EE4110 Optical Communication System Design - OBTL
EE4110 Optical Communication System Design - OBTL
Course Aims
This course is intended to introduce to you an overview of optical fibre communication devices and
systems, as well as hands-on experience of using professional tools for the design of optical fibre
communications systems.
Course Content
Design of fibre optic communication systems involving issues such as light propagation, fibre
characteristics and classification, fibre cables, connectors and splices, optical transmitters and receivers,
optical amplifier and filter, optical coupler and wavelength converter, non-linear effects in WDM
systems, and system design methodology are covered.
Course Outline
This design course aims to provide an overview of the principles and the potential of optical fibre
communication systems and an understanding of the physical principles underlying the characteristics of
component parts of the system. An engineering design approach is maintained throughout the course.
After completion of this class, you should be able to understand manufacturer's data sheets, and design
elementary fibre optic communication systems. The topics covered include light propagation through
optical fibres, fibre characteristics and classification, fibre cables, connectors and splices, measurement
of fibre parameters, light sources (LED and ILD) and optical transmitters, PIN/APD optical receivers,
optical amplifier and filter (including optical multiplexer, demultiplexer and OADM), optical coupler and
wavelength convert, non-linear effects in WDM systems, and system design methodology. Case studies
are included to illustrate the design of fibre optic communication systems. This course ends with two
1
design assignments.
Assessment (includes both continuous and summative assessment)
Related
Course
Programme LO or Team/ Assessment
Component LO Weighting
Graduate Individual rubrics
Tested
Attributes
1. Continuous Assessment
1,2,3 EAB SLO* a, b, g 20% Individual
1 (CA1): Quiz
2. Continuous Assessment
1,2,3 EAB SLO* a, b, g 20% Individual
2 (CA2): Assignment
3. Continuous Assessment
EAB SLO* a, b, c, d,
3 (CA3): Case Study 1 1,2,3,4 30% Individual
j^
Formal Report
4. Continuous Assessment
EAB SLO* a, b, c, d,
4 (CA4): Case Study 2 1,2,3,4 15% Individual
j^
Lab Assessment
5. Continuous Assessment
EAB SLO* a, b, c, d,
5 (CA5): Case Study 3 1,2,3,4 15% Individual
j^
Lab Assessment
Total 100%
* Please refer to Appendix 5 on the EAB accreditation SLO
Mapping of Course SLOs to EAB Graduate Attributes (new requirement to update School database)
2. Determine how to use active and passive optical devices in optical fibre
EAB SLO* a, b, c
communication systems
EAB SLO* a, b, c,
3. Identify the performance issues of the most important relevant devices.
g, j^
2
EAB SLO* a, b, c,
4. Design and implement fibre optic communication systems such as an elementary d, g, j^
WDM optical fibre system.
Legend: Fully consistent (contributes to more than 75% of Student Learning Outcomes)
◐ Partially consistent (contributes to about 50% of Student Learning Outcomes)
Weakly consistent (contributes to about 25% of Student Learning Outcomes)
Blank Not related to Student Learning Outcomes
^
Inclusion of EAB SLO j (represented by ) is recommended by TLPD as technical report is involved.
Formative feedback
The results of close book quiz and assignment will be available for student to check in NTULearn grade
centre. The solutions will be discussed during the session and common errors made by the students
will be pointed out. In addition, the key case study design concepts will be discussed during smaller
group discussion. Student will be given ample opportunities to ask questions and clear their doubts
during interactive sessions. This will provide a thorough feedback to the students on their performance
in the course.
Approach How does this approach support students in achieving the learning outcomes?
3
REFERENCES
1. Hecht Jeff, Understanding Fiber Optics, 5th Edition, Pearson/Prentice-Hall, 2006. (TA1800.H447
2006)
2. Powers John P, An Introduction to Fiber Optic Systems, 2nd Edition, Irwin, 1999. (TA1800.P888
1999)
3. Palais Joseph C, Fiber Optic Communications, 5th Edition, Pearson/Prentice-Hall, 2005.
(TK5103.59.P154 2005)
4. Ramswami Rajiv and Sivarajan Kumar N, Optical Networks: A Practical Perspective, 3rd Edition,
Morgan Kaufmann 2008.
Academic Integrity
Good academic work depends on honesty and ethical behaviour. The quality of your work as a student
relies on adhering to the principles of academic integrity and to the NTU Honour Code, a set of values
shared by the whole university community. Truth, Trust and Justice are at the core of NTU’s shared
values.
As a student, it is important that you recognize your responsibilities in understanding and applying the
principles of academic integrity in all the work you do at NTU. Not knowing what is involved in
maintaining academic integrity does not excuse academic dishonesty. You need to actively equip
yourself with strategies to avoid all forms of academic dishonesty, including plagiarism, academic fraud,
collusion and cheating. If you are uncertain of the definitions of any of these terms, you should go to
4
the academic integrity website for more information. Consult your instructor(s) if you need any
clarification about the requirements of academic integrity in the course.
Course Instructors
5
amplifier), signal regeneration.
0% F Absent
30% F Poor – Little actual achievement, Limited understanding, far below expectation
80% A Excellent – Highly competent work, with achievement high above expectation
Criteria Standards
Method of Using methods that are Able to identify relevant Applying methods and
Approach irrelevant or do not apply methods that help solve theorems that are both
(LO 1 – 3) to the given problem. the problem but unable to relevant and efficiently to
arrive at the complete/ solve the entire problem.
Applying theorems whose
final solution.
conditions are not
satisfied.
Validity of The student’s reasoning is The student’s reasoning is The student’s reasoning is
Reasoning logically valid and
logically invalid. logically valid.
(LO 1 – 3) effective.
Clarity of The student’s argument is The student’s argument is The student’s argument is
Argument poorly explained or not clear, but may contain clear, precise, with no or
6
Appendix 5: The EAB (Engineering Accreditation Board) Accreditation SLOs (Student Learning
Outcomes)