Rochester City School District

Rochester, New York

SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSED
DRAFT BUDGET
2011-2012
FOR THE BOARD OF EDUCATION

MARCH 29, 2011

 ROCHESTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
2011 - 12 BUDGET BOOK AND DISTRICT PROFILE

BOARD OF EDUCATION FINANCE TEAM

Malik Evans, President Joyce Martelli, Chief Financial Officer
José Cruz, Vice President Vernon Connors, Budget Director
Melisza Campos David Adams, Manager of Financial Reporting
Cynthia Elliott De Lores Alexander Vickers, Clerical Support
Willa Powell Colleen Guyett, Budget Analyst
Van Henri White Karen Jacobs, Director of Financial Management
Allen Williams Charles Kaye, Senior Management Analyst
Sophie Gallivan Glendine Miller, Senior Budget Analyst
Cathy Peets, Principal Management Analyst
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Everton Sewell, Senior Budget Analyst
Jean-Claude Brizard Scott Sittig, Principal Management Analyst
Elizabeth Spalty, Senior Budget Analyst
CABINET Catherine Wilson, Project Manager
Kim Dyce-Faucette, Chief of Staff
John Scanlan, Deputy Superintendent of ACCOUNTABILITY TEAM
Administration Nita Brown, Project Manager, Administrative Analyst
Elisabeth Mascitti-Miller, Deputy Superintendent of Robert Lau, Senior Information Services Business Analyst
Teaching and Learning
Mary Doyle, Chief of School Innovation SPECIAL ASSISTANCE
Jim Fenton, Chief Strategy Officer Holly Howell, InDesign Specialist
Shaun Nelms, Chief of Northeast Zone Lorene Mulhern, Graphic Artist
Leslie Boozer, Chief of Human Capital Initiatives Brenda Smith, Print Shop Manager
Deasure Matthew, Chief of South Zone
Charles Johnson, General Counsel
Anne Brown Scott, Chief of Northwest Zone
Gladys Pedraza-Burgos, Chief of Youth Development
and Family Services
Tom Petronio, Chief Communications Officer
Jeanette Silvers, Chief Accountability Officer

For additional information regarding the District, please visit www.rcsdk12.org

 BOARD OF EDUCATION PROFILES

Malik Evans is serving his third term as Board President. He is a graduate of Roches-
ter City Schools and the University of Rochester. Elected in 2003, President Evans became
the youngest member ever to sit on the Rochester Board of Education. He is a Vice Presi-
dent with M & T Bank and he sits on the boards of several organizations. A passionate be-
liever in the power of education and the importance of community service, President Evans
is a strong role model for students in the City School District.

José Cruz was elected to the Board of Education in 2009, and is currently serving as
the Vice president of the Board. He recently retired from the Monroe County Legislator
having served a full term of ten years representing the residents in Northeast Rochester.
Commissioner Cruz graduated from Benjamin Franklin High School and is one of sev-
eral founders of the Puerto Rican Youth Development & Resource Center, Inc. (PRYD).
Commissioner Cruz serves as the Chief Operating Officer for the Ibero-American Action
League. Ibero works to foster growth and development, primarily of Hispanics, by provid-
ing advocacy, along with culturally sensitive programs and services, which are intended to
raise their socio-economic status, well-being, and citizenship awareness. Commissioner
Cruz serves on several other Boards of Directors including Ibero Investors Corporation,
Legal Aid Society, Charles Settlement House, Empire Sports Authority, and the Allendale
Columbia School.

Melisza Campos was elected to the Board of Education in 2007. She is the Vice
President of Operations and Instruction for the Dale Carnegie Rochester office. She is a
multi-course certified Dale Carnegie Master Trainer. Commissioner Campos serves as a
voice for the Latino community as well as for the Rochester community as a whole. Her
focus as a Board Member is on student achievement, community engagement and student
safety. Commissioner Campos also serves on the board of the Bivona Child Advocacy
Center and is a member of Latinas Unidas. She volunteers for the Rochester Hispanic Youth
Baseball League and Ibero American Action League.

Cynthia Elliott has a passion for Rochester’s children and families who are eco-
nomically and socially disadvantaged. She is committed to this population attaining self-
sufficiency. Commissioner Elliott is Assistant to the Executive Director of Baden Street
Settlement. She graduated from Monroe Community College, received her Bachelor’s De-
gree from St. John Fisher, and two Master’s Degrees, one from SUNY Brockport and the
other from Fielding Graduate University. Commissioner Elliott is currently working on a
Ph.D in Human and Organizational Systems.
Willa Powell was first elected to the Board of Education in 1997 and served a four-
year term. She advanced policies strengthening parent involvement in the District and en-
suring equitable school choice for all parents and students. She has long been an advocate
for strong leadership in Rochester schools, accountability for performance, and support for
student achievement. Commissioner Powell is a PTO member at School 23 and the School
of the Arts, and has served as a PTSA officer at Nathaniel Rochester Community School and
as a representative to the District Parent Council.

Van Henri White was elected to the Board of Education in 2007. Commissioner
White was instrumental in drafting and enacting a Board Policy requiring the infusion of
African/African American studies in the District’s K-12 curriculum, the first such policy to
be enacted in New York State. Commissioner White also drafted and ensured the enactment
of the first of its kind “Responsible Bidder Policy,” requiring contractors who have violated
EEOC and Human Rights Laws to prove that they are in compliance with those laws before
they receive additional funds from the District. Commissioner White has worked tirelessly
at improving school safety, decreasing truancy rates, and attacking the problem of lead poi-
soning. He is an outspoken advocate for urban education, continuously working at reversing
student dropout rates and increasing the District’s graduation rates.

Allen Williams was elected to the Board in 2007. He ran on a platform of raising
student achievement, increasing parental involvement and providing financial oversight of
the District’s finances. Commissioner Williams would like to align the District’s spending
with the dual goals of raising student achievement and closing the achievement gap. He
brings to the Board nearly 30 years of financial, accounting, and strategic planning experi-
ence. Commissioner Williams also serves on the Board of the Landmark Society of Western
New York, the ARC of Monroe County and the Urban League of Rochester Economic De-
velopment Corporation.

Sophie Gallivan is Student Representative to the Rochester Board of Education,

serving as the voice of students in matters regarding the district. She attends Joseph C.
Wilson Magnet High School and is President of Student Leadership Congress (SLC). SLC
is an organization that brings students in grades 6-12 together once a month to talk about is-
sues that concern them and to discuss what courses of action they can take to improve their
schools and lives. Sophie reports back to the Board of Education each month, telling them
SLC’s concerns, ideas, and relaying student perspectives on issues involving our schools.
SLC also engages students in community service and leadership development activities.
 TABLE OF CONTENTS DRAFT BUDGET BOOK

Introduction and Overview

City Transmittal and Resolution.................................................................................................. FINAL BOOK ONLY
Superintendent’s Letter to the Community ................................................................................................................ 1-1
District Map ............................................................................................................................................................... 1-2
2011-12 Executive Budget Summary......................................................................................................................... 1-3
RCSD Organizational Chart ....................................................................................................................................... 1-6
Reader’s Guide ........................................................................................................................................................... 1-7

Policies, Priorities and Plans

Mission and Vision .................................................................................................................................................... 2-1
Strategic Plan ............................................................................................................................................................. 2-3
School Innovation ...................................................................................................................................................... 2-6
Board Goals and Objectives ....................................................................................................................................... 2-8
Board Policies ............................................................................................................................................................ 2-9
Student Achievement ............................................................................................................................................... 2-20
Student Enrollment................................................................................................................................................... 2-34
Collective Bargaining............................................................................................................................................... 2-35

District-Wide Summary Budget

Budget Summary........................................................................................................................................................ 3-1
Revenue and Expenditures Charts .............................................................................................................................. 3-2
Assumptions and Priorities......................................................................................................................................... 3-3
Revenue Summary and Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 3-6
Expenditure Summary and Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 3-20
Position Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 3-22
Explanation of Changes to Budget ........................................................................................................................... 3-23
Multi-Year Projection .............................................................................................................................................. 3-24

School Profiles and Budgets

All Schools ................................................................................................................................................................. 4-1
Northeast Zone Schools ............................................................................................................................................. 4-8
Northwest Zone Schools .......................................................................................................................................... 4-52
South Zone Schools................................................................................................................................................ 4-106
Chiefs of Schools ................................................................................................................................................... 4-158

Program Profiles and Budgets

Overview ..................................................................................................................................... FINAL BOOK ONLY
Individual Program Summaries .................................................................................................................................. 5-1

School Support Profiles and Budgets

Teaching and Learning ............................................................................................................................................... 6-1
Youth Development and Family Services .................................................................................................................. 6-9

Administration Profiles and Budgets

Board of Education .................................................................................................................................................... 7-1
Superintendent ........................................................................................................................................................... 7-6
Chief of Staff ............................................................................................................................................................ 7-10
Accountability .......................................................................................................................................................... 7-15
Administrative Services ........................................................................................................................................... 7-21
Communications ...................................................................................................................................................... 7-36
General Counsel ....................................................................................................................................................... 7-40
Human Capital Initiatives......................................................................................................................................... 7-44
School Innovation .................................................................................................................................................... 7-49
Strategic Leadership ................................................................................................................................................. 7-54
Debt Service ............................................................................................................................................................. 7-59
District-Wide Non-Program Expense ...................................................................................................................... 7-61
Employee Benefits ................................................................................................................................................... 7-63

Capital Improvement Plan

Capital Improvement Plan and Cash Capital Plan ...................................................................... FINAL BOOK ONLY

Appendices
A – Budget Development Process .............................................................................................................................. 9-1
B – Glossary ............................................................................................................................................................... 9-5
C – District Report Card.............................................................................................................. FINAL BOOK ONLY
Introduction and Overview

Superintendent’s Letter to the Community

District Map
2011-12 Executive Budget Summary
RCSD Organizational Chart
Reader’s Guide
 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Superintendent’s Letter to the Community

Our work to become one of the nation’s most effective and well-run urban school districts continues with some
indicators showing progress and others reflecting much work ahead. Conversations around improving education
have made front page news, sharing the headlines with bleak economic news at all levels of government. For the
second year we have seen fewer dollars from the state at the same time federal transformation funding programs
are coming to an end.

According to President Barack Obama, “In a global economy where the most valuable skill you can sell is your
knowledge, a good education is no longer just a pathway to opportunity--it is a prerequisite.” As educators, we are
responsible for transmitting knowledge, skills, and values to our students to ensure they graduate with the learning
necessary to be career and college ready. As we face an $80M budget shortage, we must keep the educational needs
of our students as the guideline for all resourcing decisions.

With the introduction of Equitable Student Funding we have moved critical funding and resourcing decisions to
schools and principals. This group, with their familiarity of district goals and their own student’s needs, are in the
best position to make the difficult funding decisions resulting from the $80M gap. Our Strategic Plan identifies the
long term learning and improvement goals and helps to align our budget and educational decisions.

Guided by this plan, our budget applies dollars to programs that promote and improve language and mathemat-
ics literacy at every grade level. We continue to build our Rochester Curriculum which serves as a district wide
standards-based, aligned curriculum, expanding the work from Pre-K through 9th grade. It also includes a rigorous
on-line course catalog for our secondary schools in all academic areas including science and social studies. The
work in teaching and learning is critical to aligning our work with the newly adopted Common Core State Stan-
dards. Funding has been applied to a group of newly created secondary schools that are focused on creating choice
and challenging learning environments for many of our secondary students.

Finally, we have started initial work around identifying, hiring, and supporting highly effective teachers and admin-
istrators. Research confirms our belief that our core business of improving student achievement rests largely upon
the people we have teaching and leading in our schools. As we enhance our platform for developing our human
capital, we will be implementing new support and evaluation tools to ensure every child has access to high-quality
educational experiences.

We continued our work to create more efficient and effective support teams for our schools resulting in better re-
sults for our students. We believe our proposed budget maximizes this focus to more effectively deliver educational
services to all students, using decisions based on sound data and sound financial practices.

In developing the 2011-12 budget, once again we collected input from staff, parents, our employee groups, and the
community. This budget reflects many difficult trades and decisions. As last year, this budget represents a tightly
integrated plan that supports our strategic and operational goals as a district while ensuring schools are able to cre-
ate masterpieces.

Sincerely,

Jean-Claude Brizard
Superintendent of Schools

Section 1 Page 1
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Section 1 Page 2
 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Exectutive Summary

The development of the 2011-12 proposed budget has been a challenging journey. Many more people have been
involved in this process than in the past. With this collaboration we aligned our revenues with our goals to support
current and new educational innovations. This allocation supports the district’s purpose, goals, strategic intent, and
our core values. The journey has been one with difficult choices, weighing the educational needs of students and the
ability of the community and the State to provide the necessary financial support.

The implementation of Equitable Student Funding has supported RCSD in delivering a budget that provides more
equity of resources to our schools and the students they serve, transparency of how schools are funded, and affords
leaders the flexibility that they need to organize the talent, time and technology around the vision and the needs for our
students. The involvement of principals and school communities, those closest to our students, will begin to transform
our educational system to better student performance.

Financial Highlights and analysis

Last year we stated that financial challenges were likely to continue for the next several years and indeed they have.
As New York State faces a $10 billion deficit, our new Governor has proposed cuts and changes to education funding.
As the State looks for ways of reducing their deficit, they will continue to evaluate the calculations of foundation aid,
State grant aid, building and transportation aid. The Governor has stated that Districts need to find more efficient and
effective ways of delivering services and should not anticipate additional revenue this year or in the next few years.
Rochester City School District (RCSD) has met that challenge and continues to search for streamlining capabilities.
RCSD started the budget planning process with an $80 million deficit. This deficit was created by a reduction of
available revenue totaling approximately $29 million and increasing costs of $51 million. The $29 million decrease
in financial resources is comprised of a $4 million decrease in State funding, $1 million fewer grant funds and the
unavailability of $24 million from District fund balance used last year to balance the 2010-11budget. This fund bal-
ance allocation to operations allowed us to cover rising costs and release fewer employees however that reduction in
personnel has now have been pushed into the 2011-12 budget year. The Governor’s budget proposed a $4 million
decrease in State funding and we are fortunate that the decrease is small compared to other large urban districts in New
York. The small decrease is due to revenue recognition and enhancements that the District generated this year. We
anticipate that grant dollars will continue to grow as we develop proposals to receive additional School Improvement
Grants (SIG), Teacher Incentive Funding (TIF), and other grants for school reform and support.

We continue to see rising costs. This remains our largest concern and challenge! Our projection of these rising costs
and planning assumptions are based on information provided by various sources such as Teachers and Employees
Retirement System, insurance carriers, and various vendors such as BOCES, transportation providers. Historical
analysis was used to validate planning assumptions and provide the pattern of expense changes from year to year.

Major increases planned for this year included an $11 million increase in salaries due to contractual obligations; $26
million in employee benefits; $9 million in fixed obligations such as Charter School tuition, transportation, Special
Education tuition; $2 million in facilities, and another $3 million in various other expenses.
The largest increase, $26 million in employee benefits, is an area that continues to be of great concern for the District.
This figure includes a $10.9 million dollar increase to Teacher’s and Employee Retirement System. Rates are project-
ed to increase close to 5% in one year. Our health insurance will also increase by approximately $7.5 million which
is an increase from 9.7% to 11.65% to accommodate the change in Federal changes in health care law. We also will
incur the first of a 5 year payout of for the State Retirement Incentive that was given late in 2009-10. This payment is
projected to be almost $6 million starting in 2011-12. The additional $2 million is related to workers’ compensation
and other employee insurances.
We struggle to meet the growing costs of the District and are reviewing alternatives to increase employee benefit
contributions as well as contract and procurement proposals from potential providers. We will continue to search for
additional grants to support our reform efforts in the District.

Section 1 Page 3
 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Financial Highlights and analysis – continued

The Federal government has made available many new grants but these grants also come with increased constraints
around how the dollars are to be used. The State has also announced that new competitive grants will be created,
however, with these new grants comes growing compliance measures and documentation to ensure proper spending
and to hold Districts accountable for measureable improvement.

Using the Governor’s Proposed Budget as a baseline, our draft budget projection for revenue is $677,673,533. This is
$16 million less than our original budget of 2010-11 ($693million), which included the use of $24 million of our fund
balance. With the fund balance well below acceptable risk levels and unavailable to augment our other revenues,, the
cuts in district-wide staffing, program elimination and reduction, and further reductions in district-wide operational
expenditures were required. Principals and school leaders were instrumental in making this year’s investment deci-
sions with the implementation of Equitable Student Funding. This allocation methodology gave more authority to
principals and allowed them to tailor their resources to ensure that a quality education is provided to their students.
With a significant reduction in the budget these decisions were not easy. As always, programs and projects have been
reviewed with rigorous scrutiny. Our resource investment aligns with our strategic goals of increasing mastery of the
curriculum, ensuring that each student is post-secondary ready and closing the achievement gap.

We analyzed all accounts for spending patterns and potential reduction opportunities. The budget reflects
a number of cuts touching all areas of the District, from central office to schools. We have minimized the
personnel cuts in the schools over the past three years. However staffing outside of the schools has taken
reductions for the past two year and will see additional reductions in the 2011-12 budget. With the magni-
tude of the deficit, which is primarily salaries and benefits, reductions at the school level will be required
this year. The reduction in force achieved approximately $62 million of savings towards the budget deficit.
The remaining $18 million was reduced through the change in programs, further reduction in the use of tem-
porary personnel, procurement of fewer supplies, less spending on professional development and contracts
where possible.

The budget highlights the major issues that we are faced with this year. Our work is not finished. We will
need to continue to monitor our expenditures as we close out the current school year. As the economy
continues to fluctuate and costs continue to rise we will evaluate and make changes throughout the coming
budget execution year. We continue to renegotiate existing contracts and look for other efficiencies in de-
livering a quality education to our children.

Budget concerns

State aid most likely will continue to decrease. The State has continued the calculation freeze from 2007-08. Fur-
ther reductions may come through the Gap Elimination Adjustment (GEA) in future years as they restructure how
funding is given to the various districts. Conversations have been held in Albany to restructure funding around Build-
ing Aid and Transportation Aid.

Declining District Fund Balance. A large portion of the fund balance ($25 million) was used in 2010-11 to maintain
the integrity of our programs while we evaluated and structured our District initiatives. Mid-year increases from the
State also have added to the reduction of that balance beyond the $25 million. It is predicted that our undesignated
portion of our fund balance will not meet the needs of even one payroll cycle which is approximately $17 million.

Increase in compliance measures. Federal and State funding sources have increased reporting and compliance
measures. This increase places additional work on program and office staff. As a result additional funding will be
required to increase staff or to allow for overtime.

Section 1 Page 4
 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Budget concerns – continued

Increase in competitive grants vs. categorical grants. Federal and State funding sources are decreasing and more
organizations are applying for the same funds. We are seeing a movement toward competitive grants which will
tighten requirements and funds will be awarded to a smaller number of organizations.

Conclusion

The budget presented is a tightly integrated and well balanced solution to the deficit problem we face this year. We
must continue to invest our resources in areas to further our mission. We must also continue our work to reduce
costs, generate additional resources and lessen reliance on our fund balance. As always, our focus will remain on
providing the highest quality education possible for every one of our children.

Section 1 Page 5
 ROCHESTER Board of Education
CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
2010 - 2011
2010-2011
General Superintendent Chief of Staff
Counsel

Chief Chief of Chief

Deputy Chief of Chief of Chief of Human Deputy
Strategy Youth Development Communications
Superintendent of School Innovation Accountability Capital Initiatives Superintendent of
Officer and Family Services Officer
Teaching and Learning Administration

Professional Learning Parent

School Engagement Finance/Budget
Chiefs Budget
Early Childhood Student
Attendance Procurement
K-12 Literacy
Student
Accounting
Placement
K-12 Mathematics
Youth Development IDEA
(Social Work, Guidance)
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

K-12 Social Studies Grants

Adult

Section 1 Page 6
Education Payroll
K-12 Science
Health and
Human Services District
Arts/Music Education Food Services
Operations
Community
Health/Physical Education Partnerships
Facilities

Specialized Services
Transportation

English Language Learners; LOTE

Information
Technology
African/African-American Studies

Instructional Technology
Labor
2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Relations
Career and Technical Education

Library Services
School Rev. 3/2011
Academic Intervention Safety
 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Reading the Rscd Budget Book

The 2011-12 Rochester City School District’s Budget Book has been revised this year to include additional financial
and academic information. This book may be used as a resource book throughout the year. You will find that this
year’s presentation includes additional transparency into all departments to provide you, the reader, with a better
understanding of the District’s policies and plans, schools and programs, and overall operations. Our main focus con-
tinues to be the equitable management of funding provided to the students and the schools and programs that support
their development and success.

The financial information of the District is based on our fiscal year, which runs from July 1st through June 30th.
Budget presentations include two fiscal years in some cases and three fiscal years in others. For the overall budget
summaries, the actual totals from FY 2010 are listed along with the current year (FY 2011) and the proposed FY 2012
budget for comparative purposes. Any presentation of FY 2011 is based on the February 2011 amended budget and
includes the most current information that will be carried forward to June 30, 2011. The proposed budget column is
the projection for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2012. The numbers used for the proposed budget are also based on
the most current information known by the District at the time of this presentation.

Organization of The Book

The budget book is divided into sections in order to facilitate the reader’s use. A Table of Contents provides a road-
map for the information.

Sections 1 and 2: Introduction and Overview and Policies, Priorities and Plans, contain basic information con-
cerning District operations as a whole. Documents explain the priorities of the District through the guidance of the
Superintendent, an Executive Budget Summary, Mission and Vision, Student Achievement, Enrollment and Collec-
tive Bargaining overviews. These sections also contain Student Achievement information for the District based on
information reflected from the 2009-10 school year.

Section 3: The District-Wide Summary Budget provides information concerning all revenue sources as well as the
breakdown of expenditures by major categories. In addition, this section includes assumptions used to develop the
2011-12 proposed budget, positions by expenditure account, and a multi-year projection.

It is important to remember that projections are made for a specific point in time. Projections are updated on a regu-
lar basis with information received from federal and state sources, changes in contracts, and changes in purchasing
trends.

Section 4: The School Profiles and Budgets section has been expanded this year. The section divides information
according to zones (Northeast, Northwest, and South). Two pages are dedicated to each school highlighting their aca-
demic profile and their financial information.

The Profile page will provide you with 2009-10 test scores, New York State Education Department (NYSED) Basic
Educational Data Systems (BEDS) enrollment data, and attendance and demographics of student populations. The
demographics section will include recent immigration data on student’s from foreign countries. The Budget will in-
clude teacher and staff breakdowns, revenue resources, and proposed expenditures.

The next two pages will show an example of the school pages with additional guidance to assist you in understanding
the information and the sources used in their creation.

Section 1 Page 7
 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Kimberly Harris-Pappin School 01

Data From School Year 2009-10 Martin B. Anderson

Mission: We enhance each student’s ability to achieve excellence through a multi-disciplinary approach. We offer a collaborative school community that
integrates a village of positive role models in students’ lives to promote critical thinking and lifelong learning.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 62.7% 37.5% 45.5% 50.0% 48.9% MATH-3 65.6% 71.1% 56.8% 79.5% 42.2%
ELA-4 43.2% 52.5% 53.8% 65.0% 18.4% MATH-4 59.6% 65.5% 68.3% 59.5% 13.5%
ELA-5 48.5% 48.7% 79.2% 87.2% 22.2% MATH-5 57.4% 60.0% 63.6% 64.1% 14.3%
ELA-6 38.1% 51.6% Performance
68.4% 91.7% and
25.5% MATH-6 11.6% 67.7% 83.8% 78.7% 34.8%
ELA-7 projected goals in MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 49.3% 48.3% ELA, 74.3%
62.6% Math,
Science
29.5% Total 3-8 51.1% 65.4% 67.2% 70.7% 27.6%
and Social Studies as
ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
reported from New
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.
York State Educa-
SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 tion Department SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
(NYSED)
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 78.7% 77.4% Elementary
90.2% 68.0% schools
51.4% Social Studies-5 92.8% 73.2% 94.6% 84.6% 83.3%
Science-8 include K-2 Test Social Studies-8
Results
RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS
KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.3 4.0 4.5 Grade 1 28.9% 22.2%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.2 4.4 4.6 Grade 2 25.6% 9.3%
Movement, Music 4.2 4.2 4.7
Science 4.1 4.3 4.1

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
School’s account- IY2 - Improvement Year 2
Profile

ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS
ability
MATHstatus based on
STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
NewSCIENCE
York State Edu-
STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
cation Department
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N
RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
OVERALL GS GS GS GS GS GS
reports (NYSED). RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 303 303 295 299 Total 2 2 0 1
American Indian or Alaska Native 1.0% 1.3% 1.2% Percent of Enrollment 0.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.3%
Black or African American 71.6% 74.6% 75.2% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 2.3% 2.3% 1.5%
Hispanic 10.2% 8.9% 8.3% Country 1 Kenya Kenya Liberia
White 14.2% 11.6% 12.5%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2
Multi 0.7% 1.3% 1.2%
* Projected Country 3 Enrollment, attendance and recent
immigration demographics reported
ATTENDANCE
from the RCSD Accountability
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Department. Projection of 2011-12
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 94.1% 94.1% 94.6% 93.7% enrollment is based on the current
numbers of 2010-11. Using this as
a base, historical and current infor-
mation was used to project reten-
tion, graduation, changes in school
structure, and other items for the
projected 2011-12. This projection
was used in the Equitable Student
Funding allocation. numbers.

Section 1 Page 8
 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Staffing allocation and ratios of the

school.

All funding resources received

by the school.

How all funding resources were allocated

by principal and school leaders.

Budget
Calculation of Equitable Student
Funding resources

Section 1 Page 9
 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Reading the Rscd Budget Book – continued

Section 5: The Program Profiles and Budget section presents goals, objectives, and measures of achievement for
programs within the District’s Strategic Plan. The information presented here shows the cost of the program and is
also included in the school budgets. Each program will include the number of students served, locations, program
description, objectives, revenue sources, expenditures, related positions, and costs per student. This information is
used throughout the year in evaluating program achievements and decisions for continuation.

Section 6: School Support Profiles and Budgets provide the reader with information on two departments that
directly support the schools. The departments are Teaching and Learning and Youth Development and Family Servic-
es. Teaching and Learning departmental budgets include Academic Support, Pupil Personnel, and Special Services.
Youth Development and Family Services (YDFS) budgets include Adult and Career Education, Parent Engagement,
Student Placement & Equity, and Youth and Family Support. The two departments will provide information concern-
ing full-time equivelents (FTEs), expenditures by major category, full departments, sub-departments, and locations.

Section 7: The Administration Profiles and Budgets section contains budget information for district-wide depart-
ments. The budgeted expenses in this section are not related to a particular program or school, but must be budgeted
SECTION
for the operations 5: The Also
of the District. Program Profiles
included and Budgets
are payments sectionCharter
to BOCES, presents goals,
school objectives
tuition, and items that
and other
measures of achievement for programs within the District’s Strategic Plan. The information
are monitored centrally. District-wide expenses include items such as utilities, transportation, and employee ben-
presented here shows the cost of the program and is also included in the school budgets. Each
efits. Information provided
program will include
will include a description
the number of each
of students department,
served, locations,FTEs, anddescription,
program expenditures by major category.
objectives,
Within each major
revenuedepartment there are sub-departments
sources, expenditures, that
related positions andwill giveperfurther
costs clarification
student. of expenditures.
This information is used
throughout the year in evaluating program achievements and decisions for continuation.
Sections 6 and 7: School Support Profiles and Budgets and Administration Profiles and Budgets, reference a
SECTIONS
5-digit department code in6 and 7: School Support
the Management Profiles
Financial and Budgets
Discussion and Administration
and Analysis pages. The Profiles and
first three digits tell the
Budgets, reference a 5-digit department code in the Management Financial Discussion and
physical location and the last two digits represent the different functions. Although the location is clear based on the
Analysis
description, the pages.
function The
is not first three digits tell
self-explanatory. Thethe physical
chart belowlocation and
explains thethefunctions.
last two digits represent
the different functions. Although the location is clear based on the description, the function is not
self-explanatory. The chart below explains the functions.

Dept. ID Description
xxx01 Preschool/Early Childhood Programs
xxx02 Elementary Schools
xxx03 Workforce Preparation
xxx04 Middle Schools
xxx05 High Schools
xxx06 School Food Service
xxx07 Support to Private & Parochial Schools
xxx08 Student Support Services
xxx09 Summer School
xxx12 Financial Services
xxx13 Central Services
xxx14 Transportation
xxx15 Facilities
xxx16 District Management
xxx17 Academic Support
xxx18 Board of Education
xxx19 District wide Non-program Expenses
xxx20 Employee Benefits
xxx21 Debt Service
xxx22 Capital Expenses
xxx26 Charter Schools

School Support Profiles and Budgets provide the reader with information on two departments
that directly support the schools. The departments are Teaching and Learning and Youth
Development and Family Services. Teaching and Learning departmental budgets include
Academic Support, Pupil Personnel and Special Services. Youth Development and Family
Services (YDFS) budgets include Adult and 1Career
Section Education, Parent Engagement, Student
Page 10
Placement & Equity, and Youth and Family Support. The two departments will provide
information concerning FTEs, expenditures by major category, full department, sub-departments,
 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Reading the Rscd Budget Book – continued

Section 8: Capital Improvement Plan The Rochester City School District’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
and Cash Capital Plan is a five-year financing strategy for the construction and reconstruction of facilities, the acquisi-
tion and replacement of vehicles and equipment, and the completion of other long-term capital projects.

Section 9: Appendices include additional information that will help you in understanding the Rochester City
School District. Presentations and explanations of programs and departments are brief and meant to provide a concise
overview of the area. Additional information may be found on our website or by contacting the District’s Communi-
cations Department.

This budget publication is available in several different formats:

• PDF format may be found on the website at www.rcsdk12.org

• Printed version may be reviewed at the District office located at: 131 West Broad St, Rochester, NY 14614
• CD or printed version may be requested by contacting the District’s Communications Department at
585.262.8363.

Section 1 Page 11
 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Overview of Equitable Student Funding

Equitable Student Funding (ESF), also known as student-based budgeting or “backpack funding”, distributes dollars
to schools based on their student enrollment and demographics. Under this model, RCSD developed a formula that
“weights” each student type based on their need. Weights differ by student type because their needs, and therefore the
resources necessary are different.

Equitable Student Funding, ESF allocation, is just one component of how dollars are allocated to schools. Other
categories include:

• Grant and Special Funds – funding sources that have restrictions on how dollars are spent. This funding
source has been worked by our grant department and their monitors to properly distribute according to grant
and special fund compliance. Examples of this funds would be IDEA, Title grants other than Title I, School
Improvement Grants (SIG),etc. This funding cannot be allocated through the ESF allocation.
• Locked Funds – resources that RCSD will manage centrally due to compelling reasons - consistency, predict-
ability, or economies of scale.
• Curriculum Index Funds – resources that RCSD has given to a school to fulfill the specific goals that the
district may have for that school. Examples of this funding would be the School of the Arts, or Career and
Technology Schools. Curriculum funds are given typically to grow the designated portfolio of the District.

Section 1 Page 12
 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Key Messages for Equitable Student Funding

The journey in implementing Equitable Student Funding this year has been rewarding and challenging. We are
pleased with the progress we have made and realize that there is much work ahead of us. ESF is not a stagnant pro-
cess. As our District continues to grow, learn and change this model will also. It is important for us to keep these
three key messages in our thoughts:

1. ESF is not the cause of our budget shortfall. ESF is not the reason that many staffing decisions were made this
year. The stagnant economy has resulted in major budget cuts at the State level, federal resources continue to
diminish and the District does not have available a significant fund balance to sustain the staff levels we have had
in the past. Whether we used ESF or another budget model there is less funding available and difficult budget
decisions would still be needed. The ESF allocation actually allowed us to invest our limited funds more strategi-
cally to support student needs by involving the principals and school leaders at a higher level.
2. ESF puts children first. Students are our top priority. Through ESF, funding is assigned to each student based
on need. The focus is on making sure EVERY child receives the resources needed to succeed. The objective
remains of supporting our strategic goals for the academic achievement of our students.
3. ESF puts decision-making in the hands of those closest to students. Principals and school leadership are the
ones that can make the best decisions about our student needs. This model gives them more of the decision-
making ability. Principals have greater flexibility and “bounded” autonomy in making the decisions that affect
their students and support their schools’ academic plans. This will allow for a higher academic impact for the
students of their school.

The following page details for you the weights used in the ESF allocation for this first year of implementation. Each
school page will also show you additional funds given to the schools in the areas of grant and special funds, locked
funds, and curriculum index funds.

Section 1 Page 13
 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Equitable Student Funding

Weighting Model

Equitable Student Funding (ESF) generates "weights" for three categories of students. The first
category applied to all students and was called the "base weight" . Every projected student in
the district was allocated a "base weight" to bring to their schools.

Category of Student Weight Enrollment Weight Total

Total Enrollment 30,976 $3,682 $114,055,105

The second category is a weight applied to support the additional costs to educate special
education students. Special education students were assigned an additional weight to help fund the
extra cost of providing special education services in each school. Some special education classes
received funding through a central allocation and thus are not reflected in this target.

"Unlocked" Special Education 4,385 $5,856 $25,678,560

The third category is a weight given to English Language Learners to support their unique
requirements. English Language Learners were assigned weights based upon their proficiency level.
Each proficiency level mandates a certain amount of individualized attention and the weights were
assigned to account for these differences.

ELL - Beginner K-8 1,067 $2,396 $2,556,465

ELL - Beginner 9-12 382 3,594 1,372,908
ELL Intermediate 905 2,396 2,168,380
ELL Advanced 608 1,198 728,384

Total Equitable Student Funding Pool $146,559,802

Section 1 Page 14
Policies, Priorities and Plans

Mission and Vision

Strategic Plan
School Innovation
Board Goals and Objectives
Board Policies
Student Achievement
Student Enrollment
Collective Bargaining
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Mission and Vision

During this past year we have worked to strengthen and refine the mission and vision of the Rochester City School
District as defined in our strategic plan. This is truly a district-wide plan and all departments have reviewed their
work and aligned their actions to meet the objectives stated in that plan. Our vision of “Every child is a work of
art. Create a Masterpiece” is the center, the heart, of every action. We are dedicated to improving every child in our
district. Our children must be prepared for the future no matter what path they chose to take in life – college or the
trades – citizens that will be active participants in our society.

The economic status of our state and nation makes our mission and vision more difficult to manage. This year we
have had a difficult task of maximizing the use of limited financial resources; finding the right people to fill critical
positions; and managing initiatives. All this while fulfilling the mission to educate every child puts a tremendous
strain on school district leaders. However, we continue to accelerate our efforts to focus on closing the achievement
gaps. The financial resources have been reviewed and invested in the reform of our schools and programs to ensure
that we are receiving maximum value to increase student performance.

Our work continues to change the structure of Rochester schools. We believe that strategy is the successful way to
align the organization for dramatic transformation.

Our Core Values continue to guide all of our work.

• Achievement – Improving student achievement through a laser-like focus on teaching and learning with
an emphasis on results.

• Equity - Equitable distribution of resources based on the needs of schools and students.

• Accountability – Use of data to ensure that we hold adults accountable for the success of all students.

We continue to make district operations more efficient and effective. and move district operations to focus on the
needs of our students and our school. This has been one of the main objectives in changing the district budgeting
mechanism to Equitable Student Funding. This mechanism places equity and accountability, two of our core values,
in the center of our financial discussions. Equity is reflected in the distribution of financial resources based on the
student enrollment and student need demographics of each school. Accountability is demonstrated by the movement
of decision making for these dollars to the principals of the schools. Central office has become more responsive by
using School Reform Teams to support principals in aligning their academic plans and using their financial resources
to best meet the needs of their students. We are committed to using continuous improvement methodologies to
improve our performances, as demonstrated by the use of School Reform Teams.

Our strategic plan will be updated and revised based on the changing environment in which we operate. We will
continue to cascade well-defined curriculum and clear academic goals to schools as part of the District’s state and
federal accountability. We continue to invest in our goals, which includes, school specific performance targets in
literacy and mathematics for all grade levels, secondary graduation targets, the delivery of post-secondary ready
students to our nation’s colleges and work force. Our new governor has stated that we will see declines in financial
resources for the next three years. We are prepared and will continue to handle these challenges while giving our
students the quality education that they deserve.

Accountable Budget Book: This year continues our development of a transparent budget. School budgets have been
expanded to two pages this year. This will continue to provide the reader with data around school performance, and
the alignment of dollars assigned based on student demographics and estimated enrollment.

Section 2 Page 1
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Mission and Vision – continued

The budget highlights the facts that we are faced with reductions in revenue and increasing cost of expenditures.
With the loss of ARRA funding, difficult decisions that were not made in the past became necessary this year. Many
lay-offs will occur as well as the reduction or elimination of additional programs. As the budget was developed, ques-
tions were asked to ensure dollars continued to support high level priorities such as: improvements in literacy and
mathematics, increased cohort graduation rates, and the District’s improvement agenda.

While the decline of revenue does limit our decision-making, we remain focused to make decisions that support the
strategy, focus on priority outcomes, and improve the learning opportunities for every student. We must fund the
“hows” that produce increased results that are orders of magnitude above our current academic performance.

State Budget Crisis: As of February, 2011, Albany has publicized a $10 billion deficit. We planned for the loss of our
ARRA funding with no additional funding coming from the State to fill in for the loss of ARRA funding. This, along
with the inability to put $25 million from our undesignated fund balance and increasing costs of our expenditures
created an $80 million dollar deficit for the District. Political turmoil in Albany continues and the final impact on
educational funding is unclear. As previously highlighted, our governor has stated that there will continue to be a re-
duction in education dollars for the next three years. It is unclear as to whether there will be additional costs that will
need to be funded by District such as the cost of regents’ exams, change in building aid, and change in transportation
aid. The governor has also stated that the possibility of more dollars being shifted to competitive grants as the State
as historical State aid is decreased.

For two consecutive years, reductions were made by operational leadership and managers in reducing the cost of do-
ing business, eliminate waste in our processes, and stop spending that did not directly support academic goals. During
this time Central office operational budgets were slashed by 40% and Central office positions were also reduced. We
have been able to keep reductions away from the schools. We accomplished this by creating support staffing ratios,
eliminating work content and gaining efficiencies in operations. This year, we were not able to hold the reduction
from the school budgets. School funding was reduced by 15% and again, Central office departments were reduced
by 15 – 20%, depending on the structure of fixed costs vs. discretionary costs of each department. Prior years’ reduc-
tion of operating expenses leftvery little room for reduction due to increased cost of items such as leases, contractual
obligations, pension costs, and other employee benefits. We identified spending priorities that eliminated the $80
million deficit.

Conclusion: Our journey and improvements continues! We are faced with potential changes to educational funding
and the State’s fiscal problems. We continue to be concerned with the drop in Federal funding and also with local
funding stability. The road is not smooth, but will persevere. Our strategic plan will guide us and we will continue to
monitor our progress closely. We will continue our journey toward creating masterpieces!

Section 2 Page 2
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Strategic Plan

THE DISTRICT’S STRATEGIC PLAN

In today’s uncertain world, the demands on school districts have never been greater. Yet the challenges of meeting
those demands increase on a daily basis. Strategic insight is needed to inform decisions on how to best allocate re-
sources, adapt to changing realities in funding, and energize employees and volunteers.

The basis of the district’s vision to “Create a Masterpiece” is the strategic plan. The balanced scorecard management
structure helps us shape our strategy and define our objectives in a way that helps us focus and communicate. The
balanced scorecard is a multilevel management system that will track performance across four perspectives: opera-
tional excellence, internal processes, stakeholders, and student achievement. Through the balanced scorecard we
create a road map for our strategy, outline performance measures, and target key issues to be addressed to improve
performance. By adopting the balanced scorecard strategic structure, we are now able to set and monitor goals and
communicate progress throughout the organization.

Last year (2010), through the effective use of strategy, district performance improved in several areas. The district’s
four year graduation rate increased by more than 8% due to a focused effort to keep students in school and a compre-
hensive summer school program. Also, Math and ELA achievement scores for Grades 3 through 8 continued to trend
upward.

For 2011-2012, we will focus on improving the processes associated with educating children. For instance, by analyz-
ing the root causes of literacy performance, we will learn how to target resources to where they will be most effective.
Also, by focusing on processes that help students stay on track to graduate, we will look for continued improvement
in results.

Section 2 Page 3
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Rochester City School District Scorecard

Perspective
Objectives Measures Initiatives

Student Achievement
Every student is post- % of students graduating with Advanced Build School level scorecard that includes school
secondary ready. Regents climate and outcome indicators.
% students graduating within 4 years Comprehensive Education Plan (CEP) alignment
to strategic plan.
% of graduates enrolled in college year 2 Track student progress 2 years and 4 years
(NSDC) beyond high school into college.
Increase mastery of % of 9th graders passing Algebra I The Rochester Curriculum/Human Capital
curriculum. Regents Initiative
Proficiency in Grade 8 ELA and Math The Rochester Curriculum/Human Capital
Initiative
Proficiency in Grades 3-6 ELA and Math The Rochester Curriculum/Human Capital
Initiative
Proficiency on K-2 nationally-normed The Rochester Curriculum/Human Capital
assessments Initiative
Close achievement gap. % closure of achievement gap among all The Disproportionality Project - NYU
subgroups of students

Stakeholders
“Has prepared me for % of graduate-respondents responding Build a college-going culture campaign to raise
college and career.” positively (midpoint or higher on ordinal student/family awareness/knowledge of college.
scale)
“Cares about my child’s % of parent-respondents responding Develop plan to address system-wide security
success and safety.” positively (midpoint or higher on ordinal issues through collaboration between School
scale) Safety and Youth Development.
“Values and supports my % of staff-respondents responding Align parent engagement efforts to School
contribution to student positively (midpoint or higher on ordinal Improvement Plan.
success.” scale)
“Is an asset to the % positive media mentions Implement new district-wide newspaper for
community.” distribution three times annually.
% of community-respondents responding Build capacity in District departments and at
positively (midpoint or higher on ordinal school level to maximize use of communications
scale) tools to support stakeholder connections.
Internal Processes
Build a learning # of incidents per 100 students Monitor incident report data to inform plan roll out
environment that and school supports needs.
supports student
success.
Create an innovative % of students demanding school as first Portfolio of Schools
portfolio of high-quality choice
choices for families.
Support the whole child % of schools with documented PBS Build a youth development framework focused on
through a systems strategy three tiers: prevention, early intervention, and
approach to school intensive intervention across student development
culture and climate. domains (social/emotional learning, adult
connections, bio-psycho-social, positive
behavioral supports, effective instruction).

Section 2 Page 4
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Rochester City School District Scorecard

Perspective
Perspective
Objectives Measures Initiatives
Objectives Measures Initiatives
Focus on college and % enrolled and % passing AP courses Through college-going campaign and other
Student Achievement
career readiness. communications, clarify the link between college
and career readiness for students and families.
Every student is post- % of students graduating with Advanced Build School level scorecard that includes school
secondary ready. % increase on average PSAT scores
Regents Establish
climate a college
and outcomereadiness
indicators.framework (e.g.
Regents exam, PSAT, SAT and AP participation
% students graduating within 4 years Comprehensive Education Plan (CEP) alignment
and performance) and college enrollment
to strategic plan.
indicators (acceptance to 2 and 4 year colleges).
% of graduates enrolled in college year 2 Track student progress 2 years and 4 years
% of students (by cohort) on track to Use data to examine performance of every
(NSDC) beyond high school into college.
graduate (Regents and credit student, not simply averages across students, to
Increase mastery of % of 9th graders passing Algebra I
accumulation) The Rochester
manage Curriculum/Human
and deliver Capital
effective instruction.
curriculum. Regents Initiative
Ensure academic rigor % gap between ELL and Special Support and hold school leaders accountable for
for every student. Proficiency in Gradeand
Education students 8 ELA and Math
general The RochesterRochester
implementing Curriculum/Human
CurriculumCapital
Framework.
population Initiative
Differentiate student Proficiency
% of schools in that
Grades
have3-6
anELA and Math
effective RtI The Rochester
Develop Curriculum/Human
protocols Capital
and metrics to track and
support to meet the framework Initiative
improve the model.
needs of every student. Proficiency on K-2 nationally-normed The Rochester Curriculum/Human Capital
Develop and support assessments
% of principals rated highly effective Initiative
Support school leaders in School Improvement
diverse
Close and highly gap. % closure of achievement gap among all
achievement planning
The and goal-setting.
Disproportionality Project - NYU
effective school leaders. subgroups of students
% of teachers retained by building by Provide ongoing, principal-driven professional
Stakeholders school development, mentoring, and coaching through
RLA.
“Has prepared me for % of graduate-respondents responding Build a college-going culture campaign to raise
Develop and support
college and career.” a % of teachers rated highly effective
positively (midpoint or higher on ordinal (as Provide specific
student/family research-based professional
awareness/knowledge of college.
diverse set of highly compared
scale) to student performance development for teachers on how to teach the
committed and effective outcomes) Rochester Curriculum to English Language
“Cares
teachers.about my child’s % of parent-respondents responding Develop
Learners. plan to address system-wide security
success and safety.” positively (midpoint or higher on ordinal issues through collaboration between School
Create a culture in which scale)
% of teacher and principal observations Improve
Safety andalignment between teacher evaluation
Youth Development.
we hold ourselves completed and posted and tenure recommendations.
“Values and supports
accountable my % of staff-respondents responding
for student Align parent engagement efforts to School
contribution
success. to student % of cabinet
positively members
(midpoint or rated
higher highly
on ordinal Regular school
Improvement site/support visits by senior
Plan.
success.” effective
scale) leadership team.
“Is an asset to the %% positive
of RCSDmedia
employees evaluated
mentions Development
Implement newofdistrict-wide
personal scorecards
newspaper forfor
community.” performance
distribution management.
three times annually.
%% of
of community-respondents
students absent from class Development
responding Build capacity of data warehouse
in District departments system
andto at
positively (midpoint or higher on ordinal monitorlevel
school attendance.
to maximize use of communications
Recruit and retain talent. scale)
% of job offers accepted tools
Buildtoa support
pipeline stakeholder
through localconnections.
and national
Internal Processes recruitment efforts.
Build a learning #Ethnic and racial
of incidents per diversity of teachers and Monitor
100 students Build a pipeline
incident through local
report data toand national
inform plan roll out
environment that administrators recruitment efforts.
and school supports needs.
supports student
Operational Excellence
success.
Ensure transparency and % of schools demonstrating school based Equitable Student Funding
Create an innovative % of students demanding school as first Portfolio of Schools
equity in resource planning team participation in budget
portfolio of high-quality choice
distribution. development
choices for families.
Become a Strategy- # of strategy meetings Use strategic framework to monitor progress and
Support the whole child % of schools with documented PBS Build a youth development framework focused on
Focused Organization. inform decision making.
through a systems strategy three tiers: prevention, early intervention, and
approach to school # of measures reported out/discussed at Comprehensive
intensive Education
intervention acrossPlan (CEP)
student alignment
development
culture and climate. strategy meetings to strategic
domains plan.
(social/emotional learning, adult
Best in class standards # at median or above on Council of Great connections,
Create operatingbio-psycho-social,
processes andpositive
procedures to
of efficiency and behavioral supports,
City Schools' KPIs for target benchmarks define, align, and streamline effectivedistrict
instruction).
operations.
customer service.
Use data to inform # of identified and improved processes Assess and continuously improve training and
decisions and actions. other supports to help schools use data to
improve teaching and learning.

Section 2 Page 5
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School Innovation

Creating the Right School for Every Child

The Rochester City School District seeks to ensure that each student is academically prepared to succeed in college,
life, and the global economy. As part of this goal, an objective is to create an innovative portfolio of high-quality
choices for families. The district’s schools are a “portfolio” that must reflect the diverse talents, needs, and interests
of each student.

One of the district’s three pillars of reform is the “Right School for Every Child.” Creating the right school includes:
1) building a learning environment that supports student success, 2) creating an innovative portfolio of high-quality
choices for families, and 3) supporting the whole child through a systems approach to school culture and climate.

The Office of School Innovation was created in 2008 to oversee the work of improving the district’s portfolio of
schools. The district has developed and implemented two Portfolio Plans of school reform: opening new high-quality
schools, redesigning schools by program and/or grade configuration, and phasing out low-performing schools. The
school design principles of rigor, personalization, and partnerships guide this work. There must be high expectations
and standards for students, strong relationships cultivated between staff and students, and intermediary partners that
provide expertise in effective practices. Expeditionary Learning and the College Board are examples of such district
partners.

The district has opened six new high-quality schools, including five new high schools. One new high school is the
district’s first Early College High School, in which students earn college credits while still in high school. Over half
of the high schools in the district are closing; nine persistently lowest-achieving high schools are phasing out. Schools
are redesigning by program, for example to Small Learning Communities at East High School and International Bac-
calaureate at Wilson Foundation Academy, as well as by grade configuration to grades K-8 and 9-12 schools to create
better transition points for students. The district is growing World of Inquiry School #58, a highly successful National
Blue Ribbon School, to serve grades K-12.

Creating the right school for every child includes district-level innovation in addition to school innovation. Autono-
mous contract schools were piloted to increase decision-making by those closest to students. District/charter school
collaboration is underway in order to share practices to improve outcomes for all students in the city. Reform work
led and supported from the federal to the state to the district level includes Race to the Top, School Improvement
Grants, and the Teacher Incentive Fund.

The Office of School Innovation continues to examine ways to improve the district’s portfolio of schools and to assess
progress on the work to date. The goal is to ensure that every Rochester City School District school is a great school
that students and families seek to attend.

Section 2 Page 6
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School Innovation – continued

Office of School Innovation 2011 - 12 Overview

Key grants:
1. School Improvement Grant (SIG)
2. Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF)
3. Race to the Top (RTTT)

New schools/programs:
1. All Boys School, located at Charlotte, grade 9 (will grow to grades 9-12)
2. Newcomer Academy, located at Jefferson
3. School No. 10, Dr. Walter Cooper Academy, will be grades K-4 (will grow to grades K-6)
4. Integrated Arts & Technology High School will be grades 7-8 (will grow to grades 7-12)
5. Vanguard Collegiate High School, Rochester Early College International High School, Rochester
STEM High School, and Robert Brown High School of Construction and Design will be grades
9-10 (will grow to grades 9-12)

Redesigns:
1. School No. 19, Dr. Charles T. Lunsford, expands to grades K-8 (will serve grades K-8)
2. School No. 58, World of Inquiry, expands to grades K-9 (will grow to grades K-12)
3. Dr. Freddie Thomas phases down to grades 7-8, 10-12 (will phase down to grades K-8)
4. Joseph C. Wilson Foundation Academy grows down to grades 5-8 (will phase down to grades K-8)

K-8 expansion schools, adding grade 7 in 2011-12:

1. No. 4 George Mather Forbes
2. No. 5 John Williams
3. No. 8 Roberto Clemente
4. No. 16 John Walter Spencer
5. No. 17 Enrico Fermi
6. No. 29 Adlai E. Stevenson
7. No. 30 General Elwell S. Otis
8. No. 44 Lincoln Park
9. No. 45 Mary McLeod Bethune

Phase outs (will close):

1. Thomas Jefferson High School will be grades 8, 10-12
2. John Marshall High School will be grades 9-12
3. School No. 14, Chester Dewey, will be closed
4. Franklin Campus: Bioscience, International Finance, and Global Media Arts schools will be
grades 11-12
5. Edison Campus: Business Finance & Entrepreneurship, Engineering & Manufacturing, Applied
Technology, and Imaging & Information Technology schools will be grades 11-12

Section 2 Page 7
 ROCHESTER BOARD OF EDUCATION 2011-2012 WORK PLAN
STRATEGIC PLAN
PRIORITY 2011-2012 OBJECTIVE METRICS RESPONSIBILITY
GOAL
GOAL 1
We will ensure that each of our Excellence in Student Achievement
students is academically prepared Committee
to succeed in college, life, and the Van Henri White, Chair
global economy Cynthia Elliott
TBD TBD Willa Powell
Staff Liaison: Jacqueline Morgan

Academic
Achievement
GOAL 2
We will create safe, engaging, and Community and Intergovernmental
nurturing school environments that Relations Committee
enable student success. Cynthia Elliott, Chair
Melisza Campos
Allen Williams
TBD TBD Staff Liaison: Jacqueline Morgan

Environment
School Safety and
GOAL 3
We will recruit, develop, and retain Policy Development and Review
highly effective, diverse people Committee
dedicated to student success.
T Jose Cruz, Chair
POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS

Melisza Campos
TBD TBD Willa Powell

Section 2 Page 8
Staff Liaisons: Debra Flanagan
F (and Shanai Lee)

Management
Performance
GOAL 4
We will use world-class
A Finance and Resource Allocation
operational standards and Committee
practices to continuously improve
how we support student success.
R
TBD TBD
Willa Powell, Chair
Jose Cruz
Van Henri White
Staff Liaison: Debra Flanagan
D

Fiscal Oversight
and Accountability
GOAL 5
We will create a culture in which Board Governance and Development
we hold ourselves accountable for Committee
student success. Melisza Campos, Chair
2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Jose Cruz
TBD TBD Allen Williams
Staff Liaison: Shanai Lee

Customer Service
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

BOARD POLICIES

Financial Accountability (Policy 6000)

Budget Policy (Policy 6110)

Budget Hearing (6120)

Budget Adoption (6130)

Investments (6240)

Financial Reports & Resolutions (6630)

Purchasing (6700)

Purchasing Regulation (6700-R)

Responsible Bidder (6725)

Contracting for Professional Services (6741)

Section 2 Page 9
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Financial Accountability (Policy 6000)

School districts must establish internal controls to ensure accomplishment of goals and objectives; adherence to laws,
regulations, policies, and good business practices; the efficacy and efficiency of operations; protection of assets; and
maintenance of accurate, timely and reliable data.

The Rochester City School District’s governance and control environment will include the following:

a) The Code of Ethics (2160) addresses appropriate behavior and the avoidance of conflicts of interest by all District
employees.

b) Financial statements are to be prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and other
principles as may be applied by governmental accounting standards and audited in accordance with generally ac-
cepted auditing standards by a certified public accounting firm..

c) Corrective action plans in response to external audit reports, State and/or Federal audit reports, or other external
reports requiring a corrective action plan will be provided to the Board.

d) Establish required policies and procedures as guidance for District operations with timely updates in response to
additional mandates from all applicable State and Federal laws and regulations.

e) Review on a regular basis the financial reports specified in Financial Reports & Resolutions Policy (6630).

f) Review the District’s Capital Improvement Plan for long-term (5 years) capital project planning.

g) Attend training programs required by New York State law for Board members, the Comptroller, treasurers, claims
auditors, and others to ensure they better understand their duties and responsibilities and the data and other informa-
tion provided to them.

h) The oversight and operation of an Audit Committee, Internal Audit, and Claims Audit as required by New York
State law in support of the Board’s fiscal oversight responsibilities.

i) Review of internal audit reports submitted to the Board to understand the adequacy of District information systems
and the internal controls related to fiscal and programmatic systems and procedures .

j) The maintenance and accountability to all policies described within this document.

Ref: 8 NYCRR Section 170.12

Code of Ethics policy (2160)
Financial Reports & Resolutions policy (6630)

Adopted November 18, 2010 pursuant to Resolution No. 2010-11: 388.

Section 2 Page 10
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Budget Policy (Policy 6110)

As the Rochester City School District receives a great deal of its revenue from New York
State, the timely completion of its budget process is integral to the orderly operation of the District’s budget process.

The Board of Education believes one of its greatest responsibilities is to exercise financial oversight to ensure fiscal
responsibility of the school district.

The Board of Education will annually approve a specific budget calendar developed by the Chief Financial Officer
and recommended by the Superintendent in accordance with the attached Exhibit A.

The Superintendent and the administrative staff shall solicit the views of persons concerned with the budget to assist
in its development. The superintendent shall ensure the participation of the Board of Education, staff, students and the
community prior to compiling data, organizing the budget and presenting the budget to the Board.

The budget shall be designed to reflect the Board-approved goals and objectives and the District’s strategic plan for
the education of our students. The recommended budget will be presented to the Board on or about the first week in
April. Efforts to solicit input from parents, the Rochester community and staff shall be disclosed at the Superinten-
dent’s initial budget presentation to the Board.

To assist in budget and long-range planning, ongoing evaluations of the district’s educational programs will include
estimates of the fiscal implications of each program, and the effectiveness of these programs over time. The superin-
tendent’s proposed budget must include the most recent program evaluation results, which should determine contin-
ued funding for existing programs.

The superintendent, in conjunction with the Chief Financial Officer, will develop a multiyear
long-range plan, including plans for budget presentation in both a program-based and school unit format. It will be
reviewed annually with the Board of Education as part of the budget process beginning with the 2006-2007 budget
process.

The budget for the ensuing school year shall be thoroughly reviewed by the Board of Education in no less than two
(2) Finance Committee Meetings of the Whole. Following this review, the Board will adopt a budget for the coming
fiscal year in accordance with policy 6130 for subsequent submission to the City of Rochester for inclusion in their
budget submission to City Council.

Adopted 12/19/2002; Amended 3/17/2005 pursuant to Resolution No. 2004-2005: 656; Amended October 28, 2010
pursuant to Resolution No. 2010-11: 335.

Ref.: Section 1709 (2) of Education Law

Section 2 Page 11
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Budget Policy (Policy 6110) – continued

Exhibit A – Budget Timeframe

Q2: Second Quarter

• Finance Staff submits calendar for budget process to Finance Committee
• Finalized by Board of Education at November Business Meeting
• Board provides direction for developing initial revenue projection
• Superintendent Submits funding priorities to Board of Education
• Board of Education begins developing its funding priorities for the following fiscal year
• Initial Revenue projection provided to Finance Committee – updated throughout process

Q3: Third Quarter

• Board provides funding priorities to the Superintendent
• Budget Templates and Instructions sent out to Department Heads and Principals
• Budget Templates returned to Budget Office for consolidation and review
• Enrollment and Staffing Projections for following fiscal year
• Finance Committee Meeting
• Finance Committee of the Whole - Draft Budget Presentation

Q4: Fourth Quarter

• Superintendent’s Budget Presentation
• Public Hearing – adjusted for school break if necessary
• Budget Deliberations – adjusted for school break if necessary
• Budget Adoption by the Board of Education
• Transmittal to City Hall

Budget Hearing (6120)

The Board of Education will hold a public hearing on the superintendent’s proposed budget during the month of April.
This hearing will be held at a facility designated by the Clerk to the Board. Those wishing to address the Board must
sign up in advance with the Board office and will receive two (2) minutes to address the Board. Individuals will be
subject to the District’s Code of Conduct during the meeting. The purpose of this hearing is to provide the Community
with an opportunity to express their interests and concerns on the superintendent’s proposed budget to the Board prior
to the Board’s deliberations, final decisions, and subsequent adoption of the budget the district will operate under for
the following fiscal year.

Note: Policy added.

Section 2 Page 12
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Budget Adoption (6130)

The Board of Education will adopt the budget proposal for the coming fiscal year no less than ten days prior to the
deadline for submission to the City of Rochester. Upon adoption, the Administration will transmit the approved bud-
get document to City Hall for its inclusion in the City of Rochester’s budget submission to City Council in accordance
with statutory and regulatory requirements. The Board will participate in the City Council of Rochester’s public hear-
ing on the district’s budget as set forth on the City Council calendar.

Approved by the Board of Education, December 19, 2002 pursuant to Resolution No. 2002-03: 488; Amended Octo-
ber 28, 2010 pursuant to Resolution No. 2010-11: 336.

Investments (6240)

As a city school district defined by NYS Education Law Article §52, the Rochester City School District is fiscally
dependent upon the City of Rochester to manage investments on behalf of the District in accordance with the require-
ments established in NYS General Municipal Law
Article §39, other applicable laws, and the Charter of the City of Rochester.

Ref: Education Law §52

General Municipal Law Article §39
Charter of the City of Rochester, §6-3; 8-9.1

Adopted August 20, 1998; Amended October 28, 2010 pursuant to Resolution No. 2010-11: 337.

Financial Reports & Resolutions (6630)

The Board of Education shall require the Superintendent (or designee) to make monthly financial reports on the status
of the budget for each fund at its monthly Business Meeting as part of their report. These financial reports shall be
provided to Finance Committee members prior to their submission to the full Board. Reports to be provided include:
• Monthly Cash Flow report beginning in September;
• Monthly Available Funds report beginning in September;
• Forecast of budget provided in December, February and April, and at other times as needed;
• Quarterly Student Activity Funds Report;
• Quarterly Change Order Report.

The Superintendent (or designee) shall provide other financial statements as requested by the Board.

The Board of Education shall require the Chief Legal Counsel to provide quarterly reports on any contracts issued
under $25,000. These reports shall include the name of the vendor, length of the contract, date contract was signed,
amount of the contract, brief description of services to be provided, and verification that the contract was reviewed by
the Department of Law and executed by the Superintendent.

All budget, finance and information technology resolutions will go before the Finance Committee for
their review and action before being submitted to the full Board of Education at a business or special meeting for its
approval. This does not preclude the Finance committee from reviewing other resolutions as deemed prudent and/or
necessary.

Note: Policy added December 2002; Amended December 2003; Amended October 2004;
Amended December 2004; Amended September 2010
8NYCRR Section 170.2
Section 2 Page 13
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Purchasing (6700)

The Board of Education views purchasing as serving the educational program by providing necessary supplies, equip-
ment and related services. Purchasing will be centralized in the business office under the general supervision of the
Purchasing Agent designated by the Board. The Purchasing Agent is hereby authorized to be the “Appropriate Of-
ficer” for the award of purchase contracts and contracts for public work pursuant to General Municipal Law Article
5-A.

It is the goal of the Board to purchase competitively, without prejudice or favoritism, and to seek the maximum
educational value for every dollar expended. In doing so, the Board is committed to complying with all applicable
Federal, State, local laws, rules and regulations which prohibit unlawful discrimination because of race, creed, color,
national origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, disability, or marital status, and encouraging the participation of Minority
and Women-owned Businesses (M/WBE) and contractors who have demonstrated a commitment to working with M/
WBEs. Competitive bids or quotations shall be solicited in connection with purchases pursuant to law. The General
Municipal Law requires that purchase contracts for materials, equipment and supplies involving an estimated annual
expenditure exceeding $20,000 and public work contracts involving an expenditure of more than $35,000 will be
awarded only after responsible bids have been received in response to a public advertisement soliciting formal bids.
Similar procurements to be made in a fiscal year will be grouped together for the purpose of determining whether a
particular item must be bid.

Goods and services which are not required by law to be procured by the district through competitive bidding will be
procured in a manner so as to ensure the prudent and economical use of public monies, in the best interests of the
taxpayers, to facilitate the acquisition of goods and services of maximum quality at the lowest possible cost under the
circumstances, and to guard against favoritism, improvidence, extravagance, fraud and corruption.
Alternative proposals or quotations will be secured by requests for proposals, written or verbal quotations or any
other appropriate method of procurement, except for procurements:

1. under a county contract;

2. under a state contract;
3. of articles manufactured in state correctional institutions; or
4. from agencies for the blind and severely disabled.

The district’s purchasing activity will strive to meet the following objectives:

1. to effectively supply all administrative units in the school system with needed materials, supplies, and con-
tracted services;
2. to obtain materials, supplies and contracted services at the lowest prices possible consistent with the quality
and standards needed as determined by the Purchasing Agent in cooperation with the requisitioning authority.
The educational welfare of the students is the foremost consideration in making any purchase;
3. to ensure that all purchases fall within the framework of budgetary limitations and that they are consistent with
the educational goals and programs of the district;
4. to maintain an appropriate and comprehensive accounting and reporting system to record and document all
purchasing transactions; and
5. to ensure, through the use of proper internal controls, that loss and/or diversion of district property is pre-
vented.

Opportunities shall be provided to all responsible suppliers to do business with the school district. Suppliers whose
place of business is situated within the district may be given preferential consideration only when bids or quotations
on an item or service are identical as to price, quality and other factors. Purchases will be made through available co-
operative BOCES bids, state contracts of the Office of General Services or county contracts whenever such purchases
are in the best interests of the district. In addition, the district will make purchases from correctional institutions and
severely disabled persons through charitable or non-profit-making agencies, as provided by law.

Section 2 Page 14
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Purchasing (6700) – continued

The district will provide justification and documentation of any contract awarded to an offer or other than the lowest
responsible dollar offer or, setting forth the reasons why such award is in the best interests of the district and otherwise
furthers the purposes of section 104-b of the General Municipal Law.

The Purchasing Agent will not be required to secure alternative proposals or quotations for:

1. emergencies where time is a crucial factor;

2. procurements for which there is no possibility of competition (sole source items); or
3. very small procurements when solicitations of competition would not be cost-effective.

The Superintendent of Schools, with the assistance of the Purchasing Agent, shall be responsible for the establish-
ment and implementation of the procedures and standard forms for use in all purchasing and related activities in the
district. Such procedures shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations of the state and the Commissioner of
Education.
No Board member, officer or employee of the school district shall have an interest in any contract entered into by the
Board or the district, as provided in Article 18 of the General Municipal Law.

Comments will be solicited from those administrators involved in the procurement process before enactment of the
district’s policies regarding purchasing and from time to time thereafter. The policies must then be adopted by Board
resolution. This policy will be amended in response to changes in NYS law or regulation. At a minimum, this policy
will be reviewed for relevance at that time.

The unintentional failure to fully comply with the provisions of section 104-b of the General Municipal Law or the
district’s policies regarding procurement will not be grounds to void action taken or give rise to a cause of action
against the district or any officer or employee of the district.

Ref: Education Law §§305(14); 1709(9)(14)(22) General Municipal Law §§102; 103; 104-b; 109-a; 800 et seq.
Policy Adopted: August 20, 1998; Amended September 23, 2010

Purchasing Regulation (6700-R)

Pursuant to the authority provided to the Superintendent of Schools pursuant to Board Policy # 3310, the following
regulations relating to District purchasing policies and procedures are hereby enacted, effective immediately:

1. Periodic Review of Bid Specifications. The Purchasing Department shall review all general conditions and all
recurring bid specifications on, at minimum, a triennial basis. Particular attention shall be paid to ensuring that
the specifications regarding guarantees and warranties are tailored to the type of product covered by such bid; and
that adequate provisions exist to assure continuity or services for the entire term by provisions for performance
bonds, liquidated damages, etc. When specifications are being authorized for the first time, or as part of a triennial
review, such bid specifications shall be reviewed and accepted by the Law Department, and then submitted to the
Superintendent for approval as a matter of standard operating procedure.
2. Exercise of the Right to Rebid and/or Not to Award. The Superintendent (or Chief Executive Officer for Busi-
ness Services as designee of the Superintendent), upon the recommendation of his/her staff, may decline to make
an award of any matter subject to the State bidding laws; and may exercise the discretion to reject all bids and

Section 2 Page 15
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Purchasing Regulation (6700-R) – continued

to readvertise, as authorized by General Municipal Law § 103(1). Exercise of the Superintendent’s discretion
under the State statute and under this regulation shall not be deemed to in any way limit the parallel discretion of
the Board of Education to exercise its discretion to withhold any award, or to direct the rejection of all bids and
readvertisement.
3. Improving Notice of District’s Right to Rebid and/or Not to Award. Effective immediately, in addition to the
reservation of discretionary authority under State statute, the District’s general conditions shall be amended to
contain express language noting that the Board of Education and the Rochester City School District reserve their
full discretion to withhold any award; and/or to reject all bids and to readvertise, as authorized General Municipal
Law § 103(1), at any time prior to the formal execution of a contract by both the District and the contractor.
4. Notifications to Successful Bidders. Effective immediately, the general conditions shall be amended to contain
express language noting (a) that bidders shall have no legal rights or expectation to a contract unless and until all
necessary authorizations are completed by the District, and the contract has been formally executed; and (b) that
any preliminary notification relating to a potential award and contract shall in writing, from the Director of Pur-
chasing or his designee; and any such written notice shall be deemed to be advisory only, constituting no promise
or assurance that a contract will be authorized or executed. Any notice provided by the Director of Purchasing
pursuant to the general conditions, as amended, shall expressly state that it is advisory, that no promise or assur-
ance is being made upon which the bidder may rely to its detriment; and that the discretion of the Board of Educa-
tion and of the District to withhold an award, and/or to reject all bids is not waived.
5. Assumption of Risk. All District bid packages and requests for proposals shall include the following language:
“The bidder is hereby advised that until all contracting requirements are complete, and a contract has been for-
mally executed by both the bidder/contractor and the District, the District shall not be liable for work done in
preparation for, or in furtherance of the objectives of said contract. Any work performed or expense incurred by
a bidder/contractor prior to the execution of a contract shall be deemed to be a voluntary act or gift, done at the
risk of the bidder/contractor.
6. Performance Bonds. The General Conditions of District bidding documents shall be amended, effective im-
mediately, to assure that a performance bond is required as a general rule, except where the specifications for a
particular bid expressly provide otherwise. Such an exception from the requirement for a performance bond may
be written into a specification where the Purchasing Department has objective evidence that performance bonds
cannot be obtained by any potential bidder; or has determined that the cost of such bonds for a specific purpose
would be disadvantageous to the District’s interests; or where the inclusion of a performance bond requirement
upon potential bidders would be detrimental to the furtherance of an articulated Policy or need of the District.
Such an exception may also be written into specifications where the anticipated contract is expected to have a
duration of less than 120 days; or where the dollar value of the contract is expected to be less than Seventy-Five
Thousand Dollars ($75,000.00). Waiver of the performance bond requirement shall not limit or prohibit the Dis-
trict from including other requirements, such as liquidated damages, designed to protect the District from injury
or loss in the event of a contract default.

Dated: Rochester, New York October 6, 2004

___/s/ MJR________________________ Dr. Manuel J. Rivera Superintendent of Schools

Section 2 Page 16
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Responsible Bidder (6725)

The Rochester City School District has developed the following guidelines for the determination of public works
contract responsibility consistent with the duties of contracting agencies and the court interpretations of State law and
regulations governing competitive bidding in the belief that the public interest will be served by the uniform applica-
tion of these guidelines on District public works contracts:

1. In determining the responsibility of a bidder for a public works contract, the Director of Procurement and
Supply may consider the following items: Lack of proper certification, adequate expertise, prior experience
with comparable projects, or financial resources to perform the work of the contract in a timely competent,
and acceptable manner. Evidence of such a lack of ability to perform may include, but shall not be limited
to, evidence of suspension or revocation for cause of an professional license of any director or officer, or any
holder of five percent (5%) or more of the bidder’s stock or equity; one or more negative performance evalu-
ations by the bidder or other evidence of poor performance on a District project; failure to submit satisfactory
evidence of insurance, surety bonds or financial responsibility; the status of bankruptcy petitions; suspension
or debarment by state or federal government; or a history of termination of prior contracts for cause.

Criminal conduct in connection with government contracts or business activities. Evidence of such conduct may in-
clude a judgment of conviction or information obtained as a result of a formal grant of immunity in connection with
a criminal prosecution of the bidder, any director or officer, or holder of five percent (5%) or more of the shares or
equity of the bidder, or any affiliate of the bidder.

Violations of safety and/or training standards as evidenced by a pattern of OSHA violations or the existence of willful
OSHA violations.

Willful noncompliance with the prevailing wage and supplements payment requirements of the Labor Law by the
bidder or any affiliate of the bidder.

Any other significant Labor Law violations, including, but not limited to, child labor law violations, failure to pay
wages, or unemployment insurance tax delinquencies.

Any significant violation of the Workers’ Compensation Law, including, but not limited to, the failure of a bidder to
provide proof of workers’ compensation or disability benefits coverage.

Any criminal conduct involving violations of the Environmental Conservation Law or other federal or
state environmental statutes or regulations.

Any criminal conviction concerning formation of, or any business association with, an allegedly false or fraudulent
Women’s or Minority Business Enterprise (W/MBE), or any denial, decertification, revocation or forfeiture of W/
MBE status by New York State.

Amended 2009-10

Section 2 Page 17
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Contracting for Professional Services (6741)

All contacts executed by the District are subject to approval or oversight by the Board of Education. Although
Requests for Proposals (“RFPs”) are not required by law and are not subject to competitive bidding, the Board of
Education shall ensure that professional services are secured by the District in a manner that protects the integrity of
the procurement process and the prudent use of taxpayer dollars and provides high quality services to the District, in
accordance with applicable law. Professional services include services requiring special skill, expertise, and/or train-
ing, including but not limited to legal, architectural, engineering, medical, and insurance services.

The Board directs the Superintendent of Schools or designee to take measures to ensure that highly qualified profes-
sionals are secured through the prudent and economical use of public monies from a variety of sources such as: trade
journals, professional listings, electronic media such as Bid-Net, and other governmental entities or reliable sources.

Subject to the exceptions described below, professional service contracts between $35,000 and $100,000 shall re-
quire a solicitation for no less than three informal requests for information (“RFIs”) prior to selection of a provider.
Subject to the exceptions below, professional service contracts that are expected to reach or exceed $100,000 in any
fiscal year, RFPs shall be required. RFIs and RFPs shall be required at least once every three years or following the
expiration of an existing contract’s term, whichever is greater. Additionally, RFIs and RFPs shall not be required in
the following circumstances based on the determination of the Purchasing Agent selected by the Board of Educa-
tion: providers specifically required pursuant to District grants, providers approved by the New York State Office
of Governmental Services, exigent circumstances that require the immediate provision of professional services, and
circumstances when the services required are unique or available from only one responsible entity. In all cases in
which an RFP or RFI is not performed, professional services shall be secured through other documented methods of
procurement which further the purposes of this policy. All RFPs and RFIs required under this policy for the securing
of professional services shall contain a detailed scope of services, and solicit specific fees and other associated costs
for such services, and other essential terms.

Among the various criteria to be considered, RFPs shall solicit information regarding the following:

1. the suitability of the individual/firm for the District’s needs;

2. the special knowledge, experience and expertise of the individual/firm;
3. the credentials and applicable certifications of the individual/firm;
4. the quality of the service provided by the individual/firm;
5. the cost of the services; and
6. the individual/firm’s commitment to workplace diversity, working with Minority and Women- o w n e d
Business Enterprises (M/WBEs), and compliance with applicable laws and regulations prohibiting unlawful
discrimination because of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, disability, or marital
status.

Approved by the Board of Education, December 16,2010

RFIs shall solicit informal proposals using the six criteria above in an abbreviated format.

Section 2 Page 18
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Contracting for Professional Services (6741) – continued

The District is committed to complying with all applicable Federal, State, local laws, rules and regulations which
prohibit unlawful discrimination because of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, disability
or marital status, and encouraging the participation of contractors who have demonstrated a commitment to working
with Minority and Women-owned Business Enterprises (M/WBEs). Contractors are encouraged to take all necessary
and reasonable steps to ensure that M/WBE firms have the opportunity to compete for, and perform services on, con-
tracts with the District. If the contractor intends to subcontract a portion of the services on the project, the contractor
is encouraged to seek out and consider M/WBE firms as potential subcontractors. The contractor is encouraged to
contact M/WBE firms to solicit their interest, capability and qualifications.

RFP respondents shall submit their Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Statement and workforce and M/WBE
participation data. Additionally, the Board directs that the Purchasing Agent for the Board utilize the applicable por-
tions of Section 1, h. and i. of Responsible Bidder Policy 6725 for all RFPs issued by the District.

After a thorough review of the proposals, the Superintendent or designee will recommend to the Board of Education
or Administration the professional service provider determined to be best suited for the District’s needs. Professional
service providers selected in this manner will not be considered employees of the District.

Ref: General Municipal Law § 104-b

2 NYCRR §§ 315.2, 315.3
Trane Co. v Broome County, 76 A.D.2d 1015
Appeal of Lombardo, 38 Educ. Dept. Rep. 730
Opn. St. Comp. 92-33

Adoption date: December 16, 2010 pursuant to Resolution No. 2010-11: 432

Effective date: In order to allow sufficient time to implement this policy, it shall be effective for all professional
service contracts executed by the District after September 15, 2011.

Section 2 Page 19
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
Student Achievement
Across New York State the Education Department (NYSED) raised the bar on how it identifies a
Across New York State the Education Department (NYSED) raised the bar on how it identifies a student
student who is meeting educational standards. Unfortunately, in establishing the new standards,
who is meeting educational standards. Unfortunately, in establishing the new standards, the State failed to
the State failed to provide adequate warning for changes it made to calculating how standards
provide adequate warning for changes it made to calculating how standards would be met. In particular, the
would be met. In particular, the threshold for performance in grades 3-8 English Language Arts
threshold for performance in grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics was retroactively
(ELA) and mathematics was retroactively recalibrated causing confusion and a rethinking of
recalibrated causing confusion and a rethinking of previously defined goals.
previously defined goals.
Under the standard score cut off used by NYSED for the past four years the District would have seen its
Under the standard score cut off used by NYSED for the past four years the District would have
fifth consecutive year of performance gains in ELA and mathematics. However, the criteria for achieving a
seen its fifth consecutive year of performance gains in ELA and math. However, the criteria for
scaled score of 650 at all grade levels was changed as part of NYSED’s realignment of its grades 3-8 and
achieving a scaled score of 650 at all grade levels was changed as part of NYSED’s realignment
high school accountability systems.
of its grades 3-8 and high school accountability systems.
As delineated in Tables 1 and 2, the changes in cut scores used to determine assignment of performance
As delineated in tables one and two, the changes in cut scores used to determine assignment of
Levels 2 and 3 were significant in both ELA and mathematics.
performance levels 2 and 3 were significant in both ELA and math.

Table 1: Comparison of ELA Cut Scores for Levels 2 and 3 by Grade Level 2009 to 2010
Grade Level 2 Change Level 3 Change
3 616 to 643 (increasing 27 points) 650 to 666 (increasing 16 points)
4 612 to 637 (increasing 25 points) 650 to 668 (increasing 18 points)
5 608 to 647 (increasing 39 points) 650 to 666 (increasing 16 points)
6 598 to 644 (increasing 46 points) 650 to 662 (increasing 12 points)
7 600 to 649 (increasing 42 points) 650 to 664 (increasing 14 points)
8 602 to 627 (increasing 25 points) 650 to 658 (increasing 8 points)

Table 2: Comparison of Math Cut Scores for Levels 2 and 3 by Grade Level 2009 to 2010
Grade Level 2 Change Level 3 Change
3 624 to 661 (increasing 37 points) 650 to 684 (increasing 34 points)
4 622 to 636 (increasing 14 points) 650 to 676 (increasing 26 points)
5 619 to 640 (increasing 21 points) 650 to 674 (increasing 24 points)
6 616 to 640 (increasing 24 points) 650 to 674 (increasing 24 points)
7 611 to 639 (increasing 28 points) 650 to 670 (increasing 20 points)
8 616 to 639 (increasing 23 points) 650 to 673 (increasing 23 points)

The recalibration of the State’s criterion determining students who are/are not meeting standards
Theinrecalibration
grades 3-8 of
hasthe State’s
given thecriterion
District determining students
two clear signals who are/are
to make not meeting
appropriate standards in grades
instructional
3-8 adjustments:
has given the District two clear signals to make appropriate instructional adjustments:

1. Standards for student

1. Standards achievement
for student growth
achievement need to
growth go to
need beyond student
go beyond “group”
student growthgrowth
“group” analysis to
student “specific” growth analysis. This will mean greater analysis of student data at the school
analysis to student “specific” growth analysis. This will mean greater analysis of student level.
2. The individual student growth analysis must include an expectation that state performance bench-
data at the school level.
marks will continue to rise.
2. The individual student growth analysis must include an expectation that state
The second performance benchmarks
signal listed above willsignificant
is the most continue to rise.learned. There was no indication that the State
lesson
had any intention for changing the criteria for meeting standards. As the District’s average scale score per-
The second
formance shows,signal
focus listed above
has been is the most
on getting significant
students to meet lesson learned. rather
state standards Therethan
wasano indicationfocus
continuous
that thegrowth.
on student State had
As any intention
tables three andforfour
changing
outline,the criteria
average for score
scale meeting standards.inAs
performance thehovers
ELA District’s
at the
650 scale score mark; whereas average scale score performance in mathematics exceeds the 650 cut point.

Section 2 Page 20
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Student Achievement - continued

average scale score performance shows, focus has been on getting students to meet state standards rather
than a average scalefocus
continuous scoreon
performance shows,As
student growth. focus has been
Tables 3 andon4 getting
outline,students
averagetoscale
meetscore
state performance in
standards rather than a continuous focus on student growth. As tables three and four
ELA hovers at the 650 scale score mark; whereas average scale score performance in mathematics outline, exceeds
average scale
the 650 cut point. score performance in ELA hovers at the 650 scale score mark; whereas average
scale score performance in mathematics exceeds the 650 cut point.
average scale score performance shows, focus has been on getting students to meet state
standards rather than a continuous focus on student growth. As tables three and four outline,
Table 3: ELA District Average Scale Scores
average scale score performance in ELA hovers at the 650 scale score mark; whereas average
Grade Level District Average Scale Score
scale score performance in3mathematics exceeds the649 650 cut point.
4 655
5Table 3: ELA District Average666 Scale Scores
Grade
6 Level District Average
654 Scale Score
7 3 650 649
8 4 638 655
5 666
6
Table 4: Math District Average Scale 654 Scores
7 650
Grade Level District Average Scale Score
8 638
3 674
4 662
Table
5 4: Math District Average
660 Scale Scores
Grade
6 Level District Average
663 Scale Score
7 3 647 674
8 4 644 662
5 660
6
The State has redefined the methods for determining students 663who are meeting or exceeding
7 647
educational standards. As figure one illustrates, the threshold for meeting standards at levels 1, 2
8 644
and 3 are much different. With the knowledge gained about how to meet these new targets, the
The State has has
District redefined the methods
implemented for determining
an aggressive students
instructional plan towho areto meeting
return the levelsorofexceeding
performanceeducational
standards. The State
As figure has redefined the
oneweillustrates, methods for
the accustomed determining
threshold fortomeetingstudents who are meeting or exceeding
in grades 3-8 that have become over the standards at levels 1, 2 and 3 are much dif-
last four years.
educational standards. As figure one illustrates, the threshold for meeting standards at levels 1, 2
ferent. With the knowledge gained about how to meet these new targets, the District has implemented an
and 3 are much different. With the knowledge gained about how to meet these new targets, the
Figureinstructional
aggressive 1: Differences in to
plan Levels
return1-4todistribution based
the levels of on old/newincut
performance scores
grades forthat
3-8 the we
2010have become ac-
District has implemented an aggressive instructional plan to return to the levels of performance
assessment
customedintogrades cycle.
over the
3-8last
thatfour years.become accustomed to over the last four years.
we have

Figure 1: Figure
Differences in Levelsin1-4
1: Differences distribution
Levels based onbased
1-4 distribution old/new cut scores
on old/new cut for the for
scores 2010
theassessment
2010 cycle.
assessment cycle.

GRADUATION

GRADUATION

Section 2 Page 21
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Student Achievement - continued

Graduation

Despite the requirements for students to graduate from high school becoming more stringent, the 2005 Total
Cohort (cohort) represented the greatest amount of students graduating from high schools in the District
over the last five years. A total of 1,334 students in the 2005 cohort graduated high school in four years.
This represented an increase of 16% over the 1,153 students that graduated from the 2004 cohort. As the
State begins to phase out local diplomas, the criteria for earning a local diploma was more rigorous for the
2005 cohort compared to the 2004. Students in the 2005 Total Cohort were required to pass two of the five
Regents exams with 65% or better for a local diploma compared to previous years when 55% or better was
acceptable on all five Regents exams for a local diploma.

Greater accounting of all students over four years (2005 to 2009) yielded the most accurate reporting of
the 2005 cohort’s four year outcomes. The 2005 Total Cohort membership increased by 704 students com-
pared to the 2004 cohort. This increase was a direct result of intensified accounting abilities of NYSED’s
data warehouse. A larger denominator cast a shadow over the dramatic increase in the number of students
graduating and actually seems to depict lower graduation performance. With all students accounted for,
the graduation rate for the 2005 Total Cohort was 46% through August 2009. In addition to the increase in
overall graduates in the 2005 total, the number of students achieving a Regents Diploma also increased to a
record 739 (15% increase from the 2004 cohort).

Summer school continues to have a positive impact for students who do not graduate in June of their fourth
year of high school. It allows them to complete the remaining credits necessary to earn their diploma in Au-
gust. An additional 103 student from the 2005 Total Cohort graduated in August 2009 (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Effects of summer school on graduation rates for cohorts 2003-2005.

A fifth year of high school makes a difference in students’ ability to complete high school. The 2004 Total
Cohort graduation rate increased 5 percentage points to a total of 57% of the cohort graduating after five
years.

Section 2 Page 22
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Student Achievement - continued

A Deeper Look

To further contextualize student performance across the District for the 2009-10 school year, the remainder
of this
Tosection
furtherserves as reference
contextualize for greater
student detail across
performance related the
to the statusfor
District of the
student achievement.
2009-10 The the
school year, tables
and charts that follow are indexed A-I.
remainder of this section serves as reference for greater detail related to the status of student
  achievement. The tables and charts that follow are indexed A-I.

A. Percentage of of
A. Percentage Students Performing
Students PerformingatatProficient
Proficient or
or Advanced
Advanced inin English
EnglishLanguage
LanguageArts
Artsonon
New York State State
New York Assessments (ELA)
Assessments Grades
Grades 3 through
3 through 8 8

NYS ELA Grades 3-8

Change in Percentage
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Points for Past Two Years

ELA-3 44% 49% 24% -25

ELA-4 52% 57% 30% -27
ELA-5 58% 64% 26% -38
ELA-6 56% 70% 32% -38
ELA-7 40% 53% 20% -33
ELA-8 31% 43% 21% -22

ALL GRADES 3-8 47% 56% 26% -30

B. Percentage of Students Performing at Proficient or Advanced in English Language Arts on

New York State Assessments Grades 3 through 8

B. Percentage of Students Performing at Proficient or Advanced in English Language Arts on

New York State Assessments Grades 3 through 8
70% 70%
64% 64%
58% 58%
57% 57%

56% 56%

56%
53% 53%
52% 52%
49% 49%

56%47%
47%
44% 44%

21% 21% 43%

45%
43%

42%

40% 40%

47%38%
32% 32%

31% 31%
30% 30%

29%

28%
26% 26%

26%
24% 24%
47%

20% 20%

43%
45%
43%

42%

38%
29%

28%

26%

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grades 3-8

Grade 3 ELA
Grade 2007
4 ELA
Grade 5 2008
GradeELA
6 2009
Grade 7 ELA 2010
Grade 8 Grades 3-8

ELA 2007 ELA 2008 ELA 2009 ELA 2010

Section 2 Page 23
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Student Achievement - continued

C. Percentage of Students Performing at Proficient or Advanced on the

C. Percentage
NewofYork
Students Performing at ProficientEnglish
or Advanced on the
C. Percentage of State Regents
Students Comprehensive
Performing 11
at Proficient or Advanced on the
New New
YorkYork
StateState
Regents Comprehensive English 11
Regents Comprehensive English 11

Regents English 11
2004 2005 2006 Change in Percentage Points for
Regents English 11
Cohort Cohort Cohort Past Two Years
C. Percentage of Students
2004 Performing
2005 at Proficient
2006 or Advanced
Change on the Points for
in Percentage
ENGLISH 11 New York46% State Regents
Cohort 47% Comprehensive
Cohort 54%Cohort English 11 +7 Two Years
Past
ENGLISH 11 46% 47% 54% +7

Regents English 11
2004 2005
Percentage of Students Performing 2006 Change
at Proficient in Percentage
or Advanced Points for
on the
Percentage of Cohort
Students Performing
Cohort at Proficient or Past
Cohort Advanced
New York State Regents Comprehensive English 11 on the
Two Years
ENGLISH 11 Percentage
New Yorkof Students
46% Performing
State Regents
47% 54% at Proficient
Comprehensive or Advanced
English 11
+7 on the
New York State Regents Comprehensive English 11
54%
46% 47%
54%
46% 47%
Percentage of Students Performing at Proficient or Advanced on the
New York State Regents Comprehensive English 11

54%
46% 47%
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort
D. Percentage of Students Performing at Proficient or Advanced in Mathematics on
New York State Mathematics Grades 3 through 8
s D. Percentage of Students Performing at Proficient or Advanced in Mathematics on
New York
New YorkState
State Mathematics Grades
Mathematics Grades 3-83 through 8
s 2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort
Change in Percentage Points for
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
New York State Mathematics GradesPast 3-8 Two Years
D.Math-3
Percentage of Students Performing at Proficient or AdvancedChange inPercentage
in Mathematics onfor
Points
71%
2007-08 79%
2008-09 28%2009-10 -51
D. Percentage ofNew
Students Performing at Proficient or Advanced
York State Mathematics Grades 3 throughPast in Mathematics
8 Two Years on
Math-4
Math-3
New York
62% State 65%
71%
Mathematics
79%
33%Grades
28%
3 through 8 -32
-51
s
Math-5 59% 68% 30% -38
Math-4 New62%
York State 65%
Mathematics 33%
Grades 3-8 -32
Math-6 56% 65% 40% Change in -25
Percentage Points for
Math-5 2007-0859% 2008-0968% 2009-1030% -38
Past Two Years
Math-7 48% 58% 23% -35
Math-6
Math-3 71% 56% 79% 65% 28% 40% -51 -25
Math-8 33% 43% 15% -28
Math-7
Math-4 62% 48% 65% 58% 33% 23% -32 -35
ALL GRADES 3-8 55% 63% 28% -35
Math-8
Math-5 59% 33% 68% 43% 30% 15% -38 -28
ALL GRADES 3-8
Math-6 56% 55% 65% 63% 40% 28% -25 -35

Math-7 48% 58% 23% -35

Math-8 33% 43% 15% -28

ALL GRADES 3-8 55% 63% 28% -35

Section 2 Page 24
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Student Achievement - continued

E. Percentage of Students
E. Percentage Performing
of Students atatProficient
Performing Proficient or Advanced
Advanced ininMathematics
Mathematicson on
New York State Assessments Grades 3 through
New York State Assessments Grades 3 through 8 8

79%
71%

68%
E. Percentage of Students Performing at Proficient or Advanced in Mathematics on

65%

65%

63%
62%

62%

59%

59%
E. Percentage of New YorkPerforming
State Assessments Gradesor 3Advanced
through 8in Mathematics on

56%
Students at Proficient

55%
52%

48%
48%
New York State Assessments Grades 3 through 8

43%
41%

40%

39%
33%

33%
30%

28%
28%

23%
79%

22%

18%

15%
71%
79%

68%
65%

65%

63%
62%

62%
71%

59%

59%
68%

56%
65%

55%
65%

63%
52%
62%

62%

59%

48%
59%
48%

56%

55%
43%
52%

41%

40%

39%
48%
48%

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grades 3-8

33%

33%
43%
41%
30%

40%

39%

28%
28%

23%
33%

33%
22%
30%

18%

28%
28%

2007 2008 2009 2010

15%
23%
22%

18%

15%
F. Percentage of Students Performing at Proficient or Advanced in Math on a
New York State Regents Mathematics Examination
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grades 3-8
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5Regents
Grade 6 Grade 7
Mathematics Grade 8 Grades 3-8
2007 2008 2009 2010
2004 2005 2006 Change in Percentage Points
F. Percentage of Students 2007 2008
Performing
Cohort 2009 Cohort
Cohort 2010
at Proficient or Advanced for in Mathematics
Past Two Years on a
F. Percentage of Students
MathematicsNew York State
Performing
53% Regents
at Proficient
Mathematics
49%
or Advanced in Math on a
54% Examination +5
F. PercentageNew York State
of Students Regents Mathematics
Performing at Proficient Examination
or Advanced in Math on a
New York State Regents Mathematics Examination
Regents Mathematics
Percentage of Students Performing
Regents
at Proficient or Advanced in Math on a
2004 2005 Mathematics
2006 Change in Percentage Points
New York State
Cohort
Regents
Cohort
Mathematics
Cohort
Examination
for Past Two Years
2004 2005 2006 Change in Percentage Points
Mathematics Cohort
53% Cohort
49% Cohort
54% for Past+5
Two Years
Mathematics 53% 49% 54% +5
53% 54%
49%
Percentage of Students Performing at Proficient or Advanced in Math on a
Percentage New York State
of Students Regentsat
Performing Mathematics
Proficient orExamination
Advanced in Math on a
New York State Regents Mathematics Examination
Percentage of Students Performing at Proficient or Advanced in Mathematics on a
New York State Regents Mathematics Examination
53% 54%
49%
53% 54%
49%
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort

2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort

2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort

Section 2 Page 25
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Student Achievement - continued

G. Percentage of Students Performing at Proficient or Advanced on the
G. Percentage of Students Performing at Proficient or Advanced on the
New
NewYork
YorkState
StateEnglish
EnglishLanguage
LanguageArts
Arts Grades
Grades 3-8
3-8 by
by Subgroups
Subgroups
NYS Grade 3 ELA
Percentage Points Change for Past Two
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Years
All Grade 3 Students 44 49 23 -26
Afr Amr/Black 42 49 22 -27
His/Lat 42 44 20 -24
Asian 54 57 27 -30
White 57 60 35 -25
Female 47 53 25 -28
Male 41 45 22 -23
SWD 15 18 7 -11
LEP 25 25 11 -14
Econ. Dis. 42 47 21 -26

NYS Grade 3 ELA

100
80
60
40
20
0
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

All Afr Amr His/Lat Asian White Female Male SWD LEP Econo Dis

NYS Grade 4 ELA

Percentage Points Change for Past Two
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Years
All Grade 4 Students 52 57 30 -27
Afr Amr/Black 51 57 28 -29
His/Lat 49 51 26 -25
Asian 66 62 30 -32
White 63 68 48 -20
Female 57 61 32 -29
Male 47 54 28 -26
SWD 19 19 12 -7
LEP 27 30 10 -20
Econ. Dis. 50 56 28 -28

NYS Grade 4 ELA

100
80
60
40
20
0
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

All Afr Amr His/Lat Asian White Female Male SWD LEP Econo Dis

Section 2 Page 26
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Student Achievement - continued

NYS Grade 5 ELA

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Percentage Points Change for Past Two Years
All Grade 5 Students 58 64 25 -39
Afr Amr/Black 58 63 25 -38
His/Lat 55 65 23 -42
Asian 65 37 -28
White 68 71 34 -37
Female 61 66 29 -37
Male 56 63 22 -41
SWD 24 30 8 -22
LEP 30 33 6 -27
Econ. Dis. 58 63 24 -39

NYS Grade 5 ELA

100
80
60
40
20
0
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

All Afr Amr His/Lat Asian White Female Male SWD LEP Econo Dis

NYS Grade 6 ELA

Percentage Points Change for Past Two
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Years
All Grade 6 Students 56 70 32 -38
Afr Amr/Black 57 69 30 -39
His/Lat 47 68 29 -39
Asian 46 39 NA
White 70 75 47 -28
Female 60 74 33 -41
Male 52 65 31 -34
SWD 22 34 8 -26
LEP 17 36 7 -29
Econ. Dis. 55 69 30 -39

NYS Grade 6 ELA

100
80
60
40
20
0
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

All Afr Amr His/Lat Asian White Female Male SWD LEP Econo Dis

Section 2 Page 27
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Student Achievement - continued

NYS Grade 7 ELA

Percentage Points Change for Past Two
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Years
All Grade 7 Students 40 53 20 -33
Afr Amr/Black 38 52 18 -34
His/Lat 36 46 16 -30
Asian 42 NA
White 60 75 38 -37
Female 47 58 23 -35
Male 34 49 16 -33
SWD 7 18 4 -14
LEP 9 14 2 -12
Econ. Dis. 38 52 17 -35

NYS Grade 7 ELA

100
80
60
40
20
0
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

All Afr Amr His/Lat Asian White Female Male SWD LEP Econo Dis

NYS Grade 8 ELA

Percentage Points Change for Past Two
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Years
All Grade 8 Students 31 43 21 -22
Afr Amr/Black 28 40 18 -22
His/Lat 28 43 17 -26
Asian 53 54 15 -39
White 54 59 50 -9
Female 38 49 26 -23
Male 25 37 17 -20
SWD 5 10 3 -7
LEP 5 14 3 -11
Econ. Dis. 30 41 19 -22

NYS Grade 8 ELA

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

All Afr Amr His/Lat Asian White Female Male SWD LEP Econo Dis

Section 2 Page 28
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Student Achievement - continued

H. Percentage of Students Performing at Proficient or Advanced on the

New York State Maatics Grades 3-8 by Subgroups
H. Percentage of Students Performing at Proficient or Advanced on the
New York State Mathematics Grades 3-8 by Subgroups
NYS Grade 3 Mathematics
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Percentage Points Change for Past Two Years
All Grade 3 Students 71 79 28 -51
Afr Amr/Black 69 78 25 -53
His/Lat 70 77 27 -50
Asian 70 78 34 -44
White 81 88 43 -45
Female 71 80 27 -53
Male 70 79 28 -51
SWD 47 56 14 -42
LEP 57 67 14 -53
Econ. Dis. 70 78 26 -52

NYS Grade 3 Mathematics

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

All Afr Amr His/Lat Asian White Female Male SWD LEP Econo Dis

NYS Grade 4 Mathematics

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Percentage Points Change for Past Two Years
All Grade 4 Students 62 65 33 -32
Afr Amr 60 63 31 -32
His/Lat 61 64 29 -35
Asian 83 83 41 -42
White 74 79 46 -33
Female 62 65 31 -34
Male 63 66 34 -32
SWD 34 36 15 -21
LEP 48 51 15 -36
Econ. Dis. 61 65 32 -33

NYS Grade 4 Mathematics

100
80
60
40
20
0
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

All Afr Amr His/Lat Asian White Female Male SWD LEP Econo Dis

Section 2 Page 29
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Student Achievement - continued

NYS Grade 5 Mathematics

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Percentage Points Change for Past Two Years
All Grade 5 Students 59 68 30 -38
Afr Amr/Black 57 66 28 -38
His/Lat 59 71 27 -44
Asian 72 36 -36
White 74 74 42 -32
Female 57 68 29 -39
Male 62 69 30 -39
SWD 34 44 14 -30
LEP 42 54 13 -41
Econ. Dis. 58 67 28 -39

NYS Grade 5 Mathematics

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

All Afr Amr His/Lat Asian White Female Male SWD LEP Econo Dis

NYS Grade 6 Mathematics

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Percentage Points Change for Past Two Years
All Grade 6 Students 56 65 40 -25
Afr Amr/Black 57 62 37 -25
His/Lat 48 66 40 -26
Asian 63 47 NA
White 67 73 52 -21
Female 57 67 39 -28
Male 55 62 40 -22
SWD 28 37 18 -19
LEP 29 49 21 -28
Econ. Dis. 56 64 38 -26

Grade 6 Mathematics

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

All Afr Amr His/Lat Asian White Female Male SWD LEP Econo Dis

Section 2 Page 30
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Student Achievement - continued

NYS Grade 7 Mathematics

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Percentage Points Change for Past Two Years
All Grade 7 Students 48 58 23 -35
Afr Amr/Black 46 58 20 -38
His/Lat 45 54 25 -29
Asian 44 NA
White 70 75 38 -37
Female 49 59 21 -38
Male 47 58 25 -33
SWD 21 32 10 -22
LEP 25 30 10 -20
Econ. Dis. 47 57 22 -35

NYS Grade 7 Mathematics

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

All Afr Amr His/Lat Asian White Female Male SWD LEP Econo Dis

NYS Grade 8 Mathematics

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Percentage Points Change for Past Two Years
All Grade 8 Students 33 43 15 -28
Afr Amr/Black 30 41 12 -29
His/Lat 27 41 12 -29
Asian 48 17 NA
White 50 62 35 -27
Female 32 44 15 -29
Male 31 42 14 -28
SWD 11 15 2 -13
LEP 17 19 4 -15
Econ. Dis. 31 42 13 -29

NYS Grade 8 Mathematics

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

All Afr Amr His/Lat Asian White Female Male SWD LEP Econo Dis

Section 2 Page 31
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Student Achievement - continued

I. Percentage of Students Graduating within 4 Years 2007-2009

(Total Cohorts 2003-2005)
I. Percentage of Students Graduating within 4 Years 2007-2009
(Total Cohorts 2003-2005)

100%
80% 52% 46%
48%
60%
40%
20%
0%
2003 2004 2005

Graduation Rate and Graduation Cohort

Graduation Rate and Graduation Cohort
The graduation rate is calculated using the New York State Education Department’s Total Cohort. The
The graduation
2005 graduationrate is calculated
rate for Total using
Cohort theconsists
New Yorkof State Education
all students Department’s
as of August 30,Total
2009,Cohort. The 2005
regardless gradua-
of their
tion rategrade
current for Total Cohort
status, who:consists of all students as of August 30, 2009, regardless of their current grade status, who:
• first entered grade 9 (anywhere)
first entered during the 2005–06
grade 9 (anywhere) during school year (July
the 2005–06 1, 2005
school through
year (July June 30, 2009);
1, 2005 or
through
• in the case of ungraded
June 30, 2009); orstudents with disabilities, reached their seventeenth birthday during the 2005–06
school
 year
in the case of ungraded students with disabilities, reached their seventeenth birthday
AND
during the 2005–06 school year
whose last enrollment in the school was 5 months or longer (excluding July and August) or, whose last enroll-
AND
ment was less than 5 months but who had a prior enrollment in this school or district between July 1, 2005
whose last enrollment in the school was 5 months or longer (excluding July and August) or,
and June 30, 2009 that was 5 months or more. (Source: NYSSIRS Policy Manual 2008-09)
whose last enrollment was less than 5 months but who had a prior enrollment in this school or
district between July 1, 2005 and June 30, 2009 that was 5 months or more. (Source: NYSSIRS
The graduation cohort year is determined by the year a student enters grade 9 for the first time anywhere in the United
Policy Manual 2008-09)
States.
The graduation cohort year is determined by the year a student enters grade 9 for the first time anywhere
in the United States.

Section 2 Page 32
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Student Achievement - continued

Rochester City School District Assessment System: 2009-10

Acuity is a learning-based assessment program for mathematics in grades 3-8. Acuity aligns to New York State stan-
dards and delivers targeted instructional materials to help prepare students for the New York State Grades 3-8 Annual
Assessments that comply with NCLB requirements.

Cumulative Benchmark Assessments are standards-based assessments in English Language Arts and mathematics
given in grades 5-9 four times a year to monitor progress toward meeting grade-level standards taught through the
unified Rochester Curriculum.

Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA) is a set of individually administered criterion-referenced diagnostic read-
ing assessments administered to students in grades K-6 three times a year.

Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) is an assessment for 3 of the 5 Big Ideas of Early Lit-
eracy phonological awareness, alphabetic principle, and fluency with connected text. It is administered to students in
grades K-3 who participate in the Reading First program.

New York State Assessments are given annually to students in grades 3 through 8. The New York State Assessments
are based on New York State standards, which define what students should learn each year. The goal is for 90% of
students to score at or above the state standard. Students pursuing a New York State Regents diploma must meet stan-
dards on five Regents exams: Mathematics; Living Environment; Global Studies; ELA 11; and US History.

Northwest Evaluation Association’s Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) for Primary Grades assessments com-
bine diagnostic tests and survey assessments to provide insight into K-2 students' knowledge of core math and read-
ing. This computer-based, adaptive assessment is being piloted in seven schools (Schools 9, 15,19, 35, 50, 52, 58) in
lieu of the Terra Nova assessment for grades 1-2.

NYSESLAT (New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test) is a New York State test designed to
measure the English language proficiency of K-12 students who have been identified as Limited English Proficient
(LEP). LEP/ELL program students take the NYSESLAT until they achieve ELA standards that qualify them to exit
the program. Students who have been in the country for less than 12 months only take the NYSESLAT. All other ELL/
LEP students take both the NYSESLAT and New York State ELA Assessments grades 3-8.

Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test is an individually administered, norm-referenced, wide-range measure of listening
comprehension for spoken words in standard English and a screening test of verbal ability used in grades K-2.

Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) Enterprise Edition provides immediate, actionable data on students' reading lev-
els and growth over time to help educators differentiate instruction and make meaningful interventions.

SUPERA is a Spanish-language achievement test that measures a student’s ELA progress in his/her primary language.
It is a comprehensive assessment with results that are based on the same scale as English-language results so that a
clear picture of student achievement is obtained regardless of the language of the test.

Terra Nova is an assessment used for grades 1-2. It provides extended open-ended tasks for classroom administration
that measure critical skills in Communication Arts and Mathematics.

Section 2 Page 33
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Student Enrollment

Six Year Enrollment Comparison by Grade Level

March 2, 2011

ALL RCSD SCHOOLS: Six Year Enrollment Comparison by Grade Level

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Projected
K 2,406 2,437 2,394 2,472 2,459 2,465
1 2,765 2,767 2,768 2,678 2,626 2,412
2 2,451 2,621 2,645 2,538 2,557 2,535
3 2,427 2,420 2,527 2,563 2,444 2,460
4 2,361 2,392 2,378 2,450 2,510 2,388
5 2,199 2,295 2,272 2,307 2,291 2,521
6 2,361 2,198 2,287 2,220 2,360 2,322
7 2,880 2,551 2,271 2,390 2,262 2,236
8 3,000 2,675 2,373 2,174 2,282 2,140
9 3,489 2,863 3,741 3,494 3,307 2,346
10 2,869 3,259 2,773 2,549 2,423 3,163
11 1,729 2,371 1,854 1,858 1,765 2,274
12 1,649 1,868 1,849 1,818 1,961 1,714
Total K-12 32,586 32,717 32,132 31,511 31,247 30,976

Rochester City Schools Total Enrollment

Rochester
RochesterCity
CitySchools
SchoolsTotal
TotalEnrollment
Enrollment

33,000

32,500

32,000

31,500

31,000

30,500

30,000

29,500
2011-12 Projected
2006-07 Actual

2007-08 Actual

2008-09 Actual

2009-10 Actual

2010-11 Actual

Section 2 Page 34
 POLICIES, PRIORITIES, AND PLANS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Collective Bargaining

Pursuant to New York’s Taylor Law (Public Employees’ Fair Employment Act, Civil Service Law, Article 14), all
school district employees have certain organizational and representational rights. The law provides employees with
the right to organize; to bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing with respect to wages, hours
and other terms and conditions of employment; and to engage in lawful concerted activities that flow out of the right
to organize.

The Rochester City School District (“Office of Labor Relations”) represents the District’s Board of Education and
Superintendent in collective bargaining with its employees.

Employees of the Rochester City School District are organized into five bargaining units. There is one group of
employees that are not governed by collective bargaining. Managerial, supervisory and confidential employees are
governed by the Superintendent’s Employee Group (“SEG”). Board of Education employees are governed by the
Board of Education Group, and share the same compensation structure and benefits as the SEG group. There are also
a number of part-time employees who work less than 20 hours who are not collectively represented.
Collective Bargaining Units and Contracts
Collective Bargaining Units and Contracts
CONTRACT UNIT TERM OF CONTRACT CURRENT STATUS
CONTRACT UNIT TERM OF CONTRACT CURRENT STATUS
Board of Education Non-Teaching 7/1/07 through 6/30/10 Under Negotiation
Board of Education Non-Teaching 7/1/07 through 6/30/10 Under Negotiation
Employees (BENTE) 1 year extension - 6/30/11
Employees (BENTE) 1 year extension - 6/30/11
Association of Supervisors and
Association of Supervisors and
Administrators of Rochester (ASAR) 7/1/09 through 6/30/14 Final CBA
Administrators of Rochester (ASAR) 7/1/09 through 6/30/14 Final CBA
Rochester Association of
Rochester Association of
Paraprofessionals (RAP) 7/1/09 through 6/30/11 Under Negotiation
Paraprofessionals (RAP) 7/1/09 through 6/30/11 Under Negotiation
Rochester Teachers Association (RTA) 7/1/06 through 6/30/09 Under Negotiation
Rochester Teachers Association (RTA) 7/1/06 through 6/30/09 Under Negotiation
1 year extension - 6/30/10
1 year extension - 6/30/10
Per-Diem Substitute Teachers Unit 7/1/06 through 6/30/09 Under Negotiation
Per-Diem Substitute Teachers Unit 7/1/06 through 6/30/09 Under Negotiation

Financial Impact
The District’s FY 2011-12 budget provides for salary increases and step increases resulting from existing bargaining
agreements. Contracts are currently being negotiated with BENTE, RAP, RTA and Per-Diem Substitute Teachers.

The FY 2011-12 budget reflects adjustments for Unions that are governed by the existing contract. Further, under
NYS Law, if a contract is not agreed upon by the end of its expiration date, the salary adjustment provided for in the
SALARY
contract SCHEDULE
would OVERVIEW
automatically continue for teachers (referred to as the Triborough Amendment to the Taylor Law).
This does not impact Per-Diem Substitute Teachers. The following table presents a Salary Schedule Overview that
provides historical comparisons: Rochester City School District
Bargaining Unit Salary Increases
Bargaining Unit Salary Increases
PER DIEM
Effective

BENTE
ASAR
RTA

BOE
RAP

SEG
Date

2006-07 4.39% 3.95% 3.95% 3.95% 4.13% 4% 44.8%

2007-08 4.39% 3.95% 3.95% 3.95% N/A 4% 3%
2008-09 4.39% 3.95% 3.95% N/A N/A 4% 2.7%
2009-10 3.53% 3.5% 3.95% 3.95% N/A 0 0
2010-11 Triborough 3.5% 3% 3.95% N/A 0 0
2011-12 To be 3.0% 3% To be To be 0 0
negotiated (pending negotiated negotiated
vote)

Section 2 Page 35
District-Wide Summary Budget

Budget Summary
Revenue and Expenditures Charts
Assumptions and Priorities
Revenue Summary and Analysis
Expenditure Summary and Analysis
Position Summary
Explanation of Changes to Budget
Multi-Year Projection
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Budget Summary

BUDGET SUMMARY
Revenue Summary
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 $ Variance
Revenue Category Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)
GENERAL FUND
Recurring State Aid $ 427,445,217 $ 404,500,155 $ 407,772,867 $ 3,272,712
Building Aid 20,158,649 20,578,146 21,916,262 1,338,116
Other State Revenues 250,000 2,277,514 2,277,514 -
Prior Year State Aid Adjustments 175,553 (38,209) (38,556) (347)
Total - New York State Revenue 448,029,419 427,317,606 431,928,087 4,610,481
City 119,100,000 119,100,000 119,100,000 -
Federal Medicaid 1,675,022 - 500,000 500,000
Local - Other 22,642,197 7,386,420 7,378,920 (7,500)
Appropriated Fund Balance for General Fund - 25,879,694 2,128,941 (23,750,753)
-
Total - GENERAL FUND Revenue 591,446,638 579,683,720 561,035,948 (18,647,772)
GRANT & SPECIAL AID FUNDS
State Sources 27,463,976 27,296,793 26,386,353 (910,440)
Federal Sources 71,771,601 81,540,985 71,006,327 (10,534,658)
Local Sources 4,297,047 3,587,923 2,454,905 (1,133,018)
Total - GRANT & SPECIAL AID FUND Revenue 103,532,624 112,425,701 99,847,585 (12,578,116)

SCHOOL FOOD SERVICE FUND Revenue 16,400,899 16,090,000 16,790,000 700,000

GRAND TOTAL REVENUE - ALL FUNDS $ 711,380,161 $ 708,199,421 $ 677,673,533 $ (30,525,888)

Expenditure Summary

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 $ Variance

Expenditure Category Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)
Salary Compensation $327,820,550 $318,083,314 $280,925,280 $ 37,158,034
Other Compensation 16,511,502 18,170,437 12,879,672 5,290,765
Employee Benefits 124,799,677 140,254,365 149,622,066 (9,367,701)
Total Compensation and Benefits 469,131,729 476,508,116 443,427,018 33,081,099
Fixed Obligations With Variability 89,353,109 86,687,636 93,446,742 (6,759,106)
Debt Service 31,839,907 27,183,227 27,871,790 (688,563)
Cash Capital Outlays 17,323,625 12,287,585 10,138,617 2,148,968
Facilities and Related 42,377,520 44,938,711 40,768,853 4,169,858
Technology 1,903,238 1,803,010 1,074,490 728,520
All Other Variable Expenses 42,384,239 58,791,135 52,820,684 5,970,451
Total Non Compensation 225,181,638 231,691,304 226,121,177 5,570,127
Sub Total 694,313,367 708,199,421 669,548,195 38,651,226
Budget Reserve - - 8,125,338 (8,125,338)
Grand Total Expenditures $694,313,367 $708,199,421 $677,673,533 $ 30,525,888

Section 3 Page 1
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Revenue & Expenditure Charts

Revenue Summary - All Funds

$677,673,533
State Aid
431,928,087
63.7%

City Aid
119,100,000
Fund Balance 17.6%
2,128,941 Other
0.3% Food Service
7,878,920 16,790,000
1.2% 2.5% Grants
99,847,585
14.7%

Expenditure Summary - All Funds

$677,673,533
Cash Capital Facilities
10,138,617 Technology
Debt Service 40,807,987 1,074,490
1.5% 6.0%
27,871,790 0.2%
Variable Expenses
4.1%
52,386,571
7.7%
Fixed Obligations Reserve
93,427,042 8,526,817
13.8% 1.3%

Benefits
149,622,066 Compensation
22.1% 293,818,152
43.4%
Section 3 Page 2
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Assumptions & Priorities

ASSUMPTIONS AND PRIORITIES: FACTORS RELATED TO THE BALANCING OF THE 2011-12 BUDGET

The challenges of developing a balanced budget for 2011-12 are many of the same challenges that we have faced for
the past two years. New York State continues to face a growing deficit, which now totals $10 billion and increasing.
There continues to be political changes in State legislative branches, a fluctuating financial market, and a new gov-
ernor that has stated a need for a three-year decline in educational funding. We also face rising costs in contractual
obligations, employee benefits, utilities, transportation and other expenditures necessary to continue supporting our
students. In addition to all this, we have come to the end of our Federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
stimulus funding and the undesignated fund balance is insufficient to offset any portion of the deficit this year. This
has forced us to further reduce our staff and programs in order to obtain a balanced budget.

Our budget process began early in September with a taskforce to implement Equitable Student Funding. This funding
mechanism is a financial redesign that enables Principals and schools to strategically manage resources in support of
their academic improvement plans. The process continued through the first part of February with the announcement
of the Governor’s Proposed Budget. This allowed us to review short-term assumptions such as revenue for the year
and longer term assumptions which include reducing our structural deficit. Key assumptions are provided below. Our
objective continues to be the building of a conservative a plan and not to rely on “soft” revenue or “possible” savings.
As with any budget, planning assumptions are based on the knowledge known at the time. Many will prove to be ac-
curate while others will require additional modifications to the plan. As stated in our policy, budget amendments will
be presented as we continue to refine the budget and execute our plan.

REVENUE
State Funding – Deficit Reduction – Federal Stabilization
We start the budget process with reduced revenue from the State. This is the third year of reductions. At this time we
have no indication of when a final budget will be passed by the Governor and legislative branches or what the amount
of our final reduction will be. State funding is based on the Governor’s Proposed Budget received in early February.

Our decrease in State funding was approximately $4 million. We were fortunate this year compared to the other Big
4 districts due to additional past revenues recognized before the close date of adjustments to State runs and also a
change in an estimated liability in Masters’ Arbitration. The loss of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
(ARRA) which flowed from the Federal government to the State and then to the individual Districts, will end Septem-
ber, 2011. The intention of the District is to expend these funds before this date.

Federal Stimulus Funds – Title I and IDEA

Additional stimulus packages were given to Title I and IDEA. This funding allowed the District to save jobs for the
past two years. Currently we do not see any funding to continue these stimulus packages or to replace them. This
is a loss of approximately $16 million. At the present time it is estimated that the stimulus funds to be given to us
through Title I and IDEA is approximately $16M. During the 2010-11 fiscal year, the Federal government did offer
an Educational Jobs Funding. The District’s portion of this is approximately $8.2 million. We will carry this funding
forward to 2011-12 and will be used to save jobs for the first few months of the year. This is being treated the same
as ARRA funding for reporting purposes. The funding will allow us to save positions within the schools.

Federal Grant Funding

We continue to see new Federal grants available for the restructuring of schools, as well funds to increase science,
technology, math, and training. RCSD continues to apply for many of these sources. Additional funding is being ap-
plied for Teacher Incentive Funds as well as Race to the Top dollars that are to be used to restructure our evaluation
process of teachers. As we complete the application process and receive approval of awards we will include them in
our 2011-12 revenue projection. We are hopeful that some of these funds will be given to us directly from the Federal
government and/or as pass-through from the State. We again are cautioned to be careful and avoid expenditures that
we may not be able to sustain once funding stops.

Section 3 Page 3
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Assumptions & Priorities – continued

Use of Undesignated Fund Balance

In order to balance the 2010-11 the District chose to use $25 million of our undesignated fund balance. Approxi-
mately $2 million of this is necessary to cover our EPE liability. The remaining $23 million was to offset our deficit.
This pushed some of our structural deficit off to 2011-12. The remaining reserves are not sufficient to use as part of
the budget revenue stream. In fact, our remaining estimated undesignated fund balance would cover only one payroll
cycle of $16 million. Using and depleting our undesignated fund balance is not the answer to our growing deficit.
Finding efficient and effective ways of completing our work and restructuring our efforts is the best way to address
this growing issue.

Structural Deficit
Each year we are faced with increasing costs due to rising cost in salaries, employee benefits, contractual require-
ments, fuel, utilities, inflation and increased mandates from Federal and State agencies. This year this increase is
approximately $51 million. This is higher due to additional increases in pension costs and health insurance reform
passed down from Federal changes in health reform. In other words, we would need an increase in revenue of this
amount just to maintain current expenses. Without this increase we have a structural deficit. This year, not only did
we not receive an increase in revenue to offset increasing expenses, but the inability to use our undesignated fund
balance has resulted in increased reductions in staffing and programs. We hope that as the year continues that we will
be able to support the reduction in programs as grant funding is approved.

Declining Enrollment
Projections still show a continued decline in District overall enrollment. This is another consideration that needs to
be reviewed as we restructure our schools and the budget. This will continue to have a negative impact on further
State funding and will cause corresponding reductions in school staffing. Reduction in staff started with the 2009-10
budget and has continued in our 2011-12 projection. Although we see a decrease in our overall enrollment, we do see
an increase in our English Language Learner population and Special Education placement. Both of groups require
higher financial resources to meet their needs, which add to our deficit. The restructuring of our schools and curricu-
lum will also have an effect on the types of teachers needed to meet the needs of our students.

EXPENDITURES
In addition to the decline in State funding, the District is required to pay the reimbursement of EPE funds. In prior
years, the District requested a waiver for the repayment of the $2.1M EPE reimbursement. A decision was made to
not request the waiver for this year due to the economic climate in State government. This amount will be paid from
our appropriated fund balance.

Alignment of expenditures to support our goals of improving ELA scores, Math scores, graduation rates, and school
safety has been provided for in the budget. We will also use financial resources to continue our reform in creating
new schools that will allow our students to become viable participants in our society whether they attend college and
continue in various trades that require specific skills. Although we will not be able to continue all the programs of
last year, we will invest our resources to ensure success of our students. Through a rigorous management review we
eliminated or reduced support for programs that did not align with our goals or that were not producing the results
necessary for sustainability. As funding is increased through the year with additional grants we will restore programs
where possible.

Short Term Fiscal Issues

Section 3 Page 4
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Assumptions & Priorities – continued

• Health Insurance: Although the District was able to change the health care plan last year from the commu-
nity rating to experience rating to recognize cost avoidance, we were met with an increase in rates due to the
President’s Health Care Reform. This increase in cost was passed to us through our insurance carrier.
• Transportation costs: Savings that we were able to recognize in 2008-09 ended in 2009-10 and 10-11 because
of directives from the Board to increase our expenses to safely transport our children. We are experiencing
fast increasing gasoline prices currently in 2010-11 and expect to see the same in 2011-12.
• Retirement Incentive costs: The State offered a retirement incentive to eligible employees. This cost is being
incurred by District’s. The increase due to the payment of this incentive is approximately $6 million each year
for the next 5 years starting with 2011-12.
• Interest Revenue: Reduction is due to declining market conditions.

Long Term Fiscal Issues

• Collective Bargaining: The District is in negotiations with two of our five bargaining units. The Rochester
Teachers Association (RTA) and Rochester Association of Paraprofessionals. Negotiations are in process.
Other than these two bargaining units, the others have received increases that will continue for the next three
years.
• Future funding will depend on the recovery of our economic system. Continual reductions will be passed to
Districts if the State continues its structural deficit. The impact will have a negative affect on the growth of
our programs.
• Some programs, which are currently supported fully or partially by Special Aid or grants, will be underfunded
as general funds are decreased.
• Decreased funding will lead to slightly increased class size, which remains at or below contract and state
averages.
• The Special Education program analysis continues. A multi-year program redesign and improvement process
has started.
• Reimbursement rates in some State and Federal reimbursements are lagging behind actual cost increases.
• The cost of textbooks and other instructional supplies continue to increase.
• Fuel and utilities costs continue to rise at rates higher than expected.
• Double digit increases in employee benefits is anticipated.

By Law and as a matter of sound business practice, we must present a balanced budget. We have completed this dif-
ficult task this year, but will be decreasing our workforce and eliminating programs. We will continue to target the
needs of our students, and support the goals of the District and the policies of the Board of Education. We continue
to face many challenges, both at the State level and within the District itself. The investment and reinvestment of fi-
nancial resources will move us toward the modernization of education with new academic initiatives and the develop-
ment and implementation of the Rochester Curriculum. We need to continue to request academic program flexibility
and changes in mandates from the State and Federal government. We will need to evaluate and address the rising cost
of the collective bargaining structure and payment as well as the employee benefit contribution from employees. This
budget is the first year of the implementation of Equitable Student Funding, which is a fundamental change in the
strategic management and resourcing of our schools. This mechanism for allocating resources is not responsible for
the deficit, but allowed an unprecedented transparency for all to address the district-wide deficit. We will continue to
distribute our resources in an equitable fashion with input from our schools, administration, parents, and community
leaders. We will be challenged with tough fiscal realities but we will resource critical education needs for all of our
students. We have a clear strategic path that will guide our work this year and in the future.

Sincerely,

Deputy Superintendent of Administration

Section 3 Page 5
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Revenue Summary

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 $ Variance

Revenue Category Actual Revenues Amended Budget Proposed Budget Fav/(Unfav)

GENERAL FUND
>>>>> STATE <<<<<
Foundation Aid $ 328,103,834 $ 319,402,714 $ 324,024,869 $ 4,622,155
NYS Stabilization Stimulus Funding 20,343,734 9,821,791 - (9,821,791)
Special Services Aid 11,532,068 9,789,107 10,868,630 1,079,523
Special Education - Public High Cost Aid 4,030,169 3,891,092 5,612,815 1,721,723
Special Education - Private Excess Cost Aid 9,293,972 9,737,925 9,725,473 (12,452)
Transportation Aid 48,605,327 44,410,045 47,050,195 2,640,150
Computer Hardware Aid 773,179 765,161 749,647 (15,514)
Textbook Aid 2,171,094 1,954,833 2,137,892 183,059
Software Aid 545,108 375,498 529,722 154,224
Library Aid 227,431 209,108 221,012 11,904
Charter School Transitional Aid 1,819,301 4,142,881 6,852,612 2,709,731
Subtotal - Recurring State Aid 427,445,217 404,500,155 407,772,867 3,272,712
>>>>> Building Aid <<<<<
Building Aid 20,158,649 20,578,146 21,916,262 1,338,116
Subtotal - Building Aid 20,158,649 20,578,146 21,916,262 1,338,116
>>>>> State - Other State Revenues <<<<<
NYS Legislative Grant 250,000 - - -
Incarcerated Youth Aid - 2,277,514 2,277,514 -
Subtotal - Other State Revenues 250,000 2,277,514 2,277,514 -
>>>>> State Aid Adjustments <<<<<
Prior Year Aid Advance - Bond Bank 1,362,000 1,362,000 1,362,000 -
Prior Year Aid - Chapter 47, 66 & 721 Tuition 484,354 236,505 236,505 -
Prior Year Aid - $20M Spin Up Loan Payment (667,000) (667,000) (667,000) -
Local Share Deduction for Certain Students (1,003,801) (969,714) (970,061) (347)
Subtotal - Prior Year State Aid Adjustments 175,553 (38,209) (38,556) (347)
Total - New York State Revenue $ 448,029,419 $ 427,317,606 $ 431,928,087 $ 4,610,481

>>>>> CITY <<<<<

City of Rochester Aid $ 119,100,000 $ 119,100,000 $ 119,100,000 $ -
Total - City 119,100,000 119,100,000 119,100,000 -
>>>>> Other Revenue Sources <<<<<
Federal - Medicaid 1,675,022 - 500,000 500,000
Subtotal - Other Revenue Sources 1,675,022 - 500,000 500,000
>>>>> Local - Other <<<<<
Indirect Costs 3,392,481 2,376,675 2,242,959 (133,716)
Nonresident Tuition 679,969 575,000 575,000 -
Health Services Revenue 752,499 700,000 700,000 -
Rental and Use of Buildings 95,273 100,000 150,000 50,000
Sale of Obsolete Equipment 30,412 25,000 25,000 -
Prior Years Refunds 1,761,152 1,150,000 1,150,000 -
E-Rate Revenue 3,902,415 1,520,284 1,589,000 68,716
Student and Other Fees 59,795 60,000 75,000 15,000
Earnings - Capital Fund Investments 11,103,656 300,000 300,000 -
Earnings - General Fund Investments 260,643 250,000 250,000 -
Miscellaneous Revenue 457,821 180,029 180,029 -
Curriculum Based Programs 146,081 149,432 141,932 (7,500)
Total - Local Other 22,642,197 7,386,420 7,378,920 (7,500)
Appropriated Fund Balance for General Fund - 25,879,694 2,128,941 (23,750,753)
GENERAL FUND Revenue $ 591,446,638 $ 579,683,720 $ 561,035,948 $ (18,647,772)

Section 3 Page 6
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Revenue Summary – continued

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 $ Variance

Revenue Category Actual Revenues Amended Budget Proposed Budget Fav/(Unfav)

GRANT & SPECIAL AID FUNDS

>>>>> State Sources <<<<<

Universal Pre-Kindergarten $ 10,688,553 $ 10,826,694 $ 10,826,694 $ -
Other State Source Grants 16,775,423 16,470,099 15,559,659 (910,440)
Total - State Grant Sources 27,463,976 27,296,793 26,386,353 (910,440)
>>>>> Federal Sources <<<<<
Formula (Recurring) 42,682,287 44,299,230 42,978,125 (1,321,105)
Federal Stimulus 12,670,421 28,064,675 9,747,895 (18,316,780)
One-Time Grants (Competitive) 11,306,516 7,947,758 18,280,307 10,332,549
Roll-Over Grants 5,112,377 1,229,322 - (1,229,322)
Total - Federal Sources 71,771,601 81,540,985 71,006,327 (10,534,658)
>>>>> Local Sources <<<<< 4,297,047 3,587,923 2,454,905 (1,133,018)
GRANT & SPECIAL AID FUND Revenue $ 103,532,624 $ 112,425,701 $ 99,847,585 $ (12,578,116)

SCHOOL FOOD SERVICE FUND

NYS Free & Reduced Price Reimbursement $ 516,992 $ 508,000 $ 514,000 $ 6,000
Federal Free & Reduced Price Reimbursement 13,921,824 13,944,000 14,177,000 233,000
Federal Surplus Food Revenue 929,925 818,000 1,000,000 182,000
Summer Food Service Revenue 311,534 458,135 483,000 24,865
Other Cafeteria Sales 720,624 361,865 616,000 254,135
SCHOOL FOOD SERVICE FUND Revenue $ 16,400,899 $ 16,090,000 $ 16,790,000 $ 700,000

GRAND TOTAL REVENUE - ALL FUNDS $ 711,380,161 $ 708,199,421 $ 677,673,533 $ (30,525,888)

Section 3 Page 7
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Revenue Summary Anaylsis

STATE AID TO EDUCATION

The General Fund State Aid shown below is based on the aid projections included in the 2011-12 Governor’s Budget
proposal.

Foundation Aid $324,024,869

Foundation Aid is unrestricted aid to support the District’s general operations such as salaries, benefits, utilities and
other operating costs. Beginning in 2007-08, NYS combined a number of separate aid categories into Foundation
Aid. These aid categories included: Public Excess Cost, Sound Basic Education, Extraordinary Needs, Limited Eng-
lish Proficiency and several categorical grants.

State Stabilization Stimulus $0

New York State used one-time federal funding to partially offset reductions to Foundation Aid in the previous fiscal
year. This funding ends at the close of the 2010-11 fiscal year.

Special Services Aid $10,868,630

This aid supports certain occupational, marketing and business programs, in grades 10-12 and for approved data pro-
cessing expenses pursuant to Regulations of the Commissioner.

Special Education – Public High Cost Aid $5,612,815

Public High Cost Aid is provided for students with disabilities placed in public settings in the Rochester City School
District and at BOCES. This aid is based upon approved costs, attendance and level of service.

Special Education – Private Excess Cost Aid $9,725,473

Excess Cost Aid is provided for students with disabilities placed in private special education settings such as St. Jo-
seph’s Villa and Crestwood Children’s Center. This aid is based upon approved costs, attendance and level of service.

Transportation Aid $47,050,195

This aid provides up to 90% of the District’s approved transportation expenses. Non-allowable expenses include: the
transportation of non-handicapped pupils who live 1 1/2 miles or less from the school attended, and transportation for
extra activities such as field trips, athletic trips, etc.

Hardware and Technology Aid $749,647

Computer Hardware and Technology Equipment Aid provides funding for the purchase and lease of micro and/or
mini computer equipment; technology equipment; repair of equipment for instructional purposes; and training and
staff development for instructional purposes.

Software, Textbook Aid and Library Materials $2,888,626

This aid provides funding for the purchase of computer software, textbooks and library material. The amount of aid
is based on a per-pupil dollar amount.

Charter School Transitional Aid $6,852,612

This aid partially offsets the cost of tuition that the District must provide for students attending Charter Schools.

Building Aid $21,916,262

This aid supports expenses associated with the construction of new buildings, additions, and/or modifications of ex-
isting buildings. Building aid is provided for projects which have received prior approval from the State Education
Department.

Section 3 Page 8
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Revenue Summary Anaylsis – continued

Other State Revenues $2,277,514

This category represents state funding that the local delegation in Albany has secured for the district. This category
also contains aid deductions for certain resident student placements including incarcerated youth detention centers.

State Aid Adjustments $(38,556)

This category represents adjustments for prior year aid monies owed to the District, contingency for prior year
aid claims owed to the State, and revenue to offset the District’s debt service under the State’s Prior Year Claims
Financing Program. This category also contains aid deductions for certain resident student placements, including
intermediate residential treatment programs, and State supported schools for the Blind and Deaf. The State as-
sumes 100% of the tuition costs for these placements.

GRAND TOTAL STATE $431,928,087

REVENUES FROM CITY $119,100,000
The City of Rochester funding includes the State funded STAR program.

MEDICAID REVENUE $500,000

The District receives partial reimbursement under Medicaid for support services provided to Medicaid eligible
students with disabilities. The District receives a portion of the approved billable amount per service. The State
recoups the remaining amount of federal Medicaid monies received by the District.

OTHER LOCAL REVENUES

Indirect Costs $2,242,959

Many grant-funded programs provide revenue to offset overhead costs, which the District incurs in the operation
of grants. Overhead costs include supervision, accounting costs, etc.

Non-Resident Tuition From Other Districts $575,000

The District provides tutoring and other education services to non-resident students on a tuition/fee basis. The
largest portion of these revenues is for tutoring services provided to non-resident students at several agencies in
the area.

Health Services Revenue $700,000

The District provides health services to non-resident students attending private/parochial schools located within the
district boundaries per NYS regulations. The District bills these costs back to the student’s home districts.

Rental and Use of Buildings $150,000

This represents the fees charged to various groups for the use of buildings in accordance with District policy.

Sales of Obsolete Equipment $25,000

This is revenue from sales of obsolete equipment and vehicles, in accordance with District policy.

Prior Year’s Refunds $2,739,000

This revenue is derived from several sources including federal E-Rate monies, BOCES refunds and refunds of prior
year expense from vendors.

Section 3 Page 9
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Revenue Summary Anaylsis – continued

Student and Other Fees $75,000

This revenue is earned through fees charged for Adult Education, rental of musical instruments and other miscella-
neous fees.

Earnings - Capitol Fund Investments $300,000

This revenue is earned primarily through two sources: Interest earned on authorized capital funds which have not yet
been expended, and any unused capital fund authorizations.

Earnings - General Fund Investments $250,000

This revenue from investments is earned by the District’s cash management program.

Premium – RAN $0
This represents the premium associated with the issuance of a Revenue Anticipation Note (RAN).

Miscellaneous Revenue $180,029

This represents revenues that do not fit in any other categories and are non-recurring.

Curriculum Based Programs $141,932

Revenue generated by student curriculum programs such as the Work Experience Program.

TOTAL LOCAL REVENUES $7,378,920

APPROPRIATIONS FROM FUND BALANCE $2,128,941
An Appropriation from Fund Balance represents the use of accumulated financial surplus that resulted from prior
years’ activity.

GRAND TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE $561,035,948

Section 3 Page 10
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Grant Revenue Summary

2010-11 2011-2012 $ Change

Grant Title Amended Budget Fav/(Unfav)

>>>>>FEDERAL SOURCES<<<<<
ADVANCED PLACEMENT INCENTIVE GRANT $ 977,180 $ - $ (977,180)
ARRA HOMELESS 76,523 - (76,523)
ARRA TITLE II EETT 1,845,802 - (1,845,802)
EDUCATION JOB FUNDS - 8,220,797 8,220,797
ESSC - ELEMENTARY 350,458 354,559 4,101
FLAP FOREIGN LANGUAGE ASSISTANCE 279,653 290,605 10,952
GCC PERKINS 101,263 - (101,263)
IDEA 611 FEDERAL STIMULUS 5,066,004 - (5,066,004)
IDEA 619 FEDERAL STIMULUS 235,921 - (235,921)
IDEA PRESCHOOL SERVICES & SECT 494,193 494,193 -
IDEA SECTION 611 - EIS 15% SET-ASIDE - 1,525,377 1,525,377
IDEA SUPPORT SERVICES & SECTIO 9,674,986 8,271,765 (1,403,221)
IMPACT AID 19,110 15,000 (4,110)
MENTOR INTERN PROGRAM 65,000 - (65,000)
NYSOTDA EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES - 112,500 112,500
NYSOTDA FOOD STAMP EMPLOYMENT 300,000 175,000 (125,000)
PERKINS ADULT BASIC 196,909 50,000 (146,909)
PERKINS CORRECTIONAL 40,000 40,000 -
PERKINS SECONDARY 563,647 500,000 (63,647)
RACE TO THE TOP - 2,317,898 2,317,898
RAISE ROCHESTER ARTS IMPACT 267,025 268,581 1,556
SAFE & DRUG-FREE AT EAST 99,893 - (99,893)
SAFE SCHOOLS/HEALTHY STUDENTS 2,235,156 1,499,933 (735,223)
SED HOMELESS CHILDREN AND YOUT 40,323 40,323 -
SETRC 470,207 484,314 14,107
STUDENT VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER 44,000 - (44,000)
TAH A HISTORICAL JOURNEY 332,329 331,622 (707)
TEACHING AS HISTORIANS 853,056 643,964 (209,092)
TITLE I 27,920,752 27,617,199 (303,553)
TITLE I - SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT 9,937,859 9,747,895 (189,964)
TITLE I FEDERAL STIMULUS 10,902,566 - (10,902,566)
TITLE IIA - HIGHLY QUALIFIED & EFFECTIVE TEACHING 4,803,129 4,705,408 (97,721)
TITLE IIB - MATH/SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP 1,154,717 1,174,834 20,117
TITLE IID - ENHANCING EDUCATION THRU TECHNOLOGY 700,000 700,000 -
TITLE III BILINGUAL 564,838 574,560 9,722
TITLE IV SAFE & DRUG FREE SCHO 66,748 - (66,748)
TITLE VII-NATIVE AMERICAN RESO 61,666 50,000 (11,666)
WIA LITERACY ZONE 325,000 325,000 -
WIA-ADULT LITERACY EDUCATION 125,072 125,000 (72)
WIA-ELL POST SECONDARY 100,000 100,000 -
WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT-TITLE 250,000 250,000 -
SUBTOTAL - FEDERAL $ 81,540,985 $ 71,006,327 $ (10,534,658)

Section 3 Page 11
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Grant Revenue Summary – continued

2010-11 2011-2012 $ Change

Grant Title Amended Budget Fav/(Unfav)

>>>>>STATE SOURCES<<<<<
CFC CUBAN HAITIAN ENTRANTS $ 39,650 $ 38,100 $ (1,550)
ECHS SMART SCHOLARS 201,893 111,875 (90,018)
EMPLOYMENT PREPARATION EDUCATION 3,206,720 2,886,048 (320,672)
FRESH FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PROGRAM 207,690 - (207,690)
LEARNING TECHNOLOGY 49,618 49,618 -
LIBRARY AUTOMATION ROLLOVER 554 - (554)
LIBRARY SYSTEMS ROLLOVER 1,230 - (1,230)
SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES 6,292,705 6,292,705 -
SCHOOL LIBRARY SYSTEM - AUTOMATION 8,938 8,938 -
SCHOOL LIBRARY SYSTEM - OPERATING 89,375 89,375 -
SUMMER PROGRAM SPECIAL ED. 5,393,926 5,183,000 (210,926)
TEACHERS OF TOMORROW 977,800 900,000 (77,800)
UNIVERSAL PRE-K 10,826,694 10,826,694 -
SUBTOTAL - STATE $ 27,296,793 $ 26,386,353 $ (910,440)

>>>>>LOCAL SOURCES<<<<< 2010-11 2011-2012 $ Change

Grant Title
COMMUNITY PRE-SCHOOL RELATED EDUC ADMIN $Amended
463,088 $ Budget
486,811 $ Fav/(Unfav)
23,723
GATES CHARTER COLLABORATION - 50,892 50,892
GATES FOUNDATION 515,000 - (515,000)
GREATER ROCHESTER HEALTH FOUNDATION 295,776 131,479 (164,297)
IAT EXPED LEARNING 10,000 - (10,000)
MONROE COUNTY CAREERS 466,000 - (466,000)
NCFL TOYOTA FAMILY LITERACY 168,880 188,200 19,320
PRE-SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION/COUNTY 381,972 397,250 15,278
PRE-SCHOOL INTEGRATED/HANDICAPPED 902,268 938,358 36,090
RWI CAREER & TECH AT JEFFERSON 22,185 - (22,185)
RWI GARDEN PLOTS SWW 21,606 - (21,606)
RWI HOSPITALITY AT JEFFERSON 25,194 - (25,194)
RWI LAW PREP SWW 21,655 - (21,655)
SPECIAL EDUCATION/ITINERANT TE 170,299 162,915 (7,384)
SPRINT FOUNDATION SCHOOL #44 5,000 - (5,000)
THE PRIMARY PROJECT 99,000 99,000 -
UNICON CONSTRUCTION AT EDISON 20,000 - (20,000)
SUBTOTAL - LOCAL $ 3,587,923 $ 2,454,905 $ (1,133,018)

TOTAL - GRANT REVENUE $ 112,425,701 $ 99,847,585 $ (12,578,116)

Section 3 Page 12
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

FEDERAL GRANT DETAIL

Title I Federal ESEA – NCLB Grant $27,617,199

Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged

The purpose of Title 1, Part A is to “ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a
high-quality education and reach, at a minimum, proficiency on challenging State academic achievement standards
and State academic assessments.” RCSD is a school-wide Title I Program and is required to deliver services to all
students with a continued focus on students with the greatest need.
• Funds are generated based on poverty criteria of free and reduced lunch eligibility. Use of funds is determined
by need.
• All Title I expenditures must be supplemental and not supplant required services and materials.
• Schools are required to use 20% of their Title 1 funds for to meet the District’s 10% of the total grant
requirement for professional development for teachers.
• The total number of students in the District who qualify for free and reduced lunch is divided into the remaining
balance to determine the Per Pupil Allocation (PPA). Each school receives Title I funds based on the Per Pupil
Allocation ($220.89 in 2011/12). Use of funds is determined by need.
Mandated Set-Asides and Pass-Throughs
Supplemental Education Services (20%) $5,523,440
PD for Highly Qualified Teachers (5%)
Tuition $844,723
Professional Development Incentive $177,660
Remainder of 5% satisfied ELA/Math Specialists (Note 1)
PD Requirement (10%) (Note 1)
Parent Involvement (1%) $276,172
City Residents Attending Non Public Schools $441,937
Neglected & Delinquent Students $636,270
Homeless Students $100,098
Indirect Costs at 3.5% $933,915
District Initiatives
Half-Day Kindergarten Teachers (to create full-day Kindergarten $4,073,429
School Innovation Initiatives $432,000
English Language Learners Initiatives $516,057
Office of Parent Engagement $475,865
ELA/Math Professional Development Leadership $133,372
Academic Intervention Services $564,929
Title I Administration $908,446
Technology/Instructional Support $491,162
NER Benchmark Assessment/Curriculum Writing $1,290,465
Newcomer Program $115,000
Accountability Support $734,446
Distribution to Schools
Title I Distributed to Schools $6,034,275
Estimated Benefits on Title I Distributed to Schools $2,913,538

Grand Total $27,617,199

Note Note
1: ELA and
1: ELA and Math Specialists
Math Specialists at theat the schools
schools provide
provide imbedded PDimbedded
to satisfy the PD
Title ItoPD
satisfy the Title I PD requirements.
requirements.

Section 3 Page 13
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

TITLE I SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT $9,747,895

The School Improvement Grants under Section 1003(g) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act
of 1965, or SIG, provides financial assistance to the lowest achieving schools to significantly raise student
achievement through the implementation of one of four recognized school intervention strategies (turn-
around, restart, school closure, and transformation). Funding from the US Department of Education flows
through the NYS Department of Education, who awards grants to individual school districts.
Continuing into 2011-2012, the school “turnaround” model will be implemented on the Edison and Franklin
high school campuses. Franklin Global Media Arts High School is turning around into the Integrated Arts
and Technology High School. Franklin Bioscience and Health Careers High School and Franklin Interna-
tional Finance and Economic Development High School are turning around into the Vanguard Collegiate
High School. Edison Skilled Trades High School and Edison Business, Finance, and Entrepreneurship are
turning around into the Robert Brown High School of Construction and Design, and Edison School of Engi-
neering and Manufacturing and Edison School of Imaging and Information Technology are turning around
into the Rochester STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) High School. Through school
turnaround, the Edison and Franklin schools will be phased out as the new schools are phased in. Similar to
activities in the East High School transformation, effective teachers and administrators are participating in
job-embedded professional learning and use student data to improve instruction.

District $1,590,699
East High School $1,703,795
Robert Brown High School of Construction & Design $1,728,184
Integrated Arts and Technology High School $1,456,778
Rochester Science, Technology & Math High School $1,946,171
Vanguard Collegiate High School $1,322,268
Grand Total $9,747,895

TITLE IIA FEDERAL ESEA – NCLB Grant $4,705,408

Highly Qualified and Effective Teaching (ESEA/NCLB Title II A)

The purpose of Title IIA is to meet NCLB highly qualified teaching requirements, by:
• Providing high quality professional development to ensure teachers become, and remain, highly
effective in helping all students learn and achieve high performance standards;
• Meeting ‘highly qualified teacher’ requirements for core course teaching through effective teacher
recruitment, retention and professional development practices; and
• Ensuring strong instructional leadership through effective principal recruitment, retention and pro-
fessional development practices

2011/2012 Title IIA Proposed Budget will fund:

• Careers In Teaching
• Teaching & Learning Training
  • Human Capital Recruitment
• Professional Development
• School Professional Development Allocation
• Tuition

Section 3 Page 14
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

TITLE III FEDERAL ESEA – NCLB GRANT $574,560

Language Instructions for Limited English Proficient and Immigrant Students

The purpose of Title III is to support and enhance the education of students who are English Language
Learners (ELL) in all aspects of the English language and literacy development in order to promote aca-
demic achievement in all areas and lead to graduation and post-high school success.
More than 11% of the student population of the Rochester City School District is English Language Learn-
ers (ELL), and the predominant non-English language group is Spanish. Other languages spoken by RCSD
students include Somali, Burmese, Arabic, and Korean/Chinese. RCSD programs receiving funds from
Title III include Bilingual programs, Learning English through Academics Program (LEAP), Dual Lan-
guage, and Free Standing ESOL.
2011/2012 Title III Proposed Budget will fund:
• Salaries, Substitutes, In-service and Teacher Hourly Pay
• Non-Salary Operating Funds
• Related Benefits
• Indirect Cost

TITLE IID ENHANCING EDUCATION THROUGH TECHNOLOGY $700,000

The NYS Title II D Enhancing Education Through Technology grant is intended to thread Math, Science,
English Language Arts and Instructional Technology in a unified effort to integrate curricula with technol-
ogy and improve instruction. There are two primary components: embedded professional development on
Technology Infusion and data driven, customized professional development on Technology Infusions and
enhanced classroom settings.

The 2011 /2012 Enhancing Education Through Technology will fund:

• Instructional Equipment
• In-service/Curriculum Development

TITLE IIB MATHEMATICS & SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP $1,174,834

The Mathematics Partnership grant funds professional development for teachers and administrators in part-
nership with the State University of New York, College at Brockport and the Warner Graduate School of
Education and Human Development at the University of Rochester. Teachers and administrators will
participate in professional development focusing on the use of data to inform instruction. The objective is
to generate systemic change and increase scores on mathematics assessment, increase the percentage of
students passing a mathematics Regents exam and increase the percentage of students enrolling in and com-
pleting more rigorous high school mathematics courses.
The Science Partnership grant funds professional development for teachers in partnership with Monroe
Community College and the Rochester Institute of Technology. The goal is to increase student prepara-
tion and performance on the NYS ILST. Teachers will participate in professional development focused on
increasing their own content knowledge, scientific understanding, and investigative skills. Inquiry-based
instruction will be implemented to energize students’ natural curiosity and increase their conceptual under-
standing and achievement in science.
Section 3 Page 15
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

TITLE IIB MATHEMATICS & SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP – continued

2011 / 2012 Title II B
Mathematics & Science Proposed Budget will fund:
• Salaries
• Professional Development
• Related Benefits
• Pre/Post Test Data Evaluation
• Local, State, Regional & National Conferences

IDEA – INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT $10,291,335

Assistance to States for the Education of School-Aged (Section 611) and Pre-School Students (Section
619) with Disabilities
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is a United States federal law that governs how
states and public agencies provide early intervention, special education and related services to children with
disabilities. The purpose of IDEA is to provide students with disabilities a Free Appropriate Public Educa-
tion (FAPE) that prepares them for further education, employment and independent living. These grants
provide funding to assist with the additional costs to the District.
2011/2012 IDEA Sections 611 and 619 Proposed Budget will fund:
• Pass-Through to Agencies, Charter Schools, and BOCES
• Hillside NorthSTAR Program
• Early Intervening Services
Funds used to develop and implement coordinated, early intervening services for students in kin-
dergarten through grade 12 who are not currently identified as needing special education or related
services, but do need additional aceademic and behavioral support to succeed in general education
environment.
1. District-wide Positive Behavior Support
2. 50% Hillside Work Scholarship
3. 50% (contract) Alternative to Suspension (ATS)

SAFE SCHOOLS HEALTHY STUDENTS $1,499,933

Safe Schools/Healthy Students Initiative is a collaborative of the US Departments of Education, Health &
Human Services, and Justice. RCSD SS/HS Award: $6 million from July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2012, with po-
tential for a fifth year no-cost extension with Monroe County Probation, Monroe County Office of Mental
Health, the Rochester Police Department, and the City School District as the Lead Fiduciary Agency.
Required evaluation measures will align with Government Performance and Results Accountability Act:
• Student Victimization/Perception of School Safety
• Student Substance Use and Abuse
• Mental Health Services Provided

Section 3 Page 16
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

SAFE SCHOOLS HEALTHY STUDENTS – continued

Five (5) required elements to be addressed:

• Safe school environments and violence prevention
• Drug and & alcohol prevention
• Student behavioral, social and emotional supports
• Mental health services
• Early childhood social and emotional learning
Expectations of approach:
• Employ programs/approaches with evidence of effectiveness
• Enact policy/systems changes that improve infrastructure/services/supports and are sustainable
• Engage parents, communities, social service agencies to create a sustainable infrastructure
• Help students develop skills, positive mental health, engagement in pro-social activities
• Help schools with activities, supports, systemic changes to ensure safe, disciplined, drug-free
schools

EDUCATION JOBS FUND (EJF) $8,220,797

Education Jobs Fund (EJF) is a new grant award under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009 (ARRA). While it serves the same overall purpose to retain or create school-level jobs as the ARRA
Education Stabilization Fund, EJF allowable uses are more restrictive – aimed more directly at school-level
jobs. Funding will be used for compensation and benefits to retain existing school-level employees.

RACE TO THE TOP GRANT $2,317,898

The purpose of Race to the Top grant is to increase the college and career readiness of all students. The goal
will be achieved through the adoption of benchmarked standards and assessments, improved instructional
data systems, effective teachers and principals, and turning around low-achieving schools.
2011/2012 Race to the Top Proposed Budget will fund:
• Network Teams
• Teacher and Principal Effectiveness
• Inquiry Team Support
• Re-design Schools Support

OTHERS FEDERAL GRANTS $4,156,468

TOTAL FEDERAL GRANT REVENUE $71,006,327

Section 3 Page 17
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

STATE GRANT DETAIL

UNIVERSAL PRE-KINDERGARTEN $10,826,694

This grant supports the District’s efforts to provide environments and experiences in socialization, early
literacy and motor skill development to all eligible four-year old children, including those with disabilities
and children whose home language is other than English at 27 Rochester City School District sites. It also
provides the support for four-year old Rochester city residents who attend Pre-Kindergarten programs at 19
Community Based Organizations that are contracted and supervised by the District.

SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES $6,292,705

The purpose of the School Health Services grant is to provide the following:
• Mandated first aid
• Emergency services
• Screening
• Contagious disease management
• Services to children with special health concerns
• Documentation and State reporting

SPECIAL EDUCATION – EXTENDED SCHOOL YEAR (ESY) $5,183,000

IDEA regulations define ESY services as Special Education and Related Services provided beyond the nor-
mal school year in accordance with an Individualized Educational Program (IEP), and at no cost to parents.
Some students with special needs are in jeopardy of not being able to retain the skills they have learned
during the school year unless given addition support throughout the summer. The cost of the ESY program
is reimbursed by the State at 80% with the remaining 20% funded locally.
• Instruction
• Home Hospital
• Agency Tuition
• Transportation

TEACHERS OF TOMORROW $900,000

This grant provides a variety of incentives that encourage prospective teachers to teach in a school district
that is experiencing a teacher shortage or subject area shortage.

OTHER STATE GRANTS $3,183,954

TOTAL STATE GRANTS $26,386,353

Section 3 Page 18
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

LOCAL GRANT DETAIL

PRE-SCHOOL SPECIAL EDUCATION - SECTION 4410 $1,985,334

Section 4410 provides a portion of the resources for mandated Pre-School Special Education programs
and services.
• Pre-School Integrated/Handicapped classrooms
• Pre-School Related Services
• Special Education/Itinerant Teachers (S.E.I.T.) services
• CPSE Administration

OTHER LOCAL GRANTS $469,571

TOTAL LOCAL GRANTS $2,454,905

TOTAL GRANT REVENUE $99,847,585

Section 3 Page 19
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 202,529,217 199,958,973 172,158,416 27,800,557
Civil Service Salary 62,652,683 60,042,592 56,881,350 3,161,242
Administrator Salary 30,599,680 28,549,883 27,453,065 1,096,818
Hourly Teachers 15,843,193 13,550,944 11,693,507 1,857,437
Teaching Assistants 4,210,208 4,974,873 2,829,271 2,145,602
Paraprofessional Salary 11,985,569 11,006,050 9,909,671 1,096,379
Sub Total Salary Compensation 327,820,550 318,083,314 280,925,280 37,158,034
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 11,713,655 11,821,216 6,938,010 4,883,206
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 3,049,617 3,308,634 2,776,664 531,970
Teachers In Service 1,748,230 3,040,587 3,164,997 (124,410)
Sub Total Other Compensation 16,511,502 18,170,437 12,879,672 5,290,765
Total Salary and Other Compensation 344,332,052 336,253,752 293,804,952 42,448,800
Employee Benefits 124,799,677 140,254,365 149,622,066 (9,367,701)
Total Compensation and Benefits 469,131,729 476,508,116 443,427,018 33,081,099
Fixed Obligations With Variability
Special Education Tuition 30,241,297 18,516,655 18,843,954 (327,299)
Contract Transportation 43,213,477 44,776,087 44,959,371 (183,284)
Charter School Tuition 14,687,132 22,043,918 28,294,665 (6,250,747)
Health Service Other Districts 465,037 575,000 600,455 (25,455)
Insurance non-employee 746,166 775,976 748,297 27,679
Sub Total Fixed Obligations 89,353,109 86,687,636 93,446,742 (6,759,106)
Debt Service
Sub Total Debt Service 31,839,907 27,183,227 27,871,790 (688,563)
Cash Capital Outlays
Cash Capital Expense 9,793,500 7,615,000 6,472,750 1,142,250
Textbooks 2,158,710 2,307,817 2,064,924 242,893
Equipment Other than Buses 1,456,898 1,079,432 647,033 432,399
Equipment Buses - - - -
Computer Hardware - Instructional 2,449,190 860,316 705,127 155,189
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional 1,104,189 199,708 100,665 99,043
Library Books 361,137 225,312 148,118 77,194
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays 17,323,625 12,287,585 10,138,617 2,148,968
Facilities and Related
Utilities 11,852,809 11,197,321 11,664,482 (467,161)
Instructional Supplies 6,580,609 8,000,671 7,043,287 957,384
Equip Service Contr & Repair 3,526,177 4,025,752 3,314,669 711,083
Facilities Service Contracts 1,493,186 2,143,238 1,283,506 859,732
Rentals 4,145,440 4,213,933 4,197,290 16,643
Maintenance Repair Supplies 1,100,417 1,164,459 984,719 179,740
Postage and Print/Advertising 1,416,631 2,040,141 1,183,049 857,092
Auto Supplies 874,753 896,780 563,930 332,850
Supplies and Materials 10,309,462 10,118,608 9,665,442 453,166
Custodial Supplies Section523,289
3 Page 20 622,980 448,824 174,156
Office Supplies 554,749 514,828 419,656 95,172
Sub Total Facilities and Related 42,377,520 44,938,711 40,768,853 4,169,858
 Sub Total Fixed Obligations 89,353,109 86,687,636 93,446,742 (6,759,106)
DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET
Debt Service 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET
Sub Total Debt Service 31,839,907 27,183,227 27,871,790 (688,563)
Cash Capital Outlays
Expenditure Summary (All Funds)
Cash Capital Expense 9,793,500 7,615,000 6,472,750 1,142,250
Textbooks 2,158,710 2,307,817 2,064,924 242,893
Equipment Other than Buses 1,456,898 1,079,432 647,033 432,399
Equipment Buses - - - Var Bud vs
-
Computer Hardware - Instructional 2,449,190
2009-2010 860,316
2010-2011 705,127
2011-2012 Amend
155,189
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional 1,104,189 199,708 100,665 99,043
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)
Library Books 361,137 225,312 148,118 77,194
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays 17,323,625 12,287,585 10,138,617 2,148,968
Facilities and Related
Utilities 11,852,809 11,197,321 11,664,482 (467,161)
Instructional Supplies 6,580,609 8,000,671 7,043,287 957,384
Equip Service Contr & Repair 3,526,177 4,025,752 3,314,669 711,083
Facilities Service Contracts 1,493,186 2,143,238 1,283,506 859,732
Rentals 4,145,440 4,213,933 4,197,290 16,643
Maintenance Repair Supplies 1,100,417 1,164,459 984,719 179,740
Postage and Print/Advertising 1,416,631 2,040,141 1,183,049
1,219,483 857,092
820,658
Auto Supplies 874,753 896,780 563,930 332,850
Supplies and Materials 10,309,462 10,118,608 9,665,442
9,667,642 453,166
450,966
Custodial Supplies 523,289 622,980 448,824 174,156
Office Supplies 554,749 514,828 419,656
420,156 95,172
94,672
Sub Total Facilities and Related 42,377,520 44,938,711 40,768,853
40,807,987 4,169,858
4,130,724
Technology
Computer Software - Instructional 919,661 1,542,415 843,923 698,492
Computer Software - Non Instructional 983,576 260,595 230,567 30,028
Subtotal Technology 1,903,238 1,803,010 1,074,490 728,520
All Other Variable Expenses
Miscellaneous Services 1,814,627 1,901,141 2,063,353 (162,212)
Professional Technical Service 26,762,013 27,652,638 22,321,145
21,855,072 5,331,493
5,797,566
Agency Clerical 1,859,557 2,460,500 2,037,604
2,041,604 422,896
418,896
Judgments and Claims 3,016,119 3,128,941 3,128,941 -
Grant Disallowances (336,895) 1,235,554 1,063,603 171,951
Departmental Credits (2,451,474) (1,796,675) (1,311,120) (485,555)
Indirect Costs Grants 3,392,481 3,459,338 2,219,966 1,239,372
BOCES Services 6,469,197 18,479,765 19,460,040 (980,275)
Professional Development 1,858,614 2,269,933 1,837,153
1,865,113 432,780
404,820
Subtotal of All Other Variable Expenses 42,384,239 58,791,135 52,820,684
52,386,571 5,970,451
6,404,564
Total Non Compensation 225,181,638 231,691,304 226,121,177
225,706,498 5,570,127
5,984,806
Sub Total 694,313,367 708,199,421 669,548,195
669,146,716 38,651,226
39,052,705
Budget Reserve - - 8,125,338
8,526,817 (8,125,338)
(8,526,817)
Grand Total 694,313,367 708,199,421 677,673,533 30,525,888

Expenditure
EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT Summary (All Funds)

Rochester City School District - RCSD 694,313,367 708,199,421 677,673,533 30,525,887

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

Section 3 Page 21
Rochester City School District - RCSD 694,313,367 708,199,421 677,673,533 30,525,887
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Position Summary

Var Bud vs
2009 - 2010 2010 - 2011 2011-2012 Amend
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

POSITIONS BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 3,603.03 3,485.93 2,914.59 571.34
Civil Service Salary 1,647.21 1,540.02 1,325.16 214.86
Administrator Salary 312.50 296.70 266.31 30.39
Teaching Assistants 182.00 195.00 104.60 90.40
Paraprofessional Salary 565.45 529.75 464.76 64.99
Hourly Teachers 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.80
Total Salary Compensation 6,310.19 6,048.20 5,075.42 972.78
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 65.00 25.00 26.00 (1.00)
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teachers In Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Compensation 65.00 25.00 26.00 (1.00)
Total Salary and Other Compensation 6,375.19 6,073.20 5,101.42 971.78
Employee Benefits
Catastrophic Illness-C.S. 8.00 4.69 6.69 (2.00)
Catastrophic Illness-Tch. 4.00 8.00 6.00 2.00
Paid Illness Leave-T.P. 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Employee Benefits 17.00 12.69 12.69 0.00
Total 17.00 12.69 12.69 0.00
Grand Total 6,392.19 6,085.89 5,114.11 971.78

POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT

Rochester City School District - RCSD 6,392.19 6,085.89 5,114.11 971.78

Section 3 Page 22
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Explanation of Changes to the Budget

The proposed 2011-12 Rochester City School District Budget decreases to $677.7M from the 2010-
2011 Amended Budget of $708.2M. This represents a decrease of $30.5M or 4.3%. The overall budget
decrease was caused by reductions in grant funding, state aid reduction, and the use Appropriated Fund
Balance. The budget was balanced by significant district-wide staffing and operating budget reductions.
The District projects Salary and Other Compensation costs to decrease to $293.8M in 2011-12 from
$336.3M in 2010-11. This represents a reduction of $42.5M or 12.6%. Contractual salary increases
were offset by a reduction of 971.78 FTEs along with savings from district-wide Substitute Teacher and
Overtime cost reductions.
Costs for Employee Benefits continue to rise. Overall, benefit costs increase to $149.6M in 2011-12
from $140.3M in 2010-11. This represents an increase of $9.3M or 6.7%. Retirement System costs
are expected to increase by $4.8M due to rate increases in both the New York State Retirement System
and the Teachers Retirement System. The District will also incur an additional $5.8M in costs for the
2010-11 New York State Early Retirement Incentive. Unemployment costs are projected to rise by
$4.3M related to staffing reductions. These cost increases are offset by a net reduction of $2.3M in
Social Security costs due to staffing salary reductions, and $2.9M in Health & Dental Insurance which
reflects a combination of staffing reductions and rate increases. The remaining items in this category
show a net decrease of $0.4M.
Fixed Obligations with Variability, which includes Charter School tuition, will increase by $6.8M to
$93.4M in 2011-12. Charter School tuition costs will increase by $6.3M to $28.3M. This increase is
attributable to projected enrollment growth of 457 students. The enrollment growth is due to grade
level additions in two existing schools and the opening of two new schools in the fall. The remaining
budgets in this category show an increase of $0.5M.
The Debt Service budget will increase by $0.7M to $27.9M to reflect changes in the District’s long-term
debt schedule. This increase is due largely to new short-term Bond Anticipation Notes, which were
issued to fund on-going construction projects.
The District anticipates Cash Capital Outlays will decrease by $2.1M to $10.1M in 2011-12. The Cash
Capital Expense line was reduced by $1.1M to $6.5M. The remaining categories experienced a collec-
tive reduction of $1.0M as part of the district-wide budget reduction effort.
Facilities and Related expenses will decrease by $4.2M to $40.8M. The largest categories with re-
ductions are Instructional Supplies, Facilities Service Contracts, Postage/Printing & Advertising and
Equipment Service Contracts & Repairs, which are decreasing by a total of $3.4M. The remaining
categories show a net decrease of $0.8M due to district-wide budget reductions.
Technology expenses will decrease by $0.7M to $1.1M. The District will be purchasing less Computer
Software due to district-wide budget reductions.
All Other Variable Expenses will decrease by $6.0M to $52.8M due largely to a $5.3M reduction in
Professional & Technical Services. This reduction reflects a combination of both grant funding and
district-wide budget cuts. The remaining items in this category show a net decrease of $0.7M due to
the district-wide budget reduction effort.
The 2011-12 Budget also includes the establishment of an $8.1M Budget Reserve. The reserve is in-
tended to support unforeseen circumstances that may occur in the upcoming budget year. The District
will need to cover these circumstances that may range from emergency situations to increased man-
dates from Federal and State.

Section 3 Page 23
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Multi-Year Projection

Multi-Year Projection
OVERVIEW:
OVERVIEW:
The multi-year projection represents a forecast of the District’s revenue and expenditures for the next three fiscal
The multi-year projection represents a forecast of the District’s revenue and expenditures for the next
years. The projections shown allow the District to begin the planning process to solve for anticipated deficit years.
three fiscal years. The projections shown allow the District to begin the planning process to solve for
anticipated deficit years.
Given the State’s fiscal situation, the projected revenues in this analysis anticipate that State Aid will not increase in
Given
the nextthe
fewState’s
years.fiscal situation,
In addition, thethe
lastprojected revenues
of the one-time in this
Federal analysisfunding
Stimulus anticipate
willthat
end State Aid will
in 2011-12, not in an
resulting
increase
$8.2M in the reduction
revenue next few years. In addition,
in 2012-13. Finally,the
thelast of theassumes
analysis one-time Federal
that Stimulus
the District will funding willtoend
not be able in
appropriate a
2011-12, resulting
significant amount ofinFund
an $8.2M
Balancerevenue
in futurereduction
years. in 2012-13. Finally, the analysis assumes that the
District will not be able to appropriate a significant amount of Fund Balance in future years.
ASSUMPTIONS:
ASSUMPTIONS:
Based
Based on
on historical
historical trend analysis and
trend analysis and contractual
contractual commitments,
commitments, the the District
District utilizes
utilizes the
the following
followingannual
annual rates of
change
rates oftochange
developto the projections:
develop the projections:

Projected Projected Projected

Assumptions 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
Revenues:
State Aid Revenue - Foundation Aid Increase 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
State Aid Revenue - Formula Aid Increase 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
City of Rochester Revenue Increase 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
All Other General Fund Revenue Increase 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Appropriated Fund Balance 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Grant and Special Aid Fund Increase 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Federal Grant Stimulus Funding -8,220,797 0.00% 0.00%
Food Services Revenue Increase 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Expenditures:
Teacher Salary Increase 3.53% 3.53% 3.53%
Civil Service Salary Increase 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%
Administrative Salary Increase 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%
Teaching Assistants Salary Increase 3.95% 3.95% 3.95%
Paraprofessionals Salary Increase 3.95% 3.95% 3.95%
Other Compensation Annual Rate Increase 2.00% 2.00% 2.00%
Health Insurance Increase 11.65% 11.65% 11.65%
Employee Retirement System % of Payroll 16.30% 16.30% 16.30%
Teachers Retirement System % of Payroll 11.11% 12.00% 12.00%
Other Benefits Increase 4.00% 4.00% 4.00%
Charter Schools Tuition Increase 2.00% 2.00% 2.00%
Transportation Contracts incl. impact of Charters 3.50% 3.50% 3.50%
Utilities 7.00% 7.00% 7.00%
BOCES Services (Special Ed & Nursing Services) 4.00% 4.00% 4.00%
CPI 3.50% 3.50% 3.50%

Section 3 Page 24
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Multi-Year Projection – continued

Projected RCSD Deficit

780
Millions

760

740

720 Structural
Deficit
700

680

660

640
Surplus/(Deficit):
620 0 ($37.8M) ($69.8M) ($103.7)

600
Proposed Budget Projected Projected Projected
2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
Grand Total Expenditures Grand Total Revenues

CLOSING
CLOSING THE
THE DEFICIT:
DEFICIT:

Based
Based on on
thethe assumptions
assumptions above,
above, the the District
District projects
projects a deficit
a deficit situation
situation in future
in future years years
due todue to stagnating
stagnating revenue and
revenue
rising and rising
expenses. Newexpenses.
York StateNew York Statethat
law mandates lawthe
mandates that the District
District maintain maintain
a balanced a balanced budget.
budget.
Revenue
Revenue
The Rochester City School District is a fiscally dependent school district and therefore cannot levy taxes.
The Rochester City School District is a fiscally dependent school district and therefore cannot levy taxes. The District
The District can impact revenue in the following ways:
can impact revenue in the following ways:
Lobbying state government officials to continue funding proposed Foundation Aid increases
• Lobbying state government officials to continue funding proposed Foundation Aid increases
Lobbying local government officials to continue their support of the District’s needs
• Lobbying local government officials to continue their support of the District’s needs
• Searching
Searchingfor
forand
andsecuring
securingadditional
additionalgrant
grantfunding
funding
Expenses
Expenses
The District continues to focus on automating operations, partnering with other government entities and
The District continues to focus on automating operations, partnering with other government entities and businesses
businesses and cost-cutting initiatives.
and cost-cutting initiatives.

Section 3 Page 25
 DISTRICT - WIDE SUMMARY BUDGET 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET
Multi-Year Projection – continued

Rochester City School District

2011-12 Budget Projection

Proposed Projected Projected Projected

2011-12 2012-13 2013-2014 2014-2015
Revenue:
New York State Foundation Aid $ 324,024,869 $ 324,024,869 $ 324,024,869 $ 324,024,869
New York State Aid - Formula 83,747,998 83,747,998 83,747,998 83,747,998
New York State Building Aid 21,916,262 21,916,262 21,916,262 21,916,262
New York State Aid - Other 2,277,514 2,277,514 2,277,514 2,277,514
New York State Aid - Adjustments (38,556) (38,556) (38,556) (38,556)
City of Rochester 119,100,000 119,100,000 119,100,000 119,100,000
Federal - Medicaid 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
Other Local 7,378,920 7,378,920 7,378,920 7,378,920
Appropriated Fund Balance 2,128,941 2,128,941 2,128,941 -
Grant and Special Aid Fund 91,626,788 91,626,788 91,626,788 91,626,788
Federal Grant Stimulus Funding 8,220,797 - - -
Food Services 16,790,000 16,790,000 16,790,000 16,790,000
Total Revenue 677,673,533 669,452,736 669,452,736 667,323,795

Expenditures:
Compensation 293,804,952 303,585,739 313,696,551 324,148,640
Employee Benefits 149,622,066 156,210,187 167,108,191 179,058,979
Total Compensation and Benefits 443,427,018 459,795,926 480,804,742 503,207,618
Fixed Obligations with Variability 93,446,742 100,490,760 107,801,095 115,382,515
Debt Service 27,871,790 27,871,790 27,871,790 27,871,790
Cash Capital Outlays 10,138,617 12,628,674 12,681,303 12,735,773
Facilities and Related 40,768,853 42,604,020 44,531,996 46,558,029
Technology 1,074,490 1,112,097 1,151,020 1,191,306
Other Variable Expenses 52,820,684 54,515,942 56,274,427 55,969,564
Total Non Compensation 226,121,177 239,223,284 250,311,630 259,708,978
Fund Balance Reserve 8,125,338 8,125,338 8,125,338 8,125,338
Total Expenditures 677,673,533 707,144,548 739,241,711 771,041,934

Total Surplus/(Deficit) $ - $ (37,691,812) $ (69,788,975) $ (103,718,139)

Section 3 Page 26
School Profiles and Budgets

All Schools
Northeast Zone Schools
Northwest Zone Schools
South Zone Schools
Chiefs of Schools
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Rochester City School District School Configuration

2010-11 2011-12
Northeast Zone
Configuration Configuration
Elementary
No. 6 Dag Hammarskjold K-6 K-6
No. 20 Henry Lomb K-6 K-6
No. 22 Abraham Lincoln K-6 K-6
No. 25 Nathaniel Hawthorne PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 33 Audubon PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 36 Henry W. Longfellow PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 39 Andrew J. Townson K-6 K-6
No. 45 Mary McLeod Bethune PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 50 Helen Barrett Montgomery K-6 K-6
No. 52 Frank Fowler Dow PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 53 Montessori Academy @ Franklin PreK-6 PreK-6

Secondary
BioScience & Health Careers High School @ Franklin 8, 10-12 11-12
Dr. Freddie Thomas High School 7-12 7-8, 10-12
Global Media Arts High School @ Franklin 8, 10-12 11-12
Integrated Arts & Technology High School 7 7-8
International Finance & Economic Development Career High 8, 10-12 11-12
School @ Franklin
Northeast College Preparatory High School @ Douglass Campus 7-12 7-12
Northwest College Preparatory High School @ Douglass Campus 7-12 7-12
Vanguard Collegiate High School 9 9-10

Programs
North S.T.A.R. Educational Program
Young Mothers & Interim Health Academy
Youth & Justice Programs

2010-11 2011-12
Northwest Zone
Configuration Configuration
Elementary
No. 3 Nathaniel Rochester Community School K-8 K-8
No. 5 John Williams PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 7 Virgil I. Grissom PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 8 Roberto Clemente PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 9 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 17 Enrico Fermi PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 30 General Elwell S. Otis K-6 K-7
No. 34 Dr. Louis A. Cerulli PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 41 Kodak Park K-6 K-6
No. 42 Abelard Reynolds Section 4 Page 1 PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 43 Theodore Roosevelt K-6 K-6
 Programs
SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET
North S.T.A.R. Educational Program
Young C
Rochester Mothers & Interim Health Academy
ity School District School Configuration
Youth & Justice Programs

2010-11 2011-12
Northwest Zone
Configuration Configuration
Elementary
No. 3 Nathaniel Rochester Community School K-8 K-8
No. 5 John Williams PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 7 Virgil I. Grissom PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 8 Roberto Clemente PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 9 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 17 Enrico Fermi PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 30 General Elwell S. Otis K-6 K-7
No. 34 Dr. Louis A. Cerulli PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 41 Kodak Park K-6 K-6
No. 42 Abelard Reynolds PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 43 Theodore Roosevelt K-6 K-6
No. 44 Lincoln Park PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 54 The Flower City School K-6 K-6
No. 57 Early Childhood School of Rochester PreK-2 PreK-2

Secondary
Charlotte High School 7-12 8-12
All Boys School @ Charlotte 9
John Marshall High School 8-12 9-12
Rochester, Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics 9 9-10
(STEM) High School
Robert Brown High School of Construction and Design 9 9-10
School of Applied Technology @ Edison 10-12 11-12
School of Business, Finance & Entrepreneurship @ Edison 10-12 11-12
School of Engineering & Manufacturing @ Edison 10-12 11-12
School of Imaging & Information Technology @ Edison 7-12 11-12
Thomas Jefferson High School 7-12 8, 10-12
Newcomer Academy @ Jefferson

Programs
Young Adult Evening High School (at Dr. Freddie Thomas High
School Campus)

2010-11 2011-12
South Zone
Configuration Configuration
Elementary
No. 1 Martin B. Anderson K-6 K-6
No. 2 Clara Barton PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 4 George Mather Forbes K-6 K-7
No. 10 Dr. Walter Cooper Academy K-6 K-4
Section 4 Page 2
No. 12 James P.B. Duffy K-6 K-6
No. 14 Chester Dewey 3-6 Closed
 ProgramsSCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET
Young Adult Evening High School (at Dr. Freddie Thomas High
Rochester City School District School Configuration
School Campus)

2010-11 2011-12
South Zone
Configuration Configuration
Elementary
No. 1 Martin B. Anderson K-6 K-6
No. 2 Clara Barton PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 4 George Mather Forbes K-6 K-7
No. 10 Dr. Walter Cooper Academy K-6 K-4
No. 12 James P.B. Duffy K-6 K-6
No. 14 Chester Dewey 3-6 Closed
No. 15 The Children’s School of Rochester K-6 K-6
No. 16 John Walton Spencer PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 19 Dr. Charles T. Lunsford PreK-7 K-8
No. 23 Francis Parker PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 28 Henry Hudson K-6 K-6
No. 29 Adlai E. Stevenson PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 35 Pinnacle K-6 K-6
No. 46 Charles Carroll K-6 K-6
No. 58 World of Inquiry K-8 K-9

Secondary
East High School 7-12 7-12
James Monroe High School 7-12 7-12
Rochester Early College International High School 9 9-10
School of the Arts 7-12 7-12
School Without Walls-Commencement Academy 10-12 10-12
School Without Walls-Foundation Academy 7-9 7-9
Joseph C. Wilson Magnet High School Commencement Academy 9-12 9-12
Joseph C. Wilson Foundation Academy 6-8 5-8

Programs
I’M READY Community Learning Center

Section 4 Page 3
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

All Schools
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
The District is comprised of three zones. Each zone provides supervision of school principals to ensure the alignment and implementation of
goals and objectives to District priorities and School Improvement Plans. Also provided is support to ensure the development of instructional
management systems relevant to the needs of students within the school setting. In summary, the main role and responsibility of the District is to
support the work of schools and the development of professional learning communities within each school designed to improve student achieve-
ment through research-based instructional practice using assessment for learning as the foundation.

2011-2012 Budget Expense Total - $240,279,627
Other Variable Expenses
Facilities and Related Technology 0.77%
3.05% 0.01%

Fixed Obligation with Variability Budget Reserve

0.19% 3.38%

Cash Capital Outlays

0.94%

Other Compensation
3.06%

Salary Compensation
88.60%

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget %
Amended Proposed Budget Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comments
Salary Compensation $253,618,259 $212,882,329 $40,735,930 16.06% Districtwide budget reduction
Other Compensation $12,393,190 $7,348,860 $5,044,330 40.70% Districtwide budget reduction
Employee Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligation with Variability $685,300 $453,596 $231,704 33.81% Summer School transportation
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $2,545,116 $2,267,075 $278,041 10.92% Grants/Districtwide budget reduction
Facilities and Related $7,578,412 $7,327,213 $251,199 3.31% Grants/Districtwide budget reduction
Technology $31,006 $22,970 $8,036 25.92% Grants/Districtwide budget reduction
Other Variable Expenses $2,543,877 $1,852,245 $691,631 27.19% Grants/Districtwide budget reduction
Budget Reserve $0 $8,125,338 ($8,125,338) (100.00%) Established budget reserve
Totals $279,395,160 $240,279,627 $39,115,533 14.00%

Total FTEs 4,903.68 3,996.48 907.20 18.50%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget %
Amended Proposed Budget Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Schools: Northeast Zone $75,028,785 $63,171,893 $11,856,893 15.80%
Schools: Northwest Zone $92,085,093 $77,437,009 $14,648,084 15.91%
Schools: South Zone $100,895,480 $82,580,906 $18,314,574 18.15%
School Support $11,385,802 $17,089,819 ($5,704,017) (50.10%)
Totals $279,395,160 $240,279,627 $39,115,533 14.00%

Section 4 Page 4
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Schools

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 189,402,980 189,346,739 160,093,197 29,253,541
Civil Service Salary 22,173,613 22,930,886 18,548,090 4,382,796
Administrator Salary 22,669,473 21,561,217 19,191,338 2,369,879
Hourly Teachers 6,697,588 4,700,848 3,252,460 1,448,387
Teaching Assistants 4,187,505 4,843,759 2,703,230 2,140,529
Paraprofessional Salary 10,841,678 10,234,811 9,094,014 1,140,797
Sub Total Salary Compensation 255,972,838 253,618,259 212,882,329 40,735,930
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 10,918,802 10,618,912 6,225,044 4,393,868
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 831,560 823,769 473,269 350,500
Teachers In Service 402,703 950,509 650,546 299,963
Sub Total Other Compensation 12,153,065 12,393,190 7,348,860 5,044,330
Total Salary and Other Compensation 268,125,903 266,011,449 220,231,188 45,780,261
Employee Benefits 4,218 - - -
Total Compensation and Benefits 268,130,121 266,011,449 220,231,188 45,780,261
Fixed Obligations With Variability
Special Education Tuition 1,002 1,500 - 1,500
Contract Transportation 245,980 683,800 453,596 230,204
Charter School Tuition - - - -
Health Service Other Districts - - - -
Insurance non-employee - - - -
Sub Total Fixed Obligations 246,982 685,300 453,596 231,704
Debt Service
Sub Total Debt Service - - - -
Cash Capital Outlays
Cash Capital Expense - - - -
Textbooks 1,761,476 1,922,048 1,716,918 205,130
Equipment Other than Buses 454,920 213,739 293,245 (79,506)
Equipment Buses - - - -
Computer Hardware - Instructional 265,670 107,602 70,799 36,803
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional 136,269 97,578 63,910 33,668
Library Books 201,785 204,149 122,204 81,945
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays 2,820,121 2,545,116 2,267,075 278,041
Facilities and Related
Utilities 1,459 15,157 4,806 10,351
Instructional Supplies 3,726,445 4,948,316 5,264,539 (316,223)
Equip Service Contr & Repair 69,106 126,617 59,078 67,539
Facilities Service Contracts - - - -
Rentals 92,048 96,737 76,285 20,452
Maintenance Repair Supplies 5,062 8,325 4,280 4,045
Postage and Print/Advertising 221,137 283,182 148,007 135,175
Auto Supplies 1,878 450 50 400
Supplies and Materials 676,529 1,377,272 1,259,578 117,694
Section 4 Page 5
Custodial Supplies 468,913 552,823 399,374 153,449
Office Supplies 169,920 169,533 111,216 58,317
 Sub Total Fixed Obligations 246,982 685,300 453,596 231,704
Debt Service SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET
Sub Total Debt Service - - - -
Cash Capital Outlays Expenditure Summary (All Funds)
Cash Capital Expense - - - -
Textbooks Schools
1,761,476 1,922,048 1,716,918 205,130
Equipment Other than Buses 454,920 213,739 293,245 (79,506)
Equipment Buses - - - Var Bud -vs
Computer Hardware - Instructional 2009-2010
265,670 2010-2011
107,602 2011-2012
70,799 Amend
36,803
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional 136,269 97,578 63,910 33,668
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)
Library Books 201,785 204,149 122,204 81,945
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays 2,820,121 2,545,116 2,267,075 278,041
EXPENDITURES
Facilities and Related BY ACCOUNT
Utilities 1,459 15,157 4,806 10,351
Facilities
Instructionaland Related
Supplies 3,726,445 4,948,316 5,264,539 (316,223)
Utilities
Equip Service Contr & Repair 1,459
69,106 15,157
126,617 4,806
59,078 10,351
67,539
Instructional Supplies
Facilities Service Contracts 3,726,445
- 4,948,316
- 5,264,539
- (316,223)
-
Equip
RentalsService Contr & Repair 69,106
92,048 126,617
96,737 59,078
76,285 67,539
20,452
Facilities
MaintenanceService Contracts
Repair Supplies -
5,062 -
8,325 -
4,280 -
4,045
Rentals
Postage and Print/Advertising 92,048
221,137 96,737
283,182 76,285
148,007 20,452
135,175
Maintenance
Auto SuppliesRepair Supplies 5,062
1,878 8,325
450 4,280
50 4,045
400
Postage and
Supplies and Print/Advertising
Materials 221,137
676,529 283,182
1,377,272 148,007
1,259,578 135,175
117,694
Auto Supplies
Custodial Supplies 1,878
468,913 450
552,823 50
399,374 400
153,449
Supplies and Materials
Office Supplies 676,529
169,920 1,377,272
169,533 1,259,578
111,216 117,694
58,317
Custodial Supplies Sub Total Facilities and Related 468,913
5,432,498 552,823
7,578,412 399,374
7,327,213 153,449
251,199
Office Supplies
Technology 169,920 169,533 111,216 58,317
Sub Total
Computer Software - InstructionalFacilities and Related 5,432,498
13,134 7,578,412
17,762 7,327,213
13,078 251,199
4,684
Technology
Computer Software - Non Instructional 49,518 13,244 9,893 3,351
Computer Software - Instructional Subtotal Technology 13,134
62,652 17,762
31,006 13,078
22,970 4,684
8,036
Computer
All Other Software
Variable -Expenses
Non Instructional 49,518 13,244 9,893 3,351
Miscellaneous Services Subtotal Technology 62,652
342,509 31,006
330,642 22,970
244,783 8,036
85,859
All Other Variable
Professional Expenses
Technical Service 876,228 1,220,015 782,463 437,552
Miscellaneous
Agency Clerical Services 342,509
170,493 330,642
139,070 244,783
66,108 85,859
72,962
Professional Technical
Judgments and Claims Service 876,228
- 1,220,015
- 722,463
- 497,552
-
Agency Clerical
Grant Disallowances 170,493
- 139,070
- 66,108
- 72,962
-
Judgments andCredits
Departmental Claims -
(76,088) -
(101,251) -
(28,589) -
(72,662)
Grant
IndirectDisallowances
Costs Grants - - - -
Departmental
BOCES Services Credits (76,088)
8,450 (101,251)
378,527 (28,589)
329,575 (72,662)
48,952
Indirect Costs
Professional Grants
Development -
367,499 -
576,874 -
457,906 -
118,968
BOCES Services
Subtotal of All Other Variable Expenses 8,450
1,689,091 378,527
2,543,877 329,575
1,852,245 48,952
691,631
Professional Development Total Non Compensation 367,499
10,251,344 576,874
13,383,711 457,906
11,923,100 118,968
1,460,611
Subtotal of All Other Variable SubExpenses 1,689,091
Total 278,381,465 2,543,877
279,395,160 1,792,245
232,154,288 751,631
47,240,871
Budget Reserve Total Non Compensation 10,251,344
- 13,383,711
- 11,863,100
8,125,338 1,520,611
(8,125,338)
SubTotal
Grand Total 278,381,465 279,395,160 232,094,288
240,279,627 47,300,871
39,115,533
Operation Contingency - - 8,526,817 (8,526,817)
Grand Total 278,381,465 279,395,160 240,621,106 38,774,054

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT
Schools: Northeast Zone - NE ZONE 75,404,194 75,028,785 63,171,893 11,856,893
Schools: Northwest Zone - NW ZONE 92,446,500 92,085,093 77,437,009 14,648,084
Schools: South
Northeast
ZoneZone - NE ZONE
- SOUTH ZONE 75,404,194
103,058,794 75,028,785
100,895,480 63,171,893
82,580,906 11,856,893
18,314,574
Schools:Support
School Northwest Zone - NW
- SCHOOL ZONE
SUPPORT 92,446,500
7,471,976 92,085,093
11,385,802 77,377,009
17,089,819 14,708,084
(5,704,017)
Schools:
Schools South Zone - SOUTH ZONE
- SCHOOLS 103,058,794
278,381,465 100,895,480
279,395,160 82,580,906
240,279,627 18,314,574
39,115,533
School Support - SCHOOL SUPPORT 7,471,976 11,385,802 17,491,298 (6,105,496)
Schools - SCHOOLS 278,381,465 279,395,160 240,621,106 38,774,054
Section 4 Page 6
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Position Summary
Schools

Var Bud vs
2009 - 2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

POSITIONS BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 3,394.88 3,280.52 2,735.74 544.78
Civil Service Salary 696.64 698.21 519.17 179.04
Administrator Salary 230.40 215.40 187.21 28.19
Teaching Assistants 174.00 191.00 100.60 90.40
Paraprofessional Salary 531.45 492.75 427.76 64.99
Hourly Teachers 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.80
Total Salary Compensation 5,027.37 4,878.68 3,970.48 908.20
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 65.00 25.00 26.00 (1.00)
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teachers In Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Compensation 65.00 25.00 26.00 (1.00)
Total Salary and Other Compensation 5,092.37 4,903.68 3,996.48 907.20
Grand Total 5,092.37 4,903.68 3,996.48 907.20

POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT
POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT

Schools: Northeast Zone - NE ZONE 1,403.68 1,362.45 1,111.45 251.00

Schools: Northwest Zone - NW ZONE 1,736.34 1,679.96 1,376.23 303.73
Schools: South Zone - SOUTH ZONE 1,927.05 1,845.16 1,502.80 342.36
School Support - SCHOOL SUPPORT 25.30 16.11 6.00 10.11
Schools - SCHOOLS 5,092.37 4,903.68 3,996.48 907.20

Section 4 Page 7
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

2010-11 2011-12
Northeast Zone
Configuration Configuration
Elementary
No. 6 Dag Hammarskjold K-6 K-6
No. 20 Henry Lomb K-6 K-6
No. 22 Abraham Lincoln K-6 K-6
No. 25 Nathaniel Hawthorne PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 33 Audubon PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 36 Henry W. Longfellow PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 39 Andrew J. Townson K-6 K-6
No. 45 Mary McLeod Bethune PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 50 Helen Barrett Montgomery K-6 K-6
No. 52 Frank Fowler Dow PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 53 Montessori Academy @ Franklin PreK-6 PreK-6

Secondary
BioScience & Health Careers High School @ Franklin 8, 10-12 11-12
Dr. Freddie Thomas High School 7-12 7-8, 10-12
Global Media Arts High School @ Franklin 8, 10-12 11-12
Integrated Arts & Technology High School 7 7-8
International Finance & Economic Development Career High 8, 10-12 11-12
School @ Franklin
Northeast College Preparatory High School @ Douglass Campus 7-12 7-12
Northwest College Preparatory High School @ Douglass Campus 7-12 7-12
Vanguard Collegiate High School 9 9-10

Programs
North S.T.A.R. Educational Program
Young Mothers & Interim Health Academy
Youth & Justice Programs

2010-11 2011-12
Northwest Zone
Configuration Configuration
Elementary
No. 3 Nathaniel Rochester Community School K-8 K-8
No. 5 John Williams PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 7 Virgil I. Grissom PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 8 Roberto Clemente PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 9 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 17 Enrico Fermi PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 30 General Elwell S. Otis K-6 K-7
No. 34 Dr. Louis A. Cerulli PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 41 Kodak Park K-6 K-6
No. 42 Abelard Reynolds Section 4 Page 8 PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 43 Theodore Roosevelt K-6 K-6
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Schools - Northeast Zone

Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
The Northeast Zone is comprised of 22 schools and/or programs. This zone provides supervision of principals that ensures the alignment and
implementation of goals and objectives to District priorities and School Improvement Plans. Also provided is support to ensure the development
of instructional management systems relevant to the needs of students. To enhance the leadership, monthly meetings of all principals are held
to focus on transformational leadership decision-making characteristics designed to improve student achievement with a focus on literacy and
school-level decision making relative to operational issues. In summary, the main role and responsibility of the District is to support the work
of schools and the development of professional learning communities within each school designed to improve student achievement through
research-based instructional practice using assessment for learning as the foundation.

2011-12 Budget Expense Total - $63,171,893

Fixed Obligation with Variability

0.03%

Other Compensation
2.14%

Cash Capital Outlays

0.53%

Facilities and Related

2.89%
Salary Compensation
93.52%

Technology
0.02%

Other Variable Expenses

0.87%

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $69,820,155 $59,079,247 $10,740,908 15.38% Districtwide budget reductions
Other Compensation $2,330,130 $1,353,653 $976,477 41.91% Districtwide budget reductions
Employee Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligation with Variability $52,810 $20,010 $32,800 62.11% Districtwide budget reductions
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $312,932 $332,742 ($19,810) (6.33%)
Facilities and Related $1,902,902 $1,822,805 $80,097 4.21% Districtwide budget reductions
Technology $9,764 $10,843 ($1,079) (11.05%)
Other Variable Expenses $600,093 $552,593 $47,500 7.92% Districtwide budget reductions
Totals $75,028,785 $63,171,893 $11,856,893 15.80%

Total FTEs 1,362.45 1,111.45 251.00 18.42%

Section 4 Page 9
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Schools: Northeast Zone

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 53,888,673 53,414,706 45,472,710 7,941,996
Civil Service Salary 5,719,351 5,866,637 4,913,480 953,157
Administrator Salary 6,080,961 6,022,635 5,029,140 993,495
Hourly Teachers 780,841 758,761 540,146 218,614
Teaching Assistants 1,053,525 1,235,507 504,674 730,833
Paraprofessional Salary 2,741,972 2,521,909 2,619,096 (97,187)
Sub Total Salary Compensation 70,265,322 69,820,155 59,079,247 10,740,908
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 2,914,622 2,016,412 1,073,431 942,981
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 86,559 120,861 34,712 86,149
Teachers In Service 109,240 192,857 245,510 (52,653)
Sub Total Other Compensation 3,110,420 2,330,130 1,353,653 976,477
Total Salary and Other Compensation 73,375,743 72,150,285 60,432,900 11,717,385
Employee Benefits - - - -
Total Compensation and Benefits 73,375,743 72,150,285 60,432,900 11,717,385
Fixed Obligations With Variability
Special Education Tuition - - - -
Contract Transportation 38,958 52,810 20,010 32,800
Charter School Tuition - - - -
Health Service Other Districts - - - -
Insurance non-employee - - - -
Sub Total Fixed Obligations 38,958 52,810 20,010 32,800
Debt Service
Sub Total Debt Service - - - -
Cash Capital Outlays
Cash Capital Expense - - - -
Textbooks 161,490 152,638 137,374 15,264
Equipment Other than Buses 113,315 66,958 124,974 (58,016)
Equipment Buses - - - -
Computer Hardware - Instructional 77,587 28,374 32,084 (3,710)
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional 29,213 14,520 7,010 7,510
Library Books 55,387 50,442 31,300 19,142
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays 436,992 312,932 332,742 (19,810)

Section 4 Page 10
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Schools: Northeast Zone

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Facilities and Related

Utilities - 5,500 2,100 3,400
Instructional Supplies 846,684 1,178,810 1,159,816 18,994
Equip Service Contr & Repair 17,133 38,332 23,170 15,162
Facilities Service Contracts - - - -
Rentals 32,301 26,650 10,260 16,390
Maintenance Repair Supplies - 4,725 1,980 2,745
Postage and Print/Advertising 50,015 62,046 30,860 31,186
Auto Supplies 14 - - -
Supplies and Materials 98,429 386,395 464,012 (77,617)
Custodial Supplies 108,911 149,688 95,132 54,556
Office Supplies 31,807 50,756 35,475 15,281
Sub Total Facilities and Related 1,185,294 1,902,902 1,822,805 80,097
Technology
Computer Software - Instructional 605 6,100 7,000 (900)
Computer Software - Non Instructional 10,229 3,664 3,843 (179)
Subtotal Technology 10,834 9,764 10,843 (1,079)
All Other Variable Expenses
Miscellaneous Services 45,943 53,161 57,580 (4,419)
Professional Technical Service 191,556 291,933 261,119 30,814
Agency Clerical 50,797 35,975 19,637 16,338
Judgments and Claims - - - -
Grant Disallowances - - - -
Departmental Credits (6,238) (16,915) (2,300) (14,615)
Indirect Costs Grants - - - -
BOCES Services - - - -
Professional Development 74,316 235,939 216,557 19,382
Subtotal of All Other Variable Expenses 356,374 600,093 552,593 47,500
Total Non Compensation 2,028,451 2,878,501 2,738,993 139,508
Sub Total 75,404,194 75,028,785 63,171,893 11,856,893
Budget Reserve - - - -
Grand Total 75,404,194 75,028,785 63,171,893 11,856,893

Section 4 Page 11
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Position Summary
Schools: Northeast Zone

Var Bud vs
2009 - 2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

POSITIONS BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 971.58 934.81 769.40 165.41
Civil Service Salary 177.75 178.09 137.90 40.19
Administrator Salary 61.40 61.40 49.20 12.20
Teaching Assistants 43.00 51.50 18.90 32.60
Paraprofessional Salary 133.95 130.45 129.55 0.90
Hourly Teachers 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.20
Total Salary Compensation 1,387.68 1,356.45 1,104.95 251.50
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 16.00 6.00 6.50 (0.50)
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teachers In Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Compensation 16.00 6.00 6.50 (0.50)
Total Salary and Other Compensation 1,403.68 1,362.45 1,111.45 251.00
Grand Total 1,403.68 1,362.45 1,111.45 251.00

Section 4 Page 12
SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Section 4 Page 13
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Miriam Miranda-Jurado School 06

Data From School Year 2009-10 Dag Hammarskjold

Mission: Develop the habits of mind that will allow all students to successfully meet or exceed New York State academic standards.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 36.8% 41.2% 53.6% 72.2% 9.6% MATH-3 32.2% 55.1% 66.7% 83.8% 36.5%
ELA-4 27.9% 27.1% 26.1% 45.9% 25.6% MATH-4 18.2% 27.1% 29.8% 45.9% 48.7%
ELA-5 26.0% 21.1% 31.8% 40.0% 28.6% MATH-5 7.5% 9.8% 31.8% 34.1% 6.9%
ELA-6 24.4% 19.2% 57.1% 56.8% 12.0% MATH-6 8.7% 24.5% 57.1% 69.0% 23.1%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 29.2% 26.7% 41.7% 53.5% 17.2% Total 3-8 17.4% 29.8% 45.7% 58.0% 30.2%

ELA Performance Goal: 59% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 79% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 48.6% 45.7% 58.7% 64.0% 87.2% Social Studies-5 75.0% 40.5% 44.2% 48.7% 66.7%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 3.6 3.5 3.8 Grade 1 29.8% 14.9%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.1 4.2 4.0 Grade 2 11.1% 25.9%
Movement, Music 4.0 4.1 3.8
Science 3.7 3.5 3.6

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS* SINI 1 SINI 1 GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS* SINI 1 SINI 2 IY-2 GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS* SINI 1 SINI 2 IY-2 GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 322 333 327 340
361 Total 0 0 11 13
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 4.0%
Black or African American 73.6% 74.5% 68.2% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.9% 1.8% 3.0%
Hispanic 19.9% 18.6% 24.0% Country 1 Bhutan Bhutan
White 5.6% 5.1% 4.3%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Rwanda Nepal
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3 China China

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91.3% 92.2% 91.4% 90.8%

Section 4 Page 14
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 06
Dag Hammarskjold Principal Miriam Miranda-Jurado
Data From School Year 2009-10

all students to successfully meet or exceed New York State academic standards.
Mission: Develop the habits of mind that will allow all
type
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING
MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 ELA - Grades 3-8
Teachers 29.1 24.2 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 1,655,720 73.7%
72.2% 9.6% Principals/AP/ADMATH-3 32.2% 55.1%
2.0 66.7% 83.8%
2.0 36.5% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,108 2005-060.0% 2006-07 2007-08 20
45.9% 25.6% MATH-4
Other Instructional 18.2% 27.1%
5.6 29.8% 45.9%
5.2 48.7% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten ELA-3 85,667 3.8% 41.2%
36.8% 53.6% 72
40.0% 28.6%
Non-instructionalMATH-5 7.5% 9.8%
10.7 31.8% 34.1%
11.2 6.9%
0268: Title I - AIS Services ELA-4 73,998 27.9%
3.3% 27.1% 26.1% 45
56.8% 12.0% MATH-6 8.7% 24.5% 57.1% 69.0% 23.1% ELA-5 7,467 26.0%
Total 47.4 42.6 0453: Safe Schools/Healthy Stdnts I 0.3% 21.1% 31.8% 40
MATH-7 ELA-6 4,071 24.4%
MATH-8 1416: Primary Project 0.2% 19.2% 57.1% 56
ELA-7
53.5% 17.2% Total 3-8 17.4% 29.8% 45.7% 58.0% 30.2% 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 84,888 3.8%
ELA-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 11.2 : 1 14 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 5.0%
79% Total 3-8 29.2% 26.7% 41.7% 53
students Math Performance
Pupil-Other-Staff Ratio Goal: 17.9 : 1of grade 3-6 students
18.5 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 106,362 4.7%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratioproficiency on Math in
6.92010-2011.
:1 8:1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 50,639 Goal:2.3%
ELA Performance 59% of grade 3-6 stu
4528: C4E - In-School Suspension will achieve proficiency 2.8%
63,594 on ELA in 2010-2011.
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
64.0% 87.2% Social Studies-5 75.0% 40.5% 44.2% 48.7% 66.7% 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 20
Social Studies-8 Science-4 48.6% 45.7% 58.7% 6
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TESTBUDGET

RESULTSALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

08 2008-09 2009-10 Major Expenditures KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score)
2010-11READING 2011-12
MATH
3.8 Grade 1 29.8% 14.9% 2006-07 2007-08
4.0 Salary Compensation Grade 2 2,491,07111.1% 2,177,403
25.9% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 2,245,874
Iniative, Social Relations100.0% 3.6 3.5
3.8 Other Compensation 67,541 36,608 Language, Literacy, Math 4.1 4.2
3.6 Fixed Obligation/Variability 2,500 - Movement, Music 4.0 4.1
Cash Capital Outlays 14,900 12,400 Science 3.7 3.5
Facilities and Related 53,148 18,463
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology - -
Other Variable Expenses GS - Good Standing
1,787 1,000

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Total 2009-10 2010-11 $IY12,630,947
- Improvement Year 1
$ 2,245,874
GS* SINI 1 SINI 1 GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
2005-06 2006
GS* SINI 1 SINI 2 IY-2 GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS GS GS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS G
GS* SINI 1 SINI 2 IY-2 GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL GS GS
Y or N - SURR/PLA

FISCAL
SCHOOL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each

Students** academic yearAllocation
Weight who had
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
Base Allocation 340.0 $3,682 $ 1,251,880 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity
09-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 26.3 2008-09 2009-10
$2,396 $ 2010-11
63,015
333 327 361 Total 0 0 11
ELL-Beginner (9-12) - $3,594 $ 13 - 2008-09 2009-
0.0% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 4.0% Total 322 333
ELL-Intermediate 14.1 $2,396 $ 33,784
4.5% 68.2% Most Prevalent Country of Birth American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% 0.0%
1.8% 3.0%
ELL-Advanced 7.0 $1,198 $ 8,386
SWD-Resource Room 2.0 $5,856 $ Bhutan
11,712 Black or African American 73.6% 74.5%
8.6% 24.0% Country 1 Bhutan
Asian 0.9% 1.8%
5.1% 4.3% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ -
Hispanic 19.9% 18.6%
0.0% 0.0% Country
SWD-Integrated 2
Special Class 22.0 $5,856
Rwanda $ Nepal
128,832 White 5.6% 5.1%
0.0% 0.0% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 27.0 $5,856 $ 158,112 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0%
Total ESF Country 3
Allocation China China
$ 1,655,720 Multi 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

.2% 91.4% 90.8% 2006-07 2007-0
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91.3% 92.2%

Section 4 Page 15
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal D’Onnarae Johnson School 20

Data From School Year 2009-10 Henry Lomb

Mission: It is our mission to structure the learning environment so that 100% of our children perform at a level that meets or exceeds national, state, and District
standards and includes the use of technology.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 57.6% 46.5% 48.9% 48.8% 26.8% MATH-3 73.7% 65.9% 80.0% 87.8% 53.7%
ELA-4 80.6% 46.3% 34.1% 60.5% 20.0% MATH-4 82.9% 82.9% 69.8% 94.7% 45.0%
ELA-5 78.7% 54.3% 73.5% 69.8% 24.4% MATH-5 34.8% 55.6% 81.8% 86.0% 38.6%
ELA-6 53.1% 44.2% 80.0% 90.3% 25.0% MATH-6 80.0% 47.7% 53.1% 90.6% 47.7%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 68.9% 48.1% 56.3% 66.0% 24.1% Total 3-8 65.4% 63.8% 71.9% 89.6% 46.2%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 97.1% 89.7% 88.1% 95.0% 67.5% Social Studies-5 97.8% 100.0% 88.6% 65.1% 76.7%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.5 4.8 4.4 Grade 1 15.6% 14.1%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.7 4.7 4.4 Grade 2 21.3% 21.7%
Movement, Music 4.7 4.9 4.5
Science 4.3 4.9 4.2

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 297 333 341 331 Total 0 1 0 0
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0%
Black or African American 63.4% 60.1% 60.5% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 2.0% 1.5% 1.4%
Hispanic 29.5% 33.0% 34.3% Country 1
White 4.4% 4.2% 2.5%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.3% 0.3% Country 2
Multi 0.3% 0.9% 0.8%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 93.7% 93.4% 91.3% 90.6%

Section 4 Page 16
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 20
Henry Lomb Principal D’Onnarae Johnson
Data From School Year 2009-10
nvironment so that 100% of our children perform at a level that meets or exceeds national, state, and District
Mission: It is our mission to structure the learning
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type 2011-12 standards
PROPOSED FUNDING and includes the use of technology.

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 26.4
2006-07 2007-08 25.1
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA
$ - 1,434,689
Grades 3-8 69.7%
48.8% 26.8% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 73.7% 2.0
65.9% 80.0% 1.087.8% 53.7% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,079 0.1%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
60.5% 20.0% Other Instructional MATH-4 82.9% 4.5
82.9% 69.8% 2.194.7% 45.0% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 57,111
ELA-3 2.8%
57.6% 46.5% 48.9%
69.8% 24.4% Non-instructional MATH-5 34.8% 55.6%
7.5 81.8% 9.586.0% 38.6% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 66,708
ELA-4 3.2%
80.6% 46.3% 34.1%
90.3% 25.0% Total MATH-6 80.0% 47.7%
40.4 53.1% 37.7
90.6% 47.7% 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 185,743
ELA-5 9.0%
78.7% 54.3% 73.5%
MATH-7 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360
ELA-6 5.5%
53.1% 44.2% 80.0%
MATH-8 ELA-7
1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 99,467 4.8%
66.0% 24.1% Total 3-8 65.4% 63.8% 71.9% 89.6% 46.2% ELA-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 12.9 : 1 13.2 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 37,979 1.8%
Pupil-Other-Staff Total 3-8 68.9% 48.1% 56.3%
students MathRatio
Performance Goal: 24.4
52%: 1 of grade 3-626.3 :1
students 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 3.1%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math8.4
in :2010-2011.
1 8.8 : 1 ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011.
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
95.0% 67.5% Social Studies-5 97.8% 100.0% 88.6% 65.1% 76.7% 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Social Studies-8 Science-4 97.1% 89.7% 88.1%
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

08 2008-09 2009-10 KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Scor

Major Expenditures 2010-11 READING2011-12
MATH
4.4 Grade 1 15.6% 14.1% 2006-07 200
4.4 Salary Compensation Grade 2 2,329,054 21.3% 2,017,644
21.7% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $Iniative,
2,058,731 100.0%
Social Relations 4.5 4
4.5 Other Compensation 48,518 22,089 Language, Literacy, Math 4.7 4
4.2 Fixed Obligation/Variability 200 10 Movement, Music 4.7 4
Cash Capital Outlays 17,500 610 Science 4.3 4
Facilities and Related 34,868 18,328
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology 10 -
Other Variable Expenses GS - 4,188
Good Standing 50

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total 2009-10 2010-11 $ 2,434,338 $ 2,058,731
GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
2005-06
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS GS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS GS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS
GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL GS
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years) Weight
Students** Allocation

009-10 Base Allocation

2010-11 2011-12* 331.0 2008-09
2007-08 $3,682
2009-10 $ 1,218,742
2010-11 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity
333 341 ELL-BeginnerTotal
331 (K-8) 0 5.6 1 $2,3960 $ 13,418
0 2008-09
0.0% 0.3% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 0.0% - 0.3% $3,594
0.0% $ 0.0%-
Total 297
60.1% 60.5% ELL-Intermediate 8.0 of Birth
Most Prevalent Country $2,396 $ 19,168 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.3%
1.5% 1.4% ELL-Advanced 11.3 $1,198 $ 13,537 Black or African American 63.4%
33.0% 34.3% Country 1
SWD-Resource Room 1.0 $5,856 $ 5,856 Asian 2.0%
4.2% 2.5% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ - Hispanic 29.5%
0.3% 0.3% Country 2
SWD-Integrated Special Class 14.0 $5,856 $ 81,984 White 4.4%
0.9% 0.8% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 14.0 $5,856 $ 81,984
Country 3 Multi 0.3%
Total ESF Allocation $ 1,434,689
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

3.4% 91.3% 90.6% 2006-07 2
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 93.7%

Section 4 Page 17
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Clinton Bell School 22

Data From School Year 2009-10 Lincoln

Mission: We support students as they work toward reaching state standards and school learning goals. Our school is a collaborative community of learners that
challenges, empowers, and prepares all students to become productive, responsible, and contributing citizens in a global society.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 31.6% 29.2% 33.3% 32.2% 15.6% MATH-3 45.2% 55.0% 57.1% 66.1% 7.5%
ELA-4 45.4% 42.5% 58.4% 50.0% 20.4% MATH-4 61.1% 56.8% 57.8% 49.2% 18.5%
ELA-5 23.8% 26.2% 55.2% 71.9% 16.9% MATH-5 28.2% 32.9% 37.0% 71.6% 9.4%
ELA-6 14.9% 45.8% 41.3% 66.2% 38.6% MATH-6 3.6% 29.1% 40.0% 59.0% 36.6%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 29.3% 36.4% 47.0% 56.1% 23.5% Total 3-8 36.7% 42.9% 47.3% 61.7% 18.4%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 79.4% 61.1% 72.6% 83.0% 60.7% Social Studies-5 65.3% 44.9% 60.3% 77.8% 47.6%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.2 4.1 4.0 Grade 1 16.3% 7.2%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.2 4.1 3.9 Grade 2 6.7% 25.0%
Movement, Music 4.2 4.1 4.0
Science 3.9 3.9 3.7

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS SINI 1 SINI 1 GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS SINI 1 SINI 1 GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 467 438 445 444 Total 6 1 21 29
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% Percent of Enrollment 1.3% 0.2% 4.8% 6.5%
Black or African American 42.5% 42.5% 43.3% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.6% 0.5% 0.2% Dominican
Hispanic 53.2% 52.3% 51.5% Country 1 Cuba Cuba
Republic
White 3.2% 4.1% 4.4%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.2% 0.2% Country 2 Ethiopia
Multi 0.2% 0.2% 0.2%
* Projected Country 3 Jamaica

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91.0% 91.1% 91.4% 91.3%

Section 4 Page 18
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 22
Lincoln Principal Clinton Bell
Data From School Year 2009-10
eaching state standards and school learning goals. Our school is a collaborative community of learners that
ecome productive, responsible, and contributing citizens in a global society. Mission: We support students as they w
type challenges, empowers, and prepares all s
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 51.0
2006-07 2007-08 42.4
2008-09 2009-10 ELA - Grades 3-8
Teachers Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 2,366,186 71.2%
32.2% 15.6% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 45.2% 55.0%
2.0 57.1% 1.066.1% 7.5% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,982 0.1% 2005-06 2006-0
50.0% 20.4% Other Instructional MATH-4 61.1% 56.8%
4.4 57.8% 2.849.2% 18.5% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 57,111 ELA-31.7% 31.6% 29.2%
71.9% 16.9% Non-instructional MATH-5 28.2% 17.0
32.9% 37.0% 16.0
71.6% 9.4% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 95,424 ELA-42.9% 45.4% 42.5%
66.2% 38.6% MATH-6 3.6% 29.1% 40.0% 59.0% 36.6%
Total 74.4 62.2 0725: NCFL Toyota Family Literacy 57,111 ELA-51.7% 23.8% 26.2%
MATH-7
1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 337,884 ELA-6 10.2% 14.9% 45.8%
MATH-8
56.1% 23.5% Total 3-8 36.7% 42.9% 47.3% 61.7% 18.4% 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 ELA-73.4%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 8.7 : 1 10.5 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 106,362 ELA-83.2%
52% Total 3-8 29.3% 36.4%
students MathRatio
Pupil-Other-Staff Performance Goal: 19 : 1 of grade 3-622.4
students
:1 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 39,072 1.2%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math in
6 2010-2011.
:1 7.1 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 89,914 2.7%
ELA Performance Goal: 67% o
4518: C4E - On Campus Intervention P 58,218 1.8%
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
83.0% 60.7% Social Studies-5 65.3% 44.9% 60.3% 77.8% 47.6% 2005-06 2006-0
Social Studies-8 Science-4 79.4% 61.1%
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale A

Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12
4.0 Grade 1 16.3% 7.2% 200
3.9 Salary Compensation Grade 2 3,823,034 6.7% 3,140,186
25.0% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,321,623
Iniative,100.0%
Social Relations 4
4.0 Other Compensation 47,010 95,177 Language, Literacy, Math 4
3.7 Fixed Obligation/Variability 500 1,500 Movement, Music 4
Cash Capital Outlays 3,300 13,500 Science 3
Facilities and Related
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS 42,230 69,760
Technology ACCOUNTABILITY
100 LEGEND
1,000
Other Variable Expenses GS - Good
2,254Standing 500

Budget
006-07 2007-08 2008-09 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total 2009-10 2010-11 $ 3,918,428 $ 3,321,623
GS SINI 1 SINI 1 GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS SINI 1 SINI 1 GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. withinStudents**
the past three years) Weight Allocation

09-10
Base Allocation
2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08
444.0
2008-09
$3,682
2009-10
$ 1,634,808
2010-11 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / E
438 445
ELL-Beginner
444
(K-8)
Total 6
60.0 1
$2,39621 $ 143,760
29
.2% 0.2% ELL-Beginner (9-12)
Percent of Enrollment 1.3% - 0.2% $3,594
4.8% $ 6.5%-
Total
2.5% 43.3% ELL-Intermediate 45.0 of Birth
Most Prevalent Country $2,396 $ 107,820
American Indian or Alaska Native
.5% 0.2% ELL-Advanced 29.0 $1,198 $ Dominican
34,742
Black or African American
2.3% 51.5% Country
SWD-Resource Room 1 Cuba 2.0 Cuba $5,856 $ Republic
11,712 Asian
.1% 4.4% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ - Hispanic
.2% 0.2% Country 2 Ethiopia
SWD-Integrated Special Class 74.0 $5,856 $ 433,344 White
.2% 0.2% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class - $5,856 $ - Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Jamaica
Total ESF Allocation $ 2,366,186 Multi
* Projected

7-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

1% 91.4% 91.3%
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate

Section 4 Page 19
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Deborah Lazio School 25

Data From School Year 2009-10 Nathaniel Hawthorne

Mission: We are committed to high expectations for all our students while working toward continuous improvement in educational practices and promoting a
positive school environment.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 65.2% 52.2% 50.0% 77.1% 21.7% MATH-3 64.0% 83.3% 79.2% 95.9% 59.6%
ELA-4 61.8% 45.2% 53.1% 47.5% 32.1% MATH-4 71.5% 61.0% 74.5% 63.4% 38.6%
ELA-5 82.9% 68.4% 85.4% 66.7% 31.6% MATH-5 81.1% 80.9% 89.7% 83.0% 36.8%
ELA-6 67.6% 75.0% 62.8% 17.0% MATH-6 71.8% 75.6% 76.2% 26.4%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 69.6% 69.6% 64.8% 64.3% 25.4% Total 3-8 71.3% 75.4% 79.3% 80.5% 40.0%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 90.2% 88.1% 83.0% 84.0% 82.1% Social Studies-5 92.7% 84.2% 86.8% 58.3% 92.1%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 3.6 3.7 4.0 Grade 1 22.0% 32.7%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.2 4.2 4.4 Grade 2 22.2% 17.8%
Movement, Music 3.8 4.4 4.0
Science 3.3 3.7 4.0

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 306 347 322 329 Total 0 4 5 4
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 1.3% 1.4% 1.2%
Black or African American 60.5% 59.7% 64.7% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.7% 1.2% 1.7%
Hispanic 32.4% 30.3% 26.6% Country 1 Yemen Yemen Bhutan
White 4.9% 7.5% 5.6%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Bhutan Bhutan Yemen
Multi 1.3% 1.2% 1.1%
* Projected Country 3 Canada

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 90.5% 91.6% 91.2% 90.3%

Section 4 Page 20
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 25
Nathaniel Hawthorne Principal Deborah Lazio
Data From School Year 2009-10
all our students while working toward continuous improvement in educational practices and promoting a
Mission: We are committed to high expecta
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type 2011-12 FUNDING
PROPOSED positive school environment.

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 44.0

2006-07 2007-08 32.8
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA - Grades 3-8
$ 1,792,222 72.5%
77.1% 21.7% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 64.0% 2.0
83.3% 79.2% 1.095.9% 59.6% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,668 0.1% 2005-06 2006-07
47.5% 32.1% Other Instructional MATH-4 71.5% 6.0
61.0% 74.5% 2.163.4% 38.6% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 57,111ELA-3 2.3% 65.2% 52.2%
66.7% 31.6% Non-instructional MATH-5 81.1% 8.7
80.9% 89.7% 7.783.0% 36.8% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 73,777ELA-4 3.0% 61.8% 45.2%
62.8% 17.0% Total MATH-6 71.8%
60.7 75.6% 43.6
76.2% 26.4% 0453: Safe Schools/Healthy Stdnts I 7,467ELA-5 0.3% 82.9% 68.4%
MATH-7 1416: Primary Project 4,071ELA-6 0.2% 67.6%
MATH-8 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 230,425ELA-7 9.3%
64.3% 25.4% Total 3-8 71.3% 75.4% 79.3% 80.5% 40.0%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 7.3 : 1 10 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360ELA-8 4.5%
Pupil-Other-Staff 92,572Total 3-8 3.7% 69.6% 69.6%
students MathRatio
Performance Goal: 19.3
52% : 1 of grade 3-630.5 :1
students 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math5.3
will achieve in :2010-2011.
1 7.5 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 37,979 1.5%
ELA Performance Goal: 67% of g
4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594
will achieve 2.6%
proficiency on ELA in 2010
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 0.0%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
84.0% 82.1% Social Studies-5 92.7% 84.2% 86.8% 58.3% 92.1% 2005-06 2006-07
Social Studies-8 Science-4 90.2% 88.1%
Science-8

BUDGET
RCSD K-2 TEST ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
RESULTS
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

08 2008-09 2009-10Major Expenditures KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Avera

2010-11 READING2011-12
MATH
4.0 Grade 1 22.0% 32.7% 2006-0
4.4 Salary Compensation Grade 2 3,094,107 22.2% 2,406,534
17.8% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 2,473,247 100.0%
Iniative, Social Relations 3.6
4.0 Other Compensation 42,437 29,202 Language, Literacy, Math 4.2
4.0 Fixed Obligation/Variability 2,000 - Movement, Music 3.8
Cash Capital Outlays 11,000 9,500 Science 3.3
Facilities and Related 28,394 24,511
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology 2,000 -
Other Variable Expenses GS - Good
5,911Standing 3,500

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Total 2009-10 2010-11 $ IY1 - Improvement$Year
3,185,849 1
2,473,247
GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
20
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA

FISCAL
SCHOOL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students Students** enrolled during Weight

each academic year who had
Allocation
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
Base Allocation 329.0 $3,682 $ 1,211,378 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethn
09-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 7.0 $2,396 $ 16,772
347 322 329 Total 0 4 5 4 20
ELL-Beginner (9-12) - $3,594 $ -
0.3% 0.3% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 1.3% 1.4% 1.2% Total 3
9.7% 64.7%
ELL-Intermediate 13.0 $2,396 $ 31,148
Most Prevalent Country of Birth American Indian or Alaska Native 0
1.2% 1.7% ELL-Advanced 9.8 $1,198 $ 11,740
Black or African American 60
0.3% 26.6% SWD-Resource Room
Country 1 5.0 Yemen $5,856
Yemen $ Bhutan
29,280
Asian 0
7.5% 5.6% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ - Hispanic 32
0.0% 0.0% Country
SWD-Integrated 2 Class
Special 84.0 Bhutan Bhutan
$5,856 Yemen
$ 491,904 White 4
1.2% 1.1% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class - $5,856 $ - Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3
Total ESF Allocation Canada $ 1,792,222 Multi 1
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

.6% 91.2% 90.3% 200
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 90.

Section 4 Page 21
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Larry Ellison School 33

Data From School Year 2009-10 Audubon

Mission: We will provide the design, materials and assistance students need to leave elementary school ready to do secondary school work without remediation.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 53.7% 50.0% 46.8% 52.6% 39.0% MATH-3 73.8% 67.5% 76.1% 85.3% 43.6%
ELA-4 66.0% 64.3% 61.9% 60.4% 49.6% MATH-4 74.0% 71.5% 76.6% 65.2% 52.8%
ELA-5 47.6% 41.8% 59.0% 66.4% 31.7% MATH-5 32.4% 44.9% 67.3% 74.0% 29.4%
ELA-6 41.9% 28.7% 55.3% 68.9% 28.4% MATH-6 35.1% 46.2% 60.4% 73.9% 63.0%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 52.3% 46.2% 55.5% 61.3% 37.5% Total 3-8 55.6% 58.7% 71.2% 74.6% 46.3%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 89.6% 83.6% 73.0% 65.0% 87.0% Social Studies-5 89.3% 81.9% 90.9% 87.5% 73.2%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 3.8 3.6 3.4 Grade 1 58.8% 37.4%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.0 4.0 3.9 Grade 2 39.5% 31.8%
Movement, Music 4.1 3.8 3.7
Science 3.9 3.8 3.8

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 1067 1060 1054 1068 Total 2 3 5 12
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.2% 0.3% 0.5% 1.1%
Black or African American 63.6% 64.8% 63.1% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.4% 0.2% 0.1% Dominican
Hispanic 30.2% 29.8% 32.2% Country 1 Chile Cuba Cuba
Republic
White 5.6% 5.0% 4.3%
Country 2 Dominican Dominican
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Cuba Chile
Republic Republic
Multi 0.2% 0.2% 0.2%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91.7% 91.9% 92.3% 91.2%

Section 4 Page 22
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 33
Audubon Principal Larry Ellison
Data From School Year 2009-10

assistance students need to leave elementary school ready to do secondary school work without remediation.
Mission: We will provide the design, mat
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type 2011-12 FUNDING
PROPOSED

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 96.0

2006-07 2007-08 78.1
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA - Grades 3-8
$ 5,016,269 75.6%
52.6% 39.0% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 73.8% 3.0
67.5% 76.1% 4.085.3% 43.6% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 3,682 0.1% 2005-06 2006-07
60.4% 49.6% Other Instructional MATH-4 74.0% 13.4
71.5% 76.6% 9.465.2% 52.8% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 199,889 ELA-3 3.0% 53.7% 50.0%
66.4% 31.7% Non-instructional MATH-5 32.4% 30.8
44.9% 67.3% 33.2
74.0% 29.4% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 217,135 ELA-4 3.3% 66.0% 64.3%
68.9% 28.4% Total MATH-6 35.1% 143.2
46.2% 60.4% 124.7
73.9% 63.0% 0453: Safe Schools/Healthy Stdnts I 7,467 ELA-5 0.1% 47.6% 41.8%
MATH-7 0513: The Primary Project 2,987 ELA-6 0.0% 41.9% 28.7%
MATH-8
1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 630,972 ELA-7 9.5%
61.3% 37.5% Total 3-8 55.6% 58.7% 71.2% 74.6% 46.3%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 11 : 1 13.7 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 ELA-8 1.7%
Pupil-Other-Staff 218,687 Total 3-8 52.3% 46.2%
students MathRatio
Performance Goal: 22.3
52% : 1 of grade 3-622.9 :1
students 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 3.3%
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math7.4
will achieve :1
in 2010-2011. 8.6 : 1 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 39,072 0.6%
ELA Performance Goal: 67% of
1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 126,598
will achieve1.9%
proficiency on ELA in 20
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 4518: C4E - On Campus Intervention P 58,218 0.9%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
65.0% 87.0% Social Studies-5 89.3% 81.9% 90.9% 87.5% 73.2% 2005-06 2006-07
Social Studies-8 Science-4 89.6% 83.6%
Science-8

BUDGET
RCSD K-2 TEST ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
RESULTS
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

08 2008-09 2009-10Major Expenditures KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Ave

2010-11 READING2011-12
MATH
3.4 Grade 1 58.8% 37.4% 2006
3.9 Salary Compensation Grade 2 7,306,083 39.5% 6,293,355
31.8% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 6,633,336 100.0%
Iniative, Social Relations 3.8
3.7 Other Compensation 151,887 132,288 Language, Literacy, Math 4.0
3.8 Fixed Obligation/Variability - - Movement, Music 4.1
Cash Capital Outlays 24,800 24,900 Science 3.9
Facilities and Related 99,947 177,793
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology - -
Other Variable Expenses GS - (4,241)
Good Standing 5,000

Budget
006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Total 2009-10 2010-11 $ IY1 - Improvement$Year
7,578,476 1
6,633,336
GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
Students**
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
Weight Allocation
Base Allocation 1,068.0 $3,682 $ 3,932,376 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Et
09-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 55.0 $2,396 $ 131,780
1060 1054 1068 Total 2 3 5 12 2
0.0% 0.0%
ELL-Beginner (9-12)
Percent of Enrollment 0.2%
- 0.3%
$3,594
0.5%
$ 1.1%-
Total
4.8% 63.1% ELL-Intermediate 39.0
Most Prevalent Country of Birth
$2,396 $ 93,444
American Indian or Alaska Native
0.2% 0.1% ELL-Advanced 37.3 $1,198 $ 44,685
Dominican Black or African American
9.8% 32.2% Country
SWD-Resource Room 1 Chile13.0 Cuba
$5,856 $ Cuba
76,128
Republic Asian
5.0% 4.3% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856
Dominican $ Dominican
- Hispanic
Country 2 Cuba
0.0% 0.0% SWD-Integrated Special Class 88.0 Chile $5,856
Republic $ Republic
515,328 White
0.2% 0.2% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 38.0 $5,856 $ 222,528 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Multi
Total ESF Allocation $ 5,016,269
* Projected

7-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

.9% 92.3% 91.2% 20
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 9

Section 4 Page 23
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Paul Montanarello School 36

Data From School Year 2009-10 Henry W. Longfellow

Mission: We are committed to creating a safe and rigorous educational environment, which supports and promotes the intellectual, social, emotional and physical
growth and development of each student. Staff, students, parents and out-of-school partners work together, sharing the responsibility of creating a student body of
life-long learners where the unique abilities and talents of each student is valued and nurtured, allowing each student the opportunity to achieve to their highest
potential.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 30.2% 36.4% 52.9% 67.9% 15.4% MATH-3 34.4% 57.4% 78.8% 77.4% 19.2%
ELA-4 37.2% 23.1% 32.7% 35.4% 17.9% MATH-4 34.5% 21.1% 62.0% 59.2% 21.4%
ELA-5 40.0% 34.8% 49.1% 39.1% 10.9% MATH-5 21.1% 43.5% 61.5% 30.4% 17.4%
ELA-6 34.6% 34.7% 50.0% 57.9% 23.3% MATH-6 17.3% 41.7% 59.1% 36.8% 14.0%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 35.4% 31.5% 46.0% 51.0% 16.8% Total 3-8 27.3% 39.9% 65.7% 51.2% 18.3%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 69.2% 63.2% 54.0% 84.0% 60.7% Social Studies-5 88.6% 64.4% 83.0% 50.0% 84.4%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 3.5 3.7 3.7 Grade 1 41.8% 34.5%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.3 3.5 3.9 Grade 2 13.6% 16.9%
Movement, Music 3.5 3.6 3.8
Science 3.9 3.2 3.5

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

ELA STATUS GS GS GS* GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS* GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 347 330 333 336
357 Total 0 0 0 0
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.3% 0.3% 0.5% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Black or African American 71.0% 67.3% 65.0% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.3% 0.9% 0.8%
Hispanic 20.7% 22.4% 23.8% Country 1
White 7.5% 8.8% 9.3%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2
Multi 0.3% 0.3% 0.5%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 90.1% 91.6% 91.7% 90.0%

Section 4 Page 24
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 36
Henry W. Longfellow Principal Paul Montanarello
Data From School Year 2009-10
igorous educational environment, which supports and promotes the intellectual, social, emotional and physical
ents, parents and out-of-school partners work together, sharing the responsibility of creating a student body of Mission: We are committed to creating a safe an
nts of each student is valued and nurtured, allowing each student the opportunity to achieve to their highest growth and development of each student. Staff, s
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs)
type life-long learners where the unique abilities and t
PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING
potential.
MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent
2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 31.7
2006-07 2007-08 28.1
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA - Grades 3-8
$ 1,460,681 58.9%
67.9% 15.4% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 34.4% 2.0
57.4% 78.8% 2.0
77.4% 19.2% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,242 0.1%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-
35.4% 17.9% Other Instructional MATH-4 34.5% 21.1%
3.6 62.0% 59.2%
1.9 21.4% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 57,111
ELA-3 2.3%30.2% 36.4% 52.9%
39.1% 10.9% Non-instructional MATH-5 21.1% 19.5
43.5% 61.5% 30.4%
18.5 17.4% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 76,869
ELA-4 3.1%37.2% 23.1% 32.7%
57.9% 23.3% Total MATH-6 17.3% 56.8
41.7% 59.1% 36.8%
50.5 14.0% 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 563,970
ELA-5 22.7%40.0% 34.8% 49.1%
MATH-7 ELA-6
1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 4.5%34.6% 34.7% 50.0%
MATH-8 ELA-7
51.0% 16.8% Total 3-8 27.3% 39.9% 65.7% 51.2% 18.3% 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 106,362 4.3%
ELA-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 10.5 : 1 12 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 37,979 1.5%
students 52%: 1 of grade 3-6 students Total 3-8 35.4% 31.5% 46.0%
MathRatio
Pupil-Other-Staff Performance Goal: 13.3 15 : 1 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 2.6%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math5.9
in :2010-2011.
1 6.7 : 1 ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-201
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
84.0% 60.7% Social Studies-5 88.6% 64.4% 83.0% 50.0% 84.4% 2005-06 2006-07 2007-
Social Studies-8 Science-4 69.2% 63.2% 54.0%
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Sc
Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12
7 3.7 Grade 1 41.8% 34.5% 2006-07 20
5 3.9 Salary Compensation Grade 2 2,995,076 13.6% 2,435,102
16.9% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 2,480,169 100.0%
Iniative, Social Relations 3.5
6 3.8 Language, Literacy, Math 4.3
Other Compensation 37,546 23,242
2 3.5 Movement, Music 3.5
Fixed Obligation/Variability 1,666 -
Cash Capital Outlays 7,600 3,000 Science 3.9
Facilities and Related
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS 27,745 18,325
ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology - -
GS - Good Standing
Other Variable Expenses 4,244 500

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total $ IY2
3,073,877
- Improvement$Year
2,480,169
2
GS GS* GS GS GS 2005-06
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS GS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS GS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS
GS GS* GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL GS
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
Students**
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years) Weight Allocation
009-10 Base Allocation
2010-11 2011-12* 336.0 2008-09
2007-08 $3,682
2009-10 $ 1,237,152
2010-11 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity
330 333 ELL-BeginnerTotal
357 (K-8) 0 3.0 0 $2,3960 $ 7,188
0 2008-09
0.3% 0.5% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 0.0% - 0.0% $3,594
0.0% $ 0.0%- Total 347
67.3% 65.0% ELL-Intermediate Most Prevalent Country
3.0 of Birth $2,396 $ 7,188 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.3%
0.9% 0.8% ELL-Advanced 3.5 $1,198 $ 4,193 Black or African American 71.0%
22.4% 23.8% Country 1
SWD-Resource Room 2.0 $5,856 $ 11,712 Asian 0.3%
8.8% 9.3% Hispanic 20.7%
0.0% 0.0%
SWD-Consultant Teacher
Country 2 - $5,856 $ -
SWD-Integrated Special Class 33.0 $5,856 $ 193,248 White 7.5%
0.3% 0.5% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
SWD-Self-Contained
Country 312:1 Class - $5,856 $ -
Multi 0.3%
Total ESF Allocation $ 1,460,681
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

1.6% 91.7% 90.0% 2006-07
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 90.1%

Section 4 Page 25
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Jason Lewis School 39

Data From School Year 2009-10 Andrew J. Townson

Mission: To empower students to believe in a successful future and provide the tools necessary to achieve it.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 34.2% 34.0% 37.9% 46.5% 16.1% MATH-3 49.4% 53.8% 60.8% 72.9% 14.0%
ELA-4 43.4% 35.9% 45.4% 52.9% 20.8% MATH-4 63.5% 48.8% 48.8% 54.0% 9.2%
ELA-5 32.9% 42.1% 56.1% 70.3% 17.1% MATH-5 26.6% 64.4% 52.9% 78.1% 24.4%
ELA-6 36.2% 42.3% 64.2% 64.6% 24.6% MATH-6 22.6% 35.1% 70.1% 66.2% 24.6%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 36.6% 38.6% 50.0% 57.7% 19.4% Total 3-8 40.5% 50.0% 57.7% 67.4% 17.9%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 74.4% 62.5% 69.6% 72.0% 61.3% Social Studies-5 77.0% 78.1% 82.1% 84.9% 74.4%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.3 4.3 4.3 Grade 1 38.0% 24.8%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.2 4.1 4.2 Grade 2 21.7% 13.3%
Movement, Music 4.3 4.3 4.3
Science 4.0 4.0 4.1

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS* GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS* GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 598 605 603 601 Total 1 2 2 2
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.5% 0.3% 0.2% Percent of Enrollment 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3%
Black or African American 66.9% 66.4% 66.9% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.5% 0.5% 0.9%
Hispanic 23.5% 24.3% 23.4% Country 1 Turkey Ethiopia Somalia
White 7.7% 7.8% 7.7%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.2% Country 2 Turkey Tunisia
Multi 0.8% 0.7% 0.8%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 92.2% 92.6% 92.7% 92.6%

Section 4 Page 26
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 39
Andrew J. Townson Principal Jason Lewis
Data From School Year 2009-10

ssful future and provide the tools necessary to achieve it.

Mission: To empower students to believ
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type 2011-12 FUNDING
PROPOSED

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 51.3

2006-07 2007-08 47.7
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA - Grades75.2%
$ 2,686,028 3-8
46.5% 16.1% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 49.4% 2.0
53.8% 60.8% 2.072.9% 14.0% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 69,609 1.9% 2005-06 2006-07
52.9% 20.8% Other Instructional MATH-4 63.5% 2.8
48.8% 48.8% 2.054.0% 9.2% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 114,222 ELA-33.2% 34.2% 34.0%
70.3% 17.1% Non-instructional MATH-5 26.6% 11.5
64.4% 52.9% 10.0
78.1% 24.4% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 120,385 ELA-43.4% 43.4% 35.9%
64.6% 24.6% Total MATH-6 22.6% 67.6
35.1% 70.1% 61.7
66.2% 24.6% 0456: ESSC Elementary 59,793 ELA-51.7% 32.9% 42.1%
MATH-7 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 152,060 ELA-64.3% 36.2% 42.3%
MATH-8
1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 ELA-73.1%
57.7% 19.4% Total 3-8 40.5% 50.0% 57.7% 67.4% 17.9%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 11.8 : 1 12.6 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 122,377 ELA-83.4%
Pupil-Other-Staff 39,072 Total 3-8 36.6% 38.6%
students MathRatio
Performance Goal: 52%37 : 1 of grade 3-642.9 :1
students 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 1.1%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math8.9
in :2010-2011.
1 9.7 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 37,979
ELA Performance Goal: 67% o
4518: C4E - On Campus Intervention P 58,218
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
72.0% 61.3% Social Studies-5 77.0% 78.1% 82.1% 84.9% 74.4% 2005-06 2006-07
Social Studies-8 Science-4 74.4% 62.5%
Science-8

BUDGET
RCSD K-2 TEST ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
RESULTS
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

08 2008-09 2009-10 KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Av

Major Expenditures 2010-11 READING2011-12
MATH
4.3 Grade 1 38.0% 24.8% 200
4.2 Salary Compensation Grade 2 3,700,220 21.7% 3,397,878
13.3% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,572,103 97.3%
Iniative, Social Relations 4
4.3 Other Compensation 103,168 112,725 Language, Literacy, Math 4
4.1 Fixed Obligation/Variability 3,000 - Movement, Music 4
Cash Capital Outlays 28,658 15,000 Science 4
Facilities and Related 59,566 44,500
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology - -
Other Variable Expenses GS - Good
3,000Standing 2,000

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total 2009-10 2010-11 $ 3,897,612 $ 3,572,103
GS GS* GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS* GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. withinStudents**
the past three years) Weight Allocation

009-10 Base Allocation

2010-11 2011-12* 601.0 2008-09
2007-08 $3,682
2009-10 $ 2,212,882
2010-11 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / E
605 603 ELL-BeginnerTotal
601 (K-8) 1 11.0 2 $2,3962 $ 26,356
2
0.3% 0.2% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 0.2% - 0.3% $3,594
0.3% $ 0.3%-
Total
6.4% 66.9% ELL-Intermediate 7.0 of Birth
Most Prevalent Country $2,396 $ 16,772 American Indian or Alaska Native
0.5% 0.9% ELL-Advanced 7.0 $1,198 $ 8,386 Black or African American
Country 1 Turkey
4.3% 23.4% SWD-Resource Room 1.0 Ethiopia Somalia
$5,856 $ 5,856 Asian
7.8% 7.7% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ - Hispanic
0.0% 0.2% Country 2 Turkey Tunisia
SWD-Integrated Special Class 71.0 $5,856 $ 415,776 White
0.7% 0.8% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class - $5,856 $ -
Country 3 Multi
Total ESF Allocation $ 2,686,028
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

2.6% 92.7% 92.6% 2
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate

Section 4 Page 27
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Brian Hill School 45

Data From School Year 2009-10 Mary McLeod Bethune

Mission: Meaningful instruction is student-centered, culturally relevant, challenging, engaging, and delivered through a positive emotional exchange. All
members of our educational community will be respectful, responsible, safe, present, and ready to achieve excellence. We will be accountable and responsible for
teaching and learning and will provide students with the knowledge to be successful in post-secondary education.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 22.4% 26.9% 30.9% 21.1% 11.1% MATH-3 27.2% 43.0% 50.5% 60.0% 16.2%
ELA-4 23.9% 27.5% 30.6% 44.9% 10.7% MATH-4 52.5% 29.2% 38.6% 52.0% 15.5%
ELA-5 31.8% 32.0% 35.8% 52.9% 25.5% MATH-5 26.9% 44.1% 44.1% 61.6% 32.7%
ELA-6 26.7% 31.1% 49.5% 50.0% 30.0% MATH-6 20.0% 24.3% 48.5% 46.7% 48.9%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 26.2% 29.3% 37.0% 42.2% 19.4% Total 3-8 31.6% 34.7% 45.7% 54.9% 28.3%

ELA Performance Goal: 57% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 81% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 54.0% 35.4% 42.5% 68.0% 65.1% Social Studies-5 61.0% 49.0% 45.9% 72.1% 72.9%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 3.9 4.2 3.9 Grade 1 10.3% 11.6%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.3 4.6 4.3 Grade 2 11.4% 10.3%
Movement, Music 4.1 4.1 3.9
Science 4.1 4.2 4.1

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Profile

ELA STATUS SINI 2 SINI 3 SINI 4 SINI 5 RY-1 RY2 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS SINI* 2 SINI *2 GS WATCH GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL SINI 2 CA PFR SINI 5 RY-1 RY2 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 683 642 646 716
695 Total 0 0 0 1
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.4% 0.2% 0.1% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%
Black or African American 67.2% 71.2% 68.5% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.7% 0.5% 0.4%
Hispanic 27.1% 22.9% 25.8% Country 1
White 4.3% 4.7% 4.7%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2
Multi 0.3% 0.6% 0.4%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91.8% 91.1% 92.1% 90.7%

Section 4 Page 28
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 45
Mary McLeod Bethune Principal Brian Hill
Data From School Year 2009-10
d, culturally relevant, challenging, engaging, and delivered through a positive emotional exchange. All
pectful, responsible, safe, present, and ready to achieve excellence. We will be accountable and responsible for Mission: Meaningful instruction is stu
h the knowledge to be successful in post-secondary education. members of our educational communit
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs)
type
PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING teaching and learning and will provide

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 57.6
2006-07 2007-08 51.8
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA - Grades
$ 3,054,358 70.6%3-8
21.1% 11.1% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 27.2% 3.0
43.0% 50.5% 3.0 60.0% 16.2% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 2,278 0.1% 2005-06 2006
44.9% 10.7% Other Instructional MATH-4 52.5% 29.2%
8.5 38.6% 8.0 52.0% 15.5% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 85,667 2.0%
ELA-3 22.4% 26.9
52.9% 25.5% Non-instructional MATH-5 26.9% 44.1%
25.4 44.1% 17.061.6% 32.7% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 151,089 3.5%
ELA-4 23.9% 27.5
50.0% 30.0% MATH-6 20.0% 24.3% 48.5% 46.7% 48.9%
Total 94.5 79.8 0305: IDEA Support Serv & Sec 611 258,996 6.0%
ELA-5 31.8% 32.0
MATH-7 ELA-6 26.7% 31.1
1323: School Redesign 44,027 1.0%
MATH-8 ELA-7
42.2% 19.4% Total 3-8 31.6% 34.7% 45.7% 54.9% 28.3% 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 272,962 6.3%
ELA-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 11.2 : 1 13.8 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 2.6%
6 students 81%: 1 of grade 3-6 students Total 3-8 26.2% 29.3
Math
Pupil-Other-Staff Performance Goal:
Ratio 17.5 25.6 :1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 152,182 3.5%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math
6.8in: 2010-2011.
1 9:1 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 39,072 ELA Performance Goal: 57%
1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 94,949 will achieve proficiency on ELA in
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
4518: C4E - On Campus Intervention P 58,218
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
68.0% 65.1% Social Studies-5 61.0% 49.0% 45.9% 72.1% 72.9% 2005-06 2006
Social Studies-8 Science-4 54.0% 35.4
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
e) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

7-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale

2 3.9
Major Expenditures Grade 1
2010-11 10.3%
2011-12
11.6% 2
6 4.3 Grade 2 11.4% 10.3%
Salary Compensation 4,471,806 4,120,501 Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 4,326,157 Iniative,
95.6%
Social Relations
1 3.9 Language, Literacy, Math
Other Compensation 129,389 92,350
2 4.1 Movement, Music
Fixed Obligation/Variability 9,235 2,500
Science
Cash Capital Outlays 21,700 13,000
Facilities and Related
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS 58,477
ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
97,806
Technology - Standing
GS - Good -
2006-07 2007-08 Other Variable Expenses IY112,527
- Improvement Year 1 -

Budget
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
SINI 3 SINI 4 Total
SINI 5 RY-1 RY2 $ IY2
4,703,134 $ Year
- Improvement 4,326,157
2
SINI *2 GS WATCH GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
CA PFR SINI 5 RY-1 RY2 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years) Weight
Students** Allocation
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race
Base Allocation 716.0 2008-09 2009-10
$3,682 2010-11
$ 2,636,312
642 646 695
ELL-Beginner Total
(K-8) 0 12.0 0 $2,396 0 1
$ 28,752
0.2% 0.1% ELL-Beginner Percent
(9-12) of Enrollment 0.0%- 0.0% 0.0%
$3,594 $ 0.2%- Total
71.2% 68.5% Most Prevalent Country
ELL-Intermediate 6.0 of Birth $2,396 $ 14,376 American Indian or Alaska Native
0.5% 0.4% Black or African American
22.9% 25.8%
ELL-AdvancedCountry 1 5.0 $1,198 $ 5,990
Asian
4.7% 4.7% SWD-Resource Room 3.0 $5,856 $ 17,568
Hispanic
0.0% 0.0% SWD-Consultant Teacher
Country 2 - $5,856 $ -
White
0.6% 0.4% SWD-Integrated Special Class 60.0 $5,856 $ 351,360 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 12:1
SWD-Self-Contained 3 Class - $5,856 $ - Multi
Total ESF Allocation $ 3,054,358 * Projected

007-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

91.1% 92.1% 90.7%
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate

Section 4 Page 29
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Tim O. Mains School 50

Data From School Year 2009-10 Helen Barrett Montgomery

Mission: It is our mission to educate all our students to high levels of academic achievement and to prepare all of our students to meet or exceed academic
standards and become lifelong learners, productive members of the workforce and responsible, contributing citizens.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 44.1% 42.2% 51.4% 43.4% 33.3% MATH-3 43.9% 45.8% 76.9% 81.9% 27.9%
ELA-4 58.7% 53.1% 60.6% 68.7% 35.9% MATH-4 56.8% 49.3% 58.6% 81.0% 37.0%
ELA-5 58.9% 50.0% 61.5% 71.1% 46.1% MATH-5 50.0% 59.3% 59.0% 63.9% 28.9%
ELA-6 60.8% 60.3% 69.9% 71.8% 39.0% MATH-6 56.6% 59.7% 78.2% 67.5% 50.0%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 56.3% 51.4% 61.1% 63.8% 38.3% Total 3-8 51.8% 53.4% 68.2% 73.6% 35.8%

ELA Performance Goal: 69% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 87% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 80.7% 67.1% 67.9% 87.0% 64.4% Social Studies-5 91.3% 71.6% 67.9% 74.1% 84.2%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.8 4.5 4.6 Grade 1 27.9% 13.2%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.7 4.5 4.4 Grade 2 18.5% 9.9%
Movement, Music 4.9 4.7 4.6
Science 4.7 4.4 4.3

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

ELA STATUS GS GS GS* GS GS IY1 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS GS GS IY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 552 560 529 512 Total 39 53 21 23
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.4% 0.5% 0.4% Percent of Enrollment 6.9% 9.6% 3.8% 4.3%
Black or African American 50.6% 51.4% 53.7% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 7.4% 9.5% 9.3%
Hispanic 31.0% 27.7% 26.7% Country 1 Vietnam Kenya Thailand Bhutan
White 10.2% 10.2% 9.5%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.2% 0.0% Country 2 Russia Russia Bhutan Nepal
Multi 0.4% 0.5% 0.6%
* Projected Country 3 Thailand Vietnam Russia Thailand

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 93.7% 93.5% 93.9% 93.5%

Section 4 Page 30
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 50
Helen Barrett Montgomery Principal Tim O. Mains
Data From School Year 2009-10
s to high levels of academic achievement and to prepare all of our students to meet or exceed academic
members of the workforce and responsible, contributing citizens. Mission: It is our mission to educate all ou
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type 2011-12 FUNDING
PROPOSED standards and become lifelong learners, pr

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 47.9
2006-07 2007-08 40.5
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA - Grades 3-8
$ 2,509,680 75.8%
43.4% 33.3% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 43.9% 2.0
45.8% 76.9% 2.081.9% 27.9% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 85,667 2.6% 2005-06 2006-07
68.7% 35.9% Other Instructional MATH-4 56.8% 5.0
49.3% 58.6% 2.681.0% 37.0% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 112,212 ELA-3 3.4% 44.1% 42.2%
71.1% 46.1% Non-instructional MATH-5 50.0% 59.3%
16.9 59.0% 16.0
63.9% 28.9% 0456: ESSC Elementary 59,793 ELA-4 1.8% 58.7% 53.1%
71.8% 39.0% Total MATH-6 56.6% 59.7%
71.8 78.2% 61.1
67.5% 50.0% 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 196,839 ELA-5 5.9% 58.9% 50.0%
MATH-7 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 ELA-6 3.4% 60.8% 60.3%
MATH-8
1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 106,362 ELA-7 3.2%
63.8% 38.3% Total 3-8 51.8% 53.4% 68.2% 73.6% 35.8%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 11 : 1 12.6 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 63,299 ELA-8 1.9%
56.3% 51.4%
students Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 22.1
87% : 1 of grade 3-624.9 :1
students 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 Total 3-81.9%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math7.4
in :2010-2011.
1 8.4 : 1 ELA Performance Goal: 69% of
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 201
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
87.0% 64.4% Social Studies-5 91.3% 71.6% 67.9% 74.1% 84.2% 2005-06 2006-07
Social Studies-8 Science-4 80.7% 67.1%
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

08 2008-09 2009-10 KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Aver

Major Expenditures 2010-11 READING2011-12
MATH
4.6 Grade 1 27.9% 13.2% 2006-
4.4 Salary Compensation Grade 2 3,639,597 18.5% 3,181,720
9.9% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,309,805 100.0%
Iniative, Social Relations 4.8
4.6 Other Compensation 71,472 75,500 Language, Literacy, Math 4.7
4.3 Fixed Obligation/Variability 300 - Movement, Music 4.9
Cash Capital Outlays 22,471 8,000 Science 4.7
Facilities and Related
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS 62,473 40,585
ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology 700 1,200
GS - Good Standing
Other Variable Expenses 6,900 2,800

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total $ 3,803,913 $ 3,309,805
GS GS* GS GS IY1 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
2
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS GS GS IY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. withinStudents**
the past three years) Weight Allocation

009-10 Base Allocation

2010-11 2011-12* 512.0 2008-09
2007-08 $3,682
2009-10 $ 1,885,184
2010-11 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Eth
560 529 ELL-BeginnerTotal
512 (K-8) 39 39.1 53 $2,39621 $ 93,684
23 2
0.5% 0.4% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 6.9% - 9.6% $3,594
3.8% $ 4.3%-
Total
51.4% 53.7% ELL-Intermediate 34.9 of Birth
Most Prevalent Country $2,396 $ 83,620 American Indian or Alaska Native
9.5% 9.3% ELL-Advanced 36.0 $1,198 $ 43,128 Black or African American 5
27.7% 26.7% Country 1 Vietnam Kenya Thailand Bhutan
SWD-Resource Room 11.0 $5,856 $ 64,416 Asian
10.2% 9.5% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ - Hispanic 3
0.2% 0.0% Country 2 Russia Russia Bhutan Nepal
SWD-Integrated Special Class 36.0 $5,856 $ 210,816 White 1
0.5% 0.6% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
SWD-Self-Contained
Country 3
12:1 Class 22.0
Thailand Vietnam
$5,856
Russia
$ Thailand
128,832
Multi
Total ESF Allocation $ 2,509,680
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

3.5% 93.9% 93.5% 20
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 9

Section 4 Page 31
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Denise Rainey School 52

Data From School Year 2009-10 Frank Fowler Dow

Mission: In partnership with our parents and community, we are committed to preparing our students to value themselves and others, attain their highest level of
achievement, become life-long learners, and serve as productive citizens in the community.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 62.8% 42.2% 73.3% 75.6% 42.9% MATH-3 58.8% 77.8% 93.3% 97.6% 23.8%
ELA-4 61.9% 51.1% 73.8% 72.7% 62.5% MATH-4 59.5% 50.0% 63.6% 82.2% 67.5%
ELA-5 56.2% 64.4% 55.8% 81.4% 50.0% MATH-5 38.8% 46.6% 51.2% 69.0% 39.1%
ELA-6 47.6% 54.5% 66.0% 76.6% 45.5% MATH-6 12.2% 34.5% 62.0% 73.9% 56.8%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 57.4% 52.7% 67.6% 76.6% 50.0% Total 3-8 42.9% 50.8% 67.6% 80.5% 46.5%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 92.5% 80.0% 84.1% 98.0% 97.5% Social Studies-5 81.6% 69.8% 84.1% 90.5% 95.7%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.1 4.0 4.2 Grade 1 50.0% 26.0%
Language, Literacy, Math 3.7 3.8 4.1 Grade 2 28.9% 31.6%
Movement, Music 3.9 4.2 4.0
Science 3.7 4.0 3.7

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 304 313 314 317 Total 0 2 0 0
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0%
Black or African American 54.3% 53.4% 49.3% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 1.3% 1.9% 2.3%
Hispanic 13.2% 15.7% 15.2% Country 1 Brazil
White 29.9% 27.8% 32.4%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2
Multi 1.0% 1.0% 0.6%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 94.0% 93.6% 94.6% 94.1%

Section 4 Page 32
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 52
Frank Fowler Dow Principal Denise Rainey
Data From School Year 2009-10
unity, we are committed to preparing our students to value themselves and others, attain their highest level of
s productive citizens in the community. Mission: In partnership with our parents an
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs)
type achievement, become life-long learners, and
PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 23.6
2006-07 2007-08 21.2
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA - Grades 3-8
$ 1,360,499 71.2%
75.6% 42.9% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 58.8% 2.0
77.8% 93.3% 2.0
97.6% 23.8% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 57,111 3.0% 2005-06 2006-07
72.7% 62.5% Other Instructional MATH-4 59.5% 3.1
50.0% 63.6% 2.1
82.2% 67.5% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 51,025ELA-3 2.7% 62.8% 42.2%
81.4% 50.0% Non-instructional MATH-5 38.8% 46.6%
6.8 51.2% 69.0%
7.5 39.1% 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 134,150ELA-4 7.0% 61.9% 51.1%
76.6% 45.5% Total MATH-6 12.2% 35.5
34.5% 62.0% 73.9%
32.8 56.8% 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360ELA-5 5.9% 56.2% 64.4%
MATH-7
1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 99,467ELA-6 5.2% 47.6% 54.5%
MATH-8
1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 31,650ELA-7 1.7%
76.6% 50.0% Total 3-8 42.9% 50.8% 67.6% 80.5% 46.5%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 13.3 : 1 15 : 1 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594ELA-8 3.3%
students 52% : 1 of grade 3-627.3
students Total 3-8 57.4% 52.7%
Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 26.5 :1
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math8.9
in :2010-2011.
1 9.7 : 1 ELA Performance Goal: 67% of g
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 201
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
98.0% 97.5% Social Studies-5 81.6% 69.8% 84.1% 90.5% 95.7% 2005-06 2006-07
Social Studies-8 Science-4 92.5% 80.0%
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

08 2008-09 2009-10 KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Aver

Major Expenditures 2010-11 READING2011-12
MATH
4.2 Grade 1 50.0% 26.0% 2006-0
4.1 Salary Compensation Grade 2 1,950,977 28.9% 1,819,553
31.6% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 1,909,856 100.0%
Iniative, Social Relations 4.1
4.0 Other Compensation 46,664 39,000 Language, Literacy, Math 3.7
3.7 Fixed Obligation/Variability - - Movement, Music 3.9
Cash Capital Outlays 9,000 8,000 Science 3.7
Facilities and Related 36,315 38,503
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology - -
Other Variable Expenses GS - Good
6,429Standing 4,800

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total 2009-10 2010-11 $ 2,049,385 $ 1,909,856
GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
2
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. withinStudents**
the past three years) Weight Allocation

009-10 Base Allocation

2010-11 2011-12* 317.0 2008-09
2007-08 $3,682
2009-10 $ 1,167,194
2010-11 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethn
313 314 ELL-BeginnerTotal
317 (K-8) 0 4.3 2 $2,3960 $ 10,303
0 20
0.3% 0.3% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 0.0% - 0.7% $3,594
0.0% $ 0.0%-
Total
3.4% 49.3% ELL-Intermediate 2.0 of Birth
Most Prevalent Country $2,396 $ 4,792
American Indian or Alaska Native 0
1.9% 2.3% ELL-Advanced 7.0 $1,198 $ 8,386 Black or African American 54
5.7% 15.2% SWD-Resource Country
Room 1 7.0 Brazil $5,856 $ 40,992 Asian 1
7.8% 32.4% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ - Hispanic 13
0.0% 0.0% Country 2
SWD-Integrated Special Class 10.0 $5,856 $ 58,560 White 29
1.0% 0.6% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 12.0 $5,856 $ 70,272
Country 3 Multi 1
Total ESF Allocation $ 1,360,499
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

.6% 94.6% 94.1% 200
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 94

Section 4 Page 33
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Miriam Cruz-Vazquez School 53

Data From School Year 2009-10 Montessori Academy @ Franklin

Mission: We are dedicated to providing an educational program that promotes the physical, social, emotional and academic well-being of the whole child in a safe
and secure learning community.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 35.3% 36.8% 18.8% 60.9% 33.3% MATH-3 47.1% 68.4% 68.8% 82.6% 33.3%
ELA-4 83.3% 66.7% 73.3% 46.2% 40.0% MATH-4 83.3% 66.7% 80.0% 69.2% 30.0%
ELA-5 60.0% 83.3% 63.6% 78.6% 27.3% MATH-5 20.0% 66.6% 63.6% 85.7% 36.4%
ELA-6 100.0% 25.0% 80.0% 100.0% 33.3% MATH-6 57.1% 25.0% 80.0% 100.0% 44.4%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 60.0% 51.2% 53.2% 68.3% 34.5% Total 3-8 51.4% 63.4% 72.3% 83.1% 34.5%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 85.0% 80.0% Social Studies-5 100.0% 100.0% 90.9% 85.7% 75.0%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations Grade 1 16.0% 28.0%
Language, Literacy, Math Grade 2 34.5% 34.5%
Movement, Music
Science

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Profile

ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2

MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS PENDIN GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 154 147 148 171 Total 1 1 0 0
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% Percent of Enrollment 0.7% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0%
Black or African American 75.3% 74.1% 69.2% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 1.3% 0.7% 1.5%
Hispanic 13.6% 14.3% 13.9% Country 1 Ghana Ghana
White 7.8% 8.8% 10.9%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2
Multi 1.9% 2.0% 2.5%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 95.1% 95.2% 94.7% 94.0%

Section 4 Page 34
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 53
Montessori Academy @ Franklin Principal Miriam Cruz-Vazquez
Data From School Year 2009-10
nal program that promotes the physical, social, emotional and academic well-being of the whole child in a safe
Mission: We are dedicated to providing an education
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type 2011-12andFUNDING
PROPOSED secure learning community.

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 13.0
2006-07 2007-08 11.1
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA -$Grades 3-8
695,772 69.2%
60.9% 33.3% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 47.1% 1.068.4% 68.8% 1.082.6% 33.3% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 505 0.1% 2006-07 2007-08
2005-06
46.2% 40.0% Other Instructional MATH-4 83.3% 0.566.7% 80.0% 1.369.2% 30.0% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 57,111 5.7%
ELA-3 35.3% 36.8% 18.8%
78.6% 27.3% Non-instructional MATH-5 20.0% 6.766.6% 63.6% 5.785.7% 36.4% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 19,437 1.9%
ELA-4 83.3% 66.7% 73.3%
100.0% 33.3% Total MATH-6 57.1% 21.2
25.0% 80.0% 19.1
100.0% 44.4% 0453: Safe Schools/Healthy Stdnts I 7,467 0.7%
ELA-5 60.0% 83.3% 63.6%
MATH-7
1416: Primary Project ELA-64,071 0.4%
100.0% 25.0% 80.0%
MATH-8
1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs ELA-7
26,830 2.7%
68.3% 34.5% Total 3-8 51.4% 63.4% 72.3% 83.1% 34.5%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 11.4 : 1 15.4 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals ELA-8
112,360 11.2%
52% Total 3-8 60.0% 51.2% 53.2%
6 students Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 18 : 1 of grade 3-621.4
students
:1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 18,990 1.9%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math 7in:2010-2011.
1 9:1 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 6.3% 67% of grade 3-6 s
ELA Performance Goal:
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011.
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
85.0% 80.0% Social Studies-5 100.0% 100.0% 90.9% 85.7% 75.0% 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Social Studies-8
Science-4 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score)
Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12
Grade 1 16.0% 28.0% 2006-07 2007-0
Salary Compensation Grade 2 1,027,458 34.5% 34.5%
959,359 Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 1,006,137 100.0%
Iniative, Social Relations
Other Compensation 59,002 21,505 Language, Literacy, Math
Fixed Obligation/Variability 500 500 Movement, Music
Cash Capital Outlays 13,700 2,100 Science
Facilities and Related
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS 51,225 19,273
ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology - 100
GS - Good Standing
Other Variable Expenses 3,100 3,300

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total $ IY2
1,154,985
- Improvement$Year
1,006,137
2
GS GS GS GS GS 2005-06 2
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2 ELA STATUS GS
GS GS PENDIN GS
RY1 - Restructuring Year 1 MATH STATUS GS
N N N N N
RY2 - Restructuring Year 2 SCIENCE STATUS GS
GS GS GS GS GS
RA - Restructuring Advanced SURR/PLA STATUS
Y or N - SURR/PLA OVERALL GS

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years) Weight
Students** Allocation
2009-10 Base Allocation
2010-11 2011-12* 171.0 2008-09
2007-08 $3,682
2009-10 $ 2010-11
629,622 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity
147 148 ELL-Beginner
171 (K-8)
Total 1 10.0 1 $2,3960 $ 23,960
0 2008-09 20
0.0% 0.5% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 0.7% - 0.6% 0.0%
$3,594 $ 0.0%- Total 154 1
74.1% 69.2% ELL-Intermediate Most Prevalent Country
- of Birth $2,396 $ - American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% 0
0.7% 1.5%
ELL-AdvancedCountry 1 Ghana 1.0 Ghana $1,198 $ 1,198 Black or African American 75.3% 74
14.3% 13.9%
SWD-Resource Room 6.0 $5,856 $ 35,136 Asian 1.3% 0
8.8% 10.9%
SWD-Consultant Teacher
Country 2 - $5,856 $ - Hispanic 13.6% 14
0.0% 0.0%
White 7.8% 8
2.0% 2.5% SWD-Integrated Special Class 1.0 $5,856 $ 5,856
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0
SWD-Self-Contained
Country 312:1 Class - $5,856 $ -
Multi 1.9% 2
Total ESF Allocation $ 695,772
* Projected

007-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

5.2% 94.7% 94.0% 2006-07 200
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 95.1% 95

Section 4 Page 35
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Mary Aronson School 73

Data From School Year 2009-10 Northeast College Preparatory High School @ Douglas
Mission: It is our mission to graduate students who will have the knowledge, skills, and experience necessary to successfully complete college and be ready to
select the career best suited to their talents, skills, and potential. We are committed to helping all students master the challenges of a rigorous college preparation
curriculum in a supportive learning environment. We aim to develop students who can analyze situations, solve problems, and communicate through speaking and
writing. Our desire is to produce individuals who are proactive, resourceful, positive, creative, and well-adjusted, and ready to make a meaningful contribution to
our society.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 38.0% 49.1% 54.6% 10.0% MATH-7 34.7% 56.6% 61.2% 26.7%
ELA-8 41.0% 57.0% 7.4% MATH-8 58.4% 53.5% 12.5%
Total 3-8 38.0% 45.6% 55.7% 8.8% Total 3-8 34.6% 57.4% 57.6% 20.4%

ELA Performance Goal: 35% of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: 59% of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11 65.0% 66.7%
Science-8 66.7% 42.9% 41.3% MATH A 69.0% 63.0% 63.0%
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 71.4% 62.8% 33.9%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG 0.0%
GEOMETRY 50.0% 15.9%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 73.0% 78.0% 85.0% 40.7%
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY 61.5% 7.3%
Social Studies-8 28.4% 24.4% 18.3% EARTH SCIENCE 75.0% 57.4% 42.5%
PHYSICS 0.0%
US HISTORY 100.0% 85.0% 90.2%
GLOBAL 50.0% 49.0% 62.0% 47.7%
LOTE 100.0% 87.1% 66.7%

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

Profile

DISTRICT 48% 52% 46%

73 Northeast College Preparatory High School @ Douglas

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS GS WATCH IY-1 IY2 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS WATCH IY-1 IY2 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Opened - 2006-07 Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 362 408 472 531 Total 2 0 5 12
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.7% 0.0% 1.2% 2.5%
Black or African American 69.1% 68.6% 64.6% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.0% 0.4% Dominican
Hispanic 23.0% 25.0% 27.3% Country 1 Somalia Cuba
Republic
White 7.9% 6.4% 7.6%
Country 2 Dominican
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Bhutan
Republic
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3 Jamaica Cuba

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 92.0% 91.2% 90.2% 88.7%

Section 4 Page 36
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 73
Northeast College Preparatory High School @ Douglas Principal Mary Aronson
will have the knowledge, skills, and experience necessary to successfully complete college and be ready to
Data From School Year 2009-10
d potential. We are committed to helping all students master the challenges of a rigorous college preparation Mission: It is our mission to graduate stude
e aim to develop students who can analyze situations, solve problems, and communicate through speaking and select the career best suited to their talents,
proactive, resourceful, positive, creative, and well-adjusted, and ready to make a meaningful contribution to curriculum in a supportive learning environ
type
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) writing. Our desire is to produce individual
PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING
our society.
MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 ELA - Grades 3-8
Teachers 42.7 41.3 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 2,751,968 77.0%
Principals/AP/ADMATH-3 2.5 1.0 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,595 0.0% 2005-06 2006-07
MATH-4
Other Instructional 8.5 8.3 0268: Title I - AIS Services 81,508ELA-3 2.3%
Non-instructionalMATH-5 15.3 12.3 1357: Student & Family Support Ctr 29,897ELA-4 0.8%
Total MATH-6 69.0 62.9 1396: District Initiative Budgets 100,000ELA-5 2.8%
54.6% 10.0% MATH-7 34.7% 56.6% 61.2% 26.7%
1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 264,507ELA-6 7.4%
57.0% 7.4% MATH-8 58.4% 53.5% 12.5%
1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830ELA-7 3.4% 38.0%
55.7% 8.8% Total 3-8 34.6% 57.4% 57.6% 20.4%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 11.1 : 1 12.9 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 102,366ELA-8 2.9%
udents 59% Total 3-8 38.0%
Pupil-Other-Staff Ratio
Math Performance Goal: 18 : 1of grade 7-8 students
24.6 : 1 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 19,536 0.5%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratioproficiency on Math in
6.82010-2011.
:1 8.4 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 37,979 1.1%
ELA Performance Goal: 35% of g
4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 1.8%
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-20
REGENTS EXAMS

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
ELA 11 65.0% 66.7% 2005-06 2006-07
42.9% 41.3% MATH A 69.0% 63.0% 63.0% Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 71.4% 62.8% 33.9% Science-8
ALGEBRA2/TRIG 0.0%
BUDGET
GEOMETRY ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT 50.0% 15.9%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 73.0% 78.0% 85.0% 40.7%
CHEMISTRY 61.5% 7.3% 2005-06 2006-07
24.4% 18.3% EARTH SCIENCE 75.0% 57.4% 42.5%
Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12 Social Studies-5
PHYSICS 0.0%
Social Studies-8
US HISTORY 100.0% 85.0% 90.2%
Salary Compensation 3,445,765 3,378,253 Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,573,780 100.0%
GLOBAL 50.0% 49.0% 62.0% 47.7%
Other Compensation
LOTE 253,057 81,131 87.1%
100.0% 66.7%
Fixed Obligation/Variability 1,159 1,500
Cash Capital Outlays 10,185 5,000
GRADUATION RATES
Facilities and Related 32,670 84,496
Technology - -
Other Variable Expenses
2003 2004 14,235 2006
2005 23,400 TOTAL COH

Budget
Total 48% 52% $ 3,757,071
46% $ 3,573,780
reparatory High School @ Douglas DISTRICT
73 Northeast
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
GS WATCH IY-1 IY2 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS FISCAL
GS YEAR GS2011-12 Equitable Student
CA2 - Corrective Funding
Action Year 2 (ESF) Allocation
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS WATCH IY-1 IY2 RY2 - Restructuring Year Weight
Students** 2 Allocation
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Base Allocation 531.0 $3,682 $ 1,955,142 OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 1.0 $2,396 $ 2,396
Opened - 2006-07
ELL-Beginner
SCHOOL PROFILE (9-12) 15.0 $3,594 $ 53,910
ELL-Intermediate 4.0 $2,396 $ 9,584
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ELL-Advanced
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three4.0
years) $1,198 $ 4,792
SWD-Resource Room 27.0 $5,856 $ 158,112
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 - 2008-09 2009-10 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethn
SWD-Consultant Teacher $5,856 $ 2010-11-
408 472 531SWD-Integrated
Total Special Class 2 60.0 0 5
$5,856 12
$ 351,360 2
0.0% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment
SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 0.7% 37.0 0.0% 1.2%
$5,856 $ 2.5%
216,672 Total
68.6% 64.6% Most Prevalent Country of Birth American Indian or Alaska Native
Total ESF Allocation $ 2,751,968
0.0% 0.4% Dominican Black or African American 6
25.0% 27.3% Country 1 Somalia Cuba
Republic Asian
6.4% 7.6% Hispanic 2
Country 2 Dominican
0.0% 0.0% Bhutan
Republic White
0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Jamaica Cuba Multi
* Projected

7-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

.2% 90.2% 88.7% 200
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 92

Section 4 Page 37
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Toyia Wilson School 89

Data From School Year 2009-10 Northwest College Preparatory High School @ Douglas

Mission: We seek to graduate students prepared to become good citizens, future leaders, and meaningful contributors to society. Students will grow and learn in a
safe and positive environment characterized by cutting-edge technology and highly skilled teachers.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 27.0% 32.2% 46.4% 14.0% MATH-7 30.2% 43.8% 51.8% 18.2%
ELA-8 35.3% 43.2% 19.7% MATH-8 43.2% 32.4% 18.8%
Total 3-8 27.0% 33.7% 44.9% 16.4% Total 3-8 30.1% 43.5% 42.8% 18.5%

ELA Performance Goal: 47% of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: 56% of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11 50.0% 47.0%
Science-8 55.6% 34.7% 26.9% MATH A 88.0% 63.0% 35.0%
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 64.3% 25.3% 47.3%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG
GEOMETRY 40.7% 18.2%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 70.0% 57.0% 77.0% 63.0%
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY 37.3% 29.3%
Social Studies-8 25.3% 18.7% 19.7% EARTH SCIENCE 57.9% 34.8% 36.6%
PHYSICS 0.0%
US HISTORY 97.0% 63.0% 72.7%
GLOBAL 57.0% 68.0% 53.0% 50.0%
LOTE 100.0% 100.0% 90.9%

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

Profile

DISTRICT 48% 52% 46%

89 Northwest College Preparatory High School @ Douglas

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS GS GS GS IY1 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS IY1 CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS IY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Opened - 2006-07 Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 332 404 440 493 Total 0 0 1 1
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.4% 0.5% 0.5% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2%
Black or African American 82.6% 76.2% 71.6% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.2% 0.5%
Hispanic 11.7% 13.4% 17.3% Country 1 Liberia Liberia
White 5.3% 9.7% 10.2%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 93.2% 91.0% 90.5% 87.6%

Section 4 Page 38
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 89
Northwest College Preparatory High School @ Douglas Principal Toyia Wilson
Data From School Year 2009-10
ecome good citizens, future leaders, and meaningful contributors to society. Students will grow and learn in a
ng-edge technology and highly skilled teachers. Mission: We seek to graduate students pr
type safe and positive environment characterize
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 43.5
2006-07 2007-08 39.0
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA - Grades 3-8
$ 2,623,488 79.8%
Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 2.5 2.0 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,657 0.1% 2005-06 2006-07
Other Instructional MATH-4 10.5 7.8 0268: Title I - AIS Services 76,649 ELA-3 2.3%
Non-instructional MATH-5 13.5 9.5 1357: Student & Family Support Ctr 29,897 ELA-4 0.9%
Total MATH-6 70.0 58.3 1396: District Initiative Budgets 100,000 ELA-5 3.0%
46.4% 14.0% MATH-7 30.2% 43.8% 51.8% 18.2% 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 100,661 ELA-6 3.1%
43.2% 19.7% MATH-8 43.2% 32.4% 18.8%
1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830 ELA-7 3.7% 27.0%
44.9% 16.4% Total 3-8 30.1% 43.5% 42.8% 18.5%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 10.1 : 1 12.6 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 95,471 ELA-8 2.9%
Pupil-Other-Staff 39,072 Total 3-8 27.0%
udents MathRatio
Performance Goal: 16.6
56% : 1 of grade 7-825.5 :1
students 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 1.2%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math6.3
in 2010-2011.
:1 8.5 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 37,979 1.2%
ELA Performance Goal: 47% of
4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594
will achieve1.9%
proficiency on ELA in 2010-2
REGENTS EXAMS

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
ELA 11 50.0% 47.0% 2005-06 2006-07
34.7% 26.9% MATH A 88.0% 63.0% 35.0% Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 64.3% 25.3% 47.3% Science-8
ALGEBRA2/TRIG
GEOMETRY
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT 40.7% 18.2%
2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 70.0% 57.0% 77.0% 63.0% SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
CHEMISTRY 37.3% 29.3% 2005-06 2006-07
18.7% 19.7% EARTH SCIENCE 57.9% 34.8% 36.6%
Social Studies-5
Major Expenditures
PHYSICS 2010-11 2011-12 0.0%
Social Studies-8
US HISTORY 97.0% 63.0% 72.7%
Salary Compensation
GLOBAL 3,400,100 57.0% 3,164,294
68.0% 53.0% 50.0% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,289,298 100.0%
Other Compensation
LOTE 153,160 79,618 100.0% 90.9%
100.0%
Fixed Obligation/Variability 5,000 4,000
Cash Capital Outlays 10,900 10,400
GRADUATION RATES
Facilities and Related 52,150 29,985
Technology - -
Other Variable Expenses2003 2004 5,600
2005 2006 1,000 TOTAL CO

Budget
Total 48% 52%$ 3,626,910
46% $ 3,289,298
reparatory High School @ Douglas DISTRICT
89 Northwe
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
GS GS GS IY1 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
GS GS GS IY1 CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
FISCALGSYEAR GS
GS 2011-12 CA2 - Corrective
Equitable StudentAction Year 2(ESF)
Funding Allocation MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS GS IY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
Students** Weight Allocation SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Base Allocation 493.0
Y or N - SURR/PLA $3,682 $ 1,815,226
ELL-Beginner (K-8) - $2,396 $ - Opened - 2006-07
SCHOOL PROFILE
ELL-Beginner (9-12) - $3,594 $ -
ELL-Intermediate
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled 2.0 during each$2,396 $ who 4,792
academic year had
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three
ELL-Advanced 1.0years) $1,198 $ 1,198
SWD-Resource Room
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08
22.0 2008-09 $5,8562009-10
$ 2010-11
128,832 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Et
404 440
SWD-Consultant
493 Total
Teacher 0
- 0
$5,8561 $ 1
-
0.5% 0.5% SWD-Integrated Special
Percent Class
of Enrollment 0.0%81.0 0.0% $5,856
0.2% $ 474,336
0.2% Total
76.2% 71.6% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 34.0 of Birth $5,856
Most Prevalent Country $ 199,104
American Indian or Alaska Native
0.2% 0.5% Total ESF Allocation $ 2,623,488 Black or African American
13.4% 17.3% Country 1 Liberia Liberia
Asian
9.7% 10.2% Hispanic
0.0% 0.0% Country 2
White
0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Multi
* Projected

7-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

.0% 90.5% 87.6% 20
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 9

Section 4 Page 39
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Sandra Jordan School 85

Data From School Year 2009-10 Dr. Freddie Thomas High School

Mission: We strive to be a community of learners in which all members use their minds well and care about one another. We engage with challenging academics
and the unique resources of our city in order to graduate active and responsible citizens.
t

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 17.0% 26.3% 48.4% 54.2% 31.5% MATH-7 11.9% 43.0% 66.8% 86.2% 69.7%
ELA-8 33.3% 24.3% 36.7% 55.3% 31.7% MATH-8 27.8% 35.1% 59.4% 74.9% 38.1%
Total 3-8 21.0% 25.1% 43.0% 54.8% 31.6% Total 3-8 15.0% 38.7% 63.5% 79.9% 54.7%

ELA Performance Goal: 69% of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: 88% of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11 61.0% 66.0% 64.0% 82.0% 62.2%
Science-8 13.6% 30.4% 38.7% 28.3% 22.9% MATH A 91.0% 67.0% 71.0% 54.0%
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 62.5% 57.7%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG 18.5%
GEOMETRY 8.3% 51.7%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 65.0% 71.0% 69.0% 73.0% 50.7%
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY 72.2% 63.3% 13.0% 16.1%
Social Studies-8 9.0% 2.1% 13.8% 1.5% 4.4% EARTH SCIENCE 87.7% 65.7% 74.1% 59.6%
PHYSICS 60.0%
US HISTORY 73.0% 64.0% 69.0% 57.0% 44.2%
GLOBAL 37.0% 26.0% 44.0% 38.0% 51.3%
LOTE 72.2% 84.6% 94.4% 63.6%

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

DISTRICT 48% 52% 46%
Profile

85 Dr. Freddie Thomas High School 42% 44% 35%

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS GS GS* SINI 1 SINI 1 GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS* GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS* SINI 1 SINI 1 IY-1 IY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 1067 1033 1064 999
1009 Total 0 0 8 14
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.0% 0.8% 1.3%
Black or African American 71.8% 67.0% 66.2% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.8% 1.3% 2.1%
Hispanic 22.2% 25.3% 25.4% Country 1 Thailand Thailand
White 5.1% 6.4% 6.4%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Pakistan Pakistan
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3 Afghanistan Bhutan

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 86.6% 86.6% 88.4% 88.1%

Section 4 Page 40
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 85
Dr. Freddie Thomas High School Principal Sandra Jordan
Data From School Year 2009-10

rs in which all members use their minds well and care about one another. We engage with challenging academics
raduate active and responsible citizens. Mission: We strive to be a community of le
type and the unique resources of our city in order
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING
MATH - Grades 3-8
2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent
ELA - Grades 3-8
08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Teachers 87.2 71.1 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 4,851,922 76.2%
MATH-3
Principals/AP/AD 6.0 5.0 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 3,429 0.1% 2005-06 2006-07 2
MATH-4
Other Instructional MATH-5
16.0 8.6 0268: Title I - AIS Services 190,186 ELA-3 3.0%
ELA-4
Non-instructional MATH-6 38.0 33.5 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 770,986 12.1%
ELA-5
% 54.2% 31.5% Total MATH-7 11.9%147.2
43.0% 66.8%118.286.2% 69.7% 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830 ELA-6 1.9%
% 55.3% 31.7% MATH-8 27.8% 35.1% 59.4% 74.9% 38.1% 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 227,642 ELA-7 3.6% 17.0% 26.3%
% 54.8% 31.6% Total 3-8 15.0% 38.7% 63.5% 79.9% 54.7% 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 39,072 ELA-8 0.6% 33.3% 24.3%
-8 students Pupil-Teacher Ratio 12.2
88% : 1 of grade 7-8
14.2 :1
students 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 101,278 Total 3-81.6% 21.0% 25.1%
Math Performance Goal:
Pupil-Other-Staff Ratio
will 17.7in: 12010-2011. 21.4 : 1
achieve proficiency on Math 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 1.0%
ELA Performance Goal: 69% of gr
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio 7.2 : 1 8.5 : 1 will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-201
REGENTS EXAMS
SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA 11 61.0% 66.0% 64.0% 82.0% 62.2% 2005-06 2006-07 2
% 28.3% 22.9% MATH A 91.0% 67.0% 71.0% 54.0% Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 62.5% 57.7% Science-8 13.6% 30.4%
ALGEBRA2/TRIG 18.5%
GEOMETRY 8.3% 51.7%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING
BUDGET ENV
ALLOCATIONS 65.0%
by 71.0%
ACCOUNT 69.0% 73.0% 50.7%
CHEMISTRY 72.2% 63.3% 13.0% 16.1% 2005-06 2006-07 2
% 1.5% 4.4% EARTH SCIENCE 87.7% 65.7% 74.1% 59.6% Social Studies-5
PHYSICS 60.0% Social Studies-8 9.0% 2.1%
Major Expenditures
US HISTORY 2010-11
73.0% 64.0%2011-12
69.0% 57.0% 44.2%
GLOBAL 37.0% 26.0% 44.0% 38.0% 51.3%
Salary Compensation
LOTE 6,890,955 72.2%6,052,196
84.6% 94.4% 63.6% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 6,368,939 100.0%
Other Compensation 286,198 42,501
Fixed Obligation/Variability
GRADUATION RATES 2,300 -
Cash Capital Outlays 10,420 -
Facilities and Related 125,792 274,743 TOTAL COH
Technology 2003 2004 2005
- 2006 -
Other Variable Expenses 48% 52% 46%
2,800 (500)

Budget
mas High School 42% 44% 35% DISTRICT
Total $ 7,318,465 $ 6,368,939
85 Dr. Freddi
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
GS* SINI 1 SINI 1 GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2 2
GS* GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS* SINI 1 FISCAL
SINI 1 YEAR
IY-1 2011-12
IY1 Equitable Student Funding
RY2 - Restructuring Year 2 (ESF) Allocation
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA
Students** Weight Allocation
SCHOOL
Base PROFILE
Allocation 999.0 $3,682 $ 3,678,318
ELL-Beginner (K-8) IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled
RECENT 1.0 $2,396
during each $ who2,396
academic year had
ELL-Beginner (9-12) to the U.S. within the past three
immigrated 6.0 years) $3,594 $ 21,564
ELL-Intermediate 10.0 $2,396 $ 23,960 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethni
9 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
ELL-Advanced 6.0 $1,198 $ 7,188
1033 1064 1009 Total 0 0 8 14 20
0.1% 0.0% SWD-Resource Percent
Room of Enrollment 10.0
0.0% 0.0% $5,856 0.8% $ 58,560
1.3% Total 1
67.0% 66.2% SWD-Consultant Teacher -
Most Prevalent Country of Birth $5,856 $ - American Indian or Alaska Native 0
1.3% 2.1% SWD-Integrated Special Class 123.0 $5,856 $ 720,288 Black or African American 71
25.3% Country12:1
25.4% SWD-Self-Contained 1 Class 58.0 Thailand $ 339,648
$5,856 Thailand
Asian 0
6.4% 6.4% Total ESF Allocation $ 4,851,922 Hispanic 22
0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Pakistan Pakistan White 5
0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Afghanistan Bhutan Multi 0
* Projected

ATTENDANCE
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
86.6% 88.4% 88.1% 2006
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 86.

Section 4 Page 41
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Beverley Pringle School 76

Data From School Year 2009-10 BioScience and Health Careers High School @ Franklin

Mission: "Perfecting the Science of Learning through Inquiry." Students approach learning through inquiry and experimentation to become problem-solvers and
gain an in-depth understanding of material.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 22.9% 18.7% 17.7% 45.7% 15.4% MATH-7 5.4% 4.0% 23.7% 40.3% 2.6%
ELA-8 20.0% 13.3% 15.6% 24.6% 9.0% MATH-8 2.6% 8.3% 25.5% 24.6% 0.0%
Total 3-8 20.4% 16.0% 16.4% 35.6% 12.4% Total 3-8 3.9% 6.4% 24.8% 32.6% 1.4%

ELA Performance Goal: 43% of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: 29% of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11 34.0% 42.0% 59.0% 58.0% 46.2%
Science-8 23.6% 24.2% 37.9% 14.0% 19.4% MATH A 57.0% 61.0% 51.0% 44.0%
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 85.7% 30.2% 32.1%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG 12.2%
GEOMETRY 63.6% 8.0%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 35.0% 34.0% 45.0% 49.0% 27.2%
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY 3.3% 26.5% 2.0% 8.3%
Social Studies-8 4.9% 6.1% 6.4% 5.0% 14.8% EARTH SCIENCE 47.8% 16.9% 11.8% 17.9%
PHYSICS 40.0% 50.0% 14.3% 11.8%
US HISTORY 48.0% 59.0% 60.0% 64.0% 34.1%
GLOBAL 27.0% 22.0% 33.0% 38.0% 16.0%
LOTE 72.2% 100.0% 52.2% 60.0%

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

Profile

DISTRICT 48% 52% 46%

76 BioScience and Health Careers High School @ Franklin 44% 65% 53%

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS GS GS* SINI 1 SINI 2 CA-1 CA2 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS* SINI 1 SINI 1 IY-2 CA1 CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS* GS GS IY1 CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N Y Y Y Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS* SINI 1 SINI 2 RY-1 RY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Phase out school Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 483 452 310 140 Total 0 0 5 0
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0%
Black or African American 71.2% 72.8% 72.7% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.9% 0.7% 0.6%
Hispanic 23.4% 21.7% 24.1% Country 1 Bhutan
White 4.3% 4.9% 2.6%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Kenya
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3 Nepal

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 86.9% 84.7% 86.9% 83.2%

Section 4 Page 42
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Samuel Rodriguez School 84

Data From School Year 2009-10 Global Media Arts High School @ Franklin

Mission: Improve student performance through a variety of assessments and project-based learning. Much of the learning is technology-based to give students
the best possible means of improving academic performance.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 24.6% 14.8% 46.5% 41.9% 4.3% MATH-7 4.7% 6.1% 24.4% 32.3% 1.1%
ELA-8 11.0% 15.4% 14.9% 36.5% 7.1% MATH-8 9.2% 6.9% 26.1% 32.3% 7.7%
Total 3-8 17.4% 14.4% 28.5% 39.2% 5.4% Total 3-8 5.8% 6.4% 25.3% 32.3% 3.8%

ELA Performance Goal: 36% of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: 33% of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11 54.0% 60.0% 53.0% 38.0% 56.5%
Science-8 19.7% 18.8% 22.1% 16.7% 11.9% MATH A 56.0% 60.0% 47.0% 34.0%
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 27.7% 23.5%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG
GEOMETRY 0.0%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 25.0% 16.0% 29.0% 28.0% 42.1%
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY 5.9% 14.0% 9.8% 3.9%
Social Studies-8 0.0% 9.4% 9.4% 5.8% 6.7% EARTH SCIENCE 11.6% 13.1% 13.9% 14.5%
PHYSICS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
US HISTORY 18.0% 42.0% 67.0% 44.0% 44.5%
GLOBAL 20.0% 21.0% 38.0% 32.0% 19.4%
LOTE 100.0% 90.0% 63.2%

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

Profile
DISTRICT 48% 52% 46%
84 Global Media Arts High School @ Franklin 60% 45% 53%

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS GS GS* SINI 1 SINI 1 GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS* SINI 1 SINI 1 GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS* GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N Y Y Y Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS* SINI SINI 2 RY-1 RY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Phase out school Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 470 447 314 204 Total 0 0 11 4
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.0% 2.5% 1.3%
Black or African American 76.2% 64.2% 61.8% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.2% 1.3% 1.0% Dominican Dominican
Hispanic 18.8% 30.4% 33.8% Country 1
Republic Republic
White 4.9% 4.0% 3.5%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Honduras
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3 Ivory Coast

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 89.0% 87.4% 87.3% 86.2%

Section 4 Page 43
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Ali Abdulmateen School 86

Data From School Year 2009-10 Intl. Finance & Economic Development Career High School @ Franklin

Mission: "Visualize Your Future." Provide students with in-depth studies of international finance, global economics, information technology, and
entrepreneurship.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 20.8% 28.6% 24.2% 46.3% 5.9% MATH-7 3.2% 11.3% 40.6% 56.9% 14.7%
ELA-8 22.9% 12.8% 21.4% 30.8% 19.4% MATH-8 20.3% 11.0% 20.7% 22.6% 8.1%
Total 3-8 19.0% 18.8% 22.7% 37.8% 12.3% Total 3-8 9.4% 11.1% 29.5% 39.2% 11.5%

ELA Performance Goal: 52% of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: 45% of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11 44.0% 39.0% 41.0% 64.0% 49.4%
Science-8 28.6% 13.6% 36.2% 26.0% 20.3% MATH A 74.0% 69.0% 47.0% 39.0%
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 88.0% 19.5% 27.7%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG
GEOMETRY 12.5% 2.1%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 74.0% 34.0% 48.0% 55.0% 54.9%
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY 0.0% 0.0% 15.4% 9.1%
Social Studies-8 13.3% 15.1% 23.0% 17.0% 15.9% EARTH SCIENCE 27.1% 25.0% 28.6% 35.3%
PHYSICS 0.0%
US HISTORY 32.0% 43.0% 52.0% 60.0% 51.2%
GLOBAL 7.0% 13.0% 26.0% 29.0% 23.0%
LOTE 75.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

Profile

DISTRICT 48% 52% 46%

86 Intl. Finance & Economic Development Career High School @ 42% 46% 33%

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS GS* SINI 1 SINI 2 SINI 2 CA-1 CA2 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS* SINI 1 SINI 1 IY-2 CA1 CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS* SINI 1 SINI 1 GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS Y Y Y Y Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS* SINI SINI 2 SINI 2 RY-1 RY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Phase out school Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 456 406 283 163 Total 0 1 0 0
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0%
Black or African American 76.0% 74.9% 73.2% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 1.2% 1.2% 1.4%
Hispanic 19.5% 20.4% 22.2% Country 1 Jamaica
White 3.3% 3.2% 3.2%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2
Multi 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 90.5% 85.7% 86.8% 81.4%

Section 4 Page 44
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 86
Intl. Finance & Economic Development Career High School @ Franklin Principal Ali Abdulmateen
Data From School Year 2009-10
with in-depth studies of international finance, global economics, information technology, and
Mission: "Visualize Your Future." Provide st
type entrepreneurship.
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-0691.8

2006-07 2007-0842.52008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA - Grades 3-863.5%
$ 2,576,690
Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 9.0 3.0 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 2,535 0.1% 2005-06 2006-07 200
Other Instructional MATH-4 22.0 7.9 0268: Title I - AIS Services 98,516
ELA-3
2.4%
Non-instructional MATH-5 45.3 23.0 1357: Student & Family Support Ctr 59,793
ELA-4 1.5%
Total MATH-6 168.1 76.4 1396: District Initiative Budgets 158,067
ELA-5 3.9%
46.3% 5.9% MATH-7 3.2% 11.3% 40.6% 56.9% 14.7% 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 488,777
ELA-6 12.0%
30.8% 19.4% MATH-8 20.3% 11.0% 20.7% 22.6% 8.1% 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830
ELA-7 3.0% 20.8% 28.6% 24
37.8% 12.3% Total 3-8 9.4% 11.1% 29.5% 39.2% 11.5% ELA-8 9.4% 22.9% 12.8% 21
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 9.9 : 1 11.9 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 383,562
Pupil-Other-Staff Ratio Total 3-8 2.7% 19.0% 18.8% 22
udents Math Performance Goal: 11.9 45% : 1 of grade 7-815 :1
students 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 107,608
Total Pupil-Staff
will Ratio 5.4in: 12010-2011. 6.6 : 1
achieve proficiency on Math 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 1.6%
ELA Performance Goal: 52% of grad
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011.
REGENTS EXAMS

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
ELA 11 44.0% 39.0% 41.0% 64.0% 49.4% 2005-06 2006-07 20
26.0% 20.3% MATH A 74.0% 69.0% 47.0% 39.0% Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 88.0% 19.5% 27.7% Science-8 28.6% 13.6% 36
ALGEBRA2/TRIG
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
GEOMETRY 12.5% 2.1%
2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 74.0% 34.0% 48.0% 55.0% 54.9% SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
CHEMISTRY 0.0% 0.0% 15.4% 9.1% 2005-06 2006-07 20
17.0% 15.9% EARTH SCIENCE 27.1% 25.0% 28.6% 35.3%
Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12 Social Studies-5
PHYSICS 0.0%
Social Studies-8 13.3% 15.1% 23
US HISTORY 32.0% 43.0% 52.0% 60.0% 51.2%
Salary Compensation
GLOBAL
8,663,011
7.0% 13.0%
3,949,333
26.0% 29.0% 23.0%
Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 4,059,972 100.0%
Other Compensation
LOTE 365,899 75.0% 64,124
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Fixed Obligation/Variability 5,300 -
Cash Capital Outlays 26,975 2,000
GRADUATION RATES
Facilities and Related 76,194 45,715
Technology - -
Other Variable Expenses 2003 2004 14,988
2005 2006 (1,200) TOTAL COHOR

Budget
Total 48% $ 9,152,367
52% 46% $ 4,059,972
omic Development Career High School @ 42% 46% 33% DISTRICT
86 Intl. Finance
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
SINI 1 SINI 2 SINI 2 CA-1 CA2 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
200
GS* SINI 1 SINI 1 IY-2 CA1 CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS G
GS* SINI 1 FISCAL
SINI 1 YEAR
GS 2011-12
GS Equitable Student Funding
CA2 - Corrective Action Year(ESF)
2 Allocation MATH STATUS G
Y Y Y Y Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS G
SINI SINI 2 SINI 2 RY-1 RY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
Students** Weight Allocation SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL G
Base Allocation Y or N - 507.0
SURR/PLA $3,682 $ 1,866,774
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 1.0 $2,396 $ 2,396 Phase out school
SCHOOL PROFILE
ELL-Beginner (9-12) 8.0 $3,594 $ 28,752
ELL-Intermediate
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students11.0 $2,396
enrolled during each $ who
academic year 26,356
had
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three
ELL-Advanced 2.0 years) $1,198 $ 2,396
SWD-Resource Room 7.0 $5,856 $ 40,992 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnici
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
SWD-Consultant Teacher 2.0 $5,856 $ 11,712
406 283 163 Total 0 1 0 0 2008
0.0% 0.0% SWD-Integrated Special
Percent Class
of Enrollment 72.0
0.0% 0.2% $5,8560.0% $ 421,632 0.0% Total 456
4.9% 73.2% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 30.0 of Birth $5,856
Most Prevalent Country $ 175,680
American Indian or Alaska Native
1.2% 1.4% Total ESF Allocation $ 2,576,690
Black or African American 76.0
0.4% 22.2% Country 1 Jamaica
Asian 1.2%
3.2% 3.2% Hispanic 19.5
0.0% 0.0% Country 2
White 3.3%
0.2% 0.0% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Multi 0.0%
* Projected

7-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

.7% 86.8% 81.4% 2006-0
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 90.5%

Section 4 Page 45
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Kevin Klein School 101

Data From School Year 2009-10 Integrated Arts & Technology High School

Mission: It is our mission to prepare students for the global community through experiential learning. With technology as a tool and the arts as the medium,
students will embark on their journey with the guidance of our school community. We do this to brighten the future of tomorrow’s leaders today.
typ

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 Total 3-8

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 7 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 7 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11
Science-8 MATH A
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG
GEOMETRY
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY
Social Studies-8 EARTH SCIENCE
PHYSICS
US HISTORY
GLOBAL
LOTE

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

DISTRICT
101 Integrated Arts & Technology High School
Profile

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Opened - 2010-11 Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 71 173 Total 1
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 1.4%
Black or African American 60.6% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 2.8%
Hispanic 23.9% Country 1 Iraq
White 12.7%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% Country 2
Multi 0.0%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate

Section 4 Page 46
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 101
Integrated Arts & Technology High School Principal Kevin Klein
Data From School Year 2009-10
for the global community through experiential learning. With technology as a tool and the arts as the medium,
guidance of our school community. We do this to brighten the future of tomorrow’s leaders today. Mission: It is our mission to prepare stud
type students will embark on their journey wit
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING
MATH - Grades 3-8
2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent
07-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 ELA - Grades 3-8
Teachers 8.8 14.2 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 797,628 35.3%
MATH-3 2005-06 2006-07
Principals/AP/AD MATH-4 2.0 2.0 0268: Title I - AIS Services 34,017 1.5%
ELA-3
Other Instructional MATH-5 1.6 1.6 0830: SIG District 120,830 5.3%
ELA-4
Non-instructional MATH-6 2.5 2.5 0833: SIG Integrated Arts 1,244,122 55.0%
ELA-5
Total MATH-7 14.9 20.3 1396: District Initiative Budgets 51,762 2.3%
ELA-6
MATH-8
1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 12,660 0.6%
ELA-7
Total 3-8 ELA-8
Total 3-8
e 7 students Pupil-Teacher Ratio
Math Performance Goal: 8.1 : 1 of grade 712.2
52% :1
students
Pupil-Other-Staffwill achieve proficiency on Math
Ratio 11.6 in
: 12010-2011. 28.4 : 1 ELA Performance Goal: 67% of
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio 4.8 : 1 8.5 : 1 will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-
REGENTS EXAMS

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
ELA 11 2005-06 2006-07
MATH A Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA Science-8
ALGEBRA2/TRIG
GEOMETRY
07-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
CHEMISTRY 2005-06 2006-07
EARTH SCIENCE
Social Studies-5
PHYSICS
Social Studies-8
US HISTORY
Major Expenditures
GLOBAL 2010-11 2011-12
LOTE
Salary Compensation 921,723 1,367,031 Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 2,261,019 100.0%
Other Compensation 127,278 133,772
GRADUATION RATES
RT
Fixed Obligation/Variability 13,700 3,000
Cash Capital Outlays 5,969 100,625
2003 2004 525,366
2005 2006 437,736 TOTAL CO
Facilities and Related
Technology 1,600 2,200
Arts & Technology High School DISTRICT
Other Variable Expenses 253,780 216,655

Budget
101 Integr
Total $ 1,849,416 $ 2,261,019
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
05-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
IY2 - Improvement Year 2
CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
Y or N - SURR/PLA
OVERALL

Opened - 2010-11
SCHOOL PROFILE Students** Weight Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students
Base Allocation 173.0 $3,682
enrolled during each $ who
academic year 636,986
had
ty
ELL-Beginnerimmigrated
(K-8) to the U.S. within the past 1.0
three years)
$2,396 $ 2,396
-09 2009-10 2010-11ELL-Beginner
2011-12* (9-12) -
2007-08 2008-09 $3,5942009-10 $ 2010-11 - ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / E
71 ELL-Intermediate
173 Total 2.0 $2,396 $ 4,792
1
0.0% ELL-Advanced Percent of Enrollment 1.0 $1,198 $ 1.4%
1,198 Total
60.6% SWD-Resource Room Most Prevalent Country
4.0 of Birth $5,856 $ 23,424 American Indian or Alaska Native
2.8% Black or African American
23.9%
SWD-Consultant Country
Teacher1 - $5,856 $ Iraq-
Asian
12.7% SWD-Integrated Special Class 22.0 $5,856 $ 128,832
Hispanic
Country
0.0% SWD-Self-Contained 2 Class
12:1 - $5,856 $ - White
0.0% Total ESF Allocation $ 797,628 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Multi
* Projected

7 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

2
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate

Section 4 Page 47
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Carol Jones School 97

Data From School Year 2009-10 Vanguard Collegiate High School

Mission: It is our mission to prepare every student for access to and success in college.
type

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 Total 3-8

ELA Performance Goal: of grade students Math Performance Goal: of grade students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11
Science-8 MATH A
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG
GEOMETRY
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY
Social Studies-8 EARTH SCIENCE
PHYSICS
US HISTORY
GLOBAL
LOTE

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

DISTRICT
97 Vanguard Collegiate High School
Profile

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Opened - 2010-11 Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 98 223 Total 9
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 9.2%
Black or African American 69.4% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 3.1%
Hispanic 23.5% Country 1 Bhutan
White 4.1%
Country 2 Dominican
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% Republic
Multi 0.0%
* Projected Country 3 Honduras

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate

Section 4 Page 48
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 97
Vanguard Collegiate High School Principal Carol Jones
Data From School Year 2009-10

udent for access to and success in college.

type Mission: It is our mission to prepare eve
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING
MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent
ELA - Grades 3-8
07-08 2008-09 2009-10
Teachers 2005-0614.8
2006-07 2007-0818.1
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 1,019,402 42.8%
MATH-3 2005-06 2006-07
Principals/AP/AD 2.0 2.0 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 33,828 1.4%
MATH-4 ELA-3
Other Instructional MATH-5 2.3 1.6 0268: Title I - AIS Services 43,736 1.8%
ELA-4
Non-instructional MATH-6 1.5 5.4 0830: SIG District 120,830 5.1%
ELA-5
Total MATH-7 20.6 27.1 0835: SIG Vanguard 1,110,736 46.6%
ELA-6
MATH-8 1396: District Initiative Budgets 40,176 1.7%
ELA-7
Total 3-8 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 12,660 ELA-8
0.5%
Total 3-8
de students Pupil-Teacher Ratio
Math Performance Goal: 6.6 : 1 of grade students
12.3 : 1
. Pupil-Other-Staff will
Ratio 16.9 :in12010-2011. 24.8 : 1
achieve proficiency on Math ELA Performance Goal: of
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio 4.8 : 1 8.2 : 1 will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-
REGENTS EXAMS
SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
07-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA 11 2005-06 2006-07
MATH A Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA Science-8
ALGEBRA2/TRIG
GEOMETRY
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
07-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
CHEMISTRY 2005-06 2006-07
EARTH SCIENCE Social Studies-5
PHYSICS Social Studies-8
US HISTORY
Major Expenditures
GLOBAL 2010-11 2011-12
LOTE
Salary Compensation 1,154,550 1,641,797 Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 2,381,368 100.0%
Other Compensation 148,787 164,151
GRADUATION RATES
Fixed Obligation/Variability 3,700 4,000
RT
Cash Capital Outlays 28,795 56,625
TOTAL CO
Facilities and Related 2003 2004 392,317
2005 2006 291,168
Technology 1,000 -
ollegiate High School DISTRICT
Other Variable Expenses 166,709 223,627

Budget
97 Vangua
Total $ 1,895,858 $ 2,381,368
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
05-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
IY2 - Improvement Year 2
CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1 ELA STATUS
CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2 MATH STATUS
RY1 - Restructuring Year 1 SCIENCE STATUS
RY2 - Restructuring Year 2 SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA
Opened - 2010-11
SCHOOL PROFILE Students** Weight Allocation
Base Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students 223.0 $3,682
enrolled during each $ who
academic year 821,086
had
ty ELL-Beginnerimmigrated
(K-8) to the U.S. within the past-three years) $2,396 $ -
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / E
8-09 2009-10 2010-11ELL-Beginner
2011-12* (9-12) 13.0
2007-08 2008-09 $3,5942009-10 $ 2010-11
46,722
98 ELL-Intermediate
223 Total 7.0 $2,396 $ 16,772
9
0.0% ELL-Advanced Percent of Enrollment 5.0 $1,198 $ 5,990
9.2% Total
69.4%SWD-Resource Room Most Prevalent Country
- of Birth $5,856 $ - American Indian or Alaska Native
3.1% Black or African American
SWD-Consultant Teacher
Country 1 - $5,856 $ Bhutan -
23.5% Asian
4.1% SWD-Integrated Special Class - $5,856 $ -
Hispanic
0.0% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1
Country 2 Class 22.0 $5,856 $ Dominican
128,832
Republic White
0.0% Total ESF Allocation $ 1,019,402 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Honduras Multi
* Projected

ATTENDANCE
07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
2
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate

Section 4 Page 49
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Profile

Section 4 Page 50
SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Budget

Section 4 Page 51
Vanguard Collegiate High School 9 9-10
SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET
Programs
North S.T.A.R. Educational Program
Young Mothers & Interim Health Academy
Youth & Justice Programs

2010-11 2011-12
Northwest Zone
Configuration Configuration
Elementary
No. 3 Nathaniel Rochester Community School K-8 K-8
No. 5 John Williams PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 7 Virgil I. Grissom PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 8 Roberto Clemente PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 9 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 17 Enrico Fermi PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 30 General Elwell S. Otis K-6 K-7
No. 34 Dr. Louis A. Cerulli PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 41 Kodak Park K-6 K-6
No. 42 Abelard Reynolds PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 43 Theodore Roosevelt K-6 K-6
No. 44 Lincoln Park PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 54 The Flower City School K-6 K-6
No. 57 Early Childhood School of Rochester PreK-2 PreK-2

Secondary
Charlotte High School 7-12 8-12
All Boys School @ Charlotte 9
John Marshall High School 8-12 9-12
Rochester, Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics 9 9-10
(STEM) High School
Robert Brown High School of Construction and Design 9 9-10
School of Applied Technology @ Edison 10-12 11-12
School of Business, Finance & Entrepreneurship @ Edison 10-12 11-12
School of Engineering & Manufacturing @ Edison 10-12 11-12
School of Imaging & Information Technology @ Edison 7-12 11-12
Thomas Jefferson High School 7-12 8, 10-12
Newcomer Academy @ Jefferson

Programs
Young Adult Evening High School (at Dr. Freddie Thomas High
School Campus)

2010-11 2011-12
South Zone
Configuration Configuration
Elementary
No. 1 Martin B. Anderson K-6 K-6
No. 2 Clara Barton PreK-6 PreK-6
Section 4 Page 52
No. 4 George Mather Forbes K-6 K-7
No. 10 Dr. Walter Cooper Academy K-6 K-4
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Schools - Northwest Zone

Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
The Northwest Zone is comprised of 24 schools and programs. This zone provides supervision of principals that ensures the alignment and
implementation of goals and objectives to District priorities and School Improvement Plans. Also provided is support to ensure the development
of instructional management systems relevant to the needs of students. To enhance the leadership, monthly meetings of all principals are held
to focus on transformational leadership decision-making characteristics designed to improve student achievement with a focus on literacy and
school-level decision making relative to operational issues. In summary, the main role and responsibility to the District is to support the work
of schools and the development of professional learning communities within each school designed to improve student achievement through
research-based instructional practice using assessment for learning as the foundation. school designed to improve student achievement through
research-based instructional practice using assessment for learning as the foundation.


2011-12 Budget Expense Total - $77,437,009 Other Compensation
2.06%

Fixed Obligation with Variability

0.06%

Cash Capital Outlays

0.50%

Facilities and Related

Salary Compensation 3.39%
93.21%

Technology
0.01%

Other Variable Expenses

0.76%

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $84,705,476 $72,181,521 $12,523,955 14.79% Districtwide budget reductions
Other Compensation $2,977,757 $1,597,112 $1,380,645 46.37% Districtwide budget reductions
Employee Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligation with Variability $160,038 $44,471 $115,567 72.21% Districtwide budget reductions
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $446,494 $385,536 $60,958 13.65% Districtwide budget reductions
Facilities and Related $2,906,199 $2,628,055 $278,144 9.57% Grant funding reduction
Technology $9,881 $10,570 ($689) -6.97%
Other Variable Expenses $879,248 $589,743 $289,505 32.93% Grant funding reduction
Totals $92,085,093 $77,437,009 $14,648,084 15.91%

FTEs 1,679.96 1,376.23 303.73 18.08%

Section 4 Page 53
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Schools: Northwest Zone

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 64,026,780 63,673,758 54,990,621 8,683,137
Civil Service Salary 7,408,197 7,839,873 6,258,391 1,581,482
Administrator Salary 8,003,056 7,487,258 6,546,140 941,118
Hourly Teachers 963,466 859,682 443,194 416,488
Teaching Assistants 1,451,599 1,709,070 1,081,101 627,969
Paraprofessional Salary 3,500,616 3,135,835 2,862,074 273,761
Sub Total Salary Compensation 85,353,713 84,705,476 72,181,521 12,523,955
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 3,864,671 2,555,071 1,368,703 1,186,368
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 191,550 171,850 45,051 126,799
Teachers In Service 111,123 250,836 183,358 67,478
Sub Total Other Compensation 4,167,345 2,977,757 1,597,112 1,380,645
Total Salary and Other Compensation 89,521,058 87,683,233 73,778,633 13,904,600
Employee Benefits 1,406 - - -
Total Compensation and Benefits 89,522,464 87,683,233 73,778,633 13,904,600
Fixed Obligations With Variability
Special Education Tuition 1,002 1,500 - 1,500
Contract Transportation 148,609 158,538 44,471 114,067
Charter School Tuition - - - -
Health Service Other Districts - - - -
Insurance non-employee - - - -
Sub Total Fixed Obligations 149,611 160,038 44,471 115,567
Debt Service
Sub Total Debt Service - - - -
Cash Capital Outlays
Cash Capital Expense - - - -
Textbooks 181,362 213,400 116,886 96,514
Equipment Other than Buses 187,320 57,327 140,100 (82,773)
Equipment Buses - - - -
Computer Hardware - Instructional 54,897 35,730 34,000 1,730
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional 63,125 59,966 41,600 18,366
Library Books 61,457 80,071 52,950 27,121
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays 548,162 446,494 385,536 60,958

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Schools: Northwest Zone

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend
SectionActual
4 Page 54 Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)
 Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays 548,162 446,494 385,536 60,958
SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Schools: Northwest Zone

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Facilities and Related

Utilities 559 6,557 400 6,157
Instructional Supplies 1,203,987 1,676,638 1,719,418 (42,780)
Equip Service Contr & Repair 18,439 45,510 24,950 20,560
Facilities Service Contracts - - - -
Rentals 4,505 2,978 1,200 1,778
Maintenance Repair Supplies 400 2,900 2,000 900
Postage and Print/Advertising 45,782 88,184 45,376 42,808
Auto Supplies 1,758 300 - 300
Supplies and Materials 255,516 817,730 656,147 161,583
Custodial Supplies 157,715 211,637 150,264 61,373
Office Supplies 62,227 53,765 28,300 25,465
Sub Total Facilities and Related 1,750,889 2,906,199 2,628,055 278,144
Technology
Computer Software - Instructional 7,811 5,181 4,920 261
Computer Software - Non Instructional 11,215 4,700 5,650 (950)
Subtotal Technology 19,026 9,881 10,570 (689)
All Other Variable Expenses
Miscellaneous Services 149,099 128,107 75,151 52,956
Professional Technical Service 180,521 381,313 216,600 164,713
Agency Clerical 56,828 42,314 18,933 23,381
Judgments and Claims - - - -
Grant Disallowances - - - -
Departmental Credits (9,998) (12,712) (6,900) (5,812)
Indirect Costs Grants - - - -
BOCES Services 2,615 200,000 200,000 -
Professional Development 77,283 140,226 85,960 54,266
Subtotal of All Other Variable Expenses 456,348 879,248 589,743 289,505
Total Non Compensation 2,924,036 4,401,860 3,658,376 743,484
Sub Total 92,446,500 92,085,093 77,437,009 14,648,084
Budget Reserve - - - -
Grand Total 92,446,500 92,085,093 77,437,009 14,648,084

Section 4 Page 55
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Position Summary
Schools: Northwest Zone

Var Bud vs
2009 - 2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

POSITIONS BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 1,150.40 1,127.65 944.24 183.41
Civil Service Salary 238.64 238.26 176.32 61.94
Administrator Salary 82.00 75.00 63.81 11.19
Teaching Assistants 60.50 64.50 40.10 24.40
Paraprofessional Salary 182.80 163.95 142.76 21.19
Hourly Teachers 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.60
Total Salary Compensation 1,714.34 1,669.96 1,367.23 302.73
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 22.00 10.00 9.00 1.00
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teachers In Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Compensation 22.00 10.00 9.00 1.00
Total Salary and Other Compensation 1,736.34 1,679.96 1,376.23 303.73
Grand Total 1,736.34 1,679.96 1,376.23 303.73

Section 4 Page 56
SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Budget

Section 4 Page 57
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Connie Wehner School 03

Data From School Year 2009-10 Nathaniel Rochester Community School

Mission: It is our mission to educate, collaborate, and prepare. NRCS is a place for your child to grow from a young child to a young adult in an environment of
caring. Students are part of a positive educational, social and emotional community where they can continually grow to be responsible and respectful. Our
students, from age 4 to age 16, coexist in an atmosphere of support, encouragement and success.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 58.1% 44.2% 56.5% 48.4% 12.9% MATH-3 73.0% 90.2% 90.3% 84.7% 20.6%
ELA-4 32.6% 43.4% 41.8% 46.9% 17.8% MATH-4 54.1% 59.0% 58.2% 60.9% 24.3%
ELA-5 37.7% 31.3% 55.6% 45.3% 27.3% MATH-5 20.3% 63.3% 75.5% 50.9% 24.2%
ELA-6 34.8% 37.3% 50.9% 66.7% 20.4% MATH-6 16.7% 45.3% 65.4% 51.8% 16.7%
ELA-7 28.9% 27.7% 34.7% 50.7% 20.6% MATH-7 24.5% 26.3% 41.0% 65.3% 28.4%
ELA-8 26.2% 52.4% 31.3% 48.1% 20.2% MATH-8 20.0% 37.6% 37.3% 46.2% 7.3%
Total 3-8 33.5% 40.8% 43.7% 50.8% 19.8% Total 3-8 30.6% 49.6% 58.7% 59.7% 20.5%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-8 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 82.6% 83.0% 80.8% 73.0% 56.1% Social Studies-5 67.2% 66.7% 72.2% 63.6% 72.3%
Science-8 23.2% 27.8% 20.8% 27.8% 44.3% Social Studies-8 20.3% 18.4% 20.8% 20.3% 21.6%

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.7 4.5 4.5 Grade 1 18.8% 0.0%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.7 4.6 4.6 Grade 2 23.7% 40.7%
Movement, Music 4.8 4.3 4.5
Science 4.8 4.4 4.5

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS* GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS* GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 651 621 665 663
649 Total 1 1 1 8
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.5% 0.2% 0.2% Percent of Enrollment 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 1.2%
Black or African American 89.4% 88.1% 86.6% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.5% 0.2% 1.1% Dominican Dominican
Hispanic 7.1% 7.2% 8.0% Country 1 Romania Nepal
Republic Republic
White 2.5% 4.2% 4.1%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Yemen
Multi 0.2% 0.2% 0.2%
* Projected Country 3 Bhutan

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 93.3% 93.0% 93.2% 91.8%

Section 4 Page 58
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 03
Nathaniel Rochester Community School Principal Connie Wehner
Data From School Year 2009-10
nd prepare. NRCS is a place for your child to grow from a young child to a young adult in an environment of
ocial and emotional community where they can continually grow to be responsible and respectful. Our Mission: It is our mission to educate, collabo
here of support, encouragement and success. caring. Students are part of a positive educati
type students, from age 4 to age 16, coexist in an a
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING
MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent
ELA - Grades 3-8
2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 62.7
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
52.9 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 3,156,698 77.1%
48.4% 12.9% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 73.0% 90.2%
3.0 90.3% 84.7%
2.0 20.6% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 2,375 0.1% 2005-06 2006-07 2
46.9% 17.8% Other Instructional MATH-4 54.1% 59.0%
8.2 58.2% 60.9%
4.2 24.3% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten ELA-3
85,667 2.1% 58.1% 44.2% 5
45.3% 27.3% MATH-5 20.3% 63.3% 75.5% 50.9% 24.2% ELA-4
Non-instructional 18.0 13.0 0268: Title I - AIS Services 113,009 2.8% 32.6% 43.4% 4
66.7% 20.4% MATH-6 16.7% 45.3% 65.4% 51.8% 16.7% ELA-5
50.7% 20.6%
Total MATH-7 24.5%
91.9
26.3% 41.0%
72.1
65.3% 28.4%
1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 246,101 6.0% 37.7% 31.3% 5
ELA-6 34.8% 37.3% 5
48.1% 20.2% MATH-8 20.0% 37.6% 37.3% 46.2% 7.3% 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830 2.9%
ELA-7 28.9% 27.7% 3
50.8% 19.8% Total 3-8 30.6% 49.6% 58.7% 59.7% 20.5% 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 129,272
ELA-8
3.2% 26.2% 52.4% 3
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 10.6 : 1 12.5 : 1 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 39,072
Total 3-8 1.0% 33.5% 40.8% 4
52%
students MathRatio
Pupil-Other-Staff Performance Goal: 22.8 : 1 of grade 3-834.5
students
:1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 75,959 1.9%
will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011. ELA Performance Goal: 67% of gra
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio 7.2 : 1 9.2 : 1 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 127,188 3.1%
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
73.0% 56.1% Social Studies-5 67.2% 66.7% 72.2% 63.6% 72.3% 2005-06 2006-07 2
27.8% 44.3% Social Studies-8 20.3% 18.4% 20.8% 20.3% 21.6% Science-4 82.6% 83.0%
Science-8 23.2% 27.8%

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)
KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Averag
08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH
4.5 Major Expenditures Grade 1 2010-11 18.8% 2011-12
0.0% 2006-07
4.6 Grade 2 23.7% 40.7% Iniative, Social Relations 4.7
4.5 Salary Compensation 4,733,603 3,897,104 Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 4,096,170 100.0%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.7
4.5 Other Compensation 161,057 136,650
Movement, Music 4.8
Fixed Obligation/Variability 9,000 1,000 Science 4.8
Cash Capital Outlays 34,500 12,500
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS
Facilities and Related 108,528
ACCOUNTABILITY 46,916
LEGEND
Technology 500Standing
GS - Good -

Budget
Other Variable
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10Expenses
2010-11 5,250
IY1 - Improvement Year 1 2,000
GS GS* Total
GS GS GS $ IY2
5,052,438
- Improvement$Year
4,096,170
2 200
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS G
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS G
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS G
GS GS* GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL G
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. withinStudents**
the past three years) Weight Allocation
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnic
009-10 2010-11 2011-12*
Base Allocation 2007-08
663.0 2008-09 2009-10
$3,682 2010-11
$ 2,441,166
621 665 649
ELL-BeginnerTotal
(K-8) 1 18.9 1 $2,3961 8
$ 45,284 200
0.2% 0.2% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 0.1% - 0.2% 0.2%
$3,594 $ 1.2%- Total 65
88.1% 86.6% Most Prevalent Country
ELL-Intermediate 5.0 of Birth $2,396 $ 11,980 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.5
0.2% 1.1% Dominican Black or African American 89.4
7.2% 8.0% ELL-Advanced Country 1 2.0 Dominican $1,198
Romania $ Nepal
2,396
Republic Republic Asian 0.5
4.2% 4.1% SWD-Resource Room 7.0 $5,856 $ 40,992
Hispanic 7.1
0.0% 0.0% SWD-Consultant Teacher
Country 2 - $5,856 $ Yemen - White 2.5
0.2% 0.2% SWD-Integrated Special Class 83.0 $5,856 $ 486,048 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 312:1 Class
SWD-Self-Contained 22.0 $5,856 Bhutan
$ 128,832 Multi 0.2
Total ESF Allocation $ 3,156,698 * Projected

ATTENDANCE
07-08 2008-09 2009-10
3.0% 93.2% 91.8% 2006
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 93.3

Section 4 Page 59
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Joanne Wideman School 05

Data From School Year 2009-10 John Williams

Mission: It is our mission to produce articulate, responsible, and life-long learners. Our highly qualified staff will accomplish this by teaching a challenging and
student-centered curriculum in a safe, supportive and culturally sensitive environment.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 50.8% 42.7% 39.0% 35.8% 25.0% MATH-3 64.7% 61.4% 60.5% 72.4% 30.3%
ELA-4 47.4% 33.3% 44.3% 50.6% 35.5% MATH-4 48.0% 43.9% 45.8% 64.7% 39.4%
ELA-5 33.3% 44.0% 48.6% 48.6% 39.5% MATH-5 41.7% 47.5% 43.4% 57.7% 25.3%
ELA-6 47.7% 37.0% 41.3% 62.2% 41.7% MATH-6 25.5% 44.3% 40.2% 60.5% 39.0%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 45.4% 39.7% 43.2% 48.4% 35.0% Total 3-8 47.6% 50.3% 47.5% 64.5% 33.6%

ELA Performance Goal: 66% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 89% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 80.3% 75.3% 65.4% 70.0% 77.4% Social Studies-5 83.9% 76.5% 72.6% 62.2% 82.3%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 3.7 4.0 4.1 Grade 1 28.2% 26.8%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.0 4.2 4.4 Grade 2 16.7% 25.8%
Movement, Music 4.1 4.2 4.3
Science 3.7 3.8 4.0

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS* SINI 1 IY-2 IY2 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS* SINI 1 IY-2 IY2 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 586 542 518 553
563 Total 34 31 74 52
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.2% 0.4% 0.4% Percent of Enrollment 3.1% 5.3% 13.7% 10.0%
Black or African American 58.3% 57.0% 54.5% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 14.4% 16.6% 18.5%
Hispanic 18.1% 17.2% 16.3% Country 1 Myanmar Thailand Thailand Thailand
White 8.9% 8.5% 9.5%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Thailand Bhutan Nepal Nepal
Multi 0.2% 0.4% 0.7%
* Projected Country 3 Tanzania Kenya Bhutan Bhutan

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 92.2% 91.9% 93.2% 93.1%

Section 4 Page 60
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 05
John Williams Principal Joanne Wideman
Data From School Year 2009-10
onsible, and life-long learners. Our highly qualified staff will accomplish this by teaching a challenging and
d culturally sensitive environment. Mission: It is our mission to produce articulate
type student-centered curriculum in a safe, supportiv
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 49.8
2006-07 2007-08 51.0
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA - Grades 3-8
$ 2,627,918 66.3%
35.8% 25.0% Principals/AP/ADMATH-3 64.7% 2.0
61.4% 60.5% 2.0
72.4% 30.3% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 42,543 1.1%2005-06 2006-07 200
50.6% 35.5% MATH-4
Other Instructional 48.0% 43.9%
3.2 45.8% 64.7%
2.9 39.4% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 85,667 2.2% 50.8%
ELA-3 42.7% 39.
48.6% 39.5% Non-instructionalMATH-5 41.7% 47.5%
22.2 43.4% 57.7%
19.7 25.3% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 128,088 3.2% 47.4%
ELA-4 33.3% 44.
62.2% 41.7% Total MATH-6 25.5% 44.3%
77.2 40.2% 60.5%
75.6 39.0% 0513: The Primary Project 3,734 0.1% 33.3%
ELA-5 44.0% 48.
MATH-7 1323: School Redesign 31,567 0.8% 47.7%
ELA-6 37.0% 41.
MATH-8
1416: Primary Project ELA-7
7,805 0.2%
48.4% 35.0% Total 3-8 47.6% 50.3% 47.5% 64.5% 33.6%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 10.4 : 1 10.8 : 1 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs ELA-8
615,474 15.5%
students Pupil-Other-Staff Ratio
Math Performance Goal: 18.9 : 1of grade 3-6 students
89% 22.5 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals Total 3-8
112,360 2.8% 45.4% 39.7% 43.
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratioproficiency on Math in
6.72010-2011.
:1 7.3 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 159,077 4.0%
ELA Performance Goal: 66% of grad
1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 39,072
will 1.0%
achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-20
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 50,639 1.3%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 4518: C4E - On Campus Intervention P 58,218
SCIENCE - Grades 4 1.5%
&8
70.0% 77.4% Social Studies-5 83.9% 76.5% 72.6% 62.2% 82.3% 2005-06 2006-07 200
Social Studies-8
Science-4 80.3% 75.3% 65
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TESTBUDGET

RESULTSALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

08 2008-09 2009-10 Major Expenditures KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average S

2010-11READING 2011-12
MATH
4.1 Grade 1 28.2% 26.8% 2006-07
4.4 Salary Compensation Grade 2 4,083,83516.7% 3,830,684
25.8% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,962,160 100.0%
Iniative, Social Relations 3.7
4.3 Other Compensation 78,181 79,123
Language, Literacy, Math 4.0
4.0 Fixed Obligation/Variability 1,200 - Movement, Music 4.1
Cash Capital Outlays 13,192 8,500 Science 3.7
Facilities and Related 66,629 43,353
ACCOUNTABILITY
Technology STATUS -
ACCOUNTABILITY -
LEGEND
Other Variable Expenses 6,710
GS - Good Standing 500

Budget
2006-07 Total 2009-10 2010-11
2007-08 2008-09 $IY14,249,747 $ 3,962,160
- Improvement Year 1
GS GS* SINI 1 IY-2 IY2 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
2005
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2 ELA STATUS GS
GS GS GS GS GS
RY1 - Restructuring Year 1 MATH STATUS GS
N N N N N
RY2 - Restructuring Year 2 SCIENCE STATUS GS
GS GS* SINI 1 IY-2 IY2
RA - Restructuring Advanced SURR/PLA STATUS
Y or N - SURR/PLA OVERALL GS

FISCAL
SCHOOL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students Students** Weight

enrolled during each academic year Allocation
who had
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
Base Allocation 553.0 $3,682 $ 2,036,146
09-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-0867.7 2008-09 2009-10 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicit
ELL-Beginner (K-8) $2,396 $ 2010-11
162,209
542 518 563ELL-Beginner
Total(9-12) 34 - 31 74
$3,594 $ 52 - 2008-0
0.4% 0.4% Percent of Enrollment
ELL-Intermediate 3.1% 46.3 5.3% 13.7%
$2,396 $ 10.0%
110,935 Total 586
7.0% 54.5% ELL-Advanced Most Prevalent Country
46.0of Birth $1,198 $ 55,108 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.2%
6.6% 18.5%
SWD-Resource Room
Country 1 Myanmar12.0 Thailand $5,856
Thailand $ Thailand
70,272 Black or African American 58.3%
7.2% 16.3%
SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ - Asian 14.4%
8.5% 9.5%
SWD-Integrated Special Class Hispanic 18.1%
0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Thailand33.0 Bhutan $5,856
Nepal $ Nepal
193,248
SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class - $5,856 $ - White 8.9%
0.4% 0.7%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Total ESF Country
Allocation
3 Tanzania Kenya Bhutan $ 2,627,918
Bhutan
Multi 0.2%
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

.9% 93.2% 93.1% 2006-07
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 92.2%

Section 4 Page 61
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal David Lincoln School 07

Data From School Year 2009-10 Virgil I. Grissom

Mission: The staff, parents, and community of Virgil. I Grissom School No. 7 are committed in using best instructional practices to meet every child’s academic
and social needs in order to create successful students that are prepared to move further in their educational careers.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 46.7% 72.9% 61.4% 68.3% 27.8% MATH-3 62.1% 91.7% 83.9% 95.2% 34.7%
ELA-4 81.2% 77.2% 76.0% 87.7% 44.6% MATH-4 79.8% 80.1% 74.0% 96.0% 43.2%
ELA-5 34.2% 44.8% 82.2% 78.6% 19.7% MATH-5 34.7% 41.9% 89.3% 88.9% 29.9%
ELA-6 64.0% 45.2% 59.8% 81.4% 37.9% MATH-6 48.3% 52.1% 53.8% 78.6% 41.8%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 56.9% 59.3% 68.9% 78.6% 32.3% Total 3-8 57.0% 66.5% 74.5% 90.0% 37.2%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 88.8% 93.6% 87.7% 82.0% 78.4% Social Studies-5 88.2% 83.3% 97.2% 90.7% 90.0%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.3 4.2 3.7 Grade 1 27.7% 41.0%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.4 4.2 3.7 Grade 2 25.3% 22.8%
Movement, Music 4.6 4.2 3.9
Science 4.2 3.9 3.8

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 539 559 563 567 Total 1 2 10 7
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.6% 0.5% 0.2% Percent of Enrollment 0.2% 0.4% 1.8% 1.2%
Black or African American 63.0% 63.1% 63.1% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.4% 1.3% 1.7% Dominican
Hispanic 16.3% 14.5% 15.6% Country 1 Jamaica Bhutan Zambia
Republic
White 19.4% 20.2% 19.1%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Thailand Bhutan
Multi 0.4% 0.4% 0.3%
* Projected Country 3 Zambia Jamaica

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 93.0% 93.0% 93.7% 93.3%

Section 4 Page 62
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 07
Virgil I. Grissom Principal David Lincoln
Data From School Year 2009-10
l. I Grissom School No. 7 are committed in using best instructional practices to meet every child’s academic
s that are prepared to move further in their educational careers. Mission: The staff, parents, and communit
type and social needs in order to create successf

POSITION
MATH INFORMATION
- Grades 3-8 (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 ELA - Grades 3-8
2010-11 2011-122008-09 2009-10 Allocation Percent
68.3% 27.8% MATH-3 62.1% 91.7% 83.9% 95.2% 34.7% 2005-06 2006-07
87.7% 44.6% Teachers MATH-4 79.8% 45.9
80.1% 74.0% 44.6
96.0% 43.2% Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 2,624,135 75.3%
ELA-3 46.7% 72.9%
78.6% 19.7% Principals/AP/AD MATH-5 34.7% 2.0
41.9% 89.3% 2.0
88.9% 29.9% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,866
ELA-4 0.1% 81.2% 77.2%
81.4% 37.9% Other Instructional MATH-6 48.3% 5.8
52.1% 53.8% 6.0
78.6% 41.8% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 114,222
ELA-5 3.3% 34.2% 44.8%
Non-instructional MATH-7 13.0 12.5 0268: Title I - AIS Services 109,663
ELA-6 3.1% 64.0% 45.2%
Total MATH-8 66.7 65.1 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 257,294
ELA-7 7.4%
78.6% 32.3% Total 3-8 57.0% 66.5% 74.5% 90.0% 37.2% ELA-8
1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 3.2%
students 52% of grade 3-6 students 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial Total 3-8 2.9% 56.9%
99,467 59.3%
Math Performance Goal:
Pupil-Teacherwill
Ratio 12.3
achieve proficiency on Math :1
in 2010-2011. 12.7 : 1 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 39,072 1.1%
ELA Performance Goal: 67% of g
Pupil-Other-Staff Ratio 27.1 : 1 27.7 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 63,299 1.8%
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 201
SOCIALRatio
Total Pupil-Staff STUDIES - Grades 5 & 88.4 : 1 8.7 : 1 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 1.8%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
82.0% 78.4% Social Studies-5 88.2% 83.3% 97.2% 90.7% 90.0% 2005-06 2006-07
Social Studies-8 Science-4 88.8% 93.6%
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Aver
3.7 Grade 1 27.7% 41.0% 2006-0
3.7 Major Expenditures Grade 2 2010-11 25.3% 2011-12
22.8% Iniative, Social Relations 4.3
3.9 Language, Literacy, Math 4.4
3.8 Salary Compensation 3,660,533 3,340,386 Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,484,972 100.0%
Movement, Music 4.6
Other Compensation 45,197 64,287 Science 4.2
Fixed Obligation/Variability 3,000 3,000
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Cash Capital Outlays 28,500 13,500
Facilities and Related GS -37,386
Good Standing 63,799

Budget
006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Technology IY1 - Improvement
- Year 1 -
GS GS GS VariableGS Expenses
GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
Other 500 - 2
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
Total $ 3,775,116 $ 3,484,972 ELA STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

09-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Eth
Students** Weight Allocation
559 563 567 Total 1 2 10 7 20
0.5% 0.2% Base Allocation
Percent of Enrollment 0.2%567.0 0.4% $3,682
1.8% $ 2,087,694
1.2% Total
3.1% 63.1% ELL-Beginner (K-8) 5.0 of Birth
Most Prevalent Country $2,396 $ 11,980
American Indian or Alaska Native 0
1.3% 1.7% ELL-Beginner (9-12) - $3,594 $ -
Dominican Black or African American 6
Country 1
ELL-Intermediate Jamaica $2,396
Bhutan $ Zambia
4.5% 15.6% Republic7.8 18,689 Asian 0
0.2% 19.1% ELL-Advanced 1.8 $1,198 $ 2,156 Hispanic 1
Country 2 Thailand
0.0% 0.0% SWD-Resource Room 2.0 $5,856 $ Bhutan
11,712 White 1
0.4% 0.3% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ - Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Zambia Jamaica Multi 0
SWD-Integrated Special Class 72.0 $5,856 $ 421,632
SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 12.0 $5,856 $ 70,272 * Projected
Total ESF Allocation $ 2,624,135
7-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE
.0% 93.7% 93.3% 200
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 93

Section 4 Page 63
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Mark Mathews School 08

Data From School Year 2009-10 Roberto Clemente

Mission: We are a community of learners dedicated to the success of each and every child.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 35.9% 33.3% 31.6% 58.8% 13.9% MATH-3 29.1% 32.9% 41.8% 63.8% 10.0%
ELA-4 37.1% 23.3% 47.5% 49.2% 16.9% MATH-4 31.5% 14.7% 36.5% 53.4% 27.7%
ELA-5 39.1% 35.8% 47.1% 68.5% 39.1% MATH-5 13.2% 25.4% 40.8% 63.6% 26.1%
ELA-6 36.6% 24.4% 27.0% 52.9% 24.5% MATH-6 26.0% 27.9% 17.2% 34.2% 41.5%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 37.2% 29.1% 38.6% 57.0% 21.8% Total 3-8 24.2% 25.2% 34.0% 52.9% 24.6%

ELA Performance Goal: 60% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 82% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 64.2% 58.8% 79.0% 80.0% 75.0% Social Studies-5 77.0% 62.7% 71.0% 70.2% 69.4%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.2 4.2 4.0 Grade 1 17.2% 9.5%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.2 4.3 4.2 Grade 2 7.1% 7.1%
Movement, Music 4.2 4.3 4.1
Science 4.1 4.3 4.2

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS SINI 1* GS GS* GS GS IY1 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS WATCH GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL SINI 1* GS GS* WATCH GS IY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 519 543 517 624
611 Total 4 1 0 0
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.8% 0.9% 0.5% Percent of Enrollment 0.8% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0%
Black or African American 61.4% 61.7% 60.1% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 1.0% 1.3% 1.6%
Hispanic 32.8% 31.1% 32.8% Country 1 Laos Jamaica
White 3.7% 4.6% 4.8%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Jamaica
Multi 0.4% 0.4% 0.2%
* Projected Country 3 Sierra Leone

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 90.6% 88.8% 89.1% 88.3%

Section 4 Page 64
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 08
Roberto Clemente Principal Mark Mathews
Data From School Year 2009-10

to the success of each and every child.

Mission: We are a community of learners d
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs)
type
PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

ELA - Grades 3-8
2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 39.0
2006-07 2007-08 41.3
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 2,394,253 69.7%
58.8% 13.9% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 29.1% 3.0
32.9% 41.8% 3.063.8% 10.0% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,628 0.0% 2005-06 2006-07 2
49.2% 16.9% Other Instructional MATH-4 31.5% 14.7%
6.8 36.5% 3.953.4% 27.7% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 85,667ELA-3 2.5% 35.9% 33.3%
68.5% 39.1% Non-instructional MATH-5 13.2% 22.8
25.4% 40.8% 20.6
63.6% 26.1% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 2,579ELA-4 0.1% 37.1% 23.3%
52.9% 24.5% Total MATH-6 26.0% 71.6
27.9% 17.2% 68.8
34.2% 41.5% 0513: The Primary Project 19,414ELA-5 0.6% 39.1% 35.8%
MATH-7 ELA-6 0.6% 36.6% 24.4%
1323: School Redesign 21,598
MATH-8 ELA-7 0.2%
57.0% 21.8% Total 3-8 24.2% 25.2% 34.0% 52.9% 24.6%
1416: Primary Project 6,175
ELA-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 13.3 : 1 15.1 : 1 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 532,626 15.5%
Total 3-8 37.2% 29.1%
students Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 82% : 1 of grade 3-622.7
15.8 students
:1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 3.3%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math7.2
in 2010-2011.
:1 9.1 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 136,167
ELA Performance4.0% Goal: 60% of gr
1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers will achieve proficiency
63,299 1.8% on ELA in 2010
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
4518: C4E - On Campus Intervention P 58,218 1.7%
SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
80.0% 75.0% Social Studies-5 77.0% 62.7% 71.0% 70.2% 69.4% 2005-06 2006-07 2
Social Studies-8 Science-4 64.2% 58.8%
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)
KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Avera
08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH
Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12
4.0 Grade 1 17.2% 9.5% 2006-07
4.2 Salary Compensation Grade 2 3,478,920 7.1% 3,296,823
7.1% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,433,983 100.0%
Iniative, Social Relations 4.2
4.1 Other Compensation 104,647 72,128 Language, Literacy, Math 4.2
4.2 Movement, Music 4.2
Fixed Obligation/Variability 1,050 -
Cash Capital Outlays 16,412 11,000 Science 4.1
Facilities and Related
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS 48,875 54,032
ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology - -
GS - Good Standing
Other Variable Expenses 6,175 -

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total $ IY2
3,656,079 $ 3,433,983
- Improvement Year 2
GS GS* GS GS IY1 20
GS GS WATCH GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS SI
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS* WATCH GS IY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL SI
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. withinStudents**
the past three years) Weight Allocation
Base Allocation 624.0 2008-09 $3,682 $ 2,297,568 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethn
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2009-10 2010-11
543 517 ELL-BeginnerTotal
611 (K-8) 4 9.0 1 $2,3960 $ 21,564
0 200
0.9% 0.5% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 0.8% - 0.2% $3,594
0.0% $ 0.0%- Total 5
1.7% 60.1% ELL-Intermediate 7.3 of Birth
Most Prevalent Country $2,396 $ 17,491 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.
1.3% 1.6% ELL-Advanced 9.0 $1,198 $ 10,782 Black or African American 61
1.1% 32.8% Country 1 Laos Jamaica
SWD-Resource Room 4.0 $5,856 $ 23,424 Asian 1.
4.6% 4.8% Hispanic 32
SWD-Consultant Teacher
Country 2 - $5,856 $ -
0.0% 0.0% Jamaica White 3.
SWD-Integrated Special Class - $5,856 $ -
0.4% 0.2% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
SWD-Self-Contained
Country 312:1 Class 4.0
Sierra Leone $5,856 $ 23,424
Multi 0.
Total ESF Allocation $ 2,394,253
* Projected

ATTENDANCE
07-08 2008-09 2009-10
.8% 89.1% 88.3% 2006
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 90.

Section 4 Page 65
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Sharon Jackson School 09

Data From School Year 2009-10 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Mission: It is our mission to prepare students to be productive members of a culturally diverse and increasingly complex society. We will accomplish this in a
safe, nurturing, and pleasing environment where a competent, cooperative, and collaborative staff provides a challenging academic program for all students.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 60.0% 52.3% 32.1% 41.1% 18.7% MATH-3 60.4% 79.8% 78.2% 75.5% 44.1%
ELA-4 35.2% 44.3% 42.5% 36.6% 18.3% MATH-4 36.3% 54.8% 69.6% 66.7% 31.4%
ELA-5 27.0% 29.5% 52.2% 53.4% 8.5% MATH-5 10.9% 48.0% 51.0% 79.8% 22.5%
ELA-6 31.8% 30.7% 32.3% 53.0% 27.4% MATH-6 13.6% 25.5% 37.0% 68.1% 46.0%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 37.2% 37.9% 39.8% 46.1% 18.3% Total 3-8 30.7% 50.4% 58.1% 72.5% 36.1%

ELA Performance Goal: 54% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 88% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 71.3% 75.3% 67.0% 69.0% 59.3% Social Studies-5 65.1% 43.4% 69.6% 67.0% 71.6%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 3.9 4.2 4.0 Grade 1 25.0% 15.1%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.1 4.4 4.1 Grade 2 7.2% 15.2%
Movement, Music 4.2 4.3 4.3
Science 3.8 4.0 3.9

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS SINI 4 SINI 5 SINI 5 SINI 5 RA RA IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL SINI 4 R YR 1 R YR 2 SINI 5 RA RA RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 674 665 709 703 Total 0 4 18 60
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.3% 0.6% 0.3% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.6% 2.7% 8.5%
Black or African American 37.6% 38.2% 35.6% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Dominican
Hispanic 59.7% 59.1% 61.8% Country 1 Cuba Cuba
Republic
White 1.9% 1.5% 1.7%
Country 2 Dominican Dominican
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.2% 0.1% Cuba
Republic Republic
Multi 0.3% 0.5% 0.4%
* Projected Country 3 Panama Panama

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 90.1% 90.5% 91.4% 91.8%

Section 4 Page 66
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 09
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Principal Sharon Jackson
Data From School Year 2009-10

roductive members of a culturally diverse and increasingly complex society. We will accomplish this in a
mpetent, cooperative, and collaborative staff provides a challenging academic program for all students. Mission: It is our mission to prepare students
type safe, nurturing, and pleasing environment wh

POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8
ELA - Grades 3-8
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
2005-06 2006-07 2011-122008-09 2009-10
2007-08 Allocation Percent
41.1% 18.7% MATH-3 60.4% 79.8% 78.2% 75.5% 44.1%
Teachers 65.4 54.9 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 3,306,418 74.1% 2005-06 2006-07 20
36.6% 18.3% MATH-4 36.3% 54.8% 69.6% 66.7% 31.4% ELA-3
53.4% 8.5% Principals/AP/AD MATH-5 10.9% 4.0
48.0% 51.0% 3.0
79.8% 22.5% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 2,487 0.1% 60.0% 52.3% 3
ELA-4 35.2% 44.3% 4
53.0% 27.4% Other Instructional MATH-6 13.6% 9.5
25.5% 37.0% 10.4
68.1% 46.0% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 142,778 3.2%
ELA-5 27.0% 29.5% 5
Non-instructional MATH-7 15.7 16.2 0268: Title I - AIS Services 145,567ELA-6 3.3% 31.8% 30.7% 3
Total MATH-8 94.6 84.5 0305: IDEA Support Serv & Sec 611 94,806ELA-7 2.1%
46.1% 18.3% Total 3-8 30.7% 50.4% 58.1% 72.5% 36.1% 0513: The Primary Project 3,734
ELA-8 0.1%
1416: Primary Project 22,739Total 3-8 0.5% 37.2% 37.9% 3
students Math Performance Goal: 88% of grade 3-6 students
Pupil-Teacherwill
Ratio 10.8
achieve proficiency on Math :1
in 2010-2011. 12.8 : 1 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 315,000 7.1%
ELA Performance Goal: 54% of gra
Pupil-Other-Staff Ratio 24.3 : 1 23.8 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 2.5%
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-
Total Pupil-Staff
SOCIALRatio
STUDIES - Grades 5 & 87.5 : 1 8.3 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 129,272 2.9%
1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 39,072- Grades0.9%
SCIENCE 4&8
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 90,238 2.0%
69.0% 59.3% Social Studies-5 65.1% 43.4% 69.6% 67.0% 71.6% 4518: C4E - On Campus Intervention P 58,218 1.3% 2005-06 2006-07 2
Social Studies-8 Science-4 71.3% 75.3% 6
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

TERRANOVA
BUDGET / NWEA - Grades 1by
ALLOCATIONS &ACCOUNT
2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)
KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Averag
08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH
4.0 Grade 1 25.0% 15.1% 2006-07
4.1 Major Expenditures Grade 2 2010-11 7.2% 2011-12
15.2% Iniative, Social Relations 3.9
4.3 Language, Literacy, Math 4.1
3.9 Salary Compensation 4,834,788 4,197,609 Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 4,462,687 100.0%
Movement, Music 4.2
Other Compensation 70,888 56,559 Science 3.8
Fixed Obligation/Variability 8,500 20,171
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS
Cash Capital Outlays 34,272
ACCOUNTABILITY 75,000
LEGEND
Facilities and Related GS107,803
- Good Standing 107,348

Budget
Technology
006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 1,000
IY1 - Improvement Year 1 5,000
SINI 5 SINI 5 Other
SINI 5 Variable
RA Expenses
RA 6,598
IY2 - Improvement Year 2 1,000 200
GS GS Total
GS GS GS $CA1 - Corrective Action
5,063,849 Year 1
$ 4,462,687 ELA STATUS SI
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS G
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS G
R YR 1 R YR 2 SINI 5 RA RA RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL SI
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

FISCAL YEAR
RECENT 2011-12 Equitable
IMMIGRANTS Student
(Students enrolled Funding
during (ESF) year
each academic Allocation
who had
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
Students** Weight Allocation ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnic
09-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
665 709 703 Total
Base Allocation 0 703.0 4 $3,68218 60
$ 2,588,446 2008
0.6% 0.3% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(K-8)of Enrollment 0.0%110.0 0.6% 2.7%
$2,396 8.5%
$ 263,560 Total 67
8.2% 35.6% Most Prevalent Country of Birth American Indian or Alaska Native 0.3
ELL-Beginner (9-12) - $3,594 $ -
0.0% 0.0% Dominican Black or African American 37.6
9.1% 61.8%
ELL-Intermediate
Country 1 80.0 Cuba $2,396 $ 191,680
Cuba
Republic Asian 0.1
1.5% 1.7% ELL-Advanced 58.0 $1,198 $ 69,484
Dominican Hispanic 59.7
0.2% 0.1% SWD-Resource Room
Country 2 7.0 $5,856
Cuba $ Dominican
40,992 White 1.9
Republic Republic
0.5% 0.4% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ - Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
SWD-Integrated Special
Country 3 Class - $5,856
Panama $ Panama- Multi 0.3
SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 26.0 $5,856 $ 152,256 * Projected
Total ESF Allocation $ 3,306,418
ATTENDANCE
7-08 2008-09 2009-10
.5% 91.4% 91.8% 2006
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 90.1

Section 4 Page 67
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Patricia Jones School 17

Data From School Year 2009-10 Enrico Fermi

Mission: We are committed to improve student achievement by working in partnership with families, caregivers, and the Rochester community to provide a
quality education in a positive school environment, maintaining high academic standards, empowering each student to be a confident and productive member of
society, recognizing and respecting diversity, and modeling life-long learning.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 37.3% 40.0% 36.7% 44.0% 15.3% MATH-3 57.9% 57.7% 65.0% 73.4% 20.5%
ELA-4 43.2% 35.7% 32.8% 45.1% 19.7% MATH-4 60.3% 45.6% 50.7% 59.5% 27.5%
ELA-5 43.3% 45.0% 45.4% 56.5% 16.7% MATH-5 20.0% 46.3% 45.3% 51.5% 21.6%
ELA-6 41.9% 21.3% 52.8% 68.3% 17.5% MATH-6 37.8% 25.0% 52.8% 39.3% 19.4%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 40.9% 35.9% 40.2% 52.6% 17.2% Total 3-8 44.4% 44.9% 54.2% 57.2% 22.3%

ELA Performance Goal: 57% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 80% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 83.3% 79.4% 76.4% 78.0% 83.8% Social Studies-5 72.6% 77.5% 54.7% 64.6% 64.9%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 3.7 3.8 3.4 Grade 1 26.3% 20.3%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.4 4.4 3.6 Grade 2 21.5% 19.7%
Movement, Music 3.7 3.8 3.5
Science 3.8 4.1 3.5

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS* SINI 1 IY-1 IY2 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS* SINI 1 IY-1 IY2 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 529 517 523 572 Total 2 9 15 32
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.2% 0.4% 0.4% Percent of Enrollment 1.4% 1.7% 2.9% 6.1%
Black or African American 57.3% 53.6% 54.5% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 1.3% 1.4% 1.2% Dominican Dominican Dominican
Hispanic 31.7% 36.2% 35.3% Country 1 Cuba
Republic Republic Republic
White 9.3% 8.1% 7.9%
Country 2 Dominican
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Sudan Cuba
Republic
Multi 0.2% 0.4% 0.5%
* Projected Country 3 Bhutan

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 88.8% 90.0% 91.2% 88.6%

Section 4 Page 68
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 17
Enrico Fermi Principal Patricia Jones
Data From School Year 2009-10
evement by working in partnership with families, caregivers, and the Rochester community to provide a
maintaining high academic standards, empowering each student to be a confident and productive member of Mission: We are committed to improve stu
odeling life-long learning. quality education in a positive school envir
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type 2011-12 FUNDING
PROPOSED society, recognizing and respecting diversi

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 46.5
2006-07 2007-08 49.6
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA - Grades 3-8
$ 2,510,892 65.0%
44.0% 15.3% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 57.9% 2.0
57.7% 65.0% 2.073.4% 20.5% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,729 0.0% 2005-06 2006-07
45.1% 19.7% Other Instructional MATH-4 60.3% 3.0
45.6% 50.7% 3.059.5% 27.5% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 114,222 ELA-3 3.0% 37.3% 40.0%
56.5% 16.7% Non-instructional MATH-5 20.0% 46.3%
25.6 45.3% 18.1
51.5% 21.6% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 123,698 ELA-4 3.2% 43.2% 35.7%
68.3% 17.5% Total MATH-6 37.8% 25.0%
77.1 52.8% 72.7
39.3% 19.4% 0513: The Primary Project 3,734 ELA-5 0.1% 43.3% 45.0%
MATH-7 1323: School Redesign 67,771 ELA-6 1.8% 41.9% 21.3%
MATH-8
1416: Primary Project 13,643 ELA-7 0.4%
52.6% 17.2% Total 3-8 44.4% 44.9% 54.2% 57.2% 22.3%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 11.2 : 1 11.5 : 1 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 631,527 ELA-816.4%
Pupil-Other-Staff 112,360 Total 3-82.9% 40.9% 35.9%
students MathRatio
Performance Goal: 17.1
80% : 1 of grade 3-624.7 :1
students 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math6.8
in :2010-2011.
1 7.9 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 122,377 3.2%
ELA Performance Goal: 57% of g
1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 39,072
will achieve1.0%
proficiency on ELA in 201
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 63,299 1.6%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 4518: C4E - On Campus Intervention P 58,218 - Grades
SCIENCE 1.5%4&8
78.0% 83.8% Social Studies-5 72.6% 77.5% 54.7% 64.6% 64.9% 2005-06 2006-07
Social Studies-8 Science-4 83.3% 79.4%
Science-8

BUDGET
RCSD K-2 TEST ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
RESULTS
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

08 2008-09 2009-10 KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Aver

Major Expenditures 2010-11 READING2011-12
MATH
3.4 Grade 1 26.3% 20.3% 2006-
3.6 Salary Compensation Grade 2 3,803,757 21.5% 3,743,494
19.7% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,862,542 100.0%
Iniative, Social Relations 3.7
3.5 Other Compensation 81,221 58,801 Language, Literacy, Math 4.4
3.5 Fixed Obligation/Variability 500 - Movement, Music 3.7
Cash Capital Outlays 19,700 29,000 Science 3.8
Facilities and Related 39,075 31,247
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology 2,041 -
Other Variable Expenses GS - Good
4,650Standing -

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Total 2009-10 2010-11 $ IY1 - Improvement$Year
3,950,944 1
3,862,542
GS GS* SINI 1 IY-1 IY2 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
2
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS* SINI 1 IY-1 IY2 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. withinStudents**
the past three years) Weight Allocation
Base Allocation 572.0 $3,682 $ 2,106,104 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Eth
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 76.0 $2,396 $ 182,096
517 523 572 Total 2 9 15 32 2
0.4% 0.4% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 1.4% - 1.7% $3,5942.9% $ 6.1%- Total
3.6% 54.5% ELL-Intermediate 41.0 of Birth $2,396
Most Prevalent Country $ 98,236
American Indian or Alaska Native
1.4% 1.2% ELL-Advanced 15.9 $1,198 $ 19,048
Dominican Dominican Dominican Black or African American 5
Country
SWD-Resource Room 1 Cuba11.0
6.2% 35.3% Republic $5,856
Republic $ Republic
64,416 Asian
8.1% 7.9% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ - Hispanic 3
Country 2 Dominican
0.0% 0.0% SWD-Integrated Special Class Sudan $5,856 $ Cuba
Republic7.0 40,992 White
0.4% 0.5% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class - $5,856 $ - Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Bhutan Multi
Total ESF Allocation $ 2,510,892
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

0.0% 91.2% 88.6% 20
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 88

Section 4 Page 69
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Petrina Johnson School 30

Data From School Year 2009-10 General Elwell S. Otis

Mission: We strive to be a school that promotes high academic achievement in a safe environment built on solid partnerships with students, families, staff, and
community members. It is our mission to meet the diverse needs of learners in a safe, supportive, and collaborative environment and through consistent, school-
wide, high expectations for behavior and academic achievement that helps promote student success.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 35.8% 28.6% 38.8% 33.9% 22.6% MATH-3 38.9% 38.6% 76.2% 72.9% 19.0%
ELA-4 52.7% 25.0% 46.4% 39.7% 16.0% MATH-4 43.4% 27.3% 48.1% 47.6% 14.0%
ELA-5 25.0% 40.4% 52.5% 53.2% 9.4% MATH-5 6.8% 28.1% 50.0% 66.0% 16.9%
ELA-6 32.8% 20.9% 50.0% 60.0% 25.0% MATH-6 25.9% 9.5% 35.2% 64.6% 30.8%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 36.4% 28.7% 46.7% 46.6% 18.0% Total 3-8 29.3% 26.8% 53.2% 62.4% 20.0%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 68.4% 59.4% 55.6% 46.0% 24.5% Social Studies-5 76.3% 50.9% 66.1% 77.3% 65.1%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 3.9 3.9 4.3 Grade 1 9.7% 33.9%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.4 4.2 4.5 Grade 2 5.4% 13.5%
Movement, Music 4.1 4.0 4.3
Science 3.8 3.8 4.0

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS* GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS* GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 466 431 388 425
414 Total 2 2 3 5
American Indian or Alaska Native 1.1% 1.2% 0.8% Percent of Enrollment 0.4% 0.4% 0.7% 1.3%
Black or African American 51.5% 53.8% 54.9% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 2.6% 1.2% 0.8%
Hispanic 26.0% 24.6% 24.2% Country 1 Vietnam Vietnam Tanzania Tanzania
White 18.0% 18.3% 18.8%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Yemen
Multi 0.9% 0.9% 0.5%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 90.6% 90.7% 90.4% 88.8%

Section 4 Page 70
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 30
General Elwell S. Otis Principal Petrina Johnson
Data From School Year 2009-10
h academic achievement in a safe environment built on solid partnerships with students, families, staff, and
verse needs of learners in a safe, supportive, and collaborative environment and through consistent, school- Mission: We strive to be a school that promo
chievement that helps promote student success. community members. It is our mission to mee
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type 2011-12 FUNDING
PROPOSED wide, high expectations for behavior and acad

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 34.3
2006-07 2007-08 32.8
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ ELA - Grades 3-8 72.1%
1,914,752
33.9% 22.6% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 38.9% 2.0
38.6% 76.2% 2.0
72.9% 19.0% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,429 0.1% 2005-06 2006-07 20
39.7% 16.0% Other InstructionalMATH-4 43.4% 4.0
27.3% 48.1% 2.0
47.6% 14.0% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 98,454
ELA-3 3.7% 35.8% 28.6% 3
53.2% 9.4% Non-instructional MATH-5 6.8% 28.1%
10.0 50.0% 10.6
66.0% 16.9% 0456: ESSC Elementary 59,793
ELA-4 2.3% 52.7% 25.0% 4
60.0% 25.0% Total MATH-6 25.9% 50.3
9.5% 35.2% 47.4
64.6% 30.8% 1323: School Redesign 101,346
ELA-5 3.8% 25.0% 40.4% 5
MATH-7 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs ELA-6
178,929 6.7% 32.8% 20.9% 5
MATH-8 ELA-7
1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 4.2%
46.6% 18.0% Total 3-8 29.3% 26.8% 53.2% 62.4% 20.0% ELA-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 11.3 : 1 13 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 99,467 3.7%
Total 3-8 36.4% 28.7% 4
students Pupil-Other-Staff
Math Ratio
Performance Goal: 24.3 : 1 of grade 3-629.1
52% :1
students 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 25,320 1.0%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratioproficiency on Math7.7
in 2010-2011.
:1 9:1 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 2.4%Goal: 67% of gra
ELA Performance
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
46.0% 24.5% Social Studies-5 76.3% 50.9% 66.1% 77.3% 65.1% 2005-06 2006-07 20
Social Studies-8 Science-4 68.4% 59.4% 5
Science-8

BUDGET
RCSD K-2 TEST ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
RESULTS
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)
KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Averag
08 2008-09 2009-10Major Expenditures 2010-11 READING2011-12
MATH
4.3 Grade 1 9.7% 33.9% 2006-07
4.5 Salary Compensation Grade 2 2,637,949 5.4% 2,563,302
13.5% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 2,655,443 100.0%
Iniative, Social Relations 3.9
4.3 Other Compensation 104,535 41,429 Language, Literacy, Math 4.4
4.0 Fixed Obligation/Variability 4,000 - Movement, Music 4.1
Cash Capital Outlays 6,200 - Science 3.8
Facilities and Related 54,617 50,712
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology 200 -
Other Variable Expenses GS - Good
4,000Standing -

Budget
006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Total 2009-10 2010-11 $ IY1 - Improvement$Year
2,811,501 1
2,655,443
GS GS* GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2 200
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS G
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS G
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS G
GS GS* GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL G
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. withinStudents**
the past three years)
Weight Allocation
Base Allocation 425.0 $3,682 $ 1,564,850 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnic
09-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 10.0 $2,396 $ 23,960
431 388 414 Total 2 2 3 5 2008
.2% 0.8% ELL-Beginner (9-12)
Percent of Enrollment 0.4% - 0.4% $3,594
0.7% $ 1.3%-
Total 46
3.8% 54.9% ELL-Intermediate 5.0
Most Prevalent Country of Birth $2,396 $ 11,980
American Indian or Alaska Native 1.1
.2% 0.8% ELL-Advanced 3.0 $1,198 $ 3,594 Black or African American 51.5
4.6% 24.2% Country
SWD-Resource Room 1 Vietnam3.0 Vietnam Tanzania
$5,856 $ Tanzania
17,568 Asian 2.6
8.3% 18.8% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ - Hispanic 26.0
Country 2
.0% 0.0% SWD-Integrated Special Class 38.0 $5,856 $ Yemen
222,528 White 18.0
.9% 0.5% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 12.0 $5,856 $ 70,272 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Multi 0.9
Total ESF Allocation $ 1,914,752
* Projected

ATTENDANCE
7-08 2008-09 2009-10
7% 90.4% 88.8% 2006-
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 90.6

Section 4 Page 71
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Tracy DelGrego School 34

Data From School Year 2009-10 Dr. Louis A. Cerulli

Mission: As a community, it is our mission to prepare our students to meet or exceed district, state and national standards. We will embrace diversity and work
together as partners to provide a positive, safe and productive learning environment.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 28.8% 28.8% 34.1% 25.8% 7.0% MATH-3 25.4% 53.9% 63.8% 72.7% 12.7%
ELA-4 50.0% 36.0% 45.1% 44.7% 19.7% MATH-4 56.0% 47.1% 60.7% 65.8% 13.1%
ELA-5 46.8% 43.5% 50.0% 50.0% 13.4% MATH-5 33.9% 48.8% 52.2% 64.9% 20.9%
ELA-6 35.7% 35.0% 66.7% 66.7% 24.1% MATH-6 19.3% 41.7% 57.1% 60.9% 31.5%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 40.1% 36.2% 46.1% 44.9% 15.4% Total 3-8 32.8% 49.1% 59.4% 66.5% 19.0%

ELA Performance Goal: 54% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 74% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 79.2% 72.0% 78.3% 62.0% 62.3% Social Studies-5 79.7% 56.3% 80.0% 72.2% 76.8%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 3.9 4.1 4.3 Grade 1 17.6% 8.2%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.1 4.3 4.7 Grade 2 29.6% 39.4%
Movement, Music 4.3 4.2 4.4
Science 4.1 4.1 4.4

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS IY1 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS GS GS IY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 461 490 500 482 Total 2 2 0 0
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% Percent of Enrollment 0.5% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0%
Black or African American 61.4% 61.2% 58.7% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 1.7% 1.4% 0.6%
Hispanic 18.0% 17.3% 19.1% Country 1 Jamaica Jamaica
White 18.2% 19.0% 19.6%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.2% 0.4% Country 2
Multi 0.4% 0.6% 1.5%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91.8% 91.9% 92.2% 91.1%

Section 4 Page 72
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 34
Dr. Louis A. Cerulli Principal Tracy DelGrego
Data From School Year 2009-10

re our students to meet or exceed district, state and national standards. We will embrace diversity and work
roductive learning environment. Mission: As a community, it is our mission to
type together as partners to provide a positive, safe

POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8
2010-112006-07 2011-122008-09 2009-10 ELA - Grades 3-8
Allocation Percent
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2007-08
25.8% 7.0% Teachers MATH-3 25.4% 41.6
53.9% 63.8% 35.6
72.7% 12.7% Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 2,262,506 72.2% 2005-06 2006-07 20
44.7% 19.7% MATH-4 56.0% 47.1% 60.7% 65.8% 13.1% ELA-3
Principals/AP/AD 2.0 2.0 0131: GRHF School #34 Grant 2 60,398 1.9% 28.8% 28.8% 3
50.0% 13.4% MATH-5 33.9% 48.8% 52.2% 64.9% 20.9% ELA-4
66.7% 24.1%
Other Instructional MATH-6 19.3%
5.0
41.7% 57.1%
4.4
60.9% 31.5%
0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,610 0.1% 50.0% 36.0% 4
ELA-5 46.8% 43.5% 5
Non-instructional MATH-7 13.8 12.8 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 85,667 2.7%
ELA-6 35.7% 35.0% 6
Total MATH-8 62.4 54.8 0268: Title I - AIS Services 103,087ELA-7
3.3%
44.9% 15.4% Total 3-8 32.8% 49.1% 59.4% 66.5% 19.0% 0513: The Primary Project 4,480ELA-8 0.1%
1134: QUAD A Program 80,640Total 3-8 2.6% 40.1% 36.2% 4
students 74% of grade 3-6 students
Pupil-TeacherMath
RatioPerformance Goal: 12 : 1 13.5 : 1 1416: Primary Project 24,569 0.8%
will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011. ELA Performance Goal: 54% of gra
Pupil-Other-Staff Ratio 24 : 1 25.1 :1 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 176,687 5.6%
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
8:1 8.8 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 3.6%
1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 106,362 3.4%
SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 50,639 1.6%
62.0% 62.3% Social Studies-5 79.7% 56.3% 80.0% 72.2% 76.8% 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 2.0% 2005-06 2006-07 20
Social Studies-8 Science-4 79.2% 72.0% 7
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades by
1 &ACCOUNT
2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)
KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average
08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH
4.3 Grade 1 17.6% 8.2% 2006-07
4.7 Major Expenditures Grade 2 2010-11 29.6% 2011-12
39.4% Iniative, Social Relations 3.9
4.4 Language, Literacy,
4.4
Salary Compensation 3,228,479 2,908,635 Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,132,599 100.0%Math 4.1
Movement, Music 4.3
Other Compensation 69,361 49,610
Science 4.1
Fixed Obligation/Variability 1,000 -
Cash Capital Outlays
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS 22,800
ACCOUNTABILITY -
LEGEND
Facilities and Related GS -99,287
Good Standing 170,954
Technology 1,000 Year 1 -

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement
GS GS Other
GS VariableGS Expenses
IY1 IY2 -12,040
Improvement Year 2 3,400 200
GS GS Total
GS GS GS $ CA1
3,433,967 $ 3,132,599
- Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS G
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS G
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS G
GS GS GS GS IY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL G
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

FISCAL YEAR
RECENT 2011-12 Equitable
IMMIGRANTS Studentduring
(Students enrolled Funding (ESF) year
each academic Allocation
who had
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
Students** Weight Allocation ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnic
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
490 500 Base Allocation
482 Total 2 482.0 2 $3,6820 $ 1,774,724
0 2008
0.2% 0.2% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(K-8)of Enrollment 0.5% 4.0 0.4% 0.0%
$2,396 $ 0.0%9,584 Total 46
1.2% 58.7% ELL-Beginner (9-12) Most Prevalent Country
- of Birth $3,594 $ - American Indian or Alaska Native 0.2
1.4% 0.6% ELL-Intermediate 6.0 Jamaica $2,396 $ 14,376 Black or African American 61.4
7.3% 19.1% Country 1 Jamaica
ELL-Advanced 1.0 $1,198 $ 1,198 Asian 1.7
9.0% 19.6% Hispanic 18.0
0.2% 0.4%
SWD-Resource Room
Country 2 3.0 $5,856 $ 17,568
White 18.2
0.6% 1.5% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ -
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
SWD-Integrated Special
Country 3 Class 65.0 $5,856 $ 380,640 Multi 0.4
SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 11.0 $5,856 $ 64,416
* Projected
Total ESF Allocation $ 2,262,506
ATTENDANCE
07-08 2008-09 2009-10
.9% 92.2% 91.1% 2006-
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91.8%

Section 4 Page 73
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Marion Whitfield School 41

Data From School Year 2009-10 Kodak Park

Mission: We are a safe, nurturing, professional learning community engaging our students in effective research based instruction. We are building an educational
foundation that prepares our students for high school, college, work, and 21st century citizenship.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 50.0% 37.0% 63.5% 45.7% 12.9% MATH-3 65.1% 51.3% 81.6% 74.7% 18.8%
ELA-4 50.0% 48.4% 44.9% 49.4% 27.3% MATH-4 57.5% 55.8% 58.6% 65.4% 16.1%
ELA-5 43.1% 45.2% 57.1% 62.3% 23.7% MATH-5 37.7% 40.3% 65.6% 77.0% 22.7%
ELA-6 65.0% 38.7% 50.0% 72.7% 34.0% MATH-6 51.6% 37.2% 62.5% 66.1% 44.4%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 52.4% 42.5% 54.4% 55.4% 23.5% Total 3-8 53.7% 47.3% 68.1% 71.0% 23.6%

ELA Performance Goal: 54% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 71% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 85.7% 78.3% 73.6% 84.0% 59.1% Social Studies-5 85.2% 72.1% 87.7% 86.6% 75.3%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.3 4.7 4.6 Grade 1 17.9% 9.5%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.6 4.6 4.7 Grade 2 9.1% 10.4%
Movement, Music 4.5 4.7 4.8
Science 4.4 4.7 4.8

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS* GS GS IY1 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS* GS GS IY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 560 572 588 581 Total 3 5 0 2
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.4% 0.2% 0.2% Percent of Enrollment 0.5% 0.9% 0.0% 0.3%
Black or African American 55.7% 55.6% 58.1% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 2.0% 1.4% 1.6%
Hispanic 15.7% 17.3% 16.5% Country 1 Cuba Cuba Rwanda
White 25.7% 24.3% 22.5%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.2% Country 2 Honduras Cameroon
Multi 0.5% 1.2% 0.3%
* Projected Country 3 Honduras

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91.7% 92.4% 92.9% 91.7%

Section 4 Page 74
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 41
Kodak Park Principal Marion Whitfield
Data From School Year 2009-10

ning community engaging our students in effective research based instruction. We are building an educational
l, college, work, and 21st century citizenship. Mission: We are a safe, nurturing, professiona
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs)
type
PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING
foundation that prepares our students for high s

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

ELA - Grades 3-8
2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 47.3
2006-07 2007-08 43.6
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 2,556,618 75.0%
45.7% 12.9% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 65.1% 2.0
51.3% 81.6% 2.0
74.7% 18.8% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,812 0.1%2005-06 2006-07 200
49.4% 27.3% Other Instructional MATH-4 57.5% 55.8%
7.4 58.6% 65.4%
7.2 16.1% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 114,222
ELA-3 3.3% 50.0% 37.0% 63.
62.3% 23.7% Non-instructional MATH-5 37.7% 12.3
40.3% 65.6% 10.8
77.0% 22.7% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 115,828
ELA-4 3.4% 50.0% 48.4% 44.
72.7% 34.0% Total MATH-6 51.6% 69.0
37.2% 62.5% 63.6
66.1% 44.4% 0513: The Primary Project ELA-5
4,480 0.1% 43.1% 45.2% 57.
MATH-7 ELA-6
1416: Primary Project 8,551 0.3% 65.0% 38.7% 50.
MATH-8 ELA-7
55.4% 23.5% Total 3-8 53.7% 47.3% 68.1% 71.0% 23.6% 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 201,322 5.9%
ELA-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 12.4 : 1 13.3 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 3.3%
Total 3-8 52.4% 42.5% 54.
students MathRatio
Pupil-Other-Staff Performance Goal: 71% : 1 of grade 3-629.1
27.1 students
:1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 129,272 3.8%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math8.5
in 2010-2011.
:1 9.1 : 1 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs ELA Performance
39,072 Goal:
1.1% 54% of grad
1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers will achieve proficiency
63,299 1.9% on ELA in 2010-20
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 1.9%
SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
84.0% 59.1% Social Studies-5 85.2% 72.1% 87.7% 86.6% 75.3% 2005-06 2006-07 200
Social Studies-8 Science-4 85.7% 78.3% 73
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)
KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average S
08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH
Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12
4.6 Grade 1 17.9% 9.5% 2006-07
4.7 Salary Compensation Grade 2 3,437,841 9.1% 3,295,946
10.4% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,410,430
Iniative, Social100.0%
Relations 4.3
4.8 Language, Literacy, Math 4.6
Other Compensation 90,672 66,884
4.8 Movement, Music 4.5
Fixed Obligation/Variability - -
Science 4.4
Cash Capital Outlays 10,894 6,200
Facilities and Related
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS 61,505 40,000
ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology 100 100
GS - Good Standing
Other Variable Expenses 1,200 1,300

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total $ IY2
3,602,212
- Improvement$Year
3,410,430
2
GS GS* GS GS IY1 2005
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS GS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS GS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS
GS GS* GS GS IY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL GS
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. withinStudents**
the past three years) Weight Allocation
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicit
009-10 Base Allocation
2010-11 2011-12* 581.0 2008-09
2007-08 $3,682
2009-10 $ 2,139,242
2010-11
572 588 ELL-BeginnerTotal
581 (K-8) 3 1.0 5 $2,3960 $ 22,396 2008-0
0.2% 0.2% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 0.5% - 0.9% $3,594
0.0% $ 0.3%- Total 560
5.6% 58.1% ELL-Intermediate 4.0 of Birth
Most Prevalent Country $2,396 $ 9,584 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.4%
1.4% 1.6% ELL-Advanced 6.0 $1,198 $ 7,188 Black or African American 55.7%
7.3% 16.5% Country 1 Cuba Cuba Rwanda
SWD-Resource Room 6.0 $5,856 $ 35,136 Asian 2.0%
4.3% 22.5% Hispanic 15.7%
SWD-Consultant Teacher
Country 2 Honduras- Cameroon $5,856 $ -
0.0% 0.2% White 25.7%
1.2% 0.3% SWD-Integrated Special Class 37.0 $5,856 $ 216,672
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
SWD-Self-Contained
Country 312:1 Class 25.0 Honduras $5,856 $ 146,400 Multi 0.5%
Total ESF Allocation $ 2,556,618
* Projected

ATTENDANCE
07-08 2008-09 2009-10
2.4% 92.9% 91.7% 2006-0
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91.7%

Section 4 Page 75
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Richard DeRose School 42

Data From School Year 2009-10 Abelard Reynolds

Mission: It is our mission to educate all students to their highest levels of academic and social performance in effective learning environments that are safe,
inclusive and learner centered, in collaboration with parents and diverse community partners.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 60.0% 48.3% 38.9% 50.7% 32.1% MATH-3 64.5% 70.0% 65.3% 83.3% 42.9%
ELA-4 49.2% 55.2% 48.3% 34.3% 23.3% MATH-4 48.5% 58.2% 61.0% 54.4% 33.8%
ELA-5 45.6% 42.6% 67.8% 66.1% 13.8% MATH-5 53.0% 56.8% 64.4% 69.0% 17.5%
ELA-6 47.5% 44.3% 47.8% 70.3% 31.0% MATH-6 25.4% 50.0% 40.3% 67.7% 50.9%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 50.2% 47.9% 50.0% 54.8% 24.0% Total 3-8 47.7% 58.4% 57.6% 68.8% 34.5%

ELA Performance Goal: 61% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 80% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 74.6% 65.1% 75.0% 57.0% 65.3% Social Studies-5 78.8% 75.7% 77.2% 72.4% 56.8%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.5 4.5 4.2 Grade 1 18.3% 15.5%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.7 4.6 4.2 Grade 2 20.6% 23.8%
Movement, Music 4.6 4.7 4.2
Science 4.8 4.6 4.2

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS* SINI 1 SINI 2 IY-2 CA1 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS* SINI 1 SINI 2 IY-2 CA1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 429 456 478 457 Total 0 0 0 0
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.5% 0.9% 1.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Black or African American 38.2% 41.7% 45.6% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 2.3% 2.2% 2.5%
Hispanic 15.7% 17.8% 16.8% Country 1
White 42.6% 36.4% 32.7%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.2% Country 2
Multi 0.7% 1.1% 1.2%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 92.3% 92.9% 93.3% 93.0%

Section 4 Page 76
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 42
Abelard Reynolds Principal Richard DeRose
Data From School Year 2009-10
heir highest levels of academic and social performance in effective learning environments that are safe,
parents and diverse community partners. Mission: It is our mission to educate all stud
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type 2011-12 FUNDING
PROPOSED inclusive and learner centered, in collaboratio

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 40.7

2006-07 2007-08 35.9
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ ELA - Grades 3-8 74.6%
2,162,204
50.7% 32.1% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 64.5% 2.0
70.0% 65.3% 2.083.3% 42.9% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,549 0.1%
2005-06 2006-07 20
34.3% 23.3% Other Instructional MATH-4 48.5% 5.0
58.2% 61.0% 2.654.4% 33.8% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 85,667 3.0%
ELA-3 60.0% 48.3% 3
66.1% 13.8% Non-instructional MATH-5 53.0% 12.0
56.8% 64.4% 10.0
69.0% 17.5% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 88,133
ELA-4 3.0% 49.2% 55.2% 4
70.3% 31.0% Total MATH-6 25.4% 59.7
50.0% 40.3% 50.5
67.7% 50.9% 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 239,384
ELA-5 8.3% 45.6% 42.6% 6
MATH-7 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360
ELA-6 3.9% 47.5% 44.3% 4
MATH-8 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 106,362
ELA-7 3.7%
54.8% 24.0% Total 3-8 47.7% 58.4% 57.6% 68.8% 34.5% ELA-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 11.7 : 1 12.7 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 37,979 1.3%
Pupil-Other-Staff Total 3-8 50.2% 47.9% 5
students MathRatio
Performance Goal: 25.2
80% : 1 of grade 3-631.3 :1
students 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 2.2%
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math in
will achieve 8 2010-2011.
:1 9:1 ELA Performance Goal: 61% of gra
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
57.0% 65.3% Social Studies-5 78.8% 75.7% 77.2% 72.4% 56.8% 2005-06 2006-07 2
Social Studies-8 Science-4 74.6% 65.1% 7
Science-8

BUDGET
RCSD K-2 TEST ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
RESULTS
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

08 2008-09 2009-10 KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Averag

Major Expenditures 2010-11 READING2011-12
MATH
4.2 Grade 1 18.3% 15.5% 2006-07
4.2 Salary Compensation Grade 2 3,139,823 20.6% 2,794,348
23.8% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 2,897,231 100.0%
Iniative, Social Relations 4.5
4.2 Other Compensation 45,065 57,549 Language, Literacy, Math 4.7
4.2 Fixed Obligation/Variability - - Movement, Music 4.6
Cash Capital Outlays 20,200 21,000 Science 4.8
Facilities and Related 35,101 17,335
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology - -
Other Variable Expenses GS - Good
6,000Standing 7,000

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Total 2009-10 2010-11 $ IY1 - Improvement$Year
3,246,189 1
2,897,231
GS* SINI 1 SINI 2 IY-2 CA1 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
200
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS G
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS G
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS G
GS* SINI 1 SINI 2 IY-2 CA1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL G
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
Students**
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
Weight Allocation
Base Allocation 457.0 $3,682 $ 1,682,674 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnic
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 7.0 $2,396 $ 16,772
456 478 457 Total 0 0 0 0 2008
0.9% 1.0% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 0.0% - 0.0% $3,594
0.0% $ 0.0%-
Total 42
1.7% 45.6% ELL-Intermediate -
Most Prevalent Country of Birth $2,396 $ -
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.5
2.2% 2.5% ELL-Advanced 5.0 $1,198 $ 5,990
Black or African American 38.2
7.8% 16.8% Country
SWD-Resource Room 1 3.0 $5,856 $ 17,568 Asian 2.3
6.4% 32.7% SWD-Consultant Teacher 1.0 $5,856 $ 5,856 Hispanic 15.7
0.0% 0.2% Country 2
SWD-Integrated Special Class 55.0 $5,856 $ 322,080 White 42.6
1.1% 1.2% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 19.0 $5,856 $ 111,264 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Multi 0.7
Total ESF Allocation $ 2,162,204
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

.9% 93.3% 93.0% 2006
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 92.3

Section 4 Page 77
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Richard Smith School 43

Data From School Year 2009-10 Theodore Roosevelt

Mission: It is our mission to provide each student with an outstanding education to enable them to become successful and productive citizens in today’s global
society.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 47.3% 40.2% 36.9% 42.5% 16.3% MATH-3 73.4% 63.0% 81.3% 76.3% 22.4%
ELA-4 59.7% 50.0% 44.6% 74.4% 39.6% MATH-4 58.2% 57.2% 75.6% 78.5% 37.1%
ELA-5 57.6% 61.4% 71.4% 75.0% 33.3% MATH-5 42.9% 45.7% 67.6% 76.2% 34.8%
ELA-6 62.0% 66.7% 79.4% 87.3% 40.2% MATH-6 50.5% 56.1% 79.4% 77.5% 33.3%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 57.0% 54.5% 57.7% 69.3% 32.5% Total 3-8 55.6% 55.9% 75.9% 77.1% 32.0%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 88.5% 81.8% 90.0% 91.0% 86.5% Social Studies-5 84.6% 86.7% 94.1% 77.1% 89.9%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.5 4.4 4.6 Grade 1 25.9% 16.5%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.6 4.6 4.7 Grade 2 20.0% 15.7%
Movement, Music 4.3 4.3 4.4
Science 4.4 4.3 4.6

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS* GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS* GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 585 572 544 566 Total 1 1 0 0
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% Percent of Enrollment 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0%
Black or African American 56.7% 60.5% 59.6% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 1.5% 1.6% 2.0%
Hispanic 17.3% 14.5% 16.0% Country 1 Nigeria Kenya
White 23.3% 22.0% 21.0%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2
Multi 0.9% 1.0% 1.1%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91.8% 92.4% 92.5% 91.8%

Section 4 Page 78
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 43
Theodore Roosevelt Principal Richard Smith
Data From School Year 2009-10
ith an outstanding education to enable them to become successful and productive citizens in today’s global
Mission: It is our mission to provide each s
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type 2011-12 FUNDING
PROPOSED society.

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 40.6
2006-07 2007-08 38.2
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA - Grades 3-8
$ 2,383,204 77.0%
42.5% 16.3% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 73.4% 2.0
63.0% 81.3% 1.076.3% 22.4% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,559 0.1% 2005-06 2006-07
74.4% 39.6% Other Instructional MATH-4 58.2% 4.2
57.2% 75.6% 2.878.5% 37.1% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 114,222ELA-3 3.7% 47.3% 40.2%
75.0% 33.3% Non-instructional MATH-5 42.9% 10.8
45.7% 67.6% 10.8
76.2% 34.8% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 91,290ELA-4 2.9% 59.7% 50.0%
87.3% 40.2% Total MATH-6 50.5% 57.6
56.1% 79.4% 52.8
77.5% 33.3% 0513: The Primary Project 8,960ELA-5 0.3% 57.6% 61.4%
MATH-7 1416: Primary Project 4,071ELA-6 0.1% 62.0% 66.7%
MATH-8
1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 165,494ELA-7 5.3%
69.3% 32.5% Total 3-8 55.6% 55.9% 75.9% 77.1% 32.0%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 13.4 : 1 14.8 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360ELA-8 3.6%
Pupil-Other-Staff 106,362Total 3-83.4% 57.0% 54.5%
students MathRatio
Performance Goal: 52%32 : 1 of grade 3-638.8 :1
students 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math9.4
in 2010-2011.
:1 10.7 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 50,639 1.6% Goal: 67% of g
ELA Performance
4518: C4E - On Campus Intervention P 58,218
will achieve1.9%
proficiency on ELA in 201
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
91.0% 86.5% Social Studies-5 84.6% 86.7% 94.1% 77.1% 89.9% 2005-06 2006-07
Social Studies-8 Science-4 88.5% 81.8%
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

08 2008-09 2009-10 KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Aver

Major Expenditures 2010-11 READING2011-12
MATH
4.6 Grade 1 25.9% 16.5% 2006-0
4.7 Salary Compensation Grade 2 3,016,688 20.0% 2,829,503
15.7% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,096,380 100.0%
Iniative, Social Relations 4.5
4.4 Other Compensation 59,682 57,559 Language, Literacy, Math 4.6
4.6 Fixed Obligation/Variability 500 1,000 Movement, Music 4.3
Cash Capital Outlays 3,575 38,000 Science 4.4
Facilities and Related 62,798 164,317
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology - 2,000
Other Variable Expenses GS -25,615
Good Standing 4,000

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total 2009-10 2010-11 $ 3,168,858 $ 3,096,380
GS GS* GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
2
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS* GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. withinStudents**
the past three years) Weight Allocation

009-10 Base Allocation

2010-11 2011-12* 566.0 2008-09
2007-08 $3,682
2009-10 $ 2,084,012
2010-11 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethn
572 544 ELL-BeginnerTotal
566 (K-8) 1 3.0 1 $2,3960 $ 7,188
0 20
0.3% 0.4% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 0.2% - 0.2% $3,594
0.0% $ 0.0%-
Total
0.5% 59.6% ELL-Intermediate 4.0 of Birth
Most Prevalent Country $2,396 $ 9,584 American Indian or Alaska Native 0
1.6% 2.0% ELL-Advanced 6.0 $1,198 $ 7,188 Black or African American 56
4.5% 16.0% SWD-Resource Country
Room 1 Nigeria 9.0 Kenya $5,856 $ 52,704 Asian 1
2.0% 21.0% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ - Hispanic 17
0.0% 0.0% Country 2
SWD-Integrated Special Class 21.0 $5,856 $ 122,976 White 23
1.0% 1.1% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 17.0 $5,856 $ 99,552
Country 3 Multi 0
Total ESF Allocation $ 2,383,204
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

2.4% 92.5% 91.8% 200
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91

Section 4 Page 79
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Sherri Armstrong School 44

Data From School Year 2009-10 Lincoln Park

Mission: We are a community of learners dedicated to nurturing curiosity and developing critical thinking skills and habits of the mind.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 58.3% 48.4% 47.2% 53.6% 20.3% MATH-3 50.0% 61.3% 74.3% 61.4% 20.0%
ELA-4 53.7% 59.1% 64.7% 56.8% 15.3% MATH-4 48.8% 41.9% 52.8% 64.3% 15.6%
ELA-5 42.4% 51.5% 57.4% 57.6% 10.8% MATH-5 37.8% 42.4% 25.5% 60.6% 18.2%
ELA-6 58.5% 36.4% 59.3% 69.6% 25.8% MATH-6 40.8% 54.5% 67.9% 67.4% 27.8%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 54.3% 49.3% 57.0% 59.3% 17.8% Total 3-8 44.9% 48.9% 52.1% 63.5% 19.6%

ELA Performance Goal: 40% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 63% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 76.5% 77.3% 81.1% 74.0% 73.8% Social Studies-5 85.3% 81.3% 76.6% 82.8% 65.9%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 3.5 4.0 3.7 Grade 1 34.9% 17.5%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.1 4.8 4.0 Grade 2 10.3% 15.6%
Movement, Music 3.9 4.6 4.0
Science 3.8 4.7 3.9

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS IY1 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS GS GS IY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 331 370 384 430 Total 2 35 62 73
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% Percent of Enrollment 0.6% 10.5% 16.8% 19.0%
Black or African American 90.1% 80.8% 78.7% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.0% 9.5% 11.2%
Hispanic 3.6% 3.2% 5.0% Country 1 Ethiopia Thailand Thailand Thailand
White 5.1% 5.4% 4.3%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Sudan Bhutan Bhutan Bhutan
Multi 1.2% 1.1% 0.5%
* Projected Country 3 Yemen Yemen Yemen

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 92.3% 92.2% 92.4% 92.9%

Section 4 Page 80
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 44
Lincoln Park Principal Sherri Armstrong
Data From School Year 2009-10

to nurturing curiosity and developing critical thinking skills and habits of the mind.
Mission: We are a community of learners dedic
type
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

ELA - Grades 3-8
2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 36.0
2006-07 2007-08 37.1
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 2,121,374 68.4%
53.6% 20.3% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 50.0% 2.061.3% 74.3% 2.0 61.4% 20.0% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,397 0.0% 2005-06 2006-07 2007
56.8% 15.3% Other Instructional MATH-4 48.8% 5.641.9% 52.8% 5.5 64.3% 15.6% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 57,111
ELA-3 1.8% 58.3% 48.4% 47.2
57.6% 10.8% Non-instructional MATH-5 37.8% 42.4%
9.8 25.5% 10.860.6% 18.2% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 172,950
ELA-4 5.6% 53.7% 59.1% 64.7
69.6% 25.8% Total MATH-6 40.8% 53.4
54.5% 67.9% 55.467.4% 27.8% 0305: IDEA Support Serv & Sec 611 ELA-5
59,254 1.9% 42.4% 51.5% 57.4
MATH-7 ELA-6
0513: The Primary Project 4,480 0.1% 58.5% 36.4% 59.3
MATH-8 ELA-7
59.3% 17.8% Total 3-8 44.9% 48.9% 52.1% 63.5% 19.6%
1323: School Redesign 88,885 2.9%
ELA-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 10.7 : 1 11.6 : 1 1416: Primary Project 8,551 0.3%
Total 3-8 54.3% 49.3% 57.0
students Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 63%: 1 of grade 3-6
22.1 students
23.5 :1 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 240,568 7.8%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math in:2010-2011.
7.2 1 7.8 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360
ELA Performance 3.6%Goal: 40% of grade
1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 122,377 3.9%
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-20
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 50,639 1.6%
4528: C4E - In-School Suspension SCIENCE
63,594- Grades 42.0%
&8
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
74.0% 73.8% Social Studies-5 85.3% 81.3% 76.6% 82.8% 65.9% 2005-06 2006-07 2007
Social Studies-8 Science-4 76.5% 77.3% 81.
Science-8

BUDGET
RCSD K-2 TEST ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
RESULTS
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)
KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average S
08 2008-09 2009-10
Major Expenditures 2010-11 READING2011-12
MATH
3.7 Grade 1 34.9% 17.5% 2006-07 2
4.0 Salary Compensation Grade 2 2,838,523 10.3% 2,923,236
15.6% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,103,541
Iniative, Social100.0%
Relations 3.5
4.0 Other Compensation 57,191 16,431 Language, Literacy, Math 4.1
3.9 Fixed Obligation/Variability 1,000 - Movement, Music 3.9
Cash Capital Outlays 7,354 - Science 3.8
Facilities and Related 34,277 163,874
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology - -
Other Variable Expenses GS - 4,898
Good Standing -

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Total 2009-10 2010-11 $ IY1 - Improvement$ Year
2,943,243 1
3,103,541
GS GS GS GS IY1 IY2 - Improvement Year 2 2005-0
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS GS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS GS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS
GS GS GS GS IY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL GS
Y or N - SURR/PLA

FISCAL
SCHOOL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS Students**(Students enrolled duringWeight

each academic year who had
Allocation
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
Base Allocation 430.0 $3,682 $ 1,583,260 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity
009-10 2010-11 2011-12*
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 2007-08
52.0 2008-09 2009-10
$2,396 2010-11
$ 124,592
370 384 430 Total
ELL-Beginner (9-12) 2 - 35 $3,59462 $ 73- 2008-0
0.0% 0.2% Percent of Enrollment 0.6% 10.5% 16.8% 19.0% Total 331
ELL-Intermediate 20.0 $2,396 $ 47,920
80.8% 78.7% Most Prevalent Country of Birth American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0%
9.5% 11.2%
ELL-Advanced 7.0 $1,198 $ 8,386
Black or African American 90.1%
3.2% 5.0% SWD-Resource Room
Country 1 Ethiopia4.0 Thailand $5,856
Thailand$ Thailand
23,424
Asian 0.0%
5.4% 4.3% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ -
Hispanic 3.6%
0.0% 0.0% Country
SWD-Integrated 2 Class
Special Sudan34.0 Bhutan $5,856
Bhutan $ 199,104
Bhutan
White 5.1%
1.1% 0.5% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 23.0 $5,856 $ 134,688 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Total ESF Allocation
Country 3 Yemen Yemen $ 2,121,374
Yemen Multi 1.2%
* Projected

ATTENDANCE
07-08 2008-09 2009-10
2.2% 92.4% 92.9% 2006-07
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 92.3%

Section 4 Page 81
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Lessie Hamilton-Rose School 54

Data From School Year 2009-10 The Flower City School

Mission: It is our mission that students leave our school with the necessary skills, experiences and techniques to ensure they achieve their highest levels of
performance. We do so by creating effectively-managed learning environments that are safe, inclusive, differentiated, and student-centered, in collaboration with
parents and community partners, resulting in the future generation of “World Class Competitors.”

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 56.8% 50.0% 30.2% 48.5% 31.3% MATH-3 51.1% 59.0% 67.4% 77.6% 16.7%
ELA-4 70.0% 60.0% 60.7% 64.5% 40.0% MATH-4 47.8% 35.9% 82.1% 58.1% 31.4%
ELA-5 55.0% 50.0% 51.5% 79.3% 28.2% MATH-5 24.4% 31.6% 50.0% 55.2% 35.9%
ELA-6 60.4% 58.1% 76.2% 89.7% 34.6% MATH-6 40.8% 20.0% 70.0% 46.4% 38.5%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 59.2% 55.8% 50.4% 65.2% 34.4% Total 3-8 40.9% 37.1% 66.7% 63.9% 29.5%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 94.4% 84.6% 100.0% 93.0% 82.9% Social Studies-5 95.3% 95.0% 81.8% 93.3% 92.3%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.1 4.0 4.3 Grade 1 15.6% 17.8%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.1 4.4 4.4 Grade 2 20.0% 7.5%
Movement, Music 4.3 3.9 4.7
Science 4.0 3.5 4.4

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS* GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS* GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 292 317 305 315 Total 2 1 0 0
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.3% 0.6% 1.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.8% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0%
Black or African American 78.8% 77.6% 76.7% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 1.0% 0.6% 0.0%
Hispanic 12.3% 14.2% 14.4% Country 1 Vietnam Vietnam
White 6.2% 5.7% 6.6%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2
Multi 1.4% 1.3% 1.3%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91.5% 93.0% 92.8% 93.5%

Section 4 Page 82
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 54
The Flower City School Principal Lessie Hamilton-Rose
Data From School Year 2009-10
hool with the necessary skills, experiences and techniques to ensure they achieve their highest levels of
ged learning environments that are safe, inclusive, differentiated, and student-centered, in collaboration with Mission: It is our mission that students leave our sc
ure generation of “World Class Competitors.” performance. We do so by creating effectively-mana
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs)
type
PROPOSED 2011-12 parents
FUNDINGand community partners, resulting in the fut

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 26.0
2006-07 2007-08 20.8
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA$ - Grades 3-8
1,284,540 71.8%
48.5% 31.3% Principals/AP/ADMATH-3 51.1% 2.0
59.0% 67.4% 2.0
77.6% 16.7% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 953 0.1%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
64.5% 40.0% Other Instructional
MATH-4 47.8% 1.4
35.9% 82.1% 1.7
58.1% 31.4% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 57,111
ELA-3 3.2%
56.8% 50.0% 30.2%
79.3% 28.2% Non-instructional
MATH-5 24.4% 6.7
31.6% 50.0% 6.2
55.2% 35.9% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 56,504
ELA-4 3.2%
70.0% 60.0% 60.7%
89.7% 34.6% Total MATH-6 40.8% 20.0%
36.1 70.0% 46.4%
30.7 38.5% 0453: Safe Schools/Healthy Stdnts I 7,467
ELA-5 0.4%
55.0% 50.0% 51.5%
MATH-7 1416: Primary Project 4,071
ELA-6 0.2%
60.4% 58.1% 76.2%
MATH-8 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 93,963
ELA-7 5.3%
65.2% 34.4% Total 3-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 40.9% 11.737.1%
:1 66.7%15.163.9%
:1 29.5% 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360
ELA-8 6.3%
students Pupil-Other-Staff Ratio 30.2
52% : 1
of grade 31.8 : 1
3-6 students 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial Total 3-8
83,617 59.2%
4.7% 55.8% 50.4%
Math Performance Goal:
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio
will achieve 8.4
proficiency on Math in :1
2010-2011. 10.3 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 25,320 1.4%
ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6
4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 proficiency
will achieve 3.6% on ELA in 2010-2011.
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
93.0% 82.9% Social Studies-5 95.3% 95.0% 81.8% 93.3% 92.3% 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Social Studies-8 Science-4 94.4% 84.6% 100.0%
Science-8
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

08 2008-09 2009-10 Major Expenditures 2010-11READING 2011-12

MATH KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score)
4.3 Salary Compensation Grade 1 1,949,28615.6% 17.8%
1,729,418 Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 1,789,499 100.0% 2006-07 2007
4.4 Other Compensation Grade 2 58,42320.0% 7.5%
22,453 Iniative, Social Relations 4.1 4.0
4.7 Language, Literacy, Math 4.1 4.4
Fixed Obligation/Variability - -
4.4 Movement, Music 4.3 3.9
Cash Capital Outlays 16,200 8,750
Facilities and Related 37,497 24,779 Science 4.0 3.5
Technology STATUS
ACCOUNTABILITY 300 2,000
ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Other Variable Expenses 2,570 2,100
Total $GS2,064,276
- Good Standing
$ 1,789,499

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
GS GS* GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
2005-06
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS GS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS GS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS
GS GS* GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL GS
Y or N - SURR/PLA
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
SCHOOL PROFILE
Students** Weight Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
Base Allocation 315.0
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years) $3,682 $ 1,159,830
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 10.0 $2,396 $ 23,960 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity
009-10 2010-11 2011-12*
ELL-Beginner (9-12) 2007-08 - 2008-09 2009-10
$3,594 $ 2010-11
-
317 305 315 ELL-Intermediate
Total 2 - 1 0
$2,396 $ 0 - 2008-09 2
0.6% 1.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.8%
ELL-Advanced 1.0 0.3% 0.0%
$1,198 $ 0.0%1,198 Total 292
7.6% 76.7% Most Prevalent Country
SWD-Resource Room 10.0of Birth $5,856 $ 58,560 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.3%
0.6% 0.0% Black or African American 78.8% 7
SWD-Consultant Teacher
Country 1 Vietnam - Vietnam $5,856 $ -
4.2% 14.4% Asian 1.0%
5.7% 6.6% SWD-Integrated Special Class 7.0 $5,856 $ 40,992
Hispanic 12.3% 1
0.0% 0.0% SWD-Self-Contained
Country 2 12:1 Class - $5,856 $ -
White 6.2%
1.3% 1.3% Total ESF Allocation $ 1,284,540
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Multi 1.4%
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

3.0% 92.8% 93.5% 2006-07 20
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91.5% 9

Section 4 Page 83
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Roshon Bradley School 57

Data From School Year 2009-10 Early Childhood School of Rochester

Mission: We are committed to providing a safe, nurturing, child centered environment where teaching and learning are valued by all. We live by the motto,
“Small Steps Today, Giant Leaps Tomorrow.”

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 Total 3-8

ELA Performance Goal: of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 Social Studies-5
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 3.7 3.7 4.0 Grade 1 27.9% 8.2%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.2 4.3 4.6 Grade 2 26.7% 33.3%
Movement, Music 3.7 4.0 4.3
Science 3.5 3.5 4.0

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 156 173 170 180 Total 0 1 0 0
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% 0.6% 0.5% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0%
Black or African American 67.5% 63.0% 66.5% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.6% 0.6% 0.9% British West
Hispanic 16.6% 16.8% 17.0% Country 1
Indies
White 14.0% 18.5% 14.7%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2
Multi 1.3% 0.6% 0.5%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 92.5% 92.6% 93.2% 88.8%

Section 4 Page 84
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 57
Early Childhood School of Rochester Principal Roshon Bradley
Data From School Year 2009-10

uring, child centered environment where teaching and learning are valued by all. We live by the motto,
Mission: We are committed to providing a s
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type 2011-12 FUNDING
PROPOSED
“Small Steps Today, Giant Leaps Tomorrow

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 17.4
2006-07 2007-08 15.8
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ ELA - Grades 3-860.1%
840,491
Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 1.0 1.0 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 668 0.0% 2005-06 2006-07 2
Other Instructional MATH-4 1.1 1.2 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 85,667ELA-3 6.1%
Non-instructional MATH-5 8.7 7.7 0268: Title I - AIS Services 33,983ELA-4 2.4%
Total MATH-6 28.2 25.7 0453: Safe Schools/Healthy Stdnts I 7,467ELA-5 0.5%
MATH-7 1416: Primary Project 4,071ELA-6 0.3%
MATH-8 ELA-7 11.2%
1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 156,633
Total 3-8 ELA-8 8.0%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 9.8 : 1 11.4 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360
Total 3-8
students Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 15.7 : 1 of grade 3-6 18.2 :1
students 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 83,617 6.0%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math in6 2010-2011.
:1 7:1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 25,320
ELA Performance1.8% Goal: of gr
4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 47,696 3.4%
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Social Studies-5 2005-06 2006-07 2
Social Studies-8 Science-4
Science-8

BUDGET
RCSD K-2 TEST ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
RESULTS
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)
KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Averag
08 2008-09 2009-10Major Expenditures 2010-11 READING2011-12
MATH
4.0 Grade 1 27.9% 8.2% 2006-07
4.6 Salary Compensation Grade 2 1,579,532 26.7% 1,353,940
33.3% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 1,397,971 100.0%
Iniative, Social Relations 3.7
4.3 Other Compensation 32,358 25,668 Language, Literacy, Math 4.2
4.0 Fixed Obligation/Variability 2,500 - Movement, Music 3.7
Cash Capital Outlays 9,000 - Science 3.5
Facilities and Related 31,100 18,363
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology 1,580 -
Other Variable Expenses GS - Good
5,100Standing -

Budget
006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Total 2009-10 2010-11 $ IY1 - Improvement$Year
1,661,170 1
1,397,971
GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2 20
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. withinStudents**
the past three years) Weight Allocation
Base Allocation 180.0 $3,682 $ 662,760 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethni
09-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 3.0 $2,396 $ 7,188
173 170 180 Total 0 1 0 0 200
0.6% 0.5% ELL-Beginner (9-12)
Percent of Enrollment 0.0% - 0.6% $3,594
0.0% $ 0.0%- Total 15
3.0% 66.5% ELL-Intermediate 0.3 of Birth
Most Prevalent Country $2,396 $ 719
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0
0.6% 0.9% ELL-Advanced - $1,198 $ - Black or African American 67.
British West
Country
SWD-Resource Room 1 -
6.8% 17.0% Indies $5,856 $ - Asian 0.6
8.5% 14.7% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ - Hispanic 16.
0.0% 0.0% Country 2
SWD-Integrated Special Class 29.0 $5,856 $ 169,824 White 14.
0.6% 0.5% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class - $5,856 $ - Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Multi 1.3
Total ESF Allocation $ 840,491
* Projected

ATTENDANCE
7-08 2008-09 2009-10
.6% 93.2% 88.8% 2006
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 92.5

Section 4 Page 85
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Wakili Moore School 60

Data From School Year 2009-10 Charlotte High School

Mission: It is our mission at the Charlotte High School community to develop students who have the skills for lifelong learning and for becoming successful,
contributing citizens in a global society. It is our collective goal to provide a student centered program, dedicated staff and a secure, nurturing environment with
high expectations.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 23.1% 24.1% 31.0% 42.4% 12.5% MATH-7 10.2% 18.7% 44.9% 53.2% 20.5%
ELA-8 23.3% 18.8% 25.8% 31.3% 12.2% MATH-8 19.8% 15.0% 34.0% 38.0% 5.2%
Total 3-8 22.7% 20.8% 28.4% 36.4% 12.3% Total 3-8 14.5% 16.5% 39.5% 45.2% 12.8%

ELA Performance Goal: 39% of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: 47% of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11 56.0% 62.0% 82.0% 80.0% 66.7%
Science-8 23.4% 16.7% 36.7% 26.9% 22.6% MATH A 83.0% 70.0% 73.0% 34.0%
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 88.2% 42.2% 31.4%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG 0.0%
GEOMETRY 55.6% 47.3%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 56.0% 48.0% 46.0% 55.0% 48.4%
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY 15.0% 7.3% 18.9% 26.7%
Social Studies-8 25.5% 9.3% 26.1% 10.2% 16.2% EARTH SCIENCE 38.5% 28.2% 25.6% 50.5%
PHYSICS 8.3% 0.0%
US HISTORY 0.0% 59.0% 75.0% 48.0% 53.4%
GLOBAL 28.0% 26.0% 42.0% 39.0% 33.9%
LOTE 75.6% 79.1% 72.2% 79.2%

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

Profile

DISTRICT 48% 52% 46%

60 Charlotte High School 50% 58% 44%

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS SINI 5 SINI 5 SINI 5 SINI 5 RA RA IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS SINI 4 SINI 5 SINI 5 SINI 2 GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS* GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL R YR2 R YR3 R YR4 SINI 5 RA RA RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 1049 1004 1048 829
819 Total 1 7 2 5
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.4% 0.0% 0.2% Percent of Enrollment 0.1% 0.7% 0.2% 0.5%
Black or African American 61.9% 60.0% 58.1% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 2.0% 1.6% 1.4%
Hispanic 18.8% 20.7% 22.9% Country 1 Afghanistan Cuba Tanzania Ethiopia
White 16.8% 17.7% 17.2%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Jamaica Guatemala
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3 China

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 89.0% 87.9% 89.8% 82.8%

Section 4 Page 86
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 60
Charlotte High School Principal Wakili Moore
Data From School Year 2009-10
hool community to develop students who have the skills for lifelong learning and for becoming successful,
lective goal to provide a student centered program, dedicated staff and a secure, nurturing environment with Mission: It is our mission at the Charlotte
type contributing citizens in a global society. It
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) high expectations.
PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 90.6
2006-07 2007-08 62.9
2008-09 2009-10 ELA - Grades 3-8
Teachers Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 4,194,448 75.1%
Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 7.0 4.0 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 3,509 0.1% 2005-06 2006-07
Other Instructional MATH-4 18.6 10.2 0268: Title I - AIS Services 126,520ELA-3 2.3%
Non-instructional MATH-5 37.5 28.8 0305: IDEA Support Serv & Sec 611 237,016ELA-4 4.2%
MATH-6
Total 153.7 105.9 0453: Safe Schools/Healthy Stdnts I 29,897ELA-5 0.5%
42.4% 12.5% MATH-7 10.2% 18.7% 44.9% 53.2% 20.5%
31.3% 12.2% MATH-8 19.8% 15.0% 34.0% 38.0% 5.2%
1357: Student & Family Support Ctr 29,897ELA-6 0.5%
ELA-7 23.1% 24.1%
36.4% 12.3% Total 3-8 14.5% 16.5% 39.5% 45.2% 12.8% 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 363,585 6.5%
ELA-8 23.3% 18.8%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 11.6 : 1 13.2 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830 2.2%
tudents 47% : 1 of grade 7-819.3
students Total 3-8 22.7% 20.8%
MathRatio
Pupil-Other-Staff Performance Goal: 16.6 :1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 250,552 4.5%
will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011. ELA Performance
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio 6.8 : 1 7.8 : 1 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 39,072 0.7% Goal: 39% of g
1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers will achieve proficiency
126,598 2.3% on ELA in 2010-2
REGENTS EXAMS
4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 1.1%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
ELA 11 56.0% 62.0% 82.0% 80.0% 66.7% 2005-06 2006-07
26.9% 22.6% MATH A 83.0% 70.0% 73.0% 34.0% Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 88.2% 42.2% 31.4% Science-8 23.4% 16.7%
ALGEBRA2/TRIG 0.0%
GEOMETRY 55.6% 47.3%
2008-09 2009-10
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS56.0%
LIVING ENV
by ACCOUNT
48.0% 46.0% 55.0% 48.4% SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
CHEMISTRY 15.0% 7.3% 18.9% 26.7% 2005-06 2006-07
10.2% 16.2% EARTH SCIENCE 38.5% 28.2% 25.6% 50.5%
Social Studies-5
PHYSICS
Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12 8.3% 0.0%
Social Studies-8 25.5% 9.3%
US HISTORY 0.0% 59.0% 75.0% 48.0% 53.4%
Salary Compensation
GLOBAL 7,476,279
28.0% 26.0% 5,315,324
42.0% 39.0% 33.9% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 5,585,517 100.0%
LOTE
Other Compensation 239,182 75.6% 118,481
79.1% 72.2% 79.2%
Fixed Obligation/Variability 4,000 2,500
Cash Capital Outlays
GRADUATION RATES 48,860 24,631
Facilities and Related 116,290 120,531
Technology - - TOTAL CO
2003 2004 2005 2006
Other Variable Expenses 16,495 4,050

Budget
48% 52% 46%
Total $ 7,901,106 $ 5,585,517
ool 50% 58% 44% DISTRICT
60 Charlotte
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
SINI 5 SINI 5 SINI 5 RA RA IY2 - Improvement Year 2
SINI 5 SINI 5 SINI 2 GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS* GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
FISCALNYEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation MATH STATUS
N N N Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
R YR3 R YR4 SINI 5 RA RA RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
Students** Weight
RA - Restructuring Advanced Allocation
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA
Base Allocation 829.0 $3,682 $ 3,052,378
ELL-Beginner
SCHOOL (K-8)
PROFILE - $2,396 $ -
ELL-Beginner (9-12) 26.0 $3,594 $ 93,444
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ELL-Intermediate 5.0
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
$2,396 $ 11,980
ELL-Advanced 5.0 $1,198 $ 5,990
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Eth
SWD-Resource Room 16.0 2008-09 $5,856
2009-10 $ 2010-11
93,696
1004 1048 819 TotalTeacher
SWD-Consultant 1 7.0 7 $5,8562 5
$ 40,992 2
0.0% 0.2% Percent
SWD-Integrated of Enrollment
Special Class 0.1%91.0 0.7% 0.2%
$5,856 0.5%
$ 532,896 Total
60.0% 58.1% Most Prevalent Country
SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 62.0 of Birth $5,856 $ 363,072 American Indian or Alaska Native
1.6% 1.4% Black or African American
Total ESF Allocation
Country 1 Afghanistan Cuba Tanzania $ 4,194,448
Ethiopia
20.7% 22.9% Asian
17.7% 17.2% Hispanic
0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Jamaica Guatemala
White
0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 China Multi
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

7.9% 89.8% 82.8% 20
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 8

Section 4 Page 87
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Matthew Laniak School 83

Data From School Year 2009-10 Skilled Trades @ Edison

Mission: Ensure that all our graduates have successful transitions to the workforce and/or post-secondary education. Our relationships with community partners
provide students with opportunities to extend their learning beyond the classroom.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 Total 3-8

ELA Performance Goal: of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11 42.0% 38.0% 54.0% 55.0% 63.9%
Science-8 MATH A 65.0% 42.0% 55.0% 37.0%
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 31.7% 45.7%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG 33.3%
GEOMETRY 68.2% 32.4%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 38.0% 45.0% 43.0% 47.0% 37.3%
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY 0.0% 0.0% 23.5% 2.8%
Social Studies-8 EARTH SCIENCE 41.5% 22.0% 42.7% 30.0%
PHYSICS 0.0%
US HISTORY 59.0% 66.0% 76.0% 57.0% 75.3%
GLOBAL 26.0% 33.0% 38.0% 54.0% 45.5%
LOTE 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

Profile

DISTRICT 48% 52% 46%

83 Skilled Trades @ Edison 39% 37% 35%

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL SINI 1 IY-2 CA1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Phase out school Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 388 383 306 223 Total 0 0 8 2
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.0% 2.1% 0.7%
Black or African American 64.0% 66.3% 68.6% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 1.4% 2.9% 2.3%
Hispanic 25.2% 24.0% 22.2% Country 1 Thailand Congo
White 9.1% 6.8% 6.9%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Congo
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3 Honduras

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 86.2% 82.6% 84.4% 84.8%

Section 4 Page 88
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 83
Skilled Trades @ Edison Principal Matthew Laniak
Data From School Year 2009-10

ful transitions to the workforce and/or post-secondary education. Our relationships with community partners
earning beyond the classroom. Mission: Ensure that all our graduates have s
type provide students with opportunities to extend
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 32.7

2006-07 2007-08 19.9
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ ELA - Grades 3-8 60.3%
1,064,248
Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 2.3 1.1 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 7,912 0.4% 2005-06 2006-07 20
Other Instructional MATH-4 7.0 3.9 0268: Title I - AIS Services 43,436
ELA-3 2.5%
Non-instructional MATH-5 13.6 7.7 0453: Safe Schools/Healthy Stdnts I 14,948
ELA-4 0.8%
Total MATH-6 55.5 32.6 1357: Student & Family Support Ctr 14,948
ELA-5 0.8%
MATH-7 1396: District Initiative Budgets ELA-6 13.8%
244,054
MATH-8 ELA-7 13.8%
1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 244,086
Total 3-8 ELA-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 9.4 : 1 11.2 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 98,370 5.6%
Total 3-8
tudents Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 13.4 : 1 of grade 7-817.5 :1
students 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 33,269 1.9%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math5.5
in :2010-2011.
1 6.8 : 1 ELA Performance Goal: of grad
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011
REGENTS EXAMS
SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA 11 42.0% 38.0% 54.0% 55.0% 63.9% 2005-06 2006-07 20
MATH A 65.0% 42.0% 55.0% 37.0% Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 31.7% 45.7% Science-8
ALGEBRA2/TRIG 33.3%
GEOMETRY
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT 68.2% 32.4%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 38.0% 45.0% 43.0% 47.0% 37.3%
CHEMISTRY 0.0% 0.0% 23.5% 2.8% 2005-06 2006-07 20
EARTH SCIENCE 41.5% 22.0% 42.7% 30.0% Social Studies-5
Major Expenditures
PHYSICS 2010-11 2011-12 0.0% Social Studies-8
US HISTORY 59.0% 66.0% 76.0% 57.0% 75.3%
Salary Compensation
GLOBAL 3,034,379
26.0% 33.0% 1,692,268
38.0% 54.0% 45.5% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 1,765,270 100.0%
Other Compensation
LOTE 103,857 100.0% 100.0%
27,146 100.0%
Fixed Obligation/Variability 1,600 -
Cash Capital Outlays 11,553 -
GRADUATION RATES
Facilities and Related 56,909 45,856
Technology 800 -
TOTAL COHO
Other Variable Expenses2003 2004 2005
3,998 2006 -

Budget
Total 48% 52%$ 3,213,096
46% $ 1,765,270
dison 39% 37% 35% DISTRICT
83 Skilled Trad
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
IY2 - Improvement Year 2 20
CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation MATH STATUS
N N N N Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
SINI 1 IY-2 CA1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
Students** Weight Allocation SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Base Allocation Y or N - SURR/PLA
223.0 $3,682 $ 821,086
ELL-Beginner (K-8) - $2,396 $ - Phase out school
SCHOOL PROFILE
ELL-Beginner (9-12) 3.0 $3,594 $ 10,782
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled
ELL-Intermediate 9.0 during each$2,396
academic year
$ who21,564
had
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
ELL-Advanced - $1,198 $ -
SWD-Resource Room ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnic
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-085.0 2008-09 $5,856 2009-10 $ 2010-11
29,280
383 306 SWD-Consultant
223 TotalTeacher 0 1.0 0 $5,8568 $ 5,856
2 200
0.0% 0.0% SWD-Integrated Special
Percent Class
of Enrollment 0.0%15.0 0.0% $5,856
2.1% $ 0.7%
87,840 Total 38
66.3% 68.6% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 15.0 of Birth $5,856
Most Prevalent Country $ 87,840 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.3
2.9% 2.3% Total ESF Allocation $ 1,064,248 Black or African American 64.0
24.0% 22.2% Country 1 Thailand Congo
Asian 1.4
6.8% 6.9% Hispanic 25.2
0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Congo White 9.1
0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Honduras Multi 0.0
* Projected

ATTENDANCE
07-08 2008-09 2009-10
2.6% 84.4% 84.8% 2006-
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 86.2%

Section 4 Page 89
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Joseph T. Baldino School 81

Data From School Year 2009-10 Business, Finance & Entrepreneurship @ Edison

Mission: Empower and develop students' skills, knowledge, and values with : a standards-based curriculum; student-staff-parent-community collaboration;
promotion of diversity, tolerance, empathy, community; and, challenging, team-orientated leadership opportunities.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 Total 3-8

ELA Performance Goal: of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11 41.0% 50.0% 52.0% 64.0% 66.7%
Science-8 MATH A 85.0% 72.0% 49.0% 46.0%
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 56.8% 39.7%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG 54.5%
GEOMETRY 36.8% 68.8%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 37.0% 64.0% 56.0% 63.0% 58.2%
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY 0.0% 16.7% 26.7% 0.0%
Social Studies-8 EARTH SCIENCE 33.3% 34.7% 25.3% 26.3%
PHYSICS 30.0% 27.8% 16.7% 50.0%
US HISTORY 68.0% 58.0% 77.0% 50.0% 66.7%
GLOBAL 49.0% 22.0% 58.0% 44.0% 61.5%
LOTE 88.9% 100.0%

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

Profile

DISTRICT 48% 52% 46%

81 Business, Finance & Entrepreneurship @ Edison 35% 38% 36%

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL SINI 1 IY-2 IY2 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Phase out school Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 311 358 244 150
160 Total 1 2 4 4
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.3% 0.6% 1.1% 1.6%
Black or African American 77.2% 77.9% 77.2% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.5% 1.1% 2.0%
Hispanic 17.2% 16.8% 17.1% Country 1 Jamaica Cuba Tanzania Tanzania
White 5.1% 4.2% 3.7%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 St. Vincent Haiti Haiti
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3 Nepal

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 85.5% 83.9% 87.7% 86.3%

Section 4 Page 90
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 81
Business, Finance & Entrepreneurship @ Edison Principal Joseph T. Baldino
Data From School Year 2009-10
wledge, and values with : a standards-based curriculum; student-staff-parent-community collaboration;
ity; and, challenging, team-orientated leadership opportunities. Mission: Empower and develop students' skills
type promotion of diversity, tolerance, empathy, com
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING
MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 28.5
2006-07 2007-08 12.5
2008-09 2009-10 ELA - Grades 3-8
Teachers Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 618,316 40.9%
Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 2.3 2.1 0268: Title I - AIS Services 37,575 2.5%2005-06 2006-07 2007
Other Instructional MATH-4 6.5 4.1 0453: Safe Schools/Healthy Stdnts I 14,948
ELA-3 1.0%
MATH-5
Non-instructional 17.8 10.9 1357: Student & Family Support Ctr ELA-4
14,948 1.0%
MATH-6
Total 55.0 29.6 1396: District Initiative Budgets ELA-5
102,992 6.8%
MATH-7
1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs ELA-6
408,314 27.0%
MATH-8
ELA-7
Total 3-8 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830 8.0%
ELA-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 8.6 : 1 12 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 97,407 6.4%
tudents Total 3-8
MathRatio
Pupil-Other-Staff Performance Goal: 9.2 : 1 of grade 7-8 students
8.8 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 31,650 2.1%
will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio 4.4 : 1 5.1 : 1 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension ELA Performance4.2%
63,594 Goal: of grade
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011.
REGENTS EXAMS

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
ELA 11 41.0% 50.0% 52.0% 64.0% 66.7% 2005-06 2006-07 2007
MATH A 85.0% 72.0% 49.0% 46.0%
Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 56.8% 39.7%
Science-8
ALGEBRA2/TRIG 54.5%
GEOMETRY 36.8% 68.8%
2008-09 2009-10 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
LIVING ENV by ACCOUNT
37.0% 64.0% 56.0% 63.0% 58.2% SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
CHEMISTRY 0.0% 16.7% 26.7% 0.0%
2005-06 2006-07 2007
EARTH SCIENCE 33.3% 34.7% 25.3% 26.3%
Social Studies-5
PHYSICS
Major Expenditures 2010-11 30.0% 2011-12
27.8% 16.7% 50.0%
Social Studies-8
US HISTORY 68.0% 58.0% 77.0% 50.0% 66.7%
GLOBAL
Salary Compensation 49.0%
2,692,076 22.0% 1,489,342
58.0% 44.0% 61.5% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 1,510,574 100.0%
LOTE
Other Compensation 112,798 88.9%
- 100.0%
Fixed Obligation/Variability 2,500 -
Cash Capital Outlays
GRADUATION RATES 17,700 600
Facilities and Related 30,295 22,432
Technology - - TOTAL COHOR
2003 2004 2005 2006
Other Variable Expenses 3,405 (1,800)

Budget
48% 52% 46%
Total $ 2,858,774 $ 1,510,574
& Entrepreneurship @ Edison 35% 38% 36%
DISTRICT
81 Business, Fina
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
IY2 - Improvement Year 2
2005
CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2 ELA STATUS

N N
FISCALNYEAR 2011-12
N Y
Equitable Student Funding
RY1 - Restructuring Year 1 (ESF) Allocation MATH STATUS
RY2 - Restructuring Year 2 SCIENCE STATUS
SINI 1 IY-2 IY2
Students** Weight
RA - Restructuring Advanced Allocation SURR/PLA STATUS
Y or N - SURR/PLA OVERALL
Base Allocation 150.0 $3,682 $ 552,300
ELL-Beginner (K-8) - $2,396 $ - Phase out school
SCHOOL PROFILE
ELL-Beginner (9-12) 4.0 $3,594 $ 14,376
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ELL-Intermediate 2.0 $2,396 $ 4,792
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
ELL-Advanced - $1,198 $ -
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-083.0 2008-09 $5,8562009-10 $ 2010-11 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity
SWD-Resource Room 17,568
358 244 160 TotalTeacher
SWD-Consultant 1 - 2 $5,8564 $ 4 - 2008-0
0.0% 0.0% Percent
SWD-Integrated of Enrollment
Special Class 0.3% - 0.6% 1.1%
$5,856 $ 1.6%- Total 311
77.9% 77.2% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class Most Prevalent Country
5.0 of Birth $5,856 $ 29,280 American Indian or Alaska Native
1.1% 2.0%
Total ESF Allocation
Country 1 Jamaica Cuba Tanzania $ Tanzania
618,316 Black or African American 77.2%
16.8% 17.1%
Asian 0.5%
4.2% 3.7%
Country 2 Hispanic 17.2%
0.0% 0.0% St. Vincent Haiti Haiti
White 5.1%
0.0% 0.0%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Nepal
Multi 0.0%
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

.9% 87.7% 86.3% 2006-07
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 85.5%

Section 4 Page 91
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Uma Mehta School 82

Data From School Year 2009-10 Engineering & Manufacturing @ Edison

Mission: Provide student-centered learning; develop cross-curricular instruction embedded with high standards; and, ensure that students demonstrate scholastic
and career expertise.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 Total 3-8

ELA Performance Goal: of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11 45.0% 37.0% 49.0% 45.0% 37.4%
Science-8 MATH A 76.0% 55.0% 49.0% 37.0%
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 31.7% 30.7%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG 28.6%
GEOMETRY 37.5%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 54.0% 39.0% 42.0% 61.0% 38.9%
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY 26.3% 25.0% 0.0%
Social Studies-8 EARTH SCIENCE 31.6% 40.3% 32.4% 31.6%
PHYSICS 25.0% 10.0% 0.0%
US HISTORY 51.0% 70.0% 76.0% 52.0% 51.1%
GLOBAL 37.0% 32.0% 37.0% 40.0% 35.1%
LOTE 62.9% 53.3% 100.0% 100.0%

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

Profile

DISTRICT 48% 52% 46%

82 Engineering & Manufacturing @ Edison 34% 45% 38%

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N Y Y Y Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL SINI 1 SINI 2 RY-1 RY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Phase out school Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 369 366 263 181 Total 0 1 2 0
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.5% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.3% 0.5% 0.0%
Black or African American 73.0% 73.0% 74.5% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.5% 2.5% 2.7%
Hispanic 19.4% 20.2% 20.2% Country 1 Yemen Thailand
White 7.1% 3.8% 2.7%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Yemen
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 89.3% 81.2% 83.8% 89.2%

Section 4 Page 92
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 82
Engineering & Manufacturing @ Edison Principal Uma Mehta
Data From School Year 2009-10

p cross-curricular instruction embedded with high standards; and, ensure that students demonstrate scholastic
Mission: Provide student-centered learn
type and career expertise.
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

ELA - Grades53.6%
3-8
2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 28.4
2006-07 2007-08 13.7
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 837,598
Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 2.3 2.1 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 34,924 2.2% 2005-06 2006-07
Other Instructional MATH-4 6.0 3.2 0268: Title I - AIS Services 32,512 ELA-32.1%
Non-instructional MATH-5 11.8 7.5 0453: Safe Schools/Healthy Stdnts I 14,948 ELA-41.0%
Total MATH-6 48.4 26.5 1357: Student & Family Support Ctr 14,948 ELA-51.0%
MATH-7
1396: District Initiative Budgets 164,566 ELA-6 10.5%
MATH-8
1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 152,572 ELA-79.8%
Total 3-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 9.3 : 1 13.2 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830 ELA-87.7%
Total 3-8
tudents Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 13.2 : 1 of grade 7-814.2
students
:1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 98,370 6.3%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math5.4
in :2010-2011.
1 6.8 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 33,269 2.1% Goal:
ELA Performance o
4518: C4E - On Campus Intervention P will achieve
58,218 proficiency on ELA in 2010
3.7%
REGENTS EXAMS
SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA 11 45.0% 37.0% 49.0% 45.0% 37.4% 2005-06 2006-07
MATH A 76.0% 55.0% 49.0% 37.0% Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 31.7% 30.7% Science-8
ALGEBRA2/TRIG 28.6%
GEOMETRY 37.5%
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 54.0% 39.0% 42.0% 61.0% 38.9%
CHEMISTRY 26.3% 25.0% 0.0% 2005-06 2006-07
EARTH SCIENCE 31.6% 40.3% 32.4% 31.6% Social Studies-5
Major Expenditures
PHYSICS 2010-11 25.0% 2011-12 10.0% 0.0% Social Studies-8
US HISTORY 51.0% 70.0% 76.0% 52.0% 51.1%
Salary Compensation
GLOBAL 2,787,476
37.0% 32.0% 1,489,717
37.0% 40.0% 35.1% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 1,562,755 100.0%
Other Compensation
LOTE 90,834 62.9% 25,875 100.0% 100.0%
53.3%
Fixed Obligation/Variability 1,300 1,000
Cash Capital Outlays 16,155 6,300
GRADUATION RATES
Facilities and Related 26,610 38,930
Technology - - TOTAL C
Other Variable Expenses2003 2004 2005
1,750 2006 933

Budget
Total 48% 52%$ 2,924,125
46% $ 1,562,755
ufacturing @ Edison 34% 45% 38% DISTRIC
82 Engine
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
IY2 - Improvement Year 2
CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF)
RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
Allocation MATH STATUS
N Y Y Y Y SCIENCE STATUS
SINI 1 SINI 2 RY-1 RY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
Students** Weight
RA - Restructuring Advanced Allocation
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA
Base Allocation 181.0 $3,682 $ 666,442
ELL-Beginner (K-8) - $2,396 $ - Phase out school
SCHOOL PROFILE
ELL-Beginner (9-12) 1.0 $3,594 $ 3,594
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled
ELL-Intermediate 1.0 during each$2,396
academic year
$ who 2,396
had
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
ELL-Advanced 1.0 $1,198 $ 1,198
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / E
SWD-Resource Room
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-081.0 2008-09 $5,856 2009-10 $ 2010-11
5,856
366 263 SWD-Consultant
181 TotalTeacher 0 2.0 1 $5,8562 $ 11,712
0
0.5% 0.0% Percent
SWD-Integrated of Enrollment
Special Class 0.0%13.0 0.3% 0.5%
$5,856 $ 0.0%
76,128 Total
73.0% 74.5% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class Most Prevalent Country
12.0 of Birth $5,856 $ 70,272 American Indian or Alaska Native
2.5% 2.7% Black or African American
Total ESF Allocation
Country 1 Yemen Thailand $ 837,598
20.2% 20.2% Asian
3.8% 2.7% Hispanic
0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Yemen White
0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Multi
* Projected

ATTENDANCE
07-08 2008-09 2009-10
1.2% 83.8% 89.2%
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate

Section 4 Page 93
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Bonnie Atkins School 94

Data From School Year 2009-10 Imaging & Information Technology @ Edison

Mission: Build a student-centered learning community, driven by high expectations for academic success; provide relevant and engaging instruction in a
technology-rich environment; prepare graduates for full-time employment as well as for college.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 Total 3-8

ELA Performance Goal: of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11 43.0% 42.0% 72.0% 75.0% 82.9%
Science-8 MATH A 79.0% 82.0% 65.0% 55.0%
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 100.0% 43.3% 58.9%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG 50.0%
GEOMETRY 41.2% 44.0%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 40.0% 46.0% 62.0% 68.0% 59.0%
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY 14.3% 10.5% 10.5% 10.5%
Social Studies-8 EARTH SCIENCE 32.1% 21.4% 34.3% 56.5%
PHYSICS 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
US HISTORY 64.0% 56.0% 81.0% 68.0% 90.3%
GLOBAL 28.0% 33.0% 40.0% 55.0% 38.9%
LOTE 100.0% 80.0% 100.0% 100.0%

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

DISTRICT 48% 52% 46%
Profile

94 Imaging & Information Technology @ Edison 32% 38% 53%

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL SINI 1 SINI 2 CA-1 CA1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Phase out school Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 394 344 273 179
182 Total 0 0 4 2
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.0% 1.2% 0.7%
Black or African American 71.3% 69.7% 68.5% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.9% 2.9% 2.9% Dominican
Hispanic 19.1% 17.5% 19.0% Country 1 Afghanistan
Republic
White 8.4% 9.6% 9.5%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.3% 0.0% Country 2 Cuba Thailand
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Dominican
* Projected Country 3
Republic

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 83.6% 83.4% 83.3% 81.9%

Section 4 Page 94
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 94
Imaging & Information Technology @ Edison Principal Bonnie Atkins
Data From School Year 2009-10
nity, driven by high expectations for academic success; provide relevant and engaging instruction in a
r full-time employment as well as for college. Mission: Build a student-centered learning
type technology-rich environment; prepare grad
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 30.1
2006-07 2007-08 16.4
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ ELA - Grades 3-8
741,598 42.9%
Principals/AP/ADMATH-3 2.3 2.1 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 34,893 2.0% 2005-06 2006-07
Other InstructionalMATH-4 7.5 4.6 0268: Title I - AIS Services 34,973ELA-3 2.0%
Non-instructional MATH-5 13.5 7.9 0305: IDEA Support Serv & Sec 611 27,078ELA-4 1.6%
MATH-6
Total 53.3 31.0 0453: Safe Schools/Healthy Stdnts I 14,948ELA-5 0.9%
MATH-7
1357: Student & Family Support Ctr 14,948ELA-6 0.9%
MATH-8
Total 3-8 1396: District Initiative Budgets 252,653ELA-7 14.6%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 9.1 : 1 10.9 : 1 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 271,915ELA-8 15.7%
students Total 3-8
Math Performance
Pupil-Other-Staff Ratio Goal: 11.7 : 1of grade 7-8 12.3
students
:1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830 7.0%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratioproficiency on Math 5.1
in 2010-2011.
:1 5.8 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 119,220 6.9% Goal:
ELA Performance of g
1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers will achieve proficiency
31,650 1.8% on ELA in 2010-20
REGENTS EXAMS
4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 3.7%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
ELA 11 43.0% 42.0% 72.0% 75.0% 82.9% 2005-06 2006-07
MATH A 79.0% 82.0% 65.0% 55.0% Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 100.0% 43.3% 58.9% Science-8
ALGEBRA2/TRIG 50.0%
GEOMETRY 41.2% 44.0%
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 40.0% 46.0% 62.0% 68.0% 59.0%
CHEMISTRY 14.3% 10.5% 10.5% 10.5% 2005-06 2006-07
EARTH SCIENCE 32.1% 21.4% 34.3% 56.5%
Social Studies-5
Major Expenditures
PHYSICS 2010-11 2011-12
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Social Studies-8
US HISTORY 64.0% 56.0% 81.0% 68.0% 90.3%
Salary Compensation
GLOBAL 2,625,698
28.0% 33.0% 1,678,324
40.0% 55.0% 38.9% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 1,728,300 100.0%
Other Compensation
LOTE 213,405 100.0% 80.0%
21,065 100.0% 100.0%
Fixed Obligation/Variability 8,550 -
Cash CapitalRATES
GRADUATION Outlays 2,000 -
Facilities and Related 29,546 28,912
Technology - -
2003 2004 2005 TOTAL COH
Other Variable Expenses 9,800 2006 -

Budget
Total 48% 52% $ 2,888,999
46% $ 1,728,300
ation Technology @ Edison 32% 38% 53% DISTRICT
94 Imaging &
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
IY2 - Improvement Year 2
CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF)
RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
Allocation MATH STATUS
N N N N Y SCIENCE STATUS
SINI 1 SINI 2 CA-1 CA1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
Students** Weight Allocation SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Base Allocation Y or N - SURR/PLA
179.0 $3,682 $ 659,078
ELL-Beginner (K-8) - $2,396 $ - Phase out school
SCHOOL PROFILE
ELL-Beginner (9-12) 5.0 $3,594 $ 17,970
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled
ELL-Intermediate 1.0 during each $2,396
academic year$who had
2,396
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
ELL-Advanced 3.0 $1,198 $ 3,594
SWD-Resource Room
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2.0 2008-09 $5,856 2009-10 $ 2010-11
11,712 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Eth
344 273 SWD-Consultant
182 Total Teacher 0 2.0 0 $5,856
4 $ 11,712
2 2
0.0% 0.0% SWD-Integrated Special
Percent Class
of Enrollment 0.0% 2.0 0.0% $5,856
1.2% $ 0.7%
11,712 Total
69.7% 68.5% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 ClassMost Prevalent Country4.0 of Birth $5,856 $ 23,424 American Indian or Alaska Native
2.9% 2.9% Total ESF Allocation $Dominican
741,598 Black or African American 7
17.5% 19.0% Country 1 Afghanistan
Republic Asian
9.6% 9.5% Hispanic 1
0.3% 0.0% Country 2 Cuba Thailand
White
0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Dominican
Country 3 Multi
Republic
* Projected

007-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

83.4% 83.3% 81.9% 200
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 83

Section 4 Page 95
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Armando Ramirez School 65

Data From School Year 2009-10 John Marshall High School

Mission: Analyze performance data, utilize successful instructional program strategies, and commit staff to the process and strategies for growth in the number of
our students meeting New York State standards in each of the five academic areas.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 28.5% 23.2% 32.6% 51.0% 10.8% MATH-7 9.5% 12.4% 44.2% 59.3% 19.0%
ELA-8 28.3% 44.1% 21.0% 37.0% 12.7% MATH-8 42.9% 29.9% 35.4% 54.2% 16.8%
Total 3-8 27.5% 33.3% 27.4% 44.6% 11.7% Total 3-8 19.7% 20.7% 40.3% 57.0% 18.0%

ELA Performance Goal: 44% of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11 66.0% 58.0% 76.0% 73.0% 64.4%
Science-8 39.0% 28.3% 32.0% 16.5% 24.9% MATH A 67.0% 69.0% 65.0% 35.0%
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 63.5% 45.0% 42.7%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG 17.4%
GEOMETRY 38.9% 43.2%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 49.0% 37.0% 47.0% 67.0% 47.0%
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY 44.4% 26.5% 40.0% 26.3%
Social Studies-8 33.8% 27.5% 15.8% 19.6% 18.5% EARTH SCIENCE 32.3% 39.6% 35.9% 27.4%
PHYSICS 66.7% 46.2% 16.7% 63.6%
US HISTORY 67.0% 60.0% 66.0% 63.0% 59.8%
GLOBAL 52.0% 47.0% 54.0% 53.0% 44.7%
LOTE 89.5% 95.0% 100.0% 89.4%

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

Profile

DISTRICT 48% 52% 46%

65 John Marshall High School 59% 58% 48%

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS GS* SINI 1 SINI 2 SINI 3 CA-1 CA2 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS* SINI 1 SINI 1 GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS* SINI 1 SINI 2 SINI 5 RA RA RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Phase out school Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 1244 1207 956 751 Total 0 1 1 2
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2%
Black or African American 80.6% 79.5% 80.3% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.2% 0.3% 0.2%
Hispanic 11.5% 12.8% 13.5% Country 1 Honduras Kenya Zambia
White 7.4% 7.0% 5.5%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 86.3% 82.8% 81.8% 78.1%

Section 4 Page 96
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 65
John Marshall High School Principal Armando Ramirez
Data From School Year 2009-10

ful instructional program strategies, and commit staff to the process and strategies for growth in the number of
ach of the five academic areas. Mission: Analyze performance data, utilize succ
type our students meeting New York State standards
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

ELA - Grades 3-8
2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 86.1
2006-07 2007-08 56.5
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 3,634,802 71.2%
Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 5.0 4.0 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 30,231 0.6%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-
Other Instructional MATH-4 16.0 10.1 0268: Title I - AIS Services 147,334
ELA-3 2.9%
Non-instructional MATH-5 46.1 24.0 0707: Perkins Secondary 160
ELA-4 0.0%
Total MATH-6 153.2 94.6 1357: Student & Family Support Ctr 59,793
ELA-5 1.2%
51.0% 10.8% MATH-7 9.5% 12.4% 44.2% 59.3% 19.0% ELA-6
1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 618,511 12.1%
37.0% 12.7% MATH-8 42.9% 29.9% 35.4% 54.2% 16.8% ELA-7 28.5% 23.2% 32.6
1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830 2.4%
44.6% 11.7% Total 3-8 19.7% 20.7% 40.3% 57.0% 18.0% ELA-8 28.3% 44.1% 21.0
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 11.1 : 1 13.3 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 287,252 5.6%
Total 3-8 27.5% 33.3% 27.4
tudents Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 52% : 1 of grade 7-819.7
14.3 students
:1 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 39,072 0.8%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math6.2
in 2010-2011.
:1 7.9 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 101,278
ELA 2.0%
Performance Goal: 44% of grade 7
4528: C4E - In-School Suspension will 63,594
achieve proficiency
1.2%on ELA in 2010-2011.
REGENTS EXAMS
SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA 11 66.0% 58.0% 76.0% 73.0% 64.4% 2005-06 2006-07 2007
16.5% 24.9% MATH A 67.0% 69.0% 65.0% 35.0% Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 63.5% 45.0% 42.7% Science-8 39.0% 28.3% 32.0
ALGEBRA2/TRIG 17.4%
GEOMETRY 38.9% 43.2%
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 49.0% 37.0% 47.0% 67.0% 47.0%
CHEMISTRY 44.4% 26.5% 40.0% 26.3% 2005-06 2006-07 2007
19.6% 18.5% EARTH SCIENCE 32.3% 39.6% 35.9% 27.4% Social Studies-5
PHYSICS
Major Expenditures 2010-11 66.7% 2011-12
46.2% 16.7% 63.6% Social Studies-8 33.8% 27.5% 15.8
US HISTORY 67.0% 60.0% 66.0% 63.0% 59.8%
Salary Compensation
GLOBAL 6,918,512
52.0% 47.0% 4,877,033
54.0% 53.0% 44.7% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 5,102,858 100.0%
LOTE
Other Compensation 390,539 89.5% 95.0%
71,941 100.0% 89.4%
Fixed Obligation/Variability 11,378 3,000
Cash Capital Outlays
GRADUATION RATES 30,950 14,255
Facilities and Related 79,218 129,469
Technology 1,000 1,000 TOTAL COHORT
2003 2004 2005 2006
Other Variable Expenses 12,374 6,160

Budget
48% 52% 46%
Total $ 7,443,971 $ 5,102,858
School 59% 58% 48% DISTRICT
65 John Marshall H
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
SINI 1 SINI 2 SINI 3 CA-1 CA2 IY2 - Improvement Year 2 2005-
GS* SINI 1 SINI 1 GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS GS*
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation MATH STATUS GS
N N N N Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS
SINI 1 SINI 2 SINI 5 RA RA RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
Students** Weight
RA - Restructuring Advanced Allocation OVERALL GS*
Y or N - SURR/PLA
Base Allocation 751.0 $3,682 $ 2,765,182
Phase out school
ELL-Beginner
SCHOOL (K-8)
PROFILE 2.0 $2,396 $ 4,792
ELL-Beginner (9-12) 6.0 $3,594 $ 21,564
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ELL-Intermediate - years)
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three $2,396 $ -
ELL-Advanced - $1,198 $ - ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12*
SWD-Resource Room 2007-08 25.0 2008-09 $5,856
2009-10 $ 2010-11
146,400
1207 956 751 TotalTeacher
SWD-Consultant 0 - 1 $5,8561 $ 2 - 2008-0
0.4% 0.4% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% Total 1244
SWD-Integrated Special Class 83.0 $5,856 $ 486,048
79.5% 80.3% Most Prevalent Country of Birth American Indian or Alaska Native 0.4%
SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 36.0 $5,856 $ 210,816
0.3% 0.2% Black or African American 80.6%
12.8% 13.5% Total ESF Allocation
Country 1 Honduras Kenya $ 3,634,802
Zambia
Asian 0.2%
7.0% 5.5% Hispanic 11.5%
0.0% 0.0% Country 2
White 7.4%
0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Multi 0.0%
* Projected

ATTENDANCE
07-08 2008-09 2009-10
2.8% 81.8% 78.1% 2006-07
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 86.3%

Section 4 Page 97
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal T’Hani Pantoja School 95

Data From School Year 2009-10 Robert Brown High School of Construction and Design

Mission: It is our mission to ensure that all students are provided with the opportunity to complete rigorous academic coursework and acquire the necessary skills
that lead to post-secondary education, career training and employment.
typ

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 Total 3-8

ELA Performance Goal: of grade students Math Performance Goal: of grade students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11
Science-8 MATH A
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG
GEOMETRY
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY
Social Studies-8 EARTH SCIENCE
PHYSICS
US HISTORY
GLOBAL
LOTE

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

DISTRICT
95 Robert Brown High School of Construction and Design
Profile

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Opened - 2010-11 Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 156 353 Total 8
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 5.1%
Black or African American 59.6% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 4.5%
Hispanic 28.2% Country 1 Nepal
White 7.1%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.6% Country 2 Cuba
Multi 0.0%
Dominican
* Projected Country 3
Republic

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate

Section 4 Page 98
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 95
Robert Brown High School of Construction and Design Principal T’Hani Pantoja
Data From School Year 2009-10

udents are provided with the opportunity to complete rigorous academic coursework and acquire the necessary skills
raining and employment. Mission: It is our mission to ensure that all s
type that lead to post-secondary education, career
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING
MATH - Grades 3-8
2010-11 2011-12 Allocation
ELA - GradesPercent
3-8
07-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Teachers MATH-3 21.1 29.2 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 1,676,004 51.2% 2005-06 2006-07 20
Principals/AP/AD MATH-4 2.0 2.7 0268: Title I - AIS Services 69,981 ELA-3 2.1%
Other Instructional MATH-5 1.1 3.5 0830: SIG District 120,830 ELA-4 3.7%
Non-instructional MATH-6 2.0 4.3 0832: SIG Robert Brown Construction 1,385,540 ELA-5 42.3%
MATH-7
Total 26.2 39.7 1396: District Initiative Budgets 10,052 ELA-6 0.3%
MATH-8
Total 3-8 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 12,660 ELA-7 0.4%
ELA-8
Total 3-8
e students Math Performance Goal: 7.4 : 1 of grade 12.1
Pupil-Teacher Ratio students
:1
will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011. ELA Performance Goal: of gra
Pupil-Other-Staff Ratio 30.6 : 1 33.6 : 1
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-201
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio
REGENTS EXAMS
6:1 8.9 : 1
SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
07-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA 11 2005-06 2006-07 2
MATH A Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA Science-8
ALGEBRA2/TRIG
GEOMETRY
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
07-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV
BUDGET CHEMISTRY
ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT 2005-06 2006-07 2
EARTH SCIENCE Social Studies-5
PHYSICS Social Studies-8
US HISTORY
Major Expenditures
GLOBAL 2010-11 2011-12
LOTE
Salary Compensation 1,400,566 2,397,800 Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,275,066 100.0%
Other Compensation 180,517 197,141
GRADUATION RATES
RT Fixed Obligation/Variability 3,200 4,600
Cash Capital Outlays 4,300 22,225 TOTAL COHO
2003 2004 2005 2006
Facilities and Related 802,895 441,470
Technology 200 150
n High School of Construction and Design DISTRICT
Other Variable Expenses 323,730 211,680

Budget
95 Robert Brow
Total $ 2,715,408 $ 3,275,066
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
05-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
IY2 - Improvement Year 2 20
CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
Y or N - SURR/PLA
OVERALL

Opened - 2010-11
SCHOOL PROFILE Students** Weight Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students
Base Allocation enrolled during each
353.0 academic year
$3,682 who had
$ 1,299,746
ty
ELL-Beginnerimmigrated
(K-8) to the U.S. within the past three years)
- $2,396 $ -
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnic
-09 2009-10 2010-11ELL-Beginner
2011-12* (9-12) 10.0
2007-08 2008-09$3,594 2009-10 $ 2010-11
35,940
156 ELL-Intermediate
353 Total 9.0 $2,396 $ 21,5648 200
0.0% ELL-Advanced Percent of Enrollment 7.0 $1,198 $ 5.1%
8,386 Total
59.6% SWD-Resource Room Most Prevalent17.0
Country of Birth $5,856 $ 99,552 American Indian or Alaska Native
4.5% Black or African American
SWD-Consultant Country
Teacher1 1.0 $5,856 $ 5,856
Nepal
28.2% Asian
7.1% SWD-Integrated Special Class 23.0 $5,856 $ 134,688
Hispanic
0.6% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1
Country 2 Class 12.0 $5,856 $ 70,272
Cuba White
0.0% Total ESF Allocation $ 1,676,004 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Dominican
Country 3 Multi
Republic
* Projected

ATTENDANCE
07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
2006
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate

Section 4 Page 99
 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Kathleen Denaro School 96

Data From School Year 2009-10 Rochester Sci., Tech., Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) High School

Mission: Our students learn about our world through the integrated studies of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Our rigorous program and
community partnerships enable our students to become productive citizens, capable and responsible for shaping our future.
typ

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 Total 3-8

ELA Performance Goal: of grade students Math Performance Goal: of grade students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11
Science-8 MATH A
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG
GEOMETRY
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY
Social Studies-8 EARTH SCIENCE
PHYSICS
US HISTORY
GLOBAL
LOTE

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

DISTRICT
96 Rochester Sci., Tech., Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
Profile

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Opened - 2010-11 Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 184 384 Total 6
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 3.3%
Black or African American 71.2% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 3.8%
Hispanic 19.6% Country 1 Bhutan
White 5.4%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% Country 2 China
Multi 0.0%
* Projected Country 3 Tanzania

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate

Section 4 Page 100

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 96
Rochester Sci., Tech., Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) High School Principal Kathleen Denaro
Data From School Year 2009-10
hrough the integrated studies of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Our rigorous program and
become productive citizens, capable and responsible for shaping our future. Mission: Our students learn about our world th
type community partnerships enable our students to
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING
MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent
07-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-0620.9
2006-07 2007-0830.6
2008-09 2009-10 ELA - Grades 3-8
Teachers Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 1,724,926 46.5%
MATH-3
Principals/AP/AD 2.0 2.7 0268: Title I - AIS Services 75,288 2.0% 2005-06 2006-07 2007
MATH-4 ELA-3
Other Instructional MATH-5
1.1 2.5 0830: SIG District 120,830 3.3%
ELA-4
Non-instructional MATH-6 1.0 5.0 0834: SIG STEM 1,711,071 46.2%
ELA-5
Total MATH-7 25.0 40.8 1396: District Initiative Budgets 2,869
ELA-6 0.1%
MATH-8 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 59,254
ELA-7 1.6%
Total 3-8 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 12,660
ELA-8 0.3%
e students Pupil-Teacher Ratio 8.8 : 1 of grade students
12.5 : 1 Total 3-8
Math Performance Goal:
Pupil-Other-Staffwill
Ratio 44.9 in
achieve proficiency on Math : 12010-2011. 37.8 : 1 ELA Performance Goal: of grade
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio 7.4 : 1 9.4 : 1 will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011.
REGENTS EXAMS

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
ELA 11 2005-06 2006-07 200
MATH A Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA Science-8
ALGEBRA2/TRIG
GEOMETRY
07-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
CHEMISTRY 2005-06 2006-07 200
EARTH SCIENCE
Social Studies-5
PHYSICS
Social Studies-8
US HISTORY
Major Expenditures
GLOBAL 2010-11 2011-12
LOTE
Salary Compensation 1,515,700 2,553,914 Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,706,898 100.0%
Other Compensation 220,949 194,773
GRADUATION RATES
Fixed Obligation/Variability 5,800 4,000
RT
Cash Capital Outlays 1,300 87,575
Facilities and Related 2003 2004 729,836
2005 2006 605,596 TOTAL COHOR
Technology 660 320
i., Tech., Engineering and Mathematics
Other (STEM)
Variable Expenses 338,240 260,720 DISTRICT

Budget
Total $ 2,812,485 $ 3,706,898 96 Rochester Sci
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
05-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
IY2 - Improvement Year 2
2005
CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 EquitableRA -Student Funding
Restructuring Advanced(ESF) Allocation
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA

Students** Weight Allocation Opened - 2010-11

SCHOOL PROFILE
Base Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year1,413,888
384.0 $3,682 $ who had
y ELL-Beginnerimmigrated
(K-8) to the U.S. within the past -three years) $2,396 $ -
ELL-Beginner (9-12)
-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08
5.0 2008-09
$3,594
2009-10
$ 2010-11
17,970 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity
184 ELL-Intermediate
384 Total 5.0 $2,396 $ 11,9806 2008-
0.0% ELL-Advanced Percent of Enrollment - $1,198 $ 3.3%- Total
71.2% SWD-Resource Room Most Prevalent 18.0
Country of Birth $5,856 $ 105,408 American Indian or Alaska Native
3.8% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ - Black or African American
19.6% Country 1 Bhutan
SWD-Integrated Special Class 30.0 $5,856 $ 175,680 Asian
5.4% Hispanic
0.0%
SWD-Self-Contained 12:1
Country 2 Class - $5,856 $ China -
White
0.0% Total ESF Allocation $ 1,724,926
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Tanzania Multi
* Projected

7 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

2006-07
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate

Section 4 Page 101

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Mary Andrecolich-Diaz School 63

Data From School Year 2009-10 Thomas Jefferson High School

Mission: Motivate all students to discover the potential within, graduate, and become merchants of their own futures.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 26.8% 23.2% 25.7% 31.9% 10.9% MATH-7 6.4% 14.1% 41.3% 35.6% 10.6%
ELA-8 25.0% 25.7% 22.6% 29.8% 12.1% MATH-8 16.1% 11.0% 36.9% 27.0% 4.1%
Total 3-8 26.6% 23.8% 24.3% 30.9% 11.5% Total 3-8 11.1% 13.2% 39.1% 31.5% 7.4%

ELA Performance Goal: 39% of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: 44% of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11 42.0% 38.0% 45.0% 56.0% 47.0%
Science-8 10.1% 6.8% 28.4% 14.3% 11.7% MATH A 69.0% 63.0% 56.0% 35.0%
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 34.7% 27.2%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG 3.3%
GEOMETRY 46.2% 18.2%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 66.0% 58.0% 54.0% 64.0% 38.9%
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY 9.5% 50.0% 15.8%
Social Studies-8 9.1% 9.9% 14.6% 6.1% 16.9% EARTH SCIENCE 44.4% 31.3% 42.0% 40.7%
PHYSICS 22.2% 18.2% 100.0% 0.0%
US HISTORY 48.0% 51.0% 51.0% 46.0% 49.7%
GLOBAL 32.0% 19.0% 25.0% 43.0% 23.2%
LOTE 95.0% 83.3% 87.0% 74.2%

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

Profile

DISTRICT 48% 52% 46%

63 Thomas Jefferson High School 52% 50% 38%

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS SINI 5 SINI 5 SINI 5 SINI 5 RA RA IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS SINI 3 SINI 4 SINI 5 SINI 5 RY-2 RA CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS* GS* SINI 1 SINI 1 IY-2 CA1 CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS Y Y Y Y Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL R YR2 R R SINI 5 RA RA RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 1053 985 956 609 Total 71 101 181 150
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.5% 0.3% 0.1% Percent of Enrollment 6.0% 9.6% 18.4% 15.7%
Black or African American 62.6% 55.5% 55.8% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 6.4% 19.3% 17.7%
Hispanic 17.9% 17.0% 18.2% Country 1 Myanmar Thailand Thailand Thailand
White 12.7% 7.9% 8.3%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Thailand Bhutan Bhutan Bhutan
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3 Kenya Myanmar Kenya Nepal

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 90.2% 82.9% 86.2% 84.6%

Section 4 Page 102

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 63
Thomas Jefferson High School Principal Mary Andrecolich-Diaz
Data From School Year 2009-10

tial within, graduate, and become merchants of their own futures.

type Mission: Motivate all students to discover the potenti
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

ELA - Grades 3-8
2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 97.5
2006-07 2007-08 46.1
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 3,314,460 73.0%
Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 8.0 5.0 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 44,406 1.0% 2006-07 2007-08 2
2005-06
Other Instructional MATH-4 17.0 10.8 0268: Title I - AIS Services 111,176
ELA-3 2.5%
Non-instructional MATH-5 39.6 24.5 1357: Student & Family Support Ctr ELA-459,793 1.3%
MATH-6
Total 162.1 86.4 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 347,347
ELA-5 7.7%
31.9% 10.9% MATH-7 6.4% 14.1% 41.3% 35.6% 10.6% ELA-6
1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830 2.7%
29.8% 12.1% MATH-8 16.1% 11.0% 36.9% 27.0% 4.1% ELA-7 26.8%
30.9% 11.5% Total 3-8 11.1% 13.2% 39.1% 31.5% 7.4% 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 310,162 6.8% 23.2% 25.7%
ELA-8 25.0% 25.7% 22.6%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 9.8 : 1 13.2 : 1 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 39,072 0.9%
udents 44% : 1 of grade 7-815.1
students Total 3-8 26.6% 23.8% 24.3%
MathRatio
Pupil-Other-Staff Performance Goal: 14.8 :1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 126,598 2.8%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math5.9
in 2010-2011.
:1 7:1 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 Goal:1.4% 39% of grade 7-8 stu
ELA Performance
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011.
REGENTS EXAMS

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
ELA 11 42.0% 38.0% 45.0% 56.0% 47.0% 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
14.3% 11.7% MATH A 69.0% 63.0% 56.0% 35.0% Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 34.7% 27.2% Science-8 10.1% 6.8% 28.4%
ALGEBRA2/TRIG 3.3%
GEOMETRY 46.2% 18.2%
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 66.0% 58.0% 54.0% 64.0% 38.9%
CHEMISTRY 9.5% 50.0% 15.8% 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
6.1% 16.9% EARTH SCIENCE 44.4% 31.3% 42.0% 40.7%
Social Studies-5
Major Expenditures
PHYSICS 2010-11 22.2% 2011-12
18.2% 100.0% 0.0%
Social Studies-8 9.1% 9.9% 14.6%
US HISTORY 48.0% 51.0% 51.0% 46.0% 49.7%
Salary Compensation
GLOBAL 7,703,090
32.0% 19.0% 4,404,857
25.0% 43.0% 23.2% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 4,537,438 100.0%
Other Compensation
LOTE 320,231 95.0% 88,884 87.0%
83.3% 74.2%
Fixed Obligation/Variability 7,960 2,000
Cash Capital Outlays 52,951 500
GRADUATION RATES
Facilities and Related 88,467 40,497
Technology 500 -
2003 2004 2005 2006 TOTAL COHORT
Other Variable Expenses 14,700 700

Budget
Total 48% 52%$ 8,187,899
46% $ 4,537,438
igh School 52% 50% 38% DISTRICT
63 Thomas Jefferson Hig
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
SINI 5 SINI 5 SINI 5 RA RA IY2 - Improvement Year 2
2005-06 2
SINI 4 SINI 5 SINI 5 RY-2 RA CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS SINI 5
GS* SINI 1 SINI 1 IY-2 CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
FISCAL YEARCA1
2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation MATH STATUS SINI 3
Y Y Y Y Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS*
R R SINI 5 RA RA RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
Students** Weight Allocation SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL R YR2
Base Allocation Y or N - SURR/PLA
609.0 $3,682 $ 2,242,338
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 7.0 $2,396 $ 16,772
SCHOOL PROFILE
ELL-Beginner (9-12) 58.0 $3,594 $ 208,452
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled
ELL-Intermediate 96.0 during each$2,396
academic year
$ who had
230,016
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
ELL-Advanced 31.0 $1,198 $ 37,138
SWD-Resource Room
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-087.0 2008-09 $5,856 2009-10 $ 2010-11
40,992 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity
985 956 SWD-Consultant
609 TotalTeacher 71 6.0 101 $5,856
181 $ 35,136
150 2008-09 200
0.3% 0.1% SWD-Integrated Special
Percent Class
of Enrollment 6.0%53.0 9.6% $5,856
18.4% $ 310,368
15.7% Total 1053 9
55.5% 55.8% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 33.0 of Birth $5,856
Most Prevalent Country $ 193,248 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.5% 0
19.3% 17.7% Total ESF Allocation $ 3,314,460 Black or African American 62.6% 55
17.0% 18.2% Country 1 Myanmar Thailand Thailand Thailand
Asian 6.4% 19
7.9% 8.3% Hispanic 17.9% 17
0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Thailand Bhutan Bhutan Bhutan
White 12.7% 7
0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0
Country 3 Kenya Myanmar Kenya Nepal Multi 0.0% 0
* Projected

7-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

.9% 86.2% 84.6% 2006-07 2007
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 90.2% 82.9

Section 4 Page 103

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

All Boys School

POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

Teachers - 9.0 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 589,082 76.3%
Principals/AP/AD - 1.0 1396: District Initiative Budgets 62,236 8.1%
Other Instructional - 1.0 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830 15.6%
Non-instructional - 1.7
Total - 12.7

Pupil-Teacher Ratio 13.9 : 1

Pupil-Other-Staff Ratio 34.2 : 1
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio 9.9 : 1

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT

Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12

Salary Compensation - 771,889 Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 772,148 100.0%

Other Compensation - -
Fixed Obligation/Variability - -
Cash Capital Outlays - -
Facilities and Related - 260
Technology - -
Other Variable Expenses - -

Budget
Total $ - $ 772,148

FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation

Students** Weight Allocation

Base Allocation 125.0 $3,682 $ 460,250
ELL-Beginner (K-8) - $2,396 $ -
ELL-Beginner (9-12) - $3,594 $ -
ELL-Intermediate - $2,396 $ -
ELL-Advanced - $1,198 $ -
SWD-Resource Room 10.0 $5,856 $ 58,560
SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ -
SWD-Integrated Special Class 12.0 $5,856 $ 70,272
SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class - $5,856 $ -
Total ESF Allocation $ 589,082

Section 4 Page 104

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Newcomer Academy

POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

Teachers - 10.0 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 697,650 75.0%
Principals/AP/AD - 1.0 0243: Title I - Eng 4 Spkrs Ot Lang 42,796 4.6%
Other Instructional - 1.6 1396: District Initiative Budgets 68,681 7.4%
Non-instructional - 2.0 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830 13.0%
Total - 14.6

Pupil-Teacher Ratio 10 : 1
Pupil-Other-Staff Ratio 21.7 : 1
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio 6.8 : 1

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT

Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12

Salary Compensation - 850,332 Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 929,957 100.0%

Other Compensation - 8,000
Fixed Obligation/Variability - 2,000
Cash Capital Outlays - 4,000
Facilities and Related - 65,625
Technology - -
Other Variable Expenses - -
Total $ - $ 929,957

Budget
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation

Students** Weight Allocation

Base Allocation 100.0 $3,682 $ 368,200
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 10.0 $2,396 $ 23,960
ELL-Beginner (9-12) 79.0 $3,594 $ 283,926
ELL-Intermediate 7.0 $2,396 $ 16,772
ELL-Advanced 4.0 $1,198 $ 4,792
SWD-Resource Room - $5,856 $ -
SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ -
SWD-Integrated Special Class - $5,856 $ -
SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class - $5,856 $ -
Total ESF Allocation $ 697,650

Section 4 Page 105

School of Engineering & Manufacturing @ Edison 10-12 11-12
SCHOOL
School of Imaging PROFILES
& Information AND BUDGETS
Technology @ Edison 2011 - 12 DRAFT
7-12 BUDGET
11-12
Thomas Jefferson High School 7-12 8, 10-12
Newcomer Academy @ Jefferson

Programs
Young Adult Evening High School (at Dr. Freddie Thomas High
School Campus)

2010-11 2011-12
South Zone
Configuration Configuration
Elementary
No. 1 Martin B. Anderson K-6 K-6
No. 2 Clara Barton PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 4 George Mather Forbes K-6 K-7
No. 10 Dr. Walter Cooper Academy K-6 K-4
No. 12 James P.B. Duffy K-6 K-6
No. 14 Chester Dewey 3-6 Closed
No. 15 The Children’s School of Rochester K-6 K-6
No. 16 John Walton Spencer PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 19 Dr. Charles T. Lunsford PreK-7 K-8
No. 23 Francis Parker PreK-6 PreK-6
No. 28 Henry Hudson K-6 K-6
No. 29 Adlai E. Stevenson PreK-6 PreK-7
No. 35 Pinnacle K-6 K-6
No. 46 Charles Carroll K-6 K-6
No. 58 World of Inquiry K-8 K-9

Secondary
East High School 7-12 7-12
James Monroe High School 7-12 7-12
Rochester Early College International High School 9 9-10
School of the Arts 7-12 7-12
School Without Walls-Commencement Academy 10-12 10-12
School Without Walls-Foundation Academy 7-9 7-9
Joseph C. Wilson Magnet High School Commencement Academy 9-12 9-12
Joseph C. Wilson Foundation Academy 6-8 5-8

Programs
I’M READY Community Learning Center

Section 4 Page 106

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Schools - South Zone

Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
The South Zone is comprised of 24 schools and programs. This zone provides supervision of principals that ensures the alignment and imple-
mentation of goals and objectives to District priorities and School Improvement Plans. Also provided is support to ensure the development
of instructional management systems relevant to the needs of students. To enhance the leadership, monthly meetings of all principals are held
to focus on transformational leadership decision-making characteristics designed to improve student achievement with a focus on literacy and
school-level decision making relative to operational issues. In summary, the main role and responsibility of the District is to support the work
of schools and the development of professional learning communities within each school designed to improve student achievement through
research-based instructional practice using assessment for learning as the foundation.

2011-12 Budget Expense Total - $82,580,906

Other Compensation
1.61%

Fixed Obligation with Variability

0.06%

Cash Capital Outlays

0.24%
Salary Compensation
95.28%
Facilities and Related
2.22%

Technology
0.00%

Other Variable Expenses

0.60%

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $93,976,369 $78,680,345 $15,296,024 16.28% Districtwide budget reductions
Other Compensation $3,204,518 $1,328,791 $1,875,727 58.53% Districtwide budget reductions
Employee Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligation with Variability $100,592 $48,115 $52,477 52.17% Districtwide budget reductions
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $433,146 $195,373 $237,773 54.89% Districtwide budget reductions
Facilities and Related $2,258,587 $1,834,528 $424,059 18.78% Districtwide budget reductions
Technology $8,366 $1,558 $6,808 81.38% Districtwide budget reductions
Other Variable Expenses $913,902 $492,196 $421,706 46.14% Districtwide budget reductions
Totals $100,895,480 $82,580,906 $18,314,574 18.15%

FTEs 1,845.16 1,502.80 342.36 18.55%

Section 4 Page 107

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Schools: South Zone

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 71,487,528 70,582,689 59,629,866 10,952,822
Civil Service Salary 8,800,833 9,062,360 7,034,075 2,028,285
Administrator Salary 8,158,019 7,582,286 7,205,088 377,198
Hourly Teachers 1,019,167 957,644 581,018 376,626
Teaching Assistants 1,682,381 1,899,182 1,117,454 781,728
Paraprofessional Salary 4,304,212 3,892,208 3,112,844 779,364
Sub Total Salary Compensation 95,452,140 93,976,369 78,680,345 15,296,024
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 4,084,925 2,687,495 1,232,911 1,454,584
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 357,252 218,325 21,449 196,876
Teachers In Service 117,499 298,698 74,431 224,267
Sub Total Other Compensation 4,559,676 3,204,518 1,328,791 1,875,727
Total Salary and Other Compensation 100,011,815 97,180,887 80,009,136 17,171,751
Employee Benefits 2,812 - - -
Total Compensation and Benefits 100,014,627 97,180,887 80,009,136 17,171,751
Fixed Obligations With Variability
Special Education Tuition - - - -
Contract Transportation 49,862 100,592 48,115 52,477
Charter School Tuition - - - -
Health Service Other Districts - - - -
Insurance non-employee - - - -
Sub Total Fixed Obligations 49,862 100,592 48,115 52,477
Debt Service
Sub Total Debt Service - - - -
Cash Capital Outlays
Cash Capital Expense - - - -
Textbooks 175,825 205,896 113,234 92,662
Equipment Other than Buses 139,406 89,454 28,171 61,284
Equipment Buses - - - -
Computer Hardware - Instructional 133,185 43,498 4,715 38,783
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional 42,998 20,662 11,300 9,362
Library Books 84,941 73,636 37,954 35,682
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays 576,355 433,146 195,373 237,773

Section 4 Page 108

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Schools: South Zone

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Facilities and Related

Utilities 900 3,100 2,306 794
Instructional Supplies 1,262,630 1,700,189 1,491,760 208,429
Equip Service Contr & Repair 26,815 42,775 10,958 31,817
Facilities Service Contracts - - - -
Rentals 10,149 9,484 1,825 7,659
Maintenance Repair Supplies 4,662 700 300 400
Postage and Print/Advertising 102,452 99,986 37,246 62,740
Auto Supplies 106 150 50 100
Supplies and Materials 308,546 162,147 117,919 44,228
Custodial Supplies 198,529 181,124 136,376 44,748
Office Supplies 73,076 58,932 35,788 23,144
Sub Total Facilities and Related 1,987,865 2,258,587 1,834,528 424,059
Technology
Computer Software - Instructional 4,718 6,481 1,158 5,323
Computer Software - Non Instructional 360 1,885 400 1,485
Subtotal Technology 5,078 8,366 1,558 6,808
All Other Variable Expenses
Miscellaneous Services 137,051 112,914 76,528 36,386
Professional Technical Service 80,400 445,960 147,115 298,845
Agency Clerical 61,981 51,781 18,208 33,573
Judgments and Claims - - - -
Grant Disallowances - - - -
Departmental Credits (59,852) (71,624) (19,389) (52,235)
Indirect Costs Grants - - - -
BOCES Services 5,835 178,527 129,575 48,952
Professional Development 199,592 196,344 140,159 56,185
Subtotal of All Other Variable Expenses 425,007 913,902 492,196 421,706
Total Non Compensation 3,044,167 3,714,593 2,571,770 1,142,823
Sub Total 103,058,794 100,895,480 82,580,906 18,314,574
Budget Reserve - - - -
Grand Total 103,058,794 100,895,480 82,580,906 18,314,574

Section 4 Page 109

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Position Summary
Schools: South Zone

Var Bud vs
2009 - 2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

POSITIONS BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 1,254.10 1,208.95 1,022.10 186.8
Civil Service Salary 277.25 276.86 201.95 74.9
Administrator Salary 84.00 77.00 71.20 5.8
Teaching Assistants 70.00 75.00 41.60 33.4
Paraprofessional Salary 214.70 198.35 155.45 42.9
Hourly Teachers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Total Salary Compensation 1,900.05 1,836.16 1,492.30 343.8
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 27.00 9.00 10.50 (1.5
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Teachers In Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Total Other Compensation 27.00 9.00 10.50 (1.5
Total Salary and Other Compensation 1,927.05 1,845.16 1,502.80 342.3
Grand Total 1,927.05 1,845.16 1,502.80 342.3

Section 4 Page 110

SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Section 4 Page 111

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Kimberly Harris-Pappin School 01

Data From School Year 2009-10 Martin B. Anderson

Mission: We enhance each student’s ability to achieve excellence through a multi-disciplinary approach. We offer a collaborative school community that
integrates a village of positive role models in students’ lives to promote critical thinking and lifelong learning.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 62.7% 37.5% 45.5% 50.0% 48.9% MATH-3 65.6% 71.1% 56.8% 79.5% 42.2%
ELA-4 43.2% 52.5% 53.8% 65.0% 18.4% MATH-4 59.6% 65.5% 68.3% 59.5% 13.5%
ELA-5 48.5% 48.7% 79.2% 87.2% 22.2% MATH-5 57.4% 60.0% 63.6% 64.1% 14.3%
ELA-6 38.1% 51.6% 68.4% 91.7% 25.5% MATH-6 11.6% 67.7% 83.8% 78.7% 34.8%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 49.3% 48.3% 62.6% 74.3% 29.5% Total 3-8 51.1% 65.4% 67.2% 70.7% 27.6%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 78.7% 77.4% 90.2% 68.0% 51.4% Social Studies-5 92.8% 73.2% 94.6% 84.6% 83.3%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.3 4.0 4.5 Grade 1 28.9% 22.2%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.2 4.4 4.6 Grade 2 25.6% 9.3%
Movement, Music 4.2 4.2 4.7
Science 4.1 4.3 4.1

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 303 303 295 299 Total 2 2 0 1
American Indian or Alaska Native 1.0% 1.3% 1.2% Percent of Enrollment 0.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.3%
Black or African American 71.6% 74.6% 75.2% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 2.3% 2.3% 1.5%
Hispanic 10.2% 8.9% 8.3% Country 1 Kenya Kenya Liberia
White 14.2% 11.6% 12.5%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2
Multi 0.7% 1.3% 1.2%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 94.1% 94.1% 94.6% 93.7%

Section 4 Page 112

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 01
Martin B. Anderson Principal Kimberly Harris-Pappin
Data From School Year 2009-10

eve excellence through a multi-disciplinary approach. We offer a collaborative school community that
ts’ lives to promote critical thinking and lifelong learning. Mission: We enhance each student’s ability to achieve
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs)
type integrates a village of positive role models in students’
PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

ELA - Grades 3-8
2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 26.3
2006-07 2007-08 25.3
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 1,203,493 55.8%
50.0% 48.9% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 65.6% 2.0
71.1% 56.8% 1.8
79.5% 42.2% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 70,147 3.3%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 20
65.0% 18.4% Other Instructional MATH-4 59.6% 65.5%
3.5 68.3% 59.5%
3.2 13.5% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten ELA-357,111 2.6%
62.7% 37.5% 45.5% 5
87.2% 22.2% Non-instructional MATH-5 57.4% 60.0%
7.0 63.6% 64.1%
7.0 14.3% 0268: Title I - AIS Services ELA-459,199 2.7%
43.2% 52.5% 53.8% 6
91.7% 25.5% Total MATH-6 11.6% 38.8
67.7% 83.8% 78.7%
37.3 34.8% 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs ELA-5
471,751 48.5%
21.9% 48.7% 79.2% 8
MATH-7 ELA-6 38.1% 51.6% 68.4% 9
1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 5.2%
MATH-8 ELA-792,572
74.3% 29.5% Total 3-8 51.1% 65.4% 67.2% 70.7% 27.6%
1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 4.3%
ELA-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 11.2 : 1 11.8 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 25,320 1.2%
Total 3-8 49.3% 48.3% 62.6% 7
students Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 52% : 1 of grade 3-624.9
23.6 students
:1 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 3.0%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math7.6
in :2010-2011.
1 8:1 ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 stu
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011.
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
68.0% 51.4% Social Studies-5 92.8% 73.2% 94.6% 84.6% 83.3% 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 20
Social Studies-8 Science-4 78.7% 77.4% 90.2% 6
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)
KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score)
08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH
Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12
4.5 Grade 1 28.9% 22.2% 2006-07 2007-08
4.6 Salary Compensation Grade 2 2,278,760 25.6% 2,061,006
9.3% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 2,155,547
Iniative, Social Relations100.0% 4.3 4.0
4.7 Other Compensation 25,691 43,491 Language, Literacy, Math 4.2 4.4
4.1 Movement, Music 4.2 4.2
Fixed Obligation/Variability - -
Cash Capital Outlays 18,903 10,500 Science 4.1 4.3
Facilities and Related
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS 40,755 40,550
ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology 500 -
GS - Good Standing
Other Variable Expenses 3,000 -

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total $ IY2
2,367,609
- Improvement$Year
2,155,547
2
GS GS GS GS GS 2005-06 200
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS GS G
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS GS G
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS G
GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL GS G
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. withinStudents**
the past three years) Weight Allocation
Base Allocation 299.0 2008-09 $3,682 $ 1,100,918 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2009-10 2010-11
303 295 ELL-BeginnerTotal
299 (K-8) 2 2.0 2 $2,3960 $ 4,792
1 2008-09 2009
1.3% 1.2% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 0.7% - 0.7% $3,594
0.0% $ 0.3%- Total 303 303
74.6% 75.2% ELL-Intermediate 2.0 of Birth
Most Prevalent Country $2,396 $ 4,792 American Indian or Alaska Native 1.0% 1.3%
2.3% 1.5% ELL-Advanced 4.3 $1,198 $ 5,151 Black or African American 71.6% 74.6
8.9% 8.3% Country 1 Kenya Kenya Liberia
SWD-Resource Room 5.0 $5,856 $ 29,280 Asian 2.3% 2.3%
11.6% 12.5% Hispanic 10.2% 8.9%
SWD-Consultant Teacher
Country 2 - $5,856 $ -
0.0% 0.0% White 14.2% 11.6
1.3% 1.2%
SWD-Integrated Special Class - $5,856 $ -
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0%
SWD-Self-Contained
Country 312:1 Class 10.0 $5,856 $ 58,560
Multi 0.7% 1.3%
Total ESF Allocation $ 1,203,493
* Projected

ATTENDANCE
07-08 2008-09 2009-10
4.1% 94.6% 93.7% 2006-07 2007-0
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 94.1% 94.1%

Section 4 Page 113

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal James Palermo School 02

Data From School Year 2009-10 Clara Barton

Mission: Engage all students in the learning process to reach high standards, so that all students are prepared for success as assessed by multiple measures.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 46.8% 38.7% 32.7% 59.0% 28.3% MATH-3 73.9% 52.3% 65.4% 85.2% 39.1%
ELA-4 40.0% 38.0% 42.2% 54.5% 30.8% MATH-4 62.5% 53.0% 50.0% 54.5% 38.5%
ELA-5 34.7% 33.3% 52.9% 48.8% 12.5% MATH-5 18.4% 35.6% 63.8% 63.4% 23.2%
ELA-6 43.3% 30.4% 48.8% 67.4% 42.6% MATH-6 53.4% 58.7% 67.4% 46.8% 57.4%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 41.3% 34.2% 44.0% 57.6% 28.0% Total 3-8 51.5% 49.2% 61.8% 63.7% 38.8%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 90.2% 92.5% 74.4% 65.0% 90.5% Social Studies-5 91.5% 75.6% 73.6% 33.3% 65.5%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.0 3.8 3.8 Grade 1 37.5% 12.5%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.4 4.1 3.9 Grade 2 37.5% 20.0%
Movement, Music 3.9 4.2 4.1
Science 4.0 3.9 3.7

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL SINI* 1 GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 327 334 346 330
351 Total 0 1 0 0
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0%
Black or African American 90.5% 89.2% 89.7% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.3% 0.3% 0.8%
Hispanic 4.3% 5.4% 4.2% Country 1 Yemen
White 4.6% 4.2% 4.5%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2
Multi 0.3% 0.6% 0.5%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91.9% 92.1% 91.9% 92.5%

Section 4 Page 114

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 02
Clara Barton Principal James Palermo
Data From School Year 2009-10

o reach high standards, so that all students are prepared for success as assessed by multiple measures.
Mission: Engage all students in the learning
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type 2011-12 FUNDING
PROPOSED

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

Teachers ELA - Grades 3-860.4%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 36.7
2006-07 2007-08 30.2
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 1,540,734
59.0% 28.3% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 73.9% 2.0
52.3% 65.4% 2.085.2% 39.1% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 85,667 3.4% 2005-06 2006-07 2
54.5% 30.8% Other Instructional MATH-4 62.5% 6.5
53.0% 50.0% 4.054.5% 38.5% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 74,882ELA-3 2.9% 46.8% 38.7%
48.8% 12.5% Non-instructional MATH-5 18.4% 12.3
35.6% 63.8% 10.8
63.4% 23.2% 0453: Safe Schools/Healthy Stdnts I 29,897ELA-4 1.2% 40.0% 38.0%
67.4% 42.6% Total MATH-6 53.4% 57.5
58.7% 67.4% 47.0
46.8% 57.4% 0513: The Primary Project 4,480ELA-5 0.2% 34.7% 33.3%
MATH-7 1357: Student & Family Support Ctr 29,897ELA-6 1.2% 43.3% 30.4%
MATH-8 1416: Primary Project 8,551ELA-7 0.3%
57.6% 28.0% 51.5%
Pupil-Teacher RatioTotal 3-8
9.4 49.2%
:1 61.8%
10.9 :63.7%
1 38.8%
1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 444,180ELA-8 17.4%
Pupil-Other-Staff Total 3-8 4.4% 41.3% 34.2%
students Math Ratio
Performance Goal: 16.6
52% : 1 of grade 3-619.6 :1
students 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360
Total Pupil-Staff Ratioproficiency on Math in6 2010-2011.
will achieve :1 7:1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 122,377 4.8%
ELA Performance Goal: 67% of g
1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 37,979 1.5%
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 4518: C4E - On Campus Intervention P 58,218 2.3%
SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
65.0% 90.5% Social Studies-5 91.5% 75.6% 73.6% 33.3% 65.5% 2005-06 2006-07
Social Studies-8 Science-4 90.2% 92.5%
Science-8

BUDGET
RCSD K-2 TEST ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
RESULTS
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)
KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Avera
08 2008-09 2009-10Major Expenditures 2010-11 READING2011-12
MATH
3.8 Grade 1 37.5% 12.5% 2006-0
3.9 Salary Compensation Grade 2 2,884,813 37.5% 2,483,246
20.0% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 2,549,222 100.0%
Iniative, Social Relations 4.0
4.1 Other Compensation 38,810 35,000 Language, Literacy, Math 4.4
3.7 Fixed Obligation/Variability 1,000 - Movement, Music 3.9
Cash Capital Outlays 6,800 4,000 Science 4.0
Facilities and Related 57,597 26,976
ACCOUNTABILITY
Technology STATUS -
ACCOUNTABILITY -
LEGEND
Other Variable Expenses 2,520Standing
GS - Good -

Budget
006-07 2007-08 Total 2009-10
2008-09 2010-11 $ IY1
2,991,540
- Improvement$Year
2,549,222
1
GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2 20
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL S
Y or N - SURR/PLA

FISCAL
SCHOOL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students Students** enrolled during Weight

each academic year who had
Allocation
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
Base Allocation 330.0 $3,682 $ 1,215,060 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethn
09-10 2010-11 2011-12*
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 2007-081.0 2008-09 2009-10
$2,396 $ 2010-11
2,396
334 346 351 Total
ELL-Beginner (9-12) 0 - 1 $3,5940 $ 0- 200
.3% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%
ELL-Intermediate - $2,396 $ 0.0%- Total 3
9.2% 89.7% Most Prevalent Country
ELL-Advanced 1.0 of Birth $1,198 $ 1,198 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.
.3% 0.8% Black or African American 90
.4% 4.2%
SWD-Resource Room
Country 1 - Yemen $5,856 $ -
Asian 0.
.2% 4.5% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ -
Hispanic 4.
.0% 0.0% SWD-Integrated Special
Country 2 Class 36.0 $5,856 $ 210,816 White 4.
.6% 0.5% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 19.0 $5,856 $ 111,264 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Total ESF Allocation
Country 3 $ 1,540,734 Multi 0.
* Projected

ATTENDANCE
7-08 2008-09 2009-10
1% 91.9% 92.5% 200
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91.

Section 4 Page 115

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Karon A. Jackson School 04

Data From School Year 2009-10 George Mather Forbes

Mission: We provide a safe and healthy environment where all children learn and develop their individual talents. Our vision is for all of our students to become
good citizens and productive members of society.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 78.4% 51.0% 51.2% 41.3% 15.7% MATH-3 79.5% 66.7% 65.0% 70.2% 17.6%
ELA-4 57.4% 67.3% 63.7% 76.9% 41.5% MATH-4 64.1% 63.3% 66.7% 65.0% 34.1%
ELA-5 46.8% 51.0% 62.0% 64.2% 32.4% MATH-5 41.3% 45.7% 64.0% 51.9% 40.5%
ELA-6 52.2% 44.8% 58.4% 70.6% 45.8% MATH-6 36.2% 37.1% 47.5% 51.9% 36.2%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 57.6% 53.0% 59.4% 63.0% 34.0% Total 3-8 54.1% 52.1% 60.2% 59.1% 31.6%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 90.6% 81.6% 86.2% 78.0% 78.0% Social Studies-5 80.4% 72.3% 74.5% 83.0% 73.2%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.2 3.2 3.5 Grade 1 11.9% 3.3%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.7 3.3 3.6 Grade 2 7.5% 10.0%
Movement, Music 4.7 3.5 3.9
Science 4.4 3.2 3.4

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 403 390 365 385 Total 2 2 0 0
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.2% 0.3% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.5% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0%
Black or African American 87.6% 87.9% 85.2% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.5% 0.3% 0.0%
Hispanic 7.2% 5.6% 6.0% Country 1 Afghanistan Iraq
White 4.5% 5.4% 8.2%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.3% 0.0% Country 2 France
Multi 0.0% 0.3% 0.3%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 92.2% 92.1% 92.4% 92.3%

Section 4 Page 116

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 04
George Mather Forbes Principal Karon A. Jackson
Data From School Year 2009-10

where all children learn and develop their individual talents. Our vision is for all of our students to become
Mission: We provide a safe and healthy enviro
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type 2011-12 FUNDING
PROPOSED
good citizens and productive members of socie

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

Teachers 41.8 39.8 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA - Grades 3-8
$ 1,681,478 48.5%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
41.3% 15.7% Principals/AP/ADMATH-3 79.5% 2.0
66.7% 65.0% 2.0
70.2% 17.6% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,545 0.0%2005-06 2006-07 200
76.9% 41.5% Other InstructionalMATH-4 64.1% 9.0
63.3% 66.7% 6.3
65.0% 34.1% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 28,556
ELA-3 0.8%78.4% 51.0% 51.
64.2% 32.4% Non-instructionalMATH-5 41.3% 45.7%
27.7 64.0% 51.9%
24.7 40.5% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 91,448
ELA-4 2.6%57.4% 67.3% 63.
70.6% 45.8% Total MATH-6 36.2% 37.1%
80.5 47.5% 51.9%
72.8 36.2% 0305: IDEA Support Serv & Sec 611 345,328
ELA-5 10.0%46.8% 51.0% 62.
MATH-7 1134: QUAD A Program ELA-6
32,000 0.9%52.2% 44.8% 58.
MATH-8 ELA-7
1323: School Redesign 108,822 3.1%
63.0% 34.0% Total 3-8 54.1% 52.1% 60.2% 59.1% 31.6% ELA-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 8.7 : 1 9.7 : 1 1416: Primary Project 11,538 0.3%
Total 3-8 57.6% 53.0% 59.
students Pupil-Other-Staff Ratio
Math Performance Goal: 52%9.4 : 1of grade 3-6 students
11.7 : 1 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 854,355 24.6%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratioproficiency on Math in
4.52010-2011.
:1 5.3 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 3.2%
ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grad
1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 106,362
will 3.1% on ELA in 2010-20
achieve proficiency
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 37,979 1.1%
4518: C4E - On Campus Intervention P SCIENCE - Grades 4 &
58,218 8
1.7%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
78.0% 78.0% Social Studies-5 80.4% 72.3% 74.5% 83.0% 73.2% 2005-06 2006-07 200
Social Studies-8 Science-4 90.6% 81.6% 86
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TESTBUDGET

RESULTSALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)
KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average S
8 2008-09 2009-10 Major Expenditures 2010-11READING 2011-12
MATH
3.5 Grade 1 11.9% 3.3% 2006-07
3.6 Salary Compensation Grade 2 3,630,7737.5% 3,362,039
10.0% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,469,989 100.0%
Iniative, Social Relations 4.2
3.9 Other Compensation 56,259 49,478 Language, Literacy, Math 4.7
3.4 Fixed Obligation/Variability 1,900 1,500 Movement, Music 4.7
Cash Capital Outlays 14,571 28,084 Science 4.4
Facilities and Related 51,829 27,888
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology - -
Other Variable Expenses GS - Good Standing
5,800 1,000

Budget
006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Total 2009-10 2010-11 $IY13,761,132
- Improvement Year 1
$ 3,469,989
GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2 2005
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS GS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS GS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS
GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL GS
Y or N - SURR/PLA

FISCAL
SCHOOL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each

Students** academic year Allocation
Weight who had
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
Base Allocation 385.0 $3,682 $ 1,417,570 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicit
09-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 4.0 $2,396 $ 9,584
390 365 385 Total 2 2 0 0 2008-0
ELL-Beginner (9-12) - $3,594 $ -
3% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.5% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% Total 403
ELL-Intermediate 1.0 $2,396 $ 2,396
.9% 85.2% Most Prevalent Country of Birth American Indian or Alaska Native 0.2%
3% 0.0% ELL-Advanced 0.1 $1,198 $ 120
Black or African American 87.6%
6% 6.0% SWD-Resource Room
Country 1 Afghanistan9.0 Iraq $5,856 $ 52,704
Asian 0.5%
4% 8.2% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ - Hispanic 7.2%
3% 0.0% Country
SWD-Integrated 2
Special Class France - $5,856 $ - White 4.5%
3% 0.3% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 34.0 $5,856 $ 199,104 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3
Total ESF Allocation $ 1,681,478 Multi 0.0%
* Projected

ATTENDANCE
7-08 2008-09 2009-10
1% 92.4% 92.3% 2006-0
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 92.2%

Section 4 Page 117

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Camaron Clyburn School 10

Data From School Year 2009-10 Dr. Walter Cooper Academy
Mission: It is our mission to engage our diverse student body in joyful, rigorous, meaningful, and fascinating learning experiences. We will use both traditional
and technological tools, along with resources from our community, to inspire in our students an enduring and intrinsic drive for learning and service to others. Our
students will work collaboratively, using creative and scientific thinking skills, technology, and positive habits of work and character. We will never give up in
our quest to ensure that all students achieve. We will instill in them both perseverance and the sense of hope that will lead to success in secondary school. It is our
ultimate goal to nurture life-long learners.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 Total 3-8

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 Social Studies-5
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations Grade 1 14.0% 11.6%
Language, Literacy, Math Grade 2 19.4% 3.2%
Movement, Music
Science

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Opened - 2009-10 Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 122 174 212 Total 2
American Indian or Alaska Native 1.6% 1.7% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 1.1%
Black or African American 85.2% 81.6% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 2.5% 1.7%
Hispanic 4.9% 9.2% Country 1 Bhutan
White 5.7% 5.7%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2
Multi 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 93.6%

Section 4 Page 118

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 10
Dr. Walter Cooper Academy Principal Camaron Clyburn
ent body in joyful, rigorous, meaningful, and fascinating learning experiences. We will use both traditional Data From School Year 2009-10
ur community, to inspire in our students an enduring and intrinsic drive for learning and service to others. Our Mission: It is our mission to engage our diverse
scientific thinking skills, technology, and positive habits of work and character. We will never give up in and technological tools, along with resources fr
instill in them both perseverance and the sense of hope that will lead to success in secondary school. It is our students will work collaboratively, using creativ
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type 2011-12 FUNDING
PROPOSED our quest to ensure that all students achieve. We
ultimate goal to nurture life-long learners.
MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 17.5

2006-07 2007-08 20.2
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 1,099,001
ELA - Grades 3-8 65.5%
Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 1.0 1.0 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 686 0.0%
2005-06 2006-07 2007
Other InstructionalMATH-4 1.5 1.4 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 57,111 3.4%
ELA-3
Non-instructional MATH-5 6.9 7.9 0268: Title I - AIS Services 40,644 2.4%
ELA-4
Total MATH-6 26.9 30.5 0513: The Primary Project 2,987
ELA-5 0.2%
MATH-7 1323: School Redesign 12,980 0.8%
ELA-6
MATH-8 1416: Primary Project 11,403 0.7%
ELA-7
Pupil-Teacher RatioTotal 3-8 9.9 : 1 10.5 : 1 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 152,060
ELA-8 9.1%
udents Pupil-Other-Staff
Math Ratio
Performance Goal: 18.5
52% : 1 of grade 3 students
20.5 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360
Total 3-8 6.7%
Total Pupil-Staff Ratioproficiency on Math6.5
will achieve :1
in 2010-2011. 6.9 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 99,467 5.9%
ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade
1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 25,320
will 1.5% on ELA in 2010-20
achieve proficiency
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 3.8%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
Social Studies-5 2005-06 2006-07 2007
Social Studies-8
Science-4
Science-8

BUDGET
RCSD K-2 TEST ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
RESULTS
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

8 2008-09 2009-10Major Expenditures 2010-11 READING2011-12

MATH KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average S
Grade 1 14.0% 11.6% 2006-07 2
Salary Compensation Grade 2 1,435,062 19.4% 1,627,650
3.2% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 1,677,612 100.0%
Iniative, Social Relations
Other Compensation 35,778 20,686
Language, Literacy, Math
Fixed Obligation/Variability 5,111 4,000
Movement, Music
Cash Capital Outlays 14,999 804 Science
Facilities and Related 28,144 23,972
ACCOUNTABILITY
Technology STATUS 1,000
ACCOUNTABILITY -
LEGEND
Other Variable Expenses GS -11,640
Good Standing 500

Budget
Total 2009-10 2010-11
006-07 2007-08 2008-09 $ IY1
1,531,734
- Improvement$Year
1,677,612
1
IY2 - Improvement Year 2
2005-
CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2 ELA STATUS
RY1 - Restructuring Year 1 MATH STATUS
RY2 - Restructuring Year 2 SCIENCE STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced SURR/PLA STATUS
Y or N - SURR/PLA OVERALL

Opened - 2009-10
FISCAL
SCHOOL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students Students**enrolled during Weight

each academic yearAllocation
who had
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
Base Allocation 212.0 $3,682 $ 780,584
09-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 22.3 2008-09 2009-10
$2,396 $ 2010-11
53,431
122 174 212 Total
ELL-Beginner (9-12) - $3,594 $ 2 - 2008-0
.6% 1.7% Percent of Enrollment
ELL-Intermediate 5.0 0.0%
$2,396 $ 1.1%
11,980 Total
5.2% 81.6% Most Prevalent Country
ELL-Advanced 1.0 of Birth $1,198 $ 1,198 American Indian or Alaska Native
.5% 1.7%
SWD-Resource Room
Country 1 2.0 $5,856 $ Bhutan
11,712 Black or African American
.9% 9.2%
SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ - Asian
.7% 5.7%
Hispanic
.0% 0.0% SWD-Integrated Special
Country 2 Class 41.0 $5,856 $ 240,096
White
.0% 0.0% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class - $5,856 $ -
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Total ESF Allocation
Country 3 $ 1,099,001 Multi
* Projected

7-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

93.6% 2006-07
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate

Section 4 Page 119

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Michele Liguori-Alampi School 12

Data From School Year 2009-10 James P.B. Duffy

Mission: In a safe, inclusive environment and through quality programs, we will meet every student’s individual needs and provide a strong foundation for life-
long learning.
type

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 57.3% 43.9% 48.3% 52.3% 34.2% MATH-3 72.7% 59.3% 70.7% 82.8% 39.3%
ELA-4 67.3% 67.3% 59.4% 74.0% 36.4% MATH-4 62.5% 63.7% 70.8% 60.0% 30.8%
ELA-5 43.7% 50.9% 66.6% 74.5% 29.5% MATH-5 40.3% 39.6% 57.1% 58.3% 30.5%
ELA-6 48.9% 57.3% 60.6% 82.7% 37.1% MATH-6 38.0% 49.0% 63.9% 74.5% 27.8%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 51.7% 56.0% 59.0% 70.3% 34.4% Total 3-8 54.0% 52.9% 65.3% 69.6% 32.5%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 88.9% 83.6% 78.6% 86.0% 83.3% Social Studies-5 78.2% 74.1% 82.7% 81.3% 78.5%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.2 4.5 4.5 Grade 1 28.7% 20.4%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.4 4.6 4.7 Grade 2 24.6% 12.7%
Movement, Music 4.4 4.6 4.7
Science 4.1 4.5 4.6

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS GS GS GS* GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
Profile

MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1

SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS* GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 753 752 785 776 Total 24 18 16 13
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.1% 0.4% 0.4% Percent of Enrollment 1.8% 3.4% 2.1% 1.7%
Black or African American 61.3% 60.5% 58.3% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 1.2% 0.9% 1.1%
Hispanic 24.5% 24.6% 26.8% Country 1 Cuba Cuba Cuba Cuba
White 12.3% 12.9% 12.9%
Country 2 Dominican Dominican Dominican Dominican
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.1% 0.1% Republic Republic Republic Republic
Multi 0.5% 0.5% 0.4%
* Projected Country 3 Honduras Russia

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 93.2% 94.0% 94.3% 93.4%

Section 4 Page 120

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 12
James P.B. Duffy Principal Michele Liguori-Alampi
Data From School Year 2009-10

hrough quality programs, we will meet every student’s individual needs and provide a strong foundation for life-
Mission: In a safe, inclusive environment and through q
type long learning.

MATH - Grades 3-8

ELA - Grades 3-8
7-08 2008-09 2009-10 POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) 2007-08
2005-06 2006-07 2008-09 2009-10 PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING
3% 52.3% 34.2% MATH-3 72.7% 59.3% 70.7% 82.8% 39.3% 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 20
4% 74.0% 36.4% MATH-4 62.5%
2010-11 63.7% 70.8%
2011-12 60.0% 30.8% Allocation
ELA-3 Percent
57.3% 43.9% 48.3% 52
6% 74.5% 29.5% MATH-5 40.3% 39.6% 57.1% 58.3% 30.5% ELA-4 67.3% 67.3% 59.4% 74
6% 82.7% 37.1%Teachers MATH-6 38.0% 61.949.0% 63.9% 55.974.5% 27.8% Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ ELA-5
3,566,553 77.4% 50.9%
43.7% 66.6% 74
Principals/AP/AD MATH-7 3.0 3.0 0132: GRHF School #12 30,123
ELA-6 0.7%
48.9% 57.3% 60.6% 82
Other Instructional MATH-8 9.5 9.3 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec ELA-72,397 0.1%
0% 70.3% 34.4% 54.0%
Non-instructional Total 3-8
22.552.9% 65.3%
17.069.6% 32.5%
0206: Title I - Kindergarten ELA-8
142,778 3.1%
Total 96.9 of grade 3-6 students
85.2 0268: Title I - AIS Services Total 3-8
137,173 51.7%
3.0% 56.0% 59.0% 70
e 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52%
11. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011. 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 290,872 Goal:
ELA Performance 6.3%67% of grade 3-6 stu
1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360
will achieve 2.4%
proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011.
Pupil-Teacher SOCIAL
Ratio STUDIES - Grades 512.7&8 :1 13.9 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 129,272 2.8%
Pupil-Other-Staff Ratio SCIENCE - Grades
39,0724 & 8 0.8%
7-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 : 2006-07
22.4 1 26.5 : 2008-09
2007-08 1 2009-10 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs
6% 86.0% Total Pupil-Staff Ratio
83.3% Social Studies-5 8.1 : 174.1%
78.2% 9.1 : 181.3%
82.7% 78.5% 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 98,187 2.1% 2006-07 2007-08 20
2005-06
Social Studies-8 4518: C4E - On Campus Intervention P 58,218
Science-4 1.3% 83.6%
88.9% 78.6% 8
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)
KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score)
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH
4.5 4.5 Grade 1 28.7% 20.4% 2006-07 2007-08
4.6 4.7 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
Grade 2 by ACCOUNT
24.6% 12.7% Iniative, Social Relations 4.2 4.5
4.6 4.7 Language, Literacy, Math 4.4 4.6
4.5 4.6 Movement, Music 4.4 4.6
Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12 Science 4.1 4.5

ACCOUNTABILITY
Salary CompensationSTATUS 4,921,293
ACCOUNTABILITY 4,368,113
LEGEND Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 4,607,004 100.0%
Other Compensation 95,598
GS - Good Standing 130,969
06 2006-07 2007-08Fixed Obligation/Variability
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement
- Year 1 -
GS GS* CashGS GS
Capital Outlays GS IY2 - Improvement Year13,500
16,369 2 2005-06 2006

Budget
GS GS Facilities
GS and Related
GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
92,142 77,922 ELA STATUS GS G
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
Technology 85 MATH STATUS GS G
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1 -
SCIENCE STATUS GS G
GS GS* Other Variable
GS Expenses
GS GS RY217,520
- Restructuring Year16,500
2
SURR/PLA STATUS N
Total $ 5,143,007 $ Advanced
RA - Restructuring 4,607,004 OVERALL GS G
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
y immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity
9 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
752 785 776 Total 24 18 16 13 2008-09 2009-
0.4% 0.4% FISCAL YEAR
Percent2011-12 Equitable1.8%
of Enrollment Student Funding
3.4% (ESF)
2.1% Allocation
1.7% Total 753 752
60.5% 58.3% Most Prevalent Country of Birth American Indian or Alaska Native 0.1% 0.4%
0.9% 1.1% Students** Weight Allocation Black or African American 61.3% 60.5
24.6% 26.8% Country 1 Cuba Cuba Cuba Cuba
Asian 1.2% 0.9%
12.9% 12.9% Base Allocation 776.0 $3,682 $ 2,857,232
Dominican Dominican Dominican Dominican Hispanic 24.5% 24.6
0.1% 0.1% Country 2
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 56.0 $2,396 $ 134,176
Republic Republic Republic Republic White 12.3% 12.9
0.5% 0.4% ELL-Beginner (9-12) - $3,594 $ - Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.1%
ELL-IntermediateCountry 3 Honduras
37.0 Russia $2,396 $ 88,652 Multi 0.5% 0.5%
ELL-Advanced 29.7 $1,198 $ 35,581 * Projected
SWD-Resource Room 12.0 $5,856 $ 70,272
ATTENDANCE
2007-08 2008-09 SWD-Consultant
2009-10 Teacher 1.0 $5,856 $ 5,856
94.0% 94.3% SWD-Integrated
93.4% Special Class 37.0 $5,856 $ 216,672 2006-07 2007-0
SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 27.0 $5,856 $ 158,112 Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 93.2% 94.0%
Total ESF Allocation $ 3,566,553

Section 4 Page 121

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Donna Gattelaro-Anderson School 14

Data From School Year 2009-10 Chester Dewey

Mission: A learning community where each and every child will be prepared for success-- today, tomorrow and always.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 55.8% 27.3% 34.6% 45.2% 17.9% MATH-3 50.0% 40.0% 67.9% 82.8% 0.0%
ELA-4 59.5% 42.9% 48.2% 73.1% 28.2% MATH-4 63.4% 62.8% 72.6% 81.5% 38.5%
ELA-5 50.0% 52.5% 58.5% 77.8% 15.2% MATH-5 50.0% 73.9% 63.3% 84.3% 41.2%
ELA-6 68.9% 37.8% 60.0% 68.1% 30.6% MATH-6 33.3% 35.1% 65.3% 67.3% 56.8%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 59.0% 39.1% 49.2% 64.6% 23.1% Total 3-8 49.5% 52.4% 67.6% 79.2% 33.3%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 95.6% 89.7% 96.4% 96.0% 94.1% Social Studies-5 82.9% 82.5% 94.6% 97.8% 83.9%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.0 4.0 4.8 Grade 1
Language, Literacy, Math 4.4 4.5 4.8 Grade 2 15.0% 10.0%
Movement, Music 4.5 4.3 4.8
Science 4.2 4.4 4.6

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS* GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS* GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Phase out school Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 399 193 132 0 Total 116 115 23 1
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.8% 0.5% 0.8% Percent of Enrollment 30.9% 28.9% 11.9% 0.8%
Black or African American 66.3% 69.4% 74.2% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 16.8% 16.1% 13.6%
Hispanic 8.0% 9.3% 6.1% Country 1 Kenya Kenya Thailand Yemen
White 7.8% 4.1% 4.5%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Somalia Thailand Sierra Leone
Multi 0.3% 0.5% 0.8%
* Projected Country 3 Vietnam Vietnam Kenya

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 92.7% 93.1% 93.7% 95.3%

Section 4 Page 122

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 14
Chester Dewey Principal Donna Gattelaro-Anderson
Data From School Year 2009-10

ry child will be prepared for success-- today, tomorrow and always.

Mission: A learning community where each and every chil
type
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

ELA - Grades 3-8
2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 18.6
2006-07 2007-08 - 2008-09 2009-10
45.2% 17.9% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 50.0% 1.0
40.0% 67.9% - 82.8% 0.0% 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-
73.1% 28.2% Other InstructionalMATH-4 63.4% 1.1
62.8% 72.6% - 81.5% 38.5% ELA-3 55.8% 27.3% 34.6% 45.2%
77.8% 15.2% Non-instructional MATH-5 50.0% 73.9%
5.0 63.3% - 84.3% 41.2% ELA-4 59.5% 42.9% 48.2% 73.1%
68.1% 30.6% Total MATH-6 33.3% 25.7
35.1% 65.3% - 67.3% 56.8% ELA-5 50.0% 52.5% 58.5% 77.8%
MATH-7 ELA-6 68.9% 37.8% 60.0% 68.1%
MATH-8 ELA-7
64.6% 23.1% Total 3-8 49.5% 52.4% 67.6% 79.2% 33.3% ELA-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio -
Total 3-8 59.0% 39.1% 49.2% 64.6%
students Pupil-Other-Staff
Math Ratio
Performance Goal: 52% -
of grade 3-6 students
Total Pupil-Staff Ratioproficiency on Math in 2010-2011.
will achieve - ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 stude
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011.
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
96.0% 94.1% Social Studies-5 82.9% 82.5% 94.6% 97.8% 83.9% 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-
Social Studies-8 Science-4 95.6% 89.7% 96.4% 96.0%
Science-8

BUDGET
RCSD K-2 TEST ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
RESULTS
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)
2010-11 2011-12
KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score)
08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH
4.8 Major Expenditures Grade 1 2006-07 2007-08 2
4.8 Salary Compensation Grade 2 1,522,213 15.0% 10.0%
- Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ Social Relations
Iniative, - 0.0% 4.0 4.0
4.8 Other Compensation 27,287 - Language, Literacy, Math 4.4 4.5
4.6 Fixed Obligation/Variability 3,000 - Movement, Music 4.5 4.3
Cash Capital Outlays 4,000 - Science 4.2 4.4
Facilities and Related 36,738 -
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology 100 -
Other Variable Expenses GS - Good
2,605Standing -

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Total 2009-10 2010-11 $ IY1 - Improvement$Year 1 -
1,595,943
GS GS* GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2 2005-06 2006-07
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS GS GS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS
GS GS* GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL GS GS
Y or N - SURR/PLA
Phase out school
FISCAL
SCHOOL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students Students** enrolled during Weight

each academic year who had
Allocation
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
Base Allocation - $3,682 $ - ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity
009-10 2010-11 2011-12*
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 2007-08- 2008-09 2009-10 $ 2010-11
$2,396 -
193 132 0ELL-Beginner
Total
(9-12) 116 - 115 $3,59423 $ 1- 2008-09 2009-10
0.5% 0.8% Percent of Enrollment 30.9% 28.9% 11.9% 0.8% Total 399 193
ELL-Intermediate - $2,396 $ -
69.4% 74.2% Most Prevalent Country of Birth American Indian or Alaska Native 0.8% 0.5%
ELL-Advanced - $1,198 $ -
16.1% 13.6% Black or African American 66.3% 69.4%
9.3% 6.1%
SWD-Resource Room
Country 1 Kenya - Kenya $5,856
Thailand $ Yemen
-
Asian 16.8% 16.1%
4.1% 4.5% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ -
Hispanic 8.0% 9.3%
0.0% 0.0% SWD-Integrated Special
Country 2 Class Somalia- Thailand $5,856
Sierra Leone$ -
White 7.8% 4.1%
0.5% 0.8% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class - $5,856 $ - Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0%
Total ESF Allocation
Country 3 Vietnam- Vietnam Kenya $ - Multi 0.3% 0.5%
* Projected

ATTENDANCE
07-08 2008-09 2009-10
3.1% 93.7% 95.3% 2006-07 2007-08
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 92.7% 93.1%

Section 4 Page 123

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Jay Piper School 15

Data From School Year 2009-10 The Children’s School of Rochester
Mission: We believe that education must be child-centered, hands-on, and meaningful and must be provided in an environment of respect, understanding, and
trust. We also believe that learning must be bonded with the child’s home culture and that the school program must explicitly value and nurture this bond. We
have a diverse population, in which approximately half of our students are English Language Learners and speak 35 different languages. We foster an
environment in which parents, guardians, teachers, and staff work together as a team to ensure that every child will reach his or her full academic potential. Our
goal is for students to be critical, literate thinkers and doers.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 76.9% 43.9% 23.7% 51.3% 17.9% MATH-3 91.1% 57.5% 31.7% 81.8% 24.4%
ELA-4 92.0% 56.4% 80.0% 53.1% 31.8% MATH-4 73.8% 65.9% 67.9% 67.6% 41.7%
ELA-5 84.4% 27.0% 63.1% 53.6% 22.2% MATH-5 62.5% 41.1% 70.0% 58.3% 10.0%
ELA-6 75.9% 43.2% 61.1% 73.7% 31.4% MATH-6 75.0% 44.4% 52.4% 68.2% 21.4%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 82.1% 42.6% 54.8% 58.4% 26.0% Total 3-8 75.0% 52.1% 54.3% 69.6% 25.1%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 100.0% 77.8% 81.5% 64.0% 75.0% Social Studies-5 100.0% 90.9% 76.5% 71.4% 78.8%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 3.3 3.7 3.9 Grade 1 6.9% 12.5%
Language, Literacy, Math 3.7 4.1 3.9 Grade 2 11.8% 8.8%
Movement, Music 3.4 3.9 3.9
Science 3.0 3.5 3.6

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS* GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS* GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 286 297 302 295 Total 92 102 73 58
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 31.9% 35.7% 24.6% 19.2%
Black or African American 45.8% 47.1% 48.3% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 23.4% 26.6% 27.5%
Hispanic 11.5% 9.4% 8.3% Country 1 Russia Thailand Thailand Thailand
White 18.9% 15.8% 14.9%
Country 2 Burma
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.3% 0.3% Kenya Nepal Nepal
(Myanmar)
Multi 0.3% 0.7% 0.7%
* Projected Country 3 Somalia Russia Bhutan Bhutan

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 95.5% 94.8% 95.0% 95.8%

Section 4 Page 124

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 15
The Children’s School of Rochester Principal Jay Piper
Data From School Year 2009-10
entered, hands-on, and meaningful and must be provided in an environment of respect, understanding, and
with the child’s home culture and that the school program must explicitly value and nurture this bond. We Mission: We believe that education m
alf of our students are English Language Learners and speak 35 different languages. We foster an trust. We also believe that learning m
nd staff work together as a team to ensure that every child will reach his or her full academic potential. Our have a diverse population, in which ap
d doers. POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type
PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING environment in which parents, guardi
goal is for students to be critical, liter
MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent
Teachers ELA - Grades 3-8
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 28.7
2006-07 2007-08 27.4
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 1,488,864 71.9%
51.3% 17.9% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 91.1% 1.0
57.5% 31.7% 1.081.8% 24.4% 0031: Empl Preparation Ed 76,708 3.7% 2005-06 2006
53.1% 31.8% Other Instructional MATH-4 73.8% 1.8
65.9% 67.9% 1.367.6% 41.7% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,101 0.1%
ELA-3 76.9% 43.
53.6% 22.2% Non-instructional MATH-5 62.5% 41.1%
9.9 70.0% 7.258.3% 10.0% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 57,111 2.8%
ELA-4 92.0% 56.
73.7% 31.4% Total MATH-6 75.0% 41.4
44.4% 52.4% 36.9
68.2% 21.4% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 57,652 2.8%
ELA-5 84.4% 27.
MATH-7 0453: Safe Schools/Healthy Stdnts I 7,467 ELA-6
0.4% 75.9% 43.
MATH-8 ELA-7
0725: NCFL Toyota Family Literacy 28,556 1.4%
58.4% 26.0% Total 3-8 75.0% 52.1% 54.3% 69.6% 25.1% ELA-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 10.5 : 1 10.8 : 1 1416: Primary Project 4,071 0.2%
Total 3-8 82.1% 42.
students Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 23.9
52% : 1 of grade 3-631.1 :1
students 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 111,873 5.4%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math7.3
in 2010-2011.
:1 8:1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 ELA Performance
5.4% Goal: 67%
1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 36,700 will achieve
1.8% proficiency on ELA i
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 25,320 1.2%
4528: C4E - In-School Suspension SCIENCE -3.1%
63,593 Grades 4 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
64.0% 75.0% Social Studies-5 100.0% 90.9% 76.5% 71.4% 78.8% 2005-06 200
Social Studies-8 Science-4 100.0% 77.
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)
KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale
08 2008-09 2009-10
Major Expenditures 2010-11 READING2011-12
MATH
3.9 Grade 1 6.9% 12.5%
3.9 Salary Compensation Grade 2 2,049,024 11.8% 2,012,668
8.8% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 2,071,376 Iniative,
100.0%Social Relations
3.9 Other Compensation 66,464 17,949 Language, Literacy, Math
3.6 Fixed Obligation/Variability 2,000 2,000 Movement, Music
Cash Capital Outlays 10,800 8,500 Science
Facilities and Related
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS 39,598 27,759
Technology ACCOUNTABILITY
- LEGEND
-
GS - Good Standing
Other Variable Expenses 10,804 2,500

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total $ 2,178,690 $ 2,071,376
GS GS* GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS* GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. withinStudents**
the past three years) Weight Allocation
Base Allocation 295.0 2008-09 $3,682 $ 1,086,190 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2009-10 2010-11
297 302 ELL-BeginnerTotal
295 (K-8) 92 94.0 102 $2,39673 $ 225,224
58
0.0% 0.0% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 31.9% - 35.7% $3,594
24.6% $ 19.2%- Total
7.1% 48.3% ELL-Intermediate 30.4 of Birth
Most Prevalent Country $2,396 $ 72,838 American Indian or Alaska Native
6.6% 27.5% ELL-Advanced 14.0 $1,198 $ 16,772 Black or African American
9.4% 8.3% Country 1 Russia Thailand Thailand Thailand
SWD-Resource Room 2.0 $5,856 $ 11,712 Asian
5.8% 14.9% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ - Hispanic
Country 2 Burma
0.3% 0.3% Kenya Nepal Nepal White
SWD-Integrated Special Class (Myanmar)
13.0 $5,856 $ 76,128
0.7% 0.7% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
SWD-Self-Contained
Country 3
12:1 Class Somalia
- Russia
$5,856
Bhutan
$ Bhutan -
Multi
Total ESF Allocation $ 1,488,864
* Projected

ATTENDANCE
07-08 2008-09 2009-10
4.8% 95.0% 95.8%
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate

Section 4 Page 125

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Sylvia Cooksey School 16

Data From School Year 2009-10 John Walton Spencer

Mission: It is our mission to create and maintain a community that shares the accountability for teaching and learning, and that promotes academic excellence
and good citizenship.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 43.5% 45.2% 32.5% 42.9% 5.5% MATH-3 50.0% 77.4% 73.7% 73.8% 9.7%
ELA-4 39.4% 44.5% 60.3% 50.7% 22.2% MATH-4 45.3% 43.6% 72.2% 51.6% 20.0%
ELA-5 41.0% 46.8% 63.9% 59.2% 8.5% MATH-5 15.8% 57.1% 65.0% 66.2% 15.3%
ELA-6 35.6% 50.0% 59.3% 72.1% 39.7% MATH-6 27.4% 28.3% 50.9% 45.2% 39.7%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 40.0% 45.9% 52.8% 56.1% 18.8% Total 3-8 35.6% 53.1% 66.7% 59.3% 21.3%

ELA Performance Goal: 54% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 70% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 90.0% 93.5% 75.0% 71.0% 70.5% Social Studies-5 73.4% 77.0% 86.7% 77.1% 62.1%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 3.9 3.8 3.4 Grade 1 44.6% 15.4%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.1 4.2 4.3 Grade 2 21.7% 15.0%
Movement, Music 4.5 3.9 3.7
Science 3.6 3.6 3.3

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS* SINI 1 IY-2 CA1 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS* SINI 1 IY-2 CA1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 456 439 414 478
457 Total 2 1 1 1
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.4% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2%
Black or African American 93.7% 91.8% 90.8% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.4% 0.9% 0.4%
Hispanic 3.3% 4.6% 3.8% Country 1 Jamaica Jamaica Jamaica Jamaica
White 2.6% 2.7% 4.7%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 92.1% 91.7% 92.3% 92.5%

Section 4 Page 126

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 16
John Walton Spencer Principal Sylvia Cooksey
Data From School Year 2009-10
ommunity that shares the accountability for teaching and learning, and that promotes academic excellence
Mission: It is our mission to create and mai
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type 2011-12 FUNDING
PROPOSED and good citizenship.

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 37.3
2006-07 2007-08 37.9
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA - Grades 3-870.6%
$ 2,164,194
42.9% 5.5% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 50.0% 2.0
77.4% 73.7% 2.073.8% 9.7% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,512 0.0% 2005-06 2006-07 2
50.7% 22.2% Other Instructional MATH-4 45.3% 6.8
43.6% 72.2% 2.551.6% 20.0% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 85,667ELA-3 2.8% 43.5% 45.2%
59.2% 8.5% Non-instructional MATH-5 15.8% 57.1%
15.7 65.0% 14.2
66.2% 15.3% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 100,505ELA-4 3.3% 39.4% 44.5%
72.1% 39.7% Total MATH-6 27.4% 28.3%
61.8 50.9% 56.6
45.2% 39.7% 0453: Safe Schools/Healthy Stdnts I 7,467ELA-5 0.2% 41.0% 46.8%
MATH-7
1134: QUAD A Program 32,000ELA-6 1.0% 35.6% 50.0%
MATH-8
1323: School Redesign 96,362ELA-7 3.1%
56.1% 18.8% Total 3-8 35.6% 53.1% 66.7% 59.3% 21.3%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 11.1 : 1 12.6 : 1 1416: Primary Project 4,071ELA-8 0.1%
students Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 70% : 1 of grade 3-625.6
16.9 students
:1 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 237,142Total 3-8 7.7% 40.0% 45.9%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math6.7
in :2010-2011.
1 8.4 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360
ELA Performance3.7% Goal: 54% of gr
1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 122,377
will achieve 4.0%
proficiency on ELA in 2010
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 37,979 1.2%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension SCIENCE
63,594 - Grades 4&8
2.1%
71.0% 70.5% Social Studies-5 73.4% 77.0% 86.7% 77.1% 62.1% 2005-06 2006-07
Social Studies-8 Science-4 90.0% 93.5%
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Avera

Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12
3.4 Grade 1 44.6% 15.4% 2006-0
4.3 Salary Compensation Grade 2 2,996,678 21.7% 2,992,486
15.0% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,065,230 100.0%
Iniative, Social Relations 3.9
3.7 Other Compensation 88,117 21,545 Language, Literacy, Math 4.1
3.3
Fixed Obligation/Variability - - Movement, Music 4.5
Cash Capital Outlays 4,565 4,418 Science 3.6
Facilities and Related
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS 30,255 46,782
ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology - -
GS - Good Standing
Other Variable Expenses 5,481 -

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total $ 3,125,096 $ 3,065,230
GS GS* SINI 1 IY-2 CA1 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
20
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS* SINI 1 IY-2 CA1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. withinStudents**
the past three years) Weight Allocation

009-10 Base Allocation

2010-11 2011-12* 478.0 2008-09
2007-08 $3,682
2009-10 $ 1,759,996
2010-11 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethn
439 414 ELL-BeginnerTotal
457 (K-8) 2 1.0 1 $2,3961 $ 2,396
1 200
0.0% 0.0% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 0.4% - 0.2% $3,594
0.2% $ 0.2%- Total 4
91.8% 90.8% ELL-Intermediate 1.0 of Birth
Most Prevalent Country $2,396 $ 2,396 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.
0.9% 0.4% ELL-Advanced 1.0 $1,198 $ 1,198 Black or African American 93
4.6% 3.8% Country 1 Jamaica Jamaica Jamaica Jamaica
SWD-Resource Room 4.0 $5,856 $ 23,424 Asian 0.
2.7% 4.7%
SWD-Consultant Teacher
Country 2 - $5,856 $ - Hispanic 3.
0.0% 0.0% White 2.
SWD-Integrated Special Class 21.0 $5,856 $ 122,976
0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
SWD-Self-Contained
Country 312:1 Class 43.0 $5,856 $ 251,808
Multi 0.
Total ESF Allocation $ 2,164,194
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

1.7% 92.3% 92.5% 2006
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 92.

Section 4 Page 127

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Susan Hasenauer-Curtis School 19

Data From School Year 2009-10 Dr. Charles T. Lunsford

Mission: We will provide relevant and engaging instruction that addresses national standards using best practices and those aligned with America’s Choice.
Students will become strategic thinkers and learners that will possess the skills necessary for success at the secondary level.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 31.3% 64.6% 72.4% 61.5% 29.7% MATH-3 41.8% 82.3% 90.0% 94.9% 65.8%
ELA-4 38.5% 59.2% 65.9% 77.8% 55.8% MATH-4 46.2% 67.3% 88.4% 86.7% 86.4%
ELA-5 42.6% 69.8% 64.6% 79.2% 48.0% MATH-5 48.9% 63.6% 83.7% 95.7% 72.0%
ELA-6 42.6% 47.6% 75.0% 78.4% 52.3% MATH-6 45.1% 69.8% 92.5% 100.0% 88.9%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 38.2% 59.6% 69.4% 74.9% 47.1% Total 3-8 44.7% 70.0% 88.5% 94.5% 78.5%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 96% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 80.0% 74.5% 93.2% 100.0% 97.7% Social Studies-5 74.5% 81.8% 93.8% 100.0% 98.0%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 3.6 3.7 3.7 Grade 1 17.4% 8.7%
Language, Literacy, Math 3.6 3.7 3.7 Grade 2 11.1% 15.9%
Movement, Music 3.7 3.8 3.7
Science 3.7 3.6 3.7

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 316 309 383 432 Total 3 1 0 1
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.6% 1.0% 1.0% Percent of Enrollment 1.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3%
Black or African American 93.4% 93.5% 89.0% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.6% 0.3% 0.2%
Hispanic 3.2% 2.9% 6.7% Country 1 Jamaica
White 1.9% 1.9% 2.6%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Kenya
Multi 0.3% 0.3% 0.5%
* Projected Country 3 Somalia

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91.2% 92.5% 92.9% 91.0%

Section 4 Page 128

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 19
Dr. Charles T. Lunsford Principal Susan Hasenauer-Curtis
Data From School Year 2009-10
struction that addresses national standards using best practices and those aligned with America’s Choice.
that will possess the skills necessary for success at the secondary level. Mission: We will provide relevant and engaging instru
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type 2011-12
PROPOSED Students will become strategic thinkers and learners tha
FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 38.9
2006-07 2007-08 36.4
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding AllocationELA - Grades 3-8
$ 1,934,958 63.5%
61.5% 29.7% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 41.8% 2.0
82.3% 90.0% 2.094.9% 65.8% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,505 0.0% 2006-07 2007-08 20
2005-06
77.8% 55.8% Other Instructional MATH-4 46.2% 4.4
67.3% 88.4% 3.886.7% 86.4% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten ELA-357,111 1.9% 64.6%
31.3% 72.4% 6
79.2% 48.0% Non-instructional MATH-5 48.9% 63.6%
21.7 83.7% 15.7
95.7% 72.0% 0268: Title I - AIS Services ELA-490,344 3.0% 59.2%
38.5% 65.9% 7
78.4% 52.3% Total MATH-6 45.1% 69.8%
67.0 92.5% 57.9
100.0% 88.9% 0453: Safe Schools/Healthy Stdnts I ELA-5 7,467 0.2% 69.8%
42.6% 64.6% 7
MATH-7 1323: School Redesign ELA-677,878 2.6% 47.6%
42.6% 75.0% 7
MATH-8 ELA-7 4,071
1416: Primary Project 0.1%
74.9% 47.1% Total 3-8 44.7% 70.0% 88.5% 94.5% 78.5% ELA-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 9.8 : 1 11.9 : 1 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 492,195 16.1%
Pupil-Other-Staff Total112,360
3-8 38.2%
3.7% 59.6% 69.4% 7
students MathRatio
Performance Goal: 13.6
96%: 1 of grade 3-620.1 :1
students 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math5.7
in :2010-2011.
1 7.5 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 122,377 Goal:4.0%67% of grade 3-6 stu
ELA Performance
1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 39,072
will achieve proficiency1.3%
on ELA in 2010-2011.
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 50,639 1.7%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 4518: C4E - On Campus InterventionSCIENCE
P - Grades
58,2184&8 1.9%
100.0% 97.7% Social Studies-5 74.5% 81.8% 93.8% 100.0% 98.0% 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2
Social Studies-8 Science-4 80.0% 74.5% 93.2% 1
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

-08 2008-09 2009-10 KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score)

Major Expenditures 2010-11 READING2011-12
MATH
3.7 Grade 1 17.4% 8.7% 2006-07 2007-08
3.7 Salary Compensation Grade 2 3,029,245 11.1% 2,905,620
15.9% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,048,196
Iniative, Social Relations100.0% 3.6 3.7
3.7 Other Compensation 71,171 83,077 Language, Literacy, Math 3.6 3.7
3.7 Fixed Obligation/Variability 3,000 3,000 Movement, Music 3.7 3.8
Cash Capital Outlays 9,500 8,000 Science 3.7 3.6
Facilities and Related
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS 45,705 45,299
Technology ACCOUNTABILITY
- LEGEND
-
GS - Good Standing
Other Variable Expenses 3,838 3,200

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total $ 3,162,459 $ 3,048,196
GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
2005-06 200
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS GS G
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS GS G
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS G
GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL GS G
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years) Weight
Students** Allocation

009-10 Base Allocation

2010-11 2011-12* 432.0 2008-09
2007-08 $3,682
2009-10 $ 1,590,624
2010-11 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity
309 383 ELL-BeginnerTotal
432 (K-8) 3 1.5 1 $2,3960 $ 3,594
1 2008-09 2009
1.0% 1.0% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 1.0% - 0.3% $3,594
0.0% $ 0.3%-
Total 316 30
93.5% 89.0% ELL-Intermediate 2.1 of Birth
Most Prevalent Country $2,396 $ 5,032 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.6% 1.0
0.3% 0.2% ELL-Advanced 1.6 $1,198 $ 1,917 Black or African American 93.4% 93.5
2.9% 6.7% Country 1 Jamaica
SWD-Resource Room 6.0 $5,856 $ 35,136 Asian 0.6% 0.3
1.9% 2.6% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ - Hispanic 3.2% 2.9
0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Kenya
SWD-Integrated Special Class 51.0 $5,856 $ 298,656 White 1.9% 1.9
0.3% 0.5% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0
SWD-Self-Contained 12:1
Country 3
Class Somalia
- $5,856 $ -
Total ESF Allocation $ 1,934,958 Multi 0.3% 0.3
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

2.5% 92.9% 91.0% 2006-07 2007-
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91.2% 92.5%

Section 4 Page 129

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Rhonda Morien 1 School 23

Data From School Year 2009-10 Francis Parker

Mission: It is our mission to provide an innovative and challenging educational program with an uncompromising commitment to excellence.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 71.0% 65.0% 81.4% 76.9% 79.5% MATH-3 87.8% 87.2% 86.4% 97.4% 72.5%
ELA-4 68.8% 69.5% 72.9% 91.2% 54.1% MATH-4 70.5% 54.2% 80.7% 87.9% 73.0%
ELA-5 81.2% 77.8% 78.4% 88.9% 61.9% MATH-5 53.2% 50.8% 88.5% 91.1% 71.4%
ELA-6 72.0% 75.5% 85.7% 94.8% 66.7% MATH-6 56.8% 79.1% 85.5% 94.8% 82.2%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 73.2% 74.6% 79.3% 88.6% 65.6% Total 3-8 67.2% 66.0% 85.3% 93.1% 75.0%

ELA Performance Goal: 100% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 100% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 95.0% 84.7% 88.1% 94.0% 89.2% Social Studies-5 95.2% 91.9% 95.0% 93.3% 97.6%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.4 4.5 4.5 Grade 1 71.7% 60.9%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.7 4.8 4.8 Grade 2 60.0% 62.2%
Movement, Music 4.6 4.6 4.9
Science 4.6 4.7 4.7

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 324 300 312 307 Total 1 0 1 4
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% Percent of Enrollment 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% 1.3%
Black or African American 66.4% 65.0% 57.1% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 1.9% 1.7% 1.7% Burma/
Hispanic 4.6% 4.3% 4.6% Country 1 Jamaica Ethiopia
Myanmar
White 26.2% 27.7% 36.0%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.3% 0.0% Country 2 Rwanda
Multi 0.9% 1.0% 0.3%
* Projected Country 3 Syria

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 94.3% 95.0% 95.3% 95.5%

Section 4 Page 130

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 23
Francis Parker Principal Rhonda Morien 1
Data From School Year 2009-10

and challenging educational program with an uncompromising commitment to excellence.

Mission: It is our mission to provide an innova
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs)
type
PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 25.3
2006-07 2007-08 22.6
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ELA - Grades 3-8 71.5%
1,348,195
76.9% 79.5% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 87.8% 2.0
87.2% 86.4% 2.0
97.4% 72.5% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 975 0.1%2005-06 2006-07 200
91.2% 54.1% Other Instructional MATH-4 70.5% 54.2%
1.9 80.7% 87.9%
0.9 73.0% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 57,111
ELA-3 3.0% 71.0% 65.0% 81.
88.9% 61.9% Non-instructional MATH-5 53.2% 12.5
50.8% 88.5% 91.1%
8.0 71.4% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 42,411
ELA-4 2.2% 68.8% 69.5% 72.
94.8% 66.7% Total MATH-6 56.8% 41.7
79.1% 85.5% 94.8%
33.5 82.2% 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 136,481
ELA-5 7.2% 81.2% 77.8% 78.
MATH-7 ELA-6
1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 6.0% 72.0% 75.5% 85.
MATH-8 ELA-7
88.6% 65.6% Total 3-8 67.2% 66.0% 85.3% 93.1% 75.0%
1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 99,467 5.3%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 12.3 : 1 13.6 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers ELA-8
25,320 1.3%
100% Total 3-8 73.2% 74.6% 79.
students Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 19 : 1 of grade 3-628.2
students
:1 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 3.4%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math7.5
in :2010-2011.
1 9.2 : 1 ELA Performance Goal: 100% of grad
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-20
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
94.0% 89.2% Social Studies-5 95.2% 91.9% 95.0% 93.3% 97.6% 2005-06 2006-07 200
Social Studies-8 Science-4 95.0% 84.7% 88
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average S

Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12
4.5 Grade 1 71.7% 60.9% 2006-07
4.8 Salary Compensation Grade 2 1,888,083 60.0% 1,819,706
62.2% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 1,885,914
Iniative, Social100.0%
Relations 4.4
4.9 Other Compensation 49,433 40,975 Language, Literacy, Math 4.7
4.7
Fixed Obligation/Variability 3,000 - Movement, Music 4.6
Cash Capital Outlays 14,200 2,400 Science 4.6
Facilities and Related
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS 39,412 22,133
ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology 500 -
GS - Good Standing
Other Variable Expenses 4,000 700

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total $ 1,998,628 $ 1,885,914
GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
2005-
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS GS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS GS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS
GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL GS
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years) Weight
Students** Allocation

009-10 Base Allocation

2010-11 2011-12* 307.0 2008-09
2007-08 $3,682
2009-10 $ 1,130,374
2010-11 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity
300 312 ELL-BeginnerTotal
307 (K-8) 1 11.7 0 $2,3961 $ 28,033
4 2008-0
0.0% 0.3% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 0.3% - 0.0% $3,594
0.3% $ 1.3%-
Total 324
65.0% 57.1% ELL-Intermediate 1.0 of Birth
Most Prevalent Country $2,396 $ 2,396 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0%
1.7% 1.7% ELL-Advanced - $1,198 $ Burma/ - Black or African American 66.4%
4.3% 4.6% Country 1 Jamaica Ethiopia
SWD-Resource Room 7.0 $5,856 $ Myanmar
40,992 Asian 1.9%
27.7% 36.0% SWD-Consultant Teacher 1.0 $5,856 $ 5,856 Hispanic 4.6%
0.3% 0.0% Country 2 Rwanda
SWD-Integrated Special Class 24.0 $5,856 $ 140,544 White 26.2%
1.0% 0.3% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
SWD-Self-Contained
Country 3
12:1 Class - $5,856 $ Syria-
Total ESF Allocation $ 1,348,195 Multi 0.9%
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

5.0% 95.3% 95.5% 2006-07
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 94.3%

Section 4 Page 131

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Susan Ladd School 28

Data From School Year 2009-10 Henry Hudson

Mission: We are a warm and nurturing school where students learn from a knowledgeable and caring staff. We provide students with strong character education
and prepare them for success in later years. Our focus is literacy, and we integrate reading and writing into all of the content areas, including math and science.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 40.4% 50.6% 25.9% 38.2% 17.9% MATH-3 45.9% 75.3% 63.2% 82.2% 17.6%
ELA-4 42.5% 47.0% 67.0% 54.1% 32.4% MATH-4 50.6% 60.0% 69.1% 62.3% 23.6%
ELA-5 55.2% 54.9% 51.9% 60.0% 25.2% MATH-5 37.4% 56.8% 60.0% 67.9% 33.3%
ELA-6 48.2% 41.4% 55.3% 69.5% 38.5% MATH-6 29.5% 25.7% 48.3% 51.8% 29.9%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 47.2% 48.5% 51.1% 55.3% 28.9% Total 3-8 40.4% 53.2% 60.7% 66.1% 26.5%

ELA Performance Goal: 72% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 74% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 69.4% 72.7% 73.6% 71.0% 60.0% Social Studies-5 75.2% 71.9% 81.5% 75.2% 69.2%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 3.7 3.8 3.9 Grade 1 47.8% 17.9%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.1 4.4 4.3 Grade 2 19.1% 29.4%
Movement, Music 4.0 4.1 4.3
Science 3.8 4.1 4.0

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

ELA STATUS GS GS GS* SINI 1 IY-2 CA1 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS* GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS* GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS* SINI 1 IY-2 CA1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 635 653 606 568 Total 0 1 4 16
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.5% 0.5% 0.3% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.2% 0.6% 2.6%
Black or African American 44.3% 43.3% 44.1% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.8% 1.1% 1.3% Dominican Dominican Dominican
Hispanic 41.9% 44.4% 46.0% Country 1
Republic Republic Republic
White 12.6% 10.6% 8.1%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.2% 0.2% Country 2 Honduras
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 92.8% 93.2% 93.3% 92.7%

Section 4 Page 132

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 28
Henry Hudson Principal Susan Ladd
Data From School Year 2009-10
e students learn from a knowledgeable and caring staff. We provide students with strong character education
us is literacy, and we integrate reading and writing into all of the content areas, including math and science. Mission: We are a warm and nurturing
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type 2011-12 FUNDING
PROPOSED and prepare them for success in later yea

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 63.6
2006-07 2007-08 52.0
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA - Grades
$ 2,836,890 3-8
67.9%
38.2% 17.9% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 45.9% 2.0
75.3% 63.2% 2.082.2% 17.6% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 2,469 0.1% 2005-06 2006-0
54.1% 32.4% Other Instructional MATH-4 50.6% 9.5
60.0% 69.1% 7.062.3% 23.6% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 114,222 ELA-3 2.7% 40.4% 50.6%
60.0% 25.2% Non-instructional MATH-5 37.4% 22.2
56.8% 60.0% 21.2
67.9% 33.3% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 129,000 ELA-4 3.1% 42.5% 47.0%
69.5% 38.5% Total MATH-6 29.5% 97.3
25.7% 48.3% 82.2
51.8% 29.9% 0513: The Primary Project 3,734 ELA-5 0.1% 55.2% 54.9%
MATH-7
1416: Primary Project 15,272 ELA-6 0.4% 48.2% 41.4%
MATH-8
1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 674,540 ELA-7 16.1%
55.3% 28.9% Total 3-8 40.4% 53.2% 60.7% 66.1% 26.5%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 9.5 : 1 10.9 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 ELA-8 2.7%
47.2% 48.5%
students Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 74%18 : 1 of grade 3-618.8
students
:1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 122,377 Total 2.9%
3-8
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math6.2
in :2010-2011.
1 6.9 : 1 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 39,072 0.9%
ELA Performance Goal: 72% o
1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 63,299 1.5%
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 1.5%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
71.0% 60.0% Social Studies-5 75.2% 71.9% 81.5% 75.2% 69.2% 2005-06 2006-0
Social Studies-8 Science-4 69.4% 72.7%
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale A

Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12
3.9 Grade 1 47.8% 17.9% 200
4.3 Salary Compensation Grade 2 4,839,836 19.1% 4,006,147
29.4% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 4,176,828
Iniative,100.0%
Social Relations 3
4.3 Other Compensation 93,690 97,709 Language, Literacy, Math 4
4.0
Fixed Obligation/Variability 1,500 500 Movement, Music 4
Cash Capital Outlays 17,175 7,000 Science 3
Facilities and Related
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS 75,144 65,072
ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology - -
GS - Good Standing
Other Variable Expenses 596 400

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total $ 5,027,941 $ 4,176,828
GS GS* SINI 1 IY-2 CA1 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
GS GS* GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS* GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS* SINI 1 IY-2 CA1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. withinStudents**
the past three years) Weight Allocation

009-10 Base Allocation

2010-11 2011-12* 568.0 2008-09
2007-08 $3,682
2009-10 $ 2,091,376
2010-11 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / E
653 606 ELL-BeginnerTotal
568 (K-8) 0 66.0 1 $2,3964 $ 158,136
16
0.5% 0.3% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 0.0% - 0.2% $3,594
0.6% $ 2.6%- Total
43.3% 44.1% ELL-Intermediate 35.9 of Birth
Most Prevalent Country $2,396 $ 86,016 American Indian or Alaska Native
1.1% 1.3% ELL-Advanced 47.0 Dominican $1,198
Dominican $ Dominican
56,306 Black or African American
44.4% 46.0% Country 1
SWD-Resource Room 12.0 Republic $5,856
Republic $ Republic
70,272 Asian
10.6% 8.1%
SWD-Consultant Teacher
Country 2 - $5,856 $ - Hispanic
0.2% 0.2% Honduras
SWD-Integrated Special Class 64.0 $5,856 $ 374,784 White
0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
SWD-Self-Contained
Country 312:1 Class - $5,856 $ -
Multi
Total ESF Allocation $ 2,836,890
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

3.2% 93.3% 92.7%
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate

Section 4 Page 133

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Rachel Windler-Freitag School 29

Data From School Year 2009-10 Adlai E. Stevenson

Mission: It is our mission to use standards-based curriculum and instruction to ensure that all students meet or exceed state and national standards in all subject
areas, with the four major goals of improving literacy/writing, numeracy, technology and attendance. We are proud to have a well-trained, capable staff of caring
individuals and many community-based partners who act as mentors and help form positive relationships with our students.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 44.6% 32.2% 44.2% 48.7% 18.2% MATH-3 36.8% 50.0% 67.4% 82.5% 11.1%
ELA-4 33.3% 46.9% 23.3% 61.5% 27.5% MATH-4 31.6% 58.3% 50.8% 74.4% 25.0%
ELA-5 36.8% 27.1% 50.0% 61.1% 20.0% MATH-5 25.4% 24.0% 61.8% 70.9% 45.0%
ELA-6 39.6% 29.6% 34.9% 46.3% 8.8% MATH-6 17.3% 25.7% 38.1% 58.2% 14.0%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 38.6% 33.3% 37.4% 54.3% 17.7% Total 3-8 28.0% 38.4% 54.8% 70.4% 22.5%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 65.3% 66.7% 50.0% 77.0% 76.9% Social Studies-5 75.4% 46.8% 74.5% 83.6% 78.6%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.1 3.8 3.5 Grade 1 36.0% 22.0%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.3 4.0 3.5 Grade 2 10.6% 17.0%
Movement, Music 4.5 3.8 3.7
Science 4.2 3.6 3.3

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 376 354 328 408
403 Total 4 4 2 1
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 1.1% 1.1% 0.6% 0.3%
Black or African American 86.7% 87.0% 83.1% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.5% 1.1% 0.8%
Hispanic 7.7% 6.8% 7.9% Country 1 Ghana Kenya Ethiopia Ethiopia
White 4.8% 4.5% 7.6%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Kenya Thailand Thailand
Multi 0.3% 0.6% 0.6%
* Projected Country 3 Somalia

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91.9% 92.1% 92.0% 92.2%

Section 4 Page 134

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 29
Adlai E. Stevenson Principal Rachel Windler-Freitag
Data From School Year 2009-10
rriculum and instruction to ensure that all students meet or exceed state and national standards in all subject
y/writing, numeracy, technology and attendance. We are proud to have a well-trained, capable staff of caring Mission: It is our mission to use standards-based curr
o act as mentors and help form positive relationships with our students. areas, with the four major goals of improving literacy/
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs)
type
PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING
individuals and many community-based partners who

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

ELA - Grades 3-8
2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 35.1
2006-07 2007-08 38.3
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 1,722,550 47.7%
48.7% 18.2% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 36.8% 2.0
50.0% 67.4% 2.0
82.5% 11.1% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,375 0.0% 2006-07 2007-08 2
2005-06
61.5% 27.5% Other Instructional MATH-4 31.6% 58.3%
7.0 50.8% 74.4%
11.6 25.0% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten ELA-357,111 1.6% 32.2%
44.6% 44.2%
61.1% 20.0% Non-instructional MATH-5 25.4% 39.3
24.0% 61.8% 70.9%
28.8 45.0% 0268: Title I - AIS Services ELA-487,252 2.4% 46.9%
33.3% 23.3%
46.3% 8.8% Total MATH-6 17.3% 83.4
25.7% 38.1% 58.2%
80.7 14.0% 0305: IDEA Support Serv & Sec 611 ELA-5
478,077 36.8%
13.2% 27.1% 50.0%
MATH-7 ELA-63,734 39.6%
0513: The Primary Project 0.1% 29.6% 34.9%
MATH-8 ELA-7
54.3% 17.7% Total 3-8 28.0% 38.4% 54.8% 70.4% 22.5%
1323: School Redesign 83,901 2.3%
ELA-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 9.3 : 1 10.7 : 1 1416: Primary Project 24,232 0.7%
Total 3-8 38.6% 33.3% 37.4%
students Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 52%
6.8 : 1 of grade 3-6 9.6
students
:1 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 750,246 20.8%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math3.9
in :2010-2011.
1 5.1 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 Goal:
ELA Performance 3.1% 67% of grade 3-6 s
1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial will achieve
136,167proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011.
3.8%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 39,072 1.1%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers SCIENCE - Grades
50,6394 & 8 1.4%
77.0% 76.9% Social Studies-5 75.4% 46.8% 74.5% 83.6% 78.6% 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 1.8% 2006-07 2007-08
2005-06
Social Studies-8 Science-4 65.3% 66.7% 50.0%
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)
KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score)
08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH
Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12
3.5 Grade 1 36.0% 22.0% 2006-07 2007-08
3.5 Salary Compensation Grade 2 3,640,886 10.6% 3,515,409
17.0% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,610,310
Iniative, 100.0%
Social Relations 4.1 3.8
3.7 Other Compensation 76,509 60,447 Language, Literacy, Math 4.3 4.0
3.3 Movement, Music 4.5 3.8
Fixed Obligation/Variability - -
Cash Capital Outlays 4,158 3,650 Science 4.2 3.6
Facilities and Related
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS 34,309 30,204
ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology 100 100
GS - Good Standing
Other Variable Expenses 1,764 500

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total $ IY2
3,757,726
- Improvement$Year
3,610,310
2
GS GS GS GS GS 2005-06 20
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS GS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS GS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS
GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL GS
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years) Weight
Students** Allocation
Base Allocation 408.0 2008-09 $3,682 $ 1,502,256 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2009-10 2010-11
354 328 ELL-BeginnerTotal
403 (K-8) 4 4.8 4 $2,3962 $ 11,501
1 2008-09 200
0.0% 0.0% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 1.1% - 1.1% $3,594
0.6% $ 0.3%- Total 376 35
87.0% 83.1% ELL-Intermediate 1.1 of Birth
Most Prevalent Country $2,396 $ 2,636 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% 0.0
1.1% 0.8% ELL-Advanced 1.0 $1,198 $ 1,198 Black or African American 86.7% 87.
6.8% 7.9% Country 1 Ghana Kenya Ethiopia Ethiopia
SWD-Resource Room 4.0 $5,856 $ 23,424 Asian 0.5% 1.1
4.5% 7.6% Hispanic 7.7% 6.8
SWD-Consultant Teacher
Country 2 Kenya
- Thailand
$5,856
Thailand
$ -
0.0% 0.0% White 4.8% 4.5
0.6% 0.6%
SWD-Integrated Special Class 10.0 $5,856 $ 58,560
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0
SWD-Self-Contained
Country 312:1 Class 21.0
Somalia $5,856 $ 122,976
Multi 0.3% 0.6
Total ESF Allocation $ 1,722,550
* Projected

ATTENDANCE
07-08 2008-09 2009-10
2.1% 92.0% 92.2% 2006-07 2007
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91.9% 92.1

Section 4 Page 135

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Robert Kuter School 35

Data From School Year 2009-10 Pinnacle

Mission: The School No. 35 community works cooperatively to integrate curriculum, instill values, and foster individual growth and development while
emphasizing the building of academic excellence and positive character and citizenship. We maintain high standards and expectations for students and staff in a
challenging environment that fosters the development of critical thinkers and the development of productive members of society.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 45.1% 31.4% 54.7% 61.0% 15.6% MATH-3 48.6% 47.1% 78.2% 80.6% 16.0%
ELA-4 46.8% 35.3% 52.8% 64.7% 32.2% MATH-4 40.8% 33.3% 52.6% 75.0% 37.1%
ELA-5 36.8% 44.1% 60.6% 66.7% 23.3% MATH-5 23.6% 34.5% 61.2% 82.4% 47.8%
ELA-6 54.0% 43.6% 47.8% 83.1% 24.0% MATH-6 43.2% 30.9% 40.4% 85.0% 46.2%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 45.9% 38.4% 54.6% 69.1% 23.1% Total 3-8 39.6% 37.1% 58.8% 80.8% 34.0%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 60.0% 73.5% 92.6% 93.0% 67.2% Social Studies-5 71.6% 67.7% 78.5% 78.6% 84.8%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.8 4.7 4.7 Grade 1 27.4% 12.9%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.8 4.3 4.6 Grade 2 17.6% 13.2%
Movement, Music 4.9 4.7 4.6
Science 4.8 4.4 4.8

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS* SINI 1 SINI 1 GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS* SINI 1 SINI 1 GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 432 423 430 427 Total 3 7 15 37
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.7% 0.5% 0.5% Percent of Enrollment 0.7% 1.6% 3.5% 8.6%
Black or African American 46.8% 47.5% 44.9% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Dominican Dominican
Hispanic 41.5% 40.4% 40.5% Country 1 Cuba Cuba
Republic Republic
White 10.4% 10.9% 13.0%
Country 2 Dominican
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Honduras Cuba
Republic
Multi 0.5% 0.7% 1.2%
* Projected Country 3 Nicaragua

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 91.6% 92.0% 92.8% 92.7%

Section 4 Page 136

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 35
Pinnacle Principal Robert Kuter
Data From School Year 2009-10
peratively to integrate curriculum, instill values, and foster individual growth and development while
d positive character and citizenship. We maintain high standards and expectations for students and staff in a Mission: The School No. 35 community
nt of critical thinkers and the development of productive members of society. emphasizing the building of academic exc
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type 2011-12 FUNDING
PROPOSED challenging environment that fosters the d

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 39.3
2006-07 2007-08 33.8
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA - Grades 68.9%
$ 1,893,256 3-8
61.0% 15.6% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 48.6% 2.0
47.1% 78.2% 2.080.6% 16.0% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,549 0.1% 2005-06 2006-07
64.7% 32.2% Other Instructional MATH-4 40.8% 5.1
33.3% 52.6% 4.975.0% 37.1% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 85,667 ELA-33.1% 45.1% 31.4%
66.7% 23.3% Non-instructional MATH-5 23.6% 34.5%
10.8 61.2% 8.882.4% 47.8% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 86,147 ELA-43.1% 46.8% 35.3%
83.1% 24.0% Total MATH-6 43.2% 30.9%
57.2 40.4% 49.5
85.0% 46.2% 0305: IDEA Support Serv & Sec 611 51,084 ELA-51.9% 36.8% 44.1%
MATH-7 0513: The Primary Project 8,960 ELA-60.3% 54.0% 43.6%
MATH-8
1416: Primary Project 4,071 ELA-70.1%
69.1% 23.1% Total 3-8 39.6% 37.1% 58.8% 80.8% 34.0%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 10.9 : 1 12.6 : 1 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 249,694 ELA-89.1%
Pupil-Other-Staff 112,360 Total 3-8 45.9% 38.4%
students MathRatio
Performance Goal: 52%24 : 1 of grade 3-627.2 :1
students 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 4.1%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math7.5
in :2010-2011.
1 8.6 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 106,362 3.9% Goal: 67% of
ELA Performance
1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 39,922 1.5%
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 20
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 4020: Green Schools Program 45,696 1.7%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension SCIENCE
63,594 - Grades2.3%4 & 8
93.0% 67.2% Social Studies-5 71.6% 67.7% 78.5% 78.6% 84.8% 2005-06 2006-07
Social Studies-8 Science-4 60.0% 73.5%
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

08 2008-09 2009-10 KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Av

Major Expenditures 2010-11 READING2011-12
MATH
4.7 Grade 1 27.4% 12.9% 2006
4.6 Salary Compensation Grade 2 2,974,900 17.6% 2,641,874
13.2% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 2,748,362
Iniative, 100.0%
Social Relations 4.
4.6 Other Compensation 69,753 21,019 Language, Literacy, Math 4.
4.8 Fixed Obligation/Variability - - Movement, Music 4.
Cash Capital Outlays 13,527 4,725 Science 4.
Facilities and Related
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS 64,128 80,744
Technology ACCOUNTABILITY
- LEGEND
-
GS - Good Standing
Other Variable Expenses 2,980 -

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total $ 3,125,288 $ 2,748,362
GS* SINI 1 SINI 1 GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS* SINI 1 SINI 1 GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
Students**
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years) Weight Allocation

009-10 Base Allocation

2010-11 2011-12* 427.0 2008-09 $3,682
2007-08 2009-10 $ 1,572,214
2010-11 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Et
423 430 ELL-BeginnerTotal
427 (K-8) 3 60.1 7 $2,39615 $ 144,000
37
0.5% 0.5% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 0.7% - 1.6% $3,594 3.5% $ 8.6%-
Total
47.5% 44.9% ELL-Intermediate 34.0 of Birth $2,396
Most Prevalent Country $ 81,464 American Indian or Alaska Native
0.0% 0.0% ELL-Advanced 30.9 Dominican $1,198
Dominican $ 37,018 Black or African American
40.4% 40.5% Country 1 Cuba Cuba
SWD-Resource Room 10.0 Republic $5,856
Republic $ 58,560 Asian
10.9% 13.0% SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ - Hispanic
Country 2 Dominican
0.0% 0.0% Honduras Cuba
SWD-Integrated Special Class - Republic
$5,856 $ - White
0.7% 1.2% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class
Country 3
- Nicaragua
$5,856 $ -
Total ESF Allocation $ 1,893,256 Multi
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

2.0% 92.8% 92.7% 2
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 9

Section 4 Page 137

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Sharon Delly School 46

Data From School Year 2009-10 Charles Carroll

Mission: It is our mission to develop students who have a positive attitude toward learning and are committed to acquiring the skills necessary to become
independent and responsible adults. Our students are provided with the necessary academic and social scaffolds so that they can learn, access information and
apply knowledge in decision making and problem solving endeavors, both individually and cooperatively with others. We develop students who exhibit a strong
sense of self and personal heritage, while acknowledging and appreciating cultural diversity and responsive citizenship.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 50.8% 42.3% 49.0% 54.2% 37.5% MATH-3 68.2% 69.4% 72.0% 89.4% 37.5%
ELA-4 50.0% 50.0% 57.8% 64.0% 29.2% MATH-4 40.0% 43.4% 44.4% 66.0% 35.4%
ELA-5 53.5% 34.8% 47.3% 67.6% 29.4% MATH-5 46.8% 46.8% 52.7% 55.3% 52.9%
ELA-6 62.2% 64.3% 56.5% 65.4% 31.7% MATH-6 48.9% 45.5% 51.1% 71.7% 39.0%
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 54.1% 46.9% 52.3% 62.6% 31.9% Total 3-8 52.6% 51.6% 55.4% 71.3% 41.5%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-6 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 3-6 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 76.2% 61.5% 62.8% 73.0% 68.8% Social Studies-5 89.1% 72.7% 64.9% 70.3% 72.2%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.4 4.3 3.7 Grade 1 38.6% 40.9%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.4 4.6 4.4 Grade 2 43.9% 29.3%
Movement, Music 4.8 4.4 3.9
Science 4.6 4.3 3.3

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 311 306 325 324 Total 1 1 0 2
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% Percent of Enrollment 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.6%
Black or African American 57.7% 56.5% 55.7% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 1.3% 1.6% 1.2%
Hispanic 14.7% 17.3% 21.2% Country 1 Sierra Leone Cuba Kazakhstan
White 25.6% 23.5% 20.9%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 1.0% 0.9% Country 2
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 94.6% 94.5% 94.7% 94.6%

Section 4 Page 138

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 46
Charles Carroll Principal Sharon Delly
Data From School Year 2009-10
have a positive attitude toward learning and are committed to acquiring the skills necessary to become
provided with the necessary academic and social scaffolds so that they can learn, access information and Mission: It is our mission to develop stud
olving endeavors, both individually and cooperatively with others. We develop students who exhibit a strong independent and responsible adults. Our s
ging and appreciating cultural diversity and responsive citizenship. type apply knowledge in decision making and
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING
sense of self and personal heritage, while
MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent
2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 26.1
2006-07 2007-08 23.4
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA - Grades 71.3%
$ 1,470,730 3-8
54.2% 37.5% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 68.2% 2.0
69.4% 72.0% 2.089.4% 37.5% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 57,111 2.8% 2005-06 2006-07
64.0% 29.2% Other Instructional MATH-4 40.0% 43.4%
3.4 44.4% 2.166.0% 35.4% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 49,038 ELA-3 2.4% 50.8% 42.3%
67.6% 29.4% Non-instructional MATH-5 46.8% 10.0
46.8% 52.7% 10.4
55.3% 52.9% 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 179,045 ELA-4 8.7% 50.0% 50.0%
65.4% 31.7% Total MATH-6 48.9% 41.5
45.5% 51.1% 37.9
71.7% 39.0% 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360 ELA-5 5.4% 53.5% 34.8%
MATH-7 ELA-6 4.8% 62.2% 64.3%
1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 99,467
MATH-8 ELA-7 1.5%
62.6% 31.9% Total 3-8 52.6% 51.6% 55.4% 71.3% 41.5%
1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 31,650
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 12.5 : 1 13.8 : 1 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 ELA-8 3.1%
students 52% : 1 of grade 3-622.3
students Total 3-8 54.1% 46.9%
Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 21.1 :1
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math7.8
in :2010-2011.
1 8.5 : 1 ELA Performance Goal: 67% of
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 20
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
73.0% 68.8% Social Studies-5 89.1% 72.7% 64.9% 70.3% 72.2% 2005-06 2006-07
Social Studies-8 Science-4 76.2% 61.5%
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Ave

Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12
3.7 Grade 1 38.6% 40.9% 2006
4.4 Salary Compensation Grade 2 2,262,688 43.9% 1,973,628
29.3% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 2,062,995 100.0%
Iniative, Social Relations 4.
3.9 Other Compensation 32,921 52,815 Language, Literacy, Math 4.
3.3 Movement, Music 4.
Fixed Obligation/Variability 1,500 -
Cash Capital Outlays 18,200 3,700 Science 4.
Facilities and Related
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS 49,989 32,202
ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology 500 150
GS - Good Standing
Other Variable Expenses 3,260 500

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total $ IY2
2,369,058
- Improvement$Year
2,062,995
2
GS GS GS GS GS
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. withinStudents**
the past three years) Weight Allocation
009-10 Base Allocation
2010-11 2011-12* 324.0 2008-09
2007-08 $3,682
2009-10 $ 1,192,968
2010-11 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Et
306 325 ELL-BeginnerTotal
324 (K-8) 1 2.0 1 $2,3960 $ 4,792
2 2
0.0% 0.0% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 0.3% - 0.3% $3,594
0.0% $ 0.6%- Total
6.5% 55.7% ELL-Intermediate 1.0 of Birth
Most Prevalent Country $2,396 $ 2,396 American Indian or Alaska Native
1.6% 1.2% ELL-Advanced 1.0 $1,198 $ 1,198 Black or African American
7.3% 21.2% Country 1 Sierra Leone Cuba Kazakhstan
SWD-Resource Room 7.0 $5,856 $ 40,992 Asian
3.5% 20.9% Hispanic
SWD-Consultant Teacher
Country 2 1.0 $5,856 $ 5,856
1.0% 0.9% White
0.0% 0.0%
SWD-Integrated Special Class 26.0 $5,856 $ 152,256
SWD-Self-Contained Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 312:1 Class 12.0 $5,856 $ 70,272
Multi
Total ESF Allocation $ 1,470,730
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

4.5% 94.7% 94.6% 2
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 9

Section 4 Page 139

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Sheelarani Webster School 58

Data From School Year 2009-10 World of Inquiry

Mission: World of Inquiry School No. 58 promotes inquiry-based learning as our primary mode of instruction across the curriculum. We believe that this
dynamic approach, with the focus on a process that is interactive, experiential, and exploratory, instills not only a specific academic goal but a personal
framework for lifelong education and the pursuit of knowledge. We also focus on our students’ character development to ensure that our students become
productive citizens. We are dedicated to academic excellence, innovation, creativity, inquiry, and discovery.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 71.0% 79.5% 61.4% 79.5% 45.5% MATH-3 92.3% 93.4% 93.2% 97.4% 54.5%
ELA-4 73.8% 83.4% 81.4% 90.5% 44.7% MATH-4 93.2% 100.0% 93.0% 97.6% 65.8%
ELA-5 65.1% 71.1% 94.0% 100.0% 53.2% MATH-5 83.8% 95.5% 100.0% 97.6% 66.0%
ELA-6 69.0% 68.3% 78.6% 100.0% 48.6% MATH-6 78.6% 80.5% 82.9% 100.0% 62.5%
ELA-7 53.1% MATH-7 57.8%
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 69.7% 75.2% 77.8% 92.3% 49.6% Total 3-8 86.8% 92.7% 91.9% 98.1% 60.9%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 3-7 students Math Performance Goal: 89% of grade 3-7 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.4% Social Studies-5 95.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Science-8 Social Studies-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations 4.7 4.5 4.7 Grade 1 53.5% 39.5%
Language, Literacy, Math 4.8 4.5 4.6 Grade 2 38.3% 19.1%
Movement, Music 4.9 4.4 4.9
Science 4.7 4.5 4.8

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
Profile

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1

ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Expanded to 8th Grade - 2010-11 Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 292 368 470 526
536 Total 0 1 2 5
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.7% 0.8% 1.1% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.3% 0.5% 1.1%
Black or African American 80.1% 76.9% 76.2% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 1.4% 1.4% 2.1%
Hispanic 8.6% 9.0% 8.9% Country 1 Thailand Thailand
White 8.2% 10.9% 10.6%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Cuba
Multi 1.0% 1.1% 1.1%
* Projected Country 3 Yemen

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 95.0% 94.9% 95.9% 96.3%

Section 4 Page 140

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 58
World of Inquiry Principal Sheelarani Webster
Data From School Year 2009-10
inquiry-based learning as our primary mode of instruction across the curriculum. We believe that this
s interactive, experiential, and exploratory, instills not only a specific academic goal but a personal Mission: World of Inquiry School No. 58 promo
knowledge. We also focus on our students’ character development to ensure that our students become dynamic approach, with the focus on a process th
xcellence, innovation, creativity, inquiry, and discovery. type 2011-12 FUNDING
framework for lifelong education and the pursuit
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED
productive citizens. We are dedicated to academi
MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent
2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 46.6
2006-07 2007-08 46.4
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation ELA - Grades 3-8
$ 2,521,142 72.7%
79.5% 45.5% Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 92.3% 2.0
93.4% 93.2% 2.0
97.4% 54.5% 0180: FLAP Grant #2 57,111 1.6%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-0
90.5% 44.7% Other Instructional MATH-4 93.2% 100.0%
3.6 93.0% 97.6%
4.0 65.8% 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 1,809
ELA-3 0.1%71.0% 79.5% 61.4%
100.0% 53.2% Non-instructional MATH-5 83.8% 18.1
95.5% 100.0% 97.6%
11.1 66.0% 0206: Title I - Kindergarten 57,111
ELA-4 1.6%73.8% 83.4% 81.4%
100.0% 48.6% Total MATH-6 78.6% 70.3
80.5% 82.9% 100.0%
63.5 62.5% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 72,894
ELA-5 2.1%65.1% 71.1% 94.0%
53.1% MATH-7 57.8% ELA-6 69.0% 68.3% 78.6%
0513: The Primary Project 2,987 0.1%
MATH-8 ELA-7
92.3% 49.6% 86.8% 92.7% 91.9% 98.1% 60.9%
1323: School Redesign 36,343 1.0%
Total 3-8 ELA-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 10.1 : 1 11.3 : 1 1396: District Initiative Budgets 114,222 3.3%
students 89% : 1 of grade 3-730.7
students Total 3-8 69.7% 75.2% 77.8%
Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 19.8 :1 1416: Primary Project 7,668 0.2%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math6.7
in :2010-2011.
1 8.3 : 1 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 187,880
ELA Performance5.4%
Goal: 67% of grade
1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 112,360
will 3.2% on ELA in 2010-2011
achieve proficiency
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 129,272 3.7%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs SCIENCE - Grades 4 &1.1%
39,072 8
100.0% 97.4% Social Studies-5 95.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 63,299 1.8%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-
Social Studies-8 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594
Science-4 1.8%100.0% 100.0% 100.0
Science-8

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Sco
Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12
4.7 Grade 1 53.5% 39.5% 2006-07 20
4.6 Salary Compensation Grade 2 3,425,892 38.3% 3,370,881
19.1% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ Iniative,
3,466,764 100.0%
Social Relations 4.7
4.9 Other Compensation 128,905 60,417 Language, Literacy, Math 4.8
4.8 Movement, Music 4.9
Fixed Obligation/Variability 4,000 -
Cash Capital Outlays 3,799 - Science 4.7
Facilities and Related
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS 98,631 35,467
ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Technology - -
GS - Good Standing
Other Variable Expenses 60,039 -

Budget
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Total $ IY2
3,721,266 $ 3,466,764
- Improvement Year 2
GS GS GS GS GS 2005-06
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS GS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS GS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS
GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL GS
Y or N - SURR/PLA
Expanded to 8th Grade - 2010-11
SCHOOL PROFILE
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. withinStudents**
the past three years) Weight Allocation

009-10 Base Allocation

2010-11 2011-12* 526.0 2008-09
2007-08 $3,682
2009-10 $ 1,936,732
2010-11 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity
368 470 ELL-BeginnerTotal
536 (K-8) 0 14.0 1 $2,3962 $ 33,544
5 2008-09
0.8% 1.1% ELL-BeginnerPercent
(9-12)of Enrollment 0.0% 2.0 0.3% $3,594
0.5% $ 1.1%7,188 Total 292
76.9% 76.2% ELL-Intermediate 3.0 of Birth
Most Prevalent Country $2,396 $ 7,188 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.7%
1.4% 2.1% ELL-Advanced 3.0 $1,198 $ 3,594 Black or African American 80.1%
9.0% 8.9% Country 1 Thailand Thailand
SWD-Resource Room 8.0 $5,856 $ 46,848 Asian 1.4%
10.9% 10.6% Hispanic 8.6%
SWD-Consultant Teacher
Country 2 - $5,856 $ -
0.0% 0.0% Cuba
SWD-Integrated Special Class 83.0 $5,856 $ 486,048 White 8.2%
1.1% 1.1% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
SWD-Self-Contained
Country 312:1 Class - $5,856 $ Yemen -
Multi 1.0%
Total ESF Allocation $ 2,521,142
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

4.9% 95.9% 96.3% 2006-07
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 95.0%

Section 4 Page 141

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Anibal Soler, Jr. School 61

Data From School Year 2009-10 East High School

Mission: We, the community, staff, parents and students, are partners in the educational process. We believe that all students can learn and successfully complete
high school. It is our collective goal to ensure that all students have the necessary skills for attaining success after graduation in higher education or the workforce.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 27.6% 26.7% 31.0% 43.0% 14.9% MATH-7 7.5% 20.9% 45.2% 48.0% 19.3%
ELA-8 22.8% 26.4% 25.2% 34.7% 14.9% MATH-8 15.3% 18.2% 19.3% 34.0% 7.9%
Total 3-8 24.1% 27.1% 28.0% 38.7% 14.9% Total 3-8 11.3% 20.1% 32.3% 40.7% 12.8%

ELA Performance Goal: 44% of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: 53% of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11 47.0% 46.0% 58.0% 51.0% 51.4%
Science-8 16.8% 14.0% 20.4% 35.8% 25.7% MATH A 62.0% 64.0% 37.0% 47.0%
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 73.7% 37.1% 33.9%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG 8.7%
GEOMETRY 37.8% 45.8%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 48.0% 43.0% 56.0% 58.0% 50.7%
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY 12.2% 11.9% 20.5% 7.0%
Social Studies-8 18.8% 22.5% 21.8% 22.1% 28.4% EARTH SCIENCE 43.4% 33.9% 38.7% 39.1%
PHYSICS 12.1% 4.5% 15.2% 14.3%
US HISTORY 56.0% 62.0% 66.0% 76.0% 68.9%
GLOBAL 32.0% 29.0% 33.0% 37.0% 31.1%
LOTE 73.7% 62.5% 82.9% 72.0%

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

Profile

DISTRICT 48% 52% 46%

61 East High School 49% 54% 39%

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS GS GS* SINI 1 IY-2 CA1 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS* SINI 1 IY-2 CA1 CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N Y Y Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS* SINI 5 RA RA RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Turnaround school Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 1941 1683 1714 1628 Total 3 4 49 83
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% Percent of Enrollment 0.2% 0.2% 2.9% 4.8%
Black or African American 67.9% 68.2% 63.9% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 1.3% 1.7% 3.1% Dominican
Hispanic 20.4% 20.2% 22.4% Country 1 El Salvador Bhutan Bhutan
Republic
White 10.2% 9.7% 10.3%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.1% Country 2 Yemen Georgia Nepal Nepal
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3 Ivory Coast Thailand Thailand

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 89.6% 86.8% 86.5% 86.7%

Section 4 Page 142

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 61
East High School Principal Anibal Soler, Jr.
Data From School Year 2009-10
dents, are partners in the educational process. We believe that all students can learn and successfully complete
l students have the necessary skills for attaining success after graduation in higher education or the workforce. Mission: We, the community, staff, parents a
type high school. It is our collective goal to ensure
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06155.9
2006-07 2007-08119.0
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ ELA - Grades 3-870.6%
8,210,139
Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 4.0 4.0 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 73,811 0.6% 2005-06 2006-07 20
Other Instructional MATH-4 32.3 21.0 0268: Title I - AIS Services 312,338ELA-3 2.7%
Non-instructional MATH-5 69.3 47.8 0305: IDEA Support Serv & Sec 611 118,508ELA-4 1.0%
Total MATH-6 261.5 191.8 0831: SIG East 1,436,534ELA-5 12.4%
43.0% 14.9% MATH-7 7.5% 20.9% 45.2% 48.0% 19.3% 1357: Student & Family Support Ctr 59,793ELA-6 0.5%
34.7% 14.9% MATH-8 15.3% 18.2% 19.3% 34.0% 7.9% ELA-7
1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 571,503 4.9% 27.6% 26.7% 3
38.7% 14.9% Total 3-8 11.3% 20.1% 32.3% 40.7% 12.8% ELA-8
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 11 : 1 13.7 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830 1.0% 22.8% 26.4% 2
Pupil-Other-Staff Total 3-8 3.2% 24.1% 27.1% 2
tudents MathRatio
Performance Goal: 16.2
53%: 1 of grade 7-822.4 :1
students 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 369,772
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math6.6
in :2010-2011.
1 8.5 : 1 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 39,072
ELA Performance0.3%Goal: 44% of gra
1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 189,897 1.6%
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011
REGENTS EXAMS 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 127,188 1.1%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
ELA 11 47.0% 46.0% 58.0% 51.0% 51.4% 2005-06 2006-07 20
35.8% 25.7% MATH A 62.0% 64.0% 37.0% 47.0% Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 73.7% 37.1% 33.9% Science-8 16.8% 14.0% 2
ALGEBRA2/TRIG 8.7%
GEOMETRY
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT 37.8% 45.8%
2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 48.0% 43.0% 56.0% 58.0% 50.7% SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
CHEMISTRY 12.2% 11.9% 20.5% 7.0% 2005-06 2006-07 20
22.1% 28.4% EARTH SCIENCE 2010-11 43.4%2011-12
33.9% 38.7% 39.1%
Social Studies-5
PHYSICS 12.1% 4.5% 15.2% 14.3%
Social Studies-8 18.8% 22.5% 2
Major Expenditures
US HISTORY 56.0% 62.0% 66.0% 76.0% 68.9%
GLOBAL
Salary Compensation 32.0%
13,826,350 29.0%10,602,152
33.0% 37.0% 31.1% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 11,629,385 100.0%
LOTE
Other Compensation 787,198 73.7% 127,527
62.5% 82.9% 72.0%
Fixed Obligation/Variability 26,900 14,500
Cash Capital Outlays
GRADUATION RATES 71,523 13,845
Facilities and Related 807,986 627,929
Technology - - TOTAL COHO
2003 2004 2005 2006
Other Variable Expenses 490,196 243,432

Budget
48% 52% 46%
Total $ 16,010,153 $ 11,629,385
49% 54% 39% DISTRICT
61 East High S
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
GS GS* SINI 1 IY-2 CA1 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
20
GS GS* SINI 1 IY-2 CA1 CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding MATH STATUS
N N Y Y Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1 (ESF) Allocation
SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS* SINI 5 RA RA RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
Students** Weight
RA - Restructuring Advanced Allocation
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA
Base Allocation 1,628.0 $3,682 $ 5,994,296
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 34.8 $2,396 $ 83,381 Turnaround school
SCHOOL PROFILE
ELL-Beginner (9-12) 42.6 $3,594 $ 153,104
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ELL-Intermediate 39.0 $2,396 $ 93,444
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
ELL-Advanced 14.9 $1,198 $ 17,850
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnic
SWD-Resource Room 41.0 2008-09 $5,856 2009-10 $ 2010-11
240,096
1683 1714 1628 TotalTeacher
SWD-Consultant 3 12.0 4 $5,85649 83
$ 70,272 200
0.2% 0.2% Percent
SWD-Integrated of Enrollment
Special Class 0.2%
177.0 0.2% $5,856 2.9% $ 1,036,512
4.8% Total 19
68.2% 63.9% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class Most Prevalent Country
89.0 of Birth $5,856 $ 521,184 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.2
1.7% 3.1% Dominican Black or African American 67.
Total ESF Allocation
Country 1 El Salvador Bhutan $ 8,210,139
Bhutan
20.2% 22.4% Republic Asian 1.3
9.7% 10.3% Hispanic 20.
0.0% 0.1% Country 2 Yemen Georgia Nepal Nepal
White 10.
0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Ivory Coast Thailand Thailand Multi 0.0
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

6.8% 86.5% 86.7% 2006-
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 89.6

Section 4 Page 143

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Vicky Ramos School 66

Data From School Year 2009-10 Monroe High School

Mission: We believe that the collaboration of our students, parents and supporters of our school will create a safe community and environment that is focused on
high academic standards, allowing our students to acquire the skills needed to live, work, and succeed in a global society.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 22.4% 16.9% 24.6% 36.0% 11.9% MATH-7 6.3% 7.8% 35.0% 43.4% 19.9%
ELA-8 22.4% 19.4% 17.6% 28.0% 11.2% MATH-8 9.3% 4.1% 12.5% 31.8% 13.0%
Total 3-8 20.4% 18.8% 20.1% 31.3% 11.6% Total 3-8 7.6% 5.3% 20.6% 37.0% 17.0%

ELA Performance Goal: 42% of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: 68% of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11 0.0% 45.0% 66.0% 61.0% 43.0%
Science-8 32.2% 23.3% 29.3% 33.4% 32.5% MATH A 71.0% 62.0% 54.0% 28.0%
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 30.8% 37.6% 33.9%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG 5.4%
GEOMETRY 31.8% 17.5%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 45.0% 56.0% 41.0% 52.0% 39.1%
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY 25.0% 5.0% 0.0% 6.7%
Social Studies-8 16.4% 9.8% 11.2% 14.3% 12.7% EARTH SCIENCE 43.0% 31.2% 27.8% 42.3%
PHYSICS 50.0% 66.7% 83.3%
US HISTORY 0.0% 56.0% 59.0% 48.0% 58.4%
GLOBAL 50.0% 25.0% 34.0% 31.0% 40.9%
LOTE 83.3% 96.4% 92.0% 95.7%

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

Profile

DISTRICT 48% 52% 46%

66 Monroe High School 45% 42%

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS SINI 3 SINI 4 SINI 5 SINI 5 RY-2 RA IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS SINI 4 SINI 5 SINI 5 SINI 5 GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS Y Y Y Y Y RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL PFR R R SINI 5 RY-2 RA RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 1137 1068 1074 1131 Total 6 18 51 81
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% Percent of Enrollment 0.4% 1.6% 4.8% 7.5%
Black or African American 38.3% 33.9% 34.5% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 1.5% 1.3% 1.5% Dominican Dominican Dominican
Hispanic 53.5% 61.6% 60.6% Country 1 Cuba
Republic Republic Republic
White 6.5% 3.1% 3.2%
Country 2 Dominican
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.1% Cuba Cuba Cuba
Republic
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3 Guatemala Brazil Bhutan Bhutan

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 87.4% 86.7% 84.2% 84.1%

Section 4 Page 144

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 66
Monroe High School Principal Vicky Ramos
Data From School Year 2009-10
udents, parents and supporters of our school will create a safe community and environment that is focused on
cquire the skills needed to live, work, and succeed in a global society. Mission: We believe that the collaboratio
type high academic standards, allowing our stu
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 102.8
2006-07 2007-08 92.3 Equitable Student Funding Allocation
2008-09 2009-10 ELA - Grades 80.0%
$ 6,252,516 3-8
Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 6.0 5.8 0124: Learn Tech Monroe 46,743 0.6% 2005-06 2006-07
Other Instructional MATH-4 22.5 18.0 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 3,833 ELA-30.0%
Non-instructional MATH-5 34.0 27.5 0268: Title I - AIS Services 198,801 ELA-42.5%
Total MATH-6 165.3 143.6 0305: IDEA Support Serv & Sec 611 167,566 ELA-52.1%
36.0% 11.9% MATH-7 6.3% 7.8% 35.0% 43.4% 19.9%
1357: Student & Family Support Ctr 39,443 ELA-60.5%
28.0% 11.2% MATH-8 9.3% 4.1% 12.5% 31.8% 13.0%
1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 390,789 ELA-75.0% 22.4% 16.9%
31.3% 11.6% Total 3-8 7.6% 5.3% 20.6% 37.0% 17.0%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 10.4 : 1 12.3 : 1 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830 ELA-81.5% 22.4% 19.4%
tudents 68% : 1 of grade 7-8 students Total 3-8 20.4% 18.8%
Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 17.2 22 : 1 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 310,162 4.0%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math6.5
in :2010-2011.
1 7.9 : 1 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 39,072 0.5% Goal:
ELA Performance 42% of
1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 126,598
will achieve1.6%
proficiency on ELA in 2010-
REGENTS EXAMS 4518: C4E - On Campus Intervention P 58,218 0.7%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension SCIENCE
63,594 - Grades 0.8%4 & 8
ELA 11 0.0% 45.0% 66.0% 61.0% 43.0% 2005-06 2006-07
33.4% 32.5% MATH A 71.0% 62.0% 54.0% 28.0% Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 30.8% 37.6% 33.9% Science-8 32.2% 23.3%
ALGEBRA2/TRIG 5.4%
GEOMETRY 31.8% 17.5%
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 45.0% 56.0% 41.0% 52.0% 39.1%
CHEMISTRY 25.0% 5.0% 0.0% 6.7% 2005-06 2006-07
14.3% 12.7% EARTH SCIENCE 43.0% 31.2% 27.8% 42.3%
Social Studies-5
Major Expenditures
PHYSICS 2010-11 2011-12
50.0% 66.7% 83.3%
Social Studies-8 16.4% 9.8%
US HISTORY 0.0% 56.0% 59.0% 48.0% 58.4%
Salary Compensation
GLOBAL 8,081,791
50.0% 25.0% 7,506,950
34.0% 31.0% 40.9% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 7,818,165 100.0%
Other Compensation
LOTE 469,612 83.3% 142,471
96.4% 92.0% 95.7%
Fixed Obligation/Variability 1,500 500
Cash Capital Outlays 57,444 45,875
GRADUATION RATES
Facilities and Related 143,304 94,912
Technology 1,000 400
2003 2004 2005 2006 TOTAL CO
Other Variable Expenses 10,827 27,057

Budget
Total 48% 52%$ 8,765,478
46% $ 7,818,165
ol 45% 42% DISTRICT
66 Monroe
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
SINI 4 SINI 5 SINI 5 RY-2 RA IY2 - Improvement Year 2
SINI 5 SINI 5 SINI 5 GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
FISCALGS GS
YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF)
RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
Allocation MATH STATUS
Y Y Y Y Y SCIENCE STATUS
R R SINI 5 RY-2 RA RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
Students** Weight Allocation SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Base Allocation Y or N -1,131.0
SURR/PLA $3,682 $ 4,164,342
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 56.0 $2,396 $ 134,176
SCHOOL PROFILE
ELL-Beginner (9-12) 86.0 $3,594 $ 309,084
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled
ELL-Intermediate 98.0 during each$2,396
academic year
$ who had
234,808
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
ELL-Advanced 43.0 $1,198 $ 51,514
SWD-Resource Room
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-0858.0 2008-09 $5,8562009-10 $ 2010-11
339,648 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Et
1068 1074 SWD-Consultant
1131 TotalTeacher 6 9.0 18 $5,85651 $ 52,704
81
0.1% 0.1% Percent
SWD-Integrated of Enrollment
Special Class 0.4%
107.0 1.6% 4.8%
$5,856 7.5%
$ 626,592 Total
33.9% 34.5% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class Most Prevalent Country
58.0 of Birth $5,856 $ 339,648 American Indian or Alaska Native
1.3% 1.5% Total ESF Allocation Dominican Dominican $ 6,252,516
Dominican Black or African American
61.6% 60.6% Country 1 Cuba
Republic Republic Republic Asian
3.1% 3.2% Hispanic
Country 2 Dominican
0.0% 0.1% Cuba Cuba Cuba
Republic White
0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Guatemala Brazil Bhutan Bhutan Multi
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

6.7% 84.2% 84.1% 2
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 8

Section 4 Page 145

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Marlene Blocker School 102

Data From School Year 2009-10 Rochester Early College International High School

Mission: It is our mission to provide an innovative educational opportunity that cultivates confident, college immersed, globally competent scholars.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 Total 3-8

ELA Performance Goal: of grade students Math Performance Goal: of grade students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11
Science-8 MATH A
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG
GEOMETRY
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY
Social Studies-8 EARTH SCIENCE
PHYSICS
US HISTORY
GLOBAL
LOTE

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

Profile

DISTRICT
102 Rochester Early College International High School

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Opened - 2010-11 Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 93 196 Total 10
American Indian or Alaska Native 1.1% Percent of Enrollment 10.8%
Black or African American 72.0% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 6.5%
Hispanic 15.1% Country 1 Nepal
White 4.3%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 1.1% Country 2 Bhutan
Multi 0.0%
* Projected Country 3 Kenya

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate

Section 4 Page 146

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 102
Rochester Early College International High School Principal Marlene Blocker
Data From School Year 2009-10

educational opportunity that cultivates confident, college immersed, globally competent scholars.
type Mission: It is our mission to provide an innov
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 11.4
2006-07 2007-08 17.0
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ ELA - Grades 3-8 63.3%
921,982
Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 1.0 1.0 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 440 0.0% 2005-06 2006-07 20
Other Instructional MATH-4 1.2 1.2 0268: Title I - AIS Services 38,435
ELA-3 2.6%
Non-instructional MATH-5 1.0 2.5 0584: ECHS Smart Scholars 103,053ELA-4 7.1%
Total MATH-6 14.6 21.7 1396: District Initiative Budgets 194,921ELA-5 13.4%
MATH-7 ELA-6
1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830 8.3%
MATH-8 ELA-7
Total 3-8
1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 12,660 0.9%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 8.2 : 1 11.5 : 1 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension ELA-8
63,594 4.4%
dents Total 3-8
Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 29.1 : 1 of grade students
41.7 : 1
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math6.4
in :2010-2011.
1 9:1 ELA Performance Goal: of gra
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011
REGENTS EXAMS

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
ELA 11 2005-06 2006-07 20
MATH A Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA Science-8
ALGEBRA2/TRIG
GEOMETRY
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV
CHEMISTRY 2005-06 2006-07 20
EARTH SCIENCE
Social Studies-5
Major Expenditures
PHYSICS 2010-11 2011-12 Social Studies-8
US HISTORY
Salary Compensation
GLOBAL 790,163 1,290,208 Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 1,455,915 100.0%
Other Compensation
LOTE 59,100 20,240
Fixed Obligation/Variability 24,321 12,500
Cash Capital Outlays
GRADUATION RATES - -
Facilities and Related 94,623 89,967
Technology - -
2003 2004 2005 2006 TOTAL COHO
Other Variable Expenses 49,551 43,000

Budget
Total $ 1,017,758 $ 1,455,915
ollege International High School DISTRICT
102 Rochester
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
IY2 - Improvement Year 2
20
CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF)
RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
Allocation MATH STATUS
SCIENCE STATUS
RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
Students** Weight Allocation SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA
Base Allocation 196.0 $3,682 $ 721,672
ELL-Beginner (K-8) - $2,396 $ - Opened - 2010-11
SCHOOL PROFILE
ELL-Beginner (9-12) 8.0 $3,594 $ 28,752
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled
ELL-Intermediate 8.0 during each$2,396
academic year
$ who19,168
had
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
ELL-Advanced 5.0 $1,198 $ 5,990
SWD-Resource Room
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-0811.0 2008-09 $5,856 2009-10 $ 2010-11
64,416 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnic
93 SWD-Consultant
196 TotalTeacher 2.0 $5,856 $ 11,712
10 200
1.1% Percent
SWD-Integrated of Enrollment
Special Class 12.0 $5,856 $ 10.8%
70,272 Total
72.0% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class Most Prevalent Country
- of Birth $5,856 $ - American Indian or Alaska Native
6.5% Total ESF Allocation $ 921,982 Black or African American
15.1% Country 1 Nepal
Asian
4.3% Hispanic
1.1% Country 2 Bhutan
White
0.0% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Kenya Multi
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

2006-
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate

Section 4 Page 147

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Brenda Pacheco School 74

Data From School Year 2009-10 School of the Arts

Mission: School of the Arts is a teaching and learning community dedicated to infusing the arts, humanities and academics into all facets of education. We value
the dignity and inherent worth of self and others. We celebrate the richness and diversity that forms our community. We challenge students and staff by expecting
and modeling high standards of performance.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 66.5% 61.9% 73.2% 82.4% 49.2% MATH-7 45.8% 42.0% 71.5% 87.4% 31.4%
ELA-8 49.5% 64.5% 62.5% 73.2% 44.0% MATH-8 44.9% 46.5% 54.3% 75.3% 34.4%
Total 3-8 56.6% 63.3% 67.9% 77.8% 46.6% Total 3-8 44.0% 44.2% 62.8% 81.4% 32.9%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11 76.0% 71.0% 80.0% 83.0% 82.9%
Science-8 42.4% 63.6% 66.8% 66.5% 67.7% MATH A 84.0% 72.0% 73.0% 69.0%
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 96.4% 56.0% 59.5%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG 44.7%
GEOMETRY 98.0% 71.6%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 82.0% 81.0% 89.0% 88.0% 85.3%
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY 79.3% 75.0% 80.8% 63.7%
Social Studies-8 46.1% 49.3% 53.1% 58.4% 59.2% EARTH SCIENCE 79.9% 79.5% 74.6% 81.4%
PHYSICS 50.0% 63.2% 90.0% 86.0%
US HISTORY 72.0% 75.0% 85.0% 78.0% 75.0%
GLOBAL 51.0% 59.0% 64.0% 73.0% 53.2%
LOTE 93.9% 87.5% 92.4% 97.3%

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

Profile

DISTRICT 48% 52% 46%

74 School of the Arts 87% 88% 85%

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS* GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 1147 1144 1169 1103 Total 1 9 0 0
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% Percent of Enrollment 0.1% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0%
Black or African American 52.4% 49.9% 49.4% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 2.0% 2.8% 2.1% Dominican
Hispanic 15.8% 17.5% 18.6% Country 1 Germany
Republic
White 29.5% 29.4% 29.5%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Russia
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3 China

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 96.0% 94.9% 95.2% 94.6%

Section 4 Page 148

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 74
School of the Arts Principal Brenda Pacheco
Data From School Year 2009-10
ng community dedicated to infusing the arts, humanities and academics into all facets of education. We value
e celebrate the richness and diversity that forms our community. We challenge students and staff by expecting Mission: School of the Arts is a teaching and
type the dignity and inherent worth of self and oth
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING
and modeling high standards of performance.

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 94.5
2006-07 2007-08 70.3
2008-09 2009-10 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ ELA - Grades 3-8
4,799,025 75.0%
Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 7.0 6.8 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 98,298 1.5% 2005-06 2006-07 20
Other Instructional MATH-4 12.4 9.0 0268: Title I - AIS Services 149,543
ELA-3 2.3%
Non-instructional MATH-5 39.0 27.5 1396: District Initiative Budgets 633,000
ELA-4 9.9%
Total MATH-6 152.9 113.6 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs ELA-5
122,950 1.9%
82.4% 49.2% MATH-7 45.8% 42.0% 71.5% 87.4% 31.4% ELA-6
1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830 1.9%
73.2% 44.0% MATH-8 44.9% 46.5% 54.3% 75.3% 34.4% ELA-7
77.8% 46.6% Total 3-8 44.0% 44.2% 62.8% 81.4% 32.9%
1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 310,162 4.8% 66.5% 61.9% 7
ELA-8 49.5% 64.5% 6
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 12.4 : 1 15.7 : 1 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 39,072 0.6%
Total 3-8 56.6% 63.3% 6
tudents Pupil-Other-Staff
MathRatio
Performance Goal: 52%20 : 1 of grade 7-825.5
students
:1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 63,299 1.0%
will achieve
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math7.6
in :2010-2011.
1 9.7 : 1 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594
ELA Performance Goal: 67% of gra
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011
REGENTS EXAMS
SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA 11 76.0% 71.0% 80.0% 83.0% 82.9% 2005-06 2006-07 2
66.5% 67.7% MATH A 84.0% 72.0% 73.0% 69.0% Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 96.4% 56.0% 59.5% Science-8 42.4% 63.6% 6
ALGEBRA2/TRIG 44.7%
GEOMETRY 98.0% 71.6%
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 82.0% 81.0% 89.0% 88.0% 85.3%
CHEMISTRY 79.3% 75.0% 80.8% 63.7% 2005-06 2006-07 2
58.4% 59.2% EARTH SCIENCE 79.9% 79.5% 74.6% 81.4% Social Studies-5
Major Expenditures
PHYSICS 2010-11 50.0% 2011-12
63.2% 90.0% 86.0% Social Studies-8 46.1% 49.3% 5
US HISTORY 72.0% 75.0% 85.0% 78.0% 75.0%
Salary Compensation
GLOBAL 8,322,912
51.0% 59.0% 6,228,125
64.0% 73.0% 53.2% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 6,399,773 99.0%
Other Compensation
LOTE 225,405 93.9% 42,652 92.4%
87.5% 97.3%
Fixed Obligation/Variability 2,000 -
Cash Capital Outlays
GRADUATION RATES 44,276 869
Facilities and Related 97,525 129,596
Technology 500 - TOTAL COHO
Other Variable Expenses2003 2004 2005
(11,546) 2006 (1,469)

Budget
Total 48% 52%$ 8,681,072
46% $ 6,399,773
87% 88% 85% DISTRICT
74 School of th
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2 20
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
FISCALGS GS
YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF)
RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
Allocation MATH STATUS
N N N N N SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
Students** Weight Allocation SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA
Base Allocation 1,103.0 $3,682 $ 4,061,246
ELL-Beginner (K-8) - $2,396 $ -
SCHOOL PROFILE
ELL-Beginner (9-12) - $3,594 $ -
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled
ELL-Intermediate 1.3 during each$2,396
academic year
$ who 3,115
had
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
ELL-Advanced 12.0 $1,198 $ 14,376
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnic
SWD-Resource Room
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-0834.0 2008-09 $5,856 2009-10 $ 2010-11
199,104
1144 1169 SWD-Consultant
1103 TotalTeacher 1 - 9 $5,8560 $ 0 - 200
0.4% 0.4% Percent
SWD-Integrated of Enrollment
Special Class 0.1%69.0 0.8% 0.0%
$5,856 0.0%
$ 404,064 Total 11
49.9% 49.4% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class Most Prevalent Country
20.0 of Birth $5,856 $ 117,120 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.3
2.8% 2.1% Total ESF Allocation Dominican $ 4,799,025 Black or African American 52.
17.5% 18.6% Country 1 Germany
Republic Asian 2.0
29.4% 29.5% Hispanic 15.
0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Russia White 29.
0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 China Multi 0.0
* Projected

ATTENDANCE
07-08 2008-09 2009-10
4.9% 95.2% 94.6% 2006-
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 96.0

Section 4 Page 149

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Idonia Owens School Without Walls: Commencement Academy

Data From School Year 2009-10

Mission: We are a caring and supportive community. We recognize that students are individuals, and foster each student’s individual growth toward academic
excellence and social/emotional well-being so that he or she can successfully meet life’s challenges, beyond high school.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 45.2% 45.9% 73.2% 94.6% 48.6% MATH-7 16.9% 17.3% 63.4% 67.6% 14.7%
ELA-8 24.6% 43.9% 68.9% 85.7% 64.0% MATH-8 9.9% 21.9% 25.7% 35.1% 6.7%
Total 3-8 34.9% 44.6% 71.1% 90.1% 56.4% Total 3-8 13.5% 20.3% 44.7% 51.0% 10.7%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11 91.0% 69.0% 70.0% 60.4%
Science-8 23.8% 43.7% 71.8% 83.8% 31.1% MATH A 92.0% 56.0% 33.0%
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 100.0%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG
GEOMETRY
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 50.0% 66.7%
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY 0.0%
Social Studies-8 6.5% 19.7% 78.9% 76.3% 36.0% EARTH SCIENCE 0.0%
PHYSICS 0.0%
US HISTORY 89.0% 66.7%
GLOBAL 66.0% 57.0% 66.7%
LOTE

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

DISTRICT 48% 52% 46%
Profile

69 School Without Walls: Commencement Academy 40% 50% 55%

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS WATCH IY-1 IY2 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 488 487 481 235 Total 0 6 19 13
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.7% 0.4% 0.6% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 1.2% 3.9% 2.7%
Black or African American 56.9% 57.9% 56.1% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 1.5% 4.5% 5.0%
Hispanic 16.7% 20.1% 22.2% Country 1 Bhutan Bhutan Nepal
White 24.2% 16.8% 15.9%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Korea Thailand Bhutan
Multi 0.0% 0.2% 0.2%
* Projected Country 3 Nepal Nepal Thailand

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 94.4% 92.4% 91.5% 92.4%

Section 4 Page 150

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School Without Walls: Commencement Academy

Principal Idonia Owens
Data From School Year 2009-10
ity. We recognize that students are individuals, and foster each student’s individual growth toward academic
he or she can successfully meet life’s challenges, beyond high school. Mission: We are a caring and supportive c
type excellence and social/emotional well-bein
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING

MATH - Grades 3-8 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

8 2008-09 2009-10 Teachers 2005-06 22.1
2006-07 2007-08 15.7
2008-09 2009-10 ELA - Grades 3-8
Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 1,030,838 75.0%
Principals/AP/AD MATH-3 1.0 1.0 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 794 0.1% 2005-06 2006-07
Other Instructional MATH-4 1.6 1.7 0268: Title I - AIS Services 38,733 ELA-32.8%
MATH-5 ELA-42.7%
Non-instructional 5.0 4.0 1396: District Initiative Budgets 37,395
MATH-6 ELA-52.0%
94.6% 48.6%
Total MATH-7 16.9%
29.7
17.3% 63.4%
22.4
67.6% 14.7%
1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 26,811
ELA-6
85.7% 64.0% MATH-8 9.9% 21.9% 25.7% 35.1% 6.7% 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830 8.8%
ELA-7 45.2% 45.9%
90.1% 56.4% Total 3-8 13.5% 20.3% 44.7% 51.0% 10.7% 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 36,700 2.7%
ELA-8 24.6% 43.9%
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 14.9 : 1 15 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 18,990 1.4%
Total 3-8 34.9% 44.6%
8 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 7-8 students
Pupil-Other-Staff Ratio 43.2 : 1 35.1 : 1 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 4.6%
will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011. ELA Performance Goal: 67% of
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio 11.1 : 1 10.5 : 1
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2
REGENTS EXAMS

8 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
ELA 11 91.0% 69.0% 70.0% 60.4% 2005-06 2006-07
83.8% 31.1% MATH A 92.0% 56.0% 33.0% Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 100.0% Science-8 23.8% 43.7%
ALGEBRA2/TRIG
GEOMETRY
8 2008-09 2009-10 BUDGET
LIVINGALLOCATIONS
ENV by ACCOUNT
50.0% 66.7% SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
CHEMISTRY 0.0% 2005-06 2006-07
76.3% 36.0% EARTH SCIENCE 0.0%
Social Studies-5
PHYSICS 0.0%
Major Expenditures 2010-11 Social Studies-8 6.5% 19.7%
US HISTORY 89.0%2011-12 66.7%
GLOBAL 66.0% 57.0% 66.7%
Salary Compensation
LOTE
1,803,964 1,262,464 Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 1,374,684 100.0%
Other Compensation 50,406 21,794
Fixed Obligation/Variability 3,660 5,000
GRADUATION RATES
Cash Capital Outlays 9,500 4,773
Facilities and Related 34,303 45,654
Technology 2003 2004 -
2005 2006 - TOTAL CO
Other Variable Expenses48% 52% 2,780
46% 35,000

Budget
Walls: Commencement Academy
Total 40% 50% 55%
$ 1,904,613 $ 1,374,684 DISTRICT
69 School W
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
6 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding
RY2 - Restructuring Year 2 (ESF) Allocation SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS WATCH IY-1 IY2 SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Students** Weight Allocation OVERALL
Y or N - SURR/PLA
Base Allocation 235.0 $3,682 $ 865,270
SCHOOL PROFILE
ELL-Beginner (K-8) - $2,396 $ -
RECENT
ELL-Beginner (9-12)IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled - during each academic year
$3,594 $ who had-
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)
ELL-Intermediate 7.0 $2,396 $ 16,772
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Eth
2009-10 2010-11 ELL-Advanced
2011-12* 2007-08 2.0 2008-09 $1,198 2009-10 $ 2010-11
2,396
487 481 235
SWD-Resource Total
Room 0 10.0 6 $5,85619 13
$ 58,560
0.4% 0.6% SWD-ConsultantPercent of Enrollment
Teacher 0.0% 1.0 1.2% $5,856 3.9% $ 2.7%5,856 Total
57.9% 56.1%
SWD-Integrated Special Class Most Prevalent Country
14.0 of Birth $5,856 $ 81,984 American Indian or Alaska Native
4.5% 5.0% Black or African American
20.1% 22.2%
SWD-Self-Contained
Country12:1
1 Class - Bhutan $5,856 Bhutan $ Nepal-
Total ESF Allocation $ 1,030,838 Asian
16.8% 15.9% Hispanic
0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Korea Thailand Bhutan
White
0.2% 0.2% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Nepal Nepal Thailand Multi
* Projected

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

92.4% 91.5% 92.4% 20
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 9

Section 4 Page 151

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Thomas Pappas School Without Walls: Foundation Academy

Data From School Year 2009-10

Mission: We are a caring and supportive community. We recognize that students are individuals, and foster each student’s individual growth toward academic
excellence and social/emotional well-being so that he or she can successfully meet life’s challenges, beyond high school.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 45.2% 45.9% 73.2% 94.6% 48.6% MATH-7 16.9% 17.3% 63.4% 67.6% 14.7%
ELA-8 24.6% 43.9% 68.9% 85.7% 64.0% MATH-8 9.9% 21.9% 25.7% 35.1% 6.7%
Total 3-8 34.9% 44.6% 71.1% 90.1% 56.4% Total 3-8 13.5% 20.3% 44.7% 51.0% 10.7%

ELA Performance Goal: 67% of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: 52% of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 Social Studies-5
Science-8 23.8% 43.7% 71.8% 83.8% 31.1% Social Studies-8 6.5% 19.7% 78.9% 76.3% 36.0%

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Average Score) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 READING MATH

Iniative, Social Relations Grade 1
Language, Literacy, Math Grade 2
Movement, Music
Science

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
IY2 - Improvement Year 2
Profile

ELA STATUS GS GS GS GS GS
MATH STATUS GS GS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS GS WATCH IY-1 IY2 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 488 487 481 222 Total 0 6 19 13
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.7% 0.4% 0.6% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 1.2% 3.9% 2.7%
Black or African American 56.9% 57.9% 56.1% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 1.5% 4.5% 5.0%
Hispanic 16.7% 20.1% 22.2% Country 1 Bhutan Bhutan Nepal
White 24.2% 16.8% 15.9%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Korea Thailand Bhutan
Multi 0.0% 0.2% 0.2%
* Projected Country 3 Nepal Nepal Thailand

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 94.4% 92.4% 91.5% 92.4%

Section 4 Page 152

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School Without Walls: Foundation Academy

Principal Thomas Pappas
Data From School Year 2009-10
nity. We recognize that students are individuals, and foster each student’s individual growth toward academic
t he or she can successfully meet life’s challenges, beyond high school.
Mission: We are a caring and supportive com
type excellence and social/emotional well-being so

MATH - Grades 3-8

POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING
8 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 ELA - Grades 3-8
MATH-3 2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent 2005-06 2006-07 20
MATH-4
Teachers MATH-5
19.7 14.9 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 980,450ELA-3 74.0%
Principals/AP/AD MATH-6 1.0 1.0 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 780ELA-4 0.1%
94.6% 48.6% Other Instructional MATH-7 16.9% 1.617.3% 63.4% 1.367.6% 14.7% 0268: Title I - AIS Services 36,590ELA-5 2.8%
ELA-6
85.7% 64.0% Non-instructional MATH-8 9.9% 5.0 21.9% 25.7% 4.535.1% 6.7% 1396: District Initiative Budgets 40,408 3.0%
ELA-7 45.2% 45.9% 7
90.1% 56.4% Total Total 3-8 13.5% 27.3
20.3% 44.7% 21.7
51.0% 10.7% 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 26,811ELA-8 2.0% 24.6% 43.9% 6
8 students 52% of grade 7-8 students 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830Total 3-8 9.1% 34.9% 44.6% 7
Math Performance Goal:
will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011. 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 36,700 2.8%
ELA Performance Goal: 67% of gra
Pupil-Teacher Ratio 7.8 : 1 14.9 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 18,990 1.4%
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011
Pupil-Other-Staff
SOCIALRatio 20.1
STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 :1 32.6 : 1 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 4.8%
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio 5.6 : 1 10.2 : 1 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
8 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Social Studies-5 2005-06 2006-07 2
% 83.8% 31.1% Social Studies-8 6.5% 19.7% 78.9% 76.3% 36.0%
Science-4
Science-8 23.8% 43.7% 7

RCSD K-2 TEST RESULTS

re) TERRANOVA / NWEA - Grades 1 & 2 (Meets or Exceeds Proficiency Level)

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT

READING MATH KINDERGARTEN COR - SPRNG (Scale Averag
Grade 1 2006-07
Grade 2
Iniative, Social Relations
Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12 Language, Literacy, Math
Movement, Music
Salary Compensation 1,430,528 1,204,179 Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 1,325,152
Science 100.0%
Other Compensation 60,774 5,280
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
Fixed Obligation/Variability 2,500 2,000
Cash Capital Outlays GS16,778
- Good Standing 4,500
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
Facilities and Related 22,102 102,618

Budget
GS GS GS GS GS IY2 - Improvement Year 2
Technology CA1 -1,100
Corrective Action Year600
1
200
GS GS GS GS GS
GS GS
Other
GS
Variable
GS
Expenses
GS CA2 -6,800 5,975
Corrective Action Year 2 ELA STATUS
Total $ RY1
1,540,582 $ Year
- Restructuring 1,325,152
1 MATH STATUS
N N N N N
RY2 - Restructuring Year 2 SCIENCE STATUS
GS GS WATCH IY-1 IY2
RA - Restructuring Advanced SURR/PLA STATUS
Y or N - SURR/PLA OVERALL

SCHOOL PROFILE

RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2009-10
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable Student Funding (ESF) Allocation
2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09
2010-112009-10 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnic
487 481 222 Total 0 6 19 13 2008
0.4% 0.6% Percent of Enrollment Students**
0.0% 1.2%Weight 3.9% Allocation
2.7%
Total 48
57.9% 56.1% Base Allocation Most Prevalent222.0
Country of Birth $3,682 $ 817,404 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.7
4.5% 5.0%
ELL-Beginner (K-8)
Country 1 2.0 Bhutan $2,396
Bhutan $ 4,792
Nepal Black or African American 56.9
20.1% 22.2%
16.8% 15.9%
ELL-Beginner (9-12) 3.0 $3,594 $ 10,782 Asian 1.5
ELL-Intermediate 19.0 Hispanic 16.7
0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Korea $2,396
Thailand $ Bhutan
45,524
ELL-Advanced 2.0 $1,198 $ 2,396 White 24.2
0.2% 0.2%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
SWD-ResourceCountry
Room 3 5.0 Nepal $5,856Nepal $ Thailand
29,280
Multi 0.0
SWD-Consultant Teacher - $5,856 $ -
* Projected
SWD-Integrated Special Class 12.0 $5,856 $ 70,272
2007-08 SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class
2008-09 2009-10 - $5,856 $ - ATTENDANCE
92.4% 91.5% Total ESF Allocation
92.4% $ 980,450
2006-
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 94.4

Section 4 Page 153

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Pamela Rutland School 67

Data From School Year 2009-10 Wilson Commencement Academy

Mission: Excellence for all students in all aspects of their development.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 MATH-7
ELA-8 MATH-8
Total 3-8 Total 3-8

ELA Performance Goal: of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11 58.0% 48.0% 62.0% 58.0% 65.7%
Science-8 MATH A 63.0% 72.0% 46.0% 35.0%
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 56.3% 26.9% 40.6%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG 62.4%
GEOMETRY 89.6% 76.5%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 60.0% 51.0% 62.0% 64.0% 40.6%
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY 33.3% 41.0% 27.2% 35.5%
Social Studies-8 EARTH SCIENCE 52.8% 41.6% 38.9% 43.5%
PHYSICS 27.0% 43.9% 29.5% 21.8%
US HISTORY 64.0% 63.0% 77.0% 71.0% 75.2%
GLOBAL 44.0% 36.0% 46.0% 42.0% 42.3%
LOTE 78.8% 58.6% 72.3% 65.0%

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

Profile

DISTRICT 48% 52% 46%

67 Wilson Commencement Academy 61% 68% 65%

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS GS GS* IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS* CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL GS* SINI 4 RY-1 RY2 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 1010 948 1145 1109 Total 3 13 24 16
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.4% 0.6% 0.4% Percent of Enrollment 0.1% 1.3% 2.5% 1.4%
Black or African American 79.9% 77.1% 76.4% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 2.2% 4.3% 3.5% Czech
Hispanic 8.7% 9.1% 10.7% Country 1 Bhutan Bhutan Bhutan
Republic
White 8.7% 8.9% 9.0%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Iraq Haiti Congo Iraq
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3 Philippines Thailand Ethiopia Congo

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 93.1% 90.5% 90.5% 91.0%

Section 4 Page 154

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 67
Wilson Commencement Academy Principal Pamela Rutland
Data From School Year 2009-10

their development.
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) type 2011-12 FUNDING
PROPOSED Mission: Excellence for all students in all as

2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent

MATH - Grades 3-8
Teachers 105.6 84.5 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ ELA
5,485,854
- Grades 3-878.8%
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Principals/AP/AD 6.0 5.0 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 4,028 0.1%
MATH-3
Other Instructional 18.4 7.8 0268: Title I - AIS Services 194,604 2.8% 2005-06 2006-07 2
MATH-4 ELA-3 3.3%
Non-instructional MATH-5 39.9 29.5 1396: District Initiative Budgets 228,444
Total 169.9 126.8 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs ELA-4 5.3%
370,781
MATH-6 ELA-5
MATH-7 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830 1.7%
ELA-6
MATH-8 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 287,252 4.1%
ELA-7
Pupil-Teacher RatioTotal 3-8 10.8 : 1 13.1 : 1 1600: International Baccalaureate 204,236
ELA-8 2.9%
Pupil-Other-Staff Ratio 17.8 : 1 26.2 : 1 4528: C4E - In-School Suspension Total 3-8 0.9%
63,594
tudents Math Performance Goal: of grade 7-8 students
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math6.7
will achieve :1
in 2010-2011. 8.7 : 1
ELA Performance Goal: of gra
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-201
REGENTS EXAMS

2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8
ELA 11 58.0% 48.0% 62.0% 58.0% 65.7% 2005-06 2006-07 2
MATH A 63.0% 72.0% 46.0% 35.0% Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 56.3% 26.9% 40.6% Science-8
ALGEBRA2/TRIG 62.4%
BUDGET
GEOMETRY ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT 89.6% 76.5%
2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 60.0% 51.0% 62.0% 64.0% 40.6% SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
CHEMISTRY 33.3% 41.0% 27.2% 35.5% 2005-06 2006-07 2
EARTH SCIENCE 52.8% 41.6% 38.9% 43.5%
Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12 Social Studies-5
PHYSICS 27.0% 43.9% 29.5% 21.8%
Social Studies-8
US HISTORY
Salary Compensation 64.0%
9,012,896 63.0% 6,706,009
77.0% 71.0% 75.2% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 6,959,623 100.0%
GLOBAL
Other Compensation 44.0%
226,191 36.0% 105,028
46.0% 42.0% 42.3%
LOTE 78.8% 58.6% 72.3% 65.0%
Fixed Obligation/Variability 8,500 2,000
Cash Capital Outlays 35,400 21,000
GRADUATION
Facilities andRATES
Related 173,781 96,076
Technology 1,881 -
Other Variable Expenses
2003 2004 74,165
2005 2006 29,510 TOTAL COHO

Budget
Total 48% 52%$ 9,532,814
46% $ 6,959,623
ment Academy 61% 68% 65% DISTRICT
67 Wilson Co
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
GS GS* IY2 - Improvement Year 2
2
GS GS* CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 Equitable StudentAction
Funding ELA STATUS
GS GS CA2 - Corrective Year 2(ESF) Allocation
MATH STATUS
N N N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS
GS* SINI 4 RY-1 RY2 RY2 - Restructuring Year
Students** 2
Weight Allocation SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Base Allocation OVERALL
Y or N - 1,109.0
SURR/PLA $3,682 $ 4,083,338
ELL-Beginner (K-8) - $2,396 $ -
SCHOOL PROFILE
ELL-Beginner (9-12) 1.0 $3,594 $ 3,594
ELL-Intermediate
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled 8.0 during each$2,396 $ who19,168
academic year had
ELL-Advanced 3.0years)
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three $1,198 $ 3,594
SWD-Resource Room 24.0 $5,856 $ 140,544 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethni
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
SWD-Consultant Teacher 5.0 $5,856 $ 29,280
948 1145 1109 Total 3 13 24 16 200
SWD-Integrated Special Class 116.0 $5,856 $ 679,296
0.6% 0.4% Percent of Enrollment 0.1% 1.3% 2.5% 1.4% Total 10
77.1% 76.4%
SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 90.0 $5,856 $ 527,040
Most Prevalent Country of Birth American Indian or Alaska Native 0.
4.3% 3.5% Total ESF Allocation $ 5,485,854
Czech Black or African American 79
9.1% 10.7% Country 1 Bhutan Bhutan Bhutan
Republic Asian 2.
8.9% 9.0% Hispanic 8.
0.0% 0.0% Country 2 Iraq Haiti Congo Iraq
White 8.
0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Philippines Thailand Ethiopia Congo Multi 0.
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

0.5% 90.5% 91.0% 2006
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 93.1

Section 4 Page 155

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Principal Jacquelyn Cox School 68

Data From School Year 2009-10 Wilson Foundation Academy

Mission: Excellence for all students in all aspects of their development.

ELA - Grades 3-8 MATH - Grades 3-8

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
ELA-3 MATH-3
ELA-4 MATH-4
ELA-5 MATH-5
ELA-6 MATH-6
ELA-7 32.5% 39.1% 50.2% 67.4% 15.7% MATH-7 15.5% 26.2% 52.0% 67.8% 12.9%
ELA-8 28.4% 26.8% 41.4% 44.4% 26.3% MATH-8 15.5% 10.9% 33.9% 35.0% 15.4%
Total 3-8 28.4% 32.1% 46.0% 55.5% 21.2% Total 3-8 14.2% 17.4% 43.4% 50.9% 14.2%

ELA Performance Goal: 51% of grade 7-8 students Math Performance Goal: 51% of grade 7-8 students
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-2011. will achieve proficiency on Math in 2010-2011.

SCIENCE - Grades 4 & 8 REGENTS EXAMS

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Science-4 ELA 11
Science-8 23.5% 28.7% 48.9% 36.4% 40.6% MATH A 36.0%
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 71.1% 40.3%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8 ALGEBRA2/TRIG
GEOMETRY 46.4% 25.0%
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 LIVING ENV 57.0% 53.9%
Social Studies-5 CHEMISTRY 0.0%
Social Studies-8 24.0% 16.5% 33.1% 26.1% 38.1% EARTH SCIENCE 43.2% 46.9%
PHYSICS 0.0%
US HISTORY 94.8%
GLOBAL 36.0% 0.0%
LOTE 83.3% 100.0%

GRADUATION RATES
TOTAL COHORT

2003 2004 2005 2006

Profile

DISTRICT
68 Wilson Foundation Academy

ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND

GS - Good Standing
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
ELA STATUS SINI 1 GS IY1 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
MATH STATUS GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
SCIENCE STATUS GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS N Y N N N RY1 - Restructuring Year 1
OVERALL SINI 1 GS IY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Y or N - SURR/PLA

SCHOOL PROFILE
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled during each academic year who had
ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethnicity immigrated to the U.S. within the past three years)

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Total 943 905 552 483 Total 0 9 1 3
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.4% 0.2% 0.2% Percent of Enrollment 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.5%
Black or African American 79.9% 73.8% 71.7% Most Prevalent Country of Birth
Asian 2.2% 2.2% 2.7%
Hispanic 8.7% 14.7% 15.2% Country 1 Iraq Iraq Bhutan
White 8.7% 9.1% 10.1%
Country 2 Dominican
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% France
Republic
Multi 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
* Projected Country 3 Ethiopia

ATTENDANCE

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate 79.9% 87.7%

Section 4 Page 156

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School 68
Wilson Foundation Academy Principal Jacquelyn Cox
Data From School Year 2009-10

f their development.
type Mission: Excellence for all students in all a
POSITION INFORMATION (FTEs) PROPOSED 2011-12 FUNDING
MATH - Grades 3-8
2010-11 2011-12 Allocation Percent
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 ELA - Grades 3-8
Teachers MATH-3 57.8 39.2 Equitable Student Funding Allocation $ 2,448,520 68.8%
2005-06 2006-07
Principals/AP/AD MATH-4 4.0 2.0 0200: Title IIA - Tchr & Prin Tr/Rec 2,431 0.1%
ELA-3
Other Instructional MATH-5 13.8 7.1 0268: Title I - AIS Services 146,450 4.1%
ELA-4
Non-instructional MATH-6 34.5 15.3 1357: Student & Family Support Ctr 59,793ELA-5 1.7%
67.4% 15.7% Total MATH-7 15.5% 110.1
26.2% 52.0% 63.6
67.8% 12.9% 1395: Community Use 29,805ELA-6 0.8%
44.4% 26.3% MATH-8 15.5% 10.9% 33.9% 35.0% 15.4% 1501: Cntrl Alloc-Specialized Servcs 196,761ELA-7 5.5% 32.5% 39.1%
55.5% 21.2% Total 3-8 14.2% 17.4% 43.4% 50.9% 14.2% 1502: Cntrl Alloc-Principals 120,830ELA-8 3.4% 28.4% 26.8%
tudents Pupil-TeacherMath
RatioPerformance Goal: 9.6 : 1 of grade 7-812.3
51% :1
students 1503: Cntrl Alloc-Custodial 227,642Total 3-86.4% 28.4% 32.1%
Pupil-Other-Staff Ratio proficiency on Math
will achieve 10.6
in :2010-2011.
1 19.8 : 1 1505: Cntrl Alloc-Building Subs 39,072 1.1%
ELA Performance Goal: 51% of gr
Total Pupil-Staff Ratio 5:1 7.6 : 1 1506: Cntrl Alloc-Social Workers 88,619 2.5%
will achieve proficiency on ELA in 2010-20
REGENTS EXAMS 1600: International Baccalaureate 95,764 2.7%
4528: C4E - In-School Suspension 63,594 - Grades
SCIENCE 1.8%
4&8
2008-09 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
5000: Grant Disallowance - Depts/Sc 38,856 1.1%
ELA 11 2005-06 2006-07
36.4% 40.6% MATH A 36.0% Science-4
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 71.1% 40.3% Science-8 23.5% 28.7%
ALGEBRA2/TRIG
GEOMETRY 46.4% 25.0%
SOCIAL STUDIES - Grades 5 & 8
2008-09 2009-10 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS by ACCOUNT
LIVING ENV 57.0% 53.9%
CHEMISTRY 0.0% 2005-06 2006-07
26.1% 38.1% EARTH SCIENCE 43.2% 46.9%
Social Studies-5
PHYSICS 0.0%
Major Expenditures 2010-11 2011-12 Social Studies-8 24.0% 16.5%
US HISTORY 94.8%
GLOBAL 36.0% 0.0%
Salary Compensation
LOTE 5,409,756 3,335,205 83.3% 100.0% Total Proposed 2011-12 Funding $ 3,558,137 100.0%
Other Compensation 280,790 101,503
Fixed Obligation/Variability 3,200 -
GRADUATION RATES
Cash Capital Outlays 9,659 -
Facilities and Related 78,487 58,003
Technology 2003 2004 100
2005 2006 - TOTAL COH

Budget
Other Variable Expenses 88,782 63,426
Academy Total $ 5,870,774 $ 3,558,137 DISTRICT
68 Wilson Fo
ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS ACCOUNTABILITY LEGEND
GS - Good Standing
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 IY1 - Improvement Year 1
SINI 1 GS IY1 IY2 - Improvement Year 2
GS GS GS CA1 - Corrective Action Year 1
ELA STATUS
GS GS GS CA2 - Corrective Action Year 2
MATH STATUS
N Y FISCAL
N NYEAR 2011-12
N RY1 - Restructuring
Equitable Year 1 (ESF)
Student Funding Allocation SCIENCE STATUS
SINI 1 GS IY1 RY2 - Restructuring Year 2
SURR/PLA STATUS
RA - Restructuring Advanced
Students**
Y or N - SURR/PLA
Weight Allocation OVERALL

Base Allocation 483.0 $3,682 $ 1,778,406

SCHOOL PROFILE
ELL-Beginner (K-8) 1.0 $2,396 $ 2,396
ELL-Beginner (9-12)
RECENT IMMIGRANTS (Students enrolled - during each$3,594 $ who had-
academic year
immigrated to the U.S. within the past three
ELL-Intermediate - years) $2,396 $ -
ELL-Advanced
009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2007-085.0 2008-09 $1,198 2009-10 $ 2010-11
5,990 ENROLLMENT (BEDS Day) % By Race / Ethn
905 552 SWD-Resource
483 Room
Total 0 7.0 9 $5,8561 $ 40,992
3 20
0.2% 0.2% SWD-Consultant Teacher
Percent of Enrollment 0.0% - 0.1% $5,856 0.1% $ 0.5%-
Total
73.8% 71.7% SWD-Integrated Special ClassMost Prevalent Country
69.0 of Birth $5,856 $ 404,064
American Indian or Alaska Native 0
2.2% 2.7% SWD-Self-Contained 12:1 Class 37.0 $5,856 $ 216,672 Black or African American 7
14.7% 15.2% Country 1
Total ESF Allocation Iraq Iraq Bhutan
$ 2,448,520 Asian 2
9.1% 10.1% Hispanic 8
Country 2 Dominican
0.0% 0.0% France
Republic White 8
0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Country 3 Ethiopia Multi 0
* Projected

07-08 2008-09 2009-10 ATTENDANCE

79.9% 87.7% 200
Avg. Daily Student Attendance Rate

Section 4 Page 157

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Chiefs of Schools
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
The Chiefs of Schools Department is a School Support area that contains the expenses for the District’s three School Zone Chiefs and their staff
along with the non-allocated funds and Summer School costs. Examples of non-allocated funds are textbooks and funds to be allocated after
the final expenses are determined for the current year. Summer School funds are allocated to the schools after the locations are determined.

2011-12 Budget Expense Total - $17,089,819

Other Variable Expenses

1.27%
Budget Reserve
47.54%

Facilities and Related

6.10%

Cash Capital
7.92%

Fixed Obligation with Variability

2.00%

Salary Compensation
Other Compensation 17.21%
17.96%

Section 4 Page 158

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Chiefs of Schools (continued)

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
#3-Nathaniel Roch Smr Sch - 10309 $56,740 $0 $56,740 100.00%
#8-Roberto Clemente Smr Sch - 10809 $69,551 $0 $69,551 100.00%
#9-M Luther King Jr Smr Sch - 10909 $0 $0 $0 0%
#12-James P B Duffy Smr Sch - 11209 $43,909 $0 $43,909 100.00%
#17-Enrico Fermi Smr Sch - 11709 $0 $0 $0 0%
#19-Dr Chas Lunsford Smr Sch - 11909 $39,403 $0 $39,403 100.00%
#25-Nath. Hawth. Smr Sch - 12509 $0 $0 $0 0%
Sch. No. 28 Smr Sch - 12809 $70,289 $0 $70,289 100.00%
#29-A E Stevenson Smr Sch - 12909 $0 $0 $0 0%
#33-Audobon School Smr Sch - 13309 $124,359 $0 $124,359 100.00%
Sch. No. 35 Smr Sch - 13509 $0 $0 $0 0%
#36-H W Longfellow Smr Sch - 13609 $0 $0 $0 0%
#41 - Kodak Park Smr Schl - SS - 14109 $85,278 $0 $85,278 100.00%
#45-Mary McLeod Bethune SmrSch - 14509 $80,930 $0 $80,930 100.00%
#58-Wrld of Inquiry Smr Sch - 15809 $27,212 $0 $27,212 100.00%
Elementary Smr Sch - 19409 $234,361 $514,755 ($280,394) (119.64%)
Elementary Schools - ES - 19902 $3,331,765 $2,410,573 $921,192 27.65%
OACES Summer Program - 23509 $173,717 $89,814 $83,903 48.30%
Special Ed Smr Sch - 24109 $0 $0 $0 0%
Commencement Evn Acad Smr Prgm - 24709 $91,196 $0 $91,196 100.00%
Eng & Sci Acad Smr Pr @ FTHS - 25009 $12,710 $0 $12,710 100.00%
Wilson Comm IB Smr Program - 25109 $9,865 $0 $9,865 100.00%
East High Smr Sch - 26109 $71,381 $0 $71,381 100.00%
Franklin High Summer School - 26209 $423,925 $0 $423,925 100.00%
Wilson Foundation Smr Sch - 26409 $0 $0 $0 0%
John Marshall Smr Sch - 26509 $390,524 $0 $390,524 100.00%
Monroe High Smr Sch - 26609 $0 $0 $0 0%
Edison Campus Summer School - 27009 $244,889 $0 $244,889 100.00%
Freddie Thomas Smr Sch - 27209 $136,217 $0 $136,217 100.00%
Franklin Campus Summer School - 27609 $0 $0 $0 0%
Edison-Skilled Trades Smr Sch - 28809 $0 $0 $0 0%
High School Smr Sch - 29409 $542,875 $1,371,799 ($828,924) (152.69%)
High Schools - HS - 29905 $4,277,345 $11,355,870 ($7,078,525) (165.49%)
Foundation Smr Sch - 39409 $62,847 $478,477 ($415,630) (661.34%)
Northeast Zone Schl Sprvision - 70716 $220,211 $254,301 ($34,090) (15.48%)
South Zone School Supervision - 74216 $251,795 $281,368 ($29,573) (11.74%)
Northwest Zone Sch Supervision - 74716 $312,508 $332,863 ($20,355) (6.51%)
School Support Total $11,385,802 $17,089,819 ($5,704,017) (50.10%)

Section 4 Page 159

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Chiefs of Schools

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary - 1,675,586 - 1,675,586
Civil Service Salary 245,232 162,016 342,144 (180,128)
Administrator Salary 427,438 469,038 410,970 58,068
Hourly Teachers 3,934,115 2,124,761 1,688,102 436,659
Teaching Assistants - - - -
Paraprofessional Salary 294,878 684,859 500,000 184,859
Sub Total Salary Compensation 4,901,663 5,116,260 2,941,216 2,175,044
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 54,584 3,359,934 2,550,000 809,934
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 196,199 312,733 372,057 (59,324)
Teachers In Service 64,841 208,118 147,247 60,871
Sub Total Other Compensation 315,624 3,880,785 3,069,304 811,481
Total Salary and Other Compensation 5,217,287 8,997,045 6,010,520 2,986,525
Employee Benefits - - - -
Total Compensation and Benefits 5,217,287 8,997,045 6,010,520 2,986,525
Fixed Obligations With Variability
Special Education Tuition - - - -
Contract Transportation 8,550 371,860 341,000 30,860
Charter School Tuition - - - -
Health Service Other Districts - - - -
Insurance non-employee - - - -
Sub Total Fixed Obligations 8,550 371,860 341,000 30,860
Debt Service
Sub Total Debt Service - - - -
Cash Capital Outlays
Cash Capital Expense - - - -
Textbooks 1,242,799 1,350,114 1,349,423 691
Equipment Other than Buses 14,880 - - -
Equipment Buses - - - -
Computer Hardware - Instructional - - - -
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional 933 2,430 4,000 (1,570)
Library Books - - - -
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays 1,258,612 1,352,544 1,353,423 (879)

Section 4 Page 160

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Chiefs of Schools

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Facilities and Related

Utilities - - - -
Instructional Supplies 413,145 392,679 893,545 (500,866)
Equip Service Contr & Repair 6,718 - - -
Facilities Service Contracts - - - -
Rentals 45,093 57,625 63,000 (5,375)
Maintenance Repair Supplies - - - -
Postage and Print/Advertising 22,888 32,966 34,525 (1,559)
Auto Supplies - - - -
Supplies and Materials 14,038 11,000 21,500 (10,500)
Custodial Supplies 3,758 10,374 17,602 (7,228)
Office Supplies 2,811 6,080 11,653 (5,573)
Sub Total Facilities and Related 508,450 510,724 1,041,825 (531,101)
Technology
Computer Software - Instructional - - - -
Computer Software - Non Instructional 27,714 2,995 - 2,995
Subtotal Technology 27,714 2,995 - 2,995
All Other Variable Expenses
Miscellaneous Services 10,416 36,460 35,524 936
Professional Technical Service 423,752 100,809 157,629 (56,820)
Agency Clerical 887 9,000 9,330 (330)
Judgments and Claims - - - -
Grant Disallowances - - - -
Departmental Credits - - - -
Indirect Costs Grants - - - -
BOCES Services - - - -
Professional Development 16,308 4,365 15,230 (10,865)
Subtotal of All Other Variable Expenses 451,363 150,634 217,713 (67,079)
Total Non Compensation 2,254,689 2,388,757 2,953,961 (565,204)
Sub Total 7,471,976 11,385,802 8,964,481 2,421,321
Budget Reserve - - 8,125,338 (8,125,338)
Grand Total 7,471,976 11,385,802 17,089,819 (5,704,017)

Section 4 Page 161

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Chiefs of Schools

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

#3-Nathaniel Roch Smr Sch - 10309 - 56,740 - 56,740

#8-Roberto Clemente Smr Sch - 10809 188,308 69,551 - 69,551
#9-M Luther King Jr Smr Sch - 10909 155,321 - - -
#12-James P B Duffy Smr Sch - 11209 934,319 43,909 - 43,909
#17-Enrico Fermi Smr Sch - 11709 177,928 - - -
#19-Dr Chas Lunsford Smr Sch - 11909 139,212 39,403 - 39,403
#25-Nath. Hawth. Smr Sch - 12509 48,138 - - -
Sch. No. 28 Smr Sch - 12809 - 70,289 - 70,289
#29-A E Stevenson Smr Sch - 12909 196 - - -
#33-Audobon School Smr Sch - 13309 - 124,359 - 124,359
Sch. No. 35 Smr Sch - 13509 160,162 - - -
#36-H W Longfellow Smr Sch - 13609 5,076 - - -
#41 - Kodak Park Smr Schl - SS - 14109 - 85,278 - 85,278
#45-Mary McLeod Bethune SmrSch - 14509 177,202 80,930 - 80,930
#58-Wrld of Inquiry Smr Sch - 15809 42,261 27,212 - 27,212
Elementary Smr Sch - 19409 511,396 234,361 514,755 (280,394)
Elementary Schools - ES - 19902 38,837 3,331,765 2,410,573 921,192
OACES Summer Program - 23509 - 173,717 89,814 83,903
Special Ed Smr Sch - 24109 287,013 - - -
Commencement Evn Acad Smr Prgm - 24709 482 91,196 - 91,196
Eng & Sci Acad Smr Pr @ FTHS - 25009 - 12,710 - 12,710
Wilson Comm IB Smr Program - 25109 - 9,865 - 9,865
East High Smr Sch - 26109 439 71,381 - 71,381
Franklin High Summer School - 26209 577,861 423,925 - 423,925
Wilson Foundation Smr Sch - 26409 244,277 - - -
John Marshall Smr Sch - 26509 379,788 390,524 - 390,524
Monroe High Smr Sch - 26609 389,370 - - -
Edison Campus Summer School - 27009 431,300 244,889 - 244,889
Freddie Thomas Smr Sch - 27209 13,747 136,217 - 136,217
Franklin Campus Summer School - 27609 8,065 - - -
Edison-Skilled Trades Smr Sch - 28809 49,872 - - -
High School Smr Sch - 29409 83,934 542,875 1,371,799 (828,924)
High Schools - HS - 29905 1,296,101 4,277,345 11,355,870 (7,078,525)
Foundation Smr Sch - 39409 299,793 62,847 478,477 (415,630)
Northeast Zone Schl Sprvision - 70716 308,845 220,211 254,301 (34,090)
South Zone School Supervision - 74216 220,541 251,795 281,368 (29,573)
Northwest Zone Sch Supervision - 74716 302,194 312,508 332,863 (20,355)

School Support - SCHOOL SUPPORT 7,471,976 11,385,802 17,089,819 (5,704,017)

Section 4 Page 162

 SCHOOL PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 FINAL BUDGET

Position Summary
Chiefs of Schools

Var Bud vs
2009 - 2010 2010 - 2011 2011-2012 Amend
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

POSITIONS BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 18.80 9.11 - 9.11
Civil Service Salary 3.00 5.00 3.00 2.00
Administrator Salary 3.00 2.00 3.00 (1.00)
Teaching Assistants 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
Paraprofessional Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hourly Teachers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary Compensation 25.30 16.11 6.00 10.11

Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teachers In Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Compensation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary and Other Compensation 25.30 16.11 6.00 10.11

Employee Benefits
Employee Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grand Total 25.30 16.11 6.00 10.11

POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT

Elementary Schools - ES - 19902 0.50 4.00 0.00 4.00

High Schools - HS - 29905 18.80 6.11 0.00 6.11
Northeast Zone Schl Sprvision - 70716 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00
South Zone School Supervision - 74216 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00
Northwest Zone Sch Supervision - 74716 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00
Rochester City School District - RCSD 25.30 16.11 6.00 10.11

Section 4 Page 163

Program Profiles and Budgets

Individual Program Summaries

 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: Agency Youth - Youth and Justice

Program Director: Margaret Porter Chief: Shaun Nelms
Program Category: Alternative School Program
Number of students served in 2009-10: 1,795
Location: Various (approximately 8)
Grade level(s) of students served: All Grades Funding Source: A Fund, Title I
Program Description:
The Agency Youth Program works primarily with juvenile youth placed through the Monroe County Office of Probation, Courts, Department of
Health, and Human Services in order to secure or non-secure environments for the purpose of receiving intensive services. The program provides
mandated educational services in a variety of facilities and hospitals. In addition, there are several educational programs not mandated that are
provided as an alternative to juvenile youth. Goal of program is to educate the total student and ensure the student's time with Agency Youth
Program brings them closer to academic credentialing and to valuing their freedom. Sites include Rochester Educators and Probation Officer
(REPO), Monroe County Children's Detention Center, St. Joseph's Villa, Watertower Academy, Northhaven non-secure Detention Center, Lovejoy
Group Home, University of Rochester Strong Memorial Hospital, RCSD at Unity Health. Note: Numbers projected decrease in secure and non-
secure as alternatives to detainment for juveniles is stressed.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Ensure each student is academically prepared to succeed in college, life and global economy.
Program Objectives:
1) Provide instructional and counseling services to ensure successful re-entry into regular school programs
2) Increase percent of student attendance
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
1) Number of students served 1,838 1,795 1,705 1,640 1,640
2) % rate of student attendance 89% 83% 84% 86% 86%
Revenue:
General Fund $ 1,857,364 $ 1,827,758 $ 1,882,145 $ 2,066,252 $ 2,144,168
Grant Fund 35,504 38,089 132,535 97,564 100,491
Total Revenue $ 1,892,869 $ 1,865,847 $ 2,014,680 $ 2,163,816 $ 2,244,660
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ 79,925 $ 99,478 $ 105,904 $ 101,118 $ 104,152
Teacher Salaries 1,286,831 1,234,414 1,277,909 1,313,442 1,352,845
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries 23,364 48,414 53,047 113,139 116,533
Benefit Expense 436,872 428,690 513,161 589,856 623,481
Material and Supplies 65,878 54,850 64,659 46,261 47,649
Other Variable Expenses - - - - -
Total Expenditures $ 1,892,869 $ 1,865,847 $ 2,014,680 $ 2,163,816 $ 2,244,660
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Teachers 20.0 20.0 21.5 19.1 19.1
Civil Service 1.5 1.5 1.5 4.5 4.5
Total Positions 22.5 22.5 24.0 24.6 24.6
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 1,030 $ 1,039 $ 1,182 $ 1,319 $ 1,369

Section 5 Page 1
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: AVID Advancement Via Individual Determination

Program Director: Kathie Mykins Chief: Beth Mascitti-Miller
Program Category: College Prep
Number of students served 2009-10: 1,348
Location: 18 secondary schools
Grade level(s) of students served: Grade 7-12 Funding Source: A Fund
Program Description:
AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students for college readiness and success in a global society. The mission is
student-focused, but the work transforms the behaviors and expectations of the teachers who support the AVID student. The AVID program
seeks to close the achievement gap by improving the performance of all students, especially those who have not traditionally succeeded in
completing college entrance requirements: students who are underrepresented in four-year colleges and universities, students in the academic
middle, students who are the first in their family to go to college. Sites include , Charlotte, , East, Edison Campus, Bioscience and International
Finance @ Franklin, Freddie Thomas High School, Thomas Jefferson, John Marshall, James Monroe, Nathaniel Rochester, Northeast College Prep,
Northwest College Prep, School of the Performing Arts, School Without Walls Foundation, Wilson Commencement Academy.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Ensure each student is academically prepared to succeed in college, life and global economy.
Program Objectives:
1) Increase number/percent of 8th grade AVID students enrolled in Algebra
2) Increase number/percent of AVID students enrolled in at least one AP class
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
Number of AVID students 995 1,348 1,338 400 400
Number Grade 8 AVID students 172 297 275 50 50
1)#(%) Grade 8 students in algebra class 39 (22%) 95 (32%) 84 (31%) 0 0
2)#(%) students in at least one AP class 7 (.7%) 176 (13%) 226 (17%) 5% 5%
Revenue:
General Fund $ 1,864,258 $ 1,534,870 $ 1,804,851 $ 311,752 $ 519,869
Grant Fund - - - 196,997 -
Total Revenue $ 1,864,258 $ 1,534,870 $ 1,804,851 $ 508,749 $ 519,869
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ 98,238 $ 104,690 $ 107,786 $ - $ -
Teacher Salaries 905,438 903,909 1,052,790 323,646 333,355
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries - - - - -
Benefit Expense 337,766 349,578 450,175 133,157 139,871
Material and Supplies 1,523 91,319 7,188 42,284 43,553
Other Variable Expenses 521,293 85,374 186,912 9,662 3,090
Total Expenditures $ 1,864,258 $ 1,534,870 $ 1,804,851 $ 508,749 $ 519,869
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators 1.0 1.0 1.0 - -
Teachers 18.0 18.0 19.0 6.0 6.0
Civil Service - - - - -
Total Positions 19.0 19.0 20.0 6.0 6.0
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 1,874 $ 1,139 $ 1,349 $ 1,272 $ 1,300

Section 5 Page 2
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: Career & Technical Education

Program Director: Beverly Gushue Chief: Beth Mascitti-Miller
Program Category: Academic Acceleration
Number of students served 2009-10: 4,445
Location: All secondary schools
Grade level(s) of students served: Grade 7-12 Funding Source: A Fund
Program Description:
Career and technical education prepares young adults for a wide range of careers. The mission of the program is to educate all students to be
successful citizens, workers and leaders in a global economy. These careers may require varying levels of education – from high school and
postsecondary certificates to two- and four-year college degrees. Career and technical education is offered in middle schools, high schools,
community and technical colleges and other postsecondary institutions. CTE provides students academic subject matter taught with relevance to
the real world, employability skills, from job-related skills to workplace ethics and career pathways that link secondary and postsecondary
education.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Recruit, develop and retain highly effective, diverse people dedicated to student success
Program Objectives:
1) Increase number of students participating in CTE courses
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
Number of students participating in CTE courses 5,197 4,445 5,000 5,200 5,200
Revenue:
General Fund $ 203,927 $ 452,785 $ 279,556 $ 124,320 $ 145,494
Grant Fund 331,903 151,769 592,499 441,235 441,235
Total Revenue $ 535,830 $ 604,554 $ 872,055 $ 565,555 $ 586,729
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ 86,261 $ 152,990 $ 93,416 $ 95,433 $ 98,296
Teacher Salaries 13,775 62,778 176,609 50,078 51,580
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries 265,194 179,070 58,236 51,617 53,166
Benefit Expense 86,515 45,016 98,311 53,547 55,416
Material and Supplies 30,337 66,218 273,331 207,646 213,875
Other Variable Expenses 53,748 98,482 172,152 107,234 114,396
Total Expenditures $ 535,830 $ 604,554 $ 872,055 $ 565,555 $ 586,729
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Teachers - - - - -
Civil Service 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Total Positions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 103 $ 136 $ 174 $ 109 $ 113

Section 5 Page 3
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: Careers in Teaching (CIT)

Program Director: Marie Costanza Chief: Beth Mascitti-Miller
Program Category: Staff/Professional Development
Number of students served 2009-10: NA
Location: All schools
Grade level(s) of students served: NA Funding Source: Title I, II
Program Description:
The Career in Teaching Program (CIT) was established in 1987. The main goal of the CIT Program is to retain highly effective teachers through Peer
Assistance and Review. This goal is accomplished by one-on-one mentoring provided to non-tenured teachers by lead teacher mentors. It is a major
collaborative effort between the RTA and the District to develop a stronger instructional staff through teacher mentoring and support. The program
focuses on providing teacher mentoring throughout each career stage: Intern, Resident, and Professional levels, both part and full time staff. The CIT
program coordinates mentor and lead teacher positions throughout the District. In February 2004, the New York State mandated that districts provide
mentoring programs for teachers at the Intern level. The overall retention rate of teachers who remain in the district for at least 5 years has remained
steady over the past 24 years at an average rate of 84%.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Recruit, develop and retain highly effective, diverse people dedicated to student success
Program Objectives:
1) Maintain the overall 5-year retention rate of teachers at or above 84%
2) Maintain the 5 year retention rate of Special Education teachers at or above 85%
3) Maintain the 5 year retention rate of Math teachers at or above 80%
4) Maintain the 5 year retention rate of Bilingual teachers at or above 68%
5) Maintain the 5 year retention rate of Science teachers at or above 75%
6) Maintain the 5 year retention rate of Foreign Language teachers at or above 64%
7) Maintain the 5 year retention rate of English teachers at or above 75%
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
Percent teachers retained after 3 years 88% 88% 88% 88% 88%
1) Overall 5 year teacher retention rate 84% 84% 84% 84% 84%
2) Special Ed 5 year teacher retention rate 85% 85% 85% 85% 85%
3) Math 5 year teacher retention rate 80% 80% 80% 80% 80%
4) Bilingual 5 year teacher retention rate 68% 68% 68% 68% 68%
5) Science 5 year teacher retention rate 75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
6) Foreign Language 5 yr. retention rate 64% 64% 64% 64% 64%
7) English 5 year teacher retention rate 75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
Revenue:
General Fund $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Grant Fund 2,485,774 2,200,352 2,556,228 2,282,639 2,342,650
Total Revenue $ 2,485,774 $ 2,200,352 $ 2,556,228 $ 2,282,639 $ 2,342,650
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Teacher Salaries 1,842,201 1,597,277 1,856,225 1,621,256 1,669,894
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries 39,748 54,775 58,729 49,999 51,499
Benefit Expense 453,302 390,950 492,596 486,603 493,019
Material and Supplies 57,217 23,737 23,734 15,000 15,450
Other Variable Expenses 93,306 133,613 124,944 109,781 112,788
Total Expenditures $ 2,485,774 $ 2,200,352 $ 2,556,228 $ 2,282,639 $ 2,342,650
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators - - - - -
Teachers 12.6 12.6 11.4 11.0 11.0
Civil Service 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Total Positions 13.6 13.6 12.4 12.0 12.0
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Section 5 Page 4
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: Diversity Initiative - Recruiting

Program Director: Charles Smith Chief: Leslie Boozer
Program Category: Diverse & Talented Teacher Recruitment
Number of students served 2009-10: all students
Location: All locations
Grade level(s) of students served: all students Funding Source: Title IIA
Program Description:
The goal of the Diversity Recruiting Initiative is to increase representation of African-American and Hispanic teaching staff in the District.
Recruitment efforts are expanded beyond western New York State primarily through attendance at job fairs and interviews at colleges and
universities that have high enrollments of African-American and Hispanic students. The recruitment effort focuses primarily on teacher hiring.
Data is for program participants.
Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:
Ensure each student is academically prepared to succeed in college, life and global economy.
Program Objectives:
1) Increase the number of teacher applications received
2) Increase the percent of African-American and Hispanic teachers in the District work force
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-2013
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
1) # of teacher applications received 1,052 1,666 1,594 1,500 1,500
2) % of minority teachers in District 21.5% 20.8% 20.6% 21.0% 21.0%
Revenue:
General Fund $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Grant Fund 233,917 315,410 320,137 181,085 186,572
Total Revenue $ 233,917 $ 315,410 $ 320,137 $ 181,085 $ 186,572
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ 48,088 $ 55,721 $ 68,495 $ 68,495 $ 70,550
Teacher Salaries 3,601 927 8,200 - -
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries 3,931 69,305 49,857 44,197 45,523
Benefit Expense 15,882 36,650 42,491 47,550 48,976
Material and Supplies 152,771 139,804 140,268 9,863 10,159
Other Variable Expenses 9,644 13,003 10,826 10,980 11,365
Total Expenditures $ 233,917 $ 315,410 $ 320,137 $ 181,085 $ 186,572
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
Teachers - - - - -
Civil Service - 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Total Positions 0.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7

Per Unit Cost Measures

Cost per student enrolled N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Section 5 Page 5
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: Drug & Alcohol Counselors (Delphi)

Program Director: Marjorie Lefler Chief: Gladys Pedraza-Burgos
Program Category: Drug and Alcohol Counseling
Number of students served 2009-10: 292
Location: Four elementary and four high schools - #2, 9, 17, 13, Charlotte, East, Jefferson, Monroe
Grade level(s) of students served: Grade K-12 Funding Source: Federal Grant
Program Description:
Delphi Drug & Alcohol Counsel was contracted to provide school-based assessment and substance abuse prevention counseling to students. Six
counselors were hired to provide services such as: individual counseling, assessments, and short term crisis intervention services. Delphi
counselors also run COA groups, parent/community workshops, staff workshops, as well as family counseling. Student seen are students who are
on the scale of “at-risk” for using and abusing substances (light users). Heavy drug users must be referred outside to drug treatment programs
(schools are not licensed to have intense therapy service). Students are referred by a parent, school counselor, teacher, administrator, other
school staff member.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Create safe, engaging and nurturing school environment to enable student success.
Program Objectives:
1) Increase number of students receiving a completed drug assessment
2) Increase number of students successfully completing drug counseling program
3) Increase number of referrals to community mental health treatment
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
1) number receiving drug/alcohol assessment N/A 292 350 350 350
2) number completing drug program 189 250 265 265
3) number referred to mental health service 56 62 70 70
Revenue:
General Fund $ - $ - $ - $ -
Grant Fund N/A 282,774 321,167 321,167 321,167
Total Revenue N/A $ 282,774 $ 321,167 $ 321,167 $ 321,167
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries N/A $ - $ - $ - $ -
Teacher Salaries N/A - - - -
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries N/A - - - -
Benefit Expense N/A - - - -
Material and Supplies N/A - - - -
Other Variable Expenses N/A 282,774 321,167 321,167 321,167
Total Expenditures N/A $ 282,774 $ 321,167 $ 321,167 $ 321,167
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators N/A - - - -
Teachers N/A - - - -
Civil Service N/A - - - -
Total Positions N/A - - - -
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled N/A $ 968 $ 918 $ 918 $ 918

Section 5 Page 6
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: Gateway to College MCC

Program Director: Karen Sangmeister Chief: Beth Mascitti-Miller
Program Category: Alternative School Program
Number of students served 2009-10: 61
Location: Monroe Community College (MCC) Damon Center
Grade level(s) of students served: Grade 9-12 Funding Source: A Fund
Program Description:
The Gateway to College program is a partnership with Monroe Community College. It is designed for students ages 16-20 who have left high
school without earning a diploma. The program helps them return to education and gain a high school diploma while earning college credit at
MCC. Students participate in small classes and receive intensive support to facilitate their success. Students earn their high school diploma while
accruing college credits towards a certificate or degree program.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Create a culture in which we hold ourselves accountable for student success.
Program Objectives:
1) Students remain engaged in the program
2) Students graduate from high school (diploma or GED)
3) Students earn a Regents Diploma
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
1) Percent remaining in program 33% 51% 60% 70% 70%
2) Percent graduating high school (diploma or GED) 6% 25% 12% 30% 30%
3) Percent earning Regents Diplomas 6% 7% 12% 20% 20%
Revenue:
General Fund $ 773,217 $ 302,558 $ 484,900 $ 430,648 $ 430,648
Grant Fund - - - - -
Total Revenue $ 773,217 $ 302,558 $ 484,900 $ 430,648 $ 430,648
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Teacher Salaries - - - - -
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries - - - - -
Benefit Expense - - - - -
Material and Supplies 773,217 302,558 484,900 430,648 430,648
Other Variable Expenses - - - - -
Total Expenditures $ 773,217 $ 302,558 $ 484,900 $ 430,648 $ 430,648
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators - - - - -
Teachers - - - - -
Civil Service - - - - -
Total Positions - - - - -
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 12,676 $ 4,960 $ 7,949 $ 7,060 $ 7,060

Section 5 Page 7
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: Hillside Work Scholarship HWSC

Program Director: GladysPedrazaBurgos Chief: Gladys Pedraza-Burgos
Program Category: Attendance/Dropout Prevention
Number of students served 2009-10: 3,100
Location: All secondary schools
Grade level(s) of students served: Grade 7-12 Funding Source: A Fund
Program Description:
HWSC began in 1987 to help at-risk students by providing long-term advocates, academic resources, life skills development, and job training in
order to increase their graduation rates, reach their full academic potential, and conduct themselves responsibly. HWSC partners provide part-time
employment at 35 different sites and 20 partners provide higher education scholarships. HWSC has worked with over 5000 students from 1987-88
through 2008-09. In 2006-07, the criteria for participation changed from a requirement that students have a GPA of 2.0 or higher to students who
were failing 2 to 3 of their 4 core courses. Program participants must now meet two of the following: failing 2 or 3 core courses, history of
suspensions, overage for grade, attendance between 71% and 85%, low income, score in level 1 or 2 on NYS 8th Grade ELA or Math.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Ensure each student is academically prepared to succeed in college, life and global economy.
Program Objectives:
1) Increase high school graduation rate
2) Maintain advocate ratio to students at 33:1
3) Provide work scholarship opportunities for HS students
4) Encourage enrollment in college
5) Provide college scholarship opportunities
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
1) District graduation rate 46.0% 50.0% 55.0% 55.0% 55.0%
2) # of students 2,176 3,100 3,000 2,500 2,500
3) ratio of advocates 33:1 33:1 33:1 33:1 33:1
3) # of HS students on work scholarship 401 600 800 800 800
4) # students enrolled in college 145 170 330 330 330
5) # students HWSC college scholarship 50 53 53 53 53
Revenue:
General Fund $ 600,000 $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ 600,000
Grant Fund - 1,200,000 600,000 600,000 600,000
Total Revenue $ 600,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 600,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Teacher Salaries - - - - -
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries - - - - -
Benefit Expense - - - - -
Material and Supplies - - - - -
Other Variable Expenses 600,000 1,200,000 600,000 1,200,000 1,200,000
Total Expenditures $ 600,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 600,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators - - - - -
Teachers - - - - -
Civil Service - - - - -
Total Positions - - - - -
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 1,496 $ 2,000 $ 750 $ 1,500 $ 1,500

Section 5 Page 8
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: Home Hospital Tutoring Program

Program Director: Brenda Ellsion Chief: Beth Mascitti-Miller
Program Category: Alternative School Programs
Number of students served 2010-11: 250
Location: Home, hospital, public locales
Grade level(s) of students served: All Grades Funding Source: A Fund
Program Description:
Per the NYS Commissioner's Regulations, Home/Hospital Tutoring provides continuity of academic instruction in core subjects to students who
are homebound; are unable to attend school, usually for reasons of illness, disability or discipline. Assignment to the program vary from ten days
to one full year, depending on the severity of the medical condition or suspension. Home/Hospital teachers travel to various locations to meet the
academic needs of District students and sometimes those of private and/or parochial school students (those with an IEP). Although a
Home/Hospital teacher provides continuity of instruction for individual students, the student continues to remain directly connected to his/her
home school. A review of all requests for Home/Hospital Tutoring must be made by the Program Administrator or a registered nurse to determine
medical necessity.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Ensure each student is academically prepared to succeed in college, life and global economy.
Program Objectives:
1) Provide at least 5 hours of instruction to homebound elementary students per week.
2) Provide at least 10 hours of instruction to homebound secondary students per week.

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
# medically eligible students 285 321 250 250 250
# out of district students 5 7 5 5 5
1) # average weekly hours elementary 5 5 5 5 5
2) # average weekly hours secondary 10 10 10 10 10
Revenue:
General Fund $ 3,115,569 $ 2,985,255 $ 2,636,395 $ 1,855,381 $ 1,938,379
Grant Fund 76,987 70,588 77,185 80,730 80,730
Total Revenue $ 3,192,556 $ 3,055,843 $ 2,713,580 $ 1,936,111 $ 2,019,108
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Teacher Salaries 2,285,127 2,169,246 1,939,941 1,309,809 1,349,103
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries 62,725 61,506 51,070 51,118 52,652
Benefit Expense 818,138 800,259 690,852 518,932 559,496
Material and Supplies 26,566 24,832 31,717 56,252 57,858
Other Variable Expenses - - - - -
Total Expenditures $ 3,192,556 $ 3,055,843 $ 2,713,580 $ 1,936,111 $ 2,019,108
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators - - - - -
Teachers 45.8 45.8 30.3 21.5 21.5
Civil Service 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Total Positions 47.8 47.8 31.3 22.5 22.5
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 11,202 $ 9,520 $ 10,854 $ 7,744 $ 8,076

Section 5 Page 9
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: I'M READY

Program Director: Jerome Watts Chief: Deasure Matthew
Program Category: Alternative School Program
Number of students served 2009-10: 613
Location: I'M READY PROGRAM
Grade level(s) of students served: Grade 7-12 Funding Source: C4E
Program Description:
The Rochester City School District I'M READY Community Learning Center is for students who have been placed on long-term suspension by the
Superintendent of Schools. The program promotes a personalized learning environment where every student assigned to the program continues
their academic program along with supportive services. These academic and support services include ongoing relationships with caring adults, a
safe place with structured activities, and access to services that promote healthy life styles, including physical and mental health.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Create a culture in which we hold ourselves accountable for student success.
Program Objectives:
1) Increase student attendance
2) Increase student promotion rate to next grade level
3) Reduce repeated long term suspension
4) Reduce number of student dropouts
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
# students assigned to program 927 613 550 525 525
# (%) students attending program 698 (75%) 519 (84%) 480 (87%) 475 (90%) 475 (90%)
1) Attendance rate for attendees 59% 62% 65% 68% 68%
2) #(%) students attending promoted 299 (43%) 275 (45%) 50% 55% 55%
3)#% students attending repeat long term 21(3%) 101 (16%) 14% 12% 12%
4)#(%) students attending drop out 27 (4%) 24 (4%) 6% 8% 8%
Revenue:
General Fund $ 2,457,247 $ 2,168,038 $ 2,490,955 $ 2,227,295 $ 2,305,944
Grant Fund - - 3,540 - -
Total Revenue $ 2,457,247 $ 2,168,038 $ 2,494,495 $ 2,227,295 $ 2,305,944
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ 177,476 $ 203,747 $ 209,711 $ 203,027 $ 209,118
Teacher Salaries 1,043,083 967,646 1,142,687 974,692 1,003,933
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries 145,866 210,478 254,121 253,583 261,190
Benefit Expense 495,877 521,158 572,326 601,971 631,860
Material and Supplies 594,945 265,010 315,650 194,022 199,842
Other Variable Expenses - - - -
Total Expenditures $ 2,457,247 $ 2,168,038 $ 2,494,495 $ 2,227,295 $ 2,305,944
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Teachers 20.0 20.0 16.1 16.1 16.1
Civil Service 8.0 10.0 8.0 8.0 8.0
Total Positions 30.0 32.0 26.1 26.1 26.1
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 2,651 $ 3,537 $ 4,535 $ 4,242 $ 4,392

Section 5 Page 10
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: Incarcerated Youth -Youth & Justice

Program Director: Margaret Porter Chief: Shaun Nelms
Program Category: Alternative School Programs
Number of students served 2009-10: 1,593
Location: Monroe County Jail and Monroe County Correctional Facility
Grade level(s) of students served: 7-12 Funding Source: A Fund, Title 1
Program Description:
The focus of the Monroe County Incarcerated Youth Programs is to maintain continuity of core course instruction as well as Regents Science
Labs, Spanish and Technology with students in regular high school programs and to provide instruction and administer the GED Examination to
students who have dropped out of Monroe County schools. The program provides students with literacy initiatives, transition counseling,
technology literacy, workforce preparation skills, vocational education programming and supports instructional curriculum. The Program partners
with the County of Monroe to support jail programming and transitioning youth back into the community. Homelessness, continued education,
health related concerns, drug use and abuse, gang violence, and individual concerns that students cite as barriers to success in the community are
addressed individually, in groups, and in classrooms as appropriate.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Ensure each student is academically prepared to succeed in college, life and global economy.
Program Objectives:
1) Provide continuity of instruction to all students who are incarcerated
2) Increase the number of youth receiving a GED Diploma (NYS Average is 55%)
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
1) Number of students served annually 1,600 1,593 1,350 1,500 1,500
2) Percent of students earing GED 73% 68% 71% 71% 71%
Revenue:
General Fund $ 8,572 $ 31,948 $ 2,251,982 $ 2,321,025 $ 2,450,224
Grant Fund 2,124,265 2,654,301 280,651 190,836 195,075
Total Revenue $ 2,132,837 $ 2,686,250 $ 2,532,633 $ 2,511,861 $ 2,645,299
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ 87,101 $ 101,640 $ 104,005 $ 183,290 $ 188,789
Teacher Salaries 1,260,360 1,554,815 1,499,109 1,428,636 1,471,495
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries 169,036 161,830 182,361 194,172 199,997
Benefit Expense 425,853 566,266 635,015 625,672 702,576
Material and Supplies 190,487 301,699 112,143 80,090 82,443
Other Variable Expenses - - - - -
Total Expenditures $ 2,132,837 $ 2,686,250 $ 2,532,633 $ 2,511,861 $ 2,645,299
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Teachers 20.5 24.2 22.7 19.3 19.3
Civil Service 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Total Positions 26.0 29.7 29.2 25.8 25.8
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 1,333 $ 1,686 $ 1,876 $ 1,675 $ 1,764

Section 5 Page 11
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: In-School Suspension (ISS)

Program Director: Lori Baldwin Chief: John Scanlan
Program Category: Alternative School Program
Number of students served 2009-10: 4,045
Location: All school buildings
Grade level(s) of students served: Grade K-12 Funding Source: C4E
Program Description:
The In School Suspension (ISS) program is a support program that began in 2008-09. The ISS program is designed to keep students who receive a
suspension at school in a learning environment during the period of their suspension. Each school has an In School Suspension Room that provides
continued instruction to their suspended students during their period of suspension. Its purpose is to not interrupt the progress of regular
classroom instruction so that students can achieve academic success and maintain engagement in the educational setting and process. After
completing their suspension in the In School Suspension Room, students return to their regular classrooms and continue the regular classroom
instruction schedule. In School Suspension (short term/in school) is a suspension of 5 or fewer days. The data does not include students placed in
ISS pending Long Term (6 or more days) adjudication. The number of individual students suspended is not the same as the number of suspensions.
An individual students may be suspended more than one time.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Create a culture in which we hold ourselves accountable for student success.
Program Objectives:
1) Reduce the percent of individual students grades K-12 suspended for 5 or fewer days (per VADIR data)
2) Reduce the number of suspensions for 5 or fewer days
3) Increase the percent of students scoring in Levels 3 & 4 on NYS ELA Grades 3-8
4) Increase the graduation rate
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
Number students in grades K-12 32,132 31,511 31,247 30,977 30,977
Number individual students suspended 2,630 2,323 2,029 2,029 2,029
1) % of individual students suspended 8.1% 7.3% 6.5% 6.5% 6.5%
2) Number of suspensions 4,757 4,045 3,800 3,800 3,800
2) % passing NYS ELA 3-8 56.0% 25.5% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0%
3) Graduation Rate 46.0% 50.0% 55.0% 55.0% 55.0%
Revenue:
General Fund $ 3,521,550 $ 3,911,403 $ 4,054,774 $ 3,930,799 $ 4,069,006
Grant Fund - - - - -
Total Revenue $ 3,521,550 $ 3,911,403 $ 4,054,774 $ 3,930,799 $ 4,069,006
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Teacher Salaries 2,658,300 2,991,691 3,067,297 2,845,832 2,931,206
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries - - - - -
Benefit Expense 863,250 919,712 987,477 1,084,968 1,137,799
Material and Supplies - - - - -
Other Variable Expenses - - - -
Total Expenditures $ 3,521,550 $ 3,911,403 $ 4,054,774 $ 3,930,799 $ 4,069,006
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators - - - - -
Teachers 46.5 48.0 40.5 44.8 44.8
Civil Service - - - - -
Total Positions 46.5 48.0 40.5 44.8 44.8
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 110 $ 124 $ 130 $ 127 $ 131

Section 5 Page 12
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: Instructional Technology (EETT)

Program Director: Tim Cliby Chief: Beth Mascitti-Miller
Program Category: Academic Acceleration
Number of students served 2009-10: 20,000
Location: All schools
Grade level(s) of students served: Grade K-12 Funding Source: ARRA, EETT
Program Description:
The Department of Instructional Technology delivers training to teachers to integrate desktop & interactive technology software and hardware
into curricula to support engaging students & creating dynamic lessons through the use of technology. The department currently manages a
Technology Grant designed to support technology integration and advance the development of Student Centered Active Learning Environments
(SCALE) also known as Model Classrooms. Professional development is provided for District owned or licensed software. This software informs
instruction and allows teachers to hone academic services to students in an individualized manner using various electronic intervention tools. The
department explores and develops credit recovery programs, virtual school opportunities and electronic regents’ preparation courses and offers
these opportunities to all High Schools. Support is provided to CTE in the form of training, technology, and software. The department works
closely with IM&T to develop the District Technology Plan and works closely with the Core Academic Directors to support curriculum and assist
in developing resources for the eCurriculum.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Ensure each student is academically prepared to succeed in college, life and global economy.
Program Objectives:
1) Develop model integrated classrooms tied to ongoing prescribed teacher profession learning
2) Provide professional development to teachers
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
1a) % high schs with Model Classroom 50% 100% 100% 100% 100%
1b) % elem schs with Model Classroom 0% 33% 66% 100%-Pending Funding
2a) PD teaching hours delivered 2,476 2,500 1,475 1,500 1,500
2b) Total teachers receiving PD 4,825 3,687 6,200 6,800 6,800
Revenue:
General Fund $ 2,728,082 $ 1,807,654 $ 2,007,527 $ 2,267,508 $ 2,365,541
Grant Fund 1,046,609 1,805,813 3,254,988 979,208 987,584
Total Revenue $ 3,774,691 $ 3,613,467 $ 5,262,025 $ 3,246,716 $ 3,353,125
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ 213,900 $ 237,845 $ 228,692 $ 235,553 $ 242,620
Teacher Salaries 817,159 754,887 815,773 818,047 842,588
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries 79,650 97,274 89,664 90,728 93,450
Benefit Expense 276,342 246,322 348,500 411,462 433,806
Material and Supplies 2,349,776 1,953,555 3,001,289 1,348,117 1,388,561
Other Variable Expenses 37,864 323,584 778,107 342,809 352,100
Total Expenditures $ 3,774,691 $ 3,613,467 $ 5,262,025 $ 3,246,716 $ 3,353,125
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Teachers 6.0 5.0 10.0 9.0 9.0
Civil Service 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Total Positions 9.0 8.0 13.0 12.0 12.0
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per staff member trained $ 782 $ 980 $ 849 $ 477 $ 493

Section 5 Page 13
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: Interscholastic Sports

Program Director: Carlos Cotto Chief: Beth Mascitti-Miller
Program Category: Extra Curricula & Interscholastic Activities
Number of students served 2009-10: 5,010
Location: Elementary School #19, 58, and all middle and secondary schools
Grade level(s) of students served: Grade 7-12 Funding Source: A Fund
Program Description:
The Department of Health, Physical Education and Athletics provides support to schools for Modified and Interscholastic sport programs at all
levels of competition for the District’s middle and senior high school students. The District affords city student athletes the opportunity to
participate on athletic teams in a myriad of sport offerings. The Department also supports various school programs and initiatives such as
curriculum development, equipment purchases, uniforms, transportation, security and technology. Data is for program participants.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Ensure each student is academically prepared to succeed in college, life and global economy.
Program Objectives:
1) Maximize the number of teams in Modified and Interscholastic sports
2) Maximize the number of student participants on teams
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
1) Number of teams 384 359 377 350 350
2) Number of student participants 5,460 5,010 5,334 5,000 5,000
Revenue:
General Fund $ 2,175,918 $ 2,139,155 $ 2,496,070 $ 2,166,507 $ 2,232,502
Grant Fund 218,007 135,869 - - -
Total Revenue $ 2,393,925 $ 2,275,024 $ 2,496,070 $ 2,166,507 $ 2,232,502
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ 87,088 $ 97,074 $ 100,622 $ 102,794 $ 105,878
Teacher Salaries 1,038,086 1,011,846 1,049,340 995,111 1,024,964
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries 276,524 255,066 306,270 230,000 236,900
Benefit Expense 278,693 238,762 314,723 315,700 326,171
Material and Supplies 260,654 241,784 243,325 134,700 138,741
Other Variable Expenses 452,880 430,492 481,790 388,202 399,848
Total Expenditures $ 2,393,925 $ 2,275,024 $ 2,496,070 $ 2,166,507 $ 2,232,502
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Teachers 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Civil Service 0.5 0.5 0.5 - -
Total Positions 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.0 2.0
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 438 $ 454 $ 468 $ 433 $ 447

Section 5 Page 14
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: Native American Resource Center (NARC)

Program Director: Jennifer Gkourlias Chief: Beth Mascitti-Miller
Program Category: Student Achievement, Teacher Development
Number of students served 2009-10: 22
Location: The Native American Resource Center is housed within School #19.
Grade level(s) of students served: Grade K-12 Funding Source: Title VII
Program Description:
The Native American Resource Center is located at School #19 and serves as an extended day opportunity for Native American students in grades
K-12. After school classes include cultural education as well as tutoring with a focus on literacy. In addition to serving Native American students,
the center provides outreach programs for District classes. The Center operates five days a week, providing two-hour classes. Each student
attends two times a week, one session focuses on cultural enrichment and the other on literacy skills. Note: Although the Native American
Resource Center is located at School #19 services are provided for Native American students from every district school. Further, programs for non-
Native students are provided in every district school and professional development is available to any teacher with the district.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Ensure each student is academically prepared to succeed in college, life and global economy.
Program Objectives:
1) Increase the number of Native American students in the program
2) Increase the number of District educators receiving Native American program services
3) Increase the number of classrooms receiving services
4) Increase the number of students in program service classrooms
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
1) # Native Americans in program 36 22 30 35 35
2) # educators with program services 482 484 450 475 475
3) # of classrooms receiving services 216 225 250 275 275
4) # students in program service rooms 5,614 5,640 6,000 6,600 6,600
Revenue:
General Fund $ 68,626 $ 49,000 $ 58,885 $ 98,367 $ 103,838
Grant Fund 61,247 62,568 58,572 58,676 58,676
Total Revenue $ 129,873 $ 111,568 $ 117,457 $ 157,043 $ 162,514
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Teacher Salaries - 33 - - -
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries 89,483 71,473 75,033 102,973 106,063
Benefit Expense 36,973 34,891 34,252 46,541 48,754
Material and Supplies 1,345 961 3,397 3,127 3,221
Other Variable Expenses 2,072 4,210 4,775 4,401 4,477
Total Expenditures $ 129,873 $ 111,568 $ 117,457 $ 157,043 $ 162,514
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators - - - - -
Teachers - - - - -
Civil Service 2.4 2.4 1.8 1.8 1.8
Total Positions 2.4 2.4 1.8 1.8 1.8
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 23 $ 20 $ 19 $ 24 $ 24

Section 5 Page 15
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: NorthSTAR Educational Program

Program Director: Marcia K. Pease Chief: Shaun Nelms
Program Category: Alternative School Program
Number of students served 2009-10: 110
Location: North S.T.A.R. Educational Program, OACES Building 30 Hart Street
Grade level(s) of students served: All Grades Funding Source: A Fund
Program Description:
The North S.T.A.R. Program is designed to help emotionally fragile children learn coping strategies and to increase their academic skills so that
they will be able to successfully reintegrate into comprehensive high schools. This is achieved through an instructional program that provides a
nurturing environment and researched-based intervention in collaboration with Hillside Children's Center. Ages 7-12 in buildings and K-12 on
Home Instruction.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Create safe, engaging and nurturing school environment to enable student success.
Program Objectives:
1) Increase the percent of student who returned to comprehensive high school programs
2) Increase average daily attendance
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
Number of students attending program 110 110 125 130 130
1) % returned to high school programs 42.0% 45.0% 50.0% 55.0% 55.0%
2) Daily attendance rate 74.0% 73.5% 75.0% 76.0% 76.0%
Revenue:
General Fund $ 2,692,374 $ 2,718,028 $ 3,169,881 $ 2,678,111 $ 2,782,806
Grant Fund 8,803 9,685 - - -
Total Revenue $ 2,701,177 $ 2,727,713 $ 3,169,881 $ 2,678,111 $ 2,782,806
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ 99,332 $ 199,429 $ 171,283 $ 106,730 $ 109,932
Teacher Salaries 1,443,442 1,451,613 1,699,689 1,369,464 1,410,548
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries 333,287 313,050 320,831 359,952 370,751
Benefit Expense 696,809 731,598 954,514 826,424 875,568
Material and Supplies 128,307 32,023 23,564 15,542 16,008
Other Variable Expenses - - - - -
Total Expenditures $ 2,701,177 $ 2,727,713 $ 3,169,881 $ 2,678,112 $ 2,782,806
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators 1.0 2.0 1.6 1.0 1.0
Teachers 23.9 24.5 30.9 22.5 22.5
Civil Service 18.0 18.0 21.0 16.0 16.0
Total Positions 42.9 44.5 53.5 39.5 39.5
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 24,556 $ 24,797 $ 25,359 $ 20,601 $ 21,406

Section 5 Page 16
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: OACES Academic (GED = ABE, ASE, ESOL)

Program Director: Paul Burke Chief: Gladys Pedraza-Burgos
Program Category: Adult & Career Education
Number of students served 2009-10: 2,437
Location: 30 Hart Street, various locations
Grade level(s) of students served: Adults / Youth Funding Source: Grants / A Fund*
Program Description:
Adult Basic Education (ABE) classes enable students to improve their academic skills prior to entering the Adult Secondary Education (ASE)
program, where instruction is focused on preparation for the General Education Diploma (GED) Exam. English for Speakers of Other Languages
(ESOL) classes enable students to improve English language literacy leading to participation in Adult Basic Education classes.
The General Education Development Preparation Program provides the necessary academic skills required for the GED, which is the equivalent to a
high school diploma. Note: Per NYSED guidelines, Adult Education programs may only assign GED attainment as a goal for students who enter
the program functioning above the grade equivalent of 10.9. All other students who are pursuing GED have an increase in the National Reporting
System (NRS) level (academic performance measured by grade equivalent) as a goal.
*A-Fund operates High School Equivalency Program (HSEP) and Alternative High School Equivalency Program (AHSEP) (16-20yr old mandatory
age enrollment SY0910 = 405 students)

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Create safe, engaging and nurturing school environment to enable student success.
Program Objectives:
1) Increase in the academic gain per National Reporting System levels 1-6 (NRS level~2 G.E.)
2) Increase number/percent of students who obtain GED = NYS High School Equivalency Diploma
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
Number of students participating in program 2,857 2,437 1,900 1,900 1,900
1) % with gain in NRS Level 41% 54% 46% 46% 46%
2) Number (%) students obtaining GED 69 (95%) 111 (96%) 25 (90%) 25 (90%) 25 (90%)
Revenue:
General Fund $ 2,183,831 $ 2,103,663 $ 1,872,924 $ 1,758,363 $ 1,810,688
Grant Fund 1,553,290 1,664,366 1,703,453 1,546,222 1,605,068
Total Revenue $ 3,737,121 $ 3,768,029 $ 3,576,377 $ 3,304,585 $ 3,415,756
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ 254,791 $ 135,180 $ 194,174 $ 150,227 $ 154,734
Teacher Salaries 1,438,775 1,677,833 1,337,448 1,369,506 1,410,592
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries 401,042 271,387 381,356 292,306 301,076
Benefit Expense 649,421 598,316 641,717 725,792 776,513
Material and Supplies 220,315 242,149 241,862 25,920 23,756
Other Variable Expenses 772,777 843,164 779,820 740,834 749,085
Total Expenditures $ 3,737,121 $ 3,768,029 $ 3,576,377 $ 3,304,585 $ 3,415,756
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators 2.3 1.9 1.9 1.5 1.5
Teachers 28.5 25.8 21.9 24.6 24.6
Civil Service 11.5 8.1 9.2 8.4 8.4
Total Positions 42.3 35.8 33.0 34.4 34.4
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 1,308 $ 1,546 $ 1,882 $ 1,739 $ 1,798

Section 5 Page 17
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: OACES Parent & Family Involvement

Program Director: Paul Burke Chief: Gladys Pedraza-Burgos
Program Category: Adult & Career Education
Number of students served 2009-10: 968
Location: 30 Hart Street, various locations
Grade level(s) of students served: Adults / Youth Funding Source: Grants
Program Description:
Office of Adult & Career Education Services (OACES) Parent and Family Involvement Programs:
• Citizenship Initiative Program (CIP) works with immigrants and refugees who wish to become US citizens. Our exceptionally experienced staff
provides multiple areas of support to participants including case management and employment services.
• Family C.A.R.E.E.R.S. is a combined Family Literacy and workforce development program running in select RCSD Elementary schools. Parents
attend school with their children and participate in Adult Education Literacy activities to gain valuable work skills.
• The Refugee Assistance Program serves both refugees and immigrants from more than 40 countries. Since 1975, over 21,000 people have
received various services.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Create safe, engaging and nurturing school environment to enable student success.
Program Objectives:
1) Increase or maintain percent obtaining citizenship/naturalization
1) Increase in the academic gain per National Reporting System levels 1-6 (NRS level~2 G.E.)
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
# of students participating in program 509 968 750 750 750
1)% obtaining citizenship/naturalization 95% 96% 90% 90% 90%
1)% increasing academic gain 64% 62% 52% 52.0% 52.0%
Revenue:
General Fund $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Grant Fund 431,407 493,084 510,806 569,904 394,782
Total Revenue $ 431,407 $ 493,084 $ 510,806 $ 569,904 $ 394,782

Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ 2,716 $ 12,135 $ 21,486 $ 11,985 $ 12,345
Teacher Salaries 129,840 147,933 114,437 228,597 147,220
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries 60,943 55,138 67,430 45,114 37,936
Benefit Expense 59,018 60,626 69,667 163,657 83,108
Material and Supplies 43,457 66,919 96,093 9,704 7,707
Other Variable Expenses 135,433 150,333 141,693 110,847 106,466
Total Expenditures $ 431,407 $ 493,084 $ 510,806 $ 569,904 $ 394,782
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1
Teachers 0.5 0.6 0.3 2.1 0.6
Civil Service 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.0
Total Positions 1.9 1.9 1.5 3.4 1.6
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 848 $ 509 $ 681 $ 760 $ 526

Section 5 Page 18
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: OACES Workforce Development

Program Director: Paul Burke Chief: Gladys Pedraza-Burgos
Program Category: Adult & Career Education
Number of students served 2009-10: 3,192
Location: 30 Hart Street
Grade level(s) of students served: Adults/ Youth Funding Source: Grants
Program Description:
Office of Adult & Career Education Services (OACES) Workforce Development Programs includes:
• Apprentice Related Supplemental Instruction Program (ARSIP) supports apprenticeship training programs in Monroe and Livingston counties.
OACES registers apprentices and monitors the progress of participants as they complete related instruction for the NYS Department of Labor
Apprenticeship program.
• Career Awareness Program (CAP) promotes career education through soft skill instruction and practice, and offers several certificate bearing
trainings. Community and Adults in Rochester – Employment and Education Resource System (CAREERS) is a workforce development initiative
serving adults 21 years plus receiving TANF/Safety Net Public Assistance. Academic class work coupled with a variety of work experiences are
offered, leading to entry level employment opportunities.
• Career and Technical Education (CTE) provides students with current, in-demand workplace skills and offers a credential, professional license or
certification, such as Electrocardiograph Technician (EKG), Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and Computer Training for the Workplace.
• Corrections Transition Education offers a range of individualized services including basic literacy instruction for the non-reader, pre-GED, GED,
and English for Speakers of Other Languages.
• Workplace Education Offerings program includes a series of educational offerings that support Rochester workers through work-based trainings

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Create safe, engaging and nurturing school environment to enable student success.
Program Objectives:
1) Increase the percent of participants who gain employment
2) Increase the percent of participants who retain employment
3) Increase the percent of participants who enter postsecondary education or training
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
# of students participating in program 5,575 3,192 2,700 2,900 2,900
1) % enter employment 79% 66% 66% 66% 66%
2) % retained employment 46% 56% 57% 57% 57%
3) % entered postsecondary education or training 94% 96% 74% 76% 76%

Revenue:
General Fund $ 64,028 $ 47,184 $ 92,012 $ 70,237 $ 70,577
Grant Fund 2,534,224 2,683,010 3,216,771 2,133,722 2,086,637
Total Revenue $ 2,598,252 $ 2,730,194 $ 3,308,783 $ 2,203,959 $ 2,157,214
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ 58,110 $ 54,604 $ 96,684 $ 53,930 $ 55,548
Teacher Salaries 756,955 794,062 892,412 854,436 845,819
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries 365,294 363,960 446,920 171,271 176,410
Benefit Expense 362,208 359,735 501,258 441,548 463,337
Material and Supplies 367,655 424,631 476,349 126,979 93,277
Other Variable Expenses 688,030 733,202 895,160 555,795 522,823
Total Expenditures $ 2,598,252 $ 2,730,194 $ 3,308,783 $ 2,203,959 $ 2,157,214
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators 1.3 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.5
Teachers 4.0 6.0 6.8 5.3 4.9
Civil Service 20.1 15.8 12.6 4.6 4.6
Total Positions 25.4 22.7 20.3 10.4 9.9
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 466 $ 855 $ 1,225 $ 760 $ 744

Section 5 Page 19
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies (PATHS)

Program Director: Marjorie Lefler Chief: Gladys Pedraza-Burgos
Program Category: Behavior
Number of students served 2009-10: 1,269
Location: PreK Programs at #2, 5, 9, 17 and 33; K-6 classes at #2, 9, 15, 17, 28, 33, 35
Grade level(s) of students served: PreK-6 Funding Source: Federal Grants
Program Description:
In 2008/09 Children's Institute took over all PATHS implementation (RFP) as a result of an RCSD competitive bidding/application process.
Program Description: Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies (PATHS) is a research-based program developed by Dr. Mark Greenberg, Penn
State University and recognized as a Model Program by the US Dept of Education Safe & Drug Free Schools, US Dept of Justice OJJDP, and US
Dept of Health & Human Services SAMSHA among others. Children receive skills building lessons in reducing aggression and acting out
behavior and can be incorporated in teaching Emotional Literacy, Self-Control, Social Competence, Positive Peer Relations, and Interpersonal
Problem Solving. The program is directed to students in grades PreK – 6. Currently (2010/11) it is being implemented in schools No. 2, 5, 9, 15, 17,
28, 33, 35 for a total of 1,280 classroom sessions (United Way supports program and evaluation at #28 and #35). Program evaluation and strategies
are being redesigned and renegotiated since teachers are not completing the Teacher Child Rating Scale (TCRS) on all children (both Pre/Post
curriculum) as planned and recommended by the program developers.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Create safe, engaging and nurturing school environment to enable student success.
Program Objectives:
1) Increase number of students using positive interpersonal problem solving
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
Number of students 844 1,269 1,300 1,300 1,300
Revenue:
General Fund $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Grant Fund 128,000 258,808 138,034 138,034 138,034
Total Revenue $ 128,000 $ 258,808 $ 138,034 $ 138,034 $ 138,034
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Teacher Salaries - - - - -
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries - - - - -
Benefit Expense - - - - -
Material and Supplies - - - - -
Other Variable Expenses 128,000 258,808 138,034 138,034 138,034
Total Expenditures $ 128,000 $ 258,808 $ 138,034 $ 138,034 $ 138,034
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators - - - - -
Teachers - - - - -
Civil Service - - - - -
Total Positions - - - - -
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 152 $ 204 $ 106 $ 106 $ 106

Section 5 Page 20
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: PENCIL

Program Director: Nydia Padilla-Rodriguez Chief: Gladys Pedraza-Burgos
Program Category: Academic Acceleration
Number of students served 2009-10: Serves 50 sites
Location: Multiple elementary and secondary schools
Grade level(s) of students served: K-12 Funding Source: A Fund, Macy's
Program Description:
Rochester PENCIL builds and supports customized partnerships between business leaders and principals to transform public schools. By bringing
together the best ideas, resources and talent across sectors, the intent is to develop strong leaders, build school capacity, enhance student
learning, and inspire greater community and corporate support, to create real change in our City's schools. Rochester PENCIL will continue to build
school-based partnerships with the business community to strengthen the Rochester City Schools.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

We will create a culture in which we hold ourselves accountable for student success.
Program Objectives:
Increase number of business partners
Increase the dollar value of in-kind services or monetary donations
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
1) Number of business partners engaged N/A 50 60 60 60
2) Dollar value of in-kind services N/A $ 600,000 $ 675,000 $ 675,000 $ 675,000
Revenue:
General Fund $ 54,829 $ 52,679 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000
Grant Fund - - - - -
Total Revenue $ 54,829 $ 52,679 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Teacher Salaries - - - - -
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries - - - - -
Benefit Expense - - - - -
Material and Supplies - - - - -
Other Variable Expenses 54,829 52,679 55,000 55,000 55,000
Total Expenditures $ 54,829 $ 52,679 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators - - - - -
Teachers - - - - -
Civil Service - - - - -
Total Positions - - - - -
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per business partner N/A $ 1,054 $ 917 $ 917 $ 917

Section 5 Page 21
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: Prekindergarten

Program Director: Robin Hooper Chief: Beth Mascitti-Miller
Program Category: Early Childhood
Number of students served 2009-10: 1,940
Location: 27 District and 27 Community Based Organization sites
Grade level(s) of students served: Prek & 3 Funding Source: A Fund,UPK, IDEA,
Program Description: County Preschool
The PreK Program is a collaboration of District and community-based programs in over 100 classrooms: 27 RCSD elementary schools, and 19
community agencies at over 54 sites. Focus is on the development of children’s literacy, math, and socialization skills in order for students to
become lifelong learners. It includes specialized programs for children of refugee families and adult learners at the Family Learning Center, #17 and
#53 Montessori, and #6, #9 and #33 bilingual. It includes the Rochester Preschool Parent Program at 15 schools, Florence Brown Center at #33, and
a program for three-year-old children at #6. Full-day programs are at the bilingual prek classrooms at #6, #9, and #33 and Montessori # 53.
Integrated classrooms are located at # 8, #19, #33, and #57. Students with disabilities receive itinerant and related services at all sites.
Transportation is provided for the 3-year olds at #53.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Ensure each student is academically prepared to succeed in college, life and global economy.
Program Objectives:
1) Reduce Hispanic males and general population gap on COR (Child Observation Record) in literacy/math growth
2) Maintain 10 days between CPSE (Committee on Preschool Special Education) and placement
3) Maintain the percent of elementary schools with prekindergarten classes
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
Number of 4 yr. old students 1,850 1,940 1,981 2,001 2,001
Number of 3 yr. old students 97 38 50 86 86
1) Gap Hispanic males/gen. pop. 30% 10% 10% 10% 10%
2) Days between CPSE and placement 10 10 10 10 10
3) Percent of elem schools with prek 66% 66% 66% 66% 66%
Revenue:
General Fund $ 7,891 $ 98,580 $ 104,038 $ 211,750 $ 211,750
Grant Fund 12,404,397 12,799,434 13,474,435 13,306,221 13,306,211
Total Revenue $ 12,412,288 $ 12,898,014 $ 13,578,473 $ 13,517,971 $ 13,517,961
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ 276,676 $ 444,476 $ 394,397 $ 426,019 $ 426,019
Teacher Salaries 3,535,658 3,981,228 3,984,730 4,163,669 4,163,669
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries 1,524,670 1,667,277 1,744,066 1,747,790 1,747,790
Benefit Expense 1,498,228 1,894,006 2,037,466 2,416,697 2,416,697
Material and Supplies 5,294,201 4,579,641 5,090,407 4,468,240 4,468,240
Other Variable Expenses 282,855 331,386 327,407 295,556 295,556
Total Expenditures $ 12,412,288 $ 12,898,014 $ 13,578,473 $ 13,517,971 $ 13,517,971
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators 3.6 3.6 4.6 4.1 4.1
Teachers 40.3 41.3 41.3 41.3 41.3
Civil Service 39.7 40.5 40.2 40.2 40.2
Total Positions 83.6 85.4 86.1 85.6 85.6
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 6,375 $ 6,521 $ 6,686 $ 6,477 $ 6,477

Section 5 Page 22
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: Primary Project

Program Director: Audrey Cummings Chief: Gladys Pedraza-Burgos
Program Category: Behavior
Number of students served 2009-10: 450
Location: #2,4,5,6,8,9,10,14,15,16,17,19,25,28,29,33,34,35,41,43,44,53,54,57,58
Grade level(s) of students served: K-3 Funding Source: SS/HS & Children's
Program Description: Institute grants
Primary Project is a school-based early intervention and prevention program designed to enhance school related competencies and reduce social,
emotional and school adjustment difficulties in children in grades kindergarten through third. Primary project has six core components that
establish a solid foundation for success: 1) A focus on young children. 2) Early screening and appropriate selection of children. 3) Use of
paraprofessionals in a direct service role. 4) Use of mental health professionals as supervisors, consultants and leaders. 5) Use of ongoing
outcome and process evaluation. 6) Integration of Primary Project within the school and community settings.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Ensure each student is academically prepared to succeed in college, life and global economy.
Program Objectives:
1) Increase the percent of students indicating improvement in taking the initiative as measured by the TCRS
2) Increase the percent of students improving a reduction in acting out behavior as measured by the TCRS
3) Increase the percent of students indicating improvement in self-confidence a s measured by the TCRS
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
# students in program 469 450 678 700 700
1) % of students taking the initiative 89% 92% 95% 95% 95%
2) % of students reducing acting out behavior 74% 76% 88% 79% 79%
3) % of students showing self-confidence 85% 90% 93% 94% 94%
Revenue:
General Fund $ 406,623 $ 412,680 $ 487,147 $ 400,851 $ 418,520
Grant Fund 219,327 244,378 224,005 252,641 268,362
Total Revenue $ 625,950 $ 657,058 $ 711,152 $ 653,492 $ 686,882
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Teacher Salaries - - - - -
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries 327,713 364,521 394,904 361,495 367,725
Benefit Expense 263,392 252,861 295,848 271,597 298,757
Material and Supplies 12,145 24,276 - - -
Other Variable Expenses 22,700 15,400 20,400 20,400 20,400
Total Expenditures $ 625,950 $ 657,058 $ 711,152 $ 653,492 $ 686,882
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators - - - - -
Teachers - - - - -
Civil Service 24.3 24.5 23.8 22.2 22.2
Total Positions 24.3 24.5 23.8 22.2 22.2
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 1,335 $ 1,460 $ 1,049 $ 934 $ 981

Section 5 Page 23
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: QUAD A

Program Director: Kathleen Fromel Chief: Deasure Matthew
Program Category: Extended Learning and Intervention
Number of students served 2009-10: 330
Location: Schools #4, 16 & 34
Grade level(s) of students served: Grade K-6 Funding Source: A Fund
Program Description:
QUAD A is a comprehensive after-school program for elementary students at Schools #4, 16 & 34. The key premise is to prepare and develop the
whole child by involving them in the arts, athletics, and academic activities outside the normal school day. The program’s focus is centered on
tutorial and extra-curricular activities that develop the whole child. These activities help prepare and develop the whole child with life skills and core
values needed to eventually graduate. Students are involved in Project Based Learning (PBL), Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies (PATHS),
Girl Scouts, karate, cultural arts, theater, computer technology, media journalism, music, and team sports. Academic activities include high-interest,
hands-on, higher level thinking skills. The academic component focuses on tutoring, basic skills, and homework completion. It is a 3 hour program
that meets 5 days per week.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Create safe, engaging and nurturing school environment to enable student success.
Program Objectives:
2) Increase the percentage of students scoring in Levels 3 & 4 on the NYS ELA 3-6
2) Increase the percentage of students scoring in Levels 3 & 4 on the NYS Math 3-6
3) Increase overall school attendance
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
Number of students 130 330 350 350 350
1) % in levels 3&4 on NYS ELA 3-6 57% 31% 37% 43% 43%
2) % in levels 3&4 on NYS Math 3-6 80% 23% 30% 36% 36%
3) % attendance 96% 94% 95% 96% 96%
Revenue:
General Fund $ 126,705 $ 207,548 $ 190,560 $ 190,560 $ 196,337
Grant Fund - - - - -
Total Revenue $ 126,705 $ 207,548 $ 190,560 $ 190,560 $ 196,337
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Teacher Salaries 53,713 26,659 114,915 114,460 117,894
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries 52,888 106,926 85 - -
Benefit Expense 20,104 22,213 22,220 22,760 23,443
Material and Supplies - 51,750 53,340 53,340 55,000
Other Variable Expenses - - - - -
Total Expenditures $ 126,705 $ 207,548 $ 190,560 $ 190,560 $ 196,337
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators - - - -
Teachers - - - -
Civil Service - - - -
Total Positions - - - - -
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 975 $ 629 $ 544 $ 544 $ 561

Section 5 Page 24
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: Student and Family Support Centers

Program Director: Marjorie Lefler Chief: Gladys Pedraza-Burgos
Program Category: Behavior
Number of students served 2009-10: 5,535
Location: #2, 30,39, 50, 60, 61, 63, 65, 66, 68, 73, 89, Edison Campus, Franklin Campus
Grade level(s) of students served: K-12 Funding Source: Federal Grants
Program Description:
Provides additional social-emotional support services that school support staff are not able to provide to the entire school populations; services
such as immediate crisis intervention, mental health, interpersonal counseling, peer mediation, employment preparation, and referrals to needed
services in the community.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Create safe, engaging and nurturing school environment to enable student success.
Program Objectives:
1) Increase the percent of students promoted
2) Increase the percent of self referrals by students
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
Number of students served 4,840 5,535 5,800 6,000 6,000
1) % Students promotion to next grade 74% 74% 77% 79% 79%
2) % of self referrals by students 27% 21% 26% 29% 29%
Revenue:
General Fund $ 886,119 $ 517,785 $ 617,670 $ 859,920 $ 887,076
Grant Fund 344,445 387,162 375,771 598,558 595,479
Total Revenue $ 1,230,564 $ 904,947 $ 993,441 $ 1,458,478 $ 1,482,555
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ - $ - $ - $ 56,428 $ 58,121
Teacher Salaries 490,475 525,743 689,605 777,309 800,628
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries 53,113 - 38,262 54,343 40,626
Benefit Expense 191,993 171,740 265,574 349,775 362,557
Material and Supplies 24,955 - - 112,466 112,466
Other Variable Expenses 470,028 207,464 - 108,157 108,157
Total Expenditures $ 1,230,564 $ 904,947 $ 993,441 $ 1,458,478 $ 1,482,555
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators - - - 0.5 0.5
Teachers 10.3 9.5 11.7 13.0 13.0
Civil Service 1.0 - 1.0 1.0 1.0
Total Positions 11.3 9.5 12.7 14.5 14.5
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 254 $ 163 $ 171 $ 243 $ 247

Section 5 Page 25
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: Title 1 SES (NCLB) Mandated Supplemental Educational Services

Program Director: Cheryl Wheeler Chief: Jeanette Silvers
Program Category: Academic Acceleration
Number of students served 2009-2010: 3,238
Location: Approximately 60 locations
Grade level(s) of students served: Grade K-12 Funding Source: Title I
Program Description:
NCLB mandates that districts offer SES tutoring in English and math to all eligible students (defined as attending a low-performing School In Need
of Improvement (SINI), and qualifying for free or reduced priced lunch.) Tutoring is offered by NYS-approved tutoring providers contracting with
RCSD who offer a minimum of 45 hours of tutoring in accordance with their NYS-approved application, from November 1 through the end of June,
before school, after school, or on weekends and holidays. Services are provided at eligible schools, tutoring centers, and community locations.
Vendors can request facilities space in any SINI school where they have 20 or more applications, demonstrating parent choice. Each year, a parent
who voluntarily enrolls his/her child chooses one of these providers. An individualized learning plan is created by the provider with RCSD and
parent input. Providers complete progress reports three times during the course of tutoring to share with students, parents, and school staff.
Providers receive payment based on actual student attendance only. Fewer students can be served than are eligible because federal funds do not
cover all eligible students and the amount per student (PPA) is pre-determined by the State. Overall allocations are decreasing while PPAs are
increasing.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Create safe, engaging and nurturing school environment to enable student success.
Program Objectives:
1) Increase % of attending students receiving =>15 hours of SES tutoring.
2) Increase % of attending students receiving =>15 hours of SES tutoring showing growth on NYS ELA 3-8.
3) Increase % of attending students receiving =>15 hours of SES tutoring showing growth on NYS Math 3-8.
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
# eligible (SINI) Schools 19 24 31 43 43
# SES providers 15 18 15 15 15
# SES-eligible (elig.)students 12,788 13,498 16,128 18,000 18,000
#(%)elig. fundable students based on PPA 2676(21%) 2728(20%) 2650(15%) 2300(13%) 2300(13%)
# elig. enrolled students not funded 73 510 450 400 400
#(%) students served/eligible 2749 (21%) 3238(24%) 3000(19%) 2700(15%) 2700(15%)
#(%) students attend. w/ ≥ 15hrs tutoring 2167(17%) 2550(19%) 2550(16%) 2500(14%) 2500(14%)
1a)% up in ELA/students with≥15 hrs 42% 44% 47% 51% 51%
1b)% up in ELA, eligible stud. not attend 42% 27% N/A N/A N/A
2a)% up in Math/students with ≥15 hrs 43% 45% 49% 52% 52%
2b)% up in Math eligible stud. not attend 39% 32% N/A N/A N/A
Revenue:
General Fund $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Grant Fund 3,745,497 4,739,934 5,797,861 5,716,760 5,888,263
Total Revenue $ 3,745,497 $ 4,739,934 $ 5,797,861 $ 5,716,760 $ 5,888,263
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Teacher Salaries - - - - -
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries - - - - -
Benefit Expense - - - - -
Material and Supplies - - - - -
Other Variable Expenses 3,745,497 4,739,934 5,797,861 5,716,760 5,888,263
Total Expenditures $ 3,745,497 $ 4,739,934 $ 5,797,861 $ 5,716,760 $ 5,888,263
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators - - - - -
Teachers - - - - -
Civil Service - - - - -
Total Positions - - - - -
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 1,362 $ 1,464 $ 1,933 $ 2,117 $ 2,181

Section 5 Page 26
 PROGRAM PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Program Name: Young Mothers & Interim Health Academy (YMIHA)

Program Director: Brenda Ellison Chief: Shaun Nelms
Program Category: Alternative School Programs
Number of students served 2010-11: 111
Location: Young Mothers and Interim Health Academy,
Grade level(s) of students served: Grade 7-12 Funding Source: Title I
Program Description:
The Young Mothers and Interim Health Academy provides a safe, challenging, supportive, and student-centered educational setting for pregnant
RCSD students and Interim Health Academy students who have exhibited school avoidant behaviors, which are often the result of Post Traumatic
Stress Disorder, anxiety, depression, or adjustments in medications. Students are 12-21 in grades 7-12. Students attend the YMIHA until the end
of the school year that they give birth or were enrolled. Pregnant students are transferred back to their original home school at the end of the year.
The program develops responsible, respectful, and self-motivated students with a focus on improved student performance in the areas of critical
thinking and problem solving across subject areas. Counseling is an integral part of the program and instruction includes reproductive health,
parenting, life skills, problem solving, graduation, and career goals. The program partners with the YWCA, which offers YPSS and Case
Management for all pregnant students.

Program's Alignment with Rochester City School District Strategic Goals:

Ensure each student is academically prepared to succeed in college, life and global economy.
Program Objectives:
1) Provide instruction and support for young mothers
2) Provide instruction for IHA students
3) Reduce the number and percent of young mothers returning to the program
4) Increase the number of students completing 12th grade
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Program Measures: Actual Actual Budget Budget Projected
1) # of young mothers served 97 111 115 115 115
2) # of IHA students served 60 28 22 22 22
3) # of recidivism among young mothers 1 6 3 3 3
4)# completing 12th grade from YMIHA 14 11 8 8 8
Revenue:
General Fund $ 1,847,431 $ 1,891,084 $ 1,801,903 $ 1,644,959 $ 1,707,938
Grant Fund 1,993 - - - -
Total Revenue $ 1,849,424 $ 1,891,084 $ 1,801,903 $ 1,644,959 $ 1,707,938
Expenditures:
Administrator Salaries $ 212,654 $ 331,163 $ 161,025 $ 144,932 $ 149,280
Teacher Salaries 1,028,272 930,330 1,048,606 927,293 955,112
Clerical/Para/Sentry Salaries 139,059 163,362 96,905 82,686 85,167
Benefit Expense 442,554 441,656 462,947 461,010 488,470
Material and Supplies 26,884 24,574 32,420 29,038 29,909
Other Variable Expenses - - - - -
Total Expenditures $ 1,849,424 $ 1,891,084 $ 1,801,903 $ 1,644,959 $ 1,707,938
Position Summary (FTE)
Administrators 2.0 2.0 1.4 1.4 1.4
Teachers 17.0 17.0 16.9 15.7 15.7
Civil Service 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Total Positions 23.0 23.0 21.3 20.1 20.1
Per Unit Cost Measures
Cost per student enrolled $ 11,780 $ 13,605 $ 13,153 $ 12,007 $ 12,467

Section 5 Page 27
School Support Profiles and Budgets

Teaching and Learning

Youth Development and Family Services
 SCHOOL SUPPORT PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Teaching and Learning

Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
The Division of Teaching and Learning is responsible for the core work of our District - teaching and learning. The division’s primary role
is to create the framework teachers will use through the creation of the Rochester Curriculum – referred to as the “what” teachers will teach.
Through this curriculum framework and corresponding pedagogical work we can also ensure that students will be able to experience an aligned
and relevant instructional program no matter where they go within the district. This framework will continue to be modified as local standards
are better aligned to the national common core - and to build the capacity of school-based leaders and teachers on pedagogue – what we refer
to as the “how.” The division encompasses all subject areas and support areas (including English Language Learners, Academic Intervention,
Specialized Services, African and African American Studies, and accelerated learning).

2011-12 Budget Expense Total - $40,509,710

Other Compensation
8.79% Fixed Obligation with Variability
0.32% Cash Capital Outlays
2.01%

Facilities and Related

6.21%

Technology
1.72%

Other Variable Expenses

22.83%

Salary Compensation
58.13%

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $24,047,500 $23,548,560 $498,940 2.07% Districtwide budget reduction
Other Compensation $3,420,341 $3,560,650 ($140,309) (4.10%) Grant funding increase
Employee Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligation with Variability $254,785 $128,308 $126,477 49.64% Districtwide budget reduction
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $1,153,833 $812,370 $341,463 29.59% Districtwide budget reduction
Facilities and Related $4,124,231 $2,515,493 $1,608,738 39.01% Grant funding reduction
Technology $1,531,816 $697,846 $833,970 54.44% Grant funding reduction
Other Variable Expenses $10,622,584 $9,246,483 $1,376,101 12.95% Grant funding reduction
Totals $45,155,090 $40,509,710 $4,645,381 10.29%

FTEs 317.42 301.58 15.84 4.99%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Academic Support - ACADEMIC SUPPORT $31,181,563 $27,835,395 $3,346,168 10.73%
Specialized Services - SPECIALIZED SRVCS $13,973,527 $12,674,315 $1,299,213 9.30%
Totals $45,155,090 $40,509,710 $4,645,381 10.29%

Section 6 Page 1
 SCHOOL SUPPORT PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Teaching and Learning – continued

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Teaching and Learning

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 8,859,755 10,072,426 8,666,846 1,405,580
Civil Service Salary 5,021,915 4,870,262 5,380,259 (509,997)
Administrator Salary 4,035,981 4,128,265 4,850,316 (722,051)
Hourly Teachers 3,275,409 3,923,037 3,985,788 (62,751)
Teaching Assistants - - - -
Paraprofessional Salary 941,506 1,053,510 665,352 388,158
Sub Total Salary Compensation 22,134,566 24,047,500 23,548,560 498,940
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 509,736 977,077 611,706 365,371
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 471,018 839,539 779,655 59,884
Teachers In Service 1,004,608 1,603,725 2,169,289 (565,564)
Sub Total Other Compensation 1,985,361 3,420,341 3,560,650 (140,309)
Total Salary and Other Compensation 24,119,927 27,467,841 27,109,210 358,631
Employee Benefits 28,501 - - -
Total Compensation and Benefits 24,148,428 27,467,841 27,109,210 358,631
Fixed Obligations With Variability
Special Education Tuition - - - -
Contract Transportation 154,480 254,785 128,308 126,477
Charter School Tuition - - - -
Health Service Other Districts - - - -
Insurance non-employee - - - -
Sub Total Fixed Obligations 154,480 254,785 128,308 126,477
Debt Service
Sub Total Debt Service - - - -
Cash Capital Outlays
Cash Capital Expense - - - -
Textbooks 83,691 99,766 22,888 76,878
Equipment Other than Buses 246,425 374,220 253,777 120,443
Equipment Buses - - - -
Computer Hardware - Instructional 929,613 658,714 525,285 133,429
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional 118,418 14,633 4,755 9,878
Library Books 145,483 6,500 5,665 835
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays 1,523,630 1,153,833 812,370 341,463

Section 6 Page 2
 SCHOOL SUPPORT PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Teaching and Learning – continued

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Teaching and Learning

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Facilities and Related

Utilities 3,744 8,540 3,557 4,983
Instructional Supplies 2,249,453 1,615,596 1,231,661 383,935
Equip Service Contr & Repair 80,255 258,659 193,359 65,300
Facilities Service Contracts - - - -
Rentals 97,377 125,733 70,730 55,003
Maintenance Repair Supplies - - - -
Postage and Print/Advertising 308,735 698,905 253,583 445,322
Auto Supplies 336 200 162 38
Supplies and Materials 1,967,324 1,289,878 664,766 625,112
Custodial Supplies 1,047 1,900 700 1,200
Office Supplies 117,998 124,820 96,975 27,845
Sub Total Facilities and Related 4,826,270 4,124,231 2,515,493 1,608,738
Technology
Computer Software - Instructional 875,743 1,462,994 626,798 836,197
Computer Software - Non Instructional 74,532 68,822 71,048 (2,226)
Subtotal Technology 950,275 1,531,816 697,846 833,970
All Other Variable Expenses
Miscellaneous Services 230,534 315,585 335,129 (19,544)
Professional Technical Service 11,067,915 9,467,413 8,255,858 1,211,555
Agency Clerical 151,522 236,185 87,348 148,837
Judgments and Claims - - - -
Grant Disallowances - - - -
Departmental Credits - - - -
Indirect Costs Grants - 8,868 - 8,868
BOCES Services 116,814 100,878 206,101 (105,223)
Professional Development 418,453 493,655 362,047 131,608
Subtotal of All Other Variable Expenses 11,985,237 10,622,584 9,246,483 1,376,101
Total Non Compensation 19,439,892 17,687,249 13,400,499 4,286,750
Sub Total 43,588,320 45,155,090 40,509,710 4,645,381
Budget Reserve - - - -
Grand Total 43,588,320 45,155,090 40,509,710 4,645,381

Section 6 Page 3
 SCHOOL SUPPORT PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Teaching and Learning – continued

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Teaching and Learning

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

Academic Support - ACADEMIC SUPPORT 30,120,173 31,181,563 27,835,395 3,346,168

Specialized Services - SPECIALIZED SERVICES 13,468,147 13,973,527 12,674,315 1,299,213
Teaching and Learning - TEACHING & LEARNING43,588,320 45,155,090 40,509,710 4,645,381

Section 6 Page 4
 SCHOOL SUPPORT PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Teaching and Learning – continued

Position Summary
Teaching and Learning

Var Bud vs
2009 - 2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

POSITIONS BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 136.20 151.65 130.60 21.05
Civil Service Salary 96.82 92.17 92.88 (0.71)
Administrator Salary 44.10 42.60 48.10 (5.50)
Teaching Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Paraprofessional Salary 30.00 31.00 30.00 1.00
Hourly Teachers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary Compensation 307.12 317.42 301.58 15.84
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teachers In Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Compensation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary and Other Compensation 307.12 317.42 301.58 15.84
Grand Total 307.12 317.42 301.58 15.84

POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT

Academic Support - ACADEMIC SUPPORT 158.47 172.97 168.10 4.87

Specialized Srvcs - SPECIALIZED SRVCS 148.65 144.45 133.48 10.97
Teaching & Learning - TEACHING & LRN 307.12 317.42 301.58 15.84

Section 6 Page 5
 SCHOOL SUPPORT PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Academic Support
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
Academic Support provides instructional and curricular resources and leadership in the core academic areas of English Language Arts, Math-
ematics, Science and Social Studies, as well as Foreign Languages, African/African-American Studies, Career and Technical Education, Pre-
School Education, Health and Physical Education. Additional components of Academic Support include ESOL, Library Media Services, In-
structional Technology, Professional Development and the Fine Arts. Academic Support provides support to schools that are listed as a school
in need of improvement by the New York State Department of Education. This sector is supervised by the Deputy Superintendent for Teaching
and Learning who reports directly to the Superintendent and is a key member of his Management Cabinet.

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $13,855,956 $14,314,722 ($458,766) (3.31%) Grant funding increase
Other Compensation $2,713,363 $2,855,236 ($141,873) (5.23%) Grant funding increase
Employee Benefits $0 $0 $0 0.00%
Fixed Obligation with Variability $254,785 $128,308 $126,477 49.64% Grant funding reduction
Cash Capital Outlays $1,152,814 $812,370 $340,444 29.53% ARRA funding reduction
Facilities and Related $3,772,240 $2,126,533 $1,645,707 43.63% Grant funding reduction
Technology $1,531,564 $697,846 $833,718 54.44% Grant funding reduction
Other Variable Expenses $7,900,841 $6,900,380 $1,000,461 12.66% Grant funding reduction
Totals $31,181,563 $27,835,395 $3,346,168 10.73%

FTEs 172.97 168.10 4.87 2.82%

Academic Support (continued)

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
#1 - Martin B Anderson - PreK - 10101 $4,455 $6,717 ($2,262) (50.78%)
#2 - Clara Barton - PreK - 10201 $9,560 $6,717 $2,843 29.74%
#5 - John Williams - PreK - 10501 $95,465 $104,848 ($9,383) (9.83%)
# 6 - Dag Hammarskjold - PreK - 10601 $74,212 $91,415 ($17,203) (23.18%)
#7 - Virgil I. Grissom - PreK - 10701 $5,811 $6,717 ($906) (15.59%)
#8 - Roberto Clemente - PreK - 10801 $352,644 $337,010 $15,634 4.43%
#9 - Martin Luther King - PreK - 10901 $86,991 $92,315 ($5,324) (6.12%)
#12 James PB Duffy Pre-K - 11201 $29,323 $0 $29,323 100.00%
#14 - Chester Dewey - PreK - 11401 $0 $0 $0 0%
#17 - Enrico Fermi - PreK - 11701 $190,402 $201,179 ($10,777) (5.66%)
#19 - Dr Chas Lunsford - PreK - 11901 $236,691 $228,145 $8,546 3.61%
#20 - Henry Lomb - PreK - 12001 $97,986 $103,498 ($5,512) (5.63%)
#22 - Abraham Lincoln - PreK - 12201 $5,371 $6,717 ($1,346) (25.06%)
#23 - Francis Parker - PreK - 12301 $9,423 $6,717 $2,706 28.71%
#25 - Nathan. Hawthorne - PreK - 12501 $101,448 $106,648 ($5,200) (5.13%)
#29 - Adlai E Stevenson - PreK - 12901 $9,091 $6,717 $2,374 26.11%
#33 - Audubon School - PreK - 13301 $887,984 $801,863 $86,121 9.70%
#34 - Dr Louis A Cerulli PreK - 13401 $6,957 $6,717 $240 3.45%
#35 - Pinnacle School - PreK - 13501 $0 $0 $0 0%
#36 - Henry Longfellow - PreK - 13601 $7,820 $6,717 $1,103 14.10%
#39 - Andrew J Townson - PreK - 13901 $5,501 $6,717 ($1,216) (22.11%)
#41 - Kodak Park School - PreK - 14101 $5,238 $6,717 ($1,479) (28.24%)
#42 - Abelard Reynolds - PreK - 14201 $4,851 $6,717 ($1,866) (38.47%)
#45 - Mary McLeod Bethune-PreK - 14501 $89,341 $105,973 ($16,632) (18.62%)
#52 - Frank Fowler Dow - PreK - 15201 $6,801 $6,717 $84 1.23%
#53 -Montessori Academy - PreK - 15301 $244,035 $281,604 ($37,569) (15.39%)
#57 - Early Childhood - PreK - 15701 $399,119 $338,135 $60,984 15.28%
#58 - World of Inquiry -PS - 15801 $0 $0 $0 0%
Pre-School Parent Program - PS - 18101 $1,775,370 $1,916,288 ($140,918) (7.94%)
Family Learn Ctr Hart St-PreK - 23701 $103,598 $99,835 $3,763 3.63%
Career & Technical Education - 24003 $753,007 $484,342 $268,665 35.68%
Health, Phys Educ, & Athletics - 29305 $2,181,347 $1,850,807 $330,540 15.15%

Section 6 Page 6
 #23 - Francis Parker - PreK - 12301 $9,423 $6,717 $2,706 28.71%
SCHOOL SUPPORT
#25 - Nathan. Hawthorne PROFILES
- PreK - 12501 AND $106,648
$101,448 BUDGETS ($5,200) 2011(5.13%)
- 12 DRAFT BUDGET
#29 - Adlai E Stevenson - PreK - 12901 $9,091 $6,717 $2,374 26.11%
#33 - Audubon School - PreK - 13301 $887,984 $801,863 $86,121 9.70%
Academic
#34S- upport – continued
Dr Louis A Cerulli PreK - 13401 $6,957 $6,717 $240 3.45%
#35 - Pinnacle School - PreK - 13501 $0 $0 $0 0%
#36 - Henry Longfellow - PreK - 13601 $7,820 $6,717 $1,103 14.10%
#39 - Andrew J Townson - PreK - 13901 $5,501 $6,717 ($1,216) (22.11%)
#41 - Kodak Park School - PreK - 14101 $5,238 $6,717 ($1,479) (28.24%)
#42 - Abelard Reynolds - PreK - 14201 $4,851 $6,717 ($1,866) (38.47%)
#45 - Mary McLeod Bethune-PreK - 14501 $89,341 $105,973 ($16,632) (18.62%)
#52 - Frank Fowler Dow - PreK - 15201 $6,801 $6,717 $84 1.23%
#53 -Montessori Academy - PreK - 15301 $244,035 $281,604 ($37,569) (15.39%)
#57 - Early Childhood - PreK - 15701 $399,119 $338,135 $60,984 15.28%
Academic Support (continued)
#58 - World of Inquiry -PS - 15801 $0 $0 $0 0%
Pre-School Parent Program - PS - 18101 Departments
$1,775,370 $1,916,288 ($140,918) (7.94%)
Family Learn Ctr Hart St-PreK - 23701 2010-11
$103,598 2011-12
$99,835 Budget
$3,763 Budget %
3.63%
Career & Technical Education - 24003 Amended
$753,007 Proposed
$484,342 Change
$268,665 Change
35.68%
Department
Health, Phys Budget
Educ, & Athletics - 29305 Budget
$2,181,347 Budget
$1,850,807 Fav/(Unfav)
$330,540 Fav/(Unfav)
15.15%
#1 - Martin
Bilingual B Anderson
Education - AS -- PreK
33317- 10101 $4,455
$1,157,444 $6,717
$1,065,002 ($2,262)
$92,443 (50.78%)
7.99%
#2 - Clara
Native Barton Program
American - PreK - 10201
- AS - 33817 $9,560
$81,224 $6,717
$108,623 $2,843
($27,399) 29.74%
(33.73%)
#5
Arts- John Williams
Education - AS--PreK
42117 - 10501 $95,465
$709,813 $104,848
$605,849 ($9,383)
$103,964 (9.83%)
14.65%
#Library
6 - DagServices
Hammarskjold - PreK - 10601
- AS - 42217 $74,212
$228,021 $91,415
$195,899 ($17,203)
$32,122 (23.18%)
14.09%
#7 - Virgil
Early I. Grissom
Childhood Office- PreK
- PS -- 44501
10701 $5,811
$6,055,467 $6,717
$5,454,876 ($906)
$600,591 (15.59%)
9.92%
#8 - Roberto
Instruct TechClemente
for Schools- PreK- CS --64513
10801 $352,644
$4,803,453 $337,010
$2,802,140 $15,634
$2,001,313 4.43%
41.66%
#9
Prof- Martin Luther &
Development King - PreK--71016
Diversity 10901 $86,991
$116,836 $92,315
$30,572 ($5,324)
$86,264 (6.12%)
73.83%
#12
DeptJames PB Duffy
of School Pre-K - 11201
Improvement - 73016 $29,323
$240,134 $0
$221,779 $29,323
$18,355 100.00%
7.64%
#14 - Chester
Teaching Dewey - PreK
and Learning - 73116- 11401 $0
$1,733,911 $0
$527,767 $0
$1,206,144 0%
69.56%
#17
Dpty- Supt
Enrico Fermi - &
Teaching PreK - 11701
Learning - 73216 $190,402
$1,548,625 $201,179
$3,147,209 ($10,777)
($1,598,584) (5.66%)
(103.23%)
#19
Dept- ofDrLeadership
Chas Lunsford Devel - PreK
- DM--11901
73316 $236,691
$257,950 $228,145
$286,295 $8,546
($28,345) 3.61%
(10.99%)
#20
Office - Henry Lomb- -73416
of Science PreK - 12001 $97,986
$742,558 $103,498
$667,756 ($5,512)
$74,802 (5.63%)
10.07%
#22
Office - Abraham Lincoln--73516
of Mathematics PreK - 12201 $5,371
$757,295 $6,717
$952,476 ($1,346)
($195,181) (25.06%)
(25.77%)
#23
Office - Francis
of SocialParker - PreK
Studies - 12301
- 73616 $9,423
$1,167,941 $6,717
$921,520 $2,706
$246,421 28.71%
21.10%
#25 - Nathan.
Integrated Hawthorne
Literacy K-12 -- 73716
PreK - 12501 $101,448
$1,364,732 $106,648
$574,676 ($5,200)
$790,056 (5.13%)
57.89%
#29 - AdlaiIntervention
Academic E StevensonServices
- PreK -- 12901
73916 $9,091
$339,337 $6,717
$298,344 $2,374
$40,993 26.11%
12.08%
#33
Office- Audubon
of Foreign School - PreK- -- 13301
Languages 74416 $887,984
$195,508 $801,863
$193,287 $86,121
$2,221 9.70%
1.14%
#34
African- Dr&Louis A Cerulli PreK
African-Amer Studies- 13401
- 74616 $6,957
$129,134 $6,717
$134,440 $240
($5,306) 3.45%
(4.11%)
#35
Dept- of Pinnacle SchoolDvlpmnt
Professional - PreK --13501
75216 $0
$443,466 $0
$575,589 $0
($132,123) 0%
(29.79%)
#36
Dept- of Henry Longfellow
Coaching - PreK --13601
& Leadership 75316 $7,820
$152,428 $6,717
$147,856 $1,103
$4,572 14.10%
3.00%
#39 - Andrew
Positive J Townson
Behaviorial Support - PreK - 13901
- 75416 $5,501
$589,057 $6,717
$494,268 ($1,216)
$94,789 (22.11%)
16.09%
#41 - Kodak
Careers Park School
in Teaching - 77716 - PreK - 14101 $5,238
$587,387 $6,717
$1,204,659 ($1,479)
($617,272) (28.24%)
(105.09%)
#42 - Abelard Reynolds - PreK - 14201 $4,851 $6,717 ($1,866) (38.47%)
#45 - Mary McLeod Bethune-PreK - 14501 $89,341 $105,973 ($16,632) (18.62%)
#52 - Frank Fowler Dow - PreK - 15201 $6,801 $6,717 $84 1.23%
#53 -Montessori Academy - PreK - 15301 $244,035 $281,604 ($37,569) (15.39%)
#57 - Early Childhood - PreK - 15701 $399,119 $338,135 $60,984 15.28%
#58
School- World
Supportof Inquiry -PS - 15801 $0 $27,835,395
$31,181,563 $0 $0
$3,346,168 0%
10.73%
Pre-School Parent Program - PS - 18101 $1,775,370 $1,916,288 ($140,918) (7.94%)
Family Learn Ctr Hart St-PreK - 23701 $103,598 $99,835 $3,763 3.63%
Career & Technical Education - 24003 $753,007 $484,342 $268,665 35.68%
Health, Phys Educ, & Athletics - 29305 $2,181,347 $1,850,807 $330,540 15.15%
Bilingual Education - AS - 33317 $1,157,444 $1,065,002 $92,443 7.99%
Native American Program - AS - 33817 $81,224 $108,623 ($27,399) (33.73%)
Arts Education - AS - 42117 $709,813 $605,849 $103,964 14.65%
Library Services - AS - 42217 $228,021 $195,899 $32,122 14.09%
Early Childhood Office - PS - 44501 $6,055,467 $5,454,876 $600,591 9.92%
Instruct Tech for Schools - CS - 64513 $4,803,453 $2,802,140 $2,001,313 41.66%
Prof Development & Diversity - 71016 $116,836 $30,572 $86,264 73.83%
Dept of School Improvement - 73016 $240,134 $221,779 $18,355 7.64%
Teaching and Learning - 73116 $1,733,911 $527,767 $1,206,144 69.56%
Dpty Supt Teaching & Learning - 73216 $1,548,625 $3,147,209 ($1,598,584) (103.23%)
Dept of Leadership Devel - DM - 73316 $257,950 $286,295 ($28,345) (10.99%)
Office of Science - 73416 $742,558 $667,756 $74,802 10.07%
Office of Mathematics - 73516 $757,295 $952,476 ($195,181) (25.77%)
Office of Social Studies - 73616 $1,167,941 $921,520 $246,421 21.10%
Integrated Literacy K-12 - 73716 $1,364,732 $574,676 $790,056 57.89%
Academic Intervention Services - 73916 $339,337 $298,344 $40,993 12.08%
Office of Foreign Languages - - 74416 $195,508 $193,287 $2,221 1.14%
African & African-Amer Studies - 74616 $129,134 $134,440 ($5,306) (4.11%)
Dept of Professional Dvlpmnt - 75216 $443,466 $575,589 ($132,123) (29.79%)
Dept of Coaching & Leadership - 75316 $152,428 $147,856 $4,572 3.00%
Positive Behaviorial Support - 75416 $589,057 $494,268 $94,789 16.09%
Careers in Teaching - 77716 $587,387 $1,204,659 ($617,272) (105.09%)

Section 6 Page 7
School Support $31,181,563 $27,835,395 $3,346,168 10.73%
 SCHOOL SUPPORT PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Specialized Services
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
Specialized Services is responsible for the implementation and oversight of all regulations as they pertain to students with disabilities. This area
offers a full continuum of special education services and programs and is committed to providing appropriate high quality education for students
with disabilities in the least restrictive environment. The District’s committees and subcommittees on Special Education determine eligibility
for special education services and the development of Individual Education Plans, assuring due process to parents and students, and providing
technical support to staff. This area is also responsible for the administration of related services such as school psychology, school social work,
speech and language therapy, state mandated screening, audiology, occupational and physical therapy, Section 504 plans, extended school year
program and management of the IDEA grant.

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $10,191,544 $9,233,838 $957,706 9.40% Districtwide budget reduction
Other Compensation $706,978 $705,414 $1,564 0.22%
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligation with Variability $0 $0 $0 0%
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $1,019 $0 $1,019 100.00%
Facilities and Related $351,991 $388,960 ($36,969) (10.50%) Increase in Instructional Supplies
Technology $252 $0 $252 100.00%
Other Variable Expenses $2,721,743 $2,346,103 $375,640 13.80% ARRA funding reduction
Totals $13,973,527 $12,674,315 $1,299,213 9.30%

Net FTE Change Fav/(Unfav) 144.45 133.48 10.97 7.59%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Summer Prog - 12 Mo. Elem - 16109 $784,950 $681,350 $103,600 13.20%
Summer Prog - 12 Mo. Secondary - 16209 $311,987 $294,732 $17,255 5.53%
The Central Assessment Team - 24208 $11,678 $0 $11,678 100.00%
SETRC - ESS - 38208 $250,761 $271,432 ($20,671) (8.24%)
Specially-Designed Instr Prog - 40508 $204,757 $165,711 $39,046 19.07%
Northwest Zone Spec Srvcs - 52508 $488,185 $411,364 $76,821 15.74%
Southeast Zone Spec Srvcs - 52608 $360,030 $485,419 ($125,389) (34.83%)
Northeast Zone Spec Srvcs - 52708 $381,718 $345,193 $36,525 9.57%
Spec Srvcs External Education - 52807 $2,238,440 $1,717,717 $520,723 23.26%
Match Team - 52917 $733,458 $836,825 ($103,367) (14.09%)
Specialized Services - 53008 $3,042,401 $2,625,062 $417,339 13.72%
Speech & Hearing Services - 53108 $721,605 $856,139 ($134,534) (18.64%)
Audiology Services - 53308 $466,836 $426,204 $40,632 8.70%
OT/PT Services - 53408 $2,358,806 $2,579,859 ($221,053) (9.37%)
Psychological Services - 53608 $519,454 $257,343 $262,111 50.46%
Special Class Programs - 54808 $1,098,463 $719,965 $378,498 34.46%
Totals $13,973,527 $12,674,315 $1,299,213 9.30%

Section 6 Page 8
 SCHOOL SUPPORT PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Youth Development and Family Services

Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
Youth Development and Family Services (YDFS) is responsible for the integration and management of student and family support services to
enhance students’ social-emotional and academic performance to produce productive citizens in society and future leaders. This area offers
a wide range of comprehensive services, initiatives and strategies with opportunities for removing the complex factors, which interfere with
learning. YDFS encompasses Student Attendance, Guidance and Counseling, Human Services Systems, Social Workers, Homless Program,
Community Partnerships, Office of Parent Engagement, School Health Services, Student Placement and Equity, and Office of Adult and Career
Education Services.

2011-12 Budget Expense Total - $16,326,439

Other Compensation
0.73%
Salary Compensation
34.65%

Fixed Obligation with Variability

4.52%

Cash Capital Outlays

0.03%

Facilities and Related

11.38%

Other Variable Expenses

48.71%

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $6,050,696 $5,656,485 $394,211 6.52% Districtwide Budget Reduction
Other Compensation $263,506 $118,536 $144,970 55.02% Grant Funding Reduction
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligation with Variability $724,234 $737,715 ($13,481) (1.86%)
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $260,004 $4,400 $255,604 98.31% Grant Funding Reduction
Facilities and Related $2,460,238 $1,857,194 $603,044 24.51% Grant Funding Reduction
Technology $3,025 $0 $3,025 100.00% Grant Funding Reduction
Other Variable Expenses $9,016,552 $7,952,109 $1,064,443 11.81% Districtwide Budget Reduction
Totals $18,778,255 $16,326,439 $2,451,816 13.06%

FTEs 98.76 89.65 9.11 9.22%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Adult and Career Education Srv - ADULT & CAREER EDUC $5,564,440 $4,353,244 $1,211,197 21.77%
Parent Engagement - PARENT ENGAGEMENT $711,036 $754,936 ($43,900) (6.17%)
Student Placement & Equity - STU PLCMNT & EQUITY $1,097,395 $934,264 $163,131 14.87%
Youth and Family Support - YOUTH & FMLY SUPPORT $11,405,384 $10,283,995 $1,121,389 9.83%
Totals $18,778,255 $16,326,439 $2,451,816 13.06%

Section 6 Page 9
 SCHOOL SUPPORT PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Youth Develop and Family Services

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Youth Develop. & Family Srvcs

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 2,579,896 2,152,806 2,226,295 (73,489)
Civil Service Salary 2,036,869 2,244,017 2,232,254 11,763
Administrator Salary 1,159,597 1,363,771 1,155,917 207,854
Hourly Teachers 465,582 235,314 - 235,314
Teaching Assistants - - - -
Paraprofessional Salary 62,190 54,788 42,019 12,769
Sub Total Salary Compensation 6,304,134 6,050,696 5,656,485 394,211
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 116,116 117,388 31,000 86,388
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 159,001 111,809 74,436 37,373
Teachers In Service 48,552 34,309 13,100 21,209
Sub Total Other Compensation 323,670 263,506 118,536 144,970
Total Salary and Other Compensation 6,627,804 6,314,202 5,775,021 539,181
Employee Benefits - - - -
Total Compensation and Benefits 6,627,804 6,314,202 5,775,021 539,181
Fixed Obligations With Variability
Special Education Tuition - - - -
Contract Transportation 45,775 74,234 62,260 11,974
Charter School Tuition - - - -
Health Service Other Districts 465,037 575,000 600,455 (25,455)
Insurance non-employee 84,112 75,000 75,000 -
Sub Total Fixed Obligations 594,924 724,234 737,715 (13,481)
Debt Service
Sub Total Debt Service - - - -
Cash Capital Outlays
Cash Capital Expense - - - -
Textbooks 112,269 3,802 3,000 802
Equipment Other than Buses 25,168 227,494 1,000 226,494
Equipment Buses - - - -
Computer Hardware - Instructional - - - -
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional 52,748 28,708 400 28,308
Library Books - - - -
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays 190,186 260,004 4,400 255,604

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Youth Develop. & Family Srvcs

Var Bud vs
2009-2010
Section 6 Page 10 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

 Library Books - - - -
SCHOOL SUPPORT PROFILES AND BUDGETS
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays 190,186
2011 - 12
260,004
DRAFT BUDGET
4,400 255,604

Youth Develop and Family Services – continued

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Youth Develop. & Family Srvcs

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Facilities and Related

Utilities 796 1,760 1,460 300
Instructional Supplies 483,028 965,312 376,692 588,620
Equip Service Contr & Repair 44,459 45,352 31,942 13,410
Facilities Service Contracts 56,018 7,360 - 7,360
Rentals 1,108,939 976,183 1,055,031 (78,848)
Maintenance Repair Supplies 2,542 600 - 600
Postage and Print/Advertising 177,030 305,482 252,007 53,475
Auto Supplies - - 5,000 (5,000)
Supplies and Materials 130,777 93,443 96,438 (2,995)
Custodial Supplies (61) - - -
Office Supplies 62,833 64,746 38,624 26,122
Sub Total Facilities and Related 2,066,361 2,460,238 1,857,194 603,044
Technology
Computer Software - Instructional - - - -
Computer Software - Non Instructional 87,816 3,025 - 3,025
Subtotal Technology 87,816 3,025 - 3,025
All Other Variable Expenses
Miscellaneous Services 110,283 55,482 45,192 10,290
Professional Technical Service 3,323,681 2,709,623 1,764,253 945,370
Agency Clerical 200,772 80,243 15,400 64,843
Judgments and Claims - - - -
Grant Disallowances - - - -
Departmental Credits (13,509) (7,740) (3,500) (4,240)
Indirect Costs Grants - - - -
BOCES Services 5,760,248 6,089,564 6,089,564 -
Professional Development 79,441 89,380 41,200 48,180
Subtotal of All Other Variable Expenses 9,460,916 9,016,552 7,952,109 1,064,443
Total Non Compensation 12,400,204 12,464,053 10,551,418 1,912,635
Sub Total 19,028,007 18,778,255 16,326,439 2,451,816
Budget Reserve - - - -
Grand Total 19,028,007 18,778,255 16,326,439 2,451,816

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Youth Develop. & Family Srvcs

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT Section 6 Page 11

 Budget Reserve - - - -
SCHOOL SUPPORT PROFILES
Grand TotalAND19,028,007
BUDGETS 18,778,255
2011 - 12 DRAFT
16,326,439BUDGET
2,451,816

Youth Develop and Family Services – continued

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Youth Develop. & Family Srvcs

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

Offc Adult Ed & Career Srvcs - OACES 5,806,591 5,564,440 4,353,244 1,211,197
Parent Engagement - PARENT ENGAGEMENT 471,947 711,036 754,936 (43,900)
Student Placement - STUDENT PLACEMENT 1,183,380 1,097,395 934,264 163,131
Youth and Family Support - YOUTH & FMLY SUPPORT
11,566,089 11,405,384 10,283,995 1,121,389
19,028,007
Youth Develop. & Family Srvcs - YTH_DEV&FMLY_SPRT 18,778,255 16,326,439 2,451,816

Section 6 Page 12
 SCHOOL SUPPORT PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Position Summary
Youth Develop. & Family Srvcs

Var Bud vs
2009 - 2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

POSITIONS BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 38.40 32.01 30.40 1.61
Civil Service Salary 56.51 50.75 46.25 4.50
Administrator Salary 13.00 14.00 11.00 3.00
Teaching Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Paraprofessional Salary 3.00 2.00 2.00 0.00
Hourly Teachers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary Compensation 110.91 98.76 89.65 9.11
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teachers In Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Compensation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary and Other Compensation 110.91 98.76 89.65 9.11
Grand Total 110.91 98.76 89.65 9.11

POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT

Offc Adult Ed & Career Srvcs - OACES 62.41 54.26 45.65 8.61
Parent Engagement - PARENT ENGAGEMENT 9.00 8.00 8.00 0.00
Student Placement - STUDENT PLACEMENT 18.00 15.00 14.00 1.00
Yth & Fmly Support - YTH & FMLY SUPPORT 21.50 21.50 22.00 (0.50)
Yth Dev & Fmly Srvcs - YTH DEV & FMLY 110.91 98.76 89.65 9.11

Section 6 Page 13
 SCHOOL SUPPORT PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Adult and Career Education Services

Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
Adult and Career Education Services helps students of all ages learn the skills they need for success in the workplace. Rochester residents learn
new skills in programs offered throughout the community in schools, businesses, industries, community-based organizations, libraries and jails.
The District offers comprehensive services to recruit, instruct, counsel, train, and place adult learners in jobs. Adult students participate in full
or part-time classes weekly. Grants are used to provide free educational opportunities to adults who do not have a high school or equivalency
diploma or speak English. Grants are used to help offset the costs of other occupational apprenticeship classes to keep student fees reasonable.
Workforce Preparation gives adults the chance to develop skills to function in a changing society.

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $3,268,319 $2,884,184 $384,135 11.75% Districtwide Budget Reduction
Other Compensation $71,131 $41,000 $30,131 42.36% Districtwide Budget Reduction
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $17,000 $45,000 ($28,000) (164.71%) Increase student transportation
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $251,894 $3,000 $248,894 98.81% Grant Funding Reduction
Facilities and Related $1,675,677 $1,203,560 $472,117 28.17% Grant Funding Reduction
Technology $2,025 $0 $2,025 100.00% Grant Funding Reduction
Other Variable Expenses $278,394 $176,500 $101,894 36.60% Grant Funding Reduction
Totals $5,564,440 $4,353,244 $1,211,197 21.77%

FTEs 54.26 45.65 8.61 15.87%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Occup/Apprent Avocat Ed - WFP - 23103 $50 $0 $50 100.00%
CAREERS - WFP - 23303 $22,023 $0 $22,023 100.00%
OACES-WFP - 23503 $5,531,695 $4,353,244 $1,178,452 21.30%
Family Learn Ctr Hart St - WFP - 23703 $10,672 $0 $10,672 100.00%
Totals $5,564,440 $4,353,244 $1,211,197 21.77%

Section 6 Page 14
 SCHOOL SUPPORT PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Parent Engagement
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
Parent Engagement is responsible for the overall customer satisfaction of parents in the Rochester City School District. This office is dedicated
to partnering with parents in making sure their children’s educational needs are being met. The Parent Engagement Office seeks to help schools
and parents work together for student achievement through support systems by programs and standards established by the National PTA. This
area offers a wide variety of courses for parents throughout the year and shares resources and pertinent information with parents. The Office of
Parent Engagement empowers all parents to support the schools in educating their child.

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $324,935 $408,457 ($83,522) (25.70%) Position Reallocation
Other Compensation $6,263 $8,263 ($2,000) (31.93%) Grant Funding Redistribution
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $1,400 $1,400 $0 0.00%
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $2,000 $1,400 $600 30.00% Districtwide Budget Reduction
Facilities and Related $349,338 $309,466 $39,872 11.41% Grant Funding Reduction
Technology $0 $0 $0 0%
Other Variable Expenses $27,100 $25,950 $1,150 4.24%
Totals $711,036 $754,936 ($43,900) (6.17%)

FTEs 8.00 8.00 - 0.00%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Parent Engagement - 24516 $0 $0 $0 0%
Parent University - DM - 54016 $0 $0 0%
Office of Parent Engagement - 55516 $711,036 $754,936 ($43,900) (6.17%)
Dist. Adv, Counc to Title I - 55616 $0 $0 $0 0%
Totals $711,036 $754,936 ($43,900) (6.17%)

Section 6 Page 15
 SCHOOL SUPPORT PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Student Placement and Equity

Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
Student Placement and Equity oversees the registration and placement of over 5,000 new students annually. It provides mailings to over 12,000
homes for recruitment into Pre-K, K, MAP, seventh grade special admissions and general admissions schools, International Baccalaureate,
Edison schools, and out of #57, NRCS, and Charter, Private and Parochial schools. This area also handles CSE and Annual Review changes in
programs and temporary placements of new Special Education students. The objective of this area is to provide equitable services to all families
who need to transition their children from one school to another, or from one program to another, and to work with over 25,000 families a year
to minimize transitions and associated disruptions to the educational process.

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $821,259 $798,547 $22,712 2.77%
Other Compensation $135,792 $38,373 $97,419 71.74% Districtwide Budget Reduction
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $0 $0 $0 0%
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $2,000 $0 $2,000 100.00% Districtwide Budget Reduction
Facilities and Related $123,344 $82,344 $41,000 33.24% Districtwide Budget Reduction
Technology $0 $0 $0 0%
Other Variable Expenses $15,000 $15,000 $0 0.00%
Totals $1,097,395 $934,264 $163,131 14.87%

FTEs 15.00 14.00 1.00 6.67%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Student Equity & Placement -HS - 55005 $1,088,413 $934,264 $ 154,149 14.16%
Parent Info Studnt Reg NW - DM - 55716 $3,345 $0 $ 3,345 100.00%
Parent Info Studnt Reg NE - DM - 55816 $5,637 $0 $ 5,637 100.00%
Parent Info Studnt Reg South - 55916 $0 $0 $ - 0%
Totals $1,097,395 $934,264 $ 163,131 14.87%

Section 6 Page 16
 SCHOOL SUPPORT PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Youth Development, Family Support and Student Attendance

Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
Youth Development, Family Support and Student Attendance is responsible for implementing and evaluating youth development strategies,
systems, and structures that help students to become fully equipped to engage constructively as academic achievers in school and as citizens
in our community. This office will take an interdisciplinary approach to help standardize the social, emotional, and counseling curriculum and
professional development across all schools and work with the Director of Counseling to expand counseling services to Elementary Schools;
work with the Director of Human Services to provide appropriate services to schools through outside agencies and student support services; The
Office of Attendance which includes the supervision of attendance staff, are responsible for working with schools to improve attendance; and
the Office of Community Partnerships to cultivate and maintain supportive partnerships through local buinesses, educational institutions and
other community partners as volunteers and mentors.

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $1,636,183 $1,565,297 $70,886 4.33% Districtwide Budget Reduction
Other Compensation $50,320 $30,900 $19,420 38.59% Districtwide Budget Reduction
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations With Variability $705,834 $691,315 $14,519 2.06%
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $4,110 $0 $4,110 100.00% Districtwide Budget Reduction
Facilities and Related $311,879 $261,824 $50,055 16.05% Districtwide Budget Reduction
Technology $1,000 $0 $1,000 100.00% Districtwide Budget Reduction
Other Variable Expenses $8,696,058 $7,734,659 $961,399 11.06% Districtwide Budget Reduction
Totals $11,405,384 $10,283,995 $1,121,389 9.83%

FTEs 21.50 22.00 (0.50) (2.3%)

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Yth Dev Fmly Srv Supervision - 38508 $1,028,764 $964,292 $64,472 6.27%
Human Services Systems - DM - 40616 $1,963,780 $1,174,834 $788,946 40.17%
Non-Public for Title IV - 40707 $0 $0 $0 0%
Attendance Services - SSS - 53208 $467,442 $398,865 $68,577 14.67%
Health Services - SSS - 53508 $6,950,155 $6,981,840 ($31,685) (0.5%)
Social Work Services - SSS - 53708 $490,168 $302,752 $187,416 38.24%
Off. of Strategic Partnerships - 70616 $232,216 $197,008 $35,208 15.16%
Office of Guidance - HS - 70905 $272,859 $264,404 $8,455 3.10%
Rochester Surround Care Comm C - 77316 $0 $0 $0 0%
Totals $11,405,384 $10,283,995 $1,121,389 9.83%

Section 6 Page 17
Administration Profiles and Budgets

Board of Education
Superintendent
Chief of Staff
Accountability
Administrative Services
Communications
General Counsel
Human Capital Initiatives
School Innovation
Strategic Leadership
Debt Service
District-Wide Non-Program Expense
Employee Benefits
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Board of Education
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
The Board is responsible for educating the children of Rochester. The Board sets the strategic direction of the District through policy develop-
ment and adoption, and provides oversight and direction to the District. The Board works with members of the local legislative delegation and
lobbying organizations to ensure that the interests of the District are represented. The Office of Auditor General (OAG) and the Claims Audi-
tor report directly to the Board in compliance with the Laws of New York. The OAG assists the Board with their oversight responsibility for
audit, internal control, financial reporting, and compliance. The Claims Auditor assumes the powers and duties of the Board to ensure that
only legitimate claims against the District are paid. The Board also oversees the Office of M/WBE Development whose mission it is to provide
minority and women-owned business enterprises with equal opportunity to participate in all aspects of the District’s contracting and purchasing
programs.

2011-12 Budget Expense Total - $1,417,302

Other Compensation
0.78%
Cash Capital Outlays
0.78%

Salary Compensation
77.68%
Facilities and Related
1.94%

Technology
0.97%

Other Variable Expenses

17.86%

Expense Categories

2010-11 2011-12 Budget %

Amended Proposed Budget Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $1,253,862 $1,100,928 $152,934 12.20% Districtwide budget reductions
Other Compensation $9,750 $11,000 ($1,250) (12.82%)
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $0 $0 $0 0%
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $7,500 $11,000 ($3,500) (46.67%)
Facilities and Related $32,745 $27,486 $5,259 16.06%
Technology $2,960 $13,800 ($10,840) (366.22%)
Other Variable Expenses $264,450 $253,088 $11,362 4.30%
Totals $1,571,267 $1,417,302 $153,965 9.80%

FTEs 22.00 20.03 1.97 8.95%

Departments

2010-11 2011-12 Budget %

Amended Proposed Budget Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Claims Audit - 60912 $146,838 $141,189 $5,649 3.85%
Office of Auditor General - 61012 $684,953 $582,728 $102,225 14.92%
Office of M/WBE - 63016 $96,498 $39,103 $57,395 59.48%
Board Of Education-BOE - 80018 $642,978 $654,282 ($11,304) (1.76%)
Totals $1,571,267 $1,417,302 $153,965 9.80%

Section 7 Page 1
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Board of Education

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary - - - -
Civil Service Salary 1,062,047 1,253,862 1,100,928 152,934
Administrator Salary - - - -
Hourly Teachers - - - -
Teaching Assistants - - - -
Paraprofessional Salary - - - -
Sub Total Salary Compensation 1,062,047 1,253,862 1,100,928 152,934
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost - - - -
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 12,156 9,750 11,000 (1,250)
Teachers In Service - - - -
Sub Total Other Compensation 12,156 9,750 11,000 (1,250)
Total Salary and Other Compensation 1,074,204 1,263,612 1,111,928 151,684
Employee Benefits - - - -
Total Compensation and Benefits 1,074,204 1,263,612 1,111,928 151,684
Fixed Obligations With Variability
Special Education Tuition - - - -
Contract Transportation - - - -
Charter School Tuition - - - -
Health Service Other Districts - - - -
Insurance non-employee - - - -
Sub Total Fixed Obligations - - - -
Debt Service
Sub Total Debt Service - - - -
Cash Capital Outlays
Cash Capital Expense - - - -
Textbooks - - - -
Equipment Other than Buses 120 2,000 1,000 1,000
Equipment Buses - - - -
Computer Hardware - Instructional - - - -
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional 3,170 5,500 10,000 (4,500)
Library Books - - - -
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays 3,290 7,500 11,000 (3,500)

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Board of Education

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Section 7 Page 2
Facilities and Related
Utilities - - - -
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Board of Education

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Facilities and Related

Utilities - - - -
Instructional Supplies - 1,500 1,000 500
Equip Service Contr & Repair - 4,500 5,000 (500)
Facilities Service Contracts - - - -
Rentals - 1,500 1,000 500
Maintenance Repair Supplies - - - -
Postage and Print/Advertising 4,343 13,195 13,200 (5)
Auto Supplies - - - -
Supplies and Materials 1,460 2,500 2,000 500
Custodial Supplies - - - -
Office Supplies 7,844 9,550 5,286 4,264
Sub Total Facilities and Related 13,646 32,745 27,486 5,259
Technology
Computer Software - Instructional - - - -
Computer Software - Non Instructional 2,500 2,960 13,800 (10,840)
Subtotal Technology 2,500 2,960 13,800 (10,840)
All Other Variable Expenses
Miscellaneous Services 77,811 100,350 98,790 1,560
Professional Technical Service 112,973 130,500 127,532 2,968
Agency Clerical 307 4,000 4,000 -
Judgments and Claims - - - -
Grant Disallowances - - - -
Departmental Credits - - - -
Indirect Costs Grants - - - -
BOCES Services - - - -
Professional Development 13,526 29,600 22,766 6,834
Subtotal of All Other Variable Expenses 204,618 264,450 253,088 11,362
Total Non Compensation 224,054 307,655 305,374 2,281
Sub Total 1,298,257 1,571,267 1,417,302 153,965
Budget Reserve - - - -
Grand Total 1,298,257 1,571,267 1,417,302 153,965

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Board of Education

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

Claims Audit - 60912 137,215 146,838 141,189 5,649

Office of Auditor General - 61012 Section 7 Page
592,1913 684,953 582,728 102,225
Office of M/WBE - 63016 - 96,498 39,103 57,395
Board Of Education-BOE - 80018 568,851 642,978 654,282 (11,304)
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Board of Education

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

Claims Audit - 60912 137,215 146,838 141,189 5,649

Office of Auditor General - 61012 592,191 684,953 582,728 102,225
Office of M/WBE - 63016 - 96,498 39,103 57,395
Board Of Education-BOE - 80018 568,851 642,978 654,282 (11,304)

Board of Education - BOE 1,298,257 1,571,267 1,417,302 153,965

Section 7 Page 4
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Position Summary
Board of Education

Var Bud vs
2009 - 2010 2010 - 2011 2011-2012 Amend
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

POSITIONS BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service Salary 22.00 22.00 20.03 1.97
Administrator Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teaching Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Paraprofessional Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hourly Teachers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary Compensation 22.00 22.00 20.03 1.97
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teachers In Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Compensation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary and Other Compensation 22.00 22.00 20.03 1.97
Employee Benefits
Employee Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grand Total 22.00 22.00 20.03 1.97

POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT

Claims Audit - 60912 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00

Office of Auditor General - 61012 7.00 7.00 5.70 1.30
Office of M/WBE - 63016 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.67
Board Of Education-BOE - 80018 11.00 11.00 11.00 0.00
Rochester City School District - RCSD 22.00 22.00 20.03 1.97

Section 7 Page 5
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Superintendent
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
The Superintendent of Schools leads the school district in carrying out its primary mission: to provide a quality education that ensures our stu-
dents graduate with the skills to be successful in the global economy. The goal is to ensure that every child is academically prepared to succeed
in college, life and the global economy. The Office of the Superintendent is focused on three core values: Achievement – Improving student
achievement through a laser-like focus on teaching and learning with an emphasis on results; Equity – Equitable distribution of resources based
on the needs of schools and students; Accountability – Use of data to ensure that we hold adults accountable for the success of all students. The
Superintendent has chief executive authority and accountability for all aspects of District operations and for integrating them all in support of
student achievement.

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $320,020 $315,511 $4,509 1.41%
Other Compensation $0 $0 $0 0%
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $0 $0 $0 0%
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital $0 $0 $0 0%
Facilities and Related $0 $0 $0 0%
Technology $0 $0 $0 0%
Other Variable Expenses $0 $0 $0 0%
Totals $320,020 $315,511 $4,509 1.41%
FTEs 2.00 2.00 - 0.00%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Chief School Administrator -DM - 70016 $320,020 $315,511 $4,509 1.41%
Totals $320,020 $315,511 $4,509 1.41%

Section 7 Page 6
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Superintendent

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary - - - -
Civil Service Salary 74,771 78,005 76,761 1,244
Administrator Salary 230,357 242,015 238,750 3,265
Hourly Teachers - - - -
Teaching Assistants - - - -
Paraprofessional Salary - - - -
Sub Total Salary Compensation 305,128 320,020 315,511 4,509
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost - - - -
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal - - - -
Teachers In Service - - - -
Sub Total Other Compensation - - - -
Total Salary and Other Compensation 305,128 320,020 315,511 4,509
Employee Benefits - - - -
Total Compensation and Benefits 305,128 320,020 315,511 4,509
Fixed Obligations With Variability
Special Education Tuition - - - -
Contract Transportation - - - -
Charter School Tuition - - - -
Health Service Other Districts - - - -
Insurance non-employee - - - -
Sub Total Fixed Obligations - - - -
Debt Service
Sub Total Debt Service - - - -
Cash Capital Outlays
Cash Capital Expense - - - -
Textbooks - - - -
Equipment Other than Buses - - - -
Equipment Buses - - - -
Computer Hardware - Instructional - - - -
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional - - - -
Library Books - - - -
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays - - - -

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Superintendent

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Section 7 Page 7
Facilities and Related
Utilities - - - -
 Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)
ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Facilities and Related

Utilities
Expenditure Summary -
(All Funds)- - -
Instructional Supplies Superintendent
- - - -
Equip Service Contr & Repair - - - -
Facilities Service Contracts - - - -
Var Bud vs
Rentals 2009-2010- 2010-2011- 2011-2012- Amend -
Maintenance Repair Supplies - - - -
Postage and Print/Advertising Actual- Amended - Proposed- Fav/(Unfav)
-
Auto Supplies - - - -
Supplies and
Facilities andMaterials
Related - - - -
Custodial
Utilities Supplies -- -- -- --
Office Supplies
Instructional Supplies -- -- -- --
Sub Total
Equip Service Contr & Repair Facilities and Related -- -- -- --
Technology
Facilities Service Contracts - - - -
Computer Software - Instructional
Rentals -- -- -- --
Computer Software - Non
Maintenance Repair Supplies Instructional -- -- -- --
Postage and Print/Advertising Subtotal Technology -- -- -- --
All Other
Auto SuppliesVariable Expenses - - - -
Miscellaneous Services
Supplies and Materials -- -- -- --
Professional Technical
Custodial Supplies Service -- -- -- --
Agency Clerical
Office Supplies -- -- -- --
Judgments and Claims Sub Total Facilities and Related -
- -- -- --
Grant Disallowances
Technology - - - -
Departmental Credits
Computer Software - Instructional -- -- -- --
Indirect Costs Grants
Computer Software - Non Instructional -- -- -- --
BOCES Services Subtotal Technology -
- -- -- --
Professional Development
All Other Variable Expenses - - - -
Subtotal
Miscellaneous of All Other Variable Expenses
Services -- -- -- --
Total
Professional Technical Service Non Compensation -- -- -- --
Agency Clerical Sub Total 305,128
- 320,020
- 315,511
- 4,509
-
Budget Reserve
Judgments and Claims -- -- -- --
Grant Disallowances Grand Total 305,128
- 320,020
- 315,511
- 4,509
-
Departmental Credits - - - -
Indirect Costs Grants - - - -
BOCES Services - - - -
Professional Development Expenditure Summary - (All Funds)
- - -
Subtotal of All Other Variable Expenses - - - -
Total Non Compensation
Superintendent
- - - -
Sub Total 305,128 320,020 315,511 4,509
Var Bud vs
Budget Reserve - - - -
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend
Grand Total 305,128 320,020 315,511 4,509
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT
Expenditure Summary (All Funds)
Chief School Administrator -DM - 70016 Superintendent
305,128 320,020 315,511 4,509

Superintendent - SUPERINTENDENT 305,128 320,020 315,511 4,509

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

Chief School Administrator -DM - 70016 305,128 320,020 315,511 4,509

Section 7 Page 8
Superintendent - SUPERINTENDENT 305,128 320,020 315,511 4,509
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Position Summary
Superintendent

Var Bud vs
2009 - 2010 2010 - 2011 2011-2012 Amend
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

POSITIONS BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service Salary 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Administrator Salary 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Teaching Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Paraprofessional Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hourly Teachers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary Compensation 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teachers In Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Compensation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary and Other Compensation 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00
Employee Benefits
Employee Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grand Total 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00

POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT

Chief School Administrator -DM - 70016 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00

Rochester City School District - RCSD 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00

Section 7 Page 9
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Chief of Staff
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
The Chief of Staff is responsible for the management and operation of the Superintendent’s Office and is assigned special projects by the Su-
perintendent of Schools. The Chief of Staff represents the Superintendent as requested, facilitates the Team and Executive Cabinet, and is re-
sponsible for coordinating communications between the Superintendent, his management team, and the Board of Education.  The Chief of Staff
serves, at the request of the Superintendent, as the liaison to the Board of Education Governance and Development Committee.  In addition, the
Chief of Staff serves as the liaison to the City of Rochester on certain matters in an effort to collaborate and identify opportunities for shared
services.

2011-12 Budget Expense Total - $3,070,322

Facilities and Related

1.99% Other Variable Expenses
62.95%

Other Compensation
0.46%

Fixed Obligations with Variability

0.01%

Cash Capital
0.16%

Salary Compensation
34.42%

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $1,113,917 $1,056,746 $57,171 5.13% Districtwide budget reductions
Other Compensation $7,000 $14,260 ($7,260) (103.71%)
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $912 $300 $612 67.11%
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital $2,146 $5,000 ($2,854) (132.99%)
Facilities and Related $23,134 $61,030 ($37,896) (163.81%) Alternative program support
Technology $100 $100 $0 0.00%
Other Variable Expenses $2,263,217 $1,932,886 $330,331 14.60% Districtwide budget reductions
Totals $3,410,426 $3,070,322 $340,104 9.97%

FTEs 19.50 18.00 1.50 7.69%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Dept of Alt School Programs - 25316 $1,462,396 $1,299,654 $162,742 11.13%
Elementary LT Susp'n / Tutrng - 55102 $376,778 $323,214 $53,564 14.22%
Administrative Support Ctr -DM - 75016 $1,016,286 $877,745 $138,541 13.63%
Teacher Assignment Room - 75116 $439,666 $454,409 ($14,743) (3.35%)
Special Projects-DWNPE - 80219 $115,300 $115,300 $0 0.00%
Totals $3,410,426 $3,070,322 $340,104 9.97%

Section 7 Page 10
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Chief of Staff

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 707,148 501,583 433,355 68,228
Civil Service Salary 296,278 266,988 259,108 7,880
Administrator Salary 377,826 300,596 256,712 43,884
Hourly Teachers 29,283 200 4,700 (4,500)
Teaching Assistants - - - -
Paraprofessional Salary 32,154 44,550 102,871 (58,321)
Sub Total Salary Compensation 1,442,689 1,113,917 1,056,746 57,171
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 5,853 5,000 13,260 (8,260)
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal - 2,000 1,000 1,000
Teachers In Service - - - -
Sub Total Other Compensation 5,853 7,000 14,260 (7,260)
Total Salary and Other Compensation 1,448,541 1,120,917 1,071,006 49,911
Employee Benefits - - - -
Total Compensation and Benefits 1,448,541 1,120,917 1,071,006 49,911
Fixed Obligations With Variability
Special Education Tuition - - - -
Contract Transportation - 912 300 612
Charter School Tuition - - - -
Health Service Other Districts - - - -
Insurance non-employee - - - -
Sub Total Fixed Obligations - 912 300 612
Debt Service
Sub Total Debt Service - - - -
Cash Capital Outlays
Cash Capital Expense - - - -
Textbooks - 2,146 5,000 (2,854)
Equipment Other than Buses 4,665 - - -
Equipment Buses - - - -
Computer Hardware - Instructional - - - -
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional - - - -
Library Books - - - -
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays 4,665 2,146 5,000 (2,854)

Section 7 Page 11
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Chief of Staff

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Facilities and Related

Utilities - - - -
Instructional Supplies 871 1,534 5,000 (3,466)
Equip Service Contr & Repair - - - -
Facilities Service Contracts - - - -
Rentals 200 2,000 1,000 1,000
Maintenance Repair Supplies - - - -
Postage and Print/Advertising 1,457 8,400 4,000 4,400
Auto Supplies - - - -
Supplies and Materials - 4,850 10,200 (5,350)
Custodial Supplies - - - -
Office Supplies 9,347 6,350 40,830 (34,480)
Sub Total Facilities and Related 11,876 23,134 61,030 (37,896)
Technology
Computer Software - Instructional - - - -
Computer Software - Non Instructional - 100 100 -
Subtotal Technology - 100 100 -
All Other Variable Expenses
Miscellaneous Services 78,107 79,050 79,500 (450)
Professional Technical Service 2,146,269 2,168,389 1,839,954 328,435
Agency Clerical 2,193 1,750 1,750 -
Judgments and Claims - - - -
Grant Disallowances - - - -
Departmental Credits - - - -
Indirect Costs Grants - - - -
BOCES Services - - - -
Professional Development 6,855 14,028 11,682 2,346
Subtotal of All Other Variable Expenses 2,233,425 2,263,217 1,932,886 330,331
Total Non Compensation 2,249,965 2,289,509 1,999,316 290,193
Sub Total 3,698,507 3,410,426 3,070,322 340,104
Budget Reserve - - - -
Grand Total 3,698,507 3,410,426 3,070,322 340,104

Section 7 Page 12
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Chief of Staff

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

Dept of Alt School Programs - 25316 1,630,047 1,462,396 1,299,654 162,742

Elementary LT Susp'n / Tutrng - 55102 309,340 376,778 323,214 53,564
Administrative Support Ctr -DM - 75016 879,395 1,016,286 877,745 138,541
Teacher Assignment Room - 75116 766,925 439,666 454,409 (14,743)
Special Projects-DWNPE - 80219 112,800 115,300 115,300 -

Chief of Staff - CHIEF OF STAFF 3,698,507 3,410,426 3,070,322 340,104

Section 7 Page 13
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Position Summary
Chief of Staff

Var Bud vs
2009 - 2010 2010 - 2011 2011-2012 Amend
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

POSITIONS BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 12.50 8.50 7.00 1.50
Civil Service Salary 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00
Administrator Salary 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00
Teaching Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Paraprofessional Salary 1.00 4.00 5.00 (1.00)
Hourly Teachers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary Compensation 20.50 19.50 18.00 1.50
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teachers In Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Compensation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary and Other Compensation 20.50 19.50 18.00 1.50
Employee Benefits
Employee Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grand Total 20.50 19.50 18.00 1.50

POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT

Elementary LT Susp'n / Tutrng - 55102 6.50 7.50 6.00 1.50

Administrative Support Ctr -DM - 75016 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00
Teacher Assignment Room - 75116 11.00 9.00 9.00 0.00
Rochester City School District - RCSD 20.50 19.50 18.00 1.50

Section 7 Page 14
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Accountability
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
The Office of Accountability provides relevant, accurate, reliable, and timely data that reflect integrity, sensitivity, and congruence with District
Goals. Data Management collects, analyzes, reports, archives student data and records, and disseminates data and provides professional develop-
ment for effective utilization. Research and Evaluation reviews all data and survey requests and evaluates student data, programs, and initiatives.
Assessment and Reporting provides test liaisons with detailed information required for administration of New York State mandated testing and
formative assessments and is the Regional Center for area district schools and agencies. Accountability verifies and communicates data regard-
ing State assessments, Special Education, VADIR, and BEDS. NCLB/Title I manages federal grant programs in accordance with applicable
statutes, regulations, and guidance.

2011-12 Budget Expense Total - $10,496,239

Salary Compensation
29.90%

Other Compensation
2.37%

Cash Capital Outlays

0.01%
Facilities and Related
2.22%

Technology
1.48%

Other Variable Expenses

64.02%

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $3,167,139 $3,138,507 $28,632 0.90% Districtwide budget reduction
Other Compensation $419,405 $248,859 $170,546 40.66% Districtwide budget reduction
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $0 $0 $0 0%
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $1,655 $755 $900 54.38%
Facilities and Related $393,887 $233,095 $160,792 40.82% Title I Stimulus funding reduction
Technology $16,820 $155,260 ($138,440) (823.07%) Data Dashboard/Datacation/Data Mentor
Other Variable Expenses $7,089,011 $6,719,763 $369,248 5.21% NCLB Supplemental Educational Services
Totals $11,087,917 $10,496,239 $591,678 5.34%

FTEs 43.50 41.60 1.90 4.37%

Accountability (continued)

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Nazareth Hall School - 17007 $43,943 $39,451 $4,492 10.22%
Aquinas Institute of Rochester - 17107 $96,152 $82,106 $14,046 14.61%
Nativity Prep Academy - 17207 $8,652 $7,828 $824 9.52%
Nazareth Academy - 17307 $6,922 Section 7 Page 15$0
$6,922 0.00%
Rochester Svnth Day Adv Acad - 17407 $10,474 $8,932 $1,542 14.72%
Talmudical Inst. Upstate NY - 17607 $2,036 $2,036 $0 0.00%
Ora Academy - 17707 $518 $518 $0 0.00%
 Facilities and Related $393,887 $233,095 $160,792 40.82% Title I Stimulus funding reduction
ADMINISTRATION
Technology PROFILES AND BUDGETS
$16,820 $155,260 2011 -
($138,440) 12(823.07%)
DRAFT BUDGET
Data Dashboard/Datacation/Data Mentor
Other Variable Expenses $7,089,011 $6,719,763 $369,248 5.21% NCLB Supplemental Educational Services
Totals $11,087,917 $10,496,239 $591,678 5.34%

FTEs 43.50 41.60 1.90 4.37%

Accountability (continued)

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Nazareth Hall School - 17007 $43,943 $39,451 $4,492 10.22%
Aquinas Institute of Rochester - 17107 $96,152 $82,106 $14,046 14.61%
Nativity Prep Academy - 17207 $8,652 $7,828 $824 9.52%
Nazareth Academy - 17307 $6,922 $6,922 $0 0.00%
Rochester Svnth Day Adv Acad - 17407 $10,474 $8,932 $1,542 14.72%
Talmudical Inst. Upstate NY - 17607 $2,036 $2,036 $0 0.00%
Ora Academy - 17707 $518 $518 $0 0.00%
Cobblestone School - 17807 $8,331 $4,908 $3,423 41.09%
Northside Christian Academy - 17907 $6,057 $5,252 $805 13.29%
Cathedral Sch at Holy Rosary - 18507 $53,045 $49,246 $3,799 7.16%
Hamidiye Academy - 18607 $3,213 $2,811 $402 12.51%
Rochester School For the Deaf - 18707 $3,516 $3,516 $0 0.00%
Mary Cariola Children's Center - 18807 $72,234 $58,231 $14,003 19.39%
Andrew Trahey Sch at Hillside - 18907 $3,294 $3,294 $0 0.00%
Northridge Christian School - 28507 $11,461 $14,765 ($3,304) (28.83%)
Monroe Nonsec Detention - SPP - 29807 $59,745 $48,898 $10,847 18.16%
Hillside Children's Cent - SPP - 35007 $160,383 $136,174 $24,209 15.09%
Non Public Schools: City - SPP - 35207 $118,618 $67,277 $51,341 43.28%
External Education - SPP - 42307 $4,000 $0 $4,000 100.00%
Testing & Accountability - 51013 $1,906,323 $1,463,197 $443,126 23.25%
Research & Program Evaluation - 51513 $421,357 $367,844 $53,513 12.70%
Early Screening - SSS - 53908 $179,904 $94,920 $84,984 47.24%
Monroe Cty Children's Ctr -SPP - 54107 $126,489 $109,129 $17,360 13.72%
Center for Youth Services -SPP - 54207 $14,700 $12,480 $2,220 15.10%
St Joseph's Villa - SPP - 54307 $35,367 $29,731 $5,636 15.94%
Salvation Army - SPP - 54407 $15,997 $12,351 $3,646 22.79%
Title 1 Office - AS - 71717 $7,027,608 $7,117,389 ($89,781) (1.28%)
Office of Accountability - 77216 $687,578 $747,033 ($59,455) (8.65%)
Totals $11,087,917 $10,496,239 $591,678 5.34%

Section 7 Page 16
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Accountability

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 174,084 107,504 93,006 14,498
Civil Service Salary 1,856,368 1,922,938 1,991,281 (68,343)
Administrator Salary 924,242 880,351 832,250 48,101
Hourly Teachers 134,602 231,346 194,892 36,454
Teaching Assistants 22,703 25,000 27,078 (2,078)
Paraprofessional Salary - - - -
Sub Total Salary Compensation 3,111,999 3,167,139 3,138,507 28,632
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 148,375 68,948 49,000 19,948
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 15,533 5,003 4,000 1,003
Teachers In Service 253,587 345,454 195,859 149,595
Sub Total Other Compensation 417,495 419,405 248,859 170,546
Total Salary and Other Compensation 3,529,494 3,586,544 3,387,366 199,178
Employee Benefits - - - -
Total Compensation and Benefits 3,529,494 3,586,544 3,387,366 199,178
Fixed Obligations With Variability
Special Education Tuition - - - -
Contract Transportation - - - -
Charter School Tuition - - - -
Health Service Other Districts - - - -
Insurance non-employee - - - -
Sub Total Fixed Obligations - - - -
Debt Service
Sub Total Debt Service - - - -
Cash Capital Outlays
Cash Capital Expense - - - -
Textbooks - - - -
Equipment Other than Buses 11,699 135 135 -
Equipment Buses - - - -
Computer Hardware - Instructional - - - -
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional 17,533 1,520 620 900
Library Books - - - -
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays 29,232 1,655 755 900

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Accountability

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Section 7 Page 17
Facilities and Related
Utilities 52 1,500 700 800
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Accountability

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Facilities and Related

Utilities 52 1,500 700 800
Instructional Supplies 60,513 260,843 100,704 160,139
Equip Service Contr & Repair 4,925 23,200 82,100 (58,900)
Facilities Service Contracts - - - -
Rentals 5,218 90 - 90
Maintenance Repair Supplies - - - -
Postage and Print/Advertising 29,909 54,724 9,544 45,180
Auto Supplies - - - -
Supplies and Materials 4,879 37,643 24,868 12,775
Custodial Supplies - - - -
Office Supplies 23,859 15,887 15,179 708
Sub Total Facilities and Related 129,353 393,887 233,095 160,792
Technology
Computer Software - Instructional - - 142,500 (142,500)
Computer Software - Non Instructional 387,156 16,820 12,760 4,060
Subtotal Technology 387,156 16,820 155,260 (138,440)
All Other Variable Expenses
Miscellaneous Services 122,253 103,924 215,191 (111,267)
Professional Technical Service 5,289,077 6,842,682 6,392,763 449,919
Agency Clerical 109,910 65,896 39,950 25,946
Judgments and Claims - - - -
Grant Disallowances - - - -
Departmental Credits (10,530) (6,400) (10,000) 3,600
Indirect Costs Grants - - - -
BOCES Services 95,812 - - -
Professional Development 85,084 82,909 81,859 1,050
Subtotal of All Other Variable Expenses 5,691,606 7,089,011 6,719,763 369,248
Total Non Compensation 6,237,348 7,501,373 7,108,873 392,500
Sub Total 9,766,842 11,087,917 10,496,239 591,678
Budget Reserve - - - -
Grand Total 9,766,842 11,087,917 10,496,239 591,678

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Accountability

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

Nazareth Hall School - 17007 35,130 43,943 39,451 4,492

Aquinas Institute of Rochester - 17107 Section 7 25,096
Page 18 96,152 82,106 14,046
Nativity Prep Academy - 17207 - 8,652 7,828 824
Nazareth Academy - 17307 48,691 6,922 6,922 -
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Accountability

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

Nazareth Hall School - 17007 35,130 43,943 39,451 4,492

Aquinas Institute of Rochester - 17107 25,096 96,152 82,106 14,046
Nativity Prep Academy - 17207 - 8,652 7,828 824
Nazareth Academy - 17307 48,691 6,922 6,922 -
Rochester Svnth Day Adv Acad - 17407 - 10,474 8,932 1,542
Talmudical Inst. Upstate NY - 17607 2,261 2,036 2,036 -
Ora Academy - 17707 603 518 518 -
Cobblestone School - 17807 1,316 8,331 4,908 3,423
Northside Christian Academy - 17907 912 6,057 5,252 805
Cathedral Sch at Holy Rosary - 18507 51,521 53,045 49,246 3,799
Hamidiye Academy - 18607 3,393 3,213 2,811 402
Rochester School For the Deaf - 18707 - 3,516 3,516 -
Mary Cariola Children's Center - 18807 50,468 72,234 58,231 14,003
Andrew Trahey Sch at Hillside - 18907 3,164 3,294 3,294 -
Northridge Christian School - 28507 12,460 11,461 14,765 (3,304)
Monroe Nonsec Detention - SPP - 29807 3,824 59,745 48,898 10,847
Hillside Children's Cent - SPP - 35007 130,617 160,383 136,174 24,209
Non Public Schools: City - SPP - 35207 116,281 118,618 67,277 51,341
External Education - SPP - 42307 - 4,000 - 4,000
Testing & Accountability - 51013 2,344,394 1,906,323 1,463,197 443,126
Research & Program Evaluation - 51513 613,456 421,357 367,844 53,513
Early Screening - SSS - 53908 168,075 179,904 94,920 84,984
Monroe Cty Children's Ctr -SPP - 54107 94,521 126,489 109,129 17,360
Center for Youth Services -SPP - 54207 19,363 14,700 12,480 2,220
St Joseph's Villa - SPP - 54307 37,559 35,367 29,731 5,636
Salvation Army - SPP - 54407 17,350 15,997 12,351 3,646
Title 1 Office - AS - 71717 5,373,153 7,027,608 7,117,389 (89,781)
Office of Accountability - 77216 613,234 687,578 747,033 (59,455)

Accountability - ACCOUNTABILITY 9,766,842 11,087,917 10,496,239 591,678

Section 7 Page 19
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Position Summary
Accountability

Var Bud vs
2009 - 2010 2010 - 2011 2011-2012 Amend
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

POSITIONS BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 10.00 2.00 1.60 0.40
Civil Service Salary 33.00 32.00 31.00 1.00
Administrator Salary 10.00 8.50 8.00 0.50
Teaching Assistants 5.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Paraprofessional Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hourly Teachers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary Compensation 58.00 43.50 41.60 1.90
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teachers In Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Compensation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary and Other Compensation 58.00 43.50 41.60 1.90
Employee Benefits
Employee Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grand Total 58.00 43.50 41.60 1.90

POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT

Nazareth Academy - 17307 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Cathedral Sch at Holy Rosary - 18507 1.00 0.80 0.66 0.14
Mary Cariola Children's Center - 18807 1.00 1.00 0.76 0.24
Northridge Christian School - 28507 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.02
Non Public Schools: City - SPP - 35207 9.80 1.00 1.00 0.00
Testing & Accountability - 51013 18.00 13.50 12.50 1.00
Research & Program Evaluation - 51513 9.00 7.00 7.00 0.00
Early Screening - SSS - 53908 6.00 6.00 3.00 3.00
Monroe Cty Children's Ctr -SPP - 54107 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Title 1 Office - AS - 71717 4.00 4.00 7.50 (3.50)
Office of Accountability - 77216 6.00 9.00 8.00 1.00
Rochester City School District - RCSD 58.00 43.50 41.60 1.90

Section 7 Page 20
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Administrative Services
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
The Deputy Superintendent of Administration (DSA) plans, organizes, controls, and directs the administrative services of the District and serves
on the Superintendent’s cabinet. The DSA provides oversight of the District’s assets and compliance with state, federal, and local laws. Areas
of operation include facilities, finance, food services, information technology, labor relations, operations, school safety, and transportation. The
team works to enhance the instructional programs of the District by providing value added services, efficiently and effectively. Administrative
Services strives to increase service levels and reduce costs through continuous improvement processes and reengineering departmental opera-
tions after recognized “best practices”.

2011-12 Budget Expense Total - $134,287,366

Debt Service
0.72%

Cash Capital Outlays

Fixed Obligations with 0.41%
Variability
47.25%
Facilities and Related
21.27%

Technology
0.06%

Other Compensation
1.05%

Other Variable Expenses

10.95%
Salary Compensation
18.30%

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $26,445,342 $24,570,440 $1,874,902 7.09% Districtwide budget reduction
Other Compensation $1,742,581 $1,413,304 $329,277 18.90% Districtwide budget reduction
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $62,616,120 $63,453,095 ($836,975) (1.34%) Special Ed tuition
Debt Service $962,161 $962,161 $0 0.00%
Cash Capital Outlays $687,343 $545,267 $142,076 20.67% Districtwide budget reduction
Facilities and Related $29,962,317 $28,559,494 $1,402,823 4.68% Districtwide budget reduction
Technology $114,178 $85,514 $28,664 25.10% Districtwide budget reduction
Other Variable Expenses $13,855,170 $14,698,091 ($842,921) (6.08%) BOCES Special Ed tuition
Totals $136,385,212 $134,287,366 $2,097,846 1.54%

FTEs 599.39 572.91 26.48 4.42%

Administrative Services (continued)

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Administrative Support - ADMIN SUPPORT $530,222 $396,823 $133,399 25.16%
Facilities - FACILITIES $22,352,849 $21,354,412 $998,437 4.47%
Finance - FINANCE $35,243,178 $35,980,698 ($737,520) (2.09%)
Food Service - FOOD SERVICE $13,832,664 $13,990,137 ($157,473) (1.14%)
Information Technology - INFO TECHNOLOGY
$10,292,480 $9,686,528 $605,952 5.89%
Labor Relations - LABOR_RELATIONS $348,548 $296,818 $51,730 14.84%
Operations - OPERATIONS $213,480 $181,852 $31,628 14.82%
School Safety - SCHOOL SAFETY $2,476,516 $2,325,669 $150,847 6.09%
Transportation Services - TRANSPORTATION
$51,095,275 $50,074,429 $1,020,846 2.00%
Totals $136,385,212 $134,287,366 $2,097,846 1.54%

Section 7 Page 21
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Administrative Services

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 8,217 - - -
Civil Service Salary 26,720,304 26,236,829 24,479,230 1,757,599
Administrator Salary 267,995 184,488 85,795 98,693
Hourly Teachers 14,767 - - -
Teaching Assistants - - - -
Paraprofessional Salary 3,491 24,025 5,415 18,610
Sub Total Salary Compensation 27,014,775 26,445,342 24,570,440 1,874,902
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 750 3,006 - 3,006
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 1,501,623 1,739,575 1,413,304 326,271
Teachers In Service 3,067 - - -
Sub Total Other Compensation 1,505,440 1,742,581 1,413,304 329,277
Total Salary and Other Compensation 28,520,215 28,187,923 25,983,744 2,204,179
Employee Benefits - - - -
Total Compensation and Benefits 28,520,215 28,187,923 25,983,744 2,204,179
Fixed Obligations With Variability
Special Education Tuition 30,240,295 18,515,155 18,843,954 (328,799)
Contract Transportation 42,760,273 43,753,310 44,310,844 (557,534)
Charter School Tuition - - - -
Health Service Other Districts - - - -
Insurance non-employee 205,539 347,655 298,297 49,358
Sub Total Fixed Obligations 73,206,107 62,616,120 63,453,095 (836,975)
Debt Service
Sub Total Debt Service 984,586 962,161 962,161 -
Cash Capital Outlays
Cash Capital Expense - - - -
Textbooks 201,274 280,055 317,118 (37,063)
Equipment Other than Buses 705,542 252,550 77,877 174,673
Equipment Buses - - - -
Computer Hardware - Instructional 1,253,907 94,000 109,043 (15,043)
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional 768,190 46,075 20,980 25,095
Library Books 13,869 14,663 20,249 (5,586)
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays 2,942,782 687,343 545,267 142,076

Section 7 Page 22
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Administrative Services

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Facilities and Related

Utilities 11,840,928 11,165,664 11,653,959 (488,295)
Instructional Supplies 36,875 62,797 63,107 (310)
Equip Service Contr & Repair 3,326,637 3,566,734 2,943,190 623,544
Facilities Service Contracts 1,437,168 2,135,878 1,283,506 852,372
Rentals 2,761,680 3,011,690 2,993,244 18,446
Maintenance Repair Supplies 1,092,813 1,155,534 980,439 175,095
Postage and Print/Advertising 564,655 521,409 351,389 170,020
Auto Supplies 872,539 896,130 558,718 337,412
Supplies and Materials 7,423,928 7,278,439 7,583,123 (304,684)
Custodial Supplies 53,389 68,257 48,750 19,507
Office Supplies 111,248 99,785 100,069 (284)
Sub Total Facilities and Related 29,521,860 29,962,317 28,559,494 1,402,823
Technology
Computer Software - Instructional 30,785 61,659 61,548 111
Computer Software - Non Instructional 274,907 52,519 23,966 28,553
Subtotal Technology 305,692 114,178 85,514 28,664
All Other Variable Expenses
Miscellaneous Services 727,905 769,244 698,964 70,280
Professional Technical Service 2,914,396 2,651,321 2,248,971 402,350
Agency Clerical 41,709 53,166 72,111 (18,945)
Judgments and Claims - - - -
Grant Disallowances - - - -
Departmental Credits (2,310,136) (1,651,784) (1,267,031) (384,753)
Indirect Costs Grants - - - -
BOCES Services 487,872 11,910,596 12,834,800 (924,204)
Professional Development 80,203 122,627 110,276 12,351
Subtotal of All Other Variable Expenses 1,941,947 13,855,170 14,698,091 (842,921)
Total Non Compensation 108,902,975 108,197,289 108,303,622 (106,332)
Sub Total 137,423,190 136,385,212 134,287,366 2,097,846
Budget Reserve - - - -
Grand Total 137,423,190 136,385,212 134,287,366 2,097,846

Section 7 Page 23
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Administrative Services

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

Administrative Support - ADMIN SUPPORT 521,147 530,222 396,823 133,399

Facilities - FACILITIES 22,081,506 22,352,849 21,354,412 998,437
Finance - FINANCE 35,267,603 35,243,178 35,980,698 (737,520)
Food Service - FOOD SERVICE 14,455,076 13,832,664 13,990,137 (157,473)
Information Technology - INFO TECHNOLOGY 12,690,560 10,292,480 9,686,528 605,952
Labor Relations - LABOR_RELATIONS 96,942 348,548 296,818 51,730
Operations - OPERATIONS 200,325 213,480 181,852 31,628
School Safety - SCHOOL_SAFETY 2,487,383 2,476,516 2,325,669 150,847
Transportation Services - TRANSPORTATION 49,622,648 51,095,275 50,074,429 1,020,846
Administrative Services - ADMINISTRATION 137,423,190 136,385,212 134,287,366 2,097,846

Section 7 Page 24
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Position Summary
Administrative Services

Var Bud vs
2009 - 2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

POSITIONS BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service Salary 688.74 597.39 571.91 25.48
Administrator Salary 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Teaching Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Paraprofessional Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hourly Teachers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary Compensation 691.74 599.39 572.91 26.48
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teachers In Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Compensation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary and Other Compensation 691.74 599.39 572.91 26.48
Grand Total 691.74 599.39 572.91 26.48

POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT

Administrative Support - ADMIN SUPPORT 3.00 2.00 2.00 0.00

Facilities - FACILITIES 126.50 106.50 96.50 10.00
Finance - FINANCE 71.50 64.00 54.65 9.35
Food Service - FOOD SERVICE 246.04 218.89 223.02 (4.13)
Information Technology - INFO TECHNOLOGY 63.50 62.50 63.50 (1.00)
Labor Relations - LABOR_RELATIONS 3.00 4.00 2.80 1.20
Operations - OPERATIONS 2.00 2.00 1.50 0.50
School Safety - SCHOOL_SAFETY 20.50 25.00 19.80 5.20
Transportation Services - TRANSPORTATION 155.70 114.50 109.14 5.36
Admin. Services - ADMINISTRATION 691.74 599.39 572.91 26.48

Section 7 Page 25
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Administrative Support
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
Under the direction of the Deputy Superintendent of Administration (DSA) the administrative team communicates with the direct reports, in-
structional departments, schools, outside agencies, community, and the Office of the Superintendent to coordinate all business and operational
work.  The budget is used to achieve District goals by providing guidance and support for district-wide initiatives such as technology, coordina-
tion between administrative and instructional services, finances, facility maintenance, position control, and pupil support. 

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $222,822 $228,848 ($6,026) (2.70%)
Other Compensation $0 $0 $0 0%
Employee Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $0 $0 $0 0%
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $1,000 $1,000 $0 0.00%
Facilities and Related $2,950 $5,400 ($2,450) (83.05%)
Technology $500 $500 $0 0.00%
Other Variable Expenses $302,950 $161,075 $141,875 46.83% Districtwide budget reduction
Totals $530,222 $396,823 $133,399 25.16%

FTEs 2.00 2.00 - 0.00%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Dpty Supt of Administration - 59016 $530,222 $396,823 $133,399 25.16%
Totals $530,222 $396,823 $133,399 25.16%

Section 7 Page 26
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Facilities
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
Educational Facilities provides management and development services for all of the District’s facilities including schools, Central Office, Ser-
vice Center, and several (multipurpose) facilities. Educational Facilities provides professional planning, design, management, and administra-
tive services in an efficient manner while insuring a high level of customer satisfaction. This sector is managed by a Director who is supported
by supervisors in facility maintenance, design, security, planning, custodial operations, plant engineering and environmental safety. Educational
Facilities is responsible for the management of over 7.3 million square feet of leased and owned space including 38 elementary school buildings,
14 secondary school buildings, Central Office, the Service Center complex and several multipurpose facilities.

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $5,781,439 $5,307,777 $473,662 8.19% Districtwide budget reduction
Other Compensation $446,004 $297,037 $148,967 33.40% Districtwide budget reduction
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $0 $0 $0 0%
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $26,150 $0 $26,150 100.00% Districtwide budget reduction
Facilities and Related $16,453,362 $15,982,323 $471,039 2.86% Districtwide budget reduction
Technology $39 $0 $39 100.00%
Other Variable Expenses ($354,145) ($232,725) ($121,420) 34.29% Indepartmental chargebacks
Totals $22,352,849 $21,354,412 $998,437 4.47%

FTEs 106.50 96.50 10.00 9.39%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Facilities Supp-Admin - FA - 66015 $132,603 $133,058 ($455) (0.34%)
Facilities Support - Rental-FA - 66115 $573,813 $598,747 ($24,934) (4.35%)
Hart Street Building - 66415 $1,051,324 $990,288 $61,036 5.81%
Utility Management - FA - 66615 $9,506,247 $10,145,775 ($639,528) (6.73%)
Recycling Center - FA - 66915 $52,459 $12,500 $39,959 76.17%
Oprtn of Plant-Sprvsn - FA - 67015 $255,951 $283,710 ($27,759) (10.85%)
Facilities Use - FA - 67115 $100,000 $84,660 $15,340 15.34%
All Schools Unassigned - FA - 67215 $1,411,168 $1,008,997 $402,171 28.50%
CO Custodial - FA - 67315 $238,399 $174,077 $64,322 26.98%
Serv Cntr Custodial - FA - 67415 $204,538 $121,922 $82,616 40.39%
Plant Security - FA - 67615 $333,685 $264,468 $69,217 20.74%
Furnishings & Logistics - FA - 67815 $174,573 $105,682 $68,891 39.46%
General Maintenance - 68015 $140,584 $109,760 $30,824 21.93%
General - FA - 68115 $1,259,806 $1,257,540 $2,266 0.18%
Electrical - FA - 68215 $807,459 $880,029 ($72,570) (8.99%)
Grounds - FA - 68315 $644,807 $640,797 $4,010 0.62%
Mechanical - FA - 68415 $1,118,283 $1,091,587 $26,696 2.39%
Preventive Maintenance - FA - 68515 $501,826 $452,239 $49,587 9.88%
Contract Maintenance - FA - 68615 $2,364,209 $1,588,506 $775,703 32.81%
690 St. Paul - 68915 $1,481,115 $1,410,070 $71,045 4.80%
Totals $22,352,849 $21,354,412 $998,437 4.47%

Section 7 Page 27
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Finance
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
Finance, with oversight by the Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for collecting, managing and overseeing the District’s financial operations
including Accounting, Accounts Payable, Budget and Revenue, Financial Management, Grants Development, Payroll, and Procurement. The
team works to communicate and develop business processes and procedures to comply with Board policies and federal and state law. Financial
direction and support is given to the District in planning, developing and implementing strategies for immediate and long-range financial man-
agement, the District’s annual budget and budget preparation for grant development. The team is also responsible for processing payroll, finan-
cial reporting to government and funding agencies, recording and verification of payment for goods and services, and the District’s procurement.

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $4,179,211 $3,529,260 $649,951 15.55% Districtwide budget reduction
Other Compensation $37,544 $77,810 ($40,266) (107.25%)
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $18,515,155 $18,843,954 ($328,799) (1.78%) Special Education tuition
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital $390,734 $448,410 ($57,676) (14.76%) Charter School textbooks
Facilities and Related $59,637 $76,464 ($16,827) (28.22%)
Technology $61,979 $61,628 $351 0.57%
Other Variable Expenses $11,998,918 $12,943,172 ($944,254) (7.87%) BOCES Special Education tuition
Totals $35,243,178 $35,980,698 ($737,520) (2.09%)

FTEs 64.00 54.65 9.35 14.61%

Departments

2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %

Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Medicaid Comp & Reimbursement - 53808 $198,405 $169,562 $28,843 14.54%
Bus & Fin Specialized Services - 54908 $172,272 $147,221 $25,051 14.54%
Tuition Costs-Specialized Srvcs - 55308 $30,421,151 $31,673,954 ($1,252,803) (4.12%)
Office of Finance - 60212 $260,088 $178,976 $81,112 31.19%
Accounting Department - FS - 61212 $865,969 $820,246 $45,723 5.28%
Payroll Department -FS - 61412 $688,904 $551,438 $137,466 19.95%
Offc of Budget & Revenue - FS - 61512 $450,787 $402,754 $48,033 10.66%
Dept of Financial Management - 61612 $355,254 $303,226 $52,028 14.65%
Procurement Dept - FS - 62012 $413,899 $430,474 ($16,575) (4.00%)
Distribution Center - 62113 $799,879 $649,863 $150,016 18.75%
Charter School Distribution - 62126 $147,877 $252,958 ($105,081) (71.06%)
Grants Office - AS - 71617 $468,693 $400,026 $68,667 14.65%
Totals $35,243,178 $35,980,698 ($737,520) (2.09%)

Section 7 Page 28
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Food Service
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
Food Service supports student achievement by efficiently providing high quality food services. The Food Service Department is managed under
contract by Aramark Educational Services, LLC, a private management company. Approximately 13,000 breakfasts and 22,000 lunches are
served daily at 54 sites, including one parochial school. This program includes operational and support personnel, comprised of full and part-
time employees. The elementary school food services program is operated through a centralized food production kitchen while the secondary
food services personnel prepare meals on-site. Approximately 87% of the students attending District schools qualify for free and reduced price
meals.


Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $5,091,415 $4,999,050 $92,365 1.81% Districtwide budget reduction
Other Compensation $533,700 $441,500 $92,200 17.28% Districtwide budget reduction
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $0 $0 $0 0%
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $124,000 $74,087 $49,913 40.25% Districtwide budget reduction
Facilities and Related $7,451,549 $7,832,500 ($380,951) (5.11%) Food Supplies increase
Technology $23,000 $17,000 $6,000 26.09%
Other Variable Expenses $609,000 $626,000 ($17,000) (2.79%)
Totals $13,832,664 $13,990,137 ($157,473) (1.14%)

FTEs 218.89 223.02 (4.13) (1.89%)

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
# 1 - Martin B Anderson - SFS - 10106 $19,946 $24,205 ($4,259) (21.35%)
# 2 - Clara Barton - SFS - 10206 $33,790 $21,499 $12,291 36.37%
# 3 - Nathaniel Rochester -SFS - 10306 $122,084 $114,901 $7,183 5.88%
# 4 - George M Forbes - SFS - 10406 $26,406 $22,111 $4,295 16.26%
# 5 - John Williams - SFS - 10506 $34,574 $26,854 $7,720 22.33%
# 6 - Dag Hammarskjold - SFS - 10606 $32,111 $21,193 $10,918 34.00%
# 7 - Virgil I Grissom - SFS - 10706 $37,507 $27,772 $9,736 25.96%
# 8 - Roberto Clemente - SFS - 10806 $40,451 $25,936 $14,515 35.88%
# 9 - Martin L King Jr - SFS - 10906 $41,041 $32,082 $8,959 21.83%
#12 - James P B Duffy - SFS - 11206 $43,082 $31,018 $12,064 28.00%
#14 - Chester Dewey - SFS - 11406 $30,774 $24,406 $6,368 20.69%
#15 - Children's School - SFS - 11506 $20,814 $19,388 $1,426 6.85%
#16 - John W Spencer - SFS - 11606 $27,636 $25,783 $1,853 6.71%
#17 - Enrico Fermi - SFS - 11706 $36,204 $24,406 $11,798 32.59%
#19 - Dr Charles Lunsford -SFS - 11906 $24,140 $22,111 $2,029 8.40%
#20 - Henry Lomb - SFS - 12006 $32,122 $22,111 $10,011 31.16%
#22 - Abraham Lincoln - SFS - 12206 $31,829 $23,029 $8,800 27.65%
#23 - Francis Parker - SFS - 12306 $29,219 $14,388 $14,831 50.76%
#25 - Nathaniel Hawthorne -SFS - 12506 $28,295 $18,287 $10,008 35.37%
#28 - Henry Hudson - SFS - 12806 $53,784 $28,842 $24,942 46.37%
#29 - Adlai E Stevenson - SFS - 12906 $44,689 $30,678 $14,011 31.35%
#30 - Gen Elwell S Otis - SFS - 13006 $21,380 $23,029 ($1,649) (7.71%)
#33 - Audubon School - SFS - 13306 $138,415 $148,539 ($10,124) (7.31%)
#34 - Dr Louis A Cerulli - SFS - 13406 $33,044 $25,936 $7,108 21.51%
#35 - Pinnacle School - SFS - 13506 $23,276 $24,406 ($1,130) (4.85%)
#36 - Henry W Longfellow - SFS - 13606 $30,457 $25,018 $5,439 17.86%
#39 - Andrew J Townson - SFS - 13906 $44,063 $25,477 $18,586 42.18%
#41 - Kodak Park School - SFS - 14106 $31,667 $26,040 $5,627 17.77%
#42 - Abelard Reynolds - SFS - 14206 $22,262 $20,123 $2,140 9.61%
#43 - Theodore Roosevelt - SFS - 14306 $39,547 $25,783 $13,764 34.80%
#44 - Lincoln Park - SFS - 14406 $19,217 $23,947 ($4,730) (24.61%)
#45 - Mary McLeod Bethune -SFS - 14506 $52,031 $46,234 $5,797 11.14%
#46 - Charles Carroll - SFS - 14606 $31,529 $18,287 $13,242 42.00%
#50 - Helen B Montgomery - SFS - 15006 $33,029 $23,029 $10,000 30.28%
#52 - Frank Fowler Dow - SFS - 15206 $21,101 $14,141 $6,960 32.99%
#54 - Flower City School - SFS - 15406 Section $16,828
$24,674 7 Page 29 $7,846 31.80%
#57 - Early Childhood - SFS - 15706 $22,023 $11,556 $10,467 47.53%
#58 - World of Inquiry - SFS - 15806 $33,753 $23,947 $9,806 29.05%
ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Departments - continued
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
#46 - Charles Carroll - SFS - 14606 $31,529 $18,287 $13,242 42.00%
#50 - Helen B Montgomery - SFS - 15006 $33,029 $23,029 $10,000 30.28%
#52 - Frank Fowler Dow - SFS - 15206 $21,101 $14,141 $6,960 32.99%
#54 - Flower City School - SFS - 15406 $24,674 $16,828 $7,846 31.80%
#57 - Early Childhood - SFS - 15706 $22,023 $11,556 $10,467 47.53%
#58 - World of Inquiry - SFS - 15806 $33,753 $23,947 $9,806 29.05%
St Monica's - SFS - 17106 $0 $10,556 ($10,556) 0%
St Andrew's - FS - 17706 $0 $11,474 ($11,474) 0%
Holy Cross - SFS - 18406 $0 $8,567 ($8,567) 0%
Holy Rosary - SFS - 18506 $11,186 $11,974 ($788) (7.04%)
Central Kitchen - SFS - 19806 $3,593,633 $3,811,835 ($218,202) (6.07%)
Elementary Schools - SFS - 19906 $204,372 $271,587 ($67,215) (32.89%)
Family Learn Ctr Hart St - FS - 23706 $76,768 $61,848 $14,920 19.44%
I'm Ready Program - SFS - 24806 $9,469 $14,067 ($4,598) (48.56%)
NE/NW College Brd Schls - SFS - 25006 $199,950 $175,100 $24,850 12.43%
Wilson Commencement Academ-SFS - 25106 $111,040 $120,867 ($9,827) (8.85%)
Charlotte High School - SFS - 26006 $111,252 $132,862 ($21,610) (19.42%)
East High School - SFS - 26106 $210,261 $190,099 $20,162 9.59%
Jefferson High School - SFS - 26306 $131,061 $162,295 ($31,234) (23.83%)
Wilson Found Academy - SFS - 26406 $187,069 $158,268 $28,801 15.40%
John Marshall High School -SFS - 26506 $138,092 $129,150 $8,942 6.48%
Monroe High School - SFS - 26606 $144,576 $132,053 $12,523 8.66%
School of The Arts - SFS - 26706 $146,661 $138,106 $8,555 5.83%
Edison Tech Occup Ed Ctr - SFS - 27006 $202,957 $207,353 ($4,396) (2.17%)
Freddie Thomas High School-SFS - 27206 $133,666 $134,691 ($1,025) (0.77%)
BioScience Health Franklin-SFS - 27706 $144,854 $177,557 ($32,703) (22.58%)
Global Media Arts Franklin-SFS - 28406 $32,350 $0 $32,350 100.00%
Finance/Econ at Franklin-SFS - 28606 $32,350 $0 $32,350 100.00%
High Schools - SFS - 29906 ($203,493) $0 ($203,493) 100.00%
Central Office Building - SFS - 67306 $115,678 $59,734 $55,944 48.36%
Office - Food Services - SFS - 69006 $6,686,946 $6,746,779 ($59,833) (0.89%)
Totals $13,832,664 $13,990,137 $ (157,473) (1.14%)

Section 7 Page 30
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Information Technology
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
Information Management & Technology (IM&T) provides district-wide support for all information systems development, installation, and inte-
gration, as well as support of the District’s core enterpriseInformation application systems - student and business operations. In addition, technical support
Technology
is provided for the planning, acquisition, implementation, training and maintenance for the data and voice networks, as well as all computer/
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
workstations/laptops/SmartBoard/projection units throughout our schools and Central Office, the service center, and several mulipurpose facili-
ties. Software development, Helpdesk
Division/Department Overview support, problem determination and resolution, training, customer service and preventive maintenance
of systems software
Informationare core competencies
Management & Technologyof the department
(IM&T) or service
provides District-wide unit.
support It is
for all IM&T’ssystems
information responsibility
development,toinstallation,
keep the and District’s data safe and to
integration,
as well as support
provide redundancy in theofevent
the District’s core enterpriseevent
of a catastrophic application systems - student
or equipment and business operations. In addition, technical support is provided for
failure.

the planning, acquisition, implementation, training and maintenance for the data and voice networks, as well as all
computer/workstations/laptops/SmartBoard/projection units throughout Central Office and our schools. Software development, Helpdesk support,
problem determination and resolution, training, customer service and preventive maintenance of systems software are core competencies of this
organization. It is this sector’s responsibility to keep the District’s data safe and to provide redundancy in the event of a catastrophic event or
equipment failure.

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $4,497,585 $4,867,071 ($369,486) (8.2%) Staffng and contractual salary increases
Other Compensation $35,673 $36,736 ($1,063) (3.0%)
Employee Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $0 $0 $0 0%
Debt Service $962,161 $962,161 $0 0.00%
Cash Capital Outlays $27,709 $10,000 $17,709 63.91% Districtwide budget reduction
Facilities and Related $4,801,524 $3,982,628 $818,896 17.05% Districtwide budget reduction
Technology $24,080 $3,000 $21,080 87.54% Districtwide budget reduction
Other Variable Expenses ($56,252) ($175,068) $118,816 211.22% Districtwide budget reduction
Totals $10,292,480 $9,686,528 $605,952 5.89%

FTEs 62.50 63.50 (1.00) (1.6%)

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Mgmt Information Systems- CS - 64013 $197,289 $239,084 ($41,795) (21.2%)
Print Shop - CS - 64113 $218,331 $257,171 ($38,840) (17.8%)
Mail Room - CS - 64213 $631,897 $508,685 $123,212 19.50%
Business Sys Tech Support - CS - 64313 $2,468,161 $1,852,707 $615,454 24.94%
Student Information Systems-CS - 64413 $964,376 $958,412 $5,964 0.62%
Mainframe Ops/Copier Mgmt - CS - 64613 $0 $0 $0 0%
Help Desk Operations - CS - 64713 $2,996,533 $3,090,193 ($93,660) (3.1%)
Network Operations - CS - 64813 $2,793,053 $2,780,276 $12,777 0.46%
Telephone Operations - CS - 64913 $22,840 $0 $22,840 100.00%
Totals $10,292,480 $9,686,528 $605,952 5.89%

Section 7 Page 31
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Labor Relations
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
The Office of Labor Relations oversees all labor matters for the District. The Office provides strategic and tactical operational support on all
matters that pertain to the District’s unions and their members. This includes collective bargaining with the five unions representing the District’s
6,000 plus employees; counseling Administrators and Department managers on labor issues; providing contract interpretation to department
superivisors and District management, managing all grievance matters, and advising all labor aspects of new initiatives. The Office promotes
and maintains harmonious District/Union relationships. The Office is the gatekeeper for the Alternative Work Location (AWL) and is the final
decison-maker, along with the Chief of Staff regarding AWL assigments. The Office implements as well as monitors and reviews, processes and
services that promote effective dispute resolution and positive relationships between labor and management.

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $302,123 $284,765 $17,358 5.75%
Other Compensation $0 $0 $0 0%
Employee Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $0 $0 $0 0%
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $0 $0 $0 0%
Facilities and Related $42,000 $8,603 $33,397 79.52% Districtwide budget reduction
Technology $0 $0 $0 0%
Other Variable Expenses $4,425 $3,450 $975 22.03%
Totals $348,548 $296,818 $51,730 14.84%

FTEs 4.00 2.80 1.20 30.00%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Office of Labor Relations - 79016 $348,548 $296,818 $51,730 14.84%
Totals $348,548 $296,818 $51,730 14.84%

Section 7 Page 32
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Operations
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
District Operations is responsible for providing safe, comfortable learning environments, transportation and food services for every child in
the District by overseeing the departments of Educational Facilities, School Food Services and Transportation. The goal of Operations is to
deliver efficient services to the schools and students in order to provide excellent learning environments, nutritional meals and safe transporta-
tion in a manner that is cost effective. Under the leadership of the Supervising Director of District Operations, the Facilities Modernization
Program is a joint venture with the City and community agencies to cooperatively undertake new and innovative ways of renovating and
financing public schools.


Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $187,280 $161,804 $25,476 13.60% Districtwide budget reduction
Other Compensation $0 $0 $0 0%
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $0 $0 $0 0%
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $1,600 $0 $1,600 100.00%
Facilities and Related $1,000 $548 $452 45.20%
Technology $500 $0 $500 100.00%
Other Variable Expenses $23,100 $19,500 $3,600 15.58%
Totals $213,480 $181,852 $31,628 14.82%

FTEs 2.00 1.50 0.50 25.00%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Administrative Operations - 78016 $213,480 $181,852 $31,628 14.82%
Totals $213,480 $181,852 $31,628 14.82%

Section 7 Page 33
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School Safety
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
School Safety and Security is committed to the safety of our students, staff, and visitors, the security of all district facilities, and creating safe
school environments. The Department collaborates with District staff and community partners to: reduce VADIR incidents (Violent and Disrup-
tive Incident Reporting) and ensure District staff is prepared to plan for, respond to, and recover from critical incidents. School Safety supports
the District’s goal in creating safe, engaging and nurturing school environments that enable student success by providing relevant training and
professional development, data analysis, safety assessments, incident reviews, and exploring and enhancing collaborative opportunities. The
department conducts thorough and impartial internal investigations to ensure the integrity of the district and the professionalism demonstrated
by District employees.

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget %
Amended Proposed Budget Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $881,831 $938,037 ($56,206) (6.4%) Contractual salary increases
Other Compensation $54,621 $26,000 $28,621 52.40% Districtwide budget reduction
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $81,000 $0 $81,000 100.00% Districtwide budget reduction
Facilities and Related $119,275 $110,500 $8,775 7.36%
Technology $0 $0 $0 0%
Other Variable Expenses $1,339,789 $1,251,132 $88,657 6.62% Districtwide budget reduction
Totals $2,476,516 $2,325,669 $150,847 6.09%

FTEs 25.00 19.80 5.20 20.80%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget %
Amended Proposed Budget Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Truancy Center - 56005 $68,851 $0 $68,851 100.00%
Office of Security Operations - 57016 $2,407,665 $2,325,669 $81,996 3.41%
Totals $2,476,516 $2,325,669 $150,847 6.09%

Section 7 Page 34
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Transportation
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
The mission of the Rochester City School District Transportation Department is to support student achievement by efficiently providing high
quality services. The Transportation Department is charged with providing safe, prompt and dependable service to students of the City of Roch-
ester to public, private, parochial, and charter schools.  The department, along with its vendor partners, transports 28,000 students on more than
1,000 bus routes each day. In addition, the Transportation Department includes a bus garage where maintenance is performed on more than 200
district-owned vehicles including 90 school buses.



Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $5,301,636 $4,253,829 $1,047,807 19.76% Districtwide budget reduction
Other Compensation $635,039 $534,221 $100,818 15.88% Districtwide budget reduction
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligation with Variability $44,100,965 $44,609,141 ($508,176) (1.2%) RTS, First Student contracts
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $35,150 $11,770 $23,380 66.51% Equipment other than Buses
Facilities and Related $1,031,020 $560,527 $470,493 45.63% Districtwide budget reduction
Technology $4,080 $3,386 $694 17.01%
Other Variable Expenses ($12,615) $101,555 ($114,170) 905.04% Interdepartmental chargebacks
Totals $51,095,275 $50,074,429 $1,020,846 1.998%

FTEs 114.50 109.14 5.36 4.681%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Transportation-Sprvsn- TA - 65014 $1,070,715 $911,204 $159,511 14.90%
Trnsprtn-Dist-Owned - TA - 65114 $3,859,805 $3,343,272 $516,533 13.38%
Trnsprtn Pub/Priv Carriers-TA - 65214 $42,989,035 $42,753,893 $235,142 0.55%
Charter School Transport - CH - 65226 $1,842,018 $1,943,593 ($101,575) (5.5%)
Trnsprtn-Vhcl Maintenance-TA - 65314 $1,333,702 $1,122,467 $211,235 15.84%
Totals $51,095,275 $50,074,429 $1,020,846 1.998%

Section 7 Page 35
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Communications
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
Communications helps the District and its schools meet their communications needs and provide clear, useful, and accurate information to the
public. This area’s work is intended to raise awareness of school and student successes; build parent and community support through effective
communication in a variety of media; and strengthen public confidence in the District and its schools through media outreach and public rela-
tions. Services include the creation of marketing/promotional materials for schools; assistance in reaching parents and the public through effec-
tive communication; daily interaction with the news media to promote positive coverage and accurate, balanced reporting; support for schools
in working with the media, video production, and multimedia support; Spanish translation; and presentation of news and information via the
District’s website.

20111-12 Budget Expense Total - $748,163

Salary Compensation
78.57%
Facilities and Related
2.92%

Technology
13.23%

Other Variable Expenses

5.28%

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $586,603 $587,811 ($1,208) (0.21%)
Other Compensation $2,189 $0 $2,189 100.00%
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $983 $0 $983 100.00%
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $4,509 $0 $4,509 100.00%
Facilities and Related $76,640 $21,852 $54,788 71.49% Districtwide budget reduction
Technology $99,605 $99,000 $605 0.61%
Other Variable Expenses $113,239 $39,500 $73,739 65.12% Districtwide budget reduction
Totals $883,768 $748,163 $135,605 15.34%

FTEs 8.00 8.00 - 0.00%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Dept of Communications-DM - 70116 $883,768 $748,163 $135,605 15.34%
Totals $883,768 $748,163 $135,605 15.34%

Section 7 Page 36
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Communications

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary - - - -
Civil Service Salary 571,272 586,603 587,811 (1,208)
Administrator Salary - - - -
Hourly Teachers - - - -
Teaching Assistants - - - -
Paraprofessional Salary - - - -
Sub Total Salary Compensation 571,272 586,603 587,811 (1,208)
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost - - - -
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 7,870 2,189 - 2,189
Teachers In Service - - - -
Sub Total Other Compensation 7,870 2,189 - 2,189
Total Salary and Other Compensation 579,142 588,792 587,811 981
Employee Benefits - - - -
Total Compensation and Benefits 579,142 588,792 587,811 981
Fixed Obligations With Variability
Special Education Tuition - - - -
Contract Transportation 1,242 983 - 983
Charter School Tuition - - - -
Health Service Other Districts - - - -
Insurance non-employee - - - -
Sub Total Fixed Obligations 1,242 983 - 983
Debt Service
Sub Total Debt Service - - - -
Cash Capital Outlays
Cash Capital Expense - - - -
Textbooks - - - -
Equipment Other than Buses 7,016 3,849 - 3,849
Equipment Buses - - - -
Computer Hardware - Instructional - - - -
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional 3,608 660 - 660
Library Books - - - -
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays 10,624 4,509 - 4,509

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Communications

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Section 7 Page 37
Facilities and Related
 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend
ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Facilities and Related
Utilities Communications
- - - -
Instructional Supplies - - - -
Equip Service Contr & Repair 445 390 - Var Bud390vs
Facilities Service Contracts 2009-2010
- 2010-2011
- 2011-2012- Amend-
Rentals Actual510 Amended- Proposed- -
Fav/(Unfav)
Maintenance Repair Supplies - - - -
Postage and Print/Advertising 43,050 74,210 21,852 52,358
Facilities
Auto and Related
Supplies - - - -
Utilities
Supplies and Materials -- -- -- --
Instructional Supplies
Custodial Supplies -- -- -- --
Equip Service
Office SuppliesContr & Repair 445
4,128 390
2,040 -- 390
2,040
Facilities Service Contracts
Sub Total Facilities and Related -
48,133 -
76,640 -
21,852 -
54,788
Rentals
Technology 510 - - -
Maintenance Repair Supplies
Computer Software - Instructional -- -- -- --
Postage and
Computer Print/Advertising
Software - Non Instructional 43,050
93,062 74,210
99,605 21,852
99,000 52,358
605
Auto Supplies Subtotal Technology -
93,062 -
99,605 -
99,000 -
605
Supplies and Materials
All Other Variable Expenses - - - -
Custodial Supplies
Miscellaneous Services -
802 -
1,148 -- -
1,148
Office Supplies
Professional Technical Service 4,128
91,131 2,040
105,491 -
39,500 2,040
65,991
Agency Clerical Sub Total Facilities and Related 48,133
218 76,640
5,300 21,852
- 54,788
5,300
Technology
Judgments and Claims - - - -
Computer
Grant Software - Instructional
Disallowances -- -- -- --
Computer Software
Departmental Credits- Non Instructional 93,062
- 99,605
- 99,000
- 605
-
Indirect Costs Grants Subtotal Technology 93,062
- 99,605
- 99,000
- 605
-
All Other Variable
BOCES Services Expenses - - - -
Miscellaneous
Professional Services
Development 802
- 1,148
1,300 -- 1,148
1,300
Professional Technical
Subtotal Service
of All Other Variable Expenses 91,131
92,151 105,491
113,239 39,500
39,500 65,991
73,739
Agency Clerical Total Non Compensation 218
245,212 5,300
294,976 -
160,352 5,300
134,624
Judgments and Claims Sub Total -
824,354 -
883,768 -
748,163 -
135,605
Grant Disallowances
Budget Reserve -
- -
- -- --
Departmental Credits Grand Total -
824,354 -
883,768 -
748,163 -
135,605
Indirect Costs Grants - - - -
BOCES Services - - - -
Professional Development - 1,300 - 1,300
Subtotal of All Other Variable Expenses 92,151 113,239 39,500 73,739
Expenditure
Total Non Compensation
Summary
245,212
(All Funds)
294,976 160,352 134,624
Communications
Sub Total 824,354 883,768 748,163 135,605
Budget Reserve - - - -
Grand Total 824,354 883,768 748,163 135,605
Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT
Communications
Dept of Communications-DM - 70116 824,354 883,768 748,163 135,605
Var Bud vs
Communications - COMMUNICATIONS 824,354 883,768 748,163 135,605
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

Dept of Communications-DM - 70116 824,354 883,768 748,163 135,605

Section 7 Page 38
Communications - COMMUNICATIONS 824,354 883,768 748,163 135,605
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Position Summary
Communications

Var Bud vs
2009 - 2010 2010 - 2011 2011-2012 Amend
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

POSITIONS BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service Salary 9.00 8.00 8.00 0.00
Administrator Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teaching Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Paraprofessional Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hourly Teachers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary Compensation 9.00 8.00 8.00 0.00
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teachers In Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Compensation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary and Other Compensation 9.00 8.00 8.00 0.00
Employee Benefits
Employee Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grand Total 9.00 8.00 8.00 0.00

POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT

Dept of Communications-DM - 70116 9.00 8.00 8.00 0.00

Rochester City School District - RCSD 9.00 8.00 8.00 0.00

Section 7 Page 39
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

General Counsel
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
The General Counsel’s mission is to advance the cause of urban education, render legal advice to the Superintendent of Schools, Board of
Education and various departments, and represent the District in matters relating to state and federal laws, regulations and policies. The General
Counsel serves as the District’s advocate in legal and quasi-legal proceedings brought by and against the District involving students, employees,
governmental entities and private citizens. The legal staff provide counsel on a daily basis to schools and District administrators. This sector
represents the District and Board of Education at administrative and arbitration hearings related to collective bargaining agreements and state
and federal law. The legal staff perform other duties at the request of the Superintendent of Schools and the Board of Education.


2011-12 Budget Expense Total - $1,055,198

Salary Compensation
89.17%

Facilities and Related

2.72%

Other Variable Expenses

8.11%

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $977,701 $940,958 $36,743 3.76% Districtwide budget reduction
Other Compensation $0 $0 $0 0%
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $0 $0 $0 0%
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital $1,545 $0 $1,545 100.00% Districtwide budget reduction
Facilities and Related $38,400 $28,700 $9,700 25.26% Districtwide budget reduction
Technology $2,700 $0 $2,700 100.00% Districtwide budget reduction
Other Variable Expenses $221,067 $85,540 $135,527 61.31% Districtwide budget reduction
Totals $1,241,413 $1,055,198 $186,215 15.00%

FTEs 11.00 10.00 1.00 9.09%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
General Counsel - 74016 $1,241,413 $1,055,198 $186,215 15.00%
Totals $1,241,413 $1,055,198 $186,215 15.00%

Section 7 Page 40
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

General Counsel

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary - - - -
Civil Service Salary 1,029,092 977,701 940,958 36,743
Administrator Salary - - - -
Hourly Teachers - - - -
Teaching Assistants - - - -
Paraprofessional Salary - - - -
Sub Total Salary Compensation 1,029,092 977,701 940,958 36,743
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost - - - -
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal - - - -
Teachers In Service - - - -
Sub Total Other Compensation - - - -
Total Salary and Other Compensation 1,029,092 977,701 940,958 36,743
Employee Benefits - - - -
Total Compensation and Benefits 1,029,092 977,701 940,958 36,743
Fixed Obligations With Variability
Special Education Tuition - - - -
Contract Transportation - - - -
Charter School Tuition - - - -
Health Service Other Districts - - - -
Insurance non-employee - - - -
Sub Total Fixed Obligations - - - -
Debt Service
Sub Total Debt Service - - - -
Cash Capital Outlays
Cash Capital Expense - - - -
Textbooks - - - -
Equipment Other than Buses - 945 - 945
Equipment Buses - - - -
Computer Hardware - Instructional - - - -
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional - 600 - 600
Library Books - - - -
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays - 1,545 - 1,545

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

General Counsel
Section 7 Page 41
Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend
 Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)
ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Facilities and Related

Utilities Expenditure Summary 1,248 (All Funds)
2,000 - 2,000
Instructional Supplies -
General Counsel - - -
Equip Service Contr & Repair (781) - - -
Facilities Service Contracts - - - Var Bud -vs
Rentals -
2009-2010 -
2010-2011 2011-2012- Amend-
Maintenance Repair Supplies - - - -
Postage and Print/Advertising Actual877 Amended
2,900 Proposed700 Fav/(Unfav)
2,200
Auto Supplies - - - -
Supplies and Materials
Facilities and Related 32,328 29,000 24,000 5,000
Custodial Supplies - - - -
Utilities 1,248 2,000 - 2,000
Office Supplies 4,940 4,500 4,000 500
Instructional Supplies - - - -
Sub Total Facilities and Related 38,613 38,400 28,700 9,700
Equip Service Contr & Repair (781) - - -
Technology
Facilities Service Contracts - - - -
Computer Software - Instructional - - - -
Rentals - - - -
Computer Software - Non Instructional 336 2,700 - 2,700
Maintenance Repair Supplies - - - -
Subtotal Technology 336 2,700 - 2,700
Postage and Print/Advertising 877 2,900 700 2,200
All Other Variable Expenses
Auto Supplies - - - -
Miscellaneous Services 4,634 6,067 4,800 1,267
Supplies and Materials 32,328 29,000 24,000 5,000
Professional Technical Service 173,286 239,500 79,340 160,160
Custodial Supplies - - - -
Agency Clerical 2,731 - - -
Office Supplies 4,940 4,500 4,000 500
Judgments and Claims - - - -
Sub Total Facilities and Related 38,613 38,400 28,700 9,700
Grant Disallowances - - - -
Technology
Departmental Credits (41,210) (29,500) (2,000) (27,500)
Computer Software - Instructional - - - -
Indirect Costs Grants - - - -
Computer Software - Non Instructional 336 2,700 - 2,700
BOCES Services - - - -
Subtotal Technology 336 2,700 - 2,700
Professional Development 2,120 5,000 3,400 1,600
All Other Variable Expenses
Subtotal of All Other Variable Expenses 141,561 221,067 85,540 135,527
Miscellaneous Services 4,634 6,067 4,800 1,267
Total Non Compensation 180,510 263,712 114,240 149,472
Professional Technical Service 173,286 239,500 79,340 160,160
Sub Total 1,209,602 1,241,413 1,055,198 186,215
Agency Clerical 2,731 - - -
Budget Reserve - - - -
Judgments and Claims - - - -
Grant Disallowances Grand Total 1,209,602
- 1,241,413
- 1,055,198
- 186,215
-
Departmental Credits (41,210) (29,500) (2,000) (27,500)
Indirect Costs Grants - - - -
BOCES Services - - - -
Professional Development Expenditure Summary 2,120 (All Funds)
5,000 3,400 1,600
Subtotal of All Other Variable Expenses 141,561 221,067 85,540 135,527
General Counsel
Total Non Compensation 180,510 263,712 114,240 149,472
Sub Total 1,209,602 1,241,413 1,055,198 186,215
Var Bud vs
Budget Reserve - - - -
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend
Grand Total 1,209,602 1,241,413 1,055,198 186,215
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT
Expenditure Summary (All Funds)
General Counsel - 74016 General 1,209,602
Counsel 1,241,413 1,055,198 186,215

General Counsel - GENERAL COUNSEL 1,209,602 1,241,413 1,055,198 186,215

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

General Counsel - 74016

Section 71,209,602
Page 42 1,241,413 1,055,198 186,215

General Counsel - GENERAL COUNSEL 1,209,602 1,241,413 1,055,198 186,215

 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Position Summary
General Counsel

Var Bud vs
2009 - 2010 2010 - 2011 2011-2012 Amend
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

POSITIONS BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service Salary 12.00 11.00 10.00 1.00
Administrator Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teaching Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Paraprofessional Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hourly Teachers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary Compensation 12.00 11.00 10.00 1.00
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teachers In Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Compensation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary and Other Compensation 12.00 11.00 10.00 1.00
Employee Benefits
Employee Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grand Total 12.00 11.00 10.00 1.00

POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT

General Counsel - 74016 12.00 11.00 10.00 1.00

Rochester City School District - RCSD 12.00 11.00 10.00 1.00

Section 7 Page 43
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Human Capital Initiatives

Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
Human Capital Initiatives is responsible for the development and implementation of workforce strategies that align with business needs, ad-
dress critical talent issues, drive higher performance, and ensure an investment in people to meet the RCSD priorities. Areas of focus include
workforce effectiveness, benefit program effectiveness, assistance with reorganizations, HR function design, service delivery and technology,
employee communication, and change management. A major priority of Human Capital Initiatives is to develop, leverage, and retain high-per-
forming and high-potential talent. Talent management as a critical function of the department includes: 1) employee performance evaluations; 2)
development of competency models; 3) clearly defining roles and job scope; 4) forecasting workforce needs; 5) identifying current talent pools
and future leaders; 6) recruiting talent; 7) developing leaders; and, 8) executing diversity and inclusion practices and policies.

2011-2012 Budget Expense Total - $7,034,687

Facilities and Related

0.08% Other Variable Expenses
Cash Capital 8.11%
0.28%

Fixed Obligations with Variability

0.06%

Other Compensation
0.28%

Salary Compensation
91.18%

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $6,901,271 $6,414,568 $486,703 7.05% Districtwide budget reductions
Other Compensation $52,725 $20,000 $32,725 62.07% Districtwide budget reductions
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $8,063 $4,063 $4,000 49.61%
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital $8,934 $20,000 ($11,066) (123.86%) Districtwide budget reductions
Facilities and Related $75,358 $5,800 $69,558 92.30% Districtwide budget reductions
Technology $800 $0 $800 100.00%
Other Variable Expenses $723,771 $570,256 $153,515 21.21% Districtwide budget reductions
Totals $7,770,922 $7,034,687 $736,235 9.47%

FTEs 40.95 32.75 8.20 20.02%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Teacher Center - 43017 $0 $0 $0 0%
Human Capital - 72016 $2,503,371 $2,113,900 $389,471 15.56%
Union Cntrctl Obligation-DWNPE - 90319 $5,267,551 $4,920,787 $346,764 6.58%
Totals $7,770,922 $7,034,687 $736,235 9.47%

Section 7 Page 44
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Human Capital Initiatives

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 797,135 585,408 508,206 77,202
Civil Service Salary 1,608,325 1,323,361 902,615 420,746
Administrator Salary 696,636 508,919 649,117 (140,198)
Hourly Teachers 5,225,961 4,377,469 4,255,667 121,802
Teaching Assistants - 106,114 98,963 7,151
Paraprofessional Salary 104,551 - - -
Sub Total Salary Compensation 8,432,608 6,901,271 6,414,568 486,703
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 11,276 27,725 - 27,725
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 50,855 25,000 20,000 5,000
Teachers In Service 5,782 - - -
Sub Total Other Compensation 67,913 52,725 20,000 32,725
Total Salary and Other Compensation 8,500,521 6,953,996 6,434,568 519,428
Employee Benefits - - - -
Total Compensation and Benefits 8,500,521 6,953,996 6,434,568 519,428
Fixed Obligations With Variability
Special Education Tuition - - - -
Contract Transportation 5,727 8,063 4,063 4,000
Charter School Tuition - - - -
Health Service Other Districts - - - -
Insurance non-employee - - - -
Sub Total Fixed Obligations 5,727 8,063 4,063 4,000
Debt Service
Sub Total Debt Service - - - -
Cash Capital Outlays
Cash Capital Expense - - - -
Textbooks - - - -
Equipment Other than Buses 1,342 4,500 20,000 (15,500)
Equipment Buses - - - -
Computer Hardware - Instructional - - - -
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional 4,254 4,434 - 4,434
Library Books - - - -
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays 5,596 8,934 20,000 (11,066)

Section 7 Page 45
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Human Capital Initiatives

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Facilities and Related

Utilities 4,582 2,700 - 2,700
Instructional Supplies 23,423 13,000 - 13,000
Equip Service Contr & Repair 1,131 300 - 300
Facilities Service Contracts - - - -
Rentals 79,467 - - -
Maintenance Repair Supplies - - - -
Postage and Print/Advertising 55,797 44,734 5,300 39,434
Auto Supplies - - - -
Supplies and Materials 10,036 4,700 - 4,700
Custodial Supplies - - - -
Office Supplies 40,224 9,924 500 9,424
Sub Total Facilities and Related 214,661 75,358 5,800 69,558
Technology
Computer Software - Instructional - - - -
Computer Software - Non Instructional 2,124 800 - 800
Subtotal Technology 2,124 800 - 800
All Other Variable Expenses
Miscellaneous Services 4,503 3,300 - 3,300
Professional Technical Service 261,968 68,311 21,255 47,056
Agency Clerical 22,968 10,000 - 10,000
Judgments and Claims - - - -
Grant Disallowances - - - -
Departmental Credits - - - -
Indirect Costs Grants - - - -
BOCES Services - 200 - 200
Professional Development 617,705 641,960 549,001 92,959
Subtotal of All Other Variable Expenses 907,144 723,771 570,256 153,515
Total Non Compensation 1,135,252 816,926 600,119 216,807
Sub Total 9,635,774 7,770,922 7,034,687 736,235
Budget Reserve - - - -
Grand Total 9,635,774 7,770,922 7,034,687 736,235

Section 7 Page 46
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Human Capital Initiatives

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

Teacher Center - 43017 401,865 - - -

Human Capital - 72016 2,980,638 2,503,371 2,113,900 389,471
Union Cntrctl Obligation-DWNPE - 90319 6,253,271 5,267,551 4,920,787 346,764

Human Capital Initiatives - HUMAN CAPITAL 9,635,774 7,770,922 7,034,687 736,235

Section 7 Page 47
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Position Summary
Human Capital Initiatives

Var Bud vs
2009 - 2010 2010 - 2011 2011-2012 Amend
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

POSITIONS BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 11.05 10.25 7.25 3.00
Civil Service Salary 25.00 19.50 16.50 3.00
Administrator Salary 6.00 8.20 6.00 2.20
Teaching Assistants 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00
Paraprofessional Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hourly Teachers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary Compensation 45.05 40.95 32.75 8.20
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teachers In Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Compensation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary and Other Compensation 45.05 40.95 32.75 8.20
Employee Benefits
Employee Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grand Total 45.05 40.95 32.75 8.20

POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT

Teacher Center - 43017 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Human Capital - 72016 26.00 21.00 17.00 4.00
Union Cntrctl Obligation-DWNPE - 90319 17.05 19.95 15.75 4.20
Rochester City School District - RCSD 45.05 40.95 32.75 8.20

Section 7 Page 48
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

School Innovation
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
School Innovation’s goal is to create higher quality school options, to provide a portfolio of choice for students, and to better compete with sur-
rounding districts. School Innovation is responsible for creating new schools, redesigning schools, and phasing out schools.


2011-12 Budget Expense Total - $1,467,020

Other Compensation
9.28%

Facilities and Related

7.95%
Salary Compensation
34.85%

Other Variable Expenses

47.91%

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $532,533 $511,218 $21,315 4.00%
Other Compensation $106,590 $136,203 ($29,613) (27.8%) Grant funding increase
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $0 $0 $0 0%
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $0 $0 $0 0%
Facilities and Related $159,549 $116,695 $42,854 26.86% Grant funding reduction
Technology $0 $0 $0 0%
Other Variable Expenses $1,721,942 $702,904 $1,019,038 59.18% Grant funding reduction
Totals $2,520,614 $1,467,020 $1,053,594 41.80%
FTEs 5.00 6.42 (1.42) (28.40%)

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Office of School Innovation - 77016 $2,520,614 $1,467,020 $1,053,594 41.80%
Totals $2,520,614 $1,467,020 $1,053,594 41.80%

Section 7 Page 49
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

School Innovation

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary - 110,000 137,510 (27,510)
Civil Service Salary 11,660 57,055 180,837 (123,782)
Administrator Salary 243,213 282,748 192,871 89,877
Hourly Teachers - 82,730 - 82,730
Teaching Assistants - - - -
Paraprofessional Salary - - - -
Sub Total Salary Compensation 254,873 532,533 511,218 21,315
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost - - - -
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal - - - -
Teachers In Service 29,931 106,590 136,203 (29,613)
Sub Total Other Compensation 29,931 106,590 136,203 (29,613)
Total Salary and Other Compensation 284,804 639,123 647,421 (8,298)
Employee Benefits - - - -
Total Compensation and Benefits 284,804 639,123 647,421 (8,298)
Fixed Obligations With Variability
Special Education Tuition - - - -
Contract Transportation - - - -
Charter School Tuition - - - -
Health Service Other Districts - - - -
Insurance non-employee - - - -
Sub Total Fixed Obligations - - - -
Debt Service
Sub Total Debt Service - - - -
Cash Capital Outlays
Cash Capital Expense - - - -
Textbooks - - - -
Equipment Other than Buses - - - -
Equipment Buses - - - -
Computer Hardware - Instructional - - - -
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional - - - -
Library Books - - - -
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays - - - -

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

School Innovation

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Section 7 Page 50

Facilities and Related

 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

School Innovation

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Facilities and Related

Utilities - - - -
Instructional Supplies - 131,773 584 131,189
Equip Service Contr & Repair - - - -
Facilities Service Contracts - - - -
Rentals - - - -
Maintenance Repair Supplies - - - -
Postage and Print/Advertising 7,067 21,000 109,467 (88,467)
Auto Supplies - - - -
Supplies and Materials 62,201 83 69 14
Custodial Supplies - - - -
Office Supplies 2,288 6,693 6,575 118
Sub Total Facilities and Related 71,557 159,549 116,695 42,854
Technology
Computer Software - Instructional - - - -
Computer Software - Non Instructional 11,575 - - -
Subtotal Technology 11,575 - - -
All Other Variable Expenses
Miscellaneous Services 143 149 199,204 (199,055)
Professional Technical Service 286,057 1,680,393 466,484 1,213,909
Agency Clerical - - - -
Judgments and Claims - - - -
Grant Disallowances - - - -
Departmental Credits - - - -
Indirect Costs Grants - - - -
BOCES Services - - - -
Professional Development 48,135 41,400 37,216 4,184
Subtotal of All Other Variable Expenses 334,335 1,721,942 702,904 1,019,038
Total Non Compensation 417,467 1,881,491 819,599 1,061,892
Sub Total 702,271 2,520,614 1,467,020 1,053,594
Budget Reserve - - - -
Grand Total 702,271 2,520,614 1,467,020 1,053,594

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

School Innovation

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

Office of School Innovation - 77016 Section 7 Page 51

702,271 2,520,614 1,467,020 1,053,594

School Innovation - SCHOOL INNOVATION 702,271 2,520,614 1,467,020 1,053,594

 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

School Innovation

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

Office of School Innovation - 77016 702,271 2,520,614 1,467,020 1,053,594

School Innovation - SCHOOL INNOVATION 702,271 2,520,614 1,467,020 1,053,594

Section 7 Page 52
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Position Summary
School Innovation

Var Bud vs
2009 - 2010 2010 - 2011 2011-2012 Amend
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

POSITIONS BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 0.00 1.00 2.00 (1.00)
Civil Service Salary 0.50 2.00 2.42 (0.42)
Administrator Salary 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00
Teaching Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Paraprofessional Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hourly Teachers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary Compensation 2.50 5.00 6.42 (1.42)
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teachers In Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Compensation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary and Other Compensation 2.50 5.00 6.42 (1.42)
Employee Benefits
Employee Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grand Total 2.50 5.00 6.42 (1.42)

POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT

Office of School Innovation - 77016 2.50 5.00 6.42 (1.42)

Rochester City School District - RCSD 2.50 5.00 6.42 (1.42)

Section 7 Page 53
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Strategic Leadership
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
In today’s uncertain world, the demands on the Rochester School District have never been greater, yet the challenges of meeting those demands
increase on a daily basis. Maximizing the use of limited financial resources, finding the right people to fill critical positions, and managing initia-
tives while fulfilling the mission to educate every child puts a tremendous strain on district leaders. The Office of Strategic Leadership brings a
focused effort to the use of strategy as a way to align the organization for dramatic transformation. The strategic plan calls for the use of a strate-
gy as a way to inform decisions on how best to allocate resources, adapt to changing realities in funding, and energize employees and volunteers.

2011-12 Budget Expense Total - $302,593

Salary Compensation
66.50%

Other Compensation
0.99%

Facilities and Related

1.59%

Other Variable Expenses

30.92%

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $201,467 $201,219 $248 0.12%
Other Compensation $2,960 $3,000 ($40) (1.35%)
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $0 $0 $0 0%
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $0 $0 $0 0%
Facilities and Related $4,800 $4,802 ($2) (0.04%)
Technology $0 $0 $0 0%
Other Variable Expenses $149,240 $93,572 $55,668 37.30% Districwide budget reduction
Totals $358,467 $302,593 $55,874 15.59%

FTEs 2.00 2.00 - 0.00%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Office of Strategic Leadership - 70416 $358,467 $302,593 $55,874 15.59%
Totals $358,467 $302,593 $55,874 15.59%

Section 7 Page 54
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Stategic Leadership
Strategic Leadership

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary - - - -
Civil Service Salary 189,878 201,467 201,219 248
Administrator Salary - - - -
Hourly Teachers - - - -
Teaching Assistants - - - -
Paraprofessional Salary - - - -
Sub Total Salary Compensation 189,878 201,467 201,219 248
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost - 2,960 3,000 (40)
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal - - - -
Teachers In Service - - - -
Sub Total Other Compensation - 2,960 3,000 (40)
Total Salary and Other Compensation 189,878 204,427 204,219 208
Employee Benefits - - - -
Total Compensation and Benefits 189,878 204,427 204,219 208
Fixed Obligations With Variability
Special Education Tuition - - - -
Contract Transportation - - - -
Charter School Tuition - - - -
Health Service Other Districts - - - -
Insurance non-employee - - - -
Sub Total Fixed Obligations - - - -
Debt Service
Sub Total Debt Service - - - -
Cash Capital Outlays
Cash Capital Expense - - - -
Textbooks - - - -
Equipment Other than Buses - - - -
Equipment Buses - - - -
Computer Hardware - Instructional - - - -
Computer Hardware - Non Instructional - - - -
Library Books - - - -
Sub Total Cash Capital Outlays - - - -

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Stategic Leadership

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Section 7 Page 55
Facilities and Related
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Strategic Leadership
Stategic Leadership

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

Facilities and Related

Utilities - - - -
Instructional Supplies - - - -
Equip Service Contr & Repair - - - -
Facilities Service Contracts - - - -
Rentals - - - -
Maintenance Repair Supplies - - - -
Postage and Print/Advertising 2,573 3,000 4,000 (1,000)
Auto Supplies - - - -
Supplies and Materials - 800 400 400
Custodial Supplies - - - -
Office Supplies 118 1,000 402 598
Sub Total Facilities and Related 2,691 4,800 4,802 (2)
Technology
Computer Software - Instructional - - - -
Computer Software - Non Instructional 49 - - -
Subtotal Technology 49 - - -
All Other Variable Expenses
Miscellaneous Services - 1,200 800 400
Professional Technical Service 36,145 137,000 82,772 54,228
Agency Clerical - 840 200 640
Judgments and Claims - - - -
Grant Disallowances - - - -
Departmental Credits - - - -
Indirect Costs Grants - - - -
BOCES Services - - - -
Professional Development 4,331 10,200 9,800 400
Subtotal of All Other Variable Expenses 40,476 149,240 93,572 55,668
Total Non Compensation 43,217 154,040 98,374 55,666
Sub Total 233,094 358,467 302,593 55,874
Budget Reserve - - - -
Grand Total 233,094 358,467 302,593 55,874

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Stategic Leadership

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

Office of Strategic Leadership - 70416 233,094

Section 7 Page 56 358,467 302,593 55,874

Chief Strategy Officer - STRATEGY 233,094 358,467 302,593 55,874

Budget Reserve - - - -
ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET
Grand Total 233,094 358,467 302,593 55,874

Expenditure Summary (All Funds)

Strategic Leadership
Stategic Leadership

Var Bud vs
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Amend

Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

Office of Strategic Leadership - 70416 233,094 358,467 302,593 55,874

Chief Strategy Officer - STRATEGY 233,094 358,467 302,593 55,874

Section 7 Page 57
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Position Summary
Strategic Leadership

Var Bud vs
2009 - 2010 2010 - 2011 2011-2012 Amend
Actual Amended Proposed Fav/(Unfav)

POSITIONS BY ACCOUNT

Salary Compensation
Teacher Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service Salary 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00
Administrator Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teaching Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Paraprofessional Salary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hourly Teachers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary Compensation 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00
Other Compensation
Substitute Teacher Cost 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overtime Non-Instructional Sal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Teachers In Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Compensation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Salary and Other Compensation 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00
Employee Benefits
Employee Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grand Total 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00

POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT

Office of Strategic Leadership - 70416 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00

Rochester City School District - RCSD 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00

Section 7 Page 58
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Debt Service
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
The City of Rochester (“the City”), on behalf of the District, contracts indebtedness in accordance with terms outlined
in the City’s Charter. The limitation of nine percent (9%) for indebtedness, as set forth in Chapter 4 of Article VIII of
the Constitution of the State of New York, is allocated by the City’s Charter on the basis of five and one-half percent
(5-1/2%) for municipal indebtedness as determined by City Council and three and one-half percent (3-1/2%) for in-
debtedness for educational purposes as determined by the Board of Education.
The District utilizes the Debt Service Fund to account for the accumulation of resources and the payment of general
long-term debt principal, interest and related costs.
Bonds
Taxable Build America Bond (BAB) - a federally subsidized bond used for qualified capital expenditures designed
to stimulate the economy – matures in February 2019
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Tax Exempt Municipal Bond – matures in February 2024
General Obligation Bonds - long term debt instruments used to fund capital projects – various maturity dates through
April 2027

2011-12 Principal 2011-12 Interest 2011-12 Total 2010-11 Total Variance

2011-12 Principal
$15,319,626 2011-12 Interest
$6,686,145 2011-12 Total
$22,005,771 2010-11 Total
$22,826,591 Variance
$820,820
$15,319,626 $6,686,145 $22,005,771 $22,826,591 $820,820
BANS - Bond Anticipation Notes (BAN) - short-term debt instruments that are periodically
converted into bonds – matures one year from date of issuance or renewal
BANS - Bond Anticipation Notes (BAN) - short-term debt instruments that are periodically
converted into bonds –2011-12
2011-12 Principal maturesInterest
one year from date of
2011-12 issuance2010-11
Total or renewal
Total Variance
2011-12 Principal
$1,665,000 2011-12 Interest
$627,977 2011-12 Total
$2,292,977 2010-11 Total
$1,207,463 Variance
($1,085,514)
$1,665,000 $627,977 $2,292,977 $1,207,463 ($1,085,514)
Capital Leases-Energy Performance Contracts – long term debt instruments used to finance
energy savings projects in schools – various maturity dates through July 2018
Capital Leases-Energy Performance Contracts – long term debt instruments used to finance
energy savings
2011-12 projects2011-12
Principal in schools – various maturity
Interest 2011-12dates
Totalthrough July 2018
2010-11 Total Variance
2011-12 Principal
$1,684,347 2011-12 Interest
$476,534 2011-12 Total
$2,160,881 2010-11 Total
$2,187,012 Variance
$26,131
$1,684,347 $476,534 $2,160,881 $2,187,012 $26,131
RAN-Revenue Anticipation Note (RAN) interest - a short-term debt instrument similar to a
temporary line of credit, which is used to cover anticipated cash deficits while ensuring continuity
RAN-Revenue Anticipation Note (RAN) interest - a short-term debt instrument similar to a
in operations and educational services – matures within one year from date of issuance.
temporary line of credit, which is used to cover anticipated cash deficits while ensuring continuity
Anticipated interest is $450,000 for 2011-12.
in operations and educational services – matures within one year from date of issuance.
Anticipated
TOTAL DEBT interest is $450,000 for 2011-12.
SERVICE
TOTAL Principal
2011-12 DEBT SERVICE
2011-12 Interest 2011-12 Total 2010-11 Total Variance
2011-12 Principal
$18,668,973 2011-12 Interest
$8,240,656 2011-12 Total
$26,909,629 2010-11 Total
$26,221,066 Variance
($688,563)
$18,668,973 $8,240,656 $26,909,629 $26,221,066 ($688,563)

Section 7 Page 59
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $0 $0 $0 0%
Other Compensation $0 $0 $0 0%
Benefits $0 $0 $0 0%
Fixed Obligations with Variability $0 $0 $0 0%
Debt Service $26,221,066 $26,909,629 ($688,563) (2.63%) Debt Service payment changes
Cash Capital $0 $0 $0 0%
Facilities and Related $0 $0 $0 0%
Technology $0 $0 $0 0%
Other Variable Expenses $0 $0 $0 0%
Totals $26,221,066 $26,909,629 ($688,563) (2.63%)

FTEs - - - 0%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Borrowed Funds (Debt) - DS - 98821 $26,221,066 $26,909,629 ($688,563) (2.63%)
Totals $26,221,066 $26,909,629 ($688,563) (2.63%)

Section 7 Page 60
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

District-Wide Non-Program Expense

Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
District-wide non-program expenses include expenditures necessary to operate the District, but are not directly related to a specific school,
program or department. A more detailed explanation is provided on the following page.

2011-12 Budget Expense Total - $43,575,662

Cash Capital Outlays

14.85%

Fixed Obligation with Variability

65.79% Facilities and Related
0.00%

Other Variable Expenses

19.32%

Other Compensation
0.00%

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation ($7,132,996) $0 ($7,132,996) (100.00%) Vacancy/turnover savings
Other Compensation ($249,800) $5,000 ($254,800) 102.00% Vacancy/turnover savings
Employee Benefits $323,102 $0 $323,102 100.00% Eliminated W. Comp Reserve
Fixed Obligation with Variability $22,397,239 $28,669,665 ($6,272,426) (28.01%) Charter School expansions
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital Outlays $7,615,000 $6,472,750 $1,142,250 15.00% Districtwide budget reduction
Facilities and Related $9,000 $10,000 ($1,000) (11.11%)
Technology $0 $0 $0 0%
Other Variable Expenses $9,937,564 $8,418,247 $1,519,317 15.29% Indirect Grant Cost reduction
Totals $32,899,109 $43,575,662 ($10,676,553) (32.45%)
FTEs - - - 0%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget Budget %
Amended Proposed Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Charter School Tuition - FS - 55326 $22,043,918 $28,294,665 ($6,250,747) (28.36%)
District-Wide Exp - DWNPE - 90519 ($1,438,382) $5,524,678 ($6,963,060) 484.09%
Indirect Costs - DWNPE - 90719 $3,443,019 $2,219,966 $1,223,053 35.52%
Adjustment/Disallowances-DWNPE - 93219
$1,235,554 $1,063,603 $171,951 13.92%
Interfund Transfers-FA - 94015 $7,615,000 $6,472,750 $1,142,250 15.00%
Totals $32,899,109 $43,575,662 ($10,676,553) (32.45%)

Section 7 Page 61
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

District-Wide Non-Program Expense

The District-Wide Non-Program Expense cost center includes major expense budgets related to the organization, but
not directly tied to a specific program or department. Examples include: Charter School tuition, indirect cost support
for grants, funds to support the District’s long-term capital plan, and grant disallowances.

Salary Compensation

The Non-Program Expenses salary budget includes staffing turnover and vacancy savings that occur throughout the
year.

Other Major Activities - budgeted under District-Wide Non-Program Expense include:

• Charter School Tuition - The District provides tuition to Charter Schools for Rochester City residents, as
stipulated by New York State law.

• Insurance Non-Employees - This budget covers Property and Liability Insurance, as well as School Board
Liability Insurance.

• Cash Capital Expenditures - These expenditures are funded with cash rather than Debt Service. Under Gov-
ernmental Accounting Rules, the District must include Cash Capital as a single cost item in the General Fund
budget. In effect, it is treated as an inter-fund expense.

• Agency Clerical - This budget represents long-term temporary labor costs. Schools and Central Office De-
partments are required to fund short-term temporary labor costs (up to five days) from their budgets. Long-
term vacancies are funded from this central budget.

• Judgments and Claims - These funds defray the costs of legal claims against the District that are not covered
by insurance.

• Grant Disallowances – This budget includes costs of programs accounted for in the Special Aid Fund that are
not reimbursed by the funding organization. This includes program costs, such as Pre-School Special Educa-
tion services, whose reimbursement rates are not sufficient to fully fund the program.

• Indirect Costs Grants - The District is allowed to charge overhead cost allocations to grants for reimbursement
purposes. These costs are not specifically identified. They are, instead, a percentage of grant dollars to be
used as an offset to District indirect expenditures. As these costs do not represent offsets to specific expendi-
tures they are included in the Non-Program Expense group.

Section 7 Page 62
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Employee Benefits
Management Financial Discussion and Analysis
Division/Department Overview:
District-wide non-program expenses include expenditures necessary to operate the District, but are not directly related to a specific school,
program or department. A more detailed explanation is provided on the following page.

2011-12 Budget Expense Total - $149,878,066

State Employee Retirement

6.85%

Health and Dental Insurance State Teachers Retirement

44.51% 16.23%

Voluntary Separation Plan

0.10%

ERI Incentive
0.63%

TRI Incentive
3.27%

Other Variable Expenses

0.17%

Employee Benefits
28.24%

Expense Categories
2010-11 2011-12 Budget %
Amended Proposed Budget Change Change
Budget Expense Category Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) Comment
Salary Compensation $0 $0 $0 0%
Other Compensation $0 $0 $0 0%
Employee Benefits $41,544,992 $42,331,396 ($786,404) (1.89%) Unemployment Insurance costs
Health and Dental Insurance $68,535,685 $66,716,686 $1,818,999 2.65% Fewer staff receiving insurance
State Employee Retirement $7,712,246 $10,266,214 ($2,553,969) (33.12%) ERS system rate increase
State Teachers Retirement $22,115,840 $24,319,450 ($2,203,611) (9.96%) TRS system rate increase
Voluntary Separation Plan $22,500 $150,000 ($127,500) (566.67%)
ERI Incentive $0 $938,674 ($938,674) (100.00%) Retirement incentive payment
TRI Incentive $0 $4,899,645 ($4,899,645) (100.00%) Retirement incentive payment
Fixed Obligations with Variability $0 $0 $0 0%
Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0%
Cash Capital $0 $0 $0 0%
Facilities and Related $0 $0 $0 0%
Technology $0 $0 $0 0%
Other Variable Expenses $269,451 $256,000 $13,451 4.99%
Totals $140,200,714 $149,878,066 ($9,677,352) (6.90%)
FTEs 12.69 12.69 - 0.00%

Departments
2010-11 2011-12 Budget %
Amended Proposed Budget Change Change
Department Budget Budget Budget Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav)
Employment Benefits - EB - 90120 $140,200,714 $149,878,066 ($9,677,352) (6.90%)
Totals $140,200,714 $149,878,066 ($9,677,352) (6.90%)

Section 7 Page 63
 ADMINISTRATION PROFILES AND BUDGETS 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Employee Benefits

The District provides employee benefits based on collective bargaining agreements and New York State (NYS) Labor
Laws. The expenditures in this area cover health insurance, retirement plans, Social Security, illness leave, and other
insurance and contractual benefits.

• Health and Dental Group Insurance Plans – The District provides health insurance coverage to active employ-
ees and retirees; active employees and some retirees are eligible to enroll in group dental plans.

• Retirement Plans – This budget provides contributions to the NYS Teachers Retirement System and the NYS
Employees’ Retirement System for active employees. The New York State Comptroller determines the em-
ployer rate of contribution required each year to maintain the fiscal integrity of the plans based upon actuarial
cost projections, employer and employee contributions and anticipated retirement fund investment earnings.

• Social Security – The Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA) requires employers and employees to con-
tribute 6.2% of salary towards retirement, and an additional 1.45% towards Medicare.

• Unemployment Insurance – The District is self-insured for unemployment and provides a quarterly payment
to the NYS Unemployment Office based on actual claims paid.

• Workers’ Compensation – The District is self-insured, and utilizes a Third Party Administrator to manage the
workers’ compensation claims for District employees.

• Employee Assistance Program (EAP) – The District provides free and confidential counseling services through
a formal EAP plan, accessible to all employees and their families.

• Life and Disability Insurance – These group plans provide insurance coverage available to employees in ac-
cordance with collective bargaining agreements.

• Paid Illness Leave – The Districts’ employees are provided with contractual long term illness benefits (cata-
strophic illness leave) for unexpected health-related absences. Civil Service employees are also eligible for
a short-term disability leave (Extended Sick Leave at half-pay). Teachers are eligible to apply for PAB (paid
absence bank) days through the RTA but funded by the District.

• Flexible Spending Accounts (Section 125 Plans) – FSAs are tax-advantaged financial accounts that allow
employees to set aside a portion of their pre-tax earnings to cover dependent or medical expenses, with admin-
istrative expenses borne by the District. Medical Reimbursement Accounts (Section 105 Plans) are available
to ASAR members who qualify for the Attendance Incentive, upon retirement.

• Other Contractual Benefits – additional benefits include early retirement and attendance incentives, tuition
reimbursement, moving costs, and vacation pay in lieu of vacation time.

Section 7 Page 64
Capital Improvement Plan

FINAL BOOK ONLY

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

FINAL BOOK ONLY

Section 8 Page 1
Appendices

Budget Development Process

Glossary
 APPENDICES 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Budget Development Process

This year’s budget process is the first full year of the implementation of Equitable Student Funding Allocation. Where
the budget development process has always been a collaborative endeavor involving the Board of Education, the
Superintendent and his cabinet, Grant Monitors, Department Leaders, Principals, and the Community, this year has
been more reliant on the information received from principals. Principals were given a target budget based on the
enrollment of general education students, special education students and English Language Learners in their schools.
Decisions were made as to the alignment of their resources with their academic plans. Principals collaborated with
their school chiefs, budget analysts and other financial and program subject matter experts to develop their budgets.
The budget department accumulated all budgets, schools and non-schools, to analyze on a district-wide basis to ensure
that all budgets aligned with the strategic and operational plans, and aligned with the District’s fiscal and human
resources to provide quality education and best meet the needs of the students.

A taskforce was developed this year to determine the enrollment projections for 2011-12. The taskforce consisted
of members from teaching and learning, accountability, special education, English Language Learners, placement,
school chiefs and budget. October, 2010 BEDS numbers reported to New York State Education Department was
used as the basis of the projection. Information was reviewed from an historical perspective to factor in retention
in grade levels, drop-out statistics, enrollment growth or decline, increases or decreases in various populations such
immigration patterns, students selecting Charter Schools, opening of new Charter Schools, transfers, IEPs and other
various areas of impact. Numbers were reviewed by the taskforce, vetted to the principals for agreement and then used
as the basis of the Equitable Student Funding allocation.

Our timeline for this process has been extremely tight this year due to the model change and the development of
a tool to be used in the budget process. The following pages include the calendar for the 2011-12 preparation and
completion of the budget process.

Legal Guidelines

New York State Education Law Section 2576(2) requires that the District file an estimated budget with the Office
of the Mayor of the City of Rochester. The District’s budget is then evaluated and dealt with in a similar manner to
estimates from other city departments. The Charter and Code of the City of Rochester, v20, updated on November
1, 2008 states that no later than thirty-three calendar days prior to the last regularly scheduled city council meeting of
June in each year that the Board of Education shall submit to the Mayor a budget estimate for the ensuing fiscal year.
The classification of the estimates for the various operating units of the District shall be as uniform as possible, and,
consistent with the Mayor’s budget estimate.

Additional Board of Education policies state that a public hearing on the Superintendent’s proposed budget will be
held during the month of April. This hearing will be held at a facility designated by the Clerk of the Board. The
purpose of this hearing is to provide the Community with an opportunity to express their interests and concerns on
the Superintendent’s proposed budget to the Board prior to the Board’s deliberations, final decisions, and subsequent
adoption of the budget that the District will operate under for the upcoming fiscal year. The Board will adopt the
budget proposal for the coming fiscal year at a Special Meeting of the Board of Education ten days prior to the
deadline for the submission to the City of Rochester.

Section 9 Page 1
 APPENDICES 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Budget Development Process – continued

Movement Toward Accountability

As part of the multi-year financial redesign, school principals will continue to have increased control over their
resources. This year the movement culminates in the rollout of the Equitable Student Funding model. The District
Office provided principals with training to increase their knowledge and skills in working with their school budgets
and resources. Principals have been trained on the impact of collective bargaining, federal and state restrictions
concerning funding and instruction, and education to better understand the requirements in developing and maintaining
their individual school budgets. This training will continue throughout the year to ensure successful transition to a
new financial model. The concept is to grow “bounded” autonomy in our leadership throughout the District. This will
allow principals to better meet the core values of achievement, equity and accountability for their staff and students.

Upon adoption of the Superintendent’s budget each department and school will be given a series of reports and trained
to monitor their budgets and amendments that may be necessary throughout the year. Communication will continue
through the year as funding resources change, whether in increases or decreases. The budget office will continue to
assist leadership in tracking and analysis throughout the year.

Section 9 Page 2
 APPENDICES 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Budget Development Process – continued

District Budget Calendar

Date Activity
July, 2010 Taskforce Team visits Baltimore Public Schools to
study student funding model
August 9, 2010 Start of Equitable Student Funding Taskforce
September, 2010 Start of training with Principals on concepts of
Equitable Student Funding
September, 2010-January,2011 Development of EPM – Budget Tool for the District
October, 2010-February, 2011 Training at Principal’s Meetings on concepts of
Equitable Student Funding
January – February, 2011 Training of District personnel on use of budget tool
February 1, 2011 Governor’s Proposed Budget announced
February 21, 2011 Roll-out of RCSD budgets
February 21 – March 11,2011 School Reform Teams work with principals to
develop budgets
March 8, 2011 All budgets submitted in EPM and district analysis
begins in the budget department
March 9 -18, 2011 Analysis and development of reports for review with
Deputy Superintendent of Administration, Deputy
Superintendent of Teaching and Learning and Chief
Financial Officer
March 21 – 25, 2011 Review of budgets with Superintendent and Cabinet
level
March 1 – 25, 2011 Preparation of Draft Budget Book
March 29, 2011 Presentation of Draft Budget Book to Commissioners
March 29 – April 18, 2011 Review and Deliberation with Board of Education;
Public Meetings with Public and Community groups
April 18 – 28, 2011 Final changes and printing of final Budget Book
April 28, 2011 Business Meeting of the BOE – Budget Adoption
(Deliberations must be completed 10 business days
prior to budget adoption)
May 13, 2011 Summary Budget Information to City
May 18, 2011 Budget Transmittal to City
June 14, 2011 City Public Budget Hearing
June 21, 2011 City Budget Adoption
June 24, 2011 Release of budgets to Principals and Departments

Section 9 Page 3
 APPENDICES 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

District’s Annual Budget Process

The Finance Department analyzes the baseline budget for potential revenue and expense changes. Potential revenue
changes include changes in state and federal aid and special funding from grants. Expense changes can include contractual
salary increases, changes in the cost of benefits, and projected program changes among other things.

The Governors preliminary budget is released to the Legislature by January 15 of each year. Once analyzed by the Finance
Department, its impact to the district budget is presented to the Board. This year, due to the transition in the Governor’s office,
the Governor’s budget was not released until February 1.

The Finance Department incorporates the impacts of the Governor’s proposed budget along with other projected revenue and
expense changes into the Equitable Student Funding model. The model produces planning targets for discretionary school
spending. Centrally managed resources are allocated to schools. Planning targets are also developed for central office depart-
ments.

Schools and Central Office Departments submit their proposed budgets to the Finance Department. The Finance Department
analyzes each budget for congruence with district policy and priority. The Superintendent and Deputy Superintendents review.

Board of Education Superintendent

Principals and Department and

School Personnel Program Managers

BUDGET
School Based Deputy
Planning Teams Superintendents
(SBPT)
Public Input

RCSD Board reviews budget and holds public hearings prior to a final vote on the budget. No less than 33 days prior to the
final City Council meeting, RCSD transmits its approved budget to the City for review and approval.

Prior to the new fiscal year, schools and departments will be made aware of their new budget. The Finance Department
administers, manages, changes, and exercises oversight of the budget throughout the year. The Finance Department reviews
various requests for changes to the budget after enactment and requests Board approval for new appropriations through the
monthly budget amendment process.

Section 9 Page 4
 APPENDICES 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Glossary

Accrual Basis of Accounting

The accounting policies of the Rochester City School District conform to generally accepted accounting principles.
The basis of accounting is the modified accrual method, wherein revenues are recognized in the period in which they
become available and measurable and expenditures are recognized at the time a liability is incurred, except for princi-
pal and interest on long-term debt, which are recorded when due.

Actuals
The amount the District has spent in a given period as opposed to original budget estimates.

Advanced Placement (AP)

A program developed by College Board that offers college level courses and end-of-course college credit eligible
exams to high school students.

Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID)

AVID provides secondary students with the skills, support, and expectations necessary to succeed in college-prepara-
tory classes and to enter four-year colleges.

Amended Budget
The original budget with adjustments which has been adopted by the Board of Education.

Adopted Budget
The annual financial plan, listing estimated revenues and expenditures for a fiscal year, and is formally adopted by the
Board of Education. Before the budget is adopted, it is known as the Proposed Budget.

Appropriation
An authorization to expend funds for stated purposes.

Assessment
Each year the District assesses student performance for identifying areas to target for improvement. The assessment
is the cornerstone for the District’s planning process and the development and implementation of initiatives.

Attrition
The difference between actual expenditure requirements for personnel resources and expenditure requirements that
would be required if all positions were filled at all times. The attrition factor accounts for position vacancies, which
result from routine employee turnover.

Average Daily Attendance (ADA)

The total days of attendance for a period divided by the number of days in which school is in session.

Balanced Budget
A budget in which income/revenues equal expenses.

Basic Educational Data System (BEDS)

System for collecting district/school student enrollment and staff counts. The data is then submitted to the New York
State Education Department

Section 9 Page 5
 APPENDICES 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Glossary – continued

Bilingual Education
Programs designed to help students who have limited English proficiency (primarily geared towards Spanish and/or
Latin American dialects).

Bond Anticipation Note

A note which may be redeemed using the proceeds from the future sale of a serial bond. A note is a short-term bor-
rowing instrument, usually requiring repayment within one year of issuance.

Capital Improvement Plan

The Rochester City School District’s Capital Improvement Program and Cash Capital Plan is a five-year financing
strategy for the construction and reconstruction of facilities, the acquisition and replacement of vehicles and equip-
ment, and the completion of other long-term capital projects.

Cash Capital
The cash capital expenditures are for the purchase of equipment, textbooks, library books, and building renovations.
Cash capital appropriations exclude those renovation projects that require the use of borrowing. The cash capital ex-
penditures are distributed in each program and departmental budget.

Career Technical Education (CTE)

A program of study involving a multiyear sequence of courses that integrates core academic knowledge with techni-
cal and occupational knowledge (I.e. trade skills) to provide students with a pathway to postsecondary education and
careers.

Categorical Grants/Funds
Funds the District receives from another entity earmarked for use exclusively for specific programs, such as Special
Education, or activities such as transportation. Categorical funds are also referred to as restricted funds because they
cannot be used for purposes other than to cover the expenses of a specific program/activity set by the funding agency.

Certificated Employee
A District employee whose position requires certification by the State of New York. Teachers and most administrators
must meet New York requirements for certification issued by the State Commission on Teacher Credentialing. Teach-
ers operating under an emergency permit are included in this category. Examples of staff that are credentialed for a
specific function include teachers, counselors, psychologists, social workers, librarians, principals and assistant prin-
cipals, certificated central office managers, resource teachers, content administrators and peer coach/staff developers.

Choice
RCSD offers students an opportunity to attend a school that is not their neighborhood school.

Debt Service
The District’s debt service is maintained in the Debt Service Fund which resources for the payment of general long-
term debt principal, interest and related costs. Debt service includes taxable bond principal and interest, Revenue
Anticipation Note interest, Bond Anticipation Note principal and interest, and capital leases.

Deficit
The amount by which expenses exceed revenues in a fiscal year.

Departmental Credits
A charge from one department to another for services rendered (e.g. printing, rental costs and automotive repairs).

Section 9 Page 6
 APPENDICES 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Glossary – continued

Employee Benefits
The direct expenditures, other than salaries, associated with employee compensation. In the budget, employee benefits
are not distributed by programs or departments. Benefits include retirement system contributions, social security con-
tributions, medical and dental insurance, workers’ compensation, unemployment payments and life insurance.

Enrollment
The total number of students enrolled, whether resident or non-resident, at a site or home-bound or in a qualifying
alternative program. Enrollment is not the same as Average Daily Attendance (ADA). Enrollment will exceed ADA,
since not every student achieves perfect attendance.

Equitable Student Funding (ESF)

The mechanism used to allocate a portion of the district’s budget to each school. The distribution is based upon school
enrollment weighted by certain student characteristics. Budgetary decisions using WSF resources are made at the
school by the principal, instead of centrally. This method of allocation allows schools to be more creative, innovative,
and responsive to the students needs. It also makes the schools more accountable and transparent to the Superinten-
dent, administration, parents, and the community.

Fiscal Year
RCSD operates on a fiscal year beginning on July 1st and ending on June 30th.

Full-Time Equivalent (FTE)

Classified employees who work an average of 35-40 hours per week are categorized as 1.0 FTE. For example, an
employee who works 20 hours per week is counted as 0.5 FTE.

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

Accounting standards such as conventions, broad guidelines, rules, procedures, and detailed practices that pertain to
universally accepted financial accounting and reporting practices.

Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB)

A federal organization that promulgates standards of financial accounting and reporting with respect to state and local
government entities.

Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA)

A national association whose purpose is to enhance and promote the professional management of governments for the
public benefit by identifying and developing financial policies and practices and promoting them through education,
training and leadership. The GFAO rates outstanding budget documents according to highly specific criteria, honoring
organizations who meet these criteria with the annual GFOA Distinguished Budget Presentation Award.

Grant Maximization
Full utilization of grant funding, including budget transfers, permissible by law or other mandates, and in compliance
with grant regulations.

Individualized Education Program (IEP)

Individual Education Program designed for students with special needs.

Section 9 Page 7
 APPENDICES 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Glossary – continued

Mentor Teachers
Specially selected teachers who receive a stipend to work with inexperienced teachers on improving curriculum and
instructional practices.

No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 became law in January 2002, effecting extensive changes to the Elementary
and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Under NCLB: 1. All states and school districts are required to develop ac-
countability systems based on student performance and to test students in grades 3-8 on reading, math and (eventually)
science; 2. Every school is expected to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in meeting state standards; 3. Parents
of children in failing schools are allowed to transfer the child to a better performing school. The law also gives states
and school districts increased local control and flexibility in the use of federal education funds.

Performance Indicators
Measures of performance because of a specific activity, program initiative, or service rendered.

Persistently Lowest Achieving (PLA)

This is a school in the Restructuring Phase of New York’s Differentiated Accountability System. PLA status applies
if the 2008-09 school year results reveal an average Performance Index for the “All Students” group in English Lan-
guage Arts and Mathematics of 146.5 or less; AND a school fails to make at least a 25 point gain on each ELA and
mathematics measure for which the school was accountable between SY 2005-06 and SY 2008-09 OR the graduation
rate is below 60 percent for the All Students group on its 2002, 2003, and 2004 graduation rate cohort.

Program Based Budgeting (PBB)

Program Based Budgeting is a program-based format that supplements the traditional Budget Book report format.
PBB is a format that links programs to the Board of Education/Superintendent goals and objectives and provides
measures of achievement to evaluate the program. This information supplements the traditional program narrative
and financial information.

Program Initiatives
Based on an assessment, program initiatives are developed to target resources for addressing specific problems related
to student performance, attainment, attendance, and behavior.

Revenue Anticipation Note (RAN)

A RAN is a short-term borrowing instrument issued in anticipation of a known and quantifiable future revenue source
(i.e., a RAN may be issued in anticipation of the collection of revenue sources later in the fiscal year).

School in Good Standing

A school is considered to be in good standing if it has not been identified as a School in Need of Improvement, in
Corrective Action, Planning for Restructuring, Restructuring, Requiring Academic Progress, or as a School Under
Registration Review.

School in Need of Improvement (SINI)

Year 1: A school that has not made annual yearly progress (AYP) on the same accountability measure for two con-
secutive years while receiving Title I funds is considered a School in Need of Improvement (Year 1) for the following
year. Among other requirements, these schools are required to offer public school choice.
Year 2: A School in Need of Improvement (Year 1) that does not make AYP on the accountability measure for which it
was identified is considered a School in Need of Improvement (Year 2) for the following year, if it continues to receive
Title I funds. Once identified, schools that continue to receive Title I funds and that did not make Adequate Yearly
Progress the next year are required to continue to provide public school choice and must also offer eligible students
supplemental educational services. These services are provided outside of regular school hours by an organization

Section 9 Page 8
 APPENDICES 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Glossary – continued
selected by the parent from a list of qualified providers approved by the State Education Department.

School in Corrective Action

A School in Need of Improvement (Year 2) that does not make AYP on the accountability measure for which it was
identified is considered a School in Corrective Action for the following year, if it continues to receive Title I funds.
In addition to offering choice and supplemental services, these schools must also implement at least one of a menu
of options for action specified under NCLB, such as replace school staff that are relevant to the failure to make AYP,
institute a new curriculum, or extend the school day or year.

School Planning for Restructuring

A School in Corrective Action that does not make AYP on the accountability measure for which it was identified is
considered a School Planning for Restructuring for the following year, if it continues to receive Title I funds. Planning
for Restructuring Schools that were in Corrective Action the previous school year and that failed to make Adequate
Yearly Progress must now use the school year to develop a plan for restructuring the school.

School Restructuring
Year 1: A School Planning for Restructuring that does not make AYP on the accountability measure for which it was
identified is considered a School Restructuring (Year 1) for the following year, if it continues to receive Title I funds.
Schools that were required to develop a restructuring plan during the previous school year and that failed to make
Adequate Yearly Progress last year must now implement their restructuring plans at the beginning of the school year.

Schools in both the planning for restructuring and restructuring phases must continue to offer public school choice as
well as supplemental educational services to eligible students.

Year 2: A School Restructuring (Year 1) that does not make AYP on the accountability measure for which it was
identified is considered a School Restructuring (Year 2) for the following year, if it continues to receive Title I funds.
Schools that were required to develop a restructuring plan during the previous school year and that failed to make
Adequate Yearly Progress last year must now implement their restructuring plans at the beginning of the school year.

Schools in both the planning for restructuring and restructuring phases must continue to offer public school choice as
well as supplemental educational services to eligible students.

Schools Under Registration Review (SURR)

The Commissioner annually identifies schools that are farthest from State standards and most in need of improvement
and places these schools under registration review. Districts with identified schools are required to develop plans for
turning these schools around and are provided support by the State Education Department to implement these plans.
If turnaround does not occur, districts must phase out and close these schools or have the Commissioner recommend
to the Board of Regents that it revoke the registration of the schools.

Schools
Most Rochester schools fall into one of the following categories:
Elementary School Grades (Pre-) K-6

Section 9 Page 9
 APPENDICES 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Glossary – continued

High School Grades 7-12

Special Education (SPED)

Special Education is a category of programs that deliver educational services to students with diverse special needs.
These programs provide instruction and services specially designed to meet each special education student’s unique
needs. Programs include classroom instruction, home instruction, instruction in hospitals and institutions, or other
settings.

The Federal Law that supports special education and related services is the Individuals with Disabilities Education
Act (IDEA). The department currently provides services to approximately 5,200 students with disabilities. Types of
disabilities include learning disabilities, emotional disturbance, speech and language impairments, orthopedic impair-
ments, hearing and vision impairments, cognitive impairments, autism and medical fragility.

State Aid
The primary type of State Aid is provided through Foundation Aid, which can be used for any purpose or program.

Title I
This federal program provides funds for educationally disadvantaged (low-income) students. Title I monies are in-
tended to supplement state and District funds, with schools involving parents in deciding and monitoring how funds
are spent. Title I is the largest federal program included in the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. Funds are generated
based on poverty. The use of the funds is determined by need.

The District was reviewed by the New York State Education Department (NYSED). Changes implemented by this
visit included establishing an objective and consistent method for allocating funds to schools in keeping with the
intent of Title I and to provide equitable distribution of the funds. The allocation to schools will hold schools to a
higher level of accountability for results, give parents greater choices and opportunity for input, and promote teaching
methods that work.

Weights
Equitable Student Funding assigns dollar “weights” to students that are then used when allocating resources to schools.
Weights are developed using a sophisticated formula that accounts for services that must be provided at each school,
school classroom sizes, and student characteristics. For FY 2012, student weights were developed in 3 primary cat-
egories: 1. Base Weight (all students receive); 2. SPED Weight (assigned to kids with IEP’s); 3. ELL Weight (assigned
to English Language Learners based on proficiency).

Section 9 Page 10
 APPENDICES 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

Glossary – continued

ABBREVIATIONS

The following are abbreviations that you may encounter in our budget presentation.
You may find additional information in the Glossary for some of the abbreviations.

ADA Average Daily Attendance

ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
ADD Attention Deficit Disorder
ADHD Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
AP Advanced Placement
API Academic Performance Index
ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
AVID Advancement Via Individual Determination
AYP Adequate Yearly Progress
BEDS Basic Educational Data System
BOE Board of Education
CCTE Career, College and Technical Education
CDC Child Development Center
CIP Capital Improvement Plan
COLA
Cost-of-Living Adjustment
CSR Class Size Reduction
CTE Career Technical Education
DRA Deficit Reduction Assessment
ECD Early Childhood Development
ED [United States] Education Department
EIA Economic Impact Aid
ELL English Language Learner
ESF Equitable Student Funding
F/RPM
Free/Reduced-Price Meals
FTE Full Time Equivalent
FY Fiscal Year
GAAP Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
GASB Governmental Accounting Standards Board
GED General Education Diploma
GFOA Government Finance Officers Association
GPA Grade Point Average
IEP Individualized Education Program
ILS Integrated Life Skills
ISLP Individualized Student Learning Plan
LD Learning Disabled
LEP Limited English Proficient
NCLB No Child Left Behind
PBB Program Based Budgeting
PLA Persistently Lowest-Achieving
PTA Parent Teacher Association
PTO Parent Teacher Organization
RAN Revenue Anticipation Note
SAT Stanford Achievement Test
SED State Education Department
SINI School in Need of Improvement
SPED Special Education
SURR School under Registration Review
Section 9 Page 11
 APPENDICES 2011 - 12 DRAFT BUDGET

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Section 9 Page 12