Monthly Environmental Monitoring and Audit Report No. 33
Monthly Environmental Monitoring and Audit Report No. 33
Babtie Asia
with sub-consultants
Urbis Ltd
Wilbur Smith Associates Ltd
BMT Reliability Ltd
Babtie Asia
R/2146/132/1
Issue 1
January 2004
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
3.1 Noise
3.1.1 Monitoring Methodology
3.1.2 Monitoring Equipment
3.1.3 Noise Parameter
3.1.4 Monitoring Locations
3.1.5 Noise Monitoring Result
5.0 FUTURE KEY ISSUES AS REVIEWED FROM THE WORKS PROGRAMME AND WORK
METHOD STATEMENTS
Figures
1.4 Locations of Cyberport Development in Telegraph Bay and Northern Access Road
Drawings
Appendix
Appendix B Calibration Certificates of the Sound Level Meters at Pine Court and
Magnolia Villa
Appendix C Calibration Certificates of the High Volume Samplers at Pine Court and
Magnolia Villa
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report mainly presents the EM&A works for the project from 27 November 2003
to 26 December 2003.
Noise Level
24 hour continuous noise monitoring was carried out during the reporting period.
No noise level exceedance was recorded at both stations. Despite this, the
Contractor had erected a tall noise barrier to shield noisy construction activities such
as the rock breaking activity. In addition, a semi-enclosure was erected along the
demolished section of the existing bridge at Sha Wan Drive to mitigate the noise.
Air Quality
One 24-hour TSP and three 1-hour TSP were taken in every six-days for monitoring.
One measurement exceeded the action/limit level from the station at Pine Court
during windy day on 18 December 2003. The Contractor has rectified the problem
and installed a sprinkler system, increased the frequency of water spraying and
erected a shelter for excavation near the crest slope to depress dust from arising.
Others
Future construction activities, such as demolition work for Bridge No. 1, rock
breaking works, construction of Retained Earth Wall Retaining Wall No. 2, and Bridge
No. 2 would be closely monitored to ensure the effects on air quality and noise levels
are minimized.
1. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS
An environmental team (ET) has been established to carry out monitoring and audit
and environmental management. In addition, an Independent Environmental Checker
(IC(E)) has been employed to verify the overall environmental performance of the
Project, including the implementation of environmental mitigation measures,
submissions relating to environmental monitoring and auditing, and any other
submissions required under the Environmental Permit.
The project organization chart of EM&A works is shown in figure 1.2 and the
management structure of contractor is shown in figure 1.3.
1.3.1 Preliminaries
- Traffic diversion at Sha Wan Drive
- A temporary footway has been formed along the crest line.
Two monitoring stations, both for noise and air quality, are located in Pine Court &
Magnolia Villa as shown in Figure 1.5 and 1.6 respectively. ASR-NA1 represents
the location of air quality monitoring station in Pine Court while ASR-A1 represents
the location of air quality monitoring station in Magnolia Villa. NSR-3 represents the
location of noise monitoring station in Pine Court while NSR-9 represents the
location of noise monitoring station in Magnolia Villa.
3. MONITORING RESULTS
3.1 Noise
The Construction noise levels were measured in terms of the A-weighted equivalent
continuous sound pressure level (Leq). Leq(30 min) was used as the monitoring
parameter for the time period between 0700-1900 hours on normal weekdays. For
all other time periods, Leq(5 min) was measured for comparison with the Noise Control
Ordinance (NCO) criteria.
As supplementary information for data auditing, statistical results such as L10 and
L90 were also obtained for reference.
Integrating Sound Level Meter, Model No. B&K2238, complying with the
requirement stated in Technical Memorandum (TM) issued under the Noise Control
Ordinance (NCO), was used for measurement. The Sound Level Meter is calibrated
by the laboratory annually. A Sound Level Calibrator, Model No. B&K 4231, is used
to calibrate the meter.
Copies of calibration certificates conducted by Wellab Ltd. for the sound level
meters used in Pine Court and Magnolia Villa are included in Appendix B.
Leq(30 min) was measured to determine the noise impact for the time period between
0700 – 1900 hours on normal weekdays and Leq(5 min) was taken at times other than
normal weekdays.
L10 and L90 were also recorded as supplementary information for reference.
Any breakdown and take down occasionally of the sound level meter at Pine Court
and Magnolia Villa was tabulated in Appendix I. No breakdown of sound level
meters was happened during the reporting period.
Occationally, when the noise meter at the stations stopped functioning, a hand-held
noise meter was used to spot check the noise level.
Locations of Monitoring Station are shown in Figure 1.5, the same locations as set
up for the Baseline Monitoring. These are as follows : -
No noise level exceedance was recorded at both stations. Despite this, the
Contractor had erected a large noise barrier to shield the rock breaking activity. In
addition, a semi-enclosure was erected along the demolished section of the existing
bridge at Sha Wan Drive to mitigate the noise.
Noise was mainly generated by plant / equipment operation on site, road traffic and
container vessels and motor boats crossing East Lamma Channel.
The graphical representation of noise level at day time are shown in Appendix E.
Detailed Monitoring Result are posted to the Cyberport Website regularly and a full set of
data is stored on the CD-ROM attached to the report.
The TSP levels are measured in accordance with the standard high volume sampling
method as established in the Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1
(Part 50), Appendix B.
One set of 24-hour TSP level and three sets of 1-hour TSP are measured in every
six days.
A High Volume Sampler, Model No. GMW2310, for TSP sampling, complying the
Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1 (Part 50), Appendix B, is
used for measurement, both for 24-hour and 1-hour TSP sampling. The High
Volume Sampler is calibrated once every three months.
Its associated calibrator, Model No. GMW25, is used to calibrate the sampler.
A copy of calibration certificates of the high volume sampler in Pine Court &
Magnolia Villa is included in Appendix C.
Samples are sent to the Government Chemist for measuring the weight of
particulates and analysis, and the ER is responsible for handling the filter paper,
conducting the tests and the calculation of TSP level.
Monitoring and audit of the Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) levels is carried out
by the ER & ET to ensure that any deteriorating air quality can be readily detected
and timely action is to be taken to rectify the situation.
Three 1-hour and one 24-hour TSP monitoring in every six-days is carried out to
indicate the impacts of construction dust on air quality. The 24-hour TSP levels are
conducted by following the standard high volume sampling method as set out in the
Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1 (Part 50), Appendix B.
Any breakdown of the air samplers of Pine Court and Magnolia Villa was tabulated
in Appendix I. The high volume sampler at Magnolia Villa was out of order and was
taken to repair.
Locations of monitoring stations are shown in Figure 1.6, the same set up as for the
Baseline Monitoring. These are as follows :
One measurement exceeded the action/ limit level from Pine Court stations during the
windy day on 18 December 2003.
Detailed monitoring results are posted to the Cyberport Website regularly and a full set of
results are stored on the CD-ROM attached to the report.
On 18 December 2003, an exceedance of 24-hour TSP level for action level was
recorded at Pine Court. A notification to the Contractor was issued. Sprinklers are
operated to depress dust from arising in earthworks zone. The Environmental Team
undertook the environmental weekly check on site.
4.1.2 Noise
No noise level exceedance was recorded at both stations. Despite this, the
Contractor had erected a large noise barrier to shield the rock breaking activity. In
addition, a semi-enclosure was erected along the demolished section of the existing
bridge at Sha Wan Drive to mitigate the noise.
The Environmental Team undertook the environmental weekly check on site, and no
major deficiencies were found during the site inspection.
4.2 Complaint
To mitigate the visual impact, the Contractor had placed the tarpaulin along the
coastline and watered the hydroseeded area more frequently to enhance the growth
of the grass.
5. FUTURE KEY ISSUES AS VIEWED FROM THE WORKS PROGRAMME AND WORK
METHOD STATEMENTS
The proposed construction works to be carried out in the next report period, which
have a potential environmental impact and will require mitigation measures, are
listed below:
The ‘trip-and-ticket’ system has been implemented for the disposal of the
construction and demolition waste.