MBA Sem 2-Emotional Intelligence Notes
MBA Sem 2-Emotional Intelligence Notes
1. Emotional Intelligence:-
Uncontrolled emotions and stress can also impact your mental health, making you
vulnerable to anxiety and depression. If you are unable to understand, get
comfortable with, or manage your emotions, you’ll also struggle to form strong
relationships. This in turn can leave you feeling lonely and isolated and further
exacerbate any mental health problems.
C.Your relationships.
By understanding your emotions and how to control them, you’re better able to
express how you feel and understand how others are feeling. This allows you to
communicate more effectively and forge stronger relationships, both at work and
in your personal life.
Being in tune with your emotions serves a social purpose, connecting you to other
people and the world around you. Social intelligence enables you to recognize
friend from foe, measure another person’s interest in you, reduce stress, balance
your nervous system through social communication, and feel loved and happy.
Cognitive empathy
Cognitive empathy: the capacity to understand another's perspective or mental
state. The terms cognitive empathy and theory of mind or mentalizing are often
used synonymously, but due to a lack of studies comparing theory of mind with
types of empathy, it is unclear whether these are equivalent.
Although science has not yet agreed upon a precise definition of these constructs,
there is consensus about this distinction. Affective and cognitive empathy are also
independent from one another; someone who strongly empathizes emotionally is
not necessarily good in understanding another's perspective.
Cognitive empathy can be subdivided into the following scales:
Perspective-taking: the tendency to spontaneously adopt others'
psychological perspectives.
Fantasy: the tendency to identify with fictional characters.
Tactical (or "strategic") empathy: the deliberate use of perspective-taking
to achieve certain desired ends.
Somatic
Somatic empathy is a physical reaction, probably based on mirror
neuron responses, in the somatic nervous system.
Personality is something that we informally assess and describe every day. When
we talk about ourselves and others, we frequently refer to different characteristics
of an individual's personality.
Psychologists do much the same thing when they assess personality but on a much
more systematic and scientific level.
The greatest benefit of self-report inventories is that they can be standardized and
use established norms. Self-inventories are also relatively easy to administer and
have much higher reliability and validity than projective tests.
Projective tests are most often used in psychotherapy settings and allow therapists
to quickly gather a great deal of information about a client.
Projective tests are most often used in psychotherapy settings and allow therapists to quickly gather a
great deal of information about a client.
7. Personality Assessment
Personality is the field within psychology that studies the thoughts, feelings,
behaviors, goals, and interests of normal individuals. It therefore covers a very
wide range of important psychological characteristics. Moreover, different
theoretical models have generated very different strategies for measuring these
characteristics. For example, humanistically oriented models argue that people
have clear, well-defined goals and are actively striving to achieve them
(McGregor, McAdams, & Little, 2006). It, therefore, makes sense to ask them
directly about themselves and their goals. In contrast, psychodynamically oriented
theories propose that people lack insight into their feelings and motives, such that
their behavior is influenced by processes that operate outside of their awareness
(e.g., McClelland, Koestner, & Weinberger, 1989; Meyer & Kurtz, 2006). Given
that people are unaware of these processes, it does not make sense to ask directly
about them. One, therefore, needs to adopt an entirely different approach to
identify these nonconscious factors. Not surprisingly, researchers have adopted a
wide range of approaches to measure important personality characteristics. The
most widely used strategies will be summarized in the following sections.
Objective Tests
Definition
Objective tests (Loevinger, 1957; Meyer & Kurtz, 2006) represent the most
familiar and widely used approach to assessing personality. Objective tests involve
administering a standard set of items, each of which is answered using a limited set
of response options (e.g., true or false; strongly disagree, slightly disagree, slightly
agree, strongly agree). Responses to these items then are scored in a standardized,
predetermined way. For example, self-ratings on items assessing talkativeness,
assertiveness, sociability, adventurousness, and energy can be summed up to create
an overall score on the personality trait of extraversion.
Self-report measures
Objective personality tests can be further subdivided into two basic types. The first
type—which easily is the most widely used in modern personality research—asks
people to describe themselves. This approach offers two key advantages. First,
self-raters have access to an unparalleled wealth of information: After all, who
knows more about you than you yourself? In particular, self-raters have direct
access to their own thoughts, feelings, and motives, which may not be readily
available to others (Oh, Wang, & Mount, 2011; Watson, Hubbard, & Weise, 2000).
Second, asking people to describe themselves is the simplest, easiest, and most
cost-effective approach to assessing personality. Countless studies, for instance,
have involved administering self-report measures to college students, who are
provided some relatively simple incentive (e.g., extra course credit) to participate.
Informant ratings
Another approach is to ask someone who knows a person well to describe his or
her personality characteristics. In the case of children or adolescents, the informant
8. Counselling Skills
Counsellors use counselling skills to help them better understand and listen
to clients.Through active listening, rapport is built, trust forms and the
speaker feels heard and understood by the counsellor or listener.
active listening
being aware of nonverbal communication
building rapport
1. Attending
Attending in counselling means being in the company of someone else and giving
that person your full attention, to what they are saying or doing, valuing them as
worthy individuals.
2. Silence
Silence in counselling gives the client control of the content, pace and objectives.
This includes the counsellor listening to silences as well as words, sitting with
them and recognising that the silences may facilitate the counselling process.
6. Building Rapport
Building rapport with clients in counselling is important, whatever model of
counselling the counsellor is working with.
Rapport means a sense of having a connection with the person.
7. Summarising
Summaries in counselling are longer paraphrases. They condense or crystallise
the essence of what the client is saying and feeling.
The summary 'sums up' the main themes that are emerging.
8. Immediacy
Using immediacy means that the therapist reveals how they themselves are feeling
in response to the client.
According to Feltham and Dryden (1993: 88), immediacy is ‘the key skill of
focusing attention on the here and now relationship of counsellor and client with
helpful timing, in order to challenge defensiveness and/or heighten awareness’.
9. Physiological Testing:-
It is important that people who are equal on the measured construct also have an
equal probability of answering the test items accurately . For example, an item on a
mathematics test could be "In a soccer match two players get a red card; how many
players are left in the end?"; however, this item also requires knowledge of soccer
to be answered correctly, not just mathematical ability. Group membership can
also influence the chance of correctly answering items (differential item
functioning). Often tests are constructed for a specific population, and this should
be taken into account when administering tests. If a test is invariant to some group
difference (e.g. gender) in one population (e.g. England) it does not automatically
mean that it is also invariant in another population (e.g. Japan).