Plato and Aristotle both viewed human nature as inherently rational and social. However, they differed in their views of human destiny. Plato believed the soul exists before and after death and is purified from the body only at death. In contrast, Aristotle thought human destiny involves living virtuously and contributing to one's community while alive. Both philosophers emphasized that humans flourish through rational thought and social interaction.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
78 views
Philosopher
Plato and Aristotle both viewed human nature as inherently rational and social. However, they differed in their views of human destiny. Plato believed the soul exists before and after death and is purified from the body only at death. In contrast, Aristotle thought human destiny involves living virtuously and contributing to one's community while alive. Both philosophers emphasized that humans flourish through rational thought and social interaction.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
philosopher nature origin Destiny
Plato viewed human bein Plato believed Plato argues that
gs as inherently the soul exists if we truly rational, social souls before birth understand huma burdened by and after n nature we can imprisonment within death. find “individual their physical happiness and bodies. According t social stability.” o him, the soul or There is a need mind attains for the soul to knowledge of the purify itself from forms, as opposed to the body, and the the senses. soul will be completely Plato also purified from the emphasized the body only at social aspect of death. Only in human nature. We death will the soul are not self- be free from the sufficient, we need distractions and others, and we cares of the body; benefit from our then the soul will social interactions, be able to fully from other persons pursue its task of talents, aptitudes, contemplating the and their friendship Ideas. which allows man to rise above an animal existence and to become fully human. Plato is a dualist; there is both immaterial mind (soul) and material body, and it is the soul that knows the forms. The soul (mind) itself is divided into 3 parts: reason; appet ite (physical urges); and will (emotion, passion, spirit.) The will is the source of love, anger, indignation, ambition, aggression, etc. When these aspects are not in harmony, we experience mental conflict. The will can be on the side of either reason or the appetites. We might be pulled by lustful appetite, or the rational desire to find a good partner. As human beings we have instincts and emotions but above all the potential to think, to control our feelings and animal urges. Reason gives us the freedom to choose how to behave, to be selfish or altruistic, to act on principle or thoughtlessly. aristotle According to Aristotle, human He also thought beings have that we can only a natural desire and reach our full capacity to know and development in understand the truth, societies. to pursue moral excellence, and to for Aristotle, in instantiate their the final analysis, ideals in the world man is what he is through because he action. Aristotle esp contains an ouses the existence element of divinity of external objective the destiny of reality. Aristotle’s man As a biologist, lies beyond his Aristotle recognized natural state, and that living things is in some sense include plants as beyond his well as human and control. non-human animals for Aristotle human beings and human societies flourish when people live peacefully, work and prosper, learn and develop wisdom, reproduce and pass on wisdom to the next generation. A fulfilled and good person is living, healthy, peaceable, prosperous, engaged in philosophy (the love of wisdom) in that they are curious about the world they live in and seek understanding of it, and are engaged in passing on understanding to the next generation.