Lifting Analysis
Lifting Analysis
LIFTING ANALYSIS
Prepared by :
Prepared by :
Luthfi Ramadhani
NIK. 07070
March 2009
Introduction
Lifting operations in the
Lifting operations in the
offshore petroleum
industry represent
y p
potentially one of the
highest risk activities in the
industry.
Generally, lifting Analysis is
performed to ensure that
the structure can withstand
th t ti
the static and dynamic
dd i
loading that occur during
lifting process
lifting process.
Codes Standards and References
Codes,
API RP 2A Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and
Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms
API Spec 2c Specification for Offshore Cranes
API RP 2D
API RP 2D Recommended Practice for Operation and Maintenance
Recommended Practice for Operation and Maintenance
of Offshore Cranes
API Spec 9a Specification for Wire Rope
API RP 9B Recommended Practice on Application, Care and Use of
Wire Rope
DNV Marine Operations ‐
Marine Operations
p ‐ Part 2: Operation Specific
p p
Requirements, Chapter 5: Lifting.
Lloyds Code for Lifting Appliances in a Marine Environment.
ASME
ASME B30.96
ASME B30.96‐
B30 96‐2006 Slings
Sli
BPWJ‐‐U‐PRC‐
BPWJ PRC‐254 BP Indonesia
BP Indonesia –– BU Lifting Operations Policy and
Standard
Etc.
Terminology
Lifting Device : An item means for moving or placing a freely suspended load
Lifting Gear : : An item of equipment for use with a “Lifting Device” for lifting
An item of equipment for use with a “Lifting Device” for lifting
people, equipment or materials. The item is designed to be detachable from
the crane and includes both rigging and “Lifted
the crane and includes both rigging and Lifted Equipment
Equipment”.
Rigging : : Equipment that connects a load to the “Lifting Device”.
Rigging Equipment that connects a load to the “Lifting Device”.
Lift Weight
Lift Weight : : The total mass of the load including crane wire rope over head
: The total mass of the load including crane wire rope over head
The total mass of the load including crane wire rope over head
sheave, hook, hook block, and all rigging.
Lifting Points
g : Points on a structure to which rigging is attached, such as
gg g
padeyes.
Safe Working Load : The maximum gross load which may be imposed for a
specific use in order to allow an adequate margin of safety. The SWL may
equal but never exceed the working load limit (WLL).
Safe
Safe working load of a crane
working load of a crane is
is the maximum mass which is permitted to be
the maximum mass which is permitted to be
safely handled by the crane.
Terminology
Lifting Equipment
Cranes
(Mobile crane, Tower crane, Wire ropes slings
Overhead crane) Chain slings
D it
Davit Polyester round slings
Forklift Shackles
Monorail Hooks
Gantry Etc.
Etc
Etc.
Lifting Analysis using SACS
START
SACS
MODELING AND ANALYSIS
OUTPUT :
OUTPUT : OUTPUT :
MEMBER STRESS
DEFLECTION STATIC SLING LOAD
UNITY CHECK
Ok?
NO
YES
FINISH
SACS Modeling
Using SACS Precede
All components (structural framing, loading) that are not present during
lifting shall be removed.
Example
E l : JJacket
k t St
Structure
t :
Inplace Analysis model: Lifting Analysis model:
- Jacket Structural - Jacket Structural
- Piles - Conductor guides
- Boatlanding - Walkway
- Risers, Conductors - Mudmat
- Marine growth - Anodes
- Corroded members - Padeyes
- Conductor g guides - Any y other items which are not
- Walkway modelled in the computer
model but attached on the
- Mudmat
jacket when jacket being lifted
- Anodes
- Padeyes
- etc
SACS Analysis Step
1. COG Calculation
l l
‐ COG Calculation is required if COG data is not provided
‐ Define lifting points (padeyes position)
Define lifting points (padeyes position)
‐ Joint Fixities (pinned) at lifting points
‐ Run Linear Static Analysis to determine the COG of structure
‐ Output : load case center.
******* SEASTATE LOAD CASE CENTER REPORT *******
RELATIVE TO STRUCTURAL ORIGIN
stiffness only in X direction with
Spring Rate = 10000 lb/in
Spring Rate = 10000 lb/in
‐ Joint fixities (110000 and 100000)
at joint springs 110000
SACS Analysis Step
2. Lifting Analysis (continue..)
‐ Load combination
Load combination
1. static load combination
2. dynamic load combination
2.1 dynamic load factor of
d
dynamic load factor of 2.0
l df f 2.0 applied to the calculated static load,
l d h l l d l d
used for padeyes and members directly connected to padeye.
2.2 dynamic load factor of
dynamic load factor of 1.35
1.35 applied to the calculated static
load used for all other structural members
load, used for all other structural members.
(refer to API RP 2A sect. 2.4.2.c)
* Static Combination
LCOMB 100 1 1.100 2 1.000 4 1.000 7 1.000
* Dynamic Combination
LCOMB 101 100 1.350
LCOMB 102 100 2.000
‐ Run linear static analysis
‐ Output : Member stress check (taken from dynamic combination
(taken from dynamic combination ‐‐ LCOMB 101 & 102)
Deflection ((taken from static combination
(taken from static combination ‐‐ LCOMB 100))
Static sling load (taken from static combination
(taken from static combination ‐‐ LCOMB 100)
Spreader Bar
COG Shift
• In some cases, effect of the variation of COG position should be
ff f h f h ld b
investigated.
• The investigated position is in a variation along X and Y equal to 10% of
g p g q
the structure dimensions, but not less than within 2.0 m.
10% of structure dimension
But not less
l than
h within
h 2 2.0
0m
3 4
1 2
The COG shift are obtained by applying dummy forces at four joints with
The COG shift are obtained by applying dummy forces at four joints with
zero force resultant.
COG Shift (continue..)
( i )
Dummy
Dummy force calculation for COG shift
force calculation for COG shift
1. The load +X causes the COG shift along X
COG Shift Force Along X
F+X LX
L1X L2X
F+X
∆X
Z
Y
F+X
X
FZ F
+X
F ∆x
F+X = 2Z L
X
COG Shift (continue..)
( i )
Dummy
Dummy force calculation for COG shift
force calculation for COG shift
2. The load +Y causes the COG shift along Y
COG Shift Force Along Y
F+Y F+Y
LY
∆Y
Z
Y
F+Y
F+Y FZ
X
FZ ∆Y
F+Y =
2 LY
COG Shift (example)
- Equipment dimension : 4.3
4 3 m x 8.1
81m
- Distance between padeyes : 4.3 m x 6.6 m
- Static combination output :
LOAD LOAD ********* Z - DIRECTION *********
CASE LABEL FORCE X Y Z
(KN) (M) (M) (M)
7 100 -444.59 0.07 -1.04 5.08
3 4
2m
1 2
FZ ∆X (444.59) * (1)
F+X 51.70 KN F+X
2 LX 2 (4.3)
(4 3)
∆X
Z
Y
F+X
X
FZ F
+X
F+Y F+YY
Z
Y
F+Y
F+Y FZ
X
COG Shift (example)
L d Case
Load C Center
C t SACS Output
O t t:
COG ORIGINAL
5 100 -444.59 0.07 -1.04 5.08 LOAD LOAD ********* Z - DIRECTION ********
6 101 -600.20 0.07 -1.04 5.08 CASE LABEL FORCE X Y Z
7 102 -889 18
-889.18 0
0.07
07 -1 04
-1.04 5
5.08
08 (KN) (M) (M) (M)
• API RP 2A : for normal offshore conditions, slings should be selected to have a factor of
safety of 4 for the manufacturer’s
manufacturer s rated minimum breaking strength of the cable
compared to static sling load.
load.
Sling design load = 4 x static sling force
(choose sling with minimum breaking strength equal to or more than calculated
sling design load)
• API RP 2A : Shackle and fittings should be selected so that the manufacturer’s rated
working load is equal to or greater than the static sling load,
load, provided the
manufacturer’ss specifications include a minimum factor of safety of 3 compared to the
manufacturer
minimum breaking strength.
strength.
Shackle design load = static sling force
((choose shackle with working g load limit equal
q to or more than calculated
shackle design load)
Note : ensure that the shackle manufacturer’s minimum breaking strength is
minimal 3 times the working load limit.
3. Eye Stress Check, stress due to pressure between elastic bodies interaction.
Heartz pressure = 0.591 x [P * E / (t * kb)]2
Kb = DHOLE * DPIN / (DHOLE – DPIN)
allowable heartz pressure = 2.5 Fy