TCH White Paper The Custody Services of Banks
TCH White Paper The Custody Services of Banks
July 2016
Preface
This white paper seeks to (i) describe the and the institutions that engage in them,
services provided by U.S.-based banking appropriately reflect the particular risks
organizations with regard to the provision they are intended to address. This paper
of custody and related services on a global does not seek to prescribe any particular
scale; (ii) distinguish the services provided regulatory framework for custody businesses
by custodians from the services provided by or the institutions that engage in them, but
other entities in the multi-tiered system for is rather intended to provide lawmakers,
safekeeping, clearing and settling securities; regulators, and the public a comprehensive
(iii) describe how the balance sheets and look at the activities and risks of the custody
risk profiles of custody businesses differ services provided by banks, with a view to
from those of other banking activities; and informing future decisions about the manner
(iv) clarify certain misconceptions regarding in which these institutions are regulated.
the risks presented by the custody and
related services. This paper is one in a continuing series
of Clearing House research reports and
As international and national regulatory working papers focused on financial
bodies continue to increase their focus on institutions and regulation, and in particular,
macroprudential supervision, The Clearing the role of large banks in the financial
House believes that it is important to system and the costs and benefits of
ensure that all supervisory policies, tools regulating such banks.1 It was prepared
and regulatory frameworks, including with the assistance of The Clearing House’s
those that apply to custody businesses special counsel, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP.
A. CUSTODY SERVICES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1. Core Custody Services.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Ancillary Services.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3. Other Administrative Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Endnotes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
At the most basic level, custody services The Clearing House is publishing this white
provided by banks involve holding assets on paper to foster a better understanding of
behalf of others, a function that banks have custody activities. Section I of this paper
historically provided to safeguard clients’ discusses the services provided by custodians
assets, including the physical securities and distinguishes the services provided by
certificates once commonly issued to investors custodians from the services provided by
representing the investors’ ownership interest other entities in the multi-tiered system
in the issuer. While this function may appear
straightforward on its face, as the securities § As previously mentioned, the Bank of New York Mellon (“BNY
Mellon”), Northern Trust Corporation (“Northern Trust”), and State
markets have grown exponentially in size and Street Corporation (“State Street”) are prime examples of these,
sophistication, and in light of technological and information about the business of these entities is included
in various places in this white paper for illustrative purposes.
Custodians’ clients hold large pools of liquid Because securities lending clients rely on
The decisions to purchase or sell investment Institutional investors use the services of
securities or other assets, or whether and custodians for many reasons. First, because
how to exercise voting or other rights with of the breadth of services custodians offer,
respect to the securities (such as whether to clients are able to work with one service
exercise options or rights to convert securities provider that can meet all of their custody
into other securities), are made by custodians’ needs. This saves clients the cost and burden
clients. In providing custody services, the of in-house staffing and resource development,
custodian acts on and follows its client’s and provides the benefits of a centralized,
instructions and does not make any investment highly integrated service delivery model. As
decisions or exercise any investment discretion the financial markets have globalized and as
on its client’s behalf. trading instruments have grown increasingly
complex, custodians have expanded their
offerings to meet the diverse needs of their
1. Custodians’ Clients large investor client base. Because custodians
operate globally, providing their services
In order to operate across such a large number in more than 100 countries, they are able
of foreign markets in which clients invest their to benefit from significant economies of
assets, custodians may establish contractual scale and provide their services to clients
relationships with local sub-custodian banks, at favorable prices. Finally, many clients
rather than establish a physical presence in prefer to use a custodian rather than a non-
each market. Whether achieved through bank custodian or FMU because custodians
organizational expansion or by establishing provide clients with traditional secure banking
a network of local sub-custodians, the services, cash deposit accounts, and access to
geographical reach of large U.S. custodians payment systems and are subject to a robust
uniquely positions them to serve investors with prudential framework and oversight (including
large and diversified international portfolios. compliance with the Basel III regulatory capital
requirements).
Custody clients consist primarily of institutional
investors, high-net-worth individuals, and Certain institutional investors are required
individual or family trusts. Institutional by law or regulation to rely upon custodians
investor clients include U.S. mutual funds to satisfy customer protection requirements,
and foreign public funds, corporate and such as those mandating the segregation of
public retirement plans, asset management client assets or transparency of investment
companies, U.S. registered investment advisers performance. The 1940 Act, for example,
and foreign investment advisors, private equity explicitly requires a U.S. mutual fund to
funds, alternative investment funds, hedge “place and maintain its securities and similar
funds, insurance companies, corporations, investments” with a qualifying custodial
Clearing
Custodian Agent Custodian
(CCP)
Clearing
Sub- Sub-
Agent
custodian custodian
(CCP)
Custodian
– U.S. Bank
UK
London CCP
Custodian
Branch or
Subsidiary
80
77.9 80.0 78.0 79.0 79.9
70 77.2 76.7
73.4
68.3 69.5
60 66.5 67.0
PERCENT
50
way as commercial banks do, but the balance 40 42.9 42.2 41.8 41.5
sheets associated with their custody services 30
means that both their income statements and 20
balance sheets differ from those of typical 10
commercial banks.43 0
12/2012 12/2013 12/2014 12/2015
Custodians also earn revenue in the form of As explained above, the market for custody
net interest income. In connection with the services is generally defined by AUC (or a
provision of custody services, net interest combination of AUC and AUA where reported
income primarily arises from the interest together). To the extent that AUC or AUA
earned on the reinvestment of clients’ cash consist of securities or other non-cash assets,
deposits in proprietary investment securities they are not recognized on the balance sheet
(which generally consist of highly liquid of custodians. This is because, provided that
government and agency securities and asset- the securities are properly segregated from the
backed securities) and interbank deposits, as custodian’s own assets and those of any sub-
well as interest charged on extensions of credit custodian, ICSD or CSD with which the securities
in connection with purchases of securities are sub-deposited, they are not the property
and other similar operational matters on of the custodian. They remain the property
behalf of clients. These extensions of credit of the beneficial owners of the securities and
are generally very short-term, primarily on therefore are recognized on the balance sheets
an overnight basis. While the percentage of the beneficial owners. The beneficial owners
of custodians’ revenues represented by net may be the custodian’s clients or clients of the
interest income is significantly lower than that custodian’s clients. Because client securities
of most commercial banks, net interest income are not reflected on the balance sheet of
is important to the overall profitability of custodians, custodians do not take any principal
custodians.50 risk in the form of credit risk (i.e., the risk of the
issuer of a debt security not paying principal
Fee-based revenues from custody services and interest and thus defaulting on the debt)
have historically been steady and predictable, or market risk (i.e., the risk of a decline in the
even during periods of economic downturn. market price of securities compared to the price
Custodians’ fee-based revenue structure paid for them) on client securities.52
creates a predictable flow of income that has
historically been quite stable throughout Although AUC and AUA are not reflected on
economic cycles.51 In short, custodians’ the balance sheets of custodians, the amounts
reliance on custody services for the majority of AUC and AUA nevertheless indirectly
250
200
US $ BILLIONS
150
contribute to the size of their balance sheets
because, for example, AUC and AUA result in 100
20
0.8
PERCENT
0.63
0.6
0.51 0.49
0.4
0.26
0.2 0.14
0.06 0.09 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.00 0.06
0.02
0.00
0.0
-0.02
-0.2
12/2012 12/2013 12/2014 12/2015
for State Street.70 Over the same time period, and have lower reserves against expected
annual charge-offs of loans as a percentage credit losses, associated with their custody
of their total loan and lease portfolios businesses, than U.S.-based BHCs with over
represented on average 0.49% to 1.03% for all $100b in assets have overall.
U.S.-based BHCs with over $100b in assets, and
0.41% to 1.22% for commercial banks generally While the overall credit risk faced by custodians
as reported by the Federal Reserve Board.71 is relatively low, custodians’ counterparty credit
exposures can be concentrated. Because of
Loans made by custodians in connection their business model, custodians typically face
with their custody business also have a lower other financial institutions74 (including sub-
allowance for loan and lease losses as a custodians and cash correspondent banks)
percentage of their total loans and leases than and collective investment funds (including
Commercial Banks on average. For example, mutual funds, UCITS, sovereign issuers, and
as seen in Figure 9, at the end of each year hedge funds). If these counterparties fail or
from 2012 through 2015, the allowance for are perceived to be failing, the exposures held
loan and lease losses as a percentage of total by custodians could present a significant risk
loans and leases ranged from 0.25% to 0.57% to custodians and their clients. Custodians
for BNY Mellon, 0.58% to 1.01% for Northern mitigate these risks by collateralizing such
Trust, and 0.18% to 0.25% for State Street.72 For transactions with high quality liquid assets,
all U.S.-based BHCs with over $100b in assets, which effectively shifts the credit risk from the
the allowance for loan and lease losses as a financial institution counterparty to the issuer
percentage of total loans and leases ranged of the collateral.
from 0.18% to 3.88% at the end of 2012,
from 0.21% to 2.95% at the end of 2013, and Further, as with all other banking organizations
from 0.21% to 2.48% at the end of 2014, and that are exposed to credit risk, custodians seek
0.25% to 2.07% at the end of 2015.73 In short, to mitigate their credit risk through a robust
consistent with their lower level of credit credit risk management framework, including
exposures and the short-term, settlement- the use of counterparty credit exposure limits,
related nature of the majority of these credit performing legal reviews of the enforceability
exposures related to their custody business, of their collateral agreements and security
banks have suffered lower credit losses, interests, and ensuring that they have control
1.4 1.31
PERCENT
1.19
1.2
1.01
1.0 0.95
0.84
0.8
0.0
12/2012 12/2013 12/2014 12/2015
over the collateral provided by their clients However, the extent of the market risk faced
(which generally consists of cash and securities by custodians is limited. They do not incur any
already held by the client with the custodian). market risk on assets they hold under custody
or administration because, as explained in
In addition, custodians also hold significant Section II.A.2 above, AUC and AUA are not the
levels of capital against their counterparty property of custodians and are not reflected on
credit risk exposures both for internal risk their balance sheets. The securities and other
management purposes and in compliance assets that comprise AUC and AUA may well be
with U.S. Basel III capital rules. For example, subject to market risk because their values will
notwithstanding their generally lower level of fluctuate based on changes in market prices,
credit risk and credit losses (including through interest rates and other market factors, but
the financial crisis) compared to the average any such market risk is borne by the beneficial
U.S.-based BHCs with over $100b in assets, owners of the assets, not by custodians. In
BNY Mellon, Northern Trust and State Street addition, as explained in Section II.A.2 above,
have reported Tier 1 risk-based capital ratios unlike banks with substantial securities market-
comparable to those of this group of banks. making and dealing activities, custodians
At December 31, 2015, for example, the Tier 1 have immaterial percentages of their balance
risk-based capital ratios were 12.29% for BNY sheets associated with their custody business
Mellon, 11.4% for Northern Trust, and 15.3% for comprising trading assets and trading liabilities
State Street; U.S.-based BHCs with over $100b as to which they incur market risk.
in assets reported Tier 1 risk-based capital
ratios ranging from 10.8% to 17.37% at the The market risk to which a custody business
same date.76 is primarily exposed relates to its portfolios of
investment securities, its broader asset-and-
liability management practices, and its foreign
exchange positions (i.e., FX trades for which
c. Market Risk
custodians act as principal). Changes in market
Custodians are also exposed to market risk, prices, interest rates or other market factors
which is the risk of loss on a position in can affect the value of investment securities,
securities, foreign currencies, commodities and changes in foreign exchange rates can
or other assets resulting from changes in affect the value of FX positions. In this respect,
market factors such as prices or interest rates. custodians are no different from other banks
»» Credit risk.
d. Liquidity Risk
Custodians are also exposed to liquidity
a. Risk of Loss or Delay Resulting
risk, which is the risk of loss from an actual from a Custodian’s Operational
or perceived inability to meet cash and Errors
collateral obligations. This includes the risk
that a custodian may fail to effectively manage As explained in Section I.A.1.a, the provision of
intraday liquidity related to mismatches in custody, custody-related and ancillary services
timing between clearing and settlement is subject to operational risks resulting from—
activities, and payments to or on behalf of among other things—inadequate internal
clients. To manage this risk on an intraday processes, human error, and system failure.
basis, custodians must actively manage If a custodian commits an operational error,
available cash and collateral positions at such as failing to process a corporate action
FMUs and other service providers. To manage or settle a securities transaction for a client,
liquidity overall, custodians maintain highly the client is at risk of losing all or a portion
liquid assets, including cash, cash equivalents, of the value of its investment or expected
U.S. government and agency securities profit from the investment or transaction. The
These risks are the same risks a client of any As with a client of any bank, clients of
bank faces in obtaining other types of services custodians face the risk of loss of any
from a bank. For example, if a bank fails to uncollateralized cash deposits in an amount
disburse a loan or to credit a fund transfer to a above the limit of the Federal Deposit
client’s account, a client may be unable to pay Insurance Corporation’s deposit insurance,
the full extent of its obligations coming due which is $250,000 for each account holder.
on that day. These are also risks that a client This is because cash held on deposit with a
would face in using any third party to provide bank represents a contractual claim for the
custody services, or indeed if it performed return of the cash amount from the bank rather
its own back-office services. In short, they than the retention of a property interest in an
are risks that are inherent in using any asset that belongs to the client. In the event
service provider in connection with holding of a custodian’s insolvency, the client would
investment assets and effecting transactions in have a claim against the Federal Deposit
those assets. Insurance Corporation as receiver of the bank
for the amount of the deposit and, under
Clients are also exposed to the operational the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, would
risk of a custodian’s failure to properly benefit from the priority that depositors
segregate client securities from the bank’s have over other unsecured creditors of the
own securities portfolio—the same risk faced bank. A client can mitigate this credit risk
by any client of any financial institution that in the case of a custodian by maintaining
holds securities or other non-cash assets on only enough cash in its cash account on any
the client’s behalf (such as securities brokers one day that is necessary to process normal
holding client securities). However, this risk course transactional activities. Cash holdings
can be mitigated by verifying the use of of custody clients represent, however, a very
separate client accounts on the books of the small percentage of custody assets.
custodian and client omnibus accounts on
the books of sub-custodians, ICSDs, CSDs and Clients of a custodian that lends securities
other FMUs, as well as verifying the existence through the bank’s agency securities lending
51 For each of the four years ended December 31, 2015, pre-tax 54 Deposit liabilities increased from approximately $81.4 billion
operating margin from custody services were reported as to $279.6 billion (an increase of 243.7%) for BNY Mellon; from
ranging from 26% to 30% for BNY Mellon, 20.2% to 27.6% for approximately $45.9 billion to $96.9 billion (an increase of
Northern Trust, and 23% to 28% for State Street. See 2014- 111.2%) for Northern Trust; and from approximately $73 billion
2015 Annual Reports of BNY Mellon, Northern Trust, and State to $191.6 billion (an increase of 162.4%) for State Street. Id.
Street, supra n. 45. For the same four-year period, net income
55 See 2014-2015 Annual Reports of BNY Mellon, Northern
as a percentage of total consolidated revenues (i.e., not just
Trust, and State Street, supra n. 45; BNY Mellon, 2012 Annual
from custody services) ranged from 14.5% to 21.2% for BNY
Report, supra n. 53; Northern Trust, 2012 Annual Report, supra
Mellon, 17.6% to 20.7% for Northern Trust, and 19.1 to 21.3%
n. 53; State Street, 2012 Annual Report, supra n. 53 (together,
for State Street. Id.
“2012, 2014, and 2015 Annual Reports of BNY Mellon,
52 As explained in more detail below, the only exception to this Northern Trust, and State Street”).
arises if a custodian takes a security interest in client securities
56 For example, the final rule implementing the Basel III Liquidity
to collateralize an extension of credit to its client to purchase
Coverage Ratio (“LCR”) in the United States defines “operational
securities and forecloses on the securities to enforce its
deposit” in relevant part as “unsecured wholesale funding or a
security interest or else to enforce a lien over the securities for
collateralized deposit that is necessary for the [bank] to provide
unpaid custody fees.
operational services as an independent third-party intermediary,
53 For example, BNY Mellon increased its AUC/AUA by 44.5% agent, or administrator to the wholesale customer or counterparty
from approximately $20 trillion to $28.9 trillion; Northern Trust providing the unsecured wholesale funding or collateralized
increased its AUC/AUA by 52.2% from approximately $4.0 deposit.” See 12 C.F.R. § 249.3 (2015).
trillion to $6.1 trillion; and State Street increased its AUC/AUA
57 For this reason, operational deposits benefit from a lower
by 111.0% from approximately $13 trillion to $27.5 trillion.
assumed run-off rate in calculating the net cash outflow
See 2014-2015 Annual Reports of BNY Mellon, Northern Trust,
denominator of the LCR than deposits from wholesale
and State Street, supra n.45; BNY Mellon, Quarterly Report for
customers that are not operational deposits. See 12 C.F.R.
the Quarter Ended June 30, 2015 (Form 10-Q) (Aug. 7, 2015);
§§ 249.32(h)(3) and (4) (2015) (5% and 25% outflow rates
BNY Mellon, Quarterly Report for the Quarter Ended June 30,
for operational deposits, depending on whether the entire
2014 (Form 10-Q) (Aug. 11, 2014); BNY Mellon, 2012 Annual
deposit amounts are covered by deposit insurance).
Report (Form 10-K) (Feb. 28, 2013); BNY Mellon, Quarterly
Report for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2012 (Form 10-Q) (Aug. 58 Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Basel III: The
8, 2012); BNY Mellon, 2010 Annual Report (Form 10-K) (Feb. Liquidity Coverage Ratio and Liquidity Risk Monitoring Tools ¶
28, 2011); BNY Mellon, Quarterly Report for the Quarter Ended 93 (Jan. 2013).
June 30, 2010 (Form 10-Q) (Aug. 6, 2010); BNY Mellon, 2008
Annual Report (Form 10-K) (Feb. 27, 2009); BNY Mellon, 59 Custodians are likely viewed as “safe havens” because, as
Quarterly Report for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2008 (Form explained above, they do not engage in high volumes of trading
10-Q) (Aug. 8, 2008); BNY Mellon, 2007 Annual Report (Form activities or typical maturity transformation activities and also
10-K) (Feb. 28, 2008); Northern Trust, Quarterly Report for the have historically reported relatively high risk-based capital ratios.
Quarter Ended June 30, 2015 (Form 10-Q) (July 29, 2015); 60 As noted elsewhere in this white paper, overdrafts and other
Northern Trust, Quarterly Report for the Quarter Ended June short term extensions of credit to facilitate transactions by
30, 2014 (Form 10-Q) (July 28, 2014); Northern Trust, 2012 custody clientele are common assets relating to a custody
Annual Report (Form 10-K) (Feb. 26, 2013); Northern Trust, business but are not material in size relative to the business as
Quarterly Report for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2012 (Form a whole.
10-Q) (July 27, 2012); Northern Trust, 2010 Annual Report
(Form 10-K) (Feb. 25, 2011); Northern Trust, Quarterly Report 61 For example, U.S. Treasuries and most foreign sovereign debt
for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 (Form 10-Q) (July 30, securities have a zero risk weighting under the U.S. Basel
2010); Northern Trust, 2008 Annual Report (Form 10-K) (Feb. III rule’s standardized approach for counterparty credit risk,
27, 2009); Northern Trust, Quarterly Report for the Quarter meaning that banks are not required to hold any capital against
Ended June 30, 2008 (Form 10-Q) (July 31, 2007); Northern such securities reflected on their balance sheets.