Basic New Keynesian Model
Basic New Keynesian Model
Xiaohan Ma
Spring 2018
A benchmark NK model
References:
Textbook ”Monetary Policy, Inflation, and the Business Cycle” by
Jordi Gali
Lecture notes ”The Basic New Keynesian Model” by Drago Bergholt
Intertemporal preferences
(∞ )
X
E0 β t U(Ct , Nt ; Zt )
t=0
Pt Ct + Qt Bt ≤ Bt−1 + Wt Nt + Dt
R1
where Pt Ct = 0 Pt (i)t C (i)di
R1
For a given level of consumption expenditure 0 Pt (i)Ct (i)di = Xt ,
static budget constraint
Z 1
Pt (i)Ct (i)di ≤ Xt
0
solution for Pt
1
Z 1 1−
Pt = Pt (i)1− di
0
Production technique
Yt (i) = At Nt (i)1−α
Law of motion for the price level, given S(t) ∈ [0, 1] as set of firms
not reoptimizing
"Z # 1
1−
UC ,t+1 Pt
Λt,t+k = β k
UC ,t Pt+1
Ct (i) = Yt (i)
3 no bond holding Bt = 0.
4 aggregate output
Z 1 −1
−1
Yt ≡ Yt (i) di
0
it = ρ + φπ πt + φy ỹt + vt
Procedure:
1 Take logs
2 Do a first order Taylor expansion about a point (usually a steady state)
Taylor expansion of an arbitrary univariate function f (x)
f 0 (x ∗ ) f 00 (x ∗ ) f 000 (x ∗ )
f (x) = f (x ∗ )+ (x −x ∗ )+ (x −x ∗ )2 + (x −x ∗ )3 +...
1! 2! 3!
where x ∗ is any point in the domain of x
When f (x) is sufficiently smooth, or in the neighborhood of x ∗ , it can
be approximated as
f (x) ≈ f (x ∗ ) + f 0 (x ∗ )(x − x ∗ )
Recall
x̂t ≡ xt − x̄ ≡ log Xt − log X̄
Some useful equations
Xt = X̄ e x̂t ≈ X̄ (1 + x̂t )
Xt Yt ≈ X̄ Ȳ (1 + x̂t + ŷt )
f (Xt ) ≈ f (X̄ )(1 + η x̂t )
∂f (X̄ ) X̄
where η ≡ ∂ X̄ f (X̄ )
Example: products
Z = X αY β ⇒ ẑ = αx̂ + β ŷ
Example: sums
Z = αX + βY ⇒ Z̄ ẑ ≈ αX̄ x̂ + β Ȳ ŷ
pt = θpt−1 + (1 − θ)pt∗
implying
πt = pt − pt−1 = (1 − θ)(pt∗ − pt−1 )
Xiaohan Ma (TTU) The Basic New Keynesian Model Spring 2018 21 / 48
Log linearizing optimal price
Price setting
P∞ −1
Et { k=0 (θβ)k UC ,t+k Pt+k ψt+k|t Yt+k }
Pt∗ = P∞ −1
−1 Et { k=0 (θβ)k UC ,t+k Pt+k Yt+k }
Inflation
πt = pt − pt−1 = (1 − θ)(pt∗ − pt−1 )
Price chosen by firms that reoptimize in period t
(∞ )
X
p̂t∗ = (1 − θβ)Et (θβ)k ψ̂t+k|t
k=0
Step (i): reset price p̂t∗ in terms of future real marginal cost and
future prices
Therefore
α
mc ˆ t+k −
ˆ t+k|t = mc (p̂ ∗ − p̂t+k )
1−α t
So
(∞ )
X α
p̂t∗ = (1 − θβ)Et (θβ)k + mc
ˆ t+k − (p̂ ∗ − p̂t+k ) + p̂t+k
1−α t
k=0
1−α
where 0 < Θ ≡ 1−α+α ≤1
Or
p̂t∗ = (1 − θβ)[Θmc ∗
ˆ t + p̂t ] + θβEt {p̂t+1 }
Substract p̂t−1 from both sides and rearrange
πt = (1 − θ)(p̂t∗ − p̂t−1 )
Solving forward
(∞ )
X
k (1 − θ)(1 − θβ)
πt = λEt β mc
ˆ t+k , λ≡ Θ>0
θ
k=0
Recall that average markup in the economy is −mc ˆ t and the steady
state or desired markup is −mc ⇒ Inflation will be high when firms
expect average markups to be below the desired level. ⇒ Firms that
get the opportunity will choose a price above the economy’s average
level in order to realign their markup closer to the desired level
Resource constraint
Ct = Yt = At Nt1−α
Household labor supply
Wt
Ntϕ Ctσ =
Pt
Firm price setting (in symmetric equilibrium)
" α #
1 Wt Yt 1−α
Pt =
− 1 1 − α At At
Equivalently
Wt
(1 − α)At Nt−α =
− 1 Pt
Ct = At Nt1−α
and
−1
Ntϕ Ctσ = (1 − α)At Nt−α
Take logs and solve to get flexible price equilibrium values
1 −1 1−σ
nt = log (1 − α) + at
(1 − α)σ + α + ϕ (1 − α)σ + α + ϕ
and
1 −1 1+ϕ
yt = log (1 − α) + at
(1 − α)σ + α + ϕ (1 − α)σ + α + ϕ
Just plug in the formula above back into expression relating inflation
and real marginal cost
where
ỹt ≡ ŷt − ŷtn = yt − ytn
and
σ(1 − α) + α + ϕ (1 − θ)(1 − θβ)
κ≡ >0
1 + α( − 1) θ
Therefore
it = rtn + σEt {∆ỹt+1 } + Et {πt+1 }
where
ut = rˆtn − φy ŷtn − vt
n
= −ψya (φy + σ(1 − ρa ))at + (1 − ρz )zt − vt
and
σ 1 − βφπ 1
At ≡ Ω ; Bt ≡ Ω
σκ κ + β(σ + φy ) κ
1
where Ω ≡ σ+φy +κφπ
The solution is unique if and only if, AT has both eigenvalues within
the unit circle
Given non-negative (φy , φπ ), a necessary and sufficient condition is
ỹt = ψy ut π˜t = ψπ ut
at = z t = 0
and
πt = −κΛv vt
1
where Λv ≡ (1−βρv )[σ(1−ρv )+φy ]+κ(φπ −ρv ) >0
1 (1 − βρv )Λv
nt = (yt − at ) = − vt
1−α 1−α
mt = pt + yt − ηit
= pt−1 − [(1 − βρv )(1 + ησ(1 − ρv )) + (1 − ηρv )κ]Λv vt
⇒
dmt
= −[(1 − βρv )(1 + ησ(1 − ρv )) + (1 − ηρv )κ]Λv
dvt
If nominal interest rate rises, money growth falls surely
It is a sufficient condition for ”liquidity effect”
Parameter values
β = 0.99 quarterly
σ = 1 log utility
ϕ = 5 Frisch elasticity 0.2
α = 1/4 labor share 3/4
= 9 steady state markup 12.5%
η = 4 coefficient of M2 velocity on i in quarterly data
θ = 3/4 price stickiness of 4 quarters
φπ = 1.5, φy = 0.5/4 Taylor’s original rule
ρv = 0.5 moderately persistent shock
σv = 0.25% policy shock of 25 basis points (1% annualized)
vt = zt = 0
and
n
πt = −ψya (φy + σ(1 − ρa ))κΛa at
1
where Λa ≡ (1−βρa )[σ(1−ρa )+φy ]+κ(φπ −ρa ) >0
Natural rate
rtn = −σψya
n
(1 − ρa )at
Output
yt = ỹt + ytn = ψya
n
κ(φπ − ρa )Λa at
Employment
1
nt = (yt − at )
1 − α
(1 − σ)κ(φπ − ρa )
= − (φy + σ(1 − ρa ))(1 − βρa ) Λa at
σ(1 − α) + ϕ + α
Parameter values
β = 0.99 quarterly
σ = 1 log utility
ϕ = 5 Frisch elasticity 0.2
α = 1/4 labor share 3/4
= 9 steady state markup 12.5%
η = 4 coefficient of M2 velocity on i in quarterly data
θ = 3/4 price stickiness of 4 quarters
φπ = 1.5, φy = 0.5/4 Taylor’s original rule
ρa = 0.9 highly persistent shock
σa = 1%
at = vt = 0