The Importance of Climate in The Upcoming Federal Election: Six Key Ridings 13th August 2021
The Importance of Climate in The Upcoming Federal Election: Six Key Ridings 13th August 2021
Vancouver, BC – A summer of extreme heat, fires and flooding, along with the release of another
sobering IPCC climate report are setting up an election where climate change could play a critical
role. National polling has already shown climate change is a top election issue across Canada, and
new data from Mainstreet Research confirms that in key ridings voters are deeply concerned about
climate change, and could be willing to shift their vote because of it.
“This summer really has demonstrated that climate change is an emergency that we have to deal
with here and now,” Amara Possian, Canada Campaign Director with 350.org said. “Voters are deeply
concerned not just that climate change is happening, but that politicians in Canada aren’t acting at the
scale and urgency that we need to tackle this crisis.”
Polling six possible swing ridings across the country, Mainstreet Research found:
At least 3 in 4 voters in all polled ridings considered climate change to be either very important or
somewhat important. Even among Conserative voters climate change was a major issue.
At least 1 in 3 voters would consider switching their vote to another candidate or party in order
to elect a climate champion in their riding. Liberal identifying voters in particular expressed a
willingness to change their vote to support climate champions.
This swing potential was most apparent in West Vancouver - Sunshine Coast - Sea to Sky Country
where 43% of all voters would switch and nearly 48% of Liberal voters would switch.
“These findings clearly show that climate change is a very important issue for voters no matter who
they plan to vote for,” said Joseph Angolano, Vice President of Mainstreet Research. “Candidates
in these key ridings must offer voters a clear vision to tackle climate change if they want to be
competitive in the upcoming election”.
With wildfires and heat expected to continue into the fall, and through a potential election, voters will
continue to feel the impacts of climate change while parties vie for their votes.
“With COVID-19, people saw what an emergency level government response can look like, and we
just haven’t been doing that when it comes to climate change,” Possian explained. “If candidates
deliver climate action at the scale we need, with a moratorium on fossil fuel expansion and a real just
transition plan, climate voters could rally behind them in a big way.”
-30-
25.1% 25.8%
26.8%
25.1% 25.8%
32.8% 26.8%
32.8%
Burnaby
Burnaby North-Seymour
North-Seymour Kitchener Centre
Kitchener Centre
6.2%6.2%
4%4%
17.9%
17.9%
13.2% 14.3%
13.2% 14.3%
22.7%
11.1%
22.7%
11.1%
19%
23%
19%
23%
34.5%
36.5% 34.5%
0.2% 36.5%
0.2%
2.9%
12.1%
12.1% Malpeque
Malpeque
2.9%
Parkdale-High Park
Parkdale-High Park
8.8%
8.8%
7%
7%
14.3%
16.6%
25.3% 14.3%
16.6%
25.3%
MacDonald, Liberal
Keenan, Green Sanderson, Conservative
Another Candidate Nash, NDP
Undecided Virani, Liberal Pham, Conservative
Another Candidate Taylor, NDP
Undecided Capra, Green
Toronto Centre West Vancouver-Sea To Sky Country
Keenan, Green Another Candidate Undecided Another Candidate Undecided
14.1%
24.3% 23.1%
4%
4%
39.9%
39.9%
15.5%
15.5%
27.5%
19.4% 27.5%
8.6% 19.4%
9.5%
8.6%
9.5%
Ien, Liberal Sharma, Conservative Chang, NDP Paul, Green Weiler, Liberal Weston, Conservative Lewis, NDP Simpson, Green
100%
6% 6%
90% 9%
12% 11% 10%
12% 6% 5% 12%
80%
7% 8%
8% 7%
70%
60%
26%
50% 30% 24%
28% 29%
32%
40%
30%
20%
10%
The surveys are intended to represent the voting population in these federal six electoral districts.
The survey was conducted by Mainstreet Research and was sponsored by 350.org
The sampling frame was derived from both a national telephone directory compiled by Mainstreet
Research from various commercially available sources and random digit dialing. The survey
that dialed from the directory was conducted as a stratified dial of the ten Canadian provinces.
In the case of random digit dials, respondents were asked the additional question of what region
of the country they resided in. Respondents were dialed at random.
At least two attempts were made to complete an interview at every sampled telephone number.
The calls were staggered over different times of day and two days to maximize the chances of
making contact with a potential respondent. Interviewing was also spread as evenly as possible
across the field period.
The questionnaire used in this survey is available in this report and online at www.
mainstreetresearch.ca. If a question is asked of a subset of the sample a descriptive note is
added in parenthesis preceding the question.
The sample was weighted by population parameters from the Canada 2016 Census for adults
18 years of age or older in Canada. The population parameters used for weighting are age and
gender.
As this survey used non-probability sampling to collect this sample, a margin of error cannot
be applied to this sample. However, the margins of error for a probability sample of these sizes
are as follows; West Vancouver-Sunshine Coast-Sea to Sky Country, n=624, +/- 3.9%; Burnaby
North-Seymour, n=558, +/- 4.1%; Kitchener Centre, n=601, +/- 4%; Toronto Centre, n=574,
+/- 4.1%; Parkdale-High Park, n=600, +/- 4%; Malpeque, n=280, +/- 5.9%
In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that the wording of questions and practical
difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.
Moreover, all sample surveys and polls may be subject to other sources of error, including, but
not limited to coverage error, and measurement error.