Rsa 2 - Arboleda, Abbiegail E. 2bbsmt
Rsa 2 - Arboleda, Abbiegail E. 2bbsmt
2B-BSMT
RSA # 2
Measures of Disease Occurrence
Defining disease occurrence in epidemiology, it refers to the number of new incident cases of disease or
injury in a population that have happened over a specified time period. There are different measures used to
delineate how frequent a particular disease or health event occurs in a population. Commonly, when dealing
with the number of new cases in a community, epidemiologists use incidence rate to determine the etiology
and risk factors associated with the disease. With this, epidemiologists may measure the probability of
developing disease as well as the ratio of the number of new cases to the time at risk for disease. In this
paper, it discusses why it is preferable to use incidence rate in terms of describing and interpreting the
occurrence of a disease. Using number of examples taken from nephrology literature, it will also discuss the
different measures of disease occurrence which are the concept of incidence and prevalence.
This section includes the specified objectives of this paper to describe and determine measure of disease
occurrence:
1. To describe how often disease or health event occurs in a population
2. To determine which is the best measure to calculate disease occurrence
3. To assess the etiology of a disease or event and its risk factors by utilizing the types of measures
The current findings of this study will provide supplementary basis for future epidemiological studies in
measuring and identifying disease frequency and health outcome in a population. Moreover, it will significantly
help the following sectors to discover the potential causes and risk of a disease and determine the most
effective preventive measure for the disease outcome.
IV. Methodology
How to Calculate Measure
of Disease Occurrence
Incidence Prevalence
The following findings are examples of measures of disease occurrence taken from different
epidemiological literature:
Example 1 – Risk
It is a cohort study that aims to determine the risk of hospitalization for bacterial infection in the first 2-
years post-renal transplantation of 3,106 children. The researchers preferably used incident rate to
measure the disease occurrence in order to distinguish who among the 3,106 children considered at risk
has lost their grafts in the first 6 months after transplantation and were hospitalized for acquiring bacterial
infection. 687 or 22.1% of these children need to be hospitalized as they developed bacterial infection.
However, problem had appeared after it was identified that 164 of these children lost their graft for another
reason and not due to bacterial infection. For this reason, the researchers pointed out that such problems
will likely occur especially if the observation period is long enough in order for those persons at-risk with
particular disease outcome come to an end.
In this example, the practical application of incidence rate was described based on different conditions.
In Austria, the registries divide annual transplant numbers by the number of country inhabitants in order
to compare the transplant activity within other countries. In addition, it was also mentioned that incidence
rate does not change with time under a steady state condition, and so it should be the reciprocal of the
waiting time which can be calculated using the average time. Meanwhile, the risk and incidence rate is
then considered similar with each other when measured over a short period of time. It is due to the fact
that there will be little loss to follow-up and competing risk will only play a minor role.
Example 3 – Prevalence
In Spain, a cost analysis study was performed among 1,312 hemodialysis patients to evaluate the
economic burden of mineral regulating therapy in this patient group. It was found out that on a daily basis,
the average cost of this therapy was 1.68 Euro per patient. And so, it aims to represent almost 10% of all
hemodialysis patients in Spain if and only if it had been a representative sample. The estimated cost shall
be slightly more than 8 million Euro per year.
VI. Discussion on Incidence and Prevalence of the disease
In the study of epidemiology, incidence and prevalence are frequently used to measure the occurrence of
disease. Incidence deals with two measures which are risk and incidence rate. To distinguish them, risk is the
probability or likelihood of developing a disease while incidence rate refers to a ratio proportion of the number
of people developing a particular disease.
Prevalence, on the other hand, deals with the current status of disease at a certain point in time. There are
two concepts to remember in prevalence and those are the number of incident cases plus the length of disease
time. An example of prevalence is the dependency between cases of aortic hemorrhage and ESRD. It was
mentioned that aortic hemorrhage leads to rapid death resulting to a short duration which makes the
prevalence extremely low. Meanwhile, ESRD has a relatively low incidence rate but it has a much higher
survival rate compare to aortic hemorrhage, hence, the disease duration is rather long.
VII. Conclusion
In conclusion, disease occurrence is the essence of epidemiology. It may be utilized to study some of the
most important aspects in studying epidemiology and those are the risk factors and causes of disease we are
ought to identify. The measure of incidence and prevalence will be of great help to know the probability of
developing disease, ratio of the number of people exposed to a risk and proportion of people in the population
having a disease at a particular point or period of time. The difference between the two measure is that
prevalence refers to “proportion”, whereas incidence refers to the “rate”. Certain examples were mentioned in
order to classify, compare and express the size of their effects in terms of the type of disease occurrence
measure used. A risk represents the number of people vulnerable to a disease and is expressed in
percentage. Sometimes rates are measured as risks because it is more convenient. One thing to take note,
when using any type of measures, it is important to consider how these measures are used and whether they
are suitable for the effect we are ought to calculate. To express the size of such effects, one uses either
differences between measures of disease occurrence or ratios of those measures.
VIII. Recommendation
While there is much progress in terms of science and technological advancement globally,
epidemiologists and infectious disease experts still need to ensure that they are using the right tool to measure
the occurrence of diseases which remain timely and relevant in today’s world. Environment, for example, are
really one of our concern as it is one of the contributing factor why diseases spread and infectious agents are
transmitted. Host factor as well can be considered as one of the reasons why most agents mutate and became
powerful enough to fight certain medication and vaccine. If epidemiologists and other experts understand the
kind of environment and people we have, then they can also help in measure of disease occurrence, and they
might as well prevent transmission of infectious disease and impose infection control guidelines. Another thing
to consider is the risk. To properly interpret risk, it is extremely important for the researchers to know the time
period to which a disease applies. Because without the time period, the risk will be just an insignificant value.
To calculate the risk, the researchers must ensure that all subjects are free of disease during the start of the
time period. In addition, while the researchers decide which measure of disease occurrence to use, it is
important to understand the study population. Because in some cases, it can result to some drawbacks. Some
of the study participants may face a sudden death, loss to follow-up, or develop another disease of interest
during follow-up. The study population eventually becomes smaller over time. In this case, the researchers
should be ready and prepared so that the study will carry on.