ISO 2597-1 Part 1 Determination of Total Iron in Iron Ore
ISO 2597-1 Part 1 Determination of Total Iron in Iron Ore
Cin which case the difference between the reported result and the reference/certified value is lly significant. ,_ is the final result for the certified reference material, Ag. is the certified value for the CRM or the reference value for the RM; C__is.a value dependent on the type of CRM or RM used. Certified reference materials used for this purpose should be prepared and certified in accordance with 1SO Guide 3:2006, Reference materials — General and statistical principles for certification. For a CRM certified by an interlaboratory test programme A 12 cxafot -herua] where nis the number of replicate determinations carried out on the CRM/RM; W{4,) is the variance of the certified value 4, For a CRM certified by only one laboratory a2)" CHa of +S This type of CRM should be avoided unless it is known to have an unbiased cerlified value. © 180 2006 - All ights reserved 9ISO 2597-1:2006(E) 8.2.5 Calculation of final result The final result is the arithmetic mean of the acceptable analytical values for the test sample, or as otherwise determined by the operations specified in Annex A, calculated to four decimal places and rounded off to the second decimal place as follows: a) where the figure in the third decimal place is less than 5, it is discarded and the figure in the second decimal place is kept unchanged; b) where the figure in the third decimal place is 5 and there is a figure other than 0 in the fourth decimal place, or where the figure in the third decimal place is greater than 5, the figure in the second decimal place is increased by one; c)_ where the figure in the third decimal place is 5 and the figure 0 is in the fourth decimal place, the 5 is discarded and the figure in the second decimal place is kept unchanged if it is 0, 2, 4, 6 or 8, and is increased by one ifitis 1, 3. 5, 7or9 8.3 Oxide factors in percent Fez03 = 1430 re reo = 1286 Wee Wreg0, = 1382 Wee 9 Test report ‘The test report shall include the following information: a) name and address of the testing laboratory; b) date of issue of the test report; ©) reference to this part of ISO 2597; 4) details necessary for the identification of the sample; ) result of the analysis f) reference number ofthe result; 9) any characteristics noticed during the determination, and any operations not specified in this part of ISO 2597 which may have had an influence on the result, for either the test sample or the certified reference material(s) 10 (© 180 2006 ~All rights reservedISO 2597-1:2006(E) Annex A (normative) Flowsheet for the procedure for the acceptance of analytical values for test samples Start with independent duplicate results Yes XX. ee No ‘One more determination a No ‘One more determination Yes max — Xnin $ 1,3 Re = Median (X;, Xz, X3, X4) (© 1SO 2006 ~ Allright reserved "1ISO 2597-1:2006(E) Annex B (informative) Derivation of precision statements The precision statements in 8.2.1 were derived from the results of international analytical trials carried out in 1966 to 1967 on eight iron ore samples, involving 30 laboratories in various countries, ‘The test samples are listed in Table B.1. Table B.1 — Total iron contents of test samples Sample 2: (ose econ) Sweden-2 8 Sweden-7 617 UK Siner 359 [Canadian 53 Mine a8 Phiipin ron sand 606 vo) Rog aad Marcona e27 NOTE 1 _Areport ofthe intemational trials and a statistical analysis of the results (Document ISO/TC 102/SC 2 N147E, November 1968) is available from the Secretarial of ISO/TC 102/SC 2. NOTE 2 The statistical analysis was performed in accordance with the principles given in ISO $725-2:1994, Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and resulls— Part 2: Basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility ofa standard measurement method, 42 (© 180 2006 — All rights reservedAnnex C (informative) Decontamination of the waste solutions from the analysis . To avoid discharging to the environment the mercury contained in the waste solutions remaining after the determination of iron, such solutions should be collected and processed for the removal of the mercury that they contain, A suitable treatment system may be constructed as follows. Three 10 litre plastics bottles are connected as illustrated in Figure C.1. (The expansion chamber incorporated in the connecting lines minimizes the risk of pressure increase in the case of a vigorous reaction.) The first two bottles each contain 3 kg of aluminium or iron rods to induce the electrochemical precipitation of mercury. ‘The solution discharged from the third bottle is fed to a neutralization vessel before being finally discarded. ‘Accumulated mercury sludge is removed from time to time and concentrated by decantation before being ‘transferred to a recovery plant. The aluminium or iron rods are replaced as necessary. (Reference: ANSMANN, W. Arch. Eisenhuttenw. 53(10) 1982: p. 390.) Figure C.1 — Apparatus for the removal of mercury from waste solutions (© 1SO 2006 — Al rights reserved 13ISO 2597-1:2006(E) rs ICS 73,060.10 Price based on 13 pages (© 1SO 2006 ~ Allrghts reserved