Scribd
Upload
101 views

8D Problem Solving Analysis: Minor

The 8D report summarizes an issue with a part that was out of specification. An immediate containment action was to conditionally accept the parts while further inspection was conducted. Root cause analysis found the parts were inspected and verified to be okay. Corrective actions included starting lot-wise sampling inspections to prevent recurrence. Effectiveness checks over subsequent months found the problem did not repeat.

Uploaded by

K K Maharana
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
101 views

8D Problem Solving Analysis: Minor

The 8D report summarizes an issue with a part that was out of specification. An immediate containment action was to conditionally accept the parts while further inspection was conducted. Root cause analysis found the parts were inspected and verified to be okay. Corrective actions included starting lot-wise sampling inspections to prevent recurrence. Effectiveness checks over subsequent months found the problem did not repeat.

Uploaded by

K K Maharana
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

8D PROBLEM SOLVING ANALYSIS QA/FR/09, Rev 01 , Date :31.05.

21

TITLE : PART.NO. OPEN ON CATEGORY


Cover Plate load group 5 0324 11.09.2020 Minor
1. TEAM OR INDIVIDUAL NAME (S) : 2. PROBLEM DESCRIPTION ( Use customre voice to describe the problem )
Mr Raju Parkhe Mechanical Value out of specification.
Mr J K Patil Po No :20201414 dated 13.02.2020
Mr Magar Inv No:2021100004 dated 17.06.20
Heat Code: DE5A11

3. INVESTIGATIVE / CONTAINMENT ACTION (S) : ANTICIPATED Responsibility IMPLEMENTATION


(Immediate action to arrest the failure) % EFFECT DATE
1) Parts are conditionally accepted at Lisega SE.
100% Mr. Magar 12.12.2020
2)100% inspection done at Poona forge and found OK.
relationship with
4. IDENTIFY ROOT CAUSE (S) : Actual verification of
problem
brainstormed idea (Gemba + Verified by / at Remark
(Used brainstorming process + affinity diagram to find strong/medium/
Gembutsu)
out root cause. weak

Rechecked and found OK. Poona forge Found Ok.

5 & 6. CHOOSE & IMPLEMENT CORRECTIVE ACTION (S) FOR IDENTIFIED & SUSPECTED ROOT CAUSES Responsibility Due Date / Status
Lot wise sampling inspection started. Magar Completed

7. PREVENT RECURRENCE : ( Horizontal Deplyoment , POKA YOKE Feasibility , Documents Updation ) Responsibility Due Date / Status
POKA YOKE Feasibility Checked YES / NO No

If yes Details of Poka Yoke No

Horizontal Deplyoment Applicable YES / NO No

If yes Details of horizontal Deplyoment

Documents Updation Reqd / Not Reqd

Drawing Not required

Process Flow Not required

Process FMEA Not required

Control Plan Not required

Work Instruction Not required

One Point Lesson Not required

Other ( Please Specify )


Effectiveness Monitoring
Problem Repeated Month One Month Two Month Three Month Four

Yes /No No No
8. CONGRATULATE YOUR TEAM :
Date : Name

You might also like