6/26/2018 Document

10-K 1 lnce-12312016x10k.htm 10-K

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to

Commission file number 0-398

SNYDER’S-LANCE, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

North Carolina 56-0292920

(State of incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
13515 Ballantyne Corporate Place, Charlotte, North Carolina 28277
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
Post Office Box 32368, Charlotte, North Carolina 28232-2368
(Mailing address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (704) 554-1421
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

$0.83-1/3 Par Value Common Stock The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE
Indicate by checkmark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by checkmark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check One):

Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o
(do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of shares of the Registrant’s $0.83-1/3 par value Common Stock, its only outstanding class of voting or nonvoting common equity, held
by non-affiliates as of July 1, 2016, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $2,530,743,572.
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s $0.83-1/3 par value Common Stock, its only outstanding class of Common Stock, as of February 21, 2017,
was 96,313,948 shares.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 3, 2017 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this
Form 10-K.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 1/107
6/26/2018 Document

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 2/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
PART I
Cautionary Information About Forward-Looking Statements 1
Item 1 Business 1
Item 1A Risk Factors 6
Item 1B Unresolved Staff Comments 13
Item 2 Properties 13
Item 3 Legal Proceedings 14
Item 4 Mine Safety Disclosures 16
Executive Officers of the Company 17

PART II
Item 5 Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities 18
Item 6 Selected Financial Data 19
Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 21
Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 37
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 38
Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts 86
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 87
Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 89
Item 9A Controls and Procedures 89
Item 9B Other Information 89

PART III
Item 10 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11 Executive Compensation
Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
Item 14 Principal Accountant Fees and Services

PART IV
Item 15 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 91
Item 16 Form 10-K Summary 95
Signatures 95

Exhibit 12 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

Exhibit 21 Subsidiaries of Snyder’s-Lance, Inc.
Exhibit 23.1 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Exhibit 31.1 Section 302 Certification of the CEO
Exhibit 31.2 Section 302 Certification of the CFO
Exhibit 32 Section 906 Certification of the CEO and CFO

Note: Items 10-14 of Part III are incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement and the Executive Officers of the Company is
included in Part I of this annual report.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 3/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

PART I
Cautionary Information About Forward-Looking Statements

This document includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements include statements about our estimates, expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies for the future,
and the assumptions underlying such statements. We use the words “anticipates,” “believes,” "continues," "could," "designed,"
“estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” "goal," "initiate," "intends," “may,” “objective,” "plan," "potential," "pursue," "should,"
"target," "will," "would," or the negative of any of these words or similar expressions to identify our forward-looking statements
that represent our judgment about possible future events. In making these statements we rely on assumptions and analyses based
on our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments as well as other factors
we consider appropriate under the circumstances. We believe these judgments are reasonable, but these statements are not
guarantees of any events or financial results, and our actual results may differ materially due to a variety of important factors,
both positive and negative. Factors that could cause these differences include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth under
Part I, Item 1A - Risk Factors.

Caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which reflect the expectations of
management only as of the time such statements are made. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update
publicly or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Item 1. Business

General
Snyder's-Lance, Inc., a North Carolina corporation incorporated in 1926, is a branded snack food company with operations in
North America and Europe. Our brands include Snyder’s of Hanover®, the market share leader in the pretzel category in the United
States ("US"), and Lance®, which is the number one ranked sandwich cracker in the US, as well as Cape Cod® kettle cooked chips
and Kettle Brand® potato chips, which combined make us the market leader in the kettle chips category in the US. In addition,
Snack Factory® Pretzel Crisps® and Pop Secret® popcorn currently rank second in the US in their respective categories and Late
July® is the number one organic and non-genetically modified organism ("non-GMO") tortilla chip in the US. These products
demonstrate our successful history of providing irresistible, high-quality snacks dating back over 100 years.

Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. is headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. References to “Snyder’s-Lance,” the “Company,” “we,” “us”
or “our” refer to Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as the context requires.

Recent Acquisitions and Divestiture

In recent years, we have acquired several companies and brands as we seek future growth both organically as well as through
acquisitions.

In October of 2012, we completed the acquisition of Snack Factory, LLC and certain of its affiliates ("Snack Factory"), which
added a Core brand to our portfolio, Snack Factory® Pretzel Crisps®. The Snack Factory® brand is known for its innovative flavor
profiles, commitment to providing the highest-quality ingredients and a broadening base of passionate consumers. In June of 2014,
we completed the acquisition of Baptista’s Bakery, Inc. ("Baptista's"), which is the sole manufacturer of our Snack Factory®
Pretzel Crisps® products. In addition, Baptista's is an industry leader in the development, innovation and manufacturing of highly-
differentiated snack foods, including organic, non-GMO, all natural and gluten-free products. In October of 2014, we made an
additional investment in Late July Snacks, LLC ("Late July") which increased our total ownership interest to 80%. Late July is a
leader in organic and non-GMO salty snacks and the investment supports our goal of having a stronger presence in "better-for-you"
snacks.

On February 29, 2016, we completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding stock of Diamond Foods, Inc. ("Diamond Foods").
The strategic combination of Snyder's-Lance and Diamond Foods brought together two established companies with strong brands,
and created an innovative, highly complementary and diversified portfolio of branded snacks. Diamond Foods was a leading snack
food company with five brands, including: Kettle Brand® potato chips; KETTLE® Chips; Pop Secret® popcorn; Emerald® snack
nuts; and Diamond of California® culinary nuts. The transaction expanded our footprint in "better-for-you" snacking, and increased
our existing natural food channel presence. In addition, this transaction expanded and strengthened our distribution network in the
US, and will provide us with a platform for growth in the United Kingdom ("U.K.") and certain other countries within Europe. We
are now even better positioned in the growing snack food industry, and we continue to see significant opportunities for both cost
and revenue synergies, which we expect will enable us to deliver earnings accretion, and support further investment behind our
brands. The integration of Diamond Foods is on track as we continue to achieve key milestones following the close of the
acquisition.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 4/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

On September 1, 2016, we completed the acquisition of Metcalfe's Skinny Limited ("Metcalfe") by acquiring the remaining 74%
interest. Metcalfe owns the U.K.'s leading premium ready-to-eat ("RTE") popcorn brand, and also incorporates a fast growing
range of corn and rice cake products. The U.K. popcorn market is one of the fastest growing categories within the U.K. snack food
industry, as consumers increasingly seek out "better-for-you" snacking options. The addition of a leading premium RTE popcorn
brand, Metcalfe's skinny®, to the U.K.'s leading premium chip brand, KETTLE® Chips, reflects our plan to become a leading
provider of premium snack foods in Europe.

On December 31, 2016, we completed the carve-out and sale of our culinary nuts business (comprised primarily of the Diamond of
California® brand, and the Stockton, CA facility; collectively "Diamond of California"). We had previously entered the culinary
nuts business as a result of the Diamond Foods acquisition. This divestiture aligns with our strategy to focus more resources on
growth opportunities for our snack food brands.

Products
We are engaged in the manufacturing, distribution, marketing and sale of snack food products. These products include pretzels,
sandwich crackers, kettle cooked chips, pretzel crackers, cookies, potato chips, tortilla chips, restaurant style crackers, popcorn,
nuts and other salty snacks. Our products are packaged in various single-serve, multi-pack, family-size and party-size
configurations. Our branded products are principally sold under trademarks owned by us. While the majority of our branded
products are manufactured by us, certain branded products are contract manufactured, due to required expertise, ingredients or
equipment, or increased demand.

We also sell Partner brand products, which consist of third-party branded products that we sell to our independent business owners
("IBO") through our national direct-store-delivery distribution network ("DSD network"), in order to broaden the portfolio of
product offerings for our IBOs. In addition, we contract with other branded food manufacturers to produce their products and
periodically sell certain semi-finished goods to other manufacturers.

Overall sales of our products are relatively consistent throughout the year, although demand for certain products may be influenced
by holidays, changes in seasons, or other annual events. In 2016, Branded products represented approximately 78% of net revenue
from continuing operations, while Partner brand and Other products represented approximately 14% and 8% of net revenue,
respectively. In 2015, Branded products represented approximately 72% of net revenue, while net revenue from Partner brand and
Other products represented approximately 18% and 10%, respectively. In 2014, Branded products represented 71% of net revenue,
while net revenue from Partner brand and Other products represented 19% and 10%, respectively. While Partner brands will
continue to be a significant component of net revenue and an important focus within our business strategy, the acquisition of
Diamond Foods resulted in additional revenue primarily within the Branded product category.

Intellectual Property
Trademarks that are important to our business are protected by registration or other means in the US and most other international
markets where the related products are sold. We own various registered trademarks for use with our Branded products, including:
Snyder’s of Hanover®; Lance®; Cape Cod®; Snack Factory® Pretzel Crisps®; Pop Secret®; Emerald®; Kettle Brand®; KETTLE®
Chips; and Late July® (collectively, "Core" brands), and Metcalfe’s skinny®; Tom’s®; Archway®; Jays®; Stella D’oro®; Eatsmart
SnacksTM; Krunchers!®; and O-Ke-Doke® (collectively, "Allied" brands) as well as a variety of other marks and designs. On a
limited basis, we license trademarks for use on certain products that are classified as Branded products. Solely for convenience,
trademarks and trade names referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may appear without the ® or ™ symbols, but
references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert our rights to these trademarks and trade names to the
fullest extent under applicable law.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 5/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Overall Strategy
Our goal is to change the way the world snacks with better ingredients, quality and taste, as we introduce new products and enter
new categories, in order to reach more consumers and broaden our customer base. As we grow, we will remain focused on
delivering margin expansion, through the attainment of expected cost synergies and ongoing enterprise wide cost reduction efforts.
We expect our growth will be a result of organic investments in our research and development capabilities, and inorganic growth
through strategic acquisitions. During 2017, our goal is to invest in key strategic areas to bolster our product portfolio positioning
and gain market share. These investments will include research and development, innovation, advertising, and retail activation.

Our strategy is built around five key strategic initiatives:

• Build premium, differentiated brands - We are focused on premium and differentiated positioning for our brands, and
ensuring that we provide value in the competitive snack food marketplace. Our goal is to offer something unique and fun
to our consumers. We execute this goal through continuous product innovation by leveraging our research and
development capabilities, with support from our marketing and advertising initiatives. In addition, we are consistently
evaluating our portfolio for opportunities to reinvigorate our iconic brands to remain ahead of consumer trends. Our
recent focus has been leveraging our innovation capabilities to expand the breadth of our “better-for-you” offerings. We
finished the year with over 30% of our retail sales coming from products with "better-for-you" defined attributes, and we
expect this to increase in 2017.

• Continuously expand retail distribution - We continuously focus on expanding our distribution to reach more consumers.
We support our growth through our DSD network, direct to warehouse network, and through exports to international
markets. Our DSD network is supported by our IBO business partners. In order to better leverage our DSD network, we
also distribute third-party Partner brand products that provide efficiencies through increased scale.

• Lead with quality - Our core DNA is making sure that we provide the very best quality in all of our products - day in and
day out. We believe that quality can be a competitive advantage, and our organization strives to deliver products with the
finest ingredients. We will continue to invest in our quality assurance capabilities to ensure that we meet our consumers
and retail partners’ expectations. Delivering on this commitment will enable us to continuously enhance our value
proposition and continue to build further brand loyalty. We believe our market-leading share positions are a testament to
this strategic focus.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 6/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

• Fund the future - In order to balance our investments to drive consistent organic growth, while also delivering greater
shareholder value, our team is grounded in a culture of continuous improvement designed to drive productivity, reduce
costs, and expand margins, to increase returns on invested capital. At Snyder's-Lance, we continuously challenge
ourselves to be efficient, productive and to do our best to drive non-value added costs out of the business. This mantra
throughout our entire organization drives a core belief that by achieving these goals we will better position our Company
for sustainable, long-term growth, while also driving increased shareholder value.

• Invest in our people - We are focused on attracting, engaging, and growing our talent. We demonstrate our passion for our
people by delivering programs and initiatives to support their personal and professional development, while also striving
to recruit world-class talent to better enable our Company to execute on its long-term strategic plan. In addition, we have
a pay-for-performance culture, where the organization is incentivized to deliver annual and long-term results that align
with our goal of creating value for our shareholders. We believe that this philosophy encourages a culture of discipline
and operational excellence, which benefits our stakeholders.

Research and Development

We consider research and development of new products to be a significant part of our overall strategy, and are committed to
developing innovative, high-quality products that exceed consumer expectations. A team of professional product developers,
including microbiologists, food scientists and culinary experts, work in collaboration with innovation, marketing, manufacturing
and sales leaders, to develop products that meet changing consumer demands. Our research and development staff incorporates
product ideas from all areas of our business in order to formulate new products. In addition to developing new products, the
research and development staff routinely reformulates and improves existing products based on advances in ingredients and
technology, and conducts value engineering to maintain competitive price points. We own a 60,000 square foot Research and
Development Center in Hanover, Pennsylvania, where we conduct much of our research and development. In addition, we have a
research and development facility adjacent to our production facility in Salem, Oregon. Our research and development costs were
approximately $10.0 million, $6.2 million and $7.6 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Marketing
Our marketing efforts are focused on building long-term brand equity through effective consumer marketing. In addition to volume
building trade promotions to market our products, our advertising efforts utilize television, radio, print, digital, mobile and social
media aimed at increasing consumer preference and usage of our brands. We also use consumer promotions, sponsorships and
partnerships which include free trial offers, targeted coupons and on-package offers to generate trial usage and increase purchase
frequency. These marketing efforts are an integral part of our overall strategy to grow our brands and reach more consumers in
order to enhance our position as a provider of premium, differentiated snacks.

We work with third-party information agencies, such as Information Resources, Inc. ("IRI"), Nielsen and other syndicated market
data providers, to monitor the effectiveness of our marketing and measure product growth. All information regarding our brand
market positions in the US included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is from IRI and is based on retail dollar sales.

Distribution
We distribute snack food products throughout the US using our DSD network. Our DSD network is made up of approximately
3,200 routes that are primarily owned and operated by IBOs. We also ship products directly to third-party distributors in areas
where our DSD network does not operate. Through our direct distribution network, we distribute products directly to retail
customers or to third-party distributors using freight carriers or our own transportation fleet. In Europe, we sell our salty snack
products through our sales personnel directly to national grocery, co-op and impulse store chains. In 2016, approximately 56% of
net revenue was generated by products distributed through our DSD network while the remaining 44% was generated by products
distributed through our direct distribution network. As a result of the acquisition of Diamond Foods, the percentage of our net
revenue generated by products distributed through our direct distribution network has increased.

In order to maintain and expand our DSD network, we routinely participate in certain ongoing route business purchase and sales
activities. These activities include the following:

• Acquisition of regional distributor businesses - As we expand our DSD network, we continue to look for potential
regional distributor business acquisition targets in areas where we do not currently have our own DSD network. Upon
acquisition, the acquired routes may be reengineered to include our products and retail locations and are then sold to a
new or current IBO, as described below.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 7/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

• Reengineering of zones - Periodically, we undertake a route reengineering project for a particular geography or zone. The
reasons for route reengineering projects vary, but are typically due to increased sales volume associated with new retail
locations and/or the addition of new Branded or Partner brand products to the routes in that zone. In these cases, we
repurchase all of the IBO route businesses in that zone. The repurchased route businesses are then reengineered, which
normally results in the addition of new IBO route territories because of the additional volume. Route businesses are then
resold, usually to the original IBO, however, the original IBO has no obligation to repurchase. Upon completion, these
route reengineering projects usually result in modest net gains on the sale of route businesses due to the value added
during the reengineering through additional volume and/or retail locations.

• Sale of company-owned routes - Some routes remain company-owned primarily because they need additional sales
volume in order to become sustainable route businesses for IBOs. As we build up the volume on these routes through
increased distribution of our Branded and Partner brand products, we may sell these route businesses to IBOs which could
result in gains.

• IBO defaults - There are times when IBO route businesses are not successful and the IBO's distributor agreement with us
is terminated due to a breach of the distributor agreement or default under the loan agreement. In these instances, if the
existing IBO is unable to sell the route business to another third party, we may repurchase the route business at a price
defined in the distributor agreement. We generally put the repurchased route business up for sale to another third-party
IBO immediately. The subsequent sales transaction generally results in a nominal gain or loss.

Capital Expenditures
We have invested significant capital in our facilities to ensure sufficient capacity, efficient production, effective use of technology,
excellent quality, and a positive working environment for our associates. In 2016, 2015 and 2014, we had capital expenditures of
$73.3 million, $51.5 million and $72.1 million, respectively. For 2017, we expect capital expenditures of approximately $90
million to $100 million. The planned increase in capital expenditures for 2017 is to upgrade equipment, increase capacity at our
manufacturing facilities, and relocate the production of one of our branded products.

Customers
Through our DSD network, we sell our Branded and Partner brand products to IBOs that, in turn, sell to grocery/mass
merchandisers, club stores, discount stores, convenience stores, food service establishments and various other retail customers,
including drug stores, schools, military and government facilities and “up and down the street” outlets such as recreational
facilities, offices and other independent retailers. In addition, we sell our Branded products directly to retail customers and third-
party distributors, both in the US and abroad. We also contract with other branded food manufacturers to produce their products or
provide semi-finished goods.

Substantially all of our revenue is from sales to customers in the US. Sales to our largest retail customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
("Wal-Mart"), either through IBOs or our direct distribution network, were approximately 13% of net revenue in 2016 and 13%
and 14% of net revenue for 2015 and 2014, respectively. Our sales to Wal-Mart do not include sales of our products made to Wal-
Mart by third-party distributors outside of our DSD network. Sales to these third-party distributors represent approximately 5% of
our net revenue and may increase sales of our products to Wal-Mart by an amount we are unable to estimate. Our top ten retail
customers accounted for approximately 52% of our net revenue during 2016, excluding sales of our products made by third-party
distributors, both in the US and abroad, who are outside our DSD network.

Raw Materials
The principal raw materials used to manufacture our products are flour, potatoes, oil, peanuts, other nuts, corn, sugar, chocolate,
cheese and seasonings. The principal packaging supplies used are flexible film, cartons, trays, boxes and bags. These raw materials
and supplies are normally available in adequate quantities in the commercial market and are generally contracted from three to
twelve months in advance, depending on market conditions.

Competition and Industry

Our products are sold in highly competitive markets. Generally, we compete with companies engaged in the manufacturing,
distribution, marketing and sale of snack food products, some of which have greater revenue and resources than we do. The
principal methods of competition are price, service, product quality, product offerings and distribution. The methods of
competition and our competitive position vary according to the geographic location, the particular product categories and the
activities of our competitors.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 8/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Environmental Matters
Our operations are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations with respect to environmental matters. We are
not a party to any material proceedings arising under these laws or regulations for the periods covered by this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. We believe we are in compliance with all material environmental regulations affecting our facilities and operations and
that continued compliance will not have a material impact on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

Sustainability
We are committed to reducing the impact that our products and operations have on the environment. We work to minimize our
environmental impact by implementing more sustainable business operations and doing more with less, as we remain committed to
being a responsible corporate citizen. Several of our manufacturing sites use solar or wind energy to generate the power needed to
make our snacks. At our bakery in Hanover, Pennsylvania, we own a solar farm that produces 3.5 megawatts of electricity that
supplies 100% of the power needed at our research and development center on site as well as approximately 30% of the power
used by the bakery for production during the day. Our kettle chip plant in Salem, Oregon captures solar energy using solar panels
on the roof and is one of the largest solar installations in the northwest. The kettle chip plant in Beloit, Wisconsin, which was the
first LEED Gold Certified food manufacturing plant in the US, uses wind turbines to offset utility usage from the local power
plant. In addition, our Supply Chain team has implemented improved recycling initiatives across the organization that now bring at
least 25% of our manufacturing plants, including all of our pretzel bakeries, to landfill-free status. At our chip producing plants, we
recycle the oil used in kettle chip production to vendors that convert it to biodiesel for use in many other applications.

Employees
As of December 31, 2016, we had approximately 6,100 active employees located in the US and U.K. compared to approximately
5,000 active employees in the US, as of January 2, 2016. None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

Available Information
Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, amendments to these reports,
and exhibits are available on our Investor Relations website free of charge at www.snyderslance.com. All required reports are
made available on the website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with or furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the following risk factors should be considered carefully
in evaluating our business. Our business, financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected by any of these
risks. Additional risks and uncertainties, including risks that we do not presently know of or currently deem insignificant, may also
impair our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Risks related to our business

Our performance may be impacted by general economic conditions or an economic downturn.
An overall decline in economic activity could adversely impact our business and financial results. Economic uncertainty may
reduce consumer spending as consumers make decisions on what to include in their food budgets. This could also result in a shift
in consumer preference toward private label products. Shifts in consumer spending could result in increased pressure from
competitors or customers that may require us to increase promotional spending or reduce the prices of some of our products and/or
limit our ability to increase or maintain prices, which could lower our revenue and profitability.

Instability in financial markets may impact our ability, or increase the cost, to enter into new credit agreements in the future.
Additionally, it may weaken the ability of our customers, suppliers, IBOs, third-party distributors, banks, insurance companies and
other business partners to perform their obligations in the normal course of business, which could expose us to losses or disrupt the
supply of inputs we rely upon to conduct our business. If one or more of our key business partners fail to perform as expected or
contracted for any reason, our business could be negatively impacted.

Volatility in the price or availability of the inputs we depend on, including raw materials, packaging, energy and labor, could
adversely impact our financial results.
Our financial results could be adversely impacted by changes in the cost or availability of raw materials and packaging. While we
often obtain substantial commitments for future delivery of certain raw materials, continued long-term increases in the costs of raw
materials and packaging, including but not limited to cost increases due to the tightening of supply, could adversely affect our
financial results.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 9/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Our transportation and logistics system is dependent upon gasoline and diesel fuel, and our manufacturing operations depend on
natural gas. While we may enter into forward purchase contracts to reduce the volatility associated with some of these costs,
continued long-term changes in the cost or availability of these energy sources could adversely impact our financial results.

Our continued growth requires us to hire, retain and develop a highly skilled workforce and talented management team. Our
financial results could be adversely affected by increased costs due to increased competition for employees, higher employee
turnover or increased employee benefit costs.

We operate in the highly competitive food industry.

Price competition and industry consolidation could adversely impact our financial results. The sales of most of our products are
subject to significant competition primarily through promotional discounting and other price cutting techniques by competitors,
some of whom are significantly larger with greater resources. In addition, there is continuing consolidation in the snack food
industry and in retail outlets for snack foods, either of which could increase competition. Significant competition increases the
possibility that we could lose one or more major customers, lose existing product authorizations at customer locations, lose market
share and/or shelf space, increase expenditures or reduce selling prices, which could have an adverse impact on our business or
financial results.

Price increases for our products that we initiate may negatively impact our financial results if not properly implemented or
accepted by our customers. Future price increases, such as those made in order to offset increased input costs, may reduce our
overall sales volume, which could reduce our revenue and operating profit. We may be unable to implement price increases driven
by higher input costs on a timely basis or at all, either of which may reduce our operating profit. Additionally, if market prices for
certain inputs decline significantly below the prices we are required by contract to pay, customer pressure to reduce the prices for
our products could lower our revenue and operating profit.

Changes in our top retail customer relationships could impact our revenue and profitability.
We are exposed to risks resulting from several large retail customers that account for a significant portion of our revenue. Our top
ten retail customers accounted for approximately 52% of our net revenue during 2016, excluding sales of our products made by
third-party distributors who are outside of our DSD network, with our largest retail customer, Wal-Mart, representing
approximately 13% of our 2016 and 2015 net revenue. The loss of one or more of our large retail customers could adversely affect
our financial results. These customers typically make purchase decisions based on a combination of price, service, product quality,
product offerings, consumer demand, as well as distribution capabilities and generally do not enter into long-term contracts. In
addition, these significant retail customers may change their business practices related to inventories, product displays, logistics or
other aspects of the customer-supplier relationship. Our results of operations could be adversely affected if revenue from one or
more of these customers is significantly reduced or if the cost of complying with customers’ demands is significant. If receivables
from one or more of these customers become uncollectible, our financial results may be adversely impacted.

We may be unable to maintain our profitability in the face of a consolidating retail environment.
As the retail grocery industry continues to consolidate and our retail customers grow larger and become more sophisticated, our
retail customers may demand lower pricing and increased promotional programs. Further, these customers are reducing their
inventories and increasing their emphasis on products that hold either the number one or number two market position and private
label products. If we fail to use our sales and marketing expertise to maintain our category leadership positions to respond to these
trends, or if we lower our prices or increase promotional support of our products and are unable to increase the volume of our
products sold, our profitability and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Demand for our products may be adversely affected by changes in consumer preferences and tastes or if we are unable to
innovate or market our products effectively.
We are a consumer products company operating in highly competitive markets and rely on continued demand for our products. To
generate revenue and profits, we must sell products that appeal to our customers and consumers. Any significant changes in
consumer preferences or any inability on our part to anticipate or react to such changes could result in reduced demand for our
products and erosion of our competitive and financial position. Our success depends on our ability to respond to consumer trends,
including concerns of consumers regarding health and wellness, obesity, product attributes and ingredients. In addition, changes in
product category consumption or consumer demographics could result in reduced demand for our products. Consumer preferences
may shift due to a variety of factors, including the aging of the general population, changes in social trends, or changes in travel,
vacation or leisure activity patterns. Any of these changes may reduce consumers’ willingness to purchase our products and
negatively impact our financial results.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 10/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Our continued success also is dependent on product innovation, including maintaining a robust pipeline of new products, and the
effectiveness of advertising and promotional campaigns, marketing programs and product packaging. Although we devote
significant resources to meet this goal, there can be no assurance as to the continued ability to develop and launch successful new
products or variants of existing products, or to effectively execute advertising and promotional campaigns and marketing
programs.

The decision by British voters to exit the European Union may further negatively impact our operations.
The June 2016 referendum by British voters to exit the European Union (“Brexit”) caused uncertainty in global markets and
resulted in a sharp decline in the value of the British pound, as compared to the US dollar and other currencies. As the U.K.
negotiates its exit from the European Union, volatility in exchange rates and in U.K. interest rates may continue. In the near term, a
weaker British pound compared to the US dollar during a reporting period causes local currency results of our U.K. operations to
be translated into fewer US dollars; a weaker British pound compared to other currencies increases the cost of goods imported into
our U.K. operations and may decrease the profitability of our U.K. operations; and a higher U.K. interest rate may have a
dampening effect on the U.K. economy. In the longer term, any impact from Brexit on our U.K. operations will depend, in part, on
the outcome of tariff, trade, regulatory and other negotiations.

Our results may be adversely affected by the failure to execute acquisitions and divestitures successfully.
Our ability to meet our objectives with respect to the acquisition of new businesses or the divestiture of existing businesses may
depend in part on our ability to identify suitable buyers and sellers, negotiate favorable financial terms and other contractual terms,
and obtain all necessary regulatory approvals. If we pursue strategic acquisitions, divestitures, or joint ventures, we may incur
significant costs and may not be able to consummate the transactions or obtain financing. Potential risks of acquisitions also
include the inability to integrate acquired businesses efficiently into our existing operations; diversion of management's attention
from other business concerns; potential loss of key employees and/or customers of acquired businesses; potential assumption of
unknown liabilities; the inability to implement promptly an effective control environment; potential impairment charges if
purchase assumptions are not achieved or market conditions decline; and the risks inherent in entering markets or lines of business
with which we have limited or no prior experience. Acquisitions outside the US may present unique challenges and increase our
exposure to risks associated with foreign operations, including foreign currency risks and risks associated with local regulatory
agencies.

Future acquisitions also could result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities or the incurrence of debt, which could
adversely affect our financial results. In the event we enter into strategic transactions or relationships, our financial results may
differ from expectations. We may not be able to achieve expected returns and other benefits as a result of potential acquisitions or
divestitures.

Potential risks for divestitures include the inability to separate divested businesses or business units from our Company effectively
and efficiently and to reduce or eliminate associated overhead costs. We are reliant on Diamond of California to provide certain
back office services under the Transaction Services Agreement, production of our products under the Facilities Use Agreement,
and the supply of walnuts under the Supply Agreement. Failure of Diamond of California to provide services or quality products
under any of these arrangements could adversely affect our financial results.

Our business or financial results may be negatively affected if acquisitions or divestitures are not successfully implemented or
completed.

The loss of key personnel could have an adverse effect on our financial results and growth prospects.
There are risks associated with our ability to retain key employees. If certain key employees terminate their employment, it could
negatively impact manufacturing, sales, marketing or development activities. In addition, we may not be able to locate suitable
replacements for key employees or offer employment to potential replacements on acceptable terms.

Failure to effectively execute and accomplish our strategy could adversely affect our financial results.
We utilize several operating strategies to increase revenue and improve operating performance. If we are unsuccessful due to
unplanned events, our ability to manage change or unfavorable market conditions, our financial performance could be adversely
affected.

Concerns with the safety and quality of certain food products or ingredients could cause consumers to avoid our products.
We could be adversely affected if consumers in our principal markets lose confidence in the safety and quality of certain products
or ingredients. Negative publicity about these concerns, whether or not valid, may discourage consumers from buying our products
or cause disruptions in production or distribution of our products and negatively impact our business and financial results.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 11/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

If our products become adulterated, misbranded or mislabeled, we might need to recall those items and we may experience
product liability claims if consumers are injured or become sick.
We may need to recall some of our products if they become adulterated or if they are mislabeled, and may also be liable if the
consumption of any of our products causes injury to consumers. A widespread recall could result in significant losses due to the
costs of a recall, the destruction of product inventory, and lost sales due to the unavailability of the affected product for a period of
time. A significant product recall or product liability claim could also result in adverse publicity, damage to our reputation, and a
loss of consumer confidence in the safety and/or quality of our products, ingredients or packaging. Such a loss of confidence could
occur even in the absence of a recall or a major product liability claim. We also may become involved in lawsuits and legal
proceedings if it is alleged that the consumption of any of our products causes injury or illness. A product recall or an adverse
result in any such litigation could have an adverse effect on our operating and financial results. We may also lose customer
confidence for our entire Branded portfolio as a result of any such recall or proceeding.

Disruption of our supply chain could have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.
Our ability to manufacture and sell our products may be impaired by damage or disruption to our manufacturing or distribution
capabilities, or to the capabilities of our suppliers or contract manufacturers, due to factors that are hard to predict or beyond our
control, such as adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, fire, pandemics or other events. Failure to take adequate steps to
mitigate the likelihood or potential impact of such events, or to effectively manage such events if they occur, may adversely affect
our business or financial results, particularly in circumstances where a product or ingredient is sourced from a single supplier or
location.

We may be adversely impacted by inadequacies in, or security breaches of, our information technology systems.
We increasingly rely on information technology systems to conduct our business. These systems can enhance efficiency and
business processes but also present risks of unauthorized access to our networks or data centers. If unauthorized parties gain access
to our systems, they could obtain and exploit confidential business, customer, or employee information and harm our competitive
position. In addition, these information systems may experience damage, failures, interruptions, errors, inefficiencies, attacks or
suffer from fires or natural disasters, any of which could have an adverse effect on our business and financial results if not
adequately mitigated by our security measures and disaster recovery plans.

Furthermore, with multiple information technology systems as a result of acquisitions, we may encounter difficulties assimilating
or integrating data. In addition, we are currently in the process of consolidating systems which could provide additional security or
business disruption risks which could have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.

Improper use or misuse of social media may have an adverse effect on our business and financial results.
Consumers are moving away from traditional means of electronic mail towards new forms of electronic communication, including
social media. We support new ways of sharing data and communicating with customers using methods such as social networking.
However, misuse of social networking by individuals, customers, competitors, or employees may result in unfavorable media
attention which could negatively affect our business. Further, our competitors are increasingly using social media networks to
market and advertise products. If we are unable to compete in this environment it could adversely affect our financial results.

Our DSD network relies on a significant number of IBOs, and such reliance could affect our ability to efficiently and profitably
distribute and market products, maintain existing markets and expand business into other geographic markets.
Our DSD network relies on approximately 2,700 IBOs for the sale and distribution of Branded and Partner brand products. IBOs
must make a commitment of capital and/or obtain financing to purchase a route business and other equipment to conduct their
business. Certain financing arrangements, through third-party lending institutions, are made available to IBOs and require us to
repurchase a route business if the IBO defaults on their loan and we then are required to collect any shortfall from the IBO, to the
extent possible. The inability of IBOs, in the aggregate, to make timely payments could require write-offs of accounts receivable or
increased provisions made against accounts receivable, either of which could adversely affect our financial results.

The ability to maintain a DSD network depends on a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control. Some of these
factors include: (i) the level of demand for the brands and products which are available in a particular distribution area; (ii) the
ability to price products at levels competitive with those offered by competing producers; and (iii) the ability to deliver products in
the quantity and at the time ordered by IBOs and retail customers. There can be no assurance that we will be able to mitigate the
risks related to all or any of these factors in any of our current or prospective geographic areas of distribution. To the extent that
any of these factors have an adverse effect on our relationships with IBOs, thus limiting maintenance and expansion of the sales
market, our revenue and financial results may be adversely impacted.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 12/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Identifying new IBOs can be time-consuming and any resulting delay may be disruptive and costly to the business. There also is
no assurance that we will be able to maintain current distribution relationships or establish and maintain successful relationships
with IBOs in new geographic distribution areas. There is the possibility that we will have to incur significant expenses to attract
and maintain IBOs in one or more geographic distribution areas. The occurrence of any of these factors could result in increased
expense or a significant decrease in sales volume through our DSD network and harm our business and financial results.

A disruption in the operation of our DSD network could negatively affect our results of operations, financial condition and
cash flows.
We believe that our DSD network is a significant competitive advantage. A material negative change in our relationship with the
IBOs could materially and negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and ability to operate and
conduct our business. In addition, litigation or one or more adverse rulings by courts or regulatory or governmental bodies
regarding our DSD network, including actions or decisions that could affect the independent contractor classifications of the IBOs,
or an adverse judgment against us for actions taken by the IBOs could materially and negatively affect our financial condition,
results of operations, cash flows, and ability to operate and conduct our business.

Continued success depends on the protection of our trademarks and other proprietary intellectual property rights.
We maintain numerous trademarks and other intellectual property rights, which are important to our success and competitive
position, and the loss of or our inability to enforce trademark and other proprietary intellectual property rights could harm our
business. We devote substantial resources to the establishment and protection of our trademarks and other proprietary intellectual
property rights on a worldwide basis. Efforts to establish and protect trademarks and other proprietary intellectual property rights
may not be adequate to prevent imitation of products by others or to prevent others from seeking to block sales of our products. In
addition, the laws and enforcement mechanisms of some foreign countries may not allow for the protection of proprietary rights to
the same extent as in the US and other countries.

Impairment in the carrying value of goodwill or other intangible assets could have an adverse impact on our financial results.
The net carrying value of goodwill represents the fair value of acquired businesses in excess of identifiable assets and liabilities,
and the net carrying value of other intangibles represents the fair value of trademarks, customer relationships, route intangibles and
other acquired intangibles. Pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles in the US ("GAAP"), we are required to perform
impairment tests on our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets annually, or at any time when events occur, which could
impact the value of our reporting unit or our indefinite-lived intangibles. These values depend on a variety of factors, including the
success of our business, market conditions, earnings growth and expected cash flows. Impairments to goodwill and other
intangible assets may be caused by factors outside our control, such as increasing competitive pricing pressures, changes in
discount rates based on changes in cost of capital or lower than expected sales and profit growth rates. In addition, if we see the
need to consolidate certain brands, we could experience impairment of our trademark intangible assets. Significant and
unanticipated changes in our business could require a non-cash charge for impairment in a future period which may significantly
affect our financial results in the period of such charge.

A significant portion of our outstanding shares of common stock is controlled by a few individuals, and their interests may
conflict with those of other stockholders.
As of December 31, 2016, Patricia A. Warehime beneficially owned in the aggregate approximately 10% of our outstanding
common stock. Mrs. Warehime serves as one of our directors. As a result, Mrs. Warehime may be able to exercise significant
influence over us and certain matters requiring approval of our stockholders, including the approval of significant corporate
transactions, such as a merger or other sale of our company or its assets. This could limit the ability of our other stockholders to
influence corporate matters and may have the effect of delaying or preventing a third party from acquiring control of our Company.
In addition, Mrs. Warehime may have actual or potential interests that diverge from the interests of our other stockholders.

New regulations or legislation could adversely affect our business and financial results.
Food production and marketing are highly regulated by a variety of federal, state and other governmental agencies. New or
increased government regulation of the food industry, including but not limited to areas related to food safety, chemical
composition, production processes, traceability, product quality, packaging, labeling, school lunch guidelines, promotions,
marketing and advertising (particularly such communications that are directed toward children), product recalls, records, storage
and distribution could adversely impact our results of operations by increasing production costs or restricting our methods of
operation and distribution. These regulations may address food industry or societal factors, such as obesity, nutritional and
environmental concerns and diet trends.

10

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 13/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

We are subject to increasing legal complexity and could be party to litigation that may adversely affect our business.
Increasing legal complexity may continue to affect our operations and results in material ways. We are or could be subject to legal
proceedings that may adversely affect our business, including class actions, administrative proceedings, government investigations,
employment and personal injury claims, disputes with current or former suppliers, claims by current or former IBOs, and
intellectual property claims (including claims that we infringed another party’s trademarks, copyrights, or patents). Inconsistent
standards imposed by governmental authorities can adversely affect our business and increase our exposure to litigation. Litigation
involving our independent contractor classification of our IBOs, as well as litigation related to disclosure made by us in connection
therewith, if determined adversely, could increase costs, negatively impact our business prospects and the business prospects of our
IBOs and subject us to incremental liability for their actions. We are also subject to the legal and compliance risks associated with
privacy, data collection, protection and management, in particular as it relates to information we collect from our employees, as
well as information we collect when we provide products to customers, IBOs and retailers.

We may fail to realize the anticipated benefits and cost savings we expect to realize from our acquisition of Diamond Foods,
which could adversely affect the value of our common stock.
The success of our acquisition of Diamond Foods will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated benefits and cost
savings from combining Diamond Foods’ business with ours. Our ability to realize these anticipated benefits and cost savings is
subject to many risks, including but not limited to:

• Our ability to continue to combine Diamond Foods’ business with ours; and
• Whether our combined businesses will perform as expected.

If we are not able to combine Diamond Foods’ business with ours successfully within the anticipated time frame, or at all, the
anticipated cost savings and other benefits of the acquisition may not be realized fully, or at all, or may take longer to realize than
expected, and we may not perform as expected and the value of our common stock may be adversely affected.

We may not be able to successfully execute our international expansion strategies.

We plan to drive additional growth and profitability through international distribution channels. Consumer demand, behavior, taste
and purchasing trends may differ in international markets and, as a result, sales of our products may not be successful or meet
expectations, or the margins on those sales may be less than currently anticipated. We may also face difficulties integrating foreign
business operations with our current sourcing, distribution, information technology systems and other operations. Any of these
challenges could hinder our success in new markets or new distribution channels. There can be no assurance that we will
successfully complete any planned international expansion or that any new business will be profitable or meet our expectations.

Our foreign operations pose additional risks to our business.

We operate our business and market our products internationally. Our foreign operations are subject to the risks described above, as
well as risks related to fluctuations in currency values, foreign currency exchange controls, compliance with foreign laws,
compliance with applicable US laws, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and other economic or political uncertainties.
International sales are subject to risks related to general economic conditions, imposition of tariffs, quotas, trade barriers and other
restrictions, enforcement of remedies in foreign jurisdictions and compliance with applicable foreign laws, and other economic and
political uncertainties. All of these risks could result in increased costs or decreased revenues, which could adversely affect our
financial results.

11

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 14/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Risks related to our substantial indebtedness

We have substantial debt, which could adversely affect our financial health, our ability to obtain financing in the future, react
to changes in our business, and make payments on our debt.
As of January 2, 2016 we had an aggregate principal amount of $388 million of outstanding debt, which increased to
approximately $1.3 billion as of December 31, 2016. The increase in our outstanding debt was the result of our acquisition of
Diamond Foods. Our substantial debt could have important consequences to holders of our common stock, including the
following:

• Our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service
requirements, acquisitions or general corporate purposes may be impaired in the future
• A substantial portion of our cash flow from operations must be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our
indebtedness, thereby reducing the funds available to us for other purposes
• We are exposed to the risk of increased interest rates because a substantial portion of our borrowings are at variable rates
• It may be more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations to our lenders, resulting in possible defaults on and acceleration
of such indebtedness
• We may be more vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions
• We may be at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors with less debt or comparable debt at more
favorable interest rates and they, as a result, may be better positioned to withstand economic downturns
• Our ability to refinance indebtedness may be limited or the associated costs may increase
• Our flexibility to adjust to changing market conditions and ability to withstand competitive pressures could be limited, or
we may be prevented from carrying out capital spending that is necessary or important to our growth strategy and efforts
to improve operating margins or our business

The agreements and instruments governing our debt contain restrictions and limitations that could significantly impact our
ability to operate our business.
Our credit facilities contain covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to do the following:

• Dispose of assets
• Incur additional indebtedness (including guarantees of additional indebtedness)
• Pay dividends and make certain payments
• Create liens on assets
• Make investments (including joint ventures)
• Engage in mergers, consolidations or sales of all or substantially all of our assets
• Engage in certain transactions with affiliates
• Change the business conducted by us
• Amend specific debt agreements

Our ability to comply with these provisions in future periods will depend on our ongoing financial and operating performance,
which in turn will be subject to economic conditions and to financial, market and competitive factors, many of which are beyond
our control. Our ability to comply with these provisions in future periods will also depend substantially on the pricing of our
products, our success at implementing cost reduction initiatives and our ability to successfully implement our overall business
strategy.

The restrictions under the terms of our credit facilities may prevent us from taking actions that we believe would be in the best
interest of our business, and may make it difficult for us to successfully execute our business strategy or effectively compete with
companies that are not similarly restricted. We may also incur future debt obligations that might subject us to additional restrictive
covenants that could affect our financial and operational flexibility. We cannot assure you that we will be granted waivers or
amendments to these agreements if for any reason we are unable to comply with these agreements or that we will be able to
refinance our debt on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

Our ability to comply with the covenants and restrictions contained in our credit facilities may be affected by economic, financial
and industry conditions beyond our control. The breach of any of these covenants or restrictions could result in a default under our
credit facilities that would permit the applicable lenders or note holders, as the case may be, to declare all amounts outstanding
thereunder to be due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest. In any such case, we may be unable to borrow under
and may not be able to repay the amounts due under our credit facilities. This could have serious consequences to our financial
condition and results of operations and could cause us to become bankrupt or insolvent.

12

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 15/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Our ability to generate the significant amount of cash needed to pay interest and principal on our debt facilities and our ability
to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness or obtain additional financing depends on many factors beyond our control.
Our ability to make scheduled payments on, or to refinance our obligations under our debt will depend on our financial and
operating performance. This, in turn, will be subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to the financial and
business factors, many of which may be beyond our control, as described under “Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Business”
above.

If our cash flow and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay
capital expenditures, sell assets, seek to obtain additional equity capital or restructure our debt. In the future, our cash flow and
capital resources may not be sufficient for payments of interest on and principal of our debt, and such alternative measures may not
be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations.

We cannot be assured that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness or obtain additional financing, particularly because
of our anticipated high levels of debt and the debt incurrence restrictions imposed by the agreements governing our debt, as well as
prevailing market conditions. In the absence of such operating results and resources, we could face substantial liquidity problems
and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. Our credit
facilities restrict our ability to dispose of assets and use the proceeds from any such dispositions. As a result, we cannot assure you
we will be able to consummate those sales, or if we do, what the timing of the sales will be, or whether the proceeds that we realize
will be adequate to meet the debt service obligations when due.

We are exposed to interest rate volatility, which could negatively impact our financial results.
We are exposed to interest rate volatility since the interest rates associated with portions of our debt are variable. While we
mitigate a portion of this volatility by entering into interest rate swap agreements, those agreements could lock our interest rates
above the market rates. As a result, an increase in interest rates, whether because of an increase in market interest rates or a
decrease in our creditworthiness, would increase the cost of servicing our debt and could materially reduce our profitability and
cash flows.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

13

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 16/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Item 2. Properties
Our corporate headquarters is located in Charlotte, North Carolina. We have additional administrative offices in Hanover,
Pennsylvania supporting our DSD network and in Norwich, England supporting our European operations. Our manufacturing
operations are located in Charlotte, North Carolina; Hanover, Pennsylvania; Franklin, Wisconsin; Goodyear, Arizona; Columbus,
Georgia; Jeffersonville, Indiana; Hyannis, Massachusetts; Perry, Florida; Ashland, Ohio; Salem, Oregon; Beloit, Wisconsin;
Norwich, England and Van Buren, Indiana. Additionally, our research and development centers are located in Hanover,
Pennsylvania and Salem, Oregon.

The map above illustrates some of the products manufactured at each facility.

We also lease or own over 100 warehouses as well as numerous stockrooms, sales offices and administrative offices throughout the
US to support our operations and DSD network. In addition, we lease warehousing facilities in Snetterton, England.

The facilities and properties that we own, lease and operate are maintained in good condition and are believed to be suitable and
adequate for our present needs. We believe that we have sufficient production capacity or the ability to increase capacity to meet
anticipated demand in 2017.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

IBO Litigation
Roxberry, et. al, v. S-L Distribution Company, LLC
On July 25, 2016, plaintiffs comprised of IBOs filed a putative class action against Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. and our distribution
subsidiary, S-L Distribution Company, Inc. in the Eastern District Court of Tennessee. The case was transferred to the Middle
District of Pennsylvania. The lawsuit seeks statewide class certification on behalf of a class comprised of IBOs in Tennessee, and
nationwide certification for the Federal law collective action. The plaintiffs allege that they were misclassified as independent
contractors and should be considered employees. We believe we have strong defenses to all the claims that have been asserted
against us. At this time, no demand has been made, and we cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any,
from this lawsuit.

Scheurer v. S-L Distribution Company, LLC

On December 8, 2016, plaintiff served a putative class action on behalf of all similarly situated IBOs in New Jersey against our
distribution subsidiary, S-L Distribution Company, LLC. Plaintiff is a former IBO whose distribution agreement was terminated
pursuant to the re-engineering and buyback of routes in New Jersey in 2011, resulting from the merger of Snyder’s of Hanover,
Inc. and Lance, Inc. The lawsuit seeks statewide class certification on behalf of a class comprised of IBOs in New Jersey for
alleged violations of the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act ("NJFPA") relative to various terminations of the distributor
agreement. We believe we have strong defenses to all the claims that have been asserted against us. At this time, no demand has
been made, and we cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, from this lawsuit.

14

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 17/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Merger-related Litigation
On November 10, 2015, a putative class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of Diamond Foods' stockholders in the Court of
Chancery of the State of Delaware. The complaint names as defendants Diamond Foods, the members of Diamond Foods’ board of
directors, Snyder’s-Lance, Shark Acquisition Sub I, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Snyder’s-
Lance (“Merger Sub I”) and Shark Acquisition Sub II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Snyder’s-Lance (“Merger Sub II”). The complaint generally alleges, among other things, that the members of Diamond Foods’
board of directors breached their fiduciary duties to Diamond Foods’ stockholders in connection with negotiating, entering into
and approving the merger agreement with Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. The complaint additionally alleges that Snyder’s-Lance, Merger
Sub I and Merger Sub II aided and abetted such breaches of fiduciary duties. The complaint sought injunctive relief, including the
enjoinment of the merger, certain other declaratory and equitable relief, damages, costs and fees. An amended complaint was filed
on December 21, 2015. The amended complaint adds further allegations related to the merger process and disclosures contained in
the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by Snyder’s-Lance on November 25, 2015. On January 15, 2016, plaintiff filed a
motion for expedited proceedings requesting a preliminary injunction and expedited discovery, which the Court denied on
February 3, 2016. Plaintiff also filed a books and records demand case in North Carolina, which the court subsequently dismissed
with prejudice. On January 19, 2016, another action was filed in the court of chancery in the state of Delaware similar to the above
matter. On October 24, 2016, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint, which modified some of plaintiff's allegations, including
now expressly seeking a quasi-appraisal remedy or rescissory damages. Defendants moved to dismiss the second amended
complaint on December 22, 2016. On February 3, 2017, plaintiffs moved to consolidate the two Delaware cases, which defendants
did not oppose, and which the Court granted on February 3, 2017. On February 24, 2017, the parties filed a stipulated proposed
order of dismissal, seeking voluntary dismissal of the Delaware litigation with prejudice as to the named plaintiffs and without
prejudice as to the putative class. The court granted the stipulated order of dismissal on February 27, 2017.

California Labor Code Litigation

Former employee Patricia Sparks filed a putative class action lawsuit against Diamond Foods on November 25, 2015 in San
Francisco Superior Court alleging Diamond Foods’ violation of the California Labor Code by failing to include on wage
statements the start date of the pay period and by failing to include on wage statements the name and address of the legal entity
that is the employer. Plaintiff amended her complaint on January 4, 2016 to add a claim for penalties under California’s Private
Attorneys General Act based on the same underlying violations. Diamond Foods timely answered the First Amended Complaint
on March 7, 2016. The parties attended the initial case management conference on May 2, 2016 and a further case management
conference occurred on August 1, 2016. We accrued $8.3 million associated with this outstanding claim in the Diamond Foods
opening balance sheet as that represented our best estimate of the probable liability at that time. We determined such accrual by
estimating the aggregate potential penalties that we believed it was probable could be assessed under the applicable California
laws, which are strict liability penalties. On September 19, 2016, the parties to this litigation reached a tentative settlement
pursuant to which we have agreed to pay $0.7 million on a class wide basis. We signed a memorandum of understanding reflecting
this preliminary settlement amount. The parties submitted a settlement agreement to the court and the court granted preliminary
approval of the settlement. As a result, we have recorded a measurement period adjustment to reduce the opening balance sheet
accrual. Accordingly this settlement amount did not impact our Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended
December 31, 2016.

Employment Tax Audit by the California Employment Development Department

On February 22, 2016, the company received notice from the Employment Development Department of the State of California
(“EDD”) that S-L Distribution Company, Inc. (“SLD”) had been selected for an employment tax audit. An onsite audit was
conducted April 27, 2016, of payroll records for 2015 as a general matter. In addition, the auditor examined the Forms 1099Misc
that the company had issued. The audit is still outstanding and will confirm whether the IBOs who received 1099s are bona-fide
contractors within the definition of an employer/employee relationship under the relevant statutes and regulations in California. If
the auditor issues an unfavorable determination and finds that the IBOs are actually employees, such a finding could have a
material adverse impact on our operations in California and potentially the other jurisdictions where the company utilizes IBO
business partners. At this time we cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, from this audit, nor are we
able to quantify the likelihood of a positive determination from the auditor.

Evaporated Cane Juice Litigation

A putative class action suit was filed against Late July on September 18, 2013, and is pending in the US District Court for the
Northern District of California. The action accuses Late July of violating federal and state law by using the term "evaporated cane
juice" ("ECJ") in the ingredients list on its products' labels. The plaintiffs' complaint alleges ECJ is not the common and usual
name for the ingredient at issue and is misleading. The complaint attempts to state claims for violation of California's Unfair
Competition Law, California's False Advertising Law, California's Consumers Legal Remedies Act, and unjust enrichment. Late
July filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on November 27, 2013, based on the primary jurisdiction doctrine, lack of standing,
and failure to state a claim.

15

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 18/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

On May 22, 2014, the Court stayed the action, applying the doctrine of primary jurisdiction, due to the FDA's ongoing
consideration of the issue of using the term ECJ on food labels. On May 26, 2016, the FDA issued its guidance for industry on the
topic. As a result, the stay was lifted on July 22, 2016. On August 31, 2016, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that, among
other things, relies on the FDA's recently issued guidance. Late July filed a motion to dismiss such amended complaint, and a
hearing on that motion was held on February 16, 2017. At this time, we cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of
loss, if any, from this lawsuit.

Other
We are currently subject to other lawsuits and environmental matters arising in the normal course of business. In our opinion, such
matters should not have a material effect upon our consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

16

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 19/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Executive Officers of the Company

Information about each of our executive officers, as defined in Rule 3b-7 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"), as of February 5, 2017, is as follows:

Name Age Information About Officers Hire Date

Carl E. Lee, Jr. 57 President and Chief Executive Officer of Snyder's-Lance, Inc. since May 2013; President 2005
and Chief Operating Officer of Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. from December 2010 to May 2013;
President and Chief Executive Officer of Snyder’s of Hanover, Inc. from 2005 to
December 2010.
Alexander W. 45 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. since 2016
Pease November 2016; Principal of McKinsey and Company from 2015 to 2016; Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Enpro Industries from 2011 to 2015; Principal of
McKinsey and Company from 2007 to 2011.
Rodrigo F. 50 Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of Snyder's-Lance, Inc. since 2013
Troni Pena December 2013; Senior Vice President, Birds Eye at Pinnacle Foods from May 2010 to
November 2013.
Frank B. 50 President, DSD Division of Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. since February 2016; Senior Vice 2009
Schuster President and Chief Sales Officer of Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. from October 2015 to February
2016; Senior Vice President, Sales Division of Snyder's-Lance, Inc. from December 2010
to October 2015; Senior Vice President, Sales Division of Lance, Inc. from June 2009 to
December 2010.
Margaret E. 56 Vice President, Corporate Controller, Principal Accounting Officer and Assistant 1992
Wicklund Secretary of Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. since December 2010.
Gail Sharps 47 Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Snyder's-Lance, Inc. since 2015
Myers January 2015; Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel, Chief Compliance Counsel
and Assistant Secretary of US Foods, Inc. from 2014 to 2015, Senior Vice President,
Deputy General Counsel and Secretary of US Foods from 2011 to 2014; Vice President
Business Law and Assistant Secretary of US Foods, Inc. from 2009 to 2011.
Andrea 47 Chief Human Resources Officer of Snyder's-Lance, Inc. since March 2016; Vice President 2016
Frohning Human Resources of Crane Co. from 2013 to 2016; Vice President Human Resources of
Hubbell Electrical Systems, Hubbell Inc. from 2009 to 2013.

17

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 20/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our $0.83-1/3 par value Common Stock trades under the symbol "LNCE" on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. We had 4,916
stockholders of record as of February 23, 2017.
The following table sets forth the high and low intraday sale price quotations and dividend information for each interim period of
the years ended December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016:

High Low Dividend

2016 Interim Periods Price Price Paid
First quarter (13 weeks ended April 2, 2016) $ 36.20 $ 27.93 $ 0.16
Second quarter (13 weeks ended July 2, 2016) 34.12 28.92 0.16
Third quarter (13 weeks ended October 1, 2016) 36.61 32.99 0.16
Fourth quarter (13 weeks ended December 31, 2016) 38.99 33.18 0.16

High Low Dividend

2015 Interim Periods Price Price Paid
First quarter (13 weeks ended April 4, 2015) $ 32.83 $ 28.82 $ 0.16
Second quarter (13 weeks ended July 4, 2015) 33.04 28.98 0.16
Third quarter (13 weeks ended October 3, 2015) 35.98 31.32 0.16
Fourth quarter (13 weeks ended January 2, 2016) 39.10 32.00 0.16

On February 8, 2017, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.16 per share payable on March 3, 2017 to
stockholders of record on February 23, 2017. Our Board of Directors will consider the amount of future cash dividends on a
quarterly basis.

In conjunction with our acquisition of Diamond Foods, we entered into a new senior unsecured credit agreement as amended (the
“Credit Agreement”) on December 16, 2015 with the term lenders and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. The Credit
Agreement restricts our payment of cash dividends and repurchases of our common stock if, after payment of any such dividends
or any such repurchases of our common stock, our consolidated stockholders’ equity would be less than $500 million. As of
December 31, 2016, our consolidated stockholders’ equity was $1,875.7 million and we were in compliance with this covenant.

The following table presents information with respect to repurchases of our common stock made during the fourth quarter of 2016,
by us or any of our “affiliated purchasers” as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act:

Total Number of Maximum Number of

Shares Purchased as Shares that May Yet
Total Number Average Price Part of Publicly Be Purchased Under
of Shares Paid Per Announced Plans or the Plans or Programs
Period Purchased (1) Share Programs (2)

October 2, 2016 - October 31, 2016 — — — —

November 1, 2016 - November 30, 2016 — — — —
December 1, 2016 - December 31, 2016 1,159 $ 38.34 — —
Total 1,159 $ 38.34 — —

Represents shares withheld by us pursuant to provisions in agreements with recipients of restricted stock granted under our equity compensation plans that allow
(1)

us to withhold the number of shares with a fair value equal to the tax withholding due upon vesting of the restricted shares.
(2) At this time the board of directors has not authorized management to repurchase any of our common stock in the market.

18

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 21/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth selected historical financial data for the five-year period ended December 31, 2016. The selected
financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations” and the audited financial statements. The prior year amounts have been reclassified as necessary for
consistent presentation.

Results of Operations (in

thousands): 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Net revenue (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) $ 2,109,227 $ 1,656,399 $ 1,620,920 $ 1,504,332 $ 1,362,911
Cost of sales 1,345,437 1,077,110 1,042,458 963,073 872,316
Gross profit 763,790 579,289 578,462 541,259 490,595
Gross margin 36.2% 35.0% 35.7% 36.0% 36.0%

Income before income taxes (6)

(7) (8) (9) (10) 67,123 79,603 91,508 87,900 79,408
Income from continuing
operations 41,803 50,718 59,217 55,603 45,489
(Loss)/income from
discontinued operations, net of
income tax (11) (12) (27,100) — 133,316 23,481 14,021
Net income attributable to
Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. $ 14,885 $ 50,685 $ 192,591 $ 78,720 $ 59,085

Average Number of Common

Shares
Outstanding (in thousands):
Basic 91,873 70,487 69,966 69,102 68,131
Diluted 92,891 71,142 70,656 69,877 68,964

Per Share of Common Stock:

Basic earnings per share from
continuing operations $ 0.46 $ 0.72 $ 0.84 $ 0.80 $ 0.66
Basic (loss)/earnings per share
from discontinued operations (0.29) — 1.90 0.33 0.20
Total basic earnings per share $ 0.17 $ 0.72 $ 2.74 $ 1.13 $ 0.86

Diluted earnings per share from

continuing operations $ 0.45 $ 0.71 $ 0.84 $ 0.79 $ 0.65
Diluted (loss)/earnings per
share from discontinued
operations (0.29) — 1.88 0.33 0.20
Total diluted earnings per share $ 0.16 $ 0.71 $ 2.72 $ 1.12 $ 0.85

Dividends declared per

common share $ 0.64 $ 0.64 $ 0.64 $ 0.64 $ 0.64

Financial Status at Year-end

(in thousands):
Total assets (13) (14) (15) $ 3,834,076 $ 1,810,704 $ 1,849,056 $ 1,752,758 $ 1,733,201
Long-term debt, net of
current portion (13) (15) $ 1,245,959 $ 372,301 $ 437,233 $ 478,671 $ 512,681
Total debt (13) (15) $ 1,294,959 $ 380,842 $ 445,794 $ 495,962 $ 533,143

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 22/107
6/26/2018 Document

19

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 23/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Footnotes:

(1) 2016 net revenue included $443 million of incremental net revenue attributable to the acquisition of Diamond Foods.

(2) 2015 net revenue increased compared to 2014, in part due to the full year impact of the acquisition of Baptista's Bakery and
consolidation of Late July, which occurred in June 2014 and October 2014, respectively. The increase was partially offset
by approximately $30 million of net revenue generated during 2014 as a result of the fifty-third week.

(3) 2014 net revenue increased compared to 2013 approximately $30 million, as a result of the fifty-third week and $44 million
as a result of the acquisition of Baptista's in June 2014 and the consolidation of the results of Late July subsequent to our
additional investment in October 2014.

(4) 2013 net revenue increased compared to 2012, in part due to the full year impact of the acquisition of Snack Factory, which
occurred in October 2012.

(5) 2012 net revenue included approximately $30 million as a result of acquisitions, including the acquisition of Snack Factory
in October 2012.

(6) 2016 pretax income was impacted by approximately $66 million of transaction and integration related expenses due to the
acquisition of Diamond Foods, approximately $11 million of additional cost of sales due to the step-up of inventory from
the acquisition of Diamond Foods, approximately $5 million for the loss on prepayment of debt, and approximately $4
million in asset impairments primarily related to the transfer of production location for certain products.

(7) 2015 pretax income was impacted by approximately $8 million in transaction-related fees associated with the pending
acquisition of Diamond Foods, approximately $12 million in asset impairment charges primarily related to the transfer of
production location for certain products and approximately $6 million in settlements of certain litigation.

(8) 2014 pretax income was impacted by a gain on the revaluation of our prior equity investment in Late July of approximately
$17 million, impairment charges of approximately $13 million and approximately $4 million of expense associated with
our margin improvement and restructuring plan.

(9) 2013 pretax income was impacted by certain self-funded medical claims that resulted in approximately $5 million in
incremental expenses as well as impairment charges of approximately $2 million associated with one of our trademarks.

(10) 2012 pretax income included the impact of approximately $4 million in severance costs and professional fees related to the
Snyder's-Lance Merger and integration activities, approximately $9 million in impairment charges offset by approximately
$22 million in gains on the sale of route businesses associated with the IBO conversion.

(11) 2016 loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax, included a $33 million pretax loss on the sale of Diamond of
California.

(12) 2014 income from discontinued operations, net of income tax, included a $223 million pretax gain on the sale of Private
Brands.

(13) 2016 total assets includes $2.2 billion acquired from Diamond Foods, and total debt increased due to the issuance of $1.1
billion of debt in conjunction with the Diamond Foods acquisition.

(14) 2014 total assets increased from 2013 primarily due to the acquisition of Baptista's and Late July, partially offset by the sale
of Private Brands.

(15) We adopted ASU No. 2015-03 in the first quarter of 2016 which had the effect of retrospectively presenting debt issuance
costs related to a recognized debt liability as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. As such,
debt issuance costs are presented as a reduction of long-term debt in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and removed from
other noncurrent assets.

20

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 24/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") is intended to
help the reader understand Snyder's-Lance, Inc., our operations and our present business environment. MD&A is provided as a
supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to the
financial statements. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The forward-
looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections
about our industry, business and future financial results. Our actual results could differ materially from the results contemplated by
these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including those discussed under Part I, Item 1A—Risk Factors and
other sections in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

MD&A is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation
of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments about future events that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Future events and their effects
cannot be determined with absolute certainty. Therefore, management’s determination of estimates and judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities requires the exercise of judgment in the selection and application of assumptions based on
various factors, including historical experience, current and expected economic conditions and other factors believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances. We routinely evaluate our estimates, including those related to sales and promotional
allowances, customer returns, allowances for doubtful accounts, inventory valuations, useful lives of fixed assets and related
impairment, long-term investments, hedge transactions, goodwill and intangible asset valuations and impairments, incentive
compensation, income taxes, self-insurance, contingencies and litigation. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
Executive Summary

2016 was an exciting year for our Company. Coming into 2016, we were focused on growing our distribution footprint and our
Core brand revenue and market share and returning our Snyder's of Hanover brand back to growth, as well as growing our "better-
for-you" portfolio. We were successful in achieving all of these goals. Our growth strategy for our Core brands continues to focus
on quality, innovation and expanded distribution. We are achieving our goals regarding the mix of "better-for-you" products
relative to our entire portfolio, with 31% of our 2016 revenue coming from products considered to be "better-for-you" and we
expect to increase this percentage in 2017.

On February 29, 2016, we completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding stock of Diamond Foods. The acquisition of
Diamond Foods significantly changed our capital structure and debt profile. Diamond Foods stockholders received 0.775 shares of
Snyder's-Lance common stock and $12.50 in cash for each Diamond Foods share, for a total purchase price of approximately
$1.86 billion, based on the closing price of our common stock on February 26, 2016, the last trading day prior to the closing date
and including our repayment of approximately $651 million of Diamond Foods' indebtedness, accrued interest and related fees.
The strategic combination of Snyder's-Lance and Diamond Foods brought together two established companies with strong brands
and created an innovative, highly complementary and diversified portfolio of branded snacks, including: Kettle Brand® potato
chips; KETTLE® Chips; Pop Secret® popcorn; Emerald® snack nuts; and Diamond of California® culinary nuts. The transaction
expanded our footprint in "better-for-you" snacking and increased our existing natural food channel presence. In addition, this
transaction expanded and strengthened our national distribution network, and provided a platform for growth in the U.K. and
across Europe. We believe we are now even better positioned in the growing snack food industry, and we continue to see
significant opportunities for both cost and revenue synergies, which we expect to deliver earnings accretion and support further
investment behind our brands.

On September 1, 2016, we completed the acquisition of Metcalfe by acquiring the remaining 74% interest. Metcalfe owns the
U.K.'s leading premium RTE popcorn brand, and also incorporates a fast growing range of corn and rice cake products. The U.K.
popcorn market is one of the fastest growing categories within the U.K. snack food industry, as consumers increasingly seek out
"better-for-you" snacking options. The addition of a leading premium RTE popcorn brand, Metcalfe’s skinny®, to the U.K.'s
leading premium chip brand, KETTLE® Chips, reflects our plan to become a leading provider of premium snack foods in Europe.

In addition to these strategic acquisitions, on December 31, 2016, we completed the sale of our Diamond of California culinary
nuts business. The sale of Diamond of California aligns with our strategy to focus more resources on the growth opportunities for
our snack food brands, and provides proceeds to reduce our overall debt and invest in other strategic transactions.

21

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 25/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

2016 Performance

Overall, net revenue increased in 2016 compared to 2015, primarily due to increased revenue associated with the contribution of
Diamond Foods, as well as strong Core Brand revenue growth in our legacy Snyder's-Lance business, despite headwinds coming
into 2016 due to:

• Declines related to strategic changes at our largest customer which impacted space, displays and store inventory levels for
certain branded products; and

• Overall slow growth in the snack food industry which led to declines in revenue from partner brand products and certain
branded products.

Our 2016 results were also impacted by the following:

• Transaction and integration related expenses - We incurred $66.3 million in transaction and integration related expenses in
selling, general and administrative expense related to the acquisition of Diamond Foods during 2016, compared to $7.7
million in 2015.

• Inventory step-up - As a result of the acquisition of Diamond Foods, we were required to step-up the value of the acquired
inventory to fair value. This resulted in $11.3 million in additional cost of sales during the year, or a 0.5% impact on gross
margin.

• Amortization expense - We acquired $355.3 million of customer relationships intangibles in the Diamond Foods
acquisition. Although $19.9 million of this balance was disposed of in the Diamond of California divestiture, we
recognized in continuing operations $14.0 million of incremental amortization expense in 2016, compared to 2015.

• Impairment charges - During 2016, we made the decision to move the production of certain products to improve
operational efficiency. As a result, we recognized a total of $3.7 million of fixed asset impairment charges in 2016.

• Incentive compensation expense - Excluding accelerated stock-based compensation expense associated with the Diamond
Foods transaction and integration, we incurred 0.3% of incremental expense as a percentage of net revenue in 2016,
compared to 2015, primarily due to lower attainment of incentive targets in 2015.

• Promotional spending - We increased promotional spending as a percentage of revenue during 2016 for our legacy
Snyder's-Lance Core brands, which resulted in approximately $27 million of additional promotional expense compared to
2015, or 1.3% lower gross margin compared to 2015.

• Interest expense - In order to complete the acquisition of Diamond Foods, we borrowed $1.13 billion in long-term debt,
which significantly increased our outstanding debt throughout the year and resulted in $21.8 million in incremental
interest expense in 2016, compared to 2015.

In spite of these challenges in 2016, we were able grow market share in all of our legacy Snyder's-Lance Core brands. A discussion
of the trends for each of our Core brands is included below:

• Despite a slight revenue decline from Snyder's of Hanover® in 2016, compared to 2015, we were able to undertake a
renovation of the brand during 2016, including television advertising, digital media, as well as aggressive coupon
programs. Our commitment to the brand enabled Snyder’s of Hanover® to return to revenue growth in the fourth quarter
of 2016, continue to grow market share during the year and maintain a substantial lead over our closest competitor in the
category.

• Net revenue from our Lance® sandwich crackers increased in 2016, compared to the prior year primarily due to
distribution gains in the club channel. The Lance® sandwich cracker brand also gained market share throughout the year.

• Snack Factory® Pretzel Crisps® experienced mid-single-digit revenue growth as well as market share growth in the deli
snacks category in 2016, primarily through expanded distribution in the grocery channel.

• We continued to grow sales with existing customers as well as expand the distribution of our Cape Cod® kettle cooked
chips in 2016, which resulted in mid-single-digit revenue growth compared to 2015 and increased market share for the
Cape Cod® brand in a growing kettle chip category.

• Late July® continued to expand distribution and gain market share in the grocery and natural channels, leading to double-
digit revenue growth in 2016.

22

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 26/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

• For the acquired Diamond Foods brands, Kettle Brand® and Emerald® grew market share, while Pop Secret® experienced
a slight reduction in market share.

As we move into 2017, we plan to substantially complete the integration of Diamond Foods and continue to grow our business
both domestically and abroad as we focus on quality, innovation and expanded distribution while "changing the way the world
snacks with better ingredients, quality and taste." Some items to note for our 2017 business outlook are as follows:

• We expect to continue to make investments in marketing and advertising, and promotional spending to support our Core
brands and our new innovation in the first half of 2017.

• We expect to continue to introduce new innovation, including Cape Cod® Thins, Wholey Cheese!TM, and "better-for-you"
multi-packs.

• We expect our weighted average diluted share count to be approximately 98 million shares for fiscal 2017, compared to
92.9 million shares for fiscal 2016, which will impact our diluted earnings per share.

• The first quarter of 2017 will include the full impact of the Diamond Foods acquisition, which was acquired on February
29, 2016.

23

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 27/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended January 2, 2016

Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
(in millions) 2016 2015 Variance
Net revenue $ 2,109.2 100.0 % $ 1,656.4 100.0% $ 452.8 27.3 %
Cost of sales 1,345.4 63.8 % 1,077.1 65.0% (268.3) (24.9)%
Gross profit 763.8 36.2 % 579.3 35.0% 184.5 31.8 %
Selling, general and administrative 594.0 28.2 % 464.5 28.0% (129.5) (27.9)%
Transaction and integration related
expenses 66.3 3.1 % 7.7 0.5% (58.6) (761.0)%
Settlement of certain litigation — —% 5.7 0.3% 5.7 100.0 %
Impairment charges 4.5 0.2 % 12.0 0.7% 7.5 62.5 %
Other income, net (5.5) (0.3)% (1.1) —% 4.4 400.0 %
Income before interest and income
taxes 104.5 5.0 % 90.5 5.5% 14.0 15.5 %
Loss on early extinguishment of debt 4.7 0.2 % — —% (4.7) (100.0)%
Interest expense, net 32.7 1.6 % 10.9 0.7% (21.8) (200.0)%
Income tax expense 25.3 1.2 % 28.9 1.7% 3.6 12.5 %
Income from continuing operations 41.8 2.0 % 50.7 3.1% (8.9) (17.6)%
Loss from discontinued operations,
net of income tax (27.1) (1.3)% — —% (27.1) (100.0)%
Net income $ 14.7 0.7 % $ 50.7 3.1% $ (36.0) (71.0)%

Net Revenue
Net revenue by product category was as follows:

Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
(in millions) 2016 2015 Variance
Branded $ 1,638.3 77.7% $ 1,190.2 71.9% $ 448.1 37.6 %
Partner brand 300.4 14.2% 300.5 18.1% (0.1) —%
Other 170.5 8.1% 165.7 10.0% 4.8 2.9 %
Net revenue $ 2,109.2 100.0% $ 1,656.4 100.0% $ 452.8 27.3 %

Prior year Partner brand revenues from the sale of Kettle Brand® potato chips are now classified as Branded revenues as a result of
the Diamond Foods acquisition. For 2015, we have reclassified $34.8 million of Partner brand revenue associated with Kettle
Brand® potato chips to Branded revenue to be consistent with current year presentation.

Net revenue increased $452.8 million, or 27.3%, in 2016 compared to 2015, primarily due to increased revenue associated with the
contribution of Diamond Foods. Excluding the revenue increase from Diamond Foods, overall net revenue increased 0.6% as
increased Branded revenue was partially offset by a decrease in the Other revenue category.

24

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 28/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

The following table reflects revenue by product category adjusted for incremental revenue attributable to Diamond Foods and
compares net revenue excluding the Diamond Foods contribution for 2016 to net revenue for 2015:

Incremental
Diamond 2016 Net Revenue Favorable/
2016 Net Foods Net excluding Diamond 2015 Net (Unfavorable)
(in millions) Revenue Revenue Foods (1) Revenue Variance
Branded $ 1,638.3 $ 430.2 $ 1,208.1 $ 1,190.2 $ 17.9 1.5 %
Partner brand 300.4 — 300.4 300.5 (0.1) —%
Other 170.5 13.3 157.2 165.7 (8.5) (5.1)%
Net revenue $ 2,109.2 $ 443.5 $ 1,665.7 $ 1,656.4 $ 9.3 0.6 %

The non-GAAP measure and related comparisons in the table above should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, our net revenue disclosure, as
(1)

well as other measures of financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP, and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other
companies. Our management believes the presentation of 2016 Net Revenue excluding Diamond Foods is useful for providing increased transparency and
assisting investors in understanding our ongoing operating performance.

Branded net revenue increased $448.1 million, or 37.6%, compared to 2015, primarily due to incremental revenue from Diamond
Foods. Branded net revenue, excluding Diamond Foods, was up $17.9 million, or 1.5%, compared to 2015. Overall Branded
volume increased approximately 5% during 2016 and all of our Core brands increased market share in the IRI covered channels.
The volume increase was partially offset by lower net price realization due to additional investments in promotional spending
necessary to drive sales in a highly competitive environment. Net revenue from our legacy Core brands increased by more than
2% as 3-5% growth in Lance®, Snack Factory® Pretzel Crisps®, and Cape Cod®, and greater than 10% growth in Late July® was
partially offset by a slight decline in net revenue from Snyder's of Hanover®. However, Snyder's of Hanover® net revenue showed
marked improvement in the second half of the year due to the brand renovation efforts undertaken in the first half of the year,
including the successful Pretzels Baby® marketing and advertising campaign.

Partner brand net revenue declined slightly in 2016 compared to 2015 as volume declines for certain Partner brand products were
substantially offset by volume increases in other Partner brands.

Other net revenue, excluding Diamond Foods, decreased $8.5 million, or 5.1%, due primarily to the planned exit of certain
contract manufacturing agreements, as well as increased Branded production at certain manufacturing facilities which limited the
capacity for contract manufacturing.

Gross Profit
Gross profit increased $184.5 million, and 1.2% as a percentage of net revenue compared to 2015. The dollar increase in gross
margin was due to increased sales volume primarily due to the acquisition of Diamond Foods. The increase in gross profit as a
percentage of net revenue in 2016 was due to lower input costs, increased productivity at our manufacturing facilities, and a higher
mix of Branded sales, which typically have a higher gross margin than Partner brand or Other sales. These increases were partially
offset by increased investment in promotional spending compared to 2015, to support the growth of our Core brands, as well as the
inventory step-up of $11.3 million required for purchase accounting associated with the Diamond Foods acquisition. The increase
in promotional spending as a percentage of revenue, excluding Diamond Foods, resulted in approximately $27.0 million of
additional promotional expense compared to 2015, or approximately 1.3% lower gross profit as a percentage of revenue for 2016,
compared to 2015.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $129.5 million in 2016, compared to 2015, and increased 0.2% as a
percentage of net revenue. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily due to additional expenses
attributable to Diamond Foods. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue was due to
increased investments in marketing and advertising to support our Branded products, as well as higher incentive compensation
expense due to improved operating performance. These increases were largely offset by synergies realized in conjunction with the
integration of Diamond Foods as well as other margin enhancement initiatives.

25

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 29/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Transaction and Integration Related Expenses

We recognized $66.3 million in Diamond Foods transaction and integration related expenses during 2016. These expenses in
continuing operations included $17.5 million of severance and retention benefits and $16.4 million of accelerated stock-based
compensation, which related primarily to change in control provisions and severance agreements with Diamond Foods personnel.
The remaining costs include investment banking fees as well as other professional fees and legal costs associated with the
acquisition and integration of Diamond Foods. We recognized $7.7 million of Diamond Foods related transaction expenses during
2015 for professional fees and legal costs associated with the acquisition.

Settlement of certain litigation

During 2015, we recognized $5.7 million in expense associated with settlements reached in our "all-natural" and IBO class action
lawsuits. See Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for additional information related to these
settlements. There were no significant litigation settlements in 2016.

Impairment Charges
Impairment charges of $4.5 million were recorded during 2016, compared to $12.0 million during 2015. During 2016, we sold the
Diamond of California business which included certain tangible assets (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements
included in Item 8 for further information). In connection with this transaction, we recorded impairment of $2.3 million for certain
machinery and equipment we retained, but no longer have the ability to use. We also incurred impairment charges of $1.4 million
related to the discontinuation of manufacturing certain products. During 2015, we made the decision to move the production of
certain products and provide additional packaging alternatives to improve operational efficiency, which resulted in fixed asset
impairment charges of $11.5 million in 2015.

In addition, in 2016, we recorded $0.8 million of impairments related to route businesses compared to $0.5 million in 2015.

Other Income, Net

We recognized other income of $5.5 million in 2016 primarily due to a $4.3 million insurance settlement related to a business
interruption claim that resulted from an unexpected production outage in the fourth quarter of 2015. Other income in 2015 of $1.1
million primarily consisted of $1.9 million in net gains on the sale of route businesses, partially offset by $0.7 million of expense
associated with the derecognition of our cumulative translation adjustment due to the liquidation of our Canadian subsidiary.

During 2016, we also recognized $1.3 million in net gains on the sale of route businesses. Net gains on the sale of route businesses
in 2016 consisted of $5.5 million in gains and $4.2 million in losses. For 2015, net gains on the sale of route businesses consisted
of $3.3 million in gains and $1.4 million in losses. The majority of the route business sales in 2016 were due to route reengineering
projects that were initiated in order to maximize the efficiency of route territories for the IBOs. The majority of the net gains on the
sale of route business during 2015 were due to the decision to sell certain route businesses that were previously Company-owned
as well as route reengineering projects.

Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt

In February of 2016, using available borrowings from our existing credit facilities, we repaid our $100 million private placement
senior notes, which were due in June 2017. The total repayment was approximately $106 million, and resulted in a loss on early
extinguishment of approximately $4.7 million.

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense increased $21.8 million during 2016 compared to 2015. The increase in net interest expense was the result of
additional debt obtained to finance the acquisition of Diamond Foods.
Income Tax Expense
The effective income tax rate increased to 37.7% in 2016 from 36.3% in 2015. The increase in the effective income tax rate in
2016 was primarily due to non-deductible Diamond Foods related transaction costs in 2016.

Loss from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax

Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax, included in 2016 was primarily due to the loss on the sale of Diamond of
California, partially offset by income generated by discontinued operations prior to the sale. See Note 3 to the consolidated
financial statements included in Item 8 for additional information related to this sale. There were no discontinued operations in
2015.

26

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 30/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Year Ended January 2, 2016 (52 weeks) Compared to Year Ended January 3, 2015 (53 weeks)

Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
(in millions) 2015 2014 Variance
Net revenue $ 1,656.4 100.0% $ 1,620.9 100.0 % $ 35.5 2.2 %
Cost of sales 1,077.1 65.0% 1,042.4 64.3 % (34.7) (3.3)%
Gross profit 579.3 35.0% 578.5 35.7 % 0.8 0.1 %
Selling, general and administrative 464.5 28.0% 478.5 29.5 % 14.0 2.9 %
Transaction-related expenses 7.7 0.5% — —% (7.7) (100.0)%
Settlements of certain litigation 5.7 0.3% — —% (5.7) (100.0)%
Impairment charges 12.0 0.7% 13.0 0.8 % 1.0 7.7 %
Gain on the revaluation of prior equity
investment — —% (16.6) (1.0)% (16.6) (100.0)%
Other income, net (1.1) —% (1.3) (0.1)% (0.2) (15.4)%
Income before interest and income
taxes 90.5 5.5% 104.9 6.5 % (14.4) (13.7)%
Interest expense, net 10.9 0.7% 13.4 0.8 % 2.5 18.7 %
Income tax expense 28.9 1.7% 32.3 2.0 % 3.4 10.5 %
Income from continuing operations 50.7 3.1% 59.2 3.7 % (8.5) (14.4)%
Income from discontinued operations,
net of income tax — —% 133.3 8.2 % (133.3) (100.0)%
Net income $ 50.7 3.1% $ 192.5 11.9 % $ (141.8) (73.7)%

Net Revenue
Net revenue by product category was as follows:

Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
(in millions) 2015 2014 Variance
Branded $ 1,190.2 71.9% $ 1,154.7 71.2% $ 35.5 3.1 %
Partner brand 300.5 18.1% 306.2 18.9% (5.7) (1.9)%
Other 165.7 10.0% 160.0 9.9% 5.7 3.6 %
Net revenue $ 1,656.4 100.0% $ 1,620.9 100.0% $ 35.5 2.2 %

Previous Partner brand revenues from the sale of Kettle Brand® potato chips are now classified as Branded revenues as a result of
the Diamond Foods acquisition. For 2015 and 2014, we have reclassified $34.8 million and $33.8 million of Partner brand revenue
associated with Kettle Brand® potato chips to Branded revenue to be consistent with the 2016 presentation.
Net revenue increased $35.5 million, or 2.2%, in 2015 compared to 2014, primarily due to acquisitions, which was partially offset
by the additional week of revenue recognized in 2014.

27

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 31/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

The following table reflects revenue by product category adjusted for amounts attributable to the 53rd week and compares 2015
net revenue to 2014 Adjusted Net Revenue:

Favorable/
2015 Net 2014 Net Estimated 2014 Adjusted (Unfavorable)
(in millions) Revenue Revenue 53rd week Net Revenue (1) Variance
Branded $ 1,190.2 $ 1,154.7 $ 21.2 $ 1,133.5 $ 56.7 5.0%
Partner brand 300.5 306.2 5.9 300.3 0.2 0.1%
Other 165.7 160.0 3.3 156.7 9.0 5.7%
Net revenue $ 1,656.4 $ 1,620.9 $ 30.4 $ 1,590.5 $ 65.9 4.1%

The non-GAAP measures and related comparisons in the table above should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, our net revenue disclosure, as
(1)

well as other measures of financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP, and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other
companies. Our management believes the presentation of 2014 Adjusted Net Revenue is useful for providing increased transparency and assisting investors in
understanding the ongoing operating performance of our Company.

Branded net revenue increased $35.5 million, or 3.1%, compared to 2014, primarily due to incremental Late July® revenue
resulting from the consolidation of Late July® beginning at the end of October 2014, as well as revenue growth in our other Core
brands. Revenue from branded products increased approximately $56.7 million, or 5.0% in 2015, when excluding our estimate of
the 53rd week in 2014. Revenue growth from our Core brands, excluding the impact of Late July®, was led by double digit
revenue increases in Cape Cod® branded products as well as revenue increases in our Snack Factory® Pretzel Crisps® and Lance®
branded products. Our Cape Cod® kettle cooked chips experienced strong volume growth and increased market share when
compared to 2014, due to growth in core markets and continued expanded distribution. We also continued to experience revenue
and market share growth in Snack Factory® Pretzel Crisps®. Our Lance® branded products performed well compared to 2014,
with increased revenue and market share driven in part by distribution gains in the second half of the year. These revenue
increases were partially offset by slight revenue declines from our Snyder’s of Hanover® branded products in 2015, compared to
2014, after excluding the impact of the 53rd week in 2014. The volume decline was primarily due to overall softness in the pretzel
category in the second half of 2015. Revenue from our Allied branded products was down in 2015 compared to 2014, after
adjusting for the 53rd week, primarily due to volume declines in certain salty product lines.

Partner brand net revenue increased 0.1% in 2015 compared to 2014 after adjusting for the 53rd week. During the second half of
2015, we experienced volume declines as a result of lower promotional activities for many of the Partner brands that we sell
through our DSD distribution network.

Other revenue, which primarily consists of revenue from contract manufactured products, increased $5.7 million, or 3.6%, from
2015 to 2016, and was up $9.0 million, or 5.7%, after adjusting for the 53rd week in 2014. The increase was primarily due to a full
year of revenue from Baptista's, which was acquired in June of 2014. However, this increase was partially offset by a reduction in
orders from Shearer's Foods LLC as part of our manufacturing and supply agreement, as well as lost revenue due to a power
outage at one of our major manufacturing facilities.

Gross Profit
Gross profit increased $0.8 million, but declined 0.7% as a percentage of net revenue compared to 2014. The dollar increase in
gross margin was due to increased sales volume compared to the prior year. The decline as a percentage of revenue was primarily
the result of increased promotional spending to support our new product offerings and generate volume for our Branded products.
The increase in promotional spending as a percentage of revenue during 2015, resulted in approximately $13.5 million of
additional promotional expense compared to 2014, or approximately 0.8% lower gross profit as a percentage of revenue for 2015,
compared to 2014.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $14.0 million in 2015, compared to 2014, and decreased 1.5% as a
percentage of net revenue. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses compared to 2014 was primarily due to
cost reduction efforts associated with our margin improvement and restructuring plan, declines in fuel and freight costs, lower
incentive compensation expense and less marketing and advertising costs. These reductions were partially offset by a full year of
Baptista's and Late July expense.

28

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 32/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Transaction-related Expenses
We recognized $7.7 million of Diamond Foods related transaction expenses during 2015, related to professional fees and legal
costs associated with the acquisition. There were no Diamond Foods related transaction expenses recognized in 2014.

Settlement of Certain Litigation

During 2015, we recognized $5.7 million in expense associated with settlements reached in our "all-natural" and IBO class action
lawsuits. See Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for additional information related to these
settlements. There were no significant litigation settlements in 2014.

Impairment Charges
Impairment charges of $12.0 million were recorded during 2015, compared to $13.0 million during 2014. During 2015, we made
the decision to move the production of certain products and provide additional packaging alternatives to improve operational
efficiency. As a result, we recognized fixed asset impairment charges of $11.5 million in 2015, compared to $5.7 million in asset
impairment charges in 2014. In addition, in 2015, we recorded $0.5 million of impairments related to route businesses compared to
$3.7 million in 2014. We also recorded $3.6 million in trademark impairments in 2014, while no trademark impairments were
necessary in 2015.

Gain on the Revaluation of Prior Equity Investment

During 2014, we recognized a $16.6 million gain on the revaluation of our prior 18.7% equity investment in Late July. Because of
our purchase of a controlling interest in Late July, the equity of the entire entity was increased to fair value, which resulted in a
$16.6 million increase in the value of our prior investment.

Other Income, Net

Other income decreased from $1.3 million in 2014 to $1.1 million in 2015. Other income in 2015 of $1.1 million primarily
consisted of $1.9 million in net gains on the sale of route businesses, partially offset by $0.7 million of expense associated with the
derecognition of our cumulative translation adjustment due to the liquidation of our Canadian subsidiary. Other income in 2014
principally consisted of $1.1 million in net gains on the sale of route businesses.

Net gains on the sale of route businesses in 2015 consisted of $3.3 million in gains and $1.4 million in losses. For 2014, net gains
on the sale of route businesses consisted of $3.3 million in gains and $2.2 million in losses. The majority of the net gains on the
sale of route business during 2015 were due to the decision to sell certain route businesses that were previously Company-owned
as well as route reengineering projects that were initiated in order to maximize the efficiency of route territories for the IBOs. The
majority of the route business sales activity in 2014 was due to the resale of routes purchased because of IBO defaults or route
reengineering projects.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense decreased $2.5 million during 2015, compared to 2014. The decrease was due to lower debt levels in 2015, as well
as a $0.8 million write-off of previously capitalized debt issuance costs that occurred in 2014 due to debt refinancing.
Income Tax Expense
The effective income tax rate increased to 36.3% in 2015 from 35.3% in 2014. The increase in the effective income tax rate in
2015 was primarily due to non-deductible Diamond Foods related transaction costs in late 2015.

Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax

Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax, included in 2014 is primarily due to the gain recognized as a result of the
completion of the sale of Private Brands. There were no discontinued operations in 2015.

29

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 33/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity
Liquidity represents our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operating activities to meet our obligations as well as our
ability to obtain appropriate financing. Therefore, liquidity should not be considered separately from capital resources that consist
primarily of current and potentially available funds for use in achieving our objectives. Currently, our liquidity needs arise
primarily from acquisitions, working capital requirements, capital expenditures for fixed assets and dividends. We believe we have
sufficient liquidity available to enable us to meet these demands throughout the next twelve months as well as over the long-term.
Cash Flows
The following table sets forth a summary of our cash flows for each of the past three years:

(in thousands) 2016 2015 2014

Net cash provided by/(used in):
Operating activities $ 261,199 $ 146,154 $ 13,025
Investing activities (1,116,861) (44,026) 99,035
Financing activities 853,008 (98,396) (90,767)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash (1,042) — —
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents $ (3,696) $ 3,732 $ 21,293

Operating Cash Flows

Cash flow provided by operating activities increased $115.0 million in 2016, compared to 2015. Operating cash flows increased
approximately $42 million, due to an increase in the payable to growers balance from the time of the Diamond Foods acquisition
to the time of the divestiture of Diamond of California. We also paid considerably less income taxes in 2016, because we used net
operating losses acquired in the Diamond Foods acquisition to offset most current taxes payable. In addition, depreciation and
amortization was $28.9 million higher in 2016, due primarily to the additional intangible and fixed assets associated with the
Diamond Foods acquisition, and stock based compensation was $21.0 million higher in 2016, due to acceleration of vesting for
former Diamond Foods personnel.
Cash flow provided by operating activities increased $133.1 million in 2015, compared to 2014. The increase in net cash provided
by operating activities was primarily driven by taxes paid in 2014, due to the gain on the sale of Private Brands. Approximately
$127 million in income taxes related to the gain on the sale of Private Brands were paid in 2014. Excluding the payment of these
income taxes, net cash provided by operating activities was favorable by approximately $6 million from 2014, compared to 2015.
Investing Cash Flows
Cash used by investing activities totaled $1,116.9 million in 2016, compared with $44.0 million in 2015. The increase in cash used
in investing activities was primarily driven by the acquisition of Diamond Foods, which accounted for approximately $1.0 billion
of the increase.
Capital expenditures for fixed assets, principally manufacturing equipment, increased from $51.5 million in 2015 to $73.3 million
in 2016, primarily due to additional capital expenditures necessary to support the acquired Diamond Foods business, of which
approximately $0.5 million related to discontinued operations. Purchases of route businesses, net of sales, resulted in cash outflows
of $2.6 million in 2016, compared to net cash inflows of $4.8 million in 2015. The majority of the net cash outflows generated
from the purchase of routes, net of proceeds from route sales, in 2016 were due to restructuring certain routes at the end of 2016,
which we have not sold as of the year end.
Cash used by investing activities totaled $44.0 million in 2015, compared with cash provided by investing activities of $99.0
million in 2014. The significant decrease in cash provided by investing activities was due to the proceeds received from the sale of
Private Brands in 2014 of $430 million, which was partially offset by cash used for the acquisition of Baptista's and our additional
investment in Late July totaling $262.3 million. Capital expenditures for fixed assets, principally manufacturing equipment,
decreased from $72.1 million in 2014 to $51.5 million in 2015. The decrease from 2014 to 2015 was due to additional capital
expenditures in 2014 used to upgrade equipment and enhance capacity, while the capital expenditures in 2015 were primarily used
to maintain our machinery and equipment and support revenue growth. Proceeds from the sale of route businesses, net of
purchases, generated cash inflows of $4.8 million in 2015, compared to net cash inflows of $1.0 million in 2014. The majority of
the net cash inflows generated from the sale of routes in 2015 were due to the decision to sell certain route businesses that were
previously Company-owned.

30

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 34/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Financing Cash Flows

Net cash provided by financing activities of $853.0 million in 2016, was principally due to proceeds from the issuance of long-
term debt of $1.13 billion that were used primarily to fund the acquisition of Diamond Foods. This significant cash inflow was
partially offset by dividends paid of $57.6 million and repayments of long-term debt of $438.6 million. In addition we received net
proceeds from our revolving credit facility of $227.0 million. This compared to cash used in financing activities of $98.4 million in
2015, which was principally due to dividends paid of $45.2 million, as well as debt repayments of $57.5 million. Cash used in
financing activities in 2014 was $90.8 million, primarily due to dividends paid of $44.9 million as well as debt repayments of
$50.4 million.
On February 8, 2017, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.16 per share payable on March 3, 2017 to
stockholders of record on February 23, 2017.
Debt
Unused and available borrowings were $148.0 million under our existing credit facilities at December 31, 2016, as compared to
$375 million at January 2, 2016. Under certain circumstances and subject to certain conditions, we have the option to increase
available credit under the Credit Agreement by up to $200 million during the life of the facility. We also maintain standby letters of
credit in connection with our self-insurance reserves for casualty claims. The total amount of these letters of credit was $12.6
million as of December 31, 2016.

In February of 2016, using available borrowings from our existing credit facilities and cash on hand, we repaid our $100 million
private placement senior notes which were due in June 2017. The total repayment was approximately $106 million, and resulted in
a loss on early extinguishment of approximately $4.7 million.

Credit Agreement
In conjunction with our acquisition of Diamond Foods, we entered into a senior unsecured credit agreement with the term lenders
party thereto (the "Term Lenders") and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent ("Credit Agreement"). Under the Credit
Agreement, the Term Lenders provided (i) senior unsecured term loans in an original aggregate principal amount of $830 million
maturing five years after the funding date (the “Senior Five Year Term Loans”) and (ii) senior unsecured term loans in an original
aggregate principal amount of $300 million maturing ten years after the funding date (the “Senior Ten Year Term Loans”). The
$1.13 billion in proceeds from the Credit Agreement were used to finance, in part, the cash component of the acquisition
consideration, to repay indebtedness of Diamond Foods and Snyder's-Lance, and to pay certain fees and expenses incurred in
connection with the acquisition.

Loans outstanding under the Credit Agreement bear interest, at our option, either at (i) a Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin
specified in the Credit Agreement or (ii) a base rate plus an applicable margin specified in the Credit Agreement. The applicable
margin added to the Eurodollar rate or base rate, as the case may be, is subject to adjustment after the end of each fiscal quarter
based on changes in the Company’s adjusted total net debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
("EBITDA") ratio.

The outstanding principal amount of the Senior Five Year Term Loans is payable in equal quarterly installments of $10.4 million
on the last business day of each quarter. These payments began in the second quarter of 2016 and continue through December
2020. The remaining unamortized balance is payable in February 2021. The outstanding principal amount of the Senior Ten Year
Term Loans is payable in quarterly principal installments of $15.0 million beginning in the second quarter of 2021 and continuing
through December 2025. The remaining unamortized balance is payable in February 2026. The Credit Agreement also contains
optional prepayment provisions.

Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by all of our existing and future direct and indirect wholly-owned
domestic subsidiaries other than any such subsidiaries that, taken together, do not represent more than 10.0% of the total domestic
assets or domestic revenues of the Company and its wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement contains
customary representations, warranties and covenants. The financial covenants include a maximum total debt to EBITDA ratio of
4.75 to 1.00 for the first two quarters following the acquisition and decreasing over the period of the loan to 3.50 to 1.00 in the
eighth quarter following the acquisition. For the year ended December 31, 2016 the maximum ratio allowed was 4.25 to 1.00, and
our total debt to EBITDA ratio was 4.17 to 1.00. It should be noted that this ratio removes the earnings of Diamond of California
but not the cash received shortly after year end. We received the cash consideration of $118.6 million for the sale of Diamond of
California on January 3, 2017, which we used to repay a portion of our indebtedness, resulting in a decrease of our debt to
EBITDA ratio to 3.80. We are in compliance and expect to remain in compliance with this covenant for the remainder of 2017.

31

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 35/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

The financial covenants also include a minimum interest coverage ratio of 2.50 to 1.00. As of December 31, 2016, our interest
coverage ratio was 6.51. We are currently in compliance and expect to remain in compliance with this covenant. Other covenants
include, but are not limited to, limitations on: (i) liens, (ii) dispositions of assets, (iii) mergers and consolidations, (iv) loans and
investments, (v) subsidiary indebtedness, (vi) transactions with affiliates and (vii) certain dividends and distributions. The Credit
Agreement contains customary events of default, including a cross default provision and change of control provisions. If an event
of default occurs and is continuing, we may be required to repay all amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement.

Total interest expense under all credit agreements for 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $32.9 million, $11.1 million, and $13.4 million,
respectively.

Contractual Obligations
We lease certain facilities and equipment under contracts classified as operating leases. Total rental expense, excluding
discontinued operations, was $37.6 million in 2016, $27.2 million in 2015 and $25.3 million in 2014.
In order to mitigate the risks of volatility in commodity markets to which we are exposed, we have entered into forward purchase
agreements with certain suppliers based on market prices, forward price projections and expected usage levels. Purchase
commitments for certain ingredients, packaging materials and energy totaled $157.2 million and $97.2 million as of December 31,
2016 and January 2, 2016, respectively. The increase in purchase commitments was due to incremental Diamond Foods
commitments. In addition to these commitments, we have contracts for certain ingredients and packaging materials where we have
secured a fixed price but do not have a minimum purchase quantity. We generally contract from approximately three months to
twelve months in advance for certain major ingredients and packaging. We also have a licensing contract which totaled $13.9
million as of December 31, 2016, and continues through 2020.
We have contracts to receive services from syndicated market data providers through 2023. Our commitment for these services
ranges from $4.6 million to $5.3 million per year, throughout the life of the contracts and totals $31.6 million as of December 31,
2016.
Contractual obligations as of December 31, 2016 were:

Payments Due by Period

(in thousands) Total 2017 2018-2019 2020-2021 Thereafter
Purchase commitments $ 202,740 $ 166,032 $ 19,030 $ 10,397 $ 7,281
Debt, including interest payable (1) 1,482,036 89,390 519,637 521,411 351,598
Capital lease, including interest 4,580 1,647 2,600 333 —
Operating lease obligations 114,753 21,097 33,209 21,341 39,106
Accrued long-term incentive plan 7,077 2,427 4,650 — —
Unrecognized tax benefits (2) 5,196 — — — —
Other liabilities (3) 22,395 — — — —
Total contractual obligations $ 1,838,777 $ 280,593 $ 579,126 $ 553,482 $ 397,985

(1) Variable interest will be paid in future periods based on the outstanding balance at that time.

Unrecognized tax benefits relate to uncertain tax positions recorded under accounting guidance that we have adopted and include associated interest and
(2)

penalties. As we are not able to reasonably estimate the timing of the payments or the amount by which the liability will increase or decrease over time, the related
balances have not been reflected in the "Payments Due by Period" section of the table.
(3)Amounts represent future cash payments to satisfy certain noncurrent liabilities recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, including the short-term portion
of these long-term liabilities. Included in these noncurrent liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 were $17.3 million in accrued
insurance liabilities and $5.1 million in other liabilities. As the specific payment dates for these liabilities is unknown, the related balances have not been reflected
in the "Payments Due by Period" section of the table.

32

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 36/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect
on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or cash flows.

We currently provide a partial guarantee for loans made to IBOs by certain third-party financial institutions for the purchase of
route businesses. The outstanding aggregate balance on these loans was approximately $154.1 million as of December 31, 2016
compared to approximately $139.3 million as of January 2, 2016. The $14.8 million increase in the guarantee was primarily due to
new IBO loans as a result of zone restructuring and sale of additional routes. The annual maximum amount of future payments we
could be required to make under the guarantees equates to 25% of the outstanding loan balance on the first day of each calendar
year plus 25% of the amount of any new loans issued during such calendar year. These loans are collateralized by the route
businesses for which the loans are made. Accordingly, we have the ability to recover substantially all of the outstanding loan value
upon default, and our liability associated with this guarantee is not material.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Preparing the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. We believe the following estimates and assumptions to be critical accounting
estimates. These estimates and assumptions may be material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account
for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change, and may have a material impact on our financial
condition or operating performance. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when title and risk of loss passes to our customers. Allowances for sales returns, stale products, promotions
and discounts are recorded as reductions of revenue in the consolidated financial statements. The timing of revenue recognition
varies based on the types of products sold and the distribution method.
Revenue for products sold to IBOs in our DSD network is recognized when the IBO purchases the inventory from our warehouses
or the products are shipped to the stockroom. Revenue for products sold to retail customers through routes operated by our
associates is recognized when the product is delivered to the customer.
Revenue for products shipped directly to customers from our warehouses is recognized based on the shipping terms listed on the
shipping documentation. Products shipped with terms FOB shipping point are recognized as revenue at the time the product leaves
our warehouses. Products shipped with terms FOB destination are recognized as revenue based on the anticipated receipt date by
the customer.
We allow certain customers to return products under agreed upon circumstances. We record a returns allowance for damaged
products and other products not sold by the expiration date on the product label. This allowance is estimated based on a percentage
of historical sales returns and current market information.
We record certain reductions to revenue for promotional allowances. There are several different types of promotional allowances
such as off-invoice allowances, rebates and shelf space allowances. An off-invoice allowance is a reduction to the sales price that
is directly deducted from the invoice amount. We record the amount of the deduction as a reduction to revenue when the
transaction occurs. Rebates are offered to retail customers based on the quantity of product purchased over a period of time. Based
on the nature of these allowances, the exact amount of the rebate is not known at the time the product is sold to the customer. An
estimate of the expected rebate amount is recorded as a reduction to revenue at the time of the sale and a corresponding accrued
liability is recorded. The accrued liability is monitored throughout the time period covered by the promotion, and is based on
historical information and the progress of the customer against the target amount. We also record certain allowances for coupon
redemptions, scan-back promotions and other promotional activities as a reduction to revenue. The accrued liabilities for these
allowances are monitored throughout the time period covered by the coupon or promotion.
Shelf space allowances are capitalized and amortized over the lesser of twelve months or the life of the agreement and recorded as
a reduction to revenue. Capitalized shelf space allowances are evaluated for impairment on an ongoing basis.
Total allowances for sales returns, rebates, coupons, scan-backs and other promotional activities recorded in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets was $39.8 million and $25.4 million as of December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, respectively. The increase
related to incremental Diamond Foods promotional allowances.

33

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 37/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on management’s estimate of uncollectible accounts receivable.
We record a general reserve based on analysis of historical data and aging of accounts receivable. In addition, management records
specific reserves for receivable balances that are considered at higher risk due to known facts regarding the customer. The
assumptions for this determination are reviewed quarterly to ensure that business conditions or other circumstances are consistent
with the assumptions. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $1.3 million and $0.9 million as of December 31, 2016 and
January 2, 2016, respectively. The increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts from 2015 to 2016 was primarily due to
additional accounts receivable associated with the acquisition of Diamond Foods.

Self-Insurance Reserves
We maintain reserves for the self-funded portions of employee medical insurance benefits. Our portion of employee medical
claims is limited to $0.4 million per participant annually by stop-loss insurance coverage. The accrual for incurred but not reported
medical insurance claims was $3.9 million and $3.8 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively.

We maintain self-insurance reserves for workers’ compensation and auto liability for individual losses up to the deductibles which
are currently $0.8 million per individual loss for workers' compensation, $0.5 million for auto liability per accident and $0.3
million for auto physical damage per accident. In addition, certain general and product liability claims are self-funded for
individual losses up to the $0.5 million insurance deductible. Claims in excess of the deductible are fully insured up to $100
million per occurrence and in the aggregate. We evaluate input from a third-party actuary in the estimation of the casualty
insurance obligation on an annual basis. In determining the ultimate loss and reserve requirements, we use various actuarial
assumptions, including compensation trends, health care cost trends and discount rates. In 2016, we used a discount rate of 2.0%,
the same rate used in 2015, based on treasury rates over the estimated future payout period.

We also use historical information for claims frequency and severity in order to establish loss development factors. For 2016 and
2015, we had accrued liabilities related to the retained risks of $17.3 million and $16.2 million, respectively, included in the
accruals for casualty insurance claims in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The liabilities related to our casualty insurance claims
were partially offset by estimated reimbursements for amounts in excess of our deductibles associated with these claims of $4.6
million and $5.2 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively, which are included in other noncurrent assets in our Consolidated
Balance Sheets.

Impairment Analysis of Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis, and between annual tests if indicators of potential impairment exist, for each
identified reporting unit using a fair-value-based approach. As part of our 2016 analysis, we identified two reporting units, North
America and Europe.

The annual impairment analysis of goodwill requires us to project future financial performance, including revenue and profit
growth, fixed asset and working capital investments, income tax rates and our weighted average cost of capital. These projections
rely upon historical performance, anticipated market conditions and forward-looking business plans.
The North America and Europe impairment analysis of goodwill was performed using a discounted cash flow model, as of
December 31, 2016, and assumed a combined average annual revenue growth of approximately 3.1% and 4.9%, respectively
during the valuation period. The 4.9% combined annual growth for Europe is only 3.1% when excluding the increased revenue
from 2016 to 2017, which is substantially higher due to two additional months of KETTLE® Chips revenue and eight additional
months of revenue from our Metcalfe acquisition. We also assumed a 3% terminal growth rate for each reporting unit. This
compares to a combined average annual revenue growth of approximately 3.5% and a terminal growth rate of 3% used in the
impairment analysis as of January 2, 2016, which was done using only one reporting unit as the UK operations had not been
acquired at that time.

34

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 38/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

We use a combination of internal and external data to develop the weighted average cost of capital, which was 7.0% and 7.5% for
North America and Europe, respectively, for 2016. For our 2015 goodwill impairment analysis, we used an 8.0% weighted average
cost of capital for the test of our one reporting unit. The decrease in the weighted average cost of capital in 2016 was primarily due
to the growth of our Company in the past year. Significant investments in fixed assets and working capital to support the assumed
revenue growth are estimated and factored into the analysis. If the assumed revenue growth is not achieved, anticipated
investments in fixed assets and working capital could be reduced. As of December 31, 2016, the goodwill impairment analysis
resulted in our North America reporting unit having a fair value substantially in excess of its carrying value, and our European
reporting unit with excess fair value over carrying value of approximately 15%. Even with a significant amount of excess fair
value over carrying value, major changes in assumptions or changes in conditions could result in a goodwill impairment charge in
the future. We performed a sensitivity analysis on our weighted average cost of capital and we determined that a 50 basis point
increase in the weighted average cost of capital would not have resulted in any of our reporting units' implied fair value being less
than their carrying value. Additionally, a 50 basis point decrease in the terminal growth rate used for each reporting unit would also
not have resulted in either of our reporting units' implied fair value being less than their carrying value.
Our trademarks are valued using the relief-from-royalty method under the income approach, which requires us to estimate
unobservable factors such as a royalty rate and discount rate and identify relevant projected revenue. In 2016 and 2015, there were
no impairments recorded for our trademarks. We recorded impairment charges of $3.6 million in 2014 for certain trademarks. In
addition to the $550.7 million acquired in the Diamond Foods acquisition, certain trade names with a total book value of $12.9
million as of December 31, 2016, currently have a fair value which exceeds the book value by less than 15%. The trademarks
related to the acquisition of Diamond Foods remain reasonably close to fair value. Any adverse changes in the use of these
trademarks or the sales volumes of the associated products could result in an impairment charge in the future.
Our route intangible assets are valued by comparing the current fair market value for the route assets to the associated book value.
The fair market value is computed using the route sales average for each route multiplied by the market multiple for the area in
which the route is located. We recognized route intangible asset impairments of $0.8 million, $0.5 million and $3.7 million of in
2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, as a result of this analysis. Many of our route territories have fair values that approximate book
value. Any economic declines or other adverse changes such as decreased demand for our products in those areas could result in
future impairment charges.
Other intangible assets, primarily customer and contractual relationships and patents, are tested for impairment if events or changes
in circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that fair value is less than book value. No event-driven impairment
assessments were deemed necessary for 2016, 2015 or 2014.

Route Intangible Purchase and Sale Transactions

We purchase and sell route businesses as a part of maintenance of our DSD network. Route businesses subject to purchase and sale
transactions represent integrated sets of inputs, activities and processes that are capable of being conducted and managed for the
purpose of providing a return directly to the IBOs and meet the definition of a business in accordance with ASC 805, Business
Combinations. Upon acquisition of a route business, we allocate the purchase price based on the fair value of the indefinite-lived
route intangible, representing our perpetual and exclusive distribution right in the route territory, with any excess purchase price
attributed to goodwill. We recognize a gain or a loss on the sale of a route business upon completion of the sales transaction and
signing of the relevant documents. Gain or loss on sale is determined by comparing the basis of the route business sold, which
includes a relative fair value allocation of goodwill in accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, to the proceeds
received from the IBO. For 2016, 2015 and 2014, we recognized net gains on the sale of route businesses of $1.3 million, $1.9
million and $1.1 million, respectively. Net gains on the sale of route businesses in 2016 consisted of $5.5 million in gains and $4.2
million in losses. Net gains on the sale of route businesses in 2015 consisted of $3.3 million in gains and $1.4 million in losses. For
2014, net gains on the sale of route businesses consisted of $3.3 million in gains and $2.2 million in losses.

35

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 39/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Impairment Analysis of Fixed Assets

Fixed assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset or asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets or asset groups to be held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or asset group to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or asset
group. If such assets or asset groups are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by
which the carrying amount of the assets or asset groups exceeds the fair value of the assets or asset groups. There were $3.7
million in fixed asset impairment charges recorded during 2016, compared to $11.5 million during 2015, and $5.7 million during
2014.
Equity-Based Incentive Compensation Expense
Determining the fair value of share-based awards at the grant date requires judgment, including estimating the expected term,
expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected dividends. Judgment is required in estimating the amount of
share-based awards that are expected to be forfeited before vesting. In addition, our long-term equity incentive plans require
assumptions and projections of future operating results and financial metrics. Actual results may differ from these assumptions and
projections, which could have a material impact on our financial results. Information regarding assumptions can be found in Note 6
to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.

Discontinued Operations Presentation

In order to be reported within discontinued operations, our disposal of a component or group of components must represent a
strategic shift that will have a major effect on our operations and financial results. Discontinued Operations are reported when a
component of an entity (“component”) that can be clearly distinguished operationally, and for financial reporting purposes from the
rest of the entity meets the threshold for reporting in discontinued operations, provided that a) the component meets the “held for
sale” criteria; b) the operations and cash flows of the component have been, or will be, eliminated from the ongoing operations of
the entity as a result of the disposal transaction; and c) the entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the
operations of the component after the disposal transaction. In the Consolidated Statements of Income, income from discontinued
operations is reported separately from income and expenses from continuing operations and prior periods are presented on a
comparable basis. In the Consolidated Balance Sheets, the assets and liabilities of discontinued operations are presented separately
from assets and liabilities of continuing operations and prior periods are presented on a comparable basis. Many provisions of
reporting discontinued operations involve judgment in determining whether results from operations, assets and liabilities will be
reported as continuing or discontinued operations. As a result of the sale of Diamond of California, revenues and expenses that no
longer continued after the sale of Diamond of California, and where we had no substantial continuing involvement, were
reclassified to discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate is based on the level and mix of income of our separate legal entities, statutory tax rates, business credits
available in the various jurisdictions in which we operate and permanent tax differences. Significant judgment is required in
evaluating tax positions that affect the annual tax rate. We recognize the effect of income tax positions only if these positions are
more likely than not of being sustained. We adjust these liabilities in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the
progress of a tax audit.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to the taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rate is recognized in income
in the period that includes the enactment date. We estimate valuation allowances on deferred tax assets for the portions that we do
not believe will be fully utilized based on projected earnings and usage. In accordance with Accounting Standards Update ("ASU")
No. 2015-17, deferred tax assets and liabilities, along with related valuation allowances, are netted by tax jurisdiction and
classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. During the fourth quarter of 2015, we elected to early-adopt ASU No. 2015-17, and
the changes to deferred tax assets and liabilities were applied retrospectively.

Applicable U.S. income taxes are provided on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries in the periods in which they are no longer
considered indefinitely reinvested. In the event that management elects for any reason in the future to repatriate some or all of the
foreign earnings that were previously deemed to be indefinitely reinvested outside of the United States, we would incur additional
tax expense upon such repatriation.
New Accounting Standards
See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for a summary of new accounting standards.

36

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 40/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to certain commodity, interest rate, and foreign currency risks as part of our ongoing business operations. We may
use derivative financial instruments, where appropriate, to manage some of these risks related to interest rates. We do not use
derivatives for trading purposes.
Commodity Risk
We purchase certain raw materials that are subject to price volatility caused by weather, market conditions, growing and harvesting
conditions, governmental actions and other factors beyond our control. Our most significant raw material requirements include
flour, potatoes, oil, peanuts, other nuts, corn, sugar, chocolate, cheese and seasonings. We also purchase packaging materials that
are subject to price volatility. In the normal course of business, in order to mitigate the risks of volatility in commodity markets to
which we are exposed, we enter into forward purchase agreements with certain suppliers based on market prices, forward price
projections and expected usage levels. Amounts committed under these forward purchase agreements are discussed in Note 16 to
the consolidated financial statements in Item 8.
Interest Rate Risk
Our variable-rate debt obligations incur interest at floating rates based on changes in the Eurodollar rate and US base rate interest.
To manage exposure to changing interest rates, we selectively enter into interest rate swap agreements to maintain a desired
proportion of fixed to variable-rate debt. See Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for further information
related to our interest rate swap agreements. While these interest rate swap agreements fixed a portion of the interest rate at a
predictable level, pre-tax interest expense would have been $1.0 million lower without these swaps during 2016, $1.3 million
lower without these swaps during 2015 and $0.6 million lower without these swaps during 2014. Including the effect of the interest
rate swap agreement, the weighted average interest rate was 2.95% and 3.14%, respectively, as of December 31, 2016 and
January 2, 2016. A 10% increase in the Eurodollar rate would not have significantly impacted interest expense during 2016.
Credit Risk
We are exposed to credit risks related to our accounts and notes receivable. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our
customers to minimize the potential exposure. For 2016, 2015 and 2014, net bad debt expense was $0.5 million, $1.1 million and
$1.6 million, respectively. Allowances for doubtful accounts were $1.3 million as of December 31, 2016, and $0.9 million as of
January 2, 2016.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
We have operations outside the US with foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, primarily in the U.K. Because we
have foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, financial exposure may result, primarily from the timing of transactions
and the movement of exchange rates. Our risks pertaining to Brexit are discussed in Part I, Item1A - Risk Factors.

For our US operations, our sales of finished goods and purchases of raw materials and supplies from outside the US are
predominantly denominated in US dollars. However, certain revenues and expenses have been, and are expected to be, subject to
the effect of foreign currency fluctuations, and these fluctuations may have an impact on operating results.

37

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 41/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

SNYDER’S-LANCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Income
For the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2016 (52 weeks), January 2, 2016 (52 weeks) and January 3, 2015 (53 weeks)

(in thousands, except per share data) 2016 2015 2014

Net revenue $ 2,109,227 $ 1,656,399 $ 1,620,920
Cost of sales 1,345,437 1,077,110 1,042,458
Gross profit 763,790 579,289 578,462

Selling, general and administrative 593,957 464,534 478,532

Transaction and integration related expenses 66,272 7,702 —
Settlements of certain litigation — 5,675 —
Impairment charges 4,466 11,997 13,047
Gain on the revaluation of prior equity investment — — (16,608)
Other income, net (5,390) (1,075) (1,359)
Income before interest and income taxes 104,485 90,456 104,850

Loss on early extinguishment of debt 4,749 — —

Interest expense, net 32,613 10,853 13,342
Income before income taxes 67,123 79,603 91,508

Income tax expense 25,320 28,885 32,291

Income from continuing operations 41,803 50,718 59,217
(Loss)/income from discontinued operations, net of income tax (27,100) — 133,316
Net income 14,703 50,718 192,533
Net (loss)/income attributable to non-controlling interests (182) 33 (58)
Net income attributable to Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. $ 14,885 $ 50,685 $ 192,591

Amounts attributable to Snyder's-Lance, Inc.:

Continuing operations $ 41,985 $ 50,685 $ 59,275
Discontinued operations (27,100) — 133,316
Net income attributable to Snyder's-Lance, Inc. $ 14,885 $ 50,685 $ 192,591

Basic earnings per share:

Continuing operations $ 0.46 $ 0.72 $ 0.84
Discontinued operations (0.29) — 1.90
Total basic earnings per share $ 0.17 $ 0.72 $ 2.74

Diluted earnings per share:

Continuing operations $ 0.45 $ 0.71 $ 0.84
Discontinued operations (0.29) — 1.88
Total diluted earnings per share $ 0.16 $ 0.71 $ 2.72

Dividends declared per common share $ 0.64 $ 0.64 $ 0.64

See Notes to the consolidated financial statements.

38

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 42/107
6/26/2018 Document

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 43/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

SNYDER’S-LANCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2016 (52 weeks), January 2, 2016 (52 weeks) and January 3, 2015 (53 weeks)

(in thousands) 2016 2015 2014

Net income $ 14,703 $ 50,718 $ 192,533

Net unrealized (gain)/loss on derivative instruments, net of income tax

expense/(benefit) of $4,447, ($247), and $186 (6,953) 360 (304)
Foreign currency translation adjustment 24,300 (737) 11,482
Total other comprehensive loss/(income) 17,347 (377) 11,178

Total comprehensive (loss)/income (2,644) 51,095 181,355

Comprehensive (loss)/income attributable to non-controlling interests (182) 33 (58)
Total comprehensive (loss)/income attributable to Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. $ (2,462) $ 51,062 $ 181,413

See Notes to the consolidated financial statements.

39

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 44/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

SNYDER’S-LANCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016
(in thousands, except share data) 2016 2015
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 35,409 $ 39,105
Restricted cash 714 966
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $1,290 and $917, respectively 210,723 131,339
Receivable from sale of Diamond of California 118,577 —
Inventories, net 173,456 110,994
Prepaid income taxes and income taxes receivable 5,744 2,321
Assets held for sale 19,568 15,678
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 27,666 21,210
Total current assets 591,857 321,613

Noncurrent assets:
Fixed assets, net 501,884 401,465
Goodwill 1,318,362 539,119
Other intangible assets, net 1,373,800 528,658
Other noncurrent assets 48,173 19,849
Total assets $ 3,834,076 $ 1,810,704

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt $ 49,000 $ 8,541
Accounts payable 99,249 54,207
Accrued compensation 44,901 26,196
Accrued casualty insurance claims 4,266 4,262
Accrued marketing, selling and promotional costs 50,179 18,806
Other payables and accrued liabilities 47,958 32,248
Total current liabilities 295,553 144,260

Noncurrent liabilities:
Long-term debt, net 1,245,959 372,301
Deferred income taxes, net 378,236 157,591
Accrued casualty insurance claims 13,049 11,931
Other noncurrent liabilities 25,609 17,034
Total liabilities 1,958,406 703,117

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.83 1/3 par value. 110,000,000 shares authorized; 96,242,784 and 70,968,054 shares
outstanding, respectively 80,199 59,138
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value. 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares outstanding — —
Additional paid-in capital 1,598,678 791,428
Retained earnings 195,733 238,314
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (17,977) (630)
Total Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. stockholders’ equity 1,856,633 1,088,250
Non-controlling interests 19,037 19,337
Total stockholders’ equity 1,875,670 1,107,587
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 3,834,076 $ 1,810,704

See Notes to the consolidated financial statements.

40

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 45/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

SNYDER’S-LANCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
For the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2016 (52 weeks), January 2, 2016 (52 weeks) and January 3, 2015 (53 weeks)

Accumulated
Additional Other Non-
(in thousands, except share and per share Common Paid-in Retained Comprehensive controlling
data) Shares Stock Capital Earnings Income/(Loss) Interests Total
Balance, December 28, 2013 69,891,890 $ 58,241 $ 765,172 $ 85,146 $ 10,171 $ (830) $ 917,900
Total comprehensive income/(loss) 192,591 (11,178) (58) 181,355
Acquisition of remaining interest in Patriot
Snacks Real Estate, LLC (937) 787 (150)
Tax effect of transaction with non-
controlling interests 198 198
Establish non-controlling interest in Late
July 19,405 19,405
Dividends paid to stockholders ($0.64 per
share) (44,925) (44,925)
Amortization of stock options 2,906 2,906
Stock options exercised, including $1,051
tax benefit 428,285 357 7,510 7,867
Issuance and amortization of restricted stock,
net of cancellations 132,472 110 3,373 3,483
Repurchases of common stock (46,561) (39) (1,292) (1,331)
Balance, January 3, 2015 70,406,086 $ 58,669 $ 776,930 $ 232,812 $ (1,007) $ 19,304 $1,086,708
Total comprehensive income 50,685 377 33 51,095
Dividends paid to stockholders ($0.64 per
share) (45,183) (45,183)
Amortization of stock options 2,194 2,194
Stock options exercised, including $2,326
tax benefit 496,828 414 9,772 10,186
Issuance and amortization of restricted stock,
net of cancellations 88,983 75 3,348 3,423
Repurchases of common stock (23,843) (20) (816) (836)
Balance, January 2, 2016 70,968,054 $ 59,138 $ 791,428 $ 238,314 $ (630) $ 19,337 $1,107,587
Total comprehensive income/(loss) 14,885 (17,347) (182) (2,644)
Dividends paid to stockholders ($0.64 per
share) (57,466) (57,466)
Dividends paid to non-controlling interests (118) (118)
Issuance of common stock and stock-based
awards assumed in the Diamond Foods
acquisition 24,363,738 20,302 780,685 800,987
Amortization of stock options, restricted
units and performance-based restricted units 21,642 21,642
Stock options exercised and restricted units
vested (net of shares surrendered for tax
withholding), including $910 tax benefit 897,875 748 2,897 3,645
Issuance and amortization of restricted
shares, net of cancellations 106,457 89 4,917 5,006
Repurchases of common stock (93,340) (78) (2,891) (2,969)
Balance, December 31, 2016 96,242,784 $ 80,199 $ 1,598,678 $ 195,733 $ (17,977) $ 19,037 $1,875,670

See Notes to the consolidated financial statements.

41

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 46/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

SNYDER’S-LANCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2016 (52 weeks), January 2, 2016 (52 weeks) and January 3, 2015 (53 weeks)

(in thousands) 2016 2015 2014

Operating activities:
Net income $ 14,703 $ 50,718 $ 192,533
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 99,251 70,379 65,164
Stock-based compensation expense 26,648 5,616 6,529
Loss on sale of fixed assets, net 141 420 1,304
Gain on sale of Private Brands, excluding transaction costs — — (229,322)
Loss on sale of Diamond of California 32,645 — —
Gain on the purchase of additional interest in Late July — — (16,608)
Gain on sale of route businesses, net (1,341) (1,913) (1,109)
Gain on write-off of debt premium (1,341) — —
Impairment charges 4,466 11,997 13,047
Derecognition of cumulative translation adjustment — 737 —
Deferred income taxes 24,811 2,433 (19,499)
Provision for doubtful accounts 472 1,104 1,600
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding business acquisitions, and foreign currency
translation adjustments:
Accounts receivable (34,047) (6,349) 1,368
Inventory 2,036 5,242 (7,131)
Other current assets 2,861 2,463 5,972
Accounts payable 21,762 (2,468) 3,135
Payable to growers 41,948 — —
Other accrued liabilities 18,312 6,970 (149)
Other noncurrent assets 6,531 709 3,741
Other noncurrent liabilities 1,341 (1,904) (7,550)
Net cash provided by operating activities 261,199 146,154 13,025

Investing activities:
Purchases of fixed assets (73,261) (51,468) (72,056)
Purchases of route businesses (42,206) (22,568) (21,359)
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets and insurance recoveries 1,409 1,776 2,122
Proceeds from sale of route businesses 39,619 27,408 22,400
Proceeds from sale of investments — 826 —
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations — — 430,017
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired (1,042,674) — (262,323)
Changes in restricted cash 252 — 234
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities (1,116,861) (44,026) 99,035

Financing activities:
Dividends paid to stockholders and non-controlling interests (57,584) (45,183) (44,925)
Acquisition of remaining interest in Patriot Snacks Real Estate, LLC — — (150)
Debt issuance costs (6,047) (5,065) (1,854)
Issuances of common stock 10,096 7,862 6,816
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation 910 2,326 1,051
Share repurchases, including shares surrendered for tax withholding (10,330) (836) (1,331)
Payments on capital leases (2,412) — —
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 1,130,000 — —

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 47/107
6/26/2018 Document
Repayments of long-term debt (438,625) (7,500) (15,374)
Net proceeds from/(repayments of) existing credit facilities 227,000 (50,000) (35,000)
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities 853,008 (98,396) (90,767)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash (1,042) — —

(Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents (3,696) 3,732 21,293

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of fiscal year 39,105 35,373 14,080
Cash and cash equivalents at end of fiscal year $ 35,409 $ 39,105 $ 35,373

Non-cash investing activities:

Proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations, not yet received, less transaction costs, not yet
paid $ 125,772 $ — $ —

Non-cash financing activities:

Common stock and stock-based compensation issued for business acquisitions (Note 4) $ 800,987 $ — $ —

Supplemental information:
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds of $2,000, $2,608 and $381, respectively $ 9,582 $ 23,068 $ 160,906
Cash paid for interest $ 30,894 $ 11,523 $ 13,798

See Notes to the consolidated financial statements.

42

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 48/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

SNYDER'S-LANCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2016, January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015
NOTE 1. OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Operations
We are engaged in the manufacturing, distribution, marketing and sale of snack food products. These products include pretzels,
sandwich crackers, kettle cooked chips, pretzel crackers, cookies, potato chips, tortilla chips, restaurant style crackers, popcorn,
nuts and other salty snacks. Our products are packaged in various single-serve, multi-pack, family-size and party-size
configurations. Our Branded products are principally sold under the Snyder’s of Hanover®, Lance®, Cape Cod®, Snack Factory®
Pretzel Crisps®, Pop Secret®, Emerald®, Kettle Brand®, KETTLE® Chips, Late July®, Metcalfe’s skinny®, Tom’s®, Archway®,
Jays®, Stella D’oro®, Eatsmart SnacksTM, Krunchers!® and O-Ke-Doke® and other brand names.

We also sell Partner brand products, which consist of third-party branded products that we sell to our independent business owners
("IBO") through our national direct-store-delivery distribution network ("DSD network"), in order to broaden the portfolio of
product offerings for our IBOs. In addition, we contract with other branded food manufacturers to produce their products and
periodically sell certain semi-finished goods to other manufacturers.

We distribute snack food products throughout the United States ("US") using our DSD network. Our DSD network is made up of
approximately 3,200 routes that are primarily owned and operated by IBOs. We also ship products directly to third-party
distributors in areas where our DSD network does not operate. Through our direct distribution network, we distribute products
directly to retail customers or to third-party distributors using freight carriers or our own transportation fleet.

Through our DSD network, we sell our Branded and Partner brand products to IBOs that distribute to grocery/mass merchandisers,
club stores, discount stores, convenience stores, food service establishments and various other retail customers, including drug
stores, schools, military and government facilities and “up and down the street” outlets such as recreational facilities, offices and
other independent retailers. In addition, we sell our Branded products directly to retail customers and third-party distributors. In the
United Kingdom ("U.K.") and certain other countries within Europe, we sell our salty snack products through our sales personnel
directly to national grocery, co-op and impulse store chains.
Our corporate headquarters is located in Charlotte, North Carolina. We have additional administrative offices in Hanover,
Pennsylvania supporting our DSD network and in Norwich, England supporting our European operations. Our manufacturing
operations are located in Charlotte, North Carolina; Hanover, Pennsylvania; Franklin, Wisconsin; Goodyear, Arizona; Columbus,
Georgia; Jeffersonville, Indiana; Hyannis, Massachusetts; Perry, Florida; Ashland, Ohio; Salem, Oregon; Beloit, Wisconsin;
Norwich, England and Van Buren, Indiana. Additionally, our research and development centers are located in Hanover,
Pennsylvania and Salem, Oregon.

Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Certain prior year amounts, including debt issuance cost balances as
described further in Note 2, have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
The Company's fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to December 31 and, as a result, a 53rd week is added every fifth or sixth
year. The Company's 2016 and 2015 fiscal years each contained 52 weeks and ended on December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016
respectively. Fiscal year 2014 contained 53 weeks and ended on January 3, 2015.
Discontinued Operations Presentation
Effective for the years beginning January 4, 2015, in order to be reported within discontinued operations, our disposal of a
component or group of components must represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on our operations and financial
results. We aggregate the results of operations for discontinued operations into a single line item in the income statement. General
corporate overhead is not allocated to discontinued operations.

As discussed in Note 3, amounts included in the Consolidated Statements of Income for prior periods have been reclassified to
separate amounts related to discontinued operations from continuing operations. Accordingly, unless otherwise stated, amounts
disclosed within the notes to the consolidated financial statements exclude amounts related to discontinued operations. The
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows were not adjusted for presentation of discontinued operations, but certain items are
disclosed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.

43

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 49/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Business Combinations
We account for business combinations under the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 805-10, Business
Combinations ("ASC 805-10"), which requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations.
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including non-controlling interests, are recorded at the date of acquisition at their
respective fair values. ASC 805-10 also specifies criteria that intangible assets acquired in a business combination must meet to be
recognized and reported apart from goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of the tangible net
assets and intangible assets acquired in a business combination. Acquisition-related expenses are recognized separately from the
business combinations and are expensed as incurred.

Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the US ("GAAP") requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of
contingent liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during
the periods reported. Examples include sales and promotional allowances, customer returns, allowances for doubtful accounts,
inventory valuations, useful lives of fixed assets and related impairment, long-term investments, hedge transactions, goodwill and
intangible asset valuations and impairments, incentive compensation, income taxes, self-insurance, contingencies and litigation.
Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Non-controlling Interests
We own 80% of Late July Snacks, LLC (“Late July”) and consolidate its balance sheet and operating results into our consolidated
financial statements. The associated non-controlling interest is classified as equity, with the consolidated net income adjusted to
exclude the net income or loss attributable to the non-controlling interest.

Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when title and risk of loss passes to our customers. Allowances for sales returns, stale products, promotions
and discounts are recorded as reductions of revenue in the consolidated financial statements. The timing of revenue recognition
varies based on the types of products sold and the distribution method.
Revenue for products sold to IBOs in our DSD network is recognized when the IBO purchases the inventory from our warehouses
or the products are shipped to the stockroom. Revenue for products sold to retail customers through routes operated by company
associates is recognized when the product is delivered to the customer.
Revenue for products shipped directly to customers from our warehouses is recognized based on the shipping terms listed on the
shipping documentation. Products shipped with terms FOB shipping point are recognized as revenue at the time the product leaves
our warehouses. Products shipped with terms FOB destination are recognized as revenue based on the anticipated receipt date by
the customer.
We allow certain customers to return products under agreed upon circumstances. We record a returns allowance for damaged
products and other products not sold by the expiration date on the product label. This allowance is estimated based on a percentage
of historical sales returns and current market information.
We record certain reductions to revenue for promotional allowances. There are several different types of promotional allowances
such as off-invoice allowances, rebates and shelf space allowances. An off-invoice allowance is a reduction to the sales price that
is directly deducted from the invoice amount. We record the amount of the deduction as a reduction to revenue when the
transaction occurs. Rebates are offered to retail customers based on the quantity of product purchased over a period of time. Based
on the nature of these allowances, the exact amount of the rebate is not known at the time the product is sold to the customer. An
estimate of the expected rebate is recorded as a reduction to revenue at the time of the sale and a corresponding accrued liability is
recorded. The accrued liability is monitored throughout the time period covered by the promotion, and is based on historical
information and the progress of the customer against the target amount. We also record certain allowances for coupon redemptions,
scan-back promotions and other promotional activities as a reduction to revenue. The accrued liabilities for these allowances are
monitored throughout the time period covered by the coupon or promotion.
Shelf space allowances are capitalized and amortized over the lesser of twelve months or the life of the agreement and recorded as
a reduction to revenue. Capitalized shelf space allowances are evaluated for impairment on an ongoing basis.
Total allowances for sales returns, rebates, coupons, scan-backs and other promotional activities recorded in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets was $39.8 million and $25.4 million as of December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, respectively.

44

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 50/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on management’s estimate of uncollectible accounts receivable.
We record a general reserve based on analysis of historical data and aging of accounts receivable. In addition, management records
specific reserves for receivable balances that are considered at higher risk due to known facts regarding the customer. The
assumptions for this determination are reviewed quarterly to ensure that business conditions or other circumstances are consistent
with the assumptions.

Fair Value
We have classified assets and liabilities required to be measured at fair value into the fair value hierarchy as set forth below:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data available, which requires us to develop our own
assumptions.

See Note 13 for more information on fair value measurements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash
Restricted cash represents cash and cash equivalents which can only be used for retention of certain employees.

Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value using the first-in first-out (FIFO) method.

Fixed Assets
Depreciation of fixed assets is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of long-term depreciable
assets. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the estimated life of the improvement or the life of the lease, whichever is
shorter. Estimated lives are based on historical experience, maintenance practices, technological changes and future business plans.
The following table summarizes the majority of our estimated useful lives of long-term depreciable assets:

Useful Life
Buildings and building improvements 10-45 years
Land improvements 10-20 years
Machinery, equipment and computer systems 3-20 years
Furniture and fixtures 3-12 years
Trucks, trailers and automobiles 3-10 years

Fixed assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset or asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets or asset groups to be held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or asset group to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or asset
group. If such assets or asset groups are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by
which the carrying amount of the assets or asset groups exceeds the fair value of the assets or asset groups. Assets held for sale are
reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.

Route Intangible Purchase and Sale Transactions

We purchase and sell route businesses as a part of maintenance of our DSD network. Route businesses subject to purchase and sale
transactions represent integrated sets of inputs, activities and processes that are capable of being conducted and managed for the
purpose of providing a return directly to the IBOs and meet the definition of a business in accordance with FASB ASC 805,
Business Combinations. Upon acquisition of a route business, we allocate the purchase price based on the fair value of the
indefinite-lived route intangible, representing our perpetual and exclusive distribution right in the route territory, with any excess
purchase price attributed to goodwill. We recognize a gain or a loss on the sale of a route business upon completion of the sales
transaction and signing of the relevant documents. Gain or loss on the sale is determined by comparing the basis of the route
business sold, which includes a relative fair value allocation of goodwill in accordance with FASB ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill
and Other, to the proceeds received from the IBO.

45

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 51/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis, and between annual tests if indicators of potential impairment exist, using a
fair-value-based approach.

We are required to evaluate and determine our reporting units for purposes of performing the annual impairment analysis of
goodwill. As a result of the Diamond Foods, Inc. ("Diamond Foods") acquisition, our 2016 analysis identified two reporting units,
North America and Europe. The annual impairment analysis of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets also requires
us to project future financial performance, including revenue and profit growth, fixed asset and working capital investments,
income tax rates and our weighted average cost of capital. These projections rely upon historical performance, anticipated market
conditions and forward-looking business plans.

Goodwill determined at the time of an acquisition represents the future economic benefit arising from other assets acquired that
could not be individually identified and separately recognized. The goodwill is attributable to the general reputation, assembled
workforce, acquisition synergies and the expected future cash flows of the business.

Our trademarks are valued using the relief-from-royalty method under the income approach, which requires us to estimate a
royalty rate, identify relevant projected revenue, and select an appropriate discount rate. Our route intangible assets are valued by
comparing the current fair market value for the route assets to the associated book value. The fair market value is computed using
the route sales average for each route multiplied by the market multiple for the area in which the route is located. Other intangible
assets, primarily customer and contractual relationships and patents, are tested for impairment if events or changes in
circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that fair value is less than book value.

Amortizable intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which is the period
over which economic benefits are expected to be provided.

Equity Method Investments

Investments where we have the ability to exercise significant influence, but do not control, are accounted for under the equity
method of accounting and are included in other noncurrent assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Under this method of
accounting, our share of the net earnings or losses of the investee is included in other income, net on our Consolidated Statements
of Income. We evaluate our equity method investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amounts of such investments may be impaired. If a decline in the value of an equity method investment is determined
to be other than temporary, a loss is recorded in earnings in the current period. Our equity method investments totaled $8.4 million
as of December 31, 2016. We had no equity method investments as of January 2, 2016.

Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate is based on the level and mix of income of our separate legal entities, statutory tax rates, business credits
available in the various jurisdictions in which we operate and permanent tax differences. Significant judgment is required in
evaluating tax positions that affect the annual tax rate. We recognize the effect of income tax positions only if these positions are
more likely than not of being sustained. We adjust these liabilities in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the
progress of a tax audit.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to the taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rate is recognized in income
in the period that includes the enactment date. We estimate valuation allowances on deferred tax assets for the portions that we do
not believe will be fully utilized based on projected earnings and usage. In accordance with Accounting Standards Update ("ASU")
No. 2015-17, deferred tax assets and liabilities, along with related valuation allowances, are netted by tax jurisdiction and
classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet.

A portion of the cumulative earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries is considered to be indefinitely reinvested and, accordingly, no
provision for U.S. federal and state income taxes is required. It is not practicable to determine the amount of unrecognized deferred
tax liability related to the unremitted earnings. Applicable U.S. income taxes are provided on earnings of certain foreign
subsidiaries in the periods in which they are no longer considered indefinitely reinvested. In the event that management elects for
any reason in the future to repatriate some or all of the foreign earnings that were previously deemed to be indefinitely reinvested
outside of the United States, we would incur additional tax expense upon such repatriation.

46

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 52/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Employee and Non-Employee Stock-Based Compensation Arrangements

We account for stock option awards based on the fair value-method using the Black-Scholes model. Compensation expense for
stock options is recognized using straight-line attribution over the vesting period, which is usually three years, and is adjusted for a
forfeiture rate based on historical and estimated future experience.

Compensation expense for restricted shares and restricted units is recognized over the vesting period, which is generally three
years, based on the closing stock price on the grant date. Restricted shares receive or accrue the same dividend as common shares
outstanding. Non-employee restricted units receive or accrue a non-forfeitable dividend equivalent that is added to the number of
units available to vest and is equal to the dividends paid on common shares outstanding.

The fair value of performance-based restricted units granted to our employees is estimated on the date of grant using a Monte
Carlo valuation model, which requires the input of subjective assumptions. The risk free interest rate is based on rates of US
Treasury issues with a remaining life equal to the expected life of the performance-based restricted units. The time to maturity
reflects the remaining performance period at the grant date. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our
common stock over the expected life as we feel this is a reasonable estimate of future volatility.

Compensation expense for performance-based restricted units is recognized using straight-line attribution over the performance
period, which is approximately three years, and is adjusted for a forfeiture rate based on historical and estimated future experience.
Performance-based restricted units receive or accrue a forfeitable dividend equivalent that is added to the number of units available
to vest and is equal to the dividends paid on common shares outstanding.

Self-Insurance Reserves
We maintain reserves for the self-funded portions of employee medical insurance benefits. Our portion of employee medical
claims is limited to $0.4 million per participant annually by stop-loss insurance coverage. The accrual for incurred but not reported
medical insurance claims was $3.9 million and $3.8 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively.

We maintain self-insurance reserves for workers’ compensation and auto liability for individual losses up to the deductibles which
are currently $0.8 million per individual loss for workers' compensation, $0.5 million for auto liability per accident and $0.3
million for auto physical damage per accident. In addition, certain general and product liability claims are self-funded for
individual losses up to the $0.5 million insurance deductible. Claims in excess of the deductible are fully insured up to $100
million per occurrence and in the aggregate. We evaluate input from a third-party actuary in the estimation of the casualty
insurance obligation on an annual basis. In determining the ultimate loss and reserve requirements, we use various actuarial
assumptions, including compensation trends, healthcare cost trends and discount rates. In 2016, we used a discount rate of 2.0%,
the same rate used in 2015, based on treasury rates over the estimated future payout period.

We also use historical information for claims frequency and severity in order to establish loss development factors. For 2016 and
2015, we had accrued liabilities related to the retained risks of $17.3 million and $16.2 million, respectively, included in the
accruals for casualty insurance claims in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The liabilities related to our casualty insurance claims
were partially offset by estimated reimbursements for amounts in excess of our deductibles associated with these claims of $4.6
million and $5.2 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively, which are included in other noncurrent assets in our Consolidated
Balance Sheets.

Derivative Financial Instruments

We are exposed to certain interest rate risks as part of our ongoing business operations and may use derivative financial
instruments, where appropriate, to manage these risks. If we elect to do so, and if the instrument meets certain criteria,
management designates its derivatives as cash flow hedges. For designated cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the change in
fair value is included in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of related tax effects, with the corresponding asset or
liability recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss, if any, is immediately recognized
in the same caption where the hedged items are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income. We do not use derivatives
for speculative purposes.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share from continuing and discontinued operations is computed by dividing income from continuing and
discontinued operations attributable to Snyder's-Lance, respectively, by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during each period.

Diluted earnings per share gives effect to all securities representing potential common shares that were dilutive and outstanding
during the period. In the calculation of diluted earnings per share, the denominator includes the number of additional common
shares that would have been outstanding if our outstanding dilutive stock options had been exercised pursuant to the treasury stock
method, or if our outstanding dilutive restricted units or performance-based restricted units had vested and converted to common
stock. Anti-dilutive shares are excluded from the dilutive earnings calculation. No adjustment to reported net income is required
when computing diluted earnings per share.

47
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 53/107
6/26/2018 Document

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 54/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating
securities and are treated as a separate class of securities in calculating earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. We
have granted and expect to continue to grant restricted shares with non-forfeitable rights to dividends and restricted units with non-
forfeitable rights to dividend equivalents. We include these awards in our calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share using
the two-class method when we have undistributed income after considering the effect of dividends declared during the period.

Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising costs included in selling, general and administrative expenses on the
Consolidated Statements of Income were $54.7 million, $31.8 million and $34.1 million during 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Research and Development

We conduct research and development for the purpose of developing innovative, high-quality products that exceed consumer
expectations. Our efforts include the use of professional product developers such as microbiologists, food scientists and culinary
experts who all work in collaboration with innovation, marketing, manufacturing and sales leaders to develop products to meet
changing consumer demands as well as formulate new products. In addition to developing new products, the research and
development staff routinely reformulates and improves existing products based on advances in ingredients and technology, and
conducts value engineering to maintain competitive price points. Our research and development costs were approximately $10.0
million, $6.2 million and $7.6 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and are included in cost of sales in the Consolidated
Statements of Income.

Shipping and Handling Costs

We do not bill customers separately for shipping and handling of product. These costs are included as part of selling, general and
administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Shipping and handling costs were $152.4 million, $112.6
million and $114.5 million during 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Loss Contingencies
Various legal actions, claims, and other contingencies arise in the normal course of our business. Specific reserves are provided for
loss contingencies to the extent we conclude that a loss is both probable and reasonably estimable. We use a case-by-case
evaluation of the underlying data and update our evaluation as further information becomes known. Legal costs are expensed as
incurred.

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of our foreign operations is the applicable local currency, the British Pound and Euro. The functional
currency is translated into US dollars for balance sheet accounts using currency exchange rates in effect as of the balance sheet
date, and for revenue and expense accounts using an average exchange rate in effect during the applicable period.

NOTE 2. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

On April 10, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU No. 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued
Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which changed the criteria for determining which disposals
can be presented as discontinued operations and modified related disclosure requirements. This accounting standard has the impact
of reducing the frequency of disposals reported as discontinued operations, by requiring such a disposal to represent a strategic
shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. However, existing provisions that
prohibited an entity from reporting a discontinued operation if it had certain continuing cash flows or involvement with the
component after disposal were eliminated by this standard. The ASU also expands the disclosures for discontinued operations and
requires new disclosures related to individually significant disposals that do not qualify as discontinued operations. We adopted
this guidance prospectively beginning January 4, 2015. The ASU was applied to 2016 divestiture information discussed in Note 3.

On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which provides for a
single five-step model to be applied to all revenue from contracts with customers. The guidance also requires improved disclosures
to help users of the financial statements better understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue that is recognized.
In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of the Effective Date,
which deferred the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year, to December 15, 2017 for interim and annual reporting periods
beginning after that date. The FASB will permit early adoption of the standard, but not before the original effective date of
December 15, 2016.

48

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 55/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

In 2016, the FASB issued final amendments clarifying the implementation guidance for principal versus agent considerations,
identifying performance obligations and the accounting of intellectual property licenses. In addition, the FASB introduced practical
expedients related to disclosures of remaining performance obligations, as well as other amendments to guidance on collectability,
non-cash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes.
The impact of adopting the new standard on our net revenue and operating income is not expected to be material. We also do not
expect a material impact to our balance sheet. The immaterial impact of adopting ASU No. 2014-09 primarily relates to the
following:
• Slotting fees, which are currently amortized over the lesser of their arrangement term or 12 months, but under the new
standard these slotting fees will be recorded as a reduction in the transaction price when the product is sold. This could
lead to a difference in the timing of recognizing revenue.
• Licensing of promotional materials to distributors would be a separate performance obligation under the new standard.
We believe that this is immaterial in the context of our contracts.
• Contract manufacturing arrangements are recognized as revenue when product is delivered to the customer. If any of our
contracts create an asset without an alternative use and an enforceable right to payment, then we would recognize revenue
over time under the new standard. The right to payment is not enforceable under the contracts we have currently assessed.

We plan to adopt ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, on December 31, 2017, the first day of our fiscal year
2018. The guidance permits the use of either a full retrospective or modified retrospective transition method. We are currently
evaluating the method of adoption but believe that we will apply the modified retrospective approach.

On April 7, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. We adopted this
change in accounting principle in the first quarter of fiscal year 2016 which requires retrospective application. This ASU requires
that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the
carrying amount of that debt liability consistent with debt discounts. This revised guidance is effective for annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2015 and related interim periods, with early adoption permitted. In August 2015, the FASB issued
ASU No. 2015-15, Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit
Arrangements, which clarified that debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements can be presented in the balance sheet
as an asset and amortized over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement. The following table summarizes the adjustments made to
conform prior period classifications to the new guidance:

January 2, 2016
(in thousands) As Filed Reclass As Adjusted
Other noncurrent assets $ 27,403 $ (7,554) $ 19,849
Long-term debt, net $ (379,855) $ 7,554 $ (372,301)

On July 22, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. This ASU requires that
inventory be measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The amendments in this update do not apply to inventory
measured using the last-in, first-out method or the retail inventory method. This revised guidance is effective for annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and related interim periods, with early adoption permitted. The Company early
adopted this standard in the first quarter of 2016. The adoption of ASU 2015-11 had no impact on our consolidated financial
statements.

On September 25, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments.
This ASU simplifies the accounting for adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized in a business combination by
eliminating the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments. This revised guidance is effective for annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and related interim periods. The amendments in the update should be
applied prospectively to adjustments to provisional amounts that occur after the effective date of the update with early application
permitted for financial statements not yet issued. We have adopted this guidance and have applied it as presented in Note 4.

49

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 56/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. This ASU requires us to recognize a lease liability for the
obligation to make lease payments, measured at the present value on a discounted basis, and a right-of-use (“ROU”) asset for the
right to use the underlying asset for the duration of the lease term, measured at the lease liability amount adjusted for lease
prepayments, lease incentives received and initial direct costs. The lease liability and ROU asset are recognized in the balance
sheet at the commencement of the lease. For income statement purposes, the FASB retained a dual model, requiring leases to be
classified as either operating or finance. Operating leases will result in straight line expense while finance leases will result in a
front-loaded expense pattern. Classification will be based on criteria that are largely similar to those applied in current lease
accounting. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim periods within those periods, beginning after
December 15, 2018, and requires the use of a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the
beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. Early application of the ASU is permitted. We
are currently evaluating the impact this accounting standard will have on our consolidated financial statements, but believe that
there will be assets and liabilities recognized on our consolidated balance sheet and an immaterial impact on our consolidated
statement of income.

On March 30, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The
updated guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is
permitted. The updated guidance includes multiple provisions intended to simplify various aspects of the accounting for share-
based payments. We plan to adopt the accounting standard in the first quarter of 2017 and the impact to our consolidated financial
statements will be as follows:

• Excess tax benefits for share-based payments will be recorded as an adjustment to income tax expense and reflected in
operating cash flows after adoption of this accounting standard. Excess tax benefits are currently recorded through income
tax receivable and equity, and presented as a financing cash flow.

• The guidance allows the employer to withhold up to the maximum statutory tax rates in the applicable jurisdictions
without triggering liability accounting. The Company's accounting treatment of outstanding equity awards will not be
impacted by its adoption of this provision of the accounting standard.

• The guidance allows for a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur rather than on an estimated basis. The
Company does not plan to make this election, and will continue to account for forfeitures on an estimated basis.

On August 26, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This
accounting standard is intended to eliminate diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and
classified in the statement of cash flows. The updated guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. We are planning to adopt this new guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year
2017 and do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

On October 24, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. This accounting
standard is intended to improve the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than
inventory. The updated guidance indicates that an entity should recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer
of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs instead of when the asset has been sold to an outside party. The updated
guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within
those annual reporting periods, and early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this accounting standard
will have on our consolidated financial statements.

On November 17, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Restricted Cash. This accounting standard requires that a statement of
cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted
cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should
be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on
the statement of cash flows. The new guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2017 and early adoption is permitted. The amendment should be adopted retrospectively. We plan to early adopt this new guidance
in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 and do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.

On January 5, 2017 the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business. This accounting standard clarifies the
definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals)
of assets or businesses. The new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and early
adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this accounting standard will have on our consolidated financial
statements.

50

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 57/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

On January 26, 2017 the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. This accounting standard
simplifies how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating step 2 from the goodwill impairment test, which
measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount.
Instead, entities should perform annual or interim goodwill impairment tests by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its
carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the excess of carrying amount over the fair value of the respective
reporting unit. The guidance is effective for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2019. Early application of the ASU is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates
after January 1, 2017. We are currently evaluating whether we will early adopt this standard as part of our 2017 annual and interim
impairment tests. As this standard is prospective in nature, the impact to our financial statements by not performing step 2 to
measure the amount of any potential goodwill impairment will depend on various factors. However, the elimination of step 2 will
reduce the complexity and cost of the subsequent measurement of goodwill.

Other amendments to GAAP in the US that have been issued by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require
adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

NOTE 3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Sale of Diamond of California

On November 28, 2016, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell our culinary nuts business (comprised primarily of the
Diamond of California® brand and the Stockton, CA facility; collectively "Diamond of California"). The sale of Diamond of
California represents a strategic shift in our business that will have a significant impact on our operations and financial results, and
aligns with the Company's strategy to focus more resources on the growth opportunities for our snack food brands. On
December 31, 2016, we completed the sale for net proceeds of $128.6 million, consisting of $118.6 million of cash and $10 million
in a promissory note. The purchase price is subject to normal working capital adjustments as well as a post closing adjustment to
working capital based on the final California Department of Food and Agriculture Walnut/Raisin/Prune Report State Summary -
2016 Crop Year, which is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2017. The purchase price is net of an estimated liability
of $2.6 million related to walnut pricing. This estimate will likely change each quarter throughout 2017 until the final walnut price
is determined in the fourth quarter.

We received the cash proceeds from the sale of Diamond of California on January 3, 2017. As of December 31, 2016, we had a
receivable due from the purchaser recorded in receivable from sale of Diamond of California on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The promissory note is due on June 30, 2025. Interest on the principal balance in this promissory note accrues at a rate per annum
equal to the 30-day LIBOR rate, plus 3.00%, provided that in no event shall the applicable rate exceed 6.00% per annum. The note
is recorded within other noncurrent assets on our consolidated balance sheet.

As a result of the sale of Diamond of California, revenues and expenses that no longer continued after the sale of Diamond of
California, and where we had no substantial continuing involvement, were reclassified to discontinued operations in the
Consolidated Statements of Income.

For 2016, income statement amounts associated with discontinued operations were as follows:

(in thousands) 2016

Net revenue $ 204,443
Cost of sales 156,008
Gross profit 48,435
Selling, general and administrative 33,638
Loss on sale of Diamond of California 32,645
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes (17,848)
Income tax expense 9,252
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax $ (27,100)

The discontinued operations pretax loss activity generated income tax expense of $9.2 million, for an effective tax rate of (51.8)%.
The tax expense is generated by the sale of Diamond of California, which included sale of goodwill which had no tax basis and for
which no deferred tax liability was recorded.

51

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 58/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

During 2016, we recorded a pretax loss in discontinued operations of approximately $32.6 million on the sale of Diamond of
California, which was calculated as follows:

(in thousands) Total

Net proceeds $ 128,577

Less carrying value of net assets transferred:

Transaction related expenses 2,805
Net working capital 31,874
Pension liability and other long-term assets and liabilities, net (11,071)
Fixed assets, net 19,695
Goodwill (1) 48,845
Other intangible assets, net 69,074
Loss on sale of Diamond of California $ (32,645)

The component of goodwill included in the carrying amount of net assets transferred was based on the fair value of Diamond of California relative to the fair
(1)

value of the remaining business within its reporting unit in accordance with FASB ASC 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other.

The following table provides depreciation, amortization, capital expenditures, and significant operating noncash items of
discontinued operations for 2016.

(in thousands) 2016

Cash flows from discontinued operating activities
Depreciation and amortization $ 4,467
Stock-based compensation expense 2,101
Loss on sale of Diamond of California 32,645
Payable to growers (1) 41,948

Cash flows from discontinued investing activities

Capital expenditures $ 514

Non-cash discontinued investing activities

Proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations, not yet received, less transaction costs, not yet paid $ 125,772
(1)The operating cash inflow generated by the increase in payable to growers from $38.3 million acquired on February 29, 2016 to $80.3 million sold in the
disposition of Diamond of California on December 31, 2016.

As a result of the sale of Diamond of California, we had a significant amount of stock-based compensation awards that accelerated
vesting at the sale date due to change in control provisions. We recognized $1.3 million in stock-based compensation expense from
awards that vested due to acceleration clauses within employment agreements with employees who were terminated as part of the
sale.

In connection with the sale of Diamond of California, we entered into a Supply Agreement ("Walnut Supply Agreement") to
procure walnuts from the purchaser for an initial term of five years subsequent to the sale transaction, which will be used in the
manufacture of Emerald® branded products. Under this agreement, the purchaser has the right to match third party offers for sale
of such walnuts to us.

52

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 59/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Additionally, we entered into a Transition Services Agreement ("Stockton TSA") and a Facility Use Agreement ("Stockton FUA"),
both effective immediately subsequent to the sale transaction, to facilitate the orderly transfer of Emerald® and Pop Secret®
business operations to Company-owned facilities. The Stockton TSA stipulates certain finance, accounting, sales, marketing,
human resources, information technology, supply chain, manufacturing, and other general services to be provided between us and
the purchaser, during an initial term of 120 days. The Stockton FUA has an initial term of six months and provides us with the
right to access Diamond of California's Stockton, CA manufacturing facility, for the purpose of manufacturing certain Emerald®
branded products. Permitted uses under this agreement include use of certain equipment and storage of inventories related to the
Emerald® production process.

Sale of Private Brands

On May 6, 2014, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell two of our US subsidiaries as well as certain assets of our Canadian
subsidiary, which included the exclusive rights to manufacture and sell the majority of our Private brand products and certain
contract manufactured products (collectively “Private Brands”) to Shearer’s Foods, LLC (“Shearer’s”). The manufacturing
facilities associated with the sale were located in Burlington, Iowa and Guelph, Ontario. On June 30, 2014, we completed the sale
of Private Brands for $430 million in cash with after-tax proceeds of approximately $303 million.

As a result of the sale of Private Brands, revenues and expenses that no longer continued after the sale of Private Brands, and
where we had no substantial continuing involvement, were reclassified to discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements
of Income. All prior period results were retrospectively adjusted to ensure comparability and consistent presentation of continuing
and discontinued operations.

For 2014, income statement amounts associated with discontinued operations were as follows:

(in thousands) 2014

Net revenue $ 124,256
Cost of sales 94,396
Gross profit 29,860
Selling, general and administrative 11,886
Gain on sale of Private Brands (222,963)
Other expense, net 205
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes 240,732
Income tax expense 107,416
Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax $ 133,316

During 2014, we recorded a pretax gain in discontinued operations of approximately $223 million on the sale of Private Brands,
which was calculated as follows:

(in thousands) Total

Cash proceeds $ 430,017

Less carrying value of net assets transferred:

Transaction related expenses 6,359
Total current assets 40,219
Fixed assets, net 39,123
Goodwill (1) 141,404
Other intangible assets, net 2,938
Total liabilities (11,883)
Derecognition of cumulative translation adjustment (2) (11,106)
Gain on sale of Private Brands $ 222,963

The component of goodwill included in the carrying amount of net assets transferred was based on the fair value of Private Brands relative to the fair value of the
(1)

remaining business in accordance with FASB ASC 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other.

The majority of our cumulative translation adjustment at that time was derecognized as a result of the sale of Private Brands due to the sale of substantially all of
(2)

the assets and liabilities of our Canadian subsidiary. We have no remaining operations in Canada.

53

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 60/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Income tax expense recognized on the sale of domestic operations in 2014 was approximately $86 million. The total effective tax
rate on discontinued operations is higher than the statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the disposal of goodwill allocated to
discontinued operations which has no tax basis and for which no deferred tax liability was recorded. The total tax expense
associated with the sale of the Canadian assets was approximately $16 million.

As the sale of Private Brands was completed on the first day of the third quarter of 2014, there were no remaining assets or
liabilities associated with discontinued operations as of December 31, 2016 or January 2, 2016.

In connection with the sale of Private Brands, we entered into a manufacturing and supply agreement with Shearer's (the "Supply
Agreement") to contract manufacture certain products as requested by Shearer's for an initial term of two years subsequent to the
sale transaction for which we have realized revenue and incurred expenses from the products sold to Shearer's. Under the Supply
Agreement, certain manufacturing facilities that were not included in the disposal group continued to produce certain products for
Shearer’s. Accordingly, previous revenues earned for the production and sale of these products were not included in discontinued
operations given the continued involvement and length of the Supply Agreement.

NOTE 4. BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS

2016 Acquisitions
On October 27, 2015, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization (the “Merger Agreement”) with
Diamond Foods. Diamond Foods was a leading snack food company that possessed five brands, including: Kettle Brand® potato
chips; KETTLE® Chips; Pop Secret® popcorn; Emerald® snack nuts; and Diamond of California® culinary nuts. Pursuant to the
Merger Agreement, we agreed to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Diamond Foods in a cash
and stock transaction, including our repayment of $651.0 million of Diamond Foods’ indebtedness, accrued interest and related
fees. The acquisition was subject to the approval of our stockholders of the issuance of our shares and the approval of the
stockholders of Diamond Foods of the adoption of the Merger Agreement.

On February 26, 2016, our stockholders approved the issuance of our shares and the stockholders of Diamond Foods adopted the
Merger Agreement. The acquisition closed on February 29, 2016 and, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Diamond Foods became
our wholly-owned subsidiary.

At the effective time of the acquisition, each share of Diamond Foods common stock that was issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the effective time (other than (i) treasury shares held by Diamond Foods, (ii) shares owned by Snyder’s-Lance or any of
our subsidiaries and (iii) shares that were owned by stockholders who had perfected and not withdrawn a demand for appraisal
rights pursuant to Delaware law) were cancelled and converted into the right to receive $12.50 in cash and 0.775 shares of
Snyder’s-Lance common stock, par value $0.83-1/3 per share. Diamond Foods shares have ceased trading on the NASDAQ stock
exchange.

Additionally, at the effective time of the acquisition, all outstanding Diamond Foods stock-based compensation awards, then
comprised of restricted shares, restricted units, performance-based restricted units, and stock options, converted to replacement
Snyder's-Lance awards or were settled with merger consideration as described within the Registration Statement on Form S-4 we
filed with the SEC on January 20, 2016. The fair value of the replacement awards, whether vested or unvested, was included in the
purchase price to the extent that pre-acquisition services have been rendered. The purchase price also included the fair value of
accelerated vesting for awards that vested at the acquisition date, due to change in control provisions. The remainder of the fair
value of the unvested outstanding replacement awards will be recorded as compensation expense over the applicable future vesting
period in the periods following the acquisition date.

54

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 61/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

The following is a summary of consideration transferred in the acquisition of Diamond Foods:

Conversion Fair Value

Calculation (in thousands)
Diamond Foods common shares outstanding as of February 29, 2016 31,062,164
Multiplied by 0.775 per the Merger Agreement 0.775
Total Snyder's-Lance common shares issued to Diamond Foods stockholders 24,071,839
Multiplied by Snyder's-Lance closing stock price as of February 26, 2016 $ 32.34
Total stock consideration for outstanding common shares $ 778,483
Cash consideration of $12.50 per Diamond Foods common share outstanding as of February
29, 2016, including cash paid in lieu of fractional converted shares 388,318
Total cash and stock consideration to stockholders $ 1,166,801
Fair value of replacement cash awards and stock-based awards attributable to pre-
acquisition service, including awards that accelerated vesting at acquisition date due to
change in control provisions (1) 28,211
Repayment of Diamond Foods’ outstanding debt due to change in control provisions (2) 651,044
Liability for value of Dissenters' merger consideration (3) 12,418
Total fair value of consideration transferred $ 1,858,474
Effective settlement of accounts payable owed by us to Diamond Foods at acquisition date (1,295)
Total purchase consideration $ 1,857,179

(1)The fair value of the Snyder's-Lance replacement cash awards, settled common stock, restricted share awards, restricted unit awards and stock options was
calculated as of February 29, 2016 using conversion terms outlined in the Merger Agreement. The closing stock price on February 26, 2016, the last trading day
before closing, was used in the fair valuation of settled common stock, restricted share awards and restricted unit awards. The fair value of the stock options was
estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model utilizing the assumptions noted below:

Assumptions used for the valuation of replacement Snyder's-Lance stock options:

Stock price as of February 26, 2016 $32.34
Post-conversion exercise price $11.75 - $80.24
Average expected volatility 31.18%
Expected dividend yield 1.98%
Weighted average risk-free interest rate 0.33%
Weighted average expected life 0.3 years
Black-Scholes weighted average value per option $15.22
The expected volatility of the Snyder’s-Lance stock price was based on average historical volatility, which was based on observations and a duration consistent with
the expected life assumption. The weighted average expected life of the option was calculated using the simplified method by using the vesting term of the option
and the option expiration date. The risk-free interest rate was based on US treasury securities with maturities equal to the expected life of the option.
(2)Repayment of Diamond Foods’ outstanding debt was required as part of the consideration to be transferred due to change in control provisions that were
triggered upon acquisition. The repayment amount was calculated as of February 29, 2016 by taking Diamond Foods’ outstanding long-term debt and current
portion of long-term debt of $633.2 million and adding accrued interest of $9.0 million and a prepayment penalty of $8.8 million.

Estimate of merger consideration unpaid and owed to certain Diamond Foods stockholders that would have otherwise received $12.50 in cash and 0.775 shares of
(3)

Snyder’s-Lance common stock for each share of Diamond Foods common stock held (see 'Appraisal Proceedings' within Note 16). This was paid during the third
quarter of 2016.

55

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 62/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. Management has used its best estimate in the allocation of the
purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on the estimated fair value of such assets and liabilities. The
following table summarizes the allocation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as part of the acquisition:

Preliminary Purchase Price

Allocation Measurement Period Allocation
As of Adjustments As of
(in thousands) April 2, 2016 December 31, 2016
Cash and cash equivalents $ 28,945 $ (6,605) $ 22,340
Accounts receivable 77,445 1,546 78,991
Inventories 168,089 (11,377) 156,712
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 12,111 1,464 13,575
Fixed assets 136,340 (8,130) 128,210
Goodwill 868,443 (37,215) 831,228
Other intangible assets 902,500 47,794 950,294
Equity investments 8,607 3,988 12,595
Other long term assets 1,018 (45) 973
Total assets acquired 2,203,498 (8,580) 2,194,918

Accounts payable, and other current liabilities,

including payable to growers 134,715 (13,080) 121,635
Deferred income tax liability 191,425 2,988 194,413
Other long term liabilities 20,179 1,512 21,691
Total liabilities assumed 346,319 (8,580) 337,739

Net assets acquired (1) $ 1,857,179 $ — $ 1,857,179

(1) Net assets acquired include the effective settlement of $1.3 million in accounts payable owed by us to Diamond Foods at the time of the acquisition.

As of December 31, 2016, the purchase price allocation is considered complete. Of the estimated $950.3 million of acquired
intangible assets, $355.3 million were assigned to customer relationships and will be amortized over 20 years. The remaining value
of acquired intangible assets of $595.0 million was assigned to trademarks, which are not subject to amortization because they
have indefinite lives. The increase in the carrying value of assets to fair value as a result of purchase price adjustments is not
deductible for income tax purposes.

During the fourth quarter, we recorded a $6.6 million correction to adjust cash and accounts payable on the opening balance sheet.
This adjustment is immaterial, with no overall impact on the full year consolidated financial statements.

Goodwill represents the future economic benefit arising from other assets acquired that could not be individually identified and
separately recognized. The goodwill is attributable to the general reputation, assembled workforce, acquisition synergies and the
expected future cash flows of Diamond Foods' business.
We have recorded a net deferred tax liability of $194.4 million related to the acquisition of Diamond Foods. We recorded deferred
tax liabilities of $384.6 million relating primarily to basis differences in identified intangible assets acquired, which includes $49.2
million related to un-repatriated foreign earnings, based on management’s assessment of the amount of earnings not considered to
be indefinitely reinvested. We recorded a deferred tax asset of $190.2 million, of which $143.7 million was recorded for federal
and state net operating loss carryforwards, and a further $9.4 million for other federal and state tax credit carryforwards. A
valuation allowance of $10.7 million has been recorded, based on management’s assessment of the ability to utilize these deferred
tax assets.

56

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 63/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Transaction and integration related expenses associated with the acquisition of Diamond Foods were approximately $66.3 million
and $7.7 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively, and are included in a separate line in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Transaction and integration expenses in continuing operations for 2016, include $17.5 million of severance and retention benefits,
and $16.4 million of accelerated stock-based compensation, which was recognized due to the change in control and severance
agreements for the Diamond Foods executive team. The remaining costs were primarily investment banking fees, as well as other
professional and legal fees associated with completion of the acquisition, and subsequent integration of Diamond Foods. We
recognized $7.7 million of Diamond Foods related transaction expenses during 2015 for professional fees and legal costs
associated with the acquisition.
Diamond Foods' results were included in our Consolidated Statements of Income from February 29, 2016. We recognized
incremental Diamond Foods net revenue of $443.5 million in 2016. A portion of Diamond Foods revenue was eliminated in
consolidation because it was sold to other Snyder's-Lance subsidiaries for distribution through our DSD network.

As a result of progress we have made integrating Diamond Foods, it is impracticable to disclose separately Diamond Foods'
contributions to income before income taxes in 2016.
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information has been prepared, as if the acquisition of Diamond Foods
had taken place at the beginning of 2015. These unaudited pro forma results include estimates and assumptions regarding increased
amortization of intangible assets related to the acquisition, reduced interest expense related to lower interest rates associated with
the new combined debt, and the related income tax effects. Pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the results that would
have occurred if the acquisition had occurred on the date indicated, or that may result in the future for various reasons, including
the potential impact of revenue and cost synergies on the business.

(in thousands) 2016 2015

Net revenue (1) $ 2,443,284 $ 2,469,732
Net income attributable to Snyder's-Lance, Inc. (1) $ 64,027 $ 75,498
(1)
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information does not reflect the sale of Diamond of California.

The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information for 2016 and 2015 included increased amortization expense of $2.1
million and $10.0 million, respectively, as a result of acquired intangible assets. In addition, the unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial information for 2016 and 2015 included reduced interest expense related to debt of $1.3 million and $13.0 million,
respectively. This reduction is due to the lower interest rates associated with our new combined debt, as more fully described in
Note 11.

We also included a reduction in cost of goods sold of $15.9 million in the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information
for 2016, related to the elimination of the inventory step-up recorded during the year in connection with the Diamond Foods
acquisition. We included additional cost of goods sold in the unaudited pro forma financial information for 2015 of $15.6 million.
The net incremental expense represents the financial impact of the inventory step-up recorded in connection with the Diamond
Foods acquisition.

For 2016, we included a reduction in non-recurring transaction-related expenses of $50.2 million, which were directly related to
the Diamond Foods acquisition. These transaction-related expenses, and additional transaction-related expenses incurred prior to
the end of 2015, were included as additional expenses of $60.4 million in the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
information for the first quarter of 2015.

Acquisition of Metcalfe's Skinny Limited

On September 1, 2016, we completed the acquisition of Metcalfe's Skinny Limited ("Metcalfe") by acquiring the remaining 74%
interest for approximately $9.7 million. Metcalfe is the U.K.'s leading ready-to-eat ("RTE") premium popcorn brand, in addition to
a growing range of corn and rice cake products. The U.K. popcorn market is one of the fastest growing categories within
the U.K. snack food industry, as consumers increasingly seek out "better-for-you" snacking options.

Because of our purchase of a controlling interest in Metcalfe, the equity of the entire entity was increased to fair value, which
resulted in the revaluation of our prior 26% interest. However, as this 26% interest was recently recorded at fair value in the
Diamond Foods opening balance sheet, the revaluation did not result in a significant gain or loss. The fair value of 100% of
Metcalfe was determined to be $13.2 million, of which $1.6 million was preliminarily allocated to current assets, $7.0 million to
goodwill, $8.8 million to other intangible assets and $4.2 million to total liabilities. Goodwill represents the future economic
benefit arising from other assets acquired that could not be individually identified and separately recognized.

57

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 64/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Prior to our acquisition of the remaining 74% of Metcalfe, our share of income for the period subsequent to February 29, 2016,
was not material and was included in other income, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Subsequent to our acquisition
of the remaining 74% of Metcalfe on September 1, 2016, Metcalfe's results were consolidated into our Consolidated Statements of
Income. Net revenue and net income from Metcalfe for the period subsequent to acquisition of the remaining 74% was not
material.
2014 Acquisitions

Late July
On October 30, 2014, we made an additional investment in Late July Snacks, LLC ("Late July") of approximately $59.5 million
which increased our total ownership interest from approximately 18.7% to 80.0%. Late July is the industry leader for organic and
non-GMO tortilla chips and sells a variety of other baked and salty snacks with particular focus on organic and non-GMO snacks.
The investment supports our goal of having a stronger presence in healthier snacks. Concurrent with the transaction, we also
established a $6.0 million line of credit between the Company and Late July, of which $3.9 million was drawn by Late July in
order to repay certain obligations.

Although our ownership interest is only 80%, we were required to value 100% of the assets and liabilities. Accordingly, the
purchase price allocation below shows the value of the assets and liabilities acquired at 100%, with an adjustment for the
noncontrolling interest (20.0%) and the value of our prior equity interest (18.7%) in order to reconcile to the purchase price.

Purchase Price
(in thousands) Allocation
Cash and cash equivalents $ 698
Restricted Cash 1,200
Accounts receivable 1,719
Inventories 1,596
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 104
Fixed assets 127
Goodwill 56,604
Other intangible assets 41,100
Other non-current assets 295
Total assets acquired 103,443

Accounts payable 2,097

Other non-current liabilities 475
Total liabilities assumed 2,572

Net assets acquired at 100.0% 100,871

Less: Noncontrolling interest 19,405

Less: Value of prior equity investment 18,101

Net assets acquired $ 63,365

Of the $41.1 million of acquired intangible assets, $20.8 million was assigned to customer relationships, which will be amortized
over their useful life of 20 years, and $20.3 million to trademarks which are believed to have an indefinite useful life. The
customer relationships were valued using the multi-period excess earnings method, an income approach which required us to
estimate projected revenues associated with customers we believe will be successfully retained post-acquisition, reduced for
contributory asset charges and taxes. The trademarks were valued using the relief-from-royalty method under the income approach,
which required us to estimate a royalty rate, identify relevant projected revenue, and select an appropriate discount rate.

58

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 65/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Because of our purchase of a controlling interest in Late July, the equity of the entire entity was increased to fair value, which
resulted in a $16.6 million increase in value of our prior investment. This $16.6 million, which represents the difference in the
book value of our 18.7% equity investment in Late July at the transaction date compared to the fair value of that equity interest,
was recognized as a gain in our Consolidated Statements of Income. The calculation of this gain is as follows:

(in thousands) Gain Calculation

Fair value of 18.7% ownership in Late July $ 18,101
Balance of prior equity investment in Late July 1,493
Gain on the revaluation of prior equity investment $ 16,608

The fair value of the percentage of assets acquired (61.3%) is deductible for income tax purposes, while the remaining assets did
not receive a step-up in tax basis. Goodwill represents the future economic benefit arising from other assets acquired that could not
be individually identified and separately recognized. The goodwill is attributable to the general reputation, assembled workforce,
acquisition synergies and the expected future cash flows of the business.

Late July's results were included in our Consolidated Statements of Income beginning October 30, 2014. External net revenue from
Late July of $3.9 million was included for 2014. Late July contributions to income before income taxes for the period subsequent
to the acquisition were immaterial to 2014. We incurred pre-tax acquisition-related transaction and other costs of approximately
$0.4 million in selling, general and administrative expense in 2014.

Baptista's
On June 13, 2014, we completed the acquisition of Baptista's Bakery, Inc. ("Baptista's") and related assets for approximately $204
million. The purchase price included the effective settlement of $2.6 million in accounts payable owed by us to Baptista's at the
time of the acquisition. Baptista’s is an industry leader in snack food development and innovation, the manufacturer of our fast
growing Snack Factory® Pretzel Crisps® brand and has unique capabilities consistent with our innovation plans.

The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation among the assets acquired and liabilities assumed:

Purchase Price
(in thousands) Allocation
Cash and cash equivalents $ 2,028
Accounts receivable 5,717
Inventories 9,222
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 318
Fixed assets 103,141
Goodwill 88,320
Other intangible assets 3,900
Total assets acquired 212,646

Current portion of long-term debt 333

Accounts payable 7,517
Accrued compensation 1,227
Other payables and accrued liabilities 1,217
Long-term debt 667
Total liabilities assumed 10,961

Net assets acquired $ 201,685

Of the $3.9 million of acquired intangible assets, $2.7 million was assigned to developed technology, $0.6 million to a non-
compete agreement and $0.6 million to customer relationships. We incurred pre-tax acquisition-related transaction and other costs
of approximately $0.4 million in selling, general and administrative expense in 2014. The fair value of all assets acquired is
deductible for income tax purposes.

59

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 66/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Goodwill represents the future economic benefit arising from other assets acquired that could not be individually identified and
separately recognized. The goodwill is attributable to the general reputation, assembled workforce, acquisition synergies and the
expected future cash flows of the business.

Baptista's results were included in our Consolidated Statements of Income beginning June 13, 2014. The majority of Baptista's net
revenue is internal and therefore eliminated in consolidation. In addition, profit margins on this internal net revenue are deferred
and not realized until the products are sold to third party customers. External net revenue from Baptista’s of $40.5 million was
included for 2014. Baptista’s contribution to income before income taxes for 2014, was approximately $5 million.

NOTE 5. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share using the two-class method, for income from continuing operations:

(in thousands, except per share data) 2016 2015 2014

Basic EPS:
Income from continuing operations $ 41,985 $ 50,685 $ 59,275
Less: Income from continuing operations allocated to participating
— 137 186
securities
Income from continuing operations allocated to common shares $ 41,985 $ 50,548 $ 59,089
Weighted average shares outstanding – Basic 91,873 70,487 69,966
Earnings per share – Basic $ 0.46 $ 0.72 $ 0.84

Diluted EPS:
Weighted average shares outstanding – Basic 91,873 70,487 69,966
Effect of dilutive stock options, restricted units and performance-
1,018 655 690
based restricted units on shares outstanding
Weighted average shares outstanding – Diluted 92,891 71,142 70,656
Earnings per share – Diluted $ 0.45 $ 0.71 $ 0.84

Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations for 2016 were each $0.29. There were no discontinued operations for
2015. Basic and diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations for 2014 were $1.90 and $1.88, respectively.

There were approximately 1.3 million stock options and restricted units excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share
for 2016 because their effects were anti-dilutive. There were no anti-dilutive shares in 2015 and 2014.
NOTE 6. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Total stock-based incentive expense recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income was $24.5 million, $5.6 million and $6.4
million for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. In addition, we recorded $3.8 million, $1.1 million and $1.8 million in incentive
compensation expense for performance-based cash incentives in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Key Employee Incentive Plans

On May 4, 2016, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the 2016 Key Employee Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was approved. The
Plan authorizes the grant of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights (SARs), restricted stock
and performance equity awards, and expires in May 2022. The Plan also authorizes other awards denominated in monetary units or
shares of common stock payable in cash or shares of common stock. The Plan provides for up to 4.0 million of securities available
for future issuance, of which only 0.7 million can be used for restricted stock or performance share awards. Including shares
carried over from the 2012 Key Employee Incentive Plan, as of December 31, 2016, there were approximately 1.0 million of
restricted shares and 3.6 million of other securities available for future issuance under the 2016 Plan. In addition there were
approximately 1.5 million shares available under the prior Diamond Foods stock plan for awards granted to former Diamond
Foods' employees prior to the acquisition.

Long-term Incentive Plans

Under our long-term incentive plan, approximately 150 key employees are granted performance-based cash awards, performance-
based restricted units, stock options and restricted shares. The amount of awards issued to employees is approved by the Board of
Directors.

60

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 67/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Diamond Foods Replacement Awards

The acquisition of Diamond Foods, as discussed further in Note 4, resulted in a significant amount of prior Diamond Foods stock-
based compensation awards converting to replacement Snyder's-Lance awards. Many of these awards vested at the acquisition date
due to change in control provisions. In addition, included in 2016 transaction and integration related expenses on the Consolidated
Statements of Income, we recognized $15.4 million in stock-based compensation expense and $1.0 million in cash compensation
expense from replacement awards that vested due to acceleration clauses within employment agreements for former Diamond
Foods personnel. As of December 31, 2016, the replacement Snyder's-Lance stock-based awards that remained outstanding were
as follows:

• 132,109 restricted units with unrecognized compensation expense of $3.3 million and vesting dates ranging from
January 7, 2017 to January 18, 2020.
• 533,660 stock options that are fully vested and have exercise prices that range from $11.75 to $65.71. The total intrinsic
value of these options was $12.6 million at the end of 2016.

Employee Stock Options

Employee stock options vest in periods ranging up to five years after the grant date with the majority vesting over three years. The
exercise price, which equals the fair market value of our common stock at the date of grant, ranges from $2.45 to $65.71 per share
for the outstanding options as of December 31, 2016.

We account for option awards based on the fair value-method using the Black-Scholes model. The following assumptions were
used to determine the weighted average fair value of options granted during 2016, 2015 and 2014.

2016 2015 2014

Assumptions used in Black-Scholes pricing model:
Expected dividend yield 2.07% 2.06% 2.40%
Risk-free interest rate 1.19% 1.44% 1.89%
Weighted average expected life 4.8 years 4.5 years 6.0 years
Expected volatility 20.43% 22.57% 31.22%
Weighted average fair value per share of options granted $ 4.47 $ 5.03 $ 6.63

The expected dividend yield is based on the projected annual dividend payment per share divided by the stock price at the date of
grant. The risk free interest rate is based on rates of US Treasury issues with a remaining life equal to the expected life of the
option.

For 2016 and 2015 grants, the expected life of the option is calculated using historical exercise patterns to estimate expected term.
For 2014 grants, we used the simplified method to calculate expected life by using the vesting term of the option and the option
expiration date, as we did not have sufficient exercise history at the time to calculate a reasonable estimate.

The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our common stock over the expected life as we feel this is a
reasonable estimate of future volatility.

61

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 68/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

The changes in options outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2016, January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015 were as follows:

Outstanding Weighted average Aggregate

Number of Weighted Average contractual term intrinsic value
shares Exercise Price (in years) (in millions)
Outstanding at December 28, 2013 2,623,888 $ 15.98 7.4 $ 33.8
Granted 418,272 26.66
Exercised (428,285) 15.91
Expired/forfeited (127,593) 24.91
Outstanding at January 3, 2015 2,486,282 $ 17.33 6.9 $ 31.4
Granted 384,453 31.02
Exercised (496,828) 15.82
Expired/forfeited (56,114) 28.36
Outstanding at January 2, 2016 2,317,793 $ 19.66 6.4 $ 33.9
Granted 1,143,753 30.93
Diamond Foods options assumed 1,038,575 20.00
Exercised (599,868) 16.83
Expired/forfeited (183,344) 44.73
Outstanding at December 31, 2016 3,716,909 $ 22.44 6.6 $ 59.5

Exercisable at January 3, 2015 1,384,435 $ 14.12 6.1 $ 21.9

Exercisable at January 2, 2016 1,283,284 $ 15.38 5.6 $ 24.3
Exercisable at December 31, 2016 2,290,991 $ 17.36 5.2 $ 48.5

As of December 31, 2016, there was $4.3 million of unrecognized compensation expense, related to outstanding stock options that
will be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.2 years. Unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options was
$2.1 million as of January 2, 2016 and $3.0 million as of January 3, 2015. Cash received from option exercises during 2016, 2015
and 2014 was $10.1 million, $7.9 million and $6.8 million, respectively. The benefit realized for the tax deductions from option
exercises was $0.9 million, $2.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, during 2016, 2015 and 2014. The total intrinsic value of
stock options exercised during 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $9.5 million, $9.0 million and $5.1 million, respectively. During 2016,
675,613 stock options vested with a weighted average exercise price of $22.54 and a weighted average vesting date fair value of
$31.07.

62

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 69/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Employee Restricted Shares

The changes in restricted share awards outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2016, January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015
were as follows:

Weighted Average
Restricted Share Grant Date
Awards Outstanding Fair Value
Balance at December 28, 2013 237,348 $ 22.72
Granted 116,823 26.77
Vested (145,845) 21.55
Forfeited (26,559) 25.34
Balance at January 3, 2015 181,767 $ 25.87
Granted 74,874 31.02
Vested (78,410) 25.12
Forfeited (11,872) 28.19
Balance at January 2, 2016 166,359 $ 28.38
Granted 102,477 30.60
Diamond Foods awards assumed 143,183 32.34
Vested (220,155) 30.73
Forfeited (12,020) 30.07
Balance at December 31, 2016 179,844 $ 29.80

The deferred portion of these restricted shares is included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as additional paid-in capital. As of
December 31, 2016, there was $2.9 million in unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted shares that will be
recognized over a weighted average period of 2.1 years. Unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted shares was $2.5
million as of January 2, 2016 and $3.2 million as of January 3, 2015. To cover withholding taxes payable by employees upon the
vesting of restricted shares in 2016, we repurchased 22,959 shares of common stock for the vesting of Snyder's-Lance employee
incentive awards and 70,381 shares for the vesting of replacement awards converted from prior Diamond awards. During 2015, we
repurchased 27,235 shares to cover withholding taxes.

Employee Performance-Based Restricted Units

During 2016, we granted 81,999 performance-based restricted units. Recipients of these awards receive shares of the Company's
common stock at the end of the performance period, based on the Company's actual performance against pre-established return on
invested capital goals and total shareholder return goals. In order to receive the shares, the recipient must be employed by the
Company on the vesting date. The performance-based restricted units represent the number of shares of common stock to be
awarded based on the achievement of targeted performance and may range from 0 percent to 200 percent of the targeted amount.
The fair value of the awards was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation and is being amortized over the performance period.
We reassess at each reporting date whether achievement of each of the performance conditions is probable, as well as estimate
forfeitures, and adjust compensation expense recognized as appropriate. At December 31, 2016, we assessed the return on invested
capital and total shareholder return targets as probable of achievement.

The following table provides a summary of the assumptions used in the Monte Carlo simulation:

2016
Assumptions used in Monte Carlo simulation:
Risk-free interest rate 0.95%
Time to maturity 2.8 years
Expected volatility 26.40%
Grant date fair value of performance-based restricted units $ 19.41

63

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 70/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

The changes in performance-based restricted units outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2016 were as follows:

Weighted Average
Grant Date
Number of units Fair Value
Balance at January 2, 2016 — $ —
Granted 81,999 19.41
Dividend equivalents 1,115 19.41
Vested (818) 19.41
Forfeited (6,789) 19.41
Balance at December 31, 2016 75,507 $ 19.41

The deferred portion of these performance-based restricted units is included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as additional paid-
in capital. As of December 31, 2016, there was $1.0 million in unamortized compensation expense related to performance-based
restricted units that will be recognized over a period of 2.2 years.

Non-Employee Director Awards

In February 2014, the Snyder's-Lance, Inc. 2014 Director Stock Plan ("2014 Director Plan") was approved. The 2014 Director Plan
is intended to attract and retain persons of exceptional ability to serve as directors and to further align the interests of directors and
stockholders in enhancing the value of our common stock and to encourage such directors to remain with and to devote their best
efforts to the Company. The Board of Directors reserved 400,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the 2014 Director
Plan. This number was subject to adjustment in the event of stock dividends and splits, recapitalizations and similar transactions.
As of December 31, 2016, there were approximately 275,000 shares available for future issuance under the Plan.

In 2016, we awarded 16,000 shares of restricted shares to our directors, at a grant date fair value of $30.99 and subject to certain
vesting restrictions. During 2015 and 2014, we awarded 20,000 and 36,000 restricted shares, respectively, to our directors with
grant date fair values of $29.66 and $25.65, respectively. Compensation cost associated with these restricted shares is recognized
over the one-year vesting period, at which time the earned portion is charged against current earnings. The deferred portion of
these restricted shares is included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as additional paid-in capital.

In addition to restricted shares, we granted 28,000 restricted units in 2016 and 24,000 restricted units in 2015 to our directors with
grant date fair values of $30.99 and 29.66, respectively, which was based on the closing market price of the stock on the date of the
grant. Awards are subject to certain vesting restrictions. Compensation cost associated with these restricted units is recognized over
the one-year vesting period, at which time the earned portion is charged against current earnings. The deferred portion of these
restricted units is included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as additional paid-in capital.

Performance-Based Cash Incentive Plans

Performance-based cash awards vest over a three year performance period and are accounted for as liability awards. At
December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, the accrual for these awards was $6.1 million and $4.6 million, respectively.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

We have an employee stock purchase plan under which shares of common stock are purchased on the open market with employee
and employer contributions. The plan provides for the Company to contribute an amount equal to 10% of the employees’
contributions. We contributed approximately $0.2 million to the employee stock purchase plan in both 2016 and 2015 and
approximately $0.1 million in 2014.

64

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 71/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

NOTE 7. INVENTORIES

Inventories as of December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016 consisted of the following:

(in thousands) 2016 2015

Finished goods $ 100,107 $ 66,143
Work in process 1,949 —
Raw materials 32,095 14,736
Maintenance parts, packaging and supplies 39,305 30,115
Total inventories, net $ 173,456 $ 110,994

The increase in inventory for 2016, as compared to 2015, was primarily due to the acquisition of Diamond Foods in early 2016
(see Note 4 for further information).
NOTE 8. FIXED ASSETS
Fixed assets as of December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016 consisted of the following:

(in thousands) 2016 2015

Land and land improvements $ 37,835 $ 28,508
Buildings and building improvements 192,874 156,725
Machinery, equipment and computer systems 607,869 506,649
Trucks, trailers and automobiles 32,723 33,760
Furniture and fixtures 4,720 4,210
Construction in progress 22,098 11,503
Capital leases(1) 3,303 —
$ 901,422 $ 741,355
Accumulated depreciation (399,472) (339,802)
501,950 401,553
Fixed assets held for sale (66) (88)
Fixed assets, net $ 501,884 $ 401,465
(1)
Gross amounts of assets recorded under capital leases represent machinery, equipment and computer systems as of December 31, 2016.

Depreciation expense related to fixed assets was $70.1 million during 2016, $59.6 million during 2015 and $52.2 million during
2014. The increase in depreciation expense for 2016 as compared to 2015 was primarily due to the acquisition of Diamond Foods
in early 2016 (see Note 4 for further information).
There were fixed asset impairment charges of $3.7 million recorded during 2016, $11.5 million recorded during 2015, and $5.7
million recorded during 2014. During 2016, we sold the Diamond of California business along with certain tangible assets (see
Note 3 for further information). In connection with this transaction, we re-purposed the machinery and equipment not included in
the sale and recorded impairment of $2.3 million for certain assets which we no longer have the ability to use. We also incurred
impairment charges of $1.4 million primarily related to machinery and equipment no longer in use due to the discontinuation of
manufacturing of certain products. During 2015, we made the decision to relocate the production of certain products to improve
operational efficiency. As part of this decision, certain packaging equipment was replaced in order to provide additional packaging
alternatives. These actions resulted in impairment charges. The fair value remaining for these fixed assets was determined using
Level 3 inputs such as the salvage value on similar assets previously sold. During 2014, we sold the Private Brands business along
with certain tangible assets (see Note 3 for further information). In connection with this transaction, we re-purposed the machinery
and equipment not included in the sale and recorded impairment of $2.9 million for certain assets where expected future cash flows
were not projected to support the carrying value of the assets. Also during 2014, we recorded impairment of $1.8 million on
packaging equipment associated with a discontinued product line, impairment of $1.0 million related to our former Corsicana,
Texas facility, and accelerated depreciation of $0.7 million due to the anticipated disposal of certain furniture and fixtures prior to
the end of their useful lives as a result of a new corporate office lease.

65

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 72/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

NOTE 9. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

(in thousands) Carrying Amount

Balance as of January 3, 2015 $ 541,539
Goodwill reclassified to assets held for sale (2,420)
Balance as of January 2, 2016 $ 539,119
Business acquisitions 838,243
Enterprise goodwill attributable to discontinued operations (48,845)
Changes in foreign currency exchange rate (9,625)
Goodwill reclassified to assets held for sale (530)
Balance as of December 31, 2016 $ 1,318,362

There have been no historical impairments of goodwill and there were no impairments in 2016, 2015 or 2014.

As of December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, acquired intangible assets consisted of the following:

Gross Net
Carrying Cumulative Accumulated Carrying
(in thousands) Amount Impairments Amortization Amount
As of December 31, 2016:
Customer and contractual relationships (1) –
amortized $ 493,026 $ — $ (58,314) $ 434,712
Non-compete agreement – amortized 710 — (417) 293
Reacquired rights – amortized 3,100 — (2,101) 999
Patents – amortized 8,600 — (3,308) 5,292
Developed technology – amortized 2,700 — (460) 2,240
Routes – unamortized 10,869 (45) — 10,824
Trademarks (2) – unamortized 926,140 (6,700) — 919,440
Balance as of December 31, 2016 $ 1,445,145 $ (6,745) $ (64,600) $ 1,373,800

As of January 2, 2016:
Customer and contractual relationships – amortized $ 166,756 $ — $ (35,415) $ 131,341
Non-compete agreement – amortized 710 — (297) 413
Reacquired rights – amortized 3,100 — (1,714) 1,386
Patents – amortized 8,600 — (2,526) 6,074
Developed technology - amortized 2,700 — (280) 2,420
Routes – unamortized 11,063 — — 11,063
Trademarks – unamortized 382,661 (6,700) — 375,961
Balance as of January 2, 2016 $ 575,590 $ (6,700) $ (40,232) $ 528,658

(1) Since the acquisition of Diamond Foods on February 29, 2016, the translation impact on customer relationships was a reduction of $12.2 million.
(2) Since the acquisition of Diamond Foods on February 29, 2016, the translation impact on trademarks was a reduction of $7.2 million.

Intangible assets subject to amortization are being amortized over a weighted average useful life of 19.4 years. The intangible
assets related to customer and contractual relationships are being amortized over a weighted average useful life of 19.6 years and
will be amortized through February 2036. The intangible assets related to patents are being amortized over 11 years, reacquired
rights are being amortized over 8 years, and intangible assets related to developed technology are being amortized over 15 years.
Amortization expense related to intangibles was $24.7 million, $10.7 million and $10.0 million during 2016, 2015 and 2014,
respectively.

66

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 73/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Annual amortization expense for these intangible assets will be as follows:

(in thousands) Amount

2017 $ 27,279
2018 26,816
2019 26,465
2020 26,135
2021 26,135
Thereafter 310,706
Total intangible asset amortization expense $ 443,536

Trademarks are deemed to have indefinite useful lives because they are expected to generate cash flows indefinitely. Although not
amortized, they are reviewed for impairment as conditions change or at least on an annual basis. There were no impairments
recorded to our trademarks in 2016 or 2015. In 2014, we recorded an impairment of $3.6 million to write down one of our
trademarks to its fair value of $2.5 million. This impairment was necessary due to a reduction in projected future cash flows for
this trademark, and the remaining value was determined using a Level 3 fair value measurement.

The fair value of trademarks measured on a nonrecurring basis is classified as a Level 3 fair value measurement. The fair value
determinations were made using the relief-from-royalty method under the income approach, which required us to estimate
unobservable factors such as a royalty rate and discount rate and identify relevant projected revenue.

Certain trademarks, in addition to the $550.7 million acquired in the Diamond Foods acquisition, with a total book value of $12.9
million as of December 31, 2016, currently have a fair value which exceeds the book value by less than 15%. Any adverse changes
in the use of these trademarks or the sales volumes of the associated products could result in an impairment charge in the future.

The changes in the carrying amount of route intangible assets for 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

(in thousands) Carrying Amount

Balance as of January 3, 2015 $ 16,880
Routes reclassified to assets held for sale (5,817)
Balance as of January 2, 2016 $ 11,063
Impairment charges (45)
Routes reclassified to assets held for sale (194)
Balance as of December 31, 2016 $ 10,824

The fair value of the route intangible assets was determined using Level 3 inputs such as market multiples for similar routes.

Routes and associated goodwill allocated to assets held for sale represent assets available for sale in their present condition and for
which actions to complete a sale have been initiated. The changes in the carrying amount of route businesses held for sale for 2016
and 2015 were as follows:

(in thousands) Carrying Amount

Balance as of January 3, 2015 $ 10,816
Purchases of route businesses held for sale 22,568
Sales of route businesses held for sale (25,495)
Reclassifications from route intangibles and goodwill 8,237
Impairment of route businesses held for sale (536)
Balance as of January 2, 2016 $ 15,590
Purchases of route businesses held for sale 42,206
Sales of route businesses held for sale (38,278)
Reclassifications from route intangibles and goodwill 724
Impairment of route businesses held for sale (740)
Balance as of December 31, 2016 $ 19,502

67

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 74/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

We recorded a $0.7 million and $0.5 million impairment of our route businesses held for sale during 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The impairments were due to declines in the fair value of the route businesses in certain regions. The fair value of the route
businesses was determined using Level 3 inputs such as market multiples for similar route businesses.

During 2016, net gains on the sale of route businesses consisted of $5.5 million in gains and $4.2 million in losses. During 2015,
net gains on the sale of route businesses consisted of $3.3 million in gains and $1.4 million in losses. During 2014, net gains on the
sale of route businesses consisted of $3.3 million in gains and $2.2 million in losses. The majority of the route business purchases
and sales were due to the reengineering of route businesses to accommodate new customers and additional Partner brand business
obtained in the impacted markets as well as the decision to sell certain route businesses that were previously owned by us. See
Note 16 for further information related to IBOs.

NOTE 10. EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS

As part of our acquisition of Diamond Foods, we obtained 51.0% of the outstanding shares of Yellow Chips Holding B.V. (“Yellow
Chips”), which produces vegetable chips and organic potato chips primarily for the Dutch and other European markets. The
investment is accounted for under the equity method, as the other owners have substantive participating rights that provide them
with significant influence greater than ours over the financial performance of Yellow Chips. The investment was measured at fair
value as part of the purchase price allocation when we acquired Diamond Foods.

As of December 31, 2016, the carrying value of our investment was $8.4 million. As of December 31, 2016, we also have a loan
receivable outstanding with Yellow Chips of $2.0 million. Our share of income from Yellow Chips for the period subsequent to
February 29, 2016 is not material and is included in other income, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The agreement with Yellow Chips includes call and put options on the remaining 49.0% outstanding equity that we or the other
Yellow Chips shareholders can exercise if a certain EBITDA target is met after 2018, or under other circumstances prior to 2018.
The agreement also includes rights for us to sell our ownership interest in the event the EBITDA threshold is not met, requiring the
remaining shareholders to sell their holdings to the same buyer. There are similar rights for the other shareholders to sell their
shares, requiring us to also sell our shares to the same buyer, if we have not first exercised our right to initiate a sale. If the party
initiating such a sale does not require the other shareholder(s) to sell, the other shareholder(s) can in any case choose to require the
same buyer to also buy their shares.

The fair value of equity method investments measured on a non-recurring basis is classified as a Level 3 fair value measurement.
The fair value determinations as of the opening balance sheet date were made using the discounted cash flows under the income
approach, which required us to estimate unobservable factors such as the discount rate and identify relevant projected revenue and
expenses.

As part of our acquisition of Diamond Foods, we also obtained 26.0% of the outstanding shares of Metcalfe. The investment was
accounted for under the equity method until September 1, 2016, whereby we exercised our purchase option and acquired the
remaining 74.0% interest. Our share of income from Metcalfe for the period February 29, 2016 to September 1, 2016 was not
material and was included in other income, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Income. See Note 4 for further details.

68

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 75/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

NOTE 11. LONG-TERM DEBT

Debt outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016 consisted of the following:

(in thousands) 2016 2015

Senior unsecured term loan due February 2021, interest payable based on the 30-day
Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin of 1.750% (All-in rate of 2.520% as of December
31, 2016, including applicable margin) (1) (6) $ 498,875 $ —
Senior unsecured term loan due February 2026, interest payable based on the 30-day
Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin of 2.125% (All-in rate of 2.895% as of December
31, 2016, including applicable margin) (2) (6) 300,000 —
Unsecured term loan due May 2024, interest payable based on the 30-day Eurodollar rate
plus an applicable margin of 2.075% (All-in blended rate of 3.247% as of December 31,
2016, including applicable margin) (3) (7) 150,000 150,000
Unsecured term loan due May 2019, interest payable based on the 30-day Eurodollar rate
plus an applicable margin of 1.700% (All-in blended rate of 2.627% as of December 31,
2016, including applicable margin) (4) (7) 129,375 136,875
Unsecured base rate revolving loan due May 2019, interest payable at the agreement base
rate plus applicable margin of 0.450% (All-in rate of 4.200% as of December 31, 2016,
including applicable margin) (Balance reduces amount available under the unsecured
revolving credit facility.) (7) 200,000 —
Unsecured revolving credit facility due May 2019, interest payable based on the 30-day
Eurodollar rate plus applicable margin of 1.450% (All-in rate of 2.220% as of December 31,
2016, including applicable margin) (7) 27,000 —
$100 million private placement senior notes due June 2017, interest payable based on fixed
rate of 5.72%, including a 2015 fair value adjustment of $1.5 million — 101,521
Debt issuance costs, net (5) (10,291) (7,554)
Total debt, net 1,294,959 380,842
Less current portion of long-term debt (49,000) (8,541)
Total long-term debt, net $ 1,245,959 $ 372,301
We hold an interest rate swap agreement which effectively fixes the variable rate (Eurodollar portion) to 1.271% on $230.0 million of underlying notional
(1)

amount from June 2017 through February 2021. See Note 14 for further details.
We hold two interest rate swap agreements, the first effectively fixing the variable rate (Eurodollar portion) to 1.337% on $100.0 million of underlying notional
(2)

amount from June 2017 through June 2021 and the second effectively fixing the variable rate to 1.615% on $100.0 million of underlying notional amount from June
2017 through June 2024. See Note 14 for further details. On February 23, 2017 we entered into an additional interest rate swap agreement to fix the variable rate
(Eurodollar portion). The new swap effectively fixes the variable rate to 2.06% on $100.0 million of underlying notional from June 2017 through December 2022.
We hold two interest rate swap agreements, the first effectively fixing the variable rate (Eurodollar portion) to 1.975% on $50.0 million of underlying notional
(3)

amount from present through May 2022 and the second effectively fixing the variable rate to 1.236% on $70.0 million of underlying notional amount from June
2017 through June 2020. See Note 14 for further details.
(4)We hold an interest rate swap agreement which effectively fixes the variable rate (Eurodollar portion) to 1.580% on $25.0 million of underlying notional amount
from present through May 2019. See Note 14 for further details.
(5)We retrospectively adopted new accounting guidance requiring debt issuance costs to be presented as a direct reduction of the associated liability. See Note 2 for
further details.
(6) Under the Credit Agreement as defined below.
(7) Under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as defined below.

Annual maturities of long-term debt as of December 31, 2016 are as follows:

(in thousands) Amount

2017 $ 49,000
2018 49,000
2019 397,875
2020 71,500
2021 407,875
Thereafter 330,000
Total long-term debt maturities $ 1,305,250

69

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 76/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

In conjunction with our acquisition of Diamond Foods, we entered into a senior unsecured credit agreement as amended with the
lenders party (the “Term Lenders”) and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent (the "Credit Agreement"). Under the
Credit Agreement, the Term Lenders provided (i) senior unsecured term loans in an original aggregate principal amount of $830.0
million maturing five years after the funding date (the “Senior Five Year Term Loans”) and (ii) senior unsecured term loans in an
original aggregate principal amount of $300.0 million maturing ten years after the funding date (the “Senior Ten Year Term
Loans”). The $1.13 billion in proceeds from the Credit Agreement were used to finance, in part, the cash component of the
acquisition consideration, to repay indebtedness of Diamond Foods and us, and to pay certain fees and expenses incurred in
connection with the Diamond Foods acquisition.

Loans outstanding under the Credit Agreement bear interest, at our option, either at (i) a Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin
specified in the Credit Agreement or (ii) a base rate plus an applicable margin specified in the Credit Agreement. The applicable
margin added to the Eurodollar rate or base rate, as the case may be, is subject to adjustment after the end of each fiscal quarter
based on changes in the Company’s adjusted total net debt-to-EBITDA ratio.

Under the Credit Agreement, the outstanding principal amount of the Senior Five Year Term Loans is payable in equal quarterly
installments of $10.4 million on the last business day of each quarter. These payments began in the second quarter of 2016 and
continue through December 2020. The remaining unamortized balance is payable in February 2021. The outstanding principal
amount of the Senior Ten Year Term Loans is payable in quarterly principal installments of $15.0 million beginning in the second
quarter of 2021 and continuing through December 2025. The remaining unamortized balance is payable in February 2026. The
Credit Agreement also contains optional prepayment provisions.

Loans outstanding under the existing credit agreement (the "Amended and Restated Credit Agreement") bear interest, at our
option, either at (i) a Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin specified in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement or (ii) a
base rate plus an applicable margin specified in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The applicable margin added to a
Eurodollar rate or base rate, as the case may be, is subject to adjustment after the end of each fiscal quarter based on changes in our
adjusted total net debt-to-EBITDA ratio.

Under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, the outstanding principal amount of the unsecured five year term loans is
payable in equal quarterly installments of $1.9 million on the last business day of each quarter. These payments began in the
second quarter of 2014 and continue through March 2019. The remaining unamortized balance is payable in May 2019. The
outstanding principal amount of the unsecured ten year term loans is payable in quarterly principal installments of $7.5 million
beginning in the third quarter of 2019 and continuing through March 2024. The remaining unamortized balance is payable in May
2024. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement also contains optional prepayment provisions.

Our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement contains a revolving credit facility which allows us to make revolving credit
borrowings of up to $375.0 million through May 2019. As of December 31, 2016, and January 2, 2016, we had available $148.0
million and $375.0 million, respectively, of unused borrowings. Under certain circumstances and subject to certain conditions, we
have the option to increase available credit under the revolving credit agreement by up to $200.0 million for the remaining life of
the facility. Revolving credit borrowings incur interest based on a Eurodollar or base rate plus an applicable margin of between
0.795% and 1.450%. The applicable margin is determined by certain financial ratios and was 1.450% as of December 31, 2016.
The revolving credit facility also requires us to pay a facility fee ranging from 0.08% to 0.25% on the entire $375.0 million based
on certain financial ratios. The facility fee rate was 0.250% on December 31, 2016.

During 2016, we borrowed $347.0 million from the revolving credit facility for prepayments to our Senior Five Year Term Loans
and our private placement senior notes (transaction further described below). Our repayments of the revolving credit facility during
2016 were $120.0 million. During 2015 and 2014, we borrowed zero and $286.0 million, respectively, from our revolving credit
facility and repaid $50.0 million and $321.0 million, respectively.

In February 2016, using available borrowings from our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and cash on hand, we repaid our
$100.0 million private placement senior notes which were due in June 2017. The total repayment was approximately $106 million,
and resulted in a loss on early extinguishment of approximately $4.7 million. The loss on early extinguishment of debt was
calculated as follows:

(in thousands) Amount

Repayment of private placement senior notes $ 100,000
Penalty on early extinguishment 6,170
Book value of private placement debt, including unamortized fair value adjustment (101,421)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt $ 4,749

70

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 77/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by all of our existing and future direct and indirect wholly-owned
domestic subsidiaries other than any such subsidiaries that, taken together, do not represent more than 10.0% of the total domestic
assets or domestic revenues of the Company and its wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement contains
customary representations, warranties and covenants. The financial covenants include a maximum total debt to EBITDA ratio, as
defined in the Credit Agreement, of 4.75 to 1.00 for the first two quarters following the acquisition of Diamond Foods and
decreasing over the period of the loan to 3.50 to 1.00 in the eighth quarter following the acquisition. For the fourth quarter of 2016,
the maximum ratio reduced to 4.25 to 1.00. The financial covenants also include a minimum interest coverage ratio of 2.50 to 1.00.
Other covenants include, but are not limited to, limitations on: (i) liens, (ii) dispositions of assets, (iii) mergers and consolidations,
(iv) loans and investments, (v) subsidiary indebtedness, (vi) transactions with affiliates and (vii) certain dividends and
distributions. The Credit Agreement contains customary events of default, including a cross default provision and change of
control provisions. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, we may be required to repay all amounts outstanding under the
Credit Agreement.

Certain covenants and terms associated with our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement were amended to agree to the Credit
Agreement in order to accommodate the additional debt. As of December 31, 2016, we were in compliance with all debt covenants
across both credit agreements.

Total debt issuance costs associated with the Credit Agreement of approximately $11.0 million were capitalized in late 2015 and
the first quarter of 2016 and are being amortized over the life of the loans. Total debt issuance costs associated with the Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement were deferred in fiscal 2014, and are being amortized over the life of the loans. Debt issuance costs
associated with the term loans were included in other noncurrent assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at the end of fiscal
2015, but have been reclassified to liabilities beginning in the first quarter of 2016 in accordance with ASU No. 2015-03.
Including the effect of interest rate swap agreements, the weighted average interest rate was 2.95%, 3.14% and 2.34%,
respectively, as of December 31, 2016, January 2, 2016, and January 3, 2015. See Note 14 for further information on our interest
rate swap agreements.
Total interest expense under all credit agreements for 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $32.9 million, $11.1 million, and $13.4 million,
respectively. In fiscal 2014, we recognized $0.8 million in additional interest expense due to the write-off of certain unamortized
debt issuance costs associated with the previous amendment to the revolving credit facility in 2010 and the prior term loan.
NOTE 12. INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2016, January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015
consists of the following:

(in thousands) 2016 2015 2014

Current:
Federal $ 920 $ 22,479 $ 23,659
State and other 4,387 3,842 2,693
Foreign — 131 301
$ 5,307 $ 26,452 $ 26,653
Deferred:
Federal $ 23,413 $ 3,109 $ 28
State and other (370) (676) 5,610
Foreign (3,030) — —
$ 20,013 $ 2,433 $ 5,638
Income tax expense $ 25,320 $ 28,885 $ 32,291

The foreign provision for income taxes is based on a foreign pre-tax loss of $35.0 million in 2016 and foreign pre-tax earnings of
$0.4 million and $1.2 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively. A portion of the cumulative earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries is
considered to be indefinitely reinvested and, accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal and state income taxes is required. It is not
practicable to determine the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to the unremitted earnings. Applicable U.S.
income taxes are provided on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries in the periods in which they are no longer considered
indefinitely reinvested. In the event that management elects for any reason in the future to repatriate some or all of the foreign
earnings that were previously deemed to be indefinitely reinvested outside of the United States, we would incur additional tax
expense upon such repatriation.

71
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 78/107
6/26/2018 Document

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 79/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Reconciliations of the federal income tax rate to our effective income tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2016, January 2,
2016 and January 3, 2015 are as follows:

2016 2015 2014

Statutory income tax rate 35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit 3.9 % 2.6 % 5.9 %
Net favorable foreign income taxes as a result of tax adjustments and
tax rate differences (3.7)% —% —%
Effect of UK rate change enacted in current year (1.9)% —% —%
Non-deductible goodwill on sale of route businesses 0.1 % 0.4 % 0.1 %
Deduction for inventory contributions (0.5)% (0.3)% (0.3)%
Meals and entertainment 0.7 % 0.5 % 0.4 %
IRC 199 deduction —% (2.6)% (2.6)%
Change in uncertain tax positions 0.8 % (1.5)% (2.8)%
Non-deductible transaction costs 4.7 % 2.0 % —%
Miscellaneous items, net (1.4)% 0.2 % (0.4)%
Effective income tax rate 37.7 % 36.3 % 35.3 %

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at
December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, are presented below:

(in thousands) 2016 2015

Deferred tax assets:
Reserves for employee compensation, deductible when paid for income tax purposes, accrued
for financial reporting purposes $ 28,560 $ 17,033
Reserves for insurance claims, deductible when paid for income tax purposes, accrued for
financial reporting purposes 4,850 4,235
Other reserves, deductible when paid for income tax purposes, accrued for financial reporting
purposes 14,947 7,355
Unrealized losses, deductible when realized for income tax purposes, included in other
comprehensive income — 425
Basis difference in fixed rate debt 187 616
Inventories, principally due to additional costs capitalized for income tax purposes 4,790 2,435
Federal NOLs and tax credit carryforwards 83,157 —
Net state operating loss and tax credit carryforwards 24,123 2,459
Total gross deferred tax assets $ 160,614 $ 34,558
Less valuation allowance (11,283) (637)
Net deferred tax assets $ 149,331 $ 33,921
Deferred tax liabilities:
Fixed assets, principally due to differences in depreciation, net of impairment reserves $ (56,851) $ (53,939)
Intangible assets, principally due to differences in amortization and acquisition basis differences (405,060) (122,846)
Employee compensation, principally due to change in method of accounting (1,278) (2,582)
Unrealized gains, taxable when realized for income tax purposes, included in other
comprehensive income (4,040) —
Basis difference in noncurrent investments (8,298) (7,377)
Unremitted foreign earnings (42,211) —
Prepaid expenses and other costs deductible for tax, amortized for financial reporting purposes (4,417) (4,768)
Total gross deferred tax liabilities $ (522,155) $ (191,512)

Deferred income taxes, net $ (372,824) $ (157,591)

72

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 80/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2016, we have approximately $15.8 million of state tax loss carryforwards available to offset future taxable
income. Of this amount, the Company assumed approximately $12.7 million as part of the Diamond acquisition. These loss
carryforwards expire at various times between 2017 and 2036. Based on projected income levels and our future state tax profile,
we believe it is "more likely than not", that several of these loss carryforwards will not be utilized prior to their expiration.
Therefore, a valuation allowance of approximately $3.4 million has been established to account for the expected realizable value of
the state loss carryforwards. Of this amount, approximately $2.8 million was established in the purchase accounting for the
Diamond acquisition.

As of December 31, 2016, we have approximately $8.9 million of state tax credits available to offset future tax liabilities. The
Company succeeded to these credits as part of the Diamond acquisition. Most of these credits expire at the end of 2023. Based on
projected income levels and our future state tax profile, we believe it is more likely than not, that most of these credits will not be
utilized prior to their expiration. Therefore, a valuation allowance of approximately $7.9 million was established in the purchase
accounting for the Diamond acquisition to account for the expected realizable value of the state tax credits.

Our effective tax rate is based on the level and mix of income of our separate legal entities, statutory tax rates, business credits
available in the various jurisdictions in which we operate and permanent tax differences. Significant judgment is required in
evaluating tax positions that affect the annual tax rate. The effective income tax rate is higher than the federal statutory rate
primarily due to non-deductible transaction costs and state and local income taxes. The effect of state and local taxes on the 2016
and 2015 effective tax rate includes the impact of a revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities due to enacted changes in the
statutory rates in various state jurisdictions.

We have recorded gross unrecognized tax benefits, as of December 31, 2016, totaling $5.8 million and related interest and
penalties of $1.0 million in other noncurrent liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Approximately $5.2 million would
affect the effective tax rate if subsequently recognized. This amount includes $0.8 million and $0.2 million of interest and
penalties, respectively. We expect certain income tax audits will be settled, positions will be resolved through administrative
procedures or statutes of limitations will expire for various tax authorities during the next twelve months, resulting in a potential
$1.4 million reduction of the unrecognized tax benefit. We classify interest and penalties associated with income tax positions
within income tax expense.

We have open years for income tax audit purposes in our major taxing jurisdictions according to statutes as follows:

Jurisdiction Open Years

US federal 2013 and forward
Canada federal 2013 and forward
Ontario provincial 2011 and forward
California 2011 and forward
North Carolina 2013 and forward
New York 2013 and forward
Illinois 2013 and forward
United Kingdom 2015 and forward

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of the gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

(in thousands) Amount

Balance at January 3, 2015 $ 3,726
Additions for tax positions taken during the current period 278
Additions for tax positions taken during a prior period 338
Reductions resulting from a lapse of the statute of limitations (1,607)
Balance at January 2, 2016 $ 2,735
Additions for tax positions taken during the current period 653
Additions for tax positions taken during a prior period 873
Additions for positions resulting from business combination 2,425
Reductions resulting from a lapse of the statute of limitations (852)
Balance at December 31, 2016 $ 5,834

73

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 81/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

NOTE 13. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The following table summarizes information regarding financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value at
December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016.

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for Significant Other Significant
Identical Assets Observable Inputs Unobservable Inputs
(in thousands) Book Value (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Balance as of December 31, 2016
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 35,409 $ 35,409 $ — $ —
Restricted cash 714 714 — —
Interest rate swaps 10,748 — 10,748 —
Total assets $ 46,871 $ 36,123 $ 10,748 $ —

Liabilities:
Interest rate swaps $ 392 $ — $ 392 $ —
Total liabilities $ 392 $ — $ 392 $ —

Balance as of January 2, 2016

Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 39,105 $ 39,105 $ — $ —
Restricted cash 966 966 — —
Total assets $ 40,071 $ 40,071 $ — $ —

Liabilities:
Interest rate swaps $ 1,045 $ — $ 1,045 $ —
Total liabilities $ 1,045 $ — $ 1,045 $ —

There were no changes among the levels of our fair value instruments during 2016.
The fair value of outstanding debt, including current maturities, was approximately $1,305 million and $391 million as of
December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, respectively. These Level 2 fair value estimates were based on similar debt with the same
maturities, company credit rating and interest rates. Refer to Note 10 for discussion of the fair value for our remaining equity
method investment assumed in the acquisition of Diamond Foods.

During 2016, 2015 and 2014 due to impairments, the fair values of certain fixed assets and route intangibles were measured using
Level 3 inputs as disclosed in Note 8 and Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements. In addition, our annually required
goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible impairment tests, as well as the initial valuation of intangible assets included in business
acquisitions, are performed using financial models that include Level 3 inputs.
NOTE 14. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

The fair value of the derivative instrument assets and liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets using Level 2 inputs as of
December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016 were as follows:

(in thousands) Balance Sheet Location 2016 2015

Derivatives designated as hedges:
Interest rate swaps Other noncurrent assets $ 10,748 $ —
Interest rate swaps Other noncurrent liabilities (392) (1,045)
Total fair value of derivative instruments $ 10,356 $ (1,045)

74

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 82/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Interest Rate Swaps

Our variable-rate debt obligations incur interest at floating rates based on changes in the Eurodollar rate and US base rate interest.
To manage exposure to changing interest rates, we selectively enter into interest rate swap agreements to maintain a desired
proportion of fixed to variable-rate debt. These swaps are accounted for as cash flow hedges. The fair value of interest rate swaps
was determined utilizing a market approach model using the notional amount of the interest rate swaps and the observable inputs
of time to maturity and interest rates. The notional amount of the interest rate swaps designated as hedging instruments as of
December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016 was $575.0 million and $75.0 million, respectively.

In November 2016, we entered into four interest rate swap agreements to manage the exposure to changing interest rates on long-
term debt. We entered into two of the agreements in order to fix a portion of our term loan due in February 2026. The first, with a
notional amount of $100 million at an interest rate of 1.62%, plus applicable margins, is effective for the interest periods from June
2017 through June 2024. A second agreement, with a notional amount of $100 million at an interest rate of 1.34%, plus applicable
margins, is effective for the interest periods from June 2017 through June 2021. We entered into a third agreement with a notional
amount of $230 million in order to fix a portion of our term loan due in February 2021 at an interest rate of 1.27%, plus applicable
margins, which is effective for the interest periods from June 2017 through February 2021. A fourth agreement, with a notional
amount of $70 million was entered to fix a portion of our term loan due in May 2024 at an interest rate of 1.24%, plus applicable
margins, and is effective for the interest periods from June 2017 through June 2020.

In February 2015, we also entered into two interest rate swap agreements to manage the exposure to changing interest rates on
long-term debt. We entered into an agreement with a notional amount of $25.0 million in order to fix a portion of our term loan due
in May 2019 at an interest rate of 1.58%, plus applicable margins, effective for the interest periods from May 2015 through May
2019. A second agreement with a notional amount of $50.0 million was entered into in order to fix a portion of our term loan due
in May 2024 at an interest rate of 1.98%, plus applicable margins, effective for the interest periods from May 2015 through May
2022.

Foreign Currency Forwards

During 2014, we had foreign currency forwards in order to mitigate foreign exchange risk related to our former Canadian
operations that were discontinued in the middle of 2014.

Changes in Other Comprehensive Loss

The changes in unrealized gains and losses, net of income tax, included in other comprehensive income due to fluctuations in
interest rates and foreign exchange rates for the years ended December 31, 2016, January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015 were as
follows:

(in thousands) 2016 2015 2014

Gain/(loss) on interest rate swaps, net of income tax (expense)/benefit
of ($4,447), $247 and ($176), respectively $ 6,953 $ (360) $ 283
Gain on foreign currency forwards, net of income tax expense of $0,
$0 and ($10), respectively — — 21
Total change in unrealized gains/(losses) from derivative
instruments, net of income tax (effective portion) $ 6,953 $ (360) $ 304

NOTE 15. POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS

All Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. US employees are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan. This 401(k) plan
provides participants with matching contributions equal to 100% of the first 4% of qualified wages and 50% of the next 1% of
qualified wages. During 2016, 2015 and 2014, total expenses associated with defined contribution retirement plans were $12.4
million, $11.3 million and $11.0 million, respectively. In addition, we contributed $0.4 million to a defined contribution retirement
plan for U.K. employees.

75

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 83/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

NOTE 16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Contractual Obligations
We have entered into contractual agreements providing benefits to certain key employees in the event of termination without cause
or other circumstances. Commitments under these agreements were $8.5 million and $6.8 million at December 31, 2016 and
January 2, 2016, respectively. In addition, our long-term incentive plans have change in control provisions which would result in
$7.1 million of additional compensation expense in the event of a change in control on December 31, 2016, $3.3 million of which
relates to Diamond Foods replacement awards.
We lease certain facilities and equipment under contracts classified as operating leases. Total rental expense was $37.6 million in
2016, $27.2 million in 2015 and $25.3 million in 2014.
Future minimum lease commitments for operating leases at December 31, 2016 are as follows:

(in thousands) Amount

2017 $ 21,097
2018 18,280
2019 14,929
2020 12,638
2021 8,703
Thereafter 39,106
Total operating lease commitments $ 114,753

Future minimum lease commitments for capital leases at December 31, 2016 are as follows:

(in thousands) Amount

2017 $ 1,647
2018 1,554
2019 1,046
2020 333
2021 —
Thereafter —
Total capital lease commitments 4,580
Less amount representing interest (146)
Present value of capital lease obligations $ 4,434

In order to mitigate the risks of volatility in commodity markets to which we are exposed, we have entered into forward purchase
agreements with certain suppliers based on market prices, forward price projections and expected usage levels. Purchase
commitments for certain ingredients, packaging materials and energy totaled $157.2 million and $97.2 million as of December 31,
2016 and January 2, 2016. The increase in purchase commitments was due to additional commitments from Diamond Foods. In
addition to these commitments, we have contracts for certain ingredients and packaging materials where we have secured a fixed
price but do not have a minimum purchase quantity. We generally contract from approximately three months to twelve months in
advance for certain major ingredients and packaging. We also have a licensing contract which totaled $13.9 million as of
December 31, 2016, and continues through 2020.
We have contracts to receive services from syndicated market data providers through 2023. Our commitment for these services
ranges from $4.6 million to $5.3 million each year throughout the life of the contracts.
We also maintain standby letters of credit in connection with our self-insurance reserves for casualty claims. The total amount of
these letters of credit was $12.6 million as of December 31, 2016. The total amount of letters of credit as of January 2, 2016 was
$9.2 million.

76

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 84/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Guarantees
We currently provide a partial guarantee for loans made to IBOs by certain third-party financial institutions for the purchase of
route businesses. The outstanding aggregate balance on these loans was approximately $154.1 million as of December 31, 2016
compared to approximately $139.3 million as of January 2, 2016. The $14.8 million increase in the guarantee was primarily due to
new IBO loans as a result of zone restructuring and sale of additional routes. The annual maximum amount of future payments we
could be required to make under the guarantees equates to 25% of the outstanding loan balance on the first day of each calendar
year plus 25% of the amount of any new loans issued during such calendar year. These loans are collateralized by the route
businesses for which the loans are made. Accordingly, we have the ability to recover substantially all of the outstanding loan value
upon default, and our liability associated with this guarantee is not material.

Legal Matters
All Natural Litigation
We have certain class action legal proceedings filed against us which allege that certain ingredients in some of our products that
are labeled as “natural” and “all natural” are not natural. Although we believe that we had strong defenses against these claims, we
reached a settlement agreement in the third quarter of 2015 in order to avoid the costs and uncertainty of litigation. We recognized
$2.8 million of expense in settlements of certain litigation in our Consolidated Statements of Income in 2015. In the fourth quarter
of 2016, we distributed the funds related to the class settlement and consider the case to be closed. We also paid a portion of the
accrued administrative fees in the fourth quarter of 2016 and the residual payment of $1.0 million is due to be paid in 2018.

IBO Litigation
Tavares v. S-L Distribution Company, LLC
In January 2013, plaintiffs comprised of IBOs filed a putative class action against our distribution subsidiary, S-L Distribution
Company, Inc., in the Suffolk Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The lawsuit was transferred to the US
District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania. The lawsuit sought statewide class certification on behalf of a class comprised of
IBOs in Massachusetts. The plaintiffs alleged that they were misclassified as independent contractors and should have been
considered employees. The plaintiffs were seeking reimbursement of their out-of-pocket business expenses. On August 20, 2015,
the parties to this litigation reached a tentative settlement on a class wide basis, which became a final settlement on December 22,
2015. We do not admit any fault or liability in this matter; however, in an effort to resolve these claims, we agreed to pay $2.9
million to fully resolve the litigation. This amount was recognized as expense in settlements of certain litigation in our
Consolidated Statements of Income in 2015, and was paid in the second quarter of 2016.

Roxberry, et. al, v. S-L Distribution Company, LLC

On July 25, 2016, plaintiffs comprised of IBOs filed a putative class action against Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. and our distribution
subsidiary, S-L Distribution Company, Inc. in the Eastern District Court of Tennessee. The case was transferred to the Middle
District of Pennsylvania. The lawsuit seeks statewide class certification on behalf of a class comprised of IBOs in Tennessee, and
nationwide certification for the Federal law collective action. The plaintiffs allege that they were misclassified as independent
contractors and should be considered employees. We believe we have strong defenses to all the claims that have been asserted
against us. We cannot reasonably estimate at this time the possible loss or range of loss, if any, from this lawsuit.

Scheurer v. S-L Distribution Company, LLC

On December 8, 2016, plaintiff served a putative class action on behalf of all similarly situated IBOs in New Jersey against our
distribution subsidiary, S-L Distribution Company, LLC. Plaintiff is a former IBO whose distribution agreement was terminated
pursuant to the re-engineering and buyback of routes in New Jersey in 2011, resulting from the merger of Snyder’s of Hanover,
Inc. and Lance, Inc. The lawsuit seeks statewide class certification on behalf of a class comprised of IBOs in New Jersey for
alleged violations of the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act relative to various terminations of the distributor agreement. We
believe we have strong defenses to all the claims that have been asserted against us. At this time, no demand has been made, and
we cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, from this lawsuit.

77

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 85/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Shareholder Derivative Litigation

Beginning on November 14, 2011, putative shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in the Superior Court for the State of
California, San Francisco County, purportedly on behalf of Diamond and naming certain executive officers and the members of its
board of directors as individual defendants. These lawsuits, which related principally to accounting for certain payments to walnut
growers, were subsequently consolidated as In re Diamond Foods Inc., Shareholder Derivative Litigation and purport to set forth
claims for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control and gross mismanagement. Following mediation efforts,
the parties agreed to the terms of a proposed settlement and the Court entered an order granting final approval of the settlement on
August 19, 2013. On September 23, 2013, a Notice of Appeal from the order granting final approval was filed by a single
stockholder in the California Court of Appeal.

On February 19, 2016, the Court set oral argument for March 15, 2016. On February 25, 2016, Diamond informed the Court of its
pending merger with Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. and filed a request to reschedule oral argument. On February 29, 2016, the Court issued
an order removing oral argument from the Court’s calendar and ordered the parties to submit letters to the Court on the status of
the merger. On March 3, 2016, the Company submitted a letter in response to the Court’s Order, informing the Court that Diamond
no longer exists as a corporate entity due to the completion of the merger with the Company. On March 25, 2016, the Company
submitted to the Court the parties’ agreed upon briefing schedule for a motion to dismiss, setting the Company’s motion filing for
April 4, 2016; Appellants’ opposition for May 4, 2016; and the Company’s reply for May 18, 2016. On April 4, 2016, the
Company filed its Motion to Dismiss and on June 9, 2016, the Court granted the Motion to Dismiss and dismissed the Appeal from
the order granting final approval. On June 28, 2016, an objection was raised with an offer to settle. On August 2, 2016 the
Company filed its Answer to Petition for Review denying Appellant’s right to maintain an appeal. On August 16, 2016 the Court
denied the Petition for Review. Accordingly, the Company considers this case to be closed.

Merger-related Litigation
On November 10, 2015, a putative class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of Diamond Foods stockholders in the Court of
Chancery of the State of Delaware. The complaint names as defendants Diamond Foods, the members of Diamond Foods’ board of
directors, Snyder’s-Lance, Shark Acquisition Sub I, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Snyder’s-
Lance (“Merger Sub I”) and Shark Acquisition Sub II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Snyder’s-Lance (“Merger Sub II”). The complaint generally alleges, among other things, that the members of Diamond Foods’
board of directors breached their fiduciary duties to Diamond Foods’ stockholders in connection with negotiating, entering into
and approving the merger agreement with Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. The complaint additionally alleges that Snyder’s-Lance, Merger
Sub I and Merger Sub II aided and abetted such breaches of fiduciary duties. The complaint sought injunctive relief, including the
enjoinment of the merger, certain other declaratory and equitable relief, damages, costs and fees. An amended complaint was filed
on December 21, 2015. The amended complaint adds further allegations related to the merger process and disclosures contained in
the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by Snyder’s-Lance on November 25, 2015. On January 15, 2016, plaintiff filed a
motion for expedited proceedings requesting a preliminary injunction and expedited discovery, which the Court denied on
February 3, 2016. Plaintiff also filed a books and records demand case in North Carolina, which the plaintiff subsequently
dismissed with prejudice. On January 19, 2016, another action was filed in the court of chancery in the state of Delaware similar to
the above matter. On October 24, 2016, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint, which modified some of plaintiff's allegations,
including now expressly seeking a quasi-appraisal remedy or rescissory damages. Defendants moved to dismiss the second
amended complaint on December 22, 2016. On February 3, 2017, plaintiffs moved to consolidate the two Delaware cases, which
defendants did not oppose, and which the Court granted on February 3, 2017. On February 24, 2017, the parties filed a stipulated
proposed order of dismissal, seeking voluntary dismissal of the Delaware litigation with prejudice as to the named plaintiffs and
without prejudice as to the putative class. The court granted the stipulated order of dismissal on February 27, 2017.

Appraisal Proceedings
On February 25, 2016, Cede & Co., on behalf of Blueblade Capital Opportunities LLC (“Blueblade I”), sent an appraisal demand
letter to Diamond Foods with respect to 211,574 shares of Diamond Foods common stock, purportedly held in connection with our
acquisition of Diamond Foods. On the same date, Cede & Co., on behalf of Blueblade Capital Opportunities II LLC ("Blueblade
II," and together with Blueblade I, "Blueblade"), sent a second appraisal demand letter to Diamond Foods with respect to 119,008
shares of Diamond Foods common stock. Under Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, certain stockholders may
be entitled to an appraisal of the fair value of the stockholders’ shares. Blueblade claims that the price we paid for Diamond Foods
was less than its fair value. A petition for appraisal was filed by Blueblade in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware on
June 27, 2016. The case was settled and dismissed with prejudice on August 12, 2016 and we agreed to pay $14.5 million to fully
resolve the litigation. Of the $14.5 million, $12.4 million represented the fair value of consideration paid as part of the Diamond
Foods acquisition. The remaining $2.1 million was recognized as a transaction related expense in 2016.

78

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 86/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

California Labor Code Litigation

Former employee Patricia Sparks filed a putative class action lawsuit against Diamond Foods on November 25, 2015 in San
Francisco Superior Court alleging Diamond Foods’ violation of the California Labor Code by failing to include on wage
statements the start date of the pay period and by failing to include on wage statements the name and address of the legal entity
that is the employer. Plaintiff amended her complaint on January 4, 2016 to add a claim for penalties under California’s Private
Attorneys General Act based on the same underlying violations. Diamond Foods timely answered the First Amended Complaint
on March 7, 2016. The parties attended the initial case management conference on May 2, 2016 and a further case management
conference occurred on August 1, 2016. We accrued $8.3 million associated with this outstanding claim in the Diamond Foods
opening balance sheet as that represented our best estimate of the probable liability at that time. We determined such accrual by
estimating the aggregate potential penalties that we believed it was probable could be assessed under the applicable California
laws, which are strict liability penalties. On September 19, 2016, the parties to this litigation reached a tentative settlement
pursuant to which we have agreed to pay $0.7 million on a class wide basis. We signed a memorandum of understanding reflecting
this preliminary settlement amount. The parties submitted a settlement agreement to the court and the court granted preliminary
approval of the settlement. As a result, we have recorded a measurement period adjustment to reduce the opening balance sheet
accrual. Accordingly this settlement amount did not impact our Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended
December 31, 2016.

Employment Tax Audit by the California Employment Development Department

On February 22, 2016, the company received notice from the Employment Development Department of the State of California
(“EDD”) that S-L Distribution Company, Inc. (“SLD”) had been selected for an employment tax audit. An onsite audit was
conducted April 27, 2016, of payroll records for 2015 as a general matter. In addition, the auditor examined the Forms 1099Misc
that the company had issued. The audit is still outstanding and will confirm whether the IBOs who received 1099s are bona-fide
contractors within the definition of an employer/employee relationship under the relevant statutes and regulations in California. If
the auditor issues an unfavorable determination and finds that the IBOs are actually employees, such a finding could have a
material adverse impact on our operations in California and potentially the other jurisdictions where the company utilizes IBO
business partners. At this time we cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, from this audit, nor are we
able to quantify the likelihood of a positive determination from the auditor.

Evaporated Cane Juice Litigation

A putative class action suit was filed against Late July Snacks, LLC on September 18, 2013, and is pending in the District Court
for the Northern District of California. The action accuses Late July Snacks, LLC of violating federal and state law by using the
term "evaporated cane juice" ("ECJ") in the ingredients list on its products' labels. The plaintiffs' complaint alleges ECJ is not the
common and usual name for the ingredient at issue and is misleading. The complaint attempts to state claims for violation of
California's Unfair Competition Law, California's False Advertising Law, California's Consumers Legal Remedies Act, and unjust
enrichment. Late July Snacks, LLC filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on November 27, 2013, based on the primary
jurisdiction doctrine, lack of standing, and failure to state a claim.

On May 22, 2014, the Court stayed the action, applying the doctrine of primary jurisdiction, due to the FDA's ongoing
consideration of the issue of using the term ECJ on food labels. On May 26, 2016, the FDA issued its guidance for industry on the
topic. As a result, the stay was lifted on July 22, 2016. On August 31, 2016, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that, among
other things, relies on the FDA's recently issued guidance. Late July filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint, and a
hearing on that motion was held on February 16, 2017. At this time, we cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of
loss, if any, from this lawsuit.

Other
We are currently subject to various other legal proceedings and environmental matters arising in the normal course of business
which are not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. We record a liability when we believe
that it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If we determine that a loss is possible
and a range of the loss can be reasonably estimated, we will disclose the range of the possible loss. Significant judgment is
required to determine both likelihood of there being, and the estimated amount of, a loss related to such matters. We cannot
currently estimate our potential liability, damages or range of potential loss in connection with our other outstanding legal
proceedings beyond amounts accrued, if any.
NOTE 17. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the fourth quarter of 2014, we increased our ownership in Late July to 80% (see Note 4 for additional information). We
also established a $6.0 million line of credit between the Company and Late July, of which $3.9 million was drawn by Late July in
order to repay certain obligations. The balance of $3.9 million remains outstanding as of December 31, 2016, and is eliminated in
consolidation.

79

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 87/107
6/26/2018 Document

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 88/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

We have two facilities used to support distribution of our products in the northeastern US that are leased from an entity owned by
two of our employees. One of the employees was Peter L. Michaud, a former officer of the Company. There were $0.4 million in
lease payments made to this entity during each of the years 2016, 2015, and 2014.

One of the members of our Board of Directors, Lawrence Jackson, is also a member of the Board of Directors of Information
Resources, Inc. ("IRI"), which we began using as our syndicated market data provider at the end of 2015. Total payments made to
IRI for these services in 2016 were $3.5 million.

ARWCO Corporation, MAW Associates, LP and Warehime Enterprises, Inc. are significantly owned or controlled by Patricia A.
Warehime, a member of our Board of Directors and a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock. Among other
unrelated business activities, these entities provide financing to IBOs for the purchase of route businesses. We have entered into
loan service agreements with these related parties that require us to repurchase certain distribution assets in the event an IBO
defaults on a loan with the related party. We are required to repurchase the route assets 30 days after default at the value as defined
in the loan service agreement, which approximates fair market value. As of December 31, 2016, there were outstanding loans made
to IBOs by the related parties of approximately $21.5 million, compared to $28.0 million as of January 2, 2016. Michael A.
Warehime, our former Chairman of the Board, who passed away in August 2014, served as an officer and/or director of these
entities. Patricia A. Warehime is the executrix, trustee and principal beneficiary of Mr. Warehime's estate and trust. Transactions
with these related parties are primarily related to the collection and remittance of loan payments on notes receivable held by the
affiliates. If IBOs default on loans, the related parties will purchase inventory in order to service the routes prior to our requirement
to repurchase the route assets. Revenue from the sale of inventory to these related parties was approximately $0.5 million for 2016
and $0.7 million for 2015 and 2014. In addition, we are reimbursed for certain overhead and administrative services associated
with the services provided to these related parties. The receivables from, payables to and administrative fees from these entities are
not significant for any period presented.
One of our directors, C. Peter Carlucci, Jr., is a member of Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC (“Eckert”), which serves as one
of our outside legal firms. Expenses incurred for services provided by Eckert were $0.3 million, $0.7 million, and $0.9 million for
2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

80

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 89/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

NOTE 18. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Total comprehensive income attributable to us, determined as net income adjusted by total other comprehensive income, was a loss
of $2.5 million, and income of $51.1 million and $181.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, January 2, 2016 and
January 3, 2015, respectively. Total other comprehensive loss presently consists of foreign currency translation adjustments and
unrealized gains and losses from our derivative financial instruments accounted for as cash flow hedges.

Amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, consisted of the following:

Income Statement
(in thousands) Location 2016 2015 2014
Losses on cash flow hedges reclassified out of accumulated
other comprehensive income:
Interest rate swaps, net of tax of $394, $515 and $223,
respectively Interest expense, net $ (625) $ (749) $ (357)
Discontinued
Foreign currency forwards operations, net of
income tax — — (191)
Total cash flow hedge reclassifications, net of tax $ (625) $ (749) $ (548)

Foreign currency translation adjustments reclassified

from accumulated other comprehensive income Other income/expense $ — $ (1,236) $ —
Discontinued
Foreign currency translation adjustments reclassified
operations, net of
from accumulated other comprehensive income
income tax — — 11,106
Total amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income $ (625) $ (1,985) $ 10,558

During 2016, changes to the balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows:

Foreign Currency
Gains/(Losses) on Translation
(in thousands) Cash Flow Hedges Adjustment Total
Balance as of January 2, 2016 $ (630) $ — $ (630)

Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications 6,328 (24,300) (17,972)

Losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive
income 625 — 625
Total other comprehensive income/(loss) 6,953 (24,300) (17,347)

Balance as of December 31, 2016 $ 6,323 $ (24,300) $ (17,977)

81

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 90/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

During 2015, changes to the balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows:

Foreign Currency
Gains/(Losses) on Translation
(in thousands) Cash Flow Hedges Adjustment Total
Balance as of January 3, 2015 $ (270) $ (737) $ (1,007)

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications (1,109) (499) (1,608)

Losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive
income 749 1,236 1,985
Total other comprehensive (loss)/income (360) 737 377

Balance as of January 2, 2016 $ (630) $ — $ (630)

During 2014, changes to the balance in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) were as follows:

Foreign Currency
Gains/(Losses) on Translation
(in thousands) Cash Flow Hedges Adjustment Total
Balance as of December 28, 2013 $ (574) $ 10,745 $ 10,171

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications (244) (376) (620)

Losses/(gains) reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income 548 (11,106) (10,558)
Total other comprehensive income/(loss) 304 (11,482) (11,178)

Balance as of January 3, 2015 $ (270) $ (737) $ (1,007)

NOTE 19. SEGMENT REPORTING

We are engaged in the manufacturing, distribution, marketing and sale of snack food products. As a result of the Diamond Foods
acquisition, we have two operating segments based on geographic operations that we aggregate into one reportable segment. We
define operating segments as components of an organization for which discrete financial information is available and operating
results are evaluated on a regular basis by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in order to assess performance and
allocate resources. Our CODM is our President and Chief Executive Officer. Characteristics of our organization which were relied
upon in making the determination of two operating segments include the nature of the products that we sell, our organization's
internal structure, and the information that is regularly reviewed by the CODM for the purpose of assessing performance and
allocating resources. We aggregate our operating segments into a single reportable segment based on similarities between the
operating segments’ economic characteristics, nature of products sold, production process, type of customer, methods of
distribution, and regulatory environment.

Revenue by Product Category

Net revenue by product category was as follows:

(in thousands) 2016 2015 2014

Branded $ 1,638,296 $ 1,190,191 $ 1,154,726
Partner brand 300,436 300,480 306,158
Other 170,495 165,728 160,036
Net revenue $ 2,109,227 $ 1,656,399 $ 1,620,920

Prior year Partner brand revenues from the sale of Kettle Brand® potato chips are now classified as Branded revenues as a result of
the Diamond Foods acquisition. For 2015 and 2014, we have reclassified $34.8 million and $33.8 million, respectively, of Partner
brand revenue associated with Kettle Brand® potato chips to Branded revenue to be consistent with current year presentation.

82

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 91/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Geographic Information
Revenue is attributable to the US, the Company’s country of domicile, and to international locations based on the country in which
the product is produced. Net revenue by geographic location was as follows:

(in thousands) 2016 2015 2014

Location:
United States $ 2,012,147 $ 1,656,399 $ 1,620,920
International 97,080 — —
Net revenue $ 2,109,227 $ 1,656,399 $ 1,620,920

Long-lived assets located in the US and international locations as of December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, were as follows:

(in thousands) 2016 2015

Location:
United States $ 477,450 $ 401,465
International 24,434 —
Total $ 501,884 $ 401,465

NOTE 20. SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS

Sales to our largest retail customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart"), either through IBOs or our direct distribution network,
were approximately 13% of net revenue in 2016, 13% of net revenue in 2015, and 14% of net revenue in 2014. Our sales to Wal-
Mart do not include sales of our products that may be made to Wal-Mart by third-party distributors outside our DSD network.
Sales to these third-party distributors represent approximately 5% of our net revenue and may increase sales of our products to
Wal-Mart by an amount we are unable to estimate. Accounts receivable as of December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, included
receivables from Wal-Mart totaling $21.0 million and $19.0 million, respectively.

83

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 92/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

NOTE 21. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

A summary of quarterly financial information follows:

2016 Quarter Ended

(in thousands, except per share data) April 2 (4) July 2 October 1 December 31
Net revenue $ 447,869 $ 561,292 $ 543,903 $ 556,163
Cost of sales 304,779 349,736 344,807 346,115
Gross profit (1) 143,090 211,556 199,096 210,048

Selling, general and administrative 121,555 160,121 152,980 159,301

Transaction and integration related expenses 48,978 9,945 3,656 3,693
Impairment charges 374 489 507 3,096
Other (income)/expense, net (2) (833) (1,141) (3,471) 55
(Loss)/income before interest and income taxes (26,984) 42,142 45,424 43,903

Loss on early extinguishment of debt 4,749 — — —

Interest expense, net 4,729 9,361 9,215 9,308
(Loss)/income before income taxes (36,462) 32,781 36,209 34,595

Income tax (benefit)/expense (13,614) 12,381 10,663 15,890

(Loss)/income from continuing operations (22,848) 20,400 25,546 18,705
(Loss)/income from discontinued operations, net of
income tax (3) (2,546) (783) 3,655 (27,426)
Net (loss)/income (25,394) 19,617 29,201 (8,721)
Net income/(loss) attributable to non-controlling
interests 37 (64) (114) (41)
Net (loss)/income attributable to Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. $ (25,431) $ 19,681 $ 29,315 $ (8,680)

Basic (loss)/earnings per share:

Continuing operations $ (0.29) $ 0.21 $ 0.26 $ 0.19
Discontinued operations (0.03) — 0.04 (0.28)
Total basic (loss)/earnings per share $ (0.32) $ 0.21 $ 0.30 $ (0.09)

Diluted (loss)/earnings per share:

Continuing operations $ (0.29) $ 0.21 $ 0.26 $ 0.19
Discontinued operations (0.03) (0.01) 0.04 (0.28)
Total diluted (loss)/earnings per share $ (0.32) $ 0.20 $ 0.30 $ (0.09)

Dividends declared per common share $ 0.16 $ 0.16 $ 0.16 $ 0.16

Footnotes:
(1)During the first quarter of 2016, our gross profit was negatively impacted by the inventory step-up of $13.6 million required for purchase accounting related to
the Diamond Foods acquisition.
During the third quarter of 2016, we recognized an insurance settlement of $3.8 million related to a business interruption claim that resulted from an unexpected
(2)

production outage in the fourth quarter of 2015.

(3) During the fourth quarter of 2016, we recognized a $32.6 million pre-tax loss on the sale of Diamond of California.
As Diamond Foods was acquired on February 29, 2016, the first quarter revenue and expenses, with the exception of transaction and integration related expenses,
(4)

are substantially less than the other three quarters.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 93/107
6/26/2018 Document

84

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 94/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

2015 Quarter Ended

(in thousands, except per share data) April 4 July 4 October 3 January 2
Net revenue $ 402,341 $ 431,428 $ 416,773 $ 405,857
Cost of sales 262,979 279,945 274,287 259,899
Gross profit 139,362 151,483 142,486 145,958

Selling, general and administrative 121,924 119,069 114,385 109,156

Transaction-related expenses (1) — — 450 7,252
Settlements of certain litigation — 2,775 2,900 —
Impairment charges — — — 11,997
Other (income)/expense, net (1,529) (184) (386) 1,024
Income before interest and income taxes 18,967 29,823 25,137 16,529

Interest expense, net 2,467 2,671 2,851 2,864

Income before income taxes 16,500 27,152 22,286 13,665

Income tax expense 5,918 9,758 6,557 6,652

Net income 10,582 17,394 15,729 7,013
Net (loss)/income attributable to non-controlling
interests (54) 65 52 (30)
Net income attributable to Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. $ 10,636 $ 17,329 $ 15,677 $ 7,043

Basic earnings per share $ 0.15 $ 0.25 $ 0.22 $ 0.10

Diluted earnings per share 0.15 0.24 0.22 0.10

Dividends declared per common share $ 0.16 $ 0.16 $ 0.16 $ 0.16

Footnotes:
Transaction expenses relating to the Diamond Foods acquisition have been reclassified out of selling, general and administrative expense to conform to current
(1)

year presentation.

NOTE 22. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On February 8, 2017, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.16 per share payable on March 3, 2017 to
stockholders of record on February 23, 2017.

On February 23, 2017 we entered into an additional interest rate swap agreement to fix the variable rate on a portion of our $300
million term loans due February 2026. The new swap effectively fixes the variable rate to 2.06% on $100.0 million of underlying
notional from June 2017 through December 2022.

On February 27, 2017, we entered into an amendment to the Credit Agreement with the term lenders party to the Credit Agreement
and Bank of America, N.A., which amended the definition of EBIT in the Credit Agreement to be EBITDA minus, to the extent
included in determining EBITDA, depreciation and amortization of the Company and its subsidiaries for the computation period.

85

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 95/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

For the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2016, January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015

Additions/(Reductions)
Beginning to Expense or Ending
(in thousands) Balance Other Accounts Deductions Balance
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 917 $ 472 $ (99) $ 1,290
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance $ 637 $ 10,664 $ (18) $ 11,283
Fiscal year ended January 2, 2016
Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 1,778 $ 1,104 $ (1,965) $ 917
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance $ 626 $ 11 $ — $ 637
Fiscal year ended January 3, 2015
Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 1,535 $ 1,573 $ (1,330) $ 1,778
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance $ 469 $ 177 $ (20) $ 626

86

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 96/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Snyder’s-Lance, Inc.:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive
income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Snyder’s-Lance, Inc.
and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2)
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated
financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for
these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and
for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements,
on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining
an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinions.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for the
classification of debt issuance costs in fiscal year 2016.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of
the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

87

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 97/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, management has
excluded certain elements of the internal control over financial reporting of Diamond Foods from its assessment of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business
combination during 2016. Subsequent to the acquisition, certain elements of Diamond Foods internal control over financial
reporting and related processes were integrated into the Company’s existing systems and internal control over financial reporting.
Those controls that were not integrated have been excluded from management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. We have also excluded these elements of the internal control over financial
reporting of Diamond Foods from our audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The excluded elements
represent controls over accounts of approximately 3.9% of consolidated assets and 13.5% of consolidated net revenues as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2016.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina

February 28, 2017

88

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 98/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, and pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
“Exchange Act”), we conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2016.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation, our management
concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.

Management has excluded certain elements of the internal control over financial reporting of Diamond Foods from its assessment
of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 because it was acquired by the Company in a
purchase business combination during 2016. Subsequent to the acquisition, certain elements of Diamond Food’s internal control
over financial reporting and related processes were integrated into the Company’s existing systems and internal control over
financial reporting. Those controls that were not integrated have been excluded from management’s assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. Management has also excluded these elements
of the internal control over financial reporting of Diamond Foods from our audit of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting. The excluded elements represent controls over accounts of approximately 3.9% of consolidated assets and 13.5% of
consolidated net revenues as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016.

The effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 has been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) during the
quarter ended December 31, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information

On February 27, 2017, we entered into an amendment to the Credit Agreement with the term lenders party to the Credit Agreement
and Bank of America, N.A., which amended the definition of EBIT in the Credit Agreement to be EBITDA minus to the extent
included in determining EBITDA, depreciation and amortization of the Company and its subsidiaries for the computation period.

89

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 99/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

PART III
Items 10 through 14 are incorporated by reference to the sections captioned Security Ownership of Principal Stockholders and
Management, Proposal 1—Election of Directors, Corporate Governance, Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation, Compensation Committee Report, Equity Compensation Plan Information, Director Compensation, Executive
Compensation, Related Person Transactions and Ratification of Selection of Independent Public Accounting Firm in our Proxy
Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 3, 2017 and the Executive Officers of the Company in Part I
of this Annual Report.
Code of Conduct
We have adopted a Code of Conduct that covers our officers, our Senior Financial Officers, including the Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Corporate Controller and Principal Accounting Officer and our employees. In addition, we have
adopted a Code of Ethics which covers the members of the Board of Directors. Information about these codes are posted on our
website at www.snyderslance.com.
We will disclose any substantive amendments to, or waivers from, our Code of Conduct for the Board of Directors on our website
or in a report on Form 8-K.

90

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 100/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) 1. Financial Statements
The following financial statements are filed as part of this report:

Page
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2016, January 2, 2016 and
January 3, 2015 38

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2016, January 2,
2016 and January 3, 2015 39

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016 40

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2016, January 2,
2016 and January 3, 2015 41

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2016, January 2, 2016 and
January 3, 2015 42

Notes to consolidated financial statements 43

(a) 2. Financial Schedules.

The following financial schedules are filed as part of this report:

Page
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts 86

Schedules other than that listed above have been omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or
because information required is included in financial statements or the notes thereto.
(a) 3. Exhibit Index.
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of October 27, 2015 by and among Company, Shark
Acquisition Sub I, Inc., Shark Acquisition Sub II, LLC and Diamond Foods, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 28, 2015 (File No. 0-398).
2.2 Form of Diamond Voting Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2015, by and between the Company and the
stockholders of Diamond Foods, Inc. listed therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on October 28, 2015 (File No. 0-398).
3.1 Restated Articles of Incorporation of Snyder’s-Lance, Inc., as amended through May 3, 2013, incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 29, 2013 (File
No. 0-398).
3.2 Bylaws of Snyder’s-Lance, Inc., as amended through May 6, 2014, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1
to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 9, 2014 (File No. 0-398).
4.1 See 3.1 and 3.2 above.
4.2 Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2010, among the Registrant, Snyder’s of
Hanover, Inc., Snyder’s Manufacturing, Inc. and each of the note holders named therein, incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 13, 2010 (File No. 0-398).
10.1* Lance, Inc. 2003 Key Employee Stock Plan, as amended, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (File No. 0-398).

91

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 101/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

10.2* Lance, Inc. 2007 Key Employee Incentive Plan, as amended effective May 4, 2010, incorporated herein by
reference to Annex A of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement filed on February 26, 2010 (File No. 0-398).
10.3* Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. 2008 Director Stock Plan (as amended and restated) dated February 8, 2013, incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 30,
2013 (File No. 0-398).
10.4* Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. 2014 Director Stock Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Annex A attached to the
Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed on March 25, 2014 (File No. 0-398).
10.5* Snyder's-Lance, Inc. 2012 Key Employee Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Annex A attached to
the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement filed on March 28, 2012 (File No. 0-398).
10.6* Snyder's-Lance, Inc. 2012 Associate Stock Purchase Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Annex B attached
to the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement filed on March 28, 2012 (File No. 0-398).
10.7* Snyder’s of Hanover, Inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated effective January 2, 2005,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No.1 on Form S-8 to Form S-4 filed
on December 8, 2010 (File No. 0-398).
10.8* Amendment No. 1 to the Snyder’s of Hanover, Inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, effective as of December 6,
2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No.1 on Form S-8 to Form S-4
filed on December 8, 2010 (File No. 0-398).
10.9* Amended and Restated Snyder's-Lance, Inc. Compensation Deferral Plan, dated as of January 1, 2012,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2012 (File No. 0-398).
10.10* Amended and Restated Snyder's of Hanover Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of October 1,
2005, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2012 (File No. 0-398).
10.11* Snyder's-Lance, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, dated as of December 10, 2014,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 3, 2015 (File No. 0-398).
10.12* Snyder's-Lance, Inc. Long-Term Performance Incentive Plan for Officers and Key Managers, dated February 7,
2013, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 30, 2013 (File No. 0-398).
10.13* Snyder's-Lance, Inc. Annual Performance Incentive Plan for Officers and Key Managers, dated February 7,
2013, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 30, 2013 (File No. 0-398).
10.14* Transition Services and Retirement Agreement, dated as of January 8, 2013, between the Registrant and David
V. Singer, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 14,
2013 (File No. 0-398).
10.15* Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated as of February 22, 2013, between the Registrant and David V.
Singer, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 30, 2013 (File No. 0-398).
10.16* Form of Amended and Restated Compensation and Benefits Assurance Agreement between the Registrant and
Rick D. Puckett, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2008 (File No. 0-398).
10.17* Retention and Amendment Agreement, effective as of February 21, 2011, between the Registrant and Rick D.
Puckett, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended April 2, 2011 (File No. 0-398).

92

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 102/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

10.18* Form of Executive Severance Agreement between the Registrant and Margaret E. Wicklund, incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 27, 1997 (File
No. 0-398).
10.19* Form of Executive Severance Agreement between the Registrant and each of Carl E. Lee, Jr., and Rodrigo F.
Troni Pena, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended April 2, 2011 (File No. 0-398).
10.20* Chairman of the Board Compensation Letter, dated February 9, 2012, between the Registrant and Michael A.
Warehime, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2012 (File No. 0-398).
10.21* Chairman of the Board Compensation Letter amendment, dated February 8, 2013, between the Registrant and
Michael A. Warehime, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 30, 2013 (File No. 0-398).
10.22* Chairman of the Board Compensation Letter amendment, dated December 13, 2013, between the Registrant and
Michael A. Warehime, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 28, 2013 (File No. 0-398).
10.23 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 30, 2014, by and among the Registrant, Bank of
America, National Association, as administrative agent and issuing lender, and each of the lenders party thereto, incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2014 (File No. 0-398).
10.24 Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 24, 2014, by and among the
Registrant, Bank of America, National Association, as administrative agent and issuing lender, and each of the lenders party
thereto, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 7,
2014 (File No. 0-398).
10.25 Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 4, 2014, by and among
the Registrant, Bank of America, National Association, as administrative agent and issuing lender, and each of the lenders party
thereto, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended January 3, 2015 (File No. 0-398).
10.26* Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. Annual Performance Incentive Plan for Officers and Key Managers, dated February 9,
2015, as amended, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended April 4, 2015 (File No. 0-398).
10.27* Snyder’s of Hanover, Inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated effective May 6, 2015,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
April 4, 2015 (File No. 0-398)
10.28 Credit Agreement, dated as of December 16, 2015 among Registrant, the lenders party thereto and Bank of
America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on December 16, 2015 (File No. 0-398).
10.29 Amendment No. 3 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated December 16, 2015, among Registrant, the
lenders party thereto and Bank of American, N.A., as Administrative Agent, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 16, 2015 (File No. 0-398).
10.30* Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. 2016 Key Employee Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the
Registrant’s Form S-8 filed on May 13, 2016 (File No. 333-211376).
10.31* Executive Severance Agreement, effective as of January 25, 2012, between the Registrant and Carl E. Lee, Jr.,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on May 12, 2016 (File No. 0-398).
10.32* Form of Executive Severance Agreement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s
Form 10-Q filed on May 12, 2016 (File No. 0-398).
10.33* Executive Severance Agreement, effective as of December 21, 2015, between the Registrant and Gail Sharps
Myers, filed herewith.

93

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 103/107
6/26/2018 Document

Table of Contents

10.34* Executive Severance Agreement, effective as of May 4, 2015, between the Registrant and Francis B. Schuster,
filed herewith.
10.35 Amendment No. 4 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of January 19, 2016, by and among
the Registrant, Bank of America, National Association, as administrative agent and issuing lender, and each of the lenders party
thereto, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on May 12, 2016 (File No. 0-398).
10.36 Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of January 19, 2016, among Registrant, the lenders party
thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s
Form 10-Q filed on May 12, 2016 (File No. 0-398).
10.37* Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. Annual Incentive Plan for Officers and Key Managers, dated March 30, 2016, incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2016 (File No. 0-398).
10.38* Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. Long-Term Performance Plan for Officers and Key Managers, dated March 30, 2016,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2016 (File No. 0-398).
10.39* Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. 2016 Key Employee Incentive Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Form Agreement,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on November 8, 2016 (File No. 0-398).
10.40* Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. 2016 Key Employee Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Form Agreement, incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on November 8, 2016 (File No. 0-398).
10.41* Chief Financial Officer Offer Letter dated September 19, 2016, between the Registrant and Alexander W. Pease,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on November 8, 2016 (File No. 0-398).
12 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges, filed herewith.
21 List of the Subsidiaries of the Registrant, filed herewith.
23.1 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, filed herewith.
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), filed herewith.
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), filed herewith.
32 Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b), as required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

101 The following materials from the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2016 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of
Stockholders’ Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) Notes to the consolidated financial statements.

________________________________________
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

94

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 104/107
6/26/2018 Document

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SNYDER’S-LANCE, INC.

Dated: February 28, 2017 By: /s/ Carl E. Lee, Jr.

Carl E. Lee, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature Capacity Date

/s/ Carl E. Lee, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer February 28, 2017
Carl E. Lee, Jr. and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Alexander W. Pease Executive Vice President, Chief Financial February 28, 2017
Alexander W. Pease Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Margaret E. Wicklund Vice President, Corporate Controller February 28, 2017
Margaret E. Wicklund and Assistant Secretary
(Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ James W. Johnston Chairman of the Board of Directors February 28, 2017
James W. Johnston

/s/ Jeffrey A. Atkins Director February 28, 2017

Jeffrey A. Atkins

/s/ Peter P. Brubaker Director February 28, 2017

Peter P. Brubaker

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 105/107
6/26/2018 Document

95

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 106/107
6/26/2018 Document

/s/ C. Peter Carlucci, Jr. Director February 28, 2017

C. Peter Carlucci, Jr.

/s/ John E. Denton Director February 28, 2017

John E. Denton

/s/ Brian J. Driscoll Director February 28, 2017

Brian J. Driscoll

/s/ Lawrence V. Jackson Director February 28, 2017

Lawrence V. Jackson

/s/ David C. Moran Director February 28, 2017

David C. Moran

/s/ Dan C. Swander Director February 28, 2017

Dan C. Swander

/s/ Isaiah Tidwell Director February 28, 2017

Isaiah Tidwell

/s/ Patricia A. Warehime Director February 28, 2017

Patricia A. Warehime

96

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/57528/000005752817000005/lnce-12312016x10k.htm 107/107