Appendix 4(b)

Rubrics for EE-401 (Final Evaluation)

Electrical Engineering Project

Name ABDUL AZIZ Group No. 63

Roll No. EE-16042 Title SYMMETRICAL MULTILEVEL 5 LEVEL H-BRIDGE INVERTER USING SPWM
TECHNIQUE
Batch 2016-2017

Level of Achievement Total Marks Total Marks

= 100 = 100
Marks*
Criteria of (Evaluator 1) ( Evaluator 2)
(as per Excellent Good Average Unsatisfactory
evaluation as Weight
weightage
per PLOs
of 100%)
80-100% 60-80% 50-60% Below 50% Obtained Marks
Principles of engineering are
Most of the principles are
thoroughly applied to address Too many assumptions are
applied in identifying,
Problem the targeted engineering made in problem analysis and Problem analysis is not
15 % 15 formulating and concluding
Analysis problem in reaching substantial work mostly cites less conclusive or clear.
the complex engineering
conclusion and are supported by authentic research.
problem.
the state-of-art research.
Proposed design/ solution
Proposed design/ solution fulfills most of the Few deficiencies in exploring Proposed design/solution
follows systematic approach in requirements with some design/ solution is does not follow engineering
Design/
all aspects. It complies with recommended implemented without multi- approach and has serious
Development 15 % 15
existing standards of respective improvements. It does not phase verifications. OR deficiencies in the theoretical
of Solution
field and fulfills all necessary comply with existing Unable to achieve desired framework of design/
requirements. standards of the respective outcomes. solution.
field.
Most of the steps are carried
The complex engineering Technical analysis requires
out with scientific Does not follow the
problem is investigated in a improvement OR drew
approach. More case methodical way of
Investigation 15 % 15 scientific way. Valid conclusion is based on
studies/experiments are investigation at all and is not
conclusions and required insufficient data or literature
needed to test in order to conclusive.
outcomes have been achieved. review.
draw authentic conclusion.
Appropriate latest IT tools are Selection of IT tools is Selection of IT tools is very
Modern Tool selected and applied with trivial with too many
15% 15 appropriate however; its
Usage proper understanding of their potentials have not be limitations. Or require more Incorrect selection of IT tool.
limitations. familiarization with the
explored and applied fully.
selected IT tool.
 Ethics
10% 10 Similarity index is less than 5% Similarity index is greater Similarity index is greater than Similarity index is greater
(Plagiarism) than 10% 15% than 20%
Communication Use of very fluent speech. Satisfactory use of
Occasional use of inflection.
(Speech quality, Effective use of charts, graphs, inflection. Fair use of Monotone voice. Information
Limited use of charts, graphs,
Quality of slides, 10% 10 figures etc. Dressed in highly charts, graphs, figures etc. in unstructured way. Dressed
Maintain formal
figures etc. Dressed neatly but
professional manner. Generally well groomed inappropriately.
attire) casual.
and professional.
Project
Management Submitted before deadline. Submitted one day after
5% 5 Submitted on deadline. Failed to follow deadline.
(Timely deadline.
submission)
Almost always listens to, Usually listens to, shares Sometimes listens to, shares Rarely listens to, shares with
Team Work 5% 5 shares with and supports the with and supports the with and supports the efforts and supports the efforts of
efforts of others. efforts of others. of others. others.
Ability to appropriately use Ability to fairly use skills,
skills, theories, or theories, or methodologies
methodologies gained towards gained towards project Some use of skills, theories, or No use of skills, theories, or
Lifelong
10% 10 project working. High potential working. Easily methodologies gained towards methodologies gained towards
Learning
for commercialization with little commercialize with project working. project working.
or no refinement in future. significant refinement in
future.
Total 100% 100 Total out of maximum marks:100
Average marks from Evaluator 1and Evaluator 2

Examiner: Evaluator 1 Evaluator 2

Name:
Signature:
PEC number:
Designation:
Company /Institution:
Contact number:
E-mail address:
* Scaling factor will be used at the end of the sheet