspected by the Local Authority Building Control, within
the given areas.
Having one point of contact regarding the plan checking aspect of these
projects is extremely useful for both myself and . We
C1
work closely with , the architects, fire engineers and various
D1, D2
specialists from early on in the design stage. This gives us the opportunity
to highlight any potential problems through pre-application meetings and
consultations. Good communication is paramount in delivering these C1, C2
projects, especially due to tight timescales associated with school
developments.
2
An initial pre application meeting was arranged where we met with
and the architects. When the initial pre-app meeting was
carried out, the plans were at an early stage and a Fire Engineer had not D1
yet been appointed. In this meeting we discussed my initial concerns. One A1, A2
of the main concerns was that the stairs had not been lobbied. Approved
B1
Document B vol 2 and BS 9999 advises that where two or more stairs are
provided it should be assumed that one of them might not be available B3
within the stairs. This was a concern as there was potential for smoke and A2
fire to spread from the open plan area into the stairs at first and second
floor level. I advised the architect to appoint a Fire Engineer at their
D1, D2, D3
earliest convenience who could advise them on possible stair width
increases and protection of the stairs in relation to the lift location. C1, C2
The architect was advised the following information would be required: D1, D2, D3
C1
Full SE details for the project, this was to include site investigation,
foundation details, super-structure. C2
Full site investigation report highlighting any contaminates found and B1, B2
remedial measures proposed.
3
Details of damp proofing and resistance to condensation.
A1, A2, A3
An acoustic report should be provided using the recommendations given in A1, A2,
BB93 Detailing the proposed sound resistance between teaching spaces
and from external noise pollution.
B1, B2, B3
A full ventilation strategy including adequate fresh air and suitable extract
B1, B2, B3
in kitchens, wc’s and other places of special interest.
C1
Toilet provisions, the number and location of toilets in accordance with the
A1, A2
guidance given in BS6465.
Full drainage details both foul and storm including internal plumbing and
drainage, sustainable storm drainage systems (SUDS).
A SEBEM report will be required for the proposed new building including
details of over heating, ventilation, thermal elements and air tightness.
Time scales with these schools are very tight from conception to starting
on site. This provides challenges as quite often we are checking plans as C1, C2
works are ongoing, so any issues need to be raised at the earliest
D1
opportunity and it is essential that good communication is maintained
between us and the inspecting authority.
4
Control in accordance with LABC partnership scheme. Shortly after sending
the information, Building Control contacted us as works had
commenced on site and they had little or no information.
A basic tracker was produced and this was sent to the architect pushing
C1, C2, C3
them for further details. In particular structural details, ground
investigation and any drainage as these works had commenced on site.
This would at least enable to compare what was being carried out D1, D2, D3
on site to the details being checked by us. At this stage the architect was
advised that they were working at risk, as the application had not yet been
checked or approved and any site inspections would only consist of noting
what was on site and any possible contraventions, rather than approving E1
works.
The first details that were submitted were details of the stairs. The
architect advised me that they were seeking approval of this element as
A1, A2
they were setting out on site. I advised the architect that, as discussed in
the pre-application meeting, I could not make any comment on the stairs
and setting out alone without the fire strategy, as the widths of the stairs B1, B2, B3
would be determined by this and the occupancy of the building. The
architect advised they would discuss this with the fire engineer. Shortly
C1, C2, D1
after the initial fire strategy was issued.
The report noted that the design principles were based on BS9999
however where details are included in the scheme, which are not included A1, A2
The fire strategy was checked against the guidance in BS 9999 and the
following observations were made: A1, A2
- The lift was still showing on the plans passing from the ground floor
open area into the stairs at first and second floor (Stair 3). The fire B1, B2, B3
strategy noted that the lift would return to the ground floor on
activation of the alarm with doors opening. This would create a
potential path for fire and smoke. Lift wells should either be
contained within the protected stairway or be enclosed throughout
their height with fire resisting construction. A lift well connecting
5
different compartments should form a protected shaft. Further
A1, A2
details/justification would be required.
- There are 'dead-end' situations at second floor level (stair 3 and 5).
These need to be protected corridors. At stair 3, an additional cross B1, B2 B3
corridor door is required (adjacent to the disabled refuge) or
alternatively the whole corridor, up to the circulation area should be a
protected corridor.
- The final exit from Stair 3 is noted as 2050mm on the fire strategy plans C1, C2, C3
however the distance alongside the stair only appears to be the same
width as the stair. This should be the same width as the final exit due
to merging flow calculations, given in the fire strategy.
- The occupancy of the sports gallery was noted as 66 people however
the doors were opening inwards. Where a room contains more than
60 people, doors should open in the direction of escape.
- A cross corridor door is required to the right hand wing at second floor
level.
- Details required for both theatres with regards to gangways no of seat
etc.
- Hold open devices should be provided to doors which are to be used
day to day and general circulation. Smoke detection is to be
installed/positioned as per the guidance given in BS 7273-4 where hold
open devices are used on doors.
- Further details were required for the area over the central core and if
this is considered an atrium, details of ventilation should be provided if
required.
- Details of protection of steel frame, walls, cavity barriers etc.
- Confirm means of escape route from roof.
- The exit doors between pupils changing rooms are noted as 800mm. If
during community use this door is to take some of the sports hall and
the theatre, 800mm may not be adequate. The plan is showing double
doors but minimum width is noted as 800mm. Confirmation required.
- Provide details of the external wall details in relation to unprotected
area (elevation 2) as noted in the fire strategy.
- Provide details of the fire brigade access, tracking details, hydrant
positions.
6
Application for
Chartered Member
via Professional Interview
cbuilde.com v1.2 oct 19
By completing this application you agree that the information contained within it
has been given freely.
Care should be taken to ensure that ALL parts of the application are fully completed.
Please refer to the relevant guidance notes to accompany the application for
Chartered member via professional interview.
Personal Details
Surname: Title (Mr/Mrs/Miss/Other):
Forename(s):
Home Address:
Postcode:
E-mail:
Date of Birth:
Mobile: Telephone:
Employment
Employer’s Name: Job Title / Position: Senior Building Control Surveyor
Address:
Postcode:
E-mail:
Mobile: Telephone:
Have you ever been the subject of disciplinary action from another professional body? Yes [ ] No [✔]
Employer
The person completing this section must be the applicant’s present employer, who may also be a
supporter of the application. If you are currently employed, this section must be completed by your
current employer. If you are not currently employed, you do not need to complete this section.
Personal Statement
This should be brief overview of who you are, what attracted you to the industry, career highlights and future goals.
Please complete this section by giving examples of how you have demonstrated
the following competencies
A) Use a combination of general and specialist building engineering knowledge and
understanding to apply existing and emerging technology relevant to your work.
A1) Maintain and extend a sound theoretical approach to the application of technology in building
engineering practice and demonstrate detailed knowledge of and the ability to apply technical
standards, codes, regulatory and other requirements relevant to your work.
A2) Use a sound evidence-based approach to problem solving and contribute to continuous
improvement in your building engineering work.
Competencies demonstrated e.g. A2
A1
A2
A2
A1
E1
E4
E3
E2