IALA Guideline 1099 - Hydrostatic Design of Buoys
IALA Guideline 1099 - Hydrostatic Design of Buoys
on
Edition 1
May 2013
AISM Association Internationale de Signalisation Maritime IALA
Document Revisions
Revisions to the IALA Document are to be noted in the table prior to the issue of a revised
document.
Page 2 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
Table of Contents
Document Revisions 2
Table of Contents 3
Index of Tables 4
Index of Figures 4
1
Purpose 5
2
Scope 5
3
Introduction 5
4
Buoyancy 6
5
Stability 7
6
Definition - Units – Notation 7
6.1
Movement of a buoy 7
6.2
Volume 7
6.3
Waterline 8
6.4
Diameter of the waterline 8
6.5
Water plane area 8
6.6
Inertia of water plane 8
6.7
Weight 8
6.8
Buoyancy 8
6.9
Displacement 8
6.10
Reserve buoyancy 8
6.11
Centre of Buoyancy 9
6.12
Buoyant force 9
6.13
Density of water 9
6.14
Centre of gravity 9
7
Calculations 9
7.1
Centre of Gravity 10
7.2
Centre of Buoyancy 10
7.3
Stability 11
7.4
Metacentric Height 11
7.5
Mass budget and position of the centre of gravity (G) 12
7.6
Displaced volume 12
7.7
Verification of the buoyancy 12
7.8
Position of the centre of buoyancy 13
7.9
Righting arm 13
7.10
Angle of heel 14
8
Practical Measurements 16
8.1
Centre of Gravity 16
Page 3 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
Index of Tables
Table 1 Examples for metacentric height of plastic buoys used by various administrationsError! Bookma
Index of Figures
Figure 1
Buoy types (left to right: skirt, deep tail tube, short tail tube, LANBY, ballasted spar,
tail tube with single mooring attachment) 5
Figure 2
Spar buoy, articulated beacon 6
Figure 3
Description of movement of a buoy (from IALA Guideline 1065) 7
Figure 4
Centre of buoyancy 9
Figure 5
Centre of gravity of a buoy 10
Figure 6
Metacentric height 11
Figure 7
Metacentric height 13
Figure 8
Angle of heel 14
Figure 9
Areas of wind- and water forces 15
Figure 10
A buoy lifted at an off-centre lifting point 16
Figure 11
Measuring the metacentric height 18
Figure 12
Towing trials 19
Figure 13
GZ-curve 21
Figure 14
Buoy in horizontal position 22
Page 4 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this guideline is to provide information on calculation of buoy stability for new buoy
designs and for establishing the impact of the installation of new equipment on existing buoys.
Methods of measuring these parameters on existing buoys are also explained.
2 SCOPE
This guideline provides information on those aspects of buoy design that effect the buoyancy and
stability of the buoy. The Guideline 1066 On the Design of Floating Aid to Navigation Moorings [1]
should be consulted when loads due to wind and tidal effects are being considered. It is
recommended that a standard textbook on naval architecture should be consulted if the reader is
not familiar with basic ship stability calculations.
The aspects of buoy design discussed in this guideline provide the basis for designing a buoy from
first principles but can also be used when considering mounting different superstructures and new
equipment on existing buoys or operating existing buoys in different mooring environments.
3 INTRODUCTION
This guideline provides information on the hydrostatic performance of conventional buoys (skirt,
tailtube, ballasted spar) moored with conventional moorings (as described in Guideline 1066 [1]).
Some of the buoy types are illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1 Buoy types (left to right: skirt, deep tail tube, short tail tube, LANBY, ballasted spar, tail
tube with single mooring attachment)
The illustrations used in the Guideline are those of a tailtube buoy used in the French service.
However the principles and processes described apply to all freely floating buoys with external or
internal ballast.
The stability of articulated beacons and spar buoys depends on the mooring providing sufficient
vertical force to maintain the buoy in an upright position. Details of such calculations are not
included. However the information provided on displacement and centre of buoyancy are relevant
to these buoy types.
Page 5 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
4 BUOYANCY
Buoyancy is the upward vertical force provided by the immersed part of the buoy displacing a
volume of water.
It is vital that the buoy will retain sufficient reserve buoyancy for all weather conditions and that the
AtoN will remain effective in most weather conditions. There must be sufficient buoyancy to
support the entire weight of the buoy and the moorings. If it is anticipated that maintenance
personnel will work on the buoy afloat then the buoy must have sufficient reserve buoyancy and
stability for this to be safely carried out. The size and hence the weight of the buoy will depend on
the navigational requirements and the local environmental conditions.
In the case of buoys with several watertight compartments an authority may require the buoys to
remain afloat with one or more sections of the float damaged, and no longer buoyant. Floatation
calculations should then be made with the reduced number of buoyant compartments.
When there are wind forces and/or tidal flow forces acting on the buoy then these will increase the
loads in the mooring and more buoyancy will be required to support the added mooring loads (See
[1]).
If low temperatures are expected estimates of the weight of ice on deck and superstructure should
be included in calculations. Ice forces, due to the freezing of the water surrounding the buoy, are
not considered in the following calculations.
Waves will have some effect on the mooring loads and hence buoyancy requirements. Wave
effects are extremely complex. However if the waves are not breaking then the buoy will follow the
water surface and there will be some increase in the buoyancy requirements in order to cope with
the wave drift.
Page 6 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
5 STABILITY
Stability measures the ability of the buoy to remain upright so that the AtoN will remain effective in
most operating conditions. There are two aspects of stability that will be incorporated in the buoy
design. These are form stability and weight stability.
Form stability is the stability provided by the shape of the immersed part of the buoy. In a normal
cylindrical buoy the greater the diameter of the buoy the more stable it will be. An extreme
example of this is the LANBY buoy which has a shallow 13-meter diameter 'dish' like body. Due to
its large diameter this body provides considerable stability in most situations, however in extreme
conditions even this large buoy can capsize and will then be stable in an inverted position.
The centre of gravity of the buoy being in a position such that it tends to right the buoy provides
weight stability. The deep tailtube buoy provides an example of this type. The ballast on the base
of the tailtube provides righting forces.
Static stability calculations evaluate the combined effects of form stability and weight stability.
6.2 Volume
The body of the buoy forms a closed volume that provides the buoyancy of the buoy when
immersed in water. The total volume is defined as V (m³).
Page 7 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
6.3 Waterline
The waterline WLi is the horizontal line between the submerged part of the buoy and the emerged
part of the buoy.
1
e.g. I f = ⋅ π ⋅ D 4 for circular surfaces
64
6.7 Weight
Weight W is the vertical force (N) of gravity downwards, applied on the buoy. This is the
summation of the mass of all the individual components multiplied by acceleration of gravity g.
W = mb ⋅ g = ∑ mi ⋅ g
i
6.8 Buoyancy
Buoyancy VB (m³) is the volume of the submerged part of the buoy limited by the waterline. The
buoyancy includes the body (float) and other immersed components such as skirt, mooring eyes,
tailtube, external ballast etc.
6.9 Displacement
Displacement Δ (kg) is the total volume displaced (VB) by the buoy multiplied by the density of
water.
Δ = VB ⋅ ρ
ρ density of water in kg/m³ (see values in 6.13)
Definition
An immersed body in a fluid undergoes a vertical force FB
directed upwards (and opposite to the weight of the
displaced fluid). This is equal to the displacement Δ of the
floating body (see 6.9).
FB = VB ⋅ ρ ⋅ g
7 CALCULATIONS
The starting point for the calculations will be a detailed drawing of the buoy along with details of all
the equipment to be mounted on it. The weight budget of the buoy will then be a summation of all
these components. The mass of steel work, aluminium fabrications, plastic mouldings etc. can be
calculated but it is recommended that checks be made by weighing components, where this is
practical.
Page 9 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
Page 10 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
7.3 Stability
With the total mass (m), centre of buoyancy (B) and centre of gravity (G) being established the
metacentric height (GM) can be calculated. The metacentric height provides a measurement of
the righting moment of the centre of mass of the buoy relative to the centre of buoyancy.
For calculation of stability it is usual to consider the buoy as a free floating body, i.e. without the
moorings. This will usually represent the worst stability case. For small buoys the mooring may be
vital for stability and the mooring weight will then have to be included in stability calculations. The
weight of the mooring varies with water level and wave variations.
Page 11 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
If metacentric height (GM) is positive, when the buoy is heeled it will return back to its upright
position. If it is negative, then in most cases any displacement of the buoy will result in heeling
further and tending to capsize.
To increase the metacentric height either the body diameter will have to be increased or, more
usually, the centre of gravity (G) will have to be lowered. This can be accomplished by:
• increasing the weight of the ballast and/or placing it lower down;
• reducing the weight of the superstructure and equipment or placing them lower down.
The ideal value for the metacentric height is difficult to define. A guide of 10% of the body
diameter was quoted for standard steel buoys (3 metre diameter) but this is thought to be rather
small for light weight plastic buoys.
Table 1 Examples for metacentric height of plastic buoys used by various administrations
Diameter / m Metacentric height / m Administration
1.80 0.65 NL
2.30 0.40 F
2.45 0.50 F
2.60 0.95 NL
2.65 0.60 F
3.00 1.10 NL
If it is planned for maintenance personnel to climb the buoy superstructure then a value of the
metacentric height and consequent angle of heel should be calculated with the estimated weight of
personnel at the highest working point on the superstructure. This will confirm if the metacentric
height remains positive in this situation i.e. the buoy remains stable with personnel on board.
∑F = 0
For static equilibrium the weight of the buoy minus the buoyancy is zero.
W − FB = 0
(mb ⋅ g ) − (VB ⋅ ρ ⋅ g ) = 0
mb
VB =
ρ
VB < V
The difference between V and VB is the reserve buoyancy. This allows us to estimate the
additional load that the buoy can support.
For the buoy to remain afloat the buoyancy reserve volume needs to be positive (Rb > 0).
RM = mb ⋅ g ⋅ GZ
therefore
Stability Condition
For the buoy to be stable GM must be positive and M must always be above G.
Page 13 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
The Moment of the area of the buoy which is subject to wind load, about the point of mooring
attachment and the moment of the submerged area of the buoy subject to current load, about the
mooring attachment can be summed and the resulting heel angle calculated. The worst case is
usually assumed when the moments produced by the current and wind forces are both trying to
heel the buoy in the same direction. The direction of heel due to current flow will depend on the
area of the immersed parts of the buoy that are situated above and below the mooring eye.
Page 14 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
The buoy is restrained by the mooring and will pivot about the point of attachment of the mooring
(mooring eye). In Figure 9 the force of the wind will act on the area of the buoy above the
waterline, shaded red. The force will act about the centroid of this area. Current forces on the
submerged area of the buoy (blue) will act about the centroid of the submerged area. Moments
are taken about the mooring eye(s). Water forces acting on the buoy include current (tidal or
stream), wind generated surface current and wave drift.
The wind drag moment [Nm] is calculated by multiplying the wind drag [N] by the distance from the
centroid of emerged area to the mooring attachment point [m].
The water drag moment [Nm] is calculated by multiplying the water drag [N] by the distance from
the centroid of immersed area to the mooring attachment point [m].
Moments are taken as positive, if the buoy tends to rotate in a clockwise direction about the
mooring point and negative if anticlockwise. The sum of these moments about the mooring point
provides a value for the overturning moment.
This formula is only valid for small angles of heel (less than ten degrees). These heeling
calculations will provide a guide to the angle the buoy will attain due to the given wind and current
Page 15 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
forces. However as the angle of heel increases the calculated result will become less accurate as
the effective shape and projected area of the buoy body will change.
If a buoy is to be used in a particular current flow situation, these calculations can be also used to
evaluate the position of mooring eyes or mooring attachment if the buoy has several mooring
attachment positions.
Note:
For the model of buoy shown in these diagrams where the mooring attachment is away from the
centre line the heeling moment due to the mooring forces being applied at a distance from the
buoy centre line (the arm) will need to be added to the calculations.
When angle of heel is being considered it should be noted that the anticipated maximum angle of
heel should not exceed half the vertical divergence (FWHM) of the lantern.
8 PRACTICAL MEASUREMENTS
The practical measurement of weight, freeboard and metacentric height may be of particular value
when considering alterations or the installation of new equipment to existing buoys for which
design drawings and calculations are not available.
Practical measurements can also be useful to confirm calculated values of Centre of Gravity.
J ⋅ (1 + k )
The natural roll period is T = 2π
mb ⋅ g ⋅ GM
k added mass coefficient (which can vary from 0.1 up to 1, depending on the float shape and
the type of skirt or tailtube)
mb mass of the buoy in kg
g acceleration due to gravity in m/s²
GM metacentric height in m
The state of the buoy should be consistent for m and GM.
The added mass coefficient (k) accounts for the amount of boundary water that moves with the
buoy. Note that the mass of the mooring line is neglected in the above formula. Moreover, remind
that this formula is valid only for small angles and static position of the buoy.
8.3 Waterline
When the freeboard is known the effects of adding the mooring loads to the buoy can be easily
calculated and the effective freeboard in service conditions estimated.
If suitable calm water facilities are available, along with a crane capable of lifting the buoy, then
floatation trials can be carried out. The draft can be measured and the line of floatation and hence
the freeboard confirmed.
At this stage weights can be placed on the deck of the buoy, possibly those to be used for the
inclining experiment. These are placed on opposite sides of the superstructure so that the buoy
remains floating in an upright position. The weights should be of sufficient size to sink the buoy by
a significant amount. The displacement (kg) per mm immersion can then be established (or
calculations confirmed). This should be carried out with two or more sets of weights to ensure
accuracy of the results.
Note:
The line of floatation will vary depending on the density of water the buoy is floating in (see 6.13).
Page 17 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
Weights will be required that can be placed at the outboard edge of the buoy's deck to heel the
buoy. The angle of heel can then be measured and used to calculate the metacentric height.
Several weights should be used to heel the buoy first one way and then the other. The angle of
heel may be measured with a pendulum (see Figure 11) on the buoy. The movement of the
pendulum can be measured with a horizontal scale.
horizontal displacement
tan(θ ) =
length of pendulum
The angle could also be measured with an inclinometer or by photographing the buoy with a
horizontal or vertical reference line in the background.
The metacentric height should be calculated with several different inclining weights.
The buoy mooring lines must be completely slack and no foreign weights or personnel must be
allowed on the buoy during the inclining test.
This is valid for small heel angles (less then five degrees) and the measurements must be carried
out in flat water. These calculated values should all be similar and an average may be taken.
Page 18 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
If the pendulum is used the mass of the pendulum is usually immersed in a container of water to
damp the motion of the pendulum.
If the photographic method is used the photos must be take from a direction perpendicular to the
plane of heel of the buoy.
For small angles of heel B follows a circle centred at M with a radius BM (metacentric radius).
GM and KM are calculated in the following formulae:
GM = KM − KG
KM = KB0 + B0 M
B0M is calculated using the following formula that incorporates the Inertia of the water plane (see
6.6)
If
B0 M =
VB
The metacentric height is calculated as follows
GM = ( KB0 + B0 M ) − KG
where the first part is the form stability and the second part is the mass stability.
Page 19 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
Stability is the ability of the buoy to return to an upright position when external actions such as
wind, waves and current have displaced it. Stability is considered adequate if the buoy retains this
capacity in all situations.
Factors that may affect the stability are the:
• loading of the buoy;
• presence of overturning moments due to external forces.
Stability can be studied via the curve of righting arm.
It is usual to produce two curves, one without mooring and one with the mooring suspended
vertically beneath the buoy.
Method:
At each angle of heel θ the value of the righting arm GZ can be determined.
Page 20 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
Figure 13 GZ-curve
The angle θ max is the peak of the curve. It is the maximum angle of stability.
Limit angle of static capsizing ( θ s ):
This angle ( θ s ) is the point where righting arm disappears and static capsizing occurs.
Beyond this angle the righting moment becomes negative and a prompt capsize occurs.
The stability curve is difficult to produce by manual calculation because the water plane shape of
the buoy will change as the buoy heels (except for buoys with spherical bodies).
A simple safety evaluation can be carried out by calculating the overturning moments at 90° heel.
This assumes the buoy is knocked down horizontally by wind or waves. It is proposed that this
calculation is carried out without considering the effects of moorings, as this will represent the most
extreme stability case.
Page 21 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
The centre of gravity G remains in the same position as in the original calculations. The displaced
volume of the buoy is also the same as originally calculated; however, this is now provided by the
new immersed section of the buoy body, parts of the tail tube and possibly part of the
superstructure. The buoyant element of the superstructure may be significant if the superstructure
is enclosed. The horizontal position of this new centre of buoyancy B is calculated and the relative
positions of G and B will show if the buoy will tend to right or to capsize.
The righting arm GZ is now xr. The value of the righting moment will be:
RM = m ⋅ g ⋅ GZ = m ⋅ g ⋅ (xr )
13 REFERENCES
Page 22 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
Page 23 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
The height of the centre of gravity G from the datum is 367 597 / 260 = 1 414 mm.
Determination of centre of gravity G of the buoy: steel buoy + aluminium superstructure
The height of the centre of gravity G of the buoy is from the datum K
17 882 100 / 5 000 = 3 576 mm.
Page 24 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
The height of the centre of buoyancy B for the buoy from the datum K is
24 867 316 / 5 000 = 4 973 mm
Page 25 of 26
Guideline 1099 – on the Hydrostatic design of buoys
May 2013
Steel buoys
Volume 7.50 m³ 12 m³ 26 m³
Mass 5 000 kg 9 500 kg 15 000 kg
Natural roll period 5.80 seconds 7 seconds 7 seconds
Volume 9 m³ 7 m³ 6 m³
Mass 3 650 kg 3 400 kg 3 150 kg
Natural roll period 4.85 seconds 4.70 seconds 4.20 seconds
Page 26 of 26