Session 5-Some Alternative Investment Rules
Session 5-Some Alternative Investment Rules
Rules
Session 5
The Balance–Sheet Model of the Firm
The Capital Budgeting Decision
Current
Current Liabilities
assets
Long- term
Fixed Assets Debt
What long-
1 Tangible term
2 Intangible investments
should the Shareholders’
firm engage Equity
in?
Capital Budgeting Decisions &
Evaluation
Estimate the cash flows involved with the
project
Estimate a required rate of return or
discount rate for the project
Apply a decision rule to determine if an
investment is good or bad
Capital Budgeting Techniques
Net Present Value (NPV)
Payback Period
Discounted Payback Period
Average Accounting Return
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
Profitability Index (PI)
9
Good Decision Criteria
We need to ask ourselves the following
questions when evaluating decision criteria
– Does the decision rule adjust for the time value
of money?
– Does the decision rule adjust for risk?
– Does the decision rule provide information on
whether we are creating value for the firm?
Project Example Information
You are looking at a new project and you have
estimated the following cash flows:
– Year 0: CF = -165,000
– Year 1: CF = 63,120; Net Income = 13,620
– Year 2: CF = 70,800; Net Income = 3,300
– Year 3: CF = 91,080; Net Income = 29,100
– Average Book Value = 72,000
Your required return for assets of this risk is 12%.
Net Present Value (NPV)
Net Present Value (NPV). Net Present Value is found by
subtracting the present value of the after-tax outflows from
the present value of the after-tax inflows.
Decision Criteria
If NPV > 0, accept the project
If NPV < 0, reject the project
If NPV = 0, indifferent
Net Present Value
NPV = CF0 + CF1 + CF2 + . . . + CFn
(1+R) (1+R)^2 (1+R)^n
Decision Criteria
If IRR > R, accept the project
If IRR < R, reject the project
If IRR = R, indifferent
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
NPV = CF0 + CF1 + CF2 + . . . + CFn
(1+IRR) (1+IRR)^2 (1+IRR)^n
20,000
10,000
0
-10,000 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2 0.22
-20,000
Discount Rate
NPV Vs. IRR
NPV and IRR will generally give us the
same decision
Exceptions
– Non-conventional cash flows – cash flow signs
change more than once
– Mutually exclusive projects
Only ONE of several potential projects can be
chosen
IRR and Non-conventional
Cash Flows
When the cash flows change sign more than once,
there is more than one IRR
When you solve for IRR you are solving for the
root of an equation and when you cross the x-axis
more than once, there will be more than one return
that solves the equation
If you have more than one IRR, which one do you
use to make your decision?
Another Example – Non-
conventional Cash Flows
$2,000.00
$0.00
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55
($2,000.00)
NPV
($4,000.00)
($6,000.00)
($8,000.00)
($10,000.00)
Discount Rate
Summary of Decision Rules
The NPV is positive at a required return of
15%, so you should Accept
If you use the financial calculator, you
would get an IRR of 10.11% which would
tell you to Reject
You need to recognize that there are non-
conventional cash flows and look at the
NPV profile
IRR and Mutually Exclusive
Projects
Mutually exclusive projects
– If you choose one, you can’t choose the other
– Example: You can choose to attend graduate school
next year at either Harvard or Stanford, but not both
Intuitively you would use the following decision
rules:
– NPV – choose the project with the higher NPV
– IRR – choose the project with the higher IRR
Example With Mutually Exclusive
Projects
Period Project A Project B
The required return
0 -17,000 -17,000 for both projects is
11%.
1 8,000 2,000
Decision Rule:
Undertake the project if the MIRR exceeds the
cost of capital.
Modified IRR: MIRR
Find the MIRR of project S with the following CFs. Rate of return is 12%
Decision Criteria
If PI > 1, accept the project
If PI < 1, reject the project
If PI = 1, indifferent
Qualitative Factors
Qualitative factors may be important in
project selection
– company image
– social pressure
– union pressure
– customer satisfaction
Quantitative analysis should be supported
by qualitative factors