Oblicon Exercises 1
Oblicon Exercises 1
1. A requested B to help him in his assignment in a very difficult subject Calculus. However, for no
reason at all, B failed to assist A. Is there a valid obligation on the part of B that he can be made
liable for damages?
Answer:
No, because there is a lack of legal tie/vinculum juris which binds both parties, therefore there is
no obligation present (Article 1156). The request of A is just a unilateral decision and was not agreed
upon by B, and such is not a valid source of an obligation. There is also no law, contract, quasi-contract,
delict, and/or quasi-delict present, and so an obligation cannot arise (Article 1157).
2. A is under obligation to deliver to B a determinate horse named Sea Horse in January 1, 2020 at B’s
house located along Teresa Street, Sta. Mesa, Manila. In January 5, 2020, Sea Biscuit delivered a
healthy baby horse which A planned to have it named Sea Horse, Jr. However, B is claiming that Sea
Horse, Jr. belongs to him which A strongly opposed. Whose contention is correct?
Answer:
Sea Horse Jr. does not belong to B because Sea Horse, which is owned by B, is not its parent and
the former is a separate entity thus is not under the ownership of B. Sea Biscuit/Sea Horse Jr. is not a
fruit nor an offspring of Sea Horse and is therefore not the possession of B, as it does not fall under
Article 1166.
3. A is obliged to deliver to B a determinate car. What are the other obligations of A relative to the car,
if any?
Answer:
A is obliged to take care of the car with the diligence of a good father of a family (Article 1163).
A is also obliged to deliver the fruits from the time the obligation to deliver arises (Article 1164). Also, A
is obliged to deliver the accessions and accessories even though they may not have been mentioned
(Article 1166). Lastly, if A is guilty of fraud, negligence, or delay, and in any manner contravene the
tenor, he/she is liable for damages (Article 1170).
4. Who is liable if the subject of the obligation was totally destroyed by a fortuitous event?
Answer:
Answer:
A has the right to comply with the obligation and complete the construction of the house. In
case of noncompliance, the court of justice may be called upon the aggrieved party (B) to enforce its
fulfillment or in default, therefore, the economic value it represents (Article 1170). However, B may not
punish A in an extrajudicial manner; legal actions must be taken. Also, B has the right to have the house
completed by himself, or by another, at the debtor’s expense. (Article 1167).