RADIONICS BASICS

The Importance of Grounding a Radionic Instrument

Something that’s very important that many books on radionics fail to mention, or they only devote a short
paragraph to is grounding your radionic instrument. It is important to ground your radionic instrument for two
reasons.

1 Grounding your instrument will cut down on broadcast times, also grounding is essential if you are using your
instruments to balance crops, trees, plants etc.

2 There is evidence that if your instrument isn’t grounded, and you use it to do a lot of radionic balancing on
other people, animals, etc. the conditions that are affecting them could be broadcast back to you, and cause
you health problems. I have no proof of this, but some of the worlds most prominent radionic experts died at a
fairly young age among them David Tansley, Peter Moscow, Pat Schmidt, you would think with their extensive
knowledge of radionics they could have prolonged their lives into old age. Maybe the problem was that they
didn’t ground their instruments. I figure for the time it takes, and the cost of a grounding rod and a piece of
wire and a few jacks it’s better to be safe than sorry.

If you have a Hieronymus type instrument grounding the instrument is easy. On these instruments, there is
usually a place to plug-in a ground wire. All you have to do is to drive a metal rod into the ground ( I used a
copper pipe).The longer the rod the better, but 3 or 4 feet should be long enough. Attach the ground wire to
the rod (this can be ordinary copper wire, insulated or bare, size or gauge doesn’t matter). Now install a Banana
Plug ( available at any electronics supply store) on the end of the wire and plug the Banana Plug into your
radionics instrument ( Most radionics instruments that are meant to be grounded have a jack for a Banana
Plug. Plug the Banana Plug into the “input side” of the instrument) and you’re good to go. Some people
recommend giving the wire a counter-clockwise twist to eliminate any natural polarity of the wire. You can do
this with an electric drill set on reverse. You can ground as many instruments as you want using the same
ground rod.

The above instructions are fine if you live in your own home, or are renting and your landlord doesn’t mind if
you construct the above set-up. Some people choose to ground their instruments to water pipes, gas lines or
electrical grounds. Water pipes and gas lines are better than electrical grounds ( electrical grounds contain a lot
of electrical noise and information). None of the above is as good as a dedicated ground rod for your
instrument. An exception would be if you have a private well, you could use the well pipes as a ground
providing they are metal, they would be almost as good as the ground rod.

If you are not sure if something will make a good ground dowse the question with your radionic instrument, if
Yes use it, if No, find a better ground.

But what if you live in an apartment building and the landlord says NO to you setting up a ground rod and wire,
or you move your radionic instrument around often to different locations, where grounding to a permanent
grounding rod wouldn’t be practical or have a radionic instrument that doesn’t provide for grounding such as
the SE-5 computerized radionics instrument. There is another option.

Another option is the “Virtual Ground” invented by Scott Ertl, he can be contacted here :Scott Ertl, 7775 U.S.
Highway 10, Marshfield, Wis. 54449 (ph 715 387-1687; ertlacresgmx @tznet.com). I have never used this but
have heard good reports about it from other radionic operators.

Some people put a tensor ring around the instrument, such as Golden-Fire-Ring-15-Inch

https://twistedsage.com/product/golden-fire-15/

Other people place a crystal on the stick pad

If you plan on doing radionic work on anyone or anything but yourself, for your own sake (not to mention it will
cut down on broadcast times) please ground your instrument.

Forums - Ed Kelly

Fact check: The early passing of my father, Peter J. Kelly, had nothing to do with the grounding of his
instruments and everything to do with the facts that he spent the entirety of his adult life between 300-350
pounds, chain smoked, and got very little exercise. Besides that, he was quite scrupulous about the grounding
of his instruments, which is why they have always had “ground” marked clearly on every unit from the earliest
models in the 1970s until today.

Thanks for clearing that up Ed. Using an ungrounded radionic instrument was not the cause of your dad’s
passing. Although there has been speculation that using ungrounded instruments have led to other radionic
practitioners becoming ill and dying. I guess it’s better to ground and instrument, and be safe than sorry.

And I thought “no I don’t need to ground my device, it is all about intention” … WRONG!

I build a new prototype and forgot somehow to ground it and the remedy I broadcast came back to me.
GRRRRR … Now I know better. Thanks for this post!

Glad to help, many people don’t understand the importance of grounding a radionics instrument.

So i am building my own Radionics machine. Where would I ideally connect the grounding to?

Good question Pablo, I haven’t built a Radionics machine, so I’m not sure where you would connect the ground
inside the machine.. After the machine is built the best ground is from a steel rod or pipe driven in the ground,
with a wire running between that and your machine. If you join this radionics group on Facebook, I’m sure
someone there could answer your question better than I could.

What if I live on 3rd floor in an apartment…..how would I dig the rod in the floor to ground my radionic
machine?

That makes things a bit more difficult, but you could ground to a copper or iron water pipe, not ideal, but
better than no ground. Also there is a website where they sell grounding units for people that don’t have a
traditional grounding source https://www.lightningpower.org/products

What you would do would be run a ground wire out of a window and down to the ground and attach to a
ground rod in the dirt. Even better is out through the wall. This is probably not doable in an apartment. A
virtual ground unit is the next best option. You could also set your instrument inside a tensor ring. If you don’t
know what that is then visit twistedsage.com.

What if radionics was fiction, and Ruth Drown a novelist? Would we be able to say in conversation about
radionics, “Read ‘Drown Radio Therapy’ by Ruth Drown,” – where today with the mention of time travel we can
say, “Read ‘The Time Machine’ by H.G. Wells,” – and expect that everyone will nod knowingly? Would that
make things any easier?
Recently I was in the final stages of constructing a new radionics device when visitors arrived. I couldn’t deny
anything; it was on full display and I had a hot soldering iron in my hand. On the table before me was a box
with two copper plates, a few wires, circuit board with amplifiers, capacitors and resistors – and a large crystal
wound with wire. Naturally, almost every person alive in the civilized world today knows that wirewound
quartz crystals generally don’t belong in an electronic device. Something distinctly esoteric was going on, I
could see the concern reflected in their eyes.

Then there was the awful question: “What [expletive] are you making?!” How do you brush off something like
that in 60 seconds or less? I attempted a quick summary of radionics in general, the instrument itself and its
inspiration. I was only partly successful. It actually took me about 10 minutes. Fortunately the visitors were
polite, if bemused. I was grateful that they didn’t respond with outright hilarity or even scorn, although to be
honest I didn’t expect any such reaction, for my friends see me (one may only assume) as an otherwise
reasonably sensible person.

I was forced to admit, however, that I’m a creator of machines that don’t work – at least according to the laws
of physics. And I like it that way. I’m fascinated by mystery. I muse on unknowable things. If someone were to
present me with chapter and verse on exactly how and why something works (or doesn’t, or won’t) that’s not
necessarily what I’m seeking. That’s simply deflating. It’s not so much a certainty that I enthusiastically pursue,
but the excitement of exploring the boundaries of possibilities. The sense of wonder is an end in itself. Wonder
is to allow yourself to fall into the infinity of chaos, that “place” which gives birth to everything.

Order and certainty is limited by definition. When surety is abandoned, chaos and infinite potential are
revealed as the background of existence. Creation takes birth there. The behaviour of the goddess Erin reveals
that truth, instead of being found in order, is to be found in chaos. Shiva, Mahadeva, the great untamed deity,
is the primary source; once everything is destroyed, pure consciousness is the soil for the seed of creation,
order and insight. Entropy is the ground of life.

You can see where I’m going with this: This is the mud where lotuses bloom; this is the dimension where
radionics works.

Life encountering chaos and confusion goes counter to universal entropy, forming knowledge and order out of
unknowable constituents, thoughts, imagination. This is the basis of Myth (capital “M,” thank you Joseph
Campbell) revealed in such stories as the Creation in Genesis. We imagine, we express our intention, thus we
create. Imagination is the first creation of chaos.

In “Conversations with God” Neale Donald Walsch pointed out that God reveals himself in every way, even
through our imagination. Albert Einstein observed that imagination is more important than knowledge, for
knowledge is limited by its own boundaries. Knowledge is bound by certainty. Einstein pointed out that
imagination is boundless, spread out through the universe.

Dogma is blinded by its own light. A little bit of truth has the danger of becoming viewed as the whole reality.
Galileo, Newton, Goethe and innumerable others would not be remembered today if they had stuck to
consensus opinion. They stretched the bounds of credibility, often at the expense of their own lives. And no,
they weren’t all rational sceptics. Isaac Newton for example, now considered the father of modern science, was
an alchemist and a “natural philosopher.” He believed in “woo,” a favourite term of otherwise apparently sane,
rational people today. Tesla (name stolen by an elite car manufacturer) was intensely curious about many
things that would make any respectable scientist today nervous about his reputation.
I’m in no way going to imply that radionics is at the frontier of a cutting edge, cold blooded science. Unless, that
is, we should include the esoteric arts of magic and energy healing in the departments of exoteric science.
Radionics exists at the blurry fringe of our imagination. I believe it is more of an artwork on the canvas of
consciousness. Radionics is what poetry is to journalism, what jazz is to mathematics. It measures the
otherwise unmeasurable quality of life itself, its ephemeral conditions and possibilities. It offers a framework
for introspection and intention. It reveals patterns in Nature rather than submitting to formulae and
conventions. It dares to ask the question, “What if?”

Radionics is a direct tool of consciousness. Consciousness is unknowable, nonexistent, yet no knowledge of

One of my visitors returned a few days later, and she asked how I was going with my radionics instrument. It
was sitting beside me, switched on, LED glowing, otherwise motionless. As I was chatting to her about it, it then
occurred to me how my radionics instrument lives in my imagination in the same way that a work of fiction
lives in the imagination of an author and her readers. The mind of the author creates a universe, forms a world
and breathes life into its characters, which take on a life of their own. Similarly the vision of my instrument is
alive in me – I understand precisely its design, how it functions, the laws or principles by which it functions, the
dimension of the universe with which it is designed to interact, and its potential effect which might be seen as a
gateway between levels of reality.

In conversation we explored and compared the two creations that arise in the imagination of the radionicist
and the novelist.

At this point I assumed that there is an unreasoned (thus unreasonable) disparity in the minds of most people
between a radionics instrument and a book, a work of fiction. I say unreasonable because the reality is that
each one has taken birth in the imagination of its creator, ultimately taking tangible form – on one hand an
instrument in the hands of an operator, and on the other a book in the hands of a reader. Each lives, so to
speak, through its creator first of all, and secondly through the user or reader.

I suppose the materialist of this world might hasten to heap scorn and ridicule on the invention and use of a
radionics instrument, simply because it is a physical device that doesn’t appear to have a direct physical effect
the way that a machine is expected to. Think of the way an excavator or an oscilloscope works, for example.
Never mind that the radionics instrument is modifying reality in many ways, not least in the mind of the
operator (also part of the totality of reality, strangely enough). This latter point, curiously, is frowned upon by
those who choose to view the world itself as a physical device, the mind thus being a modification of that
material structure. Okay, so the problem is that the device is mental in concept, of unprovable purpose.

But when we come to a book, the situation is quite different. The book, by contrast, is almost universally
permitted to continue creating an alternative reality, despite it being just as much a figment of the creator’s
fertile imagination. A sceptic may even enjoy the novel. It may even change his life. The ideas embodied in a
novel, for some strange reason, isn’t necessarily a threat to sensibility the way a physical device might seem to
be. (Ignoring such books as Noddy, and The Satanic Verses, obviously.) So I may ask: What poses more of a risk,
an instrument or a book? I would answer that a book is potentially a more dangerous thing! Revolutions have
started with an idea in print.
Conceive a machine in your mind and write about it, and you’re an author, even an H.G. Wells. But to actually
manufacture that instrument, you’re potentially considered a weirdo, a fringe geek, with the possibility of legal
action taken against you for fraud should you promote its use. A time machine is a marvellous literary device –
until you try to sell one. A medical device is even more dangerous since the self-appointed authorities behave
as though they literally possess your health (or rather your illness) as long as you can pay for it. They’ll let you
keep your good health for free. And they’ll even let you keep your books about quack medical devices – just
don’t build and use one!

Perhaps the only legitimate way radionics can exist in the eyes of most people in our age of scientism is as an
artf orm, as Duncan Laurie suggests in his book “The Secret Art.” A work of art is important for what it suggests
rather than for what it actually does. Artwork isn’t expected to do anything, except change the viewer in some
way.

Some arguably atrocious and disturbing literary creations have won Booker and Pulitzer prizes, while radionics
creations are put into quack medicine museums. I like that the Dutch call their art galleries “museums,” as by
implication it means that a museum is a gallery for what should pass as art – natural art, if nothing else. At least
art is one way that sophisticated folk can make sense of Nature and pigeon-hole reality. It’s as if, by labelling
radionics as “quack medical devices” the self-appointed critics are saying that radionics is untrue and worthy of
ridicule, while art and literature is allowed to blatantly state untruths and, if well stated, be praised for it.

Someone – I wish I could recall who – once stated that the correct understanding of reality is to know that it is
a lie, but to believe in the lie willingly.

So what am I trying to say here? – only that radionics is a creature that seems to live while I live, as easily
believable as great literature or philosophy, and arguably just as important as any other work of originality. The
same sense of reality is cultivated by reading great works as when I contemplate my radionic creation – valid,
relevant, alongside and parallel to the world while intersecting it, equal in their existence. Is it really Chuang-tzu
dreaming of a butterfly, or is the butterfly dreaming of Chuang-tzu? Both, perhaps, are true.

The Buddha asserted that everything is mind. Who am I to argue? I believe that the mind literally creates what
is commonly understood as reality. Perception is projection. Within consciousness the perception of both
tangible or imaginary realities is non-different. A radionics instrument works at the same level as it is
conceived. In that reality a book can change your life. Radionics may also.

A very interesting thought process. I believe it is a valid comparison and assesment of the situation. I would
extend it a bit maybe in this way. Much, probably all of what we do in radionics starts in our mind. There are
things about how it works that make no logical sense to linear thinking. There are some who claim dogmatic
procedures and rules about how some things work, but the actual practice of radionics says otherwise.

When I was first introduced to radionics, I saw it primarily as a path to increasing my awareness, or even
conciousness, and I believe it is doing so. We are created in Gods image in the sense that we are creators (not
because God has a humanoid body). Radionics allows us an enhanced way to create. We can create better
situations for ourselves and those around us. I create radionc reagents that make my work easier and more
effective, thus allowing me to create even more. But the expanded awareness also allows for greater creation
in other areas of my life, including possibly writing a book (or books), funny enough.

I just finished building my first non-powered radionic machine, and I am struggling a little with the stick and
understanding rates, I have an 8 dial machine, all the circuits are connected in series. I used this design
https://www.esoterictechnology.com/classic-radionics/.
I am now starting to build a powered radionics machine, do you have any pointers on making sure it is done
correctly? Or designs i should consider. I am going to use the Jensen two dial design, as it is available online,
with an external plate and external wells for simplicity.

I have a problem with moles on my plot, and was wondering if You could share the rates for moles for the
hieronymous machine.

Well its not as simple as just broadcasting rates to get rid of the moles. There are a few different techniques
that have worked in similar cases. One is to get something, such as straw or hay from a zoo, that has lion or
tiger urine on it, and broadcast that to a photo of your garden. Another method of ashing, here is a link that
describes it https://radionicsspectro.com/2017/12/21/ashing/ Here is another link, that tells how to get rid of
garden pests https://radionicsspectro.com/2017/09/02/getting-rid-of-insect-pests-in-your-field-or-garden-
with-radionics/