0% found this document useful (0 votes)
894 views

Final Staar Spring 2021 Results Wfisd

The document provides STAAR test results for 2021 for various grades and subjects in one school district. It notes that 2021 testing occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic and some students received remote instruction. Key data points shown in graphs and tables include the number of students tested, and the percentages of students who did not meet, approached, met, and mastered grade level standards in reading and math for grade 3. Campus-level results are provided for comparison.

Uploaded by

Denise Nelson
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
894 views

Final Staar Spring 2021 Results Wfisd

The document provides STAAR test results for 2021 for various grades and subjects in one school district. It notes that 2021 testing occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic and some students received remote instruction. Key data points shown in graphs and tables include the number of students tested, and the percentages of students who did not meet, approached, met, and mastered grade level standards in reading and math for grade 3. Campus-level results are provided for comparison.

Uploaded by

Denise Nelson
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 115

2021

STAAR GRADES 3-8


AND
STAAR END-OF-COURSE
 All campuses and the district rating is: Not Rated: Declared State of Disaster
 STAAR 2021 was administered during a world wide pandemic
 Students who chose remote instruction were not required to test
 Math grades 5 and 8 were only given once (no retesting opportunities)
 Spanish Version & STAAR ALT 2 data is not included in slides presented
 Spring 2021 was the final administration for 4/7 writing
 JJAEP numbers are not included
 District STAAR participation rate = 96%
 Public link to statewide analytic portal:
https://txreports.emetric.net/?domain=3&report=4

NOTES TO KEEP IN MIND


2021
STAAR GRADES 3-8
Data on this slide is for explanation purposes only.

Subject # tested Did Not Meet Approaches Meets Masters

Reading # % # % # % # %

Grade 3 1406 362 26 433 30 306 22 305 22

Grade 4 1489 483 32 396 27 290 19 320 22


Did not Meet = 26% The way these data are reported by TEA:
Approaches = 30% Did not Meet = 26%
Meets = 22% Approaches or above = 74%
Grade 5 1622 390 24 421 26 260 16 551 34
Masters = 22% Meets or above = 44%
TOTAL =100% Masters = 22%
Grade 6 1648 418 25 575 35 319 19 336 20
READING Grade 3
Number Tested – District = 925
BOOKER T 48
BURGESS 40
CROCKETT 68
CUNNINGHAM 57
FAIN 51
FOWLER 105
FRANKLIN 71
HAYNES 26
JEFFERSON 59
LAMAR 34
MILAM 71
SCOTLAND PARK 61
SHEPPARD 44
SOUTHERN HILLS 38
WEST 82
ZUNDY 70

20 40 60 80 100 120
READING Grade 3
Did Not Meet
DISTRICT 46%
SHEPPARD 11%
FAIN 31%
CROCKETT 35%
FOWLER 36%
WEST 37%
CUNNINGHAM 40%
FRANKLIN 41%
JEFFERSON 47%
MILAM 49%
SOUTHERN HILLS 50%
BURGESS 53%
HAYNES 58%
LAMAR 62%
SCOTLAND PARK 62%
ZUNDY 70%
BOOKER T 71%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 3
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 54%
SHEPPARD 89%
FAIN 69%
CROCKETT 65%
FOWLER 64%
WEST 63%
CUNNINGHAM 60%
FRANKLIN 59%
JEFFERSON 53%
MILAM 51%
SOUTHERN HILLS 50%
BURGESS 48%
HAYNES 42%
SCOTLAND PARK 38%
LAMAR 38%
ZUNDY 30%
BOOKER T 29%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 3
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 25%
SHEPPARD 48%
FAIN 39%
WEST 33%
FRANKLIN 32%
FOWLER 31%
CROCKETT 29%
MILAM 28%
BURGESS 28%
LAMAR 24%
SOUTHERN HILLS 21%
CUNNINGHAM 21%
JEFFERSON 19%
HAYNES 19%
SCOTLAND PARK 13%
ZUNDY 7%
BOOKER T 4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 3
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 11%
JEFFERSON 19%
SHEPPARD 18%
WEST 17%
MILAM 14%
FRANKLIN 14%
FAIN 14%
BURGESS 13%
HAYNES 12%
FOWLER 12%
CUNNINGHAM 11%
CROCKETT 10%
SCOTLAND PARK 7%
LAMAR 6%
SOUTHERN HILLS 5%
ZUNDY 4%
BOOKER T 0%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 3
Number Tested – District = 953
BOOKER T 48
BURGESS 40
CROCKETT 68
CUNNINGHAM 58
FAIN 51
FOWLER 105
FRANKLIN 71
HAYNES 26
JEFFERSON 59
LAMAR 47
MILAM 71
SCOTLAND PARK 64
SHEPPARD 44
SOUTHERN HILLS 48
WEST 82
ZUNDY 71

20 40 60 80 100 120
MATH Grade 3
Did Not Meet
DISTRICT 47%
SHEPPARD 16%
FAIN 27%
FRANKLIN 32%
MILAM 34%
FOWLER 37%
CROCKETT 37%
WEST 39%
JEFFERSON 46%
LAMAR 49%
SOUTHERN HILLS 52%
CUNNINGHAM 52%
BURGESS 60%
SCOTLAND PARK 66%
ZUNDY 77%
HAYNES 77%
BOOKER T 85%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 3
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 53%
SHEPPARD 84%
FAIN 73%
FRANKLIN 68%
MILAM 66%
FOWLER 63%
CROCKETT 63%
WEST 61%
JEFFERSON 54%
LAMAR 51%
SOUTHERN HILLS 48%
CUNNINGHAM 48%
BURGESS 40%
SCOTLAND PARK 34%
ZUNDY 23%
HAYNES 23%
BOOKER T 15%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 3
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 23%
SHEPPARD 45%
FAIN 39%
FOWLER 33%
FRANKLIN 31%
CROCKETT 31%
MILAM 30%
WEST 28%
CUNNINGHAM 21%
JEFFERSON 20%
LAMAR 19%
SOUTHERN HILLS 17%
SCOTLAND PARK 11%
BURGESS 10%
HAYNES 4%
BOOKER T 4%
ZUNDY 3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 3
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 10%
SHEPPARD 23%
CROCKETT 18%
FAIN 16%
MILAM 15%
FRANKLIN 13%
FOWLER 13%
CUNNINGHAM 12%
SOUTHERN HILLS 8%
JEFFERSON 7%
WEST 6%
LAMAR 6%
SCOTLAND PARK 5%
HAYNES 4%
BURGESS 3%
BOOKER T 2%
ZUNDY 0%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Reading Grade 4
Number Tested – District = 899
BOOKER T 37
BURGESS 48
CROCKETT 63
CUNNINGHAM 56
FAIN 60
FOWLER 80
FRANKLIN 79
HAYNES 23
JEFFERSON 53
LAMAR 50
MILAM 66
SCOTLAND PARK 64
SHEPPARD 37
SOUTHERN HILLS 59
WEST 50
ZUNDY 74

20 40 60 80 100 120
READING Grade 4
Did Not Meet
DISTRICT 46%
WEST 20%
FOWLER 21%
SHEPPARD 30%
FAIN 33%
MILAM 35%
LAMAR 36%
CROCKETT 38%
SCOTLAND PARK 47%
CUNNINGHAM 48%
JEFFERSON 49%
HAYNES 57%
BURGESS 58%
FRANKLIN 61%
ZUNDY 66%
BOOKER T 70%
SOUTHERN HILLS 71%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 4
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 54%
WEST 80%
FOWLER 79%
SHEPPARD 70%
FAIN 67%
MILAM 65%
LAMAR 64%
CROCKETT 62%
SCOTLAND PARK 53%
CUNNINGHAM 52%
JEFFERSON 51%
HAYNES 43%
BURGESS 42%
FRANKLIN 39%
ZUNDY 34%
BOOKER T 30%
SOUTHERN HILLS 29%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 4
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 30%
WEST 62%
FOWLER 59%
FAIN 45%
SHEPPARD 43%
MILAM 38%
CROCKETT 37%
LAMAR 34%
CUNNINGHAM 27%
SCOTLAND PARK 25%
BURGESS 21%
FRANKLIN 20%
JEFFERSON 19%
SOUTHERN HILLS 10%
ZUNDY 9%
HAYNES 9%
BOOKER T 5%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 4
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 13%
WEST 32%
FOWLER 30%
FAIN 27%
MILAM 24%
SHEPPARD 19%
LAMAR 14%
CROCKETT 13%
HAYNES 9%
FRANKLIN 9%
CUNNINGHAM 9%
SCOTLAND PARK 8%
JEFFERSON 6%
BURGESS 6%
SOUTHERN HILLS 2%
ZUNDY 1%
BOOKER T 0%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Math Grade 4
Number Tested – District = 903
BOOKER T 37
BURGESS 48
CROCKETT 63
CUNNINGHAM 59
FAIN 60
FOWLER 80
FRANKLIN 79
HAYNES 23
JEFFERSON 53
LAMAR 52
MILAM 66
SCOTLAND PARK 64
SHEPPARD 36
SOUTHERN HILLS 59
WEST 50
ZUNDY 74

20 40 60 80 100 120
MATH Grade 4
Did Not Meet
DISTRICT 46%
CROCKETT 22%
FOWLER 23%
SHEPPARD 25%
FAIN 28%
CUNNINGHAM 37%
WEST 40%
SCOTLAND PARK 42%
MILAM 48%
BURGESS 52%
FRANKLIN 53%
LAMAR 56%
JEFFERSON 57%
HAYNES 61%
ZUNDY 65%
SOUTHERN HILLS 73%
BOOKER T 73%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 4
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 54%
CROCKETT 79%
FOWLER 78%
SHEPPARD 75%
FAIN 72%
CUNNINGHAM 63%
WEST 60%
SCOTLAND PARK 58%
MILAM 52%
BURGESS 48%
FRANKLIN 47%
LAMAR 44%
JEFFERSON 43%
HAYNES 39%
ZUNDY 35%
SOUTHERN HILLS 27%
BOOKER T 27%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 4
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 31%
FOWLER 58%
SHEPPARD 50%
FAIN 48%
CROCKETT 44%
WEST 40%
CUNNINGHAM 39%
SCOTLAND PARK 33%
MILAM 30%
FRANKLIN 24%
LAMAR 23%
BURGESS 23%
JEFFERSON 19%
ZUNDY 12%
HAYNES 9%
SOUTHERN HILLS 8%
BOOKER T 5%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 4
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 18%
FOWLER 46%
CROCKETT 30%
WEST 28%
FAIN 28%
SHEPPARD 25%
SCOTLAND PARK 20%
MILAM 20%
FRANKLIN 14%
LAMAR 13%
CUNNINGHAM 12%
JEFFERSON 9%
BURGESS 8%
ZUNDY 7%
SOUTHERN HILLS 2%
HAYNES 0%
BOOKER T 0%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 5
Number Tested – District = 933
BOOKER T 30
BURGESS 28
CROCKETT 55
CUNNINGHAM 57
FAIN 64
FOWLER 99
FRANKLIN 82
HAYNES 25
JEFFERSON 65
LAMAR 46
MILAM 70
SCOTLAND PARK 63
SHEPPARD 33
SOUTHERN HILLS 66
WEST 73
ZUNDY 74

20 40 60 80 100 120
READING Grade 5
Did Not Meet
DISTRICT 35%
SHEPPARD 6%
FAIN 14%
WEST 16%
BURGESS 21%
FOWLER 27%
LAMAR 28%
MILAM 29%
FRANKLIN 33%
CUNNINGHAM 33%
JEFFERSON 35%
SCOTLAND PARK 44%
CROCKETT 44%
BOOKER T 53%
SOUTHERN HILLS 55%
HAYNES 60%
ZUNDY 65%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 5
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 65%
SHEPPARD 94%
FAIN 86%
WEST 84%
BURGESS 79%
FOWLER 73%
LAMAR 72%
MILAM 71%
FRANKLIN 67%
CUNNINGHAM 67%
JEFFERSON 65%
SCOTLAND PARK 56%
CROCKETT 56%
BOOKER T 47%
SOUTHERN HILLS 45%
HAYNES 40%
ZUNDY 35%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 5
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 38%
SHEPPARD 76%
FAIN 64%
WEST 51%
FOWLER 48%
FRANKLIN 41%
MILAM 40%
CUNNINGHAM 39%
BURGESS 39%
CROCKETT 36%
JEFFERSON 32%
SCOTLAND PARK 30%
LAMAR 28%
BOOKER T 23%
SOUTHERN HILLS 21%
ZUNDY 16%
HAYNES 12%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 5
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 26%
FAIN 50%
SHEPPARD 45%
WEST 40%
FOWLER 37%
FRANKLIN 30%
JEFFERSON 28%
MILAM 27%
CUNNINGHAM 25%
BURGESS 25%
CROCKETT 22%
LAMAR 17%
SCOTLAND PARK 14%
BOOKER T 13%
HAYNES 12%
SOUTHERN HILLS 8%
ZUNDY 5%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Math Grade 5
Number Tested – District = 935
BOOKER T 30
BURGESS 28
CROCKETT 55
CUNNINGHAM 57
FAIN 64
FOWLER 99
FRANKLIN 82
HAYNES 25
JEFFERSON 65
LAMAR 46
MILAM 71
SCOTLAND PARK 63
SHEPPARD 33
SOUTHERN HILLS 67
WEST 73
ZUNDY 74

20 40 60 80 100 120
MATH Grade 5
Did Not Meet
DISTRICT 35%
CUNNINGHAM 14%
FAIN 17%
BURGESS 18%
MILAM 20%
FOWLER 20%
WEST 22%
SHEPPARD 24%
LAMAR 35%
FRANKLIN 35%
JEFFERSON 38%
CROCKETT 42%
SCOTLAND PARK 46%
BOOKER T 50%
HAYNES 52%
ZUNDY 57%
SOUTHERN HILLS 72%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 5
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 65%
CUNNINGHAM 86%
FAIN 83%
BURGESS 82%
MILAM 80%
FOWLER 80%
WEST 78%
SHEPPARD 76%
LAMAR 65%
FRANKLIN 65%
JEFFERSON 62%
CROCKETT 58%
SCOTLAND PARK 54%
BOOKER T 50%
HAYNES 48%
ZUNDY 43%
SOUTHERN HILLS 28%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 5
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 37%
SHEPPARD 67%
BURGESS 61%
CUNNINGHAM 58%
FAIN 56%
FOWLER 55%
WEST 45%
LAMAR 39%
MILAM 38%
FRANKLIN 37%
CROCKETT 36%
JEFFERSON 29%
HAYNES 24%
BOOKER T 20%
ZUNDY 16%
SCOTLAND PARK 16%
SOUTHERN HILLS 10%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 5
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 19%
SHEPPARD 48%
BURGESS 36%
FAIN 34%
FOWLER 33%
CUNNINGHAM 26%
WEST 23%
FRANKLIN 20%
CROCKETT 20%
MILAM 14%
JEFFERSON 14%
LAMAR 13%
SCOTLAND PARK 11%
ZUNDY 8%
HAYNES 8%
BOOKER T 3%
SOUTHERN HILLS 1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 6
Number Tested – District = 900

BARWISE 325

KIRBY 189

MCNIEL 362

SHEPPARD 20

10 60 110 160 210 260 310 360


READING Grade 6
Did Not Meet

DISTRICT 50%

SHEPPARD 5%

MCNIEL 43%

BARWISE 54%

KIRBY 61%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 6
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 50%

SHEPPARD 95%

MCNIEL 57%

BARWISE 46%

KIRBY 39%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 6
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 20%

SHEPPARD 65%

MCNIEL 25%

BARWISE 18%

KIRBY 13%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 6
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 9%

SHEPPARD 30%

MCNIEL 12%

BARWISE 7%

KIRBY 4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 6
Number Tested – District = 900

BARWISE 324

KIRBY 189

MCNIEL 363

SHEPPARD 20

10 60 110 160 210 260 310 360 410


MATH Grade 6
Did Not Meet

DISTRICT 42%

SHEPPARD 10%

MCNIEL 35%

BARWISE 44%

KIRBY 57%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 6
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 58%

SHEPPARD 90%

MCNIEL 65%

BARWISE 56%

KIRBY 43%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 6
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 26%

SHEPPARD 80%

MCNIEL 29%

BARWISE 26%

KIRBY 13%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 6
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 9%

SHEPPARD 35%

MCNIEL 10%

BARWISE 9%

KIRBY 4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 7
Number Tested – District = 864

BARWISE 349

KIRBY 167

MCNIEL 346

100 150 200 250 300 350 400


READING Grade 7
Did Not Meet

DISTRICT 47%

MCNIEL 36%

BARWISE 49%

KIRBY 67%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 7
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 53%

MCNIEL 64%

BARWISE 51%

KIRBY 33%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 7
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 30%

MCNIEL 38%

BARWISE 29%

KIRBY 13%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 7
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 14%

MCNIEL 19%

BARWISE 12%

KIRBY 7%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 7
Number Tested – District = 868

BARWISE 349

KIRBY 168

MCNIEL 349

100 150 200 250 300 350 400


MATH Grade 7
Did Not Meet

DISTRICT 49%

MCNIEL 36%

BARWISE 50%

KIRBY 71%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 7
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 51%

MCNIEL 64%

BARWISE 50%

KIRBY 29%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 7
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 25%

MCNIEL 36%

BARWISE 23%

KIRBY 7%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 7
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 13%

MCNIEL 20%

BARWISE 11%

KIRBY 1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 8
Number Tested – District = 898

BARWISE 327

KIRBY 183

MCNIEL 377

100 150 200 250 300 350 400


READING Grade 8
Did Not Meet

DISTRICT 37%

MCNIEL 26%

BARWISE 42%

KIRBY 52%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 8
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 63%

MCNIEL 74%

BARWISE 58%

KIRBY 48%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 8
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 35%

MCNIEL 45%

BARWISE 30%

KIRBY 23%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
READING Grade 8
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 12%

MCNIEL 17%

BARWISE 10%

KIRBY 5%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 8
Number Tested – District = 686

BARWISE 275

KIRBY 161

MCNIEL 239

100 150 200 250 300


MATH Grade 8
Did Not Meet

DISTRICT 43%

MCNIEL 34%

BARWISE 43%

KIRBY 55%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 8
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 57%

MCNIEL 66%

BARWISE 57%

KIRBY 45%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 8
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 26%

BARWISE 30%

MCNIEL 27%

KIRBY 18%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MATH Grade 8
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 3%

BARWISE 5%

MCNIEL 2%

KIRBY 1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
SCIENCE Grade 5
Number Tested – District = 932
BOOKER T 30
BURGESS 28
CROCKETT 54
CUNNINGHAM 57
FAIN 64
FOWLER 99
FRANKLIN 80
HAYNES 25
JEFFERSON 65
LAMAR 46
MILAM 71
SCOTLAND PARK 63
SHEPPARD 33
SOUTHERN HILLS 67
WEST 73
ZUNDY 74

20 40 60 80 100 120
SCIENCE Grade 5
Did Not Meet
DISTRICT 40%
SHEPPARD 12%
BURGESS 18%
FAIN 20%
WEST 23%
CUNNINGHAM 26%
FOWLER 27%
JEFFERSON 35%
MILAM 37%
CROCKETT 39%
LAMAR 41%
FRANKLIN 45%
SCOTLAND PARK 48%
BOOKER T 63%
SOUTHERN HILLS 67%
ZUNDY 72%
HAYNES 72%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
SCIENCE Grade 5
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 60%
SHEPPARD 88%
BURGESS 82%
FAIN 80%
WEST 77%
CUNNINGHAM 74%
FOWLER 73%
JEFFERSON 65%
MILAM 63%
CROCKETT 61%
LAMAR 59%
FRANKLIN 55%
SCOTLAND PARK 52%
BOOKER T 37%
SOUTHERN HILLS 33%
ZUNDY 28%
HAYNES 28%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
SCIENCE Grade 5
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 28%
SHEPPARD 58%
FAIN 53%
WEST 47%
FOWLER 36%
CUNNINGHAM 32%
BURGESS 32%
CROCKETT 31%
MILAM 30%
JEFFERSON 29%
FRANKLIN 23%
LAMAR 22%
SCOTLAND PARK 17%
SOUTHERN HILLS 12%
ZUNDY 8%
HAYNES 8%
BOOKER T 7%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
SCIENCE Grade 5
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 11%
FAIN 33%
SHEPPARD 21%
BURGESS 18%
WEST 16%
JEFFERSON 15%
FOWLER 15%
CROCKETT 15%
MILAM 11%
FRANKLIN 9%
CUNNINGHAM 7%
SCOTLAND PARK 5%
LAMAR 4%
ZUNDY 3%
SOUTHERN HILLS 3%
HAYNES 0%
BOOKER T 0%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
SCIENCE Grade 8
Number Tested – District = 899

BARWISE 328

KIRBY 182

MCNIEL 378

100 150 200 250 300 350 400


SCIENCE Grade 8
Did Not Meet

DISTRICT 39%

BARWISE 34%

MCNIEL 35%

KIRBY 52%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
SCIENCE Grade 8
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 61%

BARWISE 66%

MCNIEL 65%

KIRBY 48%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
SCIENCE Grade 8
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 34%

MCNIEL 39%

BARWISE 38%

KIRBY 19%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
SCIENCE Grade 8
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 17%

BARWISE 22%

MCNIEL 17%

KIRBY 8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
SOCIAL STUDIES Grade 8
Number Tested – District = 895

BARWISE 325

KIRBY 181

MCNIEL 378

100 150 200 250 300 350 400


SOCIAL STUDIES Grade 8
Did Not Meet

DISTRICT 50%

MCNIEL 40%

BARWISE 51%

KIRBY 70%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
SOCIAL STUDIES Grade 8
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 50%

MCNIEL 60%

BARWISE 49%

KIRBY 30%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
SOCIAL STUDIES Grade 8
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 25%

MCNIEL 35%

BARWISE 24%

KIRBY 6%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
SOCIAL STUDIES Grade 8
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 12%

MCNIEL 19%

BARWISE 10%

KIRBY 2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
WRITING Grade 4
Number Tested – District = 907
BOOKER T 36
BURGESS 48
CROCKETT 63
CUNNINGHAM 60
FAIN 62
FOWLER 80
FRANKLIN 78
HAYNES 23
JEFFERSON 53
LAMAR 51
MILAM 66
SCOTLAND PARK 64
SHEPPARD 38
SOUTHERN HILLS 60
WEST 51
ZUNDY 74

0 20 40 60 80 100 120
WRITING Grade 4
Did Not Meet
DISTRICT 54%
WEST 20%
FOWLER 25%
SHEPPARD 37%
CROCKETT 44%
JEFFERSON 51%
FAIN 53%
SCOTLAND PARK 56%
MILAM 56%
CUNNINGHAM 57%
LAMAR 61%
FRANKLIN 64%
SOUTHERN HILLS 67%
BURGESS 67%
HAYNES 74%
ZUNDY 76%
BOOKER T 78%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
WRITING Grade 4
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 46%
WEST 80%
FOWLER 75%
SHEPPARD 63%
CROCKETT 56%
JEFFERSON 49%
FAIN 47%
SCOTLAND PARK 44%
MILAM 44%
CUNNINGHAM 43%
LAMAR 39%
FRANKLIN 36%
SOUTHERN HILLS 33%
BURGESS 33%
HAYNES 26%
ZUNDY 24%
BOOKER T 22%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
WRITING Grade 4
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 18%
FOWLER 49%
WEST 39%
SHEPPARD 26%
FAIN 24%
MILAM 23%
CROCKETT 22%
CUNNINGHAM 20%
SCOTLAND PARK 17%
JEFFERSON 15%
LAMAR 12%
FRANKLIN 9%
BURGESS 8%
ZUNDY 4%
SOUTHERN HILLS 3%
HAYNES 0%
BOOKER T 0%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
WRITING Grade 4
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 5%
FOWLER 21%
WEST 12%
MILAM 6%
CROCKETT 6%
SHEPPARD 5%
SCOTLAND PARK 5%
CUNNINGHAM 5%
LAMAR 2%
FAIN 2%
ZUNDY 1%
SOUTHERN HILLS 0%
JEFFERSON 0%
HAYNES 0%
FRANKLIN 0%
BURGESS 0%
BOOKER T 0%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
WRITING Grade 7
Number Tested – District = 887

BARWISE 357

KIRBY 179

MCNIEL 349

100 150 200 250 300 350 400


WRITING Grade 7
Did Not Meet

DISTRICT 50%

MCNIEL 37%

BARWISE 55%

KIRBY 66%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
WRITING Grade 7
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 50%

MCNIEL 63%

BARWISE 45%

KIRBY 34%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
WRITING Grade 7
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 21%

MCNIEL 30%

BARWISE 17%

KIRBY 9%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
WRITING Grade 7
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 4%

MCNIEL 6%

BARWISE 3%

KIRBY 1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
2021
STAAR END-OF-COURSE
STAAR EOC ENGLISH I
Number Tested – District = 1,092

HIRSCHI 279

RIDER 435

WFHS 369

100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500


STAAR EOC ENGLISH I
Did Not Meet

DISTRICT 40%

RIDER 24%

WFHS 47%

HIRSCHI 55%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
STAAR EOC ENGLISH I
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 60%

RIDER 76%

WFHS 53%

HIRSCHI 45%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
STAAR EOC ENGLISH I
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 45%

RIDER 61%

WFHS 37%

HIRSCHI 30%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
STAAR EOC ENGLISH I
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 10%

RIDER 16%

WFHS 5%

HIRSCHI 5%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
STAAR EOC ENGLISH II
Number Tested – District = 1,000

HIRSCHI 218

RIDER 403

WFHS 367

100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500


STAAR EOC ENGLISH II
Did Not Meet

DISTRICT 36%

RIDER 21%

WFHS 43%

HIRSCHI 52%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
STAAR EOC ENGLISH II
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 64%

RIDER 79%

WFHS 57%

HIRSCHI 48%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
STAAR EOC ENGLISH II
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 53%

RIDER 69%

WFHS 46%

HIRSCHI 34%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
STAAR EOC ENGLISH II
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 11%

RIDER 17%

WFHS 8%

HIRSCHI 3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
STAAR EOC ALGEBRA I
Number Tested – District = 1,045
HIRSCHI 218

RIDER 294

WFHS 307

MCNIEL 142

KIRBY 23

BARWISE 52

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350


STAAR EOC ALGEBRA I
Did Not Meet
DISTRICT 31%

KIRBY 0%

BARWISE 0%

MCNIEL 1%

RIDER 27%

WFHS 39%

HIRSCHI 53%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
STAAR EOC ALGEBRA I
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard
DISTRICT 69%

KIRBY 100%

BARWISE 100%

MCNIEL 99%

RIDER 73%

WFHS 61%

HIRSCHI 47%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
STAAR EOC ALGEBRA I
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 37%

BARWISE 92%

MCNIEL 88%

KIRBY 87%

RIDER 35%

WFHS 19%

HIRSCHI 13%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
STAAR EOC ALGEBRA I
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 20%

BARWISE 73%

KIRBY 61%

MCNIEL 53%

RIDER 18%

HIRSCHI 5%

WFHS 5%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
STAAR EOC BIOLOGY
Number Tested – District = 1,020

HIRSCHI 256

RIDER 411

WFHS 340

100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450


STAAR EOC BIOLOGY
Did Not Meet

DISTRICT 24%

RIDER 13%

WFHS 28%

HIRSCHI 38%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
STAAR EOC BIOLOGY
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 76%

RIDER 87%

WFHS 72%

HIRSCHI 62%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
STAAR EOC BIOLOGY
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 49%

RIDER 65%

WFHS 43%

HIRSCHI 30%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
STAAR EOC BIOLOGY
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 18%

RIDER 26%

WFHS 16%

HIRSCHI 10%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
STAAR US HITSORY
Number Tested – District = 969

HIRSCHI 205

RIDER 405

WFHS 347

100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450


STAAR EOC US HISTORY
Did Not Meet

DISTRICT 19%

RIDER 14%

WFHS 19%

HIRSCHI 29%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
STAAR EOC US HISTORY
≥ Approaches Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 81%

RIDER 86%

WFHS 81%

HIRSCHI 71%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
STAAR EOC US HISTORY
≥ Meets Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 63%

RIDER 72%

WFHS 62%

HIRSCHI 48%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
STAAR EOC US HISTORY
≥ Masters Grade Level Standard

DISTRICT 43%

RIDER 51%

WFHS 41%

HIRSCHI 29%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

You might also like