See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/340309879

Local Area Network Design proposal

Technical Report · March 2017

CITATIONS READS

0 11,826

1 author:

Konstantinos Bazoukis
University of Derby
7 PUBLICATIONS   0 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Konstantinos Bazoukis on 31 March 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

4CC523 - NETWORKING
FUNDAMENTALS
Local Area Network Design

Network design proposal for Derwent College

Konstantinos Bazoukis
[email protected]
 1. Introduction and Requirements of the Report
This report aims to cover a network installation for a new three-floor building at Derwent
College - School of Computing. The main plan involves a LAN design that will be able to
endure for the next five to seven years but will also be able to provide the means for any future
upgrades.
The hardware of the network will consist of a number of dedicated servers and will also provide
directory services and database services. The LAN will be resilient and secure with the ability
to handle high traffic loads and support voice and video communications. Moreover, it will be
cost effective and upgradable to cater for more users.
The school consists of 4 departments: The staff, general and administrative, where each
member of both departments will have their own computer and connection to a printer and the
servers, but the admin staff will be using a shared printer; The technicians, where all of its
members will have their own computer and access to all networks but also access to a large
and secure storeroom that exist in their area; And 6 Computing Laboratories.
Each department will be logically separated with the use of different subnets that will also
provide the necessary isolation so that some departments will have limited access to others.
A wireless network will also be available to provide access to the Internet to anyone from
anywhere within the campus but will separate access from guests to lecturers and students
by using proper security.
Remaining Sections

• Proposed Design
1. Cabling and connectivity
2. Logical Topology
3. Device selection and placement
• IP Addressing
1. IP addressing scheme
2. Subnetting benefits
3. IP address LAN allocation
• Summary
• References

2. Proposed Design
For the current plan, a two-tier collapsed core hierarchical network model is proposed
because it offers the same benefits as a three-tier design such as modularity, which
facilitates scalability, isolation through subnetting, which improves resiliency and reduced
cost, as it provides the functions of the core and distribution layer in single device.

2.1 Cabling and connectivity

The whole network utilizes wired connectivity and offers restricted wireless connectivity for
those who want to bring their own devices. While wireless connectivity is easier to setup,
manage and maintain, it is not suggested in the enterprise area due to the many
disadvantages that comes with it, such as high security risks and much slower speeds from
wired ones due to wireless signals being affected from walls, floors or other electronics(Evans
2013).
In order to keep an organized and well-planned cabling system at the main distribution core,
the network follows a structural cabling standard such as the EIA/TIA-568, where it suggests
colored cables with appropriate labeling and patch panels for easy management. The cables
travel from rack to rack via overhead cable pathways and with the use of vertical and horizontal
cable managers at the sides of the racks end up to their corresponding device while keeping
an organized cabling environment. This structured approach offers a reliable, scalable and
manageable cabling infrastructure (Brocade, 2007).
The types of cables for the network are chosen based on the types of the devices that will be
used for, as well as the layer that those devices exist in the hierarchical model. At the core
layer, the cable of choice is the CAT6 STP straight-through that is made of copper, is shielded
to protect from various interferences and supports 10GBase gigabit speeds within distances
of 55 meters. For intermediary devices and hosts the cable of choice is the CAT5e UTP
crossover which is widely used with fast ethernet connections but it also supports 1gigabit
connections. Other alternatives are the CAT7 copper cable that supports 10GBase
connections up to 100 meters and fiber optic cable that support various standards with
different modes based on its wavelength, and distances up 40 kilometers. However, for the
current plan these alternatives are cost-inefficient and redundant since that the chosen cables
can already provide the required resiliency and scalability (Partsenidis, 2016).
The table below shows the categories of cables and the differences between them.

CABLE DATA RATE DISTANCE APPLICATION

Fast Ethernet
CAT5e Up to 1Gbps 100 meters (Hosts, Intermediary
devices)

10Gigabit Ethernet
CAT6 Up to 10Gbps 55 meters Backbone - medium-
sized campuses

10Gigabit Ethernet
CAT7 Up to 10Gbps 100 meters Backbone -large-
sized campuses

10Gigabit Ethernet
40 kilometers (single
Fiber Optic Up to 10Gbps Large enterprises –
mode)
industrial

2.2 Logical Topology

 Figure 1 Logical topology Diagram
Figure 1 shows the IP addressing of the floor switches and the vlans that belong to each
one of these.
2.2.1 Physical Topology

Figure 1.1 Physical topology Diagram

Figure 1.1 shows the main concept of the physical topology to be implemented throughout
the network.
2.2.2 Physical Topology - Firewalls

Figure 1.2 - Firewalls

Figure 1.2 shows the placement of firewalls for the servers as well as for accessing the
Internet.

2.3 Device selection and placement

The devices are chosen based on the hierarchical model that is going to be implemented. At
the core, a router operates as the default gateway and route the traffic in and outside of the
network. At this point two firewalls control ingoing and outgoing traffic for security purposes
as depicted in figure 1.2. Next, two, fixed configuration, fully managed, Layer 3 switches with
48 ports and stackable functionality, operate as backbone. Both switches and firewalls, are
coupled for redundancy. The backbone of the network is placed at the large storeroom that
exists in the technician’s area depicted on figure 2 for security and protection reasons.
The chosen switches are the most optimal for this plan because they offer full configuration
features such as, protection over DDNS attacks, Quality of Service and the ability to create
Virtual LANs(vlans) but they are also stackable, which they could be a number of switches
operating as one. Alternative options were the modular switches, which offer the best
flexibility but are the most expensive, standalone, which are configured individually, or
unmanaged, which are not offering any configuration (Diedricks, 2014).
Next on the hierarchy are 8 L2 switches with 48 ports, that are placed on each floor based
on the number of end devices, as well as 6 wireless access points, 2 for each floor.
Specifically, 2 switches are placed on the technician’s room, one for the servers and the
other one for providing connection to all the other hosts and devices on the floor, including
the two access points. Another one is used on the second floor at the large staff room as
depicted in figure 3, that provides connection to all the hosts at this floor and the other two
access points and the remaining 5 switches are placed on the third floor in a circular
placement starting from the networks to the cyber security lab as depicted in figure 4 in order
to connect all the hosts and devices as well as the remaining 2 access points.
The number of L2 switches is chosen and placed in such way because of the
implementation of vlans which reduces the number of required switches compared to regular
subnetting, as it allows each port to operate as a separate subnet. The number of 6 access
points is chosen for increased availability at any place of the campus and they are placed on
each floor at high positions at the aisles at the left and the right side of the stairs. The access
points are configured with unique SSIDs and WPA2 security measurements so that every
authorized person will be able to login to securely to their corresponding depart but guests
will only have limited traffic-controlled access to the Internet.
The remaining devices in the topology are: the network printers in each department, one for
each lab, one for the technicians and one shared for the admin staff. The IP phones that
provide VoIP and exist at the staff’s rooms, both admin and general, and the technician’s
departments. Lastly, there are the servers at the technician’s area which are four, a HTTP, a
MAIL, a DHCP & DNS, and a LDAP for directory services and a firewall to secure the
servers.
Figure 2 Physical topology diagram for first floor
Figure 3 Physical topology diagram for second floor
Figure 4 Physical topology diagram for third floor
 3. IP Addressing
3.1 IP addressing scheme
The given IP address 172.16.0.0 with subnet mask 255.255.240.0 provides a total of 16
subnets with 4094 available hosts for each subnet. However, the number of these hosts is
very large and redundant. In order to minimize the number of hosts the subnet mask is
moved 4 bits and thus giving the IP 172.16.0.0 with subnet mask 255.255.255.0. With this
subnet mask a total of 16 subnets is available but the number of hosts is reduced to 254 per
subnet. At the table below the IP addressing of all the departments is depicted.
Department Number Network Broadcast First Last Subnet mask
of Address address Usable
Usable
hosts Address
Address

Guest 200 172.16.6.0 172.16.6.255 172.16.6.1 172.16.6.254 255.255.255.0

wireless
access

Networks 200 172.16.9.0 172.16.9.255 172.16.9.1 172.16.9.254 255.255.255.0

labs

General 200 172.16.7.0 172.16.7.255 172.16.7.1 172.16.7.254 255.255.255.0

staff offices
Digital 180 172.16.13.0 172.16.13.255 172.16.13.1 172.16.13.254 255.255.255.0
forensics
lab

Cyber 220 172.16.12.0 172.16.12.255 172.16.12.1 172.16.12.254 255.255.255.0

security lab
Admin 150 172.16.8.0 172.16.8.255 172.16.8.1 172.16.8.254 255.255.255.0

Computer 170 172.16.11.0 172.16.11.255 172.16.11.1 172.16.11.254 255.255.255.0

games lab
Computer 190 172.16.10.0 172.16.10.255 172.16.10.1 172.16.10.254 255.255.255.0
science lab
Technicians 130 172.16.5.0 172.16.5.255 172.16.5.1 172.16.5.254 255.255.255.0

3.2 Subnetting benefits

By moving the bits on the given IP, the number of available hosts is reduced and the number
of broadcast packets that will be sent. This provides network performance and speed
because it limits the traffic to a single subnet but also increases security. Even more
flexibility is provided by using vlans because compared to basic subnetting implementation,
the number of the switches needed is limited to individual ports. This implementation
increases security even more but also keeps costs lower because the number of switches is
reduced.

3.3 IP address LAN allocation

 In the current IP allocation scheme, all the devices belong to separate vlans. The first one
begins with the IP address 172.16.1.0 which is assigned dynamically via DHCP servers to
the L2 floor switches and each port of these switches has a separate vlan from numbers 5
and up. The vlans 2-4 with the IPs 172.16.2.0 – 172.16.4.0 are assigned to the voIP, servers
and printers respectively as depicted in figure 1. All the vlans are configured accordingly with
the right ports so that they can get IPs from the DHCP server and have as first usable IP for
hosts the 172.16.x.11. The reason for this configuration is to allow each vlan in any floor
switch to assign an IP from 2 to 10 for accessing the servers, the printers and voIP services
and the first IP 172.16.x.1 in each vlan, as the default gateway.

4. Summary
The proposed design analyzed in this report provides the necessary means to cover for the
requirements of the campus. The collapsed core design, combined with the appropriate
structural cabling and connectivity, provides a Gigabit network that is cost-effective and
resilient for the next five to seven years but also easily upgradable with the use of stackable
L3 switches. Moreover, the LAN is secure logically, as a combination of firewalls, vlans and
secure wireless access points is implemented but also physically with the backbone installed
in a secured area. Finally, with the chosen IP addressing scheme and the wireless
availability on each floor, scalability and availability is also ensured.

5. References

Brocade (2007). ‘Best Practices Guide: Cabling the Data Center’, Brocade.com [Online]. Available
from: https://www.brocade.com/content/dam/common/documents/content-types/product-design-
guide/cabling-best-practices-ga-bp-036-02.pdf [Accessed: 7 APR 2017].

Diedricks, I. (2014). ‘Understanding the different types of Ethernet Switches’, blogs.cisco.com

[Online]. Available from: http://blogs.cisco.com/smallbusiness/understanding-the-different-types-
of-ethernet-switches [Accessed: 7 APR 2017].

Evans, S. (2013). ‘Wired vs wireless in the enterprise’, computerweekly.com [Online]. Available from:
http://www.computerweekly.com/feature/Wired-vs-wireless-in-the-enterprise [Accessed: 7 APR
2017].

Partsenidis, C. (2016). ‘Essential network cabling tips for your infrastructure’,

searchnetworking.techtarget.com [Online]. Available from:
http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/tutorial/Ten-cabling-tips-in-10-minutes [Accessed: 7 APR
2017].

View publication stats