UK Specification For Ground Investigation
UK Specification For Ground Investigation
Prepared by
on behalf of the AGS Procurement of Ground Investigation Steering Group and British
Geotechnical Association
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Full details of ICE Publishing sales representatives and distributors can be found at:
www.icevirtuallibrary.com/info/printbooksales
www.icevirtuallibrary.com
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN 978-0-7277-3506-5
Cover images courtesy of © AGS - Yellow Book Photography – Competition Winner Mark Lindahl, Site Investigation
Director, Bridgeway Consulting © Bridgeway Consulting Limited.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
ICE Publishing is a division of Thomas Telford Ltd, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE).
All rights, including translation, reserved. Except as permitted by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, no part of this
publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,
photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Publisher, ICE Publishing, 40 Marsh Wall, London E14
9TP.
This book is published on the understanding that the author is solely responsible for the statements made and opinions expressed in
it and that its publication does not necessarily imply that such statements and/or opinions are or reflect the views or opinions of
the publishers. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the statements made and the opinions expressed in this
publication provide a safe and accurate guide, no liability or responsibility can be accepted in this respect by the author or
publisher.
C Rotary drilling
D Pitting and trenching
E Sampling and monitoring during intrusive investigation
F Dynamic probing and cone penetration testing
G Geophysical surveys
H In situ testing
I Instrumentation
J Installation monitoring and sampling
K Geotechnical laboratory testing
L Geoenvironmental laboratory testing
M Technical support from ground practitioners and other personnel
N Long-term sample storage
Summary of Bill of Quantities
FEEDBACK
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
The first edition of this document formed part of the Site Investigation in Construction series, published in 1993 by
Thomas Telford Limited. Since then, this document has become the industry standard, but there have been many
advances and regulatory changes affecting ground investigation, particularly in respect of contaminated ground, dealing
with waste materials and different investigatory techniques.
The second edition was based on the first edition but represents a major revision and extension of the series with the aim of
bringing together the whole industry and is intended for general application to all ground investigation work. Input was
provided by key client organisations such as the Highways Agency, Network Rail, British Waterways and National House-
Building Council.
The third edition is a significant revision to update the document in respect of new legislation, standards and guidance
published since the second edition. This revision also took the opportunity to reflect changing practices, data capture and
management, innovation, new technologies and the growth of the geoenvironmental sector and associated ground
investigations on potentially contaminated and contaminated land.
The third edition revision was carried out by the AGS ‘Yellow Book’ Revision Working Group, part of the AGS
Procurement of Ground Investigation Steering Group. The Working Group comprised:
Main Authors:
Julian Lovell Chair of AGS and Managing Director of Equipe Group
Matthew Baldwin Independent Consultant
Members:
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
The authors acknowledge the technical contributions made by many other colleagues of the AGS ‘Yellow Book’ Revision
Working Group members, the AGS Instrumentation and Monitoring Working Group, the AGS Laboratories working Group
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
and the AGS Contaminated Land Working Group during the drafting of the document.
Other Specialists
Jonathan Gammon AGS Instrumentation and Monitoring Group and Geotechnical Observations
Andrew Ridley Geotechnical Observations
Simon Hughes TerraDat
James Whitfield European Geophysical Services
Darren Ward In Situ Site Investigations
Dimitris Xirouchakis AGS Laboratories Working Group and Structural Soils (part of the RSK Group)
Vivien Dent AGS Contaminated Land Working Group and RSK Group
Graham Comber Robertson Geologging
Callum Whitelaw Geosonic Drilling
Mark Hudson Geoterra
Graham Comber Robertson Geologging
Roger Clark SiLC and Marlow Clarke
Ian Evans SiLC and Wood
Specification: This Specification retains the essentials of the original format, including associated Schedules and Notes for
Guidance. The Specification has been written to be contract and measurement neutral, so it may be used with any form of
Conditions of Contract. The NEC Engineering and Construction Contracts provides one such suitable form of conditions.
The Specification includes guidance on the measurement of the works and does not require the use of any other form of
Method of Measurement. The Specification clauses meet current practice and standards at the time of publication.
Schedules: All the relevant Schedules must be completed for each investigation in order to fully detail both the information
provided to the contractor and work which is to be undertaken. If necessary, the Schedules and the Bill of Quantities can be
extended to provide for increased levels of technical complexity to meet the needs of an individual project, e.g. where a site
contains or may contain archaeological remains, scheduled monument(s) or is of an environmentally sensitive nature (e.g.
Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), Ramsar wetland sites etc.). Where a
Schedule is not relevant then the words ‘Not required’ should be inserted alongside the Schedule title; where none of the
sub-items are required, they can then be omitted for brevity. Those Schedules that are not required for the particular
investigation should also be listed in Schedule S1.5.
Bill of Quantities: A Bill of Quantities, together with a Preamble, which defines item coverage and payment details, is
provided in an Annex. The Bill of Quantities is drafted to be compatible with the Specification and Conditions of Contract,
such as NEC Engineering and Construction Contract (Option B). It is provided so that the majority of ground investigations
can make use of it as the standard form in the Contract: the Bill items correspond to those of the Specification. However,
some procurers may opt to use the Specification on its own with alternative forms of Contract and to use a formal method of
measurement and item coverage (with an appropriate Bill of Quantities).
Notes for Guidance: Notes for Guidance, which shall not form part of the contract, are provided for the Specification,
Schedules and Bill of Quantities.
Ground Practitioners: The involvement of one or more ground practitioners of suitable experience or those with
corresponding qualifications and relevant experience, relevant to the work required, is essential in the planning,
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Desk Study: A properly designed and executed site-specific desk study, in general accordance with BS EN 1997-2
(2.1.1.7), is essential for all ground investigations. If the Contractor is not required to undertake the Desk Study, the
results of the study need to be provided to the Contractor prior to undertaking the investigation.
CDM (Construction Design & Management Regulations): CDM defines construction work as the carrying out of any
building, civil engineering or engineering construction work and includes, amongst others, ‘the preparation for an intended
structure, including . . . exploration, investigation . . . and excavation’. This clearly includes both the intrusive and non-
intrusive parts of the ground investigation.
Pre-construction Information: Under CDM, Pre-construction Information that includes details of any safety hazards shall
be provided at tender stage. Where there are known gaps in the existing information then the mechanism for providing the
missing information shall be outlined e.g. the Contractor may be instructed to carry out additional surveys to provide the
necessary information prior to a site start. Such details may include but not be limited to: a Desk Study, Designer’s Risk
Assessment or safety risk register, utility plans (less than 90 days old), PAS 128 Survey (Type B, C & D and Type A, where
relevant), UXO Risk Assessment, ecology survey report, environmental constraints and walkover, archaeological report,
assessment for potential to encounter chemical and biological hazards (Information of Historical Use) site categorisation (see
BDA Guidance for Safe Investigation of Potentially Contaminated Land), asbestos survey reports and historic land use
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Feedback: Feedback is important, and the Specification and accompanying documentation will benefit from updating in the
future. Users are invited to submit recommendations for revision by email.
The Specification is independent of the Conditions of Contract, although the NEC Engineering and Construction Contract or
the ICC Conditions of Contract for ground investigation will often be the most relevant and appropriate to apply. It should be
noted that terms and roles within a Conditions of Contract and other industry documents may be different to those within this
document. For the purposes of this Specification the roles identified within the Construction Design and Management (CDM)
Regulations have been adopted. The Client shall be the procurer of the ground investigation and shall appoint in writing
specialists to develop, execute and manage the ground investigation. The Client shall adopt the role of or appoint a Designer
(they may also be appointed as the Principal Designer) to develop the scope of the ground investigation. A Contractor shall
also be appointed (they may also be appointed as the Principal Contractor) to execute and manage the ground investigation. It
has been assumed that technical direction of the investigation will be the responsibility of the Investigation Supervisor, an
experienced ground practitioner, who may be someone appointed from the Client, Designer, Contractor or an independent
organisation. The Investigation Supervisor is required to independently assist and advise the Client and Designer.
Depending upon the complexity of the ground investigation, other specialists may need to be involved in the work in order
that the full range of disciplines (e.g. engineering geology, geotechnical engineering, contamination, hydrogeology, waste
assessment, geophysics, archaeology, ecology and safety) relevant to the specific investigation are adequately covered.
Appropriately qualified and experienced ground practitioners may be resourced from the Designer, independent specialist
consultants or the Contractor. This involvement of ground practitioners is considered to be essential to the success of any
ground investigation.
The Specification relies heavily on compliance with good practice as set out in BS 5930, Code of Practice for ground
investigations. The reproduction of parts of British Standards in the Specification, although in some ways preferable to cross-
references, has been rejected in favour of keeping the Specification brief. Particular reference should also be made to the
standards listed in Table 1 of Clause 3.1, CIRIA Site investigation manual, SP25 and to ICE publications Manual of
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Geotechnical Engineering Volume I and II. Attention is drawn to the increasing use of previously developed and contaminated
land which will require specific and detailed investigation, particularly with respect to previous history. There are several
important publications in connection with investigating contaminated land which are extensively referenced in the
Specification, e.g. the CLR reports (except CLR 11), the Environment Agency web pages Contaminated Land Risk
Management (LCRM) which replaces CLR 11 and BS 10175, Investigation of potentially contaminated sites – Code of
Practice. Special consideration must also be given to the hazards and risks to which all staff on site and the public may be
exposed (see the BDA Guidance for Safe Investigation of Potentially Contaminated Land and CIRIA C681, Unexploded
ordnance, A guide for the construction industry).
CDM pre-construction information should include a properly designed and executed Desk Study for all ground investigations,
especially where previous industrial or commercial use of the land has taken place. The importance of making the results of
the Desk Study available to all parties cannot be overemphasised if a safe and effective investigation is to be designed and
undertaken. If a Desk Study has not been carried out prior to an intrusive investigation, it is strongly recommended that this
essential preliminary study together with a walkover survey is included in the scope of the investigation works (but to be
undertaken prior to intrusive work commencing). This Desk Study report should be included as an item in the Bill of Quantities
and time allowed for attendees of the walkover.
If inappropriate or incomplete pricing is to be avoided, with the consequent risk of subsequent claims and disruption to the
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
investigation, the information provided, and the investigation requirements need to be fully detailed in the Schedules. For
example, if aquifer protection measures are required, then the method of protection to be adopted (e.g. multiple casing sizes
with seals between them) needs to be stated together with the expected number of casing size reductions, the lengths of and
materials to be used for seals and whether allowance for standing time is required. A similar approach of providing full details
needs to be taken by the investigation procurer for many other items e.g. traffic management, additional personal protective
equipment (PPE) over and above statutory minimum requirements, access limitations, etc. This Specification is general in
nature and may require to be modified for a specific investigation. In recognition of this the bill of quantities within the Third
Edition has been expanded to reduce ambiguity but there is still a need for flexibility, the Schedules provide for additions
and/or modifications to the published Specification.
Many investigations now require combinations of methods to a much greater extent than was previously the case, e.g. field
and laboratory testing and sampling both during the intrusive phase of work and subsequently from installed instruments.
Furthermore, sampling for geotechnical purposes and for contamination or waste assessments demands different techniques,
transport and storage conditions and, in respect of contamination and waste consideration aspects, laboratory testing needs to
be carried out within much shorter timescales.
Successful ground investigation work will only be accomplished when quality, rather than cost, is prioritised. Attention must
therefore be given to desk studies, field reconnaissance, careful planning, the employment of properly equipped contractors
using trained and qualified operatives and the supervision of the field and laboratory work by experienced personnel. The
following Notes for Guidance are intended to assist with the Contract documentation, but experienced ground practitioners
should be involved for an appreciation of the technical aspects of the work.
Contract documentation
Information and requirements specific to the particular contract are to be inserted in the Schedules which are cross-referenced
to the clause numbers in the Specification and accompanying Notes for Guidance. Any amendments or additions to the
Specification should be identified within the appropriate Schedule. It is intended that the UK Specification for Ground
Investigation be simply referenced in any contract documentation, with the Schedules and Bill of Quantities included as
necessary.
•
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Bill of Quantities
• Preamble (reference to published document)
• Preamble amendments
• Works Items
• Summary of Bill of Quantities
Method of Measurement
A formal Method of Measurement and Item Coverage are not required for use with the Bill of Quantities, as the Specification,
together with the Preamble, adequately defines the Bill items for payment. Additional items may be included in the
Specification and Bill of Quantities with the minimum of documentation. Alternatively, a formal Method of Measurement and
Item Coverage (together with an appropriate Bill of Quantities) may be included with the Contract documentation. This is
likely to result in duplication of statements and increase the complexity of the documentation, however, particularly when
additional items are included.
poor procurement of ground investigation was amongst the top three concerns of the responders.
The purpose of the survey was to identify the level of understanding of, and detail the concerns with, the current procurement
processes for UK ground investigation services.
The survey highlighted that the vast majority of participants considered that good formal Specifications and Bill of Quantities
was necessary. The Designer’s input in clearly outlining the objectives of the investigation were also seen to be critical to
provide the Contractor with sufficient detail to accurately assess the risk and price the investigation.
In response to the questions regarding improvements needed there was little appetite expressed for significant changes to the
specification or measurement process and documentation. Nonetheless this edition has been extensively re-formatted for ease
of use and measurement and extended to provide clarity of project costs and to reduce ambiguity. Re-measurement is still
regarded as the most appropriate method of payment. The most important issues regarding improvements centred around three
themes:
1. that the procurer should have a good understanding of the technical objectives of the ground investigation as well as
the process and methods;
2. that the involvement of appropriate specialists to deliver the investigation should be identified and used throughout
the process or specific activity e.g. engineering geologist, geotechnical engineer, geoenvironmental, geophysical,
ecological, archaeological specialist; and
Some concern was expressed about the use of specification documents within framework contracts and the increased primacy
of quantity surveyor’s involvement in the procurement process which sometimes resulted in a negative impact on the overall
quality.
There was also widespread support from the survey participants for improvements to the specification to encourage an
improved level of detail and clarity of the specification requirements and improvements to the notes for guidance and bill of
quantity items to reduce mis-interpretations and ambiguities and improve transparency of costs.
The Third Edition Working Group considered the results of the survey and areas for improvement whilst drafting this revision.
The specification document still heavily relies upon the specifiers having sufficient competence to provide the level of detail
which a competent contractor can then accurately price against. The desire would be for this to be a collaborative approach
between the Designers, Contractors and other specialists, as required, as far as contractual constraints will allow in order to
develop an achievable scope of works, reasonable cost and clear identification of risk and agreement as to which party will
bear that cost.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
1.1 General
Information and requirements specific to a particular ground investigation shall be fully detailed in the Schedules which form
part of the Specification.
Not all the Schedules will necessarily be applicable to any particular investigation; those not required shall be identified in
Schedule S1.5 ‘Scope of Investigation’ as ‘Not required’
Work over water or unstable ground including mine-shafts, for example, is not extensively dealt with in the Specification.
This is specialist work, which will require additional Specification, and Bill of Quantity documentation.
Schedules S4 and S5 are provided for Specification amendments and additions respectively, while additional Bill of Quantity
items should be included in the space provided at the end of each Bill.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
The Investigation supervisor shall be an experienced ground practitioner with an appropriate level of knowledge and working
experience of ground investigation and the Specification, sufficient to guide the technical direction and execution of the
proposed works.
The Investigation Supervisor may be part time or full time and may require the assistance of one or more specialists who may
have defined delegated powers, dependent upon the nature, size and complexity of the investigation.
(c) Registered Ground Engineering Practitioner / Experienced ground practitioner / Experienced geoenvironmental
practitioner
(d) Registered Ground Engineering Professional
(e) Registered Ground Engineering Specialist
(f) Registered Ground Engineering Adviser
(g) Chartered practitioner e.g. CGeol, CSci, CEng, CIWEM
(h) Registered Specialist in Land Condition (SiLC)
(i) Registered Risk Assessor (RSoBRA or ASoBRA)
other personnel include, but are not necessarily limited to, Qualified Operators, qualified technicians, Responsible Expert,
data manger, health and safety advisor, drilling supervisor, highway traffic safety officer, marine supervisor, ecologist,
geophysicist, archaeologist and railway trained staff.
The definitions for Registered Ground Engineering Professionals (Category (a), (c), (d), (e), and (f)) are those set out by the
ICE Register of Ground Engineering Professionals Guidance (RoGEP). Category (h) is defined by the Specialist in Land
Condition Register (SiLC) and (i) is defined by the Society of Brownfield Risk Assessment (SoBRA).
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
The definitions of a Qualified Operator and Responsible Expert are provided in BS 22475-2.
An experienced ground practitioner (Category (c)) would typically be one with at least 3 years of relevant experience since
graduation with an appropriate degree, or alternatively with at least 5 years of experience if not a graduate.
In recognition of training requirements, a graduate ground practitioner (Category (b)) or experienced ground practitioner
(Category (c)) working under the close supervision of a Registered or Chartered category of person would be acceptable for
certain activities by agreement with the Investigation Supervisor.
ground investigation shall mean investigation of the condition of the ground and groundwater at a site in a broad sense, which includes
desk studies, field reconnaissance, and field and laboratory work within geographical, geological, hydrogeological and environmental
contexts.
In accordance with BS EN 1997-2 and BS 10175 and the Environment Agency’s publication Land Contamination Risk
Management (LCRM), ground investigations should be carried out in phases to identify and progressively reduce
uncertainties and increase reliability of the information about the ground.
The term ‘hazardous ground’ is not synonymous with ‘hazardous waste’, which is subject to statutory definition.
The 14 categories of hazardous properties are defined in the Hazardous Waste (England and Wales) Regulations and The List
of Waste Regulations, although within the United Kingdom there are regional versions of these documents. The Joint Agency
Groundwater Directive Advisory Group (JAGDAG) also provides definitions of hazardous substances for groundwater.
2.6 Contamination
contamination shall mean the presence of a substance or agent, as a result of human activity or natural processes, in, on or
under land, which has the potential to cause harm or to cause pollution.
There is no assumption in this definition that harm results from the presence of the contamination.
Potentially hazardous substances of natural origin (e.g. radon, arsenic, lead) might also be present in the ground.
2.8 Topsoil
topsoil shall mean the top layer of material that contains humus and can support vegetation.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
2.9 Soil
soil shall mean assemblage of mineral particles and/or organic matter that can be separated by gentle mechanical means and
which includes variable amounts of water and air (and sometimes other gases). Soils typically have an undrained shear
strength less than 300kpa.
The term is also applied to anthropogenic ground consisting of reworked natural soil or man-made materials exhibiting
similar behaviour, e.g. crushed rock, blast furnace slag, fly-ash.
Soils, known as saprolites, may have structures and textures derived from rock but are usually of lower strength than rocks.
2.10 Rock
rock shall mean naturally occurring assemblage of minerals, crystallized, consolidated, cemented, or otherwise bonded
together, so as to form material of generally greater strength or stiffness than soil. Rock typically has an unconfined
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Hard material and obstruction shall apply to percussive boring, where it is shown that Condition 1 (below) and Conditions 2
and 3, where sampling and testing is being undertaken are fulfilled, provided that the boring rig involved is in good working
order and is fully manned. The progress rate observations and driving tests shall be repeated at hourly and 0.50 m depth
intervals, respectively.
• Condition 1: Boring with normal appropriate tools cannot proceed at a rate greater than 0.50 m/hour. The stated rate
shall be applicable to the boring operation alone and exclude sampling/in situ testing and standing time.
• Condition 2: 100 mm diameter undisturbed sample tubes cannot be driven more than 300mm with 50 blows of the
driving hammer.
• Condition 3: A Standard Penetration Test (SPT) shows a resistance in excess of 35 blows/75 mm.
Hard material and obstruction shall apply to machine excavation of trial pits and trenches where it is shown that conditions
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
(4) or (5) below are fulfilled.
• Condition (4): Natural or artificial material, including rock, is encountered in volumes exceeding 0.20 cubic metres
or which cannot be penetrated except by the use of powered breaking tools.
• Condition (5): Existing pavements, footways, paved areas (but excluding unbound materials) and foundations in
volumes exceeding 0.20 cubic metres or which cannot be penetrated except by the use of powered breaking tools.
Hard material shall apply to hand excavation of inspection pits, trial pits and trenches where it is shown that conditions (6) or
(7) below are fulfilled.
• Condition (6): Natural or artificial material, including rock, is encountered in masses exceeding 50 kg or which cannot
be penetrated except by the use of powered breaking tools.
• Condition (7): Existing pavements, footways, paved areas (including unbound fill materials) and foundations in
masses exceeding 50kg or which cannot be penetrated except by the use of powered breaking tools.
The number of sinker bars used during boring and sampling should be appropriate to the ground conditions and should be
taken into account when assessing blow count and penetration.
If a maximum period is to be set for boring, pitting or trenching through a hard `material’ or an ‘obstruction’ before alternative
measures are adopted, this should be specified in Schedule S1.8.15.
Hard ground and obstructions does not apply to rotary drilling techniques.
2.12 Fill
fill shall mean anthropogenic ground in which the material has been selected, placed and compacted in accordance with an
engineering specification.
made ground shall mean anthropogenic ground in which the material has been placed without engineering control and/or
manufactured by humans in some way, such as through crushing or washing, or arising from an industrial process.
2.15 Borehole
borehole shall be an exploratory hole formed by means of Cable Percussive Boring, Rotary Drilling, Sonic Drilling or Dynamic
Sampling.
surface water bodies shall include rivers, streams, canals, ditches (or any other surface watercourse), lakes and ponds.
2.24 Sample
sample shall mean soil, rock, water or ground gas collected from a specified sampling point, irrespective of the number and
type of containers required to collect that sample.
Individual samples may require more than one container or type of container. For example, a large bulk sample may need to
be collected in multiple bulk bags to comply with manual handling guidelines, and / or to provide sufficient quantity of material
to test. Similarly, a sample for contamination testing may require material to be collected in plastic tubs and various glass
jars.
The welfare facilities are now identified in Schedule 2 of CDM – Minimum welfare facilities on construction sites and apply
regardless of whether an investigation is notifiable or not.
The daily record was formerly known as the ‘driller’s log’. The definition is now extended to include all required
measurements, observations and test results obtained during the site operations.
In practice, a daily record sheet designed for recording the information required for exploratory holes may not be suitable for
recording information from some in situ testing, sampling and monitoring, particularly where these activities are independent
of exploratory holes. In such cases, separate purpose-designed record sheets may be necessary. These records should be input
directly into digital devices wherever possible to assist with the project data flow.
2.27 Data
data shall mean the facts or figures obtained from all phases of a ground investigation, including derivations from other
data.
Facts and figures might include text, numbers and formulae.
2.28 Information
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
information shall mean the presentation of data in a readable format such as borehole logs, graphs, tables and figures.
Any reference in the Contract to a Standard published by the British Standards Institution, or to the Specification of another
body, shall be construed equally as reference to an equivalent one.
Table 3.1 provides a summary of key British Standards in common use. It is not intended to be a complete or comprehensive
list. Current versions of all standards shall be considered unless otherwise instructed.
BS EN 1997
BS EN 1997-1 Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design – General rules 2004, 2013 Currently under revision
+A1:2013
BS EN 1997-2 Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design – Ground 2007 Currently under revision
investigation and testing
BS ISO 18400-104 Soil quality - sampling - strategies 2018 Particularly important for correct
application of BS 10175
BS EN ISO 22475 Ground Investigation and Testing – Sampling Methods and Groundwater Measurement
BS EN ISO 22475-1 Technical principles for execution 2007 Currently under revision
BS 22475-2 Qualification criteria for enterprises and personnel 2011
BS 22475-3 Conformity assessments of enterprises and personnel 2011
by third parties
BS EN ISO 22476
BS EN ISO 22476-1 Electrical Cone and piezocone penetration tests 2013
BS EN ISO 22476-2 Dynamic Probing 2005, 2011 Should be in routine use in UK
BS EN ISO 22476-3 Standard Penetration test 2005, 2011 Should be in routine use in UK
BS EN ISO 22476-4 Menard Pressuremeter test 2012 Revision in progress
BS EN ISO 22476-5 Flexible dilatometer test 2012 Revision in progress
BS EN ISO 22476-6 Self Boring pressuremeter test 2018
BS EN ISO 22476-7 Borehole jacking test 2012
BS EN ISO 22476-8 Full displacement pressuremeter test 2018
BS EN ISO 22476-9 Field vane test Draft prepared, but not accepted
BS EN ISO 22476-10 Weight sounding test 2017
BS EN ISO 22476-11 Flat dilatometer test 2017
BS EN ISO 22476-12 Mechanical cone penetration test 2009
BS EN ISO 22476-13 Plate loading test In preparation
BS EN ISO 22476-14 Borehole dynamic probing Involves probing within a borehole
BS EN ISO 22476-15 Drilling parameters – recording 2016
BS 1377: 1990 Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes
BS 1377-1 General requirements and sample preparation 2016 Remains current
BS EN ISO 14688 & Ground Investigation and Testing – Identification and classification of soil and rock
14689
BS EN ISO 14688-1 Identification and classification of soil – identification 2018 Accommodated in BS5930 +A1: 2020
and description
BS EN ISO 14688-2 Identification and classification of soil – Principles for 2018 Accommodated in BS5930 +A1: 2020
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
a classification
BS EN ISO 14689 Identification and classification of rock – Identification 2018 Partially accommodated in BS5930
and description +A1: 2020
BS EN ISO 18674 Ground Investigation and Testing – Geotechnical monitoring by field instruments
BS EN ISO 18674-1 Geotechnical monitoring by field instruments – General 2015
rules
BS EN ISO 18674-2 Measurement of displacements along a line; 2016
Extensometers
BS EN ISO 18674-3 Measurement of displacements along a line; 2017
Inclinometers
BS EN ISO 18674-4 Measurement of displacements along a line; In preparation
Piezometers
BS EN ISO 18674-5 Measurement of displacements along a line; Total 2019
pressure cells
BS EN ISO 18674-6 Measurement of displacements along a line; Hydraulic In preparation
settlement gauges
BS EN ISO 18674-7 Measurement of displacements along a line; Hydraulic In preparation
settlement gauges
BS EN ISO 18674-8 Measurement of displacements along a line; Strain In preparation
gauges
aggregates
BS EN 1367-1 Determination of Resistance to Freezing and Thawing 2007
BS EN 1367-2 Magnesium sulfate test 2010 R2020
BS EN 13242 (+A1) Aggregates for unbound and hydraulically bound 2002 (2007)
materials for use in civil engineering work and road
construction
BS EN 13286 Unbound and Hydraulically bound mixtures
BS EN 13286 (parts 1 Unbound and Hydraulically bound mixtures – Test
– 5,7, 40-54 Methods
BS 1924-1 Sampling, sample preparation and testing of materials 2018 Currently being replaced by BS EN
before treatment 13286
Includes LWD and FWD
BS 1924-2 Sample preparation and testing of materials after 2018 Currently being replaced by BS EN
treatment 13286
Includes LWD and FWD
Sections of BS 5930 and BS 1377 will be progressively replaced by BS EN publications under BS EN 1997.
It is implicit that to carry out the investigation to the relevant Standards all plant and equipment should be in good condition
and manufactured to British or equivalent Standards where they exist. All relevant certificates should be in date and available
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
for inspection.
BS 8574: Code of practice for the management of geotechnical data for ground engineering projects, requires the
development of a Data Management Plan for the project which shall state the objective(s) of the project including limitations
and/or boundaries at organisational or project level. The plan shall also consider all phases of the ground investigation and
their interactions. Details of the content of the Data Management Plan, if required, shall be provided in Schedule S1.8.1 and
details of specialist data personnel required on site shall be provided in Schedule S1.8.3.
Data shall be presented in a standard format which in the UK shall be either the current version of the AGS Data Format or
another industry recognised format as specified in Schedule S1.8.1.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
The Data Management Plan should give recommendations on the collection, storage, archiving, sharing and transfer of data
and is relevant to both large and small ground investigations but may differ in complexity. The Data Management Plan
should be developed in recognition that data must be managed efficiently and with professional discipline, through a
partnership of operational leadership and technical expertise.
Data should be collected at source, entered once and retained electronically, e.g. in a computer system. If it is not possible
to log data electronically at the source of collection, the data should be recorded manually in a paper-based format only
once and then entered into a computer system at the earliest opportunity.
Data should be freely available to all parties involved in the project and available through the whole life of the project.
The Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists (AGS) publication ‘Electronic transfer of geotechnical
and geoenvironmental data’ provides a specification for the transfer of data between parties involved in any ground
investigation. Appropriate software is required to access and use AGS format data. The AGS website (http://www.ags.org.uk)
provides more information on both the format and available software.
The format of the data files is provided by the AGS data format publication. This format provides scope for extending the
type and range of data that is contained within any data files.
3.3 Quality management
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
When specified in Schedule S1.8.2, all work shall be carried out in accordance with a quality management system(s)
established in accordance with BS EN ISO 9001, BS EN ISO 14001 and BS OHSAS 18001/BS ISO 45001. Records to
demonstrate compliance shall be made available to the Investigation Supervisor on request.
Where Accreditation to BS EN ISO 9001, BS EN ISO 14001 and BS OHSAS 18001/BS ISO 45001 is required, this should be
stated in Schedule S1.8.2.
Requirements for particular laboratory tests to be carried out by a laboratory accredited by the United Kingdom Accreditation
Service (UKAS) to BS EN ISO/IEC 17025 (or an equivalent in another country) should be given in Schedules S1.22.4 and
S1.23.2. All such tests should comply with UKAS requirements.
Investigations that are notifiable under CDM Regulations require a Principal Designer and Principal Contractor to be
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
appointed by the Client. Non-notifiable projects require a named person or body to be appointed by the Client and who will
be responsible for safety. However, whether notifiable or not, CDM regulations apply to all investigations.
Account should also be taken of the information contained in the Guidance for Safe Investigation of Potentially Contaminated
Land (BDA).
Prior to the start of site operations, the Contractor shall assess the available information including the Designer’s Risk
Assessment or safety risk register and provide to the Investigation Supervisor developed site specific risk assessments and
method statements covering all aspects of the work to be carried out. In addition, where a contractor has been appointed as
Principal Contractor, a Construction Phase health and safety Plan (CPP) shall be prepared in accordance with CDM.
Risk Assessments and Method Statements shall be reviewed and, if necessary, amended whenever there are changes and/or
additions to the originally planned work or when conditions change e.g. additional hazards are identified or changes to
techniques proposed.
Where the Client is not familiar with the requirements of ground investigation, the Principal Designer should advise the Client of the
required Pre-construction Information (PCI). The Principal Designer should then develop a Designer’s Risk Assessment or Risk
Register.
The site-specific risk assessment and method statements should address, among other things:
(a) control measures for physical, environmental, chemical, biological, ergonomic hazards such as
• safe use of machinery during ground investigation operations
• safe access and egress for plant and personnel
• security of the site, personnel and others
• underground and overhead utilities
• potential contaminants (including asbestos), unexploded ordnance, hazardous gases, vapours
• investigating on or through hazardous or potentially hazardous ground e,g, coal seams, areas of active or historic
mining activities
• control of substances or flora hazardous to health
(b) the proposals for formation of the exploratory holes
(c) the proposals for reinstatement of exploratory holes so that they do not become a hazard to the public or the environment
(d) provision for the collection and safe disposal of contaminated soil, arisings or flush from exploratory holes
(e) procedures to be adopted to protect the environment (e.g. not to place contaminated soil onto unprotected ground and
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
aquifer protection)
(f) procedures to be adopted where geotechnical testing is required on samples suspected or known to be contaminated
(g) requirements for instrumentation and monitoring
(h) health, safety and environmental risks posed to those carrying out tests, both on site and in the laboratory
(i) welfare
There may be a need to agree the approach to be adopted with the appropriate statutory authority prior to the works
commencing.
The need for PPE, over and above statutory requirements, should be identified in Schedule S1.8.5. If additional PPE is to be
provided by the Contractor for sole use of the Investigation Supervisor, this should be identified in Schedule S3.6.
A PAS 128 utility survey (see Clause 5.5) shall be carried out prior to the commencement of intrusive exploratory holes to
positively identify and determine the location of the utilities across the site.
The utility survey and drawings provided shall be no older than 90 days prior to the commencement of the ground investigation
works.
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Any additional information not shown on the Contract Drawing(s) shall be detailed in Schedule S1.8.6.
The utilities drawings and documentation should be provided by the Client or Designer. Nevertheless, responsibility for
confirming the locations and protecting utilities on site rests with the Contractor regardless of any information provided to
assist in their location.
The presence of underground and overhead utilities should be checked, noting that some utilities can be at considerable
depth belo0w ground level e.g. cable tunnels.
Utilities to individual properties are likely to exist but there may be insufficient information to enable their details to be
included on the Drawing(s).
Reference to statutory distances from any known utilities, or the required safe distances if these exceed statutory requirements,
should be included in Schedule S1.8.6 unless included in the Special Requirements of the Conditions of Contract.
The Contractor can be allocated the task of assembling all the known information on utilities, but sufficient time before
commencement of site works should be allowed for this within the programme of the works.
Drawings supplied to the Contractor should preferably be in an appropriate CAD format. However, to minimise transcription
errors it is recommended that the original service drawings (or copies thereof) provided by the statutory authorities should
also be provided to the Contractor.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
As described in the definitions of hazardous ground and land affected by contamination (Clauses 2.5 and 2.7), Schedule S1.8.5
and S1.8.7 should include both areas that are known or suspected of being hazardous or contaminated.
Land affected by contamination may also be hazardous and, in such cases, this should be noted in Schedule S1.8.5.
Other hazards could include, ground at risk of landslips or collapse from underground voids or unexploded ordnance.
Sampling and/or testing for explosives, pathogens, asbestos and high-activity radioactive material requires the use of
specialist contractors and/or specialist advisors with appropriate experience and knowledge, whose advice should be sought
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
where the site-specific desk study indicates that such materials could be present.
The heading of “Protected species” should be taken to encompass not only legally protected species and habitats but also the
bird nesting and lambing seasons and the limitations that these may impose on investigations.
When the areas of protected species can be defined, those areas should be shown on the Drawing(s) detailed in Schedule S1.7.
Other invasive or notifiable species (Giant Hogweed, Himalayan Balsam, Rhododendron etc.) may allow work to be
undertaken closer than 25m to the infestation and such cases should be identified in Schedule S1.8.5.
Further guidance can be found in the Wildlife & Countryside Act Schedule 9 and CIRIA 679.
The presence and nature of known or suspected mine workings, mineral extractions, etc. shall be detailed in Schedule S1.8.7.
Designers and Contractors should be aware of the statutory requirement (Borehole Operations and Services Regulations) to
notify the HSE Inspector of Mines of all boreholes in excess of 30 m depth and within 1 km of past or present mining
activities as well as the requirement to obtain a Coal Authority Permit if drilling through Coal Measures.
3.5.6 Archaeology
The presence and nature of any known archaeological remains shall be detailed in Schedule S1.8.9.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
When the areas of archaeological remains can be defined those areas should be shown on the Drawing(s) detailed in Schedule
S1.7.
It should be noted that work within Scheduled Monuments requires Schedule Monument Consent and may be subject to
restrictions set by the local planning authority.
Consideration should be given to pre and post-condition surveys in accordance with Clause 5.2.4. which can avoid claims or
disputes for damages deemed to have been caused by the ground investigation works.
Contractor to the owner and/or occupier of the intended time of entry on to the site.
Unless otherwise specified, it is the responsibility of the Client or Investigation Supervisor to serve notices, obtain permits
and licenses and to arrange and agree preliminary access details with the landowner/occupier.
Where access to the site is required after the completion of the main works – for example for the purposes of collecting
monitoring data and/or samples from installations – then the arrangements for such access should also be identified in S1.3.
Agreed access routes should be defined on the Drawing(s) at the time of tender with due consideration having been given to
the site conditions likely to persist at the time of investigation and of the plant expected to be used.
Any access difficulties, including restrictions where passes are required, should be detailed in the description of the site in
Schedule S1.3.
If the detailed arrangements for entry and access routes, the provision of access route drawings, etc. are delegated to the
Highway reinstatement shall be in accordance with the Specifications for the reinstatement of openings in highways
(Department for Transport).
Paved areas comprise all those surfaced with man-made materials, e.g. blacktop, concrete and paving slabs and blocks.
Details of the reinstatement required should be specified in Schedule S1.8.16.
If special measures such as jet-washing facilities, vegetable-oil-based lubricants, etc. are required, their details should be
specified in Schedule S1.8.14.
Aquifer protection will usually be required when exploratory holes penetrate through an aquiclude into an underlying aquifer
to prevent upward/downward groundwater migration. Aquifer protection is particularly important where the ground overlying
the aquiclude is contaminated. Multiple aquifers (possibly including perched water systems) will need the protection measures
to be repeated for each aquiclude/aquifer system. The protection measures will normally be formed by:
(a) boring or drilling (both with temporary casing) a suitable depth into but not penetrating through the aquiclude;
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
(b) forming a bentonite plug in the base of the hole then pulling back the temporary casing to just below the top of the
bentonite seal;
(c) installing a secondary smaller diameter temporary casing through the seal to the depth required.
When only a single aquiclude/aquifer boundary is penetrated, the depth to which the secondary temporary casing extends will
be governed by the need to prevent collapse of the exploratory hole wall. Where the hole is to penetrate through more than
one aquiclude/aquifer boundary the secondary temporary casing should be extended into the lower aquiclude, then steps (b)
and (c) above repeated with a tertiary casing.
The detailed design (hole and casing diameters, depths, etc.) will need to be specified to meet site-specific conditions.
Further guidance is available in ‘Technical Report P5-065/ TR’ in ‘Technical aspects of site investigation’ Volume 2
(Environment Agency).
Where contamination is suspected, disposal of arisings, flush and ground water, shall not be carried out until the results of
laboratory testing to enable the waste to be characterised and Waste Acceptance Criteria determined testing has been
completed.
Any observed feature which is not referred to in the site-specific desk study (e.g. including but not limited to buried
archaeology, old foundations, protected species, invasive plants, free phase contaminants) should be advised to the
Investigation Supervisor by the Contractor.
Any clauses of this Specification which relate to work or materials not required in the Schedules shall be deemed not to apply.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
The establishment of a site for the purposes of ground investigation involves a large number of inter-dependent activities, all
of which need to be planned and coordinated before arrival on site. The establishment of plant and equipment on site often
involves coordination with other sites, as such plant and equipment will often move from site to site. Because of this, the
removal of plant and equipment from site also requires planning and coordination and the contractor shall not be
disadvantaged by the unforeseen cancellation or suspension of works that requires such plant and equipment to be removed
from site without reasonable notice being given.
Unless instructed otherwise, exploratory holes shall be set out using digital coordinates detailed in Schedule S2 by accurate
survey equipment with a maximum tolerance of +/- 10 mm. During setting out and immediately prior to breaking ground the
final location shall be checked against the location of known utilities and any concerns raised with the Investigation Supervisor
to allow further instructions to be provided.
When the position of an exploratory hole has been varied, the Contractor shall take all necessary measurements and shall
inform the Investigation Supervisor of the revised coordinates and ground elevation, or other measurements required to locate
the as-built exploratory hole.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
The nature of ground investigation requires reasonable flexibility from the Contractor. The Designer, Investigation Supervisor
and Client should make provision for possible effects on the Contractor’s programme if the number of exploratory holes, their
locations, access routes and quantities of sampling and in situ testing are significantly changed.
The Designer shall provide an initial estimation of the plant, equipment and utilities necessary to complete the works and
include itemisation in Bill A of the Bill of Quantities.
The Contractor shall review the minimum itemization provided by the Designer in Bill A and identify any additional such
items to complete the works. Where additional items or quantities are identified, the Contractor shall make appropriate
amendments to the proposed Bill A Items and sub-items and quantities.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Unless otherwise specified in Schedule S1.8.16, on completion of each exploratory hole all equipment, surplus material and
rubbish of every kind shall be cleared away. Surplus material and rubbish shall be removed from the site to a disposal point
licensed to accept the waste concerned unless otherwise instructed.
On land affected by contamination, all necessary precautions to control and secure the working area should be taken at all
times. Access to and from that area shall be via a single designated point where, if specified in Schedule S1.8.17, welfare
facilities for personnel shall be provided.
Where additional facilities are required in or near working areas e.g. wash down area or wheel wash this shall be specified in
Schedule S1.8.17.
On land affected by contamination, arisings from exploratory holes shall be placed on heavy-gauge polythene sheeting and
covered in wet or windy weather in order to prevent the spread of contamination (or alternatively placed in covered skips).
The whole of the site and any ancillary works shall be left in a clean and tidy condition.
Where unavoidable damage (e.g. rutting of access routes under normal plant passage) is required to be made good by the
Contractor, this should be stated in Schedule S1.8.16.
The requirements for the Investigation Supervisor’s office and facilities required should be listed in Schedule S3. This should
include any motor vehicles for the use of the Investigation Supervisor and detail the vehicle insurance
requirements/limitations.
The welfare facilities provided for all investigations must meet the minimum requirements set out in CDM.
Where a site is extensive, e.g. for investigations covering large geographical areas or long linear investigations i.e. highways,
consideration should be given to satellite welfare facilities local to any remote location.
Where an investigation is on a construction site or within an existing development, welfare facilities may be available through
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
a third party e.g. the Principal Contractor or the Client. Such instances should be identified in Schedule S1.8.17 together with
contact details of the third party.
taken in accordance with any statutory requirements and any special requirements in Schedule S1.8.11. Where the
circumstances of any particular case are not covered by the statutory requirements or described in the Schedules, proposals for
dealing with such situations shall be submitted to the Investigation Supervisor for approval.
Work on or adjacent to public highways, motorways, waterways and rail tracks requires the utmost care and attention to
traffic safety and management, including the safety of the general public. Any particular constraints and requirements should
be given in Schedule S1.2 and S1.8.11. Highway works, for example, should comply with recommendations contained in
Chapter 8 of the Traffic Signs Manual (DFT) and any amendments thereto.
If the Contractor is to supply highway traffic safety officers or other personnel (e.g. railway or waterways trained staff) or
special traffic measures, the requirements should be included in either Schedule S1.8.4 and/or S1.8.11, as appropriate.
The working hours specified shall be the maximum contracted working hours available on site to carry out the ground
investigation activities.
The Contractor’s management and supervision personnel shall be responsible for the works being carried out in accordance
with the Contract, Specification and Schedules.
The qualification criteria for personnel including the Responsible Expert are defined in BS 22475-2.
The level of project management shall be compatible with the scope and nature of the works and with the minimum
requirements detailed in Schedule S1.8.3.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
The minimum project management required to be supplied by the Contractor is to be specified by the Designer at the time of
tender within S1.8.3. The Contractor shall review the minimum requirements and identify any additional resources to
appropriately complete the works. Any additions to or deletions from this list shall be detailed in the Contractor’s tender
submission.
The Contractor’s costs associated with the proposed project management resources shall be included within separate rates
identified in Section A of the Bill of Quantities.
Project management may be required to include the support services of data management, quality control, auditing, legal,
accounting, commercial and marketing etc.
Minimum details of the project management shall be provided in S1.8.3
.
The level of supervision shall be compatible with the scope and nature of the works and with the minimum requirements
detailed in Schedule S1.8.3 and shall also consider whether full-time or part-time supervision is required.
Where Drilling supervisors are provided, they shall hold a Level 2 Diploma and Level 3 Diploma in Advanced Land Drilling
for the drilling activity being supervised and a valid and current CSCS or MPQC competency card.
The minimum supervision required to be supplied by the Contractor is to be specified by the Designer at the time of tender
within S1.8.3. The Contractor shall review the minimum requirements and identify any additional resources to appropriately
complete the works. Any additions to or deletions from this list shall be detailed in the Contractor’s tender submission.
The Contractor’s costs associated with the proposed supervision resources, such as project management, supervision and
execution personnel etc, shall be included within separate rates identified in Bill A of the Bill of Quantities.
The Contractor shall provide sufficient on-site supervisory services to complete the works. These roles shall be ground
practitioners as defined in Clause 2.3 or other specialists (refer Clause 4.4.6) who will undertake the technical supervision of
site activities, site liaison, logistics, land access, logging, in situ testing and sampling, instrumentation and monitoring,
photography and the preparation of daily records and preliminary logs (except where any of the above activities are carried
out by qualified operators) etc. Any additions to or deletions from this list shall be detailed in the Contractor’s tender
submission.
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
The number, years of experience, training and competence requirements (beyond the minimum requirements of BS 22475-2)
of ground practitioners and other supervisors required may vary depending upon the scope and nature of the works being
undertaken. Where such requirements are necessary relevant details will be provided in S1.8.3.
The on-site supervisory services provided by a Level 3 qualified Drilling Supervisor comprise the technical supervision of the
drilling activity, advice on methodologies especially when problems have been encountered with regard to sample recovery
and/or quality and safety around the drilling activity.
The name, contact details, powers delegated under the Contract and other relevant information shall be set out and fully defined
in Schedule S1.2.
works;
• Respond in a timely manner to technical queries, review technical method statements and site records;
• Maintain a daily record of works which provide an overview of works undertaken and resources used, challenges
met and technical queries raised for comparison with the submitted Contractor’s records; and
• Undertake quality audits of the Contractor’s work in relation to their management plans and application of the
specification requirements.
• Provide a professional independent assessment of the facts in the event of a dispute occurring.
The Investigation Supervisor may be appointed from any of the parties involved in the ground investigation process, but more
usually from the Designer. The Client can choose to appoint the Investigation Supervisor from an independent organisation.
In some cases, the designer of the proposed investigation works may be directly appointed as Investigation Supervisor by the
Contractor but must remain independent from the Contractor’s influence.
The Investigation Supervisor may be part time or full time and may require the assistance of one or more specialists who may
have defined delegated powers, dependent upon the nature, size and complexity of the investigation.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
These should include, but not be limited to boring and drilling operatives, plant operatives, pitting and trenching operatives,
labourers and any specialist subcontract operatives.
The minimum Specialist personnel required to be supplied by the Contractor is to be specified by the Designer at the time of
tender within S1.8.3. The Contractor shall review the minimum requirements and identify any additional resources to
appropriately complete the works. Any additions to or deletions from this list shall be detailed in the Contractor’s tender
submission.
The Contractor’s costs associated with the proposed Specialist personnel shall be included within separate rates identified in
Section A of the Bill of Quantities.
Specialist personnel could include land surveyors, highway traffic management personnel, UXO/EOD specialists,
geophysicists, geoenvironmental scientists, geologists, instrumentation and monitoring personnel, railway safety personnel,
ecologists, archaeologists or marine supervisors.
Specialist in situ testing, monitoring or sampling may include; for explosives, pathogens, asbestos, chemical contaminants
and radioactive material which would require the use of experienced specialist contractors and/or specialist advisors whose
advice should be sought when the site-specific desk study indicates that such materials could be present or the tests may be
required. These may also be regulated activities and governed by specific legislation.
Schedule S1.24.9 should detail the elements of the Ground Investigation Report which are to be compiled by the Contractor.
See also Clause 17.3.3.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Where known at tender, Schedule S1.24.10 shall state whether the Contractor is to contribute to the Geotechnical Design
Report and, if so, detail the elements which are required. See also Clause 17.3.4.
4.5 Qualifications
4.5.1 Project management and supervisory personnel
Project management and supervisory personnel, including Responsible Experts, shall hold a professional or vocational
qualification, where available, appropriate to their job role and to the type of work activity being undertaken. Details of the
numbers of personnel, job roles and competency requirements shall be provided in Schedule 1.8.3.
All project management and supervisory personnel employed on the contract and carrying out construction related activities
shall also hold a valid and current Construction Skills Certification Scheme (CSCS) card for their occupation as issued by
CSCS or an equivalent body.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
All site works shall be carried out by appropriately trained, qualified and competent personnel.
Qualification criteria for the Responsible Expert(s) is defined in BS 22475-2 and LCRM. The level of competency required for
the roles should be specified as defined within Clause 2.3.
For a Lead Driller, the L2 Diploma and audit card shall be relative to the technique being carried out on site and can carry one
or more of the following endorsements:
• Ground Investigation – Cable Percussion
• Ground Investigation – Rotary
• Ground Investigation – Sonic
• Ground Investigation – Dynamic Sampling
The land drilling/drilling operations vocational qualifications are derived from the National Occupational Standards which
can be found on the MPQC website www.mp-qc.org.
BS 22475-2 provides details of the competency requirements of qualified operators (Lead Drillers).
BS 22475-3 requires an annual conformity assessment of qualified operators and verification by re-assessment by an
independent and competent body e.g. the BDA Audit carried out by the British Drilling Association and accredited by MPQC.
Site inspection should be carried out once the factual information for the site and its environs has been compiled (the Desk
Study) in order to collect additional information on the geology and hydrogeology, potential construction, access and
environmental constraints for ground investigation.
Further guidance on the items to inspect, actions and observations to be recorded are provided in BS EN 1997-2. In addition
to the geotechnical and environmental requirements detailed in BS EN 1997-2, the Investigation Supervisor should also take
account of the geoenvironmental considerations during the site inspection to ensure the appropriate personnel are involved
in the inspection.
A post-condition survey shall be carried out on completion of the ground investigation. The requirements of post-condition
survey shall be detailed in Schedule S1.8.19. The photography requirement and specification shall be detailed in Schedule
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
S1.8.20.
The pre-condition survey can be carried out concurrently with the site inspection and involve the Investigation Supervisor and
any other party or specialist, where necessary. Where additional hazards are identified, alternative proposals can then be
discussed with the Investigation Supervisor and amendments to the Risk Assessments and Method Statements made to minimize
disruption or delays.
Pre-condition surveys are a useful method of obtaining information on the environment and ground conditions before the
investigation commences whilst post-condition surveys provide information regarding the impact of the investigation works
and also level of reinstatement completed.
The combination of well documented pre-condition and post-condition surveys can avoid disputes over damage that is claimed
to have been caused by the ground investigation works.
Topographical surveys may be required prior to the ground investigation and shall consist of the recording of coordinates and
height data for a defined survey area. They are used to identify and map the contours of the ground and existing features on
the surface or slightly above or below the earth's surface (i.e. trees, buildings, streets, walkways, manholes, utility poles,
retaining walls, etc.).The required output of the survey and detail required shall be described i.e. create spot height maps,
contour maps, more complex terrain models of the surveyed area or as the base for the Site Plan and Exploratory Hole Location
Plan as described in the Schedule S2.
Any access restrictions imposed on the Contractor that may lead to areas of the site not being surveyed or lead to a reduction
in precision and/or accuracy shall be included in Schedule S1.3.
Each exploratory hole shall be set out at the location given to the nearest 1 m or to the specified accuracy, using the survey
data provided in Schedule 2.
The as-built position of each exploratory hole shall be determined in relation to either a local or National Grid system, and to
the nearest 1 m or accuracy or as specified. The as-built position shall be recorded on an exploratory hole location plan as
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
referred to in Clause 17.2.7 and all reference points used shall be included in the report.
During the period of the site operations, the elevation of the ground at each as-built exploratory hole related to Ordnance
Datum or other datum as specified in Schedule S1.8.19 shall be established to the nearest 0.05 m.
The use of National Grid coordinates and Ordnance Datum levels are advisable wherever possible to define the exploratory
hole location. This will ensure the data remain of value if location plans are misplaced or ground surface levels are
subsequently changed by site operations. Where local grid coordinates and datums are used they should, if possible, be related
to National Grid coordinates and Ordnance Datum.
Accurate utility data can be obtained following HSG 47 and PAS 128. The Designer shall specify which of the four types of
PAS 128 utility surveys (Type D, Type C, Type B and Type A) are required and at what stage of the investigation they are
required. This shall be detailed in Schedule S1.8.6.
With inspection pits, the utility plans shall be consulted, and additional CAT scanning shall be carried out after the PAS 128
utility survey immediately prior to breaking ground, every 300 mm of excavation and on completion of the pit.
For trial pit and trench locations, the utility plans shall be consulted, and additional CAT scanning shall be carried out after
the PAS 128 utility survey and immediately prior to breaking ground by a suitably trained ground practitioner or site operative.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Details of the CAT scanning, its findings and any consequent actions taken shall be included in the daily records.
Where utilities are required to be marked out, these shall be carried out so as to remain unaffected by weather and other
environmental factors from the point of survey / utility clearance to the date of the intrusive works. To ensure clear and
unambiguous marking out of utilities, the duration between utility clearance and the instructive works should be reduced to
as shorter duration as possible and not exceeding two weeks.
Notwithstanding that the Designer should, as far as possible, locate proposed exploratory holes well clear of all known and
suspected utilities, all exploratory holes should be risk assessed prior to commencement. The use of a ‘Permit to Dig/Break
Ground’ system is recommended, and the utility drawings should always be available on site and consulted for all proposed
exploratory holes.
The use of locating devices should wherever possible prove the positive presence of utilities shown on the drawings rather
than purely their absence.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Although CAT scanning with a signal generator and GPR will be the principle means of detection, consideration should also
be given to the use of sondes, direct connection equipment, home attachment devices and other geophysical methods.
Schedule S1.14.1 should be used to identify any exploratory hole locations where a PAS 128 survey is not required. Overwater
investigations are one example where a utility survey is not practical. Subject to the risk assessment, exploratory holes located
where there is a significant thickness of backfill may be a further case where PAS 128 surveys may be beneficial, but the
exclusion of additional CAT scanning may not be appropriate.
A number of different tools and techniques can be used in utility detection, with varying degrees of success. Some are complex,
time consuming, costly and may provide diminishing returns for the amount of effort and cost expended. PAS 128 specifies
utility detection methodologies that increase in complexity (and therefore cost) to provide increasing levels of confidence in
the resulting deliverables. With the hierarchical approach to underground utility survey, PAS 128 has recognised that projects
may require different levels of detail, at different stages of asset lifecycle. Therefore, various methodologies may need to be
deployed within certain areas of a whole site, with the associated cost variations that this implies.
Further guidance on avoiding the dangers from underground utilities is given in the HSE publication HSG 47.
The presence and nature of buried unexploded ordnance (UXO), together with exclusion zones and risk level, shall be detailed
in Schedules S1.8.19 together with references to any reports. For sites where there is a possibility of a UXO hazard, an
emergency response plan shall be developed and reference to the plan shall be detailed in Schedule S1.8.19.
In accordance with CIRIA C681 there are four stages of assessment which shall be followed:
Stage 1: Preliminary Risk Assessment.
Stage 2: Detailed Risk Assessment.
Stage 3: Risk Mitigation.
Stage 4: Implementation.
These surveys can be carried out in a variety of different ways and the Schedules should detail which party is carrying out
each stage. Stage 1 and Stage 2, if required shall be carried out in the desk study phase of the ground investigation.
If the desk study shows an elevated risk to be present, then services from a qualified UXO/Explosive Ordnance Disposal
(EOD) specialist shall be engaged to deliver an onsite brief to all staff on the risk of encountering UXO. If required, the
UXO/EOD expert shall provide a safe working zone for the investigation locations, either in advance or as the work progresses.
Methods such as non-intrusive surveys, watching briefs, CPT magnetometer cones and downhole magnetometer testing
(combined with the use on non-magnetic drill casing, if appropriate) could be used and the method shall be specified on a site-
specific level by a qualified UXO/EOD specialist taking into account factors including access, geology, programme and
proposed investigation methods.
Where a significant risk of UXO has been identified by the UXO/EOD specialist, site-specific surveys shall be carried out
prior to any intrusive investigation.
The assessment of risk from UXO and the development of emergency response plans on sites where a UXO hazard has been
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
identified, is the responsibility of the Client/ Principal Designer in accordance with CDM. Where the responsibility is passed
to the Principal Contractor this should be clearly stated in writing and sufficient time and resources allowed.
Guidance on assessing and mitigating the risks from unexploded ordnance is given in CIRIA Report No. 785 What lies beneath
- Unexploded ordnance (UXO) risk management guide for land-based projects and further guidance can be found in CIRIA
Report C681 Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) – A Construction Industry Guide.
Risk mitigation measures, safe systems of work and implementation of mitigation/survey methods should be developed
collaboratively between the Client/Principal Designer/Principal Contractor and the UXO/EOD specialist.
If suspected UXO objects are encountered during an investigation they should be left undisturbed and an appropriate exclusion
zone established around the area. Their presence should be notified immediately to the Investigation Supervisor who will give
instructions on any actions to be taken by the Contractor.
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), Unmanned Arial Systems (UAS), Small Unmanned Aircraft (SUA) or Remotely Piloted
Aircraft Systems (RPAS), all known simply as drones, are now commonly used to complete geospatial surveys or to
supplement a site walkover or pre/post-condition survey. The requirements for Drone surveys shall be detailed in Schedules
S1.8.19 together with details of the data and reporting formats required.
All drone pilots should be trained, qualified, licensed and competent to operate the specific aircraft. Organisations operating
drones should hold a valid Air Navigation Order (ANO) permission to conduct aerial work and Permission for commercial
operations (PfCO) from the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). The CAA’s CAP 1361 list of Small Unmanned Aircraft operators
holding a valid CAA permission can be downloaded via their website.
Site specific restrictions may also apply e.g. drone surveys near an airport, strategic road, military base etc.
Where cavity surveys are carried out as part of the ground investigation the aims of the survey, equipment requirements and
data type shall be specified in Schedule 1.8.19.
survey viewable on the field laptop. It is essential that the borehole is lined to protect an open hole collapsing in on the
expensive equipment.
The RICS specification for Surveys of Land, Buildings and Utility Utilities at Scales of 1:500 and larger states that: “The
accuracy of planimetric detail should be such that the plan position of any well-defined point of detail should be correct to
within 0.3mm r.m.s.e. at the plan scale when checked from the nearest permanent control station.” Therefore, using this
specification, a point of detail on a 1:100 survey would be accurate to 30mm r.m.s.e and on a 1:500 survey would be accurate
to 150mm r.m.s.e when checked from the nearest permanent control station.
The location, coordination and elevation, of the initial and as-built exploratory holes should be as set out in Clause 5.4.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
5.10 Records
The requirement and type of record for each inspection or survey shall be specified in Schedule S1.8.20. Survey data shall be
provided in a digital format which can be shared by all parties i.e. Computer Aided Design (CAD) files. These records may
include a formal report or for inspections may comprise a photographic record.
Where a photographic record of a site inspection or survey has been specified, the Contractor shall take photographs of access
routes, exploratory hole locations, access restrictions i.e. doors, gateways, water courses, steep, soft or uneven ground, existing
damage to land, property or equipment and any pertinent feature which may lead to a specification restriction or additional
requirement.
The images shall be a minimum of 5 million pixels in resolution (minimum 2560 pixels by 1920 pixels). Copies of the
photographic images shall be provided or made available digitally to the Investigation Supervisor in .jpg format within 3
working days of being taken, unless otherwise specified. Where these photographs are required to be presented within a report
or as a separate report, this shall be specified in Schedule S1.24.12.
Where inclined boreholes are required, the inclination shall be described in relation to a reference point i.e. degree from
horizontal or degree from vertical together with any other details required to form the borehole.
Any general restrictions to be imposed on the Contractor on boring and drilling methods should be included in Schedule
S1.9.1, S1.10.1, S1.11, S1.11.1, S1.12.1 and S1.13.1.
Any particular requirement for the use of nested casings with intervening seals to avoid cross-contamination between different
soil horizons should be detailed in Schedule S1.8.14.
Puncturing the aquiclude above a stratum containing an artesian head of water can lead to many severe problems if
inappropriate or no action is taken. The most important first requirement is to stem the water egress from the hole as quickly
as possible.
The achievable height of casing extension above ground level is likely to be site specific; for example, if the rig is being
operated from staging, greater extension heights can be achieved. If extending the casing fails to stem the egress of
groundwater, an alternative is for the Contractor to cap the borehole and fit a by-pass and pressure gauge to measure the
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
In selecting grout materials, consideration needs to be given to any environmental protection measures required by the site-
specific conditions which should have been identified in the desk study e.g. proximity to public water supply, abstraction wells,
SSSIs, watercourses and other environmentally sensitive sites. There may be a need to consult an environmental specialist to
identify site specific conditions which may require approval from a regulatory body such as the Environment Agency, Natural
England for approval of backfill materials before use.
6.1.3 Backfilling with an artesian head less than 1m above ground level
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
On completion of drilling, the exploratory hole shall be sealed using bentonite pellets or a grout mix injected from the base
through a tremie pipe. The method to be used shall be approved by the Investigation Supervisor. If it is not possible to extract
the casing it shall be left in the hole permanently.
If casings are left in the ground permanently, details should be included in the Factual Report and the Health and Safety file.
6.1.4 Backfilling with an artesian head more than 1m above ground level
On completion of drilling the exploratory hole shall be grouted up as specified in Schedule S1.9.2, except that grouting
operations shall be carried out by appropriate methods approved by the Investigation Supervisor.
Grouting carried out through the by-pass or a ‘stuffing box’ may be appropriate.
Boreholes shall be backfilled in such a way that no resultant settlement or collapse occurs. Methods and materials for
backfilling boreholes shall be specified to ensure that vertical pathways for migration of potential contaminants or
groundwater between aquifers are not formed. Boreholes, unless otherwise stated, shall be backfilled with materials that
reflect or are lower than the permeability and have the equivalent strength to the horizon they are placed in.
Boreholes backfilled with bentonite or bentonite/cement mixes, should suit the constraints of the site and ground conditions.
A liquid bentonite/cement mix will require time to cure and attain a strength. The strength of the cured grout can be of a soil
or very weak or weak rock depending on the mix used. A cement/bentonite pellet or tablet will require water to be added to
the borehole if placed above the groundwater level to allow the material to hydrate and seal the borehole. Pure bentonite,
usually in the form of pellets or sometimes granules, will remain plastic indefinitely and is suited to backfilling boreholes
through soil and also may require the addition of water when installing above the groundwater table.
Boreholes may be backfilled with arisings provided they are free from contamination and are replaced in the borehole in the
sequence in which they were extracted. Where arisings are used for backfill, they should be placed in the borehole and
compacted in such a way that resultant settlement or collapse does not occur.
The selection of either a liquid grout or a solid pellet/ tablet form of backfill should be controlled by ground and
groundwater conditions but also, where it does not compromise the integrity of the investigation, the economic cost. The use
of liquid grout where sites are time constrained i.e. railway possessions, highway road closures or traffic management may
not provide sufficient time to allow the grout to cure and alternative methods and materials may be more suitable and cost
effective.
Generally, when backfilling boreholes on a large scale, liquid grout is more economic, however, certain ground conditions
do not suit the use of liquid grout. For example, in highly fractured or voided ground where potentially large quantities of
liquid grout may be lost from the borehole which may detrimentally affect the local hydrogeological conditions. In such
circumstances, a suitable method should be agreed between the Contractor and Investigation Supervisor and the use of
bentonite pellets or bentonite/cement pellets are advised.
For small investigations, the cost of mobilising the equipment necessary to facilitate mixing and pumping of liquid grout
may be prohibitive and it may be more economic to use bentonite pellets or bentonite/cement pellets.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Dynamic (window or windowless) sampling shall be carried out at the locations specified in Schedule S2, or as directed by
the Investigation Supervisor.
Guidance on safety in respect of dynamic sampling equipment is given in the BDA publication BDA Guidance for the safe
operation of dynamic sampling rigs and equipment.
Where access constraints are such that the use of hand-held equipment is proposed, serious consideration should be given to
increased manual handling and hand arm vibration hazards and the resulting reduced duration of work tasks to determine if
this is a viable method prior to specifying.
The small tracked rigs typically used for dynamic sampling are also capable of undertaking a conventional geotechnical
sampling sequence of standard penetration tests (SPTs) and driven U100/UT100/U70 samples but to much lesser depths than
conventional cable percussion boring.
Where necessitated by ground conditions, the sampling tube diameter may be sequentially reduced with increasing hole depth
Probing should be carried out prior to sampling: it has the potential to give advance warning of obstructions and results in a
smaller lateral extent of ground disturbance than if sampling is carried out before probing.
6.2.6 Backfilling
Dynamic sampling holes shall be backfilled with cement/bentonite grout, cement/bentonite pellets, bentonite pellets or as
directed by the Investigation Supervisor and detailed in Schedule S1.9.2.
All other windowless samples shall immediately have the top and bottom of the liner tube marked in indelible ink and the ends
of liners shall be capped and sealed. Liners shall be cut to the length of the enclosed sample.
Consideration should be given to health and safety, possible contamination of the surrounding area and cross-contamination
in determining the arrangements for geoenvironmental test sub-sampling.
Samples in their liner tubes shall be capped and kept horizontal and moved and handled with care at all times. They shall be
stored in a suitably cool environment and protected to ensure that their temperature does not fall below 5oC. They shall also
be protected from direct heat and sunlight. At the end of each day’s work, tube samples shall be stored secure from interference
and protected from the weather.
Samples should be stacked carefully to avoid deformation of the plastic liner tubes.
The equipment used in the cable percussion process consists of a string of tools which can include a clay cutter, stubber,
shell (bailer), chisel or similar and used in conjunction with one or two sinker bars. The tool string is attached to the
drilling line (wire rope), which passes over the crown sheave at the top of the tripod mast structure and then to the winch
drum on the base unit. The tool string is winch raised and dropped by freefall action by the Lead Driller thus causing
crushing and fragmentation of the formation and loosening of unconsolidated soils in the borehole being drilled. Depths
of sampling and in situ tests should take account of the tools being used and potential for disturbance within the borehole.
Where the borehole penetrates through granular strata above the standing groundwater level, water may be added to the
borehole to assist boring.
Where the borehole penetrates through granular strata below the standing groundwater level, a positive hydraulic head shall
be maintained in the borehole.
Subject to agreement by the Investigation Supervisor, small amounts of water may be introduced onto the boring tools to aid
the removal of spoil from the tools.
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
In addition to maintaining a positive head in the borehole, the use of undersize boring tools will also assist in minimising
disturbance at and below the base of the hole.
Strata comprising principally clay but with laminations or thin bands of granular material (generally sand) are particularly
prone to disturbance due to water head imbalance. In such cases, it is often beneficial to maintain the hole full of water.
(a) continuation of appropriate techniques (e.g. chisel/ shell with additional weights, see also Clause 2.11);
(b) rotary or other approved drilling until the stratum is proved for a sufficient depth (should the hard material prove to be a
thin layer and further boring be required beneath, the Contractor shall break it out sufficiently to enable boring, in situ
testing and sampling to proceed);
(c) abandonment of the borehole and a further borehole started nearby to obtain the required samples and/or in situ tests.
The progress rate observations and driving tests necessary under Clause 2.11 to demonstrate that ‘hard material’ or
‘obstruction’ has been encountered shall be included on the daily record.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Where unexpected hard material or an obstruction is encountered work should stop and a check should be made to ensure
that it is not a buried utility or other structure e.g. tunnel.
6.3.6 Backfilling
When cable percussion boreholes are required to be backfilled, details shall be provided in Schedule S1.10.2.
Successful backfilling of boreholes, particularly when grout is used, requires conditions of little or no ground-water flow into
or out of the borehole.
Backfilling with arisings generally settles with time and needs to be topped up after a suitable time delay. Backfilling with
grout usually also requires to be topped up once the initially placed grout has set. Any settlement developing after backfilling
will be a hazard and, in such cases, measures will need to be taken to preclude both personnel (including members of the
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
public) and livestock entry to the borehole location until permanent reinstatement of the ground surface can be effected.
Any general restrictions to be imposed on the Contractor on rotary drilling methods and hole diameter should be included in
Schedule S1.11.2.
Unless otherwise indicated in Schedule S1.11.4, the Contractor may elect not to use core liner in certain materials where the
Specification is met without it.
Consideration should be given to control of the flush at surface and environmental constraints in selecting a particular drilling
fluid. Any preference or limitation should be detailed in Schedule S1.11.3.
Note should also be taken of the Coal Authority guidance for drilling into coal measures, i.e. air and air mist flushing may not
be allowed. See also Clause 3.4.
The use of air flush is not recommended due to the risk of Respirable Crystalline Silica disease.
Off-site disposal of drilling fluids may require the use of a suitably licensed contractor and prior laboratory testing. On land
affected by contamination, all necessary precautions should be taken to contain the drilling fluid returns to prevent surface
contamination.
When drilling in soluble evaporites e.g. halite the use of a brine flush is likely to be required and careful control of the surface
flush is required.
6.4.3 Augering
6.4.3.1 General comments
Augering shall be carried out as specified in Schedule S1.11.1, or as instructed by the Investigation Supervisor.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
A disadvantage with continuous flight augering can be the difficulty in identifying the depths of changes in strata, unless
frequent sampling is carried out through a hollow stem auger.
A potential limitation of hollow stem flight augering is that of basal failure of the hole below the standing groundwater table.
Great care is required when carrying out Standard Penetration Tests to ensure that undisturbed ground beneath the toe/end
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
It is recognised that the expertise to select the appropriate equipment to maximise core recovery of the highest quality generally
rests with the Contractor, although particular methods and core diameters may be specified in Schedule S1.10.4. Those
methods may include limiting core run length, type of bit, drilling fluid, equipment diameter, rate of rotation and bit pressure.
The specified core recoveries should be achievable in most strata but there will occasionally be difficult ground conditions
where high recoveries cannot be obtained.
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
6.4.4.2 Drill runs
The first drill run in each hole shall not exceed 1.5 m in length. Subsequent drill runs shall be reviewed to achieve optimal
core recovery for the ground conditions. The core barrel shall be removed from the drill-hole as often as is required to obtain
the best possible core recovery.
The core run shall also be terminated where there is any suspicion that forward penetration is not being suitably achieved.
Where 95% core recovery has not been attained, the run length may be required to be reduced by 50%, and then further
reduced by 50% until a minimum run length of 0.5 m is achieved or the recovery exceeds 95%.
The Specification should consider the rotary drilling technique being deployed and at what depth in situ testing can be carried
out. Rotary percussive techniques allow in situ testing to be specified between drill runs but where coring is being deployed
depths should align with the length of the barrel.
The length of the first drill run should be restricted so that the risk of losing information in what is likely to be the most
weathered material is minimised.
If in situ testing such as a SPT is specified between drill runs, it will inevitably lead to degradation and a likely reduction in
core recovery and sample quality in the succeeding drill run. SPTs should not be specified between drill runs where rotary
wireline techniques are being used. SPT spacing should also consider the core barrel lengths and technique being used.
and in a manner to prevent disturbance to the core. The core shall be rigidly supported at all times while it is being extruded
and during subsequent handling, and the liner containing the core must not be allowed to flex.
(c) Immediately after removing the liner, the top and bottom shall be marked in indelible ink. The ends of liners shall be
capped and sealed using adhesive tape. Liners shall be cut to the length of the enclosed core.
(d) Where the length of core recovered from any single core run is such that it cannot be accommodated in one channel of the
core box, the liner shall be cut to coincide, if possible, with existing fractures. The liner either side of the cut shall be
marked ‘cut’ and the ends capped as above.
(e) Each section of liner shall be marked with the contract title, exploratory hole reference number, date and the depths of the
top and bottom of the drill run.
(f ) Core obtained without a liner and within the core catcher shall be wrapped in two layers of plastic cling film and labelled
to indicate the depth and exploratory hole reference number.
Cores shall be rigidly and securely packed at the site of drilling and during all subsequent handling and storage the cores shall
remain packed unless required for examination or testing. Cores shall be placed in the box, in their liners where used, with the
shallowest core to the top left-hand corner, the top being considered adjacent to the hinged section. Cores from the core catcher
shall also be placed in the core boxes at the correct relative depth.
Depths shall be indicated on the core box by durable markers at the beginning and end of each drill run. Rigid core spacers
shall be used to indicate missing lengths. The Contract title, exploratory hole reference number and the depth range of core
contained in each box shall be clearly indicated in indelible ink inside, on top and on the right-hand end of the box. Core boxes
from each hole shall be sequentially numbered from ‘1 of X’ to ‘X of X’.
Core boxes containing core shall be kept horizontal and moved and handled with care at all times. Cores shall be stored in a
cool environment. They shall also be protected from direct heat and sunlight. At the end of each day’s work, core boxes shall
be stored secure from interference and protected from the weather.
Where reasonably practicable, manual handling should be avoided. Where this is not possible, careful consideration should
be given to the design of the box, the environment, the individuals and all activities involving manual handling of the core
boxes. This should follow the broad structure as set out in Schedule 1 of the Manual Handling Operations Regulations (as
amended) and guidance provided in the HSE’s Manual Handling Assessment Charts (MAC) in order to reduce the risk to an
acceptable level.
The stability and interlocking of stacks of core boxes should also be considered.
The cores shall be examined and described in accordance with BS EN ISO 14688-1, BS EN ISO 14689-1 and BS 5930 by or
under the supervision of an experienced ground practitioner meeting the requirements of Clause 2.3 item (c).
Where specified in Schedule S1.11.5, the Contractor’s site compound shall include all necessary facilities for core logging to
be carried out on site. Otherwise, cores will be logged at the Contractor’s office facility which shall also include all necessary
facilities for core logging.
Access for inspection of the cores by the Investigation Supervisor with not less than 48 hours’ notice shall be provided by the
Contractor for the duration of the Contract.
6.4.4.6 Photographs
The Contractor shall, where specified in Schedule S1.11.10 or instructed by the Investigation Supervisor, photograph cores in
a fresh condition prior to logging and ensure that the following criteria are fulfilled:
(c) zones of assessed core loss and where samples have been taken shall be clearly identified
(d) a clearly legible reference board identifying the project title, exploratory hole number, date and depth range of drill runs
shall be included in each photograph
(e) core boxes are evenly and consistently lit
(f) the length of the core box in each photograph fills the frame
(g) the focal plane of the camera and the plane of the core box are parallel
(h) the camera is placed in the same position with respect to the core box in every photograph.
It may be beneficial when investigating the fabric of soils and weak rocks to split the core and re-photograph the sample.
Where specified or instructed by the Investigation Supervisor, the Contractor shall ensure the core is protected and scanned in
a fresh condition and that the following criteria are fulfilled:
Where exploratory holes are likely to intersect, disturb or enter any of Coal Authority property interests (e.g. unworked coal,
coal workings, shafts and adits), an application shall be made to the Coal Authority for permission to carry out the investigation.
Documentation and guidance on its use is available on the Coal Authority website (www.coal.gov.uk).
Where exploratory holes are greater than 30 m deep and within 1 km of a mining area the HSE Chief Investigator of mines
shall be notified in accordance with the Borehole Operations and Services Regulations.
Approximately 4 weeks should be allowed for written permission to be granted by the Coal Authority after submission of an
application.
Investigation of mining features, for example, old shafts, shallow mine workings, etc., should be specifically identified in
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Schedule S1.11.9 as the work involves the risk of sudden and unpredictable subsidence which can be triggered by the drilling
process. The latter may also cause or release toxic or explosive gases which have collected in partially backfilled shafts and
old workings.
The investigation planning should be based on the results of an exhaustive desk study and take account of considerations such
as the likely need for steel grillages to support the drilling rig and tethered full-body harnesses for the operatives and
supervisory staff.
Such investigation should only be undertaken by personnel knowledgeable in mining methods and conversant with the risks
involved.
The measuring while drilling (MWD) method deals with the recording of the machine parameters during the drilling process.
This can be done manually or with the use of computerized systems which monitor a series of sensors installed on rotary and/or
percussive drilling equipment. These sensors continuously and automatically collect data on all aspects of drilling, in real time,
without interfering with the drilling progress. The data are displayed in real time and are also recorded for further analysis.
It is applicable to top-driven, destructive drilling methods performed by a fully hydraulically powered drill rig and driving
device. It is commonly used with destructive drilling techniques but can also be used with core drilling.
The parameters that may be recorded include: Penetration rate, down thrust pressure, holdback pressure, flushing medium
pressure, torque and rotation speed.
The borehole can be used for other applications such as installation of monitoring equipment, geophysical logging or
realization of expansion tests. The interpretation of the MWD results can be done in relation with the information provided by
sampling.
It should be noted that measured and calculated drilling parameters are relative and dependent of the test conditions,
procedures and equipment.
Equipment for undertaking MWD is not fitted as standard to most of the drilling rigs used by UK contractors.
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
6.4.7 Backfilling
Except where otherwise specified in Schedule S1.11.12, the Contractor shall backfill rotary drill holes with a cement/bentonite
grout.
The grout shall consist of equal portions by weight of cement and bentonite mixed by machine or a hand-operated mixer to a
uniform colour and consistency before placing, with a moisture content not greater than 250% (i.e. 1:1:5
cement:bentonite:water). Additives such as expanding agents or accelerators may be required, as directed by the Investigation
Supervisor. The grout shall be introduced at the bottom of the hole by means of a tremie pipe, which shall be raised as the
filling proceeds but kept below the grout surface at all times.
Backfilling under artesian water conditions shall be carried out as described in Clause 6.1.3 and 6.1.4.
Where voids, fractured or broken ground make normal grouting impracticable, the Contractor shall consult and agree with the
Investigation Supervisor a procedure for sealing the drillhole. The Contractor shall calculate the required volume of grout to
fill the borehole and keep records of materials used. Where the volume of grout exceeds the calculated volume, the Contractor
shall review the procedure and agree any changes in grout mix or procedure with the Investigation Supervisor.
Successful backfilling of boreholes, particularly when grout is used, requires conditions of little or no ground-water flow into
or out of the borehole.
Backfill generally settles with time and needs to be topped up after a suitable time delay.
Where voids are encountered such as natural voids or mine workings, permanent casing may be an option or sealing of the
boreholes above the void using packers or sacrificial packers may be necessary. Additives are available which can be used to
help seal up broken ground or fractured ground but their effectiveness can depend upon the quality of the mix, the size of the
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
fractures or area of broken ground and if groundwater is flowing through the zone.
Sonic drilling may be required in soil or very weak, fractured or highly weathered rock for the recovery of samples, cores and
in situ testing. ‘Open hole’ drilling for the advancement of a hole without core recovery is also possible using sonic drilling.
Sonic drilling is a system that uses high-frequency mechanical vibration to advance casing and/or sampling equipment through
soil and some bedrock formations. Rotation can be added to assist penetration. It generally requires use of a flushing medium
to flush its outer casing over the inner sampling barrel which maintains borehole stability. The minimal or zero requirement
for drilling flush at the bit / cutting face is an obvious advantage of the sonic drilling method. Borehole diameters commonly
fall within the range 80 to200 mm but capabilities extend beyond these diameters for specialist applications. Sample diameters
obtained depend upon the use or not of a semi rigid liner. Samples extruded directly into polythene tubes or bags range from
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
55 – 130 mm and where semi rigid liner are used are typically 100 – 150 mm in diameter. As the sample diameter is more
often than not the same as the borehole diameter the Designer should consult with the Contractor to check the system and
sample sizes being proposed and the specification should make clear differentiation of what is required with regard to borehole
and sample diameter.
Schedule S1.12.1 should specify the required diameter(s) and depth(s.) The lead driller will select appropriate drill bits
dependent on the information required and material encountered.
Sonic core is most often collected within a single wall ‘core barrel’ and the core is extruded at the end of each core run into
a flexible polythene cylindrical core bag. Alternatively, samples can be collected within a rigid thick-walled plastic core liner
which sits within the barrel into which the sample is collected and retained. Samples collected in this manner can exhibit less
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
disturbance in relation to those within a flexible polythene core bag but are not suited to all formations. Specifiers should
consider that samples are generally considered to be mechanically and thermally disturbed and this should be borne in mind
when scheduling laboratory tests. The plastic liner is much thicker walled than conventional core liner and may need a
specialist cutting tool to split.
Sonic drilling is principally an overburden drilling technique. Where coring is required in rock or competent materials the
Designer or Investigation Supervisor should consider specifying conventional rotary coring techniques using the sonic drill
rig, where sonic drilling has been specified for drilling through the overburden. Most sonic drilling rigs can undertake
conventional rotary coring methods by either operating the drill head without vibration using rotation only, or by a separate
dedicated rotary coring head on the same machine. Schedule S1.12.1 should specify the information required, the type(s) and
depth(s) of samples and whether semi-rigid liners are required.
6.5.4 Backfilling
See Clause 6.4.7.
Concrete or structural coring may be specified as part of a ground investigation, either as a means to penetrate a hard surface
to facilitate access to the ground beneath for a ground investigation borehole, or for the purpose of collecting samples of road
or highway pavement or a structure for subsequent analysis, description or testing.
This type of drilling is generically referred to as diamond drilling, as drill bits are impregnated or surfaced with diamonds.
Diamond drilling is undertaken using a thin-walled single skin core barrel and diameters typically range from 25mm to 300mm
with or without water flush. Cores may be taken vertically, horizontally or indeed at specified angles to suit the investigation
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
requirement, generally using electric powered drill rigs which are either hand-held, bolt down or held down by a vacuum
plate depending on core size, site environment and core orientation.
The Contractor shall pre-core pavement surfaces at specified locations at sufficiently large diameter to facilitate completion
of the borehole at the specified diameter taking account of the need to reduce casing sizes, introduce environmental seals or
hand excavate service inspection pits to the specified depth as necessary.
For opening up a pavement for subsequent exploratory drilling, the Contractor would be required to drill a hole of adequate
size to provide access for the largest diameter casing or tooling they may need to complete the exploratory hole with beneath,
so selection of equipment should be left with the Contractor. It may be that only a 50mm hole is required for a Dynamic Probe
test or 250mm diameter hole for a 200mm diameter borehole.
The requirement or not to hand excavate a service inspection pit beneath the hard surface should also be considered by the
Contractor in selection of core size. Some larger cores may be sufficiently large to allow passage of double shovels to excavate
a pit or multiple core holes connected together may be needed to form a hole of adequate size to excavate a pit in certain
circumstances.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Cores within or through specific structures may be required to be taken as part of the investigation and shall be detailed in
Schedule S1.13.1.
Where cores using diamond drilling techniques, of structures are required for investigation in their own right, individual core
requirements should be specified in Schedule xx. Detailed requirements including diameter, depth and inclination/azimuth
should be included as well as backfill requirements.
6.6.4 Backfilling
Except where otherwise specified in Schedule S1.13.1, the Contractor shall backfill pavement and structural cores with
material matching the as found construction.
Where cores are obtained intact and not required to be tested or stored, they may, if agreed with the Investigation Supervisor,
be used as a component of the backfill material.
Hand-operated specialist power tools (e.g. vacuum excavation tools/air picks specifically designed for excavation in close
proximity to underground utilities) may be used to assist the excavation of inspection pits where it is considered to be safe and
necessary.
The positions, depths and dimensions of all utilities encountered shall be measured and recorded in the daily record with other
information as required by Clause 14.2.
The Designer should use the desk study and utility drawings obtained from the utility survey and position exploratory hole
locations a safe distance from identified or anticipated utilities. The use of inspection pits should, wherever possible, prove
the positive presence of utilities rather than their absence and should be carried out to reduce the risk of danger from
underground utilities.
Where utilities are suspected, known or found to be in close proximity to the proposed exploratory hole, the Investigation
Supervisor should in the first instance relocate the hole to be clear of the utilities. The revised location should take into account
statutory/required safe distances from utilities. If the location of the exploratory hole cannot be moved it is recommended that,
subject to consultation with and the agreement of the relevant utility, further inspection pits are put down to confirm the
utilities and ensure that they will be unaffected by the investigation.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
On the basis of safety, a hand-dug inspection pit should always be excavated unless specifically identified in Schedule S1.14.1
as not being required: overwater investigations are one example where neither CAT scanning nor inspection pits are practical.
However, the justification for dispensing with CAT scanning and/or inspection pits should be based on a site-specific risk
assessment.
The appropriate depth of inspection pits will depend on site-specific circumstances which should be determined by the desk
study, but they should generally extend to a minimum depth of 1.2m below ground level, where possible. Where obstructions
are encountered the Contractor should consult with the Investigation Supervisor to agree an alternative method or early
termination. Although most utilities will be located between 0.45 and 1.0 m below ground level, some may be at greater depths
(e.g. foul sewers and high-voltage electricity cables) and where ground level has been raised after the service was installed.
If utilities are expected at depths greater than 1.2 m, this should be detailed in Schedule S1.14.1 together with the required
inspection pit depth(s).
Inspection pits must be of a larger diameter than that of the equipment used to put down the exploratory hole. Inspection pits
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
can be formed using scissor shovels, but they must be of sufficient diameter to allow the ground below the base to be scanned
using a CAT.
It will not usually be economically practical to excavate inspection pits over the whole plan area of trial pits/trenches. If these
cannot be relocated and the risk assessment does not give surety of safe excavation in the absence of an inspection pit, other
methods of investigation may need to be considered. If trial pits/trenches are required, they should be excavated under
supervision and with care.
Further guidance on avoiding the dangers from underground utilities is given in HSG 47 and PAS 128.
As an alternative to providing support to vertically sided excavations, the sides may be battered back to a safe angle.
The following method of excavation is recommended, particularly where the risk of underground utilities within or close to
the plan area of machine-dug pits/trenches has not been eliminated. A toothless bucket should be used and the excavator
operator instructed to dig slowly in as thin a layer as possible (not more than 100 mm thick). The work should be closely
supervised by an appropriately experienced ground practitioner who should closely observe the bucket and ground conditions
as the pit/trench proceeds.
All hand tools used in the excavation of utility pits or trenches shall be of an approved insulated design. Excavation should be
carried out either by hand, by vacuum excavation techniques, or with great caution using a mechanical excavator with a smooth
or toothless bucket. Utility providers typically require that hand operated power tools shall not be used within 500 mm of a
utility and mechanical excavators within 500 mm to 1 m depending on the nature of the utility, however these requirements
vary, and greater clearances may be required or recommended in some cases. Excavation in either case shall be carried out in
thin 50mm layers with Cable Avoidance tool checks prior to the excavation of each layer. When utilities are encountered, they
shall be exposed by hand from the side of the utility if safe to do so.
Stability of the side walls of utility pits and trenches shall be continuously assessed by a competent person. Appropriate lateral
support (shoring) or battering of pit sides shall be used to ensure stability of the excavation and that buried utilities are not
undermined, or their stability compromised.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Where lateral support (shoring) is required, a temporary works design shall be carried out in advance by an appropriately
qualified individual. The design shall be signed off and checked.
Utility providers should be contacted to identify whether they have particular requirements in relation to exposing their
apparatus or backfilling over or around it.
Entry of personnel into excavations should be avoided wherever possible. Where this becomes a necessary requirement,
such working should be considered as confined space working.
The primary consideration when designing an investigation should be safety and therefore avoidance of entry into an
excavation must be the primary driver. This should only be considered as an absolute last resort and where absolutely
unavoidable. Where it is essential appropriately trained individuals should be engaged working to appropriate standards
and following risk assessment which may discount the possibility.
Attention should also be given to adequate fencing, barriers, and/or other means of constraint where personnel are working
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
in close proximity to the edge of the excavation and at risk of falling from height into the excavation.
Risk assessments together with all necessary support design calculations shall be carried out by a suitably qualified and
experienced Ground Practitioner for all observation pits and trenches. A qualified Temporary Works Designer shall also sign
off the design and any calculations carried out.
In all cases, consideration should be given to whether the required information, sampling and/or testing can be carried out so
that entry of personnel into the excavation can be avoided.
There may be occasions when pits or trenches require to be deepened to examine or sample deeper strata. In such cases, the
risk assessments, support design and associated calculations must be compatible with the proposed greater depth in order to
allow continued safe entry of personnel into the deepened excavation.
Ground related hazards including granular bands, pre-existing shear surfaces, ground water and contamination should be
considered and included in the risk assessment.
Subject to the Contractor being satisfied that the obstruction or hard material is not part of a buried service, the Contractor
shall attempt to continue the excavation for a period of up to 1 hour, or as specified in Schedule S1.8.15. Should this not
penetrate through the hard material the Contractor shall inform the Investigation Supervisor, who shall instruct what actions
are to be taken.
(a) trial pits shall have a minimum base area of approximately 1.5 m2
(b) trial trenches shall be generally greater than 3 m in length.
Logging and sampling of pits and trenches may require experience in both geotechnical and geoenvironmental/contamination
disciplines.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
7.9 Groundwater
When the Contractor is required to keep pits and trenches free of surface water run-off, this shall be detailed in Schedule S1.14
Where instructed by the Investigation Supervisor, groundwater within the excavation shall be controlled and the requirements
detailed in Schedule S1.14.
On land affected by contamination, any groundwater pumped from a trial pit or trench shall be regarded as contaminated and
the Contractor shall agree with the Investigation Supervisor appropriate measures for its collection and disposal and early
termination.
The rate of inflow of groundwater would typically be expected to be controlled by use of a 50 mm outlet diameter pump which
could be achieved by pumping from a sump.
Where measures for collection and disposal of groundwater pumped from a trial pit or trench can be defined in advance of
the investigation, they should be detailed in Schedule S1.14.5. Consideration should be taken that suitable permits and
consents are in place prior to discharge or disposal.
7.10 Backfilling
Backfilling of the pits and trenches shall be carried out as soon as practicable with material replaced at a similar depth to which
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
it was encountered. The backfill shall be compacted using excavation plant, or as specified in Schedule S1.14.6, in such a
manner as to minimise any subsequent depression at the ground surface. In open land, any surplus shall be heaped proud over
the excavation site.
Backfill generally settles with time and should be topped up after a suitable time delay.
Where there is any danger that a person or item of mobile plant could fall or drive into a pit or trench, suitable control measures
shall be put in place to prevent such an occurrence and to ensure a safe place of work.
Precautions shall be taken to protect the pits and trenches from the adverse effects of weather during this period.
In soils such as stiff over-consolidated clays, there can be advantages in leaving the pit or trench open overnight or possibly
up to several days as this allows the excavated surfaces to partially dry, exposing fissures and soil fabric better than
immediately after excavation.
Although pits and trenches should not be left open and unattended, it is essential that an appropriate risk assessment should
be carried out and all required safety measures put in place.
7.12 Photographs
Photographic requirements shall be detailed in Schedule S1.14.7. Photographs shall clearly show details of the ground
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
conditions in the pit or trench with any support in place and contain a graduated scale and photographic board. A minimum of
two photographs shall normally be required: one to show the exposed faces in the pit or trench and one of the stockpile
containing the arisings.
If photographs are required in shafts the reasons for the photographs and information they are attempting to capture shall be
detailed in S1.14.7.
The need for artificial lighting will depend on the ambient light conditions at the time of the works.
Schedule S1.14.9 should include details of the depths of pits to be excavated, any ground support equipment to be provided
and whether a suitably qualified and experienced ground practitioner meeting the requirements of Clause 2.3 item (b) is
required for sampling and/or logging. Where personnel are required with higher levels of competency as detailed in Clause
2.3 this should be detailed in Schedule S1.14.9.
8.1 General
Sampling is likely to be required for the purposes of logging and description of the ground, geotechnical design, contamination
assessment, the characterisation and classification of waste materials or any combination of these.
This section generally addresses only sampling and monitoring during the intrusive phase of an investigation. Sampling from
and monitoring of instruments, which often extends beyond the intrusive phase of work, is dealt with in Section 12.
Samples which are known to have or are suspected of having hazardous properties will require precautions to be taken in
sample handling and description, the precautions being specific to the nature of the hazardous properties. Desk study
information should be provided to the Contractor to enable the appropriate precautions to be applied.
The level of risk posed by the investigation, handling and sampling of substances such as pathogens, asbestos, chemical
contaminants, explosives and radioactivity will vary depending upon the extent and nature of the substance. The appropriate
investigation and sampling procedures should therefore be managed according to the risk. For example, the risks posed by
and sampling procedures for the investigation of radioactive substances of a low activity should be managed differently from
those with higher activity radioactive materials. The Control of Asbestos Regulations (CAR) identifies that personal able to
take samples of asbestos or suspected asbestos should be at least Non Licensed Work trained. Further information can be
found in the AGS guidance Assessment and control of asbestos in soil Part 1.
It is therefore advisable that the project team includes either a Contractor and/or specialist advisor with appropriate
experience and knowledge where the site-specific desk study indicates that any materials with hazardous properties could be
present.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
8.2 Sampling
Prior to the commencement of any ground investigation sampling requirements shall be specified and detailed in Schedule
S1.15.3. These should be based on the objectives of the proposed works, the likely design parameters and the anticipated
ground conditions. These sampling requirements may evolve as the intrusive phase(s) of the ground investigation progress in
response to the ground conditions encountered. Changes to sampling during the works shall be agreed between the Contractor
and Investigation Supervisor.
Samples shall be clearly labelled in accordance with BS 5930 and BS EN ISO 22475-1. If barcodes are required, the
information to be supplied within the barcode shall be specified in Schedule S1.15.
If samples are suspected of containing asbestos or are known to contain asbestos, asbestos warning stickers should be
applied to the outside of the samples and they should also be double bagged. Where contamination or potential
contamination has been identified on site and samples are taken for geotechnical testing these should also be clearly marked
to identify the potential hazard.
Some projects benefit from the use of formation experts or senior logging specialists to ensure a consistent approach to logging
difficult formations or on long duration projects where site loggers may change. These specialists can also help ensure the
identification of marker horizons, accurate identification of formations or specific parts of formations of significance.
Tube and core samples shall be stored on their sides in purpose-made racks. Piston samples shall be stored vertically.
Recommended storage temperatures for different types of sample are given in the relevant clauses, for example Clauses 6.2.8
and 6.4.4.4 for dynamic windowless tube and rotary core samples respectively. Further guidance is given in BS EN ISO 22475.
Samples to be tested for chemical aggressiveness to concrete require more controlled temperature conditions than those taken
for other geotechnical purposes: see Clause 15.7.
Samples for contamination and waste acceptance criteria testing require more controlled temperature conditions than those
taken for geotechnical purposes. Samples required for geoenvironmental testing should be taken by a competent person and
carried out in accordance with the laboratory requirements.
Some guidance on the long-term and short-term storage of samples is given in BS ISO 18512 and BS 5667-3.
Consideration should be given to the time for which samples are transported and stored prior to testing as some tests,
particularly geo-environmental and BRE SD1 tests, may be time critical and this aspect of the project needs to be carefully
planned.
SPTs should be reduced back to 1.0m until 5m penetration into that stratum has been achieved.
(b) Small disturbed samples should be taken of the topsoil, at each change in soil type or consistency and midway between
successive open-tube samples or SPTs.
(c) Bulk disturbed samples should be taken of each soil type and where no sample is recovered with an SPT,U100 or UT100.
(d) Groundwater samples should be taken whenever groundwater is encountered. Where more than one ground-water level
is found, each one should be sampled separately.
Tube samplers are classified in two groups; namely thick-walled and thin-walled. In general, thick-walled samplers are
obtained by dynamic driving methods (ie are hammered into the ground using a weight), whilst most thin-walled samplers
comprise static thrust methods of driving (ie slow continued pressure). The exception to this is the thick-walled piston
sampler which is driven by static thrust.
The method of obtaining the sample and choice of sampler has a direct bearing on the likely quality class of the recovered
sample. The sampling equipment and procedures for both methods are described in BS EN ISO 22475-1 and BS 5930.
The nominal diameter shall be 100 mm unless otherwise specified in Schedule S1.15.4.
Before any tube sample is taken, the bottom of the hole shall be carefully cleared of loose materials and where a casing is
Where an attempt to take a tube sample is unsuccessful, the hole shall be cleaned out for the full depth to which the sampling
tube has penetrated, and the recovered soil saved as a bulk disturbed sample. A fresh attempt shall then be made from the level
of the base of the unsuccessful attempt. Should this second attempt also prove unsuccessful, the Contractor shall agree with
the Investigation Supervisor alternative means of sampling.
The samples shall be sealed immediately to preserve their natural moisture content and in such a manner as to prevent the
sealant from entering any voids in the sample.
Thick-walled samplers include the U100 and U70 (OS-TK/W), thick-walled piston samplers (PS-TK/W) and less commonly
the U38. Unless specified to the contrary, each of these sampler types will use a metal sampler tube to obtain the soil sample.
Soil from the cutting shoe of an open tube shall be retained as an additional small disturbed sample.
Under the requirements of BS EN ISO 22475-1 the U100 sampler, used in the industry for many years, is classified as a thick-
walled open-tube (OS-TK/W) sampler. As such, it cannot produce the Class 1 quality of samples which are required for
laboratory strength and compressibility testing. There is also a smaller diameter version (U70) which can be used with
dynamic sampling activities which produces a lower quality of sample than the U100. The sample quality problem can be
overcome by the use of thin-walled samplers (OS-T/W) or piston samplers (PS-T/W).
The range of available samplers and sample types for different ground conditions is given in BS EN ISO 22475.
Common practice is to use one sinker bar when taking U100 samples in soft and firm clays, but to increase to two sinker bars
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Thin-walled samplers include the thin-walled piston sampler (PS-T/W), the Shelby Tube and the UT100 (OS-T/W). Both the
piston sampler and Shelby Tube are driven by static thrust, whilst the UT100 is driven dynamically, and the limitations
given below should be noted.
The applicability of thin-walled samplers is very dependent on the ground conditions. Most piston samplers can only be
pushed in fine soils with a strength <75kPa, whilst the UT100 is generally only suitable for fine soils within the strength
range 40kPa to 150kPa. None of these samplers are suitable for fine grained soils that have a significant coarse-grained
secondary element.
The use of UT100 samples, as described by Gosling and Baldwin, can be considered but the possible detrimental effects of the
driving mechanism and the number of blows to retrieve the sample should be appreciated.
Where piston sample diameters other than 100mm are required (e.g. 250 mm), the diameter should be stated in Schedule
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
S1.15.4.
If cutting shoe samples are not to be retained, this should be stated in Schedule S1.15.5. Cutting shoe samples would normally
be inspected by the personnel responsible for logging.
Sample containers should be fully filled where possible in order to minimise the space within the container which is occupied
by humid air, which promotes sample oxidation and chemical breakdown. Small disturbed samples should not be placed into
plastic bags.
Designers should consider specifying a reduced weight of sample within each bulk bag as this will help to reduce or eliminate
manual handling incidents.
To minimise the loss of fines, bulk samples of mixed fine and coarse soils from cable percussion boreholes need to be collected
in a suitable watertight container and the fines allowed to settle before carefully decanting off excess clear water. The
remaining solids can then be collected as the bulk sample in a suitable puncture-proof container.
Samples collected in the above manner are likely to be Class 4 or 5 in accordance with BS EN ISO 22475-1.
The mass of bulk samples obtained from boreholes will be limited by the diameter of the borehole and thickness of the stratum.
Large bulk samples may be required for material reuse tests such as compaction tests.
To comply with manual handling guidelines, the sample should be collected in two or more containers.
Reference should be made to BS 1377and BS EN ISO 17892 to determine the sample size consistent with the maximum particle
of the soil and Tables 15.1 and 15.2 in Section 15.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Large bulk samples will mainly be recovered from trial pits or trenches. Where mixed fine and coarse soil strata are sufficiently
thick to allow large bulk samples to be recovered from boreholes, the sample collection procedure described in NG 8.7.6
should be adopted.
Unless instructed to the contrary, each container making up the large bulk sample, should contain material that is
representative of the overall stratum being sampled. It is therefore, not acceptable to place the coarse fraction in one container
and the fine fraction in another.
and these shall be labelled identically to the core sub-samples that they replace. The core sub-samples shall be retained in
separate core boxes clearly marked to indicate the origin of the cores contained within.
In particular for certain tests, the taking, handling, preservation and storage of samples will require more detail to be
provided in Schedule S1.11.6.
Detailed logging of core requires parts of it to be broken. This is likely to conflict with any requirement to retain core samples
for laboratory strength or modulus testing. It is therefore recommended that logging and the selection of core samples for
laboratory testing are carried out concurrently.
Where core sub-samples are required for laboratory testing, the Contractor should be informed of this requirement prior to
logging the core.
The entire sample should be fully wrapped carefully in a single layer of cling film, carefully smoothed to remove any air
pockets that may form between this film and the sample. The sub-sample should then be wrapped in a single layer of aluminium
foil with the shiny surface of the foil on the outside to dissipate heat from the molten wax. Care should be taken to avoid excess
When the wax has solidified, the sample should be dipped into a wax bath so that it is coated in a thin film of wax and then
wrapped tightly in heavy duty cling-film under tension, overlapping at least 30mm on to both ends of the sample. Care should
be taken to avoid the formation of air pockets. Each end of the sample should then be wrapped tightly in heavy duty cling-film.
The cling film should overlap at least 30mm onto the curved surface of the sample.
The sample should then be dipped into the bath of low melting point wax and rotated until all the cling film (including that at
the ends of the sample) is entirely covered in a second coat of wax. It may be necessary to dip the ends of the sample in wax
as a separate action. The wax should then be allowed to cool.
When the wax on the surface of the sample has solidified, the sample should be wrapped in a second layer of cling film dipped
in wax, as described above. The cling film should cover the curved surface and both ends of the sample. Any joins in the cling
film should overlap by at least 30mm. Heavy duty adhesive tape should then be wrapped around the bottom edges of both ends
to protect the cling film from becoming damaged at these locations. A further label should be attached to the outside of the
sample which should also include sample orientation (Top).
Bulk disturbed samples shall be taken of the surface material and at 1 m intervals, with at least one bulk disturbed sample of
each soil type and be representative of the zone from which they have been taken unless specified otherwise and where strata
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
thickness allows.
Groundwater samples shall be taken where there is sufficient ingress to permit samples to be collected.
If additional large bulk samples are required these shall be detailed in Schedule S8.7.7.
A series of large bulk samples may be required for earthworks testing, particularly where materials breakdown during
compaction testing.
Samples of surface materials comprising pavement materials, such as asphalt or concrete, may not be required.
Mostap sampling can be carried out over the full depth penetrated or over discrete depth ranges. Sampling may need to be
instructed on site depending on the conditions encountered in the borehole.
Specialist penetration equipment such as a Cone Penetration Test (CPT) rig will be required to carry out Mostap sampling.
Where water has been previously added, the hole shall be bailed, pumped or air-lifted dry or where there is sufficiently rapid
groundwater ingress Three times the volume of water within the hole shall be extracted before sampling, so that only
groundwater is present in the exploratory hole. See Clause 12.3.2.
Samples taken for testing in respect of concrete design shall be not less than 0.5 litre.
Groundwater samples taken after water has been added to the borehole may not be representative of in situ conditions, even
if the borehole has been bailed out prior to taking the sample. Sampling from piezometers which have been purged immediately
prior to the sampling operation is recommended. See also Clauses 12.3.1 and 12.3.2.
Consideration should be taken of how excess extracted water from an exploratory hole obtained during the sampling process
is stored and subsequently disposed of.
Special samples should be described in Schedule S1.15.8 with reference to BS 5930 and 22475-1 where possible.
All the measurements and observations made should be included in the daily record information to be provided under Clause
14.2.
Water levels shall be measured at the beginning and end of each shift or other rest periods during the work.
8.9 Samples for contamination assessment and Waste Acceptance Criteria testing
8.9.1 Programme of sampling
Sampling and testing for contamination (‘geoenvironmental’) purposes typically involves assessment of all three phases (soil,
groundwater and gas/vapour). As such, much of the sampling and testing (specifically in relation to groundwater and
gas/vapour) is carried out after the completion of the intrusive investigation. Such groundwater samples shall be taken from
standpipes or standpipe piezometers and ground gas/vapour samples from ground gas standpipes, for which reference shall be
made to Section 12.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
In order to meet with Waste Disposal Regulations, the nature of any contamination and whether materials should be disposed
of off- site will be site specific. The number, type, distribution and mass of samples required, together with the method of
sampling, should be specified on a site-by-site basis according to findings from the desk study and the nature of the proposed
construction.
Where the nature and extent of contamination is significant and/or complex, an additional schedule should be prepared setting
out a site-specific overview of the problem together with the investigation objectives and strategy.
Disturbed samples should be taken in accordance with BS 10175 and Guidance for Safe Investigation of Potentially
Contaminated Land but, in any event, from the surface material and then at not more than 1 m depth intervals and at changes
in strata type.
Samples shall be taken from the inspection pit preceding the formation of the exploratory hole.
Guidance on the design of sampling strategies is given in BS 10175, BS ISO 18400-104, Technical Report P5-066/TR and
CLR4 published by Department of the Environment.
Samples for laboratory testing shall be taken using a stainless steel trowel which shall be decontaminated between sampling
events and on completion of each exploratory location to avoid cross-contamination between samples.
Samples shall be taken by a suitably trained and competent person under the supervision or direction of an environmental
scientist, geoenvironmental specialist or geochemist meeting the requirements of Clause 2.3 item (b) as detailed in Schedule
S1.15.12. Where personnel are required with greater levels of competence in accordance with Clause 2.3 these shall be detailed
in Schedule S1.15.12.
The use of lubricants on the boring casing and sample liners should be avoided to prevent external contamination being
introduced to samples.
Plant and equipment can normally be cleaned by pressure washing or, in ground heavily contaminated with organic chemicals,
by steam cleaning. The wash water should be temporarily stored and treated prior to disposal.
Further guidance on the decontamination of sampling tools and the avoidance of cross-contamination is given in ‘Research
and development technical report P5-065/TR’ in ‘Technical aspects of site investigation’ Volume 1 (Environment Agency).
Whether it is more appropriate for samples to be taken by a geoenvironmental specialist or an environmental scientist or by
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
others working under the supervision or general direction of a geoenvironmental specialist or an environmental scientist will
necessarily be a site-specific decision taking into account factors such as the scale of the investigation and the nature of the
likely contamination.
The size and type of sample and container, method of sampling and time limitations for carrying out specific analyses shall be
commensurate with the range of analyses to be carried out or as described in Schedule S1.23.3 for contamination assessment
and Schedule S1.23.5 for Waste Acceptance Criteria testing.
8.9.6 Headspace testing using flame ionisation detector (FID) or photo ionisation detector (PID)
FID and/or PID testing shall be carried out where specified in S1.15.13, or as instructed by the Investigation Supervisor, to
assist in identifying samples to be subjected to laboratory contamination testing for hydrocarbons and volatile organic
compounds (SVOC and VOC).
Samples for headspace testing shall not be subjected to direct sunlight and shall be tested on the day of their collection.
(a) Half fill a suitable 500 ml container with freshly collected sample in clean containers and immediately seal the container
in order to have approximately equal volumes of sample and air.
(b) In an environment above 8C, allow a minimum of 20 minutes for headspace development by vigorously shaking the
container at the beginning and end of development.
(c) Check the PID/FID is working and in calibration (calibrated and recorded natural background).
(d) Insert the instrument probe through the seal to about mid-depth of the headspace, taking care to avoid the uptake of water
droplets or soil particles.
(e) Record the highest meter response. Erratic meter readings should be discounted.
(f) Record details of the sampling and testing, including comments on results which are inconsistent with visual/olfactory
evidence of contamination.
(g) Record details of the ambient weather and temperature during the test.
Suitable containers for headspace testing are glass jars and plastic freezer bags.
The highest meter readings in the headspace test should occur within a few seconds of probe insertion.
Specialist testing may require humidity to be controlled in the laboratory during testing so as to maintain the sample at the
ambient ground temperature. Samples required for specialist testing shall be identified at logging stage.
Guidance on geotechnical sample storage is given in BS EN ISO 22475 and for geoenvironmental samples guidance on sample
storage is given in BS 10175.
Guidance on sample preservation schemes (suitable containers, necessary preservatives and additives, storage conditions and
sample shelf lives) for contaminated samples is given in the Department of the Environment CLR reports and BS ISO 18512.
All geoenvironmental samples shall require chain of custody documentation. Further details of the requirements of a Chain of
Custody are provided in Clause 14.3 and an example is provided in Appendix A.
Samples submitted to the geotechnical and / or geoenvironmental testing laboratory for analysis shall be disposed of 28 days
after submission unless otherwise instructed in Schedule S1.15.11..
It should be noted that various Conditions of Contract also refer to retention and disposal of samples.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Although this clause requires samples to be retained for 28 days, it should be appreciated that samples deteriorate with time;
their shelf life can vary from days to years and depends on many factors including the type of sample, the conditions under
which the samples were taken and stored and what the samples contain. BS ISO 18512 (2007) gives guidance on storage of
soil samples.
The costs of storing samples under controlled conditions (particularly temperature) at the testing laboratory can be large and
sample shelf lives will generally be shorter than the period between taking the sample and 28 days after final report approval.
It is therefore recommended that storage times at the geoenvironmental testing laboratory are limited to 28 days from sample
receipt.
It is assumed that the Contractor will provide a final factual report and this should be approved within a reasonable time
period normally as specified in the contract.
VANE TEST Soft to firm clays in UK. Used in Currently BS 5930. Relevant section
stiff clays in other countries. likely to be replaced by BS EN ISO
22476-9
PLATE LOADING TEST Clays, Silts, Sands, Gravel and BS 1377 Part 9 or DIN 18134
rocks. May also be used at depth in
a borehole.
CONE PENETRATION TEST (CPT) All soils up to maximum particle BS EN ISO 22476-1
size of xx mm. BS EN ISO 22476-6
BS EN ISO 22476-12
PACKER PERMEABILITY TEST All material types but requires BS EN ISO 22282-6
inspection of test zone to ensure
suitability.
BOREHOLE PUMPING TEST Usually carried out in coarse soils. BS EN ISO 22282-4
Characterization
Direct Current Resistivity Method for Surface ASTM D6431
Subsurface Site Characterization
Surface Ground Penetrating Radar Surface ASTM D6432
Method for Subsurface Investigation
Frequency Domain Electromagnetic Surface ASTM D6639
Method for Subsurface Site
Characterizations
Time Domain Electromagnetic Method Surface ASTM D6820
for Geophysical Subsurface Site
Investigation
Seismic Reflection Method for Subsurface ASTM D7128
Investigation
Seismic Refraction Method for Surface ASTM D5777
Subsurface Investigation
Seismic-Reflection Method for Shallow Surface ASTM D7128
Subsurface Investigation
Field Measurement of Soil Resistivity Surface ASTM G57
Using the Wenner Four-Electrode
Method
Sonic Drilling for Site Characterization Soil and Rock, Borehole ASTM D6914
and Installation of Monitoring Devices
9.2.2Test procedures
Cone penetration tests (CPT) using electric friction cones or piezocones shall be carried out in accordance with BS EN ISO
22476-1 and BS 5930. A suitable means of viewing the raw field data on site shall be provided.
The type and size (10,000 or 15,000 mm2) of electric cone to be used, the pore pressure filter position and whether the cone is
to include an inclinometer should be specified in Schedule S1.16.2.
The Contractor should provide full details of the thrust, machine and other equipment proposed. A nominal reaction of 20 T
is required but lower values may be permitted depending upon the anticipated ground conditions.
9.2.3 Calibration
Where load, displacement or other measuring equipment is used which necessitates regular calibration, then this shall be
carried out in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and comply with the requirements of BS 1377-9. Evidence of
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
calibrations and copies of calibration charts shall be supplied to the Investigation Supervisor prior to commencing work and
when otherwise requested.
Where the water table is not close to the ground surface, air entry via the filter element can lead to partial saturation of the
piezometric system. This problem can be minimised by the use of water-filled holes which have been pre-bored down to the
water table.
9.2.5 Interpretation
Any additional parameters to be reported, over and above those required by BS1377-9, shall be specified in Schedule S1.16.6.
Schedule S1.16.6 should specify whether additional parameters, such as normalised or derived parameters, for example soil
type and ch, from dissipation tests are required.
9.2.6.3 Interpretation
The recorded travel times shall be corrected for the horizontal offset between the shear-wave source and the rod string to give
corrected vertical travel times, unless otherwise specified in Schedule S1.16.6. The travel time over the prescribed depth range
of the two geophone sets is obtained by difference to give the resulting vertical shear-wave velocity Vs. The dynamic shear
modulus (Gmax) shall be calculated using the relationship.
Gmax = γb · Vs 2
A range of other cones and probes exists or is being developed to measure electrical conductivity, temperature and to carry
out down-hole geoenvironmental testing.
Details of any computer software used in the interpretation of results should be included in the report.
Consideration should be given by specifiers to both the safety implications of carrying out SPTs and the test’s technical
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
limitations. The technical value of SPTs in hard strata such as rock with strength greater than weak should be considered to
avoid damaging the equipment or getting equipment jammed in the ground. The depths of SPTs when using techniques such
as rotary drilling and/or wireline equipment should take account lengths of core barrels to avoid working at height issues.
Specifiers should also consider specifying the use of automatic hammers as opposed to standard drop hammers when using
rotary rigs to reduce manual handling and potential crushing incidents.
BS EN ISO 22476-3 states that the energy ratio (Er) of the SPT equipment used has to be known if the N values are to be used
for quantitative evaluation of foundations or comparisons of results. It requires that a calibration certificate of the E r value
immediately below the driving head/anvil shall be available and provided prior to the commencement of the project well as
being recorded on the daily records.
The suitability of the various capacity probes (DPL up to DPSH) to differing ground conditions and interpretation of the
results are also discussed in Butcher, McElmeel and Powell.
DPSH-A and DPSH-B differ in respect of the height of the hammer drop (500mm and 750 mm, respectively). DPSH-B is more
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
commonly used in the UK especially when using dynamic sampling equipment.
BS EN ISO 22476-2 recommends that the actual energy (Emeas) delivered to the driving rods is measured and that this is
used when the test results are used for quantitative evaluation purposes
Further information on these tests can be found in BS 5930 and are described in Clarke and Smith and Clarke et al. (2005)
Schedule S1.16.12 should specify, for example, whether tests are to be carried out in pre-drilled pockets or using a driven type
of probe, the required probe diameter, calibrations and results to be obtained.
Where specified in Schedule S1.16.14 or Schedule S1.16.15 or instructed by the Investigation Supervisor, shear vane tests
shall be carried out to give a preliminary estimate of undrained shear strength of the soil tested.
Field shear vane diameters vary from about 19 mm to 33 mm and vane heights from about 29mm to 51mm. It should be noted
that not all vanes have a length-to-diameter ratio of 2:1. It is therefore recommended that shear strength is calculated from
the torque M (in Nm) divided by the vane constant K. The torque can be obtained from the recorded dial divisions via the
manufacturer’s calibration chart of torque versus dial divisions.
Hand shear or torsion vane equipment shall be of an approved proprietary make with stainless steel vanes. The scale shall be
suitably graduated. The procedure for test shall be in accordance with the principles for the laboratory vane and in situ vane
tests (detailed in BS 1377 parts 7 and 9, respectively) and the manufacturer’s instructions.
The hand vane should not be confused with the more controlled laboratory vane test described in BS 1377-7.
Peak shear strength and remoulded shear strength shall be recorded. The reported shear strength for all field vane tests shall
be the average of a set of three readings in close proximity but avoiding interference between tests. Tests giving inconsistent
readings shall be reported and comments on the relevance of the test noted.
The reported shear strength for the hand penetrometer test shall be the average of a set of three readings in close proximity but
avoiding interference between tests. Tests giving inconsistent readings shall be reported and comments on the relevance of the
test noted.
It should be noted that hand penetrometer tests are regarded as imprecise tests due to a lack of consistency in procedure for
the test. The results may be helpful in formulating a controlled test programme and description of soils.
Some penetrometers directly record unconfined compressive strength in kg/cm 2 (1 kg/cm2 = 98kPa).
Plate loading tests can be performed using different diameter plates, typically 300, 450 or 600mm. Loads can vary from a few
tons applied using on site plant to much higher loads requiring kentledge which may be applied in the form of weights or
concrete blocks. The specifier should consider the safety implications for using high loads and also if tests are required in the
base of pits where confined space hazards need to be assessed. Automated equipment is also available which may improve the
safety of the test as this will remove the need for an operative who would normally carry out manual readings from the area
below the load.
The requirements for in situ density tests shall be detailed in Schedule S1.16.18.
Pouring equipment size of 100mm is typical but having the option for using different sizes makes the test more versatile and
is suitable for use with both fine and coarse soils containing fine and coarse particles.
Water replacement tests are typically performed in coarse soils and soils with very coarse fractions. They require larger areas
as the pits are typically around 1m in diameter. The specifier should also consider the availability of a water source and
disposal of the water after the test.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
The specifier should consider the handling, transport and preservation of the sample and ensure the sampling equipment is
undamaged as this will affect the sample quality and laboratory test results.
The nuclear density gauge has both a radioactive source and a neutron source. The radioactive source emits gamma rays
which are detected by sensors normally at the back of the gauge and the more compacted the soil, the less gamma rays will
be detected.
Unlike the NDG which typically uses a Caesium radioactive source for density and Americium Beryllium radioactive source
for moisture the NNDG uses non-radioactive electromagnetic sources for both. Most units look very similar and operate very
similar to an NDG but the electromagnetic sources measure the dielectric constant of the test material which can then be used
to determine density and moisture.
Calibrations of the equipment and training of the users is extremely important and users of the nuclear density gauge will also
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
require a license to operate them and occupational health surveillance due to use and potential exposure of a radioactive
source.
The nuclear and non-nuclear density gauge methods of in situ density measurement differs from other methods in that they
are a rapid determination and therefore useful for multiple determinations but do require detailed calibration against the
specific soils tested and a license for use.
Permeability tests may be required in standpipes or piezometers and where specified in Schedule S1.16.19. they shall be carried
out in accordance with BS EN ISO 22282-6 - Water permeability test in borehole using closed system.
Water extracted from a borehole when preparing for a rising head test should be contained and stored for off-site disposal
depending on local site arrangements.
In unstable soils below the water table it may be necessary to insert a filter material or perforated tube to conduct the test.
Should the preparation method require isolation of the test section using a packer this should be specified.
Tests specified above the water table require the ground to be pre-saturated, this requirement should be specified.
Calculation of permeability is not a requirement of the reporting procedure in BS EN ISO 22282-2. If required, it and one of
the 4 available methods in the standard to be used should also be specified.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Water extracted from a borehole when preparing for a Constant head or Constant flow test where water is extracted from the
borehole may need to be contained and stored for off-site disposal depending on local site arrangements. In unstable soils are
present below the water table it may be necessary to insert a filter material or perforated tube to conduct the test. Should the
preparation method require isolation of the test section using a packer this should be specified.
Tests specified above the water table require the ground to be pre-saturated, this requirement should therefore be specified.
Calculation of permeability is not a requirement of the reporting procedure in BS22282-2, subsequently if required it should
be specified.
Packer tests shall be carried out and reported in accordance with BS EN ISO 22282-3 - Water pressure test in rock. The
Designer or Investigation Supervisor shall provide details of the depth of the test, the test zone, the type of test (single or
double or pump out), and test stage pressures to be monitored in Schedule S1.16.20. The monitoring requirements shall also
be detailed including whether this should be by transducers or by other viable means at surface such as borehole water level
loggers or water level indicator (tape type meter/dipmeter). Readings shall include within the test section as well as above the
test section for single packers and for dual packer configurations below, above and within the test section. Details of the
boreholes within which packer tests are to be carried out shall be detailed in Schedule S2.
Undertaking tests incrementally whilst the borehole is being extended is less efficient and can result in additional costs as
both the rig and packer equipment and technician have down time. Undertaking tests in a completed borehole is likely to be
more cost effective as the packer equipment is fully utilized.
Packer test equipment should be as detailed in BS EN ISO 22282-1. The length of a packer should be at least five times the
borehole diameter when inflated. The effective pressure of the packer on the borehole wall should be at least 30% higher than
the maximum test pressure.
If the seal length is required to increase due to evenness of the borehole wall and/or the soil and rock type to avoid leakage
this should be detailed in Schedule 2.
Maximum required test pressures and flow rates if known should be specified as these will have a significant bearing on the
equipment required to undertake the test.
The tests required and results to be reported shall be specified in Schedule S1.16.21 or as instructed by the Investigation
Supervisor.
Pumping tests can provide valuable information for the setting up or calibration of numerical groundwater models for any
intrusive investigation where groundwater interaction with planned subsurface structures occur.
When specifying a pumping test, the objective of the test and logistics of undertaking the test should be considered. A
hydrogeological desk study should ideally be undertaken to understand the approximate permeabilities of the strata to be
tested and from this the Contractor should design an adequately sized well to install a suitably sized pump to perform the test.
A pumping test can generate huge quantities of water that need to be managed, either through capture, storage and off-site
disposal or more sustainably via discharge to drainage or the ground. How pumped water is to be controlled needs
consideration and guidance. The location and proximity of suitable surface drains should be considered and advised as this
will control the quantity and cost of temporary hoses. Abstraction and discharge consents are also likely to be required and
the party responsible for obtaining these should be advised in the specification.
The test is predominantly used to estimate the load bearing capacity and mechanical strength of pavement subbases and
subgrades. The CBR value is derived from an empirical relationship between the soil measured against the value obtained if
the same test were carried out on a crushed rock.
CBR values can also be derived from plate loading tests, dynamic cone penetrometer tests and lightweight deflectometer
(LWD) tests and the specifier should consider the advantages and limitations of each test method both on a technical and
safety level whilst specifying.
Specifiers should consider the safety implications of carrying out DCPs from surface and the risk of damage to buried services.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Further information on the method, use and interpretation of DCP tests in UK practice can be found in TRL Report 587 - The
correlation between the CBR value and penetrability of pavement construction materials.
A falling weight deflectometer (FWD) is a larger piece of equipment which uses the same technology as LWD and is usually
trailer mounted and towed behind a vehicle. Where FWD is required, details shall be provided in Schedule 1.16.24.
The LWD test is best suited to made ground, recycled materials and aggregates because they have elastic stage properties
whereas clays tend to have very little elastic stage properties to measure.
FWD tests are typically used for highway and runway testing and design.
In low permeability soils, the test can continue over several days.
Soakaway tests should not be carried out in land which is contaminated or suspected to be contaminated.
Designers should consider the technical value of tests in high permeable materials i.e. fractured rock or chalk due to the cost
and logistical requirements resulting from mobilising high volumes of water and the safety implications of working close to a
water filled excavation.
Where gravel has been used to fill the pit for a soakaway test, the Investigation Supervisor should agree with the Contractor
whether the gravel is to be left in situ or removed following the test and how surplus arisings or excavated gravel are disposed
of.
9.10.2 Infiltrometer
The infiltrometer test is not commonly used in the UK but is used across Europe and the United States of America to determine
the infiltration capacity of the ground at the surface or shallow depth. Where specified the test shall be carried out and reported
in accordance with BS EN 22282-5 and at locations specified in Schedule S2.
Field-based screening test results can be used to assist in the selection of laboratory analyses that should be carried out and
to support visual/olfactory evidence of contamination met with during fieldwork.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Interface probes may not be able to identify very thin layers of LNAPL overlying the groundwater or DNAPL at its interface
with an underlying aquiclude.
Unless otherwise specified in Schedule S1.17.1, a geophysicist shall be provided by the Contractor to advise on the types and
methods of geophysics to be used.
Any site trials of the selected geophysical methods to be carried out prior to the main survey shall be specified in Schedule
S1.17.1.
Some guidance on the applicability of a range of geophysical methods towards meeting the objectives under a variety of site
conditions is given in BS 5930 and CIRIA Report No. C562. Further guidance is given by Darracott and McCann.
In order to avoid inappropriate methods being specified it is recommended that, if the Investigation Supervisor is not a
qualified and experienced geophysicist, such a person is employed to advise the Investigation Supervisor. If the experienced
geophysicist is from the Contractor’s staff that person should be engaged under Clause 4.4.6 or 4.4.8. The geophysical
specialist should consult, as necessary, with specialist geophysical contractors to produce a performance specification
outlining the survey objectives and allowing a collaborative approach to selecting the survey approach.
Schedule S1.17.1 should describe:
(a) whether the works comprise land or overwater surveys
(b) the types of geophysics required (mapping/profiling/borehole geophysics)
(c) the methods to be used:
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Where marine geophysics is to be carried out, the grid reference system should be defined in Schedule S1.17.2.
Where marine geophysics is to be carried out levels may be related to Chart Datum. Its relationship to Ordnance Datum
should be stated in Schedule S1.17.4.
Site conditions should include, for example, wind strength and direction, precipitation, sea state (e.g. wave height and
direction) and proximity of potential sources of interference.
The interpretation should be developed using all available data provided as PCI (pre-construction information) and should
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
include forward modelling as appropriate to allow comparison of the anticipated ground model with the data obtained from
the geophysical survey.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
aquitards
NMR Total, Clay- Hydraulic Measurement of
bound, Conductivity principal aquifer
Capillary and properties
Mobile Porosity
The extent to which instrumentation can be specified prior to the investigation depends, in part, on the type of investigation to
be undertaken; for a preliminary investigation, it may only be possible to give a general indication of the instrumentation
likely to be required. On the other hand, if the investigation is supplementary to a previous main investigation it may be
possible to fully detail the instrumentation requirements (e.g. their types, locations and depths).
The required type(s) of instruments, details of the installations to be effected and any base readings to be taken by the
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Each instrument shall be permanently labelled with a metal stamp or tag indicating the exploratory hole number and, if there
are multiple instruments in one exploratory hole, the tags shall clearly distinguish between each of the instruments, indicating
the borehole name and the tip depth / response zone of the installation.
To allow for the use of down-hole data loggers, dedicated bailers or similar, the head works for any observation well or
piezometer standpipe shall be constructed such that there is a secure anchor point from which a down-hole data logger, bailer,
etc, can be suspended if required.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
The headworks to any installation shall be constructed from concrete unless otherwise agreed, be suitable for the loading that
it may be subjected to and be the smallest size practical to provide sufficient space for all elements of the instrument, including
dataloggers, etc, as appropriate, while also providing sufficient space for access for monitoring and sampling.
The type of cover required will depend on both the type of instrument and its location. For example, instruments installed
in a highway location will require the cover to be flush with ground level whereas those in areas subject to local ponding of
surface water would likely need the cover arrangements to be elevated above ground level.
In general, all covers should be lockable, and should be installed immediately after installation of the monitoring point. Two
sets of keys for the covers are to be provided to the Investigation Supervisor.
The selection of cover and construction of the headworks needs to take into account the loading that is likely to occur in the
area where they are constructed (e.g. highways loading, motorised lawn mowers, livestock).
Where the headworks are to a gas monitoring instrument, sufficient clearance needs to be given to ensure that the cover
does not foul the top of the gas tap, and that there is sufficient space within the headworks around the instrument to enable
the gas tap to be unscrewed to permit groundwater monitoring/sampling.
The cover and headworks design should be such as to prevent flooding of the headworks; for example through the use of
suitable seals to prevent ingress of surface water and, unless there is a risk of high groundwater / surface flooding, a
drainage channel.
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
11.3 Fencing
When specified in Schedule S1.18.2, or instructed by the Investigation Supervisor, the Contractor shall install a timber
protective fence around the top of an installation. The fence shall comprise at least three wooden stakes, 75mm square,
preserved in accordance with BS 8417, firmly bedded in the ground, stoutly cross-braced and projecting at least 1.0 m above
ground level.
In areas with growing crops whose height is expected to exceed 0.75 m, longer wooden stakes will be required.
Where livestock are expected to be present, the protective fencing needs to be stock proof and this may require fence posts to
be concreted into the ground. Any such special measures should be included in Schedule S1.18.2.
Where a site is expected to be heavily trafficked during the monitoring period (such as active construction sites), more robust
protection measures such as concrete rings should be used to protect installations. These should be sufficiently painted or
marked so as to be clearly visible to the vehicles/plant operating in the area.
Sites with two or more separate groundwater regimes will usually require them to be individually sampled and/or monitored.
In principle, more than one instrument can be installed in a single exploratory hole, giving cost savings in forming the hole.
However, it is difficult to ensure and prove fully functioning seals between the different response zones. It is therefore
recommended that, in general, instruments are limited to one (but in any event no more than two) per hole.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Where multiple aquifers exist or multiple groundwater sampling levels are required, consideration should be given to
installing specialist equipment such as multi-point installations. These will require additional Specification items.
Where it is intended to monitor LNAPL or DNAPL the installation should be designed appropriately.
The drawings of observation wells and standpipe piezometers show generic forms of these installations. Particular installation
details (e.g. perforated screen diameter, filter grading, filter length, etc.) should be determined in relation to the site-specific
ground/groundwater conditions and the intended purpose of the installation (e.g. groundwater level monitoring, LNAPL or
DNAPL monitoring, ground-water sampling, permeability testing).
The diameter of the observation well or standpipe piezometer should take into account any requirement for groundwater
sampling and ground gas monitoring requirements.
11.4.2 Observation Wells
Observation wells shall be as generally described in Figure 11.1 below and all dimensions and depths shall be recorded on the
daily record at the time of installation.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Simple observation wells should be installed to sample from or determine the general water level in the ground. They may not
be suitable for monitoring pore water pressure, ground gas, LNAPL, DNAPL or vapours.
Notes
1.The installation should be generally as shown opposite and described
below, with the site-specific requirements being detailed in Schedules
S1.18.3 and S1.18.4 or as instructed by the Investigation Supervisor.
2.The observation well tubing should consist of unplasticised
polyvinylchloride (uPVC) or high-density polyethylene (HDPE) whose
internal diameter is consistent with the specified sampling and/or
monitoring requirements.
3.The base of the tubing should be plugged and the lower section
perforated by holes or slots to give an open area of 10–15%. Where
specified in Schedule S1.18.3, the slotted section should be wrapped with
a filter fabric.
4.Where the depth of the exploratory hole is greater than the depth to
which the filter and tubing are to be installed, then the exploratory hole
should be backfilled with impermeable material (cement/bentonite grout
and/or bentonite pellets) up to the base of the filter.
5.If grout is used it should consist of cement and bentonite in the
proportions of 1:1 by weight prepared by thorough mixing with approved
equipment and with only sufficient water to form a pumpable mix. The
grout shall be placed using a tremie pipe to 1m below the base of the
filter. Sufficient time should be allowed for the grout to cure (set). When
the grout has set, the remaining depth of hole to the level of the base of
the filter should be filled with bentonite pellets to form the lower seal.
6.If water in the exploratory hole becomes contaminated by grout it
should be replaced by clean water, the method being to the approval of
the Investigation Supervisor.
7.Where the hole is dry and bentonite pellets are used, sufficient clean
water for immediate saturation should be added concurrently with the
bentonite pellets.
8.The filter should be clean granular material (sand or gravel) and
placed in the exploratory hole up to the level of the base of the tubing.
9.The tubing with a centralising device attached within the perforated
zone should be lowered carefully down the exploratory hole to the level of
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
the filter material, and the exploratory hole backfilled to about 1.2m
below ground level with filter material. Bentonite pellets should be placed
on top of the filter to form an upper seal not less than 0.5 m thick. The
elevations of the base of the tubing and top and base of the filter should
be recorded.
10.The top of the tubing should be covered by a plastic cap or similar.
The cap should include an air vent to allow free ingress/egress of air to
the top of the standpipe tubing.
Arrangements to prevent the ingress of surface water and to protect the
top of the tubing should comprise a suitably sized steel barrel or stopcock
cover or as specified in Schedule S1.18.1 or as agreed with the
Investigation Supervisor. The protective cover should be set in concrete
and incorporate a gravel drainage layer connected to the air space
around the top of the tubing. Protective fencing, where required, should
be in accordance with Schedule S1.18.2
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Standpipe piezometers should be installed to determine the water level within or sample groundwater from a particular
stratum.
Notes
1.The installation shall be generally as shown opposite and
described below, with the site-specific requirements being detailed
in Schedules S1.18.1, S1.18.2 and S1.18.3 or as instructed by the
Investigation Supervisor.
2.The piezometer tip should consist of a porous ceramic element or
slotted pipe with an open area of 10–15% and, if required, wrapped
in a filter fabric (all as specified in Schedule S1.16.3).
3.The piezometer tubing should consist of unplasticised
polyvinylchloride (uPVC) or high-density polyethylene (HDPE)
whose internal diameter is consistent with the specified sampling
and/or monitoring requirements. The tubing should be supplied and
installed in not less than 3m lengths, except for one shorter length as
required to suit the total piezometer depth. The tubing and porous
element/slotted section should be joined by screw thread or screwed
couplings.
4.Where the depth of the exploratory hole is greater than the depth
to which the filter and tubing are to be installed then the exploratory
hole should be backfilled with impermeable materials
(cement/bentonite grout and/or bentonite pellets) to the base of the
filter.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Hydraulic continuity with the groundwater cannot easily be proved with pneumatic and electrical piezometers: their
satisfactory operation relies upon correct installation by experienced operatives and check readings during the installation
process.
Further details are provided in BS 5930.
11.4.6 Development
Where specified in Schedule S1.18.5, or instructed by the Investigation Supervisor, groundwater installations shall be
developed by air lifting, surging, over-pumping or jetting.
Particularly where observation wells or standpipe piezometers are to be used for in situ permeability measurements, they
should be developed by air lifting or other suitable methods to:
1. ensure good hydraulic continuity between the installation and the groundwater
2. ‘settle down’ the filter pack
3. break down any skin of remoulded soil on the borehole wall surface created during its formation.
Where observation wells or standpipe piezometers are to be used for groundwater sampling, the installations should also be
purged/micro-purged prior to sampling; see Clause 12.3.2.
Observation wells for monitoring ground gas concentration and taking samples of ground gas in exploratory holes shall be
installed as specified in Schedule S1.18.6 or as instructed by the Investigation Supervisor. They shall be as generally described
in Figure 11.3 and all dimensions and depths shall be recorded at the time of installation.
Guidance on the requirements for ground gas monitoring installations is also available in CIRIA Report C665 and BS 8576.
Similarly, any requirement for further readings beyond the base set, either during the intrusive phase of the investigation or
requiring return visits to site, should be detailed in Schedule S1.19.1. If return visits to site are required, this should be clearly
identified in Schedule S1.19.1.
In general, it is preferable for ground gas to be monitored in dedicated ground gas monitoring instruments, with the response
zone above the groundwater.
Particular attention should be given to the selection of the response zone, which should lie within the unsaturated zone, and
closely targeted on the stratum of interest; where groundwater level is high, it may be impossible to install a gas monitoring
well above the normal groundwater level while still providing for an adequate seal between response zone and ground surface.
Combined ground water and ground gas monitoring observation wells may be used, and in this case, the response zone should
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
be designed to extend from the unsaturated zone to below the phreatic surface, and to allow for variation in groundwater level
to ensure as much as possible that the instrument functions reliably as both a ground gas and a ground water instrument at
all times. Where the response zone of a gas monitoring well extends below the ground water, consideration should be given
to the influence of dissolved phase materials on any gas monitoring results.
Notes
1.The installation should be generally as shown in the drawing
opposite and described below, with the site-specific requirements
being detailed in Schedules S1.18.6 or as instructed by the
Investigation Supervisor.
2.The tubing should consist of unplasticised polyvinylchloride
(uPVC) or high- density polyethylene (HDPE). HDPE is the
preferred material as it is more resistant to attack by aggressive
chemicals. Each length of tubing should be joined by screw
thread or threaded couplers. Glue or adhesive should not be used
to join tubing. The base of the tubing should be plugged and the
tubing perforated by holes or slots to give an open area of 10–
15%. The depth to the top of the perforated tubing should be as
specified in Schedule S1.18.6 or as instructed by the Investigation
Supervisor.
3.The filter should be clean non-calcareous quartz-based single-
sized gravel, 6– 10 mm in diameter.
4.Where the depth of the exploratory hole is greater than the
depth to which the filter and tubing are to be installed, then the
exploratory hole should be back filled with impermeable
materials (cement/bentonite grout and/or bentonite pellets) to the
base of the filter.
5.The tubing should be lowered carefully down the exploratory
hole to the level of the filter gravel, and the exploratory hole
backfilled with filter gravel to the top of the perforated section.
Where tubing is required to be installed to a considerable depth,
the use of centralising devices should be considered.
6.The top of the tubing should be covered by a screw-on gas tap,
rubber bung or push-on cap with a gas valve as indicated on the
drawing opposite.
7.That part of the borehole above the perforated section should
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Narrow diameter pipework (3 mm to 10 mm) in small diameter boreholes are favoured to limit disturbance of the ground.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
However, pipe diameters up to 50 mm can be used. If using an adopted gas observation well, consideration should be given
to the details of construction to ensure it is suitable for monitoring and sampling of vapours. Observation wells are required
to be vapour specific and fully screened within the vadose zone. Use of groundwater observation wells will not be
representative of soil vapour as dissolved VOCs in groundwater can influence the concentrations in the monitoring well.
Vapour observation wells are a specialist installation which requires advice and guidance from geoenvironmental
practitioners.
For certain VOCs, stainless steel installations might be required, for example if vinyl chloride is a key contaminant of concern,
sampling from a PVC well is not appropriate.
Good observation well construction including sufficient seals are essential for reliable investigation of vapours. Sampling
procedures should be carefully evaluated to ensure that data integrity is maintained and project objectives are met.
Consideration should be given to leak detection tests as well as ensuring components of the sample train do not compromise
the sampling process. Further guidance can be found in BS 10175 and BS 8576.
11.7 Inclinometers
Where specified in Schedule S1.18.8 or instructed by the Investigation Supervisor, inclinometer tubes or in-place inclinometers
shall be installed, measured, recorded and reported in accordance with BS EN ISO 18674-3.
The inclinometer tubing shall be installed in the borehole in lengths not exceeding 3m which are joined by proprietary methods,
supported by centralising spiders at not more than 3 m depth intervals and with the keyways orientated parallel and orthogonal
to the line of maximum slope or structure to be monitored.
The annular space around the inclinometer tubing shall be filled with a grout mix as specified in Schedule S1.18.8, with the
minimum water to provide a slurry which can just be pumped into the hole via a tremie pipe.
The Contractor shall ensure that no extraneous material is allowed to enter the inclinometer tubing and that damage and
deformation of the tubing are prevented.
The Contractor shall provide the Investigation Supervisor with a set of base readings comprising readings at 0.5 m depth
intervals over the full depth of the installation.
It is not normal practice for the Contractor to supply the Investigation Supervisor with inclinometer reading equipment and
software. If equipment and software are required, this should be specified in Schedule S1.19.9.
Any requirement for further readings beyond the base set, either during the intrusive phase of the investigation or requiring
return visits to site, should be detailed in Schedule S1.18.8. If return visits to the site are required, this should be clearly
identified in the Schedule.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
The Investigation Supervisor shall provide details of any installations which require decommissioning or removal of their
surface protection. Decommissioning or removal shall be carried out so as not to create pathways for potential contaminants
or surface waters and details of the requirements shall be detailed in Schedule S1.18.12.
Where the top of an installation (e.g. a stopcock cover and surrounding concrete should be removed to avoid a long-term
obstruction, this should be specified in detail.
If decommissioning or removal of instrumentation is required there may be specific requirements which should be detailed
e.g. Environment Agency.
Where concurrent (or immediately sequential) monitoring and sampling of ground gas, vapour and groundwater are required
from the same installation, the Contractor shall ensure that the operations are carried out such that monitoring does not
adversely affect sampling and vice versa.
The required type(s) of instrumentation, details of the installations to be constructed and any base readings to be taken by the
Contractor shall be specified in Schedule S1.19. If multiple sets of base readings are required from instrumentation this shall
also be stated in Schedule S1.19.1.
Groundwater quality, ground gas and vapour monitoring and sampling are specialist activities which require input from
geoenvironmental practitioners.
Where combined installations have been installed for ground gas and groundwater, the monitoring/sampling of ground gas
must precede that related to groundwater.
Similarly, where concurrent/immediately sequential groundwater level monitoring and sampling in the same installation are
required, monitoring should generally precede sampling.
Return visits carried out up to issue of Draft Report are deemed to be included as part of fieldworks and those visits after issue
of the Draft Report should be termed long term monitoring and reported separately as an addendum.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
The frequency of observation and reporting of instrumentation readings shall be specified in Schedule S1.19.1.
It is good practice to also check and record the depth to the installation tip. This is particularly important when there is more
than one installation per borehole. When sampling is required at the same time, however, consideration also needs to be given
to the disturbance caused to the water column within the instrument if the depth to the installation tip is measured.
The Investigation Supervisor should approve the instrument used to take groundwater readings and this may comprise an
electronic dipmeter or readings from water level loggers.
BS EN ISO 22475-1 and BS 5930 provides details of the requirements for sampling of groundwater.
Sample volumes, the containers, preservatives and conditions required in transit should be agreed with the testing laboratory
before sampling.
Water sample containers should be kept in the dark, filled and refrigerated, without any contact with materials that could
affect the water quality.
Pump type should be assessed prior to monitoring to select the most suitable pumping method to meet groundwater conditions
and sample pumping requirements (i.e. low flow pump).
Samples should be scheduled for testing and dispatched to the testing laboratory in appropriate containers on the day of
sampling where possible and, at the latest, within 24 hours of the sample being taken.
During purging, groundwater shall be monitored for conductivity, pH, temperature, electrical conductivity, dissolved oxygen
and Redox potential. Purging shall cease upon stabilisation of these parameters. Alternatively, a minimum of three installation
groundwater volumes shall be purged from the well. If the installation pumps dry or site-specific conditions dictate that
additional purging is required, the Contractor shall inform the Investigation Supervisor who will decide what actions the
Contractor is to carry out.
Micro-purging (to minimise disturbance to the water column) may be specified or instructed by the Investigation Supervisor
as an alternative to purging if free-phase contaminants (light or dense non-aqueous phase liquids, LNAPLs and DNAPLs
respectively) or VOCs are present or the groundwater column is stratified.
Based on three installation groundwater volumes, the purge volume V is calculated as follows:
where r is radius of standpipe; R is radius of filter pack; p is assumed porosity of the filter pack; WL is the depth below ground
level to the water surface; and TD is the depth below ground level of the base of the screened section.
The pumping rate during purging should not be greater than the recharge rate to avoid recharging groundwater cascading
down the well screen. The pumping rate should also be less than the rate of abstracting water from the installation during its
development.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
The purged water should be disposed of in an environmentally sensitive manner that ensures purged water does not re-enter
or influence water levels within the borehole/standpipe that is being purged, introduce contaminants or affect local
drainage, water courses or other water bodies.
Where the need for micro-purging can be identified from the desk study results, it should be specified in Schedule S1.19.3.
The diameter of the installation will have to be sufficient to install a dedicated pump: bailers, grab samplers and inertial
pumps are not suitable.
As noted in Clause 12.1, where sampling and groundwater level monitoring are required at the same time, monitoring should
normally be carried out first. Since sampling will usually be preceded by purging with a resultant temporary lowering of the
borehole water level, it may be necessary to take several water level measurements over a period of time to demonstrate that
the equilibrium value has been obtained.
Continuous measurement using multi-parameter meters can also be specified as a means of determining purging duration.
Purging should continue until the variation in these parameters becomes stable, unless specified otherwise by the Investigation
Supervisor.
A multi-parameter meter allows determination of the above sensitive analytes and when combined with a flow cell minimises
atmospheric contact, aeration and de-pressurisation. The process requires a continuous stream of groundwater flowing
directly into the flow cell where direct measurement is carried out.
Stability is defined as a constant concentration of a parameter, within a defined variance (typically 10%), held over a pre-
defined period of time. The selection of parameters should be based on site-specific conditions but as a minimum should
include pH, electrical conductivity and temperature.
The measurements shall include atmospheric pressure, ground gas pressure, flow rate(s) and concentrations of methane,
oxygen and carbon dioxide, or as specified in Schedule S1.19.5.
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Where the reading instrument does not allow concurrent measurements to be taken, the gas pressure in the installation shall
be determined prior to measuring flow rates (including their range and whether the flow is positive or negative). Flow rate
measurements shall precede the individual gas concentration measurements.
Ground gas concentrations shall be measured for a minimum of 3 minutes and both the peak and steady-state concentrations
recorded. If the concentration is rising/falling at the end of the monitoring period, this shall also be recorded. Where VOC
concentrations are required, monitoring may be undertaken using PID/FID to give overall concentrations.
The depth to water, atmospheric pressure, atmospheric temperature, ground conditions and weather shall be measured and
recorded at the time of taking gas measurements.
If speciated VOCs are required to be determined, samples for laboratory testing shall be required and specified in S1.19.8.
Monitoring should, where practical, include readings taken when the atmospheric pressure is below 1000 mb as well as under
falling barometric pressure; see CIRIA C665. Consideration should be made for additional visits and timescales for
monitoring if this is required.
As noted in Clause 12.1, ground gas or vapour measurements should precede that of the depth to water.
and provide greater confidence for risk assessment, the collection of continuous gas monitoring data shall be considered and
if required specified in Schedule S1.19.6.
This approach might, for example, be used to better assess ground gas risks at higher characteristic situations (CS) sites.
Continuous monitoring involves high-frequency, time-series measurements over short internals, for instance, a period of up
to six weeks. Where the frequency of sampling is equal to or greater than the change in the parameters being monitored, the
data set can be termed continuous.
High-frequency and continuous data can allow a range of correlations between gas concentrations and environmental
variables to be identified, which can be used within both detailed qualitative and quantitative assessments, including statistical
and sensitivity analysis.
The period over which high-frequency and continuous monitoring is conducted should take into account site-specific
circumstances and the type of assessment being completed. For ground gas risk assessment purposes, high-frequency
monitoring should be conducted over a period of time that covers sufficient variation in the most critical factors that affect
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
gas emission from the ground. Examples are weather conditions, atmospheric pressure drops, changing groundwater levels
and tidal effects.
When it is considered appropriate to carry out high-frequency monitoring, regular visits should still be made to site to record
the condition of the ground surface and other nearby activities. Additional care is necessary for the design and construction
of headworks see Clauses 11.2 and 11.6.
Samples of ground gas for chemical analysis shall be obtained from exploratory holes or standpipes in accordance with BS
10175 and BS 10176. The sampling method shall relate to the volume of gas available and the type of laboratory analysis to
be carried out. The sampler receptacle shall be airtight and may include lockable syringes, Tedlar bags, gas bombs, VOC
sampling canisters, adsorbent columns or cold traps.
Guidance on groundwater and ground gas sampling is also provided in the SCA Blue Book ‘General Principles of sampling
water and associated materials’, and ‘Guidance on monitoring trace components in landfill gas’ (Landfill Directive Technical
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Guidance Note 04) (Environment Agency).
Silonite canisters, sorbent tubes and passive sampling may be considered suitable for vapour sampling subject to specialist
advice.
Tedlar bags and Gresham cylinders are not suitable for sampling VOCs because of the stability of the target compounds.
Gresham cylinders are simply a steel or aluminium tube with no passivated coating so are not suited to volatile analytes.
Tedlar bags have very short holding times (typically 48 hours or less). The laboratory will provide high detection limits and
permeation of VOCs is possible through the bag. These bags are also fragile and easily punctured.
Where ongoing monitoring of such installations by the Contractor is required, it shall be specified in Schedules S1.19.9 or
instructed by the Investigation Supervisor. Schedules S1.18.1-S1.18.11 shall state whether return visits to site will be required.
Where additional monitoring is required, this should be listed in Schedule S1.19.10 with appropriate Specification items.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Any requirement for sampling and/or testing necessitating a return visit to site should be detailed in Schedule S1.19.11.
BS EN ISO 5667-1 provides guidance on the design of sampling programmes and techniques. Guidance on sampling rivers
and streams is given in BSEN ISO 5667-6.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
In certain locations e.g. public highways the method of reinstatement (and indeed backfilling) will be determined by
Department of Transport; Specification for Reinstatement of Openings in the Highways (SROH) including verges, kerbs,
cycleways, etc This specification also deals with breaking out, excavation and backfilling of excavations through road
surfaces, the relevant clauses of which should also be followed.
The objective should be that the surface of exploratory holes be returned to an equivalent quality and material type, to that
before the ground was disturbed. On rare occasions, when perhaps the ground investigation is being undertaken on an area
of land under development it may be acceptable, with the permission of the client, Investigation Supervisor, owner and
developer, to leave the surface of the exploratory hole safely backfilled but un-reinstated.
There will also be occasions when a site is primed for imminent development or re-development and a temporary reinstatement
may be acceptable. In this instance however, the temporary reinstatement must suit and be deemed safe and appropriate for
the temporary use of that land.
Considerations should be given to pre and post-condition surveys in accordance with Clause 5.2 which can avoid claims or
disputes for damages deemed to have been caused by the ground investigation works.
After completion of an exploratory hole through a turf or topsoil surfaced area and subsequent backfilling, a layer of topsoil
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
equivalent to that displaced at commencement shall be gently placed into the exploratory hole and gently tampered and raked
to form a level surface.
Where access routes are required across turf and topsoil surfaced areas the scope of reinstatement shall be specified in Schedule
S1.20.2.
If there is a turf surfacing, the turf taken off the location at commencement should be rolled out over the topsoil layer and
gently rolled or tamped down with a flat surface. The gaps between adjacent pieces of turf should be infilled with loose topsoil.
Re-seeding may be deemed to be an acceptable form of reinstatement and if required should be agreed with the Investigation
Supervisor or specified in Schedule S1.20.2.
The reinstated layer of gravel shall be at least as thick as the layer excavated through at commencement and shall be placed
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
If the land use is a track, road or parking area, particular attention shall be made to backfilling the exploratory hole in such a
way as to eliminate settlement.
As far as is reasonably practicable permanent, reinstatements shall meet both the structural integrity and visual characteristics
of the original surface using comparable materials, unless there is a particular instruction or reason why not.
Backfilling of hard surfaced areas shall be specified in such a way that no subsequent settlement or collapse of the backfill can
occur beneath the surfacing layers.
On private sites, reinstatement should be carried out by any appropriately experienced competent person.
On ‘public streets maintainable at public expense’ The New Roads and Street Works Act (NRSWA) requires that there is a
qualified operative on site at all times while street works are in progress under appropriate supervision on a NRSWA
Supervisor.
Where large diameter coring (a road core >150mm diameter) has been specified through paved surfacing this may allow for
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
re-use of the road core as a component of the reinstatement material.
13.5 Headworks
Headworks installed as part of a borehole reinstatement shall in all circumstances be fit for purpose and details shall be
provided in Schedule S1.20.5.
Details of covers and headworks relating to installation requirements are provided in Clause 11.2.
In accordance with BS 8574, the daily record shall, wherever possible, be provided as data in AGS data format obtained at
source and retained electronically. Unless otherwise specified, the data shall be collected using digital recording devices such
as smart phones, tablets, data loggers or other digital devices at each exploratory hole or investigation point and include
specified measurements, observations and test results deriving from the site works.
In practice, a daily record should comprise an exploratory hole log, in situ test report, monitoring results or other geotechnical
or geoenvironmental data. Many Contractors and suppliers have developed digital devices and outputs for their operations
and equipment and many Apps are available to capture data and details of these should be provided to the Investigation
Supervisor before works commence or the equipment is used. Where these are not available, purpose designed record sheets
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
should be developed for recording all of the information required in Table 14.1.
The Investigation Supervisor should consult with the Contractor to ensure that proprietary systems proposed for the works
should have data import and export facilities which will enable data to be transferred using the AGS data format.
C
BDA Audit Card No. ● ● ● ● ○
Exploratory hole or ● ● ● ● ● ●
observation point i.d.
Day and Date ● ● ● ● ● ●
Utility scan details ● ● ● ● ●
Equipment and techniques ● ● ● ● ● ●
used1
Inclination and direction ● ● ● ● ● ○
relative to north
Dimensions ● ○ ○
Diameter and depth of ● ● ● ● ● ○
exploratory holes and
casing
Depths and volume of any ● ● ○
water or flush medium
added to exploratory hole
Depth of each change of ● ● ● ● ● ○
stratum
Description of each ● ● ● ● ● ○
stratum2
Notes
● denotes details are required
○ denotes details are required, if applicable
1
Details shall include for drilling and boring the rig type, rig i.d., tooling used i.e. chisel, core barrel, core bit and for
excavations; machine type, bucket width and whether it is toothed or smooth and if a breaker or pump was used.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
2
Descriptions should be in accordance with the specified versions of BS 5930, BS EN ISO 14688 and BS EN ISO
14689.
3
Top and bottom depth of each sample shall be recorded. Details to be recorded for driven open tube samplers shall
also include the length of sample recovered and number of blows. Details to be recorded for coring shall also include
total core recovery per core run and top and bottom depths. Details of any difficulty obtaining the sample, including
failed samples, or potential or known disturbance to the sample shall also be recorded.
4
Details shall include any changes of equipment required to progress the exploratory hole, time taken in duration and
time, depth of penetration and whether the hard material/obstruction stopped progress.
5
Indicates groundwater during drilling / excavation. Depth of any water strike and details of speed of inflow or
outflow recorded every 5 mins for 20 mins.
6
Indicates groundwater or ground gas readings from installations and shall include the time of the reading and
barometric pressure.
Copies of all chain of custody records shall be provided to the Investigation Supervisor, upon request, within 24 hours of the
samples being taken. The Chain of Custody records shall be kept by the Contractor until acceptance of the Final Report.
Laboratories may also use an on-line data management platform which allows electronic scheduling of samples. The above
information should still be provided regardless of the system used.
The Contractor shall inform the Investigation Supervisor within 5 working days from the receipt of the testing schedule if a
sample referred to in the schedule is not available for testing.
The laboratory shall visually assess the quality and shall make its best assessment of the sample quality and suitability prior
to testing and advise the Investigation Supervisor, as soon as possible, of any non-compliant, unanticipated disturbed or
unsuitable samples for the tests specified so that appropriate action can be taken, and further instructions provided.
Irrespective of whether the Investigation Supervisor or the Contractor is to specify the testing it is necessary to ensure that
arrangements are put in place by both parties to ensure that the specified time limits are achieved.
It should be accepted that laboratory testing quantities cannot be accurately predicted at tender stage before detailed
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
ground conditions are known. It may be necessary to specify additional testing once the results of the original tests are
available. The additional testing may comprise more of the original tests and/or different tests.
Example blank laboratory test schedules are provided in Appendix A and these should be available in digital format.
Predominant size of Minimum mass of prepared soil required Type of mould used
material present
based on visual
observation
(a) (b)
Medium gravel or 6kg 15kg 1 litre
finer (c)
Coarse gravel (d) 15kg 40kg CBR
(X) Tests not applicable
(a) Soil particles not susceptible to crushing during compaction.
(b) Soil particles susceptible to crushing during compaction.
(c) Material with occasional coarse gravel and no cobbles
(d) Material with some coarse gravel and occasional cobbles
X For coarse gravel and coarse gravel with cobbles these types of test will not be suitable
1L = one-litre compaction mould CBR = CBR mould
Determination of BS EN ISO Cone penetrometer method often used on all samples. Four-point definitive
liquid limit 17892-12 method performed automatically. Specify if one point method is to be used.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Determination of BS EN ISO If specimen is unsuitable for plastic limit, liquid limits will normally be
plastic limit 17892-12 performed.
Determination of BS EN ISO Specify whether a small or large pyknometer, or the gas jar method, for
particle density 17892-3 gravelly soils is required when scheduling.
Determination of BS EN ISO Wet sieving method generally used for all specimens. Specify whether
particle size 17892-4 Hydrometer or Pipette sedimentation is required for all specimens having
distribution greater than 10% passing 63 µm sieve. If a different percentage passing value
is required for sedimentation specify when scheduling. If extra sieves are
required in the grading specify when scheduling. Note: sedimentation and
grading curves are often combined using K.H.Head’s Manual of Soil
Laboratory Testing sedimentation riffling correction.
Particular attention should be given to the table and graph of minimum mass
required in the British Standard. Testing will only be completed on insufficient
specimens if this has no effect on other scheduled tests for the specific sample
under consideration. If unsuitability is to be reported before testing, then
specify when scheduling.
Determination of BS 1377: Part 4: Specify method of compaction required when scheduling. Particular attention
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
dry density/ 1990 (1) must be given to material type regarding the table of minimum sample mass
moisture content required in the British Standard. (Note any additional testing on the sample
relationship will require additional material).
Determination of BS 1377: Part 4: Specify single point, calibration, or rapid assessment when scheduling.
moisture condition 1990 (1)
value
Determination of BS 1377: Part 4: Single determination performed. If the mean of six determinations, as detailed
chalk crushing 1990 (1) in the British Standard, is required, specify when scheduling.
value
Determination of BS 1377: Part 4: Specify method of compaction when scheduling. Specify if the sample can be
California Bearing 1990 (1) tested within 3 hours of ramming up. Unless specified, sample will be tested
Ratio at top and bottom. Methods 1 to 4 also require specifying the density and
moisture content. Method 5 requires specifying the compactive effort. All
methods require to specify the surcharge to be applied during the test. If a
soaked test is required, then specify when scheduling, including soaking
duration.
Determination of BS EN ISO Specify the number of loading and unloading stages and pressures required
one-dimensional 17892-5 when scheduling. Specify method of determining end of primary stage. Unless
consolidation otherwise specified, the loading pressures will be modified so that the first load
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
properties increment is greater than the swelling pressure. If full swelling pressure
determination is required specify when scheduling. If coefficient of volume
compressibility for pressure increment of 100 kN/m 2 in excess of the present
effective overburden pressure (Po’) is required then specify (Po') when
scheduling.
Determination of BS 1377: Part 6: Specify the density and method of placement when scheduling. If testing is
permeability by the 1990 (1) required over a range of hydraulic gradients specify when scheduling. Note
constant head that this test is ideally suited to coarse samples. Triaxial permeability
method determination should be considered for fine soil samples.
Determination of BS 1377: Part 6: 63–250 mm specimens can be tested. When scheduling, specify all the
hydraulic cell 1990 (1) following: drainage conditions; loading conditions; sequence of effective
(Rowe cell) pressure increments and decrements; criterion for terminating each primary
consolidation consolidation and swelling stage; and the method for determining cv. Where
no method of cv determination is specified, the pore pressure dissipation
method is to be used, with the exception of two-way vertical drainage tests
where the log time curve fitting method is used. If specimens are to be
remoulded, then specify the required density and moisture content or
compactive effort when scheduling.
Determination of BS EN ISO When scheduling, specify all the following: size of test specimen; drainage
isotropic 17892-9 conditions; sequence of effective pressure increments and decrements. The
consolidation in a axial strain at which the test is to be stopped; the requirements for any or all of
triaxial cell the optional reporting information.
Determination of BS EN ISO When scheduling, specify all the following: size of test specimen; direction of
permeability in a 17892-11 flow of water; method of saturation; and effective stress at which each
triaxial cell permeability measurement is to be carried out. Note that this test is ideally
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Determination of BS EN ISO When scheduling, specify all the following: size of test specimens; method of
shearbox shear 17892-10 remoulding including density and moisture content if required; the normal
strength pressures to be applied; and if residual strength is required, the method of
reversal. Note that two reversals are performed to determine the residual
strength. Further reversals may be required to define the true residual strength
and if these are required then specify when scheduling. For the 300 mm shear
box, a minimum of 35 kg of soil passing the 20 mm sieve is required for each
stage.
Determination of BS EN ISO When scheduling, specify all the following: the moisture content required for
ring shear residual 17892-10 the test; the number of specimens to be tested as a set; the normal pressures to
strength be applied; and the procedure for forming the shear plane. The procedure in
BS EN ISO 17892-10 is rather vague; therefore, either rely on the procedure
described in BS 1377 or specify a different one when scheduling.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Undrained triaxial BS EN ISO When scheduling, specify all the following: size of specimens; number of
without 17892-8 specimens to be tested; cell confining pressure. If a remoulded test is required,
measurement of also specify the method of compaction, and required density and moisture
pore water content. is Multistage UU tests are not covered in BS EN ISO 17892-8 due to
pressure practical concerns of misinterpretation of the data.
Effective stress BS EN ISO When scheduling, specify all the following: size of specimens; number of
testing 17892-9 specimens to be tested as a set; type of drainage; correction to be applied for
side drains if used; isotropic or anisotropic consolidation and if the latter then
the stress conditions; effective pressures; and criterion for failure. If a
remoulded test is required, also specify the method of compaction, and
required density and moisture content. Multistage CU or CD tests are not
covered in BS EN ISO 17892-9 due to practical concerns of misinterpretation
of the data.
NOTES: The international ISO series of laboratory test standards (BS EN ISO 17892), have now largely replaced BS
1377 parts 2 to 9. BS 1377 Part 1 is however retained.
(1) For these tests, there are no ISO standards and continued reference to BS 1377 is required. However, it should be
noted that BS 1377 is being redrafted to cover these tests and the part numbers shown in this table will change in due
course.
Specifications for laboratory tests not described in British Standards or in the reference list should be inserted in Schedule
S1.22.3.
TABLE 15.4: Test standards for common laboratory tests for soils
BS 1377 Part 2.
the intention to make part 2 of the updated standard a reference for these additional soil parameters.
The assessment of whether contaminated samples can be safely handled by the geotechnical laboratory should be determined
on a sample by sample basis and the Investigation Supervisor kept informed.
15.3 Accreditation
The required schemes and standards to which the laboratory testing shall be accredited shall be specified in Schedule S1.22.4.
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
It is recommended that where UKAS accreditation is available it is specified.
The precise scope of a laboratory’s accreditation should be checked prior to engagement as accreditation relates to the
individual tests and not the laboratory as a whole. Accreditation is generally obtained against compliance to individual test
procedures and the laboratory should also be required to be compliant to BS EN ISO/IEC 17025 General requirements for
the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.
Sections of BS 1377 have almost entirely been replaced by British Standard versions of the BS EN ISO 17892.
If tests include optional methods and a particular option is required or where test specifications may vary or are not available
from the Standards, the requirements or particular test specifications should be provided in Schedule S1.22.3.
If tests include optional methods and a particular option is required, this should be included in Schedule S1.22.5.
Most laboratories will be UKAS accredited for testing in accordance with either ISRM or ASTM methods but not both
(although for most tests the ISRM and ASTM procedures are similar and in some cases the same). UKAS accreditation is
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
considered to be more important than the choice between ISRM and ASTM methods. Many tests are not currently covered by
any national or international test standards, and for these, reference should be made to the series of test methods in the
‘Orange Book’ titled "The ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring", edited by Prof. R.
Ulusay.
TABLE 15.5: Test standards for common laboratory tests for rock tests
NOTES:
1. Rock testing is not currently covered by any UK or international testing standards, the ‘usual’ reference for in
situ and laboratory rock testing are
• ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 2007-2014” edited
by Prof. R. Ulusay (Orange Book)
• ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 1974-2006” (Blue
Book)
• American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Suggested Methods and Guides.
2. Where a test method is covered by both the ISRM ‘blue book’ and the ISRM ‘orange book’, the more
recently published reference should be used.
3. Since each test given in these documents are only advisory, any deviations from the tests will need to be
specified to the relevant testing laboratory.
The test suites listed in Schedule S1.22.6 cover the requirements for the four types of site (Greenfield without pyrite, Greenfield
with pyrite, Brownfield without pyrite and Brownfield with pyrite) defined in BRE Special Digest 1). Most sites will only
require one of the listed test suites to be undertaken. An initial assessment of the category of site (e.g. Brownfield without
pyrite) should be made from the desk study results.
In recognition that most testing laboratories will not be able to offer all of the alternative test methods, the final column of
each test suite allows for either a particular test method to be specified or the tendering Contractor to indicate which method(s)
can be offered. If the latter course is to be followed, it should be stated in Schedule S1.22.6.
Both test suites for Brownfield sites (i.e. pyrite-absent and pyrite-present) include dependent options of testing for magnesium
(when SO4>3000 mg/l in water/soil extract or = 3000 mg/l in groundwater) and testing for nitrate and chloride (when pH
<5.5). One alternative is to let the initial test results determine whether testing for magnesium and/or chloride and nitrate is
required, with responsibility for carrying out the additional testing either left with the testing laboratory or subject to further
instruction from the party scheduling the testing. This approach will likely give the smallest cost of testing but will probably
extend the overall testing time and risk sample deterioration. The other alternative is to include for magnesium, chloride and
nitrate testing at the outset: the shortest test period will result but at the possible expense of unnecessary testing.
Schedule S1.22.6 does not include testing for the ammonium ion or for aggressive carbon dioxide. It is recommended that, if
the desk study results indicate either of these to be of concern, specialist advice is sought.
The environment within which soil samples are transported and stored shall be chosen to minimize disturbance through
vibration and temperature controlled such that extremes of temperature are avoided. The temperature range shall be between
5°C and 25°C.
Water samples shall be transported within 24 hours to the laboratory after sampling. They shall be protected against heat, frost,
light and damage and be transported at a temperature not exceeding 12º C.
Samples shall be tested as soon as possible but, in any event, in a timeframe to minimize sample degradation.
BRE SD1 Guidance recommends a suitable temperature for transport and storage of groundwater of 4oC.
Consideration for the timescales required to obtain UKAS accreditation for a field laboratory should be taken. Where the
mobile field laboratory may not be accredited, it may still provide value by providing preliminary screening to better enable
appropriate sample selection and test scheduling from an accredited laboratory.
Where special laboratory testing is required, this should be listed in Schedule S1.22.8 with appropriate Specification items.
If a test specimen is found to be unsuitable for testing for whatever reason, the laboratory shall prepare a record of the
unsuitable sample.
A photographic record of the failed sample shall be taken and presented alongside a geological description of the material on
the relevant laboratory test result sheet. The Investigation Supervisor shall be immediately notified, such that an alternative
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
All laboratory tests undertaken on undisturbed samples, be they soil or rock, require a specimen to be prepared for the test
before the test itself can commence. This process involves; extracting or extruding the sample from its temporary protective
coating or liner, physically trimming or resizing the sample and inserted it into the test apparatus, all vital parts of the test
process. The testing facility must take the greatest care possible to maintain integrity of the sample throughout this and
subsequent parts of the test process.
In some cases however, during this preparation stage the specimen proves to be unsuitable for the scheduled test. This could
be for a variety of reasons including the sample collapsing on extrusion, the sample on extrusion being found to be excessively
disturbed or damaged from the sampling process, the sample failing along a line of geological weakness during preparation,
etc.
Ordinarily the preparation costs form part of the overall test costs however if the reasons for failure could not reasonably
have been foreseen prior to the sample preparation process and are a function of the material properties, the laboratory
contractor should be compensated proportionally for the costs incurred. In these circumstances, the Investigation Supervisor
should confirm if they would like the laboratory to complete a non-compliant test. Where the Designer agrees to abort the test
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
or where the specimen is untestable the Contractor should recover costs through the appropriate items in the Bill of Quantities.
In all circumstances the laboratory should provide details of the outcome in their reports.
The Contractor shall inform the Investigation Supervisor within a further 24 hours if a sample referred to in the schedule is
not available or unsuitable for testing.
It should be accepted that laboratory testing quantities cannot be accurately predicted at tender stage before detailed ground
conditions are known. It may be necessary to specify additional testing once the results of the original tests are available. The
additional testing may comprise more of the original tests and/or different tests.
Certain analyses (e.g. microbiological tests and biochemical oxygen demand) are highly time dependent and should be
scheduled immediately; the specifier should avoid delays in instructing the laboratory to ensure analysis is carried out within
holding times and samples are not deviated. Irrespective of whether the Investigation Supervisor or the Contractor is to
specify the testing, it is necessary to ensure that arrangements are put in place by both parties to ensure that the specified time
limits are achieved.
16.2 Accreditation
The required schemes and standards to which the laboratory testing shall be accredited shall be specified in Schedule S1.23.2.
Chemical laboratory testing should be carried out to in accordance with BS EN ISO/IEC 17025. Where appropriate, test data
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
for soil and water samples should also meet the requirements of MCERTS soil and water standards. The precise scope of a
laboratory’s accreditation should be checked prior to engagement. The UKAS website provides further information on
laboratory accreditation: http://www.ukas.org/testing/.
16.3 Chemical testing to assess land contamination, risk to controlled waters, ground gas and vapours
Schedule S1.23.3 shall specify which suites of chemical tests and any additional individual tests are required. If appropriate,
the Schedule shall also include any detection limits and/or test methods which the Contractor is required to comply with.
Where particular testing turnaround times are required, this shall be included in Schedule S1.23.3.
Both the initial selection of which test suites (and any additional individual tests) based on the desk study findings and any
revisions required by the investigation findings should be made by the Investigation Supervisor or the advising site
Environmental Scientist.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Beyond that, Schedule S1.23.3 provides for the Investigation Supervisor to specify test methods and/or limits of detection on
a test-by-test basis. Alternatively, it can be left to the tendering Contractor to complete either or both of these columns to show
what test methods and limits of detection can be offered. However, detection limits should reflect the assessment criteria
against which the test results will be compared, for example Human Health Generic Assessment Criteria, Environmental
Quality Standards (EQS) or Drinking Water Standards (DWS), etc. unless the tendering Contractor is to be informed of these,
it therefore favours the Investigation Supervisor specifying the limits of detection.
The above considerations require close cooperation and dialogue between the specialist environmental site staff, Investigation
Supervisor and the Contractor/testing laboratory.
It is emphasised that Schedule S1.23.3 includes only a basic list of determinands which are likely to be common to the majority
of sites. The schedule should be reviewed (and amended accordingly) on a site-by-site basis to cover all the contaminants of
concern identified during the preliminary site investigation and any subsequently obtained information. Where necessary,
specific contaminants or additional test suites should be added (e.g. emerging contaminants of concern as required as a result
of the preliminary investigation.
Testing turnaround times of 5 days from receipt of the testing schedule are normal. If shorter times are required this should
be stated.
It should however be noted that, due to the test requirements themselves, certain tests (e.g. those for WAC) may require more
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
than 5 days turnaround. The specifier should check with the testing laboratory the achievability of the proposed testing
regime. This may result in specifying a nominated testing laboratory.
Environment Agency guidance on waste classification should be consulted. References are included in Section 17.
WAC analysis for inert, stable non-reactive hazardous and hazardous waste are defined under statutory regulations. WAC
testing is required to determine whether materials can be disposed of at a particular landfill site. Such testing may also be
required to determine the appropriate methods of dealing with investigation arisings.
Leachate preparation details are set out in Part 2 of BS EN 12457 and in accordance with the Environmental Permitting
Regulations.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Consideration should be given to the timescales required to obtain UKAS or MCERTS accreditation for a field laboratory.
Where the mobile field laboratory may not be accredited, it should still provide value by providing preliminary screening to
better enable appropriate sample selection and test scheduling from an accredited laboratory.
BS EN 1997 only provides guidance on geotechnical aspects of ground investigation. For potentially contaminated sites, it is
recommended reference should be made to BS 10175 Investigation of potentially contaminated sites – code of practice and
gov.uk Land Contamination Risk Management (LCRM) procedures, which set out appropriate reporting.
These key reports may be supplemented as appropriate by other reports such as:
• Mining Report
• Archaeology Report
• UXO Report
• Geophysical Report
• Monitoring Report
These reports can be provided as a single report or as separate reports in two parts.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
The following sections provide guidance on the typical sequencing of data submissions, from field records, in situ test data
and exploratory hole logs, through to laboratory data and then full reports. At all stages of reporting, it is assumed that data
submissions will be via digital means; digital data and data transfer formats are discussed in Clauses 17.4.1 and 17.4.2,
respectively.
UK standard practice is to undertake all investigations in accordance with BS EN 1997, and in this case the Contractor or
Designer should produce a GIR.
17.2 Information
17.2.1 General comments
The Information shall be prepared from the digital data. The content and sequence of the submission of information is described
below.
subject to any degree of interpretation or calculation, the raw data shall be made available to the Investigation Supervisor upon
request.
If raw data is to be provided as part of the report or as a separate report this shall be detailed in Schedule S1.24.1. and include
the format required and timescales for issue.
Preliminary exploratory hole logs should be produced using the driller’s daily record, in situ test results and after logging to
the specified standards and prior to completion of relevant laboratory test results.
If the Investigation Supervisor requires a particular style of log to be used, an example should be provided with Schedule
S1.24.3.
Note that the supply of AGS Format Data (Clauses 17.4.1 and 17.4.2) can reduce the need for specific formats of exploratory
hole logs. Use of systems to collect data at source during the ground investigation can also reduce the time for provision of
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
preliminary exploratory hole records.
Exploratory hole logs will develop from the preliminary exploratory hole logs as additional information becomes available
and can be issued as Draft or Final.
Notes
● denotes details are required
○ denotes details are required, if applicable
1
Descriptions shall be in accordance with the specified versions of BS 5930, BS EN ISO 14688 and BS EN ISO
14689.
2
Additional details should include depth specific details i.e. discontinuity details, observations, driller’s remarks,
minor stratum changes and levels of uncertainty i.e. due to lack of samples, sample disturbance and problems
encountered. Logs shall, as a minimum, include the initials of the person who carried out the logging.
3
Should be specified to be in accordance with the current British Geological Survey (BGS) formation terminology.
4
Approach shall be in accordance with the relevant parts and specified versions of BS 5930, BS EN ISO 22475, BS
EN ISO 14688 and BS EN ISO 14689.
If, in addition to the description of each stratum, soil classification is required, it should be in accordance with BS EN ISO
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
14688-2.
Schedule S1.24.3 should state whether fracture index (FI) or fracture spacing (I f) is required.
Where in situ test results require interpretation, e.g. CPT data, geophysical data or pressuremeter data, the interpretation
approach required shall be specified in S1.24.4 or agreed between the Contractor, sub-contractor, if appropriate, and the
Investigation Supervisor. Details of the interpretation approach and methods shall be provided in the report.
Legible PDF copies of work sheets may be required by the Investigation Supervisor if specified in Schedule S1.24.4.
As well as being provided in AGS (or other agreed) data format, in situ test results should also be provided within the
Factual Report or GIR; they may be presented in Appendices or provided as separate reports.
Legible PDF copies of work sheets may be required by the Investigation Supervisor if specified in Schedule S1.24.1.
Details and types of plans and drawings and the required digital format shall be specified in Schedule S1.24.5.
The site plan shall be provided showing the geographical location of the site, the site boundary, orientation and scale.
The exploratory hole location plan shall be provided showing as a minimum; the site boundary, orientation, scale, existing
features sufficient to locate the exploratory holes from, exploratory hole and test locations and a legend.
It is preferable for drawings to be provided in an appropriate CAD format which should be specified in Schedule S1.24.13.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
If required, pre-condition and post-condition information, and any of the other types of report given in Clause 17.1 shall be
provided as separate reports unless otherwise specified in Schedule S1.24.7.
All reports shall begin with a cover page showing the name of the Contract, a unique project reference number, date, revision
status and the names of the Client, Designer, Investigation Supervisor and Contractor. Report pages shall be numbered
consecutively. All reports shall be produced and signed by at least one Responsible Expert following a quality assurance
process. All Final Reports shall be signed as a minimum by the main author of the report and checker prior to issue.
Each report shall be submitted to the Investigation Supervisor as an electronic copy (Clause 17.4) in PDF, AGS Data Format
and any other agreed data format. Elements of the report which cannot be provided in PDF format shall be in the agreed format
specified in Schedule S1.24.13.
Certain projects may have specific requirements for the format and content of the reports and any such requirements should
be included in Schedule S1.24. For example, a particular style of exploratory hole log may be specified; long sections may be
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
required at a particular scale and showing particular information; or the reports may be required in sections analogous to
packages of construction work.
Clients may require reports covering the geoenvironmental aspects of a project to be prepared in accordance with the National
Quality Mark Scheme (NQMS) and a Declaration to be submitted by a Suitably Qualified and experienced Person (SQP)
registered under the NQMS (www.claire.co.uk/projects-and-initiatives/nqms).
Some Conditions of Contract may not cover all the stated requirements of the Specification in respect of a Geotechnical Design
Report and the Conditions of Contract may require adjustment accordingly.
Pages in the report should be rotated to the correct orientation.
Extensive use of bookmarks should be used to enable easy navigation of the PDF file. As a minimum, links should exist within
the document between the contents page and the component parts. For large reports comprising several volumes the structure
of the whole report should be provided at the start of each volume.
If specified in Schedule S1.24.13, the electronic copy of the photographs should be submitted as JPG format files.
Where a full GIR is required, it shall be prepared in accordance with BS EN 1997-2 and include:
• the ground model;
• a factual account of all ground investigation activities carried out;
• a presentation of all appropriate geotechnical information including geological and hydrogeological features and
relevant data;
• a geotechnical evaluation of the information, stating the assumptions made in the interpretation of the test results.
BS EN 1997 provides full details of the recommended content for this type of report.
Any known limitations of the investigation results should be included in the GIR, as required by BS EN 1997-2.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
The GIR may include geotechnical and/or geoenvironmental data which, for larger or more complex projects, may be required
as separate volumes if specified in Schedule S1.24.9.
It should be noted that generally, the production of a GDR will be the responsibility of the Designer, since the Contractor will
not be in possession of the necessary structural loadings, that are a requisite of the GDR.
If the Contractor is required to supply personnel for technical support to the Investigation Supervisor to develop or produce
the GDR this should be specified in Schedule S1.8.4 and Bill M of the Bill of Quantities used.
The factual account of the GIR shall be provided in an agreed digital format as detailed in Clause 17.4, unless otherwise
specified in S1.24.13.
Factual and Interpretative Reports are occasionally specified but these terms should not be used, and reporting
requirements should use the terms GIR or GDR. It should be noted that the production of a Factual or Interpretative Report,
will only be permitted when a contract is being undertaken outside of BS EN 1997.
The frequency of issue of the draft and final reports shall be specified in Schedule S1.24.11.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
The format of the draft and final reports shall be specified in Clause 17.4.1.
All electronic data submitted to the Investigation Supervisor for approval shall include or be accompanied with the following
information in associated electronic documentation:
The definitive copy of the report shall be the Final Report in electronic format which has been issued and approved by the
Investigation Supervisor. The Designer or Investigation Supervisor shall provide contact details for the delivery of the
electronic copy of the Final Report which may be property and/or email addresses depending upon the agreed file transfer
method.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
If a paper copy is required, this shall be specified in Schedule S1.24.7 and additional items added to the contract specific
section within Bill A.
17.4.1 General
The electronic copy of the report shall be in PDF format accompanied by the AGS data file(s) and non-AGS digital data, where
applicable. Elements of the report which cannot be provided in PDF format shall be in the format specified in Schedule
S1.24.13 or as agreed with the Investigation Supervisor.
The Contractor shall provide all fieldwork, monitoring and laboratory data, together with draft and final reports in digital data
format in accordance with the current revision of the Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists (AGS)
publication ‘Electronic transfer of geotechnical and geoenvironmental data’ or as specified in Schedule S1.24.13.
Where standard AGS headings (fields) are not available the Contractor shall advise the Investigation Supervisor and the AGS
Data Format Working Group shall be consulted to determine if new fields are required and, if required, can be added. If this
is not possible the data shall be provided in Excel or other format agreed with the Investigation Supervisor and detailed in
Schedule S1.24.13.
The digital data shall be produced from the same source as that used to produce the electronic report. All PDF files shall be
If a different version of the AGS data format from the current version is required for consistency with earlier submissions,
this should be specified in Schedule S1.24.13. With reference to earlier versions of AGS data format.
The version of the AGS data format shall be explicitly stated in Schedules S1.24.15.
Abbreviations and codes within the AGS data format file shall be from the definitions listed in the AGS publication.
If the Employer, Designer or the Investigation Supervisor requires additional data groups, fields or codes or associated files
within the AGS format data then these shall be fully specified within Schedule S1.24.5.
The file format for associated files shall be agreed in advance between the Contractor and the Investigation Supervisor.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
The versions supported by the AGS at the time of writing are v4.1, v.4.04 and v.4.0.3. The version quoted may determine the
manner in which the Contractor collects, manipulates and supplies data, therefore changing the version requirements partway
through a project should be avoided wherever possible. The term ‘AGS version 4’ should be avoided as it is ambiguous.
The data dictionary defining the data groups and headings is given in the AGS publication ‘Electronic transfer of geotechnical
and geoenvironmental data’.
The way that GEOL_GEOL, GEOL_GEOL2, GEOL_BGS, GEOL_FORM and GEOL_STAT should be used (by the Employer,
Designer or Investigation Supervisor) should be defined prior to any generation of AGS data.
Before specifying additional data groups or headings, the Investigation Supervisor is responsible for checking the AGS website
(http://www.ags.org.uk) to ensure that data transfer requirements which are not included in the current AGS publication have
not already been assigned a code, group or heading.
If the Designer or the Investigation Supervisor requires specific data to be reported differently from the suggested Unit / Type
quoted in the AGS data format this should be defined prior to generation of AGS data, preferably well before commencement
of sitework.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Associated files may include photographs, CAD format drawings, and data not covered by the version of the AGS data
format in use, such as advanced laboratory testing or down borehole geophysical logging data.
Digital data should be provided wherever possible, and the issue of paper copies should be avoided. Depending on the contract
the Investigation Supervisor may prefer to receive digital data only after a significant amount of data has been collected.
The Investigation Supervisor is likely to be receiving information from a number of sources within the Contractor’s
organisation, for example field data and laboratory data. The Investigation Supervisor should be prepared to manage the data
as it arrives. Any file transmitted during the contract may contain all or part of the data available at that time. It may contain
exploratory hole log data, laboratory data or both.
Preliminary data may be subject to update as necessary in the light of laboratory testing and the further examination of
samples and cores. When available, laboratory data should be input.
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Common practice is for digital data to be transmitted by email but larger file sizes may require an agreed file transfer platform
to be used or data sent by memory sticks or hard drive.
The digital data provided by the Contractor with the Ground Investigation Report or Factual Report (as applicable) is required
to be complete and a total replacement of any previously submitted data with the exception of monitoring data collected after
the field work period.
All sampling and monitoring results which are produced up to submission of the Draft Report shall be included within the
Draft Report and subsequent Final Report, and those obtained afterwards, during the long-term monitoring period, shall be
provided as a separate monitoring report.
File names should be descriptive of the file contents and, where required, submitted in a folder structure agreed with the
Investigation Supervisor which clearly identifies the structure of the report.
It should be recognised that the use of checking software ensures compliance of file format, but not completeness or integrity
of file content. Manual checks of information should also be required which are typically part of the report production process.
Checking software should be freely available to both parties and agreed by the Investigation Supervisor.
The Transmission (TRAN) and/or Project (PROJ) groups (edition 4.1 or earlier editions, respectively) in the AGS format data
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
file contains transmission information including data status which should be included in every file submitted.
The Investigation Supervisor and the Contractor should be aware of the problems posed by the presence of small sets of data
in a series of files and the potential for, and the presence of, errors in the datasets. These become very important if the data is
being transferred to a database where incoming data is added to existing data. The organisation of the data prior to issue is
the responsibility of the Contractor. The Contractor’s system should ensure that data originating from different sources within
the Contractor’s organisation are compatible.
corrected by the Contractor and a corrected dataset issued. When a change or addition is made to data within an issue, a
complete data group should be reissued (not just the changed fields). This may not require complete replacement of the whole
dataset which includes other previous issues.
The Contractor’s data management system should ensure that all issues of digital data are compatible, the data status is
unambiguous, and the issues are numbered in the correct sequential order.
Environmental sampling may require reporting within 24hrs, but other types of sampling or monitoring should be reported as
preliminary digital data within 7 working days.
If physical media is required and more than one memory drive (or other agreed transmission medium) is required to issue
digital data, then each shall be clearly labelled to indicate the order in which the receiver of the data should read the data. The
split of the data into separate files shall be decided by the Contractor following the rules defined in the AGS publication (see
Clause 17.4.1). All physical media shall be securely labelled and clearly marked with the information listed in Clause 17.3.6.
The acceptable process or media for the transmission of information files should be specified. For example, email submission
of preliminary information may be acceptable. However, submission of final information by secure file transfer systems is
desirable. If physical media is used (i.e. memory cards, memory sticks or portable hard drives) these should also use a secure
format.
The virus scanning software should be capable of scanning the included associated files, for example, for macro viruses.
The Designer may choose to request a recognised accreditation which ensures the Contractor has robust cyber security
procedures i.e. Cyber Essentials Certification.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Legislation
Health and safety at Work Act (1974).
Construction (Design and Management) Regulations (2015).
Control of Pollution Act (1974) and amendment Schedule 23 (1989).
Environmental Protection Act (1990).
Hazardous Waste (England and Wales) Regulations (2005).
Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations (1999) and amendment (2006).
Manual Handling Operations Regulations (1992) and amendments (2002).
New Roads and Street Works Act (1991).
Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations (1992) (as amended).
Safe Use of Lifting Equipment: Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations (LOLER) (1998).
Safe Use of Work Equipment: Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) (1998).
Wildlife & Countryside Act Schedule 9 (1981)
BSI (2005) BS EN ISO 5667-6: Water quality. Sampling. Guidance on sampling of rivers and streams.
BSI (2005) BS EN ISO/IEC 17025: General requirements for the competency of testing and calibration laboratories.
BSI (2005) BSEN ISO 22476-2: Geotechnical investigation and testing. Field testing. Dynamic probing.
BSI (2005) BS EN ISO 22476-3: Geotechnical investigation and testing. Field testing. Standard penetration test.
BSI (2006) BS EN ISO 5667-1: Water quality. Sampling. Guidance on the design of sampling programmes and sampling
techniques.
BSI (2006) BS EN ISO 22475-1: Geotechnical investigation and testing – sampling methods and groundwater measurements
– Part 1: Technical principles for execution.
BSI (2007) BS EN 1997-2: Eurocode 7 – Geotechnical design. Part 2: Ground investigation and testing.
BSI (2007) BS OHSAS 18001: Occupational health and safety management systems.
BSI (2007) BS ISO 18512: Soil Quality: Guidance on long and short term storage of soil samples.
BSI (2008) BS EN ISO 9001: Quality Management Systems – requirements.
BSI (2009) BS ISO 5667-11: Water Quality. Sampling. Guidance on sampling of groundwaters.
BSI (2011) BS 8417: Preservation of wood.
BSI (2011) BS10175 + A2 (2017): Investigation of potentially contaminated sites: Code of practice.
BSI (2011) BS EN ISO 22475-2: Geotechnical investigation and testing – sampling methods and groundwater measurements
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
– Part 2: Qualification criteria for enterprises and personnel.
BSI (2011) BS EN ISO 22475-3: Geotechnical investigation and testing – sampling methods and groundwater measurements
– Part 3: Conformity assessment of enterprises and personnel by third parties.
BSI (2013) BS 8576: Guidance on investigation for ground gas – permanent gases and volatile organic compounds.
BSI (2013) BS ISO 18400-104: Soil quality – sampling - strategies.
BSI (2015) BS EN ISO 18674-1: Geotechnical investigation and testing — Geotechnical monitoring by field instrumentation.
Part 1: General rules.
BSI (2016) BS EN ISO 18674-2: Geotechnical investigation and testing — Geotechnical monitoring by field instrumentation.
Part 2: Measurements along a line - extensometers.
BSI (2017) BS EN ISO 18674-3: Geotechnical investigation and testing — Geotechnical monitoring by field instrumentation.
Part 3: Measurements across a line - inclinometers.
BSI (2020) BS EN ISO 18674-4: Geotechnical investigation and testing — Geotechnical monitoring by field instrumentation.
Part 4: Piezometers.
BSI (2019) BS EN ISO 18674-5:2 Geotechnical investigation and testing — Geotechnical monitoring by field instrumentation.
Part 5: Stress change measurements by total pressure cells (TPC). Published by British Standards Institution. London.
BSI (2014) BS EN ISO 17892-1 Geotechnical investigation and testing — Laboratory testing of soil. Part 1: Determination of
water content. Published by British Standards Institution. London.
BSI (2014) BS EN ISO 17892-2 Geotechnical investigation and testing — Laboratory testing of soil. Part 2: Determination of
Bulk Density. Published by British Standards Institution. London.
BSI (2015) BS EN ISO 17892-3 Geotechnical investigation and testing — Laboratory testing of soil. Part 3: Determination of
Particle Density. Published by British Standards Institution. London.
BSI (2016) BS EN ISO 17892-4 Geotechnical investigation and testing — Laboratory testing of soil. Part 4: Determination of
particle size distribution. Published by British Standards Institution. London.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
BSI (2017) BS EN ISO 17892-5 Geotechnical investigation and testing — Laboratory testing of soil. Part 5: Incremental
loading oedometer test. Published by British Standards Institution. London.
BSI (2017) BS EN ISO 17892-6 Geotechnical investigation and testing — Laboratory testing of soil. Part 6: Fall cone test.
Published by British Standards Institution. London.
BSI (2018) BS EN ISO 17892-7 Geotechnical investigation and testing — Laboratory testing of soil. Part 7: unconfined
compression test. Published by British Standards Institution. London.
BSI (2018) BS EN ISO 17892-8 Geotechnical investigation and testing — Laboratory testing of soil. Part 8: Unconsolidated
undrained triaxial test. Published by British Standards Institution. London.
BSI (2018) BS EN ISO 17892-9 Geotechnical investigation and testing — Laboratory testing of soil. Part 9: Consolidated
triaxial compression tests on water saturated soils. Published by British Standards Institution. London.
BSI (2018) BS EN ISO 17892-10 Geotechnical investigation and testing — Laboratory testing of soil. Part 10: Direst shear
tests. Published by British Standards Institution. London.
BSI (2019) BS EN ISO 17892-11 Geotechnical investigation and testing — Laboratory testing of soil. Part 11: Permeability
tests. Published by British Standards Institution. London.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Miscellaneous
Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists (AGS) (1991) Quality management in geotechnical
engineering: a practical approach. AGS, Kent.
Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists (AGS) (2010) Electronic Transfer of Geotechnical and
Geoenvironmental Data AGS4 ed 4.0. AGS, Kent.
British Drilling Association (BDA) (2007) Guidance for the safe operation of dynamic sampling rigs and equipment. BDA,
London.
British Standards/International Organization for Standardization (2003) BS ISO 14686: Hydrometric determinations. Pumping
tests for water wells. Considerations and guidelines for design, performance and use.
Building Research Establishment (BRE) (1995) BR 279 (Bowley MJ): Sulphate and acid attack on concrete in the ground,
Recommended procedure for soil analysis. BRE, Watford.
Building Research Establishment (BRE) (2005) BRE Special Digest 1: Concrete in aggressive ground. 3rd Edition. BRE,
Watford.
Building Research Establishment (BRE) (2007) BRE Digest 365: Soakaway Design. BRE, Watford.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Butcher AP, McElmeel K and Powell JJM (1995) Dynamic probing and its uses in clay soils. Proceedings of International
Conference on Advances in Site Investigation Practice. ICE London, March 1995. Thomas Telford, 383–395.
Clarke GB and Smith A (1992) A model specification for radial displacement measuring pressuremeters. Ground Engineering
25(2), 28–37.
Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA) (1998) CIRIA SP 149: A guide to British stratigraphical
nomenclature. Powell JH, CIRIA, London.
Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA) (2002) CIRIA C562: Geophysics in engineering
investigations. CIRIA, London.
Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA) (2007) CIRIA C665: Assessing risks posed by
hazardous ground gases to buildings (errata February 2007). CIRIA, London.
Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA) (2009) CIRIA C681: Unexploded ordnance (UXO) A
guide for the construction industry. CIRIA, London.
Darracott BW and McCann DM (1986) Planning engineering geophysical surveys. Engineering Geology Special Publication
No. 2. Geological Society, London.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Department for the Environment (DOE) (1994) Sampling Strategies for Contaminated Land. Contaminated Land Research
Report 4 (CLR4). DOE,
Department for Transport (DFT) (2006) Traffic Signs Manual Chapter 8-1. Traffic safety measures and signs for road works
and temporary situations. DFT, London.
Department for Transport (DFT) (2011) Specifications for the reinstatement of openings in the highways. DFT, London.
Environment Agency (EA) (2000) Technical aspects of site investigation. R&D Technical Report P5-065/TR. EA, Rotherham.
Environment Agency (EA) (2001) Secondary Model Procedure for the Development of Appropriate Soil Sampling Strategies
for Land Contamination. Technical Report P5-066/TR.
Environment Agency (EA) (2004) Guidance on monitoring trace components in landfill gas. Landfill Directive Technical
Guidance Note 04. EA, Rotherham.
Environment Agency (EA) (2005) Guidance on sampling and testing of wastes to meet landfill waste acceptance criteria,
Version 4.3a. EA, Rotherham.
Environment Agency (EA) (2006) Performance Standard for Laboratories undertaking geoenvironmental testing of soil.
Version 3. EA, Rotherham.
Environment Agency (EA) (2020) Land Contamination Risk Management, www.gov.uk/government/publications/land-
contamination-risk-management-lcrm.
Gosling RC and Baldwin M (2010) Development of a thin wall open drive tube sampler. Ground Engineering 43(3), 37–39.
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Health and Safety Executive (HSE) (2000) Avoiding danger from underground utilities. Guidance Booklets HSG47. HSE,
UK.
Health and Safety Executive (HSE) (2002) Safe work in confined spaces. INDG Series 258. HSE, UK.
Hepton P and Gosling RC (2008) The standard penetration test in the UK after Eurocode 7. Amendment to BS1377: Part 9:
1990. Ground Engineering 41(11), 16–20.
Highways Agency (2011) Manual of contract documents for highway works. (MHCW1). Highways Agency, London.
Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) (2003) ICE Conditions of Contract for Ground Investigation. Thomas Telford, London.
Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) (2010) ICE 3009: UK Register of Ground Engineering Professionals. Thomas Telford,
London. www.ukrogep.org.uk
International Society for Rock Mechanics (ISRM) (2007) The complete suggested methods for rock characterisation, testing
and monitoring: 1974–2006. (Available from ISRM.)
International Society for Rock Mechanics (ISRM) (2015) The complete suggested methods for rock characterisation, testing
and monitoring: 2007–2014. (Available from ISRM.)
Standing Committee of Analysts (SCA) (1996) General Principles of sampling water and associated materials (second edition).
SCA, Rotherham.
Transport Research Laboratories (TRL) TRL447 (Updated) (2005), Sulfate specification for structural backfills (Reid JM,
Czerewko MA, Cripps JC). TRL, London.
Geotechnical instrumentation for monitoring field performance. J. Dunnicliff. Published by J. Wiley & Sons Inc, New York,
1993. ISBN: 0-471-00546-0.
ICE Manual of Geotechnical Engineering. J. Burland, T. Chapman, H. Skinner and M. Brown. Chapter 94: Principles of
geotechnical monitoring. J. Dunnicliff, W.A. Marr and J. Standing Chapter 95: Types of geotechnical instrumentation and
their usage. J. Dunnicliff Published by ICE Publishing, London, 2012. ISBN: 9780727736529.
Monitoring Underground Construction. The British Tunnelling Society. Published by ICE Publishing, London, 2011. ISBN:
9780727741189.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Further reading
BSI (1980) BS 7022: Geophysical logging of boreholes for hydrogeological purposes. BSI, Milton Keynes.
BSI (2000) BSEN 197-1: Cement. Compositions, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. BSI, Milton
Keynes.
BSI (2002) BSISO 10381: Soil quality: Sampling. BSI, Milton Keynes.
BSI (2004) BSEN 1997-1: Eurocode 7 – Geotechnical design. Part 1: General rules. BSI, Milton Keynes.
Clark GB (1966) Deformation moduli of rocks. ASTM SP No. 402.
Clarke GB, Allan P, Akbar K and Irvine J (2005) A simple, robust pressuremeter to test glacial till. Proceedings of the 5th
International Symposium on Pressuremeter. Paris, France.
Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA) (1983) CIRIA 25: Site Investigation Manual. (Weltman
AJ and Head JA (eds)) CIRIA, London.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Environment Agency (EA) (1997) The physical properties of major aquifers in England and Wales. R&D Publication 8. EA,
Rotherham.
Environment Agency (EA) (2001) Piling and penetrative ground improvement methods on land affected by contamination:
guidance on pollution prevention. Report NC/99/73. National Groundwater and Contaminated Land Centre. EA, Rotherham.
Environment Agency (EA) (2003) Technical Guidance WM2 Hazardous waste – Interpretation of the definition and
classification of hazardous waste. EA, Rotherham.
Environment Agency (EA) (2004) Framework for the Classification of Contaminated Soils as Hazardous Waste. Version 1.
EA, Rotherham.
Environment Agency (EA) (2006) Guidance for waste destined for disposal in landfills. Version 2. EA, Rotherham.
Environmental Protection: The Air Quality Limit Values Regulations (2001) SI 2001/2315.
Geological Society Engineering Group (1988) Working Party Report on Engineering Geophysics. Quarterly Journal of
Engineering Geology 2(1), 207–271.
Head KH (1992) Manual of soil laboratory testing. Pentech Press, London.
Health and Safety Executive (HSE) (1991) Protection of workers and the general public during the development of
contaminated land. Health and Safety: Guidance Booklets 66. HSE, UK.
Mair RJ and Wood DM (1987) Pressuremeter Testing. CIRIA, London.
Valentine SJ and Norbury DR (2011) Measurement of total core recovery dealing with core loss and gain. Quarterly Journal
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology 44, 397–403.
Water, England and Wales: The Water Supply (Water Quality) Regulations (2001) SI 2001/3911 (W.323)
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Specification
The Specification shall be the UK Specification for ground investigation published by ICE Publishing, with information,
amendments and additions as described in the Schedules.
1. Information and requirements specific to the particular contract are to be inserted in the Schedules. The intention is that
all extra information is entered in the Schedules so that the remainder of the Specification may be incorporated unchanged
or may be simply referenced.
2. The Schedules should normally be produced in electronic form using the published documents but, if appropriate, may
be completed by hand or retyped for presentation purposes. For consistency, Schedule clause numbers should remain
unaltered. If there are no particular requirements in a section, the words ‘Not required’ should be inserted against the
section header and the underlying string of Schedules may be omitted. For example, against Cable Percussion Boring
enter ‘Not required’ and delete Schedules S1.10 – S1.10.2 inclusive.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
General comments
1. Schedules S1.1–Sl.7 must be completed for all investigations and preferably Schedule 2, cross-referenced to the drawings.
Those parts of the remaining Schedules which are applicable to the specific investigation also need to be completed.
2. Schedules S1.8–S1.21 inclusive should be used to provide information and Specification requirements which are particular
to the site-specific investigation. When completing the schedules, reference should be made to the Specification and
accompanying Notes for Guidance: the latter which include advice on the information to be included in the Schedules are
not generally repeated here.
3. Schedule S2 should list all the planned exploratory holes, together with details of the expected in situ testing and
monitoring installations to be installed.
4. Schedule S3 should detail all the facilities/utilities to be provided by the Contractor for the sole use of the Investigation
Supervisor. This Schedule may be omitted if the investigation is let as a Design and Construct with the Contractor carrying
out all aspects of the work.
5. Schedules S4 and S5 should be used for amendments and additions to the actual Specification clauses.
A concise and unique name is required for contract and reporting purposes. The name should include the nearest town where
possible.
The name, contact details and other relevant information for the Investigation Supervisor should be inserted.
Detailed information shall be provided here or referenced in the contract amendments in order to clarify/define the role of the
Investigation Supervisor in relation to the selected Conditions of Contract. This shall include a list of delegated powers
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
The description of the site should include its location (with national grid reference), boundaries, topography, current use, site
classification (green, yellow or red), known or expected contamination, any access restrictions (physically difficult access or
the need for passes to a restricted entry site) and all other pre-construction information required by CDM.
1. A description of the Main Works should be provided including proposed land use, locations and descriptions of proposed
groundworks, earthworks, roads and structures together with the type(s) of foundations intended, if known.
2. The text should state whether the investigation comprises a desk study or is a preliminary, main or supplementary intrusive
investigation and whether it is for geotechnical, environmental or combined geo-environmental purposes.
1, A brief outline of the GI objectives shall be provided to allow the GI Contractor to better understand the reason for
undertaking this work to enable a more informed resourcing, management, and implementation of the works.
2. A brief outline is required of the work to be done under the contract, stating the type of exploratory holes (boring, drillings,
trial pits, probings, etc.). It should also be stated whether sampling and testing (in situ and laboratory) and monitoring
during/after completion of fieldwork are required, what monitoring instruments are to be installed and what types of report
are to be compiled (desk study, factual, Geotechnical Investigation Report or Geotechnical Design Report).
3. Schedules which are not used for a particular investigation should be listed.
4. Any restrictions on the methods of investigation or their timing due to the presence of protected species of flora or fauna
need to be stated.
5. All other general requirements where further schedules are not used in detail.
The drawing number, title and scale of each contract drawing should be listed; landowners and tenants may be listed where
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
appropriate. Setting out points, temporary benchmarks (TBMs) and benchmark data should be shown when such data are
available and provided. Agreed access points and routes to and from exploratory hole locations should also be shown on the
drawings.
Other documents which should be referenced include the available information on utilities and the desk study report if one
exists. Reference should also be made to other relevant documents which may be inspected at the Investigation
Supervisor/Employer’s Office, for example previous site investigations on or immediately adjacent to the site and aerial
photographs.
1. Any restrictions on the order of carrying out the work (unnecessary restrictions should not be imposed on the Contractor)
or section(s) of the investigation which are to be completed at a particular time or within a particular period need to be
stated.
2. Any restrictions on the methods of investigation or their timing due to the presence of protected species of flora or fauna
need to be stated.
S1.8.3 Project management, supervision and execution personnel (Clauses 4.4 and 4.5)
The provision of any part- or full-time personnel should be detailed here, and appropriate items included in/deleted from
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
The minimum requirements for project management, supervision and execution personnel, to be provided by the Contractor,
are indicated below in Table S1.8.3. It is anticipated that the on-site personnel’s duties shall primarily relate to the
role/operations indicated in the table below, however, in cases where these operations do not require a full-time role, they shall
also undertake other duties as appropriate.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
The costs associated with the provision of project management, supervision and execution personnel are to be included within
separate rates identified in Section A of the Bill of Quantities.
The CVs for all personnel shall be submitted to the Investigation Supervisor for approval prior to commencement of the ground
investigation.
The Contractor shall not replace or substitute personnel during the works period without the Investigation Supervisor’s prior
written consent. If replacement is required, then a full Curriculum Vitae for the Contractor’s proposed alternative shall be
submitted. Personnel shall not start work on site until approval is received.
Table S1.8.3: Minimum requirements for project management, supervision and execution personnel
Qualification/Level of Competence
Category Role/Operation [Example only] Personnel Required
[Example only]
1. Project Manager appointed for the 1 No. Geotechnical Engineer or
lifetime of the contract and shall be (part time) Environmental Scientist with
available to attend project offices on appropriate post-graduate experience.
an ad hoc basis for meetings as Registered Ground Engineering
required by the Client, Designer or Professional or Specialist in Land
Investigation Supervisor. Condition (SiLC) or equivalent.
3. Site Agent on site for the duration of 1 No. Minimum Engineering Geologist or Geotechnical
the contract with responsibility for Engineer or Environmental Scientist
the Contractor’s on-site co-ordination with appropriate post-graduate
of Permissions and Access, experience in geotechnical and
Environmental Management, contaminated land investigations as
Environmental Consents and may be required by the nature of the
Community Liaison [excluding specified work.
liaison with landowners] Registered Ground Engineering
Preparation of Reports for weekly Practitioner or equivalent.
technical meetings. Relevant experience in the
environmental disciplines included
within the accepted Environmental
Management Plan.
Appropriately experienced with proven
communication and/or community
relations skills.
4. Health, Safety and Environment [X] No. Appropriately experienced and trained
Coordinator appointed for the (part/full time) person with proven communication
duration of the Contractor’s site skills, and who shall have a prescribed
operations, including responsibility Occupational Health and Safety
for utilities coordination. qualification and relevant experience
within ground investigation.
5. Technical Lead to ensure technical [X] No. Engineering Geologist or Geotechnical
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
consistency and accuracy for all (part/full time) Engineer and/or Environmental
geotechnical sampling, Scientist/Hydrogeologist as applicable
geoenvironmental sampling, with appropriate post-graduate
preservation, storage, dispatching and experience including working
in-situ testing, and geotechnical logs knowledge of the strata likely to be
of boreholes and pits. encountered and the recognition of key
mineralogical associations.
Registered Ground Engineering
Practitioner or equivalent.
6. Drilling Supervisor to ensure the [X] No. Lead Driller holding a Level 2
safety and technical quality of (part/full time) Diploma in Land Drilling for the
drilling, sampling and testing activity being supervised and a Level 3
operations. Diploma Vocational Qualification in
Advanced Land Drilling for the activity
being supervised.
7. Technical Rig Supervisor (in addition [Each professional to Graduate Geologist/Engineering
to staff provided in 3, 8 and 9) to supervise no more Geologist/Geotechnical
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
ensure the technical quality and than two operating Engineer/Environmental Scientist with
specification compliance of sampling rigs on the same site appropriate post-graduate geotechnical
and testing operations. or one pitting and/or geoenvironmental experience.
operation at any one
time.]
8. Logging and Sampling Supervisor to [X] No. Engineering Geologist or Geotechnical
ensure the technical quality, (part/full time) Engineer and/or Environmental
specification compliance and Scientist/Hydrogeologist as applicable
consistency of logging and sampling with appropriate post-graduate
operations. experience including working
knowledge of the strata likely to be
encountered and the recognition of key
mineralogical associations.
Registered Ground Engineering
Practitioner or equivalent.
9. Loggers – to log samples in [X] No. minimum Graduate Geologist/Engineering
accordance with the specification and Geologist/Geotechnical Engineer with
produce engineering logs appropriate post-graduate geotechnical
experience.
10. Geoenvironmental Specialist for [X] No. Graduate Environmental
geoenvironmental sampling of (part/full time) Scientist(s)/Engineering
Draft 14, June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
drilling and pitting operations and of Geologist/Hydrogeologist(s) with
water bodies and on-site analysis (in appropriate post-graduate
addition to staff provided in 3, 8 and geoenvironmental field sampling
9). experience.
11. Geophysical Specialist to ensure the [X] No. Engineering Geologist or Geophysicist
technical quality and specification (part/full time) with appropriate post-graduate
compliance for geophysical experience including working
surveying operations. (in addition to knowledge of the geophysical methods
staff provided in 3, 8 and 9). likely to be used.
Registered Ground Engineering
Practitioner or equivalent.
12. In situ Testing Supervisor to ensure [X] No. Appropriately experienced and trained
the technical quality and specification (part/full time) person with proven ability and
compliance for in situ testing competence required by the nature of
operations. (in addition to staff the specified work.
provided in 3, 8 and 9).
13. Instrumentation and Monitoring [X] No. Appropriately experienced and trained
Supervisor to ensure the technical (part/full time) person with proven ability and
quality and specification compliance competence required by the nature of
for installation and monitoring the specified work.
operations. (in addition to staff
provided in 3, 8 and 9).
14. Environmental Advisor to respond to [X] No. Professionally qualified, experienced
any Environmental Management Plan (part/full time) and licensed Environmental Scientist.
queries and direct the actions of the
Ecology Clerk of Works.
15. Site Data Coordinator to deal with all [X] No. Appropriately experienced and trained
AGS and other digital data receipt, (part/full time) person with proven skills and ability to
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
S1.8.4 Provision of ground practitioners and other personnel for technical support (Clauses 4.3.5, 4.4.7 and 4.4.8)
When known at the time of tender, the requirements for ground practitioners or other personnel to provide advice or assistance
to the Investigation Supervisor during the course of the works or for the preparation of the Ground Investigation Report and/or
the Geotechnical Design Report and/or the provision of other personnel to assist in the running of the investigation should be
detailed in this schedule by the Designer.
Where ground practitioners or other personnel are included within this schedule, these personnel shall be identified in Bill M
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
of the Bill of Quantities and will be paid for on a time and expenses basis.
Provision of ground practitioners and other personnel to support the Investigation Supervisor can also be instructed during
the works period by the Investigation Supervisor once the Investigation Supervisor identifies a requirement for such support.
S1.8.5 Hazardous ground, land affected by contamination and notifiable and invasive weeds (Clauses 4.6.5 and
4.6.10)
Details of notifiable and/or invasive weeds which may affect or restrict the ground investigation works need to be included
in Schedule S1.8.
S1.8.6 Additional information on utilities not shown on Contract drawings (Clauses 4.6.4 and 5.1.6)
Reference should be made to the PAS 128 survey and relevant statutory distances, or safe distances if these exceed statutory
distances, from any known or suspected utilities unless included in the Contract.
S1.8.7 Known/suspected mine workings, mineral extractions, etc. (Clauses 3.4, 4.6.5)
Reference should be made to the statutory requirement (Borehole Operations and Services Regulations) to notify the HSE
Inspector of Mines for all boreholes in excess of 30 m depth and within 1 km of past or present mining activities and the
requirement for a Coal Authority Permit if drilling through Coal Measures.
All forms of traffic management should be included (not just highways) as well as the required pedestrian safety controls.
S1.8.14 Contamination avoidance and/or aquifer protection measures required (Clauses 4.6.6 and 4.6.7 and 6.3.5)
S1.8.15 Maximum period for boring, pitting or trenching through hard material or obstruction (Clauses
2.8, 4.3 and 6.4)
S1.8.17 Welfare and other facilities required (Clause 4.3.1, 4.3.3 and 4.3.7)
S1.8.18 Unavoidable damage to be reinstated by Contractor (Clauses 4.3.1 and Clause 13.1)
S1.8.19 Surveys (Clauses 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7 and 5.8)
The survey type and required accuracy and location and elevation accuracy of exploratory holes shall be detailed.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Further particular Contract restrictions/relaxations shall be entered below, using sequential numbers to those above
S1.9.1 Permitted methods and restrictions (Clauses 6.2.2, 6.2.3, 6.2.4 and 6.2.5)
Particular project requirements should be detailed. Sampling requirements should be detailed under the relevant schedules
of S1.12.
Further particular Contract restrictions/relaxations shall be entered below, using sequential numbers to those above
S1.10.1 Permitted methods and restrictions (Clauses 6.3.2, 6.3.3, 6.3.4 and 6.3.5)
Particular project requirements should be detailed. Sampling requirements should be detailed under the relevant schedules
of S1.12.
Further particular Contract restrictions/relaxations shall be entered below, using sequential numbers to those above
Any requirements for minimum hole or core diameter, drilling/coring methods/equipment and flush medium should be
specified in the Schedule.
S1.11.4 Rotary core drilling equipment and core diameter (Clauses 6.4.1 and 6.4.4.1)
Core diameter can either be stipulated where experience is available, or the Contractor asked to identify the core diameter
proposed to be used to achieve the core recovery within the known ground conditions.
Details of the method of taking, preserving and transporting core sub-samples should be specified. These will vary depending
on whether the logging and associated sub-sampling is carried out on site or at the Contractor’s offices, the type of material,
what laboratory tests are required and the delay between sub-sampling and testing.
S1.11.9 Rotary open-hole drilling for locating mineral seams, mine workings, etc. (Clause 6.4.5.2)
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
A purpose-designed form may be necessary to record the additional information required by the referenced Specification
clause, over and above that listed in the daily record under Specification Clause 13.2.
Further particular Contract restrictions/relaxations shall be entered below, using sequential numbers to those above
Particular project requirements should be detailed. Sampling requirements should be detailed under the relevant schedules
of S1.12.
Further particular Contract restrictions/relaxations shall be entered below, using sequential numbers to those above
S1.13.1 Permitted methods and restrictions (Clauses 6.6.2, 6.6.3, 6.2.4 and 6.2.5)
Particular project requirements should be detailed. Sampling requirements should be detailed under the relevant schedules
of S1.12.
Further particular Contract restrictions/relaxations shall be entered below, using sequential numbers to those above
S1.14.1 PAS 128 survey and inspection pits (Clauses 3.8.3 and 7.1)
If CAT scanning and/or service inspection pits are not required, this should be stated and the accompanying risk assessments
made available to the Contractor.
S1.14.9 Provision of pitting equipment and crew for Investigation Supervisor’s use (Clause 7.13)
Schedule S1.14.9 must include details of the depth of pits to be excavated, any required ground support measures and whether
a ground practitioner is required for sampling/logging.
Further particular Contract restrictions/relaxations shall be entered below, using sequential numbers to those above
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
S1.15 Sampling and monitoring during intrusive investigation (Specification Section 6, 7 and 8) Particular
restrictions/relaxations
S.15.1 Address for delivery of selected geotechnical samples (Clauses 6.2.9 and 7.6.1)
S1.15.2 Retention and disposal of geotechnical samples (Clauses 6.2.9 and 7.6.2)
S1.15.3 Frequency of sampling for geotechnical purposes (Clauses 8.7.2 and 8.9.2)
S1.15.4 Open-tube and piston sample diameters (Clauses 8.7.3.2 and 8.7.3.3)
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
S1.15.7 Groundwater samples and groundwater level measurements during exploratory hole formation
(Clause 8.7.11)
S1.15.9 Address for delivery of selected samples (Clause 8.10.2, 8.10.3 and 8.10.4)
Whether contamination/WAC samples are to be taken by an environmental scientist, etc. or by others working under the
supervision or under the direction of the environmental scientist, etc. should to be defined.
A purpose-designed form may be necessary to record the additional information required by the referenced Specification
clause, over and above that listed in the daily record under Specification Clause 14.2.
Further particular Contract restrictions/relaxations shall be entered below, using sequential numbers to those above
S1.16.1 Tests in accordance with British Standards or other standards or methods (Clause 16.1)
S1.16.3 Capacity and equipment requirements for cone penetration testing (Clauses 9.2.1 and 9.2.6)
S1.16.10 Self-boring pressuremeter and high-pressure dilatometer testing and reporting (Clause 9.5.1)
S1.16.11 Full displacement driven or push-in pressuremeter testing and reporting requirements (Clause 9.5.2)
S1.16.13 Flat plate dilatometer tests and reporting requirements (Clause 9.5.4)
S1.16.14 Hand or torsion vane tests and reporting requirements (Clause 9.6.1.2)
S1.16.18 Density tests and reporting requirements (Clauses 9.7.2, 9.7.3, 9.7.4 and 9.7.5)
S1.16.19 Permeability tests and reporting requirements (Clauses 9.8.1 and 9.8.2)
S1.16.22 California bearing ratio tests and reporting requirements (Clause 9.9.1)
S1.16.23 Dynamic cone penetrometer tests and reporting requirements (Clause 9.9.2)
S1.16.25 Soil infiltration tests and reporting requirements (Clauses 9.10.1 and 9.10.2)
A purpose-designed form may be necessary to record the additional information required by the referenced Specification
clause, over and above that listed in the daily record under Specification Clause 14.2.
Further particular Contract restrictions/relaxations shall be entered below, using sequential numbers to those above
The requirements for the objectives of the survey, type of geophysical surveys, pre-survey trials of geophysical methods and
the requirement for a geophysicist and their specialisms should be defined.
A purpose-designed form may be necessary to record the additional information required by the referenced Specification
clause, over and above that listed in the daily record under Specification Clause 14.2.
Further particular Contract restrictions/relaxations shall be entered below, using sequential numbers to those above
S1.18.3 Groundwater observation wells and piezometer installations (Clauses 11.4.1 and 11.4.2)
S1.18.4 Other types of observation wells and piezometer installations (Clause 11.4.3)
Details of required type(s) of extensometers and settlement gauges and proposed installations need to be specified.
Details of required type(s) of settlement monuments and proposed installations need to be specified.
Details of required type(s) of decommissioning and/or removal and proposed installations need to be specified.
S1.19 Installation monitoring and sampling (Specification Section 12) Particular restrictions/relaxations
The frequency of measurements/sampling is to be stated for the fieldwork and/or post fieldwork periods.
Further particular Contract restrictions/relaxations shall be entered below, using sequential numbers to those above
A purpose-designed form may be necessary to record the additional information required by the referenced Specification
clause, over and above that listed in the daily record under Specification Clause 14.2.
Further particular Contract restrictions/relaxations shall be entered below, using sequential numbers to those above
Further particular Contract restrictions/relaxations shall be entered below, using sequential numbers to those above
S1.22.3 Specifications for tests which vary or are not covered by the British Standards (Clauses 15.2.1 and 15.4)
S1.22.6 Geoenvironmental testing for aggressive ground/groundwater for concrete (Clause 15.6) (Test Suites A–D
are overleaf)
The Schedules for test suites A–D allow for the Investigation Supervisor to specify the test methods required or for the
Contractor to detail which methods can be offered.
The Schedule should also define whether dependent option tests in Suites C and D are to be carried out in any event or only if
the option trigger level are reached. See Specification NfG 15.6.
Further particular Contract restrictions/relaxations shall be entered below, using sequential numbers to those above
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
pH <5.5)
Groundwater pH BR 279 Electrometric
BS 1377 Part 3
SO4 BR 279 Gravimetric method, cation exchange
or ion chromatography
BS 1377 Part 3
Commercial lab in-house procedure –
determination of sulfur by ICP-AES3
Mg (only required BR 279 AAS method2
if water soluble
SO4 ⩾3000mg/l) Commercial lab in-house procedure – Mg in
solution by ICP-AES3
NO3 BR 279
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
(only required if
pH <5.5)
Cl (only required BR 279
if pH <5.5)
BS 1377 Part 3
1
Either Investigation Supervisor to specify method required or Contractor to indicate method(s) offered.
2
AAS: atomic absorption spectrometry.
3
ICP-AES: inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy.
Schedule S1.23.3 should include the details of any nominated testing laboratories which are to be used.
Schedule S1.23.3 should include any required testing turnaround times.
The test suites provided under Schedule S1.23.3 must be reviewed (and amended accordingly) on a site-by-site basis to cover
all the contaminants of concern identified during the preliminary investigation or subsequently obtained information.
The Schedules for Test Suites E–I allow for the Investigation Supervisor to specify the test methods (except testing under
MCERTS), limit of detection and accreditation required or for the Contractor to detail what can be offered under each of
these categories.
Analysis of marine sediments will require different sample preparation and/or testing methods. Laboratories have to be
validated by the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) where results are used to inform license applications.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Zinc
pH
Water soluble sulphate
(as SO4)
Soil Organic Matter
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Criteria Working
Group
(TPH CWG)
Speciated Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
(US EPA 16) (PAHs)
Volatile Organic Compounds
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
1
Either Investigation Supervisor to specify the test method (except testing under MCERTS), limit of detection and
accreditation required or Contractor to detail what can be offered under each of these categories. See also Specification Note
for Guidance 16.3.
Arsenic
Boron
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Zinc
pH
Sulphate (as SO4)
TPH CWG
PAHs
VOCs
Phenols
Cyanide (total)
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
1
Either Investigation Supervisor to specify the test method, limit of detection and accreditation required or Contractor to
detail what can be offered under each of these categories. See also Specification Note for Guidance 16.3.
Perfluoro-1-butane sulfonate
(PFBS)
Perfluoro-1-pentanesulfonate (PFPeS)
Perfluoro-1-hexanesulfonate (PFHxS)
Perfluoro-1-heptanesulfonate (PFHpS)
Perfluoro-1-decanesulfonate (PFDS)
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Perfluorooctanesulfonamide (PFOSA)
1
Either Investigation Supervisor to specify the test method, limit of detection and accreditation required or Contractor to
detail what can be offered under each of these categories. See also Specification Note for Guidance 15.3.
1
Either Investigation Supervisor to specify the test method, limit of detection and accreditation required or Contractor to
detail what can be offered under each of these categories. See also Specification Note for Guidance 16.3
The Schedules for Test Suites J–L allow for the Investigation Supervisor to specify the test methods, limit of detection and
accreditation required or for the Contractor to detail what can be offered under each of these categories.
Further particular Contract restrictions/relaxations shall be entered below, using sequential numbers to those above
Molybdenum
Nickel
Lead
Antimony
Selenium
Zinc
Chloride
Fluoride
Sulphate (as SO4)
Total dissolved solids
Phenol Index
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Selenium
Zinc
Chloride
Fluoride
Sulphate (as SO4)
Total dissolved solids
Phenol Index
Dissolved organic carbon
1
Either Investigation Supervisor to specify the test method, limit of detection and accreditation required or Contractor to
detail what can be offered under each of these categories. See also Specification Note for Guidance 16.5.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Antimony
Selenium
Zinc
Chloride
Fluoride
Sulphate (as SO4)
Total dissolved solids
Phenol Index
Dissolved organic carbon
1
Either Investigation Supervisor to specify the test method, limit of detection and accreditation required or Contractor to
detail what can be offered under each of these categories. See also Specification Note for Guidance 16.5.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
The Schedule should state whether fracture index or fracture spacing is to be used on the log and whether soil classification is
required.
S1.24.9 Ground Investigation Report (GIR) (or specified part thereof) (Clauses 17.3.3 and 17.3.5)
The Schedule shall fully detail what elements of the Ground Investigation Report are to be compiled by the Contractor and if
the Investigation Supervisor requires technical support to be provided.
S1.24.10 Geotechnical Design Report (GDR) (or specified part thereof) (Clauses 17.3.4)
The Schedule shall fully detail any elements of the Geotechnical Design Report which are to be compiled by the Contractor
and if the Investigation Supervisor requires technical support to be provided.
S1.24.12 Electronic and digital data (Clause 17.4.1, 17.4.7 and 17.4.8)
It is also recommended that, where there have been previous investigations on the site, entirely separate exploratory hole
numbering sequences are used for the proposed investigation.
S2.2 Type
Reference to the type of hole should be given if not covered by the hole number.
S2.3 Scheduled depth
This is the depth anticipated, but it is subject to variation depending on the ground conditions encountered. Note that under
most Conditions of Contract the Contractor may vary the depth under certain circumstances. The required depth of
investigation is also heavily dependent on the anticipated type of foundation, for example a piled foundation will require a
much greater depth of investigation than a shallow founded structure. See also Annex B3 of BS EN 1997-2.
S2.4 National grid reference
A provisional national grid reference should be given where possible, in advance of exploration, for setting-out purposes.
S2.6 Remarks
Where known in advance, an indication should be given of any in situ tests or instrument installations, for example
pressuremeter tests, standpipe piezometer installations for water and/or gas, specialist sampling for laboratory tests, etc.,
together with any further controlling detail, for example depths and spacings of tests.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
S3.1 Accommodation
The accommodation requirements will vary depending on the size and duration of the Contract and the number of the
Investigation Supervisor’s staff involved.
S3.2 Furnishings
S3.3 Utilities
The need for steady current electricity may relate to the use of on-site computers. Portable telephones are likely to be
necessary on larger sites and where fixed lines are not available. Cleaning of the office should be included and other facilities
such as copiers, paper supply, etc.
S3.4 Equipment
The Investigation Supervisor may require equipment such as tapes, penetrometer, hand vane, hand probing equipment,
computer hardware and software, etc. Details should be given, and also the period for which it is required. If on-site computer
equipment is required, the robustness of such equipment in dusty site conditions should be considered.
S3.5 Transport
If vehicles are required for the Investigation Supervisor’s use, the number and type should be specified. The following example
clause illustrates factors to be specified.
The Contractor shall provide (number) plain-coloured (vehicle type) transport for the exclusive use of the Investigation
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Supervisor for any purpose in connection with the site operations. The vehicles shall be delivered and maintained in good
roadworthy condition. They shall be licensed and insured for use on the public highway and shall have comprehensive
insurance cover for any qualified driver over 21 years of age authorised by the Investigation Supervisor, together with any
authorised passengers and the carriage of goods or samples. The Contractor shall provide fuel, oil and maintenance in
conformity with the vehicle manufacturer’s recommendation and shall clean the vehicles inside and outside as required. A
suitable replacement shall be provided for any vehicle out of service for more than 24 hours.
Essential clothing should be listed, bearing in mind the possibility of working in contaminated ground. If clothing is to be
retained by the Investigation Supervisor this should be stated.
It should be noted, however, that current practice is for essential PPE to be provided by the Investigation Supervisor’s
Employer.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
1. The Bill of Quantities is presented as a comprehensive list of items which are conveniently correlated to the
Specification items.
2. It is intended that the numbering of items will remain unaltered. Additional items may be added to correspond with
contract-specific Specification requirements. If necessary, a subsidiary numbering system may be introduced where
this extends an existing item (for example B2.1 Extra over Item B1 for moving over a distance exceeding 500 m –
nr). Otherwise, any contract-specific additional items should be detailed in the space provided at the end of each
Bill.
3. Work items should have required quantities inserted. Items against which no quantities are entered shall be deemed
not to be required. If lump-sum items are not required, this should be stated against the item in the Bill of
Quantities. Provisional sums should be inserted as required to cover items not detailed in the Specification and Bill
of Quantities and which are to be charged by the Contractor as agreed with the Investigation Supervisor.
Provisional sums should normally be entered by the Investigation Supervisor but alternatively by the Contractor,
where the Contractor is acting as Designer as well.
4. The use of ‘rate only’ items is discouraged. Where there is a reasonable probability that an item will be required, a
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
realistic assessment of the quantity should be made and entered in the Bill of Quantities. However, the nature of
ground investigation is such that some modifications and/or additions to the work content may be identified as the
investigation proceeds.
5. The Bill of Quantities should be prepared in electronic form using the published documents. There is also an option
to re-draft and omit items not required, but preferably retaining the same item numbering system to reduce cross-
referencing errors. Where a series of items is to be omitted, for example drilling without cores (Items C11–C20
inclusive), this may be done by first entering the words ‘Not required’ in the header/sub-header line under the
Quantity column and then deleting the individual lines for Items C11–C20 inclusive.
6. Any apparent conflict between the Bill of Quantities and other contract documentation should be clarified with the
Investigation Supervisor during the tender period.
7. The preamble supplements the Specification to define general and particular activities to be included in the rates.
Additional numbered preambles may be included as necessary at the end of the Preambles.
The rate entered for Item A2 does not include for setting up at the first exploratory hole location.
In accordance with Clause 4.3 the Contractor shall be responsible for identifying the appropriate level of plant,
equipment and amenities required to complete the works. Where necessary, the Contractor shall include additional
itemisation and quantification as necessary to complete the works within Bill A Item 2 and sub-items of the Bill of
Quantities.
Where it is identified during the works period that additional plant, equipment and amenities are necessary to
complete the works, these shall be discussed with the Investigation Supervisor. Where agreed the Investigation
Supervisor may instruct establishment of additional plant, equipment or amenities to site
The Contractor in collaboration with the Designer shall review the supervision, management and execution of the
works to identify additional resources necessary to satisfactorially complete the works. Where additional resources
are identified, the Contractor shall amend Table S1.8.3 and adjust the quantities for Bill A Item 7 and sub-items of
the Bill of Quantities appropriately and submit the revised Bill items with the tender submission.
Unless otherwise detailed in Schedule S1.8.3, the on-site services provided by the technical staff shall comprise the
technical supervision of site activities, site liaison, logistics, logging, in situ testing and sampling, photography and
the preparation of daily records and preliminary logs (except where any of the above activities are carried out by site
operatives and boring/drilling operatives).
When individuals are not carrying out their specific duties or are otherwise away from site, then daily rates will not
apply and these costs will be deemed to be covered under general items. The Contractor shall compile a detailed
daily resource list, which is to be agreed with the Investigation Supervisor, for payment of these resources under Bill
A Item 7 and sub-items of the Bill of Quantities.
Work on highways, waterways and railways, etc. may require additional professional safety staff. These individuals
must either be provided by the Client or provision included in the Bill of Quantities under additional Bill A items for
each individual, subject to the understanding of need at the time of preparation of the job-specific documentation.
The Contractor shall maintain suitable daily records for payment purposes, which shall be agreed with the
Investigation Supervisor.
The Investigation supervisor may instruct the Contractor to provide technical and/or specialist support during the
works period.
8.0 Photographs
The item for photographs shall allow for the standing time of associated personnel, plant and supply of electronic
images in .jpg format, unless specified otherwise.
Rates for moving plant and equipment to the site of each exploratory borehole, excavation, probing or testing location
shall allow movement of plant and equipment only. Where setting up over a previously formed exploratory hole or
for angled drilling additional items shall be used. The formation of access routes, working areas, setting up and
removing signage, fencing or barriers, and making good avoidable damage to access routes and working areas on
completion as required by the Contract shall be priced for separately.
Agreed access points and routes should be defined on the Drawing(s) at the time of tender.
Any access difficulties, including restrictions where passes are required, should be detailed in the description of the
site in Schedule S1.3.
Extra over items for setting up on a slope of a gradient greater than 20% is limited to a gradient not greater than 36%.
These items allow for creating a level working area to facilitate the safe setting up and operating of plant. Any
requirement for scaffolding, importing materials to create a ramp and working platform, craning or lifting shall be
charged against items listed in Contract Specific Additional Bill Items.
Any requirement for forming an exploratory borehole or excavation, undertaking probing or in situ testing starting
above ground level, such as from scaffolding, platform or overwater shall be charged against additional items listed
in Contract Specific Additional Bill Items.
Should an exploratory hole in unstable rock require to be cased to maintain borehole stability or in advance of
continuation by other techniques payment will be recovered in a separate item.
The measurement of breaking out hard strata or obstructions shall be the duration of time which the boring equipment
is engaged in breaking out the hard strata or obstructions as agreed by the Engineer. This measurement shall be in
addition to the measurement of boring. Slow boring shall be charged as breaking out hard strata or obstructions where
progress is less than 0.5m/hr.
The installation of temporary casing to maintain borehole stability in advance of continuation of the borehole by
another technique is not included in items charged as a “Day Rate.”
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Damage to land or property in the vicinity of the exploratory hole and on access routes in excess of that which is
avoidable should be made good at the Contractor’s expense.
12.0 Backfilling
Backfilling with arisings shall include for any required topping-up of the backfill during the fieldwork and
maintenance periods. Any requirement for topping up a borehole backfilled with cement/bentonite grout, bentonite
or pre-mixed bentonite/cement will be charged at an hourly rate with time measured as associated non-productive rig
time.
The rate for aquifer protection shall include for the minimum time element associated with curing of a bentonite seal
which should be stated within S1.8.14. Time in excess and topping up of grout shall be charged at an hourly rate with
time measured as associated non-productive rig time.
Where both aquifer protection measures and cross-contamination measures at a single soil boundary or more than
one set of aquifer measures are required in a single hole, additional bill items may be required.
Standing time shall be paid for interruption of the formation of exploratory holes to record groundwater entry in
accordance with Clause 8.8. The rates for standing time shall include for:
A detailed description of what and who is required to be included in the day rate for the provision of these activities
should be provided. Where a ground practitioner is required for sampling/logging, Bill A Items for personnel should
be completed.
16.0 Sampling
The rates for sampling shall allow for the standing time of associated plant. The rates for sampling shall also include
for the costs of the sample containers and transport and storage of the samples up to the specified time limits.
The rate for taking a U100 or UT100 sample does not include for recovery of a sample from the cutting shoe.
The rates for each of Items E13.1–E15.3 shall include for all necessary containers and collected samples for an
individual determination of the specified contamination or WAC suite.
In the case of the self-boring pressuremeter, high-pressure dilatometer or Menard pressuremeter, the rates shall
include for interpretation. The mutual standing of the respective boring/drilling plant and specialist testing equipment
and crews during the combined process shall be charged as standing in appropriate Bill Items under Bills B and C.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Where in situ testing is paid for on a time related basis, the time measured shall be the actual time taken to carry out
the test in accordance with the Investigation Supervisor’s instruction and/or the Specification but excluding the time
taken to erect and dismantle test equipment where this is itemised separately.
The rate for carrying out an SPT (whether using a split spoon or solid cone) does not include for recovery of an
associated sample. Items H1.1-H1.4 apply to cable percussive and dynamic sampling boreholes. SPT’s undertaken
by a rotary or sonic drilling rig will be charged against items 2.1-2.4 and 3.1-3.4, respectively.
Rates for California Bearing Ratio and Plate Loading Tests shall not include for the provision of kentledge. If
kentledge is required to be provided by the Contractor this shall be priced under a separate additional item.
For the seismic cone, the recorded and presented data shall include the specified CPT data recorded between seismic
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
test depths.
The rates for dynamic probing shall allow for undertaking and reporting torque measurements at the prescribed
vertical intervals.
Curing and settling time for grout will be charged at an hourly rate with time measured as associated non-productive
rig time.
The rates for monitoring and sampling of installations during the post-fieldwork period shall allow for:
(d) items (a)–(c) above
(e) all costs associated with remobilising the appropriate (number and experience) staff to site and all travelling
and accommodation expenses.
The rates for recording of water level, ground gas or other monitoring measurements shall allow for notices of re-
entry to the Investigation Supervisor, owners or occupiers affected by the location or access route.
The costs of laboratory testing to determine the nature of the waste shall be covered by laboratory testing rates for
tests actually completed and to an agreed schedule. Those sums shall be offset against the Provisional sum Item A6.
Prior to laboratory test results becoming available, the cost of disposing of arisings cannot be accurately estimated
and it is recommended that a Provisional Sum is included in the Bill of Quantities, the monetary value being assessed
using the results of the site-specific desk study.
It is recommended that Bill M is included in all contracts to provide a tendered basis for works that may be required
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
If not required, the words ‘Not required’ should be entered and the respective items.
24.0 Reporting
Items for the supply of electronic copies, and AGS and non-AGS digital data as appropriate, of the Desk Study,
Ground Investigation Report and/or Geotechnical Design shall include for the provision of the report/data on the
required physical media if specified. If paper copy/ies are required, additional items shall be provided in the contract
specific section of Bill A and include for printing and supply of the specified number of draft and final copies
(Specification Clause 17.3 and Schedule S1.24.7). All other duties in compiling, preparing and checking the draft and
final reports shall normally be paid for under Item A7 of the Bill of Quantities.
If the Investigation Supervisor requires technical support from the Contractor to prepare reports this shall be paid for
using the rates given under Bill M.
Items A2–A5 may be subdivided where the investigation requires the involvement of several separate Contractors or it is
preferable to separately itemise different investigatory techniques.
The same approach of subdividing Items A2–A5 can be used where a site includes both Yellow and Red Category areas, for
example Items A2–A5 can be retained for Yellow areas and A2.1–A5.1 for the Red areas. However, a Red Categorisation may
well require additional items to be included in other Bills, for example those for percussion boring, rotary drilling, sampling,
etc. to cover for the additional costs arising from the Red Categorisation.
If the whole of a site is a Red Category, the same subdivisions as suggested above can be used but with Items A2–A5 (Yellow
Category) shown as ‘Not required’.
Depending on the nature of a Red Category site it may be necessary to include further additional items such as off-site
monitoring and health motoring of site personnel: items could be numbered A5.2, A5.3, etc.
Item A6 does not include for laboratory testing to determine the nature of the contaminated arisings. The required testing
should be covered by relevant rates under Bill L. It is recommended that a provisional sum is always included under Item A6
and rates under Bill L are obtained in order to cover for unforeseen contamination not revealed by the desk study.
Subject to the following notes, Item A7 enables full identification of professional staff which the Contractor is required to
provide.
Items under A7 are intended for detailing the requirements for the provision of Contractor’s personnel in accordance with
Specification Clause 4.4.2, Clause 4.4.3 and Clause 4.4.5. Items should be included for different activity role and where other
specialists are required. An estimate of the appropriate number of person days should be entered under Quantity against each
item. It may be necessary to add additional items in order to adequately describe the categories of other specialists, for
example traffic safety officer, archaeologist, etc. and the grade of person required. Any items listed shall be chargeable only
when present on site.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Persons fulfilling the roles identified under Item A7 must be fully competent and be able to demonstrate they have the skills,
knowledge and experience to be able to safely fulfill their role appropriately.
Where the provision of personnel for work in accordance with Specification Clauses 4.4.2, 4.4.3 and 4.4.5 cannot be
adequately specified at tender by the Designer, the Contractor should complete the appropriate items in the bill relevant to
the site roles and number of personnel required.
The provision of technical support and other specialists to assist the Investigation Supervisor should be itemised under Bill M
of the Bill of Quantities.
Item A16 may be revised to ‘sum’ if the traffic safety and management requirements are simple and can be fully defined in
Schedule S1.8.11. In many cases it will be appropriate to add additional items (A16.1, A16.2, etc.) to cover for the provision
and maintenance of the measures. In any event, Schedule S1.8.11 should provide the maximum possible detail of the required
traffic management measures.
Items
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
In connection with Items A22 and A23, Schedules S1.24.9 and S1.24.10 should specify the required parts of the Ground
Investigation Report and Geotechnical Design Report, respectively.
A2 Establish on site all plant, equipment and utilities for a Green Category sum
site
A2.1 Establish on site and remove from site, one cable percussion rig and ancillary nr
plant and equipment
A2.2 Establish on site and remove from site, one dynamic sampling rig and nr
ancillary plant and equipment
A2.3 Establish on site and remove from site, one rotary drilling rig and ancillary nr
plant and equipment
A2.4 Establish on site and remove from site, one sonic drilling rig and ancillary nr
plant and equipment
A2.5 Establish on site and remove from site, one dual purpose rotary drilling and nr
dynamic sampling rig and ancillary plant and equipment
A2.6 Establish on site and remove from site, one cone penetration test (CPT) rig nr
and ancillary plant and equipment
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
A2.7 Establish on site and remove from site, one excavator for machine dug trial nr
pits and ancillary plant and equipment
A2.10 Establish on site S.I.A or similar approved Contractor for Site Security sum
A12 Fuel for vehicle for the Investigation Supervisor provisional sum
A13 Investigation Supervisor’s telephone and facsimile charges provisional sum
A14 Deliver selected cores and samples to the specified address provisional sum
A15 Special testing and sampling required by Investigation Supervisor provisional sum
A18 Electronic copy of the PAS 128 utilities survey report sum
A21 Electronic copy of the final Ground Investigation Report (or specified sum
part thereof)
A21.1 Electronic copy of the draft Ground Investigation Report (or specified sum
part thereof)
A21.2 Electronic copy of an interim Ground Investigation Report (or sum
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
For certain sites it is optional to introduce an extra over rate as Item B1.1 for moving boring plant and equipment over distances
exceeding, say, 500 m to give more flexibility in the Investigation Supervisor’s direction of field operations; similarly, for Item B15.
Where boring diameters are in excess of 200mm, an extra over item as B1.2 shall be introduced to allow for longer time associated
with setting up larger size equipment.
Items B2 and B16 allow for the creating of a level working area on sloping ground to facilitate the safe setting up and operating of
plant. Any requirement for scaffolding, importing materials to create a ramp and working platform, craning or lifting shall be charged
against items listed in Contract Specific Additional Bill Items.
Dynamic sampling may be measured on a per hole and metreage basis or alternatively on a time basis; the Investigation Supervisor
will normally adopt one of these methods. Quantities shall be entered for only one method. Measurement on a time basis is often
appropriate to permit flexibility for adequate examination, sampling and testing in less certain or complex ground condition or in
areas of difficult access.
If dynamic probing is to be carried out at the site of each sampling hole this should be stated in Schedule S1.9.3 and be allowed for
in the rates entered under Items B15–B20 or B22 as appropriate.
If two or more dynamic sampling units are required, this should be stated in Schedule S1.9.3. The requirement for window or
windowless sampling should also be indicated in Schedule S1.9.3.
If dynamic sampling rigs are used to carry out conventional sampling (SPTs, UT100/U100 driven samples) additional Bill Items will
be required.
Item B22 is limited to a Competitor / Terrier / Dart or similar small tracked soils sampling rig. Where window or windowless sampling
is to be undertaken by a Rotary rig within a rotary drill hole then measurement and additional Bill Items shall be included in Section
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
C.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
B13 Standing time for cable percussion plant, equipment and crew h
B14 Provision of cable percussion plant, equipment and crew as directed by the day
Investigation Supervisor
Dynamic sampling
B15 Move dynamic sampling equipment to the site of each exploratory hole and set nr
up
B16 Extra over Item BI5 for setting up on a slope of gradient greater than 20% and nr
less than 36%
B17 Advance dynamic sample hole between existing ground level and 5m depth m
B22 Provision of dynamic sampling equipment and crew for sampling as directed by day
the Investigation Supervisor; maximum depth 15 m
Backfill
For certain sites it is optional to introduce an extra over rate as Item C1.1 or C49.1 for moving rotary drilling plant and
equipment and C62.1 for sonic drilling plant and equipment over distances exceeding, say, 500 m to give more flexibility in
the Investigation Supervisor’s direction of field operations.
Hole and core diameters will be defined in the Schedules. If more than one hole or core diameter is required, the Bill of
Quantities must identify this with different items repeated as required for each core size. The separate Bill items for the semi-
rigid core liner should always have quantities corresponding to the lengths of rotary or sonic drilling to obtain cores, unless
the Investigation Supervisor wishes to restrict the drilling method used.
Casing off “unstable rock” referred to in Item C38 allows for casing off fractured, broken and/or weathered rock and
cavities/voids associated with mine workings or erosional features. Measurement of casing used in this connection shall be
from Ground Level to depths such that casing if not required to maintain borehole stability.
Where a Sonic drilling rig is to be used for rotary open-holing or coring in rock, measurement shall be against the items C11
through to C20, inclusive and C25 through to C34, inclusive.
Items C2, C49, C62 and C102 allow for the creating of a level working area on sloping ground to facilitate the safe setting up
and operating of plant. Any requirement for scaffolding, importing materials to create a ramp and working platform, craning
or lifting shall be charged against items listed in Contract Specific Additional Bill Items.
Hand auguring may be measured on a meterage basis or alternatively on a time basis; the Investigation Supervisor will
normally adopt one of these methods. Quantities shall be entered for only one method. Measurement on a time basis is often
appropriate to permit flexibility for adequate examination and sampling in less certain or complex ground conditions. If two
or more hand auguring crews are required, this should be stated in Schedule 1.
ecti
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
C Rotary Drilling
C1 Move rotary drilling plant and equipment to the site of each exploratory nr
drillhole and set up
C2 Extra over Item C14 for setting up on a slope of gradient greater than 20% and nr
less than 36%
C3 Extra over Item C14 for setting up over a pre-formed/cased borehole nr
C4 Extra over Item C14 for setting up drilling plant for inclined drillhole nr
C5 Extra over Item C14 for setting up for mist/water/polymer/mud flush nr
C6 Break out surface obstructions where present at exploratory drillhole h
C7 Provide aquifer protection measures at a single aquiclude/aquifer boundary in a nr
drillhole
C8 Provision of rotary drilling plant, equipment and crew for sampling as directed day
by the Investigation Supervisor
C9 Insert drill rods through pre-formed cased borehole m
C10 Standing time for rotary drilling plant, equipment and crew h
C49 Move rotary percussive drilling plant and equipment to the site of each drill hole nr
and set up
C50 Extra over Item C49 for setting up on a slope of gradient greater than 20% and nr
less than 36%
C51 Rotary percussive drill at the specified diameter in any material between existing m
ground level and 10 m depth
C52 As Item C45 but between 10 and 20m depth m
C53 As Item C45 but between 20 and 30m depth m
C54 As Item C45 but between 30 and 40m depth m
C55 As Item C45 but between 40 and 50m depth m
C56 Standing time for rotary percussive drilling plant, equipment and crew h
C57 Backfill borehole with arisings m
C58 Backfill borehole with bentonite / pre-mixed cement/bentonite pellets m
C59 Move grout plant, tremie pipe and pump to the site of each exploratory hole and nr
set up
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Sonic drilling
C62 Move sonic drilling plant and equipment to the site of each exploratory drillhole nr
and set up
C63 Extra over Item C62 for setting up on a slope of gradient greater than 20% and nr
less than 36%
C64 Extra over Item C62 for setting up sonic drilling plant for inclined drillhole nr
C65 Break out surface obstructions where present at exploratory drillhole h
C66 Provide aquifer protection measures at a single aquiclude/aquifer boundary in a nr
drillhole
C67 Provision of sonic drilling plant, equipment and crew for sampling as directed by day
the Investigation Supervisor
C68 Standing time for sonic drilling plant, equipment and crew h
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Hand augering
C97 Bring hand auger equipment to the position of each exploratory hole
C98 Bore with hand auger from existing ground level to 2 m depth
C99 As Item C2 but between 2 and 4m depth
C100 Standing time for hand auger equipment and crew
C101 Provision of hand auguring equipment and crew for auguring as directed by the
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
set up
C113 Backfill borehole with cement/bentonite grout (tremie) m
C114 Return to the site of each exploratory hole and set up where borehole requires nr
topping up
Contract specific additional bill items
Hand excavated pits for the purposes of the avoidance of underground services, structures or assets should be undertaken in
advance of borehole, probing or CPT operations. Where it is known that no underground services exist below the site (e.g.
setting up directly on bedrock) then an Inspection Pit need not be undertaken. Inspection pits are normally excavated to a
minimum depth of 1.2mbgl. Where underground services, structures or assets are known or suspected to be present below a
depth of 1.2mbgl then the borehole, probe or CPT should be relocated or steps taken to excavate to depths required to
positively prove the position is clear of any services. Surface dimensions of each hand excavated pit are largely dictated by
the depth required to be achieved and subsurface ground conditions.
Trial pits and trenches may be measured on a linear metre depth basis (for pits) and a m3 basis (for trenches) or alternatively
on a time basis. Normally the Investigation Supervisor will adopt one of these methods. Quantities shall be entered for only
one method for each pit or trench. Measurement on a time basis is often appropriate to permit flexibility for adequate
examination, sampling and testing in less certain or complex ground conditions. If two or more pitting crews are required,
this should be stated in Schedule S1.14.
Pits and trenches exceeding 4.5 m in depth require the mobilisation of more significant plant and an extra over item is included
for moving to the site of each pit or trench accordingly. An additional item in A2 may also be considered appropriate for
mobilisation to site.
Rates for Items D20 - D22 inclusive will vary on a site-specific basis and these should be detailed in Schedule S1.14.
An additional item in A2 shall also be included for mobilising specialist equipment, materials and labour to site where
undertaking Observation Pits or Trenches.
Where personnel are required for logging an excavation, then this should be recovered under Item A7.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Inspection pits
Cable percussion boring / Dynamic sampling
D1 Excavate inspection pit by hand to 1.2 m depth nr
D2 Extra over Item Dl for breaking out surface obstructions h
Rotary / Sonic Drilling
D3 Excavate inspection pit by hand to 1.2 m depth nr
D4 Extra over Item Dl for breaking out surface obstructions h
Cone Penetration Testing
D5 Excavate inspection pit by hand to 1.2 m depth nr
D6 Extra over Item Dl for breaking out surface obstructions h
Concrete Coring
D7 Diamond core through hard standing in advance of borehole nr
works (minimum 250mm diameter)
Trial pits and trenches
D8 Move equipment to the site of each trial pit or trench of not greater nr
than 4.5 m depth
D9 Extra over Item D8 for setting up on a slope of gradient greater nr
than 20% and less than 36%
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
D10 Extra over Item D8 for trial pit or trench between 4.5 and 6m nr
depth
D11 Excavate trial pit between existing ground level and 3.0 m depth m
D31 Extra over Items D8 through to D30, inclusive for Temporary sum
Works Design
D32 Extra over Items D8 through to D30, inclusive for the provision of day
shoring, propping or other excavation support and all necessary
safety equipment, PPE and emergency procedures to allow safe
manned entry and safe working
Contract specific additional bill items
Use of static pushed or thin-walled samplers is recommended where the sample is to be used for laboratory strength and/or
compressibility testing. The UT100 can be considered but the driving mechanism and the number of blows to retrieve the
sample should be taken into account.
Item E7 relates to sub-samples obtained from larger samples recovered by rotary or sonic methods.
The rates for Items E13.1–E15.5 should include for plastic tubs, glass bottles or any combination of these as required for the
laboratory analysis of the contaminants concerned.
Where other laboratory tests or test suites are required on a site-specific basis, additional Bill items will be needed to cover
for the provision of the appropriate containers.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
G (S1.20.3)
E15.1 Provision of containers and collection of samples for WAC Suite H nr
(S1.20.5)
E15.2 Provision of containers and collection of samples for WAC Suite I (S1.20.5) nr
E15.3 Provision of containers and collection of samples for WAC Suite J (S1.20.5) nr
If dynamic probing is to be carried out at the site of each dynamic sampling hole, Items F1-F6 or F7 should not be used and
the cost of the probing included in the rates defined under Items B15-B21 or B22 as appropriate.
Cone penetration testing may be measured on a per hole and meterage basis or alternatively on a time related basis; the
Investigation Supervisor will normally adopt for one of these methods. Quantities shall be based for only one method.
Measurement on a time related basis is often appropriate to permit flexibility for adequate examination, sampling and
testing in less certain or complex ground conditions or in areas of difficult access.
The rates for cone penetration tests Items F15, F21 and F23 shall allow for provision of daily records and for interpretation
and presentation of the results on agreed report forms/exploratory hole logs in accordance with BS 1377 and Schedules
1.13.3 or 1.13.4.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
F23 Provision of static cone penetration testing equipment and crew for day
measuring both cone and sleeve resistance from existing ground
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
The recommended basis for pricing land-based mapping is linear (line) metres. In order to compare alternative tenders, it
will be necessary for the intended line spacings either to be specified or defined by the tenderers. Linear metres is also adopted
for land-based profiling techniques. Here the inter-sensor spacings need either to be specified or defined by the tenderers.
Slim-line down-hole methods have been provided as common suites but can be subdivided as subitems of G5 to cover specific
individual sondes that can be run. The recovered cost being the metres run for that sonde.
Daily rate is adopted for overwater geophysics as the majority of methods can be carried out simultaneously. However,
performance and acceptance criteria will need to be agreed.
Where exploratory boreholes need to be lined with grouted in place uPVC casings, or similar, to facilitate cross or downhole
seismic testing, this should be billed on a linear metre basis under contract specific additional bill items, similarly cement
bond log and liner verticality measurements requirements should be billed here.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
G1.6 Standing time for land-based mapping geophysical survey crew and hr
equipment
G2.8 Standing time for land-based profiling geophysical survey crew and hr
equipment
G3 Land-based in situ geophysical techniques
G3.1 Collect & process electrical resistivity sounding (4-pin wenner) data nr
G3.4 Standing time for land-based in-situ geophysical survey crew and hr
equipment
G4 Land-based borehole seismic geophysical techniques
G4.1 Move down-hole seismic equipment to the site of each borehole and set up bh
G4.2 Move cross-hole seismic equipment to the site of each set of borehole and set
set up
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
G4.3 Move cross-hole seismic tomography (P wave) equipment to the site of set
each set of boreholes and set up
G4.7 Standing time for land-based borehole seismic geophysical survey crew hr
and equipment
G5 Land-based borehole wireline geophysical techniques
G5.6 Collect and process basic geotechnical investigation suite survey data m
G5.9 Collect and process Cavity Laser Scanning wireline logging data sum
G5.10 Collect and process Cavity Sonar Scanning wireline logging data sum
G5.11 Standing time for land-based borehole wireline geophysical survey crew hr
and equipment
G6 Overwater
G6.1 Collect and process echo sounding, side-scan sonar, magnetic, day
conductivity, seismic reflection, seismic refraction, resistivity imaging or
ground-probing radar data
The nuclear method of determining in situ density is one which can be carried out rapidly and is therefore more appropriately
priced on a time basis.
Items H37–H51 (self-boring pressuremeter), H52–H65 (high-pressure dilatometer), H66–H80 (Menard pressuremeter) and
H81–H95 (driven or push-in pressuremeter) provide stand-alone coverage of the works involved without the need to cross-
refer to relevant items from Bill B (percussion boring) and/or Bill C (rotary drilling). The stand-alone coverage also allows
for the use of other hole-forming plant not covered by Bills B and C.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
H In situ testing
H1 Standard penetration test in borehole between ground level and 10m depth nr
H1.1 As Item H1 bur between 10 and 20m depth nr
H1.2 As Item H1 bur between 20 and 30m depth nr
H1.3 As Item H1 bur between 30 and 40m depth nr
H1.4 As Item H1 bur between 40 and 50m depth nr
H2 Standard penetration test in rotary drillhole between ground level and 10m nr
depth
H2.1 As Item H2 bur between 10 and 20m depth nr
H2.2 As Item H2 bur between 20 and 30m depth nr
H2.3 As Item H2 bur between 30 and 40m depth nr
H2.4 As Item H2 bur between 40 and 50m depth nr
H3 Standard penetration test in Sonic drillhole between ground level and 10m
depth
H3.1 As Item H3 bur between 10 and 20m depth
H3.2 As Item H3 bur between 20 and 30m depth
H3.3 As Item H3 bur between 30 and 40m depth
H3.4 As Item H3 bur between 40 and 50m depth
H4 In situ density testing
H4.1 Small pouring cylinder method nr
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Permeability testing
H16 Set up and dismantle variable head permeability test in cable percussion h
borehole
H17 Set up and dismantle constant head permeability test in cable percussion h
borehole
H18 Carry out permeability test in cable percussion borehole h
H19 Set up and dismantle variable head permeability test in observation nr
well/standpipe piezometer
H20 Set up and dismantle constant head permeability test in observation well nr
/standpipe piezometer
H21 Carry out permeability test in observation well /standpipe piezometer h
H22 Set up and dismantle variable head permeability test in rotary borehole nr
H23 Set up and dismantle constant head permeability test in rotary borehole nr
H24 Carry out permeability test in rotary borehole h
H25 Set up and dismantle single packer permeability test nr
Pumping Tests
H29 Move and set up pumping test plant and equipment to site of each nr
exploratory hole
H30 Carry out background monitoring day
H31 Carry out equipment test in test well nr
H32 Carry out variable rate step test in test well nr
H33 Carry out constant rate test in test well day
H34 Extra over Item H33 for additional days pumping day
H35 Carry out recovery monitoring day
H36 Standing time for pumping test plant, equipment and crew hr
Self-boring pressuremeter nr
H37 Move and set up self-boring pressuremeter and exploratory hole-forming
equipment to site of each exploratory hole
H38 Extra over Item H25 for setting up on a slope of gradient greater than 20% nr
and less than 36%
H39 Advance exploratory hole to pressuremeter test location between ground m
level and 10 m depth
H49 As Item H39 but between 10 and 20m depth m
H41 As Item H39 but between 20 and 30m depth m
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Investigation Supervisor
H50 Backfill exploratory hole for pressuremeter with cement/bentonite grout m
High pressure dilatometer nr
H51 Move and set up high-pressure dilatometer and exploratory hole-forming
equipment to site of each exploratory hole
H52 Extra over Item H52 for setting up on a slope of gradient greater than 20% nr
and less than 36%
H53 Advance exploratory hole to dilatometer test depth between ground m
level and 10 m depth
H54 As Item H54 but between 10 and 20m depth m
H55 As Item H54 but between 20 and 30m depth m
H56 Advance exploratory hole through hard stratum or obstruction h
H57 Rotary core to form dilatometer test pocket between ground level and 10m m
depth
H58 As Item H58 but between 10 and 20m depth m
H59 As Item H58 but between 20 and 30m depth m
Menard pressuremeter
H66 Move and set up Menard pressuremeter and exploratory hole-forming
equipment to site of each exploratory hole
H67 Extra over Item H68 for setting up on a slope of gradient greater than nr
20% and less than 36%
H68 Advance exploratory hole to pressuremeter test location between m
ground level and 10 m depth
H69 As Item H70 but between 10 and 20m depth m
H70 As Item H70 but between 20 and 30m depth m
H71 Advance exploratory hole through hard stratum or obstruction h
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
H72 Rotary core to form pressuremeter test pocket between ground level m
and 10m depth
H73 As Item H74 but between 10 and 20m depth m
H74 As Item H74 but between 20 and 30m depth m
H75 Carry out Menard pressuremeter test, provision of data and report, test nr
duration not exceeding 1.5 hours
H76 Extra over Item H77 for test duration in excess of 1.5 hours
H77 Carry out additional calibrations as instructed by the Investigation
Supervisor
H77.1 Displacement transducers nr
H77.2 Pore pressure transducers nr
H77.3 Total pressure transducers nr
H77.4 Membrane stiffness nr
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
H95 Standing time for driven or push-in self-boring pressuremeter and crew h
H96 Provide equipment and carry out infiltration tests as specified, rate to nr
include hire of excavation equipment
H97 day
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Rock Testing
The types of instrumentation included are those most often used. Additional instrumentation should be added when
required and included as additions to the Specification.
Additional Items will be required to cover extensometers, settlement gauges and settlement monuments. The form and
content of the additional items will depend on the Specification details set out in Schedules S1.18.8 and S1.18.9.
Forming the exploratory hole for standpipe, standpipe piezometer, inclinometer or extensometer installations by cable
percussion or rotary drilling should have meterage included under Bill B or C, respectively.
Where monitoring wells and standpipe piezometers for sampling and monitoring groundwater and ground gas
monitoring wells are in the form of a combined installation, they should be measured once under appropriate Items I6, I7
or I8.
Geoenvironmental testing necessary to enable the safe disposal of the purged water, Item I15.10 should be charged and
included per number under Bill L.
Item I18 includes only for a base set of readings following initial installation of the instrument. Subsequent sets of
readings during the fieldwork period or during the post fieldwork period and requiring a return visit to site should be
charged under additional Bill I items or J13 as appropriate.
Time waiting for cement/bentonite grout to cure below a monitoring well or standpipe piezometer will be charged at the
standing time rates given in Bill B or C.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
I15.10 Extra over Item I15.9 for containment, transport and disposal of Provisional
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Inclinometer
I16 Supply and install inclinometer tubing in exploratory hole, not including m
hole formation
I17 Hire of inclinometer readout unit day
I18 Carry out base set of inclinometer readings per installation and installation h
report
I19 Provide and install protective cover (flush) nr
Contract Specific Additional Bill Items
A set of base inclinometer readings is defined in Specification Clause 11.7 but may be varied on a site-specific basis by
means of Schedule S1.18.8. Further readings during or after fieldwork should comply with this requirement unless
otherwise stated in the Schedule.
When readings from monitoring wells, standpipe piezometers, inclinometers, extensometers etc. are required to be
continued after the fieldwork period, the alternative of measuring this work on Bill M rates may be appropriate.
Item J8 should be based on a number of site visits where purging is required. The rate for disposal of contaminated
waters should be charged under Item J8.1.
Geoenvironmental testing necessary to enable the safe disposal of the purged water, Item J8.1 and J17.1 shall be
charged and included per number under Bill L.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
water Sum
For the purposes of preparation, the following types of soil specimens are considered: disturbed, undisturbed, re-
compacted, remoulded and reconstituted. To determine the strength properties of clay, silt and organic soil, undisturbed
samples should be used. Alternatively, for certain soil, e.g. coarse silt or sand, or special purposes, tests can be carried
out on reconstituted or remoulded specimens. Item K1.5 may be scheduled to assess fine-grained soil, i.e. BS EB 16907-
2 Earthworks: Classification of materials.
The deformation of soil specimens in Section K8 can be measured with on-specimen transducers placed horizontally and
axially to measure the radial and axial strain, respectively. Somewhat similarly, three pairs of bender elements (Item
K9.1) can be placed on the soil specimen horizontally and axially to measure the shear-wave velocity in three orientations.
Measurements of shear-wave velocity can be scheduled after specimen saturation or consolidation, or both.
In Section K10, tests, such as the magnesium sulfate test, resistance to fragmentation or wear, may require crushing to
obtain the appropriate fraction, typically between 10 mm and 14 mm.
Items K3.11, K7.22, K8.14, K9.20 and K10.28 cover the cost of preparation of specimens that prove unsuitable to testing
after preparation owing to sample deficiencies, e.g. not readily identified interval voids or fractures in intact samples,
excessive amount of gravel in bulk samples, etc. See Clause 15.1.
Where significant quantities of geotechnical testing of contaminated ground samples are also anticipated, consideration
may be given to the inclusion of an additional Bill which repeats the relevant geotechnical tests to enable the Contractor
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Items K2.3–K2.10 are combined by many testing laboratories in respect of aggressivity of soil and groundwater, but the
same chemical tests are listed individually in Bill K to permit separate selection of required tests. Test suites in respect of
the aggressivity of soil and groundwater are provided in Bill L as these are more often completed by the geoenvironmental
laboratories.
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
K2.15 Extra over Items K2.13 & K.14 for specimen remoulding or re-compaction nr
K2.16 Redox potential nr
K3 Compaction-related
K3.1 Dry density/moisture content relationship using 2.5 kg rammer nr
K3.2 Dry density/moisture content relationship using 4.5 kg rammer nr
K3.3 Dry density/moisture content relationship using vibrating rammer nr
K4 Consolidation
K4.1 One-dimensional consolidation, test period not exceeding 7 days nr
K4.2 Extra over Item K4.1 for test period exceeding 7 days day
K4.3 Measurements of swelling pressure, test period not exceeding 2 days nr
K4.4 Measurement of swelling, test period not exceeding 2 days nr
K4.5 Measurement of settlement on saturation, test period not exceeding 1 day nr
K4.6 Extra over Items K4.3-K4.5 for test period exceeding 1 or 2 days day
K4.7 Consolidation of a specimen up to 100 mm diameter in a hydraulic cell, nr
test period 4 days
K4.8 As Item K4.7 but using a 150 mm diameter specimen nr
K4.9 As Item K4.7 but using a 250 mm diameter specimen nr
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
K4.10 Extra over Items K4.7–K4.9 for test period exceeding 4 days day
K4.11 Extra over Items K4.7-K4.9 for specimen remoulding or re-compaction nr
K4.12 Consolidation in a triaxial cell, test period 4 days nr
K4.13 Extra over Item K4.12 for test periods exceeding 4 days day
K4.14 Extra over Items K4.12 for specimen remoulding or re-compaction, or nr
specimen diameter reduction
K5 Permeability
K5.1 Permeability of soil in a rigid or flexible wall permeameter by the constant nr
head or falling head method, test duration not exceeding 4 days
K5.2 Extra over Item K5.1 for test period exceeding 4 days day
K5.3 Permeability of soil in an oedometer ring permeameter, test duration not day
exceeding 1 day per loading or unloading stage
K5.4 Extra over Items K5.3 for test period exceeding 1 day per stage day
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
K8.11 Extra over Items K8.1, K8.2, K8.4, K8.6, K8.7 and K8.9 for remoulding,
or reconstitution, or re-compaction, or specimen diameter reduction
K8.12 Extra over Items K8.1, K8.2, K8.4, K8.6, K8.7 and K8.9 for measuring the sp.
porewater pressure at the mid-plane in addition to the end of the specimen
K8.13 Extra over Items K8.1, K8.2, K8.4, K8.6, K8.7 and K8.9 for measuring the nr
specimen deformation with on-specimen transducers, per orientation
K8.14 Sample preparation/abortive cost for unsuitable to test as an intact sample nr
K9 Advanced soil testing
K9.1 Shear-wave velocity (Svh, Shh, Shv) and initial shear modulus (Gvh, Ghh, Ghv) nr
of soil using bender elements, per orientation
K9.2 Consolidated undrained shear strength by direct simple shear testing of nr
soil, test duration not exceeding 1 day per specimen
K9.3 Extra over Item K9.2 for test durations exceeding 1 day per specimen sp.day
K9.4 Consolidated undrained cyclic direct simple shear testing of soil, test sp.
duration not exceeding 3 days
K9.5 Extra over Item K9.4 for additional cycle stages or part there of sp.
K9.6 Extra over Item K9.4 for post-cyclic simple shear test sp.
K9.7 Extra over Item K9.4 for test duration exceeding 3 days per specimen sp.day
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
K9.8 Load-controlled cyclic triaxial strength of soil, test duration not exceeding nr
4 days
K9.9 Extra over Item K9.9 for test duration exceeding 4 days per specimen sp.day
K9.10 Modulus and damping properties of soils using the cyclic apparatus, test nr
duration not exceeding 4 days
K9.11 Extra over Item K9.11 for additional consolidations stages and companion nr
modulus & damping measurements
K9.12 Extra over Item K9.11 for post-cyclic triaxial shear test nr
K9.13 Extra over Item K9.11 for test duration exceeding 4 days per specimen sp.day
K9.16 Extra over Item K9.15 for post-resonance or post-torsion triaxial test nr
K9.17 Extra over Item K9.15 for test duration exceeding 4 days per specimen sp.day
K9.18 Extra over Items K9.1, K9.2, K9.4, K9.8, K9.10 and K9.14 for specimen
remoulding, or reconstitution, or re-compaction, or specimen diameter
reduction
K9.20 Sample preparation/abortive cost for unsuitable to test intact sample nr
The tests included in each of Suites E and F, under Items L1.5–L1.6 need to be reviewed and, if necessary, amended in
light of the results of the site-specific desk study. It is likely that other determinands will need to be included for many
investigations.
Additional test suites or individual tests may be added as Items L1.5.1, L1.6.1, etc. where required.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
Rates should be entered for the various grades of resources listed. These resources will provide technical support to the
Investigation Supervisor in accordance with Clause 4.4.7 and Schedule S1.8.4.
The technical support may comprise advice or assistance during the course of the investigation and/or the preparation of
the Ground Investigation Report and/or the Geotechnical Design Report all in accordance with Specification Clauses
17.3.3 and Clause 17.3.4. Where such support is required, it will either be detailed in Schedule S1.24.9 or S1.24.10, or
may be instructed by the Investigation Supervisor.
The resources identified in Bill M exclude resource for the project management, supervision, technical direction and
execution required from the Contractor under the Conditions of Contract and the requirements of Specification Clause
4.4.2, Clause 4.4.3, and Clause 4.4.6, and Schedule S1.8.3, which shall be included in the relevant items within Bill A of
the Bill of Quantities (see Clause 1 of the Preamble to the Bill of Quantities).
The disciplines and/or grades of ground practitioners and other personnel required to assist or advise the Investigation
Supervisor will need to be determined by the Designer on a site-specific basis. The list may be subdivided or repeated for
the main utilities required where due consideration is to be given to the separate costs of the advisory utilities or report
preparation.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
M1 Ground practitioners
M1.1 (a) Registered Ground Engineering Technician / Technician h
M1.2 (b) Graduate ground practitioner / Graduate geoenvironmental h
practitioner
M1.3 (c) Registered Ground Engineering Practitioner / Experienced h
ground practitioner / Experienced geoenvironmental
M1.4 (d) practitioner
Registered Ground Engineering Professional h
M1.5 Geoenvironmental Specialist / Environmental Scientist h
M1.6 (e) Registered Ground Engineering Specialist h
M1.7 (f) Registered Ground Engineering Adviser h
M1.8 (g) Chartered practitioner h
M1.9 (h) Registered Specialist in Land Condition (SiLC) h
M1.10 (i) Registered Risk Assessor (RSoBRA or ASoBRA) h
M2 Other specialists (to be separately identified and listed below)
M2.1 h
M2.2 h
M2.3 h
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
M2.4 h
M3 Expenses
Notes
1Where considered more appropriate, ‘kilometre’ may be used.
An estimate of the duration for long-term storage of samples after the standard retention period of 28 days after issue of
the Final Report, where required in Schedules S1.15.2, should be assessed by the Designer or Investigation Supervisor.
Consideration of the type of sample and its likely deterioration with time should be made as well as the testing requirements
and restrictions of any subsequent testing, especially with regard to geoenvironmental samples.
Where samples comprise more than one container, the rate entered shall be per container.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
N1 Geotechnical samples
N1.1 Small disturbed sample nr
N1.2 Bulk disturbed sample nr
N1.3 Groundwater sample nr
N1.4 U100 Open-tube sample (thick-wall sampler) nr
N1.5 UT100 Open-tube sample (thin-wall sampler) nr
N1.6 Dynamic (windowless) sample nr
N1.7 Rotary drilling core in core box nr
N1.8 Rotary drilling core sub-sample nr
N1.9 Block sample nr
N1.10 Mostap sample nr
N1.11 Piston sample nr
N2 Geoenvironmental samples
N2.1 Soil sample in plastic tubs nr
N2.2 Soil sample in glass containers nr
N2.3 Groundwater sample nr
N2.4 Gas sample nr
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Total tender
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited
General comments
Company name
Analysis 10
Analysis 11
Analysis 12
SHIPMENT INFORMATION Company:
Analysis 1
Analysis 2
Analysis 3
Analysis 4
Analysis 5
Analysis 6
Analysis 7
Analysis 8
Analysis 9
Company address Address:
Project location
CONTACT INFORMATION Tel:
Project reference Email:
PO Number
COURIER INFORMATION Tel:
ALS Quote number
Report turnaround time Standard. According to agreement MATRIX CODE CLASSIFICATIONS - WATER MATRIX CODE - OTHER
(TAT)
Please cross Express. Required reporting date: Ground Water (GW) Treated Sewage (TS) Soils (S)
appropriately Surface Water (SW) Trade Effluent (TE) Gas (G)
(Express fees may apply, contact laboratory for confirmation)
Drinking Water (DW) Saline Water (SA) Product (P)
CLIENT CONTACT AND REPORTING INFORMATION Land Leachate (LE) Process Water (PR) Sludge (SL)
Prepared Leachate (PL) Recreational Water (RE) Unspecified Solid (UNS)
Project contact name(s) Untreated Sewage (US) Unspecified Liquid (UNL)
Primary phone
Secondary phone/contact
Depth in Depth in AGS AGS SAMPLING AND CONTAINER INFO
MATRIX REMARKS AND KNOWN HAZARDS (including high
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION metres metres sample client sample ANALYSIS REQUIRED (please cross appropriately)
code Date Tim e Total bottles concentrations of contam inants)
(top) (bottom) type reference
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
For lab use only For lab use only For lab use only For lab use only For lab use only For lab use only For lab use only For lab use only For lab use only For lab use only For lab use only
No.
Appendix A2
BH / TP
Project No.
(m)
Depth
Sample Details
Ref.
Sample
Type
Particle Density
Client
Sieve Analysis
Routine Tests
Consolidation
pH
Sulphate Determination
Total / 2:1 W/S or Groundwater
Triaxial Permeability
Special Tests
Laboratory Vane
Date Scheduled
Page
Remarks
Appendix A3 Example of a Geoenvironmental Laboratory Testing Schedule
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
hing Limited
Feedback is important and it is recognised that the Specification and accompanying documentation will benefit
from being updating in the future.
Users are invited to email recommendations for revision to the Site Investigation Steering Group: please email the following
details to [email protected]
Name:
Organisation:
Address:
Email:
Date:
Page No.:
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Section:
(e.g. Specification, Schedules, Bills of Quantities, Notes for Guidance)
Clause/Schedule/Bill No.:
Description of problem:
Suggested amendment:
Uncontrolled Copy – © ICE Publishing Limited