Mankiw – Chapter 9

SOLUTIONS TO TEXT PROBLEMS:

Quick Quizzes

1. Since wool suits are cheaper in neighboring countries, Autarka would import suits if it were to
allow free trade.

2. Figure 1 shows the supply and demand for wool suits in Autarka. With no trade, the price of
suits is 3 ounces of gold, consumer surplus is area A, producer surplus is area B + C, and
total surplus is area A + B + C. When trade is allowed, the price falls to 2 ounces of gold,
consumer surplus rises to A + B + D (an increase of B + D), producer surplus falls to C (a
decline of B), so total surplus rises to A + B + C + D (an increase of D). A tariff on suit
imports would reduce the increase in consumer surplus, reduce the decline in producer
surplus, and reduce the gain in total surplus.

Figure 1

3. Lobbyists for the textile industry might make five arguments in favor of a ban on the import
of wool suits: (1) imports of wool suits destroy domestic jobs; (2) the wool-suit industry is
vital for national security; (3) the wool-suit industry is just starting up and needs protection
from foreign competition until it gets stronger; (4) other countries are unfairly subsidizing
their wool-suit industries; and (5) the ban on the importation of wool suits can be used as a
bargaining chip in international negotiations.

In defending free trade in wool suits, you could argue that: (1) free trade creates jobs in
some industries even as it destroys jobs in the wool-suit industry and allows Autarka to enjoy
a higher standard of living; (2) the role of wool suits for the military may be exaggerated; (3)
government protection is not needed for an industry to grow on its own; (4) it would be good
for the citizens of Autarka to be able to buy wool suits at a subsidized price; and (5) threats
against free trade may backfire, leading to lower levels of trade and lower economic welfare
for everyone.

170
 Chapter 9/Application: International Trade ™ 171

Questions for Review

1. If the domestic price that prevails without international trade is above the world price, the
country does not have a comparative advantage in producing the good. If the domestic price
is below the world price, the country has a comparative advantage in producing the good.

2. A country will export a good for which its domestic price is lower than the prevailing world
price. Thus, if a country has a comparative advantage in producing a good, it will become an
exporter when trade is allowed. A country will import a product for which its domestic price is
greater than the prevailing world price. Thus, if a country does not have a comparative
advantage in producing a good, it will become an importer when trade is allowed.

3. Figure 2 illustrates supply and demand for an importing country. Before trade is allowed,
consumer surplus is area A and producer surplus is area B + C. After trade is allowed,
consumer surplus is area A + B + D and producer surplus is area C. The change in total
surplus is an increase of area D.

Figure 2

4. A tariff is a tax on goods produced abroad and sold domestically. If a country is an importer
of a good, a tariff reduces the quantity of imports and moves the domestic market closer to
its equilibrium without trade, increasing the price of the good, reducing consumer surplus
and total surplus, while raising producer surplus and government revenue.

5. The arguments given to support trade restrictions are: (1) trade destroys jobs; (2) industries
threatened with competition may be vital for national security; (3) new industries need trade
restrictions to help them get started; (4) some countries unfairly subsidize their firms, so
competition is not fair; and (5) trade restrictions can be useful bargaining chips. Economists
disagree with these arguments: (1) trade may destroy some jobs, but it creates other jobs;
(2) arguments about national security tend to be exaggerated; (3) the government cannot
easily identify new industries that are worth protecting; (4) if countries subsidize their
exports, doing so simply benefits consumers in importing countries; and (5) bargaining over
trade is a risky business, because it may backfire, making the country worse off without
trade.

6. A unilateral approach to achieving free trade occurs when a country removes trade
restrictions on its own. Under a multilateral approach, a country reduces its trade restrictions
172 ™ Chapter 9/Application: International Trade

while other countries do the same, based on an agreement reached through bargaining. The
unilateral approach was taken by Great Britain in the 1800s and by Chile and South Korea in
recent years. Examples of the multilateral approach include NAFTA in 1993 and the GATT
negotiations since World War II.

Problems and Applications

1. a. In Figure 3, with no international trade the equilibrium price is P1 and the equilibrium
quantity is Q1. Consumer surplus is area A and producer surplus is area B + C, so total
surplus is A + B + C.

Figure 3

b. When the Mexican orange market is opened to trade, the new equilibrium price is PW, the
quantity consumed is QD, the quantity produced domestically is QS, and the quantity
imported is QD – QS. Consumer surplus increases from A to A + B + D + E. Producer
surplus decreases from B + C to C. Total surplus changes from A + B + C to A + B + C
+ D + E, an increase of D + E.

2. a. Figure 4 illustrates the Canadian market for wine, where the world price of wine is P1.
The following table illustrates the results under the heading "P1."
 Chapter 9/Application: International Trade ™ 173

Figure 4

b. The shift in the Gulf Stream destroys some of the grape harvest in Europe and raises the
world price of wine to P2. The table shows the new areas of consumer, producer, and
total surplus, as well as the changes in these surplus measures. Consumers lose,
producers win, and Canada as a whole is worse off.
P1 P2 CHANGE
Consumer Surplus A+B+D+E A+D –(B + E)
Producer Surplus C B+C +B
Total Surplus A+B+C+D+E A+B+C+D –E
3. The impact of a tariff on imported autos is shown in Figure 6. Without the tariff, the price of
an auto is PW, the quantity produced in the United States is Q1S, and the quantity purchased
in the United States is Q1D. The United States imports Q1D – Q1S autos. The imposition of the
tariff raises the price of autos to PW + t, causing an increase in quantity supplied by U.S.
producers to Q2S and a decline in the quantity demanded to Q2D. This reduces the number of
imports to Q2D – Q2S. The table shows the areas of consumer surplus, producer surplus,
government revenue, and total surplus both before and after the imposition of the tariff.
Because consumer surplus declines by C + D + E + F while producer surplus rises by C and
government revenue rises by E, the deadweight loss is D + F. The loss of consumer surplus
in the amount C + D + E + F is split up as follows: C goes to producers, E goes to the
government, and D + F is deadweight loss.
174 ™ Chapter 9/Application: International Trade

Figure 6

Before Tariff After Tariff CHANGE

Consumer Surplus A+B+C+D+E+F A+B –(C + D + E + F)
Producer Surplus G C+G +C
Government Revenue 0 E +E
Total Surplus A+B+C+D+E+F+G A+B+C+E+G –(D + F)

4. a. For a country that imports clothing, the effects of a decline in the world price are shown
in Figure 7. The initial price is Pw1 and the initial level of imports is Qd1 – Qs1. The new
world price is Pw2 and the new level of imports is Qd2 – Qs2. The table below shows the
changes in consumer surplus, producer surplus, and total surplus. Domestic consumers
are made better off, while domestic producers are made worse off. Total surplus rises by
areas D + E + F.

Price of
Clothing
S

B
Pw1
C E F
Pw2 D
G
D

Q S2 Q S1 Q D1 Q D2 Quantity of
Clothing
Figure 7
 Chapter 9/Application: International Trade ™ 175

Pw1 Pw2 CHANGE

Consumer Surplus A+B A+B+C+D+E+F C+D+E+F
Producer Surplus C+G G –C
Total Surplus A+C+G A+B+C+D+E+F+G D+E+F
b. For a country that exports clothing, the effects of a decline in the world price are shown
in Figure 8. The initial price is Pw1 and the initial level of exports is Qs1 – Qd1. The new
world price is Pw2 and the new level of exports is Qs2 – Qd2. The table below shows the
changes in consumer surplus, producer surplus, and total surplus. Domestic consumers
are made better off, while domestic producers are made worse off. Total surplus falls by
area D.

Price of
Clothing

A S
Pw1
B C D
Pw2
H
F G
E

Q1d Q2d Q2s Q1s Quantity of

Clothing

Figure 8

Pw1 Pw2 CHANGE

Consumer Surplus A A+B+C B+C
Producer Surplus B+C+D+E+F+G+H E+F+G+H –B – C – D
Total Surplus A+C+G A+B+C+E+F+G+H –D

c. Overall, importing countries benefit from the fall in the world price of clothing, while
exporting countries are harmed.

5. The tax on wine from California is just like a tariff imposed by one country on imports from
another. As a result, Washington producers would be better off and Washington consumers
would be worse off. The higher price of wine in Washington means producers would produce
more wine, so they would hire more workers. Tax revenue would go to the government of
Washington. So both claims are true, but it is a bad policy because the losses to Washington
consumers exceed the gains to producers and the state government.

6. a. There are many possible answers.

b. There are many possible answers.

176 ™ Chapter 9/Application: International Trade

7. Senator Hollings is correct that the price of clothing is the world price. When trade is allowed,
the domestic price of clothing is driven to the world price. The price is lower than it would be
in the absence of trade, so consumer surplus is higher than it would be without trade and
this means that consumers do benefit from lower-priced imports.

8. a. Figure 9 shows the market for T-shirts in Textilia. The domestic price is $20 Once trade is
allowed, the price drops to $16 and three million T-shirts are imported.

Price of
T-shirts

20
A B C
16

1 3 4 Quantity of
T-shirts
(millions)

Figure 9

b. Consumer surplus increases by areas A + B + C. Area A is equal to ($4)(1 million)

+(0.5)($4)(2 million) = $8 million. Area B is equal to (0.5)($4)(2 million) = $4 million.
Area C is equal to (0.5)($4)(1 million) = $2 million. Thus, consumer surplus increases by
$14 million.

Producer surplus declines by area A. Thus, producer surplus falls by $8 million.

Total surplus rises by areas B + C. Thus, total surplus rises by $6 million.

9. a. Figure 10 shows the market for grain in an exporting country. The world price is PW.
 Chapter 9/Application: International Trade ™ 177

Figure 10

b. An export tax will reduce the effective world price received by the exporting nation.

c. An export tax will increase domestic consumer surplus, decrease domestic producer
surplus, and increase government revenue.

d. Total surplus will fall because the decline in producer surplus is less than the sum of the
changes in consumer surplus and government revenue. Thus, there is a deadweight loss
as a result of the tax.

10. a. This statement is true. For a given world price that is lower than the domestic price,
quantity demanded will rise more when demand is elastic. Therefore, the rise in
consumer surplus will be greater when demand is elastic.

b. This statement is true. There would be no gain from trade if demand is perfectly
inelastic.

c. This statement is false. Even though quantity demanded does not rise when trade is
allowed, consumer surplus rises, because consumers are paying a lower price.

11. a. Figure 11 shows the market for jelly beans in Kawmin if trade is not allowed. The
market equilibrium price is $4 and the equilibrium quantity is 4. Consumer surplus is $8,
producer surplus is $8, and total surplus is $16.
178 ™ Chapter 9/Application: International Trade

Figure 11

b. Since the world price is $1, kawmin will become an importer of jelly beans. Figure 12
shows that the domestic quantity supplied will be 1, quantity demanded will be 7, and 6
bags will be imported. Consumer surplus is $24.50, producer surplus is $0.50, so total
surplus is $25.

Figure 12

c. The tariff raises the world price to $2. This reduces domestic consumption to 6 bags and
raises domestic production to 2 bags. Imports fall to 4 bags (see Figure 12). Consumer
surplus is now 418, producer surplus is $2, government revenue is $4, and total surplus
is $24.
 Chapter 9/Application: International Trade ™ 179

d. When trade was opened, total surplus increases from $16 to $25. The deadweight loss
of the tariff is $1 ($25 - $24).

12. a. When a technological advance lowers the world price of televisions, the effect on the
United States, an importer of televisions, is shown in Figure 13. Initially the world price
of televisions is P1, consumer surplus is A + B, producer surplus is C + G, total surplus is
A + B + C + G, and the amount of imports is shown as “Imports1”. After the
improvement in technology, the world price of televisions declines to P2 (which is P1 –
100), consumer surplus increases by D + E + F, producer surplus declines by C, total
surplus rises by D + E + F, and the amount of imports rises to “Imports2”.

Price of
Televisions
S

B
P1
C E
P1 – 100 = P2 D F
D
Import1

400 1,000 Quantity of

200 1,200 Televisions
(thousands)
Import2

Figure 13

P1 P2 CHANGE
Consumer Surplus A+B A+B+C+D+E+F C+D+E+F
Producer Surplus C+G G –C
Total Surplus A+B+C+G A+B+C+D+E+F+G D+E+F

b. The areas are calculated as follows: Area C = 200,000($100) + (0.5)(200,000)($100)

= $30 million. Area D = (0.5)(200,000)($100) = $10 million. Area E = (600,000)($100)
= $60 million. Area F = (0.5)(200,000)($100) = $10 million.

Therefore, the change in consumer surplus is $110 million. The change in producer
surplus is -$30 million. Total surplus rises by $80 million.

c. If the government places a $100 tariff on imported televisions, consumer and producer
surplus would return to their initial values. That is, consumer surplus would fall by areas
C + D + E + F (a decline of $110 million). Producer surplus would rise by $30 million.
The government would gain tariff revenue equal to ($100)(600,000) = $60 million. The
deadweight loss from the tariff would be areas D and F (a value of $20 million). This is
not a good policy from the standpoint of U.S. welfare because total surplus is reduced
180 ™ Chapter 9/Application: International Trade

after the tariff is introduced. However, domestic producers will be happier as they benefit
from the tariff.

d. It makes no difference why the world price dropped in terms of our analysis. The drop in
the world price benefits domestic consumers more than it harms domestic producers and
total welfare improves.

13. An export subsidy increases the price of steel exports received by producers by the amount
of the subsidy, s, as shown in Figure 14. The figure shows the world price, PW, before the
subsidy is put in place. At that price, domestic consumers buy quantity Q1D of steel,
producers supply Q1S units, and the country exports the quantity Q1S – Q1D. With the subsidy
put in place, suppliers get a total price per unit of PW + s, because they receive the world
price for their exports PW, and the government pays them the subsidy of s. However, note
that domestic consumers can still buy steel at the world price, PW, by importing it. Domestic
firms do not want to sell steel to domestic customers, because they do not get the subsidy
for doing so. So domestic companies will sell all the steel they produce abroad, in total
quantity Q2S. Domestic consumers continue to buy quantity Q1D. The country imports steel in
quantity Q1D and exports the quantity Q2S, so net exports of steel are the quantity Q2S – Q1D.
The end result is that the domestic price of steel is unchanged, the quantity of steel
produced increases, the quantity of steel consumed is unchanged, and the quantity of steel
exported increases. As the following table shows, consumer surplus is unaffected, producer
surplus rises, government revenue declines, and total surplus declines.

Thus, it is not a good policy from an economic standpoint because there is a decline in total
surplus.

Figure 14

Without Subsidy With Subsidy CHANGE

Consumer Surplus A+B A+B 0
Producer Surplus E+F+G B+C+E+F+G +(B + C)
Government Revenue 0 –(B + C + D) –(B + C + D)
Total Surplus A+B+E+F+G A+B–D+E+F+G –D