B/ Reading I/ Open Cloze Tests 1/fill in Each Blank in The Following Passage With A Suitable Word
B/ Reading I/ Open Cloze Tests 1/fill in Each Blank in The Following Passage With A Suitable Word
Questions 1-6
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 3?
In boxes 1-6 on your answer sheet, write
TRUE if the statement is true
FALSE if the statement is false
NOT GIVEN if the information is not given in the passage
1 The title of the debate is not unbiased. T
2 All the scientists invited to the debate were from the field of medicine. NG
3 The message those scientists who conducted the survey were sending was people
shouldn’t take risks. F
4 All the 40 listed technologies are riskier than other technologies. NG
5 It was worth taking the risks to invent antibiotics. T
6 All the other inventions on the list were also judged by the precautionary principle. NG
Questions 7-13
Complete the following summary of the paragraphs of Reading Passage
Using NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the Reading Passage for each answer.
Write your answers in boxes 7-13 on your answer sheet.
When applying the precautionary principle to decide whether to invent a new technology,
people should also the consideration of the 7……risk……………………., along with the
usual consideration of 8……advantages …………………….. For example, though risky and
dangerous enough, people still enjoy 9…skiing……………………….. for the excitement it
provides. On the other hand, experts believe that future population desperately needs 10……
…………………… in spite of their undefined risks. However, the researchers conducted so
far have not been directed towards increasing the yield of 11…wheat and
rice………………………, but to reduce the cost of 12……
production…………………………. and to bring more profit out of it. In the end, such selfish
use of the precautionary principle for business and political gain has often led people
to 13……doubt …………………….. science for they believe scientists are not to be trusted.
Question 14
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
14 What is the main theme of the passage?
A people have the right to doubt science and technologies
B the precautionary principle could have prevented the development of science and
technology
C there are not enough people who truly understand the precautionary principle
D the precautionary principle bids us take risks at all costs
1naked 2method 3which 4coming 5and 6until 7which 8system 9prove 10technological
11broke 12much 13allow 14support 15 space
III/ CAE, CPE READING
You are going to read an extract from an article about traffic congestion. For questions
1 — 6, choose the answer (A, B, C or D) which you think fits best according to the text.
Congestion is the bane of modern life, yet no more than we deserve. It is the result of our
commodity-obsessed stupidity. In Joel Schumacher's 1992 film falling Down, a demented
Michael Douglas finally cracks under the stresses of modern American life — in a traffic
jam. The heat, the fumes, the flies and the sweat all accentuate his sense of suffocation. He
has to get away, breathe again, decongest his tubes, empty his barrels. Traffic jams feature,
too, in Jean Luc Godard's critique of consumerism run wild, Weekend (1968). Following one
gruesome pile-up, a hysterical woman runs back to the carnage, not to help the dying, but to
rescue her Hermes handbag.
We see congestion as an urban disease; since the 19th century, city routes have been
described as arteries. Now, the new mayor thinks he has found the cure, with his proposals
for road charges in London. But what if the mayor's 'diagnosis is wrong? Is it possible that
traffic congestion is not a symptom of urban disease, even less a sign of social meltdown, but
rather a mark of robust health? Just as physicians no longer advocate bleeding, nor try to
stimulate the flow of the humours, perhaps traffic congestion is another aspect of circulation
that is best left alone. Before dismissing the idea, just try thinking of a decent world city that
is not regularly gripped by gridlock.
Congestion is slow-moving traffic. Nothing more complicated than that, although it is worth
noting the discriminatory definition of 'traffic', which is generally applied only to motor
traffic (20 cars waiting at traffic lights indicate traffic congestion, whereas 20 pedestrians
waiting to cross the same road do not). If we don't have congestion, then, we have two
alternatives: either fast-moving motor traffic or no motor traffic. Is either situation actually
any better than congestion?
Speeding up urban traffic dominated the minds of planners and city administrators throughout
the 20th century. The visions of Le Corbusier and the brutal realities of Robert Moses's New
York freeways are only the two most widely known cases. ''A city made for speed is made for
success," wrote Le Corbusier. The connection between the two notions still appears logical in
many circles — a successful economy or business is one in which money circulates, and
profits accrue, speedily.
But money is an abstract and increasingly amorphous concept. Cars are not. Allowing hard,
heavy, speeding vehicles to come into contact with fleshy mortals is a recipe for disaster.
Cutting the death toll has consistently dominated the minds of planners. Modernists such as
Le Corbusier and Moses engineered new types of urban road on which only motor vehicles
were permitted, but there are obvious limits to this approach. Not only is the cost prohibitive,
in terms of money and destruction, but there are people inside those vehicles, heading to a
place where they will want to get out, walk about, stay alive.
So, in cities around the world, planners sought ways to enable speeding motorists and
vulnerable non-motorists to coexist. It has proved a tortuous exercise, and one based on a
notion of compromise: that it must surely be possible to allow motorists to enjoy reasonable
speed while affording pedestrians a reasonable chance of survival. In this mood of give and
take, pedestrians have been contained and controlled, apparently for their own good. Walking
through many urban areas has become a pinball experience of pedestrian barriers, bollards,
street signage, constricted pavements, walk/don't walk signs, pedestrian underpasses,
overpasses, and jaywalking restrictions. Yet, in almost every city in the world, the violence
inflicted on human beings by motor vehicles still far outstrips the violence inflicted by crime.
Not much of a deal.
Then there have been the other costs associated with trying to manage the competing claims
of speed and safety, in particular those of the countless research institutions, university
departments, engineers, planners, systems analysts, etc, all apparently dedicated to finding
better means for managing motor traffic. Plus the costs of installing and operating their
solutions: the one-way systems, tidal-flow roads, urban clearways, gyratories, underpasses,
overpasses, eyes in the sky, traffic lights, parking restrictions, speed cameras, and so on. Few
of these experts would deny that somewhere in their heads was the kernel of that modernist
vision — flashing tail lights on elevated freeways — but the tabula rasa was mythical. These
were real cities and real people's lives that had to be devastated before they could be rebuilt.
Despite all this physical and mental exertion, average road journey times in London have
remained unchanged for a century.
PART 2/ You are going to read extracts from an introductory book about studying the
law. For questions 1-10, choose from the sections (A-D). The extracts may be chosen
more than once. Mark your answers on the separate answer sheet.
B Legal rules can be divided up in many different ways. The rules show differences in
purpose, in origin and form, in the consequences when they are breached, and in matters of
procedure, remedies and enforcement. One of the most fundamental divisions in law is the
division between criminal and civil law. Newcomers to the study of law tend to assume that
criminal law occupies the bulk of a lawyer's caseload and of a law student's studies. This is an
interesting by-product of the portrayal of the legal system by the media. Criminal law weighs
very lightly in terms of volume when measured against non-criminal (that is, civil) law. There
are more rules of civil law than there are of criminal law; more court cases involve breach of
the civil law than that of the criminal law.
C The term 'national law' is used to mean the internal legal rules of a particular country, in
contrast to international law which deals with the external relationships of a state with other
states. There is no world government or legislature issuing and enforcing laws to which all
nations are subject. The international legal order has no single governing body and operates
by agreement between states. This means that the creation, interpretation and enforcement of
international law lie primarily in the hands of states themselves. Its scope and effectiveness
depend on the sense of mutual benefit and obligation involved in adhering to the rules.
Disputes about the scope and interpretation of international law are rarely resolved by the use
of international courts or binding arbitration procedures of an international organisation. This
is because submission to an international court or similar process is entirely voluntary and
few states are likely to agree to this if there is a serious risk of losing their case or where
important political or national interests are at stake.
D One source of detailed information about the legal system is statistical analyses.
Information about the number of cases handled by a court shows in specific terms what a
court's workload is. Changes in these from year to year may indicate some effects of changes
in the law and practice. Statistical tests can establish that there is a relationship, a correlation,
between different things. For example, the length of a sentence for theft may correlate with
the value of the items stolen or the experience of the judge who heard the case. This means
that the sentence will be longer if, for example, more items are stolen or the judge is more
experienced. A correlation can provide evidence for a theory. Such confirmation is important;
without it we have little to establish the impact the law has, being forced to rely on individual
instances of its application and having to assume that these have general truth. Empirical
study of the operation of law may reveal areas of improvement. It can also confirm that,
measured by particular standards, the courts are working well.