Enantioselective Total Synthesis of (+) - Wortmannin: Yinliang Guo, Tianfei Quan, Yandong Lu, and Tuoping Luo
Enantioselective Total Synthesis of (+) - Wortmannin: Yinliang Guo, Tianfei Quan, Yandong Lu, and Tuoping Luo
pubs.acs.org/JACS
a
Reagents and conditions: (a) 14 (1.05 equiv), Pd2(dba)3 (0.02 equiv), dppf (0.08 equiv), DIPEA (2.4 equiv), PhCl, 130 °C, 1.5 h; 15, 42%; 16,
33%; (b) TBSCl (1.1 equiv), imidazole (1.3 equiv), DMF, 1.5 h, 0 °C to RT, 85%; (c) NiCl2·6H2O (5.0 equiv), NaBH4 (15.0 equiv), MeOH, −90
°C to −60 °C, 69%; (d) LHMDS (2.0 equiv), PhNTf2 (1.8 equiv), THF, −78 to 0 °C, 98%; (e) 10 (1.3 equiv), Pd2(dba)3 (0.04 equiv), AsPh3 (0.24
equiv), NMP, 70 °C, 6 h, 69%; (f) TBHP (2.0 equiv), (−)-DIPT (0.5 equiv), Ti(OiPr)4 (0.4 equiv), 4 Å MS, DCM, −40 °C, 5 h, 68%; (g) NaH (2.5
equiv), MeI (2.0 equiv), DMF, −10 °C to rt, 91%; (h) Ph4PBF4 (3 equiv), DCM:HFIP (4:1), −15 °C, 65 h; (i) TBAF·3H2O, rt, 1 h; 20, 47% (2
steps); (j) TEMPO (0.3 equiv), PhI(OAc)2 (1.5 equiv), DCM, rt, 20 h, 93%; (k) NaClO2 (5.0 equiv), NaH2PO4·2H2O (5.0 equiv), 2-methyl-2-
butene (30.0 equiv), tBuOH/THF/H2O (3:2:1), rt, 1.5 h; (l) CMPI (6.0 equiv), Et3N (8.0 equiv), DCM, rt, 12 h, 75% (2 steps); (m) urea
hydrogen peroxide (4.0 equiv), TFAA (1.5 equiv), Na2CO3 (6.0 equiv), DCM, 0 °C, 1.5 h, 69% (brsm: 85%); (n) NBS (1.5 equiv), AIBN (0.3
equiv), CCl4, reflux, 1.5 h; then AgBF4 (1.2 equiv), Et3N (2.0 equiv), DMSO, rt, 65%; (o) Et2NH (2.0 equiv), DCM, rt, 20 min; then DBN (4.0
equiv), DCM, 35 °C, 6 h; then HCl, THF, 35 °C, 15 h, 25% (brsm: 40%); (p) Ac2O (15 equiv), pyridine, rt, 12 h; then 3HF·Et3N, THF, 45 °C,
76%; (q) DMP (1.5 equiv), DCM, 0 °C to rt, 2.5 h, 85%.
manuscript, Guerrero and co-workers reported elegant asym- fully, this strategy would also secure the C1 stereogenic center.
metric syntheses of furanosteroids (−)-viridin and (−)-viridiol, The epoxide in 8 could be reliably introduced by a Sharpless
which featured an intramolecular Heck reaction as well.13 asymmetric epoxidation, leading us back to ketone 9 given the fact
Based on our ongoing interest in chemotypes capable of that 10 is known.18 It was envisaged that ketone 9 could be
reacting with proteinogenic amino acid residues,14 we envisaged prepared by the coupling of enolate 11 with furan 12 or suitable
that the electrophilic [6,6,5]-tricyclic furan moiety found in equivalents.
various natural products could hold great potential for this In the forward direction (Scheme 1), we started from acid 13,
purpose, the chemical synthesis of which started from hibiscone C which was synthesized in three steps from (+)-Hajos−Parrish
(4) by Smith group in 1982.15 We recently reported the first ketone following reported procedures.19 The connection of
enantioselective synthesis of (−)-hibiscone C (4),16 but an Hajos−Parrish ketone and the furan moiety via direct Hajos−
innovative strategy would be needed to access wortmannin (1) in Parrish alkylation20 was deprioritized due to the two-fold
an efficient and modular manner. Careful consideration of the alkylation in the model reaction and the multistep preparation
structural features of wortmannin (1) suggested that intermediate of the halofuran electrophile (see Figure S1 in Supporting
5 could be prepared from the corresponding pentacycle 6 through Information for details). We subsequently designed a cascade
olefin epoxidation and late-stage allylic oxidation. In turn, it was transformation based on the unique properties of π-propargyl-
envisaged 6 could be traced back to furan 7 by opening the lactone palladium to achieve the first connection (Figure S2).21 Under the
ring. We planned to conduct an intramolecular Friedel−Crafts optimized reaction conditions (Table S1), acid 13 reacted with
alkylation between the furan and epoxide moiety in 8 to install the propargyl carbonate 14 to afford the coupling product 15 in 42%
critical C10 stereogenic center in which the SN2 mechanism yield on a multigram scale, while the decarboxylated product 16
framework would allow for specific stereocontrol.17 If success- was isolated in 33% yield and reconverted to acid 13 in one step.19
6816 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b02515
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 6815−6818
Journal of the American Chemical Society Communication
As shown in Table S2, this Pd-catalyzed cascade reaction was Scheme 2. Alternative Approach to (+)-Wortmannin (1) from
discovered to be an efficient method for the preparation of 5a
substituted furans. Following the protection of the primary
alcohol in 15 as the corresponding TBS ether, we performed the
stereoselective 1,4-reduction of the enone moiety to furnish
ketone 9 in 69% yield.22 This reaction also afforded 1,2-reduction
product as a major side product (17% yield), which could be
subjected to PCC oxidation to recycle the enone starting material
17 (see Supporting Information for details). Installation of the
triflate under the kinetic-controlled enolization conditions,
followed by a Stille coupling with 10 provided allylic alcohol 18
in 68% yield over two steps. The Sharpless epoxidation of 18,
followed by methylation of the primary alcohol delivered the
cyclization precursor 8 in 62% overall yield as a single
diastereomer.
A series of condition screening were conducted using substrate
8 to determine the optimal conditions for the cyclization (see a
Reagents and conditions: (a) 3HF·Et3N, THF, 45 °C, 17 h, 95%; (b)
Table S3 in Supporting Information for details). To the best of DMP (2.0 equiv), DCM, 0 °C to rt, 1.5 h, 89%; (c) Et2NH (2.0
our knowledge, there have been very few reports describing the equiv), DCM, rt, 20 min; then DBN (4.0 equiv), DCM, 35 °C, 4 h;
functionalization of furan β-position in the Friedel−Crafts then HCl, THF, 35 °C, 12 h, 54% (brsm: 62%); (d) Ac2O (12 equiv),
alkylation involving an epoxide.23 While various Lewis acids pyridine, rt, 12 h, 84%.
only led to decomposition of the starting material 8, we were
delighted to find 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexofluoroisopropol (HFIP) and
Ph4PBF4 additive greatly facilitated the desired transformation,17 reconstruction of the furan ring, to give 27 in 54% yield (62%
although the cyclization product 7 was contaminated with based on recovered starting material), which was converted to
unidentified side products even after purification by flash (+)-wortmannin (1) upon acetylation. All of the analytic data for
chromatography. Therefore, the partially purified 7 was the synthesized samples of 1, 24, and 27 were consistent with
subsequently treated with TBAF at room temperature to afford those reported in the literature (Tables S4−S6).2,9,27
diol 20 as a single diastereomer in 47% yield over two steps on a We next subjected wortamnnin and its analogues to character-
gram-scale.24 ization by biochemical assays. In order to determine the selectivity
The stage was then set to investigate the elaboration of 20 to profiles using the KinomeScan approach (DiscoverX),28 the
give wortmannin (1). The selective oxidation of the primary binding constants (Kds) of 1, 24, and 25 against several PI3Ks
alcohol in 20 followed by lactonization of the resulting carboxylic were first determined using the same platform, which also
acid with Mukaiyama’s reagent afforded 6, completing the revealed that (−)-hibiscone C (4) was unable to bind the ATP
pentacyclic skeleton of wortmannin. The epoxidation of 6 was binding site of p110α (Table S7). Consistent with previous
found to be sluggish even in the presence of excess in situ- reports,4b,29 17-β-hydroxy-wortmannin (24) was found to be
generated trifluoroacetyl peroxide,25 but the reaction cleanly more potent than 1, whereas the activities of 25 were at least an
produced the desired product as a single stereoisomer in 69% order of magnitude weaker than those of 1 except for its activities
yield (85% based on recovered starting material), leaving only one against VPS34 and p110β. The profiling of compounds 24 (1 μM)
allylic methylene in 21. The subsequent exposure of 21 to N- and 25 (5 μM) against a panel of 468 kinases showed they only
bromosuccinimide (NBS) in the presence of the radical initiator interacted with class I PI3Ks, VPS34, and PI3K-C2β, while clinical
AIBN resulted in successful formation of the corresponding p110α mutations did not have an adverse impact on the binding of
bromo intermediate, which underwent an immediate Kornblum these inhibitors (Figure S3 and Table S9).30 Compounds 24 and
oxidation to afford 5 in 65% isolated yield.26 It is noteworthy that a 25 were also evaluated using a series of enzymatic assays
similar intermediate bearing a benzoyl protecting group on the (Invitrogen), which confirmed that the introduction of an
C17 hydroxyl group instead of a TBS ether was reported in the epoxide moiety to the C-ring led to a pronounced drop (>280-
semisynthesis of wortmannin.9a With this in mind, we applied the fold) in the inhibitory activity, although this effect was less
same sequence of operations as those developed by Shibasaki and prominent for PI3Kβ (p110β/p85α) and VPS34 (Table S8).
co-workers to obtain 23 (via 22), albeit in low yield (25%, 40% Given that several other changes to the C-ring substitution
based on recovered starting material).9a Nonetheless, subsequent patterns in wortmannin were reasonably tolerated,4b,29 further
acetylation and TBS deprotection of 23 delivered the previously investigation is needed to provide a rationale of our observation
reported 17-β-hydroxy-wortmannin (24),4b,c which was oxidized that the inclusion of an epoxide moiety resulted in significant
with DMP to give (+)-wortmannin (1) in 85% yield. The low decrease of activity.
yield of 23 was attributed in part to the lability of TBS protecting In summary, starting from the known acid 13 and triol 14, we
group under the acidic reaction conditions (see Supporting have achieved the total synthesis of (+)-wortmannin (1) in 18
Information for details), which prompted us to develop an steps (21 steps from Hajos−Parrish ketone) (Scheme S1).31 The
alternative and high yielding approach to 1 (Scheme 2). To this key features of our synthesis include the systematic optimization
end, the removal of TBS protecting group in 5 afforded 25 in of a Pd-catalyzed cascade reaction and an intramolecular Friedel−
excellent yield, which was oxidized to give ketone 26. The Crafts alkylation, as well as the application of a late-stage allylic
structure of 26 was unambiguously confirmed by X-ray oxidation. Most notably, our approach allows for the synthesis of
diffraction. Compound 26 was subjected to the same one-pot new wortmannin analogues to expand research territory of such
procedure involving the opening of the electrophilic furan ring an important irreversible kinase inhibitor, which is currently
with diethylamine, eliminative opening of the epoxide, and underway in our group and will be reported in due course.
6817 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b02515
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 6815−6818
Journal of the American Chemical Society Communication
■
*
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
S Supporting Information
Rabien, A.; Makrantonaki, E.; Zouboulis, C. C. PLoS One 2016, 11,
e0154770.
(8) Zhang, D.; Jiang, W.; Liu, M.; Sui, X.; Yin, X.; Chen, S.; Shi, Y.; Deng,
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS H. Cell Res. 2009, 19, 429.
Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b02515. (9) (a) Sato, S.; Nakada, M.; Shibasaki, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
Detailed experimental procedures, compound character- 6141. (b) Mizutani, T.; Honzawa, S.; Tosaki, S.-y.; Shibasaki, M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4680. (c) Shigehisa, H.; Mizutani, T.; Tosaki, S.-
ization data, and complete ref 28 (PDF) y.; Ohshima, T.; Shibasaki, M. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 5057.
KinomeScan profile of 24 and 25 (XLSX) (10) Maddaford, S. P.; Andersen, N. G.; Cristofoli, W. A.; Keay, B. A. J.
Crystallographic data for 26 (CIF) Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10766.
■
(11) Miyazaki, F.; Uotsu, K.; Shibasaki, M. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 13073.
AUTHOR INFORMATION (12) Kienzler, M. A.; Suseno, S.; Trauner, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 8604.
Corresponding Author (13) Del Bel, M.; Abela, A. R.; Ng, J. D.; Guerrero, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
*[email protected] 2017, DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b02829.
ORCID (14) Zhao, S.; Dai, J.; Hu, M.; Liu, C.; Meng, R.; Liu, X.; Wang, C.; Luo,
T. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 4702.
Tuoping Luo: 0000-0003-2156-3198 (15) Koft, E. R.; Smith, A. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 5568.
Author Contributions (16) Lu, Y.; Yuan, H.; Zhou, S.; Luo, T. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 620.
§ (17) (a) Li, G.-X.; Qu, J. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2653. (b) Tian, Y.;
These authors contributed equally.
Xu, X.; Zhang, L.; Qu, J. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 268.
Notes (18) Betzer, J.-F.; Delaloge, F.; Muller, B.; Pancrazi, A.; Prunet, J. J. Org.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
■
Chem. 1997, 62, 7768.
(19) Frie, J. L.; Jeffrey, C. S.; Sorensen, E. J. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 5394.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (20) Hajos, Z. G.; Micheli, R. A.; Parrish, D. R.; Oliveto, E. P. J. Org.
This work was supported by generous start-up funds from the Chem. 1967, 32, 3008.
National “Young 1000 Talents Plan” Program, College of (21) For reviews, see: (a) Guo, L.-N.; Duan, X.-H.; Liang, Y.-M. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 111. (b) Yoshida, M. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2012, 60,
Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University and 285.
Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, and the National (22) Yamashita, S.; Iso, K.; Hirama, M. Org. Lett. 2009, 10, 3413.
Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21472003, 31521004, (23) (a) Kantam, M. L.; Aziz, K.; Likhar, P. R. Catal. Lett. 2004, 98, 117.
and 21672011). We thank Dr. Nengdong Wang and Prof. (b) Chung, W. K.; Lam, S. K.; Lo, B.; Liu, L. L.; Wong, W.-T.; Chiu, P. J.
Wenxiong Zhang (Peking University) for their help in analyzing Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4556.
the X-ray crystallography data. (24) The major side product in this key transformation was determined
■
to be diene 19, resulting from the ring opening of epoxide (see Table S3
REFERENCES in Supporting Information for details).
(1) (a) Vanhaesebroeck, B.; Stephens, L.; Hawkins, P. Nat. Rev. Mol.
Cell Biol. 2012, 13, 195. (b) Wymann, M. P.; Schultz, C. ChemBioChem
2012, 13, 2022.
(2) (a) Brian, P. W.; Curtis, P. J.; Hemming, H. G.; Norris, G. F. L. Trans.
Br. Mycol. Soc. 1957, 40, 365. (b) Petcher, T. J.; Weber, H.-P.; Kis, Z. J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1972, 1061. (c) MacMillan, J.; Simpson, T. (25) (a) Cooper, M. S.; Heaney, H.; Newbold, A. J.; Sanderson, W. R.
J.; Yeboah, S. K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1972, 1063. Synlett 1990, 9, 533. (b) Heaney, H. Aldrichimica Acta 1993, 26, 35.
(3) Wipf, P.; Halter, J. H. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 2053. (c) Arimoto, H.; Shimano, T.; Uemura, D. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53,
(4) (a) Wymann, M. P.; Bulgarelli-Leva, G.; Zvelebil, M. J.; Pirola, L.; 3863.
Vanhaesebroeck, B.; Waterfield, M. D.; Panayotou, G. Mol. Cell. Biol. (26) (a) Kornblum, N.; Powers, J. W.; Anderson, G. J.; Jones, W. J.;
1996, 16, 1722. (b) Norman, B. H.; Shih, C.; Toth, J. E.; Ray, J. E.; Dodge, Larson, H. O.; Levand, O.; Weaver, W. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79,
J. A.; Johnson, D. W.; Rutherford, P. G.; Schultz, R. M.; Worzalla, J. F.; 6562. (b) Kornblum, N.; Jones, W. J.; Anderson, G. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Vlahos, C. J. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 1106. (c) Creemer, L. C.; Kirst, H. A.; 1959, 81, 4113. (c) Ganem, B.; Boeckman, R. K., Jr. Tetrahedron Lett.
Vlahos, C. J.; Schultz, R. M. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 5021. (d) Walker, E. 1974, 15, 917. (d) Zheng, C.; Dubovyk, I.; Lazarski, K. E.; Thomson, R. J.
H.; Pacold, M. E.; Perisic, O.; Stephens, L.; Hawkins, P. T.; Wymann, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 17750.
P.; Williams, R. L. Mol. Cell 2000, 6, 909. (e) Mandelker, D.; Gabelli, S. B.; (27) (a) Haefliger, W.; Kis, Z.; Hauser, D. Helv. Chim. Acta 1975, 58,
Schmidt-Kittler, O.; Zhu, J.; Cheong, I.; Huang, C.-H.; Kinzler, K. W.; 1620. (b) MacMillan, J.; Vanstone, A. E.; Yeboah, S. K. J. Chem. Soc.,
Vogelstein, B.; Amzel, L. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106, Perkin Trans. 1 1972, 22, 2898.
16996. (28) (a) Fabian, M. A.; et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 329. (b) Karaman,
(5) Manning, G.; Whyte, D. B.; Martinez, R.; Hunter, T.; Sudarsanam, M. W.; et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 127.
S. Science 2002, 298, 1912. (29) Dodge, J. A.; Bryant, H. U.; Kim, J.; Matter, W. F.; Norman, B. H.;
(6) (a) Brunn, G. J.; Williams, J.; Sabers, C.; Wiederrecht, G.; Lawrence, Srinivasan, U.; Vlahos, C. J.; Sato, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1995, 5,
J. C.; Abraham, R. T. EMBO J. 1996, 15, 5256. (b) Liu, Y.; Shreder, K. R.; 1713.
Gai, W.; Corral, S.; Ferris, D. K.; Rosenblum, J. S. Chem. Biol. 2005, 12, 99. (30) 17-β-Hydroxy-wortmannin (24) also potently inhibited PI4Kβ,
(c) Liu, Y.; Jiang, N.; Wu, J.; Rosenblum, J. S. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, PLK1, and DNA-PK; for the inhibition of PLK1 and DNA-PK by
2505. wortmannin, see ref 6.
(7) For recent applications, see: (a) Sherratt, A. R.; Nasheri, N.; McKay, (31) One reaction step is defined as the conversion of a substrate to a
C. S.; O’Hara, S.; Hunt, A.; Ning, Z.; Figeys, D.; Goto, N. K.; Pezacki, J. P. product in a single reaction flask without intermediate workup or
ChemBioChem 2014, 15, 1253. (b) Somoza, J. R.; Koditek, D.; Villaseñor, purification. See: Kawamura, S.; Chu, H.; Felding, J.; Baran, P. S. Nature
A. G.; Novikov, N.; Wong, M. H.; Liclican, A.; Xing, W.; Lagpacan, L.; 2016, 532, 90.
Wang, R.; Schultz, B. E.; Papalia, G. A.; Samuel, D.; Lad, L.; McGrath, M.
E. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 8439. (c) Hossini, A. M.; Quast, A. S.; Plötz,
M.; Grauel, K.; Exner, T.; Küchler, J.; Stachelscheid, H.; Eberle, J.;