Report of The WGUPR Philippines
Report of The WGUPR Philippines
Original: English
* The annex is being circulated without formal editing, in the language of submission only.
GE.17-12107(E)
A/HRC/36/12
Introduction
1. The Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, established in accordance
with Human Rights Council resolution 5/1, held its twenty-seventh session from 1 to 12
May 2017. The review of the Philippines was held at the 11th meeting, on 8 May 2017. The
delegation of the Philippines was headed by the Senior Deputy Executive Secretary in the
Office of the President, Menardo I. Guevarra, and the Chair of the Foreign Relations
Committee, Senate of the Philippines, Alan Peter S. Cayetano. At its 17th meeting, held on
11 May 2017, the Working Group adopted the report on the Philippines.
2. On 13 February 2017, the Human Rights Council selected the following group of
rapporteurs (troika) to facilitate the review of the Philippines: Kenya, Paraguay and
Switzerland.
3. In accordance with paragraph 15 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution
5/1 and paragraph 5 of the annex to Council resolution 16/21, the following documents
were issued for the review of the Philippines:
(a) A national report submitted/written presentation made in accordance with
paragraph 15 (a) (A/HRC/WG.6/27/PHL/1);
(b) A compilation prepared by the Office of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in accordance with paragraph 15 (b)
(A/HRC/WG.6/27/PHL/2);
(c) A summary prepared by OHCHR in accordance with paragraph 15 (c)
(A/HRC/WG.6/27/PHL/3).
4. A list of questions prepared in advance by Belgium, Czechia, Germany, Mexico, the
Netherlands, Norway, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America was transmitted to the
Philippines through the troika. These questions are available on the extranet of the universal
periodic review.
5. The delegation stated that Filipinos believed that people were created in the image of
God and that there could be no compromise on human rights and dignity. Filipinos also
believed in accountability.
6. The President of the Philippines, Rodrigo Duterte, was at the helm of the
Government because the people had demanded real change. Filipinos longed for the rule of
law, equality and respect for the human rights of all people regardless of faith, social status,
sexual orientation, age, disability or ethnicity, or of whether they were from urban or rural
areas.
7. The Government was committed to meeting its obligations arising from the treaties
it had ratified and to integrating a human rights agenda into its development initiatives.
Guided by the Philippine Development Plan for 2017-2022, the Government had adopted a
culture- and gender-sensitive paradigm and a human rights-based approach to public
service. A campaign against illegal drugs was being pursued to preserve lives and to
prevent the country from turning into a narco-State. At all times, the Government upheld
the rule of law and President Duterte had adopted a policy of zero tolerance for abuse by
law enforcers. The Government had adopted a holistic and balanced approach to addressing
crime and illegal drugs. In addition to strengthening law enforcement and judicial
mechanisms, it encouraged private sector participation to ensure more effective and
sustainable rehabilitation and reintegration programmes for drug users who wished to stop
using.
2
A/HRC/36/12
3
A/HRC/36/12
18. Algeria appreciated the plans to improve the living standards of the population,
particularly of women and children from poor families.
19. Angola noted the progress made through the adoption of laws to fulfil the
obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
20. Argentina congratulated the Philippines for adopting the Philippine Development
Plan for 2017-2022, especially the section on the rights of women.
21. Australia expressed concern at reports of extrajudicial killings associated with the
war on drugs and the involvement of the national police.
22. Austria commended the Philippines for the measures on modern family planning
and poverty reduction but expressed concern at plans to reintroduce the death penalty and
the increase in extrajudicial killings.
23. Azerbaijan recognized the progress made in protecting vulnerable groups,
combating trafficking in human beings and ensuring the rule of law.
24. Bangladesh noted the 10-point socioeconomic agenda aimed at combating poverty,
efforts to protect vulnerable groups, support to education, the programme against child
labour and policies to combat human trafficking.
25. Belarus commended the Philippines for the measures implemented to guarantee
socioeconomic rights, including the development of social support, and to combat human
trafficking.
26. Belgium commended the Government for creating a monitoring, reporting and
response system for children affected by armed conflict and for further defining
responsibilities of government agencies responding to violations against children.
27. Bosnia and Herzegovina noted the Government’s focus on improving the protection
of civil and political rights, as well as economic, social and cultural rights. It welcomed the
efforts made in relation to women’s rights.
28. Botswana noted the commitment to promoting human rights but was concerned by
reports of extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances and heightened campaigns against
illegal drug-related activities resulting in deaths.
29. Brazil welcomed efforts to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and
gender identity but was concerned about the alleged number of disappearances and
extrajudicial killings.
30. Brunei Darussalam noted efforts to expand access to quality education through the
enactment of several laws and progress in the empowerment of women and promotion of
gender equality.
31. Bulgaria commended the Philippines for its efforts to reduce poverty and
appreciated its accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture.
32. Cambodia welcomed the implementation of most of the accepted recommendations
from previous reviews. It commended the 10-point socioeconomic agenda aimed at poverty
reduction.
33. Canada urged the Philippines to dismantle and disarm paramilitary groups, to stop
the militarization of the ancestral lands of indigenous peoples and improve access by
indigenous peoples to health and social services.
34. Chad highlighted the Philippine Development Plan for 2017-2022, which advocated
the use of a human rights approach in the public sector, in the allocation of funds for
poverty reduction and in social services programmes.
35. Chile welcomed the progress made in the ratification of international human rights
instruments. It was however concerned about the persistence of extrajudicial executions and
enforced disappearances.
36. China expressed support for the campaign against illegal drugs.
4
A/HRC/36/12
37. Costa Rica was concerned about the war on drugs, as it incited extrajudicial
executions, enforced disappearances and torture.
38. Croatia encouraged a more proactive approach that linked the principle of the rule of
law to the socioeconomic development agenda in order to achieve a more comprehensive
integration of human rights norms.
39. Cuba highlighted the existence of a human rights commission with a mandate to
investigate human rights violations, as well as the work of the commission on women to
counter discrimination against women.
40. Czechia acknowledged the efforts and accomplishments in closing the gender gap.
41. Denmark expressed concern about the fact that some recent initiatives to combat
crime, including the war on drugs, might lead to impunity and violations of human rights. It
also expressed concern about the high number of attacks on human rights defenders.
42. Ecuador praised the actions taken to protect domestic workers, including the joint
operations handbook, and the commitments to protect the environment through a national
plan and specific laws.
43. Egypt urged the Philippines to uphold international human rights norms in the
context of the war on drugs. It noted the peace plan between the Government and the Moro
Islamic Liberation Front.
44. Estonia noted the efforts made by the Philippines to meet its human rights
obligations since its previous review.
45. France raised concerns regarding the proliferation of extrajudicial executions and
inquired about the national surveillance mechanisms that existed in that area.
46. Georgia called on the Philippines to refrain from restoring the death penalty and to
issue a standing invitation to the special procedure mandate holders.
47. Germany expressed deep concern about reports of human rights violations in the
context of the so-called war on drugs.
48. Ghana stated that, despite the acceptance by the Philippines of 11 recommendations
on putting an end to extrajudicial killings and strengthening accountability for those crimes
at the previous review, such killings remained widespread.
49. Guatemala acknowledged the accession by the Philippines to the Optional Protocol
to the Convention against Torture. It expressed concern at reports that the Government’s
campaign against drugs had resulted in the persecution and killing of drug users and drug
traffickers.
50. Haiti welcomed the success of the economic programmes in the Philippines.
51. The Holy See referred to reports of trafficking in Philippine men, women and
children for labour exploitation. It also expressed concern about extrajudicial killings and
enforced disappearances.
52. Honduras highlighted the progress made in the areas of social inclusion,
participation of women in decision-making and youth education.
53. Hungary expressed concern about the fact that since President Duterte had taken
office and announced a campaign targeting those allegedly involved in drug-related
activities, over 7,000 people had been killed by the police and unknown individuals. It also
referred to the threats faced by human rights defenders.
54. Iceland expressed alarm over the high rate of killings since the election of President
Duterte and referred to the allegations of enforced disappearances, torture and other ill-
treatment by police officers.
55. Indonesia commended the Philippines for completing the human resources road map
for 2016-2022, the significant budget allocated to public education and the commitment to
fighting human trafficking.
5
A/HRC/36/12
56. Iraq praised the Philippines for its national report and commended it for the
reproductive rights act and the recovery care provided in the fight against drugs.
57. Ireland appreciated the commitment to human rights but shared its deep concern at
the marked deterioration in the rule of law since the previous review.
58. Italy welcomed and encouraged further efforts in the field of human rights.
59. Japan noted social problems involving violence against women. It offered its support
for the development of drug treatment facilities and the formulation of treatment
programmes.
60. Kenya commended the Philippines for the steps taken since its first and second
reviews and urged it to continue to implement the remaining recommendations.
61. The Lao People’s Democratic Republic commended the Philippines for taking
measures to implement the recommendations arising from previous reviews and welcomed
the progresses made in protecting the rights of women.
62. In response to questions and comments, the delegation of the Philippines stated that,
pursuant to Administrative Order No. 163, non-governmental and civil society
organizations had been encouraged to join the efforts of the Government in promoting
compliance with human rights obligations. Human rights defenders participated in
congressional hearings on the enactment of laws that affected human rights and the
enactment of a law defining their rights was under review.
63. The Government respected the independence of the Commission on Human Rights.
The President appointed the members of the Commission through a selection process that
gave weight to endorsements mostly from non-governmental organizations. The budget of
the Commission for 2016-2017 had almost doubled.
64. The Government had established an inter-agency committee to resolve cases of
enforced disappearances, torture and other grave violations of the rights to life, liberty and
security of person. According to the national definition, extrajudicial killings only involved
victims who were members of cause-oriented advocacy groups. Crimes falling outside that
definition were treated as regular crimes.
65. An inter-agency committee addressed trafficking in persons, including involuntary
servitude. The ASEAN Convention against Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and
Children, had been ratified in 2017 and a “child protection compact” had been concluded
with a third country to advance the campaign against trafficking in children.
66. Individuals meeting the required criteria continued to avail themselves of the
Witness Protection, Security and Benefit Programme.
67. The protection and welfare of vulnerable and marginalized groups such as
indigenous peoples, persons with disabilities, women, children and older persons were at
the top of the administration’s agenda and a package of laws addressing their various needs
was being considered.
68. Since the previous review, a number of laws had been enacted, including a foster
care act and a law mandating emergency relief and protection for children before, during
and after disasters and emergencies. The Universal Health Care Act and the Sin Tax
Reform Law had been strengthened.
69. Measures ensuring the equal rights of wives in relation to property, among other
issues, were pending. An executive order had been issued to fully implement the
reproductive health law. Progress had been made in implementing the Responsible
Parenthood and Reproductive Health Programme and there had been a significant increase
in the national contraception prevalence rate and in the provision of free and lifelong
antiretroviral therapy for pregnant and breastfeeding women with HIV.
70. The police had implemented an internal mechanism to ensure that personnel
responsible for human rights violations such as torture were disciplined. The doctrine of
command responsibility had been introduced. Proper procedures were being observed to
ensure that torture was not used to extract confessions during investigations.
6
A/HRC/36/12
71. Prison congestion was being addressed through various measures, including a
paralegal programme.
72. A specific law prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation was
being pursued. However, there were statutes, local government ordinances and
jurisprudence that addressed discrimination and hate crimes, including on the grounds of
sexual orientation and gender identity.
73. The Kindergarten Education Act and the Enhanced Basic Education Act had led to
an increase in enrolment among indigenous peoples and a decline in the dropout rate. Also,
an increase in the budget for basic education reform had increased enrolment among
working learners and marginalized children.
74. Latvia encouraged the Philippines to use the expertise of the special procedures and
expressed concern about the rising death toll from extrajudicial executions owing to the war
on drugs.
75. Lebanon welcomed the campaign against drugs, which had had positive effects on
the level of crime.
76. Libya appreciated the efforts made to combat corruption, crime and illegal drug use
and the determination of the Philippines to address the challenges of poverty reduction and
implement policies and programmes for sustainable development.
77. Liechtenstein expressed concern at the proposal to reinstate the death penalty and at
the persistence of appalling conditions of detention.
78. Lithuania acknowledged the positive steps taken to strengthen human rights
standards but expressed concern about the extrajudicial killings and the intention to
reinstate the death penalty.
79. Luxembourg expressed concern about the human rights situation, particularly about
the extrajudicial executions within the framework of the fight against drugs and the
allegations of torture of civilians.
80. Malaysia commended the Philippines for its human rights achievements and, as a
fellow ASEAN member, recognized the significant role of the Philippines in the pursuit of
a common human rights agenda in the region.
81. The Maldives was encouraged by the efforts to promote gender equality and
recognized the efforts made by the Philippines to ensure a better quality of education.
82. Mexico hailed the political peace agreement in Mindanao, the actions to assist
displaced people and the enactment of the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive
Health Act.
83. Montenegro noted the efforts to protect children’s rights but regretted that a high
number of children were engaged in child labour. It expressed concern at the extrajudicial
killings of suspected drugs dealers.
84. Morocco commended the Philippines for initiatives to promote socioeconomic rights
through poverty reduction programmes, improve access to education and promote
employment, as well as for its action to combat human trafficking.
85. Mozambique noted with appreciation the implementation of the 10-point
socioeconomic agenda, which had led to a drastic reduction in poverty, and commended the
progress achieved on gender equality.
86. Myanmar stated that the response to the threat posed by illegal drug use should be
left to the Government and took positive note of recent measures with regard to the
environment.
87. Nepal welcomed the initiatives to further promote the rights to health and education
and noted efforts to eliminate the worst forms of child labour, combat human trafficking
and protect the rights of migrant workers.
7
A/HRC/36/12
88. The Netherlands commended the Philippines for the impressive measures taken in
the fight against online sexual exploitation and human trafficking. It expressed concern
about the high number of extrajudicial executions.
89. New Zealand commended the Philippines for ratifying the Second Optional Protocol
to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aiming at the abolition of the
death penalty, and for enacting the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act.
90. Norway appreciated the efforts and commitment to work for peace and encouraged
continuation of reforms to strengthen workers’ rights and combat corruption.
91. Pakistan appreciated the creation of the National Anti-Environmental Crime Task
Force and the implementation of poverty reduction programmes, the Sustainable Livelihood
Programme and a comprehensive and integrated social services programme.
92. Peru acknowledged the progress made in the areas of health, education and housing.
It noted the commitment to sustainable development.
93. Poland welcomed the adoption of the Children’s Emergency Protection and Relief
Act, which aimed to facilitate the reunification of separated children and the training of
emergency responders in child protection.
94. Portugal was concerned about plans to restore the death penalty more than a decade
after it had been abolished and about the ongoing anti-drug campaign.
95. Qatar noted the progress made, particularly in relation to economic, social and
cultural rights, and appreciated the development action plan, as it took a holistic approach
to development on the basis of human rights.
96. The Republic of Korea noted concerns about the current situation of civil and
political rights and stated that human rights should be respected at all times.
97. The Republic of Moldova encouraged the Philippines to place the protection of the
fundamental rights of all persons at the core of every policy and action. It was concerned
about initiatives to reinstate capital punishment.
98. Romania stated that the implementation of supported recommendations from the
previous review demonstrated a commitment to human rights. It commended the
Philippines for its human rights-based campaign to eliminate the drug menace.
99. The Russian Federation commended the Philippines for enacting legislation in the
areas of health care, education and labour, and welcomed the working quota for persons
with disabilities and the Philippine Development Plan for 2017-2022.
100. Saudi Arabia commended the Philippines for its poverty alleviation strategy and
relative plan, from which about 4 million poor households benefited.
101. Sierra Leone commended the Philippines for sustained efforts aimed at improving
the lives of its peoples, including the Sustainable Livelihood Programme. It noted efforts to
address the rights of women, including through the Magna Carta of Women.
102. Slovakia noted that various human rights laws related to recommendations arising
from the previous review had been passed. It was concerned about reported initiatives to
reinstate capital punishment.
103. Slovenia was concerned about reports on enforced disappearance and extrajudicial
killings in the name of the war against drugs and reminded the Philippines of its
commitments under international human rights law.
104. Spain welcomed the mechanism established by the Commission on Human Rights to
address human rights complaints, as well as the legislation on protecting children in
emergency situations.
105. Sri Lanka noted the policies and programmes that had been developed to strengthen
the rights of migrant workers at the national level, especially the assistance provided to
Filipinos working overseas through the Assistance to Nationals and Legal Assistance Fund.
8
A/HRC/36/12
106. The State of Palestine welcomed the efforts to improve education and commended
the steps taken to promote the rights of people with disabilities, including by developing a
national action plan.
107. The Sudan welcomed the “green job creation” programme to protect the
environment, as well as the accession to the ASEAN Convention against Trafficking in
Persons, Especially Women and Children, and the Domestic Workers Convention, 2011
(No. 189), of the International Labour Organization.
108. Sweden was concerned that 7.3 million women in the Philippines had an unmet need
for modern contraceptives, as estimated by 2016 government data.
109. Switzerland was gravely concerned at reports indicating that many extrajudicial
executions were being carried out and at the legislative steps under way to reintroduce the
death penalty.
110. Thailand applauded the protection of vulnerable groups, the implementation of the
United Nations Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-custodial Measures
for Women Offenders (the Bangkok Rules), efforts to combat human trafficking and
provide assistance to victims and the implementation of the “Freedom of information
order”.
111. Timor-Leste noted the adoption of the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive
Health Act, the Food Staples Sufficiency Programme, the Sustainable Livelihood
Programme and efforts to increase gender sensitivity in the courts.
112. Tunisia welcomed the accession of the Philippines to the Optional Protocol to the
Convention against Torture and the programmes to combat poverty.
113. Uganda was encouraged by the commitment to achieve inclusive growth under the
Philippine Development Plan for 2017-2022 and the 10-point socioeconomic agenda.
114. Ukraine respected the commitment to international conventions and encouraged the
Philippines to take measures to improve the human rights situation, including in the
criminal justice system and in respect of the rights of children and persons with disabilities.
115. The United Kingdom expressed concern about the high death toll associated with the
campaign against illegal drugs and about plans to reinstate the death penalty and to lower
the age of criminal responsibility, among other things.
116. The United States of America stressed the importance of investigating the deaths
associated with the counter-narcotics campaign.
117. Uruguay welcomed the efforts to protect victims of human trafficking and
achievements in the fight against discrimination and violence based on sexual orientation
and gender identity.
118. Uzbekistan noted the accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention against
Torture.
119. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela welcomed the efforts in the fight against
poverty and the campaign against illicit drugs.
120. Gabon praised the significant progress made in promoting and protecting human
rights since the previous review.
121. Singapore commended the Philippines for its efforts to pursue social justice, achieve
inclusive growth and reduce inequality.
122. In relation to violence against women, the delegation of the Philippines stated that
guidelines had been issued at the village level for the establishment of points of contact
where victims could go to receive immediate help.
123. The delegation of the Philippines reported that an inter-agency committee on
children in armed conflict had been created in 2013. There was also a monitoring, reporting
and response system for grave violations of children’s rights in situations of armed conflict.
9
A/HRC/36/12
124. The Juvenile Justice Welfare Act had been strengthened. Local government units
were required to appoint social workers to assist children in conflict with the law, among
others.
125. The programme against child labour had recorded a 47.9 per cent decrease in
children involved in labour, had awarded child labour-free certificates to establishments
and closed establishments engaging minors in hazardous work. Project Angel Tree
provided social assistance to children who had been subjected to child labour.
126. The Government had issued Department Order No. 174, which reaffirmed workers’
constitutional and statutory right to security of tenure by prohibiting “labour-only
contracting” (an arrangement whereby a contractor or subcontractor merely recruits,
supplies or places workers to perform a job or work for a principal) and reinforced workers’
rights in terms of labour standards, self-organization and collective bargaining. A review of
the enforcement framework would be undertaken.
127. Safeguarding the rights of Philippine workers abroad was a priority. The Philippine
Overseas Employment Administration regulated the overseas recruitment industry. The
Philippines had bilateral labour agreements with 31 countries of destination. Returning
workers were offered reintegration seminars and training.
128. The armed forces implemented the Internal Peace and Security Plan “Bayanihan”
(Cooperation), which had been subsumed by the Development Support and Security Plan
“Kapayapaan” (Freedom). Both Plans focused on support for nation-building, civil military
cooperation, peacebuilding and military action against terrorists and other armed groups.
Military operations were only conducted in areas where there had been threats endangering
the safety of the people.
129. Executive Order No. 264 had led to the creation of the Citizens Armed Force
Geographical Units to assist the military in helping address local insurgency threats in
operations during disasters and calamities and in socioeconomic development projects. The
Citizens Armed Force was not a paramilitary force. A national task force had been created
to disband private armed groups in Bangsamoro and in the adjacent Regions 9 and 12.
130. The collective rights of indigenous peoples were being protected by the Indigenous
Peoples Rights Act. There had been no forced evictions of indigenous peoples owing to
mining operations. Ancestral domains could not be accessed by mining companies without
the free, prior and informed consent of indigenous peoples. That prohibition was also
applicable to the armed forces, except in “hot pursuit” operations. The Philippine
Development Plan for 2017-2022 raised awareness of the rights of indigenous peoples.
131. Recommendations relating to the death penalty would be discussed with the leaders
of Congress. The Government was committed to ending killings and supressing, to the
extent possible, crime caused by the consumption of illegal drugs, corruption and poverty.
132. In summary, the delegation reiterated that the Philippines consistently maintained a
culture of respect for human rights; relevant mechanisms and institutions to enable
compliance with treaty obligations were in place and functioned properly; the Philippines
encouraged inclusiveness in complying with its human rights obligations by encouraging
the participation of all stakeholders; the Philippines continued to make significant strides in
promoting and protecting the human rights of vulnerable sectors of society; and there was
no State policy promoting, sanctioning or encouraging extrajudicial killings, as all law
enforcement operations in pursuit of the anti-illegal drug campaign were conducted within
the boundaries of the law, as instructed by President Duterte.
10
A/HRC/36/12
133.2 Ratify and implement without delay the International Convention for
the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (France);
133.3 Ratify the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons
from Enforced Disappearance (Angola) (Iraq) (Japan) (Kenya) (Montenegro)
(Sierra Leone);
133.4 Consider acceding to the International Convention for the Protection
of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, recognizing the competence of its
Committee (Uruguay);
133.5 Ratify the International Convention on the Protection of All Persons
from Enforced Disappearance and the Optional Protocol to the International
Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Portugal);
133.6 Promptly ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Indigenous and Tribal Peoples
Convention, 1989 (No. 169), of the International Labour Organization
(Guatemala);
133.7 Ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the
Child on a communications procedure (Slovakia);
133.8 Adhere to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of
the Child on a communications procedure (Croatia);
133.9 Ratify and adapt its national legislation to the Arms Trade Treaty
(Guatemala);
133.10 Uphold the human rights mechanisms and the special procedures
(Sudan);
133.11 Cooperate with special procedures by extending a standing invitation
to them (Peru);
133.12 Extend a standing invitation to all special procedure mandate holders
(Latvia);
133.13 Accept without prior condition the request for a visit by the Special
Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions and cooperate
with her fully (France);
133.14 Extend an invitation to the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial,
summary or arbitrary executions for an official visit in line with United Nations
terms of reference without any further delay (Germany);
133.15 Allow access to the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or
arbitrary executions and remove conditions on her proposed visit that could
compromise her impartiality (Ghana);
133.16 Permit the requested visit by the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial,
summary or arbitrary executions (Hungary);
133.17 Respond positively and unconditionally to the request of the Special
Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions to visit the
country (Latvia);
133.18 Make public the findings and implement the recommendations of the
Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment arising from its visit to the country in
2015 (Liechtenstein);
133.19 Consider establishing or strengthening a national mechanism
responsible for coordination, implementation, reporting and follow-up, in line
with the critical elements (best practices) of the OHCHR global study and guide
concerning national mechanisms for reporting and follow-up (Portugal);
11
A/HRC/36/12
12
A/HRC/36/12
133.39 Expedite the process to put in place a human rights action plan
(Uganda);
133.40 Publicize and implement the national human rights action plan
(Kenya);
133.41 Strengthen cooperation with national and international human rights
institutions in order to implement the national human rights action plan
(Mexico);
133.42 Ensure human rights training for State security forces in order to
enhance their capacity to protect human rights (Ghana);
133.43 Provide adequate resourcing to the Commission on Human Rights
and allow it to investigate alleged extrajudicial killings (Australia);
133.44 Ensure that the fight against crime strictly respects international
standards (Peru);
133.45 Strengthen the campaign against illegal drugs (Bolivarian Republic
of Venezuela);
133.46 Continue its efforts to protect its people from the threat of drugs
while upholding human rights values (Myanmar);
133.47 Take the necessary measures to combat drug trafficking while
ensuring that the methods used are in conformity with international standards
(Haiti);
133.48 Ensure that all counter-narcotics operations are conducted in
conformity with constitutional protections and international human rights
obligations (United States of America);
133.49 Bring into line with international best practices the methods of
combating the use of illegal drugs in the Philippines, namely in terms of
prevention and alternative sanctions (Portugal);
133.50 Continue the holistic approach of the Inter-Agency Committee on
Anti-Illegal Drugs focusing on law enforcement operations, as well as on the
rehabilitation and reintegration of drug users (Romania);
133.51 Address the root cause of illegal drugs through development (China);
133.52 Adopt comprehensive and human-centred approaches to its anti-
illegal drug policy, particularly the provision of appropriate health measures
(Thailand);
133.53 Continue efforts to combat drugs and crime within a framework of
the protection of and respect for human rights (Lebanon);
133.54 Ensure human rights standards are observed in the current
government’s conduct of its campaigns against illegal drugs (Zambia);
133.55 Bring its methods of combating the use of illegal drugs into line with
international standards (Timor-Leste);
133.56 Continue to realign its national procedures to combat drug
trafficking with international standards (Egypt);
133.57 Enact effective legislation aligned with international standards to
combat the use of illegal drugs (Maldives);
133.58 Employ methods that adjust to international norms, including human
rights norms, to combat the consumption of illegal drugs (Guatemala);
133.59 Guarantee that all the Government’s methods of combating the use
of illegal drugs are brought into line with international standards (Estonia);
133.60 Strengthen international cooperation to combat illegal drugs and
human trafficking (China);
13
A/HRC/36/12
14
A/HRC/36/12
133.82 Refrain from reintroducing the death penalty, in accordance with its
international obligations, in particular those under the Second Optional
Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aimed at
the abolition of the death penalty (Switzerland);
133.83 Continue to uphold the implementation commitments as a State party
to the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty (Romania);
133.84 Respect its obligations under the Second Optional Protocol to the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and refrain from the plans
to reimpose the death penalty (Norway);
133.85 Uphold its international obligations and not reinstate the capital
punishment (Portugal);
133.86 Cease all steps to reintroduce the death penalty, which would be
contrary to its obligations under the Optional Protocol to the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; urgently accept a visit from the Special
Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, without
preconditions or limitations; fully investigate and prosecute all cases of
extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances; take immediate steps to
combat torture in the criminal justice system, including torture in police
stations to extract confessions; and fully respect international human rights law
in its efforts to combat the trade in and use of illegal drugs (Ireland);
133.87 Respect its obligations under international law as a State party to the
Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty (Belgium);
133.88 Continue the implementation of the provisions of the Second
Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
aiming at the abolition of the death penalty, and abandon plans to restore the
death penalty as a legal punishment (Lithuania);
133.89 Continue its support for the Second Optional Protocol to the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (New Zealand);
133.90 Maintain the abolition of death penalty in line with its obligations
under the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (Czechia);
133.91 Fulfil the obligations assumed as a State party to the Second Optional
Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aimed at
the abolition of the death penalty, and oppose any attempt to reinstate capital
punishment (Uruguay);
133.92 Maintain its binding commitment to the Second Optional Protocol to
the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aiming at the abolition
of the death penalty, thereby repealing legal propositions aiming at restoring
the death penalty (Brazil);
133.93 Abide by its obligations under the Second Optional Protocol to the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Ukraine);
133.94 Abandon the plan to reintroduce the death penalty, which would be
against the international commitments of the country (France);
133.95 Refrain from introducing the death penalty in the national legal
system, also in respect of international obligations (Italy);
133.96 Do not reintroduce the death penalty, consistent with the Philippines’
obligations as a State party to the Second Optional Protocol to the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Australia);
133.97 Refrain from reintroducing the death penalty (Canada);
15
A/HRC/36/12
133.98 Refrain from reintroducing the death penalty and from lowering the
minimum age of criminal responsibility (Bulgaria);
133.99 Maintain the protection of the right to life from conception to natural
death (Holy See);
133.100 Take steps to put an end to extrajudicial executions, enforced
disappearances, illegal arrests and acts of torture perpetrated by the police
corps, and private security or paramilitary groups, and to investigate actions of
the police dismantling all groups created in the margin of law (Costa Rica);
133.101 Guarantee the protection of all people against enforced
disappearances and guarantee the rights of persons with disabilities (Sudan);
133.102 Without delay, take measures to put an end to extrajudicial,
summary or arbitrary executions and prosecute the perpetrators of these acts
(France);
133.103 Establish necessary mechanisms to eradicate extrajudicial, summary
and arbitrary executions by bringing perpetrators to justice and intensifying
efforts to eradicate the use of torture and inhuman and degrading treatment
(Spain);
133.104 Strengthen efforts to stop extrajudicial killings and enforced
disappearances in the country (Poland);
133.105 Put an end to extrajudicial killings, including those related to the war
on drugs, enforced disappearances, illegal arrests and detention, torture,
harassment and other human rights violations (Slovakia);
133.106 Take immediate steps to stop extrajudicial killings and to conduct an
independent and impartial inquiry into all enforced disappearances and
extrajudicial killings so that the perpetrators of these crimes are brought to
justice (Netherlands);
133.107 Take concrete measures to stop extrajudicial killings and invite the
Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions to visit
the country without conditions (Lithuania);
133.108 End extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, illegal arrests
and detention, torture and harassment, including by effectively implementing
criminal prohibitions against extrajudicial killings (Canada);
133.109 Take all necessary measures to prevent extrajudicial killings and
enforced disappearances and carry out impartial investigations to hold
perpetrators accountable (Germany);
133.110 Immediately end extrajudicial executions and carry out an
independent and impartial investigation into all enforced disappearances and
extrajudicial executions in order to bring the authors of these crimes to justice
(Chile);
133.111 Immediately end the campaign of extrajudicial killings, which may
amount to crimes against humanity under international law (Ghana);
133.112 Protect and guarantee the right to life and to a fair trial also in the
context of the campaign against drug trafficking, and take all necessary steps to
guarantee a proportionate use of force by the security forces (Italy);
133.113 Take all necessary steps to ensure prompt, impartial and transparent
investigations into alleged unlawful killings and other abuses during anti-drug
operations (Hungary);
133.114 Condemn and put an end to unresolved homicides and enforced
disappearances (Uruguay);
133.115 Immediately stop all unlawful killings and incitement to carry out
killings in the name of the anti-drug campaign (Iceland);
16
A/HRC/36/12
17
A/HRC/36/12
18
A/HRC/36/12
19
A/HRC/36/12
20
A/HRC/36/12
21
A/HRC/36/12
22
A/HRC/36/12
23
A/HRC/36/12
133.248 Continue its efforts to promote the rights of people with disabilities
and ensure that persons with disabilities have equal access to all public facilities
and services (State of Palestine);
133.249 Continue efforts in social and health insurance to the benefit of
children with disabilities (Tunisia);
133.250 Take necessary measures to preserve the ancestral lands of
indigenous peoples (Peru);
133.251 Continue the promotion and protection of the rights of migrant
workers at all levels, in particular through the agenda on migrants’ health (Sri
Lanka);
133.252 Continue to engage bilateral, regional and multilateral partners to
better protect the rights and welfare of migrants and members of their families
(Viet Nam);
133.253 Enhance its engagement with its partners to better protect the rights
and welfare of migrant workers and members of their families (Indonesia);
133.254 Continue to make concerted efforts to protect the rights of overseas
migrant workers (Nepal);
133.255 Develop a permanent resettlement approach for internally displaced
persons (Kenya);
133.256 Accede to and fully implement the 1961 Convention on the Reduction
of Statelessness and ensure that all otherwise stateless persons in the country
have access to a procedure that will facilitate the acquisition of a nationality
(Slovakia);
133.257 Continue to do all that is necessary to end statelessness, especially for
those living in areas that have experienced armed conflict before peace (Egypt).
134. All conclusions and/or recommendations contained in the present report reflect
the position of the submitting State(s) and/or the State under review. They should not
be construed as endorsed by the Working Group as a whole.
24
A/HRC/36/12
Annex
25
A/HRC/36/12
26