Beam Dynamics Fundamentals
Beam Dynamics Fundamentals
Christoph Steier
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
C. Steier, Beam-based Diagnostics, USPAS 2019, 2019/1/21-25
Lecture Outline
• Motivation
• Transverse Beam Dynamics
– History (cyclotron, synchrotron, …)
– Hill’s Equation, Twiss Functions (Beta-Function, …)
– Tune, Resonances, Emittance
– Matrix Formalism
• Basis for simulation codes
• Longitudinal Dynamics
– Time of Flight, Synchrotron Oscillations
• Radiation
– Damping/Excitation, Equilibrium Emittances
http://www2.als.lbl.gov/als_physics/csteier/uspas19/
r
Ñ×E = Coulomb s or Gauss law for electricity
e0
dB
Ñ´ E = - Faraday s law 1831-1879
dt
Time variable
magnetic fields
Ñ× B = 0 Gauss law for magnetism
are always
associated with
dE electric fields
Ñ ´ B = µ 0 J + µ 0e 0 Ampere s law
(and vice versa)
dt
C. Steier, Beam-based Diagnostics, USPAS 2019, 2019/1/21-25 6
Lorentz Equation
F = q(E + v ´ B )
W = ò F × dl = q ò E × dl + q ò (v ´ B )× dl
B fields can change the trajectory of a particle
But cannot do work and thus change its energy
1853-1928
F = qE W = q ò E × dl
• Cyclotron condition:
Lawrence’s cyclotrons
• Only works for non-relativistic particles were foundation of LBNL
dipoles
s
ol e
RF
ru p
ca
ad
vity
qu
• Lorentz Force
F = ma = e( E + v ´ B ),
m is the relativistic mass of the particle,
e is the charge of the particle,
v is the velocity of the particle,
a is the acceleration of the particle,
E is the electric field and,
B is the magnetic field.
• Typically acceleration with electrical fields, guidance
with magnetic ones
C. Steier, Beam-based Diagnostics, USPAS 2019, 2019/1/21-25
12
Typical Magnet Types
There are several magnet types that are used
in storage rings:
Dipoles à used for guiding
Bx = 0
By = Bo
Quadrupoles à used for focussing
Bx = Ky
By = -Kx
Sextupoles à used for chromatic correction
Bx = 2Sxy
By = S(x2 – y2)
Dipoles
Sextupoles
Quadrupoles
14
C. Steier, Beam-based Diagnostics, USPAS 2019, 2019/1/21-25
Differential Equation vs. Matrix Formalism
There are two approaches to describe the motion of
particles in a storage ring
I will begin with the first way (as a brief recap) but spend
most of the time with the second approach
y x
s
y x
s
• Note that
S1 S2 S3 …S n-1
from s0 to s1
S0 Sn
from s0 to s2
from s0 to s3
from s0 to sn
C. Steier, Beam-based Diagnostics, USPAS 2019, 2019/1/21-25
30
Examples of transfer matrices
Drift of length L
æ 1 Lö
Rdrift =ç ÷
è 0 1 ø
The matrix for a focusing quadrupole of gradient k = (¶B / ¶x ) /( B r )
and of length l q
æ cos f sinf / k ö
RQuad =ç ÷
ç - k sinf cos f ÷ø
è
Closed orbit
dx 'i
( x 'i - x 'i ,co ) +...
R21 R22
The map can be calculated by taking orbits that have a
slight deviation from the closed orbit and tracking them
around the ring.
Closed orbit
e geometric,rms = x¢ - xx¢
2 2 2
x
• Using the twiss functions and the emittance, the beam envelopes
(size, divergence, …) can be calculated at any place around the ring
æ b -a ö
å beam = e x ç -a
x
÷
è g ø
å å
x x T
beam , f
= R x , i - f beam ,i
R R are the linear
x ,i - f transfer maps
æ xö æ C S Dx ö æ x ö
DE/E > 0 ç ÷ ç ' ÷ç ÷
ç x '÷ = ç C ' S ' D x ÷ç x '÷
çd ÷ ç 0 0 ÷ç d ÷
è øf è 1 ø è øi
C. Steier, Beam-based Diagnostics, USPAS 2019, 2019/1/21-25
39
Off energy: Chromatic Aberration
d2x
2
= −k(s)x
ds
y x
s
ALS RF cavity
C. Steier, Beam-based Diagnostics, USPAS 2019, 2019/1/21-25
45
Dependence on revolution time on energy
– momentum compaction
Again, assume that the energy is fixed à no cavity or damping
• Find the closed orbit for a particle with slightly different momentum
• Dispersion is the difference in closed orbit between them normalized by
the relative momentum difference
• Momentum compaction factor relates the change in total closed orbit
length to the momentum difference
• From geometry one can find that it is the integral of the
dispersion over the bending radius
Dp/p = 0
Or with Damping:
Dispersion can
be minimized in
lattice design
Dispersion Function
Dispersion Function
1/2 Insertion Straight 1/2 Insertion Straight 1/2 Insertion Straight 1/2 Insertion Straight
Achromat Achromat
Insertion Symmetry Point Insertion Symmetry Point
æ1 L 0 0ö æ1 0 0 0ö æ x( s) ö
ç ÷ ç1 ÷ ç ÷
ç0 1 0 0÷ çf 1 0 0÷ ç x' ( s) ÷
ç0 ç0 0÷ ç y( s) ÷
0 1 L÷ ç
0 1
÷ ç ÷
ç ÷ ç0 0 - 1f 1 ÷ø ç y' ( s) ÷
ç0 0 0 1 ÷ø è è ø
è
Drift: Thin lens:
C. Steier, Beam-based Diagnostics, USPAS 2019, 2019/1/21-25
59
Beam Ellipse
In an linear uncoupled machine the turn-by-turn positions and
angles of the particle motion will lie on an ellipse
e = g x 2 + 2a xx ' + b x ' 2
xb ( s ) = e b ( s ) cos(j ( s) + j 0 )
a e
xb' ( s ) = - e cos(j ( s) + j 0 ) - sin(j ( s) + j 0 )
b ( s) b ( s)
• At a given time t:
• But:
2 g
4
2
PSR = a !c 2
3 r
4p g4
U0 = a !c 2
3 r
3 g3
uc = !wc = !c
2 r
The number of photons emitted is
4 g
N = ac
9 r
With a statistical uncertainty of N
è ø e 0