History of The Indian Penal Code
History of The Indian Penal Code
The Indian Penal Code is the official criminal code of the Republic of India. It is a complete
code intended to cover all aspects of criminal law.
It came into force in 1862 in all British Presidencies, although it did not apply to the Princely
states, which had their own courts and legal systems.
To know more about other Legislations in British India, visit the linked article.
The first draft of the Code was presented before the Governor-General in council in the year
1837, but subsequent revisions and amendments took two more decades. The complete
drafting of the code was done in 1850 and presented to the Legislative Council in 1856. It
was delayed being placed on the statute book of British India due to the Indian Revolt of
1857.
The code came into force on January 1st, 1860 after undergoing many revisions and
amendments by Barnes Peacock who would go on to serve as the first Chief Justice of the
Calcutta High Court.
Before the advent of the British, the penal law prevailing in India, for the most part, was the
Muhammedan law. For the first few years of its administration, the East India Company did
not interfere with the criminal law of the country and although in 1772, during the
administration of Warren Hastings, the Company for the first time interfered, and henceforth
till 1861, from time to time, the British Government did alter the Muhammedan law, yet up to
1862, when the Indian Penal Code came into operation, the Muhammedan law was
undoubtedly the basis of the criminal law excepting in the presidency towns. The epoch of
the administration of Muslim criminal law in India extended for a considerable period and
has even supplied many terms for the vocabulary of Indian law.
The IPC in its various sections defines specific crimes and provides punishment for them. It
is sub-divided into 23 chapters that comprise of 511 sections. The basic outline of the code is
given in the table below:
These offences are provided for in Chapter XVI of the Code spanning from Section 299,
which deals with culpable homicide to Section 377, which deals with unnatural offences.
The chapter deals with all kinds of offences which can be committed against the human body,
from the very lowest degree i.e. simple hurt or assault to the gravest ones which include
murder, kidnapping and rape.
These crimes are defined and punished under Chapter XVII and range from Section 378
which defines theft, to Section 462 which prescribes punishment for the offence of breaking
upon an entrusted property. The offences that are dealt with under this chapter include,
among others, theft, extortion, robbery, dacoity, cheating and forgery.
The definitions and punishment for this category of offences are provided in Chapter VIII
which ranges from Section 141 to 160. This chapter lays down the acts which are considered
to be criminal in nature because they disturb and destroy public tranquillity and order. This
chapter includes offences like being a member of an unlawful assembly, rioting and affray.
Chapter VI, which deals with offences of this nature, and includes Sections 121 to 130 are
some of the most rigorous penal provisions of the entire code. This includes the offence of
waging war against the state under Section 121 and the much-debated, criticised, and abused
offence of Sedition under Section 124A. The offence defined under this Section has been
much maligned as it was used by the British to prosecute many freedom fighters; it has also
been used post-independence to silence critics of the government and continues to date which
is why many experts advocate repealing the same.
General Exceptions
Sections 76-106 (Chapter IV) embody the general exceptions which are exceptional
circumstances where the offender can escape criminal liability. A basic example in this
context is the Right of Private Defence (Section 96-106). Other concepts that are elaborated
upon in this chapter include Insanity, Necessity, Consent, and acts of children below a certain
age.
Aspirants can refer to the links below to ace the GS-II paper of the IAS exam:
UPSC Mains General Studies Paper-II Strategy, Topic-Wise GS 2 Questions for UPSC
Syllabus & Structure Mains
Social Justice Questions for UPSC Mains Governance Questions for UPSC Mains
International Relations Questions for
Constitution Questions for UPSC Mains
UPSC Mains
The IPC has been successful by and large in its attempt to prosecute and punish individuals
who commit the crimes that are defined in this Code, but like Sedition there have been certain
other provisions that have invited scrutiny time and again. Some of these provisions are as
follows:
This Section, among other things, punished consensual sexual acts between consenting adults
belonging to the same sex. With the advent of time, several voices advocated for the
decriminalisation of this part which punishes homosexuality. The Supreme Court, finally in
the case of Navtej Johar, obliged and decriminalised the portion of this Section which
punished consensual acts of this nature.
This Section prescribed punishment of up to one year for attempting suicide. There is a
longstanding recommendation of the Law Commission to decriminalise attempting suicide by
dropping Section 309 from the statute books. But the amendment to this effect has not been
carried, albeit, the use of the provision has minimized, by the coming into force of the Mental
Healthcare Act, 2017.
As per the non-obstante clause contained in Section 115(1) of the Mental Healthcare Act,
2017, there is the presumption of severe stress on a person who attempted suicide and such
person is not to be punished under Section 309 IPC.
But the reports about the use of Section 309 IPC are not unknown and continue to be reported
from almost all the parts of the country. As such, it is the need of the hour that the police
authorities should be sanitized about the issue.
This Section, which criminalised and prescribed punishment, was criticised for treating a
woman as the private property of her husband and imposing moral principles on married
couples. This Section was finally struck down by the Supreme Court in September 2018
while disposing of the case of Joseph Shine v. Union of India. Watch a video lecture on the
adultery judgement below:
2,22,637
The Code also provides for imposing the death penalty in certain offences like murder, rape,
and waging war against the government. Several human rights groups call for the abolition of
the death penalty citing data to suggest that the imposition of this punishment, in addition to
being arbitrary, is also against the very human rights of the offender.
IPC as a statute has survived and flourished over the last 160 years, which speaks volumes
about its effectiveness as a penal code of high stature. However, over these years it has not
been able to shed away some of its provisions that reek of colonialism e.g. sedition. The
Malimath Committee report while advocating criminal justice reforms has provided the
Parliament with an opportunity to revamp the Code and other criminal laws. It has been 17
years since the submission of the report and no concrete steps have been taken in this respect.
It is about time that the legislature steps in to make the Code more in sync with modern times
than with the times of British colonialism. It does not reflect well on the legislature when the
apex court intervenes and strikes off laws because it is the job of the legislature to do so in
the first place.
Even though the IPC has been haphazardly amended more than 75 times, no comprehensive
revision has been undertaken despite the 42nd report of the law commission in 1971
recommending it — the amendment bills of 1971 and 1978 lapsed due to the dissolution of
the Lok Sabha. As such it has undergone many amendments that have been ad hoc and
reactive.
The nature of the Indian Penal Code has been highlighted as that one of ‘Master and Servant’,
with some of the provisions having no place in Independent India. Some of the sections that
need reform and review are as follows:
Related Links
Revolutionary Movements in Indian Councils Act,
Government of India Act, 1858
India 1892
Historical Background of the
UPSC Books UPSC Notes
Constitution of India
Ans. The Indian Penal Code was drafted by the first Law Commission which was chaired by
Thomas Babington Macaulay. It was drafted in 1834 and submitted to the Council of
Governor-General of India in the year 1835.
Ans. Dr Neelakanta Ramakrishna Madhava Menon is said to be the Father of Indian Modern
Legal Education.
Ans. The Indian Penal Code is the main criminal code for the country. It includes all the
criminal offences including crimes related to human body, property, conspiracy, crimes
against the state or Public Tranquillity, etc. Anyone found guilty of a crime is punishable
under the IPC.
Ans. Penal code of a country defines or mentions crimes and offences which are punishable
by law. It consists of all the laws that are related to crime and punishment.
Ans. Yes, amendments have been made multiple times in the Indian Penal Code after it was
drafted.
Ans. The Indian Penal Code is sub-divided into 23 chapters that comprise 511 sections.