Module 2, Audit An Overview Powerpoint
Module 2, Audit An Overview Powerpoint
Sec. 232 of NIRC – Keeping of Books RA No. 11232 – Act for the Revised Corporation Code, Feb. 20,
of Accounts 2019, Section 177
The Philippine Regulatory Commission (PRC) is the government agency
responsible for regulating the accounting profession in the country and the
Board of Accountancy (BOA) is responsible for the licensure examination as
well as for CPAs to observe the rules implemented in the Philippine
Accountancy Law of 2004 (RA 9298).
Notably, not all CPAs are allowed to sign on the financial statements. Such must be
accredited by the Board of Accountancy as well as the Bureau of Internal Revenue
as Tax practitioner. Requirements for Continuing Professional Education (CPE) is
also mandated before renewing for accreditation.
Top Accounting and Auditing Firms
(In the Philippines)
Philippine Firm International Firm Facts (Local Firm)
1. SyCip Gorres Velayo & Ernst & Young (EY) Largest multidisciplinary
professional services firm in the
Co. (SGV & Co.) Philippines
Established in 1946
2. Navarro Amper & Co. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
(Deloitte Philippines) Ltd.)
3. Isla Lipana & Co. PWC (Pricewaterhouse Founded in 1922 being the
oldest firm
Cooper)
4. R.G. Manabat & Co. KPMG Fastest growing KPMG
Ernst & Young (EY) 1. SyCip Gorres $25.83B 230K professionals around the
world and 150 countries
Velayo & Co. (SGV
& Co.)
KPMG 4. R.G. Manabat & $ 23.42B Swiss firm with 207K
professionals and 157 countries
Co.
3. Operational Audit study of a specific unit of an organization for the purpose of measuring its
performance. The main purpose is to:
• Assess the entity’s performance
• Identify areas for improvement
• Make recommendations to improve performance
Established Criteria Financial Reporting Laws, regulations and Objectives set by the
Framework contracts Board of Directors
These are Certified Public Accountants who offer their professional services to clients
on a contractual basis. They generally perform the Financial Statements Audit.
2. Internal Auditors
Internal Auditors are the entity’s own employees who investigate and appraise the
effectiveness and efficiency of the operations and internal controls. They usually
perform Operational Audit.
3. Government Auditors
The objective of an audit of financial statements is to enable the auditor to express an opinion whether
the financial statements are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with an identified
financial reporting framework
The management is responsible for preparing and presenting the financial statements in accordance
with the applicable financial reporting framework.
The auditor’s responsibility is to form and express an opinion on these financial statements based on the
audit result. An audit of financial statement does not relieve the management of its responsibilities.
The assurance provided by the auditor is not a guarantee that the financial statements are
dependable. An audit conducted in accordance with PSAs provides a reasonable assurance that the
financial statements are free from material misstatements. Inherent limitations are existent that could
affect the auditor’s ability to detect material misstatements.
Nature of Audit
4. Nature of the Procedure
Due to cost constraint (and time constraint), auditors do not examine all evidence available. Many
audit conclusions are made by examining sample of evidence only. When using a sample there is a
possibility that the conclusions drawn from the sample may be different from the conclusion that would
have been reached if the auditor examines the entire population.
Even if the auditor examines all evidences, there is no absolute assurance that material misstatements
will be detected, because the work undertaken by the auditor to form an opinion is permeated by
judgement. There is a possibility of error in judgement that may cause mistakes in the application of
audit procedures.
Nature of Audit
5. Nature of Financial Reporting
Application of PFRS involves estimation and judgement by the management. Most financial
statement items involve subjective decisions that are subject to inherent variability that cannot be
eliminated by performing audit procedures.
6. Nature of Evidence
The audit is evidence is generally persuasive rather than conclusive in nature. This is because audit
evidence comprises pieces of information and impressions that are gradually accumulated during
the course of audit, and when taken together persuade the auditor about the fairness of the
financial statements.
There is what we call inherent limitation; an unavoidable risk that even an audit conducted in
accordance with PSAs may not be able to detect material misstatements in the financial
statements. Subsequent discovery of the material misstatement in the financial statements does
not itself indicate a failure to conduct the audit in accordance with PSAs.
The auditor’s opinion is not an assurance as to the future viability of the entity nor the efficiency or
effectiveness with which management has conducted the affairs of the entity
General Requirements when
auditing financial statements:
PSA 200 – Overall objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in
Accordance with the Philippine Standards on Auditing
The objective of audit is to enhance the degree of confidence of the intended users in the
financial statements.
1. The auditor should comply with the ethical requirements relating to an audit of financial
statements, as stated in the code of ethics for CPAs (Part A and B) in order to retain public
confidence in the credibility of the auditors’ work.
Integrity
Objectivity
Professional Competence and Due Care
Confidentiality
Professional Behavior
General Requirements when
auditing financial statements:
2. The auditor shall plan and perform an audit with professional skepticism recognizing that
circumstances may exist that cause the financial statements to be materially misstated.
3. The auditor shall exercise professional judgement in planning and performing an audit of
financial statements.
Informed decisions throughout the audit cannot be made without the application of
professional judgement to the facts and circumstances.
General Requirements when
auditing financial statements:
4. To obtain reasonable assurance, the auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence to reduce the risk to an acceptably low level and thereby enable the auditor to
draw reasonable conclusions on which to base the auditor’s opinion.
Audit evidence is needed to support the opinion expressed in the auditor’s report. Sufficiency
and appropriateness of the audit evidence is a matter of professional judgement.
5. The auditor should conduct an audit with Philippine Standards on Auditing (PSAs).
Philippine Standards in Auditing issued by the Auditing and Assurance Council (AASC), and
according to PSA 200, are to be applied in assurance engagements other than audits or
reviews of historical financial information. PSAs contain the basic principles and essential
procedures which the auditor should follow. It contains explanatory and other materials that
are designed to assist auditors in interpreting and applying auditing standards.
Management are often times placed in a position where they can benefit from overly
optimistic financial result, outside parties however want unbiased, realistic financial
statements. Because of this conflict, users have become skeptical of unaudited financial
statements.
2. Expertise
Most users of financial information are not equipped with the skills and competence to
determine whether the financial statements are reliable, a qualified person is hired by users to
verify the reliability of the financial statements on their behalf.
WHY IS THERE A NEED FOR INDEPENDENT
FINACIAL STATEMENTS AUDIT?
3. Remoteness
Users of financial statements are usually prevented from directly assessing the
reliability of the information. They do not have direct access to the entity’s records
to personally verify the quality of the financial information. Therefore, an
independent auditor is needed to assist them in verifying the reliability of the
financial information.
4. Financial consequences
1. Audit function operates on the assumption that all financial data are verifiable.
2. The auditor should always maintain independence with respect to the financial
statements under audit
The report of the auditor will be of no or little value if the readers are aware that the
auditor is not independent with respect to the client.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF
AUDIT
3. There should be no long term conflict between the auditor and the client
management
Both parties must be interested in the fair presentation of the financial statements.
The condition of the entity’s internal control directly affects the reliability of the
financial statements. The stronger the internal control, the more assurance is
provided about the reliability of the data.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF
AUDIT
5. Consistent application of the applicable financial reporting framework such as the
PFRS results in fair presentation of financial statements
6. What was held true in the past will continue to hold true in the future in the
absence of known conditions to the contrary.
Knowledge accumulated in a client from prior audit years can be determine the
audit procedures to be performed.
a. Performance Audit
b. Management Audit
c. Operational Audit
d. Compliance Audit
a. Engagement letter
b. Audit report
c. Management letter
d. Financial Statements
Question!
5. The NOT objective of an OPERATIONAL AUDIT is
a. Engagement letter
b. Audit report
c. Management letter
d. Financial Statements
Question!
7. Certain fundamental beliefs called "postulates" underlie auditing theory. Which of the
following is not a postulate of auditing?
a. No long-term conflict exists between the auditor and the management of the enterprise
under audit.
b. Economic assertions can be verified.
c. The auditor acts exclusively as an auditor.
d. An audit has a benefit only to the owners.