Module5-Topic Notes
Module5-Topic Notes
Topic Notes
By Craig Deegan
RMIT University
Accounting in Organisations and Society
Module 5: Analysis of organisations’ external reports
Accounting in Organisations and Society
Disclaimer
This subject material is issued by RMIT on the understanding that:
1. RMIT, its directors, author(s), or any other persons involved in the preparation of this
publication expressly disclaim all and any contractual, tortious, or other form of liability to any
person (purchaser of this publication or not) in respect of the publication and any
consequences arising from its use, including any omission made, by any person in reliance
upon the whole or any part of the contents of this publication.
2. RMIT expressly disclaims all and any liability to any person in respect of anything and of the
consequences of anything done or omitted to be done by any such person in reliance, whether
whole or partial, upon the whole or any part of the contents of this subject material.
3. No person should act on the basis of the material contained in the publication without
considering and taking professional advice.
4. No correspondence will be entered into in relation to this publication by the distributors,
publisher, editor(s) or author(s) or any other person on their behalf or otherwise.
All details were accurate at the time of printing.
March 2017
Table of Contents
Learning objectives .................................................................................................... 1
How this module links with previous modules in this course ...................................... 1
Financial statement analysis - some initial ‘scene setting’ issues .............................. 2
How do we do financial statement analysis ................................................................ 3
Ideally be aware of the existence of organisation’s contracts that rely upon
accounting numbers ................................................................................................... 4
Further reflections about the assets that appear - and do not appear on the balance
sheet .......................................................................................................................... 5
Accounting policies..................................................................................................... 6
Broad classification of accounting ratios .................................................................... 7
Profitability ratio – return on assets ............................................................................ 8
Profitability ratio – return on owners’ equity................................................................ 9
Profitability ration – profit margin .............................................................................. 10
Profitability ratio – gross profit margin ...................................................................... 10
Efficiency ratio – inventory turnover ......................................................................... 10
Efficiency ratio – debtors turnover ............................................................................ 10
Efficiency ratio – operating cash flow margin ........................................................... 11
Capital structure ratios – debt to assets ratio ........................................................... 11
Capital structure ratios – debt to equity ratio ............................................................ 11
Liquidity ratios – current ratio ................................................................................... 12
Liquidity ratios – quick ratio ...................................................................................... 12
Liquidity ratios – interest coverage ratio ................................................................... 12
Liquidity ratios – cash flows from operations to current liabilities ............................. 13
Market based ratios – price earnings info................................................................. 13
Changing focus ........................................................................................................ 13
Let’s move to different ‘accounts’ ............................................................................. 20
Analysis of social and environmental (sustainability) reports ................................... 20
Further considerations.............................................................................................. 22
The organisation context .......................................................................................... 22
Independent review .................................................................................................. 25
Concluding comments .............................................................................................. 26
References ............................................................................................................... 41
Learning objectives
By the end of this Module, you should be able to:
• Understand the nature of financial statement analysis (FSA) in terms of:
– Who should do it?
– Why we might do it? and
– How we might do it?
• Understand why we should have knowledge of financial accounting rules and
conventions before we attempt to perform FSA.
• Explain that financial accounting numbers are used in many contractual arrangements
and that knowledge of such arrangements is useful prior to undertaking FSA.
• Understand that financial ratios are often used in FSA, and understand that different
ratios provide information about different aspects of an organisation.
– For example, about profitability, efficiency, and ability to pay debts as and when due.
• Be able to explain that there is also very important information within the notes to the
financial statements that should also be analysed.
– For example, information about events after the end of the reporting period and
information about contingent liabilities.
• Explain how we need to have knowledge about an organisation’s specific social and
environmental context before we can attribute proper meaning to organisational social
and environmental disclosures.
• Understand that once we have information about organisational context (for example,
where it is operating, with whom it is operating) then that in turn, informs us about what
types of social and environmental information we might expect to find in a report.
• Briefly explain the insights provided by some of the research that explores the objectivity,
or otherwise, of social and environmental disclosures.
• Understand that reports prepared by managers will not always be objective and therefore
appreciate the role and value provided by third party audits/assurances of financial
reports and social and environmental reports.
– Many stakeholders want information from annual reports, as their own wealth might
be influenced by such numbers.
– For example: managers might be receiving bonuses tied to accounting profits;
lenders might have negotiated debt to asset restrictions; employees want to know the
security of their employment.
• Financial accounting numbers create various social impacts.
– For example: if reported profits are falling then staff might be sacked so as to save
on ‘expenses’; labour unions might use high reported profits as an excuse to call for
increased wages.
– Are there some potentially significant contingent liabilities (these are not shown in the
financial statements – and hence are not reflected in the numbers we are using - but
are in the accompanying notes)?
– What are the accounting policies of the organisation?
– The point to be made here is that because of the way accounting numbers are used
within society, and how they are used in various contractual arrangements, we need
to accept that the numbers will not always be prepared objectively. To assume
otherwise is naïve. It is sensible to have an element of ‘healthy scepticism’.
Accounting policies
• Accounting policies are the specific principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices
applied by an entity in preparing and presenting financial statements
• Whilst often very difficult to understand (even for experienced accountants), the first
notes that accompany financial statements generally are the ‘accounting policy notes’. In
this regard, the International Accounting Standard IAS 1 (in Australia, AASB 101)
Presentation of Financial Statements states (at paragraph 117):
An entity shall disclose its significant accounting policies comprising:
a. The measurement basis (or bases) used in preparing the financial statements; and
b. The other accounting policies used that are relevant to an understanding of the
financial statements.
• Because for some assets and liabilities there can be a choice between measurement
bases it is important to ensure that if two or more organisations are being compared then
they should be applying the same policies, else the comparison can be misleading.
• Organisations will also change accounting policies over time. Often this could be
because new accounting standards have been released, or because previously used
accounting methods no longer provide ‘relevant’ information for the organisation.
• Calculations like ‘profits’; ‘total assets’, ‘total liabilities’ and so forth only really make
sense if we understand the rules (policies) that have been used to generate the
numbers– rules that can frequently change.
– So there is a need to be careful when comparing accounting numbers (and therefore,
ratios that have been calculated from those numbers) across time as there is a very
real chance that the underlying rules for calculating those numbers has changed. It
would actually be very misleading to compare a profitability measure from this year –
such as return on assets – with the same measure ten years ago for the same
organisation as the rules for measuring various assets, liabilities, income and
expenses have changed a lot in that time making comparison somewhat
meaningless.
• This brings into question much of the (naïve) analysis that can often be seen, which
charts aspects of financial position or financial performance over an extended and
sometimes lengthy period of analysis. People that do such analysis often really do not
understand financial accounting, particularly the fact that the recognition and
measurement rules for various expenses, revenues, assets and liabilities often change.
Example
An example of an accounting policy for measuring assets:
An accounting policy note within the BHP 2016 Annual Report states:
Property, plant and equipment (PPE)
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated
depreciation and impairment charges. Cost is the fair value of
– Provides an insight into how the organisation is being funded (from owners or
through debt) and therefore provides some indicator of risk.
– For example, the debt to assets ratio, debt to equity ratio.
• Liquidity ratios
– Provides insights into the ability of an organisation to pay its debts as and when they
fall due.
– For example, the current ratio, the quick ratio, interest coverage ratio, cash flows
from operations to current liabilities.
• Market based ratios
– Provides an insight into how the market values an organisation.
– For example, price earnings ratio.
multiple periods for one organisation can also be misleading as, for example, the way
we might measure assets can change from one year to the next.
– The point being made is that although we have only considered one ratio so far, the
general rule is that financial statement analysis should be undertaken with care. If the
numbers themselves are somewhat questionable then the analysis must also be
questionable.
– Garbage in, garbage out!
Adjusted measure of return on assets
• The ratio just discussed, whilst widely used, does not take into account the sources of
funding.
• As we know:
– For equity funding, owners are paid dividends which are not an expense and
therefore do not reduce profits.
– For debt funding, lenders are paid interest, which is an expense and therefore does
reduce profits.
• By adding back interest expense we are removing the influences of where the funds are
sourced, and therefore efficiency of asset use might be better assessed.
• The adjusted measure becomes:
• (Profit + interest expense) ÷ total assets x 100
• Some analysts also add back tax so as to remove the effects of such things as different
tax regimes and other arrangements.
– Budgeted ROE
– ROE of similar organisations
• When an organisation sells inventory on credit it needs to collect the amounts due from
debtors so as to complete the operating cycle.
• Provides an indication of the number of times during the period that debtors turn over
(pay).
• The higher the number the less the amount of cash tied up with debtors.
• Average collection period (365 / debtors turnover) provide a measure of how many days
it takes to collect cash from debtors.
• Provides an indication of the effectiveness of credit granting policies and debtor follow-
ups.
• The longer amounts owing stay with debtors the lower the probability of payment and the
greater potential liquidity problems.
• If this amount is in excess of 50% then this indicates that the organisation is more reliant
on funding from lenders than from owners.
• All things being equal, the greater the relative level of debt financing the riskier the
organisation.
• This is because for debt there are legal requirements for payments in terms of principal
and interest. For equity there is generally no legal requirements to pay dividends.
• Different types of organisations can tend to absorb different levels of debt.
• Organisations with high variability in cash flows (meaning there might often be periods of
no profits) will find it relatively risky to have higher levels of debt relative to equity.
• All things being equal, the greater the amount of times an organisation can cover its
interest payment requirements, the better.
• Interest coverage clauses are often included within borrowing agreements wherein a
minimum number of times is stipulated.
Changing focus
• Moving our attention away from the financial statements themselves, we can also find
some very important information in the notes that accompany the financial statements
(and remember we have already discussed the accounting policy notes).
• So, as well as reviewing the financial statements we also should spend time looking at
the accompanying notes.
• The notes that accompany financial statements can sometimes make up 50 to 100
pages of an annual report.
• Within these notes, there are many important issues addressed. We will consider 3
issues, but please remember there will be many other items of important information in
the notes as well.
• The three specific topics we can consider are:
– Notes about events occurring after the end of the reporting period.
– Notes about contingent liabilities.
– Notes about how senior managers/executives are being paid – what type of
incentives are there?
• We will consider these issues now.
Example
Examples of notes describing events occurring after the end of the
reporting period.
From Commonwealth Bank Annual Report 2016 (reporting period
ending 30 June 2016)
Note 44 Subsequent Events
The Bank expects the DRP for the final dividend for the year ended 30
June 2016 will be satisfied by the issue of shares of approximately $628
million.
The Directors are not aware of any other matter or circumstance that has
occurred since the end of the financial year that has significantly affected
or may significantly affect the operations of the Group, the results of
those operations or the state of affairs of the Group in subsequent
financial years.
Contingent liabilities
• As we know from Module 3, a contingent liability is:
An obligation that is payable contingent upon a future event or an obligation that is not
probable (in terms of resource outflows) or is not measurable with sufficient reliability
• As we also know, contingent liabilities are not recorded within the financial. statements
and hence will not be reflected within our ratio analysis.
• Rather, we need to look at the notes accompanying the financial statements to find them.
– And again such notes are often found towards the end of the annual report.
• As part of our financial statement analysis we should review the notes and see if there
are any significant contingent liabilities.
• At the extreme, contingent liabilities can potential threaten the ongoing existence of an
organisation – so it is very important to be aware of them.
Example
Extracts from the contingent liabilities note within the ANZ Group Annual
Report 2016
Bank fees litigation
Litigation funder IMF Bentham Limited commenced a class action against
ANZ in 2010, followed by a second similar class action in March 2013.
The applicants contended that certain exception fees (honour, dishonour
and non-payment fees on transaction accounts and late payment and
overlimit fees on credit cards) were unenforceable penalties (at law and
in equity) and that various of the fees were also unenforceable under
statutory provisions governing unconscionable conduct, unfair contract
terms and unjust transactions. In August 2014, IMF Bentham Limited
commenced a separate class action against ANZ challenging late
payment fees charged to ANZ customers in respect of commercial credit
cards and other ANZ products (at this stage not specified). This action is
expressed to apply to all relevant customers, rather than being limited to
those who have signed up with IMF Bentham Limited. In the second
class action, all the applicants' claims have failed. The claims in relation
to all fees were dismissed by the Full Federal Court. That decision was
appealed to the High Court only in relation to credit card late payment
fees (the other claims were not appealed). On 27 July 2016 the High
Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the judgment in favour of ANZ in
respect of credit card late payment fees. The applicants are presently
considering the implications of the High Court's decision for the
remaining class actions, which have been on hold pending the outcome
of the second class action. ANZ believes that the remaining class actions
are likely to be discontinued or dismissed.
Proceedings in relation to Bank Bill Swap Rate (BBSW)
On 4 March 2016, ASIC commenced court proceedings against ANZ.
Remuneration policies
• Organisations – particularly larger organisations – often include several pages of
information about how senior managers in an organisation are paid and remunerated.
• This is a corporation’s law requirement within many countries.
There would appear to be a ‘decoupling’ between their ‘public face’ and their actual
behaviour. – and that would be a reason for concern. What else can we also not
believe?
– If an organisation is rewarding its managers in terms of yearly accounting profits, and
nothing else, then this might motivate them to be short term in focus which creates
various risks for the organisation and its stakeholders. Its also something the
financial statement auditors would want to be aware of.
– So, knowing about how managers are being paid is important in assessing the
direction an organisation might be going.
Discussion
Qantas 2016 annual report
https://www.qantas.com/infodetail/about/corporateGovernance/2016Direc
torsReport.pdf
1. Review Qantas’ 2016 remuneration report provided within its
annual report on page 30-48. Discuss:
• If the managers are being rewarded with bonuses linked to
performance then what type of performance is the bonus being
linked to?
• As a reader of the report and with knowledge of the bonus
plans, what aspects of performance do you believe are being
encouraged?
• To what extent is social and environmental performance being
addressed by the bonus plans?
• Do you think enough weight is being place on social and
environmental performance?
Suggested Reading
Deegan & Islam 2012, Corporate Commitment to Sustainability–Is it All
Hot Air? An Australian Review of the Linkage between Executive Pay
and Sustainable Performance, Australian Accounting Review 22 (4),
pp384-397.
– Where is the organisation located and what are the significant environmental aspects
of the location?
– What are the significant social implications of its operations on employees?
– What are the significant social implications of its operation on customers?
• Once we have some background information about the organisation, and the social and
environmental risks and opportunities associated with its operations, we are then in a
better position to determine whether the report addresses our information needs. In
many instances we might need to look beyond the organisation’s reports and review
other publicly available information.
Reflection
1. Assume you were set the task of reviewing the social and
environmental disclosures made by Crown Resorts Ltd – an
organisation that runs various gambling venues.
a. What aspects of performance would you be particularly
interested in and expect to find in a report prepared by the
organisation?
b. Would your interest be the same as other stakeholders (for
example, investors, anti-gambling campaigners, government,
employees, and local communities)?
c. What would your thoughts be if the information you expected
was not disclosed?
Its 2016 Corporate Social Responsibility Report can be found at:
http://www.crownresorts.com.au/CrownResorts/files/34/34c3a60d-6c86-
4733-9f48-7840199f2d0a.pdf
2. Assume that you were also set the task of reviewing the
social and environmental disclosures of British American
Tobacco Australia.
a. Can a producer of tobacco products ever really be considered
to be “socially responsible”?
b. Can it be a sustainable organisation?
c. Should it actually produce a sustainability report?
d. Why would it produce a sustainability report?
e. What items of information would you be particularly interested
in? (Of course, the answers to these questions are very much
a matter of personal opinion).
Its Sustainable Focus Report 2016 can be found at:
http://www.bata.com.au/group/sites/bat_9rnflh.nsf/vwPagesWebLive/DO9
RNMLG/$FILE/medMDADJ5Y4.pdf?openelement
Further considerations
Why is the report being prepared?
• Because of the predominantly voluntary nature of public social and environmental
reporting many accounting researchers have considered the question of ‘why
organisations voluntarily report?’
• A lot of the research has shown that social and environmental disclosure has tended to:
– Highlight positive aspects of an organisation’s social and environmental
performance whilst downplaying negative aspects
– be particularly responsive to ‘legitimacy threatening’ events
– For example, if an organisation is linked to a particular social or environmental
crisis/catastrophe then it has been common to find firms responding by making
disclosures which highlight positive aspects of their performance as well as
highlighting the introduction of governance policies which will address such
crises in the future.
– be used as means for managing ‘powerful’ stakeholders whilst neglecting the
information needs of less powerful stakeholders.
– For example, if an organisation is particularly dependent on certain customers
then managers will typically ensure that the organisation is reporting the
information such stakeholders want/need.
– Therefore, evidence clearly seems to show that we need to be careful when
reviewing such voluntarily prepared reports.
– We need to place the report within the context of the events occurring around that
point in time and also within the context of changing stakeholder expectations.
– The evidence to date suggests that much social and environmental disclosure
appears to be motivated by profitability and survival considerations rather than being
reflective of management accepting an accountability for their social and
environmental performance.
– Hence we must not be naïve and necessarily believe/trust everything we read!
– Creates many issues in terms of accountability for workers within the supply
chain. An absence of disclosures indicates a lack of accountability for people in
the supply chain. As recent experience has indicated (eg Rana Plaza) that poor
accountability can lead to high levels of criticism of an organisation – and
potentially large scale consumer boycotts with direct implications for profitability.
– Does the organisation source animal-based products from different countries?
– Different countries have different standards for animal treatment. If we know an
organisation is sourcing animal products from different countries, and if we are
concerned about the welfare of animals, then we should review the report to see
what information, if any, is provided. Failure to be accountable for proper
treatment of animals (whilst simply being morally wrong) also exposes the
organisation to many risks.
Web Resources
This article shoes how animals have been treated in China.
http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-clothing/fur/chinese-fur-
industry/
Reflection
Can you understand the social or environmental context of Puma (which
is necessary in order to ‘make sense’ of the various social and
environmental disclosures being made)?
Review Puma’s 2010 Environmental Profit and Loss Account, and discuss
• If they provide information about water use then why is that
important in that context? Do they tell us?
• If they are providing information about particular emissions, do
they explain why that is important?
• Does it report on its supply chain? What does it report?
• Do you think it provides an ‘objective’ perspective of the
organisation’s social and environmental performance? Why?
• What are the implications of providing/not providing an
objective account of the organisation’s social and
environmental performance?
Puma’s 2010 Environmental Profit and Loss Account can be found at
http://about.puma.com/damfiles/default/sustainability/environment/e-p-
l/EPL080212final-3cdfc1bdca0821c6ec1cf4b89935bb5f.pdf
Independent review
• We will conclude this module with a brief discussion of independent (third party)
reviews/audits of external reports.
• This discussion applies to all reports prepared by managers – both financial reports as
well as social and environmental reports.
• Earlier we said that we need to be careful not to believe everything we read, particularly
where the information is being prepared voluntarily.
– We need to have a healthy dose of scepticism.
• As a general principle, if reports are prepared by management then there will perhaps be
incentives, at times, for them to be less than objective when preparing the reports.
– Why might they be less than objective?
– Remember the idea of ‘creative accounting’ discussed earlier wherein managers
might use various accounting techniques so as to project the best picture of the
organisation.
– An independent expert review of a report will tend to add credibility and ‘value’ to
the report.
– Because it acts to reduce the risks of external stakeholders when assessing
such things as whether to invest in the organisation, loan to the organisation, or
sell on credit to the organisation it is actually in the organisation’s interest to pay
for the third party review.
• So something to consider when reviewing the reports produced by organisations is:
– Who prepared the financial reports or the social and environmental reports
(typically managers, but for some reports it might also be a public relations
organisation)? and
– Who reviewed/audited them?
• When reviewing an external audit/assurance report there are a few questions we should
consider before considering whether we might rely upon the independent third party
opinion, including:
– What is the purpose of the third party review? For example, was it to check
conformity with particular standards? Was it for the whole report or part thereof?
– Who is the intended audience of the assurance report?
– Against what standards was the audit/assurance undertaken and what form of
testing/risk assessment was undertaken?
– Who did the audit? What is their reputation? What are their relevant
qualifications?
– Did it provide a clear unambiguous opinion about the report?
• If the opinion provided was that the reports were poorly prepared perhaps breaching
particular standards and guidelines then we might actually be wasting our time reviewing
them. Again, garbage in, garbage out!
• If the independent review was performed by individuals who have no clear expertise then
its value would be questionable.
• We now provide some examples of independent third party reviews/audits. One from a
financial statement audit and one from a sustainability report.
Example
Examples of independent reviews of reports
Concluding comments
• We have now concluded our final topic and we hope you have enjoyed this course, as
well as having various prior beliefs about accounting challenged!
• Hopefully your understanding of ‘accounting’ has grown significantly.
• You would now understand that ‘accounts’ can take many forms and can address
various aspects or organisational activities.
• We can also now appreciate that ‘accounting’ seems to be everywhere and the practice
of ‘accounting’ can – perhaps surprisingly – be extremely interesting and thought
provoking.
• We all make choices about what to consume, what resources to use when producing
items, where to work, who to support, where to invest, and so forth.
• Information is central to many of these decisions and information – accounting
information (!) – provides us with power to make informed decisions.
• Because ‘accountants’ generate much of the information that is used to make important
decisions with various social and environmental impacts then accountants are indeed
very powerful people!! Indeed, arguably accountants are amongst the most powerful
people within all of society. Who knew?!
Case Study
DC Surf Co.
Download Video:
https://smoovivideov1.s3.amazonaws.com/11fce144-8af0-e234_7452.mp4
Background
De and Claire studied a business course together 5 year ago. De majored in
Marketing and Claire majored in International Business. They met through
the University Surfing Club.
De works full-time as a marketing Assistant for a major retailer. On the
weekends he shapes surfboards in his shed. It started out as a hobby but he
has now started selling his boards in a few local surf shops. Claire works
part-time for a graphic design firm. She also designs her own t-shirts and
sells them online. She currently ships her t-shirts to 7 different countries
throughout South East Asia as well as the US.
De and Claire surf together a couple of times a month and often talk about
starting a business together. Finally, they have decided to take the plunge
and have set up ‘DC Surf Co’ with the vision of supplying high quality surfing
equipment and apparel. They have decided to start small but have plans to
grow quickly. For now, they are operating from a small home office in De’s
lounge room.
De and Claire decided to set up their business as a partnership. They
employed De’s neighbour Johnny on a part-time basis to assist with setting
up the website and other administrative tasks so that De and Claire can
focus on growing the business. De already had a relationship with a few of
the local surf shops and they have agreed to stock the full range of DC Surf
Co boards and apparel. They have also started selling their goods online
through their website. They have made a few bulk purchases of materials
(fibreglass, cotton, fabric) and are storing these in De’s lounge room. They
realise that they are quickly running out of space and expect to either rent or
purchase commercial premises within the next 6 months.
De and Claire considered restructuring the business from a partnership to a
company. They initially set up the business as a partnership because it
seemed to be the easiest and least expensive option but they then wondered
if perhaps they made the decision in haste and should have researched
business structures more thoroughly before making their choice. After further
consideration, they restructured the partnership into a company.
boards locally and has now employed one experienced staff member and
one trainee to assist him. Prior to the recent media attention, no-one really
asked about the origins of the boards and De has never made an effort to
voluntarily provide this information.
De decided to label his locally made boards with a sticker which says
“designed and made locally in Australia”. Since promoting his boards as
locally made, De has noticed a significant increase in sales but is finding that
most of this extra money is being used to purchase materials and pay staff
wages. De isn’t sure how well the business is performing and how he should
best go about improving the performance of the business. He came across
this article about how to make a living as a surfboard maker and has decided
that he and Claire should develop a business plan for their business. De also
thinks that they should hire an accountant to assist them in their business but
Claire isn’t convinced that this is necessary and is worried about the extra
cost. They decide on a compromise which is to advertise a position for a
part-time accountant to work in the business 2-3 days per week.
Congratulations, you got the job!
With your help De and Claire have prepared and implemented a business
plan which they hope will increase sales, reduce costs and help their
business to perform better overall. Their vision is to become an emerging
leader in the surfing industry with a reputation for high quality products and
great service. It has now been six months since the plan was put into place
and from De and Claire’s perspective, the business seems to be going well.
DC Surf Co’s surfboards are currently stocked by 22 different surf shops. In
order to keep up with the demand, De and Claire have hired an additional
two trainees and one experienced staff member to assist with the surfboard
manufacturing. A great deal of time has gone into training the new trainees
and while they were learning they made some mistakes in the manufacturing
process that were not detected until the boards were purchased and used by
customers. In total, out of 192 board produced, 16 boards were returned to
DC Surf Co. The business replaced 12 of these boards and issued refunds
for the remaining 4 boards. DC Surf Co. retained the faulty boards so that
the current and any future trainees could use these boards to practice their
board shaping skills.
The apparel line is also growing. The business produces t-shirt which are
also stocked by the 22 surf-shops and are sold online both in Australia and
overseas. A celebrity was recently photographed in one of the t-shirts and
since then the t-shirts sales have tripled and the business has temporarily
sold out of some of the most popular styles and has been unable to fulfil
some customer orders. Whilst customer reviews on Facebook initially spiked
at 4.8 stars, since running out of stock, some customers have become
frustrated and their current rating has decreased to 4.1.
In order to leverage from the popularity of their t-shirts, De is keen to add
board shorts to their apparel line. Claire is not convinced that this is a good
idea and is concerned that board shorts are a very seasonal item and that
people do not buy shorts all year round. T-shirts on the other hand are
purchased by customers even during the winter time to wear underneath
warmer clothing. Before taking a risk on the new board short line, De and
19 April 2017 De discovers that the one of the surfboard shapers has
been incorrectly disposing of potentially hazardous
waste. The employee has been storing the waste
behind an old shed and after recent storms, much of
this waste has been washed into the nearby waterways
and estuaries.
27 April 2017 DC Surf Co receives the $85,000 from the sale made
on 13 April 2017. They use $30,000 of this money in
order to pay back their bank loan.
De and Claire have decided to purchase new equipment that will allow them
to manufacture surfboards more efficiently and with fewer faults. The
equipment cost $180,000 with a further $15,000 of installation costs. It was
fully installed and ready to use on 1 July 2017. The useful life of the
equipment is 10 years with a residual value of $25,000.
It is now the end of the 2017 financial year and after a number of years
working for DC Surf Co you have been promoted to a senior accounting role.
Well done! You have been very busy supervising Megan the assistant
accountant to prepare the 2017 financial statements and have also been
busy assisting De and Claire to understand and improve their cash flow.
The 2017 financial statements are almost ready to be released to the public.
De and Claire are considering what other information they might provide to
the public regarding the operations and performance of DC Surf Co. As part
of this process they have reviewed the annual reports and websites of their
key competitors and have noticed that many of these organisations have
reported information in relation to their social and environmental
performance.
Additional Information:
De and Claire have been wanting to introduce wetsuits into their product line
for some time but have been reluctant to do so as there is a lot of skill
involved in designing wetsuits and there are already a number of well
established brands on the market that DC Surf Co would struggle to compete
with. While reviewing the annual reports of other companies in the surfing
industry, De and Claire looked at the 2016 annual report of a company called
TJ Wetsuits Ltd. They had heard many good things about TJ branded
wetsuits and in fact, Claire has recently purchased one for herself and is very
impressed. De and Claire are now considering significantly investing in this
company with the view that one day they may wish to acquire it.
They have asked you to keep an eye out for the release of the 2017 annual
report and once available they would you like you to analyse the profitability
and the efficiency of the business. They noticed in the 2016 financial reports
that the company was funded partly through bank loans and there were a
number of covenants associated these loans. They have asked you to look
into these also.
The 2017 annual report and the 2017 sustainability report have been
released. Extracts from the reports are included below. You have also
ascertained the following account balances from the 2015 annual report of
TJ Wetsuits Ltd:
• Inventory: $528,000
• Accounts Receivable: $791,000
• Total Equity: $3,929,000
Income Statement
For the year ended 30 June 2017
2017 2016
$'000 $'000
Continuing Operations
Revenue from the sale of goods 11,245 8,650
Total operating revenue 11,245 8,650
Cost of goods sold (4,377) (3,979)
Gross profit 6,868 4,671
Depreciation (1,298) (865)
Employee benefits expenses (273) (260)
Lease expenses (234) (260)
Other expenses (571) (519)
Earnings before interest and tax 4,492 2,767
Interest expense (519) (519)
Profit before tax 3,973 2,248
Income tax expense (1,271) (674)
Profit for the period from continuing operations 2,702 1,574
TJ Wetsuits Ltd
Statement of Financial Position
As at 30 June 2017
2017 2016
$'000 $'000
Current assets
Cash 2,990 304
Accounts receivable 913 507
Inventories 1,330 760
Total current assets 5,233 1,571
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 5,016 3,344
Intangible assets 152 152
Total non-current assets 5,168 3,496
Total assets 10,401 5,067
Current liabilities
Accounts payable 221 245
Income tax payable 318 169
Accrued expenses 131 145
Total current liabilities 670 559
Non-current liabilities
Bank loans 1,590 636
Provisions 107 89
Total non-current liabilities 1,697 725
Total liabilities 2,367 1,284
Net assets 8,034 3,783
Equity
Share capital 1,135 946
Reserves 1,700 340
Retained earnings 5,199 2,497
Total Equity 8,034 3,783
TJ Wetsuits Ltd
Statement of Cash Flows
For the year ended 30 June 2017
2017 2016
$'000 $'000
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Receipts from customers 10,839 6,340
Payment to suppliers and employees (6,045) (3,872)
Interest paid (519) (493)
Income tax paid (1,122) (708)
Net cash provided by operating activities 3,153 1,760
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (1,610) (1,150)
Net cash used in operating activities (1,610) (6,135)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds from share issue 189 -
Proceeds from loan 954 4,681
Net cash used in financing activities 1,143 4,681
Net (decrease)/increase in cash 2,686 306
Cash at the beginning of the period 304 (2)
Cash at the end of the period 2,990 304
TJ Wetsuits Ltd
Statement of Changes in Equity
For the year ended 30 June 2017
Share Reserves Retained Total
Capital Asset Revaluation General Earnings Equity
$'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000
Balance at start of period 946 272 68 2,497 3,783
Comprehensive income for the year 4,062
Gain of revaluation - 1,360 - -
Profit for the period - - - 2,702
Issue of share capital 189 - - - 189
Balance at the end of the period 1,135 1,632 68 5,199 8,034
The company believes that this new method is preferable as it more accurately reflects the
current market value of property, plant and equipment assets. The impact of this voluntary
change in accounting policy on the statement of financial position is an upward revaluation
of property, plant and equipment assets of $1.36 million thus increasing non-current assets,
total assets and net assets by this amount. A corresponding increase has been made to
equity via the company’s asset revaluation reserve.
The company will maintain an interest coverage ratio (calculated as earnings before
interest and taxes/interest expense) of no less than 3:1
If a breach of these conditions occurs, the lender may demand payment of all outstanding
debts due immediately. Should payment not be made within 5 business days, the lender
may commence legal action to recover the debt including exercising their right to take
physical possession of secured assets.
The loans are currently secured against property, plant and equipment.
TJ Wetsuits Ltd
Sustainability Report
2017
Extracts from the sustainability report for the year ended 30 June 2017
20%
REDUCTION TARGET
Reduce, re-use, recycle
8.3 tonnes of shredded paper recycled and implemented paperless filing systems
20% decrease in neoprene wastage with offcuts donated to charity to make pencil
cases
6.2 tonnes of shipping materials recycled externally and reused within the
organisation
Recycled 8kg of office equipment (mobile phones, computer accessories,
electricals etc.)
$100,000
to this important cause. We are incredibly
proud of this effort and would like to give
our customers a high-five for their
awesomeness in achieving this goal.
Continuing to grow
At TJ Wetsuits we aim to continually grow and improve the way we do business.
This means improving the way we interact with customers, suppliers, communities
and the environment. It is important that we continue to identify ways to be more
sustainable in everything that we do. Not only does it make good business sense
but it helps secure the future of our industry, our sport and most importantly our
planet.
References
References
Australian Accounting Standards Board, 2016, Framework for preparation
and presentation of financial statements, viewed on 22 March 2017
http://www.aasb.gov.au/admin/file/content105/c9/Framework_07-
04_COMPjun14_07-14.pdf