We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4
oo
Republic of the Philippines
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION
CHED MEMORANDUM ORDER
No. _08
Series of 2008
SUBJECT GUIDELINES FOR THE CHED OUTSTANDING
EXTENSION PROGRAM AWARD
In accordance with the pertinent provisions of Republic Act No. 7722, otherwise known as
the “Higher Education Act of 1994”, for the purpose of promoting/enhancing the Extension
function of Higher Education Institutions, and pursuant to Resolution No. 534 — 2007, the
Commission hereby issues the following Guidelines for the Search for CHED Outstanding
Extension Program Award,
I, RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES
Extension is one of the three major functions of higher edu
ion.
In line with the present Administration's thrust to mobilize knowledge and technology
towards enhancing productivity, generating employment and reducing poverty, higher
education institutions have been actively conducting research and extension
programs/projects, particularly transfer and/or application of technology/knowledge that
contribute to the attainment of the country’s development goals.
‘There are ongoing award and recognition programs for outstanding achievements in teaching
and research. CHED has two ongoing programs to recognize outstanding researchers and
research programs—REPUBLICA and Best Higher Education Institution Research Program
Awards. Response to these programs in the last three years shows increasing research
productivity in HEIs as evidenced by the number of excellent research outputs that have been
nominated for the Awards.
In comparison, the proposed Outstanding Extension Program Award will be the first
nationwide recognition program for Extension.
The objectives of the proposed Award are to:
* recognize and reward both the implementor(s) and the
for their outstanding Extension programs;
* encourage conduct of Extension work that is relevant and responsive to the needs of
the community and society; °
+ promote appreciation of the importance of the Extension function of HEIs
igher education institutions
SIF Upper DAP Bidg., San Miguel Avenue, Ortigas Center, Pasig City 1605 Philippines
Web Site: wwrw.ched.gov.ph, Tel. Nos. 633-27-13, 6324-68-36, 6368-58-35, 636-16-94, Fax No. 635.58-29,Il, THE AWARDS
‘Two national winners and 16 regional winners will be selected and given the prizes indicated
below:
Award Category
National Winners:
Most Outstanding Exten:
Program
‘Trophy and cash prize of PIM*
Second Most Outstanding Extension Trophy and cash prize of P500,000*
Program
Regional Winners |
Outstanding Extension Program Plaque of recognition and cash prize
in the Region of P300,000
* The cash prizes for the national winners shall be utilized as follows: 50% as
incentives for the program staff; and 50% to be plowed back into the program.
TI. GENERAL GUIDELINES
A. Definition of Extension
Extension refers to the act of communicating, persuading and helping specific sectors or
target clienteles (as distinguished from those enrolled in formal degree programs and course
offerings) to enable them to effectively improve production, community and/or institutions,
and quality of life.
‘An Integrated Extension Program shall include the following components:
1. Training programs- non-degree and non-credit courses offered by a college or unit;
2. Technical assistance and advisory services ~ to agencies, organizations, associations
and other groups;
3. Communication/information services- communication and/or dissemination of
knowledge and skills to particular client groups through the various means of
dissemination such as person-to-person contact, radio, television, newspaper and other
printed materials
4. Community outreach activities- extension activities conducted in areas outside the
university/college, e.g. community-based social services, pilot projects, mobile clinic,
ete.5
Technology transfer, utilization and commercialization — the process of circulating,
promoting and marketing research outputs or technologies to potential users. In
general, two mechanisms are used for this purpose: technology incubator — an
environment and program that offers a full array of business assistance services
tailored to the client companies; and technology part — a mechanism designed to
stimulate the development of entrepreneurial knowledge-based micro to small and
medium size enterprises.
B. Eligibility Requirements
‘The award is open to all higher education institutions in the country, public and private
Each HEI may submit one program for the Award. The candidate Integrated Extension
program must be —
= consistent with the mandate, academic program offerings and research programs
of the candidate institution
+ active and with accomplishment/outputs during the last 3 years (2005-2007)
C. Criteria for Judging
Entries shall be evaluated and ranked on the basis of the following criteria:
Criteria Weight
1, Development impact - the contribution 50%
of the program to regional/national
development and productivity of the society
based on the technologies transferred/utilized,
policies developed and applied, and the economic
and social benefits derived from the program
2. Institutional and policy environment for the 40%
Program - the organizational/infrastructural
and policy support provided by the HEI to the
program such as but not limited to extension
office, equipment, funding, manpower and other
policies supportive of the research utilization
program
3. Recognition given to the program - citations, 10%
Awards given by external organizations/bodiesThe details of the criteria shall be developed and reflected in a score sheet to be used in the
evaluation of entries.
IV. NOMINATION AND SELECTION PROCEDURE,
1, Nomination forms may be obtained from any of the following:
Commission on Higher Education
Office of Policy, Planning, Research and Information (OPPRI)
Rm, 204 Jollibee Center Building, San Miguel Avenue,
Ortigas Center, Pasig City
Nearest CHED Regional Office; or
Downloaded from www.
.gov.ph
2. Each nomination should be signed by the President of the concerned HEI and
submitted to CHED-OPPRI or Regional Offices.
3. Regional Winners shall be selected by the Regional Extension Awards Committees
to be chaired by the respective CHED Regional Directors and composed of the
following members: Regional Directors of DOST, DA-ATI and DTI and one
representative from the Chamber of Commerce in the region.
4. The National Winners shall be selected from the Regional Winners by the Technical
Working Group on the CHED Outstanding Extension Program Awards (created
through CSO No, 94, 2. 2007).
5. The decision of the TWG shall be final,
V._ EFFECTIVITY. — This CMO shall take effect immediately.
SO ORDERED.
Pasig City, Philippines. April 9, 2008 .
ROMULO L. NERT
Chairman