Gp-3105 Gravity & Magnetic: Metode Gayaberat & Magnetik
Gp-3105 Gravity & Magnetic: Metode Gayaberat & Magnetik
Djedi S. Widarto
Dicky Ahmad Zaky
= 2-0
g
= 2-0
Distance
g
g
g? ?
g = V2(2-0) / r22 = V2 / r22
= 2-0
Distance
0
→ For the given model, could
2 we observe the gravity anomaly
on the ground? …..
What is Gravity Anomaly?
In Conclusions, what do Bouguer gravity anomalies mean?
▪ the difference between observed and expected gravity!
→ “expected” for average Earth (not rotating, perfect sphere, no topography, no
lateral density variations) …..
▪ in calculating the Bouguer anomaly, the data have been corrected for the effects of
latitude and elevation;
▪ any remaining gravity variations due to local density variations → due to subsurface
geology,
negative g value = anomalously low density
positive g value = anomalously high density
GRAVITY DATA PROCESSING
(REDUCTION & CORRECTIONS)
Reduction & Corrections
Gravity Data Reduction → to transform raw gravity data into gravity anomaly through the
process as follows:
Tidal Correction
▪ To eliminate gravity effects of the sun and moon
which are time function due to relative motion
among earth, moon and sun → ±0.3 mGals;
▪ The size of the ocean tides is measured in terms of
meters;
▪ The size of the solid earth tide is measured in terms
of centimeters → as large as 0.2 mGals;
▪ In case of gravity variations in Tulsa, Oklahoma; the
tides, the cyclic variation in gravity with a period of
oscillation of about 12 hours, have the amplitude of
the tidal variation about 0.15 mGals ….
Reduction & Corrections
Tidal Correction
▪ To calculate vertical attractions of the tidal accelerations produced by the Moon and the Sun, at any
time and any place on the Earth’s surface, using the Longman’s formula (Longman, 1959):
3 𝐺𝑚𝑟 3 𝑟
∆g 𝑟 𝑚 =− 3 3 𝑐𝑜𝑠 2 𝜓𝑚 − 1 + 5 𝑐𝑜𝑠 3 𝜓𝑚 − 3 cos 𝜓𝑚
𝑅𝑚 2 𝑅𝑚
3 𝐺𝑆𝑟
∆g 𝑟 𝑠 =− 3 𝑐𝑜𝑠 2 𝜓𝑠 − 1 ; 𝑟 = 6,378,139.00 1 − 0.0033528 𝑠𝑖𝑛2 + 0.0000070 𝑠𝑖𝑛2 2
𝑅𝑠3
Where G is the universal gravity constant = 6.6732 x 10-11 N-m2/kg2 = 6.67408 x 10-11 m3·kg-1·s-2
m, s = the zenith angles of the Moon and Sun, respectively
Rm, Rs = the distance between the center of the Earth and Moon, the Earth and Sun, respectively
m, S = mass of the Moon and Sun, respectively
r = earth ellipsoidal, based on e = 1/298.256 (natural number)
= geographic latitude of observation point Longman I. M., 1959: Formulas for Computing the Tidal Accelerations Due to
the Moon and the Sun. Journal of Geophysical Research, 64, 2351–2355.
Reduction & Corrections
Tidal Correction
▪ To calculate g due to tides using Schureman’s formula (Schureman, 1941):
Zenith angle is a parameter that depend on the latitude position and the
time of observation
High tides are occurred twice in a day, or one-time in 14 days due to the Moon, or in 6 months due to
the Sun.
Reduction & Corrections
Instrument Drift Correction
▪ Observed gravity changes as a function of time at a
given location;
▪ To eliminate the effect of spring fatigue of the
instrument….
Latitude Correction
▪ Ellipsoid earth gravity reference has to be applied to produce an earth gravity value
at mean sea level as a function of the latitude of observation point;
▪ This reference implies an homogenous mass distribution of the earth ellipsoid
model;
▪ The ellipsoid model:
Latitude Correction
▪ g-normal based on WGS84 (World Geodetic System) using newly constant values as described by NIMA
(2000):
1 + 0.00193185265241 sin2 ∅
𝑔𝑛 = 978032.53359 𝑚𝐺𝑎𝑙
1 − 0.00669437999014 sin2 ∅
▪ g-normal using the International Terrestrial Reference Frame, as recommended by the North American
Gravity Data Committee (NAGDC, 2005), with the 1980 Geodetic Reference System (GRS80; Moritz,
1980):
1 + 0.0019131851353 sin2 ∅
𝑔𝑛 = 978032.67715 𝑚𝐺𝑎𝑙
1 − 0.0066943800229 sin2 ∅
Where
𝑔𝑛 : theoretical (normal) gravity value (in mGal) as function of ɸ
ɸ : geographic latitude of observation point
Reduction & Corrections
Elevation Corrections
After eliminating the effect of the latitude of the observation point, the gravity variations are affected
by topographic/elevation (→ free-air correction) effect and local geologic effect (→ Bouguer
correction).
▪ Free-Air Correction → variation of gravity g due to the distance between observation point at topographic
surface to the center of the Earth (r):
𝑔𝐹𝐴 = −(0.3087691 − 0.0004398 𝑠𝑖𝑛2) ∆ℎ mGal
𝐺𝑀𝐸
or it can be calculated by: 𝑔 = → distance r >>, g <<
𝑟2
∆𝑔 in mGal and ∆ℎ in meter ....... Minus means increasing of h will decrease of g value ….
Reduction & Corrections
▪ Free-Air Correction
A gravity value is observed from A to B, so
▪ To compare the gravity values at A, B, and C, we have to apply Free-Air Correction at those observation
points, and
▪ We have to define a reference level that is generally represented as mean sea level …..
Reduction & Corrections
▪ Free-Air Correction
▪ Free-Air Correction 𝐶𝐹𝐴= 0.3086 ∆ℎ
▪ The gravity value as due to the free-air correction is called Free-Air Gravity Anomaly (𝑔𝐹𝐴 ) →
𝑔𝐹𝐴 is gravity variation if we observed at any points at the same distant from the center of the
Earth ...
gFA = gobs – (gn – CFA) = gobs – gn + CFA
Reduction & Corrections
▪ Bouguer Correction
▪ Bouguer correction is to estimate the earth gravity
infinite layer/slab at elevation h above sea level with earth mass of
density (g/cm3) fill up the space of thickness h;
h ▪ The gravity value observed at B is determined by the
height of observation point and all masses with
density beneath the observation points;
▪ The elevation of observation points are corrected by
CFA;
▪ But the gravity value at B is still higher than at A due
to the existence of mass of the hill beneath site B;
▪ Approaching by gravity effect due to the infinite layer/slab with homogeneous density and thickness;
▪ Then the gravity value of an infinite slab is defined as 𝑔 = 2G∆ℎ, where ∆ℎ is thickness and is
density (assumed to be constant values) ....
Reduction & Corrections
▪ Bouguer Correction
▪ Bouguer correction is given by,
𝐶𝐵 = 2G∆ℎ = 0.04193 ρ∆ℎ mGal
infinite layer/slab
▪ By assuming that the average density of the Earth =
h 2.67 g/cm3, so
𝐶𝐵 = 0.1119∆ℎ mGal
▪ After this Bouguer correction, the gravity value is then so-called Bouguer Gravity Anomaly 𝑔𝐵 ....
Reduction & Corrections
PLEASE NOTE that this Simple Bouguer Anomaly is evaluated based on simple slab model, the effect
of mass excess from the hill and mass deficit from the valley have not considered yet ….
Reduction & Corrections
▪ Bouguer Correction: Nettleton’s Density Profile
At Site B: the gravity value becomes slightly lower due to missing mass at surrounding valleys.
For those cases, we have to run Terrain Correction in order to eliminate the topographic effect near the
observation sites .....
Reduction & Corrections
▪ Terrain Correction
✓ To compensate the topography: the existence of mass excess of the hill (M1) and missing mass at
valley (M2);
✓ M1 will decrease gravity value at A (negative vertical attraction), Bouguer correction considers that
there is M2, so mass attraction equivalent to M2 must be extracted from values at A;
✓ So terrain correction CT will give negative gravity value, or the other word by adding the value of
Simple Bouguer Anomaly gSBA;
✓ CT value can be obtained from a table of CT or calculation …
Reduction & Corrections
▪ Terrain Correction: Hammer Chart Correction
Reduction & Corrections
▪ Terrain Correction: Hammer (Cylindrical Ring/Segment) Correction
2πρ𝐺 1/2
𝐶𝑇−𝑠𝑒𝑔 = 𝑟0 − 𝑟𝑖 + 𝑟𝑖2 + 𝑧 2 − 𝑟𝑜2 + 𝑧 2 1/2
𝑁
▪ 18th and 19th century surveys set out to measure the shape of the Earth;
▪ They used plumb bobs and expected them to be Angle of deflection
▪ Two densities, that of the rigid upper layer𝜌𝑢 , and that of the
substratum 𝜌𝑠
𝜌𝑠
The compensation depth is the depth below which all pressures are
hydrostatic
Isostasy & Isostatic Gravity Anomaly
▪ Airy’s Hypothesis:
Equating the masses in vertical columns above the
compensation depth:
1 2 1 3
𝑡𝜌𝑢 +𝑟1 𝜌𝑠 = ℎ1 + 𝑡 + 𝑟1 𝜌𝑢 t𝜌𝑢 +𝑟1 𝜌𝑠 = 𝑑𝜌𝑤 + 𝑡 − 𝑑 − 𝑟3 𝜌𝑢 + 𝑟1 + 𝑟3 𝜌𝑠
𝜌𝑢
A mountain height ℎ1 is Ocean basin with depth d is underlain
underlain by a root of by an anti-root of thickness:
𝜌𝑠 thickness:
𝜌𝑢 𝜌𝑢 − 𝜌𝑤
𝑟1 = ℎ 𝑟3 = 𝑑
𝜌𝑠 − 𝜌𝑢 1 𝜌𝑠 − 𝜌𝑢
𝜌𝑢 : crustal density
The compensation depth … 𝜌𝑠 : mantle density
𝜌𝑤 : water density
t : crustal thickness
h1, h2 : elevations
d : water depth
Isostasy & Isostatic Gravity Anomaly
▪ Pratt’s Hypothesis:
To account for the mass deficiency beneath mountains
▪ The depth of the base of the upper layer is constant;
▪ Mountains therefore have low density roots …..
𝜌𝑢 𝜌1 𝜌2 𝜌𝑑 The compensation depth is the depth below which all pressures are
hydrostatic
𝜌𝑢
Equating the masses in vertical columns above the compensation depth:
1 2 1 3
𝐷𝜌𝑢 = ℎ1 + 𝐷 𝜌1 𝐷𝜌𝑢 = 𝑑𝜌𝑤 + 𝜌𝑑 𝐷 − 𝑑
A mountain height ℎ1 is underlain by Ocean basin with depth d is underlain by an
a low density material, density 𝜌1 : anti-root of thickness:
𝐷 𝜌𝑢 𝐷 − 𝜌𝑤 𝑑
𝜌1 = 𝜌𝑢 𝜌𝑑 =
ℎ1 + 𝐷 𝐷−𝑑
Isostasy & Isostatic Gravity Anomaly
▪ Vening Meinesz ‘s Hypothesis:
In this type of isostasy, short-wavelength topography is supported by the elastic
strength of the crustal rocks. The load is instead distributed by the bent plate over a
broad area. This distributed load is compensated.
Thank you,
See you for the next lecture ....