Operant Connditioning Theory
Operant Connditioning Theory
Operant conditioning suggests that people emit responses that are rewarded & will not emit responses
that are either punished or not rewarded. Operant conditioning implies that behavior is voluntary & it is
determined, maintained & controlled by consequences.
The basic principle of learning new behaviors( operant or also called instrumental) involves
relationship between three elements:
Stimulus situation
Behavioral response to the situation &
Consequence of the response to the person.
Example- application of brake by a vehicle driver to avoid accident. Here, the possibility of accident
without application of break is stimulus situation, application of break is the behavior & avoidance of
accident is the consequence of behavior. Through this process, human beings learn what behaviors will
be rewarding & they engage in those behaviors.
Implication of theory- most behaviors in organizations are learned, controlled & altered by
consequences. Management can use the operant conditioning process successfully to control &
influence the behavior of employees by designing the suitable reward system.
Cognitive theorists argue that he learner forms a cognitive structure in memory, preserves & organizes
information about the various events that occur in a learning situation.
Experiment- Tolman trained a rat to turn right in a “T” shaped maze in order to obtain food. Then he
started the rat from the opposite part of the maze; according to conditioning theory, the rat should have
turned right because of past conditioning. But the rat, instead turned towards where the food had been
placed. This phenomenon forced Tolman to conclude that rat formed a cognitive map to figure out how
to get the food.
LEARNING
Nature of Learning
Learning involves change in behavior, though this change is not necessarily an improvement
over previous behavior.
The behavioral change must be relatively permanent.
The behavioral change must be based on some form of practice or experience.( example- the
ability to work which is based on physical maturation would not be considered learning).
The practice or experience must be reinforced in order for learning o occur.
T
E
M
N
F
G Maturation takes place irrespective of the conditions, favorable/unfavorable, but learning is
possible only in the favorable conditions.
Since maturity is a natural process, it does not require motivation to change behavior but
learning is cognitive process which is affected by motivation in some form.
Since learning is an acquires process. It is quite natural that several factors may affect the process.
Motivation- learner’s motivation is one of the major conditions for learning.( motivation is
something that moves a person to action & continues him in the course of action already
initiated. This course of action includes learning too.)
Mental Set- mental set refers to the preparation for an action, in this context of learning. If a
person is prepared to act he can do the things quickly & in no time. Without mental set, learning
cannot go smoothly & easily.
Nature of learning materials( easy/difficult, familiar/unfamiliar etc).
Practice-Practice is a very basic external condition of learning & affects all types of learning. The
more a person practices, more he absorbs learning contents. Most of the motor skills( like
typing, swimming etc) are learned based on this principle.
Environment- environment in which learning process occurs, affects learning. Environment,
here, refers to the situational set up for learning. Environmental factors can either strengthen or
weaken the innate ability to achieve & learn.
INTERNAL FACTORS
MOTIVATION
A MODEL OF MOTIVATION
Although a few human activities occur without motivation, nearly all conscious behavior is motivated, or
caused.
Example- it requires no motivation to grow hair, but getting a hair cut does.
A manager’s job is to identify employees’ drives & needs & to channel their behavior, to motivate them,
toward task performance.
Internal needs & drives create tensions that are affected by one’s environment. For example-
the need for food produces tension of hunger. The hungry person then examines the
surroundings to see which foods (external incentives) are available to satisfy that hunger.
Results occur when motivated employees are provided with the opportunity ( such as proper
training) to perform & the resources ( such as the proper tools) to do so.
The presence of goals & awareness of incentives to satisfy one’s needs are also powerful
motivational factors leading to the release of effort.
When an employee is productive & the organization takes note of it, rewards will be distributed.
If those rewards are appropriate in nature,, timing, & distribution, the employee’s original needs
& drives are satisfied. At that time, new needs may emerge & the cycle will begin again.
Opportunity
Needs &
Derives Tension Effort Performance Rewards
MOTIVATION THEORIES
He also proposed that unless the need at the lower level is satisfied, the higher-order need will
not be operative, & that once the lower order need is satisfied, it will no longer motivate the
person.
Maslow proposed five main hierarchical levels of needs.
becoming using one’s skills to the fullest, & stretching talents to the maximum.
Herzberg’s model provides a useful distinction between maintenance factors, which are
necessary but not sufficient, & motivational factors, which have the potential for improving
employee effort.
Managers should now be aware that they cannot neglect a wide range of factors that create at
least a neutral work environment. In addition, unless hygiene factors are reasonably addressed,
their absence will serve as significant distractions to workers.
According to Herzberg, preventing or reducing dissatisfaction in the work environment is not the
same as providing positive satisfaction.
According to him, motivation can be provided only if motivators are used in the work situation in
addition to hygiene factors.
Job satisfaction & dissatisfaction are two opposite points on a single continuum. Individuals on
the job are affected by any change either in the job environment or in the job content.
This theory does not attach much importance to pay, status or interpersonal relationship which
are held generally as important contents of satisfaction.
Herzberg’s Two-factor Model of Work Motivation
H
F
C
P
a
t
o
n
i
l
r
w
p
n
s
g
&
y
m
c
d
b
h
i
v
p
e
f
l
u
e
M
/
ti
a