0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views6 pages

Application of Queueing Theory To Airport Related Problems: Nityangini Jhala and Pravin Bhathawala

Uploaded by

barkon desie
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views6 pages

Application of Queueing Theory To Airport Related Problems: Nityangini Jhala and Pravin Bhathawala

Uploaded by

barkon desie
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics.

ISSN 0973-1768 Volume 13, Number 7 (2017), pp. 3863-3868


© Research India Publications
http://www.ripublication.com

Application of Queueing Theory to Airport Related


Problems

Nityangini Jhala1 and Pravin Bhathawala2


1
Assistant Professor, Applied Sciences and Humanities Department, Parul
University, Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
2
Retd. Professor & Head, Department of Mathematics, VNSGU, Surat,
Gujarat, India.

Abstract
Air traffic, worldwide, keeps growing strongly, creating critical capacity
situations and traffic congestion. Large delays are suffered by airlines,
passengers and airport authorities alike. When a rough estimate is needed, the
results of queuing theory can be used to analyse airport runway systems, but
when airports are too congested or a more realistic description of the system
behaviour is necessary, Careful analytical planning is needed in advance of
facilities and systems design, as the results of congestion could be both serious
and expensive to travellers, airlines, and airports.

1. INTRODUCTION
Air line passengers are subjected to increasing levels of congestion in airport
environments. This congestion is caused by three interrelated problems. The first is
fluctuations of demand. Variations of demand occur at various time frames ranging
from days to months. Sometimes special events create demand spikes. The second
cause of congestion is related to network issues. The third cause of congestion in
check is related to flight scheduling. Here, the congestion is caused by arrangement of
scheduled departure times of aircraft. The congestion is caused by overlapping
passenger arrival periods of the chosen aircraft. It can be seen that overlapping
passenger arrival distributions concept assists in estimation of the period of
congestion.
Nuhu A. Ademoh and Anosike, Esther Nneka[1] has developed a mathematical model
to solve problem of queuing of air transport passengers at the Nnamdi Azikiwe
International Airport (NAIA), Abuja, Nigeria’s capital city.
3864 Nityangini Jhala and Pravin Bhathawala

M.E. El-Naggar[2] described a methodology designed to support the decision-making


process by developing seaport infrastructure to meet future demand. In order to
determine an optimum number of berths at a sea port using queuing theory, the
optimum number of berths that minimizes the total port costs can be decided.
S. Vijay Prasad and V. H. Badshah[3] has suggested a Alternate queuing system for
tatkal railway reservation system to decrease Customer’s waiting time.
Ronald R. Gilliam[4] decribed an application that can help the organization design
passenger screening facilities to reduce the waiting time of customers.

2. METHODOLOGY
We will make the following assumptions for queuing system in accordance with
queuing theory.
1. Arrivals follow a Poisson probability distribution at an average rate of λ customers
per unit of time.
2. The queue discipline is First-Come, First-Served (FCFS) basis by any of the
servers. There is no priority classification for any arrival.
3. Service times are distributed exponentially, with an average of μ customers per unit
of time.
4. There is no limit to the number of the queue (infinite).
5. The service providers are working at their full capacity.
6. The average arrival rate is greater than average service rate.
7. Service rate is independent of line length; service providers do not go faster
because the line is longer.

2.1 M/M/1 queuing model:

M/M/1 queuing model means that the arrival and service time are exponentially
distributed (Poisson process)
Application of Queueing Theory to Airport related problems 3865

λ: The mean customers arrival rate


μ: The mean service rate
𝜆
ρ = 𝜇 : utilization factor

Probability of zero customers in the system:


𝑃0 = 1 – ρ
The probability of having n customers in the system:
𝑃𝑛 = 𝑃0 𝜌𝑛
The average number of customers in the system:
𝜌 𝜆
Ls = 1−𝜌 = 𝜇−𝜆

The average number of customers in the queue:


𝜌2 𝜌𝜆
Lq = L x ρ = 1−𝜌 = 𝜇−𝜆

Wq: The average waiting time in the queue:


𝐿𝑞 𝜌
Wq = = 𝜇−𝜆
𝜆

Ws: The average time spent in the system, including the waiting time
𝐿 1
Ws = 𝜆 = 𝜇−𝜆

2.2 M/EK/1 queuing model:

λ: The mean customers arrival rate


μ: The mean service rate
The average number of customers in the queue:
3866 Nityangini Jhala and Pravin Bhathawala

𝑘+1 𝜆2
Lq = ( 2𝑘 ) (𝜇(𝜇−𝜆))

The average number of customers in the system:


𝜆
Ls = Lq + 𝜇

Wq: The average waiting time in the queue:


𝐿𝑞
Wq = 𝜆
Ws: The average time spent in the system, including the waiting time
1
Ws = Wq + 𝜇

2.3 Analysis of data


2.3.1 Present Scenario:
Passengers are standing in the queue thrice for the whole process which includes the
first queue for check-in, Second for Security check and the last for boarding.
Performance measures:
It was observed in an XYZ airport that the arrival rate was λ= 70 customers per hour
and the service rate was µ = 75 customers per hour.
The performance measures are:
The average number of customers in the system: Ls = 35
The average number of customers in the queue: Lq = 34.027
The average waiting time in the queue: Wq = 0.5 hr or 30 min
The average time spent in the system, including the waiting time Ws = 0.4861hr or 29
min

2.3.2 Proposing Model:


Here, we are using our M/Ek/1 queuing model in e first phase, in which there are three
phases.
Phase 1:
Web check-in with baggage
Customers (or passengers) can do web check-in by their smart phone or laptop
whenever they are free.
Application of Queueing Theory to Airport related problems 3867

Phase 2:
Web-Security
Security screening consists of two distinct operations: Inspecting the passenger’s
cabin bags and inspecting the passenger himself. Both of these operations can be
automated by using electronic equipment. Carry-on bags may be inspected by a visual
scan in an x-ray device. Door-way type walk through metal detectors detect weapons.

Phase 3:
Mobile bar-coding for boarding
Once a passenger has done web check-in, boarding pass generates in his smart phone.
After he is through security check, the update is done in his boarding pass, which
contains a bar code. And through that he can board with the smart boarding pass.

Performance measures:
It was observed in an XYZ airport that the arrival rate was λ= 70 customers per hour
and the service rate was µ = 85customers per hour,
Service time per phase = 5 min, k = 3
The performance measures are:
The average number of customers in the system: Ls = 9.33
The average number of customers in the queue: Lq = 2.56
The average waiting time in the queue: Wq = 0.036 hr or 2 min
The average time spent in the system, including the waiting time Ws = 0.047hr or 3
min

3. CONCLUSION
This proposing model is a small step towards easing out the life from the long queues
in the airports. The problem of waiting for ones turn to come in a long queue could be
easily overcome by this project. It reduces queue length and actual waiting times, thus
improving customer satisfaction. It upholds the image of the firm as the queue system
ensures discipline at the premises.

REFERENCES:
[1]. Nuhu A. Ademoh and Anosike, Esther Nneka; Queuing Modelling of Air
Transport Passengers of Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport Abuja, Nigeria
Using Multi Server Approach, (2014)
3868 Nityangini Jhala and Pravin Bhathawala

[2]. M.E. El-Naggar; Application of Queuing Theory to the container terminal at


Alexandria seaport; Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management;
Volume 1, Issue 4 (2010)
[3]. S. Vijay Prasad and V. H. Badshah; Alternate queuing system for tatkal
railway reservation system; Advances in Applied Science Research-(2014)
[4]. Ronald R. Gilliam; An Application of Queueing Theory to Airport Passenger
Security Screening, Vol. 9, Issue 4 (1979)
[5]. Md. Manjurul Ahsan, Md. Raisul Islam , Md. Ashikul Alam; Study of Queuing
System of a Busy Restaurant and a Proposed Facilitate Queuing System;
IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering ; Volume 11, Issue
6(2014)
[6]. Nityangini Jhala, Pravin Bhathawala; Application Of Queuing Theory In
Banking Sector; IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM); Volume 12, Issue
2 Ver. II (Mar. - Apr. 2016)
[7]. Vasumathi.A, Dhanavanthan P; Application of Simulation Technique
in Queuing Model for ATM Facility; International Journal of Applied
Engineering research, Volume 1, No 3, (2010)

You might also like