Cia Review: Part 2 Study Unit 4: Engagement Planning
Cia Review: Part 2 Study Unit 4: Engagement Planning
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 1 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 2
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4
Engagements
• An engagement is a specific internal audit assignment,
task, or review activity, such as an internal audit, control
self assessment review, fraud examination, or consultancy
(The IIA Glossary).
Engagement Objectives,
Scope, and Criteria • Performance Standard 2200: Engagement Planning
o Internal auditors must develop and document a plan for
each engagement, including the engagements
4.1 objectives, scope, timing, and resource allocations. The
plan must consider the organizations strategies,
objectives, and risks relevant to the engagement.
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 3 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 4
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4
Engagement Objectives Engagement Scope
• IG 2210, Engagement Objectives • Performance Standard 2220: Engagement Scope
o Objectives assist in determining the procedures to o The established scope must be sufficient to achieve the
perform and the priorities for testing risks and controls. objectives of the engagement.
o Objectives ordinarily are based on identified key risks
relevant to the subject matter.
o Preliminary objectives of engagements are based on • Implementation Standard 2220.A1
• The plan of engagements o The scope of the engagement must include
• Prior results consideration of relevant systems, records, personnel,
• Stakeholder feedback and physical properties, including those under the
• The auditees mission and objectives control of third parties.
o Risk assessment exercises should be performed related
to the auditees governance, risk management, and
controls.
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 5 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 6
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4
A. Hourly employees are being paid only for hours actually worked as indicated by time cards or
similar reports.
B. An equitable training program exists that provides all employees with approximately the same
amount of training each year. Planning and Risk
C. Reference checks of prospective employees are being performed.
D. Recruitment is being delegated to the various departments that have personnel needs. Assessment
An effective personnel function is necessary for hiring, training, and monitoring human
resources. One purpose of this function is to recruit, select, hire, train, supervise, and
evaluate individuals who are suitable in light of job requirements, job descriptions, and job
4.2
specifications (the abilities needed for particular jobs). In a review of this function, an
appropriate objective is to determine whether the selection process is being properly
performed. Thus, a potential employees references should be checked to determine whether
(s)he is truthful and has the desired qualifications.
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 9 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 10
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 13 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 14
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4
A. Preliminary survey.
B. Survey of company policies.
C. Assignment of audit staff.
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 17 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 18
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4
• The work plan of any internal audit activity must reflect the plan to determine the priorities of the internal audit
organizations assessment of many diverse risks. activity, consistent with the organizations goals.
• The audit plan must be logically related to identified risks of the
organization.
• Interpretation of Standard 2010
• Making this connection between identified risks and how they
relate to strategic and operational goals is the primary advantage o To develop the risk based plan, the chief audit executive
of risk based audit planning. consults with senior management and the board and
• Planning also involves considering what services stakeholders obtains an understanding of the organizations
want. strategies, key business objectives, associated risks, and
• Planning for consulting services involves considering what risk management processes. The chief audit executive
benefits these engagements may offer. must review and adjust the plan, as necessary, in
response to changes in the organizations business, risks,
operations, programs, systems, and controls.
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 19 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 20
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4
Implementation The Risk-Based Audit Plan
• Implementation Standard 2010.A1 • Developing the internal audit activitys audit plan often
o The internal audit activitys plan of engagements must be based on
a documented risk assessment, undertaken at least annually. The follows developing or updating the audit universe.
input of senior management and the board must be considered in
this process. • The internal audit activitys audit plan is based on the audit
universe, input from senior management and the board,
• Implementation Standard 2010.A2 and assessed risk and exposures.
o The chief audit executive must identify and consider the
expectations of senior management, the board, and other • Key audit objectives are to provide assurance and
stakeholders for internal audit opinions and other conclusions. information to senior management and the board.
• Work schedules are based on an assessment of risk priority
• Implementation Standard 2010.C1
o The chief audit executive should consider accepting proposed
and exposure.
consulting engagements based on the engagements potential to • An internal audit usually is prepared for an annual period.
improve management of risks, add value, and improve the
organizations operations. Accepted engagements must be included But it might be for a rolling 12 month cycle or two or more
in the plan.
years with annual evaluation.
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 21 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 22
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 25 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 26
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4
Audit Risk and Its Components Audit Risk and Its Components
• Audit risk is the risk that an auditor expresses an • Control risk is the risk that internal control will not timely
inappropriate opinion on materially misstated financial prevent, or detect and correct, a material misstatement of
statements. an assertion.
o Control risk is the risk that the system of internal control
o Audit risk is the risk that the auditor will provide senior
designed and implemented by management will fail to
management and the board with flawed or incomplete achieve managements goals and objectives for the
information about governance, risk management, and account or activity under review.
control.
• Detection risk is the risk that the audit procedures intended
• Inherent risk is the susceptibility of an assertion about a to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level will not
transaction class, balance, or disclosure to a material detect a material misstatement.
misstatement before considering relevant controls. o Detection risk is the risk that the auditor will fail to
o Inherent risk is the risk arising from the nature of the discover conditions relevant to the established audit
account or activity under review. objectives for the account or activity under review.
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 27 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 28
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4
Auditor Response to Assessed Rank and Validate Risk
Risk Priorities
• Of the three components, only detection risk is under the • Risk modeling is an effective method used to rank and
auditors direct control. validate risk priorities when prioritizing engagements in the
• The internal auditor must first determine the levels of audit plan.
inherent and control risk for the account or activity under • Risk is the possibility that an event will occur having an
review. Detection risk is then adjusted to achieve an overall impact on the achievement of objectives.
acceptable level of audit risk. • Risk is measured in terms of impact and likelihood.
• All three components may be assessed in quantitative (e.g.,
scale of 1% to 100%, with 100% being maximum risk) or
nonquantitative (e.g., high, medium, low) terms.
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 29 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 30
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4
A. The external auditors have requested assistance for their upcoming annual audit.
B. A new accounts payable system is currently undergoing testing by the information technology
department.
• In establishing the appropriate priorities for the deployment of limited internal audit resources, the
CAE undertakes the following analysis:
C. Management has requested an investigation of possible lapping in receivables.
o Risk D clearly takes precedence over Risk C because D has a higher likelihood. D. The existing accounts payable system has not been audited over the past year.
o Risk C also clearly has a higher priority than Risk A because C has a higher likelihood and the
same impact.
• Choosing the higher priority between Risk B and Risk A is a matter of professional judgment based on
the organizational risk assessment and the stated priorities of senior management and the board.
o If the more likely threat is considered the greater risk, Risk B will rank higher in the internal audit
work plan.
o Likewise, if the threat with the greater possible impact causes senior management and the board
more concern, the internal audit activity will place a higher priority on Risk A.
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 31 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 32
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4
Multiple-Choice Answer Multiple-Choice Question
When a risk assessment process has been used to construct an audit engagement schedule, which Risk is measured in terms of significance and likelihood. Excessive cash disbursements due to
of the following should receive attention first? duplicate payments to vendors are events that most likely are placed in which area of a risk map?
A. The external auditors have requested assistance for their upcoming annual audit. A. Low significance, low likelihood.
B. A new accounts payable system is currently undergoing testing by the information technology B. Low significance, high likelihood.
department.
C. High significance, medium likelihood.
C. Management has requested an investigation of possible lapping in receivables.
D. High significance, low likelihood.
D. The existing accounts payable system has not been audited over the past year.
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 33 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 34
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4
Multiple-Choice Answer
Risk is measured in terms of significance and likelihood. Excessive cash disbursements due to
duplicate payments to vendors are events that most likely are placed in which area of a risk map?
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 35 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 36
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4
Managing Internal Audit
Standard and Interpretation Resources
• Performance Standard 2030: Resource Management • The CAE is primarily responsible for the sufficiency and
o The chief audit executive must ensure that internal audit management of resources, including communication of
resources are appropriate, sufficient, and effectively needs and status to senior management and the board.
deployed to achieve the approved plan. These parties ultimately must ensure the adequacy of
resources.
• Interpretation of Standard 2030 • The competencies of the internal audit staff should be
o Appropriate refers to the mix of knowledge, skills, and appropriate for the planned activities. The CAE may conduct
other competencies needed to perform the plan. a documented skills assessment based on the needs
Sufficient refers to the quantity of resources needed to identified in the risk assessment and audit plan.
accomplish the plan. Resources are effectively deployed
when they are used in a way that optimizes the
achievement of the approved plan.
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 37 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 38
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 39 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 40
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4
Outsourcing the Internal Audit
Activity Multiple-Choice Question
• An organizations governing body may decide that an external The advantage attributed to the establishment of internal auditing field offices for work at foreign
service provider is the most effective means of obtaining internal locations is best described as
audit services.
A. The possibility of increased objectivity of personnel assigned to a field office.
• Performance Standard 2070: External Service Provider and B. A reduction of travel time and related travel expense.
Organizational Responsibility for Internal Auditing C. The increased ease of maintaining uniform organization wide standards.
o When an external service provider serves as the internal audit
D. More contact with senior personnel leading to an increase in control.
activity, the provider must make the organization aware that
the organization has the responsibility for maintaining an
effective internal audit activity.
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 41 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 42
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4
Multiple-Choice Answer
The advantage attributed to the establishment of internal auditing field offices for work at foreign
locations is best described as
The advantages of field offices compared with sending internal auditors from the
home office include (1) reduced travel time and expense, (2) improved service in 4.5
the operating locations served by the field offices, (3) better morale of internal
auditors as a result of increased authority, and (4) the possibility of employing
persons who do not wish to travel.
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 43 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 44
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4
Resources at the Engagement
Level Audit Staff Schedules
• Performance Standard 2230: Engagement Resource • Audit staff schedules should be prepared to achieve
Allocation effective use of time.
o Internal auditors must determine appropriate and o Audit teams are selected based on their knowledge,
sufficient resources to achieve engagement objectives skills, and other competencies to meet engagement
based on evaluation of the nature and complexity of
each engagement, time constraints, and available objectives efficiently and effectively.
resources. o All engagements should be under budgetary control.
Project budgets and schedules should be developed for
• Engagement resource allocation is based on evaluation of each engagement.
o The number and experience of staff; o Budget adjustments need to be justified and approved
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 45 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 46
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4
A. Link internal auditors compensation to the pay for comparable positions in the controllers A. Link internal auditors compensation to the pay for comparable positions in the controllers
department. department.
B. Provide for cost of living, longevity, and merit increases annually. B. Provide for cost of living, longevity, and merit increases annually.
C. Be informal and as flexible as possible to allow the chief audit executive to respond to unusual C. Be informal and as flexible as possible to allow the chief audit executive to respond to unusual
situations. situations.
D. Be clearly stated and based on evaluations of position requirements and individual D. Be clearly stated and based on evaluations of position requirements and individual
performance. performance.
Internal auditing job descriptions are important because, among other things, they may
be used to justify adequate salaries. As part of an overall personnel management and
development program, they should be used together with periodic, formal performance
appraisals as a basis for compensation adjustments and promotions.
Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 47 Copyright © 2017 Gleim Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication prohibited. Reward for information exposing violators. Contact [email protected]. 48
CIA 2, SU 4 CIA 2, SU 4