The Location Is Been Selected As: How These Methods Were Developed
The Location Is Been Selected As: How These Methods Were Developed
which I
have studied is multidisciplinary landscape assessment for Exploring biological diversity, environment and local
people’s perspectives in forest landscapes. The researchers worked with seven communities and established two
hundred research plots between November 1999 and November 2000.
So research is a practical method, or indeed a suite of methods, that can reduce the understanding gap, to provide a
comprehensible summary of what actually matters locally: to determine what is important, to whom, how much
and why, and a means to make these local preferences more relevant to the decision making process.
A structured method of landscape assessment-
• linking description
• classification
• analysis
• evaluation
Will provide an integrated framework within which decisions on land use management and advice can be debated.
So first I would like to explain that why this type of research was held as Biodiversity surveys have
Become a major preoccupation of conservation agencies and are increasingly included in impact assessments. The
information generated usually has little impact as most decisions reflect
Other priorities. And much of the global concern about tropical rainforests derives from fears of major impending
extinctions.
As a means to address the multiple interests and values of landscape and natural resources, they developed a suite
of survey methods to identify what is ‘important’ to some local communities in the district of Malinau in East
Kalimantan, Indonesia.
Impact opportunities
Unlike some countries, Indonesia does not have a long history of community involvement in officially sanctioned
forest management. Researcher work clearly implies that local communities have complex dependencies upon forest
landscapes that need to be respected and understood. For Indonesia, this message requires a revolution that must
impact all the institutions and processes related to forest management. At both regional and national levels, CIFOR is
deeply engaged in contributing to policy reform.
Operational overview
Team
For most purposes, the team was divided into two: the village team and the field team. The village team collected a
wide range of information about the judgements, needs, culture, institutions and aspirations of the local
communities, and examined their perceptions of and relationship with the local landscape. The field team collected
biophysical and ethnographic data at specific geo-referenced sample points.
Field sample selection
They chose a number of sample sites from the landscape surrounding each community. These were selected to
represent the range of variation in the local environment. While variation in forest was an emphasis, we also
included a wide range of non-forest sites for comparison. Two hundred research plots were established in the
Malinau watershed in four separate data collection periods between November 1999 and November 2000. Each plot
included a wide range of biophysical information and local knowledge. Around 40 trees over 10 cm diameter were
generally recorded using an innovative variable area method, while other vegetation was assessed in a 5 x 40 m
transect. The 200 samples have also been classified into eight categories of land cover.
Village-based activities
The first community meeting was used to introduce the survey, explain the research and the reasons for doing it. In a
second meeting, usually on the following night, all these points were recapped and further questions from the
community were answered. Than Community mapping is done gathering information about natural resources,
special sites and local perceptions within a shared geographical framework. Once the community meetings were
completed, the teams set out to gather their respective data. The village team, along with several local assistants,
was charged with collecting socio-economic and cultural cognitive categories of information. A scoring exercise,
known as the Pebble Distribution Method (PDM), was used to quantify group assessments of the importance of
forest products and landscape units.
Scoring exercises: the Pebble Distribution Methods (PDMs) Introduction: concepts of ‘importance’
One objective of research was to develop practical methods to assess the importance of biodiversity to people who
are partly dependent upon wild resources. A number of techniques were used in the studies, and in all these it was
assumed that local people are the best judge of what is directly important to them. The PDM method include that in
each stage of the exercise, informants were asked to distribute 100 counters (buttons, seeds or pebbles) between
labelled and illustrated cards in proportion to their ‘importance’.
Data checking and triangulationEfforts were made to ensure that participants represented a broad range of the
community, including all the local informants who were present in the field. Once all the plant data had been
compiled, the allocation of use-categories was revisited in an extra field visit. This review was conducted with a cross
section of each community and clarified the consensus views on which uses fitted in each class, and identified the
small number of miscellaneous values that do not fit.
Soil technical data collection Physical characteristics including soil depth, moisture regime, colour, texture,
structure, consistency, matrix node, pores, and roots were recorded by horizon using standard methods.
Soil as viewed by local informants Field informants were fully briefed about the study and were selected because
they were known to have good knowledge of both soils and cultivation.
CONCLUSION So at the end They have an extensive amount of information to assess what is important for several
communities in Malinau. Also they now recognise critical issues of which researcher were previously unaware.
Especially important as researchers, is the fact that they had now in many cases also place these data in relation to
detailed biophysical information about this previously un-researched region.