Scribd
Upload
113 views

PNB vs. Philippine Vegetable Oil Company 49 Phil 897 Facts

This case involves a dispute between the Philippine National Bank (PNB) and the Philippine Vegetable Oil Company (PVOC) regarding PNB's right to obtain a judgment of PHP 15.8 million against PVOC and foreclose a PHP 17 million mortgage on PVOC's property. An intervenor, Phil C. Whitaker, also sought to invalidate the mortgage and require an accounting and payment from PNB and PVOC. The issue was whether PNB failed to comply with an alleged contract to provide unlimited funding to allow PVOC to continue operating. The court ultimately found no evidence that PNB's board of directors or general manager made a binding promise to indefinitely support PVOC's operations, so Whitaker was not entitled to damages

Uploaded by

Jay Mark Esconde
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
113 views

PNB vs. Philippine Vegetable Oil Company 49 Phil 897 Facts

This case involves a dispute between the Philippine National Bank (PNB) and the Philippine Vegetable Oil Company (PVOC) regarding PNB's right to obtain a judgment of PHP 15.8 million against PVOC and foreclose a PHP 17 million mortgage on PVOC's property. An intervenor, Phil C. Whitaker, also sought to invalidate the mortgage and require an accounting and payment from PNB and PVOC. The issue was whether PNB failed to comply with an alleged contract to provide unlimited funding to allow PVOC to continue operating. The court ultimately found no evidence that PNB's board of directors or general manager made a binding promise to indefinitely support PVOC's operations, so Whitaker was not entitled to damages

Uploaded by

Jay Mark Esconde
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

PNB vs.

PHILIPPINE VEGETABLE OIL COMPANY


49 Phil 897

FACTS:

This appeal involves the legal right of the PNB to obtain a judgement against Vegetable Oil Co.,
Inc., for Php 15,812,454 and to foreclose a mortgage on the property of the PVOC for Php
17,000,000.00 and the legal right of the Phil C. Whitaker as intervenor to obtain a judgement
declaring the mortgage which the PNB seeks to foreclose to be without force and effect,
requiring an accounting from the PNB of the sales of the property and assets of the Vegetable
Co. and ordering the PVOC and the PNB to pay him the sum of Php 4,424,418.37
In 1920, the Vegetable Oil Company, found itself in financial straits. It was in debt to the extent
of approximately Php 30,000,000.00. The PNB was the largest creditor. The VOC owed the bank
Php 17,000,000.00. The PNB was securedly principally by a real and chattel mortgage in favor
of the bank on its vessels Tankerville and H.S. Everett to guarantee the payment of sums not
exceed Php 4,000,000.00

ISSUE:

Whether or not the plaintiff had failed to comply with the contract, that it was alleged to have
celebrated with the defendant and the intervenor, that it would furnish funds to the defendant so
that it could continue operating its factory.

RULING:

In the present instance, it is found that the Board of Directors of the PNB had not consented to an
agreement for practically unlimited backing of the V corporation and had not ratified any
promise to trhat effect made by its general manager.
All the evidence, documentary and oral, pertinent to the issue considered and found to disclose
no binding promise, tacit, or express made by the PNB to continue indefinitely the operation of
the V corporation. Accordingly, intervenor Whitaker is not entitled to recover damages from the
bank.

You might also like