0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views

Indemnity & Guarantee

The document defines and discusses indemnity and guarantee under contract law. It outlines the key parties and rights involved in indemnity and guarantee agreements. Some key points covered include definitions of indemnity and guarantee, rights of the indemnity holder and surety, discharge of surety's liability, and rights of the surety against the principal debtor and creditor.

Uploaded by

quteo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views

Indemnity & Guarantee

The document defines and discusses indemnity and guarantee under contract law. It outlines the key parties and rights involved in indemnity and guarantee agreements. Some key points covered include definitions of indemnity and guarantee, rights of the indemnity holder and surety, discharge of surety's liability, and rights of the surety against the principal debtor and creditor.

Uploaded by

quteo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

INDEMNITY

 Dictionary meaning

◦ Protection against the loss

◦ To make good the loss

 Definition S. 124

◦ A ‘Contract’

◦ Promise to ‘save from loss’

◦ Caused by

 Conduct of promisor HIMSELF; OR

 Conduct of any other PERSON

Note: LOSS caused by human Agency.

 Parties

 INDEMNIFIER (Promisor)

 The Person who makes the promise

 INDEMNITY HOLDER (Promisee)

 The person whose loss is to be made good

 Illustration

 Railway receipt of certain goods is lost by A. A & B both claim the goods. Railway Co.
Agrees to hand over the goods to A only if he gives an indemnity bond. Later on B
(real owner) sues the railway Co. and gets a decree against the Co.Railway Co. can
claim indemnity from A.

 RIGHTS OF INDEMNITY HOLDER S. 125

 When sued indemnity holder has following rights

◦ Recover all damages

◦ Recover all cost

◦ Recover all sums paid under compromise


CONDITION:

 Within authority of the indemnifier

 Acted prudently

 COMMENCEMNT OF LIABILITY

 When to indemnify ?????

◦ BEFORE the indemnity holder suffers loss OR AFTER

 English law

 No action could be brought against the indemnifier until the


indemnity holder had suffered actual loss

 Great hardship for indemnity holder

 Court of equity – not necessary for indemnity holder to be


damnified before he could be indemnified

 Indian law

 Contract law is silent

 Judiciary

 Chand Bibi v Santosh Kumar Pal 1933

 Osmal Jamal & Sons Ltd. v Gopal Purushotham

 Gajanan Moreshwar v Moreshwar Madan (1942) 44 BOMLR


703

“Indemnity requires that the party to be indemnified shall never be called upon to pay”

TIME: As soon as the liability of the indemnity holder to pay becomes clear and certain

*********************
GUARANTEE

 DEFINITION S.126

◦ A Contract

◦ to perform the promise or discharge the liability

◦ of third party

◦ in case of his (third party’s) default

 Illustration

 Parties

◦ Surety (C)

 Who gives guarantee

◦ Principal debtor (B)

 For whom guarantee is given

◦ Creditor (A)

 To whom guarantee is given

 3 Contracts

◦ Principal debtor – Creditor

◦ Surety – Creditor

◦ Principal debtor - Surety


 Features

◦ Oral or written (English law - written)

◦ There should be a principal debt

◦ Benefit to the principal debtor is sufficient consideration (S.127)

◦ Consent of surety should not be obtained by misrepresentation (S.142) or


concealment (S.143)

 Difference between Indemnity & Guarantee

◦ Number of parties

◦ Number of contracts

◦ Object of contract

◦ Nature of liability

◦ Request

◦ Recovery of payments

 Liability of surety S.128

◦ Co – extensive with that of principal debtor

◦ Exactly the same as that of principal debtor

 Recover everything that could be recovered from Principal debtor ( PA +


interest + expenses)

 If liability is reduced of principal debtor then surety’s liability is also reduced.

 Narayan Singh v. Chattarsingh

 If principal debtors liability is affected by illegality then surety’s liability also


does not arise

◦ Jointly and severally liable with Principal Debtor

 Surety’s liability is immediate

 Creditor can sue the surety even though he has not exhausted his remedies
against the principal debtor

◦ Limit on surety’s liability

 Provided by contract

 Aditya Narayan Chauresia v. Bank of India AIR 2004


 Continuing Guarantee S.129

◦ Extends to a series of transaction

◦ Illustration

 B -----Supplies Tea -----C

 A ------ guarantees -----B the payment for any tea which C may buy from time
to time.

 Revocation of Continuing Guarantee S.130

◦ By giving notice to creditor

◦ Revocation of guarantee for future transactions

 Discharge of Surety’s liability

◦ Revocation by the surety S.130

◦ By surety’s death S.131

 Exception – contract to the contrary

◦ By variance in terms of contract S.133

 Variance in terms of contract between Principal Debtor & Creditor

 Without the consent of the Surety

 Surety’s Liability is discharged for subsequent variance.

 If alteration is not detrimental – surety is liable

 Anirudhan v. Thomco’ Bank

◦ By release or discharge of principal debtor S. 134

 By any contract between creditor & principal Debtor which releases the PD

 By any act / omission which discharges the PD

 The legal consequence of the act / omission is that it discharges the PD

 If discharge or release is after the decree is passed - Surety is liable

 Charan Singh v. Security finance Pvt. Ltd.

◦ When creditor compounds, gives time or agrees not to sue the Principal debtor
S.135

 Without the consent of surety


 Compounding

 A borrows Rs. 10,000/- from B . C Stands as surety for the loan. Later
on A and B agree that Rs. 5000/- may be repaid. C is discharged from
liability

 Promise to give time (extension of time)

 Payment in installments instead of lump sum.

(Amrit Lal v. State Bank of Travancore , AIR 1968 SC 1432)

 Exception S.136

Contract to give time is between creditor and third party.

 Creditor promises not to sue

 Mere neglect to sue does not discharge S.137

 By creditor’s act /omission which impairs surety’s remedy S.139

◦ Though not having the legal consequence of discharging the PD, impair the eventual
remedy of the surety

◦ State of M.P v. Kaluram AIR 1967 S.C. 1105

◦ M.R. Chakrapani v. Canara Bank AIR 1997

◦ By loss of the security by the creditor S.141

◦ Creditor loses the security

 Carelessness or negligence

 Exception – lost due to Act of God/Enemy/unavoidable


circumstances

◦ Parts with the security without the consent of the surety

◦ Surety discharged to the extent of the value of the security

 Rights of Surety

◦ Against Principal Debtor

◦ Right of subrogation S.140

 On default of Principal Debtor

 After Surety makes all necessary payments


 Surety is vested with all the rights which creditor has against the principal
debtor

 Surety may claim securities , if any

◦ Right to claim indemnity S. 145

 Only in respect of the payments rightfully made

 Right against the creditor

◦ Right to securities S.141

◦ Surety entitled to the benefit of every security

◦ Given at the time of entering the contract of guarantee

◦ Irrespective of the knowledge of the surety

 Right against co-surety

 Right of contribution S.146

◦ The duty of the co-surety is to contribute equally

◦ Exception – contract to the contrary

 Certain other proportions

******************

You might also like