Waves II: 5.1 Reflection & Transmission of Waves
Waves II: 5.1 Reflection & Transmission of Waves
Waves II
Let us now consider what happens to a wave travelling along a string which no longer has a
single uniform density, but has a step change in density at x = 0, with the string essentially
extending from 1 < x < 0 with a density of ⇢1 and for 0 < x < 1 with a density of ⇢2 .
If the wave travels from the left-hand of the string to the right, then we can write,
with the negative k1 x implying that the wave is travelling to the right. In this case k1
contains the relevant information about the density of the string. Remembering that k =
p p
!/c, and that c1,2 = T /⇢1,2 , thus k1,2 / ⇢1,2 .
We also know that although the density is no longer uniform, the tension in the
somewhere.
The wave moves to the right along the string towards x = 0, at x = 0 two things
could happen, (i) the wave could be reflected resulting in a wave travelling to the left, and
(ii) the wave could be transmitted across the boundary and continue moving to the right.
Therefore, for the wave to the left of x = 0 we can write it as the sum of the incident and
reflected waves,
62
63
For the transimitted wave, we just have the component moving to the right at x > 0:
where we now have k2 which contains the information about the density of the string.
We can now apply some boundary conditions to determine how the amplitude of the trans-
y1 (0, t) = y2 (0, t)
We also know that the tension throughout the string is also constant, implying that
the vertical tension to the left of the boundary is balanced by the vertical component of
the tension to the right of the boundary. Therefore, from Eq. 4.2,
y
Fy = T. = tan ✓ ⇡ T. ✓,
x
therefore,
@y1 @y2
(0, t) = (0, t). (5.4)
@x @x
So applying these boundary conditions at x = 0 we find, with the fact that the string
is continuous,
which are just the ratios of the amplitudes of the reflected and transmitted waves to the
A0 k1 k2
r⌘ = (5.7)
A k1 + k2
A00 2k1
t⌘ = . (5.8)
A k1 + k2
Given these reflection and transmission coefficients, we can consider some specific cases,
• k1 = k2
r = 0, t = 1 as you would expect, the string is just a single uniform density and there
• k 1 < k2
A0 is negative and we can write down the equation for the reflected wave as |A0 | sin(!t+
k1 x) = |A0 | sin(!t + k1 x + ⇡), i.e. there is a phase change at the boundary as we move
• k 1 > k2
the A0 is positive, i.e. we don’t get the phase change in this case where ⇢1 > ⇢2 .
• k2 ! 1 (or ⇢2 ! 1)
A0
in this case r = A ! 1, i.e. full reflection with a phase change and no transmitted
wave. This is unsurprising as it it just the same as the second string being immovable,
From the last section, we have the reflection and transmission coefficients,
65
A0 k1 k2
r⌘ = (5.9)
A k1 + k2
A00 2k1
t⌘ = . (5.10)
A k1 + k2
In Sec. 4.6 we showed that the power to generate a wave, was given by
1
P = T !kA2 (5.11)
2
So the ratios of the reflected to incident power, Rr and the transmitted to incident
1 02 ✓ ◆2 1 00 2
2 k1 T !A k1 k2 2 k2 T !A 4k1 k2
(5.12)
Rr = 1 = Rt = 1 =
2 k1 T !A
2 k1 + k2 2 k1 T !A
2 (k1 + k2 )2
Therefore,
5.3 Impedence
Impedence is a general term in physics that describes the opposition of a material to a time
equivalent to, the ratio of a push variable (i.e. voltage or pressure) to a flow variable (i.e.
One of the key assumptions that we made in the previous sections was that the tension
in the string is uniform throughout the string. What happens if we relax this condition?
First of all, let us consider how we might be able to alter the tension either side of
x = 0, given that this implies that the nearly massless atom within the string at x = 0,
We can get around this by joining the two halves of the string via a massless ring,which
encircles a fixed frictionless pole (Fig. 5.3.1). The pole that sits at the boundary now
balances the horizontal components of the tensions, so that the net horizontal force on the
ring is zero. This obviously has to be the case as the ring must remain on the pole and can
However, in this case the net vertical force on the ring must also be zero, otherwise
it would have infinite acceleration (as it is massless). This zero vertical component of the
@y1 (x = 0, t) @y2 (x = 0, t)
T1 = T2 (5.14)
@x @x
Figure 5.1: (left) Set up to imitate a system with non-uniform tension across the x = 0
boundary.(right) Forces acting on the ring.
In the previous examples, the vertical component of T1 was equal to the vertical
component of T2 , but now these vertical components to the tensions can be di↵erent. So
if we have the same form as Eq. 5.4, but now with the additional tension terms which
no longer cancel out. Therefore, implementing the same form of the wave solution, i.e.
y(x, t) = A sin(!t kx), for incident, reflected and transmitted waves, we arrive at a very
similar result, but with the tension in the string on either side of the massless ring also
included, i.e.
67
Therefore, the new coefficients of reflection and transmission becomes slightly modi-
fied,
A0 k 1 T1 k 2 T2 Z1 Z2
r⌘ = =
A k 1 T1 + k 2 T2 Z1 + Z2
(5.17)
A00 2k1 T1 2Z1
t⌘ = =
A k 1 T1 + k 2 T2 Z1 + Z2
where Z1 = k1 T1 and Z2 = k2 T2 , or more correctly,
Z1 = T1 /v1
(5.18)
Z2 = T2 /v2
where v1,2 are the wave velocities. Note that replacing k1,2 with 1/v1,2 just means that we
have assumed !1 = !2 , which it must across the massless ring (remembering v = !/k).
Although we can describe impedence in the way we have above, what does it actually mean
The force acting on the right-hand side of the massless ring is just given by,
@y2 (x = 0, t)
Fy = T 2 (5.19)
@x
Substituting in a solution of the form y2 (x, t) = A sin[!(t x/v2 )] (which is equivalent
to y2 (x, t) = A sin(!t kx), using the normal relation between k, ! and v).
68
@y2 A!
= cos[!(t x/v2 )]
@x v2
(5.20)
@y2
= A! cos[!(t x/v2 )]
@t
therefore,
@y2 1 @y2
= . (5.21)
@x v2 @t
Then we find,
T2 @y2 (x = 0, t) T2
Fy = = vy ⌘ vy , (5.22)
v2 @t v2
where vy is the transverse velocity of the ring at x = 0, and is defined as T2 /v2 . So we
have a force that is proportional to the negative of the transverse velocity. Therefore, it
acts exactly like a damping force! This means that from the perspective of the left string,
the right string acts like a resistance that is being dragged against.
Now let us consider a slightly more complicated system, rather than having a massless ring
around a frictionless pole at the boundary, we now have an object of mass M . Either side
of this mass we have semi-infinite strings of linear density ⇢1 to the left and ⇢2 to the right,
Figure 5.2: System of two strings of density ⇢1 and ⇢2 attached to an object of mass M at
x = 0.
We can solve this system as we did in the previous examples, but in this case the
We have the usual boundary condition that the system in continous and the at x = 0
the y displacement must be the same for the left and right side of the mass, i.e. y1 (0, t) =
y2 (0, t).
However, if we consider the forces at the boundary, we now have to consider the
exponentials rather than sines and cosines. Then for a wave travelling from left to right
n o
y1 (x, t) = < Aei(!t k1 x)
+ A0 ei(!t+k1 x) (5.24)
and
n o
y2 (x, t) = < A00 ei(!t k2 x)
(5.25)
As before, with a continuous system we have A + A0 = A00 , but from Eq. 5.23 we have
A0 (k1 k2 )T i! 2 M
r⌘ = = Rei✓ (5.27)
A (k1 + k2 )T + i! 2 M
A00 2k1 T
t⌘ = = T ei (5.28)
A (k1 + k2 )T + i! 2 M
where R and T are real numbers.
✓ is the phase shift of the reflected wave and is the phase shift of the transmitted
wave with respect to the incident wave. Therefore, combining Eq. 5.24 with Eq. 5.31 and
and
where,
1
(k1 k2 )2 T 2 + ! 4 M 2 2
1 !2M 1 !2M
R= and ✓ = tan tan
(k1 + k2 )2 T 2 + ! 4 M 2 (k1 k2 )T (k1 + k2 )T
(5.31)
1
4k12 T 2 2
1 !2M
T = and = tan (5.32)
(k1 + k2 )2 T 2 + ! 4 M 2 (k1 + k2 )T
Checking that energy is conserved,
k2 2 k2
|r|2 + |t| = R2 + T 2 = 1, (5.33)
k1 k1
so it is.
Consider a leftward-moving single sinusoidal wave that is incident on a brick wall at its left
end, located at x = 0.The most general form of a left ward-moving sinusoidal wave is given
by
The brick wall is equivalent to a system with infinite impedence, i.e. Z2 = 1, and the
reflection coefficient r = 1, which gives rise to a reflected wave with amplitude of the
same magnitude as the incident wave but with the opposite sign and travelling in the
If we were to observe this system, we would see the summation of these two waves,
or,
✓ ◆ ✓ ◆
2⇡x 2⇡t
y(x, t) = 2A sin sin + . (5.37)
T
Thus we have a wave that is factorised in space- and time-dependent parts, where
every point on the string is moving with a certain time dependence, but the amplitude of
It is also important that we have a sine function rather than cosine in the x-dependent
part, as the cosine would not satisfy the boundary condition of y(0, t) = 0 for all vaues of
t. However, it wouldn’t matter if we had sine or cosine for the time dependent part as we
can always turn one into the other with a phase shift .
We therefore obtain stationary points along the x-direction, these are the nodes with
y = 0 and they occur every /2 wavelengths. Between these nodes, i.e. the peaks, are the
anti-nodes. All points on the string have the same phase, or are multiples of ⇡, in terms
of how the oscillations move in time. For example, all the points are at rest at the same
time ,when the string is at a maximum displacement from the equilibrium position, and
they all pass through the origin or equilibrium position at the same time. These waves are
Rather than invoking the fact that r = 1 for a wall, we could always derive this
result using the fact y = 0 at all t and start from the general solution to the wave equation,
i.e.
72
Figure 5.3: Standing wave with two full wavelengths shown. The solid curves are for t0 = 0
and t = t0 = t and the dashed curved shows where the waves would be at a time t = t0 + ⇡
and t = t0 + ⇡ ± t later. For this standing wave the nodes are the stationary points where
the wave crosses the y = 0 axis.
at y(0, t) = 0 for all t, therefore we should only have the sin kx terms, i.e.
= B sin(!t + ) sin kx
We can also consider a similar system as discussed in Sec. 5.3, where we fix one end to a
massless ring which encircles a frictionless pole at x = 0. This ensures that the wave cannot
move in the longitudinal direction, but is still free to move in the transverse direction. This
is similar to assuming that the string beyond the pole has a density of zero. If we assume
that the wave is travelling towards the pole form the left hand side (i.e. along negative x),
Since the massless ring has zero impedence (remember it was the string on the other side
of the ring that provided the impedence in Sec. 5.3), then the reflection coefficient r = +1
and therefore the wave we would observe is the summation of the incident and reflected
waves,
y(x, t) = yi (x, t) + yr (x, t) = A cos(!t kx + ) + A cos(!t + kx + )
(5.40)
= 2A cos(!t + ) cos kx
As in the cse considered before, you can also apply the usual boundary conditions
to the general solution to the wave equation and reach the same result. In both of these
cases, ! and k can and number and are not necessarily discrete, unlike the case which we
will look at next, where we find that only discrete values are allowed.
Up until now we have considered only inifinte strings which are either free or fixed at one
end. In this section we will look at a finite string with both fixed and free ends. We consider
a string on length L and with the two ends assigned the values of x = 0 and x = L. We
can think of what the general boundary conditions for such a system are. At a fixed end
we know that the displacement in the y direction must be zero at all times, and that the
displacement at any free end must result in @y/@x = 0, because the slope must be zero,
74
Figure 5.4: Standing wave for a system with a free end, with two full wavelengths shown.
As in Fig. 5.5.1, the solid curves are for t0 = 0 and t = t0 = t and the dashed curved
shows where the waves would be at a time t = t0 + ⇡ and t = t0 + ⇡ ± t later. For this
standing wave the nodes are the stationary points where the wave crosses the y = 0 axis.
In this case the end of the string are anti-nodes.
otherwise we would have a vertical force on a massless end, which in turn would result in
infinite acceleration.
First, let us consider a system in which the string is fixed at both ends, i.e. at x = 0 and
x = L. Then we have similar boundary conditions to that considered for the infinite string
fixed at one end, i.e. the boundary conditions that resulted in Eq. 5.36, but we require not
only that y(0, t) = 0, but also y(L, t) = 0. Therefore, the only way to have y(L, t) = 0 for
75
all t is to ensure that sin kL = 0. This implies that kL must be an integer number of ⇡, i.e.
n⇡
kn = ,
L
The fact that each end must be a node implies that we can only have wavelengths
2⇡ 2L
n = = . (5.41)
kn n
So the allowed wavelengths on the string are all integer divisors of twice the length of
the string. This can easily be seen if you consider what the n = 1 mode actually is based
on previous lectures, i.e. the lowest mode is one in which there are two nodes and a single
anti-node halfway between the ends. This unavoidably has half of a full wavelength, where
this half wavelength is the length of the string. You can obviously have an n = 0 mode as
well, but this just means that sin(0) = 0 and the string is just at rest in its equilibrium
position.
Now looking at the angular frequency !, we know that it is related to the velocity of
p
the wave through !/k = T /⇢ = v, so that !n = vkn , i.e. the frequency of oscillation also
n⇡
!n = k n v = v. (5.43)
L
Therefore, the frequency of the oscillations of the string are all integer multiples of the
Combining Eqs. 5.41 and 5.43, we find that v = n /2⇡!n as you would expect.
Since the wave equation in Eq. 4.7 is linear, the most general motion of a string with
two fixed ends is a linear combination of the solution given in Eq. 5.36, where k can only
take a form kn = n⇡/L and !/k = v. Therefore the general expression for y(x, t) is the
1
X
y(x, t) = Fn sin(!n t + n ) sin kn x (5.44)
n=0
or
1
X ⇣ n⇡v ⌘ ⇣ n⇡ ⌘
y(x, t) = Fn sin t+ n sin x . (5.45)
L L
n=0
This is the sum of all possible solutions with the coefficients Fn given by the initial
displacement, which is the boundary condition we have yet to invoke. Note that the sine
function for the time dependent term could be replaced by a cosine, with the phase di↵erence
n adjusted accordingly, but this cannot be done for the x dependent sine term.
Now we will look at what happens if one end of a finite string is left completely free. If
we take the fixed end to be at x = 0 then the boundary conditions are y(0, t) = 0 and
@y/@x|x = L = 0 for all t. From Eq. 5.36 we find that the slope (@y/@x) is proportional
to cos kx. Therefore, for this to be zero at x = L, we require that kL = n⇡ + ⇡/2 for any
integer n. Therefore,
(n + 1/2)⇡
kn = . (5.46)
L
The first thing to note here is that now with n = 0 we have an excited wave, as k0 = ⇡/2L.
where the string has length L. This is straightforward to visualise: with one free we have
an anti-node, whereas at the fixed end there is a node. In this case, the general solution is
again the summation over all possible modes, n, and is given by,
1
X
y(x, t) = Fn sin(!n t + n ) cos kn x (5.47)
n=0
77
or
1
X ⇣ n⇡v ⌘ ✓ ◆
(n + 1/2)⇡
y(x, t) = Fn sin t+ n cos x (5.48)
L L
n=0
Finally, we will look at the case where we have two free ends. In terms of the boundary
conditions, we now do not require that y(x, t) = 0 at any end of the string, and only require
that the gradient of the string @y/@x = 0 at both x = 0 and x = L, for all t. Therefore
Eq. 5.40 provides us with the most general solution for this system, therefore the slope
@y/@x is proportional to sin kx. To ensure that this is zero at x = L and x = 0, we require
n⇡
kn = , (5.49)
L
which is the same as we found for the case with two fixed ends, and again the possible
wavelengths are all integral divisors of 2L, similarly !n = n⇡v/L. So writing down the
1
X
y(x, t) = Fn cos(!n t + n ) cos kn x (5.50)
n=0
or
1
X ⇣ n⇡v ⌘ ⇣ n⇡ ⌘
y(x, t) = Fn cos t+ n cos x . (5.51)
L L
n=0
So in this case the cos(kn x) term ensures that we have an anti-node at either end of
the string for all n. One things to note about this system is that the equilibrium position
Fig. 5.6.3 shows the possible oscillations for these three di↵erent set-ups for a finite
string.
Figure 5.5: Wave pattern for a finite string with two fixed ends (left panels), one fixed end
(central panels) and two free ends (right panels). In this case the length of the string is
fixed at twice the wavelength for the n = 1 mode and the excited modes, defined by n, are
shown in each panel. All panels show the wave pattern at t = ⇡.
Let us now look at a specific example of a string in which the initial conditions mean that
If h(x) describes a pattern for the initial displacement of a finite string then,
1
X n⇡x
y(x, 0) = Fn sin = h(x). (5.52)
L
n=0
79
5⇡x
h(x) = sin for F5 = 1 and Fn = 0 when n 6= 5 (5.53)
L
therefore,
5⇡x 5⇡vt
y(x, t) = sin cos . (5.54)
L L
However, when there is more than one mode active, i.e. when F1 = 1, F2 = 0.5 and Fn = 0
when n 6= 1 or 2, we obtain
In contrast to the case with just a single normal mode, the subsequent motion of the case
with > 1 mode active is not equal to the initial displacement multiplied by a time-dependent
amplitude. This is because the shorter waves move faster, resulting in the shape of the wave
Note: Even if the initial displacement takes the most simple form (i.e. a plucked
string at the centre), it can be expressed as a sum of normal modes. You will see more of
Finally let us consider the energy associated with each normal mode for the finite string
The general solution for the motion of a string fixed at both ends, is given by
1
X n⇡x n⇡vt
y(x, t) = Fn sin cos (5.56)
L L
n=0
So as before, we can calculate the kinetic energy in the fixed string for the nth normal
mode.:
80
Z ✓ ◆
1 L
@yn 2
Kn = ⇢ .dx
0 2 @t
Z
1 2 ⇣ n⇡v ⌘2 2 n⇡vt L 2 n⇡x (5.57)
= ⇢Fn sin sin .dx
2 L L 0 L
⇢(Fn n⇡v)2 n⇡vt
= sin2
4L L
and the potential energy in the fixed string:
Z L ✓ ◆
1 @yn 2
Un = T .dx
0 2 @x
⇣ ⌘2 Z L
1 2 n⇡ 2 n⇡vt n⇡x (5.58)
= T Fn cos cos2 .dx
2 L L 0 L
T (Fn n⇡)2 n⇡vt
= cos2
4L L
p
The total energy in each normal mode is given by En = Kn +Un , and since, v = T /⇢,
then
⇢LFn2 2 ⇣ n⇡ ⌘2
En = K n + U n = v
4 L (5.59)
2
⇢LFn !n 2 n⇡v
= as !n =
4 L
We can now determine the total energy in string fixed at both ends by just generalising the
This is simple extension of exercise for individual normal modes, but with additional terms
1
X 1 X
X 1
E= En + sin ↵x sin x or cos ↵x cos x terms (5.61)
n=1 n=1 m=1
Now if n 6= m,
Z L L
sin[(↵ )x] sin[(↵ + )x]
sin ↵x sin x = =0
0 2(↵ ) 2(↵ + ) 0
Z L
(5.62)
L
sin[(↵ )x] sin[(↵ + )x]
cos ↵x cos x = + =0
0 2(↵ ) 2(↵ + ) 0
1
X
Etot = En , (5.63)
n
i.e. the total energy in the system is the sum of the energies in each normal mode,
as we found in the first set of lectures for the coupled pendulum and spring-mass systems.
We saw that for a travelling wave, that power is transmitted. A given point on the string
does work (which may be positive or negative, depending on the direction of the waves
velocity) on the part of the string to its right. And it does the opposite amount of work on
So is there any energy flowing in a standing wave? We know that there is an energy
density as the string streteches and moves, this is what we saw in Sec. 5.9, but is any energy
Given that a standing wave is just the superposition of two waves of equal amplitudes
travelling in opposite directions then they should have equal and opposite energy flow. This
The power flow in any wave is just given by the rate of work done, or the vertical
✓ ◆✓ ◆
dW @y @y @y
P (x, t) = = Fy = F vy = T . (5.64)
dt @t @x @t
If our standing wave can be described by
then
This is non-zero for most values of x and t, so energy does flow across a given point.
However, at given value of x, the average power over a whole period, is zero. This is
because the average of sin !t cos !t over the period is zero. Therefore the average power is
zero.