What is an Unreliable Narrator: Definition

and Examples
In literature, an unreliable narrator is a character who tells a story with a lack of credibility.
There are different types of unreliable narrators (more on that later), and the presence of one can
be revealed to readers in varying ways — sometimes immediately, sometimes gradually, and
sometimes later in the story when a plot twist leaves us wondering if we’ve maybe been a little
too trusting.

While the term “unreliable narrator” was first coined by literary critic Wayne C. Booth in his
1961 book, The Rhetoric of Fiction, it’s a literary device that writers have been putting to good
use for much longer than the past 80 years. For example, "The Tell-Tale Heart" published by
Edgar Allan Poe in 1843 utilizes this storytelling tool, as does Wuthering Heights, published in
1847.

But wait, is any narrator really reliable?

This discussion can lead us down a proverbial rabbit hole. In a sense, no, there aren’t any 100%
completely reliable narrators. The “Rashomon Effect” tells us that our subjective perceptions
prohibit us from ever having a totally clear memory of past events. If each person subjectively
remembers something that happened, how do we know who is right? "Indeed, many writers have
used the Rashomon Effect to tell stories from multiple first-person perspectives — leaving
readers to determine whose record is most believable." (Check out As I Lay Dying by William
Faulkner for an example).

For the purpose of this article, however, we will refer to narrators who are purposefully
unreliable for a specific narrative function.

How to write an unreliable narrator that has us on our toes and reading between the lines.

Click To Tweet

Literary function of an unreliable narrator

Fiction that makes us question our own perceptions can be powerful. An unreliable narrator can
create a lot of grey areas and blur the lines of reality, allowing us to come to our own
conclusions.

Fallible storytellers can also create tension by keeping readers on their toes — wondering if
there’s more under the surface, and reading between the lines to decipher what that is.
Unreliable narrators can make for intriguing, complex characters: depending on the narrator’s
motivation for clouding the truth, readers may also feel more compelled to keep reading to figure
out why the narrator is hiding things.
Finally, all unreliable narrators are first-person: they live in the world of the story and will have
an inherent bias or perhaps even an agenda. While you may find an unreliable narrator who's
written in the second-person or third-person point of view, this is generally rare.

PRO-TIP: If you'd like to see the different point of views in action, check out this post that has
50+ point of view examples.

Types of unreliable narrators

Just like trying to classify every type of character would be an endless pursuit, so is trying to list
every type of unreliable narrator. That said, we've divided these questionable raconteurs into
three general types to better understand how they work as a literary device.

1) Deliberately Unreliable: Narrators who are aware of their deception

This type of narrator is intentionally lying to the reader because, well, they can. They have your
attention, the point of view is theirs, and they’ll choose what to do with it, regardless of any
“responsibility” they might have to the reader.

A quick note about this kind of narrator: people want to read about characters they can connect
with or relate to. This is one of the tricky parts of writing this kind of narrator: the character has
to be compelling enough that we’ll keep connecting with them even if we suspect we’re being
misled. We don’t have to necessarily like them, but we need to understand them. For instance,
even Alex from A Clockwork Orange has an underlying humanity: his desire for individual
freedom above all. His flagrant lies are therefore an exercise of his freedom.

Unreliable narrator definition: a character who tells a story with a lack of credibility. #amwriting

Click To Tweet

2) Evasively Unreliable: Narrators who unconsciously alter the truth

The motivations for this kind of narrator are often quite muddy — sometimes it’s simple self-
preservation, other times it’s slightly more manipulative. Sometimes the narrator isn’t even
aware they are twisting the truth until later in the book. Their unreliability often stems from the
need to tell the story in a way that justifies something, and their stories are often embellished or
watered down.

These kinds of contradictory characters whose mindsets aren’t clear can keep readers anxiously
waiting for the narrator’s moment of clarity — drawing their own conclusions all the while.

3) Naively Unreliable: Narrators who are honest but lack all the information
Unlike the previous two types, this type of narrator is not unreliable on purpose — they simply
lack a traditional, “greater understanding.” This kind of unreliability can allow the reader to view
your story with fresh eyes. The narrator’s “unorthodox” interpretations might only provide us
with partial explanations of what’s going on, forcing us to dig a little deeper and connect the
dots. These naive narrators can also encourage readers to take more significant notice of things
we might’ve taken for granted.

Craft tip: Don’t cheat the reader. Great novels inspire readers to come back and find new
meaning and elements they hadn’t yet discovered the first time. This can be especially true of
stories told by unreliable narrators. If you employ this literary device gradually throughout the
novel, ensure you leave clues for your readers along the way. Drop hints that make us question
the validity of our source and have us eagerly reading to find the next clue that will act as
another part of the story-puzzle. If you suddenly reveal out of nowhere that the narrator hasn’t
been giving us all the facts in an abrupt twist, readers will feel they have been cheated.

Unreliable narrator examples

Once you’ve determined what your narrator’s motivation for being unreliable is — or isn’t! —
you can start thinking about how you will use this literary device to achieve your narrative goal.

If you’re toying with the idea of writing a story that fills readers’ mind with question marks, here
are a few examples of wavering yarn-spinners from literature to help you get started (spoilers
ahead!).

From Alex from "A Clockwork Orange" to Pi from "Life of Pi" - we're talking unreliable
narrators.

Click To Tweet

Deliberately Unreliable

A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess

The protagonist and narrator, Alex, is a notoriously brutal character who does not feel a sense of
responsibility to anything or anyone other than himself. His lack of credibility feels deliberate
and coy straight off the bat. He speaks 'Nadsat,' a dialect that confounds other characters and
keeps the reader on their back foot. He is also a skilled manipulator who excels in getting others
to let their guards down.
(The film adaptation of A Clockwork Orange, image: Warner Bros.)

Alex is presumably aware that the narrative audience will be repulsed by his accounts, yet he
repeatedly refers to the audience as “brother” — a term that implies familiarity and camaraderie.
Readers can never be quite certain if they’re being confided in or reeled in as another one of
Alex’s deceitful games.

The Murder of Roger Ackroyd by Agatha Christie

While some fallible storytellers may lack credibility because they deliver false or skewed
information, others are untrustworthy because of the information that they omit. They leave out
key pieces of information without which the reader is left in the dark. This is the case in The
Murder of Roger Ackroyd, whose narrator — Dr. Sheppard — is one of the most classic
unreliable examples.

Dr. Sheppard takes us through Poirot’s investigation into the murder of Roger Ackroyd. He is
genial and rather neutral throughout the story, seeming to explain the events as they happened
without bias. Only at the end is it revealed that this voice we have allowed to carry us through
the novel is actually the voice of the murderer. Sheppard also reveals at the end that he started
writing the manuscript with the intention of documenting Poirot’s failure. Therefore the entire
manuscript was based on a detailed lie by omission. 100% deliberate deception!
PRO-TIP: To read more of the Queen of Mystery's works, go here for ten of Agatha Christie's
best stories.

Evasively Unreliable

Life of Pi by Yann Martel

At the end of the novel, when Pi wraps up his fantastical story of being stranded at sea with a
group of animals, we hear another version of his story — where the animals are replaced by
humans, and the events are much more tragic and disturbing. Pi never concretely confirms which
story is true: is the first version simply a coping mechanism or is the second version simply to
placate the unbelieving cops? Readers are faced with the choice to pick which story they believe,
as the narrator does not make it clear — and even if he did specify which version is the true one,
would we believe him?
(Image by artemisiasynchroma)

We Need To Talk About Kevin by Lionel Shriver

Narrated through Eva’s letters to her husband, We Need To Talk About Kevin takes place in the
aftermath of her son committing a deadly attack at his high-school. It’s not easy to be totally
honest with ourselves — especially when it comes to looking within and seeing where we might
be at fault.

The only thing objective about Eva is that her accounts are subjective, and we are left to come to
our own conclusions based on her descriptions. Was Kevin inherently sociopathic? Did Eva do
her best as a mother or did she reject Kevin as an unwanted outcome? How much blame should
Eva shoulder for Kevin's actions? We won’t find the answers in Eva’s letters, but they do prompt
us to reflect on these questions in the first place.

Unreliable narrators can encourage readers to notice things they might not have.

Click To Tweet

Naively Unreliable

Room by Emma Donoghue

Five-year-old Jack is an often quoted example of an unknowingly unreliable narrator. Jack is not
withholding information from the reader or providing false information. He simply reports the
facts as he sees them — however, as a child, his accounts often lack insight into the implications
of what is happening around him. Because of this, even though Jack’s voice is a poignantly
honest one, his narration is not a source of information that can be taken at face value.

(The film adaptation of Room, image: Universal Pictures)

Forrest Gump by Winston Groom
Forrest is another example of a narrator who’s not deliberately unreliable in order to pull the
wool over the readers’ eyes or to “save face.” From the outset, we are aware that Forrest doesn’t
comprehend things like the “average” person does, and we’re aware that we might not be able to
take everything he says at face value. This is confirmed when Forrest begins detailing his life,
which is peppered with stories about major events from history that he was apparently intimately
involved in. We can’t be certain that he’s not telling the truth, but it would be quite the life if he
is.

Six examples of unreliable narrators and how to write your own fallible storyteller.

Click To Tweet

An unreliable narrator breaks the conventional relationship of trust between a reader and a
storyteller. However, the key is that you don’t want to shatter that trust entirely, because you’re
likely to lose the reader. Ensure your unreliable narrator has a clear purpose for being unreliable,
employ just enough mist around the narrator’s accounts to put question marks in our minds, give
us the underlying sense that there’s more to the story, and you’ll be able to foster a connection
between the reader and narrator that has the pages of your book flipping.